2004/03/22
FIFTH MEETING
Monday, March 22, 2004
From 4:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
City Hall, Committee Room #2A & B
1)
Approval of the 2004-02-23 Community Services Committee Minutes.
2)
DEPUTATION
Name:
Subject:
Sharon Allen
Claws and Paws Animal Rescue
3)
REPORTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
a)
Imax Theatre Fallsview Boulevard -
Request for Variance to the Sign By-law
John Castrilli
BBS-2004-01 -
b)
MW-2004-34 -
Residential All-way Stops - Revised
Policy & Procedures
Ed Dujlovic
c)
MW-2004-48 -
North Street Lowell Avenue
Intersection Control Review
Ed Dujlovic
4)
COMMUNICATIONS
Clerks
Various Financial Requests
5)
NEW BUSINESS
6)
ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING
Monday, February 23, 2004, City Hall, Room 2 at 4:00 p.m.
PRESENT:
REGRETS:
STAFF:
PRESS:
GUESTS:
Chairman Alderman Victor Pietrangelo, Mayor Ted Sa1ci, Alderman Wayne
Campbell, Alderman Selina Volpatti, Alderman Carolynn Ioannoni, Alderman
Janice Wing, Alderman Jim Diodati, Alderman Joyce Morocco, Alderman
Vince Kerrio (4:50 p.m)
John MacDonald, Ed Dujlovic, Tony Ravenda, Adele Kon, Ken Burden, Ray
Kallio, Dean Iorfida, Pat Burke, Marzenna Carrick, John Castrilli, Marianne
Tikky - Steno.
Corey Larocque, Niagara Falls Review
Barney & Mary Gray - 8976 Ridge Road, Rick Flannigan - 8810 Biggar Road,
Tim Charles - 32 River Street, Port Robinson, Colin Biggar - 8986
Grassybrook Road, Rick Dritsacos - 5481 Dunn Street, Tony Martin - 5249
Crowland Avenue, G. Norton - 9805 Schisler Road, Gert Boulette - 9906
McLeod Road, Kathy Vormitagg - 9906 McLeod Road, Kathleen Powell -
7711 Ronnie Crescent.
1)
MINUTES:
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN Ioannoni and seconded by Alderman Wing, that the
minutes of the February 2,2004 meeting be approved as amended. Alderman Diodati was
opposed to report MW-2004-23 - Dorchester Road Environmental Assessment Update
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2004-02-23
2)
DEPUTATION:
After a brief presentation by the Niagara Falls Volunteer Firefighter Station #6 the
following motion was made;
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN CAMPBELL and seconded by Alderman Wing that the
design and replacement of the septic system and cistern proceed.
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2004-02-23
-2-
3)
PRESENTATION:
After a brief presentation by John Hemingway regarding the Lundy's Lane Battlefield
Traffic Study the following motion was made;
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMANVOLPATTI and seconded by Mayor Sa1ci that the Lundy's
Lane Battlefield Traffic Study be received for the information of Council and that funding be
sought ftom other levels of government.
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2004-02-23
4)
REPORTS:
a)
MW-2004-26 - Coventry Road Parking Review
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN MOROCCO and seconded by Mayor Sa1ci that;
a)
A stopping restriction at all times be implemented on the north side of
Coventry Road between Kalar Road and Buckingham Drive; and
b)
The existing "no parking" zone on the southside of Coventry Road between
Kalar Road and Buckingham Drive be changed to a "no stopping zone." Also,
that the schools be notified of the changes.
Motion:
Conflict:
Action:
Carried
Alderman Pietrangelo, Alderman Campbell
Recommendation submitted to Counci12004-02-23
b)
MW-2004-27 - Fredonia Drive at Henley Avenue Intersection Control Review
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMANVOLPATTIand seconded by Alderman Morocco that a
stop sign be installed facing westbound motorists on Fredonia Drive at Henley Avenue.
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2004-02-23
c)
MW-2004-29 - Main Street Environmental Assessment Update
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN VOLP ATTI and seconded by Alderman Diodati that the
Main Street Environmental Assessment Update be received for the information of Council and
that City staff work with the Region to make interim improvements to the intersection.
-3-
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2004-02-23
d)
MW-2004-30 - Casino Roads Reconstruction Update
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN MOROCCO and seconded by Alderman Ioannoni the
Casino Roads Reconstruction Update be received for the information of Council and that a report
be prepared on the cost increases.
Motion:
Conflict:
Action:
Carried
Alderman Wing
Recommendation submitted to Council 2004-02-23
e)
MW-2004-31 - Encroachment onto Private Property (Dritsacos) Construction of
Sidewalk - Fallsview Boulevard
Mr. Rick Dritsacos informed the Chair that he had just received the report and requested a
deferral so that he and his family could review the report.
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN CAMPBELL and seconded by Alderman Ioannoni that
report MW-2004-3l be deferred.
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2004-02-23
1)
MW-2004-32 - McLeod Parking Review
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN WING and seconded by Alderman Volpatti that the
McLeod Road Parking Review be received for the information of Council and that no
stopping/parking signs be installed between Thorold Townline Road and Beechwood Road.
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2004-02-23
g)
MW-2004-35 - Street Lighting Contract Extension
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN MOROCCO and seconded by Alderman Diodati that
Council authorize staff to proceed with minimum one year extension to Contract 2001-01, 2002-
2004 Street Lighting Services, City-wide contract to Ground Aerial Maintenance Services Ltd.
(GAMS) for the 2003 rates plus the Consumer Price Index calculated in March 2004.
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council2004-02-23
-4-
5)
NEW BUSINESS
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMANVOLPATTI and seconded by Mayor Salci that staff
investigate and prepare a report on no-stopping signs on Thorold Stone Road at Portage Road.
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2004-02-23
5)
ADJOURNMENT
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN Wing and seconded by Alderman Kerrio, that the regular
meeting of the Community Services Committee be adjourned at 5:30 p.m. and Committee move
into In-Camera Session.
To:
Alderman Victor Pietrangelo
& the Community Services Committee
Clerk's Department
Inter-DeDartmental Memorandum
From:
Dean Iorfida
City Clerk
Ext. 4271
Subject:
Deputation Request - Sharon Allen
Ms. Allen operates Claws & Paws, a non-profit charitable organization that houses abandoned and
unwanted animals. Ms. Allen operates out of her home.
Despite this honourable activity, the operation is contrary to the City's Animal Control By-law
(2002-129) and Zoning By-law (79-200).
Under the Animal Control By-law, no owner shall keep more than three (3) cats. The only exception
is if the owner is a breeder registered with the Canadian Cat Association. It is staff s understanding
that although Claws & Paws is registered as a charitable organization, Ms. Allen is not registered
as a breeder.
Attached please find a memo ftom Senior Zoning Administrator, Bill Clark, outlining that the type
of operation is not a permitted use in a residential zone.
Finally, the By-law Services division has received a complaint ftom a neighbour and is ready to lay
charges.
Öw/
c. John Castrilli, Director of Building & By-law Services
Bill Clark, Senior Zoning Administrator
workil1{ Together to Serve Our Communit~
"
Record Details
Page lof2
Community Information
Database
Record
Details
Other Search Results: 1< First < Previous 1 Next> Last >1 (3 of 8 Total)
CLAWS AND PAWS ANIMAL RESCUE
[Suggest An Update 1 Suggest Volunteer Opportunity)
Record #: NlA6l29 Last Modified: 12 Dec 2003 Last Update: 12 Dec 2003
Description & Services
Description A non-profit charitable organization that houses abandoned and unwanted
animals. Also babysits pets for seniors moving into nursing homes or people
going out oftown. Looking for volunteers, donations and foster homes to place
animals.
Supplementary Became a registered charity in Jan 2002 - Registered Number: 866209071
Description RROOI
Host a Golf Tournament annually to raise funds.
Dates All year
Areas Served Niagara Falls
Contact Information
Located In Niagara Falls
Community
Mailing Address clo Sharon Allen
5612 Glamis Cres
Niagara Falls, ON L2G lG3
Primary Contact Sharon Allen, Phone: Res: 905-354-3869; Answering Machine
Alternate Contact Joan Allen, Phone: Res: 905-371-8791
Other Details
Established 2000
Funding Donations
Service Level (50) Non Profit
Subjects
Subjects I Animal welfare; Pets
http://niagara.cioc.ca/details.asp?RSN=6 8 72&N um ber=2
3/17/2004
Corporate Services Department
Planning and Development
Inter-Department Memorandum
The City of J~
Niagara FaIlS'J.1
Canada ~
-- ..iii ¿ .
TO:
Dean lorfida
City Clerk
DATE: March 12,2004
FROM:
William Clark
Senior Zoning Administrator
Ext. 4233
RE:
5612 Glamis Crescent
Animal Care Shelter
The subject lands are zoned Residential Single Family lD Density zone (RID) in accordance to By-
law 79-200 as amended.
From our recent discussion and your memorandum of March 11,2004, it is my understanding that
the owner keeps upwards of 100 animals or more comprising of both dogs and cats.
This person operates a non-profit charitable organization for the care, housing and placement of
those same animals.
From my telephone conversation with Ms. Valerie Brown of the City's Animal Shelter, the same
person operates this use throughout her entire home.
Based upon these details, it would be my opinion that the noted operation is not a permitted use in
accordance to the RID zone regulations of By-law No. 79-200 as amended.
The numbers of animals being kept, and the purposes for which they are being kept are similar and
consistent with a kennel use and not unlike the City's public animal shelter. A kennel is not a
permitted use in a residential zone. The keeping of all these animals throughout her home further
distances this use ftom being able to be qualified in any way as a home occupatiqn and brings it even
closer to the like of a kennel use.
WC:pb
~~~~
S :\COMUNITYI WESTLANEIROY ALMAN\5612G1amisCres.wpd
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Clerks' Finance. Human Resources' Information Systems' Legal' Planning & Development
!
1.
2.
3.
- 4-
SCHEDULE "B"
CATS
In this Schedule:
"being at large" means to be found in any place other than the property of the owner of the
cat and causing damage to property other than the property of the owner of the cat, and "be
at large" has a corresponding meaning.
This Schedule applies to all owners of cats in the Municipality who reside within the Urban
Boundary.
No owner shall allow or pennit his or her cat to be at large.
4.
(2)
5. (1)
(2)
6.
(1)
No owner of a cat shall allow or pennit the cat to defecate or urinate on or in the
following places;
(a)
(b)
private property, other than the property of the owner; or
in any public place.
The owner shall immediately and without delay, remove the excrement and provide
for its sanitary disposition.
No owner sha11 keep more than three cats in or about any dwelling unit except that
any owner who, on the date of the passage of this by-law, was lawfuIly keeping more
than three cats may keep those cats until they have died or are otherwise disposed of.
Subsection (1) does not apply to any owner who is registered as a breeder with The
Canadian Cat Association and whose cats are registered with The Canadian Cat
Association.
Where a cat is impounded, the owner shall pay the following expenses incurred:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
7. (I)
the expenses oftaldng the cat into custody;
the expenses for the care of the cat;
veterinarian fcos; and
cage rental fees.
Every owner shall claim the cat within five days of the day on which the cat was
impounded, excluding the day of impounding, Sundays and statutory holidays.
I
- 5 -
(2)
Where a cat is not claimed by its owner in accordance with subsection (I), the cat
may be adopted forthwith or disposed of or killed in a humane manner.
"
Community Services Department
885-2004-01
Building & By-Law Services
d~ 4310 Queen Street
The City of P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
canada:l1 web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
..., Tel.: (905) 356-7521
---- Fax: (905) 374-7500
E-mail: jcastrilli@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
March 22, 2004
John Castrilli
Director
Alderman Victor Pietrangelo, Chair
and Members ofthe Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re:
BBS-2004-01 - IMAX Theatre, Fallsview Boulevard
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Committee recommend the approval of the proposed sign by-law variances.
BACKGROUND:
The IMAX Theatre group is proposing to develop a stronger exterior appearance by reorienting the
building image to coordinate with the significant street improvements along Fallsview Blvd. Along
with this redesign new signage has been suggested in the form of new ground and roof signs. The
ground sign has a proposed height of 40 feet whereas the by-law permits a maximum of25 feet. Roof
signs, as such, are permitted, and the only surface for signage is the sloped portion of the roof since
the design of the building is that of a pyramid. Both sign elements have been designed so that they
will be visible above the new streetscape lamp-standards and trees along Fallsview Blvd. and are in
keeping with the general development of the area.
.:;:4
John MacDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
attach.
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Municipal Works. Fire Services. Parks, Recreation & Culture. Business Development. Building & By-Law Services
I MAX'
THEATRE
NIAGARA FALLS
March 12, 2004
Mr. Robert Judge
Manager of By-law Services
The City of Niagara Falls Canada
City Hall P.O. Box 1023
4310 Queen Street
Niagara Palss, ON L2E 6X5
6170 Fallsview Boulevard
Niagara Falls ON L2G ITS
Re: IMAX Theatre Exterior Revitalization Program
Phone: 905-35B-3611
Fax:905-35S-3613
Showtimes:
Phone: 905-374-IMAX (4629)
Dear Robert,
Reach us On-line at:
www.tourismniagara.com/IMAX
Over the last two years, ¡MAX Niagara Falls has experienced a significant drop in business
caused by many market factors.
As part of our business improvement strategy, we have retained signage and branding specialists
Kramer Design Associates to develop a stronger exterior image for our property and re-orient our
building image to coordinate with the significant street improvement program along Fallsview
Blvd., now underway by the City of Niagara Falls.
We have developed a new pedestrian path that will connect to the City sidewalk allowing patrons
to enter from Fallsview Blvd., banner poles along the perimeter path to beautifY the street
experience, pedestrian wayfinding, a roof-mural and developed a new entrance beacon that will
be visible from the comer of Fallview Blvd and Murray 51.
We require a signage variance to address the height of our proposed new entrance beacon
and roof-top mural. Both sign elements have been designed so they are visible above the new
streetscape lamp-standards, trees along Fallsview Blvd. and to be consistent with new signage
currently being implemented at Niagara Fallsview Casino Resort and related Hospitality projects
along Fallsview Blvd.
It is essential to our business success that ¡MAX Niagara Falls is visible and visually comparable
to other competing entertainment choices along Fallsview Blvd and we are investing over
$650,000 in overall exterior enhancements to meet our goals. Our Theatre for more than 19 years
has offered the only custom movie recounting historic stories about the Falls combined with
outstanding imagery and a gallery of historic artifacts.
We are confident that our design program, coupled with related business improvements will
enable ¡MAX Niagara Falls to prosper and remain a valuable experience for Visitors and
Residents of Niagara Falls.
Thank you in advance for your support.
veCJ[)~
Chris Thompson / Theatre Director
Ðl?6-1oo4-01
-
a
.
.
~
.
~
cO
I
I
L__~
"
!
b
-
Community Services Department
MW-2004-34
j Municipal Works
The City of 4310 Queen Street
Niagara Falls P.o. Box 1023
Canada Niagara Falls. ON L2E 6X5
:~ _b ,.., -.o,.""_,".œ
~~
--- Tel.: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-mail: munwks@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Ed Dujlovlc
Director
March 22, 2004
Alderman Victor Pietrangelo, Chairperson
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re:
MW-2004-34
Residential All-Way Stops
Revised Policy & Procedures
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the revised document "Policy and Procedures for Initiating, Reviewing and
Implementing an All- Way Stop Controf' be adopted.
BACKGROUND:
In October 1998, the Municipal Parking and Traffic Committee adopted a "made in Niagara Falls"
all-way stop control warrant. The warrants were designed to reflect the needs and driving habits of
the citizens of the City of Niagara Falls. Not only were traffic engineering aspects taken into
consideration in formulating the warrants, but also the humanistic values and concerns of residents
within the neighbourhoods of Niagara Falls were incorporated. The intention of incorporating both
factors, is to strategically place the controls at locations where reasonable guidelines for their
installation are based on solid practice, while at the same time eliminate the proliferation of
unwarranted signs.
The City of Niagara Falls All-Way Stop Warrant was developed due to the difference in driving
habits between large and small municipality residents. The provincial warrants which were used to
assess intersection control measures did not meet the needs of a smaller municipality, such as
Niagara Falls. Our technical warrant reduces the average hourly traffic volume requirement by 71 %,
provided the volume split (ratio) and local intersection geometry requirements are also fulfilled. By
ensuring that these criteria are accomplished, staff can maintain the integrity of recommending all-
way stop control installations primarily based on providing alternating right-of-way amongst two
roadways with similar traffic volume demand and operating characteristics. Ifmotorists perceive
that all-way stops are installed solely to control speeding, experience shows that drivers tend to
disobey the signs, as they consider them to be unnecessary. This is particularly true at locations
where little or inftequent side street traffic exists, since motorists that routinely travel through the
intersection quickly realize that the majority oftimes they do not encounter any opposing traffic.
The installation of unwarranted signs causes motorists to develop bad driving habits and may assume
other traffic control devices are installed under similar circumstances, creating a potentially
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Municipal Works. Fire SelVÌces . Parks, Recreation & Culture. Business Development. Building & By-Law SelVÌces
Community Services Department
MW-2004-48
. :i~ Municipal Works
The City of 4310 Queen Street
Niagara Falls P.O. Box 1023
Canada ~ Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
~ web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
----
Tel.: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-mail: munwks@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Ed Dujlovic
Director
March 22, 2004
Alderman Victor Pietrangelo, Chairperson
and Members ofthe Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re:
MW-2004-48
North Street at Lowell Avenue
Intersection Control Review
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that an additional school crossing guard be hired on a temporary basis for the
remainder of the 2003-2004 school year and assigned to the intersection of Portage Road and North
Street.
BACKGROUND:
In reply to a request, staffhas conducted a traffic operations review on North Street in the vicinity
ofSt. Joseph School. The intention of this investigation is to resolve concerns relating to motorists
driving in excess of the speed limit and the potential increase in vehicle traffic resulting ftom the
Portage Road bridge closure.
North Street is a collector roadway extending in an east/west direction fÌ'om Drummond Road to
Slater Avenue. In the study area, the roadway is 10.5 metres in width and consists of a sidewalk and
a boulevard on both sides. St. Joseph school is located on North Street between Lowell Ave and
Portage Road. There are two (2) school crossing locations, where crossing guards are on duty,
located in the vicinity of the school. One school crossing location is in ftont of the school, the
second is located 80 metres easterly, at the signalized intersection of Portage Road and North Street.
A sign inventory reveals that "school crossing ahead" and "school crossing" signs are present on
North Street between Drummond Road and Portage Road. In fact, additional signs were recently
posted on all approaches at the intersection of Portage Road and North Street, to forewarn motorists
of the school crossing at the signalized intersection. All signs were noted to be in good condition.
One week ago on March 15, 2004, the Portage Road bridge was closed for reconstruction. The
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Municipal Works' Fire Services. Parks, Recreation & Culture' Business Development. Building & By-Law Services
March 22, 2004
-2-
MW-2004-48
signed detour route does not include North Street between Portage Road and Drummond Road, and
therefore, the traffic volumes on North Street should not be significantly affected by the bridge
closure. However, in preparation for the potential change to turning movement patterns at the
intersection of Portage Road and North Street, a rover crossing guard was assigned to the intersection
for a two-week period. The assistance of a school crossing guard at a signalized intersection is
typically warranted when a large percentage of vehicles carry out turning movements as opposed to
through movements. Thus, staffis recommending that the rover be replaced with a permanent guard
for the duration of the school year, while the bridge is closed.
The staffing cost associated with hiring of an additional school crossing guard is approximately
$1,600 for the remainder of the school year.
In addition, an intersection control review at the intersection of North Street and Lowell Avenue was
carried out to determine whether an all-way stop control is warranted. The request for the additional
stop signs stems ftom motorists exceeding the 50-km/hr speed limit on North Street. Currently, the
intersection of North Street and Lowell Avenue is controlled by a stop sign facing northbound
motorists on Lowell Avenue. To determine whether the installation of an all-way stop control is
feasible, the City a/Niagara Falls Residential All-way Stop Wa"ant was completed. The following
technical studies were carried out as part of the warrant:
. turning movement count
. general observations
. collision history
. visibility studies
. radar studies
. residential petition form
The results obtained ftom the aforementioned studies revealed that the All- Way Stop Warrant is not
fulfilled. The vehicular traffic volumes obtained ftom the traffic count reveal that for every thirty-
two (32) vehicles travelling on North Street, there is one (1) vehicle on Lowell Avenue approaching
the intersection. The installation of an all-way stop control at a location where the vehicular volume
split on the main street is overwhehningly greater than that on the side street, results in poor stop
sign compliance. Therefore, an all-way stop control may provide a false sense of security at the
study intersection and result in complaints regarding vehicles not stopping at the intersection.
The residential petition form was provided to the resident who requested the all-way stop control.
However, the completed form was not returned to staffto include in the warrant assessment. Given
the results of the technical study, the completion of the residential petition would not satisfy the
fulfihnent of the all-way stop warrant. All ten (10) pedestrians observed, crossing North Street at
Lowell Avenue, were either adults or children accompanied by adults. Sidewalks are present on both
sides of North Street, allowing pedestrians a safe passage to St. Joseph School without having to
cross North Street until they proceed to the ftont of the school where a school crossing guard is
present. Therefore, in light of the study results, it is recommended that the existing intersection
control at North Street and Lowell Avenue be maintained.
A review of collision files reveals that there were no collisions reported at the intersection of North
Street and Lowell Avenue during the previous three year period. Furthermore, sight investigations
reveal that the available stopping sight distance and crossing sight distance exceeds the minimum
standards outlined in the Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads.
March 22, 2004
-3-
MW-2004-48
Radar studies on North Street reveal that the operating speed is 57 kmIhr. Since the legal speed limit
on North Street is 50 krn/hr, there is evidence to suggest that some motorists are driving in excess
of the speed limit. Enforcement of the speed limit may best be attained through Niagara Regional
Police. Therefore, staff will request Niagara Regional Police to carry out enforcement of the speed
limit on North Street.
In conclusion, the introduction of the additional school crossing guard at the signalized intersection
of Portage Road and North Street has maximized safety for pedestrian traffic, especially school
children, proceeding through the intersection. Therefore, for the duration ofthe Portage Road bridge
closure, the assistance of an additional school crossing guard at the intersection of Portage Road and
North Street is recommended. Additional traffic control devices are not warranted in the study area
at this time.
Committee's concurrence with the recommendation outlined in this report would be appreciated.
P~¡;d V
h~ren, C.E.T.
OlVf.anager of Traffic & Parking Services
r~oo A
Ed DUj:1? ~
Director of Municipal Works
Tim Burshtein
V : \2 OO4CO UN C IL 104032 2IMW -2004-48. wpd
File 0-180-03
Respectfull.y S. Ub~' tted:
in if¡
ohn MacDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
--- -~--_.~~_.___~n-
§
~
~
0
HlGHW A Y #420
KITCHENER ST.
BRITANNIA CRES.
PROSPECT ST.
NORTH ST.
~
~
~
~I
~
NORTH ST.
EMERY ST.
j
North Street @ Lowell Avenue
Intersection Control Review
NORTH
March 22, 2004
Tim Burshtem
NOT TO SCAIJ
To:
Alderman Victor Pietrangelo
& the Community Services Committee
Clerk's Department
Inter.Deoartmental Memorandum
From:
Dean Iorfida
City Clerk
Subject:
Various Financial Requests
The municipality often receives requests for one-time financial assistance ftom sporting groups, athletes or
individuals. There is a policy in place through the Recreation Commission to provide grants for athletes or
teams who have qualified for sanctioned provincial, national or international championships, as long as certain
criteria is met (i.e. student, minor, senior, disabled). Please find two recent requests attached:
#1
From: "Rowdies" Ladies Slo-Pitch team.
Request: Either financial assistance or donation of goods to use in upcoming fund-raising events.
Why: The Rowdies are Provincial champions, who are competing in the Nationals in Newfoundland this
summer. They will be sending 14 players and 2 coaches.
Staff Comments: From Adele Kon:
"The Ladies Slo-pitch team does not qualify for funding under our Policy because they are adults. It is also
important to note that not all players come ftom Niagara Falls. I do not have an exact number however we
do know that there are a number ftom St. Catharines, Fort Erie, Port Colborne.
Besides funding for their travel expenses they also requested items to be included in their fund-raising events.
Council may consider providing some of the gift items ftom the Mayor's office."
. . .
#2
From: Stephanie Pang, Grade 12 A.N. Myer student.
Request: Financial assistance to deftay tuition and travel costs to attend the Global Young Leaders
Conference.
Why: Ms. Pang has been nominated to represent her school at the 2004 Global Young leaders Conference
in Europe. The conference offers a unique opportunity for students ftom around the world to interact and
explore global leadership issues.
Staff Comments: Clearly, Ms. Pang's accomplishments are to be applauded. Unfortunately, the municipality
does not have any grant programs for scholastic achievements or any criteria set up to determine whether such
scholastic achievements are worthy of recognition.
Working Together to Serve Our Communit~
tH~G. fALLS CLERKS '04 030514:41
~eE!\I'Êil
;/ , Iiì JM:1 2 2004 D
!folt/lIl,!/21.2004 PARKS, RECREATIÒN
& CULTURE
Vollr hclp wollld ÚC oppretÍllted:
<:his post Scptcmúer ollr "f¿owdies" £¡¡dies' SID-pitch t(l1m WOlf thc Pro/lilfcÍIlI Chompiolfship ilf
their recr(l1tiolf di/lisiolf. Competilfll olloinst 63 other l(I1ms wc werc undef(l1tal. 11 wos on fKdlinll w«kcnd
ond onc which wc willlr(l1sllrc for ollr lifclimc.
Wilh Ibis win wc fIlrned on invilolion 10 Ihc .Nolionol ehompionship. 10 úc hcld in .Newfollndlnnd
dllrinlllhc slimmer of 2004. 10 rcprcscnt ollr dtll ol.NÍIlllorn 'lolls ond ollr prDl/ince of Ontario.
Ollr IfIlm is mokinll plnns 10 mise fllnds 10 hclp offset Ihc high cosl of Ibis Irip. Wc hope 10 scnd
14 plnllers ond 2 cMchcs to lItis 4-dn1l (/Icnt. /1 therc is onll WIllI in which 11011 collld hclp us finoncÍIl/!II.
Dr with 0 donotion 01 gOllás to IISC in ollr IIpcominglllnd-rnising (/I(nts. wc would ÚC vcrlloppretÍllti/l(.
Wc will ÚC hoving 0 banner erfllied which will ÚC displolled ot our regionollournomcnts. fund-raising
cvenls. os we/Ins ot ollr .Newfollndlnnd tollrlfllmcnt. Anllonc who hclps sponsor. Dr donotcs itcmslo ollr tfllm
willhovc Iheir nomc Dr logo nJded to our úonner.
Wc hovc olrfllllll completed 0 SIlIe of scented fIlndles. On 'le/mlllrll 21" wc will úc holding ollr
SPflllhclli'inn" ollhc ehippnwo 'lirc holl úe!w«n 4:00 p.m. on' 7:00 p.m. A SIOII on' 'Due. 0 polf
tollrnomcnt ond possibluo gorogc SIlIe orc 01$(1 in thc plonning slogcs.
PlfIlse hclp liS olloin ollr IIMI of $ 10.000. 'lor fllrlher information lIoU fIln (1111 ollr eoptoin
!Jennifcr f¿ondoll ot 905-356-3461 Dr muself. -Cundo }fcndruot 905-354-5927 Dr cmoil IISOt
rowdics2004 (whotmoil. COHI.
Sincere/u-
;;:;~ \\""~
eMch (#2).
tne/.
Estimated ExDenses for TriD to Newfoundland
Since most of our players have to work. they will have to fly out the day before the
tournament begins.
By Air
NationalEntranceFee ................................
Flight............................................. .
Hotel (5 nights at quad accommodations) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Van rental (6 days) ...................................
Meals (5.5 days - breakfast $10, lunch $15, dinner $25) . . . . . . .
$30.00
520.00
125.00
100.00
275.00
Total.............................................. $1050.00
By Road
National Entrance Fee ................................
Hotel (8 nights at triple accommodations - per person) . . . . . . . .
Gas (6 people per van) ................................
Ferry(6-hourtrip) ....................................
Meals (9 days) ......................................
$30.00
270.00
80.00
80.00
450.00
Total..............................................- $910.00
A ball park estimate - excuse the pun - would be $1,000 per person. We hope to have 14
players and 2 coaches attend.
Miss Stephanie Pang
6975 "McMillan Dr.
Niagara Falls, On
L2G 2N3
February 18,2004
Mr. Ted Salci
Mayor of Niagara Falls
4310 Queen Street
Niagara Falls, ON
L2E 6X5
Dear Mr. Salci:
My name is Stephanie Pang and I am a grade 12 student at AN. Myer Secondary School
in Niagara Falls. I have been nominated to be a Global Scholar representing my school and
community at the summer 2004 Global Young Leaders Conference (GYLC) in Europe.
The Congressional Youth Leadership council, a non-profit educational organization,
sponsors the GYLC which offers students ftom countries allover the world the unique
opportunity to interact with each other and explore global leadership issues.
Our activities are coordinated around the theme, "The Leaders of Tomorrow Preparing
for the Global Challenges and Responsibilities of the Future." We will focus on various global
issues, including communications, diplomacy, peace and security, economics, law and human
rights, and the role of the United Nations. I have enclosed a sample of our itinerary for your
review.
My participation in the GYLC depends on whether I can raise $5000.00 in sponsorships.
(í'he conference tuition is $3795.00 USD and my travel to Vienna ftom Toronto will be $1600.00
CAN). I am hoping the City of Niagara Falls will assist me with part of these costs.
I strongly believe that attending the Global Young Leaders Conference will enhance my
education in a way few can experience. As a Global Scholar, I will have a first-hand opportunity
to join with other exceptional students ftom around the world, to see numerous international
organizations at work, in both the public and private sectors. I will meet and discuss various
global issues with high-ranking diplomats, international fmanciers and prominent media figures
in Vienna, Budapest, and Prague.
Your support for my sponsorship request in this endeavor would be greatly appreciated.
Please contact me at 905-357-4054 or the Council at (202) 777-4173 for any further infonnation.
Sincerely, . ~
~g
Curriculum
In-Country Sample Schedule
Sample Schedules are a composite based on past schedules and are provided to demonstrate
the pace and composition of a typical Summit. Country location, speakers, sites and activities
may vary. Below is a sampling of activities for the GYL5 2004 program in Europe.
Day 1: Welcome to Vienna!
Meet at the Vienna International Airport
A Waltz Through Vienna: Exploring the Imperial Oty
Program Registration and Orientation
Leadership Group Meeting (LGM)
Welcome Dinner and Opening Session
Day 2: A Call to Action
Welcome Session at the Austrian Parliament
0 Historical Role of Central and Eastern Europe
0 Parliamentarianism: Reforms and Perspectives
Community Action Plan Meetings (CAP)
Keynote Dinner and Address
Leadership Group Meetings: Introduction of Malawi Simulation
.
Day 3: Politics of Powers and Trade
Global Powers
0 International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA)
0 Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)
Leadership Group Meetings (LGM)
Evening at Leisure to Explore Vienna's Old World Charm
Day 4: Decision Making at Global Levels
Leadership Group Meetings (LGM)
Grassroots Leadership: Insights from NGOs
0 Student-Selected Visits
Community ActIon Plan Meetings (CAP)
Evening Performance at Wiener Konzerthaus, VIenna's Revered Concert Hall
Day 5: Traveling from Vienna to Prague, Discovering Cultural Riches
Journey Through the Wachau UNESCO Region
Afternoon Exploration of Cesky Krumlov
Evening Arrival in Prague
Welcome and Orientation
Leadership Group Meeting (LGM)
Day 6: Ethics and Leadership
Leadership Group Meetings (LGM)
Embassy Visits: Diplomacy In Action
River Lunch Cruise on the Vltava
Business Leadership Panel
Evolution of Ethics
0 Practices Pre and Post-Communism
Prague's Royal Ways
0 Prague Castle
0 St.Vitus Cathedral
0 Charles Bridge
Student-Led Leadership Workshops
Day 7: Case Study in Human Rights
Leadership Group Meetings (LGM)
Terezin: Case Study in Human Rights
0 Learning From the Past
Exploration of the Golden City
0 Wenceslas Square
0 Mala Strana to Old Town Square
0 Josefov: Old Jewish Quarter
Community Action Plan Meetings (CAP)
0 Action Plan and Objectives
Evening at Leisure
Day 8: Traveling from Prague to Budapest
Stop in Brno: Capitol of Moravia Region
Budapest Orientation: A Tale of Three Towns
0 Asherman's Bastion
0 Trinity Square
0 Heroes Square
Welcome Dinner
Student-Led Leadership Workshops
Day 9: Impacts of Globalization
.
Community Action Plan Meetings (CAP)
0 Meeting Community Needs
Global Issues I: Expert-Led, Student-Selected Seminars
0 Environment, Privacy Issues, Technology
Community Action Plan Meetings (CAP)
0 Small Group Presentations
Evening at Leisure
Day 10: International Development
Leadership Group Meetings (LGM)
Global Issues II: Expert-Led, Student-Selected Seminars
0 Healthcare, Immigration, Terrorism vs. Security
The Hungarian Puszta
0 An Evening of Hungarian Dinner, Storytelling, Music, Dancing
Day 11: Traveling from Budapest to Vienna
Community Action Plan Meetings (CAP)
---- -"T------r-----,...-------
0 Review and Proposals
Return to Vienna
Grassroots Leadership: Insights From NGOs
0 Student-Selected Seminars and Roundtable Discussions
Community Action Plan Meetings (CAP)
0 Anal Preparations
Day 12: Community Action Plan Summit
Community Action Plan Meetings (CAP)
0 Group Presentations
Leadership Group Meetings (LGM)
Afternoon at Leisure Exploring the Museum Quarter
Strengthening Social Graces: Diplomatic Hospitality
0 The Politics of Protocol
Formal Farewell Dinner at a Viennese Palace
Day 13: Homeward Bound
Depart Vienna
The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls
Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Installing
an All-Way Stop Control
Originally Adopted October 20, 1998
Revised March 22, 2004
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
A
B
Table of Contents
Page (5)
Purpose of All-Way Stop Controls ......................,.................. 2
Misuse of All-Way Stop Controls ........................................ 2-3
All-Way Stop Warrant Evaluation ......................................... 3
Hierarchy of Roads .....................,............................. 4-5
City of Niagara Falls All-Way Stop Warrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6-8
All-WayStopStudyProcedure ............................................9
RemovingAll-WayStopControls ..................................... 10-11
Costs ...............................................................11
Appendicies
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL
SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE & FACT SHEET
CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ALL- WAY STOP WARRANT
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION
OF AN ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL
C
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR INST ALLA TION
OF ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL
FLOW CHART OF WARRANTS
D
INTERSECTION REVIEW PROCEDURES
FLOW CHART
E
ALL-WAY STOP REMOVAL
SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE &
NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENT
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
-2-
March 22, 2004
1.0
Purpose of All-Way Stop Controls
All-Way Stop controls should only be considered under the following situations:
1.
As an interim measure, where traffic controls signals are warranted but cannot be
immediately installed.
2.
At locations having a high collision frequency where less restrictive measures
have been tried and were found to be inadequate.
3.
At locations where sight limitations exist, where the offending sight problem
cannot be removed or relocated.
4.
As a means of providing alternating right-of-way amongst two roadways with
similar traffic volume demand and operating characteristics.
2.0
Misuse of All-Way Stop Controls
Studies conducted in many municipalities in Ontario indicate that the incorrect use or overuse of
all-way stop controls have the following effect:
slows traffic only within 30 metres or so on each side of the intersection. Most
drivers accelerate back to their original speed (or faster to make up for lost time)
just past the intersection, therefore, having an adverse effect on the neighbourhood
beyond 30 metres.
Vehicle Speeds
Before/After All-Way Stop Installation
70
60
~ 50
1 40
I 30
(/ 20
10 I
0 I
::II'.
.
'"""'"
-"
:;
150
75
30
'"
0
Oistance (m)
30
75
150
Direction
-
.. Before
~ After
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
-3-
March 22, 2004
tends to cause motorists to not obey stop signs when they consider them to be
unnecessary. One study showed that 78% of all vehicles do not come to a full
legal stop at stop signs.
provides a false sense of security to pedestrians and other motorists as drivers tend
to roll through the intersection or fail to stop if it is perceived to be unnecessary
(i.e., little or infrequent side street traffic encountered). Commuters that pass
through the intersection on a daily basis quickly recognize that after stopping at
the intersection without encountering any opposing traffic, begin to disobey the
signs.
causes disrespect to other traffic control devices that are legitimately installed.
increase in the noise level and air pollution near the intersection as cars accelerate
away.
consumption oflarge amounts of fuel. (Source: Tech Topics, October 1987, Municipal
Transportation Energy Advisory Committee Volume 3, No.3, July 1984).
increase in the response time of emergency vehicles (i.e., fire vehicles,
ambulances, etc. are required by law to stop at stop signs before proceeding
through an intersection).
Therefore, as a result of the potential adverse affect associated with all-way stop installations, it
is important that these devices not be placed indiscriminately. In order to preserve the
effectiveness of the multi-way stop against incorrect use or overuse, the new warrants described
under Section 5.0 have been developed that incorporate the driving characteristics of the
residents within Niagara Falls.
3.0
All-Way Stop Warrant Evaluation
Not only are traffic engineering aspects taken into consideration in formulating the warrants, but
humanistic values and concerns of residents within the City of Niagara Falls taken into
consideration. The intention of incorporating engineering and humanistic factors is to
strategically place all-way stop controls at locations where reasonable guidelines for their
installation is based on solid practice, while at the same time eliminate the proliferation of
unwarranted signs.
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
-4-
March 22, 2004
4.0
Hierarchy of Roads
In developing the City of Niagara Falls All-Way Stop Warrant it was recognized that the service
functions and traffic flow characteristics on urban local streets, urban collector streets and urban
arterial streets are unique. To ensure that traffic flows in an expeditious and safe manner it is
important to understand the function of roads within our street system. Improper use of traffic
devices on high volume roads i.e. arterial roads can have devastating impacts on road function
and traffic flows within our City. The following definitions were used in determining road
classification.
Urban Arterial Street
Service Function - Urban arterial streets are intended to carry large volumes of all types of traffic
moving at medium to high speeds. These streets serve the major traffic flows between the
principal areas of traffic generation and also connect to rural arterials and collectors. In urban
areas without freeways, arterial streets provide the best quality of traffic service. Urban arterial
streets normally experience average daily traffic volumes of 5,000 to 30,000 vehicles.
Flow Characteristics - The traffic flow is desirably uninterrupted except at signalized
intersections and cross walks. Where signals are closely spaced they should be interconnected
and synchronized to minimize the interference to through movements. Parking and unloading
should be prohibited where they might affect through movement of traffic, particularly at rush
hours.
Example - Thorold Stone Road, Bridge Street
Major Collector Street
Service Function -Urban collector streets provide both traffic service and land service. The
traffic service function of this type of street is to carry traffic between local and arterial streets.
Full access to adjacent properties is generally allowed on collectors. The average daily traffic
ranges between 5,000 and 12,000 vehicles.
Flow Characteristics - Major collector streets have stop or signalized controls where they
intersect arterial streets. There are few parking restrictions except during peak hours when traffic
movement may be the most important consideration. There are generally no special pedestrian
crossing restrictions, but special crosswalks might be provided where traffic volumes are high.
To improve traffic flow, particularly at peak hours, it is sometimes desirable to provide major
collector streets with bus bays or turning lanes similar to those provided on arterial streets.
Example - Main Street, Victoria Avenue
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
-5-
March 22, 2004
Minor Collector Street
Service Function -Urban collector streets provide both traffic service and land service. The
traffic service function of this type of street is to carry traffic between local and arterial streets.
Full access to adjacent properties is generally allowed on collectors. The average daily traffic
ranges between 1,000 and 5,000 vehicles.
Flow Characteristics -Minor collector streets have stop, yield or signalized controls where they
intersect major collector streets and arterial streets. There are few parking restrictions except
during peak hours when traffic movement may be the most important consideration. There are
generally no special pedestrian crossing restrictions.
Example - Woodbine Street, Huggins Street, Paddock Trail Drive
Urban Local Street
Service Function -The main function of lCJcal streets is to provide land access. Direct access is
allowed to all abutting properties. Local streets are not intended to move large volumes of
traffic. The local street primarily carries only traffic with an origin or destination along its
length. It is not intended to carry through traffic other than to immediately adjoining streets.
Flow Characteristics -Local streets have stop, yield or signalized controls where they intersect
more important streets. Parking may be restricted to one side on narrow streets. Pedestrian
traffic is unrestricted.
Example - Southwood Drive, Kirkland Drive, Heximer Avenue
-6-
March 22, 2004
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
5.0
City of Niagara Falls Residential All-Way Stop Warrant
The City o/Niagara Falls Residential All-Way Stop Warrant is comprised of six sections.
Section 1 - Traffic Control
If traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the all-way stop may be used as an
interim measure prior to installing the traffic signals.
Section 2 - Minor Collector/Local Criteria
This warrant assesses the surrounding property usage and the roadway geometrics.
Provided that all the requirements are met, the minor collector/local warrants may be
utilized in determining the placement of all-way stop controls. The following are the
requirements:
A)
B)
C)
D)
E)
F)
All approaches have residential, school or park ftontage with existing
speed limits of 50 km/h or less; AND
Both streets are classified as minor collectors or locals, or function as
minor collectors or locals; AND
No existing stop sign or signal is located on the more heavily travelled
street within a distance of 100 metres; AND
Approaches extend 100 metres or more away ITom the intersection on at
least three approaches; AND
Intersection configuration is not a skewed or offset intersection; AND
Visibility approaching the intersection exceeds 60 metres on all
approaches.
Section 3 - Minimum Vehicle Volume
This warrant is divided into two parts.
When Section 2 (Minor CollectorlLocai Criteria) is fully met, the Residential All-Way
Stop Warrant applies. For this section of the warrant to be fulfilled, the following two
criteron must be met:
A.
The average hourly vehicular volume at the intersection must exceed 100
vehicles for the study period (normally encompassing the morning,
afternoon and/or mid-day peak intervals); AND
B.
A minimum 25% of the traffic volume crossing the major roadway must
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
- 7-
March 22, 2004
be present. Traffic includes both vehicles and pedestrians.
The Ministry of Transporation Warrants suggests that for an all-way stop to be considered
for a minor roadway, the total vehicle volume on all intersection approaches exceed 350
for the highest hour recorded. In addition, the volume split does not exceed a 75/25 ratio
for three way control or 65/35 for four way control. The City of Niagara Falls
Residential All-Way Stop Warrants reduces the average hourly volume requirement
alone by 71 %. Less stringent reqnirements for the volume split (ratio) is also provided
through the revised warrant.
If the local/minor collector criteria is not fulfilled as identified in Section 2 (Minor
CollectorlLocai Criteria), then the Arterial Warrant is applied. These intersections would
normally be located outside of a residential subdivision. In this case, the intersection is
reviewed based on the guidelines provided in Book 5 of the Ontario Traffic Manual
(Regulatory Signs). For a multi-way stop to be fulfilled at an arterial roadway, a
minimum hourly volume of 500 vehicles for each of any eight hours of the day. The
volume split (or ratio) would be 75/25, meaning that at least one quarter of the traffic
entering the intersection must originate ftom the minor roadway. Both parts must exceed
the minimum requirements in order for the Arterial Warrant to be fulfilled.
Section 4 - Accident Historv
For the collision component to be fulfilled, either one of the following must be met:
1.
Three (3) or more reportable collisions of a type susceptible to correction
through the installation of an all-way stop control within a l2-month
period averaged over a 3-year period; OR
2.
Five (5) or more reportable collisions of a type susceptible to correction
over the previous l2-month period.
Section 5 - Visibilitv ReQuirement
The minimum visibility requirements are standards developed by the Transportation
Association of Canada and Ontario Geometric Design Standards. Intersection sight lines,
visibility triangles and safe stopping sight distance requirements are reviewed. Due to the
number of variables in the field, the final decision on determining adequate visibility will
be the responsibility of the Traffic & Parking Services Manager or designate.
Section 6 - Residential Criteria
This warrant addresses residents' preference of intersection control. The warrant is valid
only within residential areas where Section Number 2 (Minor CollectorlLocal Criteria) is
met, and is considered to be warranted if 80% of the homeowners within 75 metres of the
intersection are in favour of the installation of an all-way stop control.
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
-8-
March 22, 2004
SUMMARY
The All-Way Stop warrant is fulfilled when the following general conditions are met:
Section 1 is 100% fulfilled, OR
Section 4 is 100% fulfilled, OR
Section 5 is 100% fulfilled
When the Minor Collector/Local Warrant is used the following conditions warrant the
installation of an all-way stop control:
Section 2 is 100% fulfilled, AND
Section 3 is 100% fulfilled, AND
Section 6 is 80% fulfilled
When the Arterial Warrant is nsed (where at least one requirement in the minor collectorllocal
criteria is not met), the following conditions warrant the installation of an all-way stop control:
Section 2 is 0% fulfilled, AND
Section 3 is 100% fulfilled
Refer to Figure 2 - Minimum Reqnirements for the Installation of an All-Way Stop Control
Warral1( and Figure 3 - Warrant Flowchart.
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
-9-
March 22, 2004
6.0
All-Way Stop Study Procedure
Upon receiving correspondence formally requesting an all-way stop control at a particular
intersection(s), the following steps are carried out:
1. Each property owner within a 75 metres of the intersection is provided with a questionnaire
prepared by staff. Through the questionnaire, the opinion of the property owner is requested
on the intersection control. Ifa school is not within the 75 metre radius of the intersection, or
it is known that children attending the school cross at the subject intersection, the principal
will also be provided with a questionnaire. A questionnaire is also sent to fire, ambulance,
police and transit officials. A sample questionnaire is contained in Appendix A - ALL WAY
STOP CONTROL SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE & FACT SHEET. The fact sheet provides
residents some basic information on all-way stops. A two-week time ftame is provided for
the responses to be mailed back.
2. If less than 80% of the residents are in favour of an all-way stop control, a cursory review of
the intersection is carried out. Homeowners that do not respond to the questionnaire will be
presumed not in favour of an all-way stop. The review consists of a collision history
analysis, visibility studies, radar speed studies, signage review, pavement marking review and
general observations. Since the residential component of the warrant has not been fulfilled, a
letter is prepared and distributed to each of the questionnaire recipients advising of the study
findings and recommendations. If any of the studies reveal that a problem exists at the
intersection, a traffic count and an in-depth review will be carried out.
3. If 80% or more of the residents within 75 metres of the study intersection are in favour of an
all-way stop control, a full technical assessment of the intersection is carried out.
Engineering studies related to collision history, visibility, vehicle and pedestrian volumes,
radar speed studies, signage, pavement markings and general observations are conducted.
The data is processed utilizing various traffic engineering software packages including the
City a/Niagara Falls Residential All-Way Stop Control Warrant (APPENDIX B & C) to
determine if the justification criteria for the multi-way stop is fulfilled.
4. A report to Committee/Council is prepared with study findings and recommendations if
warranted. If the warrants are not met, a letter is prepared and distributed to the original
questionnaire recipients.
5. If an all-way stop is approved for installation, local agencies (fire, ambulance, police, transit,
school boards) are advised in advance of the impending sign installation.
6. All-way stop installed. Pavement markings are not applied until after the signs are installed.
Also, as an interim measure, STOP AHEAD signs supplemented with the circular NEW sign
are posted in advance of the newly controlled approaches for an introductory period of three
months.
Refer to APPENDIX D for a detailed All-Way Stop Control study procedure and a sample
facsimile sheet advising local agencies of the upcoming all-way stop installation.
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
-10-
7.0 Removing An-Way Stop Controls
March 22, 2004
When a request is received to remove an all-way stop control, a similar study process is carried
out. When all-way stops are removed, the stop condition for motorists on the major road is
eliminated, but the stop signs on the minor road approach( es) remain.
Each property owner within a 75 metre distance of the intersection is first provided with a
questionnaire. They are requested to respond whether they feel the all-way stop should be
maintained, or if they prefer to remove the stop signs on the more heavily travelled roadway. If a
school is not within the 75 metre distance of the intersection, but it is known that children
attending the school cross at the subject intersection, the principal will also be provided with a
questionnaire. A questionnaire is also sent to fire, ambulance, police and transit officials. A
sample questionnaire is contained in Appendix E - SAMPLE ALL WAY STOP CONTROL
REMOVAL QUESTIONNAIRE.
Traffic studies are carried out and study results are applied to the warrant. The warrant is
processed such as if the request pertains to a new potential installation. Therefore, for the all-
way stop control to continue to be warranted at a particular intersection, all the technical
requirements must be fully met, in addition to at least 80% of the residents supporting the signs
to remain installed. If either the technical or residential component is not satisfied, staff prepares
a report recommending the removal of the all-way stop to Committee/Council. The residents that
were petitioned are advised of the recommendations and invited to attend any meeting(s) on the
subject. Ifno change is recommended, a letter is prepared and distributed to sent to the original
questionnaire recipients.
If an all-way stop is scheduled for removal, the following procedure will take place:
1.
At least 15 days before the removal of the all-way stop, a 90
em * 90 em diamond shaped warning sign bearing the
legend CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP in black
letters on a yellow retroreflective background is installed on
the approach(es) where the STOP sign is to remain.
A circular NEW sign is posted directly over the CROSS
TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP sign with a AFTER (month
and day) sign with black text on a yellow retroreflective
background, stating the date when the control on the
crossing roadway will be removed. An illustration of the
aforementioned signage is provided on the right.
2.
Notification of the all-way stop removal is provided to the
following agencies via facsimile:
.
.
.
Ambulance Services
Fire Department
Niagara Regional Police Service
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control'
-11-
March 22, 2004
.
.
.
.
.
School Boards
Transit Authorities *
PrivMeBusCompanies*
Taxi Companies *
Trucking Firms *
* if it is known that these firms use the intersection frequently.
3.
A public notice is advertised in the Niagara Review and Niagara Shopper's News
of the impending all-way stop removal on at least two (2) occasions. A sample
advertisement is provided in APPENDIX E.
4.
On the appointed date, the following activities are undertaken:
a.
Any STOP AHEAD signs will be removed on the approaches where the
STOP signs will be removed.
b.
Painted stop lines and crosswalks are also removed (these may be painted
black or the asphalt stripped).
c.
The ALL- WAY tabs are removed ftom the STOP signs that will remain
posted.
d.
The subject STOP signs are removed.
e.
The AFTER (month and day) sign is removed from the warning signs.
5.
At least 15 days following the removal of the STOP signs, the CROSS TRAFFIC
DOES NOT STOP signs and the circular NEW signs are removed ftom the
approach(es) where the STOP sign(s) remained.
The guidelines for the removal of the stop signs shall be in accordance to the Ontario Traffic
Manuals as amended.
8.0
Costs
The average cost to install an all-way stop control at a "cross" intersection is approximately
$3,000.00. Additional costs are incurred in the future when signs are replaced due to vandalism
or age. Every all-way stop in Niagara Falls will consist of painted stop bars on each intersection
approach, and crosswalks on select approaches.
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
March 22, 2004
APPENDIX A
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL
SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE & FACT SHEET
Community Services Department
Municipal Works. Traffic & !'arklng Services
Ed Dujlovic, P. Eng.
Director of Municipal Works
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel:
Fax;
E-mail:
(905) 356-7521
(905) 353-0651
munwks@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Date
SAMPLE
ALL-WAY
STOP
QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Homeowner/Business Owner:
A request has recently been submitted by [generic - no personna! identification provided] to review the
feasibility of installing an all-way stop control at the intersection of [Street A] and [Street B]. Currently,
this intersection consists of [current intersection control]. The concern stems from [list of concerns].
Staff is requesting your input and comments regarding the traffic control at this intersection. Therefore
we are asking that you assist us by completing the questionnaire and forwarding it back to us. Please
take the time to read the facts about all-way stops in the enclosed fact sheet. The infonnation you
provide is strictly confidential.
Name
Telephone
Address
Please check one:
D
D
My preference is to maintain the existing intersection control at [Street A] and [Street B].
My preference is to install an all-way stop at the intersection of [Street A] and [Street B].
Comments to your above preference would be appreciated:
Your response to the above is important. Please mail your response to the above address or call the
undersigned on or before [nonna1lytwo weeks after sent date]. You may also reply bye-mail to [E-mail]
or by fax to the "Traffic & Parking Services Section" at 353-0651. Be advised that if a response is not
received ftom you, it will be presumed that you prefer to maintaio the current signage at the intersection.
Thank you for your assistance regarding this matter.
Yours Truly,
CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS
S:\TRAFFlCIG-180-O2 -Policies & Procedures\2004WI-Way Stop Policy\Sample All-Way Stop Questionnaire.wpd
Information About
All-Way Stop Controls
Facts about All-Way Stop Contois
PURPOSE
Thepurpose of an all-way stop control is to provide altemating right-of-way to relatively equal volumes of opposingtraffic.
SPEED CONTROL
Provincial regulations state that an all-way stop control shouldnot be used as a device to control vehicle speeds.
STUDIES
Numerous studies have shown that excessive speeding is not affected by this device; speeds are of course affected within
approximately 30 metres (100 feet) of the stop location as vehicles are required to stop. Speeds outside of the 30 metre range
usually increase as drivers attempt to make up the time lost at the stop locations.
CITY WARRANT
When a request is made for an all-way stop control, the proposed location is evaluated under the City ofN'wgara Falls
ResidentiIJI All-Way Stop Wammt, which addresses vehicle and pedestrian traffic, volume ratio, collision histmy, sight
distances, roadway geometries, and yourpreference on intersection control. Staffwill recommend the installation of the all-
way stop if the warrant criteria is met. Inappropriate use of all way stop controls has the following impactsIeffects:
~
~
creates disrespect for stop signs and other traffic control devices in general
provides false sense of security to pedestrians as drivers tend to roll through the intersection or fail to
stop if it is perceived to be unnecessary (i.e., little or infrequent side street traffic encountered)
negative impact on emergency services (police, ambulance & fire vehicles must stop at stop signs)
negative impact on tnmsit routes (if applicable)
environmental impacts (i.e., increased emissions, increase in fuel consumption, noise generated by
braking and acceleration)
inconvenience to local residents who legitimately use the roadway
cost of installation (signs, pavement markings, etc.) for a typical 4 legged intersection is approximately
$3000.00
~
~
~
~
~
ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS
Generally, residents look to stop signs to control speeds or eliminate cut-through traffic. AB stated above, unwarranted
or unnecessary stop sign instal1ations do not necessarily accomplish wbat the residents are looking for. Therefore, staff
are always actively pursuing other methods to alleviate neighboUIhood concerns. Alternative solutions may include
such minor modifications as parking restrictions or speed reductions to such major modifications as traffic calming
reconstruction projects.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Call the Traffic & Parldng Services Section, at 356-7521 ext. 5201 or by e-mail at tburshtein@city.niagarafa11s.on.ca
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
March 22, 2004
APPENDIX B
CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ALL-WAY STOP WARRANT
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION
OF AN ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL
Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls
Minimum Requlrementa for Installation of All Way Stop Control
_oed March a, 2004
Date'
Location: Major Roadway at Minor Street
March 8. 2004
Section' 1 .
Section' 2-
Section' 3-
Section. 4 -
Section' 5.
Section' 6 -
NOTE:
Observe'
Traffic Staff
ALL WAY STOP WARRANT SUMMARY
Traffic Control
Collector/Local Criteria
Minimum Vehicle Volume
Accident History
VislbHity Requirements
Residential Criteria
0%
100 %
100 %
40%
0%
87 %
r--------------- -- --------------,
I ALL WAY STOP WARRANTEO? I
I YES I
L______-------------------------I
FOR THE MULTIWAY STOP WARRANT TO BE SATISFIED, SECTIONS 2. 3. AND 6 £ACH NEED TO BE FULFILLED 100%
OR EITHER SECTION 1, SECTION 4 OR SECTION 5 MUST BE FULFILLED 100%
1) TRAFflCCONTROL
Where traffic contrcl signels ere warranted and urgently needed, the
all way stop is en interim measure that can be installed quickly to
control traffic while arrangements are being made for the treffic
control signal Installation
c=J YES
2) MINOR COLLECTORILOCAL CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA
The Collector/Local volume warrants are to be used if the following condllions ara met:
1)
2)
AJI approaches have residential. school or perk frontage with
existing speed limlls of 50 kmlh or less
Both straets ara classified as collectors or locals or function
as collectors or locals
No existing stop sign or signal is located on the more heavily
trevelled street within a distance of 100m
Approaches extend 100m or more away from tho intersection
on at least three sides
Intersection configuretlon Is not a skewed or offset intersection
Visibility approaching tho Intarsection exceeds 80m
on all approaches
CD YES
CD YES
CD YES
CD YES
CQ YES
CQ YES
3)
4)
5)
6)
3) MINIMUM VEHICLE VOLUME
a) The averege houriy vehicular volume at this Intersection
(all approaches)
~NO
C=:J NO
t:=J NO
C=:J NO
C=:J NO
C=:J NO
C=:J NO
114 vehicles per hour at this intersection
[all approacheaj
100%
b)
The average hourly vehicular and pedestrian volume
from the minor approach(es) only
34 vehicles and pedestrians per hour
on the minor approach[es] only
c)
The combined vehicle and pedestrian volume from the minor approach(es)
entering the intersection must not axceed 75:25 for a local roadway
75 on tha through road
25 on the sop road
Ouration of Count =
70
/
30
100%
8 hours
Minimum Requirements for Installation of All Way Stop Control
Pogo 2
4) ACCIDENT HISTORY
Three (3) or more reportable accidents of a type susceptible to correction
through the installation of an all way stop coot"; within a 12 month
period avaraged over a 3 year period
3 motor vehiclas
collisions
33%
OR
Five (5) or more reportabie accidents of a type susceptible to correction
through the installation of a multiway stop control over the latest
12 months
2 motor vehicies
collisions
40%
5) VlSIBlUTY REQUIREMENT
The minimum sight distances at this intarsection is lass than tha applicable
criteria as specifiad in the following table"
[==:J YES
~NO
40
50
60
70
60
50
60
85
110
130
Intersection Sight Distance Requirements
40
50
60
70
60
70
91
110
125
152
These vslues are developed from the Transportation Association of Canada and Ontario Geometric Design Gukiellnes. Due to the number of
variables in the fieid the final decision on detennlning adequate visibility will be the responsibility of the Traffic & Parking Services Manager or designate.
6) RESIDENTIAL CRITERIA
1) The ColiectorlLocal Criteria (Section No.2) is 100% fu~illed
2)
At least 80% of the homeowners living within 75 metrea of the intersaction
are in favour of an all way atop
~YES
c:::Q YES
c=.::=J NO
~NO
Number of Homea Pstllioned:
Number of Homeowners In Favour:
15
13
Response to Questionnaire =
Minimum Raqulred =
87%
80%
Commants: Rasidential Critaria used to detennine whether an all way stop is warranted
All Way Stop Warrant previously celculated based on old warrants reo volumas, accidants, etc.
60% or more of the residents in favour required for locaVcoliector roadways
Not applicable for arterial roadways
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
March 22, 2004
APPENDIX C
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALLATION
OF ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL
FLOW CHART OF WARRANTS
" TflAFfJC CONTROL
'"""--""""""""""'--."
....,...""""".........""".......-"
-___""'made""--"""-
No
1 -,"".-"",
~ COLL£CTORILOCAL CLASSlFJCAT1ON CRITERIA
""'~"-""-""""'-~""""."
........"".....
., "-""-'.-"---
--""'..~"'-"...
.. """"..---""", ,,-
--'~""
0' No_.......~_._oo"_-
.._--._~",.,
(0 --"",,",,-...,-............
00.',,"_-
"'--"""""""--
, '__"'___00"-
No._' ""'-1"" ! v_-,.-"""",
-..-, -..-,
...."""",v""".w~" ...._w"""
"
~ MINIMUM VEHICLE VOWME
~ """"----"-'"
.. ........--...--
_"'m""_""
0' ",,--..--..........
...........""""....."",
""--_._-",-_.._"",,,~-
-~.....v...." 1 -~.....,......
,..........-..... ,.......--
-."".- -"-1""""
~ ACCIDEHTHISTOI!Y
-"'-'_~"""""'m'"
., -(3),,---~...._.........
"""""-~"""""--"'"""'"
---"--
.. """'~-_-~""_.-
"""""_d.m_...__"'_""""",-
"-_"""""bym__"",'
...__........~.........
1 -_..,~_.."",-
-."".-
~ VJSIBlUTYREQUIREMENT
""""""'-""-."'-""""
_"""'by"'T__~c..-.....
..... ~ T - -- .. - ........
""""""'"
..
'"
..
TO
..
-:::---
-
...
""'"
""'"
'-..................-...---
1 '_"""m""~_'"
-."".-"'"
RESlDÐmAI. CRITERIA
",,--..-,.
., -,.""",.-....
.. "'~_d"""""'."""'d",_...-
NOTE. ...-...---
_eo,...."",......,
_e"".-"",
I
!
I
¡
_eo"",..,-.""",
_e.-"""",
ALL WAY STOP SUMMARY
""_"'_'_d"'""",__",_-,-
_w....
'"""""""-~"'-
.,-,.""",.-
..-.."""'.-
,,_..,""".-
~w....
~ _'.3..e.._""",
_w....
.,-,.""",.-
.. -,.....-...
..... --_00-"_"""'"
_"'-"""""'_00_""
...-..-,.....--
v..
:""'.:'=-"~::"':::',,,""'-
~,,--..""""...-
----...--
.....-............-
_~-.-e'-I""""
.1 "=:: I
-"... I
1 w"""""
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
APPENDIX D
INTERSECTION REVIEW PROCEDURES
FLOW CHART
March 22, 2004
50%" mono '" "'"""~
. ,"pport '" 'eo""
All-Wa, Stop Wa"""'a' baae' '"
City'" Nla,.,. Fa"."'.,
I",lalla"'"
patitiona""Fport""""
TIIIEUNE
3..aka
3..aka
All-Wa, Stop Not Wa",,""" baaed
'" City'" Naga'" Fa" .0410"
Racomma"dati'"'
Do "",....".. all-..",",
1...k
t
1 2...ka
I 2..aka
TOTAl. LENGTH OF .ROCESS,
2.5 to 3.0 montha
Community Services Department
Municipal Works - Traffic & Parking Services
Ed Dujlovlc, P. Eng.
Director of Municipal Works
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel:
Fax:
E-mail:
(905) 356-7521
(905) 353-D651
munwks@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
[Date]
To:
Niagara Regional Police Service
Niagara District Ambulance Service
Niagara Falls Fire Department
Niagara Transit
District School Board of Niagara
Niagara Catholic District School Board
Facsimile
905-374-0604
905-357-5572
905-356-6236
905-356-5576
905-687-7453
905-735-2940
RE:
Intersection of IStreet AI and IStreet BI
All-Way Stop Installation
Dear Sir/Madam:
This is notification that the intersection of [Street A] and [Street B] has been approved for an all-way
stop control. The signs are tentatively scheduled for installation on or around (Date of Installation].
This issue was presented and approved by Council at its regular meeting on [Meeting Date].
Notification confmning the installation of the all-way stop will be provided shortly after the signs are
posted in the field.
Inquiries on this matter may be directed to [contact person] at (905) 356-7521, extension [extension].
Thank you for your co-operation.
Yours Truly,
CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS
cc.
Traffic & Parking Services Field Supervisor
S:\TRAFFIClG-180-Q2 -Policies & Procedures\2004\All-Way stop PolicylSample AU-Way Stop Notification.wpd
Proposed Policy and Procedures for
Initiating, Reviewing and Implementing
An All-Way Stop Control
March 22, 2004
APPENDIX E
ALL-WAY STOP REMOVAL
SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE &
NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENT
The City of f~
Niagara Falls'J
Canada ~
-'"
---
Community Services Department
Municipal Works - Traffic & Parking Services
Ed Dujlovlc, P. Eng.
Director of Municipal Works
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel:
Fax:
E-mail:
(905) 356.7521
(905) 353-0651
munwks@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Date
SAMPLE ALL-WAY STOP REMOVAL QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Homeowner/Business Owner:
A review of the intersection of [Street A] and [Street B] is currently being carned out by staff as
requested by [generic - no personnal identification provided]. Io the interim, staff is requesting your
input and comments regarding the traffic control at this intersection. Therefore we are asking that you
assist us by completing the questionnaire and forwarding it back to us. TIris information is strictly
confidential.
Name
Telephone
Address
Please check one:
0
My preference is to maintain the all-way stop control at the intersection of [Street A] and [Street
B].
0
My preference is to remove the stop signs on [Street A], thus making [Street A] a through route
while maintaining the stop condition for motorists on [Street B].
Comments to your above preference would be appreciated:
Your response to the above is important. Please mail your response to the above address or call the
undersigned on or before [Date). You may also reply bye-mail to [E-mail] or by fax to the "Traffic &
Parking Services Section" at 353-0651. Thank you for your assistance regarding this matter.
Yours Truly,
CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS
s:\TRAFFlaG. I 80-02 -Policies & Procedures\2004\A1I- Way Stop PolicylSample Removal Questionnaire. wpd
. PUBLIC NOTICE
~~~.. ALL-WAY
~ STOP REMOVAL
.
CALIFORNIA ROAD at TEXAS STREET
Further to recent traffic studies, this Is to Inform motorists that the stop signs
northbound and southbound on California Road at Texas Street will be
removed on or around Wednesday, April 14, 2004. This will make California
Road a through street. Motorists on Texas Street will still be required to stop at
the posted signs. This Issue was presented and approved by Council at Its
regular meeting on March 8, 2004.
As per approved polley, all emergency services and public/private agencies
have been notified of this revision.
Further Information on this specific Issue may be obtained by calling The Ci1y
of Niagara Falls Traffic & Parking Services Division at (905) 356- 7521 .
Working Together to Serve Our Community