Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-20-2023
AGENDA City Council Meeting 4:00 PM - Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Council Chambers/Zoom App. All Council Meetings are now open to the public in person, in Council Chambers or watched virtually. All electronic meetings can be viewed on this page, the City of Niagara Falls YouTube channel, the City of Niagara Falls Facebook page, along with YourTV Niagara. Page 1. CALL TO ORDER O Canada: Aubrey Quaranto (singing live in Chambers) Land Acknowledgement and Traditional Indigenous Meeting Opening 2. IN CAMERA SESSION OF COUNCIL 2.1. Resolution to go In-Camera (added) June 20 2023 - Resolution to go In-Camera 13 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 3.1. Council Minutes of May 30, 2023 City Council - 30 May 2023 - Minutes - Pdf 14 - 30 4. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST Disclosures of pecuniary interest and a brief explanation thereof will be made for the current Council Meeting at this time. 5. MAYOR'S REPORTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS 6. DEPUTATIONS / PRESENTATIONS All speakers are reminded that they have a maximum of 5 minutes to make their presentation. 6.1. Mayor's Youth Advisory Committee (MYAC) Year-End Deputation (Presentation added) 31 - 45 Page 1 of 936 The Mayor's Youth Advisory Committtee (MYAC) will provide Council with a presentation to include the following: • Scholarship presentation - Nathan Smith, Community Development Coordinator, will recognize the 3 scholarship recipients: •Monica Lica, Jim Mitchinson Scholarship - $1000.00 •Stefan Candeloro, Jim Mitchinson Scholarship - $1000.00 •Tiya Patel, NPEI Scholarship - $1000.00 • Annual Deputation - MYAC Co-Chairs, Maddox Libera and Katie Hutchings, to review MYAC's 2022-2023 school year. Memo 2023 MYAC Scholarship Recipients Presentation - MYAC council deputation 2023 - Maddox and Katie (1) 6.2. Accessibility Advisory Committee - Honouring Mr. and Mrs. Jill and Gary Taylor The Accessibility Advisory Committee at its May 29th, 2023, meeting nominated Mr. & Mrs. Jill and Gary Taylor for the 2023 Patrick Cummings Award. The Taylor Family owned and operated For The Needy Not The Greedy (a non for profit), company which assisted many disabled persons with getting access to a wide variety of mobility devices. Mayor Diodati to present Jill and Gary Taylor with this award. 6.3. Resident, Amelia Upper - regarding Bill 23, More Homes Built Faster Act (Presentation added) Resident Amelia Upper wishes to address Council regarding Bill 23, More Homes Built Faster Act and its effectiveness and seeks to discuss alternative ways to address the housing crisis. Presentation - Bill 23 - Amelia Upper Bill 23 City Council Address - Amelia Upper 46 - 57 7. PLANNING MATTERS 7.1. PBD-2023-34 26T-11-2023-002 & AM-2023-007 Draft Plan of Subdivision-McLeod Meadows 9304 McLeod Road Parts 1 and 2 59R-16846 Lot 181 Twp of Stamford 58 - 112 Page 2 of 936 Applicant: 800460 Ontario Ltd (Fred Costabile) Agent: Upper Canada Consultants (Matt Kernahan) Julie Hannah, Senior Manager of Current Planning, will provide an overview of Report PBD-2023-34. PBD-2023-34 - Pdf Presentation ((Staff) - AM-2023-002 Mcleod Meadows PM Presentation (Agent) - UCC Public Meeting - McLeod Meadows (R1) 7.1 - Comments from Resident 7.2. PBD-2023-36 (Presentation added) AM-2023-005 Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application 7081 McLeod Road Applicant: LivWell Development Group Inc. (Adam Peaker) Agent: NPG Planning Solutions Inc. (Aaron Butler) Alexa Cooper, Planner 2, will provide an overview of Report PBD- 2023-36. PBD-2023-36 - Pdf Presentation (Staff) - AM-2023-005 Presentation (Agent) 7081 McLeod PM PBD-2023-36 - AM-2023-005 - Comments from residents (Redacted) 7.2 - Comments from Resident 113 - 152 7.3. PBD-2023-37 AM-2021-005 Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application 7449 Montrose Road Applicant: 2683421 Ontario Limited Agent: Zelinka Priamo Ltd. (Rob McFarlane) Alexa Cooper, Planner 2, will provide an overview of Report PBD- 2023-37. 153 - 187 Page 3 of 936 PBD-2023-37 - Pdf Presentation (Staff) - AM-2021-010 7449 Montrose Public Meeting Presentation (Agent) - 7449 Montrose (June 20 - 23) 7.3 - Comments from Resident 8. MOTIONS 8. 1. Motion - Niagara Falls Electoral System (correspondence from residents added) Councillor Lococo brought forth the following Motion from the May 30, 2023 Council Meeting: THAT the City of Niagara Falls: -initiate a timeline of a process to review the electoral systems - ward and at large, etc. -review the current population of Niagara Falls and the expected growth and in what areas of the city. -have numerous public consultations - in-person and through surveys. -promote consultation and surveys through in-person, social media channels, website, newspapers, etc... -create an Ad-Hoc Committee and appoint Councillor Lori Lococo as Chair. Aurora-Pros--Cons-Ward--At-Large-Electoral-Systems Ontario Ward Municipalities Watson_and_Associates_Economists_Ltd._City_Council_Composition_and_Wa rd_Boundary_Review_–_Phase_One_Report Ward system letter (from Frances Chandler) to City Clerk June 12 Comments from resident (Judy) Comments from Resident (Linda Manson) Letter from Peter Colosimo Comments from Resident (Heather Gifford) Ward vs at Large Letter June 18, 2023 (Hickey)_Redacted 18 8 - 56 2 9. REPORTS 9.1. CLK-2023-05 563 - 580 Page 4 of 936 Fee Waiver Applications - June 2023 Submissions CLK-2023-05 - Fee Waiver Applications - - Pdf 9.2. F-2023-18 Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Taxes Under Section 357 and 358 of The Municipal Act, 2001 F-2023-18 - Pdf 581 - 584 9.3. L-2023-11 (Updated) Insurance Renewal Report L-2023-11 - Pdf 585 - 587 9.4. MW-2023-18 Budget Amendment for John N Allan Park - Parking Lot and Lighting Improvements MW-2023-18 - Pdf 588 - 591 9.5. L-2023-13 Permanently Close and Declare Surplus of Lands Road Allowance between Lots 2 & 3, Concession 3, Willoughby being Morningstar Road; Niagara Falls Our File No.2023-79 L-2023-13 - Pdf 592 - 596 9.6. PBD-2023-38 26CD-11-2017-003 Extension of 7736-7746 Beaverdams Road Draft Plan of Condominium 7736-7746 Beaverdams Road Applicant: Kamlesh Patel Agent: Quartek Group (Susan Smyth) PBD-2023-38 - Pdf 597 - 606 9.7. CLK-2023-06 (Added) Updates to Council's Code of Conduct CLK-2023-06 - Pdf 607 - 627 Page 5 of 936 9.8. CAO-2023-05 (Added) Park Street Development CAO-2023-05 - Pdf 628 - 632 10. CONSENT AGENDA The consent agenda is a set of reports that could be approved in one motion of council. The approval endorses all of the recommendations contained in each of the reports within the set. The single motion will save time. Prior to the motion being taken, a councillor may request that one or more of the reports be moved out of the consent agenda to be considered separately. 10.1. HR-2023-01 Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Committee It is recommended: That Council consider revising the current committee name (Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Committee), to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Advisory Committee. HR-2023-01 - Pdf 633 - 634 10.2. PBD-2023-35 Development and Housing Monitoring Report and Provincial Reporting It is recommended: 1. THAT Council receive the Quarter 1 Development and Housing Monitoring Report that reviews the status of current development and housing activity in the City for the first quarter of 2023. 2. THAT Council direct staff to forward the housing information to the Province as requested. PBD-2023-35 - Pdf 635 - 649 11. COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMENTS OF THE CITY CLERK The Communications section of the agenda is a set of items listed as correspondence to Council that could be approved in one motion of Council. If Staff feel that more than one recommendation is required, the listed communications items will be grouped accordingly. The single motion per recommendation, if required, will save time. Page 6 of 936 Prior to any motion being taken, a Councillor may request that one or more of the items be lifted for discussion and considered separately. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council approve/support Item #11.1 through to and including Item #11.4. 11.1. Resolution - Town of Fort Erie - Maintenance of Fort Erie Urgent Care Centre Hours of Operation The Municipal Council of the Town of Fort Erie at its Special meeting of June 5, 2023, passed the attached resolution. Recommendation: For Council's Consideration and Support. Ford-Jones-Maintenance of FEUC Hours 650 - 652 11.2. Memo from Planning Regarding: PLC-2023-003, Request for Removal of Part Lot Control Memo to Council - PLC-2023-003 653 11.3. Memo from Planning Regarding: PLC-2023-004, Request for Removal of Part Lot Control Memo to Council - PLC-2022-004 654 11.4. Proclamation Request - World Hepatitis Day - 2023 Niagara Health, on behalf of the Hepatitis C Care Clinic Team, is requesting the City of Niagara Falls to proclaim Friday, July 28, 2023 as World Hepatitis Day in Niagara Falls. Proclamation Request - World Hepatitis Day 2023 - request from Niagara Health Proclamation - World Hepatitis Day 2023 - Niagara Falls 655 - 659 12. COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMENTS OF THE CITY CLERK Page 7 of 936 RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council receive and file for information Item #12.1 through to and including Item #12.2. 12.1. Niagara Region Correspondence (#5 added) Attached is correspondence sent from the Niagara Region regarding the following matters: 1. Niagara Region Report PDS14-2023 - Niagara Region Highlights from the 2021 Census of Population. 2. Niagara Region Report PDS 12-2023 - Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control and Wet Weather Management (WWM) Program - 2023 Funding Recommendations 3. Niagara Region Report PDS 17-2023 - Climate Change Update 4. Niagara Region Report PDS 13-2023 - 2022 Reserve Water and Wastewater Treatment Capabilities 5. Niagara Region Motion - Enhancing Canada's National Adaption Strategy Through a Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Basin Coastal Resiliency Study Recommendation: For the Information of Council. CLK-C 2023-060 PDS 14-2023 - Niagara Region Highlights from the 2021 Census of Population CLK-C 2023-062 PDS 12-2023 - Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control and Wet Weather Management (WWM) Program - 2023 Funding Recommendations CLK-C 2023-058 PDS 17-2023 - Climate Change Update CLK-C 2023-059 PDS 13-2023 - 2022 Reserve Water and Wastewater Treatment Capabilities CLK-C 2023-064 Coastal Resiliency Study 660 - 800 12.2. The Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) Attached is a letter outlining CFIB's request for municipalities across Ontario to implement a construction mitigation program for lengthy projects that cause major disruptions. Recommendation: For the Information of Council. CFIB Construction Mitigation Letter - Niagara Falls 801 - 802 12.3. Comments from resident 803 - 896 Page 8 of 936 Comments from Resident 13. COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMENTS OF THE CITY CLERK 13.1. Noise By-law Exemption - Wedding - Saturday, October 12, 2024 A Niagara Falls resident is requesting a noise by-law exemption on Saturday, October 12, 2024 to allow for outdoor music from 2:00 PM to 1:00 AM at 5041 River Road in Niagara Falls, for an outdoor wedding (approximate number of guests: 70). Recommendation: THAT Council approve the extension of the noise by-law exemption on Saturday, October 12, 2024 to allow for outdoor music from 2:00 PM to 1:00 AM at 5041 River Road in Niagara Falls, for an outdoor wedding. Noise By-law Exemption - Outdoor Wedding request on a property 897 13.2. Memo - Drainage Petition The attached Petition for Drainage Works by Owners - Form 1 - was received in the Clerk's Office on June 6, 2023, by Mr. David White of 5981 Willow Road. Recommendation: THAT Council refer this petition to Staff for review in accordance with the Drainage Act, AND THAT Staff report back at the next Council meeting. Clerk's Memo - Drainage Petition Clerks Memo - Drainage Petition Form 1 - 898 - 900 13.3. Noise By-law Exemption - Taps Brewhouse Taps Brewing Company is seeking Council’s exemption to the Noise By-law for the playing of amplified music during 3 events taking place this year, namely: -Super Heros of Autism Talent Showcase on June 25, 11am to 11pm. -One Big Day Music Festival with Innvitico (supported by Niagara Falls Cultural Grant) on July 22, Noon to midnight. -Rise Against Bullying fundraiser with Just Preston (who was just at the City's Pride flag event) on July 29, 11am to 9pm 901 - 910 Page 9 of 936 Recommendation: THAT Council approve the noise by-law exemptions as outlined above. Noise By-law Exemption - Taps Brewhouse 13.4. Lundy's Lane BIA - 2023 Budget for Council Approval Attached is a copy of the Lundy's Lane BIA 2023 Budget. The budget was approved unanimously by the LLBIA Board at our May 30, 2023 board meeting. Recommendation: THAT Council approve the 2023 budget for the Lundy's Lane BIA. LLBIA 2023 Budget - Final - Approved by LLBIA Board 911 - 913 13.5. Clifton Hill BIA - 2023 Budget Attached is the 2023 budget for the Clifton Hill BIA. Recommendation: THAT Council approve the 2023 budget for the Clifton Hill BIA. Clifton Hill BIA - 2023 Budget 914 14. RESOLUTIONS 14.1. Resolution No. 7 - AM-2023-007 - Minor Changes, No additional notice That subject to subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act, 1990 R.S.O Council deems the change in the zoning by-law minor and exempts the requirement for further written notice. No. 7 - Resolution to Council- AM-2023-007-minor changes no additional notice- PM 915 - 916 15. RATIFICATION OF IN-CAMERA 16. NOTICE OF MOTION/NEW BUSINESS Except as otherwise provided in the Procedural By-law, all Notices of Motion shall be presented, in writing, at a Meeting of Council, but shall not be debated until the next regular Meeting of Council. A Motion may be introduced without notice, if Council, without debate, dispenses with the requirement for notice on the affirmative vote of two- thirds of the Members present. Page 10 of 936 17. BY-LAWS The City Clerk will advise of any additional by-laws or amendments to the by-law listed for Council consideration. 2023- 058. A by-law to designate Block 103, Registered Plan 59M-498, not to be subject to part-lot control (PLC-2023-004). By-law 2023-058 - PLC-2022-004 917 2023- 059. A by-law to designate Blocks104, 115, 118 & 119, Registered Plan 59M-498, not to be subject to part-lot control (PLC-2023- 003). By-law 2023-059 - PLC-2023-003 918 2023- 060. A by-law to provide for the adoption of Amendment No. 156 to the City of Niagara Falls Official Plan (AM-2022-031). By-law 2023-060 - AM-2022-031 - 7085 Morrison Street - OPA 919 - 922 2023- 061. A by-law to amend By-law No. 79-200, to permit the use of the lands for commercial purposes and to permit the construction of a 9 unit commercial building (AM-2022-031). By-law 2023-061 - AM-2022-031 - 7085 Morrison St - ZBA 923 - 925 2023- 062. A by-law to repeal By-law 2002-156 and to amend By-law No. 79-200, to permit the use of the lands for an 8 storey mixed-use building with 3 ground floor commercial units and 77 dwelling units subject to the removal of a holding (H) symbol (AM-2022- 018). By-law 2023-062 - AM-2022-018 - 5687 Ferry St - ZBA 926 - 930 2023- 063. A by-law to declare PIN 64251-0036 (LT), Road Allowance between Lots 2 & 3, Concession 3, Willoughby, being Morningstar Road, in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara, as surplus. 931 Page 11 of 936 By-law 2023-063 - Declare Surplus 2023- 064. A by-law to permanently close part of a highway. By-law 2023-064 - Permanently Close Unopened Road Allowance 932 2023- 065. A by-law to amend By-law No. 2002-081, being a by-law to appoint City employees, agents and third parties for the enforcement of provincial or municipal by-laws. By-law 2023-065 - Appointment of Inspectors and By-law officers 933 - 935 2023- 066. A by-law to adopt, ratify and confirm the actions of City Council at its meeting held on the 20th day of June, 2023. By-law 2023-066 - 06 20 23 Confirming By-law 936 18. ADJOURNMENT Page 12 of 936 The City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Resolution June 20, 2023 Moved by: Seconded by: WHEREAS all meetings of Council are to be open to the public; and WHEREAS the only time a meeting or part of a meeting may be closed to the public is if the subject matter falls under one of the exceptions under s. 239(2) of the Municipal Act. WHEREAS on June 20, 2023, Niagara Falls City Council will be holding Closed Meetings as permitted under s. 239 (2) of the Municipal Act, namely; (a) The security of the property of the municipality or local board; (b) personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that on June 20, 2023 Niagara Falls City Council will go into a closed meeting to consider matters that fall under section 239 (2) (a) to discuss the security of the property of the municipality with regards to insurance coverage and matters that fall under section 239 (2) (b) regarding a personal matter involving the CAO. AND The Seal of the Corporation be hereto affixed. Carried Unanimously WILLIAM G. MATSON JAMES M. DIODATI CITY CLERK MAYOR Page 13 of 936 MINUTES City Council Meeting 4:00 PM - Tuesday, May 30, 2023 Council Chambers/Zoom App. The City Council Meeting of the City of Niagara Falls was called to order on Tuesday, May 30, 2023, at 4:19 PM, in the Council Chambers, with the following members present: COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Jim Diodati, Councillor Tony Baldinelli, Councillor Wayne Campbell, Councillor Lori Lococo, Councillor Ruth-Ann Nieuwesteeg, Councillor Mona Patel, Councillor Victor Pietrangelo, Councillor Mike Strange, Councillor Wayne Thomson STAFF PRESENT: Jason Burgess, Bill Matson, Mat Bilodeau, Tiffany Clark, Nidhi Punyarthi, Chief Jo Zambito, Andrew Bryce, Kent Schachowskoj, Kathy Moldenhauer (Present in Chambers) 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 4:19 PM. 2. IN CAMERA SESSION OF COUNCIL 2.1. Resolution to go In-Camera Moved by Councillor Mona Patel Seconded by Councillor Tony Baldinelli THAT Council enter into an In-Camera session. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Wayne Campbell was absent from vote). 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 3.1. Council Minutes of May 9, 2023 Moved by Councillor Wayne Thomson Seconded by Councillor Mike Strange THAT Council approve the minutes of the May 9, 2023 meeting as presented. Carried Unanimously 4. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST Page 1 of 17 Page 14 of 936 a) Councillor Mike Strange declared a conflict of interest to Item #12.1 - Noise By- law Exemption - 12th Annual Heaters Heroes Run for Children as the Councillor belongs to the Falls View Hose Brigade. b) Councillor Victor Pietrangelo declared a conflict of interest to the following items on the agenda: • Item #8.1 - PBD-2023-28 - as Councillor's parents own property within the notification zone. • Item #8.2 - CAO-2023-02 as Councillor owns property which can be affected. • Item #8.9 - PBD-2023-32 - as Councillor's parents own property which can be affected. c) Councillor Mona Patel declared a conflict of interest to Item #7.1 - PBD-2023- 029, as Councillor's spouse's place of employment will be affected by the development. d) Councillor Tony Baldinelli declared a conflict of interest to Item #12.1, Noise By-law Exemption - 12th Annual Heaters Heroes Run for Children, as the Councillor is a member of the Falls View Hose Brigade. 5. MAYOR'S REPORTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS a) Mayor Diodati extended condolences to the following: • Kathi Dolch, mother-in-law of Kira Dolch, General Manager of Planning. b) Mayor Diodati mentioned the following city events: Camp Molly •Also attended by Councillors Patel and Nieuwesteeg Key to the City – Trish Stratus •Also attended by Councillor Nieuwesteeg, Councillor Patel and Councillor Baldinelli Bahdi Boxing Match •Attended by Mayor Diodati, along with Councillor Strange Public Works Staff Appreciation Week BBQ •Attended by Mayor Diodati, CAO, Jason Burgess and General Manager of Municipal Works, Erik Nickel. NF Rotary Club’s Paul Harris Fellowship Award Presentation •Attended by Councillors Nieuwesteeg and Patel 20th Edition of 40U40 Award Ceremony •Also attended by Councillor Strange, Councillor Patel and Councillor Nieuwesteeg Councillor Representation – (catching up) Page 2 of 17 Page 15 of 936 Councillor Patel attended the following events: • Royal Canadian Legion Homeless Veterans Information Session • Niagara Region Volleyball League Opening Ceremonies • Knights of Columbus Meet and Greet • United Way Period Promise Campaign Kick-Off • Mountainview Homes Lemon Twist Councillor Strange attended the following events: • Niagara Spring Classic • Walker Industries Day of Action on Litter • Grand Opening of Helenrie's Kitchen • Mother Earth Day Councillor Pietrangelo attended the following event: • Mother Earth Day Councillor Lococo attended the following events: • Circle of Friends 10th Anniversary • Lincoln-Niagara District Women's Institute AGM • Miyen Coffee Diversity Festival Grand Openings & Business Happenings [photos shown for each] •Main Street Urgent Care oAttended by Councillors Baldinelli, Strange, Patel and Nieuwesteeg •Spicy Cocina Chicken Hut oAttended by Councillors Patel and Nieuwesteeg •Ren’s Asian Restaurant oAttended by Councillors Patel, Nieuwesteeg and Pietrangelo Flag Raisings [photos shown for each] • 13th Annual Pride Flag Raising [photo] •Also attended by Councillors Lococo, Baldinelli, Nieuwesteeg and Patel National Accessibility Awareness Week [photo] •Also attended by Councillors Thomson, Patel, Baldinelli, Nieuwesteeg, Lococo, Patel, Campbell, Pietrang c) The next Council Meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, June 20, 2023. Councillor Wayne Campbell brought forth his concerns about the lack of handicapped parking spots within the city. Direction to Staff: That Staff undertake an investigation on increasing the number of handicapped parking spaces within the City of Niagara Falls and to report back to Council. Page 3 of 17 Page 16 of 936 Councillor Victor Pietrangelo provided some further background and detail around Mother Earth Day (the tree give-away). Direction to Staff: Staff to follow-up on partnering with a nursery (ie. public entity - school, Vineland Research etc...) for tree supply. Direction to Staff: Looking for City staff to support the Environmental Action Committee (EAC - formerly the Park in the City Committee) to support the tree give-away. Direction to Staff: Consideration of converting a surplus fire truck for a watering truck (tanker or pumper). 6. DEPUTATIONS / PRESENTATIONS 6.1. R&C-2023-08 Allister Young Arts & Culture Endowment Fund 2023 Recipient Clark Bernat, Senior Manager of Culture and Kim Van Stygeren, Cultural Development Coordinator, presented the award to the 2023 recipient, Eve Atoms. The Allister Young Arts & Culture Endowment Fund is awarded annually to one Niagara Falls resident in any creative arts field who is graduating high school and has accumulated substantial volunteer hours in the arts. Moved by Councillor Mike Strange Seconded by Councillor Ruth-Ann Nieuwesteeg THAT Council acknowledge Eve Atoms as the 2023 Allister Young Arts & Culture Endowment Fund recipient. Carried Unanimously 7. PLANNING MATTERS Councillor Mona Patel left Chambers at 5:35 PM as she had declared a conflict to Item #7.1. 7.1. PBD-2023-029 26T-11-2023-001 & AM-2023-002 Draft Plan of Subdivision 8218, 8228, and 8547 Grassy Brook Road Applicant: Empire (Grand Niagara) Project GP Inc. Agent: Armstrong Planning I Project Management The public meeting commenced at 5:36 PM. Julie Hannah, Senior Manager of Current Planning, provided an overview of the report PBD-2023-029. Page 4 of 17 Page 17 of 936 Resident Leslie Laan, of 5525 Reixinger Road, Niagara Falls, ON, L2G 0S1 cited a few concerns regarding environmental (ie the migration of wildlife) and safety issues due to the number of increased residents (3000-5000) involved in this development. Stephen Armstrong, of Armstrong Planning, spoke in support of the application, stating the company's commitment to the affordable housing component. The Public Meeting was closed at 6:57 PM. Moved by Councillor Wayne Thomson Seconded by Councillor Mike Strange 1. That the application to amend the City’s Official Plan be approved, subject to the policies outlined in this report and in Schedule 3; 2. That the application to amend the Zoning By-law be approved, subject to the regulations outlined in Schedule 4; 3. That the amending zoning by-law include a Holding (H) provision to require an Overall Servicing Strategy, an updated Land Use Compatibility Study, and an Environmental Strategy be submitted for each respective phase of development to the satisfaction of the Niagara Region; 4. That the Plan of Subdivision be draft approved subject to the conditions in the attached Appendix A; 5. That the notice of decision include a statement that public input has been received, considered, and has informed the decision of Council; 6. That the Mayor or designate be authorized to sign the draft plan as "approved" 20 days after notice of Council’s decision has been given as required by the Planning Act, provided no appeals of the decision have been lodged; 7. That draft approval be given for three years, after which approval will lapse unless an extension is requested by the developer and granted by Council; and, 8. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Subdivision Agreement and any required documents to allow for the future registration of the Subdivision when all matters are addressed to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Patel declared a conflict) 8. REPORTS Councillor Patel returned to Chambers at 7:01 PM upon conclusion of Item #7.1. Councillor Pietrangelo left Chambers at 7:02 PM as he had declared a conflict of interest to Item #8.1. 8.1. PBD-2023-28 Grassy Brook Secondary Plan Phase 1: Existing Conditions and Background Review Page 5 of 17 Page 18 of 936 Kelly Martel, of Dillon Consulting, presented the findings of Phase 1: Existing Conditions and Background Review for the Grassy Brook Secondary Plan. John Doherty, Legal Counsel representing clients of properties 7047 Reixinger Road and 5789 Lyons Creek Road, spoke requesting that Council reject Staff's recommendation or to consider the proposed PPS changes. Moved by Councillor Wayne Thomson Seconded by Councillor Mike Strange 1. THAT Council receive the Phase 1: Existing Conditions and Background Review for the Grassy Brook Secondary Plan attached as Appendix 1; and 2. THAT Council direct Staff to proceed to Phase 2 of the Grassy Brook Secondary Plan Project. Carried (Councillor Pietrangelo declared a conflict and Councillor Lococo was opposed to the vote). 8.2. CAO-2023-02 Update and Clarification on Bed and Breakfasts By-laws and Short Term Rental Use Linda Manson, of 4732 Cookman Crescent, spoke in opposition of the staff recommendations citing concerns of impact on rental housing and hotels, steering tourists away from hotel accommodations. Also cited concerns of illegal vacation units and that this will create new problems. Council previously provided direction to limit licensed vacation rental units (VRUs) to commercial tourist areas only and permit licensed bed and breakfasts (B&B) within various commercial and residential zoned areas within the City. Some homeowners raised concerns about how to interpret the motion and the intent of the direction. To clarify recent by-law and licensing changes, Council approved the request from staff to revisit the bed and breakfast by-law to permit owner-occupied short-term rental units in residential areas of the City. CAO, Jason Burgess, provided a summary of the report. He spoke of balancing the rights of property owners and the rights of neighbours, citing the biggest issue is safety. You have to be a legal vacation rental and you have to be owner-occupied. The intent is that long term, we can create more rental units and this will address the affordability issue. This is to help those residents whom can operate within the boundaries of the policy. The vast majority won't qualify for this. The hotel association understand that this is a small percentage. Enforcement would have to verify that it is owner-occupied (same rules would apply as our current B&B). Could increase affordability for the student (don't have to rent it for the 4 months) and it could increase affordability for the owner. This may entice new builds to integrate this option into their Page 6 of 17 Page 19 of 936 build. The goal is to educate the public (advertisements) and enforce, giving them options so that they may be able to comply. Direction to Staff: A request from Council to the Province to ensure Vacation Rental Platforms only advertise licensed units and asking the Ministries in Ontario to mandate this. Mayor Diodati left the meeting at 8:25 PM. Councillor Mike Strange, was Acting Mayor at 8:25 PM. Mayor Diodati returned to the meeting at 8:36 PM. Moved by Councillor Ruth-Ann Nieuwesteeg Seconded by Councillor Mike Strange 1. That Council RECEIVE this report for information. 2. That Council DIRECT staff to consider and report back on the necessary by- law and licensing changes to the bed and breakfast by-law to permit owner occupied short-term rental units in residential areas of the City. Carried (Councillor Lococo was opposed; Councillor Victor Pietrangelo declared a conflict of interest; Councillor Tony Baldinelli was absent from the vote). 8.3. Councillor Pietrangelo returned to the meeting at 8:53 PM. CAO-2023-03 Hospice Development Ad-Hoc Committee Council identified the desire to develop a Hospice in Niagara Falls in late 2022 and directed staff to undertake a Request for Information (ROI) on site selection and operations of a Hospice facility. In the early stages of developing the plan for a Hospice, staff have identified the need for significant assistance in areas including fundraising, building and design, operator selection and long-term organizational support. Moved by Councillor Ruth-Ann Nieuwesteeg Seconded by Councillor Mike Strange THAT Council APPOINT Mayor Jim Diodati and Councillor Pietrangelo to work with staff to provide input to staff with regards to (i) Forming a Hospice Ad-Hoc Committee or Committees, (ii) Assist staff with site selection approach. Carried Unanimously Page 7 of 17 Page 20 of 936 8.4. F-2023-15 2023 Property Tax Rates Moved by Councillor Wayne Thomson Seconded by Councillor Tony Baldinelli THAT Council approve the 2023 Property Tax Rates. Carried Unanimously 8.5. F-2023-17 Final Tax Notice Due Dates for Residential, Pipeline, Farmland and Managed Forest Assessment Classes Council approved June 29 and September 29 as the 2023 Final Due Dates for the Residential, Pipeline, Farmland and Managed Forest Assessment Classes and August 31 and October 31 as the 2023 Final Due Dates for the Commercial, Industrial and Multi-residential Assessment Classes. The City of Niagara Falls is responsible for billing and collecting property taxes on all assessable properties within the municipality. These annual billings include the annual taxes for the City, for the Region of Niagara and for the appropriate local school boards. Due dates for property taxes are set to coincide with the quarterly levy payments made to the Region and the school boards. Moved by Councillor Mike Strange Seconded by Councillor Victor Pietrangelo 1. THAT June 29 and September 29 be approved as the 2023 Final Due Dates for the Residential, Pipeline, Farmland and Managed Forest Assessment Classes. 2. THAT August 31 and October 31 be approved as the 2023 Final Due Dates for the Commercial, Industrial and Multi-residential Assessment Classes. Carried Unanimously 8.6. MW-2023-16 F.H. Leslie Park Playground Replacement Due to major safety concerns with the slide and turf surface, the play structure at F.H. Leslie was unexpectedly closed and removed in early May 2023. The play structure provides a very important park amenity for the Valley Way neighbourhood. Moved by Councillor Mike Strange Seconded by Councillor Victor Pietrangelo Page 8 of 17 Page 21 of 936 1. THAT Niagara Falls City Council approve a 2023 Capital Budget amendment of $165,000, funded by unallocated special purpose reserves, for the expedited replacement of the playground at F.H. Leslie Park; and further, 2. THAT Council delegate the General Manager of Municipal Works authority to proceed with a single-source procurement for supply and install of play structure equipment from Open Space Solutions Inc. and for supply and install of turf surfacing from Toronto Artificial Grass per their respective quotations. Carried Unanimously 8.7. MW-2023-17 Children's Memorial Walkway Memorial Bench Program - Custom Bench Purchase Moved by Councillor Victor Pietrangelo Seconded by Councillor Mona Patel 1. THAT City Council direct staff to single source contract with Hall Ironworks Inc. for the fabrication of 10 custom memorial benches; and furthermore, that Staff look at different pricing options and to report back on the butterfly fundraising options. Carried Unanimously 8.8. PBD-2023-31 26T-11-2019-003 Extension of St. Thomas More Draft Plan of Subdivision 6642 St. Thomas More Drive Applicant: 1956662 Ontario Inc. Agent: Corbett Land Strategies Inc. (Candice Hood) Moved by Councillor Victor Pietrangelo Seconded by Councillor Ruth-Ann Nieuwesteeg THAT Council grant a 1-year extension to draft plan approval of subdivision with a new lapsing date of June 19th, 2024. Carried Unanimously 8.9. Councillor Pietrangelo left the meeting at 9:10 PM, as he had a conflict to Item #8.9. Councillor Nieuwesteeg left the meeting. PBD-2023-32 New 2023 Provincial Planning Statement Council reviewed a report which summarized major changes to the 2023 Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) and discussed implications for the City of Niagara Falls. The 2023 PPS impacts several of the City’s strategic priorities, Page 9 of 17 Page 22 of 936 including Diverse and Affordable Housing, Vibrant and Diverse Economy and Healthy, Safe, Livable Communities. Moved by Councillor Mike Strange Seconded by Councillor Tony Baldinelli 1. THAT Council receive PBD-2023-32 for information. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Pietrangelo declared a conflict and Councillor Nieuwesteeg was absent from the vote). 8.10. Councillor Pietrangelo returned to the meeting at 9:24 PM. Councillor Campbell left the meeting and did not return. PBD-2023-33 Exemption to Plan of Condominium 26CD-2023-001 7277 Wilson Crescent Applicant: Build Up Real Development Co. Inc. (Priscilla Facey) Agent: NPG Planning Solutions (Aaron Butler) Moved by Councillor Wayne Thomson Seconded by Councillor Mike Strange 1. THAT Council exempts the condominium description from approvals required under Section 51 and Section 51.1 of the Planning Act for lands municipally known as 7277 Wilson Crescent, as identified in Schedule 1, pursuant to Sections 9(3)(b) and 9(7) of the Condominium Act; 2. THAT the Certificate of Exemption, required to be issued by the City under Sections 9(3)(b) and 9(7) of the Condominium Act, be conditional on submission to the City of the final condominium plan for compliance review with the registered site plan agreement prior to registration; and 3. THAT Council pass the by-law on tonight’s agenda. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Nieuwesteeg and Councillor Campbell was absent from vote). 9. CONSENT AGENDA 9.1. L-2023-10 Declare Surplus of Lands Part of Blocks L and M, Plan M33 Land Exchange - Stamford Lions Park Our File No. 2022-59 Moved by Councillor Victor Pietrangelo Seconded by Councillor Wayne Thomson Page 10 of 17 Page 23 of 936 1. THAT in the event that Council determines that it is in the public interest to do so, that Part of Blocks L and M on Plan M33, hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Lands", as shown as Part 3 on the draft Plan attached as Schedule "A", be declared surplus to the City's needs so that they can be transferred to 2717981 Ontario Inc. in exchange for lands and additional compensation as previously approved by Council and outlined in this report. 2. THAT the City Solicitor and Chief Administrative Officer, or their designate, are authorized to execute all documentation and take whatever steps necessary to carry out Recommendation 1. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Nieuwesteeg was absent for the vote). 9.2. MW-2023-15 Clifton Hill & Murray Hill – Holiday Road Closures Moved by Councillor Victor Pietrangelo Seconded by Councillor Wayne Thomson THAT Council direct staff to retain a traffic control contractor and the Niagara Regional Police to close Clifton Hill and Murray Hill on the dates detailed in this report. THAT Council approve the additional funding required to retain the Niagara Regional Police and implement the traffic management plans to an upset limit of $115,500, to be funded by the Transportation Services operating budget. THAT Council approve and direct staff to fund any year-end unfavourable variances resulting from this additional unbudgeted cost pressure from the Tax Rate Stabilization Special Purpose Reserve. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Nieuwesteeg was absent for the vote). 9.3. PBD-2023-30 Matters Arising from the Municipal Heritage Committee 2023 Designated Property Grants Moved by Councillor Victor Pietrangelo Seconded by Councillor Wayne Thomson 1. THAT Council approve the proposed alteration and a grant in the amount of $5,000 to assist with the cost of the restoration of seven (7) pairs of wood shutters on the front (east) elevation of the Danner – Sherk House at 12549 Niagara River Parkway as it will not alter the reasons for designation and will assist in maintaining the original appearance of the house. 2. THAT Council approve the proposed alterations and a grant in the amount of $5,000 to assist with the cost of the foundation repair and the restoration of the front verandah on the McMurray House at 5257 River Page 11 of 17 Page 24 of 936 Road as it will not alter the reasons for designation and will assist in the overall preservation of the house with the following conditions: a. The loose mortar in the foundation be brushed out and no pressure washing should be used; b. The repointing of the foundation is to be done with a mortar mix of 1:4:8 (Cement: Lime: Sand); c. A spray-on waterproof membrane, below grade, would be recommended; d. The restoration of the eaves and downspouts is also recommended to address water penetration problems. e. Prior to final approval of grant the second quotation be received by the City. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Nieuwesteeg and Councillor Campbell was absent for the vote). 10. COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMENTS OF THE CITY CLERK 10.1. Flag-Raising Request - Nikola Tesla Day The Director of the Nikola Tesla Day Festival is requesting the City of Niagara Falls to support and participate in raising the flag of Nikola Tesla at City Hall on Thursday, July 6th, 2023. The Nikola Tesla Day Festival is an event dedicated to honouring the incredible contributions of Nikola Tesla to science, technology, and society. The festival is scheduled to take place on July 9th, 2023, 6 pm -11 pm at Queen Victoria Park, Niagara Falls. 10.2. Proclamation Request - NiagaraGives Day Attached is a request for Council to proclaim Thursday, June 15, 2023 as "NiagaraGives Day" within the City of Niagara Falls. NiagaraGives, the Giving Tuesday Community Movement representing Niagara Falls and the Niagara Region, is celebrating its 2nd ann iversary on June 15, 2023. NiagaraGives was first established in the City of Niagara Falls with the mission of bringing the global GivingTuesday movement back to Niagara and its 12 municipalities. The NiagaraGives movement has helped to inspire community generosity and volunteerism in many ways, and at a time when charities and non-profits are seeing vast increases in people needing assistance. 10.3. Proclamation Request - Trailer Park Boys Day Attached is a request for Council to declare Friday, June 9, 2023 as "Trailer Park Boys Day" in Niagara Falls, to help awareness for mental health and PTSD through Cracked Armour, a not-for-profit organization. This organization is strongly supported by Canadian celebrities, the Trailer Park Boys. 10.4. Opiod Crisis in our Communities and Municipalities The National Chronic Pain Society is asking the City of Niagara Falls to support the motion the the "Government of Ontario maintain OHIP coverage Page 12 of 17 Page 25 of 936 for chronic pain treatments and continue to provide much-needed care for the people of Ontario." Recommendation: THAT Council support the request. Moved by Councillor Wayne Thomson Seconded by Councillor Mona Patel That Council approve Item #10.1 through to and including Item #10.4. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Nieuwesteeg and Councillor Campbell was absent for the vote). 11. COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMENTS OF THE CITY CLERK 11.1. Resolution - City of Cambridge - Highway Traffic Act Amendments Attached is motion passed by the Council of the Corporation of the City of Cambridge at its Council Meeting of May 9, 2023 regarding the Highway Traffic Act Amendments. 11.2. Resolution - Township of Bonfield - Supporting Municipality of Waterloo's motion to Protect the privacy of candidates and donors on publicly available forms - Attached is a resolution of support for the Municipality of Waterloo from the Township of Bonfield calling on the Minister of Affairs and Housing for the Province of Ontario to protect the privacy of candidates and donors on publicly available forms. 11.3. Resolution - United Counties of Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry (SDG) - Bill 97 Attached is a resolution passed by the Council of the United Counties of Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry at its May 15, 2023 meeting. 11.4. Niagara Region Correspondence Attached is correspondence sent from the Niagara Region regarding the following matters: 1. Niagara Region Report CSD 22-2023 - 2023 Property Tax Policy, Ratios and Rates 11.5. Resolution - Town of Grimsby - Mental Health, Addiction and Housing Affordability Attached is a resolution passed at the Town of Grimsby's Council meeting on May 15, 2023 pertaining to a a call for action as it relates to the crisis on mental health, addiction and Housing Affordability. 11.6. Comments from resident Moved by Councillor Wayne Thomson Seconded by Councillor Ruth-Ann Nieuwesteeg Page 13 of 17 Page 26 of 936 THAT Council receive and file for information Item #11.1 through to and including Item #11.6. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Campbell was absent from vote). 12. COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMENTS OF THE CITY CLERK 12.1. Noise By-law Exemption - 12th Annual Heaters Heroes Run for Children The Heaters Heroes Committee along with the Fallsview Hose Brigade are requesting that Council grant an exemption to the City's Noise-By-law until 11:00 PM on Saturday, September 9, 2023, for the purpose of playing music for their annual event taking place at Oakes Park. Recommendation: That Council grant an exemption to the City's Noise-By-law until 11:00 PM on Saturday, September 9, 2023, for the purpose of playing music for their annual event taking place at Oakes Park. Moved by Councillor Wayne Thomson Seconded by Councillor Victor Pietrangelo THAT Council grant an exemption to the City's Noise-By-law until 11:00 PM on Saturday, September 9, 2023, for the purpose of playing music for their annual event taking place at Oakes Park. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Baldinelli and Councillor Strange declared a conflict and Councillor Campbell was absent from the vote). 12.2. Resolution - City of Welland - Homelessness Attached is a motion approved by the City of Welland City Council. Recommendation: That Council support the resolution from the City of Welland and offer further support by circulating a copy of the Niagara Falls motion to all Niagara area municipalities, the Office of the Premier of Ontario, the Federal Minister of Housing and Diversity and Inclusion, Niagara Area MPPs and MPs, the Ontario Solicitor General, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. Moved by Councillor Victor Pietrangelo Seconded by Councillor Mona Patel THAT Council support the resolution from the City of Welland and offer further support by circulating a copy of the Niagara Falls motion to all Niagara area municipalities, the Office of the Premier of Ontario, the Federal Minister of Housing and Diversity and Inclusion, Niagara Area MPPs and MPs, the Ontario Solicitor General, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Campbell was absent from the vote). 12.3. Memo from City Clerk - Matters Arising from the Diversity & Inclusion Committee Page 14 of 17 Page 27 of 936 Attached is a motion that was passed by the Diversity & Inclusion Committee at a recent meeting regarding the Land Acknowledgement at Council. Recommendation: That Council refer the matter to staff to consider options for the Land Acknowledgement at Council Meetings and other City run events, as well as when and where the acknowledgement appears on an agenda and report back to Council. Moved by Councillor Victor Pietrangelo Seconded by Councillor Lori Lococo That Council refer the matter to staff to consider options for the Land Acknowledgement at Council Meetings and other City run events, as well as when and where the acknowledgement appears on an agenda and report back to Council. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Campbell was absent from vote). 12.4. Niagara Falls Supper Market A request is being made of Council to declare the 2023 Niagara Falls Supper Market as a community event to assist with obtaining a Special Occasion Permit from the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario. Recommendation: That Council declare the 2023 Niagara Falls Supper Market, taking place at Fireman’s Park, August 2, 9, 16, 23, and 30, 2023 as an event of municipal significance in the City of Niagara Falls in order to assist with obtaining a Special Occasion Permit from the AGCO. Moved by Councillor Tony Baldinelli Seconded by Councillor Wayne Thomson THAT Council declare the 2023 Niagara Falls Supper Market, taking place at Fireman’s Park, August 2, 9, 16, 23, and 30, 2023 as an event of municipal significance in the City of Niagara Falls in order to assist with obtaining a Special Occasion Permit from the AGCO. Carried Unanimously (Councillor Campbell was absent from vote). 13. RATIFICATION OF IN-CAMERA None to report. 14. NOTICE OF MOTION/NEW BUSINESS a) Notice of Motion - Niagara Falls Electoral System Councillor Lococo brought forth the following Notice of Motion: THAT the City of Niagara Falls: • initiate a timeline of a process to review the electoral systems - ward and at large, etc. Page 15 of 17 Page 28 of 936 • review the current population of Niagara Falls and the expected growth and in what areas of the city. • have numerous public consultations - in-person and through surveys. • promote consultation and surveys through in-person, social media channels, website, newspapers, etc... • create an Ad-Hoc Committee and appoint Councillor Lori Lococo as Chair. b) Agenda Notice to Public Direction to Staff: To have Communications send out a notice of items on the agenda on the Friday prior to a Council meeting. 15. BY-LAWS 2023- 050. A by-law to exempt the property municipally known as 7277 Wilson Crescent from the requirements for approval of condominium descriptions under Sections 51 and 51.1 of the Planning Act. 2023- 051. A by-law to declare PIN 64250-0049 (LT), Part Lot 1, Concession 3, Crowland, being a given road known as Cook’s Mills Road (aka County Road No. 11), lying between Schisler Road & Road Allowance between Concession 3 & 4, in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara, as surplus. 2023- 052. A by-law to permanently close a highway. 2023- 053. A by-law to amend By-law No. 2002-081, being a by-law to appoint City employees, agents and third parties for the enforcement of provincial or municipal by-laws. 2023- 054. A by-law to declare Vacant Land between 3846 Portage Road and 3943 Orlando Drive, being Part of Blocks L and M on Plan 33 being Part 3 on a draft Reference Plan, as surplus. 2023- 055. A by-law to amend By-law No. 89-2000, being a by-law to regulate parking and traffic on City Roads. (Parking Meter Zones, Limited Parking). 2023- 056. A by-law to set and levy the rates of taxation for City purposes, for Regional purposes, and for Education purposes for the year 2023. 2023- 057. A by-law to adopt, ratify and confirm the actions of City Council at its meeting held on the 30th day of May, 2023. Page 16 of 17 Page 29 of 936 16. ADJOURNMENT a) Adjournment Moved by Councillor Wayne Thomson Seconded by Councillor Victor Pietrangelo THAT Council adjourn the meeting at 9:36 PM. Carried Unanimously Mayor City Clerk Page 17 of 17 Page 30 of 936 A Great City … For Generations To Come RECREATION & CULTURE Inter-Departmental Memo To: Mayor Diodati and Members of Council From: Maddox Libera & Katie Hutchings, MYAC Co-Chairs Mayor’s Youth Advisory Committee Date: June 20, 2023 Re: 2023 MYAC Scholarship Recipients On behalf of the Niagara Falls Mayor’s Youth Advisory Committee (MYAC), we would like to inform the Mayor and Council that the following students were selected to receive 2023 Scholarships Presented by MYAC: • Monica Lica, Jim Mitchinson Scholarship - $1000.00 • Stefan Candeloro, Jim Mitchinson Scholarship - $1000.00 • Tiya Patel, NPEI Scholarship - $1000.00 The Scholarships presented by MYAC recognize Niagara Falls students who have demonstrated leadership and involvement in their community and/or school throughout their secondary career. MYAC is extremely proud to honour the memory of Jim Mitchinson through the Jim Mitchinson Scholarship. Jim was dedicated to giving back to the City of Niagara Falls throughout his life and embodied the values of leadership and involvement in the community. Jim Mitchinson’s son, Tom, has generously funded the scholarship in his honour. In 2021, MYAC was able to expand the scholarship offering thanks to a generous contribution from NPEI. To be eligible for the scholarships students must be Niagara Falls residents, in their graduating year, attending a school in Niagara Falls, have a minimum average of 75% and demonstrate leadership and involvement in their community and/or school At a special MYAC meeting, held on May 3, 2023, the Mayor’s Youth Advisory Team reviewed the 2022 applications and voted. The following motion was made: IT WAS MOVED by Maddox Libera, seconded by Katie Hutchings, THAT Monica Lica and Stefan Candeloro be the recipients of the 2023 Jim Mitchinson Scholarship ($1000.00 each) and that Tiya Patel be the recipient of the 2023 NPEI Scholarship ($1000.00) presented by the Mayor’s Youth Advisory Committee. Motion Carried Page 31 of 936 A Great City … For Generations To Come Recipient Bios: Monica Lica, St. Michael Catholic Secondary School Nearing the end of her final year at St. Michael Catholic Secondary School, Monica Lica is an ambitious young woman who values leadership and community service above all else. In her tenth grade, Monica joined her school’s Key Club and quickly found her calling in volunteering and altruism. Her first initiative within the Key Club was participating in a virtual speed-friending event with the residents of a local old age home, which was glowingly successful in boosting the moods of the residents who were isolated during COVID-19 lockdowns. After only a few months, Monica had become so inspired by her Key Club’s efforts to help the community around her that she accepted a higher role of responsibility and became the Club’s bulletin editor. The next year, she was elevated to the role of President of the Club and found great gratification in fostering the next generation of mindful, compassionate leaders. Outside of the Key Club, Monica also competed on St. Michael’s rowing team for three years, and though she has since left the team, she still stays involved in the rowing community by volunteering at regattas. Furthermore, for the past two years Monica has served as a lifeguard at Great Wolf Lodge’s water park, working diligently and participating in work events such as car wash fundraisers for cancer research. In the fall, Monica will begin a new adventure at Toronto Metropolitan University, where she will take new steps towards adulthood and self - discovery. Her drive, passion for community service, an d enjoyment of leadership roles and assisting the public will undoubtedly guide her into a bright and fulfilling future. Stefan Candeloro, St. Paul Catholic Secondary School Stefan Candeloro, a senior at St. Paul Catholic Secondary School, is driven, independent, and will never allow anyone to sway him away from what he believes is right. Some of his numerous academic accomplishments and responsibilities include tutoring Math and Science to his peers through his school’s Student Academic Assistance Program, sitting as the student-chair of the Saint Paul Parent Council, acting as a judge for the Niagara Science and Engineering Fair, and being awarded the March 2023 Student of the Month award. Furthermore, he is also St. Paul’s current Student Council President, and spends the majority of his free time tutoring students in the library after school, connecting the gap between students and parents, and planning entire school events such as the Semi-Formal and Grade 9 Orientation. Aside from academic achievements, Stefan is also a renowned student-athlete, and has played on St. Paul’s tennis, volleyball, hockey, soccer, squash, curling, and badminton teams and was named the Christian Males Athlete of the Year in his 11th grade as well as winning multiple provincial-level medals competing in these sports for his schools. On top of this all, Stefan holds a part-time job as a busser at Brasa Brazilian Steakhouse and regularly volunteers with Project Share and as a Program Instructor and Camp Leader for the Niagara Falls Soccer Club. In his numerous roles and positions, Stefan has learned to appreciate the importance of role modeling strong, confident, and kind leadership. This Page 32 of 936 A Great City … For Generations To Come summer, Stefan has multiple soccer coaching volunteer positions lined up, and he will be attending McMaster University in September to study Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences. He is already researching volunteer opportunities at his new school, including working with the Geriatric Rehab Unit at McMaster’s Hospital, and has no plans to stop unapologetically being himself and contributing to the community around him. Tiya Patel, Stamford Collegiate There is not much more important to Tiya Patel, grade 12 student at Stamford Collegiate, than empathy. Tiya strongly believes that empathy is what makes a good leader, and she puts this belief into practice by volunteering with multiple organizations, such as St. John’s Ambulance, the Canadian Blood Services, and with a local homeless shelter in order to assist the less fortunate individuals in her community. As a daughter of immigrants, Tiya also places much personal emphasis on education accessibility and the well-being of her fellow students and works diligently to ensure her peers receive equitable opportunities and support. She is a part of her school’s student council, as well as sitting as one of three Student Trustees for the DSBN. As well, she collaborated with the DSBN Equity and Inclusion team to implement an E&I club at each local school for students to join and have their voices heard and appreciated. In her opinion, the most impactful contribution Tiya has made was through negotiating with DSBN's catering service to serve food options that are both healthy and culturally diverse. The efforts of her and her fellow Student Trustees have raised enough concern that the DSBN has begun to scrutinize their own culinary programs at each secondary school so they can make changes to ensure that students are fed, and fed well. In September, Tiya will be attending McMaster University and already has plans to join their Student Union as a First Year Representative of her program as well as their Emergency First Response Team. Overall, Tiya is excited to continue making a positive impact in her community through her ongoing commitment to service and advocacy. Page 33 of 936 Mayor's YouthAdvisory CommitteeDeputation Presented by Katie Hutchings and Maddox Libera 2023 Page 34 of 936 Introduction Page 35 of 936 The City of Niagara Falls Mayor’s Youth Advisory Committee (MYAC) will provide a voice for the youth of Niagara Falls, while advising Council of important recreational and social issues concerning the City’s younger population. Background It is the vision of the Committee to provide a communication link between the youth of Niagara Falls and City Council and to encourage facilities and programs that will enhance the quality of life, health and well-being of the youth in our community.Page 36 of 936 Our Subcommittees Giving Back Youth Empowerment Just For Fun Green Mental Health Page 37 of 936 Result 1 MANDATE - AIMS TO SPREAD AWARENESS AND ADVOCATE FOR STRONG MENTAL HEALTH CARE AND SUPPORT FOR NIAGARA'S YOUTH. 1 . 2 . 3 . Giving Back - Bella Krick Christmas Family Coldest Night of the Year Teen Skate Night Page 38 of 936 MANDATE - AIM TO ADVOCATE FOR AND PROVIDE LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE TO STUDENTS OF NIAGARA FALLS. Youth Empowerment - AzkaSiddiqui 1. Student Speaker's Symposium 2. STEM Q&A Page 39 of 936 Just For Fun - Pranshu Patel& Shreedev Patel MANDATE - TO RUN FUN SOCIAL EVENTS FOR ALL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN NIAGARA. 1. Game Night 2. BasketBall Tournament 3. Movie Night Page 40 of 936 Result 11 . 2 . 3 . Take A Break Giveaway Mental Health - Issie Berardi MANDATE - PAYING IT FORWARD THROUGH VOLUNTEERISM, FUNDRAISING AND MONETARY DONATIONS WHILE HELPING SUPPORT YOUTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. Hygiene Drive Children's Mental Health Awareness Week Fair Page 41 of 936 Green - Abby Critelli 2. 1. 4. 3. MANDATE - TO PROMOTE AND TEACH ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY TO STUDENTS AND YOUTH IN NIAGARA. 5. Green Movement Community Cleansweep Project SHARE Community Garden Days Mother Earth Day Children’s Memorial Garden Page 42 of 936 Conclusion MYAC had a successful year planning many successful events and learning many things along our journey. MYAC looks forward to another year helping connect youth, and giveback to our community. Page 43 of 936 QuestionTime Page 44 of 936 THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT! THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT!Page 45 of 936 Bill 23: More Homes Built Faster Act June 20, 2023 Amelia Upper Page 46 of 936 Table of contents 01 03 02 04 Policy The Alternative Environmental Impact Thank you Page 47 of 936 -In November 2022, Bill 23, the More Homes Built Faster Act was approved -It set out to build 1.5 million homes in 10 years in response to the housing crisis and expected population demands in Ontario. -It allows for housing to be built faster by eliminating approvals and development charges, which take both time and money -Proposes to remove 7,400 acres of the Greenbelt for development, replacing it with 9,400 acres of land elsewhere (Ontario Municipal Affairs and Housing, 2022) Policy -the Planning Act -the Conservation Authorities Act -the Environmental Assessment Act -the Heritage Act -Exempted some projects from the Environmental Assessment Act Page 48 of 936 Environmental Impact 1. Ecosystem Services: the benefits to humans provided by the natural environment and healthy ecosystems 2. Increased resilience against climate change events, such as drought, floods, food shortages and more 3. The Greenbelt’s ecosystem services amount to $2.6 billion annually 4. Development means the Greenbelt is even more compromised, and so are we. The Greenbelt, Photo Credit: CBC, 2023Page 49 of 936 -More than 350 km2 of land has already been approved for development in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area as of 2022 -Bill 23’s development will take approximately 150 km2. This means about 590 km2 of the Greenbelt will be needlessly lost. -This discredits the argument that the removal of the Greenbelt is motivated by a need for more space, as there is already sufficient land on which to develop affordable housing. -Bill 23 neglects to support people and the planet The Alternative Photo Credit: Environmental Defence, 2023Page 50 of 936 Credit: Environmental Defence, 2023 Map Displaying the Development Around the GTHA Page 51 of 936 Further inquiries, please reach out to me at ameliau004@gmail.com Thank you for your time and consideration References included in accompanying document.Page 52 of 936 Introduction Good afternoon.My name is Amelia Upper and today I will be discussing Bill 23,or the More Homes Built Faster Act.As a student at the University of Waterloo in the Environmental Faculty and a Niagara Falls local, this is something that is very close to my heart. Context In November 2022,Bill 23,the More Homes Built Faster Act was approved.It set out to build 1.5 million homes in 10 years in response to the housing crisis and expected population demands in Ontario. The bill made changes to existing policies,such as the Planning Act,the Conservation Authorities Act,the Environmental Assessment Act,and the Heritage Act,and exempted some projects from the Environmental Assessment Act.It also reduced or eliminated completely,development charges for certain types of housing development.It allows for housing to be built faster by eliminating approvals and development charges,which take both time and money (Ontario Municipal Affairs and Housing,2022). Bill 23 also proposes to remove 7,400 acres of the Greenbelt for development.The intention to substitute 9,400 acres of land elsewhere will not be able to compensate for the damage sustained by the Greenbelt and its many ecosystem services.Today I am seeking support from the Council in proposing an alternative that preserves the integrity of this critical ecosystem while meeting the needs of the people of Ontario. Environmental Impact -Ecosystem Services:the benefits to humans provided by the natural environment and healthy ecosystems.For example,food and water, regulation of floods,air and water purification,carbon storage,and a number of cultural benefits,such as outdoor recreation. -Ecosystem services help increase resilience against climate change events,such as drought,floods,food shortages and more -According to a report published by the Suzuki foundation,the total value of the Greenbelt’s ecosystem services is $2.6 billion annually. Page 53 of 936 -By directly reducing the responsibilities of Conservation Authorities and allowing for development,the Greenbelt is even more compromised, and so are we. The Proposed Alternative A study published by the Environmental Defence on May 30th, 2023,found that there is enough land that has already been approved for development in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA). The GTHA has more than 350km2 of previously designated,but unused land for business and housing development,which was approved prior to 2022. Bill 23’s development will take approximately 150 km2.This means about 590 km2 of the Greenbelt will be needlessly lost.This discredits the argument that the removal of the Greenbelt is motivated by a need for more space,as there is already sufficient land on which to develop affordable housing. Bill 23 neglects to support people and the planet,by removing essential ecosystem services,reducing our community’s resilience to climate change events and refusing to build in alternative locations.In the long run,Bill 23 in its current state will not help the people it set out to support,which is,ultimately,the goal of governing bodies. Background I am a student at the University of Waterloo studying in the Environmental Faculty.In my program,there is a strong focus on meeting people’s needs within planetary boundaries.Bill 23 neglects this focus,by removing essential ecosystem services,reducing our community’s resilience to climate change events and refusing to build in alternative locations.In the long run,Bill 23 in its current state will not help the people it set out to support. Page 54 of 936 References Blanchard,E.,Tang,I.,Baker,A.,Robinson,L.,Lesage,J.,English,L., Taylor-Conboy,B.,&Zhen,C.(2022,December 6).Bill 23 in Ontario:The More Homes Built Faster Act,2022 receives Royal Assent -Construction &Planning -Canada.Bill 23 In Ontario:The More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 Receives Royal Assent -Construction &Planning -Canada. https://www.mondaq.com/canada/construction--planning/1257776/bill-23-i n-ontario-the-more-homes-built-faster-act-2022-receives-royal-assent#:~:t ext=On%20November%2028%2C%202022%2C%20the,land%20develop ment%20across%20the%20Province. Chong ,H.-S.(2022,November 7).There’s something bad for everyone in bill 23. Toronto Environmental Alliance. https://www.torontoenvironment.org/there_s_something_bad_for_everyon e_in_bill_23 Clark,H.S.(2022).More homes built faster act,2022.Legislative Assembly of Ontario. https://www.ola.org/en/legislative-business/bills/parliament-43/session-1/bi ll-23 County of Brant,A.(2023).Bill 23 summary and implications.County of Brant. https://www.brant.ca/en/planning-and-Development/bill-23-summary-and-i mplications.aspx#:~:text=Bill%2023%20allows%20immediate%20amend ments,Consent%20and%20Minor%20Variance%20applications. David Suzuki Foundation,A.(2021,March 15).Ontario’s wealth,Canada’s future:Appreciating the value of the Greenbelt’s ecoservices.Greenbelt Foundation.https://www.greenbelt.ca/greenbelt_ecoservices Flynn-Guglietti,M.,Forristal,A.,Sutton,K.,&Pinho,P.(2022a,November 24). Bill 23:The More Homes Built Faster Act,2022,and the proposed amendments to the greenbelt plan and oak ridges moraine conservation plan.McMillan LLP. https://mcmillan.ca/insights/bill-23-the-more-homes-built-faster-act-2022-a nd-the-proposed-amendments-to-the-greenbelt-plan-and-oak-ridges-morai ne-conservation-plan/#:~:text=Greenbelt%20Swaps%3A%20As%20part% 20of,for%20a%20total%20addition%20of Page 55 of 936 Flynn-Guglietti,M.,Forristal,A.,Sutton,K.,&Pinho,P.(2022b,November 24). Bill 23:The More Homes Built Faster Act,2022,and the proposed amendments to the greenbelt plan and oak ridges moraine conservation plan.McMillan LLP. https://mcmillan.ca/insights/bill-23-the-more-homes-built-faster-act-2022-a nd-the-proposed-amendments-to-the-greenbelt-plan-and-oak-ridges-morai ne-conservation-plan/#:~:text=Greenbelt%20Swaps%3A%20As%20part% 20of,for%20a%20total%20addition%20of Grafton,K.(2023,March 6).Who really benefits from Ontario’s Bill 23?Canadian Dimension. https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/who-really-benefits-from-onta rios-bill-23#:~:text=Now%20that%20the%20head%2Dshaking,beneficiarie s%20are%20real%20estate%20developers. Gray,J.(2022,November 22).Ontario revises Bill 23 legislation aimed at speeding up housing construction.The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-ontario-tweaks-sweeping -housing-legislation-bill-23/ Hill Country Alliance,A.(2023).Ecosystem Services.Welcome to Hill Country Alliance. https://hillcountryalliance.org/our-work/communities/planning-and-develop ment/ecosystem-services/#:~:text=food%2C%20air%2C%20water%2C%2 0energy,outdoor%20recreation). Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism,A.(2023,January 9).Proposed changes to the Ontario Heritage Act and its regulations:Bill 23 (schedule 6)-the proposed more homes built Faster Act,2022.Environmental Registry of Ontario.https://ero.ontario.ca/notice/019-6196 Municipal Affairs and Housing,A.(2022,October 25).Ontario Taking Bold Action to Build More Homes.Ontario newsroom. https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/1002423/ontario-taking-bold-action-to-b uild-more-homes Municipality of Leamington,A.(2023,March 8).About Bill 23,the more homes built faster act.Let’s Talk Leamington. https://letstalkleamington.com/bill-23-more-homes-built-faster-act-summar y-and-implications#:~:text=In%20November%20of%202022%2C%20the,h omes%20in%20Ontario%20by%202031. Page 56 of 936 Ontario Land Tribunal,A.(2023,February 8).More homes built faster act,2022. Ontario Land Tribunal. https://olt.gov.on.ca/blog/news/more-homes-built-faster-act-2022/#:~:text= On%20October%2025%2C%202022%2C%20the,over%20the%20next%2 010%20years. Parks and Recreation Ontario,A.(2022,November 18).Bill 23:More Homes Faster Act.Parks and Recreation Ontario. https://www.prontario.org/policy/issues/bill23 Pothen,P.(2023,May 30).New mapping and analysis discredits the Ontario government’s excuses for forcing suburban boundary expansions and removing Greenbelt,floodplain and wetland protections.Environmental Defence. https://environmentaldefence.ca/2023/05/30/new-mapping-and-analysis-di scredits-the-ontario-governments-excuses-for-forcing-suburban-boundary- expansions-and-removing-greenbelt-floodplain-and-wetland-protections/ Sliwa,K.(2022,December 5).Part 3:Shovels in the ground for ontario –bill 23 receives Royal Assent,the province announces the Better Municipal Governance Act,2022,and the stronger mayors,Building Homes Act comes into force.Dentons. https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/articles/2022/december/5/part-3-sho vels-in-the-ground-for-ontario Page 57 of 936 PBD-2023-34 Report Report to: Mayor and Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: 26T-11-2023-002 & AM-2023-007 Draft Plan of Subdivision-McLeod Meadows 9304 McLeod Road Parts 1 and 2 59R-16846 Lot 181 Twp of Stamford Applicant: 800460 Ontario Ltd (Fred Costabile) Agent: Upper Canada Consultants (Matt Kernahan) Recommendation(s) 1. That the application to amend the Zoning By-law be approved, subject to the regulations outlined in this report; 2. That the amending zoning by-law include a Holding (H) provision to require to the satisfaction of the City and Niagara Region: • The "Compatibility/Mitigation Study-Air Quality, Noise and Vibration" prepared by SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd. (dated March 23, 2022), as well as any subsequent revisions thereto, be approved by Niagara Region and City; • The approval of City Official Plan Amendment 147 by the Regional Municipality of Niagara and the Amendment going into force and effect; • Any development on the subject lands shall conform to the policies of Official Plan Amendment 147, including any resulting modifications; and, • The implementation of any mitigation measures as required by the approved Land Compatibility- Air Quality, Noise and Vibration Study, all to the satisfaction of the City and Niagara Region; 3. That the Plan of Subdivision be draft approved subject to the conditions in the attached Appendix A; 4. That the notice of decision include a statement that public input has been received, considered, and has informed the decision of Council; 5. That the Mayor or designate be authorized to sign the draft plan as "approved" 20 days after notice of Council’s decision has been given as required by the Planning Act, provided no appeals of the decision have been lodged; 6. That draft approval be given for three years, after which approval will lapse unless an extension is requested by the developer and granted by Council; and, Page 1 of 35 Page 58 of 936 7. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Subdivision Agreement and any required documents to allow for the future registration of the Subdivision when all matters are addressed to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. Executive Summary 800460 Ontario Ltd. has submitted an application to subdivide 22.92 hectares (56.6 acres) of land on the south side of McLeod Road east of Beechwood Road. The application proposes a total of 498 dwelling units consisting of 203 detached lots, 23 blocks for 107 on-street townhouse dwellings, 11 blocks for 62 reverse frontage on-street townhouse dwellings, 6 blocks for 46 back-to-back townhouse dwellings, 3 multiple residential blocks for 80 dwellings, and blocks for park, stormwater management, environmental protection (existing watercourse), road widenings, reserves, and land to be dedicated as municipal streets. The applicant has also applied to amend Zoning By -law No. 79-200 to rezone the lands to permit residential, environmental, and open space uses. Planning staff recommends the applications, subject to a holding (H) provision, for the following reasons: • The proposed development conforms to Provincial, Regional, and City policies as it meets Greenfield area density targets, provides a variety of housing types, contributes to a complete community, preserves the natural heritage feature, results in the efficient expansion of infrastructure, and is transit supportive; • The requested residential, environmental, and open space zones maintain appropriate regulations for the proposed dwelling types, environmental land, and open space uses and ensures the proposed development will be compatible with surrounding properties; and, • Draft plan conditions appropriately address servicing, environmental, land use compatibility, and archaeological matters. Future site plan applications will review the site layout and servicing for the multiple residential blocks. The conditions of draft plan approval, which must be satisfied before subdivision registration, are listed in Appendix A. These conditions address servicing, roads, environmental protection, land use compatibility, landscaping, utility installation, and all other matters related to the development of the subdivision. Page 2 of 35 Page 59 of 936 Background Proposal 800460 Ontario Ltd. has submitted an application to subdivide 22.92 hectares (56.6 acres) of land on the south side of McLeod Road east of Beechwood Road. Refer to Schedule 1 for the location and Schedule 2 for details of the proposed subdivision. The application proposes a total of 498 dwelling units consisting of 203 detached lots, 23 blocks for 107 on-street townhouse dwellings, 11 blocks for 62 reverse frontage on-street townhouse dwellings, 6 blocks for 46 back-to-back townhouse dwellings, 3 multiple residential blocks for 80 dwellings, and blocks for park, stormwater management, environmental protection (existing watercourse), road widenings, reserves, and land to be dedicated as municipal streets. The land is currently zoned Light Industrial (LI), in part, Hazard Lands (HL), in part, and Development Holding (DH), in part, under Zoning By-law 79-200. The applicant requests the land be rezoned to a site specific Residential Mixed (R3) zone, in part, a site specific Residential 5B Density (R5B) zone, in part, Open Space (OS) zone, in part, and Environmental Protection Area (EPA) zone, in part, under Zoning By-law 79- 200. Refer to Schedule 3 for the proposed zoning schedule. Site Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses The subject land is bordered by McLeod Road to the north and Beechwood Road to the west. It is vacant having been used previously for residential (the previous dwelling was demolished) and agricultural purposes. A watercourse (realigned in accordance with a NPCA Permit) abuts the eastern boundary of the lands. To its north is the Faith Factor Church; to the north-west is Dan’s Produce (a fresh produce supplier); to the east is the Forestview Estates subdivision that consists of detached and on-street townhouse dwelling units; and, to the south and west are agricultural fields. Further south are lands comprising of the Cytec (Solvay) Canada industrial facility. It is noted that lands on the north side of McLeod Road are now included within the City’s Urban Boundary following Niagara Region’s Municipal Comprehensive Review. Circulation Comments - Niagara Region • Until the City's Official Plan Amendment 147 is approved by Regional Council (the approval authority), that is under consideration this summer, and until the Page 3 of 35 Page 60 of 936 peer review of the submitted Compatibility/Mitigation Study is complete, the Region is unable to confirm whether the proposed applications conform to Provincial and Regional Policies. • The Region requests that Holding (H) provisions be applied to the subject land to ensure the amending by-law will not come into effect until Official Plan Amendment 147 is approved and in effect; that any development on the subject lands shall conform to the policies of the Amendment, including any resulting modifications; and that the "Compatibility/Mitigation Study-Air Quality, Noise and Vibration" prepared by SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd. (dated March 23, 2022), as well as any subsequent revisions thereto, be approved by Niagara Region. • Regional draft plan conditions are listed in Appendix A and include: archaeological warning clauses; requirements for erosion, grading, restoration/enhancement, and ecological monitoring plans as well as rear -lot fencing to protect the natural heritage feature; that the City's Official Plan Amendment 147 receive approval from the Regional Municipality of Niagara and be in force and effect; that the proposed development conform to the approved policies of Amendment 147; that the Compatibility/Mitigation Study- Air Quality, Noise and Vibration as well as any subsequent revisions be approved by Niagara Region; and, that the recommendations of the approved Compatibility/Mitigation Study are implemented. • Regional conditions are subject to change pending final approval of the City's Official Plan Amendment 147. - Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority • No objections, subject to meeting the conditions listed in Appendix A. • Draft plan conditions include the provision of grading, construction sediment and erosion control drawings and the construction of a chain link fence along the boundary of the watercourse block. - Building Services • Building permits will need to be obtained. Building permit fees and development charges will be assessed during building permit application review. - GIS Services and Legal Services • No objections. - Parks & Landscape Services, Municipal Works, Transportation Services, Bell Canada, Cogeco, Canada Post, and Enbridge • No objections, subject to meeting the conditions listed in Appendix A. • Municipal Works conditions include: the provision of servicing and grading plans for review and approval, the western extension of watermain, the provision of an Page 4 of 35 Page 61 of 936 updated servicing strategy that considers the future sanitary needs for lands to the south, that existing flows to Thompson Creek are maintained with no adverse impacts to surrounding or downstream properties and confirmation the watercourse block is appropriately sized for the watershed drainage area, and, that speed control measures be constructed within the subdivision. • 3.0 m road widening is required along the south side of McLeod Road. • 2.94 m road widening is required along the east side of Beechwood Road. • 0.3 m reserves are to be applied to all lots/blocks abutting McLeod Road and Blocks 204, 205, and 230 on Beechwood Road. • The developer is to contribute 100% of the funds to be provided for a future 1.5 metre sidewalk along both the McLeod and Beechwood Road frontages. • The developer is to contribute 100% to the construction of a westbound left turn lane on McLeod Road at Street B and the construction of left turn lanes on McLeod Road at Beechwood Road. • It is recommended that driveways are located on the opposite side for abutting lots to enable one vehicle to be legally parked on the street in front of two homes. Neighbourhood Comments A neighbourhood open house was held on May 15, 2023, attended by the applicant’s agent and 1 individual. The individual who attended inquired as to the proposed development’s design and its potential impact on the land uses and densities that may be realized on lands to the north. Staff identified that these other lands are part of the City’s Secondary Plan program for the North Garner neighbourhood. Land uses and densities will be determined through the creation of a Secondary Plan for the area. No written comments have been provided to date. Submitted Reports Planning Justification Report- Provides an overview of the proposal and its conformity to Provincial, Regional, and City policies. The Report concludes that the applications satisfy Planning Act requirements, conform to policy, and represent good planning. D6 Compatibility & Mitigation Study, Air Quality, Noise, and Vibration (SLR)- Provides warning clauses to address noise traffic. No adverse vibration impacts are expected. The restriction of building height to 10 metres for the portion of the lands located within the 2 km Cytec (Solvay) Arc (from the phosphine storage on the Cytec (Solvay) lands) is supported. There is not expected to be emissions of dust or odour generating from Cytec (Solvay) on the subject land. Further, the report indicates that there are residential uses located closer to Cytec (Solvay) than the subject lands and as Cytec’s (Solvay's) existing regulatory requirements must comply at the existing residential lands, a d etailed noise assessment is not required. Page 5 of 35 Page 62 of 936 Cytec (Solvay) must operate and be in compliance with their issued Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA). The compliance is determined at the property boundary and at approved receptor locations. The facility, which produces phosphine, operates a number of air emission control equipment (i.e. emergency flares and thermal oxidizers) to prevent and manage air, noise and odour emissions. The permit also requires Cytec (Solvay) to development a Best Management Practices Plan and have a Complaints Recording and Reporting program. Functional Servicing Report- Servicing is proposed to be extended from Forestview Estates to the east. The stormwater management pond is of a sufficient size. The existing municipal watermain and sanitary sewer on the adjoining property has sufficient capacity. Headwater Drainage Features Assessment- The assessment concludes there is no fish habitat or connectivity between wetland features off-site. There isn't the need to retain features on the western parcel as there is limited contribution to Thompson Creek. The realigned channel on the eastern channel is being retained. Land Use Compatibility Assessment (RWDI)- There are closer residential uses than the proposed lands and Cytec is required to comply with their regulatory requirements. A detailed noise assessment is not required. In the future, any proposed industrial uses will need to be assessed at the time of site plan to determine compatibility and any mitigation measures that may be required. Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment- Archaeological potential was reviewed and determined there were no archaeological sites or resources. A Ministry clearance letter accepting the findings has been provided. Traffic Impact Study- The study concludes that the traffic generated from the site will not negatively impact the existing road network. As the plan was revised following the submission of the original Traffic Impact Study, an updated Study, is required to be reviewed and approved by Transportation Services as a condition of subdivision approval. Transportation Services support the revised draft plan. Wetland Catchment Assessment- There are no wetlands on site and nearby off-site wetlands are classified as swamp. The residential development will have not negatively impact nearby wetlands as they are within separate surface water catchments. Page 6 of 35 Page 63 of 936 Analysis 1. Provincial Policies The Planning Act requires City planning decisions to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and conform to the Provincial “A Place to Grow” Plan. The proposed development is consistent and conforms as follows: • The proposed development satisfies matters of provincial interest as outlined in Section 2 of the Planning Act, subject to the clearance of draft plan conditions; • Under the D6 Guidelines, Cytec (Solvay) is classified as a Class 3 (heavy) industry. Cytec (Solvay) is considered a Class 3- Heavy Industry as it is a chemical manufacturer that has the continuous movement of products and employees and has large production levels. The plant is involved in purification, mixing and packaging, and research and development. It is permitted to produce 40,000 tonnes of phosphine based chemicals per year under the operations of their ECA permit. The proposed development is located outside of the recommended minimum separation distance (300 metres) but falls within the 1000 metre area of influence (it is 850 metres from Cytec's (Solvay's) plant's property boundary on the south side of Brown Road). A portion of the proposed development is within the 2 km Cytec (Solvay) arc, that is measured from the phosphine storage tank (refer to Schedule 3). Development is permitted on lands within the arc; however, height is limited to 10 metres. The SLR report indicates that given the size and nature of Cytec (Solvay), the height limitation within the 2 km radius is appropriate. There are no height restrictions outside of the 2 km Cytec (Solvay) Arc. The SLR Study (2022) indicated that no odours, visible dust, or noise were observed during their site visits to the facility. Cytec (Solvay) is not permitted under their Environmental Compliance Approval to discharge phosphine into the atmosphere and must comply with Provincial noise and vibration emission limits. The company is required to frequently inspect and schedule preventative maintenance, have procedures to prevent or minimize emissions, and have pro emergency its on each quarter report as well training, cedures, as operations. Staff is satisfied that the conditions of the ECA permit, the height restrictions placed on the proposed development that falls within the 2 km Cytec (Solvay) arc, and a draft plan condition requiring the confirmation of any safety requirements and inclusion of any mitigation measures and warning clauses in the subdivision Page 7 of 35 Page 64 of 936 agreement following the completion and acceptance of the peer review will mitigate known hazards to the proposed development.; • The proposed development is within a Greenfield Area, provides a mixture of housing types, is transit supportive, assists in the creation of a complete community, protects a natural heritage feature (watercourse), and minimizes land consumption and servicing costs; • The proposed subdivision’s density of approximately 58 persons and jobs per hectare exceeds the Provincial density target of 50 persons and jobs/hectare within a Greenfield Area; • The Land Use Compatibility, Air, Noise, and Vibration Study identified no concerns with transportation noise, vibration and noise emissions, or safety concerns from the surrounding industries. Within the 2 km Cytec (Solvay) arc, the dwelling height is limited to 10 metres. As Cytec (Solvay) is required to comply with their Environmental Compliance Approvals and there are dwellings closer than the proposed development, the Study did not provide a detailed noise assessment. The peer review will analyze the findings to determine if they are acceptable. A holding provision and draft plan condition requires the acceptance of the peer review, any further reports required, and reporting on any safety measures in place to protect surrounding residents; and, • The recommended regulations will facilitate the development of land in a manner that offers a mixture of housing that will accommodate the needs of people of all ages and abilities while maintaining appropriate levels of health and safety and ensuring the protection of the natural heritage feature. 2. Regional Official Plan The subject land is designated as Urban Area (Designated Greenfield Area) in the Regional Official Plan. The proposed development will conform with the Regional Official Plan, with the application of a holding (H) provision and draft plan conditions as proposed by the Region, as follows: • As the subject lands are designated Industrial in the City’s Official Plan they are considered to be employment lands under the Regional Official Plan. The City’s Official Plan Amendment 147, adopted on March 21, 2023, has not yet been approved by Regional Council (the approval authority). It is expected that Regional Council will consider it this summer. As such, Regional staff are currently una ble to support the applications. To ensure development does not occur until Official Plan Amendment 147 is approved, the Region is requesting a holding (H) provision be applied to the lands until the Amendment is approved and in force and effect and a draft plan condition address the same. Once the Amendment is in effect, the proposed development Page 8 of 35 Page 65 of 936 will conform to the Regional Official Plan as the land will be designated Residential by the City; and, • The proposed development is located near industrial uses (i.e. Cytec (Solvay) Canada) and near vacant land zoned for light and heavy industrial uses. Consequently, a predictable ‘worst case scenario’ based on the permitted uses is to be considered. A peer review of the submitted Compatibility/Mitigation Study is being completed. The Region has indicated they will provide detailed comments and additional draft plan conditions upon receipt of the peer review. To address this, the Region has requested a Holding (H) provision and a draft plan condition require the approval of the Compatibility/Mitigation Study by the Region and the implementation of the recommendations of the approved Compatibility/Mitigation Study. The proposed development conforms with other policies as follows: • The proposed development exceeds the Designated Greenfield Area density target, is sequential with the existing built-up area, provides for a mixture of housing types to accommodate the needs of residents, contributes to a complete community as parkland will be provided, there will be the orderly extension of municipal services from the abutting subdivision, and there is an efficient road network; • The Region considered the conversion of the subject land from employment land to residential as part of their Comprehensive Review; and, • The core Natural Heritage System feature (i.e., watercourse- fish type 2 habitat) has been assessed. It was determined the feature does not provide fish habitat. Draft plan conditions require the submission of plans and monitoring as well as the installation of rear lot fencing to ensure no negative impact to the Core Natural Heritage System (i.e., watercourse) results from the proposed development. No development will occur within the watercourse and its buffer and the lands are being appropriately placed under the EPA zone. It is noted that the buffer of the realigned watercourse was previously vegetated, in accordance with a NPCA permit, and it is functioning as intended. Additional drainage features on the property have been determined to be ill -defined and ephemeral, and as the features do not provide an ecological or hydrological function, they do not need to be retained. It has been determined that the proposed development will not negatively impact the hydrology of nearby wetlands as they have separate surface water catchments. Page 9 of 35 Page 66 of 936 3. City's Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject land as Industrial, in part, and Environmental Conservation Area (ECA), in part, within the Designated Greenfield Area. The City initiated and approved Official Plan Amendment 147 that, once approved by Regional Council and in effect, would redesignate the lands to Residential, in part, with a Special Policy Area (87) to be applied that would limit building height to 10 metres within 2 km of the Cytec (Solvay) phosphine storage facility and required the completion of risk assessment (i.e. Land Use Compatibility Study) that is to be peer reviewed to justify residential use within the 2 km radius. As well, an assessment of the job replacement to support the conversion is to be provided (refer to PBD-2022-61). The 10 metre maximum height restriction was applied based on the information the City had on file to address emergency management requirements of Cytec (Solvay) relating to the dispersion of emissions in the event of an emergency incident occurring at the plant. Staff have requested on numerous occasions any further information from Cytec (Solvay) relative to any updated studies. To date, no additional information or studies or reports have been provided. As a result, Staff has assessed the merits of the appl ication based on the information available. Staff have also requested the peer review of the developer's SLR Study (2022) and have recommended a Holding (H) provision be applied to the land and a draft plan condition. The proposal complies to the Official Plan, once Official Plan Amendment 147 receives Regional Council approval, and is in force and effect, as follows: • The proposed development will have a range of dwelling types, on a variety of sized lots that will exceed the City greenfield intensification target of 53 persons and jobs per hectare (as the proposed density is 58 persons and jobs/ha), contributes to the creation of a complete community, and is transit supportive; • As the land was used for farming minimal jobs were provided. The development is expected to create at home or report jobs providing adequate job replacement; • While not within the Garner South Secondary Plan area, the proposed development is consistent with the development land use patterns and densities that are contemplated in the Plan. As it is a small development, it may proceed without an amendment to the Garner South Secondary Plan as the Amendment did not require its inclusion prior to the approval of residential development; • The restriction of a maximum building height of 10 metres within 2 km of the Cytec (Solvay) phosphine storage facility is being maintained. The 4 storey height (14.5 metres) for the medium-density residential (apartment/stacked townhouse dwellings) blocks are located outside of the 2 km limit. In addition, the medium-density blocks abut an arterial road which is an appropriate location for the increased height and density; Page 10 of 35 Page 67 of 936 • The applicant has completed Land Use Compatibility Studies that indicates there are no current land uses that will result in significant noise or air quality impacts on the proposed residential development. The RWDI Study (2020) states that there are residential uses located in closer proximity to the Cytec (Solvay) lands than the proposed development and notes that as Cytec’s (Solvay) existing regulatory requirements to the existing residential lands require compliance that a detailed noise assessment is not required. The Study indicates that the location of new industrial facilities on the abutting lands will require assessment to ensure future compatibility. The light industrial zoned lands immediately to the south is not expected to have an impact from the proposed rezoning; however, the heavy industrial zoned lands located further to the southwest may require noise and air quality mitigation. The mitigation would be determined at the site plan stage to ensure compatibility with residential uses. The SLR D6 Compatibility, Air Quality, Noise and Vibration Study (2022) conc ludes the same as the RWDI Study and provides warning clauses to address traffic noise. It notes there are no adverse vibration impacts expected. The restriction of building height to 10 metres for the portion of the lands located within the 2 km Cytec (Solvay) Arc is supported. There is not expected to be emissions of dust or odour generating from Cytec (Solvay) on the subject land. Further, the report indicates that there are residential uses located closer to Cytec (Solvay) than the subject lands and as Cytec’s (Solvay) existing regulatory requirements must comply at the existing residential lands, a detailed noise assessment is not required. It concludes that the development is unlikely to result in increased risk of complaint claims and is unlikely to result in constraints on industrial facilities to reasonably expand, intensify, or introduce changes to their operations; A draft plan condition that requires the approval of the Compatiblity/Mitigation Study, the submission of any updated reports (if required); and, the implementation of mitigation measures and warning clauses in the subdivision agreement; • As the applications will implement the residential designation contemplated in Official Plan Amendment 147, the use of the lands will conform once the Amendment is in force and effect; • As the proposed development did not provide housing costs, a draft plan condition requires the developer to demonstrate in a report to be submitted prior to final approval how the dwelling units will contribute to the City's annual target of 40% affordable housing construction, as defined in the City's Official Plan; • Although the western portion of the proposed development is within a Phase 4 servicing area, and the eastern portion is within a Phase 1 area, there are existing municipal services that service the land to the east. The extension of municipal services to service the entirety of the site is orderly and logical. The Page 11 of 35 Page 68 of 936 developer is required to confirm that there is capacity in the sanitary sewer system prior to final approval and will pay for the extension of servicing; • The Traffic Impact Study concludes that the traffic generated from the site will not negatively impact the existing road network; • The Core Natural Heritage Feature (i.e. watercourse) and its associated buffer is being retained and appropriately zoned. The Headwater Drainage Features Assessment concluded that the watercourse does not provide fish habitat and that the additional drainage features did not need to be retained as they provided no hydrological function. The Wetland Catchment Assessment concluded that the proposed development will not negatively impact the hydrology of nearby Thompson Creek Wetland Complex as its surface water catchment is separate; and, • A Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment has been acknowledged and a clearance letter has been received from the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport. 4. Zoning By-law The applicant has requested a site specific R3, a site specific R5B, EPA, and OS zone be applied to the subject land to permit the proposed development. Refer to Schedule 4 for the proposed zoning schedule. Residential Lots and Blocks The applicant is requesting detached lots and on -street, and back-to-back townhouse dwelling blocks be zoned a site specific Residential Mixed (R3) zone and the medium density residential blocks be zoned a site specific Residential 5B Density (R5B) zone. The R3 zone permits a detached dwelling, a semi-detached dwelling, a duplex dwelling, an on-street townhouse dwelling, a triplex dwelling, a quadruplex dwelling, a home occupation in a detached dwelling or semi-detached dwelling or a duplex dwelling, and accessory buildings and accessory structures. The applicant requested that back-to-back townhouse dwellings be zoned under the proposed site specific R3 zone. The R5B zone permits an apartment dwelling, stacked townhouse dwelling, and accessory buildings and accessory structures. The departures requested from the standard R3 regulations are summarized in the following table: Page 12 of 35 Page 69 of 936 Existing Regulation Proposed Regulation Staff Recommendation (details to follow) Permitted uses The uses permitted in the R3 zone Add: Back to back townhouse dwellings in accordance with the regulations for an on-street townhouse dwelling SUPPORT For the purposes of the amending by- law, definition: Back to back townhouse dwelling A townhouse dwelling that contains dwelling units divided vertically from each other by common side walls and common rear walls SUPPORT Minimum lot area The existing regulation for minimum lot area for dwelling and on-street townhouse dwelling For a detached dwelling: 300 metres square For a on-street townhouse dwelling 180 metres square Add: For each back to back townhouse dwelling 120 metres square SUPPORT Minimum lot frontage For a detached dwelling on an interior lot 12 metres For a detached dwelling on an interior lot 10 metres SUPPORT Page 13 of 35 Page 70 of 936 For a detached dwelling on a corner lot 15 metres For an on-street townhouse dwelling 6.5 metres For an on-street townhouse dwelling 6.0 metres Minimum front yard depth 6 metres plus any applicable disance specified in Section 4.27.1 4.5 metres to front face of dwelling 6.0 metres to garage except 3.5 metres for on- street townhouses fronting McLeod Road or Beechwood Road SUPPORT Minimum rear yard 7.5 metres, subject to Section 4.17.1 7 metres, to a dwelling unit 7 metres to an on- street townhouse dwelling unit 0 metres, for aback to back townhouse dwelling unit SUPPORT Minimum interior side yard 1.2 metres 0.9 metres for buildings with less than 2 storeys for a detached dwelling 1.2 metres for buildings with 2 or more storeys for a detached dwelling 1.2 metres for an on-street townhouse dwelling unit SUPPORT Page 14 of 35 Page 71 of 936 1.2 metres for a back to back townhouse dwelling unit Minimum exterior side yard 4.5 metres plus any applicable distance specified in section 4.27.1 3.0 metres SUPPORT Maximum lot coverage 55% Not applicable SUPPORT Maximum driveway width for on-street townhouse dwelling 60% of the lot frontage 70% of the lot frontage SUPPORT Accessory structure An accessory building or structure may be erected in an interior side yard provided that it is distant not less than 1.2 metres from the from the side lot line. Common semi- detached private garages may be centred on the mutual lot line if erected simultaneously on two abutting lots and as one building Common detached accessory structures may be centred on the mutual lot line if erected simultaneously on two abutting lots. SUPPORT Except as modified above, the balance of the regulations of the R3 zone shall apply. The departures requested from the standard R5B regulations are summarized in the following table: Page 15 of 35 Page 72 of 936 Existing Regulation Proposed Regulation Staff Recommendation (details to follow) Minimum lot area 133 square metres for each dwelling unit 120 square metres for each dwelling unit SUPPORT Minimum front yard depth 7.5 metres 4 metres SUPPORT Minimum interior side yard width one-half the height of the building (14.5 metres/2- 7.25 metres) 4.5 metres SUPPORT Minimum exterior side yard width 7.5 metres, subject to Section 4.17.1 Block 246: 3 metres Blocks 244 & 245: not applicable SUPPORT Maximum building/structure height 10.0 metres, subject to Section 4.7 14.5 metres and 4 storeys SUPPORT, WITH MINOR AMENDMENT 14.5 metres, or 4 storeys, whichever is less Number of apartment dwellings on one lot 1 only not applicable SUPPORT Minimum landscape open space 35% of the lot area 30% SUPPORT Except as modified above, the balance of the regulations of the R5B zone shall apply. The requested zoning is appropriate, with modifications as noted, as follows: • The R3 zone regulates detached and on-street townhouse dwelling units; • Staff support the inclusion of a definition of back-to-back townhouse in the R3 zone; • The R5B zones are intended to regulate apartment and stacked townhouse dwellings; • The requested reductions in the R3 and R5B zone for minimum lot area, lot frontage, front yard, rear yard, interior side yard, and exterior side yard is Page 16 of 35 Page 73 of 936 appropriate as suitable lot dimensions are maintained, an acceptable building envelope remains, and a compact urban form will result; • The requested increase in the R5B zone for maximum height is supported as the increase in height will not have an impact on surrounding properties and there is no height restriction on the R5B zone proposed land under Official Plan Amendment 147; • The requested elimination in the R3 zone of lot coverage is supported as the minimum landscaped open space regulation is being maintained which will ensure suitable amenity area is provided to residents; • The addition of a regulation to permit accessory detached structures centred on the mutual lot line is supported as it will maximize usable open landscape space and group driveways for the reverse frontage lots together; • The requested reduction in the R5B zone for minimum landscape open space for Blocks 244 & 245 is supported as a suitable amount of landscape is provided for the subject land; • The elimination of the number of apartment dwellings on one lot for the R5B zone is appropriate as multiple dwellings may be constructed on the blocks with no negative impact on abutting parcels; and, • The requested increase in the maximum width of a front yard driveway in the R3 zone for on-street townhouse dwellings is supported as a suitable amount of landscaping is still being provided. Staff recommend that the amending by-law require the front elevation of dwelling units on Blocks 206-214 orient to McLeod Road and Blocks 204 and 205 orient to Beechwood Road and that the units provide detached accessory buildings that will function as garages with driveways onto Streets ‘C’ and 'I'. Staff would support the creation of accessory dwelling units above the detached accessory buildings. The creation of the units would provide affordable housing for residents. As the applicant is not requesting site specific regulations for accessory dwelling units, the existing regulations in By-law 79-200 would apply. Other Lands The applicant is requesting the watercourse block (Block 248) be zoned under the EPA zone. The EPA zone permits conservation use, existing agricultural use, wildlife management, and works of a Conservation Authority. The applicant is requesting the stormwater and park blocks be zoned a site specific Open Space (OS) zone. Page 17 of 35 Page 74 of 936 Staff support the zoning of the park block (Block 247) open space with the elimination the minimum lot frontage and lot area requirements as the parcel will be under municipal ownership and is a suitable size for a neighbourhood park. As stormwater management blocks are zoned EPA, staff recommend that the proposed stormwater management block (Block 249) be zoned under the EPA zone. Holding (H) Provision The amending by-law is to have applied a Holding (H) provision to require, to the satisfaction of the City and Niagara Region: • The "Compatibility/Mitigation Study-Air Quality, Noise and Vibration" prepared by SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd. (dated March 23, 2022), as well as any subsequent revisions thereto, be approved by Niagara Region; • The approval of City Official Plan Amendment 147 by the Regional Municipality of Niagara and the Amendment going into force and effect; • Any development on the subject lands shall conform to the policies of Official Plan Amendment 147, including any resulting modifications; and, • The implementation of any mitigation measures as required by the approved Land Compatibility- Air Quality, Noise and Vibration Study. 5. Subdivision Design and Conditions of Approval The application proposes a total of 498 dwelling units consisting of 203 detached lots, 23 blocks for 107 on-street townhouse dwellings, 11 blocks for 62 reverse frontage on-street townhouse dwellings, 6 blocks for 46 back-to-back townhouse dwellings, 3 multiple residential blocks for 80 dwellings, and blocks for park, stormwater management, environmental protection (existing watercourse), road widenings, reserves, and land to be dedicated as municipal streets. A comprehensive set of conditions, addressing City, Regional, and agency concerns, are listed in Appendix A and includes the following: • The approval of City Official Plan Amendment 147 by the Regional Municipality of Niagara and the Amendment being in force and effect; • Extension of roads and services at the developer’s cost; • Confirmation of available capacity of the Region; • The provision of an updated Transportation Impact Study, Servicing Study (to consider sanitary expansion south of the lands), a brief to address the existing and future flows to Thompson’s Creek and confirmation the watercourse block is appropriately sized; • The dedication of blocks for road widening and application of 0.3 metre reserves to lots/blocks abutting McLeod Road and Blocks 204, 205, and 230 abutting Beechwood Road; Page 18 of 35 Page 75 of 936 • The developer shall contribute 100% of the cost for future sidewalk installation along McLeod and Beechwood Roads abutting the land; • The contribution of 100% of the cost towards constructing a westbound left turn lane on McLeod Road at Street B and left turn lanes on McLeod Road at Beechwood Road; • Approval of the Compatibility/Mitigation Study, and any subsequent revisions; and, the implementation of mitigation measures and inclusion of warning clauses in the subdivision agreement; and, • All other matters typically covered under the subdivision process (i.e. execution of a subdivision agreement, provision of utilities and mail service, engineering works, landscaping, street naming, and necessary fees and securities). In considering a proposed plan of subdivision, Council shall have regard to the pla nning matters listed under Section 51(24) of the Planning Act. The proposed development complies as follows: • The proposed development complies with matters of Provincial interest, listed under Section 2 of the Planning Act, subject to the clearance of draft plan conditions, and is not premature as it is adjacent to a built-up area and draft plan conditions require the confirmation of servicing capacity prior to the registration; • The land’s configuration is suitable for development. The medium density residential blocks will require future draft plan of condominium/site plan applications which will confirm building placement, parking and landscape areas, and amenity space; • Adequate access will be provided from the existing road network and the proposed transportation network is sufficient for the development’s needs; • Development is not proposed in natural and hazard lands; • The proposed development will be serviced by municipal services and students may attend neighbourhood schools (St. Michaels High School is 860 metres, and Kate S Durdan and Loretto Catholic Elementary Schools are 2000 metres from the proposed development; • Land for parkland purposes is being conveyed for public purposes; • The configuration of the proposed development and the construction of the units will result in an energy efficient design; and, • The site plan matters such as streetscaping, servicing, and lighting are addressed through draft plan of conditions that will be cleared prior to the execution of the subdivision agreement that will be registered on title. Works will be secured through the provision of security that will be held until satisfactorily completed and certified. Operational Implications and Risk Analysis No operational implications or risk. Page 19 of 35 Page 76 of 936 Financial Implications/Budget Impact The proposed development will generate development charge contributions and property tax revenue for the City. Extension of services is to be at the applicant’s cost. There are no other financial implications. Strategic/Departmental Alignment The proposed subdivision supports the Diverse and Affordable Housing Strategic Priority by providing housing to meet the needs of people of all ages, incomes and abilities, and preserves the natural heritage system. List of Attachments Schedule 1- Location Map Schedule 2- Draft Plan of Subdivision Schedule 3- Cytec (Solvay) Arc Schedule 4- Proposed Zoning By-law Schedule Appendix 1- McLeod Meadows-Draft Plan Conditions Written by: Julie Hannah, Senior Manager of Current Planning Submitted by: Status: Andrew Bryce, Director of Planning Approved - 13 Jun 2023 Kira Dolch, General Manager, Planning, Building & Development Approved - 14 Jun 2023 Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 15 Jun 2023 Page 20 of 35 Page 77 of 936 Schedule 1 Location Map N Page 21 of 35 Page 78 of 936 Schedule 2 Draft Plan of Subdivision Page 22 of 35 Page 79 of 936 Schedule 3 Location of 2 km Cytec (Solvay) Arc N Page 23 of 35 Page 80 of 936 Schedule 4 Proposed Zoning By-law Schedule Page 24 of 35 Page 81 of 936 PBD-2023-034 June 20, 2023 Appendix A: McLeod Meadows Draft Plan Conditions 1. Approval applies to the McLeod Meadows Draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Upper Canada Consultants dated March 2, 2023, showing Lots 1-217 for 217 detached dwellings, Blocks 218-226 for 53 reverse frontage on-street townhouse units, Blocks 227-244 for 85 on-street townhouse units, Blocks 245-253 for 68 back to back townhouse units, Blocks 254-256 for multiple residential (72 apartment or stacked townhouse dwelling units), as well as blocks for park, watercourse, stormwater management facility, road widening, reserves, and public highways. Planning and Legal 2. The Developer enter into a registered Subdivision Agreement with the City to satisfy all requirements, financial and otherwise, related to the development of the land. Note: Should any other body wish to have its conditions included in the Subdivision Agreement, they may be required to become party to the Subdivision Agreement for the purpose of enforcing such conditions. If the development is to be constructed and subdivision plans registered in two or more phases, a separate Subdivision Agreement will be required for each phase. 3. The Developer submit a Solicitor’s Certificate of Ownership for the subdivision land to the City Solicitor prior to the preparation of the Subdivision Agreement. 4. That the City’s Official Plan Amendment #147 receive approval from the Regional Municipality of Niagara and be in force and effect. 5. The Developer receive final approval of the Zoning By-law amendment to provide land use regulations to guide the development of the subdivision. 6. The Developer provide one (1) calculated plans and a letter prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor to Planning, Building & Development confirming that all lots and blocks comply with the Zoning By-law. 7. The Developer provide one (1) copy of the pre-registration plan to Planning, Building & Development and a letter stating how all the conditions imposed have been or are to be fulfilled. 8. That the proposed development, in a report, demonstrate to the City’s satisfaction how the dwelling units will contribute to the City’s annual 40% target for affordable housing construction as defined in the City’s Official. 9. That the Developer submit an updated Land Use Compatibility Study and Noise, Air, and Vibration Study, that may be peer reviewed, to the satisfaction of the City and Region and the inclusion of any warning and mitigation clauses as determined through the approved studies in the subdivision agreement. Such study shall address any safety measures that are needed to meet Provincial standards. 10. That the following notice clause shall be included in the Subdivision Agreement and in any Condominium Agreement and in any Site Plan Agreement and in all Agreements of Purchase and Sale for the subdivision lots and blocks, and in any Page 25 of 35 Page 82 of 936 PBD-2023-034 June 20, 2023 leases: “Cytec Canada Inc. (“Cytec”) owns lands located north of the Welland River and west of Garner Road. Cytec’s lands are designated Industrial and zoned for heavy industrial uses. Cytec operates chemical manufacturing and industrial facilities on its lands and may in the future expand its operations by expanding or adding to its existing buildings or constructing new buildings and/or intensifying its operations. Cytec may also erect and/or construct and operate facilities for any of the uses permitted in the City’s Zoning By-law. Cytec’s use of its lands may generate odour and air emissions and create noise, together with other industrial effects. Cytec is a member of the Canadian Chemical Producer’s Association and has been verified under the Responsible Care Codes of Practice. This notice clause includes any successors and/or assigns in title to Cytec.” Municipal Works 11. The roadways and sidewalks be designed and constructed in accordance with City standards which, in part, include the following: (a) That a 3.0 m road widening be dedicated along the south side of McLeod Road abutting the subject lands; (b) That a 2.94 m road widening be dedicated along the east side of Beechwood Road abutting the subject lands; (c) That all roads in the subdivision be dedicated to the municipality as public highways and designed and constructed in accordance with City Engineering Design Guidelines; (d) That daylighting triangles be dedicated at all intersections according to road classifications, in accordance with prevailing Official Plan policies. Daylighting triangles with 5 m legs will be required at the corner of lots where the roads bend; (e) That 0.3 m reserves be applied to all lots/blocks fronting onto McLeod Road and Blocks 204, 205, and 230 on Beechwood Road to the satisfaction of the City; (f) That road allowances be dedicated to the City as public highways; (g) That a 1.5 m boulevard-separated concrete sidewalk be provided on at least one side of all 18 m subdivision roads; (h) That the Developer contribute 100% of funds be provided for a future 1.5 m sidewalk along the frontage of the proposed development on the south of McLeod Road and the east side of Beechwood Road; (i) That speed control measures be constructed within the subdivision. Exact locations of devices to be determined at detailed design; Page 26 of 35 Page 83 of 936 PBD-2023-034 June 20, 2023 (j) That the Developer contributes 100% of all costs of constructing a westbound left turn lane on McLeod Road at Street B, and there share for the construction of left turn lanes on McLeod Road at Beechwood Road; (k) That an updated Traffic Impact Study be submitted for City approval; (l) All streets named to the City’s satisfaction; and, (m) Provide a plan that illustrates building orientation, especially on corner lots, for addressing purposes. 12. The services be designed and constructed in accordance with City standards which, in part, include the following: (a) That the existing 300 mm diameter PVC Municipal watermain on McLeod Road be extended west from Matteo Drive to Beechwood Road and south along Beechwood Road to the southern-most intersecting street of this development to form a loop. Cost sharing with the City may be applicable; (b) That the Developer submit a Functional Servicing Report, signed by a professional engineer licensed to practice in the province of Ontario, demonstrating that the existing and proposed watermains and sanitary sewers are sufficient to service all phases of the development; (c) That the water distribution system within the proposed development be designed and constructed in accordance with Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks and City Engineering Design Guidelines ; (d) That testing of the new mains be completed in the presence of a Certified Water Operator using the City’s Watermain Commissioning Checklist; (e) That the sanitary sewer system within the proposed development be designed and constructed in accordance with Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks and City Engineering Design Guidelines ; (f) That future sanitary servicing for lands to the south be investigated and an updated servicing strategy be completed to the satisfaction of the City. Cost sharing with the City may be applicable; (g) That Blocks 258 and 259 be dedicated to the City for stormwater management purposes; (h) That the Developer submit a Stormwater Management Report, signed by a professional engineer licensed to practice in the province of Ontario, demonstrating that the proposed storm sewers and stormwater management facilities are sufficient to service all phases of the development. The stormwater management facilities shall be designed and implemented in accordance with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks and any applicable regulatory agencies, to the satisfaction of the City. Page 27 of 35 Page 84 of 936 PBD-2023-034 June 20, 2023 (i) That existing flows to Thompson’s Creek are maintained, there are no adverse impacts to surrounding properties or downstream flows, and improvements to the safety and ongoing maintenance of Thompson’s Creek are made to the satisfaction of the City. Design confirmation of the size/area of the watercourse block to allow future urban expansion for the watershed drainage area to be completed to the satisfaction of the City. (j) That the storm sewer system within the proposed development be designed and constructed in accordance with Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks and City Engineering Design Guidelines ; (k) That an overland flow route be designed within the proposed road allowances for major storm events in accordance with Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks and City Engineering Design Guidelines; (l) That weeping tiles be connected to the storm sewer system via sump pumps and all roofwater leaders outlet to grade and be directed to front and/or rear yards; (m)That a geotechnical report, prepared by a qualified professional, is submitted to the City for review and acceptance prior to start of construction ; (n) That lot grading within the proposed development be designed and constructed in accordance with the City’s Lot Grading & Drainage Policy, as amended, and City Engineering Design Guidelines; (o) That the Developer pays the Street Lighting Inspection Fee in accordance with the latest version of the City’s Schedule of Fees; (p) That the Developer pays the required fees for boulevard tree plantings in accordance with the latest version of the City’s Schedule of Fees; (q) That the Developer provide to the City all necessary design reports and plans for review and acceptance prior to start of construction; (r) That the Developer convey to the City and/or Public Utilities any easements which may be required to service the subdivision; (s) That the Developer enters into a separate Subdivision Agreement for each stage of construction; (t) That the Developer pays the required fees for engineering inspection and administration in accordance with the latest version of the City’s Schedule of Fees; (u) That the Developer pays the applicable development charges in place at the time of Subdivision Agreement execution and Building Permit issuance in accordance with the latest Development Charges By-law; Page 28 of 35 Page 85 of 936 PBD-2023-034 June 20, 2023 (v) That the Developer’s engineering consultant provide written confirmation that the works completed conform with the City’s accepted drawings and are in accordance with Niagara Peninsula Standard Contract Document and City Engineering Design Guidelines; (w) That the Developer submit digital data and contract documentation in accordance with the latest version of the City’s CAD Standards Manual and the City’s Schedule of Quantities and Unit Prices template; and, (x) That the developer is responsible to obtain all required Agency approvals (i.e. MNR, NPCA, DFO, Regional Niagara, MTO, MECP, CN, OPG, Hydro One Networks Inc., etc.) and is required to apply for a Site Alteration Permit if any works are to be scheduled to commence prior to full execution of any applicable Municipal Agreements. 13. The developer shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the City of Niagara Falls to ensure all above referenced conditions are addressed to the City’s satisfaction. Parks Design 14. That City sidewalks be provided along the frontages of all parkland. 15. That a tree survey plan, prepared by a certified professional be submitted to the City for review and acceptance prior to the start of construction. 16. Chain-link fencing will be required along all property lines abutting the watercourse block. Fencing shall be 1.8 m high commercial grade, black vinyl coated, chain -link fencing with no gates to the satisfaction of the City. 17. Consideration for a footbridge to connect the proposed development and Forestview Subdivision in the future shall be accommodated in the design to the satisfaction of the City. 18. Block 257 is to be dedicated to the City for parkland. 19. That parkland be serviced, graded, and seeded to the s atisfaction of the City. Fire Services 20. The developer submit servicing plans to the Fire Prevention Office and shall clearly indicate width of all roads, curbs radii and the location of all fire hydrants. 21. That adequate water for fire fighting purposes be immediately available and accessible with sufficient volume and/or flow to facilitate firefighting operations prior to the construction of buildings. 22. That the developer submit a phasing plan that details the phasing of construction of roads within the proposed subdivision should the subdivision be phased. Page 29 of 35 Page 86 of 936 PBD-2023-034 June 20, 2023 Bell Canada 23. The developer is hereby advised that prior to commencing any work within the Plan, the developer must confirm that sufficient wire-line communication/telecommunication infrastructure is currently available within the proposed development to provide communication/telecommunication service to the proposed development. In the event that such infrastructure is not available, the developer is hereby advised that the developer may be required to pay for the connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure. If the developer elects not to pay for such connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure, the developer shall be required to demonstrate to the municipality that sufficient alternative communication/telecommunication facilities are available within the proposed development to enable, at a minimum, the effective delivery of communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services (i.e. 911 Emergency Services). 24. The developer enter into an agreement (Letter of Understanding) with Bell Canada complying with any underground servicing conditions imposed by the municipality, and if no such conditions are imposed, the developer shall advise the municipality of the arrangement made for such servicing. 25. The developer acknowledges and agrees to convey any easement(s) as deemed necessary by Bell Canada to service this new development. The developer further agrees and acknowledges to convey such easements at no cost to Bell Canada. The developer agrees that should any conflict arise with existing Bell Canada facilities where a current and valid easement exists within the subject area, the developer shall be responsible for the relocation of any such facilities or easements at their own cost. 26. The developer is advised to contact Bell Canada at planninganddevelopment@bell.ca during the detailed utility design stage to confirm the provision of communication/telecommunication infrastructure needed to service the development. It shall be noted that it is the responsibility of the developer to provide entrance/service duct(s) from Bell Canada’s existing network infrastructure to service this development. In the event that no such network infrastructure exists, in accordance with the Bell Canada Act, the developer may be required to pay for the extension of such network infrastructure. If the developer elects not to pay for the above noted connection, Bell Canada may decide not to provide service to this development. Canada Post 27. That Community Mail Boxes (CMBs) be located in locations determined in cooperation with Canada Post, and that the developer identify these sites on a display in the sales office and on appropriate maps, information boards and plans. 28. The developer include in all offers of purchase and sale, a statement that advises the prospective purchaser that mail will be delivered via a CMB. The developer also Page 30 of 35 Page 87 of 936 PBD-2023-034 June 20, 2023 agrees to note the locations of all CMBs within the development, and to notify affected homeowners of any established easements granted to Canada Post to permit access to CMBs. 29. The developer satisfy all requirements of Canada Post regarding granting necessary easements for CMBs, concrete pads for CMBs, temporary CMBs, walkways to CMBs, curb depressions for wheelchair access, informing potential homeowners of CMB locations, timing of construction and identification of CMBs and related works on engineering servicing drawings. 30. Canada Post’s multi-unit policy, which requires that the owner/developer provide the centralized mail facility (front loading lockbox assembly or rear-loading mailroom [mandatory for 100 units or more]), at their own expense, will be in effect for buildings and complexes with a common lobby, common indoor or sheltered space. Enbridge 31. The developer shall use the Enbridge Gas Get Connected tool to determine gas availability, service, and meter installation details and to ensure all gas piping is installed prior to the commencement of site landscaping. If the gas main needs to be relocated as a result of changes in the alignment or grade of the future road allowances or for temporary gas pipe installations pertaining to phase construction, all costs are the responsibility of the applicant. 32. The developer provide Enbridge Gas Inc. with easements required to service this development, and any future adjacent developments, at no cost. Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) 33. That the Developer provide detailed grading, construction sediment and erosion control drawings to the NPCA for review and approval. The Owner/Developer agrees that all Sediment and Erosion Control Measures shall be maintained in good condition for the duration of construction until all disturbed surfaces have been stabilized. 34. That the Developer provide a 1.5 m high (minimum) chain link fencing along the rear lot lines of lots 1 to 16, to the satisfaction of the NPCA. 35. That the Developer provide appropriate limit-of-work fencing and ESC fencing along the rear of Lots 1 to 16 and Block 259 at the boundary of the watercourse block (Block 259), to the satisfaction of the NPCA. 36. That conditions 33 to 35 above be incorporated into the Subdivision Agreement between the Developer and the City of Niagara Falls to the satisfaction of the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority. The City of Niagara Falls shall circulate the draft Subdivision Agreement to the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority for its review and approval. Page 31 of 35 Page 88 of 936 PBD-2023-034 June 20, 2023 All requests for clearance of conditions must be made through the Municipality and shall include a comprehensive matrix that confirms how each condition has been addressed. All corresponding plans and reports used to clear the conditions shall also be circulated with the clearance requests. Regional Municipality of Niagara 37. That the Developer/Owner agrees to include the following warning clause within the Subdivision Agreement to protect for any potential archaeological resources that may be discovered during construction activities: “Should deeply buried archaeological remains/resources be found during construction activities, all activities impacting archaeological resources must cease immediately, and the proponent must notify the Archaeology Programs Unit of the Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism (416-212-8886) and contact a licensed archaeologist to carry out an archaeological assessment in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act and the Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists. In the event that human remains are encountered during construction, all activities must cease immediately and the local police as well as the Cemeteries Regulation Unit of the Ministry of Government and Consumer Services (416-326-8800) must be contacted. In situations where human remains are associated with archaeological resources, the Ministry should also be notified to ensure that the site is not subject to unl icensed alterations which would be a contravention of the Ontario Heritage Act.” 38. That an Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) Plan be prepared for review and approval by the Niagara Region. All ESC measures shall be maintained in good condition for the duration of construction until all disturbed surfaces have been stabilized. Muddy water shall not be allowed to leave the site. 39. That a Grading Plan be provided to the satisfaction of Niagara Region, that demonstrates that existing overland flow patterns are maintained and no grading within the natural heritage features and/or their buffer will occur. The Grading Plan shall designate specific locations for stockpiling of soils and other materials which will at a minimum be outside of the natural heritage features and their buffers and a minimum of 10 metres from the dripline of any trees to be retained. 40. That permanent rear-lot fencing be provided adjacent to the natural heritage features, to the satisfaction of the Niagara Region. A no-gate by-law is recommended to reduce human encroachment and limit the movement of pets into the adjacent natural areas. 41. That the Subdivision Agreement contain wording wherein the Developer/Owner agrees to implement the approved Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Grading Plan, Ecological Restoration and Enhancement Plan, and Ecological Monitoring Plan. Page 32 of 35 Page 89 of 936 PBD-2023-034 June 20, 2023 42. That the Developer/Owner provides a written acknowledgement to Niagara Region stating that draft approval of this subdivision does not include a commitment of servicing allocation by Niagara Region as servicing allocation will not be assigned until the plan is registered and that any pre-servicing will be at the sole risk and responsibility of the Owner. 43. That the Developer/Owner provides a written undertaking to Niagara Re gion stating that all Offers and Agreements of Purchase and Sale or Lease, which may be negotiated prior to registration of this subdivision shall contain a clause indicating that servicing allocation for the subdivision will not be assigned until the plan is registered, and a similar clause be inserted in the Subdivision Agreement between the Owner and the City. 44. That verification of the available wet weather sanitary capacity in the South Niagara Falls system required to accommodate development be submitt ed for review and approval by Niagara Region and the City of Niagara Falls. Based on the information submitted, the Region/City will be requiring flow monitoring conditions be included in the agreement to verify, if required, that the estimated wet weather flows are being met in the field after construction of the sanitary sewers and before assumption by the City. If the verification is unsuccessful, mitigation measures may be required. 45. That the Developer/Owner provide engineering drawings to the Region for review and approval for the works proposed in McLeod Road to ensure the Region’s watermain is protected. 46. That prior to the approval of the final plan of subdivision or the undertaking any onsite grading or storm servicing, the Developer/Owner shall submit a Detailed Stormwater Management Plan and all associated engineering drawings (stamped and signed by a qualified professional engineer in accordance with the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change’s Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual, 2003 and the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority’s Stormwater Management Guidelines, 2010 to the Niagara Region for review and approval. The stormwater management engineering submission shall include: a) Detailed lot grading, servicing and drainage plans, noting both existing and proposed grades and the means whereby overland flows will be accommodated across the site. b) Detailed erosion and sedimentation control plans. c) That prior to final approval for registration of this plan of subdivision, the Owner shall submit the confirmation from City CLI-ECA for the stormwater management facility required to service this development. 47. That the Subdivision Agreement between the Developer/Owner and the City of Niagara Falls contain provisions whereby the Developer/Owner agrees to implement the approved plan(s) required in accordance with the condition above. Page 33 of 35 Page 90 of 936 PBD-2023-034 June 20, 2023 48. That the subdivision agreement contain a condition that the Owner/Developer agrees to comply with the requirements of Niagara Region’s Corporate Waste Collection Policy and enters into an Indemnity Agreement with Niagara Region for the purpose of entering the subject property to provide waste collection services. 49. That the City’s Official Plan 147 receive approval from the Regional Municipality of Niagara, and be in force and effect. 50. That the proposed development shall conform to the approved policies of the City’s Official Plan Amendment 147 and be modified as necessary. 51. That the “Compatibility/Mitigation Study—Air Quality, Noise and Vibration”, prepared by SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd. (dated March 23, 2022), as well as any subsequent revisions thereto, be approved by Niagara Region. 52. That the Developer/Owner agrees to implement the recommendations of the approved Compatibility/Mitigation Study, as required in the condition above. NOTES 1) Prior to granting final approval, the City must be in receipt of written confirmation that the requirements of each condition have been met satisfactorily and that all fees have been paid to the satisfaction of Niagara Region. Clearance requests shall be submitted to the Region in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding, which stipulates that requests for formal clearance of conditions are to be received and circulated to the Region by the local municipality. The local municipality is also responsible for circulating a copy of the draft agreement, and the Region is unable to provide a final clearance letter until the draft agreement is received. The Region is committed to reviewing submissions related to individual conditions prior to receiving the formal request for clearance. In this regard, studies and reports (one hard copy and a PDF digital copy) can be sent directly to the Region with a copy provided to the local municipality. 2) Prior to final approval for registration, a copy of the executed Subdivision Agreement for the proposed development should be submitted to Niagara Region for verification that the appropriate clauses have been included. Niagara Region recommends that a copy of the draft agreement be provided in order to allow for the incorporation of any necessary revisions prior to execution. Clearance of Conditions Prior to granting approval to the final plan, Planning, Building & Development requires written notice from applicable City Divisions and the following agencies indicating that their respective conditions have been satisfied: Page 34 of 35 Page 91 of 936 PBD-2023-034 June 20, 2023 • Legal Services for Conditions 2 and 3 • Planning and Development Services for Conditions 4 to 10 inclusive • Transportation Services for Condition 11 • Municipal Works for Conditions 11 to 13 inclusive • Landscape Architect for Conditions 14 to 19 inclusive • Fire Services for Conditions 20 to 22 inclusive • Bell Canada for Conditions 23 to 26 inclusive • Canada Post for Conditions 27 to 30 inclusive • Enbridge Gas Inc. for Conditions 31 to 32 inclusive • NPCA for Condition 33 to 36 inclusive • Regional Municipality of Niagara for Conditions 37 to 52 inclusive Page 35 of 35 Page 92 of 936 Address: 9304 McLeod Road; Parts 1 and 2 59R-16846 Lot 181 Twp of Stamford Applicant: 800460 Ontario Limited Proposal: To facilitate the development of 498 dwelling units, blocks for parkland, stormwater management, environmental protection, and municipal streets Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Application AM-2022-007 & 26T-11 -2023-002 Page 93 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Location PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Detached dwellings Vacant/Agricultural Zoned for Light Industrial use PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Forestview Estates Detached dwellings Institutional Environmental Protection Area Agricultural Vacant/Agricultural Zoned for Heavy Industrial use Page 94 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Background Draft Plan of Subdivision: •Total 498 dwelling units •Detached dwellings •Reverse on-street, on-street, and back-to-back townhouses •Multi-residential (stacked townhouse or apartment) dwellings •Parkland •Stormwater management pond •Environmental protection (existing watercourse) Zoning By-law Amendment: Requests: •A site specific Residential (R3-XXX) zone, •A site specific Residential 5B Density (R5B-XXX) zone •Environmental Protection Area (EPA) zone •Open Space (OS) zone.Page 95 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Cytec Arc Page 96 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Draft Plan Multi-Residential Back-to-back Reverse On-Street On-Street Detached Parkland Watercourse Stormwater Page 97 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Proposed Zoning Site Specific R3 OS EPASite Specific R5B PART 2 & 3 Page 98 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Requested R3 Zoning-Support Relief-Support Min. Interior Side Yard Width 0.9m for detached less than 2 storeys, 1.2 for detached more than 2 storeys (req’d 1.2m) Min. Front Yard Depth 4.5m to face of dwelling, 6.0m to garage, except 3.5m for on-street townhouses on McLeod or Beechwood (req’d 6m) Min. Lot Frontage: 10m interior detached 6.0m on-street townhouse (req’d 12m/6.5m) Add definition of a back-to-back townhouse Min. Lot Area 180sq.m. for on- street townhouse, 120 sq.m. for back- to-back townhouse (req’d 160sq.m./N/A) Max. Lot Coverage- N/A% (55% req’d) Permitted Uses add back-to-back townhouses Max. driveway width for on-street townhouse 70% (req’d 60%) Min. Exterior Side Yard Width 3m + 15m to CL of McLeod Min. Rear Yard 7m to dwelling unit, 7m to on-street townhouse, 0m to back-to-back (req’d 7.5m) Permit detached accessory structures to be centred on mutual lot lines if erected at the same time on two abutting lots as one building Page 99 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Requested R5B Zoning Relief-Support Minimum Interior Side Yard Width 4.5m (7.25m req’d) No maximum apt buildings on one lot Not applicable (max 1 permitted) Min. Front Yard Depth 4m (req’d 7.5m) Max. Building Height 14.5m and 4 storeys (max. 10m) Min. Exterior Side Yard Width 3m + 15m to CL of McLeod (req’d 7.5m + 15m) Min. Landscape Open Space 30% (35% req’d) Min. Lot Area 120m2 (req’d 133m2)Page 100 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Public Comments •An Open House was held in May 2023. •One resident attended. •Discussed land uses and densities for lands to the north. •These lands will be part of a North Garner Secondary Plan. •No written comments have been received to date. Page 101 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Recommendation That Council approve the proposed Zoning By-law amendment & Draft Plan of Subdivision as modified in report PBD-2023-34, subject to a Holding (H) provision. •The Holding (H) provision is recommended to be placed on the land to require: 1.The "Compatibility/Mitigation Study-Air Quality, Noise and Vibration" prepared by SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd. (dated March 23, 2022), as well as any subsequent revisions thereto, be approved by Niagara Region and City; 2.The approval of City Official Plan Amendment 147 by the Regional Municipality of Niagara and the Amendment going into force and effect; 3.Any development on the subject lands shall conform to the policies of Official Plan Amendment 147, including any resulting modifications; and, 4.The implementation of any mitigation measures as required by the approved Land Compatibility-Air Quality, Noise and Vibration Study, all to the satisfaction of the City and Niagara Region.Page 102 of 936 MCLEOD MEADOWS CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION & ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT CITY FILE NOS. AM-2023-007 & 26T-11-2023-002 Matt Kernahan, MCIP, RPP Planning Manager Upper Canada Consultants Page 103 of 936 Site Context Located south east of the intersection between Beechwood Road and McLeod Road 22.92 hectares in area Contains a creek that was realigned along the eastern property line in accordance with an NPCA Permit Was re-designated from Industrial to Residential through a City-initiated Official Plan Amendment (OPA #147) Remains Zoned as Light Industrial •Hazard Zoning present where former creek floodplain was located •Small portion of Development Holding Zoning on eastern side of the property Forestview Estates Warren Woods Garner Estates Urban Boundary Subject Lands Page 104 of 936 Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision 203 Single Detached Lots 23 Street- townhouse Blocks (107 units) 11 Reverse Frontage Street- townhouse Blocks (62 units) 6 Back-to-Back Townhouse Blocks (46 units) 3 Multiple Family (apartment) Blocks (80 units) 1.145 hectare park block (5% of the total land area) Stormwater Management Block Environmental Protection Block for Watercourse Compact Grid Road Network Page 105 of 936 Proposed Zoning Zoning Amendment will implement City-initiated Official Plan Amendment Singles and Townhouses to be Zoned as R3 •Add definition for “back-to-back townhouses” •Site-specific provisions to reflect the built-form of surrounding subdivisions Multiple Unit Blocks to be Zoned as R5B •Site specific provisions based on conceptual site plans Park and SWM Facility to be Zoned as Open Space Watercourse Block to be Zoned As Environmental ProtectionPage 106 of 936 Supporting Studies Title Author Key Findings / Recommendations Stage 1-2 Archeological Assessment AMICK Consulting •No archeological resources were encountered on the property Land Use Compatibility Assessment RWDI •There are presently no adjacent land uses, including Cytec, which would result in significant noise or air quality impacts on the proposed residential development or any other compatibility issues D-6 Compatibility & Mitigation Study, Air Quality, Noise and Vibration SLR •The requirements of MECP Guideline D-6, Regulation 419/05, and Publication NPC300 are met Functional Servicing Report UCC •Existing municipal water, sanitary and stormwater infrastructure has capacity to service the proposed development Headwater Drainage Feature Assessment Summary LCA Environmental Consultants •The re-aligned channel improves storage capacity during storm events and enhances riparian function of the watercourse Traffic Impact Study RV Anderson •The development will not result in critical capacity, delay or queuing concerns at area intersections Wetland Catchment Assessment Terra-Dynamics •The site is hydrologically separate from nearby wetlands and the development will not impact the hydrology of these wetlands Page 107 of 936 Questions Page 108 of 936 The Niagara Falls Shadow Council A 1-ey'tte|-ed rmiepemienc Sodal cuumeung organization "Holding Gavel-mnents Accountable" Lady Justice Do not rewlact the content:of cm.document This document can be freely distributed aros.2o.2o23.o4 Tuesday,June 20,2023 This is a petition concerning the 06/20/2023 Council Meeting Agenda Item #7.1. PBD-2023-34 26T-11-2023-002 &AM-2023-007 Draft Plan of Subdivision-McLeod Meadows 9304 McLeod Road Parts 1 and 2 59R-16846 Lot 181 Twp of Stamford Applicant:800460 Ontario Ltd (Fred Costabile) Agent:Upper Canada Consultants (Matt Kernahan) Council, The Niagara Falls Shadow Council,its members and the general public petition Council to approve the application to amend the Zoning By-law,subject to the regulations outlined in the report and that the amending zoning by-law include a Holding (H) provision to require to the satisfaction of the City and Niagara Region: I The "Compatibility/Mitigation Study-Air Quality,Noise and Vibration" prepared by SLR Consulting (Canada)Ltd.(dated March 23,2022),as well as any subsequent revisions thereto,be approved by Niagara Region and City; I The approval of City Official Plan Amendment 147 by the Regional Municipality of Niagara and the Amendment going into force and effect; I Any development on the subject lands shall conform to the policies of Official Plan Amendment 147,including any resulting modifications;and, I The implementation of any mitigation measures as required by the approved Land Cornpatibility-Air Quality,Noise and Vibration Study,all to the satisfaction of the City and Niagara Region; and that the Plan of Subdivision be dra?approved subject to the conditions in the attached Appendix A and that the notice of decision include a statement that public input has been received,considered,and has informed the decision of Council and that the Mayor or designate be authorized to sign the dra?plan as "approved"20 days a?er notice of Council’s decision has been given as required by the Planning Act,provided no appeals of the decision have been lodged and that dra?approval be given for three years, Page 109 of 936 after which approval will lapse unless an extension is requested by the developer and granted by Council and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Subdivision Agreement and any required documents to allow for the future registration of the Subdivision when all matters are addressed to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. Petition commenced this day June 15,2023. Signed by. Joedy Burdett Petition Organizer -4480 Bridge St.,Niagara falls,ON,CA William Burdett -Unit 473 23 Four Mile Creek Rd,Niagara-on-the-Lake,ON,CA Len McLean -4692 Chrysler Ave.,Niagara Falls,ON,CA Lynn Burdett -4 Hadden Rd.,Sutton West,ON,CA Michael Lubbetts -4 Hadden Rd.,Sutton West,ON,CA Y Y Y V V7 Joedy Burdett reserves the right to all Planning Act appeals and requests to be notified of all Planning Act notices and desires to be informed and participate in all planning events to which a member of the public is entitle to concerning these matters. Page 110 of 936 J oedy Burdett President of the Niagara Falls Shadow Council Former 2022 Candidate for The Niagara Falls City Council election. Quali?ed Ontario Independent Designer (BCIN 38837) Building Services,Plumbing-All Buildings,Small Buildings Owner Niagara Tinting 4480 Bridge Street,Niagara Falls,ON,CA,L2E 2R7 (905)353 8468 Niagara Falls Shadow Council.ca [TNFSC.ca) The Niagara Falls Shadow Donna’!is a I-eg'slei-ed Independent Social Counseling organization [am 1ooos1s774)a The Niagara Falls Shadow Owundl is not associated with The City of Niagara Falls Altering or Redaeling can document will be viewed as a violation of Section 211»)of The Canadian came:of Rights Page 111 of 936 Petitions addressed to City Council 1. 1 ”! “ 10. A petition is a legibly written request signed by more than one member of the public in support of a shared cause or concern.A petition may be presented in paper format, electronically,or through the use of an on-line system.Council will be the only body that can receive a petition,via the City Clerk. A petition may be delivered in person or sent by mail,fax or email to the City Clerk. A petition must contain the following: 1.The date of when the petition commenced; 2.The name and local civic address,telephone number or email address of the organizer who started the petition for contact purposes; 3.The name and address of each person who signed or electronically submitted their name to the petition,and; 4.A clear,legible statement,which communicates the purpose of the petition.All petitions MUST be related to matters within the direct jurisdiction of the City. A petition shall not contain any obscene or improper matter or language. All information on the petition,including names,addresses and telephone numbers shall become part of the public record of the meeting at which it is received. Petitions must be received by noon on the Friday before a scheduled Council meeting in order to appear on the Council agenda.No petition shall be presented or accepted by Council without first appearing on a Council agenda. Petitions that relate to a matter listed on the Council agenda will appear as additional correspondence listed under the related agenda item.At that time any petitions may be read into the record by stating the purpose of the petition and indicating how many ‘relevant’individuals have signed.“Relevant’meaning;those who have listed both their name and local address to the petition. Unless otherwise directed by Council by way of a motion.petitions pertaining to a matter on the agenda,will be received and filed for information. A petition not relating to an item on the agenda may be listed as under ‘Communications of the City Clerk‘and will also be received and ?led for information unless otherwise directed by Council by way of a motion. The City Clerk shall refuse to list a petition on the council agenda \vhere the subject matter involves; current or pending litigation: insurance claims; labour relations,union negotiations or employee relations: advertisements for products or services: election campaign related; matters not within Council’s jurisdiction matters which have been decided by Council during the current term; matters which have been referred to staff for a report,until the matter is before Council for consideration;and matters which are the subject of an Education and Training Session of Council. .‘°.°°.“.°‘.”':".“’!°t“ Page 112 of 936 PBD-2023-36 Report Report to: Mayor and Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: AM-2023-005 Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application 7081 McLeod Road Applicant: LivWell Development Group Inc. (Adam Peaker) Agent: NPG Planning Solutions Inc. (Aaron Butler) Recommendation(s) That Council approve a Special Policy Area Official Plan Amendment for a maximum density of 147 units per hectare and site specific Zoning By -law amendment as detailed in this report for a 5 storey apartment building with 50 dwelling units. Executive Summary LivWell Development Group Inc. has requested a Special Policy Area Official Plan Amendment for a maximum density of 147 units per hectare and site specific Zoning By- law amendment to permit a 5 storey apartment building with 50 dwelling units. Submitted with the amendment application was a Planning Justification Report, Noise Impact Study, Tree Management Plan, and Municipal Servicing & Stormwater Management Report. The amendment are recommended for the following reasons: • The proposed development conforms to Provincial, Regional, and City policies as it intensifies land within the Built-up Area, will assist the City in meeting its intensification targets, and will provide additional housing choices for residents; • The requested site specific residential zone maintains appropriate regulations for the proposed dwelling type and ensures the proposed development will be compatible with surrounding properties; • An increased landscape buffer along the northern property line will improve compatibility/privacy and landscape space, and larger balconies will provide future residents with more amenity space. Additional items will be addressed at site plan (i.e. lighting, noise, etc.); and, • Public concern included air quality, compatibility/privacy, loss of green/amenity space, infrastructure, lighting, noise, property values, and traffic. Background Proposal Page 1 of 10 Page 113 of 936 LivWell Development Group Inc. has requested an Official Plan and Zoning By -law amendment to permit the development of 5 storey apartment building with 50 dwelling units. The subject land is located at 7081 McLeod Rd and is approximately 0.3 ha (0.85 acr es), as shown on Schedule 1. Schedule 2 shows details of the proposed development. The subject land is designated Residential in the City’s Official Plan. This designation permits apartment buildings up to 6 storeys in height with a maximum density of 100 units per hectare on an arterial road in proximity to commercial uses. The applicant is requesting that the lands be placed under a Special Policy Area designation to permit a maximum density of 147 units per hectare. The subject land is zoned Institutional (I) under Zoning By-law No. 79-200. The applicant is requesting the lands be placed under a site specific Residential Apartment 5E Density (R5E) zone to permit the proposed development. Site Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses The subject land, 7081 McLeod Road, is located on the northwest corner of McLeod Road and Sharon Drive and is currently occupied by Our Saviour Lutheran Church, which is proposed to be demolished. To the north are detached dwelling units; to the west is vacant land with a pprovals for a 6-unit apartment building and detached dwelling units; to the south are commercial uses and detached dwelling units; and to the east are commercial uses and detached dwelling units. Circulation Comments • Niagara Region o No objections. o Technical detailed review will occur at the site plan stage. o A noise impact study addendum/implementation of approved noise mitigation measures will be required at time of site plan. o A 2.15 metre road allowance across McLeod Road frontage and a 4.5 metre x 4.5 metre daylight triangle at Sharon Avenue and McLeod Road is required to be conveyed to the Region at time of site plan. o The Official Plan amendment is exempt from Region Council approval. • Building Services • Building and demolition permits will need to be obtained. Building permit fees and development charges will be assessed during building permit application review. Page 2 of 10 Page 114 of 936 • Business Development, Fire Services, GIS Services, Landscape Services, Legal Services, Municipal Works, and Transportation Services • No objections to the application or site specific regulations. • Detailed technical review will occur at site plan stage. Neighbourhood Comments The neighbourhood open house was held on May 11, 2023, attended by the applicant, the applicant’s agent, and one (1) resident. Written comments were received from one (1) resident. Both residents are opposed and indicated concerns regarding: air quality, compatibility/privacy, loss of green/amenity space, infrastructure, lighting, noise, property values, and traffic. Staff’s response is as follows: • The proposal is not anticipated to generate negative air quality or noise impacts to surrounding uses. • The developer has increased the landscape buffer to 3 metres for the northern lot line. This will provide adequate space for tree plantings and a fence to mitigate compatibility and privacy concerns. • The existing church is privately owned land that is not considered a public park. Westfield Park located at the northwest corner of Centennial Street and Warden Avenue provides a public park for the neighbourhood. • There is adequate infrastructure capacity for the proposal. • At time of site plan, a lighting plan is required to be submitted. Light is not permitted to trespass onto neighbouring properties. • The Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) is responsible for determining value and providing the City with property values. Generally, development and redevelopment leads to an increase or no significant impact to property values. • A traffic impact study was not required by the City or the Region due to the low volume of anticipated traffic that will be generated from the site. Analysis 1. Provincial Policies The Planning Act requires City planning decisions to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and conform to the Provincial “A Place to Grow” Plan. The proposed development is consistent and conforms as follows: • The proposed development satisfies matters of provincial interest as outlined in Section 2 of the Planning Act; and • The proposed development is within a settlement area, provides an apartment housing option, is transit supportive, assists in the creation o f a complete community as it is within walking distance to major commercial uses, and effectively uses land and infrastructure. Page 3 of 10 Page 115 of 936 2. Regional Official Plan The subject land is designated as Urban Area (Built-up Area) in the Regional Official Plan. The proposal conforms as follows: • The proposed apartment dwelling units will contribute to the Region’s intensification target of 50%, diversify the housing supply, contribute to the creation of a complete community, and effectively utilize municipal infrastru cture and urban lands. 3. City Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject land as Residential. The subject land is permitted to develop to a maximum height of 6 storeys and a maximum density of 100 units per hectare as it abuts an arterial road and is in close proximity to commercial uses. The applicant is requesting the lands be placed under a Special Policy Area designation to permit a maximum density of 147 units per hectare. When reviewing an Official Plan amendment, Council is to con sider the conformity of the proposal to the general objectives of the Plan, suitability of the site or area for the proposed use, compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent land use designations, need for the use, availability of adequate municipal services, and facilities for the proposed uses and its financial implications. The proposal complies with the intent of the Official Plan as follows: • The proposed development is located on lands that front onto an arterial road, are on an existing transit route, and are located in close proximity to commercial uses where higher density residential uses are directed to; • The proposed building height of 5 storeys is currently permitted; • It provides setbacks that are appropriate for the abutting land uses a s the rear yard setback generally exceeds the height of the building and the interior side yard setback is greater than half the building height; • Both transportation and municipal infrastructure have adequate capacity to accommodate the proposal; • The proposal provides articulated architectural treatments through the use of balconies and changes in exterior cladding (i.e. different coloured bricks and concrete panels) and engages the street by providing amenity areas at grade along McLeod Road; • The parking is located in the rear and interior side yard with a landscaped buffer provided along McLeod Road and Sharon Avenue to improve the streetscape; and, • The proposal will provide residents with a variety of housing that is proposed to be rental. The estimated rental rates are between $1,600-$1,800 for the one- bedroom units (32) and between $2,200-$2,400 for the two-bedroom (18) units. Page 4 of 10 Page 116 of 936 These rental rates would not be considered affordable to low-income households under the City’s Housing Strategy. However, they would be considered affordable to moderate income households with an approximate annual income of $60,000 - $95,900 as per Table 3-2 of the City’s Housing Strategy. This can be secured through a site plan agreement. 4. Zoning By-law The applicant has requested a site specific R5E zone be applied to the entire site to permit the proposed development. The departures requested from the standard R5E regulations are summarized in the following table: ZONE REGULATION EXISTING REGULATION REQUESTED REGULATION Staff Recommendation (Details to Follow) Minimum front yard depth 7.5 metres 4 metres Support Minimum exterior side yard width 7.5 metres + 15.25 metres from the centreline of McLeod Road 1 metre + 14.3 metres to the centreline of McLeod Road Support Minimum amenity area per unit 20 metres square 13.15 metres square Support Minimum landscaped open space 50% 22% Support Minimum width of landscaped open space strip between parking spaces and the front lot line 3 metres 1.5 metres Support Parking requirements 1.4 parking spaces per dwelling unit 70 parking spaces 1.25 parking spaces per dwelling unit 63 parking spaces Support Minimum maneuvering aisle dimensions for a 2.75m x 6m parking stall 6.3 metres 6 metres Support Page 5 of 10 Page 117 of 936 ZONE REGULATION EXISTING REGULATION REQUESTED REGULATION Staff Recommendation (Details to Follow) Projection of a balcony into a required exterior side yard 0.45 metres 1.2 metres Support Projection of an unsupported canopy into any required yard 0.45 metres 1.5 metres Support The requested zoning is appropriate as follows: • The requested reduction in the R5E regulations for front yard depth and exterior side yard width are supported as it will result in a compact, urban built form; • The decreased amenity space is appropriate as every unit has a balcony and there are two amenity rooms with outdoor patios provided on the ground floor of the proposed building; • The requested reduction to landscaped open space is supported as there is an adequate landscape buffer along the edges of the property and an adequate amount of amenity space is being provided to residents; • The requested reduction in the number of parking spaces and the width of the manoeuvring aisle is supported as Transportation Services have no concerns with the requested parking rate of 1.25 spaces per unit and the reduced maneuvering aisle width; and, • The requested increase for projections can be supported as there is adequate space to maintain the canopy and balconies on the property and facilitates the increased amenity space. In the amending by-law, to secure suitable landscape buffers, staff are recommending that a 3 metre landscaped buffer be required along the northern lot line, a 4 metre landscaped buffer be provided along the eastern lot line (save and except 1.5m to a parking space), a 2.3 metre landscaped buffer along the south lot line (save and except where it abuts a maneuvering aisle where it may be 1.4 metres), and a 1.0 metre landscaped buffer along the west lot line. In addition, staff are recommending a maximum height of 16 metres and an interior side yard setback of 16.5 metres from the furthest northern lot line and 10 metres from the closest northern lot line. These are to ensure the proposed height and setbacks are captured. Operational Implications and Risk Analysis No operational implications and risk analysis. Page 6 of 10 Page 118 of 936 Financial Implications/Budget Impact The proposed development will generate development charge contributions, community benefits, cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication, and property tax revenue for the City. The Development Charges Act exempts affordable housing from development charges. If the development qualifies, the applicant will need to enter into an agreement with the City to maintain affordable housing for a period of 25 years. Should the development qualify, and when the regulations come into effect, this agreement will be executed at the site plan stage. Strategic/Departmental Alignment The proposed development supports the Diverse Housing Strategic Priority by providing housing to meet the needs of people of all ages, incomes and abilities. List of Attachments Schedule 1 - Location Map Schedule 2 - Conceptual Site Plan Schedule 3 - Renderings Written by: Alexa Cooper, Planner 2 Submitted by: Status: Andrew Bryce, Director of Planning Approved - 12 Jun 2023 Kira Dolch, General Manager, Planning, Building & Development Approved - 13 Jun 2023 Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 13 Jun 2023 Page 7 of 10 Page 119 of 936 SCHEDULE 1 (Location Map) N Page 8 of 10 Page 120 of 936 SCHEDULE 2 (Conceptual Site Plan) N Page 9 of 10 Page 121 of 936 SCHEDULE 3 (Renderings) View from McLeod Road looking towards Sharon Avenue View from Sharon Avenue looking towards McLeod Road Page 10 of 10 Page 122 of 936 Address: 7081 McLeod Road Applicant: LivWell Development Group (Adam Peaker) Proposal:To permit the construction of a 5 storey, 50 unit apartment building Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendment Applications AM-2023-005 Page 123 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Location PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Power Canal Commercial Uses Fire Station Cogeco Detached Dwellings Vacant Land with 6-unit apartment (Max. 10m height) approvals Page 124 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Background •The land is designated Residential in the City’s Official Plan, which permits 6 storey apartment buildings at a rate of 75-100 units per hectare. •The OPA requests a Special Policy Area be placed on the property to permit a density of 147 units per hectare. •The land is zoned Institutional (I) under Zoning By-law 79-200. •The application requests the subject land be rezoned to a site -specific Residential Apartment 5E (R5E) Density zone to facilitate the development Page 125 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Concept Plan Page 126 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Renderings Page 127 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Requested Zoning –R5E-XX Landscaped Open Space 22% (Req’d: 50%) Support Amenity Area: 13.15m2/unit (Req’d: 20m2/unit) Support Parking: 1.25/unit (63) (Req’d: 1.4/unit (70)) Support Min. Landscape Open Space Strip between Parking Spaces and the Front Lot Line: 2m for front yard, 1.5m for exterior (Req’d: 3m for front yard) Support Min. Interior Side Yard Width 16m (5.3m req’d) Min. Interior Side Yard Width 10m (5.3m req’d) Max. Height 16m (25m max)Page 128 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Requested Zoning –R5E-XX Front Yard Depth 4.3m (Req’d: 7.5m) Support Exterior Side Yard Width 1m + 14.3m to the centreline of McLeod Rd (Req’d: 7.5m + 15m) Support Covered open balconies can project 1.2m (Max: 0.45m) Support Min. maneuvering aisle for a 2.75m x 6m parking stall 6m (req’d 6.3m) Support Min. Landscape Strip 2.3m (except 1.4m to maneuvering aisle) Min. Landscape Strip 1m Unsupported canopies can project 1.5m into a yard (Max: 0.45m) Support Min. Landscape Strip 4m (except 1.5m to a parking space)Min. Landscape Strip 3m Page 129 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Neighbourhood Comments Concern Staff Response Air Quality & Noise The proposal is not anticipated to generate negative impacts to surrounding uses. Compatibility/ Privacy A 3m landscape buffer has been provided to the north to ensure adequate space for tree plantings and fencing for mitigation Loss of Green/ Amenity Space Existing church is privately owned land and not considered a public park. Westfield park provides a public park for the neighbourhood. Infrastructure There is adequate infrastructure capacity Lighting Light is not permitted to trespass onto neighbouring properties. A lighting plan will be submitted during the site plan process, if approved. Property Values No significant impact to property values is anticipated. Traffic Traffic Impact Study was not required by the City or Region due to the low volume of anticipated traffic generated by the proposal, if approved.Page 130 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Recommendation •That Council approve the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment application subject to the recommendations contained in Staff report PBD-2023-36.Page 131 of 936 7081 McLeod Road Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications June 20th, 2023 Prepared by NPG Planning Solutions Inc. Public Meeting AM-2023-005Page 132 of 936 Area: 0.34 hectares Frontage: 35 metres (Sharon Avenue) Depth: 86.7 metres (McLeod Road) Existing Use: Church Current Official Plan Designation: Residential Current Zoning: Institutional (I) Aerial Context 7081 McLeod Road – Public MeetingAM-2023-005Page 133 of 936 Surrounding Uses Approved 3-storey building 7081 McLeod Road – Public MeetingAM-2023-005Page 134 of 936 Proposed Development Official Plan Amendment (OPA) and Zoning By-law Amendment (ZBA) applications are proposed to facilitate a: •5 storey apartment building •50 residential units o 32 one-bedroom units o 18 two-bedroom units •63 parking spaces o 16 covered spaces o 47 uncovered spaces 7081 McLeod Road – Public MeetingAM-2023-005Page 135 of 936 Renderings MCLEOD ROAD PERSPECTIVE MCLEOD ROAD AND SHARON AVENUE PERSPECTIVE RENDERINGS PREPARED BY BIM STUDIO 7081 McLeod Road – Public MeetingAM-2023-005Page 136 of 936 Renderings REAR BUILDING PERSPECTIVE MCLEOD ROAD NIGHT-TIME PERSPECTIVE RENDERINGS PREPARED BY BIM STUDIO 7081 McLeod Road – Public MeetingAM-2023-005Page 137 of 936 LINE 1 RODProposed Official Plan Amendment Existing Designation: Residential Proposed Designation: Residential Special Policy Area •Permitting a maximum density of 147 units per hectare 7081 McLeod Road – Public MeetingAM-2023-005Page 138 of 936 Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Existing Zone: Institutional (I) Zone Proposed Zone: Residential Apartment 5E Density (R5E) Zone with Site-Specific Provisions. 7081 McLeod Road – Public MeetingAM-2023-005Page 139 of 936 Proposed Site-Specific Provisions Minimum Front Yard Minimum Exterior Side Yard Width Minimum Width of Landscaped Strips Minimum Width of Landscaped Strips Minimum Landscaped Open Area Required: 50% of lot area Proposed: 22% of lot area Minimum Amenity Area Per Unit Required: 20m2 per unit Proposed: 13.15m2 per unit Minimum Parking Required: 1.4 space per unit Proposed: 1.25 space per unit 7081 McLeod Road – Public MeetingAM-2023-005Page 140 of 936 Changes to Site Plan •Increased landscaping coverage from 20% to 22% •Increased amenity area per unit from 10.5 m2 to 13.15 m2 by increasing private balconies •Increased northern landscaped buffer from 1.9m to 3m •Increased southern landscaped buffer from 1m to 1.4m 7081 McLeod Road – Public MeetingAM-2023-005Page 141 of 936 Supporting Studies •Architectural Plans, Elevations, and Landscaping •Municipal Servicing Study •Stormwater Management Plan •Noise Impact Study •Tree Preservation Plan 7081 McLeod Road – Open HouseAM-2023-005Page 142 of 936 Response to Comments Received •One (1) written comment and one (1) open house attendee •Opposed with concerns regarding air quality, compatibility and privacy, loss of green space, infrastructure, lighting, noise, property values, and traffic •NPG Response: •No anticipated negative impacts on air quality, noise, traffic, or property values •Changes to site plan to increase landscaped buffer to enhance privacy •Adequate infrastructure capacity 7081 McLeod Road – Open HouseAM-2023-005Page 143 of 936 Conclusion •Consistent with the PPS •Conforms with the Growth Plan, NOP, and the City’s Official Plan •Contributes to intensification and a range of housing options in a regionally accessible location near the QEW and McLeod Road interchange •Provides an opportunity to make efficient use of land and existing services and infrastructure by directing growth to an area designated for residential use •Appropriate density along a Regional and arterial road with ease of access to local transit, active transportation, and a variety of commercial uses •Compact, well-designed and compatible built form with surrounding areas from an urban design and land-use compatibility perspective •Creates new purpose-built rental housing with a mix of unit types, contributing to attainable housing and units affordable to moderate income households 7081 McLeod Road – Public MeetingAM-2023-005Page 144 of 936 THANK YOU Questions or Comments? 7081 McLeod Road – Public MeetingAM-2023-005Page 145 of 936 Dear City Officials, As an owner and resident at in Niagara Falls, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed zoning change for the land currently zoned as Institutional (I) under By-law 79-200, which is occupied by a small church. The proposed change would place the land under a site-specific Residential Apartment 5E Density (R5E) zone, allowing a large 5-story apartment building containing 50 dwelling units to be constructed. The developer is requesting to increase the maximum permitted density from 100 units per hectare to 147 units per hectare. While the land is designated Residential in the City's Official Plan, the proposed density is excessive and unjustified. The maximum permitted density of 6 stories and 100 units per hectare is already generous and should not be exceeded without strong justification. The proposed change would have significant negative impacts on our neighborhood, including overcrowding, traffic congestion, noise, and air pollution. The requested site-specific zoning would also permit changes to various technical parameters, such as site-specific front yard depth, exterior side yard width, landscaped open space, amenity area per unit, landscaped open space strip between a parking space and street, parking spaces, and an increase in the maximum permitted encroachment for balconies into the front and exterior side yards. However, I strongly oppose this change for several reasons. Firstly, it is incompatible with the existing character of our neighborhood, which consists of single-family homes. Secondly, it would place a significant strain on our infrastructure, including our water and sewer systems, roads, and sidewalks. Thirdly, it would lead to a reduction in property values for homeowners in the area. Furthermore, the proposed development would take away valuable green space and open areas that are currently occupied by the church. It would not offer any new amenities that would benefit our community. Instead, it would bring increased traffic, noise, and pollution, making our community less livable and less desirable for residents. Additionally, the proposed development would have a negative impact on safety in our community, particularly in terms of traffic safety. Equally concerning, is the impact such a development would bring to an already problematic traffic situation at the intersection of Sharon Streets, Jubilee Drive and McLeod Rd. At present, there is no traffic light at the intersection of Sharon St/ Jubilee Dr and McLeod Road. As anyone familiar with this intersection will attest, due to constant heavy traffic load in both directions, it is practically impossible on most days to make a left hand turn from Sharon St onto McLeod Road or a left hand Page 146 of 936 turn from Jubilee Drive onto McLeod Road. It is dangerous and virtually impossible for pedestrians to cross McLeod Road at this intersection as well although many risk this to avoid walking an extra block to cross this street. The second issue faced at this intersection pertains to eastbound traffic on McLeod Road attempting to turn left onto Sharon St often takes up to 3-5 minutes. The same situation exists for westbound traffic attempting to turn left onto Jubilee Drive. This currently causes significant backup of traffic westward on McLeod Road all the way back to Oakwood Drive and eastward towards Dorchester Road many times through the day. This is particularly worse in busy rush hour periods. Constructing a new 50-unit apartment building on this corner will only worsen the situation by adding to the already significant congestion. The current proposed location of the parking lot for this building cannot logically work in this setting without amplifying an already overloaded traffic situation on McLeod Road in both directions. Even if a traffic light is added at the intersection of McLeod Rd and Sharon Street, Jubilee Drive (which would be difficult since Sharon Street and Jubilee Drive are not in direct alignment) the added strain of eastbound cars turning left into the proposed parking lot will further contribute to westward traffic backup on McLeod Road. For traffic reasons alone, it is imperative that a full traffic study is completed before any further consideration is given to this proposal. The construction of a large apartment building at this location will have a detrimental impact on the local community. It will increase traffic congestion, reduce the quality of life for local residents, and negatively impact local businesses. It is essential that the City Council take these factors into account when making a decision on this proposal. In conclusion, I strongly urge you to reject the proposed zoning change and protect our community from these negative impacts. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Lise Grieve Niagara Falls, ON Page 147 of 936 1 Alexa Cooper From:Ron Milde < Sent:Wednesday, May 10, 2023 9:44 PM To:Alexa Cooper Subject:[EXTERNAL]-7081 McLeod Road Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged My husband and I live on Jubilee Dr and we have lived here for almost 34 years. We are opposed to the size of this proposed building. We understand that more housing is needed in our city, but McLeod Rd is an extremely busy street now that we have Costco nearby. The stretch between Oakwood and Dorchester Rd is somemes so congested especially when someone is trying to make a le turn onto Sharon. A 50 unit building means 50 or more vehicles trying to negoate there way in and out of Sharon to McLeod Rd. This will affect our ability to get to our street. We also feel that the height of this building is unfair to the privacy of the homes around it. Our final concern is that there really isn’t any green space, it’s just building and parking. Ron and Linda Milde Sent from my iPad CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organizaon. Do not click links or open aachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 148 of 936 The Niagara Falls Shadow Council A 1-ey'tte|-ed rmiepemienc Sodal cuumeung organization "Holding Gavel-mnents Accountable" Lady Justice Do not rewlact the content:of cm.document This document can be freely distributed aros.2o.2o23.o5 Tuesday,June 20,2023 This is a petition concerning the 06/20/2023 Council Meeting Agenda Item #7.2. PBD-2023-36 AM-2023-O05 Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application 7081 McLeod Road Applicant:LivWell Development Group Inc.(Adam Peaker) Agent:NPG Planning Solutions Inc.(Aaron Butler) Council, The Niagara Falls Shadow Council,its members and the general public petition Council to approve the application to amend the Zoning By-law,subject to the regulations outlined in the report and that the amending zoning by-law include a Holding (H) provision to require to the satisfaction of the City and Niagara Region: I The "Compatibility/Mitigation Study-Air Quality,Noise and Vibration" prepared by SLR Consulting (Canada)Ltd.(dated March 23,2022),as well as any subsequent revisions thereto,be approved by Niagara Region and City; I The approval of City Official Plan Amendment 147 by the Regional Municipality of Niagara and the Amendment going into force and effect; I Any development on the subject lands shall conform to the policies of Official Plan Amendment 147,including any resulting modifications;and, I The implementation of any mitigation measures as required by the approved Land Cornpatibility-Air Quality,Noise and Vibration Study,all to the satisfaction of the City and Niagara Region; and that the Plan of Subdivision be dra?approved subject to the conditions in the attached Appendix A and that the notice of decision include a statement that public input has been received,considered,and has informed the decision of Council and that the Mayor or designate be authorized to sign the dra?plan as "approved"20 days a?er notice of Council’s decision has been given as required by the Planning Act,provided no appeals of the decision have been lodged and that dra?approval be given for three years, Page 149 of 936 after which approval will lapse unless an extension is requested by the developer and granted by Council and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Subdivision Agreement and any required documents to allow for the future registration of the Subdivision when all matters are addressed to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. Petition commenced this day June 15,2023. Signed by. Joedy Burdett Petition Organizer -4480 Bridge St.,Niagara falls,ON,CA William Burdett -Unit 473 23 Four Mile Creek Rd,Niagara-on-the-Lake,ON,CA Len McLean -4692 Chrysler Ave.,Niagara Falls,ON,CA Lynn Burdett -4 Hadden Rd.,Sutton West,ON,CA Michael Lubbetts -4 Hadden Rd.,Sutton West,ON,CA Y Y Y V V7 Joedy Burdett reserves the right to all Planning Act appeals and requests to be notified of all Planning Act notices and desires to be informed and participate in all planning events to which a member of the public is entitle to conceming these matters. Page 150 of 936 J oedy Burdett President of the Niagara Falls Shadow Council Former 2022 Candidate for The Niagara Falls City Council election. Quali?ed Ontario Independent Designer (BCIN 38837) Building Services,Plumbing-All Buildings,Small Buildings Owner Niagara Tinting 4480 Bridge Street,Niagara Falls,ON,CA,L2E 2R7 (905)353 8468 Niagara Falls Shadow Council.ca [TNFSC.ca) The Niagara Falls Shadow Donna’!is a I-eg'slei-ed Independent Social Counseling organization [am 1ooos1s774)a The Niagara Falls Shadow Owundl is not associated with The City of Niagara Falls Altering or Redaeling can document will be viewed as a violation of Section 211»)of The Canadian came:of Rights Page 151 of 936 Petitions addressed to City Council 1. 1 ”! “ 10. A petition is a legibly written request signed by more than one member of the public in support of a shared cause or concern.A petition may be presented in paper format, electronically,or through the use of an on-line system.Council will be the only body that can receive a petition,via the City Clerk. A petition may be delivered in person or sent by mail,fax or email to the City Clerk. A petition must contain the following: 1.The date of when the petition commenced; 2.The name and local civic address,telephone number or email address of the organizer who started the petition for contact purposes; 3.The name and address of each person who signed or electronically submitted their name to the petition,and; 4.A clear,legible statement,which conuuunicates the purpose of the petition.All petitions MUST be related to matters within the direct jurisdiction of the City. A petition shall not contain any obscene or improper matter or language. All information on the petition,including names,addresses and telephone numbers shall become part of the public record of the meeting at which it is received. Petitions must be received by noon on the Friday before a scheduled Council meeting in order to appear on the Council agenda.No petition shall be presented or accepted by Council without first appearing on a Council agenda. Petitions that relate to a matter listed on the Council agenda will appear as additional correspondence listed under the related agenda item.At that time any petitions may be read into the record by stating the purpose of the petition and indicating how many ‘relevant’individuals have signed.“Relevant’meaning;those who have listed both their name and local address to the petition. Unless otherwise directed by Council by way of a motion.petitions pertaining to a matter on the agenda,will be received and filed for information. A petition not relating to an item on the agenda may be listed as under ‘Communications of the City Clerk‘and will also be received and ?led for information unless otherwise directed by Council by way of a motion. The City Clerk shall refuse to list a petition on the council agenda \vhere the subject matter involves; current or pending litigation: insurance claims; labour relations,union negotiations or employee relations: advertisements for products or services: election campaign related; matters not within Council’s jurisdiction matters which have been decided by Council during the current term; matters which have been referred to staff for a report,until the matter is before Council for consideration;and matters which are the subject of an Education and Training Session of Council. .‘°.°°.“.°‘.”':".“’!°t“ Page 152 of 936 PBD-2023-37 Report Report to: Mayor and Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: AM-2021-005 Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application 7449 Montrose Road Applicant: 2683421 Ontario Limited Agent: Zelinka Priamo Ltd. (Rob McFarlane) Recommendation(s) 1. That Council approve the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment to permit an 8 storey apartment building, a 13 storey apartment building, and ten 3 storey block townhouses with a density of 150 units per hectare on the subject lands. 2. That the amending zoning by-law include a Holding (H) provision to require the submission of an updated Wind Study (with wind tunnel modelling), tree compensation agreement at a ratio of 2 trees for every 1 tree removed, an updated Traffic Impact Study, an updated Phase 1 and a Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment and Record of Site Condition, if required, and an updated Noise Study to the satisfaction of the Niagara Region and the City. Executive Summary 2683421 Ontario Limited has requested an Official Plan and Zoning By -law amendment to permit the development of an 8 storey apartment building, a 13 storey apartment building, and ten 3 storey block townhouses with a density of 150 units per hectare for a total of 382 dwelling units. A Planning Justification Report, Environmental Impact Study, Functional Servicing Report, Noise Study, Shadow Analysis, Transportation Impact Study, Arborist Report, Tree Inventory Preservation Plan, Landscape Plan, Wind Study , and Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment. The amendments are recommended, subject to a Holding (H) provision, for the following reasons: • The proposed development conforms to Provincial, Regional, and Local policies, as it intensifies land within the Built-up Area, will assist the City in meeting its intensification targets, will provide additional housing choices for residents, and is appropriate development for the area; Page 1 of 13 Page 153 of 936 • The requested site specific residential zone, as modified in this report, maintains appropriate regulations for the proposed dwelling types and ensures the proposed development will be compatible with surrounding properties ; • To date, no concerns have been provided by the public and, • The Holding (H) provision will ensure that matters such as environmental site conditions, design considerations for wind comfort level at the pedestrian scale, traffic, and noise requirements will be adequately addressed before development can occur. Background Proposal 2683421 Ontario Limited has requested an Official Plan and Zoning By -law amendment to permit the development of an 8 storey apartment building (Building B, 158 dwelling units), a 13 storey apartment building (Building A, 167 dwelling units), and ten 3 storey block townhouses (Buildings C1-C10, 57 dwelling units) for a total of 382 dwelling units. The subject lands are municipally known as 7449 Montrose Road and are approximately 2.5 hectares (6.2 acres), as shown on Schedule 1. Schedule 2 shows details of the proposed development and Schedule 3 shows a rendering of the design concept. The subject land is designated Major Commercial and is within the Niagara Square Retail District in the City’s Official Plan. The designation permits residential development th at complements the district, including apartment buildings up to 6 storeys in height with a maximum density of 100 units per hectare. The applicant is requesting that th e lands be placed under a Special Policy Area designation to permit apartment buildings with a maximum height of 8 and 13 storeys, townhouses with a maximum height of 3 storeys, and to permit a maximum density of 150 units per hectare, excluding road widen ings. The subject land is zoned Planned Shopping Centre Commercial Zone (SC -773), under Zoning By-law No. 79-200, as amended. The applicant is requesting the land be placed under a site specific Residential Apartment 5F Density (R5F) zone to permit the p roposed development. Site Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses The subject land is currently vacant with trees at its west end that are not considered to be a significant wood lot. It is bound by McLeod Road to the north, Montrose Road to the east, and Pin Oak Drive to the west. To the north is the McBain Centre and commercial uses; to the west is a gas station, car wash, and other commercial uses; to the south is Niagara Square; and, to the east is a Royal Bank and land approved for future commercial development. Page 2 of 13 Page 154 of 936 Circulation Comments • Niagara Region o No objections, subject to a holding provision for an updated Phase 1 and 2 Environmental Site Assessment clearly identifying previous land uses, and Record of Site Condition, if required. The current submissions indicate the previous use was a campground but do not explicitly state this. o It is recommended the applicant demonstrate that all other alternatives for noise mitigation have been exhausted prior to the City approving the proposed Class 4 noise designation for the subject property. In response, the City is requiring an updated Noise Study to address alternatives to noise mitigation. o An updated Traffic Impact Study will be required at site plan. A Holding (H) provision is being applied. o Tree plantings and landscape features will be addressed at site plan. o There are no Regional Core Natural Heritage System features on the property. o The Official Plan amendment is exempt from Region Council approval. • Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority o No objections. o The two swamp communities identified on the site do not provide specialized habitat functions nor do they function as part of a wetland complex. o The swamps do not fulfil the definition of a wetland provided in the Conservation Authority Act and are therefore no longer regulated by the NPCA. • Building Services o Building permits will need to be obtained. Building permit fees and development charges will be assessed during building permit application review. • Transportation Services o Updates to the Traffic Impact Study are required to address left-turn lane requirements, traffic count timing, and address potential traffic increases from future developments. A Holding (H) provision will be applied. These are technical details that can be addressed prior to site plan submission. • Business Development, Fire Services, GIS Services, Landscape Services, Legal Services, and Municipal Works o No objections to application or site specific regulations. o Detailed technical review will occur at site plan stage. o Confirmation at site plan that the arborist report is current. Page 3 of 13 Page 155 of 936 Neighbourhood Comments The neighbourhood open house was held on July 27, 2021, attended by the applicant, the applicant’s agent, and one (1) resident. The resident provided no comments fo r the proposal. To date, no written comments have been received from the public. Submitted Reports The following reports were submitted with the applications to amend the City's Official Plan and Zoning By-law 79-200: • Planning Justification Report, • Environmental Impact Study, • Functional Servicing Report, • Noise Study, • Shadow Analysis, • Transportation Impact Study, • Arborist Report, • Tree Inventory Preservation Plan, • Landscape Plan, • Wind Study, and • Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment. Analysis 1. Provincial Policies The Planning Act requires City planning decisions to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and conform to the Provincial “A Place to Grow” Plan. The proposed development is consistent and conforms as follows: • The proposed development satisfies matters of provincial interest as outlined in Section 2 of the Planning Act, subject to the lifting of the Holding (H) provisions; • The proposed development is within a settlement area, provides a mix of housing options, is transit supportive, assists in the creation of a complete community as it is within walking distance to major commercial uses, and effectively uses land and infrastructure; and, • An updated Noise Study is required to demonstrate that all other alternatives for noise mitigation have been exhausted prior to approving a Class 4 noise designation for the subject property. A Holding (H) provision is being applied. Page 4 of 13 Page 156 of 936 2. Regional Official Plan The subject land is designated as Urban Area (Built-up Area) in the Regional Official Plan. The proposal conforms as follows: • The proposed development will contribute to the Regional intensification density target of 50% and the apartment and townhouse dwelling units will diversify the housing supply, contribute to the creation of a complete community, and effectively utilize municipal infrastructure and urban lands; • An updated Phase 1 and 2 Environmental Site Assessment and Record of Site Condition (if required) will clearly identify the previous use of the land and if remediation is required. The updates are anticipated to identify the previous use as a campground and outline steps on how the land may need to be remediated. The updated Assessments will also confirm if the filing of a Record of Site Condition is required. A Holding (H) provision is being applied; and, • An updated Traffic Impact Study is required to determine if road upgrades are required based on anticipated traffic volumes for the surrounding area. A Holding (H) provision is being applied. 3. City Official Plan The Official Plan designates the subject land as Major Commercial and it is within the Niagara Square Retail District. Residential development is permitted on the subject lands that complements and enhances the function of the district. The prop osed residential use is permitted to develop to a maximum height of 6 storeys with a maximum density of 100 units per hectare as it abuts an arterial road and is near commercial uses. The applicant is requesting the lands be placed under a Special Policy Area designation to permit an 8 and a 13 storey apartment building and 3 storey townhouse blocks with a maximum density of 150 units per hectare, excluding road widenings. When reviewing an Official Plan amendment, Council is to consider the conformity of the proposal to the general objectives of the Plan, suitability of the site or area for the proposed use, compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent land use designations, need for the use, availability of adequate municipal services, and, facilities for the proposed uses and its financial implications. The proposal complies with the intent of the Official Plan as follows: • The proposed residential uses will complement and enhance the function of the commercial district by providing a large number of residents in close proximity to existing commercial uses that will assist in creating a complete community; • The proposal will be compatible with the neighbourhood as buildings with greater heights and densities are permitted west of the site. The proposal is similar in scale to the approved 12 storey apartment building to the west; Page 5 of 13 Page 157 of 936 • The 13 storey tower has a 6 storey podium and for the 8 storey building, Staff recommend a 4 storey podium. The design of the apartment buildings, with their linear elements (i.e. columns, windows, and exterior façade cladding) and variation in heights, will provide visual interest and a positive interface with McLeod Road. Staff recommend landmarking be sought at the site plan stage. This can be achieved through unique architectural elements; • Shadowing from the proposed development should not affect any developed residential properties. Setbacks are recommended for the proposed apartment buildings to provide a defined podium and reduce shadowing. There is minimal impact along Pin Oak Drive, McLeod Road, and Montrose Road; • The Wind Study anticipates fast walking (0-36km/h) wind conditions between Buildings A and B as well as at the northeast corner of Building A in the winter. An updated Wind Study with wind tunnel modelling is required for Buildings A and B to demonstrate the building design has been amended to present comfortable/safe wind conditions for standing pedestrians (0-29km/h). A Holding (H) provision is being applied; • Surface parking is provided interior to the site and is screened with the placement of the buildings and landscaping. The majority of parking is provided below grade; • The 8 storey apartment building is targeted to be rental apartments while the 13 storey apartment building and townhouses are targeted to be sold for individual ownership. The proposed units are intended to be more affordable than what is currently in the area, but not intended to be affordable as per the City’s Official Plan definition. This application was filed prior to the adoption of the City's Affordable Housing policies and therefore requiring 40% of the units as affordable is not recommended; • An updated Phase 1 and 2 Environmental Site Assessment and Record of Site Condition (if required) will clearly identify the previous use of the land and if remediation is required. The updates are anticipated to identify the previous use as a campground and outline steps on how the land may need to be remediated. The updated Assessments will also confirm if the filing of a Record of Site Condition is required. A Holding (H) provision is being applied. The Noise Study is requesting a Class 4 designation due to the car wash to the west of the subject land. Class 4 designations are put in place when noise requirements cannot be met and mitigation measures are not feasible. This is often used as a last resort when all other options have been exhausted. Mitigation measures have no t been detailed and there is no explanation to why mitigation is not feasible. As such, Staff are requesting that a Holding (H) provision be placed on the subject land requiring an updated Noise Study to provide noise mitigation options for the property and only apply a Class 4 designation if necessary. A tree compensation agreement is recommended to compensate for the existing trees to be removed at a rate of 2 trees for every 1 tree removed. The Arborist Report indicates there are approximately 137 trees on site and 10 are proposed to remain. A Holding (H) provision is being applied. Page 6 of 13 Page 158 of 936 4. Zoning By-law The applicant has requested a site specific R5F zone be applied to the entire site to permit the proposed development. The departures requested from the standard R5F regulations are summarized as follows: ZONE REGULATION EXISTING REGULATION REQUESTED REGULATION Staff Recommendation (Details to Follow) Deem to be a lot N/A That the lands shown in Schedule 2 of this report be considered one lot Support Permitted uses As per Section 7.15.1 of By-law 79-200 Add a block townhouse dwelling Support Front lot line Pin Oak Drive and Montrose Road To deem McLeod Road as the front lot line Support Minimum lot area 57 square metres per apartment unit 63.9 square metres per dwelling unit Support Minimum front yard depth 7.5 metres + 15 metres from the original centreline of McLeod Road 2 metres + 15 metres from the original centreline of McLeod Road Support Minimum rear yard depth 10 metres 8.4 metres Support Minimum exterior side yard width 7.5 metres + 13 metres to the centreline of Pin Oak Drive 7.5 metres + 15.25 metres to the centreline of Montrose Road 4 metres + 13 metres to the centreline of Pin Oak Drive 12.4 metres + 15.25 metres to the centreline of Montrose Road Support Minimum landscaped open space 55% 47% Support Page 7 of 13 Page 159 of 936 ZONE REGULATION EXISTING REGULATION REQUESTED REGULATION Staff Recommendation (Details to Follow) Number of apartment dwellings on one lot 1 2 Support Maximum permitted number of dwelling units N/A 400 Don’t Support Parking requirements 1.4 parking spaces per dwelling unit 534 parking spaces 1.25 parking spaces per dwelling unit 477 parking spaces Support with modifications Maximum permitted height 28 metres 47 metres (13 storey apartment building) 30 metres (8 storey apartment building) 9 metres (townhouse dwellings) Support Maximum permitted lot coverage 30% 33% Support The requested zoning is appropriate as follows: • Considering the subject land one lot and deeming McLeod Road to be the front lot line is supported; • Allowing block townhouse dwellings as a permitted use, and permitting 2 apartment dwellings on the lot, is supported as it will provide a mix of housing; • The reduction in lot area is supported as it is required to permit the proposed density; • The reduction to front yard depth, exterior side lot width, and landscaped space are supported as suitable landscaped areas have been provided for streetscaping and maintenance, and a centralized parkette is provided on site; • The reduction to the rear yard depth can be supported as it is not anticipated to result in negative impacts to Niagara Square to the south; • The increase in lot coverage can be supported as there is an adequate amount space for parking, setbacks, and landscaping; • The requested increase in the R5F regulation for height is supported as no impact to abutting properties is anticipated; and, Page 8 of 13 Page 160 of 936 • The requested reduction in the parking regulations is supported by Transportation Services staff as an appropriate amount of parking is provided for residents and visitors and the property is on a transit route. Planning Staff recommend that 120 spaces be provided above ground and that 357 parking spaces be provided below ground. This can be achieved by removing 13 spaces above ground as the plan proposes more parking spaces than required at a rate of 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit. Staff recommend that 13 space adjoining the parkette lands be removed and the parkette be expanded, at the site plan stage. Staff recommend the following regulation be included in the amending by -law: • A 3 metre setback be provided above the 4th floor for Building B, and a 3 metre setback be provided above the 6th floor for Building A to reduce shadowing impacts and the massing of the building as it increases in height. This will be shown in the height schedule to be passed with the amending by-law, if approved. The requested zoning is inappropriate as follows: • Staff are unable to support the requested maximum of 400 dwelling u nits. The Official Plan amendment requests a density of 150 units per hectare, excluding road widenings, which is a total of 394 units for the land. The requested 400 dwelling units exceeds the maximum number of units per hectare. Staff recommend that the requested Official Plan amendment of 150 units per hectare regulate the maximum number of units permitted on the land. Holding (H) Provision The amending by-law is recommended to include a Holding (H) provision to require: • An updated Phase 1 and 2 Environmental Site Assessment and a Record of Site Condition (RSC) be filed with the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks, if required, and a copy be provided to the Niagara Region and City; • An updated Wind Study with wind tunnel modelling demonstrating safe wind conditions for pedestrians for Buildings A and B to the satisfaction of the City; • A tree compensation agreement be entered into with the City at a rate of 2 trees provided for every 1 tree removed; • An updated Traffic Impact Study be submitted to the satisfaction of the City and Region; and, • An updated Noise Study be submitted to the satisfaction of the City and Region. Operational Implications and Risk Analysis No operational or risk implications. Financial Implications/Budget Impact Page 9 of 13 Page 161 of 936 The proposed development will generate development charge contributions, community benefits, cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication, and property tax revenue for the City. Strategic/Departmental Alignment The proposed development supports the Diverse Housing Strategic Priority by providing housing to meet the needs of people of all ages, incomes and abilities. List of Attachments Schedule 1 - Location Map Schedule 2 - Conceptual Site Plan Schedule 3 - Rendering Written by: Alexa Cooper, Planner 2 Submitted by: Status: Andrew Bryce, Director of Planning Approved - 13 Jun 2023 Kira Dolch, General Manager, Planning, Building & Development Approved - 13 Jun 2023 Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 15 Jun 2023 Page 10 of 13 Page 162 of 936 SCHEDULE 1 (Location Map) McLeod Road Pin Oak Drive Page 11 of 13 Page 163 of 936 SCHEDULE 2 (Conceptual Site Plan) Page 12 of 13 Page 164 of 936 SCHEDULE 3 (Rendering) Page 13 of 13 Page 165 of 936 Address: 7449 Montrose Road Applicant: 2683421 Ontario Limited Proposal: To permit a residential development consisting of 382 units in apartment and townhouse dwellings Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendment Application AM-2021-010 Page 166 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Location PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Shopping Mall & Big Box Stores MacBain Community Centre Commercial Retirement Residence Apartments Page 167 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Background •Land is designated Major Commercial in Official Plan and within the Niagara Square Retail District. •An Official Plan Amendment is requested to permit a density of 150 units/ha. •The subject land is zoned Planned Shopping Centre Commercial (SC-733) Zone. •Applicant is requesting the land be rezoned to a site specific Residential Apartment 5F Density (R5F) zone.Page 168 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Site Plan 13 storey apartment 8 storey apartment 3 storey townhouses Page 169 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Rendering Page 170 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Requested Zoning Relief Minimum Rear Yard Depth 8.4m (10m req’d) Maximum of 2 apt buildings on one lot Min. Front Yard Depth 2 m + 15 m CL of McLeod (7.5 m +15 m required) Maximum Building Height-13 storeys and 47m, 8 storeys and 30m, 3 storeys and 9m (townhouse) Maximum Number of Dwelling Units 400 Don’t Support Minimum Lot Area- 63.9 sq.m./dwelling unit (57 req’d) Max. Lot Coverage- 33% (30% req’d) Min. Parking Rate 1.25 spaces/dwelling unit (1.4 req’d) with 120 spaces above ground and 357 below Deem the land to be considered 1 lot Permit townhouses Minimum Exterior Side 4m + 13m to CL of Pin Oak 12.4m + 15.25 to CL of Montrose (7.5 m + distance to CL) Min. Landscaped Open Space 47% (55% req’d) 3m setback above 4th floor 3m setback above 6th floor Page 171 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Public Comments •An Open House was held in July 2021. •One resident attended for information purposes and provided no comments. •No written comments have been received to date. Page 172 of 936 A GREAT CITY…FOR GENERATIONS TO COME Recommendation That Council approve the proposed Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendment as modified in report PBD-2023-37, subject to a Holding (H) provision. •The Holding (H) provision is recommended to be placed on the land to require: o Updated Phase 1 & 2 Environmental Site Assessment and Record of Site Condition, if required; o Updated Wind Study with wind tunnel modelling; o A tree compensation agreement; o Updated Traffic Impact Study; and, o Updated Noise Study.Page 173 of 936 7449 Montrose Road Bayfield Realty Advisors Public Meeting Proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment File No. AM-2021-010 June 20, 2023 Page 174 of 936 2. Subject Lands Subject Lands: +/-2.63 ha (6.5 ac) Location and boundaries are approximatePage 175 of 936 3. Niagara Falls Official Plan: Future Land Use Subject Lands Page 176 of 936 4. Niagara Falls Zoning By-law 79-200 Subject Lands Page 177 of 936 5. Concept Plan Page 178 of 936 6. Concept Massing –Building A Page 179 of 936 7. Concept Massing –Building B Page 180 of 936 8. Concept Massing -Townhouses Page 181 of 936 9. Proposed Planning Applications Official Plan Amendment •Site Specific Policy •Allow for a mix of apartment and townhouses •Recognize the scale (height/density) proposed Zoning By-law Amendment –Site Specific R5F •Permitting townhouse uses, including back-to back townhouses (new defined term); •For the purposes of zoning, the lands shall be interpreted as one lot; •A maximum of two apartment buildings and 10 townhouse buildings are permitted; •The maximum building height for back-to-back town houses is 3 storeys, and the maximum height for apartments is 13 storeys as shown on the height schedule; •A minimum parking rate of 1.25 spaces per unit, for residential uses; •The maximum number of dwelling units shall be 382; •The minimum lot are shall be 63.9 sq.m per unit; •For interpretation, McLeod Road shall be deemed to be the Front Lot Line; •Establish applicable yard setbacks •Minimum front yard depth is 2m; •Minimum rear yard depth is 8.4m; •Minimum exterior side yard depth is 4.4m; and •Maximum lot coverage is 33% and minimum Landscaped Open Space is 47%Page 182 of 936 10. Thank You Location and boundaries are approximatePage 183 of 936 Page 184 of 936 Page 185 of 936 Page 186 of 936 Page 187 of 936 Town of Aurora General Committee Report No. CS20-013 Subject: Pros and Cons of Ward and At-Large Electoral Systems Prepared by: Michael de Rond, Town Clerk Department: Corporate Services Date: June 16, 2020 Recommendation 1. That Report No. CS20-013 be received for information. Executive Summary This report is being provided concurrently with the Electoral System Review – Final Report to provide Council and the public with academically accepted pros and cons of the ward and at-large electoral systems. The pros and cons are provided by Dr. Robert Williams, a Professor at the University of Waterloo for many years. Background On December 10, 2019, Council directed staff to include a report regarding pros and cons of the Town’s potential change to a ward system. The report is to be provided to Council concurrently with the final report from the consultant regarding ward options for the Town. Analysis Dr. Robert Williams provided last term’s Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee with some general pros and cons of both ward and at-large system. Perceived pros and cons of each system are often circumstantial and may differ greatly across municipalities. Dr. Williams, Professor Emeritus at the University of Waterloo, Political Science department, has conducted or advised on ward boundary and electoral system reviews in more than twenty-five Ontario municipalities, provided generally accepted academic pros and cons of the system in 2017 which are below. In some cases, he provided some Aurora specific points in parenthesis; At-Large System – Pros General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Item R1 Page 1 of 12 Page 188 of 936 June 16, 2020 Page 2 of 4 Report No. CS20-013 • Electors have greater choice and flexibility in elections (each voter has the opportunity to consider every candidate in the Council election). • Electors are able to select the candidates they think will do the best job, rather than having to make a choice among candidates who happen to run in their ward. • Residents will have a larger number of Councillors to approach with their concerns. • The system promotes the concept of a Town-wide focus, with Councillors being elected by, and concerned for, the Town as a whole, rather than placing a priority on more parochial interests. • The likelihood of acclamations is reduced. At-Large System – Cons • There would be no designated voices for particular neighbourhoods. • At-large elections can lead to significant communities of interest and points of view being unrepresented (or under-represented). • The system can lead to Councillors being relatively inaccessible for residents of some parts of the Town (each Councillor has 55,000+ constituents). • Candidates who appeal to areas where voter turnout is highest tend to be elected disproportionately. • Large numbers of candidates on the ballot (18 in 2010, 28 in 2014) can be confusing for voters. • Candidates must campaign across the entire municipality; this may make the cost of a campaign prohibitive (especially for newcomers). • The format can lead to confusion of responsibilities and duplication of effort on the part of Councillors (everybody on Council represents everybody in the municipality).1 Ward System – Pros • Councillors are more likely to be truly local representatives, easily accessible to residents and aware of local issues • Significant communities of interest are more likely to be represented. 1 Dr. Robert Williams, Report to Town of Aurora Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee, https://www.aurora.ca/en/your-government/resources/Legislative-Services/Agendas-and-Minutes/2020- Committee-Documents/Governance-Review-Ad-Hoc-Committee/GRAHC-2020-03-04-Agenda-bmk.pdf, page 3 General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Item R1 Page 2 of 12 Page 189 of 936 June 16, 2020 Page 3 of 4 Report No. CS20-013 • It is less likely that one particular point of view or sectional interest will dominate the Council. • Provides more cost-efficient government, primarily by eliminating duplication of administrative work communicating the same information to and from two or more Councillors. • Simplifies the election process for electors. Ward System – Cons • Voters may have a restricted choice of candidates in elections for individual wards. • There is a greater likelihood of acclamations. • There may be problems if a Councillor is not performing effectively or is clashing with some electors, as electors in a single-member ward have no alternative (knowledgeable) Councillor to approach. • Ward boundaries may be susceptible to frequent change caused by demographic shifts. • Population changes can lead to unequal workloads for Councillors until ward boundaries are reviewed. • If a Councillor resigns or dies, it may be necessary to hold a by-election to select a replacement. • May discourage new candidates if an incumbent is generally popular or if an incumbent who is popular with a dominant community of interest is running.2 Advisory Committee Review Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the planned meeting of the Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee was cancelled. This report was circulated to the Committee for comment prior to being placed on the agenda. Legal Considerations None 2 Dr. Robert Williams, Report to Town of Aurora Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee, https://www.aurora.ca/en/your-government/resources/Legislative-Services/Agendas-and-Minutes/2020- Committee-Documents/Governance-Review-Ad-Hoc-Committee/GRAHC-2020-03-04-Agenda-bmk.pdf, page 3-4 General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Item R1 Page 3 of 12 Page 190 of 936 June 16, 2020 Page 4 of 4 Report No. CS20-013 Financial Implications None Communications Considerations None Alternative(s) to the Recommendation 1. Council provide direction . Conclusions This report is being provided in accordance with Council direction and is meant to offer general pros and cons for the ward and at -large electoral systems. Attachments Attachment 1 - Report to Town of Aurora Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee Previous Reports None Pre -submission Review Agenda Management Team review by email prior to June 5, 2020 Departmental Approval Approved for Agenda Techa van Leeuwen Doug Nadorozny Director Chief Administrative Officer Corporate Services General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Item R1 Page 4 of 12 Page 191 of 936 Report to Town of Aurora Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee May 5, 2017 Prepared by Dr. Robert J. Williams Purpose On April 11, 2017, the Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee voted to “recommend to Council: (a) That staff investigate and report back on the feasibility of a ward system, including the process and cost of retaining a consultant, projected budget, and timelines”. This report is provided to the Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee in response to its direction to staff. Systems of Representation in Ontario Municipalities Municipalities in Ontario are governed by elected Councils that are subject to legislative provisions found in the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 and the Municipal Act, 2001. While elections themselves are subject to numerous standard practices related, for example, to elector and candidate eligibility, nominations, financial accountability and other institutional arrangements that are set out in detail, the system of representation is described in minimal terms. The Municipal Act, 2001 at s. 217 (1) (4) provides that “other than the head of council, members shall be elected by general vote or wards or by any combination of general vote and wards” and at s. 222 (1) it authorizes a municipality “to divide or redivide the municipality into wards or to dissolve the existing wards” through a by-law. Beyond those brief references, there are no conditions or constraints imposed by the Province to help formulate a local decision to adopt one electoral system or another. The distinction between the two systems is primarily based on the way the municipality is organized to elect the members of the Council. In one system, referred to as a “general vote” system in the Municipal Act, 2001 (or as an “at-large” system in popular terminology), the municipality is a Attachment 1 General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Item R1 Page 5 of 12 Page 192 of 936 single electoral district in which all seats on the municipal Council are contested. In other words, the entire municipality can be considered a “multi-member” electoral district. In the other system (a ward system), the municipality is divided into a number of electoral districts that elect representatives in separate contests. Within this arrangement, the “district magnitude” (that is the number of seats to be elected in each district) may vary from one (a “single-member” ward) to some larger number (a “multi- member” ward). As noted above, s. 217 of the Municipal Act, 2001, makes it possible to include both general vote and ward systems in a single municipality’s electoral system. In some cases, as well, the system of representation includes a combination of single-member and multi-member wards. Aurora has always used a general vote system, despite attempts from time to time to change to a ward system. Once again, there is no direction from the Province either through legislation or regulation about the conditions to be met or considered for changing from one system to the other. While there are clearly differences in the impact of each system, there are no “standard” circumstances that favour one method over the other. Nor is one system or the other mandatory for particular types of municipalities. For many people, a general vote system is the most appropriate election method in municipalities where the population is small. Aurora has traditionally been considered “small.” Today the population is approximately 55,000 and arguably that label should no longer apply.1 However, as noted already, there is no conventional benchmark to apply to indicate whether a change is appropriate. Exercising the authority set out in s 217 of the Municipal Act, 2001 to adopt one system rather than the other is therefore at Council’s discretion. Comparing the Alternatives The Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee is interesting in exploring a ward system for Aurora in 2017 through a Ward Boundary Review. Given the long history of at-large elections in the Town, it is prudent to provide 1 The 2016 Census shows a population of 55,445 in Aurora, up from 53,203 in the 2011 Census (an increase of 4.2%). General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Item R1 Page 6 of 12 Page 193 of 936 members of Council and residents a summary of some of the implications of the two systems as background.2 Implications of an At-Large System of Representation Advantages Disadvantages • Electors have greater choice and flexibility in elections (each voter has the opportunity to consider every candidate in the Council election). • Electors are able to select the candidates they think will do the best job, rather than having to make a choice among candidates who happen to run in their ward. • Residents will have a larger number of Councillors to approach with their concerns. • The system promotes the concept of a Town-wide focus, with Councillors being elected by, and concerned for, the Town as a whole, rather than placing a priority on more parochial interests. • The likelihood of acclamations is reduced. • There would be no designated voices for particular neighbourhoods. • At-large elections can lead to significant communities of interest and points of view being unrepresented (or under-represented). • The system can lead to Councillors being relatively inaccessible for residents of some parts of the Town (each Councillor has 55,000+ constituents). • Candidates who appeal to areas where voter turnout is highest tend to be elected disproportionately. • Large numbers of candidates on the ballot (18 in 2010, 28 in 2014) can be confusing for voters. • Candidates must campaign across the entire municipality; this may make the cost of a campaign prohibitive (especially for newcomers). • The format can lead to confusion of responsibilities and duplication of effort on the part of Councillors (everybody on Council represents everybody in the municipality). Implications of a Ward System of Representation Advantages Disadvantages • Councillors are more likely to be truly local representatives, easily accessible to residents and aware of local issues. • Councillors may be elected on minor or parochial issues and may lack a perspective of what is to the benefit of the Town as a whole. 2 This is a summary extracted by the author from reports he has previously prepared. Many of these points were also included in Wards for Aurora: A Discussion Paper prepared in 2010 by Aurora’s Customer & Legislative Services Department. General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Item R1 Page 7 of 12 Page 194 of 936 Advantages Disadvantages • Significant communities of interest are more likely to be represented. • It is less likely that one particular point of view or sectional interest will dominate the Council. • Provides more cost-efficient government, primarily by eliminating duplication of administrative work communicating the same information to and from two or more Councillors. • Simplifies the election process for electors. • Voters may have a restricted choice of candidates in elections for individual wards. • There is a greater likelihood of acclamations. • There may be problems if a Councillor is not performing effectively or is clashing with some electors, as electors in a single-member ward have no alternative (knowledgeable) Councillor to approach. • Ward boundaries may be susceptible to frequent change caused by demographic shifts. • Population changes can lead to unequal workloads for Councillors until ward boundaries are reviewed. • If a Councillor resigns or dies, it may be necessary to hold a by-election to select a replacement. • May discourage new candidates if an incumbent is generally popular or if an incumbent who is popular with a dominant community of interest is running. Briefly, the at-large system places an emphasis on Councillors having a Town-wide mandate and outlook and electors having greater choices at election time. The reality, however, is that all eight Councillors are faced with the potential of having to deal with questions and issues from all 55,000 plus residents and electors have been required to sort through 18 candidates in 2010 and 28 candidates in 2014 to mark up to eight names on their ballot. The ward system places greater emphasis on direct accountability and the expectation that distinctive neighbourhood voices will be heard around the Council table. The reality, however, may be that in some wards choices will be limited and the ward boundaries will need to be reviewed periodically to stay in step with population changes. General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Item R1 Page 8 of 12 Page 195 of 936 What is a Ward Boundary Review? A Ward Boundary Review (W.B.R.) is basically a task designed to assist Council in reaching a determination on an electoral arrangement that provides effective representation through a structure sensitive to the geographic distribution of the inhabitants of the municipality. In Ontario there is no prescribed process for a municipality to follow to review its system of representation and no mandatory principles to apply in the design of an electoral system. It is therefore up to each municipal council to set the terms of reference for a review, including the process to be followed, and, ideally, to establish criteria or guiding principles that can be used to evaluate the municipality’s electoral system. Given the primary importance of the electoral structure to those presently holding public office in the Town, a review that would be considered acceptable by the community (and by the O.M.B. in the event of an appeal) must be conducted for the municipality by someone who is not a member of Council or a municipal employee, ideally an experienced independent consultant. Furthermore, a successful W.B.R. requires expertise on municipal electoral systems, reliable data on present and future population trends across the municipality, expertise to develop and map alternative designs and a public engagement strategy. Without access to such capacities, there is a risk that an electoral review may lead to unfair, ill-conceived or politically motivated results. An effective W.B.R. process would require Council to agree at the outset on a set of guiding principles (that is, “what would wards and a ward system ‘look like’ in Aurora?”) and a process consistent with Town practices in relation to public consultation. In this instance, it would also be important for Council to confirm what the Municipal Act, 2001 calls “the composition of Council.” That is, will the Council remain at nine members (a Mayor and eight Town Councillors)? In conducting a comprehensive W.B.R., a consultant would start by developing a clear understanding of the present electoral system, including its origins and operations as a system of representation. The next step would be to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the present system on the basis of the identified principles with the aim of Identifying plausible General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Item R1 Page 9 of 12 Page 196 of 936 modifications to the present electoral structure. Without wards in place, some of the evidence would possibly have to be anecdotal (for example voter turnout or residential addresses of successful candidates). Put another way, what are the “problems” with representation that could be solved by changing from an at-large system to a ward system? Since an at-large system implicitly treats the municipality as a single community of interest, some evidence about the delivery of services, transportation patterns, residential configurations, retail and commercial clusters and other data will shed light on whether Aurora can be considered a compact community built around a single population node – a community where an at-large system might still be appropriate. If this is not the case, the Review would seek to develop options that capture the diversity of the Town in the election of its Councillors. In order to design wards that will provide effective representation over at least two elections, detailed population data (including growth forecasts) for the Town will also be a priority. A successful W.B.R. will include an appropriate consultation process to ensure community support for the review and its outcome. In this phase, various alternative arrangements will be subject to public discussion and comment both at public meetings and through on-line tools. Finally, Council will receive a report that will set out recommended alternative ward boundaries to ensure effective and equitable electoral arrangements for the Town of Aurora, based on the principles identified. Are Wards “Feasible” in Aurora? The Governance Review Ad Hoc Committee asks about the “feasibility” of wards in Aurora. This is a legitimate concern since the Municipal Act, 2001 stipulates that municipal elections be conducted under provisions in place on January 1 of an election year. Since 2018 is the next municipal election year in Ontario, any changes to the Town’s electoral system must be agreed upon in time to allow for an Ontario Municipal Board hearing, should any decision to divide the municipality into wards be appealed. The full process includes two segments: getting to a Council decision and the legislated appeal period. The latter (Municipal Act, 2001 section 222) basically includes a 15 day notification period after Council passes a by-law to establish wards, a 45 day appeal period during which the by-law could be appealed to the O.M.B. and the time needed by the Board to schedule, General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Item R1 Page 10 of 12 Page 197 of 936 conduct and rule on an appeal. Unless a by-law passed after the middle of October has significant community support and is unlikely to be appealed, the implementation of a change to a ward system late this year is risky. It can be done but above all requires Council to select a plausible and defensible ward configuration. The process of getting a recommendation to Council can take several months, depending on the time required to collect and analyze data, to undertake background research and consultation, to conduct public consultation and finalize suitable options for Council to consider. However, several of these steps can be compressed without compromising the integrity of the process. Ideally, to meet the timelines just noted, Council should endorse a W.B.R. as soon as possible, including a set of guiding principles and other terms of reference. As well, an independent consultant should be identified and engaged by the end of June 2017. Stage in Process Month Conduct research on present electoral system Collect data on present and future population Conduct interviews with elected officials and senior Town staff July 2017 Conduct public open house to consider alternative ward configurations and seek public feedback September 2017 Prepare report to Council with alternative ward configurations and recommendation early October 2017 Council approval of final report and adoption of by- law mid-October 2017 at the latest Possible O.M.B. appeal process (includes time for appeals, notifications, and hearings by the Board) October- December 2017 Budget Requirements Comparable Ward Boundary Reviews with appropriate public consultation have been conducted by experienced consultants on a budget of $35,000 - $40,000 (including disbursements but excluding HST). Municipal staff’s role would be limited to providing background data to support technical work, to General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Item R1 Page 11 of 12 Page 198 of 936 oversee provision of communications, correspondence and to make logistical arrangements for the public consultation component. The consultants would handle the bulk of the project at arm’s length, including research, data collection, mapping, running public consultation sessions and preparing and presenting reports. This report was prepared by Dr. Robert J. Williams, an independent consultant specializing in municipal electoral systems. Since 2008 he has personally undertaken reviews for Kitchener, Markham, Milton, New Tecumseth, Oakville, Whitchurch- Stouffville, Windsor and West Lincoln. He has also worked in conjunction with Watson and Associates on reviews for Pelham, Barrie, Bradford West Gwillimbury, Clearview, Gravenhurst, Hamilton, Milton, Georgina and Severn. They are currently collaborating on ward boundary reviews in Oshawa, Scugog, Orillia and Essex. Dr. Williams has also been an advisor to Municipal Clerks or citizens on ward boundary matters in Wilmot, Brantford, East Gwillimbury, Georgian Bay, Kearney, Killarney and Kawartha Lakes. He has served as an expert witness before the OMB hearings on ten occasions. In 2010 he was engaged by the Nova Scotia Utilities and Review Board to prepare reports in relation to the appropriate size of councils in Halifax and Cape Breton Regional Municipalities. Dr. Williams is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of Waterloo. General Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Item R1 Page 12 of 12 Page 199 of 936 Status: 2018 Municipal Election Municipality Name Ward At Large Population (2016 Census) Population (2021 Census)Size Town of LaSalle No At Large 30,180 32,721 65.35 km2 City of Stratford No At Large 31,465 33,232 25.28 km² City of St. Thomas No At Large 38,909 42,840 35.52 km² City of Woodstock No At Large 40,902 46,705 43.79 km² City of Cornwall No At Large 46,589 47,845 61.83 km² City of North Bay No At Large 51,553 52,665 314.9 km² Town of Aurora No At Large 55,445 62,057 50.00 km2 City of Sarnia No At Large 71,594 72,047 164.6 km² City of Niagara Falls No At Large 88,071 94,415 209.7 km² **Information used from AMO and Statistics Canada Page 200 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 905-272-3600 October 14, 2020 info@watsonecon.ca In association with: Dr. Robert J. Williams ICA Associates Inc. and Dr. David Siegel Council Composition and Ward Boundary Review City of Guelph ________________________ Phase 1 Report Page 201 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Terms of Reference ................................................................................... 1 1.2 Municipal Representation in the City of Guelph ......................................... 2 1.3 Study Objectives ........................................................................................ 4 1.4 Project Structure and Timeline ................................................................... 5 1.5 Public Consultation .................................................................................... 6 1.6 Consideration for City Council ................................................................... 8 2. The Composition of City Council .................................................................... 10 2.1 Context .................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Stakeholder and Public Consultation ....................................................... 12 3. Ward System or At-Large System ................................................................... 15 3.1 Context .................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Stakeholder and Public Consultation ....................................................... 16 4. Ward Magnitude (the Number of Councillors per Ward) ............................... 20 4.1 Context .................................................................................................... 20 4.2 Stakeholder and Public Consultation ....................................................... 21 5. The Number of Wards ...................................................................................... 26 5.1 Context .................................................................................................... 26 6. The Role of Councillor: Part-Time or Full-Time? .......................................... 26 6.1 Context .................................................................................................... 26 6.2 Stakeholder and Public Consultation ....................................................... 27 7. Recommendations ........................................................................................... 33 8. Potential Next Step – A Ward Boundary Review ........................................... 36 Appendix A Public Consultation ............................................................................. A-1 Page 202 of 936 Table of Contents (Cont’d) Page Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Appendix B Ward-Based Versus At-Large System Advantages and Disadvantages ................................................................................................ B-1 Appendix C Time Commitment to Council Activities ............................................ C-1 Appendix D Councillor Compensation ................................................................... D-1 Appendix E Media Coverage ....................................................................................E-1 Appendix F Engagement Site Tool – Questions and Answers ............................. F-1 Appendix G Survey Responses .............................................................................. G-1 Page 203 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 1 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx 1. Introduction 1.1 Terms of Reference Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. (Watson), in conjunction with ICA Associates Inc. and Drs. David Siegel and Robert J. Williams, hereinafter referred to as the Consultant Team, was retained by the City of Guelph in January 2020 to conduct a comprehensive Council Composition and Ward Boundary Review. The study has been organized into two phases: • Phase 1 – Council Composition and Employment Status Review; and • Phase 2 – Ward Boundary Review. Phase 1, which is presented herein, includes a review of council composition and employment status. In the Ontario Municipal Act, 2001, section 217 council composition refers simply to the total number of councillors and the method of election (in wards or at-large) but in this study council composition also includes the number of councillors elected in each ward. Employment status refers to whether councillors should be part- time (as they have been in the past) or full-time. Once Council has made a decision on the recommendations resulting from Phase 1 of the review, the Consultant Team will undertake Phase 2 of the study. Phase 2 will encompass a comprehensive evaluation of the City’s ward boundaries and set out alternative ward boundary options to ensure effective and equitable electoral arrangements for the City of Guelph, based on the guiding principles found in the Terms of Reference for the study. Following the completion of Phase 1 and parallel to Phase 2, City staff will prepare a report for Council on voting systems and methods for the 2022 municipal election and, later, Councillor compensation (that is, the actual salary paid to Councillors) and staff support. These two topics do not form part of this study and will be assessed independently of this assignment. Page 204 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 2 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx 1.2 Municipal Representation in the City of Guelph Guelph Council is comprised of thirteen members, including the Mayor and twelve City Councillors, elected in six wards, as presented in Figure 1. Figure 1 Current Ward Map of Guelph Page 205 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 3 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx The current municipal electoral system has been in place, without significant modification, since 1990. At that time, the number of City Councillors (then called aldermen) was increased from 11 to 12 and a ward system was implemented. Each elector has two votes for councillor and the two candidates who receive the largest number of votes in a ward are elected for that ward. The principle of “one person, one vote” anticipates that the population in each ward would be roughly equal. There are other principles that enter into the drawing of ward boundaries (see Chapter 8), but population parity is a very important consideration. Figure 2 illustrates the populations in the six wards in Guelph’s current system based on the 2016 Census.1 Ward 6 has been growing rapidly since these boundaries were established in 2006, meaning that the imbalance in the number of electors per ward would be even greater in 2022 unless some change is made in the ward system. The population metrics presented in Figure 2 make it clear that the wards are at odds with the “one person, one vote” principle. At a minimum, the boundaries of the existing wards need to be changed to bring Guelph into alignment with this principle. Phase 2 of this project will therefore be a ward boundary review, a task which will be conducted to assess the extent to which the present wards constitute an effective and equitable system of representation and, where they do not, to propose alternatives. 1 These figures are for illustration only. The Census only partially captures post- secondary students. During the Ward Boundary Review (in Phase 2), more comprehensive data on the post-secondary student population will be collected and included in the design of new wards. Page 206 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 4 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Figure 2 City of Guelph Population per Ward – 2016 1.3 Study Objectives The primary purpose of Phase 1 of the study is to prepare Guelph City Council to make decisions with respect to: • How many Councillors are appropriate; • Whether Councillors should continue to be elected in wards or city-wide; • If so, how many Councillors should be elected in each ward; and • Whether the City of Guelph would benefit from having City Councillors who could devote themselves full-time to their Council responsibilities or remain part-time. Depending on the decisions made by Council at the conclusion of Phase 1, the next Phase would evaluate the suitability of the present or of alternative wards (in the event that Council determines that there will be some other number of wards). The wards recommended to Council at the conclusion of Phase 2 will be designed with reference to locally approved guiding principles to “re-divide” the City (see Chapter 8). Page 207 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 5 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx 1.4 Project Structure and Timeline The study started in January 2020 and is expected to be completed by May 2021. It is anticipated that Phase 1 of the study will be completed in November 2020. Phase 1 of the review was to be completed by June after a series of Town Hall meetings across the City in March and April 2020. Restrictions during the COVID-19 global pandemic has delayed and changed this phase of the review and the way it has been conducted. To achieve the City’s deadline that any changes to Council composition and ward boundaries be in place before the 2022 municipal election, th e consultants collaborated with City staff to find a way to modify Phase 1 timelines after the project was suspended in March 2020 due to COVID-19. Public consultation and engagement in Phase 1 shifted from three weeks of traditional in-person community engagement, with open houses and events, to three weeks of 24/7 online community engagement to follow physical distancing guidelines and measures. The online engagement period was revised to run three weeks beginning August 17 and ending September 4, 2020. The focus or hub of online engagement became the City’s online engagement platform called: HaveYourSay.Guelph.ca/council-composition. It housed information and background research documents to help provide guidance towards more informed input, an interactive survey, a question and answer tool and a mapping activity. It was built using the City’s subscription to EngagementHQ service. In addition, a live online panel discussion event was held August 25, where citizens participated remotely in real time (by logging into the webinar, through Facebook live, or by dialing in to listen) to share their questions and comments on the topics and have them answered by the experts involved. Communication activities and promotional tactics helped drive informing and engaging public and stakeholder participation by reaching diverse audiences and demographics. To note, although a complete shift occurred from already planned in-person to online consultation, there was no financial impact to the City as a result of this move. The review has reached an important milestone with the release of this Phase 1 Report that will be presented to City Council on November 5, 2020 to seek direction on the four topics noted above. Page 208 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 6 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx The study has several main phases as illustrated in Figure 3. Figure 3 City of Guelph Council Composition, Employment Status and Ward Boundary Review Study Process Council Composition Review Ward Boundary Review • Data Collection and Research • Interviews with Senior City Staff • Interviews with Mayor and Members of Council • Development of Options • Public Consultation (Round 1) • Phase 1 Report • Presentation to City Council • Data Collection and Research • Interviews with Mayor and Members of Council • Population Trends and Growth Analysis • Development of Preliminary Options • Public Consultation – Round 2 • Finalize Options • Phase 2 Report • Presentation to City Council • Adoption and Implementation Through By-law 1.5 Public Consultation The purpose of Phase 1 public consultation was to inform and educate, then gather insights and advice so the Consultant Team could develop recommendations for the public’s and Council's consideration. The topic of council composition and employment status was broken down into five key questions. While these were closed-ended and mandatory questions, there were optional follow-up questions for each so citizens could explain their reasoning. • How many Councillors should sit on the Council? • Should elections be at-large or ward-based? • How many Councillors should be elected per ward? • How many wards should there be? • Should the role of Councillors be understood to be (and paid) as full-time or part- time? As previously mentioned, instead of a series of public meetings in different parts of the City over a few weeks, the online consultation ran 24 hours a day for three weeks. It made ample use of an online engagement platform to which the City subscribes for other projects. In addition, on August 25 there was a livestreamed virtual town hall Page 209 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 7 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx structured like a panel discussion designed to help inform participants with useful background information supported by visuals and a 20-minute question period. Citizens were also invited to telephone the City any time and to send emails and letters as they normally might. Further, sixteen hours of dedicated call-in times for live conversations were also provided (2 hours assigned per day over eight days). These additional opportunities were also promoted. The online engagement platform offered citizens a range of options to meet their needs. If they only wanted to research, there were background documents to download and read. If they wanted to track the project, there was timeline and contact information and they could register for updates. If they had a question, they could ask it and get answers publicly. Most importantly, when visitors to the site felt sufficiently informed about the topic, there was a survey tool for them to add their insights. City staff pulled out all the stops to promote civic engagement by reaching out to their most comprehensive and up-to-date list of over 200 community organizations and encouraging them to reach their own constituencies, and by providing reminders and updates to Councillors, advertising, promotion on the City’s social media accounts, and large signs placed strategically around the City. The City kept track of media exposures like letters to the editor and news stories. Level of Participation Generally speaking, the topic of council composition has proven challenging to attract citizen involvement within other communities. In Guelph, the Consultant Team set a target for themselves to engage more than 300 people in the first phase and 1,300 people in total from both phases. With that in mind, the City’s communications staff set in motion extensive promotions in collaboration with the Consultant Team. As a result, Phase 1 engagement and consultation significantly exceeded expectations. The following chart is information from the engagement platform itself and does not include the additional telephone calls and emails to City staff or the webinar engagement. It is helpful because it frames visitor activity in terms of levels of engagement. Page 210 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 8 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Level of Engagement Number of People Aware 1,729 people visited at least one page of the engagement site. Informed 949 people viewed multiple pages, downloaded documents, completed surveys, left comments, viewed the timeline, and generally interacted on the site. Engaged 670 people also completed the survey. A few of them asked questions, added their pin to the map, and/or contributed to news feeds. Most importantly, 670 citizens shared their detailed insights in the survey. While there were only five “mandatory” key questions, each was followed by optional questions so respondents could explain their reasoning. Almost everyone took the opportunity to explain, generating thousands of data points. Their ideas were well considered and clearly inform the consultant recommendations to Council. Further details on the public engagement plan and the results from Phase 1 are provided in Appendices A, F, and G. Appendix E summarizes media coverage for Phase 1 of the study. 1.6 Consideration for City Council The purpose of this Phase 1 Report is to summarize the technical and academic research completed and feedback received from the first round of consultation. The order in which the topics are presented here mirrors the provisions of section 217(1) of the Municipal Act 2001 by starting with the number of councillors and then considering inter-related aspects of the way councillors are to be elected and concluding with a discussion of how they should be compensated. The topics are then grouped as recommendations in Section 7 of this report by building on two key principles that emerge from Sections 2 throu gh 6 pertaining to the decisions that City of Guelph Council needs to address: Page 211 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 9 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx 1. Decide whether to retain a ward system or to dissolve the wards in favour of electing all members of Council at-large; 2. If wards are to be used, determine the number of members o f Council to be elected in each ward; 3. If wards are to be used, determine the number of wards; and 4. Establish the employment status of members of Council. If wards are to be used, the Consultant Team will initiate a review of the boundaries to ensure that the wards constitute an effective and equitable electoral arrangement (Phase 2) of the study. If wards are to be dissolved, Phase 2 of the study is unnecessary. A more detailed explanation of the separate decisions and some of the implications associated with each of them are provided in the following chapters. The direction of the review is presented in Figure 4, which visualizes the series of decisions that are to be considered. Page 212 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 10 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Figure 4 Four “Layers” of Decisions 2. The Composition of City Council This decision involves determining whether Guelph City Council will continue to be composed of a Mayor (a mandatory office under the Municipal Act, 2001) and twelve Councillors. The position of Mayor will not be open to change in this review; the decisions to be taken by Council will only involve the number of councillors and the basis for their election. 2.1 Context The Municipal Act, 2001 s. 217 (1) authorizes a local municipality “to change the composition of its council” subject to five enumerated rules, the most relevant of which Page 213 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 11 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx is: “There shall be a minimum of five members, one of whom shall be the head of council.” Although a by-law that changes the ward boundaries (Municipal Act, 2001 s. 222 (1)) is open to appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT), a by-law that changes the composition of council is not. Despite this authority granted to councils under the Municipal Act, 2001, there are no clear principles, standards, or formulas to apply in determining the appropriate size of a municipal council. As just noted, a municipality must have at least four councillors; there is no maximum set in the Act or any provincial regulation. The composition of local councils in Ontario varies widely and is entirely a matter for each municipality to decide. Guelph is what is known in Ontario as a “single-tier municipality”; that is, it is not part of an upper-tier municipality such as a regional government or a county (for example, Waterloo Region or Perth County).1 Figure 5 compares Guelph to other single-tier municipalities within the same population range. Figure 5 Composition of Council Ontario Single-Tier Municipalities – Population 100,000 to 200,000 Municipality Population (2016 Census) Number of Councillors (excluding the Mayor) Councillors per Ward Greater Sudbury 161,531 12 1 Barrie 141,434 10 1 Guelph 131,794 12 2 Kingston 123,798 12 1 Thunder Bay 107,909 12 1 plus 5 at-large Chatham-Kent 101,647 17 Varies from 2 to 6 Source: Population – Statistics Canada, 2016 Census of Population Council information – various websites Deciding on an appropriate number of councillors is a balancing act. A large number of councillors can slow down and complicate the decision-making process when every 1 Although Guelph shares some services with Wellington County, such as Paramedic Services, the City is not part of the County governing structure. Page 214 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 12 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx councillor may feel a need to weigh in on every discussion. Councils need to be large enough to ensure that all the community’s interests are represented on council. A council should be large enough to address the diversity of the community in terms of its neighbourhoods, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic interests, and history. 2.2 Stakeholder and Public Consultation In our interviews with the Mayor and Councillors, we were told that the current number of Councillors prolongs debate without adding to its quality when every Councillor chooses to participate in a debate without adding substance. It is clear that more participants will lengthen a debate; however, sometimes that lengthened debate will result in better discussion of the topic. The quality of a contribution is frequently in the eye of the beholder. Figure 5 (above) illustrates the above comments about there being no guiding principles that govern the number of councillors and wards. For example, the largest municipality by population on the list (Greater Sudbury) has a smaller Council than the smallest municipality in the category (Chatham-Kent). Guelph’s twelve Councillors make it very similar to comparable municipalities in Ontario. This information offers little direct guidance to Guelph but provides a reassurance that the City currently falls in the middle of the range, and if it increases or decreases the number of Councillors or wards slightly it would remain within that range. The survey conducted as part of the Phase 1 public engagement activity asked respondents for their opinion on the size of Council. Figure 6 indicates that slightly less than a majority of respondents was satisfied with the current number and a quarter of the responses preferred a smaller Council. Fewer than twenty percent of respondents supported the idea of a larger Council in Guelph. It is helpful to consider the reasons why respondents provided the answers summarized in Figure 6. Page 215 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 13 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Figure 6 What Number of Councillors Do You Prefer for the City of Guelph? Response Number Percent Smaller 169 25.2 Larger 114 17.0 Same 329 49.1 Don’t know 58 8.7 Total 670 100.0 The comments of those who endorsed maintaining a twelve-member Council can be grouped around three themes: the size is consistent with other similar municipalities, a larger Council would hinder good decision-making, and what might be called the “Goldilocks” outlook (“not too large, not too small, just about right”). For example: • “It is a good size for a city of our population.” • “The current allocation of Councillors is about the middle of the pack in Ontario, which is where Guelph likes to be.” • “Why not? I see no compelling reasons to change it.” • “If it isn't broke, don't fix it.” • “Larger bodies become less capable of arriving at decisions.” • “Adding more voices does not always make it easier to make decisions or reach consensus around the table.” • “This is a good size to ensure representations yet small enough to be accountable.” • “Guelph is too big for less than 12 and not big enough for more.” • “The population is not declining, so why would we have fewer? And it's increasing slightly, but not extremely quickly.” The comments of those who believe Guelph City Council should be smaller can also be grouped into three themes: a smaller Council will contribute to better decision-making, would cost less, and would contribute to addressing two other issues (two-member wards and the role Councillors play). For example: • “Too many cooks in the kitchen...more decisiveness in issues when fewer people can push their agendas.” Page 216 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 14 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx • “Less is sometimes more viable and easier to make proper decisions for all citizens.” • “Group decision making is more efficient with a smaller number, with 7-8 optimal.” • “Guelph has more councillors than larger cities. It's a waste of tax-payers money.” • “To reduce costs. I think it will be easier to achieve consensus with fewer councillors.” • “I believe 8 councillors will suffice in providing a voice of various wards across the city of Guelph, especially if they each work full-time.” • “It should be smaller but the roles should be full-time.” • “So they can be full-time.” • “Having too many councillors, especially part-time, will create a lot of inefficiencies and lost communication between the 2 councillors in each ward.” • “Prefer to have smaller council but make them full-time. Even with two Councillors responses can take days, if they ever get back.” The case for a larger Council was consistently tied to the population growth of Guelph. For example: • “We lack representation. Guelph is huge and growing.” • “As the city expands rapidly more representation is key.” • “The city has grown, so it makes sense to have more councillors so as to maintain an acceptable level of engagement.” • “As the city grows, it makes sense that more councillors are needed to represent the various communities.” • “The city is growing. To keep the representation equal (with each councillor representing about the same number of people), there needs to be more councillors. Failing that, at least admit that being an effective councillor for a city the size of Guelph is a full-time job.” Our recommendation on the composition of Guelph City Council is found in Chapter 7 (see below). Page 217 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 15 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx 3. Ward System or At-Large System The next decision involves determining whether Guelph will continue to elect Councillors in wards or at-large (called a “general vote” system in the Municipal Act, 2001). 3.1 Context In the Municipal Act, 2001 s. 222 (1) a “local municipality” is authorized “to divide or redivide the municipality into wards or to dissolve the existing wards” through a by-law that is subject to appeal to the LPAT. Section 217 (1) (4) provides that “other than the head of council, members shall be elected by general vote or wards or by any combination of general vote and wards.” Beyond these provisions, there are no conditions or constraints imposed by the Province to help formulate a local decision to adopt one electoral system or another.1 In an at-large system there are no geographic divisions within the municipality. All candidates run across the entire municipality, and voters choose candidates who will represent the entire municipality. For example, if a municipality chooses to have eight councillors elected at-large, then each voter has eight votes to cast among the candidates. When the votes are tallied, the eight candidates with the most votes are declared elected. In a ward system in comparison, candidates are nominated in a particular ward and electors choose among those candidates who are nominated in that ward. In principle, each system has its own attributes and implications that assist in determining whether it is appropriate for the particular municipality. A table that sets out some of the strengths and weaknesses of each system is presented in Appendix B. 1 Before amendments to the Municipal Act in 2006, section 222 (2) of the Municipal Act stipulated that before passing a by-law the municipality shall “(b) have regard to criteria for establishing ward boundaries prescribed by the Minister.” That clause was repealed in 2017 but, in fact, the Minister of Municipal Affairs has never issued criteria related to municipal representation arrangements. Page 218 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 16 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx A ward system is used by most medium and large municipalities because it recognizes the natural divisions in a municipality defined by neighbourhoods and natural barriers such as waterways, highways, railway lines and so forth. An at-large election system is most often found in smaller, rural municipalities that do not have significant social or topographical differences within the municipality. Vancouver (population 610 ,000) is the largest city in Canada with an at-large system but elections there are contested by candidates who represent local political parties, a factor that assists electors in making a choice about which candidates to support. The largest municipalit y in Ontario using an at-large system is Niagara Falls (population 85,000). Both cities have had periodic discussions about switching to a ward system. No Ontario municipality with a population greater than 100,000 elects its councillors in an at -large system. From 1909 through to the 1988 municipal election, Councillors in Guelph (at one time as many as 18) were elected by general vote. Since the 1991 municipal election, Guelph has elected a total of 12 Councillors in six wards and in response to a question on the 2006 municipal ballot [“Are you in favour of retaining the current ward system as the method of electing City Councillors?”], 80% of Guelph electors endorsed keeping that system. 3.2 Stakeholder and Public Consultation The survey responses reported in Figure 7 below and our interviews with the Mayor and Councillors indicated that there was general satisfaction with the principle of a ward system in the City of Guelph. There is an understanding that the current boundaries of the wards need to be reviewed because of uneven growth across the City. That issue, however, will be considered in Phase 2 of the review and is a separate issue from the principle of continuing to use a ward system. A number of respondents supported a system in which some Councillors are elected in wards and others at-large, an arrangement permitted under Ontario legislation but not widely used. Page 219 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 17 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Figure 7 Residents’ Attitudes to a Ward System: From Your Perspective as a Citizen, Which Way of Electing Councillors Do You Think Makes the Most Sense for the City of Guelph? Response Number Per cent Ward 446 66.6 At-large 76 11.3 Mixed 138 20.6 Not sure 3 0.4 Don’t know 7 1.0 Total 670 100.0 It is helpful to consider the reasons why respondents provided the answers tabulated above. Those who favoured retaining wards in Guelph saw these advantages: • “Different parts of the city have different experiences in the city. It's important to have people that reflect those different experiences negotiating with each other when they make decisions.” • “Guelph is (still) a city of neighbourhoods. If we were to lose ward representation, then the only voices would be those who view the city as something to be homogenized. The value of the city is in its neighbourhoods. I don't want to live in a faceless suburb.” • “It’s only natural that there will be times that there is a conflict between the needs of one ward over another ward. It’s only good and fair practice that each ward have a local representative to speak for their ward at council.” • “Responsible to neighbourhood and more knowledgeable about specific areas, don’t have to be expert everywhere, thus able to be part time.” • “Local advocacy. Councillors should feel responsible to their entire ward. At- large structures can create a system where a geographically small area can have a disproportionate voice on council, and could lead to neglect in other areas.” • “Easier to get rid of the non-performers.” • “Residents should have someone who lives in their part of the city that is able to advocate on their behalf. At-large elections typically favour incumbents, as people will usually just vote for familiar names.” Page 220 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 18 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx A small proportion of the survey respondents support at-large elections in Guelph. They view the role of Councillors differently; for example: • “More focus on good of the City as a whole.” • “Ward Councillors can create more division, each representing the classic NIMBYism regularly seen in Guelph. Councillors who have to represent everyone might take a more holistic view of what the community needs and may better represent Guelph's diversity than wards do now.” • “Councillors would be more likely to represent the best interests of the city and not fall prey to parochial local issues and special interests.” • “What happens in another ward impacts me as well. I drive around the city for services.” • “As councillors vote on issues of the city as a whole it seems to make much more sense for councillors to be responsible to the whole city rather than their ward alone. Of course, all will then be responsible for all wards all the time.” • “Local ward system in no way ensures representation of local concerns. A system allowing us to vote for members who we feel reflect our concerns and beliefs would be beneficial and would allow for reduction in size of council.” • “At-large councillors could help to move decision making forward from the “big picture” perspective when there are conflicts between the needs of the different wards and their representatives.” A number of respondents support the idea of a system in which some Councillors represent wards but combining it with an additional second “layer” of Councillors who are elected at-large. For example, • “The combination allows for some focused representation from the variety of wards in the city plus gives ‘at large’ representatives who can be counted on to see decisions in a more holistic manner.” • “Each ward can have unique interests, viewpoints, and experiences, which necessitates having ward councillors. A couple of citywide councillors could provide balance by representing the city as a whole.” • “I believe that having a larger city-wide based category allows for the City to consider and elect individuals that are operating on platforms that encompass more than just the needs of their particular ward. Hyper-localized politics and ward advocacy have their role, but I believe that individuals who are thinking of a Page 221 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 19 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx larger picture should also be offered the opportunity to present that agenda without having to tailor it to a particular ward.” • “A mixed system would give the benefits of each type of election while allowing for more flexibility.” • “I would like to see a mix, where you have one vote designated for a local representative and one vote for any candidate. We must have representation at the ward level. Guelph is a large enough city that it is imperative that each ward is represented by at least one person who is knowledgeable about that ward, and is also directly accountable to those who live in it. It would also be of value to be able to vote for a councillor who does not represent the ward you are in, but who has a vision for the city's future that aligns with your own.” • “Having primary councillors elected by the city and then secondary councillors that are more ward specific. This brings more awareness to who is actually in council (if they're not in my ward I probably have no idea who they are or what they stand for), so by voting for primary councillors as a city, you get a better idea of who is actually making decisions about the city.” As noted earlier, Ontario legislation permits municipalities to combine at-large and ward systems, but it is relatively rare. The City of Kingston, for example, experimented with a combination of ward and at-large councillors for one term in the late 1990s as part of an amalgamation before quickly converting to electing all councillors in wards. Among single-tier Ontario municipalities comparable to Guelph (in the 100,000 to 200,000 population range), only the City of Thunder Bay uses a combination system; five members of its Council are elected at-large and seven in wards (note: 26 candidates sought the five at-large seats in 2018). This configuration was also the result of an amalgamation and has been used ever since the City was created in 1970. While many respondents to the survey presented legitimate reasons for introducing such a system to Guelph, the problem with the hybrid system is that it creates an awkward relationship between at-large and ward councillors. Under Ontario legislation, all councillors at the table are equal, but when councillors are elected from different electoral bases, does this mean that some are seen to be more important than others? In the early 1900s, several large Ontario cities elected a combination of councillors chosen by wards and at-large. The at-large councillors were members of what was called a Board of Control, a group that tended to dominate council decision-making Page 222 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 20 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx since it acted as an executive committee of council through its responsibilities over budget and key administrative matters. Most Boards of Control were eliminated in Ontario during the latter part of the 20th century, largely because of dissatisfaction with the idea of a hierarchy of councillors. In principle, ward and at-large election systems each have valid positive and negative attributes [see tables of attributes]; however, the risks to effective representation for the City’s distinctive neighbourhoods and other communities of interest that an at -large system would bring to a municipality the size of Guelph cannot be overlooked. Our recommendation that the City of Guelph continue to use a ward system to elect Council members is found in Chapter 7 (see below). If Guelph City Council has determined the number of Councillors and decides to elect them at-large, the only remaining Phase 1 consideration will be the employment status of Councillors (see Chapter 6 below) and Phase 2 of this review is unnecessary. If Council has determined the number of Councillors and accepts the recommendation to elect some or all of them in wards, two inter-related questions follow: 1. How many Councillors should be elected from each ward? 2. How many wards should the City be divided into? These questions are addressed in Chapters 4 and 5 below. Answering one question will of course determine the answer to the other. Since Guelph has had long experience with the same format to elect Councillors (two per ward), it is appropriate to address that question first, since even if Council chooses to maintain a two-member per ward format, the community should be confident that the merits of the present system actually outweigh its shortcomings and that none of the alternatives is an improvement. 4. Ward Magnitude (the Number of Councillors per Ward) 4.1 Context The City of Guelph has elected two Councillors per ward since the ward system was introduced in Guelph for the 1991 election. Figure 5 (above) indicates that Guelph is Page 223 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 21 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx the only city of its direct comparators using this arrangement. There are, however, other cities in two-tier regional government systems such as St. Catharines and Welland, and other smaller single-tier cities such as Peterborough, Orillia, and Brantford that use this arrangement. There are a very small number of Ontario municipalities such as Chatham-Kent and Prince Edward County where varying numbers of members are elected per ward. Such arrangements are typically products of amalgamations where the electoral system recognizes those historical circumstances. A system in which an unequal number of councillors is elected in the various wards, however, would likely be seen as confusing or unfair, even in municipalities that have these unique historical circumstances. Councillors in Guelph are, of course, familiar – even comfortable – with this long- standing two-member per ward system but familiarity should not be the crucial factor in determining the most appropriate system of representation. There are several attributes that should be considered in Council’s decision. The primary strength of a two-member per ward model is the perception that it is more likely that a constituent will be able to get the ear of a councillor even if one of the ward councillors is unavailable or unsympathetic to the constituent’s concerns. For others, having two choices may assist in strategic voting; for example, an elector may choose to vote for both a male and female candidate, or for an incumbent and a fresh candidate rather than having to vote for one or the other. The shortcomings are more numerous: the two Councillors per ward system contributes to a larger Council which could complicate and prolong debate. It also increases the size of wards (since there are currently only six in Guelph) which makes it more difficult for Councillors to stay on top of issues across their entire ward. It can also lead to confusion when a constituent approaches both Councillors, each of whom then approaches City staff. 4.2 Stakeholder and Public Consultation Figure 8 below indicates that two-member wards are favoured by the majority of survey respondents. This distribution might be viewed from the perspective that a two-member ward system is the only one with which many Guelph residents are familiar. Page 224 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 22 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Figure 8 From a Citizen of Guelph Perspective, How Many Councillors Should be Elected from Each Ward? Response Number Per cent One 232 34.6 Greater than one 353 52.7 Doesn’t matter 11 1.6 Not sure 25 3.7 Other 49 7.3 Total 670 100.0 The reasons provided by survey respondents are informative. Those who supported a system in which each ward elected more than one Councillor saw the advantages in these terms: • “If one is unable to do their job for some reason such as illness, holiday, etc., you can go to the other one.” • “If one doesn't really represent your views, you have someone else to go to. I am more inclined to err on the side of having more representation than less. In the case that one councillor is unresponsive to a citizens’ needs, having a second councillor would provide additional avenues for citizen engagement. Having two councillors approach city staff to advocate for their constituents would be preferable to one councillor forgetting to do so.” • “Two member wards have generally done well for Guelph for a long time, why change it now?” • “With 2 councillors per ward, it allows for collaboration, a variety of perspectives, and allows citizens some choice when contacting their representative.” • “Multiple councillors per ward makes it more likely that ward representation is more diverse, and represents a greater number of the people of the ward. In a 'winner takes all' electoral system, limiting ward representation to just one councillor makes it highly likely that a large number (or even a majority) of constituents are not represented by the person they voted for. That's not acceptable.” Page 225 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 23 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx • “It makes sense to have two people with different strengths, experience and points of view to offer insights and to back each other up to ensure the needs of the people they represent are met.” • “A single councillor per ward, elected under our first past the post system, could win with the support of a small minority of ward voters.” • “It's working as is. Not sure why this issue has come up for discussion.” • “One councillor is insufficient to represent citizen diversity.” It is also noteworthy that some respondents link the case for two-member wards to maintaining a system of six wards: • “The wards are large so I feel at least 2 councillors are necessary to handle true community engagement as well as the work load.” • “Some wards are quite large and Guelph is growing. Wards are getting more diverse and they need to have more than one representative.” • “The wards are fairly big and the population is growing. Having two councillors from each ward hopefully gives a broader representation. It would also give easier access to at least one of the councillors.” • “To allow everyone the ability to contact and communicate with their representative, there should be more than 1 councillor per ward, or smalle r wards.” • “I believe that residents require access to their councillors so more than one per ward sounds appropriate.” • “The wards are large enough that one person does not seem like enough, especially given the multiple roles of a Councillor (i.e., engagement, advocacy, policy, administration, etc.). The number of Councillors should be proportional to the number of people in each ward, or better yet, the ward boundaries should be modified so that they are approximately equal in size.” Those who endorsed one-member wards identified several kinds of benefits, in particular related to better accountability and efficiency, as well as contributing to a smaller Council or to a full-time role for Councillors: • “One representative per ward. Straightforward.” • “Easier way by having just one point of contact.” Page 226 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 24 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx • “So that it is clear. Why should I email two councillors to be aware of an issue? It would be easier to know who has responsibility for my area of the city.” • “Two councillors does not make sense. Information gets lost between the two representatives. One councillor per ward means better accountability. A single full-time councillor can focus their efforts on a particular ward and if citizens find them to be unavailable, they can be held accountable. There isn't the option to go to the other councillor such as in the two per ward system which I fear can hide poor representation and work.” • “There is less need to cooperate with other councillors when you have a built-in partner for support.” • “Having more than one councillor per ward seems redundant and unnecessarily expensive.” • “Better value to the taxpayer and quicker decisions will be made.” • “We have too many now. My ward has two very different councillors, with different views and I feel like their votes cancel each other out.” • Less of a chance for competing interests and focus. • “It would force them to be directly accountable. No 'hiding' behind a more active Councillor.” • “If there is one per ward, the councillor will need to make sure they hear all the people and not just those that they agree with. Then it will certainly become clear whether a councillor is listening or not to everyone.” • “Once again, when it comes to making important decisions that impact the citizens of a city, smaller is better. This is basic knowledge: all successful organizations keep their decision-making bodies small.” • “Because I think there should be more, smaller wards. I only want to make one phone call if I have a political concern to raise or a local issue that needs to be addressed. Also, fewer voters, less comparing $$, better democracy.” • “One per ward with smaller wards to make it more representative of your area.” • “As the city is expanding, perhaps more wards, and 1 councillor who can be more dedicated to their specific area.” • “Just not sure we need two, especially if number of constituents per ward goes down.” • “Fewer councillors but full time.” • “1 full time is sufficient.” Page 227 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 25 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx • “2 per ward make sense if both working part time. Having 1 per ward but working full time makes sense since the demands of the job has (sic) increased over time.” • “I think that ward sizes should be adjusted so 1 councillor per ward can service each ward. This to me would be the most cost-effective solution for a city that is destined to grow so much in the next decade.” Our interviews with the Councillors and City staff identified some problems with the two- member arrangement that reflect experiences we are familiar with in other municipalities (and noted above). The system can cause confusion on the part of residents who do not know which Councillor to contact when they have an issue. When they contact both Councillors, this may cause further confusion about which Councillor should take a lead role. When both Councillors try to deal with the issue, relevant City staff members will be contacted twice about the same issue. When the two ward Councillors get along with one another, there are work-arounds to deal with this problem. We heard that two Councillors in one ward in Guelph have agreed to divide the ward in half and each one deals with issues in his half. Thus, they deal with the two Councillors per ward issue by effectively converting their one ward into two. When the two Councillors get along with one another, there are a number of work- arounds like this that can be established. When they do not get along so well, there can be problems. No matter how hard Councillors try to get along with one another, however, it is difficult for them to ignore the fact they will be running against one another in the next election. Two-member wards also result in larger wards. Compared to similar cities, Guelph’s six wards are fairly large. This makes them less homogeneous and more difficult for Councillors to represent effectively. If Guelph retained 12 Councillors and shifted to one-member wards, it would have 12 wards which would be approximately half the size of the existing wards. Our recommendation that Guelph move to a system of one Councillor per ward is found in Chapter 7 (see below). Page 228 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 26 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx 5. The Number of Wards 5.1 Context If Council has agreed on the total number of Councillors and opts for a system of one- member wards, this question has already been answered. A twelve-member Council with one-member wards, leads to 12 wards. If the idea of single-member wards is adopted, however, the City actually has more flexibility than it currently has with two- member wards. By retaining two-member wards, it is difficult to get away from six wards in Guelph. Fewer than six wards for a City the size of Guelph does not seem desirable, and adding wards means adding two Councillors for each new ward which would increase the total size of Council. If Council decides to move to one-member wards, it will have the flexibility to consider eight, nine, or ten wards, for example. This would simultaneously reduce the size of Council, which some see as desirable, and at the same time reduce the size of the individual wards which would help to make the wards more homogeneous. In effect, this question intersects with Council’s initial decision in Phase 1 (the composition of council) and the previous question on the number of Councillors per ward. In a single-member ward system, whatever number of Councillors is preferred will be the number of wards. A decision to adopt two-member wards will require half as many wards as there are Councillors. Our recommendation on the number of wards is found in Chapter 7 (see below). 6. The Role of Councillor: Part-Time or Full-Time? 6.1 Context Guelph, like most other municipalities in Ontario, has had part-time Councillors since its inception. This means that Guelph Councillors have been paid at a level that would require them to obtain supplementary employment to support themselves and a family. In truth, there is no legal distinction between a part-time and full-time Councillor. All Page 229 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 27 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Councillors have the same legal rights and responsibilities. A Councillor is a Councillor. The difference between part-time and full-time Councillors is the rate of pay and the accompanying expectations. Appendix D shows that only three municipalities in Ontario pay their Councillors what would be considered a full-time wage. Councillors in the other single-tier municipalities in the table are paid less than $50,000 per year, in a few cases less than $35,000. Councillors in the next group in the table (“lower-tier municipalities double direct”) serve on both an area and regional Council while Councillors in the last group (“lower-tier municipalities direct”) serve on either the area Council or the regional Council but not both. The former collects two salaries, the latter receives one or the other. 6.2 Stakeholder and Public Consultation There is a perception that the workload of Councillors has been increasing a s the complexity of government activity and the expectations of residents have increased. Appendix C shows the results of a survey conducted as a part of this review. It indicates that current Guelph Councillors say that they spend an average of about 20 hours per week on Council business. This is less than typical full-time employment, but it uses up so much time that it is difficult to see how a Councillor could seek other full- time employment or even pursue a regular, fixed-schedule part-time job. Furthermore, the average disguises the fact that the number of hours can vary significantly from week to week with little or no warning. Some variations are predictable; for example, budget time requires a commitment of a major block of time. Crises or dealing with constituents’ issues, however, are totally unpredictable and can require a great deal of time. Fitting a regular full-time job or even a traditional part-time job with regular hours around the significant and irregular time commitments of a Councillor would be very difficult. The residents who responded to our survey seemed to understand the increa sing demands of the position of Councillor. Slightly less than a majority of respondents felt that the position of Councillor should be considered full-time. Page 230 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 28 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Figure 9 From a Citizen Perspective, How Do You Recommend that the Role of City Councillor be Viewed in Guelph? Response Number Per cent Part-time 265 39.6 Full-time 327 48.8 Doesn’t matter 17 2.5 Not sure 61 9.1 Total 670 100.0 Support for full-time Councillors in Guelph was seen as a positive part of the electoral system. For example, • “We need Councillors to be fully engaged in understanding the work of the city and representing their constituents. They cannot do this part-time.” • “They would be able to focus their attention on making decisions and engaging with city residents.” • “Councillors have a lot of work to do and should not be distracted by another position.” • “Properly compensated, full time councillors would be able to put all their efforts into ensuring proper management of this city.” • “They would not have to juggle other jobs. Currently, there are a mix of situations where some councillors work full-time elsewhere, thus putting in much less time/effort as Councillor than others, who are treating this as full-time work, and are not getting paid for the effort they are putting in. It would equalize expectations of what a Councillor is expected to do.” • “Municipal issues have become increasingly complex. A full time Council will be more accessible.” • “To allow proper consideration of issues – review documentation, consult with experts/residents. Meet with other councillors to come up with solutions that benefit the most parties. This might help reduce some of the crazy long council meetings that happen! Good decisions don't happen at 1 a.m.!!” • “From interacting with my local councillors, this seems like a lot of work. I can't imagine trying to do it as a part-time job and tacking another job on top. This should absolutely be a full-time job.” Page 231 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 29 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Other respondents saw treating the position as full-time as a way to attract stronger candidates: • “Having full-time councillors opens the door to more potential candidates who may not be able to afford to leave their current employment.” • “Better candidates running for council. Full time attention to council work.” • “Keeps the job from being only available to affluent candidates.” • “Then a person who does not have an alternative source of income could take on the position of Councillor and still pay the bills. As it is, Councillors need another source of income, like a pension.” • “This leads to a skewing of the age of Councillors. I'm OK with older, smart people, but I don't like to exclude younger, smart people.” • “More diversity among candidates. A full-time job would appeal to more and different kinds of people. Most people can't afford to live on a part time salary and would have to work another job or rely on another income on top of this one. More people may want to participate, but can't afford to live with a part -time income. Part time jobs are most attractive to retired people or people with other sources of income. Then, if elected, their commitment may be split between their "real" job and being a Councillor. Being a Councillor is important, requires full time commitment, and warrants a full-time income.” Critics of the idea emphasized the idea that serving on a local Council is a form of public service not “a forty hour a week job” and that Councillors should stay connected to the Guelph community through a job while many others were unwilling to pay the costs. For example, • “Pay for the work they do, not for the title.” • “Not enough work to be 40 hours a week.” • “It’s a calling to one’s civic duty not a job.” • “We don't need professional politicians.” • “It’s important for local government representatives to be working in the community as well as serving it!” • “The need for full time councillors is not there. So allowing councillors to work amongst the citizens they represent allows them to be seen by the public more.” • “May attract a broader group of individuals to apply for the position.” Page 232 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 30 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx • “I do not like the idea of having full time ‘politicians’ deciding on our future. Let it be some people with a great sense of community and who show their love for our city and neighbourhoods.” • “Prevents ‘institutionalization’ of the councillors. However, with increasing responsibilities full time might in the end be required.” • “They only really work Part-time anyways, meetings are not held 8 hours a day.” • “Work life balance for Councillors. There are many people who might feel that leaving a current occupation to serve on council full time would have a detrimental effect on their career/employment and so would choose not to seek election even though they would be good in the position. I think a part-time commitment makes it easier for more people to consider running for election.” • “City staff run the city with council oversight. Council is not a full-time job.” • “Because it is less political and more pro the inhabitants of a ward, since even though they are pay for their time, they don't depend solely on the Councillor job, and that makes them more in tune with the actual living conditions/struggles of the community they represent.” • “Part-time councillors would have more background experience/knowledge of the working world around them. They can still work full time or part time in their existing career.” • “I would hope councillors are more imbedded in their neighbourhoods/wards and what goes on there, not just applying for a full-time job as a councillor.” • “People can continue their work while working as a councillor. We don’t need full time professional politicians.” • “I am wary of turning the city councillor role into a full-time job, as this would tend to attract opportunistic career politicians more concerned with their own re- election rather than with the concerns of their wards. It's not a job, really. It's a form of community service for which councillors should receive honoraria and expenses rather than salaries and benefits. This is an argument for keeping our ward- based system with two councillors per ward. City council should not be populated by the same people year in and year out. But there are problems with part-time in that business people and retirees tend to have the time and flexibility needed to serve. And regardless of full- or part-time status, huge swathes of the community have little incentive to serve and would not/cannot take a break from family commitments and/or career commitments.” • “Keeps costs down.” Page 233 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 31 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx • “Less of a burden on the tax payer due to lower salaries.” • “Salary. Works fine. Why fix what’s not broken? Our councillors work hard, are available. Don’t need full time. Whose idea is this anyway? Leave well enough alone. We are not a big city.” • “Guelph is a relatively small city. It is city staff that propose and prepare policies for council's consideration. Part time means less politicization of issues.” • “We are not a large city, keeping up with say Mississauga or London is not necessary. They need to be efficient. Our taxes are high enough now without having to add full time salaries to the mix.” Moving from part-time and full-time Councillors will involve an increased cost. The current total annual compensation cost for the 12 Councillors is $578,319. This represents a salary of $41,528 per Councillor plus benefits. The estimates in Figure 10 below for full-time Councillors are based on the assumption that the salary level would double to $83,056 and the benefits would also be adjusted. This is an estimate because Council could set the salary figure at any amount. The actual compensation for Guelph Councillors after the next election will be considered by the Council Remuneration Advisory Committee, a body composed of citizen volunteers. This estimate was chosen for purposes of illustration. This figure would make Councillors for the City of Guelph the lowest paid full-time Councillors in Ontario. Page 234 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 32 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Figure 10 Comparison of Current Cost for 12 Part-time to Costs of Select Number of Full-time Councillors For this number of full-time Councillors This would be the total cost of compensation This is the current cost of Councillor compensation This would be the additional cost of compensation beyond the current compensation 6 $593,268 $578,319 $14,964 8 $791,024 $578,319 $212,720 10 $988,780 $578,319 $410,476 12 $1,186,536 $578,319 $608,232 It is likely that full-time Councillors would want to have full-time staff support of some type. Figure 11 below provides information supplied by the City of Guelph about the cost of salary and benefits associated with some positions that would like ly meet the needs of Council. Figure 11 Compensation Costs of Selected Positions Position Total Compensation (Salary Plus Benefits) Executive Assistant $111,800 Policy Analyst $111,800 Administrative Assistant $90,350 Page 235 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 33 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Full-time Councillors would likely want office space in City Hall and additional common space such as a meeting room. There would also need to be office space for support staff. This could involve one-time renovation cost to create any additional office space needed. There would also be the cost of equipping new offices with office furnishings. We were unable to estimate the one-time costs associated with renovations at City Hall. However, City staff have provided an estimate of these renovation costs in the accompanying staff report. There would be some additional cost in accepting this idea but based on our research and the viewpoints expressed by residents of Guelph in the public engagement activities, Council must decide whether it wants to continue the status quo. The present arrangement restricts the type of people who can afford to make themselves available to run for office and forces people to make sacrifices to become a Councillor, but there is a case that compensating Councillors at a full-time wage so that they can concentrate primarily on their Council responsibilities is now appropriate. Our recommendation whether Councillors should serve on full-time basis and should be compensated accordingly is found in Chapter 7 (see below). 7. Recommendations We began this report by asking five questions: • How many Councillors should sit on the Council? • Should elections be at-large or ward-based? • How many Councillors should be elected per ward? • How many wards should there be? • Should the role of Councillors be understood to be (and paid) as full-time or part- time? The purpose of this section is to provide recommendations related to these five inter- related questions. These issues cannot be addressed in isolation because the number of Councillors is related to the number of wards and the number of members per ward. In order to deal with this inter-relatedness, we begin by establishing two guiding principles drawn from the information we obtained from public consultation and personal interviews. These principles then guided us in forming our recommendations. Page 236 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 34 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Principle 1. The City of Guelph should have at least six wards. The City of Guelph has functioned with six wards in the past and residents are comfortable with that number. Guelph, however, has fewer wards than other comparable cities and is planning on significant growth. The City of Guelph could continue to operate with six wards, but there are good reasons for considering an increase in that number. Principle 2. The City of Guelph should have no more than 12 Councillors. Respondents to the survey indicated that they were comfortable with the current number of Councillors and there was little appetite for an increase. Interviews with Councillors indicated some concern that 12 Councillors slowed down and complicated the decision-making process. Comparison with other municipalities indicated 12 Councillors was within the norm. There seems to be no compelling argument to increase the current number of Councillors, but some have suggested that the system would work better with fewer Councillors. Working with those two principles we have developed the following recommendations that begin with an affirmation that Guelph should continue to elect councillors by ward (implicit in our first principle) followed by the question of the number of councillors per ward. (our second principle). With those questions determined, council can then address the appropriate number of wards leading to the determination of the total number of councillors. The employment status of councillors will be influenced by Council’s responses to the first three recommendations. Recommendation 1. The City of Guelph should continue to use a ward system. Large and medium-size cities generally employ a ward system because it recognizes that there are real differences in different parts of the City and it is important that each of those areas is represented. The results of the survey and interviews with Councillors indicated a great deal of support for the continuation of a ward system. Recommendation 2. The City of Guelph should switch to a system of one member per ward. Using a system of one member per ward would provide the City of Guelph with more flexibility in choosing its governance system than it has currently. Page 237 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 35 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx If the City of Guelph wanted to retain the two-member per ward system, there is little room to maneuver within the two principles established above. The only way to reduce the size of Council would be to reduce the number of wards, but Guelph is growing a nd already has fewer wards than comparable cities. There was also little support for a reduction in the number of wards. If the City of Guelph wanted to retain the two-member ward system and increase the number of wards, the number of Councillors would increase by two for each additional ward. This is not the direction in which people expressed a desire to move. A system of one member per ward would allow the City to increase the number of wards and decrease the number of Councillors simultaneously. This is not in agreement with the majority view of those who responded to the survey, although a significant minority did support one-member wards. It is understandable that residents are more comfortable with a system that has been in place for almost thirty years. The views of Councillors and staff who work in the system, however, as well as experience elsewhere, lead us to conclude that one-member wards would solve issues that frequently arise both between the two Councillors in the same ward and the working arrangements with City staff. Recommendation 3. The City of Guelph should have eight single-member wards. This would move the City of Guelph in the direction that many people advocated in two dimensions. As a growing city, Guelph would now have two additional wards at the same time that it has four fewer Councillors. If the City chose not to settle on eight Councillors, it could easily move to six, ten, or even 12 either now or in the future. Recommendation 4. Councillors for the City of Guelph should be considered full- time Councillors and should be compensated accordingly. The current Councillors, who are considered part-time, have a significant workload. This will certainly increase as the City grows. Reducing the number of Councillors will further increase the workload falling on the remaining Councillors. Reducing the number of Councillors will also reduce the impact of the increased cost associated with full-time Councillors. Page 238 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE 36 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx 8. Potential Next Step – A Ward Boundary Review If one of the decisions taken at the conclusion of Phase 1 is to maintain a ward system in Guelph, Phase 2 will take that direction from Council to develop alternative ward options for consideration by the community and Council early in 2021. This review will occur even if it is Council’s decision to retain six wards, since the present wards have not been subject to a comprehensive review since they were established in 1990. The only adjustments in ward boundaries since that time occurred in 2006 when the northern boundary of Ward 5 west of Woolwich Street was moved from the CNR line to Waterloo Avenue and the southern boundary moved from Stone Road closer to Kortright Road and in 2016 when the boundary between Wards 5 and 6 just west of Victoria Road South was realigned to take account of a subdivision built since 2006. In the latter case, a total of 38 properties were reallocated between the wards. Electoral divisions like wards are intended to reflect the distribution of population at a given time and, since Guelph’s population has increased from approximately 91,000 in 1991 to approximately 132,000 in 2016, the present wards do not reflect that change (see Figure 2 above). Terms of Reference for Phase 2 were approved by Council in July 20 19 (Report CS- 2019-61 “2018-2022 Council Composition and Employment Status Review”) and will be applicable even in the context of the changes to the way the review will be conducted under restrictions related to the COVID-19 global pandemic. The ward boundary review will undertake to develop wards that adhere to a number of specific guiding principles, subject to the overriding principle of effective representation. Information on the process, the guiding principles, and opportunities for public participation in the review will be available by mid-November through https://www.haveyoursay.guelph.ca/. Page 239 of 936 Appendices Page 240 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-1 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Appendix A Public Consultation Page 241 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-1 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Appendix A: Public Consultation The Importance of Community Engagement in Guelph Guelph strives to make decisions that are sustainable, reflect the common good, provide transparency in decision making, and are grounded in understanding and support by the community. It is through this lens that the review seeks to engage citizens and stakeholders. The City of Guelph is guided by a community engagement framework that guides those decision-making activities by goals that will: 1. Support the City’s strategic goals through transparent, accountable, consistent, and accessible community engagement. 2. Build engagement opportunities that inspire community stakeholders to shape Guelph’s future. 3. Support decisions that reflect the common good for all Guelphites now and in the future. 4. Build community stakeholder trust in the City of Guelph’s decision-making process. In order to provide Council with an independent recommendation, Council strongly endorsed that the review be supported by wide-ranging community engagement and best practices. The City of Guelph has a well-developed and defined community engagement framework and the review’s public engagement strategy has been prepared in accordance with this framework. Principles Guiding the Project’s Public Consultation The community engagement strategy and public engagement component is considered a critical part of the review and is grounded in the following principles: • Providing input to the work being done by the Consultant Team as they develop their recommendations to Council. • Engaging the people of Guelph in a manner that provides valuable input to the evaluation of council composition and employment status of councillors, and the existing ward structure alongside alternative approaches being presented. Page 242 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-2 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx • Educating residents on the context/background and the key factors that are being considered and ensure that they understand why this is happening and the impact of decisions being made. • Inspiring confidence in local decision making and a transparent process. • Enhancing the ability of City of Guelph residents and ultimately decision makers to make sound assessments about the democratic structure of Guelph. • Expanding the diversity of community members’ voices and support to decisions that seek to make change or to maintain the status quo. Community Engagement Purpose, Objectives, and Goals for the Project The review incorporates a comprehensive public engagement component which includes two distinct phases of public consultation – Round 1 and Round 2. The purpose of the public engagement component is two-fold: • Inform residents of Guelph about the context and reasons for the review and the key factors that are being considered in the review; and • Engage the residents in a manner that provides valuable input to the development and design of council composition, employment status, and ward boundary options which reflect municipal vision. The community engagement and public consultation objectives and goals for the two phases are: 1. Engage with City of Guelph, designated stakeholders, and external stakeholders to accumulate insights of the City’s current electoral system approach and identify what works, issues and options for evaluation, and further development to understand and evaluate the present and potential future considerations. 2. Engage with as many citizens of Guelph as is possible and stakeholders over the two phases of the project. • Interact and converse through 1,300 engagements with City of Guelph citizens and designated stakeholders over the two phases of the project and motivate them to learn more and provide their comments, considerations, and opinions including perspectives on what works, issues Page 243 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-3 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx and options for evaluation, and further development which will be utilized in reports on the project with Council. Given past experiences with engagements on this kind of topic in other communities, this numerical goal seemed aspirational. • Build engagement opportunities through virtual, online or otherwise facilitated by digital tools and platform interaction that reach a cross range representative of the citizen population and allows for multiple forms of participation. Consultation Process Overview Consultation Program Public and stakeholder engagement and consultation played an important role in shaping the Phase 1 review report. As well, this round of consultation is helping feed into the report recommendations by giving consideration to citizens’ shared ideas, advice, and concerns. HaveYourSay.Guelph.ca/council-composition, the project’s online engagement page and portal was created and launched. It contained as much as possible for citizens to use: the project timeline, main contact people, background resources information, and community feedback data gathering tools. It was designed to provide an easy and secure way for the citizens of Guelph to participate and give their feedback when and where it was convenient for them, 24 hours a day. The City’s website had a page (guelph.ca/council) for sharing general information on the project, timeline, and how and where to engage more. It was launched in March 2020. The Consultation Period The first round of public consultation was completed during the period August 17 to September 4, 2020. The public consultation in Round 1 was intended to inform the public about the review and to be able to provide their insights and advice to the Consultant Team as input to inform their Phase 1 Report recommendations to Council specific to council composition and employment status, with key questions around: • How many Councillors? Page 244 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-4 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx • How many Councillors per ward? • At-large or ward elections? • How many wards? • Full-time or part-time Councillors? Synopsis of Engagement Methodologies that were Used to Generate Community Input Members of the community provided their feedback to help shape the review through an online survey which ran the duration of the campaign, one live town hall webinar on August 25, the City’s Engagement HQ project website portal HaveYourSay.Guelph.ca/ council-composition, and selected platform tools that allow ways for citizens to become aware, informed, and engage in the topic. In addition, the engagement activities included City-led emails and newsletter updates and other methods of correspondence including updates to Council to encourage engagement of their local community residents. City staff reached out to more than 200 community organizations using the most comprehensive and up-to-date list they possessed. Virtual office hours were held by City staff with dedicated time slots posted on the project website and shared in correspondence and on the City’s site with a goal to ensure the public had the opportunity to speak directly, one-on-one with someone live. This added level of support was for people who were uncomfortable with digital communications, or who were uncomfortable writing their ideas in a survey. It was hoped this high-touch addition might help engagement feel more “normal” or “familiar” during a time when COVID-19 challenges the public consultation process around what is normal. Interestingly, nobody took advantage of these opportunities. Consultation Activities The feedback and comments received from Round 1 of consultation are reflected in the analysis presented herein. The following is a summary of the Phase 1 engagement activities and tools deployed. Further details on the feedback from the public and input received are provided in appendices. Dedicated Project Engagement Website Hub – HaveYourSay.Guelph.ca/council- composition The site was set up for the public to: • Ask questions and get answers; Page 245 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-5 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx • Review background information; • Register to keep in touch; • Share ideas; • Indicate where they live on a map; and, • Make recommendations. Tools used on the site for engagement over the period include activities and measures for awareness, informing, and engagement with the information. Specific Tools Used for Phase 1 on the Project Website Consultant-Generated Short Background Documents (Inform) – On each of these topics a downloadable PDF was posted including a study overview, current electoral system, at large or ward comparisons, full- or part-time Councillors, size of Council and ward structure. Each contain definitions and explanations and comparisons with other cities of similar size in Ontario. City Council Composition Review Survey (Engage) – The 10-minute survey of 12 questions (with only four required, the rest optional) ran for the full consultation period. The public’s considerations have been combined and have influenced research to help build this report and can help in framing ward boundary considerations. The Phase 1 survey sought input on: • The size of Council in total; • How Councillors should be elected, from wards or at large; • If Councillors are to be elected from wards, how many Councillors to elect from each ward; and, • Whether the role is seen as a part-time or full-time position. Respondents were given the opportunity to explain why they recommend each of their choices. There were three optional questions at the outset designed to give respondents a few moments to collect their thoughts and examine their personal assumptions before diving into the main questions. The first was an open-ended question about their vision of what they might see as a result of having a successfully composed Council. The second and third were closed-ended questions about what they see as the primary role of Council and Councillors. Page 246 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-6 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Since the four key questions included an option for respondents to explain their ideas, then the researchers have a richer understanding of the thinking behind the numbers. Question and Answer Area (Engage and Inform) – For citizens to ask a question about the composition or design of Guelph City Council for response by staff or the Consultant Team. These came through the site directly and also housed questions following the live event that were asked and responded to during the live stream, and captured those that could not be answered because the event ran out of time. Map with Current Ward Boundaries (Engage) – Optional for citizens to “drop a pin” in the ward where they live. This tool will be far more important in phase two. Introducing it in phase one has added value in that it prepares people to recognize it and use it later. Video (Inform) – The panel discussion recording of the live virtual town hall was hosted on the site following the event. Project Timeline (Inform) – Each phase of the entire project lifecycle is posted on the site which remains up throughout the duration of the project. Virtual Town Hall Panel Discussion Live Event (Inform/Engage) A live-streamed panel discussion and presentation occurred on Tuesday, August 25, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. It was moderated by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. and ICA Associates, and included opening comments from the General Manager, City Clerk’s Office, and two of the project’s consulting experts, a Public Affairs Consultant and a Municipal Governance and Administration Consultant. The session focused on informing about the project and timelines, providing background for the big questions of Phase 1 through a series of short presentations, collecting comments from all sources and putting the questions to the panelists. Questions that could not be answered along with those that were, were collected and posted with responses on the project website. Audience participants were encouraged on numerous occasions to ask questions and share their ideas through the webinar chat function or through comments on the Facebook live stream. These were collected and consolidated throughout the event into a shared document being reviewed by the moderator during the event. The moderator Page 247 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-7 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx grouped the questions by topic as they were being collected. There was duplication among the questions, yet the entire range of questions were posed to the panelists and answered live for 30 minutes. After the event, the questions and answers were added to the appropriate section of the haveyoursay.guelph.ca/council-composition website. The virtual town hall panel discussion was streamed live in exactly the same manner as the City’s council meetings. Participants could attend using Webex, or watch it live streamed on the City's Facebook page and the City’s council page. The event was also recorded and posted on the City’s website and Facebook page for viewing at any time. It was intended for re-broadcast on Rogers Cable TV. Dedicated Virtual City Office Hours (Inform/Engage) Four City staff allocated four two-hour time blocks for residents to be able to call and speak in person with the General Manager, City Clerk’s Office, or the Manager, Legislative Services/Deputy City Clerk. Two times were allocated prior to the town hall and two following. Citizens were also encouraged to email the City or write letters. Communication and Promotional Tactics Summary The following were used to promote the online town hall, survey, and other engagement opportunities: DIGITAL City Website Content Updates Content was updated to include Phase 1 engagement opportunities, key dates , and online meeting. Also included: event listings for open office hours, media releases in a latest news updates feed, and resources on separate subpages to educate our audience prior to engagement. Event Calendar Listings Public Notice – Used to promote the August 25 virtual town hall Email to Mayor and Council – Request to promote the August 25 virtual town hall Page 248 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-8 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Council splash screen – displayed at the August 12 Special City Council meeting and the August 24 City Council meeting YouTube video tile – Up following the virtual town hall to share the recording Screenscapes – Ran the campaign duration with Guelph’s public library, select City department/services landing pages and Guelph transit. Social media – Posts and interactions on the City’s Facebook page, Instagram and Twitter EHQ newsletter – Covered in eblast just prior to consultation period date ADVERTISING Various promotional paid advertising to get the message out through ads on City news; • Guelph Today digital advertising through daily headline emails and banners on their website; • social media boosts to promote the online event on Facebook to the broader city • and on Instagram to specifically target younger and student audiences; • mobile signs placed strategically in the City which ran with rotating messages throughout the campaign period. It's important to note that one mobile sign was located in each ward, in high-traffic areas located in parks and active transportation routes where audiences likely had more time to pause, pull out a phone and either take a picture for later or visit the website. Phase 1 Public Consultation and Engagement Results Overview Summary Citizen engagement through the consultation period exceeded expectations. The Phase 1 review garnered much interest by the public mainly with thanks to communication activities and promotional tactics. The response rate to the survey, engagement on the site and through the live event were representative of citizens across the City (demographics postal codes were gathered) and in age, although youth were not well represented in the phase. Just over half the survey respondents said they had learned something new about council composition from participating in the review. Page 249 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-9 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx The most important results to note is that the survey had 670 respondents from August 17 to September 4. The engagement tool itself categorizes visitor interactions on a scale from low to higher levels of engagement. The following are some additional highlights from the EHQ analytics. 1.Resources were widely used. There were 461 downloads of documents from the resource library by 166 people during the consultation period. People continue to download the documents and the count is currently over 550. This project relies heavily on residents understanding the dynamics of various council makeups. The resources were intended to help residents achieve a base level sense of knowledge of the project to help them decide how they picture Council in the next few decades. Downloads have exceeded expectations. 2.Participants came from different parts of the City. The project team’s goal was to achieve participation in all wards with little disparity between them. The survey asked participants for their postal code, which shows location in each ward. Visitors were from widely dispersed postal codes. During the second phase of the project (ward boundary review), site visitors will be more strongly urged to indicate in which ward they live. 3.People learned from their experience. About half the survey respondents indicated they had learned something new about council composition from participating in the survey. While that may not be high, the other half considered themselves to be already well informed. Judging by the thoughtfulness of the open-ended answers, this seems very likely. 4.The most popular age range to complete the survey was 35-44. There were fewer survey respondents under the age of 24 and over the age of 75. 5.Those who are interested are really interested. Survey respondents only had a few closed-ended questions but almost everyone – usually more than 500 people – wanted to explain their reasons for their choices. Many understood the interconnected nature of their choices and took pains to explain their thinking. Inside the survey responses there were surprisingly few off-topic comments. Page 250 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-10 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Project Engagement Site Results Visitors Summary • The highest number of visitors per day was 219. There were three waves of participation corresponding with: the launch of the consultation period, the live webinar, and the final two days before the end of the consultation period . • The majority of the people came to the site directly (936) and from social media (444). Table 16 Visitor Sources Summary Total visitors 2,200 Direct visitors 1075 Social media visitors 529 Email visitors 13 Search engine visitors 178 Referrals 421 Visits by Channel The following information is generated by the engagement tool itself and does not capture the engagements from emails or telephone calls to City staff. It is worth noting this information as it relates to the City’s successful advertising and communication efforts. Page 251 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-11 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Survey Tool The survey was the most important source of insights and input to researchers, and participation was higher than hoped. • There were 914 visitors that went to the survey with 670 completed. • Of those who chose to share their postal code, there were 20 City of Guelph postal codes represented. • More than 500 people completed every optional question to explain their choices. They generated thousands of data points in their comments. Questions and Answers Tool • There were 125 visitors • 33 visitors posted questions and 27 were answered publicly (4 were duplicate questions). 2 questions were answered privately because they were deemed out of scope. • Questions raised during the town hall live presentation were answered live then copied from the Facebook and Webex chats to the Question and Answer section of the engagement site. Places Tool • 38 visitors looked at the map and 14 individuals identified the ward where they live by placing a virtual “pin” on the map. Virtual Live Town Hall Results The virtual town hall took place on August 25. There were 122 total participants watching on Facebook, guelph.ca/live, and on Webex. The breakdown is as follows: • 39 participants watched on Facebook. • 33 participants watched on Webex. • 50 participants watched on guelph.ca/live. • At 2.4k and growing, the video is one of the most frequently viewed on the City’s Facebook channel. • Numbers of viewers of the re-broadcast on Rogers Cable are not known. Page 252 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-12 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Contacting the City Directly Results • Total number of emails, letters, or telephone calls with citizen comments was 25. • Number of people that called during dedicated call-in office hours was zero. • Three calls from the public outside the advertised call-in time. • Manually entering in answers to the survey questions on behalf of callers accounts for the difference between number of individual respondents and number of surveys completed. Communication Results that Helped Drive Engagement Media Coverage • 19 stories were run since March 2020 through September 4, 2020. • 7 of the 19 stories were letters to the editor or opinion pieces. Social Media The City’s communications staff executed targeted campaigns that generated an impressive reach. • Total reach between Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, both boosted and organic was an exceptional 99,418. o 41,179 reach on Facebook with 2,146 engagements and 271 link clicks. o 44,485 reach on Twitter with 1,704 engagements with 4,905 link clicks to the project website; 118 retweets on Twitter. o 1 Instagram add targeted to reach students and youth and especially ones expressing an interested in policy. • There were 2,400 video views of the virtual town hall on Facebook with 89 clicks to share following the event. • 766 clicks from social media to the website. • 124 total comments on social media (including the town hall video). • 89 shares on Facebook. City-Hall website page for project • 320 visitors to home page with 241 unique visitors. • 135 unique visits to the Council composition page. 58 unique visits to the ward boundaries page. Page 253 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE A-13 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx • People spent longer than the average amount of time on these pages than others on the City’s website, anywhere from 1.5 to 2.5 minutes. Page 254 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-1 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Appendix B Ward-Based Versus At-Large System Advantages and Disadvantages Page 255 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-2 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Appendix B: Ward-Based Versus At-Large System Advantages and Disadvantages Implications of an At-Large System of Representation Advantages Disadvantages • Electors have greater choice and flexibility in elections (each voter has the opportunity to consider every candidate in the Council election). • Electors are able to select the candidates they think will do the best job, rather than having to make a choice among candidates who happen to run in their ward. • Residents will have a larger number of Councillors to approach with their concerns. • The system promotes the concept of a City-wide focus, with Councillors being elected by, and concerned for, the City as a whole, rather than placing a priority on more parochial interests. • The likelihood of acclamations is reduced. • Candidates must campaign across the entire City; this may make the cost of a campaign prohibitive (especially for newcomers). • There would be no designated voices for particular communities or localities within the municipality. • At-large elections can lead to significant communities of interest and points of view being unrepresented (or under- represented). • The system can lead to Councillors being relatively inaccessible for residents of some parts of the City. • Candidates who appeal to areas where voter turnout is highest tend to be elected disproportionately. • The format can lead to confusion of responsibilities and duplication of effort on the part of Councillors (everybody on a Council represents everybody in the municipality). • Large numbers of candidates on the ballot can be confusing for voters. Page 256 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE B-3 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Implications of a Ward System of Representation Advantages Disadvantages • Councillors are more likely to be truly local representatives, easily accessible to residents and aware of local issues. • Significant communities of interest are more likely to be represented. • It is less likely that one particular point of view or sectional interest will dominate the Council. • Provides more cost-efficient government, primarily by eliminating duplication of administrative work communicating the same information to and from two or more Councillors. • Simplifies the election process for electors. • Councillors may be elected on minor or parochial issues and lack a perspective of what is to the benefit of the City as a whole. • Ward boundaries may divide communities of interest which may be difficult to define. • Voters may have a restricted choice of candidates in elections for individual wards. • There is a greater likelihood of acclamations. • There may be problems if a Councillor is not performing effectively or is clashing with some electors, as electors for that ward have no alternative (knowledgeable) Councillor to approach. • Ward boundaries may be susceptible to frequent change caused by demographic shifts. • Population changes can lead to unequal workloads for Councillors until ward boundaries are reviewed. • If a Councillor resigns or dies, it may be necessary to hold a by-election to select a replacement. • May discourage new candidates if an incumbent is generally popular or if an incumbent who is popular with a dominant community of interest is running. Page 257 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-1 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Appendix C Time Commitment to Council Activities Page 258 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-2 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Appendix C: Time Commitment to Council Activities Time Commitment to Council Activities (hours per month) Question Number Who Responded Range Average Approximately how many hours do you spend attending meetings of Council and Committee of the Whole in an average month? 11 10-24 hours 17 hours Approximately how many hours do you spend reading and preparing for Council and Committee of the Whole meetings in an average month? 11 5-34 hours 15.27 hours Approximately how many hours do you spend attending other meetings of committees directly related to the City of Guelph (Police Services Board, Conservation Authority, etc.) in an average month? 11 1-13.5 hours 5.64 hours Approximately how many hours do you spend meeting with constituents (including meeting with staff and others to deal with constituent issues) in an average month? 10 4-20 hours 10.5 hours Approximately how many hours do you spend meeting with other Councillors and staff to deal with internal City issues in an average month? 11 2-10 hours 4.05 hours Approximately how many hours do you spend on activities related to municipal issues beyond the scope of the City of Guelph (AMO, FCM, etc.) in an average month? 9 1-10 hours 3.33 hours Approximately how much time do you spend on Council related work not listed above in an average month? Please identify the type of activity and the hours spent. 9 4-54.4 hours 18.93 hours Total time on direct Council business. 8 35-135.4 hours 78.36* hours Page 259 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE C-3 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Question Number Who Responded Range Average Approximately how much time do you spend on service with other community groups not directly related to City of Guelph business, but that are important for your role as Councillor (service clubs, recreation associations, faith-based organizations, etc.) in an average month? If you're comfortable, please also provide examples of these organizations? 11 2-29 hours 9.64 hours Total time on community and Council activity. 8 39.5-143.4 85.68* hours Do you have full-time or part-time employment in addition to your role as a Councillor? If so, how much time do you spend on that employment in an average month? 9 0-200 57.44 On average, how many constituent emails do you receive weekly? 10 10-50 24.45 On average, how many constituent telephone calls do you receive weekly? 11 0-10 3.73 *Averages include only data from Councillors who responded to all questions. Page 260 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-1 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Appendix D Councillor Compensation Page 261 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-2 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Appendix D: Councillor Compensation Councillor Compensation for Select Ontario Single-Tier and Lower-Tier Municipalities Single-Tier Municipality: Municipality Population 2016 Annual Compensation ($) Toronto 2,731,571 117,1641 Ottawa 934,243 105,6841 Hamilton 536,917 97,3572 London 383,822 33,3373 Windsor 217,188 45,7481 Greater Sudbury 161,531 38,7347 Barrie 141,434 32,1252 Guelph 131,794 41,5284 Kingston 123,798 40,0002 Thunder Bay 107,909 30,6728 Chatham-Kent 101,647 32,0001 Lower-Tier Municipalities (Double-Direct): Annual Compensation ($) Municipality Population 2016 Area Municipality Upper-Tier Total Caledon 66,502 37,2342 55,9572 93,191 Mississauga 721,599 82,831 55,9572 138,788 Vaughan 306,233 78,9533 55,9553 134,908 Oshawa 159,458 27,1106 54,6942 81,804 Pickering 91,771 35,3172 54,6942 90,011 Burlington 183,314 56,7962 51,0262 107,822 Lower-Tier Municipalities (Direct): Annual Compensation ($) Municipality Population 2016 Area Municipality Upper-Tier Waterloo (City) 104,986 28,8925 43,7312 St. Catharines 133,113 21,0292 30,2044 Page 262 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE D-3 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Notes: 1 Effective 2019 2 2018 3 2017 4 2020 5 2018, 1/3 is non-taxable 6 2017, 1/3 is non-taxable 7 Average of remuneration of Councillors in 2018. This includes compensation of work on Council and committee(s) 8 Base salary effective 2019 but before additional pay from sitting on outside boards (average $2,650 in 2018) Source: Population – 2016 Statistics Canada Census; Compensation – various websites Page 263 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE E-1 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Appendix E Media Coverage Page 264 of 936 Page 1 of 2 Appendix E - Media Coverage Council composition and ward boundary review Pre-launch City staff wants to review Council makeup, ward boundaries starting next year Guelph Today, April 2, 2019 Guelph could see new wards, Council size in 2022 Guelph Mercury-Tribune, June 27, 2019 Opinion: Guelph city council review deserves strong public participation Guelph Mercury-Tribune, July 10, 2019 More money sought to review Council makeup and ward boundaries Guelph Today, November 19, 2019 Opinion: Remember, the Internet is more complicated than you think Guelph Today, Market Squared, May 9, 2020 Changes to Guelph’s council, ward could still be in place for 2022 election, despite COVID-19 delays Guelph Mercury-Tribune, July 28, 2020 Review of ward boundaries, council make-up, voting methods back on track Guelph Today, July 30, 2020 Podcast: Behind the scenes of the remote Council Guelph Politico, August 5, 2020 Phase 1: Council composition How many councillors does Guelph need? City wants your input Guelph Today, August 17, 2020 Guelph reviews makeup of City council, ward boundaries Global News, August 17, 2020 Guelph reviews city council composition and district boundaries The Canadian, August 17, 2020 BLOG: Should we have part-time councillors? Should they serve wards or the community at-large? Ward 2 Guelph, August 17, 2020 Composition of future Guelph councils now up for public discussion Guelph Mercury Tribune, August 18, 2020 Council composition virtual town hall Rogers TV, August 18, 2020 Page 265 of 936 Page 2 of 2 City of Guelph Public Notice Guelph council: Goal-setting is the first step in renewing our municipal democracy Guelph Mercury-Tribune, August 20, 2020 Letter to the editor: A smaller city council wouldn’t be a good idea Matt Saunders, Guelph Today, August 22, 2020 Have your say about the composition of City council Guelph Today, August 24, 2020 Guelph hosting virtual town hall on structure of city council Global News Kitchener, August 24, 2020 Guelph hosting virtual town hall on structure of city council MSN Canada, August 24, 2020 Guelph hosting virtual town hall on structure of city council Jump 106.9, August 24, 2020 Guelph hosting virtual town hall on structure of city council CFox News, August 24, 2020 Letter to the Editor: A lot democratically wrong with invitation for input about future Guelph councils Karen Farbridge, Guelph Mercury-Tribune, August 24, 2020 Letter to the Editor: There are many advantages to having multiple councillors per ward Kevin Bowman, Guelph Mercury-Tribune, August 27, 2020 Opinion: A startling string of true clichés about trust Adam Donaldson, Guelph Today, August 29, 2020 Letter to the editor: In support of the ward system and full-time councillors Guelph Today, September 1, 2020 Letter to the editor: Guelph council review: I urge you to have your say Guelph Mercury-Tribune, September 3, 2020 Residents call on Guelph to “press the pause button”, extend consultations on Council composition Guelph Mercury-Tribune, September 4, 2020 Page 266 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE F-1 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Appendix F Engagement Site Tool – Questions and Answers Page 267 of 936 APPENDIX F Questions and Answers Context The following questions and answers were collected from the City’s engagement site tool called “Q & A”. Visitors to the HaveYourSay.Guelph.ca/council-composition site posted their questions themselves. In addition, questions were posted by city staff who cut and pasted them from a webex live event and Facebook livestream held August 25, 2020. Questions were received and directed to a relevant expert for an answer and the public was promised a three -day turnaround. Some answers came from the consulting team and some from the City Clerk’s office. Questions posed at the livestreamed event were read aloud by a moderator and answered by panelists. For the record, questions captured at the virtual town hall (whether from Webex or Facebook chats) are documented separately at the end of this file, so a little repetition might be noticed by the reader. “We want to answer questions you have about the Council composition and ward boundary review. We're an open book. Ask us a question and we’ll share the answer. “ Q. Susan asked a question during the webex virtual townhall. How has the ratio of population to representation changed over the years in Guelph? A. The table below shows the trend since the current system of 12 councillors elected from six wards has been in place. Census year Number of Councillors Population Population per Councillor 1991 12 87,976 7,331 2001 12 106,170 8,848 2011 12 121,700 10,142 2016 12 131,705 10,975 Q. Susan asked this question during the virtual townhall chat. What does research show about the number of women and minorities elected in at-large vs. ward systems? A. At this point we are not aware of any research in Ontario that addresses this issue. There is a new database that should allow research on this question, but this database has only become available recently. Q. Susan asked this question at the webex virtual townhall. Any data/research which shows whether full-time or part-time positions support the participation of women or minorities? A. We are not aware of any research on this issue. The relatively small number of municipalities with full-time councillors in Ontario would make it difficult to do very much research which Page 268 of 936 would yield statistically significant results. We understand that other aspects of female representation are being considered and may be viewed at nosecondchances.ca(External link) Q. Susan asked this question at the webex virtual townhall: Do these other cities also have part-time councillors, or are they full-time? A. Our research indicates that only three cities in Ontario pay councillors what could be considered full-time pay—Toronto, Ottawa, and Hamilton. All three of these cities use single- member wards. Q. This question was asked on Facebook: Is there a breakdown of projected population growth by ward as they are currently available at this time? Seems it might be helpful In making this decision (answer: slide #26) A. These projections are available and they will be used in drawing ward boundaries in Phase 2 of this project. It is a widespread practice in drawing ward boundaries that current populations as well as projections into the future are considered. In the Guelph ward boundary review we will use population projections to 2030 to design wards for the next three municipal elections (2022, 2026 and 2030). Wards need to be of reasonably equal size now, but it is undesirable to change ward boundaries too frequently so both current population and future growth are considered. Q. Anonymous Southie asked this question at the webex townhall: Is it better to have wards of different sizes and populations to match the distinct neighbourhoods in guelph (which are of different sizes), or keep wards equivalent populations but blend more than one unique neighbourhood? A. You point to an inevitable problem in creating wards. Wards should have relatively equal populations (one person, one vote), but they should also be built around existing communities of interest. Sometimes these two considerations can work at cross-purposes. This can be a problem in drawing ward boundaries, but usually a reasonable compromise can be worked out that involves recognizing these two (and other) considerations but bending to a certain extent. There are very few examples of municipalities using wards of different sizes and presumably electing different numbers of councillors. One we are aware of is Chatham-Kent where this came about as a result of an amalgamation in 1998. It seems to work reasonably well there because of the historical circumstances. Niagara Falls used a similar system in the 1960s and 1970s as a product of an amalgamation, but eventually eliminated it. One crucial consideration in a system of this kind is that it would give an advantage to the residents of some wards not others; that is, some people could get to vote for two or three members of council and others only one. This would not be an equitable system. Page 269 of 936 Q. Corrie asked this question on Facebook. Are there any advantages to having "councillors - at-large" added to one councillor per ward. A. This mixed system was used in most large cities in Ontario in the 19th and early 20th century. The at-large members formed what was called the Board of Control. This was abandoned in most places in the 1960s or 1970s. It caused tension around the council table because it created two classes of councillors. Thunder Bay has used this system as a product of the amalgamation that created the city in 1970. By most accounts it has worked well there because it has a lengthy history. Kingston instituted a mixed system like this when it was reogranized by amalgamation in 1998. It abandoned the system after one term. A form of this is used in some regional governments where regional councillors are elected at-large and serve on the councils of area municipalities. The lesson seems to be that this system can work where it has historical roots or is a by -product of a larger system such as regional government. However, the fact that it can create two classes of councillor has caused other municipalities to steer away from it. It is not clear what role a number of councillors-at-large would play in Guelph. Q. Denese asked a question on Facebook: With the idea of growing demand how would it be if we would had 7 Councillors and and 7 wards would that relieve the growing demand of the citizens on the Councillors A. Reducing the number of councillors from 12 to seven would increase the workload on those councillors. Of course, if they became full-time the expectation would be that they could devote full-time to their council work. The alternative of reducing the number of councillors is open to Guelph City Council and will be addressed in the Phase 1 report to Council in November. Q. Michelle asked a question on Facebook: What is the average number of councilors per capita in a city of comparable size for our projected 2040 population? A. The table below shows the population per councillors for comparable municipalities in 2020. It is difficult to project forward to 2040 and, in fact, our review is aimed at designing wards based on population projections out to 2030, not 2040. A reasonable assumption would be that whatever changes affect Guelph over the next 20 years would have a similar impact on these comparable municipalities, so the actual numbers will change, but the relationship betwe en them will likely stay approximately the same. Municipality Population Number of Councillors Population/Councillors Sudbury 168,813 12 14067.8 Barrie 149,302 10 14930.2 Guelph 143,169 12 11930.8 Kingston 135,204 12 11267.0 Page 270 of 936 Thunder Bay 112,740 12 9395.0 Chatham-Kent 105,666 17 6215.6 Q. During our recent townhall the following question was asked: How would changing the number or configuration of the wards affect the distribution and cost of services and/or community funding? A. Wards are part of the election system in Guelph. It is our understanding that the delivery of services in the City is not affected by the configuration of wards. Therefore, a change in the ward system would have no impact on the distribution and cost of services or other aspects of community funding. Q. How many Councillors (probably "Aldermen" at that time) did we have in 1909 when the population of Guelph was 11,500? Were they full or part-time? A. Reaching too far back in history can be a bit murky. According to the Canadian Encyclopedia the number of councillors fluctuated between 11 and 18 from Guelph’s founding in 1856 until 1930 when it was fixed at 11 councillors elected at-large (https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/guelph#:~:text=Guelph%2C%20Ontari o%2C%20incorporated%20as%20a,km%20east%20of%20Kitchener%2DWaterloo.) This was changed to 12 councillors elected from six two-member wards for the 1991 election. Throughout this time, all councillors have been part-time. Q. Why have "student populations" been excluded from the "Population per Ward" Table 1 in the background document: "Guelph's Current Electoral System"? Roughly 30,000 students attend the University of Guelph. While they are resident in the City, they are eligible to vote like any other citizen. If we are going to uphold the principle of "One person, one vote" in relationship to generally equal electorate sizes in each ward, then it is critical that the student population be included. With the set date for municipal elections, we know that the civic election will always take place during the academic year. Susan Watson asked 21 days ago A. The figures used for reference in Phase 1 were compiled from the 2016 Census which does not include post-secondary students who reside in Guelph only during the school year and were included purely as an illustration of the differences in ward populations in Guelph today. A key component of the ward boundary review in Phase 2 will involve the compilation of accurate data on post-secondary students that will involve consultation with all post -secondary institutions in Guelph to obtain complete figures. The Ontario Municipal Board confirmed in a case in 2013 that post-secondary students must be considered in a ward boundary review and that precedent will apply in this review. Page 271 of 936 Q. I apologize for not being clearer with my question. I understand that we can submit comments via the survey. How do we get to see comments that other citizens are making? In the Town Hall, one of the panelists commented that a lot of input is being received around the diversity of Council. I would like to read what other people are saying. One of the characteristics of in-person consultation is that we get to hear what other people in the community are saying. A. We are posting questions and answers that we have received here. Some of the conversations have been taking place on social media and in letters to the editor. We have included links to those letters below. Letter to the editor: A smaller city council wouldn’t be a good idea Matt Saunders, Guelph Today, August 22, 2020 Letter to the Editor: A lot democratically wrong with invitation for input about future Guelph councils Karen Farbridge, Guelph Mercury-Tribune, August 24, 2020 Letter to the Editor: There are many advantages to having multiple councillors per ward Kevin Bowman, Guelph Mercury-Tribune, August 27, 2020 Q. When considering the possibility of changing the number of wards and ward boundaries I'd like to know what other elements of city life are based on ward boundaries. For example, what city services or community funding are managed through the ward system? How would changing the number or configuration of the wards affect the distribution and cost of services and/or community funding? A. The current wards serve primarily as electoral boundaries for Guelph municipal elections as well as elections held for school board trustees. Changes to Guelph’s ward boundaries might also lead to changes in the wards used to elect school board trustees. The guiding principles for the ward boundary review, which will include a second round of community engagement in early 2021, are: • Respect for the approved recommendations of Phase One of the Council Composition and Ward Boundary Review (CCWBR). • Ensure effective representation as mandated by the Supreme Court decision in the Carter case. • Information received through the community engagement process. • Representation by population: where possible efforts should be made to ensure that wards have reasonably equal populations. • Geographic representation: revised ward boundaries should follow Guelph’s natural boundaries and geographic features where possible. • Projected demographic trends: revised ward boundaries should accommodate projected growth patterns for the City. • Communities of interest: to the extent possible, efforts should be made to avoid splitting neighbourhoods or communities of interest into different wards. Page 272 of 936 • A best practices approach that builds on the experience of other municipal ward boundary reviews and the outcome of LPAT hearings where ward boundary reviews have been appealed. • Fiscal responsibility and alignment to the Community Plan and Strategic Plan for the City of Guelph. Other City services such as waste collection, transit and drinking water are not affected by changes to ward boundaries. Q. Maureen asked during the webex Townhall chat: Can you repeat how many councillors currently work full-time? A. Guelph City Council has several councillors who have jobs (part-time and full-time) in addition to their roles as councillors. Q. Marty asked a question on facebook - Is it possible to maintain current size of council and number of wards but pay councillors a full-time salary rather than part-time basis as is presently the case? A. Yes. It is possible to maintain the existing size and composition of City Council while raising salaries to be more consistent with a full-time work load. The Council composition review will make a recommendation to City Council on whether the work-load of a councillor should be considered full-time or part-time. Once that determination has been made, a resident advisory committee will make recommendations to City Council regarding salary and benefits. Q. Joanne asked this question on Facebook What is there to stop "full-time" councilors for taking on additional part-time work A. There is nothing which would prohibit part-time Councillors from taking on additional part- time work. In addition, there is nothing in provincial legislation that would prevent a full-time Councillor from taking on additional work. Q. Dhruv request this information during our Townhall webex chat: Can you please mention current Guelph Councilor are working full time or part time Thank You . A. Currently, Guelph City Councillors work part time. Several councillors have jobs (part time and full time) in addition to their roles on Council. Q. Mike asked this question during our Townhall webex chat: will their be any discussion on the roles, responsibilities of councillors and how much time they currently spend fulfilling their duties? I believe this needs to be disclosed before making an y decision. A. The Council composition review is in fact a review of whether Guelph needs full or part time councillors, which speaks to their role and time spent performing their duties. A breakdown of Page 273 of 936 the number of hours that councillors spend fulfilling various duties is available as part of the ‘full-time or part-time councillors?’ backgrounder document on guelph.ca/council. Q. Maureen asked the following Question: Has the option of a mixed member representation been considered? A. Mixed member proportional representation refers to electors placing one vote for a local/ward candidate and one vote for a political party. As political parties are not permitted at the municipal level in Ontario, mixed member proportional representation cannot be considered. Q. Tayna asked the question during the Townhall webex chat: I don't understand how 2 councilors per ward leads to "increased size of wards" (the second bullet point on the disadvantage A. Having two councillors per ward generally leads to a lower overall number of wards than if one councillor is elected per ward. A lower number of total wards means a higher population in each ward. In this case, “increased size” refers to population counts and not necessarily geographic size. Q. Michelle asked during our virtual townhall webex chat: Is a hybrid option possible with one for each ward and the rest at large? A. Yes, hybrid options (with some councillors serving wards and others serving at- large) are allowed and are being considered as part of this review Q. In 2006 our ward system for electing councillors was confirmed via a referendum question on the ballot of the municipal election that year. Will a referendum be held again on whether or not we should have a ward or "at-large" system? If not, how will you ensure that the decision reached is a democratic one, supported by a majority of Guelphites? A. A referendum (referred to as a ‘question on the ballot’ or ‘question t o electors’ in the Municipal Elections Act) can be requested by City Council through a bylaw. Currently, staff do not anticipate recommending a question to electors on the topic of Council composition. Instead, staff will recommend that City Council make the decision based on the recommendation of third-party subject matter experts and the results of this community engagement. Q. I'm not clear how this forum is set up for comments, as well as questions? On the Metrolinx consultation, comments and questions go up directly on their site so we can see what other citizens are both thinking and asking. (You are much more prompt on the answer end of things!) My comment on your response to my question about timelines is that the process needs to serve citizens, not the other way around. Page 274 of 936 A. We certainly welcome comments. This tool is used specifically for questions, if you could summit your comments to clerks@guelph.ca. We will direct them to our project team. Q. I recognize that this process is operating under time constraints and that the original plans for community engagement were derailed by the pandemic. However, would it be possible to extend this consultation period for at least another two weeks until September 18th? Public consultation is normally not conducted during the summer as people are away and generally disengaged from politics. While many people had been staying home, the stops seem to have opened on vacationing this August. The decisions that will arise out of this process are critically important. Many people may tune in after Labour Day to find that the window for input has closed. A. You are correct, the consultation period was delayed due to a full pause on all public engagement by the City during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Originally this engagement period was to run through an earlier part of this year and include both in-person and online components. Consideration was given to extending public engagement post-summer vacation months. The timelines of the project make it difficult to extend engagement periods in phase one (Council composition) without affecting phase two (ward boundary review) since one requires completion before moving on to the second phase. The ward boundary review also requires completion with enough time to manage any potential appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal so that results can be in place, in advance of the 2022 municipal and school board elections. While the revised online engagement plan is not what we had originally envisioned, we are offering a thorough three-week virtual engagement that includes: • online survey • question boards • virtual town hall (which will be recorded and shared after the fact online and through local Rogers broadcasts) • thorough communication and advertising • set virtual office hours for the project team answers questions via phone, e-mail or video calls This engagement will provide members of the public the opportunity to safely, within the guidelines we know that public health is recommending and requiring that we follow, effectively engage with the project while maintaining the original intention of having composition and ward boundary changes in place for the 2022 municipal election. The final decision regarding Council composition will take place at a Special City Council meeting this November – ensuring delegates and City Council have a dedicated meeting at Page 275 of 936 which to consider the topic. In addition to this first round of engagement, there will also be a second round of engagement related to the ward boundary review early next year. Q. Will the Town Hall Tuesday evening be recorded so that people can watch it at a later date? A. Yes, the town hall will be recorded so that it can be viewed at a later date. The video will be available on the Council composition page over at guelph.ca, the project page on haveyoursay.guelph.ca and the City’s Facebook page. We’ll share a tweet on the City’s Twitter account with a link to the video when it’s ready. In addition, there will be a delayed broadcast on Rogers Television, you can check out those dates and times here. Q. I saw in comments on Guelph Today that people think we should limit Council and the Mayor from being elected for more than two terms. Is the allowed? A. Discussion of term limits for City Councillors is not a part of the Council composition review. At this time, Canada has no legislated or mandated term limits at any level of elected government. The City cannot impose term restrictions because it would conflict with provincial legislation. This does not mean that the suggestion has not been made at other levels of government where changes could come forward in future legislation. Page 276 of 936 Live Webinar Questions And Comments Arising From August 25th, 2020 panel discussion about Guelph Council Composition. Cut from Webex chat and FaceBook chat then pasted into the categories of research questions. Panelists addressed the whole range of questions live during the last stage of the event. The moderator did not ask duplicate questions. Questions and answers from the live event were added to the HaveYourSay.Guelph.ca engagement site (in the “Q & A” tool) to ensure anyone can read the answers. The whole event was recorded too, so the questions and answers can be viewed on the City’s Facebook page and shared. Re: SIZE OF COUNCIL • How would changing the number or configuration of the wards affect the distribution and cost of services and/or community funding? • Susan: For how long has Guelph had 12 part-time councillors? (Answered in the presentation) • Kevin: I am concerned that any reduction in the size of council will reduce the capacity of council to do its job. However, if councillors became full-time then a reduction in the number of councillors would not be as much of a concern since the total working hours of council would remain the same or increase. • From Facebook (Michelle): What is the average number of councillors per capita in a city of comparable size for our projected 2040 population? • Claudia: We need more councillors and perhaps re-arrange the wards, maybe one more? Ward 6 is definitely growing, and is the one suffering the most changes • When considering the possibility of changing the number of wards and war d boundaries I'd like to know what other elements of city life are based on ward boundaries. For example, what city services or community funding are managed through the ward system? How would changing the number or configuration of the wards affect the distribution and cost of services and/or community funding? On number of councillors, number of wards and full-time vs part-time councillors. • Claudia: I don't think 12 people to represent 132,000 people on the contrary, I think 12 people is barely enough to represent the residents of Guelph, • From Facebook (Denese): With the idea of growing demand how would it be if we would had 7 Councillors and 7 wards would that relieve the growing demand of the citizens on the Councillors? Re: WARDS OR AT-LARGE • Susan: In 2006, we had a referendum to make the decision to keep the ward system. Would we have a referendum again this time? How would you ensure that any change to an at-large system would be democratic? • Susan: What does research show about the number of women and minorities elected in at-large vs. ward systems? • Facebook question from Corrie: Are there any advantages to having "councillors -at- large" added to one councillor per ward. Page 277 of 936 • Michelle: Is a hybrid option possible with one for each ward and the rest at large? • Claudia: Ward system represents residents best as it ensures that the councillor will not have a partisan relation with the other councillors/major • Scott: A more appropriate starting point for this process would have been to as citizens about values. Once values are sorted out, the aspects of Council composition would flow from those values. We are somewhat starting in the middle of the conversation . • Anonymous Southie: is it better to have wards of different sizes and populations to match the distinct neighbourhoods in Guelph (which are of different sizes), or keep wards equivalent populations but blend more than one unique neighbourhood? Re: ONE REP OR MORE PER WARD • Steve: I think having more than one councillor per ward is really important. The City is having to deal with more complex issues. Making good decision requires thoughtful discussion and having more than one perspective represented per ward will improve the decisions made. • Kevin: Multiple councillors per ward is great and we should not move to single member wards. Multiple Councillors per ward ensures an alternate if one member is unable or unwilling to represent some constituents. It also kind of forces a minimum of dialogue as the two councillors for a ward will likely discuss issues with each other rather than just form an opinion in isolation and stick to it. • Tanya: I don't understand how 2 councilors per ward leads to "increased size of wards" (the second bullet point on the disadvantages) • Scott: I favour multiple member wards because combined with ranked balloting will lead to a more proportional system • Susan: I think the Guelph experience is that the Ward Councillors work in partnership and avoid duplication. • James: What is the best Council composition for ranked ballots? • Maureen: Has the option of a mixed member representation been considered? Re: FULL-TIME OR PART-TIME ROLE • Q From Facebook: What would the property tax increase would be required to have the current number of Councilors on a full-time salary? • Q Susan: Do these other cities also have part-time councillors, or are they full-time? • Mike: Will their be any discussion on the roles, responsibilities of councillors and how much time they currently spend fulfilling their duties? I believe this needs to be disclosed before making any decision • Dhruv: Can you please mention current Guelph Councilor are working full time or part time Thank You • Q from Facebook (Joanne): What is there to stop "full-time" councilors for taking on additional part-time work? • Q from Facebook (Marty): Is it possible to maintain current size of council and number of wards but pay councillors a full-time salary rather than part-time basis as is presently the case? Page 278 of 936 • Susan: Any data/research which shows whether full-time or part-time positions support the participation of women or minorities? • Maureen: Can you repeat how many councillors current work full-time? • Susan: how has the ratio of population to representation changed over the years in Guelph? • Susan: We're not discussing ranked ballots at this stage, but the number of councillors elected per ward impacts the level of proportionality you get under a ranked ballot system. Could someone comment? • Q from Facebook: Is there a breakdown of projected population growth by ward as they are currently available at this time? Seems it might be helpful In making this decision (answer: see presentation slide #26)Q From Webex: I saw in comments on Guelph Today that people think we should limit Council and the Mayor from being elected for more than two terms. Is the allowed? • Q From Webex: I recognize that this process is operating under time constraints and that the original plans for community engagement were derailed by the pandemic. However, would it be possible to extend this consultation period for at least another two weeks until September 18th? Public consultation is normally not conducted during the summer as people are away and generally disengaged from politics. While many people had been staying home, the stops seem to have opened on vacationing this August. The decisions that will arise out of this process are critically important. Many people may tune in after Labour Day to find that the window for input has closed. QUESTIONS/COMMENTS OUT OF THIS PROJECT’S SCOPE • Claudia: Very small, too many projects going on in Guelph for the current council to do a deep dive on each project • Q from Facebook (Mike): I think the new library should be a referendum question on next election ballot. It should be put on hold until them. I understand majority of residents are against it. This would be the fairest way to get a true picture. Can this be done? • Mike: Will the consultants be looking at how any potential changes to council structure will impact working with City staff? Page 279 of 936 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. PAGE G-1 \\10.0.0.52\hdrive\Guelph\2020 CCESR\Deliverables\Final\Guelph Council Composition Ward Boundary Review - Phase 1 Report.docx Appendix G Survey Responses Page 280 of 936 City Council Composition Review Survey SURVEY RESPONSE REPORT Engagement Period: 7 August 2020 - 04 September 2020 PROJECT NAME: Council composition and ward boundary review www.HaveYourSayGuelph.ca/council-composition Prepared by: Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. in conjunction with ICA Associates Inc. and Drs. David Siegel and Robert J. Williams Page 281 of 936 SURVEY QUESTIONS Q1 What would you hope to see in 5 years as proof that the way citizens elect their Council in the City of Guelph is working well? City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 1 of 275 Page 282 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:41 AM Full time council. More transparency. adding a new ward Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:46 AM Diversity including women, men and ethic group representation. Young, middle aged and senior. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 AM Composition of council is more diverse/representative of Guelph’s racial diversity lmousseau 8/17/2020 09:06 AM More diverse voices being heard and represented in decisions that represent the entire community, not just the vocal minorities of the entitled/elite who *think* they represent everyone and have the privilege of time and/or money to respond and engage. Councillors should do more to understand the voices of all their constituents, especially the marginalized ones. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:19 AM Less duplication of effort. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:52 AM Council reflects the community's diversity while striving for a growing community with good jobs. Anonymous 8/17/2020 10:08 AM Increased voter turnout, more candidates vying for positions Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:20 AM I would like to see BIPOC members of council. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:27 AM Change and options. Recent election was full of incumbants and unchallenged candidates Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:15 PM A healthy variety of opinions on Guelph's future, and a rigorous adherence to the Strategic Plan Anonymous 8/17/2020 12:23 PM Able to effectively and transparently solve problems while minimizing the wasteful spending and boutique projects we've seen over the last 30 years. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:15 PM Each Council member plus the mayor elected with over 50% of the popular vote. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:33 PM Competent, knowledgeable, engaged councillor. No deadwood or old, outmoded thinking/beliefs. Diverse. No overt or covert sexism, racism, nimbyism, other isms. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:33 PM Councillors that have the resources and time to respond to their residents. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 2 of 275 Page 283 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:15 PM Greater representation of the public's interest and desires while balancing necessary growth and development in the city. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:47 PM A larger percentage of our community voting. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:52 PM Variety of voices across the city are able to be heard rather than a focus on a minority of strong special interests groups Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:28 PM I’d like to see fiscally responsible decisions that are: fairly distributed between the wards; reflect the will of the majority of the citizens; with the goal of maintaining essential services while enhancing our quality of life. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:57 PM The City should provide an overview on an annual basis of what were the key issues both City-wide and per Ward, and then provide a summary of what engagement was part of the review process, and whether or not the Councillor's view (and ultimate vote) was consistent with his/her Ward engagement process. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:57 PM Wards represented fairly, cohesiveness among councillors, educated & knowledgeable councillors. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:04 PM 6 or 8 full time councilors and a boundary redistribution that has the extra councilors in the south and east end. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:17 PM Strong, diverse and qualified candidates for mayor and councilor positions; strong voter turnout In municipal elections; strong citizen engagement between elections at town halls and other opportunities to provide input. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:43 PM I would expect to see a City Council that is more diverse, representing the cross-section of cultures in this community. I would hope to have a City Council that is seriously concerned about Climate Change. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:48 PM Ranked ballots Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:49 PM Citizens of all political stripes feel represented by their councillors and we have a diversity of opinion on council that reflects Guelph, but can still work together cooperatively to implement solutions and make decisions that move Guelph in a progressive, just, equitable and sustainable direction. It would be lovely to see more BIPOC folk represented in our City leadership. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:50 PM More engagement from citizens. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:51 PM Citizen engagement and no hidden agendas. If there are still 2 part time per ward they should be representing that ward while keeping the whole city in perspective. Council should not be telling staff how to do their jobs nor City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 3 of 275 Page 284 of 936 expect them to not follow policy and by- laws voted on by council. Anonymous 8/17/2020 04:57 PM Proof? Is there proof that it's working well currently? Anonymous 8/17/2020 04:59 PM That what the majority of Guelphites have their voices heard and that decisions are more streamlined. Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:11 PM That the citizens of Guelph are well-represented in their wards with diverse, dynamic council members Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:22 PM Significant improvement via statistics in community engagement and Citizen satisfaction with City Council Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:51 PM That we are listened to when we voice our concerns, our objections and our ideas. So like... hey no $67 plus million dollar library. Preservation of naturalized areas. More green spaces. Affordable housing. Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:04 PM Better road conditions and traffic flow for vehicles Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:38 PM Stop centralizing city services in the northern area of the city, centered around Wyndham and McDonnell, services must be decentralized Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:51 PM Internet voting, protected by, but not limited to, dual authentication such as Google Authenticator. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 PM A council that actually listens to and acts on residents concerns Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 PM Councillors having regular meetings with their ward members to discuss their issues. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:33 PM Progress in wards to support community. Each ward should have reasonable short term and long term goals Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:44 PM More public trust/confidence in City decisions as a result of early and thorough engagement Anonymous 8/17/2020 10:36 PM no changes Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:37 AM Diversity on council, senior city staff and boards, particularly police. Guelph Leadership is way too white. Anonymous a way to cast votes online in order to ensure a true majority elected anyone City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 4 of 275 Page 285 of 936 8/18/2020 05:07 AM to council Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:31 AM More diversity on council. Controls on development. We need more parks. We need a grocery store serving every neighbourhood. There is far too much focus on serving (out of town) land developers, and far, far too little on serving our citizens. Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:03 AM More women and marginalized populations on council and on staff, a new library, bike lanes everywhere, and a downtown closed to traffic. Cam Guthrie and Dan Gibson are no longer on council. Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:53 AM I would hope to see a diverse Council that is representative of different cultural, economic, and generational backgrounds. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:39 AM I'd love to see a "cleaner" downtown core with a vibrant shopping and restaurant industry there and free weekend parking. I'd love to see a more "complete" City of Guelph where all residents feel involved in the entire city. Right now I feel that there is a division between downtown, south end and even west end. That is not sustainable and there needs to be more understanding of the challenges and benefits of all regions of our city Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:41 AM Greater City transparency in its operations. More effective procedures for approving, building and funding business and civic space. A better public transportation service that is publicly owned, runs more frequently, and services citizens of Guelph just as efficiently and fairly as University Students. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:41 AM That council members get elected with long-term vision of the city in mind. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:59 AM Responsible decision-making and budgeting. A Council that reflects all views and all community members, including more diversity of Councillors. Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:02 AM More positive engagements and delegations with city council Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:51 AM That I see and am familiar with the councillors representing my ward, that I have a predictable, publicly known way of accessing them during protected time blocks; that they make all decisions following publicly known, protected, accessible consultation processes where the councillor sits down as an equal in a circle with other citizens; that their responses show attentiveness and not just stick to the message-ness and twist your words in order to affirm their own positions while ignoring your input. Protected, predictable space in the public, not behind closed doors, literally out in the open whenever possible, for citizens to voice and listen in a non-adversarial format. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:06 AM A council as diverse as it's electorate Anonymous Tax increases which are affordable and online with other municipalities, City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 5 of 275 Page 286 of 936 8/18/2020 09:08 AM becoming an expensive city to live in. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:18 AM More diversity so they are actually representative of Guelph's population Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:29 AM Council that works together and on behalf of all citizens. Given the price of housing today, what that also understands that our taxes are based on the value of our homes, and both keep rising beyond affordability. Anonymous 8/18/2020 11:01 AM Council composition that is reflective of the population. Tangible outcomes that reflect the needs of all areas of the city. Anonymous 8/18/2020 11:58 AM Easy to contact when an issue arises in my area or ward; councillors represent my ward at council meetings; my councillors listen to concerns and are willing to speak up at council meetings. Anonymous 8/18/2020 01:15 PM Council is able to connect better to constituents in a timely manner. Council is able to be present and involved 100% of the time with their designated communities. Council can do their jobs efficiently with limited conflict of interest. Anonymous 8/18/2020 12:48 PM 2 full time councillors per ward. Anonymous 8/18/2020 01:29 PM We only need one council member per ward! Why 2, so they can disagree? There is not enough work to make it full time. Anonymous 8/18/2020 02:48 PM Incorporate secure internet voting, in order to increase voter participation. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:18 PM Representation that speaks directly to the unique needs Of the community based on the composition of each of the wards and on the changes expec Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:46 PM Increased public infrastructure in green transportation Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:51 PM Fiscal restraint, stop the waste of taxpayers money. Too many projects that are unsustainable. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:10 PM When major votes take place, council should contact their citizens for their views and opinions on the issue, go with the majority to help with the vote. This can be done by connecting via social media, info at city owned facilities to reach a large amount of the population. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:37 PM More diversity among the elected officials would be a good way to demonstrate that minorities matter to Guelph. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 6 of 275 Page 287 of 936 Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:10 PM No hunger. No homelessness. Incomes based on TRUE cost of living. Two children policy plan. An environmental plan with no garbage and renewable energy policy plan. An inter-jurisdictional quality management system for the ONE taxpayer, citizen, voter needing planned openness, transparency and accountability. Anonymous 8/19/2020 05:36 AM Greater diversity on Council. Stronger leadership on Council that understands their governance role and has hired administrative leadership that believes in engaging citizens in local decision making. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:01 AM More accountability on the part of Councillors. And not just on issues like driveways. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:11 AM Diversity of all kinds, and more turnover. This council has two new members, elected from Wards where incumbents didn't run. No incumbent member was defeated at the polls. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:49 AM More candidate debates. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:57 AM Improvement in voter turnout rate Anonymous 8/19/2020 08:00 AM Fix the roads. Anonymous 8/19/2020 08:45 AM A diverse council representing young and old and people from a variety of cultures and backgrounds Anonymous 8/19/2020 11:47 AM Equal representation by each ward, as it compares to population size. If a ward has a higher population, it should have higher representation. Alternatively, the ward boundaries should be re-drawn, so that each ward has an equal population of residents. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:08 PM Proof would be indicated by voter turn out, by positive i put from citizens, by communication between citizens and their representatives. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:27 PM There wouldn't be just a group of white males and female. I think it is important that we represent diversity and forward thinking. We need to also be mindful that youth and young adults are impactful to the future and maybe taking a lead through that. The community Plan will be a perfect way to make this tangible solution for our future. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:36 PM Increases in participation in local elections; increases in participation in public consultations; greater opportunities for citizen participation between elections; a council that broadly reflects the social, political, and ethnocultural diversity of Guelph; a moderate increase in council turnover; a stronger media and civil society public conversation around issues under consideration at City Hall. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 7 of 275 Page 288 of 936 Anonymous 8/19/2020 03:42 PM Less stress at the meetings more positive actions Anonymous 8/19/2020 03:43 PM Proof regarding the electoral system is working well would be reflected in a large percentage of the population from all walks of life engaged at a level of 70% or more voter turnout. Anonymous 8/19/2020 05:15 PM A reduced council size so that votes in each ward don’t cancel each other out. Anonymous 8/19/2020 06:10 PM Caps on how many terms a councilor can sit Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:42 PM A great working group of councillors that debate issues fairly. Anonymous 8/19/2020 09:11 PM Citizens feel represented and are reaching out to give input because they know their voice matters. Anonymous 8/20/2020 04:43 AM to have actual recreation. more than 2 rec centres. NO increase in taxes. not stupid looking painted fire trucks that DON'T look like fire trucks at all. Anonymous 8/20/2020 06:01 AM Term limits. Must live in the ward that you represent. Anonymous High voter turn out. A council that represents the diversity of our community. Regular community engagement, responsive councillors, A Council which represents the various area of the city but works toward policies and procedures which benefit the city as a whole That all votes count and representation is not limited by fewer councilors. I would like to see a city that is affordable, especially for seniors. Increasing property taxes every year is not appropriate. Having bike lanes that are rarely used by cyclists and are seasonal is a waste of money. Having a new library, when the existing downtown library is never busy is a complete waste. If another library is built, it should be a smaller library in the south end. 8/20/2020 08:17 AM Caleahcampbell 8/20/2020 08:45 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:15 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 09:35 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:01 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:12 AM less collusion between mayor and his buddies on council City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 8 of 275 Page 289 of 936 Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:52 AM A council acting much as it does today but 2 more wards to account for growing pop Anonymous 8/20/2020 11:12 AM Things are be accomplished in all parts of the city. We see growth in all parts not just the areas with the fastest population growth. Local issues are being addressed but there is a clear vision and goals for the whole city Anonymous 8/20/2020 12:57 PM Council listens and acts on the constituents behalf, not their own Anonymous 8/20/2020 03:35 PM A continued diversity of opinions in council representing the diversity of opinions of Guelphites. New projects to be evaluated effectively by a number of representatives. New spending to be appropriately reviewed to ensure fiscal responsibility while continuing to succesfully execute these new projects in a way that makes needed improvements across Guelph's many communities. Anonymous 8/20/2020 05:06 PM Feedback to the public quarterly on achievements Anonymous 8/20/2020 05:40 PM Councils are reachable Anonymous 8/20/2020 07:22 PM Regular public reviews (quarterly or semi-yearly) of what that counselor has done, how they have protected their citizens and their rights and whether or not they have met expectations. Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:01 PM by reducing our debt Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:28 PM I would hope that the city of Guelph will attract amazing candidates who will move the city forward and continue to be one best places to live in Canada. Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:40 AM A diversity of individuals from a wide range of neighborhoods. Anonymous 8/21/2020 07:00 AM Fair distribution of resources around the city. Anonymous 8/21/2020 08:12 AM As the city grows, the amount of wards also grows, keeping the same representational system of 2 part time councillors per ward. I have lived all across this country and find this the most responsive/participatory system so far. Anonymous 8/21/2020 08:38 AM Strong movement toward renewable energy targets, robust public transportation, bicycle infrastructure, green space protection, additional food gardens and urban agriculture City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 9 of 275 Page 290 of 936 Anonymous 8/21/2020 09:07 AM like to see maybe 4 more people on council in the next 5 to 10 years as the city gets bigger Anonymous 8/21/2020 10:36 AM Better management of big projects and a clear vision for future developments and programs. Anonymous 8/21/2020 12:46 PM Budget is set well and the general public agrees that it is reasonable. Turnover on Council is regular but not extraordinary. Polling the public yields answers that are generally positive. Anonymous 8/21/2020 01:12 PM That we continue to see healthy respectful debate not only among individual views of the councillors but also between the varying needs of the wards (ie downtown vs east vs west etc). Too much grandstanding or alignment based on labels (liberal vs conservative) would indicate a failure as none of the council members nor the mayor should be representing provincial or federal political parties - they represent the people of the city. Anonymous 8/21/2020 02:05 PM More community engagement, less partisanship, more cooperation. Anonymous 8/21/2020 04:14 PM Members of City Council representative of diverse gender ethnicity cultural and economic backgrounds Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:30 PM Some kind of system that compares the views of a particular Ward on one issue in relation to the voting record of the Council. Anonymous 8/22/2020 09:58 AM Citizens feel well represented and their voices heard, Regardless of political affiliation or belief. Anonymous 8/22/2020 11:15 AM Reduced homelessness and drug addiction in the city. Lower housing prices. Anonymous 8/22/2020 11:26 AM I would like to see an effective council, working for the benefit of all residents, not just council members. I would like council to be responsive as I have contacted my member many times with no response. I would also like to see a long term plan for Guelph including water access as we are expanding and our needs are already short. An effective hiring process within the City and not just friends or family. And MORE.... Anonymous 8/23/2020 10:45 AM That Council is responsible to the community that elected them and not to the pressures of corporations or big companies. (This not meant as a criticism) Anonymous 8/23/2020 04:15 PM that everyone in the neighbourhood knows who they are, because they get out and get involved in neighbourhood events. Anonymous 8/24/2020 07:38 AM Big and small projects across the city are discussed; plans don't focus on just downtown or just the south end etc. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 10 of 275 Page 291 of 936 Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:23 AM Less politics and more long term planning and decision-making for public good. Visionary leadership. Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:55 AM As a business, we do not vote for council. That makes it difficult for us to have a say in the process. (Guelph Little Theatre) Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:26 AM A spirit of cooperation and mutual respect on Council. Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:35 AM Decisions reflect the common good and fit the general consensus of both the City and respect the unique makeup of each individual Ward. Councillors should be accessible, knowledgeable, passionate and respectful. They must be willing to work together, but also advocate strongly for their respective community members. I believe a single, full-time councillor per ward could provide the continuity, the consistency and the representation without all the duplication and overwork. Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:49 AM Number of citizens running for council or getting involved at committee levels Municipal voter turnout rate Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:51 AM A diverse council that reflects our community and works for the benefit of everyone. Denese 8/24/2020 01:15 PM Social housing, Hospital ready for the population infrastructure repairs fiscal responsibility Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:39 PM With council actually working together to find solutions to Guelph problems Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:44 PM A well represented and functioning city. Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:48 PM Cam Guthrie and anyone else who is in the developers pockets to be off of it. Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:59 PM Increased investment in social problems, incubation of the green technology sector, significantly reduced investment in the police department Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:01 PM Two terms maximum Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:01 PM A greater representation for conservation and restoring surrounding communities. Less dense condo developments and greater protections on small town buildings as well as increased environmental projects(greenspaces/planting/trees/greenroofs/solar/cleanup projects) City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 11 of 275 Page 292 of 936 Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:15 PM Council treats the city as a whole when making decisions in wards. The ward system fragments the money and decision-making Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:16 PM Continuing the ward system, but changing Ward boundaries if necessary, to ensure that each ward has roughly the same population numbers. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:57 PM More election and city government involvement as perhaps measured by voter turnout. Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:00 PM high voter turnout for municipal elections and a functional council with no obvious political 'blocks' Anonymous 8/24/2020 04:15 PM I would like to see a way of measuring the effectiveness of councilors. For example if a councilor chooses not to represent all residents in their ward the citizens can remove the ineffective councilor and hold a new vote. Anonymous 8/24/2020 04:25 PM less older white people on the council, and a unified team of doers of good deeds that all get along the past twe terms it was like a battle of two sides, 6- 7 council members on each side, sad and very sloppy results, and back stabbing. Anonymous 8/24/2020 05:39 PM Low rises, not more than 4 story tall. By laws and zoning bylaws not changed at the whim of developers. Parkland and natural spaces increased. Metrolinx located outside city limits. Growth slowed. City legal challenge of “Places to Grow”. 10% of new housing reserved for low income. Anonymous 8/24/2020 06:00 PM A council that better reflects the diversity of our city. Anonymous 8/24/2020 06:19 PM I would like to see more diverse members of council and mixed-member proportional voting. Anonymous 8/24/2020 07:57 PM During the last municipal election homemade signs made for the person that ran against this mayor were destroyed. Speaks volumes for the supporters of this mayor. I do not approve of on line voting. We should eliminate the role of the mayor as he is overpaid for what he does. Ward councillors can rotate chairing the meetings. City staff need to be thinned. The wards are unbalanced. There are "friends" representing wards that they do not even live in. That is absolutely wrong. Kortright Hllls is represented by two councillors that live in the far south end of the city. One has blatantly not supported the concerns of many of the residents of Kortright Hills and is not respected by many residents who live in Kortright Hills. He blatantly dismissed hundreds of concerns regarding the unnecessary and costly replacement of the Niska bridge. Kortright Hills should be merged with Ward 5 and not be a part of Ward 6. Advocacy? What advocacy? Is that a joke? Engagement? This is insulting. Anonymous I would hope to see a decrease in police spending and an increase in mental City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 12 of 275 Page 293 of 936 8/24/2020 08:27 PM health support and social services. Anonymous 8/24/2020 09:03 PM Ward representatives from all the different neighborhoods. Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:15 PM All areas of the city are well represented Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:24 AM Proof that we have a Council that works well would include new and revised policies that reflect the diversity of the citizens of Guelph. Policies that reflect our reputation as a progressive city that does not simply follow, but leads in environmental, social, and fiscal sustainability. I would also like to see the city adopt a clear systems approach to discussing and solving city-wide problems. Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:38 AM Increased voter participation, increased number of candidates for elected positions. Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:57 AM The concerns that are brought forward by the particular ward residents are taken in to account and are dealt with in a timely manner. Anonymous 8/25/2020 08:25 AM More effective and frequent community engagement by councilors. More things getting done with precision and strategy. No more half-baked ideas that don't make sense economically because our council is overworked as "part-timers". Anonymous 8/25/2020 08:53 AM Prioritize their approvals of items. eg: right now: stop catering to the people who want unnecessary things such as library. Concentrate more on helping the underprivileged and allocate more money to road improvements. Affordable housing now we are in a pandemic and people have lost jobs. Good idea to have a referendum at voting eg: new library as we the citizens are paying for it. Anonymous Statistics about engagement and role. I really haven't had much interaction with either of my councilors. That things haven't gotten worse. I would see perhaps another ward implemented due to Guelph's growth. I would see more ethnic diversity in council. The Ward system works well. Online voting; more diversity in the applicants / selection of council members 8/25/2020 10:15 AM Anonymous 8/25/2020 11:26 AM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:03 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:09 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:09 PM I would love to see a more diverse mix of people who represent the ethnic and cultural makeup of Guelph. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 13 of 275 Page 294 of 936 Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:18 PM Fair representation of voters on council such that each councilor represents roughly the same proportion of the Guelph population Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:27 PM A streamlined, a dedicated full time council that are able to make decisions quickly, consult constituents and work with city staff to improve Guelph Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:31 PM I would hope to see new people in council positions, and considerably more diversity. If we cannot achieve both of those things, we should consider our system to be underperforming. The present system favours those who have the privilege to take on the position part time. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:41 PM I like how Guelph has a Guelphiness to it. We are kind, caring, are open to everyone and have a green spin to things. Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:16 PM Community diversity is well represented, councillors work together to come up with good solutions rather than working as adversaries, council debates in meetings rather than on Twitter, councillors live in their wards Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:22 PM Decisions moving forward are reached sooner. Seems many councilors in city our size is a little over kill and slows processes down. Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:36 PM A council that doesn't listen to special interest groups and spend our tax dollars on the hospital or roads Anonymous 8/25/2020 02:45 PM In 5 years, I would like to look around the Council horseshoe and see a greater diversity of ages, gender identity, income level / background, professional experience and cultural perspective. I would like to see not only more diverse candidates with diverse perspectives that represent our evolving community. Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:21 PM City Council will work as a Engagement Manager, their main task is so to collect requirements from Guelph Citizen and deliver agreed/approved task with the help from City Staff's resources. Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:32 PM All people know who to talk to when they need help with a civic matter. Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:42 PM Increased diversity, gender parity Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:22 PM All neighbourhoods in Guelph are represented by a council reflective of the neighbourhood. Diverse and vibrant neighbourhoods planned and developed with vision, Greenpeace and bylaws that stand. Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:23 PM I would like to see councillors reach out to their ward members more for feedback and engagement and not rely so much on who comes to delegate. Taking time to delegate is important, but also difficult, stressful, and done by people who feel strongly against things primarily. Councillors need to do City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 14 of 275 Page 295 of 936 outreach to get a good feel for what their voters want them to support. Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:28 PM Fiscally responsible, no more buildings and construction projects that always seem to end up over budget. Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:44 PM Diversity in our councillors Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:58 PM I would like to see Guelph citizens well represented on the Council, and I do not want them to be as part of a party team as I think that would create bias among the council Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:11 PM More diversity on council Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:13 PM Diversity! And limits on terms. All of the city should vote for every council member Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:13 PM A high functioning balanced council with less absolute philosophical divides Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:28 PM Diverse voices are running for council seats and are reflective of local constituents Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:34 PM I’m just praying I’m not getting a 9 story apartment building down the street from me. Omg. Please only 5 or 6 stories. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:11 PM Better interaction between Councillors and electorate Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:55 PM I think it's working well now, so I'd like to se no large changes in 5 years. Anonymous 8/25/2020 09:06 PM Happy citizens and minimal tax increases. Anonymous 8/25/2020 09:52 PM I would hope to see a council that really pushes for community growth. Councillors who are active within the community, answering emails, active on social media. Be more like Cam! Anonymous 8/26/2020 06:58 AM More diversity in the voices in council. In particular, representation from across the city, equal numbers of men and women, people of colour. Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:21 AM A better mix of Councillors. People from all backgrounds and Professions. More wards, more Councillors representing more demographics as Guelph is very diverse. Councillors who engage with their Wards to find out what residents of Guelph actually want instead of making decisions based on their City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 15 of 275 Page 296 of 936 own opinions. Eliminate the Ward voting system so that the voters have more options. Encourage more currently working Professional people to run for City Council. Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:30 AM Councillors are engaged with their constituents and respond to their concerns, take the time to understand ward issues, and follow up. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:00 AM I would like to see greater accountability, canvasing of input from neighbourhoods from the different wards, a more active role/voice on city council for all areas of the city not just one, a councillor who lives in the ward on a full time basis - not living and working in another city/country. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:24 AM Improved decision making that aligns with Guelph's strategic plan and values. More meaningful engagement with constituents to ensure Councillors represent our needs. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:26 AM Diversity of councillors that represent the gender, racial, and regional differences within Guelph. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:22 AM Community engagement opportunities are not just surveys intended for subject matter experts with a lot of time to spare. Shovels in the ground for a new library. Information dropped off in my mailbox about what my councillors are doing and what is happening in the city. Opportunities to engage at a time when I am not at work. Plain-language and visual information available to everyone about how the city is governed and how to engage. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:27 AM High voter turnout, potentially online options, good public knowledge of system and elections, representation of different locations in the city. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:32 AM The city council's decisions are based fairly on the needs, wants and desires of the increasingly diverse and growing population. The city council has been able to do comprehensive reviews, with public input, and is able to make truly informed decisions. Therefore, decision are not rushed due to inadequate city council resources. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:17 AM That the decisions being made by Council, reflect those of its Citizens. That our Councilors are pushing forward decisions that make sense (financially, socially, etc.) and not just for their legacies. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:31 AM We see the current council and Mayor both tossed out for poor decisions with Guelph Hydro, increasing their own salaries, the library boon dockle, another over budget and over delivery project like the Police HQ etc.. etc.. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:35 AM If we stay a "ward" system rep. Must live in the ward they run in. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:58 AM Make decisions efficiently and act on them. (See Library. Stalling is costing us millions.) JUST DO IT. Too many councillors change their mind too often when it is politically convenient. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 16 of 275 Page 297 of 936 Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:42 AM Accountability, record of votes, attendance at meetings, etc. Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:44 AM Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:46 AM I hope to see ongoing ward representation so neighborhoods can continue to have 2-3 designated ward counselors. This ensures local issues are addressed and fair representation for all. Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:32 PM Ward system Continues so all areas of the city get to have input Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:36 PM Continue to elect 2 councillors per ward Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:42 PM A diverse council that represents their constituents and having a guiding hand over the municipality (as it's elected board). Anonymous 8/26/2020 02:29 PM Less councillors Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:10 PM A Council that functions better because of diversity and direct citizen representation for each ward. Never at-large purely by election with no specific accountability to ward residents. A ward based council makeup that checks and balances against political ganging and non-resident representation. Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:28 PM Citizens are represented equally - with the number of potential voters in each ward similar number. Councillors representing the interests of those resident in their ward, with pre-conceived ideological perspectives minimized. That council continues to maintain a strong credit-rating, and is focused on a livable, climate-friendly city - i.e. not short-sighted. Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:32 PM Proper roads, saving areas from over development Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:48 PM Nothing more than a general sense that each voter had a fair opportunity to elect who they want and those elected do as they promised or to do what seems necessary. Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:59 PM Greater diversity and representation Greater transparency More community engagement Innovative, community-driven uses of public funds Anonymous 8/26/2020 05:12 PM Council Members who keep the taxpayer in mind. The cancellation of the expensive library is a good start. Enlarge the present one by building on the parking lot and buy the properties on Paisley for parking. Should be a lot less than $67,000,000. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 17 of 275 Page 298 of 936 Anonymous 8/26/2020 05:41 PM Council works in the interest of their community, without partisan interests. Anonymous 8/26/2020 06:50 PM Decisions are made taking into consideration the following priorities: creating resilient communities, environmental stewardship, walk able communities. Address the issues of poverty, homelessness, mental health and addiction. These are all interrelated issues and cannot be dealt with separately. We need visionaries, more than functionaries.This city must stop building condos devoid of nature and dependent on automobile transportation. Developers should not be allowed and cut down trees. We need communities gardens, naturalization areas, groceries stores and small shops in all communities. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:15 PM i would like to see councillors send out surveys to their constituents to get a better feel for what the community is looking for. People are busy and don't always have time or confidence to attend a council meeting to voice their opinion. Its 2020 the democratic process is allowed to evolve now... Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:29 PM 50% Less socialists on council Anonymous 8/27/2020 07:11 AM Limited terms Anonymous I would like to see a focused council of full time individuals empowered to make system changes and uphold the ideals of Guelph we claim are important. Experienced individuals on council with development experience to grow guelph for the rich and poor would be what I'd like to see. Shrink council but make pay and oversight comparable to a full time position. Not sure Working for the betterment of the whole city together More wards (10 in total) and 1 councillor per ward They represent our best interest; appropriate supports have been implemented. Residents feel satisfied with the changes. A fair and responsive city that prioritizes humans and the environment over merely commercial and development. Quality of life. 8/27/2020 08:22 AM Anonymous 8/27/2020 10:15 AM Anonymous 8/27/2020 12:12 PM Anonymous 8/27/2020 01:34 PM Anonymous 8/27/2020 02:20 PM Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:24 PM Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:36 PM No major changes. Council works well. A few tweaks should help adjust to our growth. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 18 of 275 Page 299 of 936 Anonymous 8/27/2020 09:39 PM If the council represents the city as a whole in terms of culturally, demographically, and with a balance of different individuals all with the clear goal of helping lead the city. Anonymous 8/28/2020 03:42 AM Economic and Racial Diversity across municpal government. Anonymous 8/28/2020 07:18 AM To see that city hall staff are not to ne the only voice Anonymous 8/28/2020 07:21 AM a Grocery store on the property at Watson and Starwood, no more houses built in Guelph until infrastructure catches up. No more lane reductions on busy streets for bike lanes no one uses and bikers don't even want. Anonymous 8/28/2020 08:42 AM a decline in partisan ideology that puts penny pinching ahead of people's enjoyment of city services. Excellent services and amenities make the city worth living in. Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:14 AM I would like to see a Council that reflects the diversity of the City's population and engages in healthy debate and decision-making to meet the full range of our community's needs. Anonymous 8/28/2020 12:00 PM Keep Wards, ideal to have representatives live in the wards, councillors need to reflect the diversity of the community, bring cakes to decision making Anonymous 8/28/2020 12:13 PM Diversity on the council that reflects the diversity within our city a council that knows how to strategically balance social, economic and environmental well- being Anonymous 8/28/2020 01:08 PM I would like to see a more diverse and at large council, actually working for all citizens, no matter their background. Self interest has to stop. We need to run on a stricter budget and shave off some salaries at city hall. Anonymous 8/28/2020 01:46 PM Higher voter turnout. Increased civic engagement between elections. Participation in public debate beyond tweets and other social media thumbs- up/thumbs-down exercises. Anonymous 8/28/2020 06:26 PM community centre plans. more outdoor rec facilities (bike park). stuff for kids of all ages. downtown issues fixed (drugs, sketchiness). Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:18 PM Diversity and inclusion Anonymous 8/29/2020 06:15 AM That Guelph is a prosperous, inclusive city where people trust one another and appreciate their public spaces. Anonymous 8/29/2020 07:29 AM Fair representation throughout Guelph for the various districts. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 19 of 275 Page 300 of 936 Anonymous 8/29/2020 08:12 AM Increased citizen engagement in Council and committee work. Anonymous 8/29/2020 11:23 AM A more diverse Council Anonymous 8/29/2020 05:23 PM Fewer socialists Anonymous 8/29/2020 05:52 PM The decisions of council truly represent the needs of residents, not developers or outside interests. Anonymous 8/29/2020 08:30 PM Evidence of engagement of citizens from all wards; development that benefits citizens in all wards (eg why isn’t there a grocery store in the ward?) Anonymous 8/29/2020 11:24 PM Councillors more focused on representing neighbourhoods Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:54 AM Keep things the same with the addition of ranked ballets. Anonymous 8/30/2020 11:29 AM Each elected member should have a digital portfolio with issues they campaigned on and a chronological record of voting, comments, involvement in various committees. This should be accessible to all city residents with no editing, redacting etc Anonymous 8/30/2020 11:59 AM Reduction in size of council. More fiscal responsibility with tax dollars (looking particularly at gross overspending on projects like city hall, library, etc) that show a true respect for their constituents. Anonymous 8/30/2020 12:09 PM Sooner than 5 years, hope to see that the council members represent all of Guelph, geographically and demographically. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:02 PM A democratically elected City Council representing specific wards in Guelph Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:03 PM I would like to see a good cross section of points of view, representative of the City as a whole: non-partisan, with an ability to manage issues by consensus. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:50 PM I would like to see a independent panel of experts conduct a report to look at the new Council Composition to verify that it is indeed benefiting the people of Guelph and make further recommendations. Surveys should also be sent to residents who could share their views as to whether the new policy is working and offer areas for improvement. Town hall meetings should be set at intervals for residents to share their concerns with city council and the Mayor and discuss improvements that need to be made. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 20 of 275 Page 301 of 936 Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:55 PM Better engagement at the local level with individual wards and their councillors Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:59 PM I would like to see proof of consultation with Guelph citizens on important issues, such as the closure of Dublin street and potentially other streets and the choice of locations for future Metrolinx infrastructure. Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:46 PM That Council proportionately reflects the diversity of the community and that lack of adequate campaign financing is not necessarily a barrier to election. Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:51 PM taxes under control and basic services meeting requirements, cut down on frills, stick to basic services Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:57 PM All areas of our economy supported (esp the arts), less homelessness, less addictions, more affordable housing. Anonymous 8/30/2020 04:46 PM Having a council that actively engages with the populous at talks and campaigns, and that citizens have met their Councillor at least once. Anonymous 8/30/2020 04:57 PM That many people stand for council Anonymous 8/30/2020 05:00 PM Elections by ward with more wards as Guelph grows in population. Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:17 PM Increasing voter turnout. Development taking place in all Wards, more or less evenly. Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:21 PM Greater community engagement, including increased voter participation. Diverse representation on Council, reflective of community and with a wide variety of lived experience, backgrounds, genders, races, and cultures. Anonymous 8/30/2020 07:03 PM - A diverse council that represents the city at large - Change occurring that benefits the vast majority Anonymous 8/30/2020 08:35 PM Reduced number of challenges to the electoral system Anonymous 8/30/2020 08:44 PM Lower taxes and more efficient staff. Community is engaged in caring for public property. New homes being built pay a fair share of property taxes (more than established as those established homes have been paying taxes for years to build the services). Anonymous 8/31/2020 06:27 AM I would like to see that the councillors I have elected represented my concerns at city council meetings. That they are available to hear my concerns about issues that arise in my ward. Anonymous A continuation of diversity on council. In five years we should continue to see City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 21 of 275 Page 302 of 936 8/31/2020 06:58 AM each ward, each neighborhood represented by a diversity of people who actually live in those wards/neighborhoods. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:29 AM -a diverse council composed of roughly equal male-female members including a component of different cultures representative of the % of people in Guelph who are of many cultures Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:04 AM this is a dumb question Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:08 AM High voter turnout. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:18 AM Councillor communication on what they are working on or issues in their ward. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:25 AM A diverse council that is representative of those it serves and a high level of satisfaction among folks as to how they are being represented at the municipal level. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:28 AM Community satisfaction. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:34 AM Good communication between the Mayor, Councillors and citizens Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:39 AM Run the city like a household! Get rid of city debt before overspending on wish projects. We all would love newer and bigger things but don’t go after these things until we have the money. We all lose our homes if we all spent like the city. Get a few people on council who can own and run a home with one salary under $50,000 per year Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:59 AM That respectful debate is facilitated and encouraged. Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:21 AM More wards and thus a few more councilors. Get ahead of possible pop. growth Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:08 PM I think things are currently working well. It's hard to know what to change. Perhaps just that there is more equal representation between wards (i.e. ward 6 having 27000 residents and ward 3 having 17000, and each with 2 votes at council, is not equal). Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:14 PM A more diverse council, greater satisfaction among citizens with decision making, greater transparency, and a more inclusive dialogue with citizens on all issues. Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:26 PM That every citizen knows their councillor and responds to our concerns City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 22 of 275 Page 303 of 936 Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:07 PM A survey of residents to ensure their needs and /or issues have been recognized by their ward representative, addressed and resolved in a timely fashion. Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:08 PM That there is an increase in voter turn out for municipal elections. Turn out is historically low which suggests voters are not engaged with municipal issues or not well informed. Anonymous 8/31/2020 02:18 PM Improved voter turn out. Long planned library open. Anonymous There is plenty of opportunity for the publics involvement in the current process .The face to face aspect is important during canvasing this should not be automated in any way, Follow historical standards, dating back to 1491 B.C. (3511 years ago) that are easy to understand, implement and adjust. Read Exodus 18:13-27, especially noting verses 21,22,25 and 26. That issues that are facing the city are well heard & council voting reflects a diverse range of opinion. A greenbelt around guelph to stop endless sprawl growth. if change is brought in before the next election A well balanced group of conservative, liberal and socialist voices who work together Fairness of attention in all wards. All Councillors work for the betterment of Guelph and not just for their own ward. The number of councillors elected is proportional to the number of people in their respective wards. The City of Guelph has a diversity and inclusion policy that extends to councillor composition on the council itself. A city council that is representative of the people of Guelph. Less complaints from residents overall across all City departments Council represents the diversity of Guelph residents Guelph is seen by other cities as a model to emulate for diverse governance Guelph residents consistently rank quality of life as high, regardless of neighbourhood where they live 8/31/2020 02:23 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:15 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:28 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:57 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:11 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:42 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:01 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:09 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:26 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:31 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:42 PM That you don’t make decisions for us. You allow freedom of choice! City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 23 of 275 Page 304 of 936 Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:15 PM If guelphites felt an understanding of the principles their elected councillors stand and stood for. Whether they feel that their voices are being held by the elected officials and whether they feel council is working hard for the city of guelph, keeping guelphites best interests ahead of external pressures. Good infrastructure and happy people. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:46 AM Higher voter turnout during elections. Anonymous 9/01/2020 05:34 AM That Council has robust debate and listens to depositions, but them comes to a consensus on difficult decisions. Sometimes council needs to demonstrate leadership on an issue on things that are not popular. Anonymous 9/01/2020 06:07 AM That’s a tough first question. I believe that the current council arrangement is working. All areas of the city are represented. In 5yrs a check into ensure that the population distribution throughout the city is represented through an equalized council distribution or ward boundaries changed for this same reason. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:01 AM a prosperous and growing City that is safe. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:45 AM That the change we will witness in this City is thoughtful and fully representative of the values, aspirations and character of the residents. I want our City to reflect our collective aspirations. Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:58 AM Diversity on city council - representation of issues in all areas of the city as well diversity of councillors in terms of gender and minorities. Ability of all citizens who have different networks (not just well established lucrative ones) to fell they have a chance of being elected. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:44 AM I would like to see electronic voting along with paper ballets Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:59 AM All aspects of governing is not viewed by the citizens that the developers with deep pockets are running the City. Anonymous 9/01/2020 10:12 AM The number of women and BIPOC on Council reflects the diversity of the City of Guelph Anonymous 9/01/2020 10:31 AM No comment Anonymous 9/01/2020 11:07 AM I hope to see no changes in that department. Anonymous 9/01/2020 11:32 AM - we should go back to at-large councillors entirely - better communication for folks not internet savvy - no more ward system City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 24 of 275 Page 305 of 936 Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:06 PM Value for tax dollars as well as elimination of all non essential services. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:21 PM Almost impossible to evaluate this? What criteria would you use to demonstrate efficacy? Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:24 PM Councillors who treat citizens money as their own, and stop CONFISCATING more and more of it.... Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:29 PM Low tax increases. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:40 PM Citizens are satisfied with the way their Councillors represent them. Councillors are responsive to the needs of their constituents. Pride in being a resident of Guelph remains strong. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:14 PM That council actually starts representing citizens by listening and acting on concerns instead of a select few voting on what they want to happen. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:23 PM More engagement from the tax payers in this city. I would like to referendum votes for matters that will significantly affect property tax increases Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:31 PM A city and council that addresses and advocates for the concerns of their constituents Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:52 PM Increased engagement, increased and timely response to citizen correspondence. Anonymous 9/01/2020 05:42 PM Hear viewpoints of several councillors, not just mayor's view, Anonymous 9/01/2020 06:12 PM Please scrap the $67 million new library! I have never heard anyone in the public suppose it besides Council. Ridiculous! Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:15 PM Smart growth that includes green space, Transat that makes sense, amenities that are concise to for all. Minimal increases to taxes Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:25 PM A citizenry more engaged in its democratic future Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:39 PM more people running for council and especially for mayor Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:43 PM I would like to see a thriving downtown, lower rental costs, more doctors accepting patients. That's a start anyway. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 25 of 275 Page 306 of 936 Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:45 PM More transparency. More accountability. Less mayoral double speak. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:50 PM Satisfaction survey by each ward's residences and summary of results. Survey to be completed by each ward as well. Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:07 PM greater voter turnout, consistency in Council direction to staff. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:04 PM An even more beautiful city but safer for everyone Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:08 PM More people taking an interest Anonymous 9/01/2020 11:46 PM A representative council that understands what the community wants. Anonymous 9/02/2020 04:47 AM Baseline survey determining level of satisfaction. Follow up survey 5 years from now. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:18 AM More representation of citizens when making decisions. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:30 AM I will see Councillors actively representing the interests of their wards. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:45 AM A council that understands the needs of ALL areas and citizens of our city. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:51 AM New candidates with fresh ideas Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:12 AM Diversity in representation and ideas. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:52 AM Informed decisions being made and less mismanaged projects. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:52 AM City that is well managed and promotes community Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:55 AM I’m not sure about this. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 26 of 275 Page 307 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:59 AM I would like to see that council is easily recognized by community members, and communities are best divided by how their interests may vary - downtown wards versus suburban wards. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:07 AM More representative and diverse council that reflects the diversity of the population not only in terms of race but also in terms of educational, financial and social background. At the moment it seems like an exclusive club for middle age white middle class members. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:19 AM Better engagement and more transparency from council. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:23 AM There is increased and sustained voter turnout. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:23 AM Council is diverse and represents all people who live here. Budget is balanced and there is a solid outlook for the future planning. No renagging on past decisions. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:35 AM Prudent fiscal management that reflects the values of the electorate Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:50 AM Surveying citizens is the best way to do this. Should be based on who well represented individual citizens feel and how well citizens feel the city has developed (economical, developmentally) Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM Localized interests/needs are addressed eg various parks for kids, dogs as well as overarching improvements to make Guelph a stronger city for the future- eg build a new central library Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM high voter turnout and engagement Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM That Councillors represents the city as a hole and not just a ward Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:16 AM A view to future developments that are environmentally sustainable and consider the well-being of the people of Guelph should be the top priority. Economic advantages for a few developers are not a priority because they most often do not include considerations that contribute to a context in which people lead a happy, meaningful life. A community in which well-being is a priority is more important for the long-term economic development of Guelph than short-term financial gain for the few. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:16 AM Continue Guelphs reputation as a good city to live in and build a new library and more athletic and kid play facilities. Anonymous Increased diversity on Council; council articulates a clear vision for the City City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 27 of 275 Page 308 of 936 9/02/2020 08:17 AM through community engagement; Council works closely with administrators and community partners to implement its vision Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:26 AM - Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:44 AM functional, working as a team Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:14 AM High voter turnout. Intelligent councillors. Rational decision-making by council that takes into account objective (not politicized) recommendations by professional staff. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:19 AM There is tight competition for the Councillor and Mayor positions; more front- running candidates in each Ward than there are positions. (e.g. 2 positions; 3 high-vote candidates) Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:22 AM Voters better understand the role of local vs. provincial government and other agencies. People may may not agree with every municipal decision, but they should have opportunities to participate and learn about competing interest and obligations. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:23 AM Present voting methods work well. I would like to see full time councilors (2 per ward) have a say in their wards 75% and at large 25%. (if that is possible) Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:33 AM while taking into consideration individual ward concerns, councillors make decisions for the overall good of the city, without the partisan camps which have occurred in the past and getting away from the "not in my backyard." recognition from councillors that this is a job, it is not personal Anonymous 9/02/2020 10:24 AM No cars downtown, more greenspace, accessible everything, grocery store downtown, library renewal. I mostly love where this city is going so more of that. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:02 AM A council that is NOT PARTISAN - "slates" of representatives or party-style divides are not helpful at the municipal level. And a Council that does not get bogged down in futile adversarial debate, but can work towards respect, compromise, and common ground - this should be every Councillor's goal regardless of their personal beliefs. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:32 AM Guelph, by population, is becoming a relatively big city; mentally, many residents and perhaps councillors, tend to think and act as if it were still small. This is reflected in the timidity with which council often addresses planning issues, where an unwillingness to invest in necessary change is evident. Obviously, structural change alone won't alter a cloistered mindset, but I believe accepting the fact that being a councillor is a full-time job is a necessary first step. Small towns can be run by part-timers. Big cities can't. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:32 AM More equitable representation in terms of class and experience. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 28 of 275 Page 309 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:40 AM Resident satisfaction with the councilors in their ward when concerns have been listened to and reacted on in a concerned fashion and not a political way. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:44 AM Full time council members, one per ward and representing constituents views and voices not solely their own views. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:44 AM I hope to have a sense that delegations and surveys are listened to, acknowledged, and perhaps used to make reasonable changes or confirm decisions. I'd like never to read on social media that Councillors do not respond to emails. I'd like to watch discussions and see votes recorded that reflect community views and yet, still embrace the broader concerns of a diverse city. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:45 AM Balance of support for all areas of the city not just downtown. Anonymous 9/02/2020 12:24 PM I hope Council in Guelph will start to listen to citizens of Guelph Anonymous 9/02/2020 12:40 PM Sound decisions and constructive cooperation between counsillors. Seems to work relatively well right now. Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:04 PM A council that considers the full range of viewpoints present in the citizenry, but ultimately is capable of making responsible, timely decisions and providing leadership, without spending disproportionate amounts of time and money on niche issues. Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:53 PM more citizen engagement Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:58 PM The city equalizes service and maintenance throughout; that is, some areas such as downtown are not sacrificed to the interest of other areas, such as suburbs. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:25 PM Better communication between council and administration staff. Continued citizen engagement on issues that impact the city and on the ward level. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:31 PM Members of Council have the ability to represent both local ward interests and needs and of the city as a whole. Members of Council have each others respect as well as the respect of their constituents. Members of Council are not associated with larger political parties or even closely identified as either left or right. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:46 PM Decisions made by council are made responsibly, with transparent information, feedback related to decisions are made with participation from the community citizens who would be impacted by the relevant decisions. Anonymous I do not like the ward system and want to hold every council member City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 29 of 275 Page 310 of 936 9/02/2020 03:35 PM accountable. Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:41 PM Less development in green spaces! Less high rises blocking out sun and causing wind tunnels Less housing to attract Toronto workers! Let Toronto find housing for their workers ! Commuters spend more time on 401 than they do in Guelph! Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:58 PM Absolutely no idea. Stupid question Anonymous 9/02/2020 04:31 PM A fair balance between business interests and private, citizen interests. Fair and transparent disclosure of business contributions to council campaigns. More consistent management of conflict of interest when discussing development. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:20 PM The concerns of residents were taken into account for decision making and that there was less in camera time and secretive actions. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:37 PM Greater diversity. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:48 PM More engaged citizens Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:55 PM Diversity of location that councillors are based in and serve, gender balance, working class representation, vigorous public debate between elections. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:30 PM More diversity on council, more transparent representation of ward issues Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:51 PM Keep the wards, perhaps realign them Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:42 PM Councillors who actually care about their city. Anonymous 9/02/2020 10:37 PM More councilors per ward Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:42 AM Yearly budgets stay within set budget. Decisions made are based on taking into consideration the benefit and advancement of the entire City Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:59 AM That no council can serve again after having done so. Anonymous Council composition will reflect the diversity of the community in respect to City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 30 of 275 Page 311 of 936 9/03/2020 05:23 AM gender and race. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:35 AM Guelph needs good accountable councillors. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:45 AM Once councillors are elected, they have a formal online system to hear from the public through to allow them to establish an understanding of what their constituents want them to support / not support. This would replace Facebook / Twitter etc and would provide a record of comments that could be reviewed long term. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:53 AM That the councilors are still living and Hopefully living in guelph Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:11 AM All my dreams come true. What a dumb, simplistic question. Anonymous 9/03/2020 07:27 AM Full time fully engaged council that actual represents it's constituency. Anonymous 9/03/2020 07:52 AM Less tall buildings Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:15 AM Better and more regular communication between my elected councilors and the ward constituents. Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:50 AM More BIPOC representation on council - and fewer barriers to the participation of lower income communities at the decision-making tables of the city. I want to keep the ward system, and keep at least two councillors per ward. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:22 AM Each ward represented equally Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:33 AM councillors are accessible to the people, councillors have fully read and understand information being presented to them, council works together more harmoniously, the public know who their councillor is and what ward they live in. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:39 AM This question is oddly phrased. Higher voter turnout Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:42 AM Citizen needs are given priority Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:49 AM A more cohesive “team” City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 31 of 275 Page 312 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:59 AM I’d like to have a hybrid of at-large and ward councillors, so that I’m able to speak to different councillors based on how much expertise they have about an issue. I’m doing that now but I feel like I’m imposing on councillors outside of my ward. Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:00 AM a completed rec center in the south end with 4 ice pads. Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:51 AM Councillors who live in the wards they represent brining info to residents & consulting & taking values & views back into city decision making - council reflects the socio economic, diversity of our wards and residents Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:37 PM Counsel now seems to be divided with the usual people always banding together in their opinions. No matter what the mayor says, the groupies always back him. Seeing more opinions that are their own would show it’s not a popularity contest but rather people trying to make Guelph a better place. Not to be seen as a follower with no mind of their own. Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:38 PM Guelph needs to build identity and make decisions accordingly . 5 year plan. State what Guelph is about. Do what we do very well! Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:46 PM A true representation of the diversity of the citizens of the city of Guelph. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:05 PM Shorter council meetings- faster decision making process Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:12 PM I would hope that they realize we don’t need a $67 million library Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:14 PM Progress Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:18 PM Increased public engagement, fewer marathon council meetings, greater diversity of experiences on Council. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:19 PM Diversity- racial and gender. Actually the majority of council should be female. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:24 PM Low taxes Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:08 PM A freeze on tax increases. Also an increase of businesses locating to our city. Tax burden is weighted on our households to fit the Bill way to unevenly. Anonymous In five years, if the composition of City Council includes more persons City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 32 of 275 Page 313 of 936 9/03/2020 02:27 PM identifying as women and racialized than white males, and no incumbents with significantly more than 10 years service, I would consider this evidence that the election process is working well. Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:54 PM That council meetings are a display of vigourous debate and display a diversity of opinion. That decisive action after debate is taken and reflect bold policy reflecting a vision of Guelph for all the potential that it and it's citizens have. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:15 PM Equal representation from wards by councillors to help make all parts of Guelph great. gmhunter 9/03/2020 04:12 PM Councillors working well together but, primarily, listening to and responding to the needs of their constituents. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:21 PM Gueph city council would be representative of the diversity of our City. There would be people of colour, women, and younger people. There would be new faces regularly. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:48 PM Higher support for elected counselors from constituents because they are more closely aligned in their concerns. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:02 PM Representative of the population- diversity to match the city. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:14 PM That council gets the city working smoothly and efficiently. This city is great because of the people who live in it. Relative to other cities I have lived in taxes are high for what we get - parks are poorly designed, tree canopy is weak, history of insiders calling the shots, developers are putting large towers everywhere with subpar addressing of the environment and long term well being of citizens, city development standards are weak and enforcement is poor and it doesn't appear that city lawyers know how to write a contract with all the crap that has happened over the years. City staff keep leaving - what's wrong in there? Weak leadership in addressing these issues. The south end is going to look like Mississauga or Brampton at the rate it's going. The Hanlon business park is an oasis of warehouses - was it worth it? Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:22 PM That council takes control of spending and returns to the mandated needs and not over spend on wants. Decisions need to be made with a city wide view, not by ward. Wards divide municipalities. Anonymous 9/03/2020 07:15 PM An electoral system that allows residents to provide more information that just "who is my first pick", AND, a system that results in a more representative council. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:27 PM Communication for the people that elected them Anonymous No property tax increase and more bike friendly City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 33 of 275 Page 314 of 936 9/03/2020 06:51 PM Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:52 PM socially responsible for those less fortunate, no large taxation increases, growth, jobs, green ideas Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:00 PM Open data polling of citizens for important issues, items, and pending decisions Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:52 PM increased voting numbers, residents interacting more with councillors and city and being listened too. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:42 AM Lower property taxes Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:57 AM Lower taxes Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:01 AM Decrease in homelessness, effective transit, vibrant downtown. No further urban sprawl Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:07 AM Good communication from elected officials; strong connections with community groups; long-term articulated vision balanced with fiscal responsibility Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:56 AM Greater diversity on council Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:10 AM More consensus building by our elected officials and less of a "strong-Mayor" approach currently being used. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:15 AM That citizens are kept up-to-date on all happenings in Guelph by their Councillor(s) on a regular basis (at least monthly). I do not live in Dominique O'Rourke's ward, but supported her campaign and she kindly kept me on her email list. Her regular newsletter to her constituents is fabulous. For the first time ever, I am "in the know" on all sorts of things, like this Council review. I am now participating more in these surveys and am aware of important decisions being made by Council. All elected officials need to follow this path so that we have more engaged and knowledgeable residents. That would be a huge marker of success for citizens. Regular communication with constituents. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:13 AM Unsure Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:14 AM Transparency in all public meetings. City Council should not be making decisions behind closed doors. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 34 of 275 Page 315 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:21 AM Ward Councillors with city-wide concerns and responsibilities. City employees freed up to do their jobs without political interference. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:22 AM The council members actually listen to everyone's concerns not just the rich people moving here from mississauga and Toronto. I want to see affordable housing initiatives! For new grads, minimum wage workers and those seeking subsidized housing. The gentrification of Guelph is pushing marginalized folks farther away and out of Guelph. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:23 AM More green spaces and public venues like the new main library...things that make this city more livable for all ages especially the older generation Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:29 AM Councilors gain knowledge and expertise on broad strategic issues that impact the social, political and financial considerations that impact the city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:32 AM Very clise to what we have now. There can be controversy in a city..that means everyone us using their right to voice their opinion. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:33 AM Citizens engaging with councillors both online and in person. Councillors being visible and accessible to citizens. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:58 AM Resident voices are strongly reflected in city planning - unpopular initiatives that favor corporate interests over citizen interests are diminished (eg metrolinx expansion harming walkability of the city) Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:01 AM See more of a focus on the east end of Guelph. Trying to build it up with more than just houses. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:05 AM I think that all major capital investments should go to vote at referendum at each election so that the new incoming counsel has a clear mandate on what the majority wants versus a select few I think any needs should be taken care of however wants should go to vote Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:05 AM A safer community- less theft from homes, yards. More affordable housing. Access to affordable recreation opportunities for youth. Services in place for vulnerable populations (housing, treatment). Affordable mental health services- without 2 year wait lists. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:07 AM Change Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:10 AM More diversity. Less ideological divide. Less catering to vocal groups that don't represent the majority. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:14 AM higher turn out to the polls, more engagement between counsellors and their constituents, more diversity on the city council Anonymous All areas of the city are flourishing. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 35 of 275 Page 316 of 936 9/04/2020 08:16 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:20 AM responsiveness to citizen requests, complaints, suggestions Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:23 AM More diversity, not just ethnically, but younger members who bring different perspectives. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:28 AM Higher voter participation rates, more accountability for councilors Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:33 AM That council decisions reflect the wants of its citizens but ensures that decisions are based on sound policy advice and evidence, and have a long term view. I would also like to know that decisions are based on meaningful engagement and that public debate and discussion are protected, including amongst councillors. Further, council make up should reflect the diversity of our city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:35 AM Council should have a review process half term or more often (polling of some kind) where they can get feedback from its citizens as to if they feel they are being represented properly. Shouldn’t have free reign to spend multimillion dollar projects without polling the city first needing at least 51% approval or higher. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:43 AM Geographic representation of citizens by elected councilors is the cornerstone of a fair representation of their municipal electoral rights. I would hope that there was a uniform and easy way for citizens to engage City Hall about problems they are experience or forsee happening. The front end for this would allow for citizens to engage the city through a single 311 like city hotline (phone, web...)so that citizens could articulate their issue and receive a method to track updates and resolution of the issue. Only if after a reasonable period of time the issue was not resolved would they then engage their councilor to make them aware of the issue and how it would impact their Ward. Random people tweeting at the Mayor is not the proper citizen engagement model. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:45 AM Balanced budget. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:51 AM That they actually vote in the way their constituents want, instead of for their own choices. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:52 AM Real engagement from councillors. I know who my mayor is. I hear from him frequently in the news and social media. Unless it is election time, I never hear from our councillors. I don’t even remember who they are anymore. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:07 AM Realigning and balancing the electoral boundaries every 4 cycle using Census data City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 36 of 275 Page 317 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:13 AM When we have a Council that is comprised of all walks of life, backgrounds and histories - working class, working poor, everyday people for instance - rather than a small sliver of semi-retired educated upper middle class managers that we are currently represented by. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:20 AM Communications inward and outward between citizens and Council involve more citizens, with frequency of participation by both entities increased. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:22 AM decisions based on local issues and needs Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:22 AM Stable taxes. Can't be increased every year Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:43 AM A polite, functional council, that collectively finds sensible, pragmatic solutions to the City's on-going needs for answers. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:44 AM Better and more even representation of whole city. More transparency. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:02 AM That there is a mixture of Councillors that reflect the community; we need to continue to encourage members from diverse communities and to make it clear that they have both a right to be at the table and that they are welcome. That there is a really broad spectrum of ideas and positions among Councillors, so that no one set of ideas ever dominates the discussion. That Councillors really understand that their job is to collaborate to support the entire Guelph community. That the Gueph electorate know that they are not just an afterthought who pay ALL the bills and vote once every 4 years. There needs to be some very real community engagement that is meaningful to participants - not just ticking boxing. Guelph has one of the best community engagement policies I have seen recently. It would be great if the staff and council actually followed it. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:06 AM Council should be more accessible on social media ( much like Cam Guthrie is ) , and willing to be transparent and engage with citizens to start . More focus on places for addiction and rehab programs , out reach . And more housing for low income and middle class ( more affordable ) Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:08 AM Better city management Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:15 AM 1) Voter turnout in municipal elections exceeds 70% of eligible voters. 2) Guelph citizen engagement as measured by on-line participation exceeds 40% of eligible voters. 3) The Guelph Mayor and all Councillor positions are full time occupations with appropriate pay and benefits and "independent councillor services staff" (Do not report to Mayor, CAO) Report to and serve Council members. 4) The Ward system is made stronger and maintains 2 City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 37 of 275 Page 318 of 936 Councillors per ward. Ward system is strengthened by keeping wards small in geographic size and amount of eligible voters. 5) There is more informed discussion at Council Meetings and between voters and Councillors during issue specific sessions. There is simply not enough informed discussion and agreement on data, data accuracy, data interpretation, problem identification and possible solutions. There is currently not sufficient time and early notification given to voters on issues and budget matters. Anonymous That the needs of the various parts of the city are being met, not simply the needs of select areas. - less development of high rises - some housing for low income folks (affordable housing) - slowing down the growth of the City population wise I feel the current system is working well. There are bound to be issues no matter what. I worry that "at large members" would have their own biases. At least this way each ward has two councillors whose politics may be different, but who work well together. I believe the current composition represents the citizens of Guelph very effectively. At least some turnover in council. More Council working together. Caring about issues outside one's ward. Less biting comments and divisiveness on social media. Less "side taking" ex Cllr Gibson & Mayor Guthrie often defend each other. Less "look what I'm doing" Less obvious Greater racial, class and gender diversity of councillors That Council can move as a reasonably cohesive group on issues that affect the city especially in housing, infrastructure, policy and sound fiscal management while maintaining its status as a great city to live and work in. Even with the ward system the overall needs of the city need to have primacy. The ward system works well for the most part in our city. Improved efficiencies for traffic flow incorporating the student impact as well No more wards. Less councillors A reversal of the library decision. I don't know how it's got as far as it has, but it satisfies the fiscal irresponsibility of a select few in the city over everyone else 9/04/2020 10:25 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:32 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:56 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:56 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:05 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:14 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:36 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:48 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:55 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:56 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:59 AM More help for community mental health services, one psychiatrist is not enough and More low income housing City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 38 of 275 Page 319 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 12:30 PM More direct input. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:07 PM Have a more diverse group of councillors who actively listen to their citizens and try to implement changes to help the community. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:12 PM Maintained roads - winter clearing and general maintenance like pot holes Reviews of out dated bylaws More accountability of councillors to their wards - councillors should not be able tp use their influence to make money privately like give city contracts to friends and their own companies. We should be making the best fiscally responsible choice for all Guelphites Updated garbage program for large bulky items, spring cleaning etc Better structured transit, and drivers held accountable for their driving. Feels like complaints get taken and go no where. Transparencies through out all processes not just the ones the city feels like sharing. Hire city employees who value their job and commitment to a public role - not just in it for the pay and benefits. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:20 PM Cap and reduction in property taxes. Serious approach to annual budgets, that, takes into account current economic factors as well as debt/deficit avoidance. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:31 PM An end to the obvious 'partisanship' Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:37 PM diverse representation, with all neighbourhoods feeling that their views are represented Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:43 PM Some KPIs around voter participation. Ex. 70% voter turnout by 2025. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:47 PM maintain or increase voter participation in municipal elections Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:58 PM Actual change, seems the old people of Guelph want one thing, the young ones either want the opposite or don't care, we need a council that'll engage us Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:58 PM Officials that listen to majority population of the city, not based on corporations or businesses. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:03 PM Because residents feel that City Council and the Mayor are only there to push their own agendas, they feel it is useless to even try to express their own interests and what they would like to see. This is why our elections have such poor turnout. We need to see City council and Mayor more in tune with all the people and not just continuing to push and support the agendas of City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 39 of 275 Page 320 of 936 those they agree with. We need a huge shift from the biases and opinions of City Council that has existed for way too many years. Also, city staff need to be challenged more and not just have everything they suggest rubber stamped. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:07 PM That's a tough question. I guess I would look to see that the municipal elections are dynamic and widely discussed with community leaders coming forward to run for council. I'm never sure that part-time council attracts the best candidates. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:10 PM Stop signs at Brady & Bathgate and Kortright and Fieldstone Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:20 PM I would hope to see more citizens engaged in voting and in making delegations on matters of concern to them. I would hope to see the voting numbers up to over 50% of the eligible electors. Anyone who does not vote should not be allowed to make comments!! Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:43 PM Sufficient turnover of councillors not just the repeat nominations as a show of a vibrant council. Also voter turnout should be greater than the provincial average. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:29 PM Council renewal (mix of new and experienced council) higher voter turnout; diversity on council reflecting Guelph; Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:42 PM Improved voter turnout, bipartisan support, more consensus decisions Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:43 PM Managed budget. Not over spending Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:05 PM Diversity on Council. Ban Developers from supporting councilors n Mayor. The Mayor should not be able to hand pick his desired council n campaign with them! Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:07 PM Balanced and equitable representation of the population, by ward, and by demographic (gender, colour, age, ability, sexual orientation, etc.) Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:44 PM l would like to see a plan on homelessness, providing community centres sufficient to service all citizens, getting citizens engaged in the process of governing, making the city more green - being a model for public transit, community gardens, access to green spaces Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:09 PM I would like to see a council that reflects the diversity of the city and that is capable of representing my and my neighbors views. A council that comes from every part of the city and is composed of people who share some of my own views. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:36 PM Counsel voting the way the people want them to not just how they feel - decisions need to be made with the citizens of Guelph top in the priority. Too City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 40 of 275 Page 321 of 936 many times decisions are made on economics and "preferences" such as environmental concerns - I believe this should be taken into consideration but we live and work here and it is our voice that should be heard. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:13 PM - Diversity on Council - Community Engagement is valued by both the administration and Council and carried out consistent with the Community Engagement Framework policy. - Council has a clear vision for the City and adequate time and resources to work closely with City staff and community partners to implement that vision. - Council decisions serve the common good by building toward a shared community vision for the future. - Council is fulfilling its governance role as a board of directors and providing robust oversight of the administration - The administration respects the governance role of Council and embraces its accountability, not only to Council, but to the people they serve. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:16 PM I'm not sure...I would like to say a progressive agenda, but right now I feel like there is an adequate balance of council pushing progressive policies while balancing a more conservative stance. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:18 PM Council debates are civil, reasoned, evidence-based discussions among well- informed and well-prepared Councillors, resulting in world-class policy decisions. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:15 PM In 5 years, the City of Guelph will see a city council that is representative of the diversity that exists within the city. Guelph is not a homogeneous city, however you would not be able to tell that by looking at the current or recent elected officials. IF the way citizens elect their council in the City of Guelph is working well, representation will be present. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:26 PM Maintaining a similar vision from one council to the next without any major swings of the "vision for Guelph's future planning strategies" pendulum. People voting in high numbers to support our city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:21 PM - Increased voter turn-out in all wards - People from all walks of life can afford to run for Council - Council better reflects the demographics of the City Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:58 PM There is a diverse number of people from the Guelph community running in the Municipal elections. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:59 PM Actual progress in reducing city's carbon footprint, increasing social survices and increasing development of low income housing. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:13 PM Public polling shows overwhelming support for the improved representation from ranked ballots. Further deepening democracy activities, eg participatory budgeting. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:26 PM Diverse thinking; alignment in execution Anonymous More Guelph citizens voting in the municipal election and hopefully better City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 41 of 275 Page 322 of 936 9/04/2020 09:27 PM government representing their values. But this also depends on whether we go to a ranked ballot. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:55 PM A council comprised of representatives of people from all backgrounds, ages, and walks of life. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:02 PM Increased voter participation Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:06 PM Strong local representation by full time councilors balanced by a mayor that builds consensus amongst members of council Optional question (511 response(s), 145 skipped) Question type: Essay Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 42 of 275 Page 323 of 936 Q2 What is your understanding of the primary role of the whole city council? 73 (11.2%) 73 (11.2%) 128 (19.7%) 128 (19.7%) 415 (63.7%) 415 (63.7%) 35 (5.4%) 35 (5.4%) A city Council is more like a “board of directors” of a company or charity, providing governance and oversight to the corporation itself. A city Council is more like a “parliament” for political debate and expression of citizen interests.Both Other (please specify) Question options Optional question (651 response(s), 5 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 43 of 275 Page 324 of 936 Q3 What do you see as the primary role of each individual city Councillor? Your choice does not eliminate the other roles, just underlines what you think is most important. 7 (1.1%) 7 (1.1%) 401 (62.0%) 401 (62.0%)96 (14.8%) 96 (14.8%) 30 (4.6%) 30 (4.6%) 113 (17.5%) 113 (17.5%) Autonomy: Councillors use their own best judgement when making decisions and citizens only get involved through elections. Engagement: Councillors actively and frequently engage with the public to understand the interests of citizens and to represent those interests when making decisions. Advocacy: Councillors are available and responsive when citizens ask for assistance dealing with any local issues. Administration: Councillors focus on overseeing the proper functioning of City administration. Policy: Councillors focus on creating and improving policies and not focus on day-to-day operations. Question options Optional question (647 response(s), 9 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 44 of 275 Page 325 of 936 Q4 What number of Councillors do you prefer for the City of Guelph? 168 (25.6%) 168 (25.6%) 113 (17.2%) 113 (17.2%) 318 (48.5%) 318 (48.5%) 57 (8.7%) 57 (8.7%) Shrink it SMALLER than the current 12 Grow it LARGER than the current 12 Keep it the SAME number of 12 Councillors I don't know Question options Mandatory Question (656 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 45 of 275 Page 326 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:41 AM 14 Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:15 PM 16 Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:33 PM 18 Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:57 PM 14 Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:49 PM 17 Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:51 PM 20 Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:04 PM 16 Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:38 PM 16 Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:51 PM 18 Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 PM 16 Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:33 PM 15 Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:31 AM 18 Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:41 AM 15 Anonymous 8/18/2020 12:48 PM 14 Q5 How many Councillors do you recommend sit in a larger City Council? City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 46 of 275 Page 327 of 936 Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:18 PM 15 Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:15 PM 14 Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:10 PM 18 Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:27 AM 14 Anonymous 8/19/2020 08:45 AM 14 Anonymous 8/19/2020 11:47 AM 14 Anonymous 14 16 15 17 14 16 16 15 8/20/2020 06:01 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:45 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:15 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:19 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:52 AM Anonymous 8/21/2020 08:12 AM Anonymous 8/21/2020 08:38 AM Anonymous 8/21/2020 09:07 AM Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:26 AM 15 City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 47 of 275 Page 328 of 936 Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:51 AM 14 Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:39 PM 15 Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:59 PM 16 Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:57 PM 15 Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:00 PM 14 Anonymous 8/24/2020 06:00 PM 16 Anonymous 8/24/2020 08:27 PM 20 Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:03 PM 14 Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:32 PM 15 Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:23 PM 17 Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:13 PM 14 Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:26 AM 14 Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:22 AM 18 Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:32 AM 14 Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:46 AM 20 City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 48 of 275 Page 329 of 936 Anonymous 8/26/2020 02:27 PM 25 Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:03 PM 18 Anonymous 8/27/2020 02:20 PM 24 Anonymous 8/27/2020 09:39 PM 14 Anonymous 8/28/2020 08:42 AM 14 Anonymous 8/28/2020 01:46 PM 16 Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:02 PM 15 Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:03 PM 16 Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:55 PM 14 Anonymous 8/30/2020 04:46 PM 20 Anonymous 8/30/2020 04:57 PM 14 Anonymous 8/30/2020 05:00 PM 14 Anonymous 8/30/2020 07:03 PM 15 Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:18 AM 18 Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:07 PM 14 City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 49 of 275 Page 330 of 936 Anonymous 14 14 16 16 13 14 18 13 16 15 16 15 14 16 8/31/2020 02:18 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:15 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:15 PM Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:46 AM Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:44 AM Anonymous 9/01/2020 10:12 AM Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:03 PM Anonymous 9/02/2020 04:47 AM Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:18 AM Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:12 AM Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:13 AM Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:58 PM Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:48 PM Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:55 PM Anonymous 9/02/2020 10:37 PM 16 City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 50 of 275 Page 331 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:53 AM 13 Anonymous 9/03/2020 07:52 AM 16 Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:50 AM 14 Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:14 PM 16 Anonymous 9/03/2020 03:34 PM 25 Ray Stultz 9/03/2020 04:15 PM 14 Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:59 AM 13 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:00 AM 14 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:01 AM 16 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:07 AM 18 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:23 AM 18 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:31 AM 14 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:35 AM 17 Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:20 AM 13 Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:22 AM 18 City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 51 of 275 Page 332 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:43 AM 14 Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:15 AM 14 Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:43 AM 16 Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:05 AM 15 Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:36 AM 14 Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:07 PM 16 Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:20 PM 15 Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:36 PM 18 Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:42 PM 16 Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:54 PM 24 Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:44 PM 14 Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:09 PM 14 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:58 PM 16 Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:13 PM 14 Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:55 PM 18 City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 52 of 275 Page 333 of 936 Optional question (104 response(s), 552 skipped) Question type: Number Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 53 of 275 Page 334 of 936 Q6 How many Councillors do you recommend sit in a smaller City Council? (the Municipal Act requires a minimum of 4 plus the Mayor) 11 (6.7%) 11 (6.7%) 4 (2.4%) 4 (2.4%) 59 (36.0%) 59 (36.0%) 26 (15.9%) 26 (15.9%) 39 (23.8%) 39 (23.8%) 7 (4.3%) 7 (4.3%) 18 (11.0%) 18 (11.0%)0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Question options Optional question (164 response(s), 492 skipped) Question type: Dropdown Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 54 of 275 Page 335 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:46 AM One person of contact for ward. One interest and voice for ward. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:06 AM I think we need one full-time Councillor per ward, not two councillors doing this work part-time/off the side of their desk. We need Councillors to be fully engaged in understanding the work of the city and representing their constituents. That might mean more wards with one per, plus the mayor, but would still likely be less people than currently sits on Council. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:19 AM i think a single full time councilor and increased number of wards will better suit our city's needs. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:27 AM I don't believe there is any benefit to having two Councillors per ward. I would be ok with 12 councillors if there were 12 wards. But the current format of 2/ward has no benefit in my view. Anonymous 8/17/2020 12:23 PM I think 6 plus mayor total. Because it is more difficult to come to a reasoned agreement with more people around the table. A variety of viewpoints is good to a certain extent, but at some point there becomes diminishing returns and that results in gridlock with regard to problem solving. I think the 7th position serves as the tie breaker (3/3) and that power should fall to the mayor. I think this structure will lend itself to meaningful and vigorous debate among people who know the stakes and are focused on what they're doing and are well prepared to defend their position. This is accomplished by reducing the number and making the positions full time instead of part time. I think it also lends itself to more constructive discussions around the table. Less chance of a big block forcing their will on the council. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:15 PM It should be smaller but this is misleading because I think councillors should be full-time and only serve a single ward. Smaller wards with single full-time councillors will provide better representation for constituents. The wards should be reduced in size based on a combination of population and size. This can also mean a better pool of candidates because councillors wouldn't need to be concerned about another source of income. This means you can get passionate people who aren't necessarily affluent. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:47 PM So they can be full time Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:52 PM If we move to full time councilors we absolutely must decrease the number of councillors and 6 seems like an adequate number. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:26 PM The reason is simple - we are such a small city! Q7 Why do you think the Guelph City Council should be smaller? City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 55 of 275 Page 336 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:28 PM There is no need for two councillors per ward, it’s unnecessarily redundant. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:57 PM Only ONE Councillor per Ward is needed to engage with the public to understand the interests of citizens and to represent those interests when making decisions. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:00 PM Just one council member per ward, make them full time. Then they can serve the city better. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:04 PM full time not part time and even up to 8 with a focus on the south and east ends. Full time allows more time to devote to the wards and their problems Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:48 PM 1 councillor per 20000 residents seems more appropriate. Some Toronto councillors have 100K residents. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:50 PM by comparison, the city of Kitchener (with 100,000 + more population than Guelph) has two LESS councillors than Guelph.... we should be cutting costs, especially now that the mayor and council are racking up additional fees (i.e., the police station) Anonymous 8/17/2020 04:59 PM Too many opinions means that decisions take longer, there are better ways to get diverse thought to the table. Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:22 PM A) To afford them to be full time B) To press them to stay at the policy level and out if the weeds of operating /administration Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:07 AM too many cooks in the kitchen...more decisiveness in issues when fewer people can push their agendas Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:52 AM Wr need to get rid of some of the egos and have a team that support and work together. The two divides (Karen vs Cam) is really obvious and unproductive. Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:53 AM I believe that 6 ward councillors and 4 general-elected councillors would be sufficient. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:39 AM I think our councillors should be full time and that one per ward makes sense. If we had 6 council members + the mayor that should enable a voting mechanism that allows a "win" of 4-3 on challenging issues. Full time councillors would be fairer for all, allowing for better advocacy and representation Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:59 AM One full-time Councillor per ward. Anonymous Duplication of efforts in some wards. Some council members are visible and City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 56 of 275 Page 337 of 936 8/18/2020 09:08 AM some I never hear from. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:18 AM Guelph has more councillors than larger cities. It's a waste of tax-payers money. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:29 AM I think that a city of this size one councilor for every 20K people is enough Anonymous 8/18/2020 01:15 PM I think we could lessen the number of councillors right now, but as per my selected priority, they could dedicate themselves better to advocacy, customer service delivery and ensuring a connection to the community by dedicating themselves full time. Anonymous 8/18/2020 12:38 PM Too many people getting paid to do nothing. We need less of that Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:05 PM Smaller, but make the Councillors full time. 1 per ward instead of 2. One councilor with a full time position could get more work done than 2 part time councilors that have to hold their regular jobs as well. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:51 PM One full time councillor per ward. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:15 PM Do not need 2 per ward. Anonymous 8/19/2020 05:36 AM Improve dynamics among councillors. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:01 AM No other city of our size has 2 standing Councillors for each ward. Furthermore, while some Councillors are engaged, many are not and it seems an egregious waste of resources (beyond those financial ones). Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:11 AM Because I believe they should be full time. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:49 AM Don't need the current two people per ward. Anonymous 8/19/2020 05:15 PM Some ward council members work against each other and do not represent the true Ward needs Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:42 AM I think that a 1 councilor per ward is a good. Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:01 AM There does not need to be 2 councillors per ward. One councillor per ward is enough. Two councillors does not offer better representation than one, if that City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 57 of 275 Page 338 of 936 councillor is actually representing the citizens in that ward. Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:12 AM nothing getting done as is Anonymous 8/20/2020 12:57 PM Population doesn’t warrant it Anonymous 8/20/2020 05:06 PM Councillors should elected to a fulltime position to address constituent concerns Anonymous 8/20/2020 05:40 PM My ward has two councils. I am only familiar with one. Not sure what the other one is doing. We don’t need “Yes” man and rubber stamps. We need someone who is approachable. I am fine to cut one council per ward. Anonymous 8/20/2020 07:22 PM Less government the better. Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:01 PM debt is out of control. Anonymous 8/20/2020 09:06 PM Because one of my two is a ghost. Never can get hold of Bob bell and he never responds to any emails or questions or requests for help Anonymous 8/22/2020 11:26 AM The more people you have, the less each has to do and be responsible / accountable for. Also, the more people in the room on any given topic, the harder it is to get a consensus on anything. Anonymous 8/24/2020 08:41 AM Cost as our mayor has advocated for keeping taxes low this has not happened as council make up continues to want to spend money . This number would be even more important if we go to full time councillors Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:23 AM Less councilors but paid full time positions. roy.clarke 8/24/2020 10:36 AM I think that it should be one council member per ward Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:35 AM Streamlining by having fewer overall, can provide more succinct debate without reducing quality of representation. Create a 7th Ward South of Ward 1 and East of Ward 6, redistribute Ward 5 & 6 to rectify the current and projected population imbalance. Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:15 PM The wards should be redesigned since the growth of the city. We only need one Councillorper ward Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:48 PM Efficiency, waste of money to have two Councillors per ward. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 58 of 275 Page 339 of 936 Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:01 PM Its a tremendous waist of money. Part time job with too many benefits. Anonymous 8/24/2020 04:25 PM dumb question but the answer is that if the council members are focused, they can get more work done, we have two council members in my ward, not sure what they have done, but only dealt with them twice, a total of two minutes, one council member is plenty per ward WTF who needs 2 in guelph wards Anonymous 8/24/2020 07:57 PM Because I believe they are overpaid for what they do. There are only 3 councillors that show up for important issues. All the rest are weak and do not provide adequate representation. The mayor should not be making $150,000 per year. He is absolutely overpaid. Anonymous 8/25/2020 08:25 AM We should cut it in half so that there is one full-time councilor per ward. If we establish new (and more) wards, that number would increase to ensure each ward has ONE full-time councilor. Anonymous 8/25/2020 10:15 AM I don't have any visibility into what the councilors actually do for the city. Maybe more education and information on how they are assisting the public would justify council size? Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:09 PM To reduce costs. I think it will be easier to achieve consensus with fewer councillors. Maybe it will alleviate some of the bickering that happens, too. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:09 PM I believe that fewer people around a table can make better decisions. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:27 PM Smaller and full time so they can focus on the work of the city and will feel more responsibility towards their constituents. Streamline debate and voting process in council. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:31 PM I would prefer to see wards re-drawn, with 1 councillor to each ward. This is based on an assumption that the current 6 wards could be re-drawn as 8 smaller wards. Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:22 PM Please refer to answer of question #1 Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:36 PM Might get along better and make wise decisions Anonymous 8/25/2020 02:45 PM I think a one full-time Councillor per ward should be the future direction - the same public cost with increased capacity to dedicate time to City and community work. If the ward review finds additional wards are needed then I support aligning one full-time Councillor per ward (if that is 7 wards then 7 Councillors, etc.). Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:16 PM I like the idea of ward system with one rep per ward, but increasing the number of wards to make the population relatively the same in each. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 59 of 275 Page 340 of 936 Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:48 PM 1 per ward. Less drama and debates. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:00 AM City council should have one representative per ward. I feel that it is businesses that run our city not city hall. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:17 AM I think that although diversity and experience are vital to on a Council, we run the risk of having too many bodies filling seats, and not taking their roles seriously - especially when these are part time roles. I think we need to curb expenses where we can and ensure oversight in the our Councilors and emphasis how important their role is. Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:42 AM less red-tape and save $ that could put towards other needs. Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:42 PM There seems to be a lot of redundancy in the current model. I have never liked the fact that there are two councillors per ward. I also don't believe that having more voices at the table is creating interesting or useful dialog. Those in the south vote as a block, those downtown vote in a block, those in the East and West vote as a block. Anonymous 8/26/2020 02:29 PM Less is sometimes more viable and easier to make proper decisions for all citizens Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:28 PM Group decision making is more efficient with a smaller number, with 7-8 optimal Anonymous 8/26/2020 05:12 PM Council should be I per Ward and 3 to 4 at large and no more than one from any ward for the at large. Anonymous 8/26/2020 05:41 PM One full time councillor per ward, focused, presently two do not seem to be aware of community issues, such as Margaret Greene Park issue. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:15 PM I think that city council should be smaller and move to a full time position. Eliminate the idea of 2 councillors per ward and move to 1. Again I would like to see that full time councillor conduct a lot more engagement with citizens and get a better feel for what their interests are. I think if that did happen we wouldn't see the giant pushback against the new library. Clearly city council was off the mark and only listening to the small interest groups making all the noise. Their job should be to reach out engage people to get a feel for what the general public wants not interest groups. Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:29 PM Significant dead wood on council. Too many platform seekers using council as a stage for their social justice projects. Anonymous Efficiency. A City the size of Guelph does not need a councillor for every City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 60 of 275 Page 341 of 936 8/27/2020 06:50 AM nook and cranny. All should be looking for the best of the whole city. Anonymous 8/27/2020 08:22 AM I think we should have redraw wards to reflect the overextended south end and shrink to 1 councillor / ward to reflect other larger communities like missosauga / Toronto. Approximately 100,000 constitutents per councillor is the going rate so I think 6-7 councillors + mayor is reasonable to stay on budget and make councillors a full time position. Anonymous 8/27/2020 12:12 PM Less arguing and better decision making on behalf of all of Guelph Anonymous 8/27/2020 01:34 PM I think having 2 councillors for each Ward makes no sense, but there needs to be a critical mass of elected officials to carry the work load on Committees. Anonymous 8/28/2020 07:18 AM Councillor should be a full time job. Only 1 per ward Anonymous 8/28/2020 01:08 PM I think some councillors are so similar in their ways of thinking, and ideas that it just is redundant to have so many representing the same interests. Anonymous 8/28/2020 06:26 PM I think the councillors should be full time - in order to pay for that, I guess we would need to have less for now until the population increases. 8 or 10 because Guelph is growing so I think we need more than half of current. Anonymous 8/29/2020 05:23 PM They would be more responsible to a broader base Anonymous 8/30/2020 11:59 AM 8 would be enough to engage in discussion and debate regarding issues in Guelph. More is a waste of money. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:50 PM Making city council smaller will reduce the amount of money spent on having more Councillors. This money then could be allocated elsewhere where their is a shortage. More council members increases unnecessary bureaucracy. Having too many members can lead to Councillors pushing for polices that favor special interests and less on the direct needs of people. There are many ways to increase the close relationship between ward Councillors and residents and improving effective government without increasing council and those should be studied and implemented. Having more Councillors doesn't automatically mean improved service for residents or that communication between parties will improve either. The amount of Councillors should ultimately be decided by the residents of Guelph, not city council. Anonymous 8/30/2020 05:46 PM If we go to full time there should be less. Guelph has grown so just cutting in half does not make sense. 8 is better than 9 as with the mayor there is an odd number meaning you won't have split votes. Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:21 PM Fewer Councillors, but full time positions. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 61 of 275 Page 342 of 936 Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:04 AM More is not better. We need better councillors not more. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:18 AM 1 councillor per ward...too many do nothing or appear to do nothing....Bob Bell Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:23 AM Barrie, a city comparable in size, has 10 councillors for 10 wards. I'd prefer more wards but with one councillor per ward. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:39 AM Less time hearing so many of the same points of view and save money for taxpayers Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:22 AM 8 plus the mayor would make the best representation Anonymous 8/31/2020 02:23 PM Use the current budget to allow the councilors to go full time Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:11 PM because there is too much happening at council.. so much division. smaller council could accomplish more Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:34 PM By making it a full time position it should be enough for proper representation for each ward Anonymous 9/01/2020 01:40 AM To reduce cost, and by mixing it with 1 Councillor per ward it would make the Ward smaller, so is a good balance on money saving plus accessibility and knowledge of a Councillor for a particular ward. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:01 AM Bigger is not better. 8 full time councilors makes more sense. Less infighting, more control and focus. Mayor breaks the tie vote. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:59 AM Too many special interests with the ward system. Smaller council would make them more accountable for the decisions that are made that affects the city down the road. Anonymous 9/01/2020 10:31 AM Make the wards larger and pay them more to represent a larger area. If you make the wards too small then you risk the concerns of an area overridden by the councilors of the other wards. For example all the intensification is being directed to ward 6 as other councilors don't want it in their ward so as to keep their people happy. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:24 PM Because all these self proclaimed 'know it alls', who buy into the Municipal 'speak' and when they tell you something at the door, the do the opposite when they're given power. Ward 6 Mark MacKinnon.... Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:14 PM A few councilors have been around far too long and I believe they put their own needs and wants first. We need new council with fresh ideas that City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 62 of 275 Page 343 of 936 actually benefit citizens. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:23 PM One council member per ward Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:52 PM Because the position should be full-time. Anonymous 9/01/2020 06:12 PM Save money Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:15 PM I have never heard or seen any communication from any councillors and I have lived in different wards in guelph Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:27 PM 2 per ward if confusing who do I go to ? Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:50 PM I believe 8 councillors will suffice in providing a voice of various wards across the city of Guelph, especially if they each work full time. Having too many councillors, especially part time, will create a lot of inefficiencies and lost communication between the 2 councillors in each ward. Anonymous 9/01/2020 11:46 PM There should be less of them and full time. The part time council members don't have the time to engage with their citizens. They have other responsibilities and are not up to speed on the issues. Their votes are muddled with personal opinion and easily led by the loudest voice. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:45 AM I think one councillor per ward plus a few councillors looking at the wider picture would be beneficial. I have two councillors, and any time I’ve contacted them both, I’ve one heard back from one, so feel like the second one hasn’t been effective for me anyway. Smaller council would also reduce cost, which given the economic disaster that Covid 19 pandemic is bringing us, would be a responsible/timely choice. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:52 AM Council meetings are already inefficient with multiple councillors adding nothing to the conversation other than "I agree." Bring in "ditto" cards to visually show approval and let the conversation move forward. Less voices will speed up the decision making process. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:23 AM Shrink the size of Council and make them full-time representatives. The city is too big and complex to have people dabbling in the side to fulfil their council duties. Also, having a smaller full-time council makes it more accessible to a wider demographic in the community (not just retirees, entrepreneurs or professionals) . Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:35 AM Large government creates nothing but additional bottlenecks. the councilors can speak for a larger ward, withe fewer councilors making more headway with less confusion. Anonymous To many hands in the pot.....some do a lot of work and others do nothing City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 63 of 275 Page 344 of 936 9/02/2020 08:02 AM Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:14 AM Convert part-time posts to full time, reduce Council by half. Make all councillors 'at large' and answerable and responsive to all residents of Guelph. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:22 AM Shorter meetings. I think we have a lot of councillors compared to other, larger cities. Collaborative decision making is critical for local government, but I feel like 9 (full-time) Councillors could discuss, debate and reflect community interests as effectively as 13. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:44 AM Reduce council to 1 person per ward, make this a full time position paid the equivalent of the previous 2 councilors. This will allow councilors to work full time hours to deal with matters quicker and result in decisions being made so one councilor can not cancel out the 2nd councilor as they can now by voting in opposing views. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:25 PM We should have at least nine wards to match the demographics. 1 full time councillor per ward. Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:35 PM Too much talk and too little action. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:18 PM Only one person per ward. Increase in number of wards if needed. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:40 PM Save taxpayer dollars. You only need 1 representative per ward Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:42 PM There no need for 12 of them, when half of them don’t engage with the city residents Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:59 AM Because they be useless now. They are working in plans from the 90’s. The library. With all the technology in our hands they should thought about change not just following what others wanted before our time. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:35 AM Guelph is one of those cities with the highest property taxes and yet it is run so poorly. Our infrastructure is outdated and we don’t have a vision of growth. Our downtown core is filled with drug addicts and we have tent cities affecting every neighbourhood at every corner. They want to build a library as well! !!! We don’t need councillors... we need less government and more advocating for the people of Guelph. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:45 AM Impacted by my selection of a mixed system below. Voting on an issue would allow for the vote of the ward plus 4 councillors at large to consider the greater good of the city. That gives 5 possible support votes. The mayor is also equivalent to an at large rep for 6 votes, which is enough to carry a vote. There is also the option for a councillor to engage neighbouring ward councillors. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 64 of 275 Page 345 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:33 AM current number does not allow for consensus building, it creates division and duplication of effort (citizens have to reach out to 2 councillors to ensure their opinions are heard) Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:39 AM Efficiency Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:53 AM Shift to full time. One per ward plus Mayor. Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:38 PM Lower cost ... There are tons of city employees to do "the work" Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:46 PM Single councilor per ward remainder at large and full time Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:12 PM Too many cooks in the kitchen. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:18 PM Prefer to have smaller council but make them full-time. Even with two Councillors responses can take days, if they ever get back. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:24 PM Not enough 'wor', a lot of 'busy' work though Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:14 PM 8 Wards, 8 Councllors and 2 at large plus the Mayor (tie-breaker). Councillors to be full-time employees of the citizens of Guelph. Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:27 PM Guelph City Council should be smaller only in terms of seats, not in reduced service. My recommendation of six Councillors plus the Mayor entails that the role of City Councilor in a rapidly developing and increasing diverse City is a full time job. The long term cost and service benefit of a focussed and dedicated council cannot be underestimated. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:14 PM Add one councillor for splitting the wards up into 7 to handle the population growth and make them full time positions. Each councillor should have to live in their ward so they really know what it's like. They don't need an office, renovations or support staff. Covid has taught us that zoom or MS teams meetings work. A church or school space can be easily obtained for meetings. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:22 PM I believe there should be 5 councilors that represent the whole of the city that would be full time. The other 5 would be part time and deal with ward issues. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:27 PM Half them don’t represent the wards like they should City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 65 of 275 Page 346 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:51 PM Cost savings Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:42 AM Any more than 7 people in a room can never come to a decision. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:13 AM I think a smaller group can work together more efficiently Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:29 AM Makes it easier to gain expertise, focus and make decisions. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:05 AM I feel that a larger council creates more red tape and that each ward then gets 2 votes to an issue whereas only one vote should apply per issue Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:28 AM More accountability, less waste, more efficiency, more transparency Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:51 AM Given recent reductions in other larger cities, 10 seems a more realistic number for our, even though ever growing, population. Right now 12 are not doing a very good job, so a small reduction may make them more aware of the responsibilities they have been awarded. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:52 AM One councillor per ward and should be a paid position. Each councillor should be focused solely on the needs of their ward and not spreading themselves too thin by trying to manage both work and council. I would like to see councillors actively engaging their ward constituents outside of election time. They are not very active outside of this time. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:22 AM I don't even know my Council. Never met my rep for my area Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:44 AM Too many people to get anything accomplished. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:48 AM There is no need to have many people debating their own agenda. Council should be used to improve the city and there of them there are the less likely anything gets accomplished. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:54 AM No money to increase or grow larger. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:55 AM We do not need these many period!!! Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:56 AM Because at 130,000 people, there's no reason to have 12 opinions on topics that will effect everyone across the city equally. The city is too small to have City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 66 of 275 Page 347 of 936 problems or solutions that only affect "some" of the residents Anonymous 9/04/2020 12:30 PM Everyone shares city interests. No need to divide up the city into small sections. The greater good for the city as a whole over small areas of the city . Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:12 PM It should be smaller but the riles should be fulltime Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:20 PM Smaller makes for greater accountability. The greater the number 9such as now) allows for the passing of inaction because the second councillor in the ward voted differently. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:03 PM One councillor per ward is fine. Some of the comments councillors have made have been offensive and insult the intelligence of residents. With one councillor per ward hopefully, with responsible residents informing themselves, these councillors will get weeded out of council. Also this means one councillor per ward will need to make sure they hear all the people and not just those that they agree with. Then it will certainly become clear whether a councillor is listening or not everyone. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:43 PM Better value for the taxpayer and faster decision making Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:29 PM Population size Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:43 PM Bigger cities operate more efficiently with fewer - ie kitchener has 10. Too many voices at the table gets nothing done. Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:41 AM City size has grown significantly. especially ward 6. Ward 6 should be split into two Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:15 PM to represent the growing areas of the City. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:33 PM City continues to grow. More councillors should enable more engagement with constituents, public, other stakeholders ...Also would enable mixed ward- city wide voting. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:57 PM Ward 6 has increased & soon we will have the addition of Clair Maltby. The south end is growing and needs more representation Optional question (158 response(s), 498 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Q8 Why do you think the Guelph City Council should be larger? City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 67 of 275 Page 348 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:49 PM Guelph's population has grown and reducing the number of councillors goes directly against principles of democratic representation. If anything, the current wards are not very well representative of Guelph's diversity of communities and neighbourhoods, and we need more, smaller wards with councillors. Our population rose from just under 96,000 in 1996, giving a ratio of 7985 residents per 1 councillor (with a council of 12). Today, with a population of 131,794 (2016 census) that ratio is 10,983 residents per councillor. To achieve a number closer to the 7985, we would need at least 16 councillors to get 8237 residents per councillor. My suggestion of a 17th seat is to entertain the idea of a single rep dedicated to University of Guelph students. Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:51 PM Better democracy and representation of citizens. Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:04 PM The city is larger Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:38 PM Part time so not dependent upon salary and to be split 2 per ward to better represent citizens Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:51 PM I'd split Wards 4, 5 & 6 in 2, with 2 new Councillors in each new ward. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 PM With the population growing at the rate it currently is, there is no way one councilor can keep up with all the concerns of resident's Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:33 PM Based on larger wards 3 sit or add a ward for progress Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:31 AM We lack representation. Guelph is huge and growing. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:41 AM To ensure more efficient representation of Wards and improve Councillors ability to operate beyond just purely administrative and budgetary concerns. Councillors should be engaging citizens, looking into issues at the ground level, and engaging with NIMBYism issues, promoting civic projects, and expanding cooperation between citizens and government. Anonymous 8/18/2020 12:48 PM To represent the population more effectively Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:18 PM As the city grows, we need to ensure we have adequate representation for each of the areas Anonymous The city has grown substantially, and the ward boundaries need to be re- City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 68 of 275 Page 349 of 936 8/18/2020 05:15 PM worked to reflect the growth, particularly in the South End. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:10 PM City is growing at a rapid rate, 3 per ward would be ideal in larger wards, in smaller wards with less growth or no new development 2 Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:27 AM Ward 6 currently too large in proportion with other wards, It should be partitioned Anonymous 8/19/2020 08:45 AM I think each ward should represent up to 20,000 people, and to plan for growth we'll need to add another ward at the south end. Anonymous 8/19/2020 11:47 AM I think the ward boundaries should be re-drawn. As the city has grown, I believe the ward system should be expanded from the current 6 Wards to a new 7 Ward map. I believe each of the new 7 Wards should continue to be represented by two councillors. Anonymous The East End (east of Victoria) should be a new ward. It is quite distinct from downtown and should have it's own representation. As the city expands rabidly more representation is key. If there is an increase the number of Wards, the city should still maintain the 2 Councillors per Ward structure. This generally ensures at least one Ward Councillor is in attendance at Council meetings. City has grown so much. We need smaller wards so councilors can actually hear what the ward is saying. add 2 new wards to accommodate growth and keep 2 councilors per ward. As the city grows, it makes sense that more councillors are needed to represent the various communities with growing population, more Councillors are needed to fairly represent citizen views as the city gets larger there can be more concillors to look over all parts of the city or have 3 people per ward so public can talk to them in person The city has grown a lot, so Council needs to grow proprtionally. 8/20/2020 06:01 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:45 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:15 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:19 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:52 AM Anonymous 8/21/2020 08:12 AM Anonymous 8/21/2020 08:38 AM Anonymous 8/21/2020 09:07 AM Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:26 AM Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:51 AM ward 6 and ward 1 have grown a lot and cover a much bigger area then other wards. With growth targets in mind it would be good to divide them into two. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 69 of 275 Page 350 of 936 Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:39 PM The ability to have a greater range of voices is important to me and also Guelph is growing at a significant rate and council should continue to reflect that growing size. Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:59 PM The City is larger than it was when the current Council was configured, and under the Places to Grow act is projected to grow more than almost any other municipality in Ontario. Growing our City Council ensures citizens are represented, and positions Council for the future. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:57 PM I believe there should be 3 “at large” councillors who are elected by the entire city and vote on behalf of the whole city, not just their Ward. Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:00 PM the city is changing and ward boundaries need to reflect that- almost certainly need to go from 6 to 7 wards, hence from 12 to 14 councillors Anonymous 8/24/2020 06:00 PM The city is growing. To keep the representation equal (with each councillor representing about the same number of people), there needs to be more councillors. Failing that, at least admit that being an effective councillor for a city the size of Guelph is a full-time job. Anonymous 8/24/2020 08:27 PM A larger number of councilors will be able to deal more carefully with the concerns of the people they represent. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:03 PM City has grown and more representation on Council for that growth would ensure a fairer representation. Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:32 PM We should have a councillor for every 10,000 people until we need to scale them to having staff members. Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:23 PM I think a mix of ward and at large councillors could help get both diversity and representation on City Council. 2 councillors per ward is a good amount, so the increase would be in 3-5 at large councillors. Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:13 PM Because the city continues to grow and the council must represent the people fairly. We must encourage young people to be council members as well Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:21 AM It currently does not represent the entire demographics in Guelph. If there were more Wards, there would be more Councillors. Some Wards have far less population than others so people are not being represented fairly. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:26 AM Guelph has expanded and changed a lot. In the interest of representing all of the voices within Guelph, I think that that wards 5 and 6 should be turned into 3 wards. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:22 AM Well- I live in Ward 3, which is very diverse and includes people living in very wealthy areas close to downtown in single detached homes, and families living in high-rise buildings along Willow Rd and Dawson Rd. Our ward is one of the most diverse in the city with regards to immigration status, language City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 70 of 275 Page 351 of 936 spoken at home, income etc. Our neighbourhood needs more representation at city council so that more voices are heard. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:32 AM There is increased complexity at the municipal level in addition to a growing population. Building a stronger city council foundation will build a stronger and more resilient city, better able to review, respond and act. Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:46 AM I want councilor positions to remain part- time but feel 12 part- time councilors are not enough would ideally have 3 per ward Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:03 PM Because population has already grown by more than 30% since 1991 and is projected to grow by another 40% by 2040 this will maintain a reasonable representation level around the 20,000 level Anonymous 8/27/2020 02:20 PM A multitude of voices with a variety of intersectional representation will more broadly be able to address issues, demands, unity, and advocacy for all. Anonymous 8/27/2020 09:39 PM To better allow for representation of smaller groups and communities that are currently not given access to political power. Anonymous 8/28/2020 08:42 AM At least two councillors are needed for every ward, while Ward 6 is geographically too large, too economically diverse, and should become two wards Anonymous 8/28/2020 01:46 PM The city has grown, so it makes sense to have more councillors so as to maintain an acceptable level of engagement. However, it should not increase the point at which numerous factions appear, which will inevitably be co- opted by various vested interests. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:02 PM Because the City is growing Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:03 PM Some wards are becoming unmanageable; wards 1 and 6 should be partitioned, resulting in a total of 8 wards, each with 2 councillors. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:55 PM There are areas in our city that are not well represented at present because Guelph has grown. Anonymous 8/30/2020 04:46 PM I think with the large influx of new citizens, especially in the south end, they have a right to see and talk to their councilors and if we keep the amount where it is at the moment this will not be a possibility. Councillors will get over worked and would not have time to talk and engage with the populous Anonymous 8/30/2020 04:57 PM The city is growing and council should keep up Anonymous 8/30/2020 05:00 PM Population is growing City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 71 of 275 Page 352 of 936 Anonymous 8/30/2020 07:03 PM The population has been growing and there should be more members of city council to represent that. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:18 AM Better oversight with different view points. Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:21 AM 18 Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:07 PM The 12 ward Councillors are good. It would be nice to have 1 or 2 elected at large to represent the interests of the City as a whole. Anonymous Assume adding at least one ward as city grows with two part time (not full time as councillors likely prefer to continue their usual employment). One councillor per 10,000 citizens, adjusted every 4 years. Due to the predicted growth rate of 40% it would seem reasonable to enlarge the number of councillors. With the increase in population with all the new development some wards should be split up or reproportioned. Ward 6 is growing quickly We do not need a 13th counsellor now. I believe we will need 1 more counselor in the future As the city grows, the number of councillors could/should also grow so that there is more chance that the council is made up of members who reflect the diversity of our city and the workload is not too great for each individual councillor. Shrink ward populations to roughly 10,000 people represented by a single councillor. City staff exist to develop policy and ensure continuity. Council provides weighted citizens input on those policy decisions. There should be two more wards with 2 councillors per each extra ward for an additional 4 councillors The city is growing larger with a larger diversity of residents. To better represent interests of growing population and allow more diversity of voices 8/31/2020 02:18 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:15 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:15 PM Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:46 AM Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:44 AM Anonymous 9/01/2020 10:12 AM Anonymous 9/02/2020 04:47 AM Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:18 AM Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:12 AM Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:52 AM Anonymous Greater representation for different neighbourhoods and areas of the city. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 72 of 275 Page 353 of 936 9/02/2020 07:13 AM Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:16 AM As the population of Guelph increases, the number of councilors representing the people needs to increase proportionately Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:58 PM The city is growing in population. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:48 PM More citizens and larger geography Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:55 PM Larger field means more avenues for engagement for citizens. Some councillors are not responsive to citizens of left-leaning political viewpoints. A larger array means more diverse political engagement. I also think there should be more wards and there should be 2 councillors per ward Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:30 PM Community is growing Anonymous 9/02/2020 10:37 PM The population of Guelph has grown and continues to grow but the council has not changed in number. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:53 AM South end is still growing. Need more representation Anonymous 9/03/2020 07:52 AM More people with different backgrounds and experiences Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:50 AM Ward 6 is large and only represented by two councillors. Current Ward 6 councillors do not represent the diverse people who live in this ward. There are a lot of immigrant communities and renters, not just home owners. The current councillors are not in touch with the diverse needs of people living in Ward 6 and do not advocate for the vulnerable people in this area, do not reflect their interest, and do not engage with them beyond social media. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:14 PM Because the population is growing Anonymous 9/03/2020 03:34 PM To better represent the interests of the people living here and better represent the diversity in the city. Double the councillors for each ward and add a councillor that is specifically associated with the university itself. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:15 PM Wards 1 and 6 need additional representation Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:59 AM To reflect Guelphs growing population City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 73 of 275 Page 354 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:00 AM Ward 6 is giant and growing Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:01 AM Guelph has grown so much. Ward 1 is for to big for two members. People who live in St. George’s park opinions differ from those on Starwood area. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:07 AM population growth Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:23 AM Provides more opportunity for diversity instead of the same people being elected every single year with no one else even having a hope of gaining council. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:31 AM 12 by ward 2 at large Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:35 AM I think it’s important that you are able to have a diverse group that represents the needs of ALL citizens and not just the wealthy or business sectors. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:20 AM I don't actually have a number in mind, beyond 12, but rather prefer to express that the number needs to grow in proportion to the population growth of the City. Proportional representation is the key. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:22 AM There should be a way to increase the number of councilors according to citizens/square km covered Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:43 AM Guelph has grown, and is growing. More taxpayers need at least another ward (with 2 councilors) to represent them, so as not to overburden real life people (who happen to be councilors). Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:15 AM Two main reasons. 1)Because of growth in the south end, another ward should be created for now (might require more in the future) Should keep wards small to reflect city neighbourhoods. 2) Should maintain 2 councillors per ward system. This better captures the diversity within wards. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:43 AM better representation for our growing city Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:05 AM Some areas have grown - ex South. Differences in closer ton401 section vs Stone rd section Ward 1 should be distinct wards - east side is different than the pocket with more downtown focus Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:36 AM The city has grown and the population has increased substantially. I believe we need to rethink some ward boundaries in order to ensure that all citizens have reasonable representation by a Councillor. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:07 PM Because the current size of some of the wards are too big for just one councillor, for instance Ward one is the entire East End of Guelph, The Ward City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 74 of 275 Page 355 of 936 and the Downtown area and each area has different and specific needs that one councillor working for just the part they're in leaves so many others in their wards voices unheard. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:57 PM i'm not sure of an exact number, but since the city is growing, perhaps it would make more sense to re-district, and have one councellor per ward rather than th current 2? Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:36 PM Wards need to be set by population and need to add more where development or urban density is happening for proper representation of the entire population. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:42 PM The city ia growing an needs more councillors. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:54 PM One person representing a Ward is not enough. It does not follow a democratic approach at the grass roots level. Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:44 PM if we look at population in guelph, we are looking at 1 councillor/11,000 citizens. With the plans of increasing the size of the city to 180,000, we should be looking at a minimum of increasing representation up to 18 councillors to represent 10,000 each. This does not have to be done at this time, but moving forward. I would like to still see wards, but possibly have Wards with several moving to an At-large Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:09 PM As the city grows, the size of council must grow to maintain the same density of representation Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:58 PM Guelph city council should be larger because the city has been expanding and requires more councillors to properly represent their constituents. Equity is very important, there should also be councillors that represent the diverse needs of the Guelph community. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:13 PM Population per ward has increased considerably, even after redistribution. To be responsive to citizens requires lower citizens / representative. I prefer even more councillors but much prefer full-time councillors as a budget trade- off. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:55 PM Right now, most councillors represent very similar viewpoints. It's easier for wealthy businesspeople to have the time to win a political campaign. We need to make room for more than just one demographic on our council. Optional question (107 response(s), 549 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Q9 Why do you think the Guelph City Council should be kept the same size (12 Councillors + Mayor)? City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 75 of 275 Page 356 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:15 AM Guelph will only get larger. This offers opportunity for diversity in thought and process for each ward. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 AM Size seems about right when compared to similar sized cities & allows for diverse mix of councillors Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:52 AM Too big of a council can create dysfunction. What needs to happen is better balance the representation of the ward councillors. Anonymous 8/17/2020 10:08 AM This depends on how many wards end up being established via the boundary review, and whether councillors move to full-time status. If councillors move to full-time, then the number can go down. However, if they remain part-time, keep the current two-per-ward system in place. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:10 AM Size is fine but instead of 2 councillors per ward make the wards smaller. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:12 AM More would create greater bureaucratic/political roadblocks to progress. Two per ward makes sense. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:20 AM I think that size of council is adequate to meet present and future rep by pop demands. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:15 PM Guelph is too big for less than 12 and not big enough for more. There has to be a certain number of citizens per Council member. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:17 PM The number depends on whether part time or full-time! If full-time, I see no reason to go beyond 12 at this time — good number for any Board or decision-making group. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:43 PM Seems to be a reasonable Council size for a city the size of Guelph Anonymous 8/17/2020 04:57 PM Seems to work. Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:42 PM It seems like it's small enough and large enough to have good generative discussions Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 PM With increasing population there is no need for a reduction in size Anonymous 8/17/2020 10:36 PM during last 50 years i have found if one councilor in my ward isn't helpful i can rely on the other. it has been vital during my lifetime. it is a fail safe fallback. some years both in my ward are equally helpful. Anonymous I don’t know. I think it’s okay if it gets smaller but definitely not bigger. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 76 of 275 Page 357 of 936 8/18/2020 04:37 AM Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:03 AM Ottawa has 1million people and 24 councillors. We have 130,000 and 12 + Mayor. We certainly do not need more councillors. Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:02 AM Two per ward offers redundancy and backup that isn't available in a one-per- ward system. There is great benefit to our current structure, though it's uncommon in Ontario. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:06 AM If we continue to have part-time city councilors we need to ensure there are at least twelve. Anonymous 8/18/2020 11:58 AM It is a good size for a city of our population. Anonymous 8/18/2020 02:48 PM With the ward system, councillors represent a certain area of town. Not necessarily population. If more wards are created, then additional councillors should be added. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:46 PM Seems like a reasonable number for diverse voices and yet can build relationships and get things done. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:37 PM It seems like the number has worked for us so far... Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:58 PM Too many councillors with competing issues will result in delayed projects and division. Speed of resolving problems is essential. Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:10 PM There are 6 priority directions being food, shelter/transporation, work/income, children, environment and governance and 2 councillors for each priority gives support and flexibility to plan policy and system for management. Anonymous 8/19/2020 11:54 AM This number allows for a wide range of opinion on council and is large enough that individual councillors have enough time to respond well to their constituents' concerns. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:36 PM Roughly 10,000 residents to a Councillor, given residents about a vote in local elections about 10 times more powerful than in provincial and federal elections, is fairly liberal. But larger councils can be connected to some positive outcomes, including stronger local democratic engagement. Also, retaining this number of councillors permits some innovation in the electoral system. The size of council should be somewhat dynamic, too; 12 councillors is appropriate for now, but council may need to add members in a decade. Anonymous 8/19/2020 03:42 PM Until Guelph grows, it is enough Anonymous 13 provides a good size; small enough for discussion and accountability, City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 77 of 275 Page 358 of 936 8/19/2020 06:10 PM large enough to still have a good discussion and representation even if 1 or 2 are away for some reason Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:42 PM Guelph is complex and needs a detailed and well resourced group to listen to our needs. Anonymous 8/19/2020 09:11 PM Guelph is one of the most desirable cities in Canada to live in. 12 has been working. 12 allows for one or two to be away and there are still enough voices to have a thoughtful discussion. Anonymous 8/20/2020 04:43 AM Because guelph iS NOT a big city. increasing means increasing taxes and taxes are already too high with NO return on investment Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:17 AM This allows for two councillors per ward which means two people to listen to the voices of citizens but also to work together and to hold each other accountable to make decisions that reflect the best interests of citizens in their ward. Anonymous 8/20/2020 09:35 AM Better represents population helping make better decisions . Too narrow of a view with fewer councilors. Possibility of council being stacked by those who are only conservative, or liberal in their views. We need a diverse council , not rulers. Anonymous 8/20/2020 11:12 AM Don’t want it to be too big but also don’t want a small number making all the decisions Anonymous 8/20/2020 03:35 PM Current council size is functional. Reducing council size would cut down on avenues of representation for Guelphites. There should never be a regression in representation in a functional democracy. Increasing council size I have not seen any specific compelling arguments or needs to justify doing so at this time. Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:28 PM As long as all of the wards are well-represented, 12 should be enough. Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:33 PM For the size of Guelph 12 is a good representation Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:40 AM Sufficient range of potential viewpoints. Anonymous 8/21/2020 07:00 AM Large and diverse city needs adequate representation. Anonymous 8/21/2020 10:36 AM Because it works. More councillors would be inefficient, fewer councillors would diminish representation, particularly with respect to minority interests. Anonymous It is fairly proportional compared to other Canadian cities, erring on the side City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 78 of 275 Page 359 of 936 8/21/2020 12:46 PM of more councillors per capita than average. Anonymous 8/21/2020 01:12 PM I believe 2 councillors per ward provides better access and responsiveness to the citizens of each ward; we should only consider more wards as the needs of the city grows. We should not reduce number of wards. Anonymous 8/21/2020 02:05 PM Allows for more diversity of thought. Could increase number of wards to 12 and decrease number of councillors per ward to one Anonymous 8/21/2020 04:14 PM There is good evidence that a decision-making group of about twelve is large enough to provide for a diversity of backgrounds and experience while allowing for effective one on one communication among the members of the group so differing points of view are understood before decisions are taken. Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:30 PM I think that shrinking the Council could lead to a loss of debate. I recognize that debate may be time consuming from a process point of view, but a smaller council increases the chances of homogeneity of thought and groupthink. At the same time, I recognize that increasing the council may unnecessarily complicate the decision making process. Anonymous 8/22/2020 09:58 AM Wards are based on population and are somewhat balanced. As Guelph grows and more wards are created, city council will grow, but the number of councillors/ward should remain at 2 = 12 councillors. 2 councillors/ward seem to provide good representation Anonymous 8/22/2020 11:15 AM Fewer voices would make it easier for a minority of voices to skew city planning, and also make it harder for them to respond to ward residents. This would be bad for ensuring bad ideas are avoided. Anonymous 8/23/2020 10:45 AM The number of councillors should be relative to the size of the population. For the current size of Guelph, 12 councillors is adequate. Anonymous 8/23/2020 04:15 PM I believe that the wards are small enough that council can get to know their communities. However, there may need to be some jigging of neighbourhoods to actually represent the numbers living there due to new subdivisions etc. Anonymous 8/23/2020 07:09 PM It is a good idea to have more than one councillor per ward. Anonymous 8/24/2020 07:38 AM This seems to work OK - too small means councillors are overworked and things get lost; too many and it becomes onerous to reach a consensus. Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:55 AM Two per ward makes sense in that there is a greater chance that someone is available to help their constituents and to provide a different perspective. Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:49 AM The number of Councillors is comparable to other similar sized municipalities that do not cover large rural areas (e.g. Chatham Kent) and it is highly representative. I have found my ward councillors to be extremely City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 79 of 275 Page 360 of 936 approachable and responsive to local issues. Anonymous 8/24/2020 12:58 PM I would only grow it if portions of the city or populace were under represented Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:44 PM As the city population grows this will still be a representative number as long as ward sizes (populations) are balanced accordingly. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:15 PM Make the positions full-time and the 12 councillors will focus better on city affairs, making a larger council unnecessary Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:16 PM The population is not declining, so why would we have fewer? And it's increasing slightly, but not extremely quickly. Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:01 PM 2 per ward seems to be working Anonymous 8/24/2020 04:15 PM I don't feel the size is the issue. I feel that the elected councilors pick and choose what constituents they represent. If there is no mechanism for accountability making council smaller or larger can still lead to ineffectiveness. Anonymous 8/24/2020 05:39 PM No need for more to represent Wards well. Anonymous 8/24/2020 06:19 PM I think it's important to have as many voices as possible in order to reduce bias. 12 or more would be great. Anonymous 8/24/2020 09:03 PM As long as each ward is equally represented, that seems right. Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:15 PM Since the heavy lifting is done by city staff, the current 12 (2 per ward) is sufficient. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:03 AM I feel that if councillors actively engage those within their wards on issues that affect their wards as well as the city as a whole including prospective building, commercial development, transportation, environment 12 is a sufficient number...or basically 2 reps per ward. I do believe though that candidates must reside in the ward they are running for. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:24 AM I am not sure what the correct citizen to councillor ratio should be, however we should not decrease citizen representation and access to their councillor. You will also see later that I am in favour for making these full-time positions. Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:38 AM Things are working well. There is a diversity of voices, each ward citizen has assigned councillors that they can reach out to specifically, who know the ward issues. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 80 of 275 Page 361 of 936 Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:57 AM I feel that 2 councillors per ward is a fair representation on behalf of the ward residents whose issues and concerns can be voiced effectively. Anonymous City is much larger and I think 2/ward is good. However, I think it was better many years ago when the aldermen represented the whole City. Undecided now which system would work better. Too many people will just make it impossible to get things done in a timely manner. too few will mean less representation for everyone and less new ideas. 12 was fine before, so I wouldn't change it. (But if you absolutely have to change it, I think adding one or two more councillors to balance out population growth is about as much of a change as would be reasonable.) If there were more councilors then the council could become difficult to manage. If there were fewer councilors then either the wards would need to be larger (keeping two councilors per ward but the councilors would be less representative of different demographics within the ward) or smaller (one councilor per ward but lots of small wards could be difficult to arrange) It seems to be working at the current size and with our budget restraints from COVID I don't think we should add additional financial burden. Decent number to represent variety of citizens and neighbourhoods, small enough to be workable and affordable 12 Councillors + Deputy Mayor + Mayor (All are Full Time) - Guelph Growing Seems to work well, if ward boundaries are adjusted to equalize number of eligible voters. The number reduces the ability for corruption of power and ensures that all communities have a say. I think a larger or smaller group would be less effective. I think two per ward is good enough, but the wards need to increase to well represent the current population, specially ward 6, too many people, too many projects, it would be best served if divided, or we go from 6 to (7-8) wards More than 12 is too expensive and too many people for meaningful debate and consensus 8/25/2020 08:53 AM Anonymous 8/25/2020 11:26 AM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:18 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:41 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:16 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:21 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:25 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:22 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:44 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:58 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:11 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:13 PM Because we need equal representation on conflicting issues City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 81 of 275 Page 362 of 936 Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:28 PM The population is growing but more in density than spread. 12 Local councillors can in theory, adequately represent their wards, recognizing that each ward is unique Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:34 PM If all 12 are good councillors then it should work. The big issue is Ward 1. It’s a big and very diverse Ward. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:31 PM I feel 2 councillors per ward is beneficial. If the number of wards changes, than the number of councillors should follow suit Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:55 PM Obviously a larger number would better represent the diversity of opinions and visions of the population, but I think 12+1 is an adequate size for Guelph. Anonymous 8/25/2020 09:06 PM Too many and voices get lost. Too few and voices will not be heard. Anonymous 8/25/2020 09:52 PM Honestly, I think 12 is a good number for a cross section of people. Anonymous 8/26/2020 06:58 AM I would consider adjusting ward boundaries to ensure the representation is equal first, and that councillors represent equal numbers of Guelphites. If the city has grown, then perhaps add another ward (and representatives). The city has different needs across the city, and I wouldn’t want to see the number reduced. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:27 AM A large representation of distinct neighbourhoods seems like a good way to ensure all voices and priorities of citizens are represented. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:04 AM Similar other council sizes of comparable cities. Allows for different perspectives while not having to many voices at the table (making it difficult to reach consensus and set an agenda). Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:31 AM There's no evidence that adding more councilors will achieve anything other than inflating the cost of town council. I don't want to see my property taxes go up so we can have more cronies just doing whatever the Mayor says. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:35 AM Our population doesn't warrant anymore. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:58 AM Each ward is already huge, so asking one person to cover a larger area would isolate even more people from the political process than currently are. Having two councillors in each ward means one can be a stiff and the ward is still represented (see current council) Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:44 AM A smaller council means less diversity in perspectives. Anonymous I think it enables issues to be debated fairly and then the decisions made are City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 82 of 275 Page 363 of 936 8/26/2020 12:36 PM based on the wants of Guelph not just certain neighborhoods. We are not a conservative city and therefore our municipal politics should align accordingly. Making our council smaller seems very reminiscent of Ford and his bid to centralize power. Our mayor should not decide things without being held accountable to the elected councillors. Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:10 PM Question #4 is not deceptively simple, it is in fact deceptive and leading. Ward systems demand that councillors are accountable to citizens in their wards while at-large has no such accountability. So, council size should be based on the number of wards with 2 councillors per ward plus the mayor. If there are more or less wards the council number would change accordingly. Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:22 PM It makes sense to have two councilors per ward. This also allows each ward to have both a man and a woman represent them. Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:32 PM It’s working. We have enough changing with over development and an unnecessary library. We need to have the same or more voices advocating for what the people in this city want and need/ don’t need Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:48 PM I don't believe we need more and yet would not want to see fewer - 6 wards, 2 per ward, 1 mayor. Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:59 PM My understanding is that each ward has representation, and that two councillors are elected per ward. I believe this allows for greater diversity. Anonymous 8/26/2020 06:50 PM It think is working well as is. This is a manageable number for debate and decision making. Everyone has their say. Each ward has 2 Councillors to represent their interest. I am definitely against reducing the number of Councillors. Our population is going to grow even more. This does not make sense. Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:32 PM I think 12 is already an adequate number to deal with council issues. Anonymous 8/27/2020 06:42 AM Cost Anonymous 2 representatives from each ward 8/27/2020 07:11 AM Anonymous 8/27/2020 10:15 AM Adding more voices does not always make it easier to make decisions or reach consensus around the table. I think you need to change boundaries as the city grows so about the same number of people are represented by each Councillor. Given our size I could see adding one more ward so going to 14 Councillors, but after that, just rezone the wards because more than 15 people would become unwieldy. Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:24 PM city not big enough yet to need more City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 83 of 275 Page 364 of 936 Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:36 PM The arrangement of two councillors per ward is good. However, one councillor per ward should be full time. Six full time and six part time councillors. Anonymous 8/28/2020 03:42 AM Increase decision-making and reduce arguments. Anonymous 8/28/2020 07:21 AM It's hard enough to get things to happen in Guelph adding more would be even more hassle Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:14 AM The current allocation of Councillors is about the middle of the pack in Ontario, which is where Guelph likes to be. The number of constituents currently in each Ward is pretty balanced: each Ward should have about 16% of the City's population and right now Wards 1, 2, 4 and 6 are within striking distance of that. The outliers are Wards 3 and 6, but neither enough to cause a great deal of concern to me at least. One of the challenges in changing Ward boundaries would be historical alliances or neighbourhood character. The current system reflects how the City has grown over the years. It also acknowledges the City's built and natural geography, which can be difficult to overcome. Most of the City's growth is scheduled to take place in Ward 6 but I don't think we are certain enough of the timing of that growth or the details to make wholesale changes to the size of Council. When growth in the South End is more on-track, I would support contemplating adding another Ward, but mathematical rigidity is not the only concern. Anonymous 8/28/2020 11:32 AM I think we need two from each ward so that they can share the work, and so that a variety of voices are present. I like that there is usually some new members while there is also some continuity. Anonymous 8/28/2020 12:00 PM Matches 6 wards Anonymous 8/28/2020 12:13 PM My actual answer isn't represented in the options. I think there should be 2 councillors from each ward, However, with the growth in our population, we may need to think about adding another ward, in which case it would be 14. I didn't select the first option, because I didn't want the results to suggest I am suggesting grow it larger just for the sake of it. I don't know yet whether another ward is justified Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:18 PM This allows for a good number without too many voices. 2 councillors per ward also allows for more than a single voice from each ward which is important to me. Anonymous 8/29/2020 04:14 AM Well, given growth in some areas, there may be a need for 2-4 more. but not a great number more. I really like the 2 councillor per ward system as it can bring more diversity in voices for each ward and to the city as a whole. I often vote for 2 very different people in my ward, because I have both progressive and conservative views on many subjects. As well, I think it City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 84 of 275 Page 365 of 936 allows councillors to act a bit as at-large and ward council. Anonymous 8/29/2020 06:15 AM Too few is not an effective representation of their community....how could they possibly serve their constituents? More than 12 and it's too cumbersome. Anonymous 8/29/2020 07:29 AM I think that 12 members is a larger number of people to make decisions and represent the city. If you think of same size corporations or larger, their leadership team is often smaller than this. At 12 members we have representation of just under 1 councillor per 12,000 residents which seems reasonable. However we need to review the # of wards and determine whether we still need 2 councillors per Ward. Anonymous 8/29/2020 08:12 AM The ratio of roughly 10,000 people per councilor is a reasonable one allowing access by citizens. Anonymous 8/29/2020 11:23 AM We are growing city Anonymous 8/29/2020 04:23 PM My general view is that more representatives per person is better, but what is most important to me is the current two-councillors-per-ward model, so I wouldn't want more councillors total if it meant changing that model Anonymous 8/29/2020 05:52 PM There are differences and differing needs of the diverse wards in the city. If we truly want councillors to understand the needs and specific issues of their constituents, ward representation is the way to go. It might even mean expanding council as Guelph grows. Anonymous 8/29/2020 08:30 PM I think you need at least 2 councillors per ward For cross coverage and more than one view on a ward issue; more than two becomes expensive; council shouldn’t increase in size as I think it’s already large for the size of the city Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:54 AM It works well now but I would be happy with more councillors added to meet population growth. Anonymous 8/30/2020 07:43 AM 12 +1 is an adequate number for Guelph's current and projected population, and the odd number makes ties impossible when members attend and vote. A larger council would make Guelph a target for downsizing by the Ford government in line with what it did to Toronto under applicable provincial legislation. Toronto now has one councillor per 100,000 residents. I think that is appalling, and I would hate to see the same kind of cuts imposed on Guelph or other municipalities. Anonymous 8/30/2020 11:29 AM I think that with 12 differing opinions, experiences, life purposes etc there is an abundance of ideas, philosophies, and representation. Anonymous 8/30/2020 12:09 PM The current ward system appears to represent the breadth of Guelph at the moment. I don't think it should be any smaller. If anything, it will need to grow as the city grows. We require representation and do not need to overwhelm our councillors with representing too many people in too broad an area. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 85 of 275 Page 366 of 936 Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:59 PM Because there are more opportunities to involve the general population in the decision-making process. If this doesn't happen then council can shrink in size. Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:46 PM It would be difficult to allow adequate diversity with fewer Councillors. I certainly would not make it bigger, though. Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:51 PM 12 is enough to make decisions, there are enough politicians at all levels of government. No need for more on public payroll. Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:57 PM More representation is never a bad thing. Smaller is def NOT better. Seems like keeping the way it is a good decision. I can’t see the point of shrinking it. Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:25 PM Although ward boundaries may have to change to take account of growth of populations in some wards, the two councillors per ward makes sense. Anonymous 8/30/2020 08:35 PM These are part-time position and should remain so. Having 2 councilors per ward means the work load can be shared and collaborate on how best to represent their constituents. Anonymous 8/30/2020 08:44 PM This is a good size to ensure representations yet small enough to be accountable. Anonymous 8/31/2020 06:27 AM The city of Guelph is required to increase significantly in size over the next 10 years; shrinking the council when the needs of the city will be increasing seems counterproductive. Anonymous 8/31/2020 06:58 AM Keep it at 12 and then perhaps expand two councillors (another ward) at a time if necessary as the city grows in population. 12 councillors seem to sufficiently cover the size of Guelph at the moment, but that could change. Also, presently we have some diversity on council, although I am hoping this increases. Diversity is incredibly important as the world goes through such changes. Every gender, and every person of colour should be given a fair chance to represent the city, and their part of the city. Fewer councillors/wards is the opposite of this and is taking council backwards to when few ruled many without truly representing who they were as people, and their needs. We need 6 wards, or more when we grow, and we are growBig. I equate going back to less councillors/wards with the introduction of amalgamation in Ontario. It is impossible to properly represent people in a very large area. There’s no chance to really help local neighbourhoods as you can with the number of wards we have now. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:25 AM I don't get the sense that the benefits of having more than 12 Councillors would outweigh the costs. To me, the issue is more about how the Councillors are chosen, and in particular, the way in which the ward boundaries are mapped out (e.g., Ward 6 is disproportionately large compared to the others but has the same number of Councillors). Anonymous Seems appropriate number for the size/population of City. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 86 of 275 Page 367 of 936 8/31/2020 10:28 AM Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:34 AM Unless Ward numbers change, the number of Councillors should remain the same. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:59 AM Removing councillors increases the burden on those remaining. Guelph is a decently sized city and the number of councillors currently seems appropriate. With the planned additional growth over the next 5-10 years, that number may need to be increased. Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:31 AM More councillors provide a better diversity of opinions on major issues. Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:08 PM seems to be working well. more councillors = significantly longer council meetings. less councillors = less opportunity to respond to residents' concerns. Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:14 PM This is a number which is small enough to have proper debates around the horseshoe. Many more councillors, and the debates will be even more unwieldy and difficult than they already are. This puts a lot of responsibility on individual councillors, however, as they're expected to represent up to 30,000 ppl each, so there's no way council can be shrunk. Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:26 PM Because we have grown in population and issues seem to be larger and more relevant than before Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:08 PM With current ward set up representation of 2 Councillors per ward seems appropriate. If a ward review of representation suggests additional wards be introduced to maintain representation equity across the City then Council numbers would grow to reflect the additional wards. Anonymous 8/31/2020 03:15 PM Unless a ward becomes to big to handle the number of constituents and perhaps should be split in two wards, the current model works fine from my perspective Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:28 PM I think that a larger Council is not needed for q city of our size, plus a 12 person council is just big enough that diversity can be achieved (without getting too big to work through conflict). Smaller would make council more inaccessible for poorer candidates (or candidates who aren't backed by wealthier supporters). Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:42 PM We don't need more people to argue decisions. We have enough on the council to make well balanced views heard Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:26 PM Provides a good number of councillors to sit on committees. Twelve wards would be small enough for personal engagement. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:42 PM Don’t want it to be less than a few controlling people get to decide for the citizen. Too many would cost the tax payers too much money. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 87 of 275 Page 368 of 936 Anonymous 9/01/2020 05:34 AM It is a reasonable amount for a city this size. Anonymous 9/01/2020 06:07 AM Simply because it appears to be working as far as size of Council...perhaps not distribution. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:45 AM As Guelph transforms in multiple ways (e.g. size, demographics, social/cultural) it is important that our Council be the steward in managing this change while having a "ear" close to residents' values, aspirations and needs. We need capable and compassionate Councilors who can understand and lead this change. It is difficult to attract Councilors with these qualities given the time commitment required to do the job right with limited compensation. So expanding the the number of Councilors exacerbates an already challenging situation. I prefer fewer highly qualified Councilors that are paid more to devote a full-time effort in this role. Anonymous 9/01/2020 11:07 AM It's been working fine. No need to fix what ain't broken. Certainly no need to make it any bigger. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:06 PM Very good representation at present for all areas of the city. Each ward is given good governance, as well as each councillor understands the needs of the area that they represent. Going to a smaller number of members would give credence to the argument that we would have to pay each elected official. This I strongly oppose as it would weaken the voice of the public in the guidance of our city. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:21 PM No particular rational to my decision. 12 people representing a population of 135,000 seems about right. Are their provincial standards for allocating the optimal size of councils/population? The one criterion that should be observed is that councillors must not be affiliated with any of the federal or provincial political parties. This should automatically disqualify them. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:40 PM It provides for a diversity of representation of constituent needs without being unwieldy in size. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:31 PM We need at least as many councellors to be able to address all of the concerns of the constituents Anonymous 9/01/2020 05:26 PM I like 2 reps per ward. I like the ward system. I feel better connected to my 2 councillors. Anonymous 9/01/2020 05:42 PM Ward System gives all parts of Guelph representation, hopefully those councillors are also thinking not city as a whole Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:25 PM Sufficiently large group for today’s size of city City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 88 of 275 Page 369 of 936 Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:30 PM I see no evidence that the current size does not work. Any larger we run the risk of an inability to function and smaller we run the risk lack of advocacy. 12 is roughly 1 councillor for every 10,000 residents... Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:39 PM if wards #s are unchanged, 2 councillors per ward seems ok. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:43 PM I think that it would make the city government less democratic if the number of councillors was decreased. There would likely be less direct contact because they would be busier. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:45 PM I think it is important to have multiple representatives for each ward to ensure all voices are being heard and shared. I think councillors should have fixed terms without renewals, as well to ensure that the citizenry is being represented and respected. No career councillors needed - they are less responsive and engaged. Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:07 PM Too many voices and nothing will get done, too few voices and special interests can take over more easily. 13 seems like a decent compromise. Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:14 PM It is okay as it is currently. In other questions I have commented on retaining two councillors per ward. It may one day be necessary to review the current wards and possibly chnage some boundaries and increase the number of wards which would increase the number of councillors. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:04 PM I don't see a reason to make it smaller, as it is I never see or hear from my representative at all. If made more than, then it will be more difficult to make decisions Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:08 PM Honestly who cares. This is a dumb question. The real question is how do we make the role of councillors more effective Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:51 AM Until I understand if their role is changing it is hard to determine if more are required Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:55 AM We do not need to add more layers of government and additional positions. We need the governments and council to be working together as a cohesive group. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:59 AM I think that wards should be decreased in size to represent the interests created by unique geographies of each neighbourhood. The values of my area are much different than the values of the furthest boundaries of my ward. I think a similar size council with smaller groups of constituents could more actively engage and represent populations. It would be amenable to see fewer councilors and more wards in my opinion. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:07 AM This seems on par with other same-sized municipalities and it seems to be working. It will also allow for wider representation. Smaller councils would offer less opportunities for diversity on the council and might leave some parts of the city or the community unrepresented. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 89 of 275 Page 370 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:19 AM 12 councilors representing the needs of approximately 130, 000 residents is reasonable. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:23 AM If more, less decisions will be made Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:50 AM I think that is a solid number, around 1 council member per 10,000 citizens seems about right. I feel like this is a good number in order to gain a variety of different ideas and perspectives on issues facing the city, but not too many that proper discussions are not hard to maintain, too many voices lead to a lot of chaos in discussion. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM Large enough for different viewpoints while manageable for discussion, debate and decision making. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM works well for the size of the wards. 2 councillors per ward allows for differing politics to be represented in the same ward Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:16 AM God number to make decisions Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:17 AM Given that Guelph is growing we cannot do with less representation. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:26 AM cost of the administration Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:44 AM number is associated with representing different perspectives on an issue; associated with members working with peer pressure in doing a 'good job' and working as part-time stewards of the city in a rapidly developing region. Acknowledges that the City is under tremendous growth pressure and balancing distinctiveness of place with a variety of interests is of upmost importance. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:16 AM the city is getting larger and we need enough councillors to cover a lot of issues. We need an odd number for voting purposes Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:19 AM I think it's hard for a group larger than 12/13 to effectively work together. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:23 AM Eliminate Ward 3 by increasing 2 and 4 with Woolwhich street as a dividing street. Divide wards 5 & 6 and a new ward 3 by population as perceived for 2041. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:33 AM I think the size is in keeping with similar cities and allows for adequate representation as the city grows. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 90 of 275 Page 371 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 10:24 AM I like the representation of 2 per ward but also like general ‘city wide’ reps. But also don’t think getting bigger than 12 is a good idea. So one per ward and then 6 city wide reps would make sense to me. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:02 AM FOR NOW 12 seems sufficient. As the city quickly grows, more would be a good idea. Wards should not be so populous that people cannot connect with their Councillors. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:32 AM I'm not adamant about this - maybe council should be larger - definitely not smaller. But 12 is a manageable size from the point of view of decision- making, large enough to give voice to a diversity of views. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:32 AM Is fair for the population. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:40 AM I feel that Councillors should represent each ward to justly represent concerns of residents in that ward. There are too many concerns in a city for concerns to be made and managed generally by city council. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:44 AM More becomes unwieldy. Less wouldn't accommodate population growth Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:45 AM It represents the entire city Anonymous 9/02/2020 12:24 PM this city can not afford to pay for full time councillors, taxes are very high, with little return. Anonymous 9/02/2020 12:40 PM Appears to work right now Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:04 PM Allows for 2 councillors per ward. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:31 PM When you get past a group of a dozen people it can get pretty unwieldy in terms of group dynamics. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:46 PM Size is appropriate so far. May require increasing if the city continues to grow. Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:41 PM Too big, too expensive, more time wasted with too many opinions! If 12 was enough to proclaim Christianity in Jewish state, it is enough for Guelph to cover all religious beliefs! Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:58 PM The existing system works Anonymous The City is growing quickly and councillors representing approximately 11K City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 91 of 275 Page 372 of 936 9/02/2020 04:31 PM citizens seems reasonable. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:20 PM A larger size will make meetings more cumbersome. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:32 PM I think it can function best with twelve councillors, enough to represent the citizens of Guelph but not too many that decisions can't be made in a timely fashion. Also I don't think we need to pay for more than twelve. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:28 PM It’s important that there are two councillors per ward. They can work together as a team. As the city grows and more wards are added then the number of councillors will need to increase. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:37 PM Seems reasonable for the size of city we have. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:15 PM Seems to be working well. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:51 PM The mayor should only vote in a tie Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:08 PM I haven't had any issues with there being 12 councillors so I see no reason to change it. Changing the number of councillors without a good reason would add unnecessary work to change the administration of the city. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:07 AM It seems appropriate based on the current population and size Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:42 AM Don’t need more expenses. Adding people adds to less work being accomplished and increases drama. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:23 AM Twelve is large enough to represent various viewpoints but not so large as to get bogged down when making decisions. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:11 AM Obviously because this is the correct choice. Anonymous 12 is good I Think we need same size to get different opinions and views. More councillors will be burden on city tax payers and sometimes it be hard to get things done. 9/03/2020 07:27 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 08:55 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:15 AM Cities of comparable size seem to manage. Twelve seems to allow for good diversity of opinion and is a manageable number for meetings. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 92 of 275 Page 373 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:22 AM Keep costs lower Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:23 AM There is a lot going on for a city this size. 12 allows us to grow and to create efficiencies for greater capacity without adding people. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:35 AM 2/Ward makes sense to me. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:42 AM Need representation in each part of Guelph. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:59 AM I think this would work for a hybrid system. 6 ward councillors and 6 at large, or 8 ward councillors and 4 at large. Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:00 AM I feel considering the current population size that 2 Councillors per ward is sufficient. I would not be opposed to adding 6 Councillors (3 per ward) once we have a population that surpasses 150,000 Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:37 AM Why not? I see no compelling reasons to change it. Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:51 AM We have 6 wards, 2 councillors each Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:37 PM Guelph is growing and 2 representations for each ward makes sense. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:05 PM More people less effective decision making Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:08 PM The city is getting bigger not smaller. It is inevitable that we will need more counselors in the future so why shrink it now? Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:54 PM Two councillors per ward allows for greater representation and diversity of opinion. It increases the availability of these councillors to engage with citizens. The mayor should act as a mediator for the different policy positions that each councillor provides and works to build concensus through compromise. NOT build consensus through the creation of partisan politics and guaranteed voting patterns. Ideally each ward is represented by two councillors that provide two different perspectives of their particular constituents. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:16 PM 2 ward councillors mean you likely have one advocate. Wards are manageable sizes. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 93 of 275 Page 374 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:48 PM Would like to see wards split, so instead of 2 for each ward, q for each smaller ward. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:02 PM Might need to grow as population grows but need two councillors per ward to have proper representation. Anonymous 9/03/2020 07:15 PM I am not overly concerned with the exact size. 12 seems reasonable, maybe a bit bigger. It needs to be big enough so that it can be representative of various interests. It also needs to be big enough to allow an electoral system where more than one seat is up for election in each ward, otherwise we will not get a representative council. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:52 PM I feel the council size can properly represent the population of Guelph and taxpayers cannot efforts large tax increases for additional salaries Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:00 PM Number is reasonable but time for full time 12. We can expect them to do more. Pay more for full time and interest in running will increase growing the talent pool Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:52 PM guelph has grown constantly over the decades, which means there is no case for decreasing the number of councillors. you need a reasonable number to express opinions both personnal and public. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:02 PM Providing the ward populations are relatively similar two Councillors should be able to effectively address and represent citizen concerns. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:26 PM In line with the council sizes of other communities of similar size in Ontario. The wards should be broken into smaller units though, 1 councillor per ward. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:57 AM More councillors make it harder for a consensus to pass policy, not worth the extra salary since we already have good representation. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:07 AM Each ward is well-represented with 2 councillors who can share responsibilities and develop areas of expertise Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:10 AM Because we are well represented by the current approach. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:15 AM Larger Councils are cumbersome. Keep it the same size but redistribute Ward boundaries, so that Councillors roughly have the same number of constituents to deal with. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:14 AM Changing it would cost too much and would be a huge hassle. Why are we even considering this? Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:21 AM Should** be a well-functioning and diverse team. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 94 of 275 Page 375 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:23 AM We have been able to afford this number so far Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:32 AM 2 councillors per ward makes it easier for people to contact a representative when they need help. It is a large load to place on only 1 person. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:33 AM It is a reasonable number of individuals to connect with citizens in a city of this population and size. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:44 AM I like the idea of two part time Councillors per ward and 6 wards. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:05 AM It is important to have more than 1 represent the best interests of each ward. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:16 AM We seem to be working just fine the way we are. Now is not the time to expand and increase our costs. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:20 AM reducing the size would hand more voting power to the mayor. increasing the size would add complexity and cost. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:33 AM I think this is a good size for ensuring proper checks and balances and ensuring effective decision making Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:43 AM This is a tough question to select one answer for. I believe that the current size of COuncil is just about right and the costs associated with is are perfectly reasonable to ensure citizens democratic representation. We do need ot be cognizant that as the population of Guelph grows there may be a need to increase the number of Councilors t ensure adequate representaiton Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:45 AM To mitigate financial waste. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:47 AM The only reason to change the present situation is if another ward is required to address the increase in population. Change for change sake in this crucial COVID scene is totally irresponsible! Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:07 AM Regardless of the number of wards there should always be two elected from each ward in the event an individual is not effective. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:13 AM 2 councilors per ward offer the council a good balance between the public facing aspects of engagement, advocacy and the governance aspects of policy and administration. Too few councilors means we will get more of one or the other. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:02 AM There are currently 2 Councillors for each of the 6 wards. This allows for the breadth of opinion in the community so that a broad spectrum of ideas and City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 95 of 275 Page 376 of 936 positions are represented in all of the wards. If you don;t like the positions of one Councillor in your ward, you can always speak to someone who might be more in tune with your positions. The ward system was put in place to deal with nepotism issues that appeared to have plagued council in the past (prior to 1996). It encouraged local people to run for office and encouraged those with modest means to take on community leadership roles. This is an important aspect of the ward system and I strongly support retaining it. Currently the ward populations are not entirely equal - but the differentials are not huge and ensuring all those who are eligible to vote (Canadian citizens) would help. In addition there needs to be a look at the boundaries to help move us towards more equal population bases in each ward - this needs to be done with care. We have a recent example of a publicly funded provincial crown corporation - Metrolinx coming to Guelph and indifferently cutting a community in half (the Dublin street rail crossing closure with NO consultation). I expect the staff of the city of Guelph to behave respectfully to all members of the communities they engage with in review ward boundaries and that those consultations will be open and transparent (there is an excellent community engagement policy in place to provide guidance for how to do that). We have one mayor and that it how it should be. The mayor only has one vote, however the position has enormous positional power - which was designed to have whoever is in that role work with all Councillor members to ensure that there is a balanced and fair decision making process in place for all issues. When the role is interpreted this way it works really well and I see no valid reason to change it. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:06 AM To many hands in the pot , makes things more complicated . Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:08 AM Good ratio of residents to reps Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:18 AM it works Anonymous 2 from each Ward is good representation. Lessening it may make decisions faster, but less accurately. Increasing it only bogs down the process. - to increase the size would be more expensive I like 2 councillors per ward plus Mayor. Assuming the current size of council takes Guelph's future growth into consideration, this current set up is fine. 9/04/2020 10:25 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:32 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:56 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:56 AM 2 per ward for 6 wards or 1 per ward with 12 wards gives better representation for each areas taxpayers. As long as its part time. If they change to full time then cut it in half. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 96 of 275 Page 377 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:14 AM Manageable. Anonymous 9/04/2020 12:00 PM Enough representation from Each community Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:03 PM It works well Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:43 PM The number of councilors should be representative of the population. 12 Councillors is roughly 1 Councillor per 10,000 people which seems reasonable. The council size should grow as the City of Guelph grows. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:47 PM We are a small city so we do not need more than 12 councilors, but it is important to have diverse voices and perspectives on council so shrinking the size could limit that potential. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:20 PM Because a larger Council would prevent the lively debates and discussions that are now often a feature of Council meetings. Too many Councillors would mean that some can sit back and be silent, or cannot get an opportunity to speak. Twelve is a good number for community meetings. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:43 PM Same size council. Smaller wards. Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:05 PM Otherwise you risk having a council of like minded one side council Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:07 PM Wider diversity of thought and perspective, allowing for better decision making. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:36 PM It seems to me that it is hard enough to get 12 Councillors to agree on anything - they are usually bent on getting their opinion heard rather than looking at the citizens desires - you increase the number there will be more disagreement and less co-operation. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:56 PM I think the city is well represented by the number we have now Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:13 PM Keep the number of Councillors the same at 12 Councillors, but make the job full-time. This will increase the quality of democratic representation without increasing the number of wards or Council positions. 12 Councillors allows for 2 per ward under the current system. This has worked well for our City. 12 Council representatives plus the Mayor enables us to achieve a diversity of age, gender, ethnic diversity and socio-economic diversity (among a number of things) that reflects the make-up of our community. Retaining 12 councillors, 2 per ward, will allow us to keep our current system of 6 wards. While the boundaries will need to be adjusted to account for population City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 97 of 275 Page 378 of 936 growth, I would suggest that the Wards as they exist have developed collective identities over the past 30 years and that this social/cultural history should be respected. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:18 PM Assuming the number of wards remains at 6, having 2 Councillors per ward gives citizens choice when it comes to constituency work, should there be any dissatisfaction with one of their Councillors. It also gives citizens the option of influencing the political makeup of Council by electing candidates from across the political spectrum. E.g., in the last municipal election I purposely voted for a candidate on the 'left' and another from the 'right' in the hope that the two points of view would be aired in Council's discussions and decisions. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:15 PM Decision making becomes more difficult if too many people are around the table. 12 seems to be an efficient number for decision making. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:26 PM Our city council works in a balanced way right now. There are 2 representatives for each ward and that improves the opportunity for more views to be represented. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:21 PM If it isn't broke, don't fix it. If there is to be a review of council composition, don't do it in the middle of a pandemic. If, for example, the south end population explodes in the next 4 years, by all means, do a proper review. But for now, the differences in ward size (geographic) and population are not enough to trigger a review. Furthermore, I don't believe that the citizens are the driving force of this review. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:59 PM It's a number that works. Larger becomes too many voices. Fewer leads to lack of access due to having too much on their plate. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:27 PM Seems to work well right now but city is growing to 190,000 people by 2040 so may have to increase size to ensure representation is fair. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:02 PM It seems an appropriate sized table for a city our size Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:06 PM The number of people elected to council plus the mayor is fine, however wards should be split by population in order to ensure greater representation by a single councilor Optional question (280 response(s), 376 skipped) Question type: Essay Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 98 of 275 Page 379 of 936 Q10 From your perspective as a citizen, which way of electing Councillors do you think makes the most sense for the City of Guelph? 435 (66.3%) 435 (66.3%) 75 (11.4%) 75 (11.4%) 136 (20.7%) 136 (20.7%)3 (0.5%) 3 (0.5%)7 (1.1%) 7 (1.1%) Local, “ward” based elections where you can only vote for the candidates running in your part of the city, with the exception of the mayor who is elected city wide. City-wide, “at-large” elections where everyone can vote for candidates from the whole pool of candidates. A mixed system with some ward voting and some general voting. Some councillors would be elected for wards and others city wide. It doesn't matter to me I am not sure Question options Mandatory Question (656 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 99 of 275 Page 380 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:41 AM If they live in my ward they should have a better understanding of issues in my ward. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 AM Provides access to councillor who can be expected to be knowledgeable about ward & able to consider/balance with what is best for entire community Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:19 AM you can contact someone to represents your local needs. I feel downtown has much different needs than a more suburban area. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:52 AM Ward councillors can focus on issues specific to a ward (e.g., community centre need) while balancing overall needs of the city. Anonymous 8/17/2020 10:08 AM Residents should have someone who lives in their part of the city that is able to advocate on their behalf. At-large elections typically favour incumbents, as people will usually just vote for familiar names. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:10 AM More focus on citizen representation. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:27 AM City council is not particularly useful as formulated already. Diluting local/ward-based input would make it even more irrelecant Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:15 PM More effective representation of local Ward issues. Anonymous 8/17/2020 12:23 PM Force the candidate to work in their ward rather than be popular city wide. The point of the ward system is to make sure the citizens have a voice on the council. So the candidate should be working in the ward to get the votes. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:15 PM Different parts of the city have different experiences in the city. It's important to have people that reflect those different experiences negotiating with each other when they make decisions. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:33 PM If we had smaller wards that had 1 Councillor then more can be done on the ground and representation of neighborhoods would be maintained. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:15 PM This would mean better representation of the diverse areas of Guelph. If councillors serve at-large, what's to say they won't all be from the same area of Guelph? Councillors from the south-end wouldn't understand the needs of downtown and vice-versa. Anonymous They will act in my wards interest Q11 From your perspective as a citizen of Guelph, what would be some advantages of having local WARD elections for city Councillors? City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 100 of 275 Page 381 of 936 8/17/2020 01:47 PM Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:28 PM Local representation. It’s only natural that there will be times that there is a conflict between the needs of one ward over another ward. It’s only good and fair practice that each ward have a local representative to speak for their ward at council. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:00 PM You would have a member of your community area on the council who would truly understand the area and could more easily meet with members of the community at town halls etc. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:04 PM easier to get rid of the non performers Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:17 PM In Ward 6 we have some very specific issues that require the specific focus of our councilors — intensification corridor, student housing issues, traffic to 401 etc. I am not sure that a more general councilor could be as laser- focused on these very real issues for residents in Ward 6. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:43 PM To the extent that Councillors are expected to represent the concerns of citizens, it makes sense to have Councillors attached to a particular community. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:48 PM Due to the size of Guelph and what the city takes care of, I don't believe that there are many Guelph wide issues that require 'at-large' councillors. I would want to see how 'at-large' councillors have worked in other similar sized cities. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:49 PM Each neighbourhood in Guelph has very unique and distinctive needs and challenges. Evidence for this statement can be seen in the neighbourhood groups formed both within and without the Guelph Neighbourhood Support Coalition. Equating the affluence of the Exhibition Park or Old University neighbourhoods with the economic situation of Onward Willow, for example is ridiculous. Westminster Woods and Clairfields struggled for years and years to get sufficient shopping development in the form of local grocery stores, whereas central and Western neighbourhoods had plenty. Grange Hill East is still stuck with a single low-end grocery store. Transit is another resource that is unevenly distributed and non-optimized in terms of connecting workers between the area they live and their place of work. In terms of workload for the councillors, it does not make sense to have 16 or even 12 councillors who are each individually expected to represent 131,000+ residents. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:51 PM Ward councillors are more interested in what is happening around them. Anonymous 8/17/2020 04:57 PM Accountable and available to someone in their area. Anonymous I think it's important for a city ward to have neighbourhood representation. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 101 of 275 Page 382 of 936 8/17/2020 06:11 PM Their city council member should be someone who lives in the ward they represent and understands the issues of that particular area. Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:38 PM Responsible to neighbourhood and more knowledgeable about specific areas, dont have to be expert everywhere, thus able to be part time Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 PM Someone you can contact directly regarding any concerns Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:33 PM Clear voice for the people and balance those placed to create views and clear planning Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:44 PM - lower financial/time barrier for candidates to run a campaign - division of labour, councillors spending at least some of their time/attention on hyper local issues instead of all trying to address every issue - less chance of a few active groups monopolizing the time/attention of the entire council Anonymous 8/17/2020 10:36 PM i like have ward representives who live in my ward know my ward intimately and therefore have affection for it. and work harder for it. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:31 AM Guelph is (still) a city of neighbourhoods. If we were to lose ward representation, then the only voices would be those who view the city as something to be homogenized. The value of the city is in its neighbourhoods. I don't want to live in a faceless suburb. Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:03 AM - understanding of local, neighbourhood issues; good relationship with residents so that neighbourhood/ward voice makes it to council. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:39 AM ward's make it easier to represent a smaller community...more understanding of needs and also a chance to get to know a ward population more than "worrying" about a larger demographic and region Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:59 AM Councillors can better represent the specific topics, needs and concerns of their ward. For example, the south end has different key needs and issues than the downtown core. Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:02 AM Smaller pool of candidates to research and get to know before an election. Also makes one-on-one contact easier with ward councillors (whether one or two per ward). At large only good for larger rural communities. Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:51 AM Presumably this person should be better connected to the realities of my local environment and more accessible than someone who resides elsewhere and who is 'flown in'. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:06 AM Local advocacy. Councillors should feel responsible to their entire ward. At- large structures can create a system where a geographically small area can have a disproportionate voice on council, and could lead to neglect in other areas. Anonymous be a voice for your ward and represent your citizens City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 102 of 275 Page 383 of 936 8/18/2020 09:08 AM Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:18 AM Different areas of Guelph have different needs, so their councillor should understand what to advocate for on behalf of their constituents Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:29 AM They should be able to represent and speak for their neighbours Anonymous 8/18/2020 11:01 AM Having elected Councillor by Ward gives citizens clarity on who to discuss local issues with. Councillors in their Ward would be the most familiar with the issues in their area to highlight to city council. Anonymous 8/18/2020 11:58 AM As a local citizen representing me in my ward, they are my neighbours with the same interests and concerns for my ward. Anonymous 8/18/2020 01:15 PM Greater connections to the communities they are elected in. Guelph has rich and diverse wards with completely different needs. There is something to be said for being able to dedicate yourself to that connection and getting to know a smaller handful of residents and their needs. Anonymous 8/18/2020 12:38 PM Accountability Anonymous 8/18/2020 02:48 PM One gets to know the councillor better, since they probably live in the ward. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:05 PM You have one contact for your concerns (if you have one full time time councilor). With 2 part time councilors per ward, communications from citizens go to both councilors and double the work. If you have at-large councilors, every citizen concern will go to the mayor cc every Councillor and no one have specific responsibility to help. "When everyone is responsible, no one is responsible" Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:18 PM It ensures the unique needs of each ward are understood and represented. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:51 PM Hopefully the individual would be required to live in the ward they represent creating greater accountability and awareness to local needs of residents. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:10 PM First off, if it stays as Ward based, I feel that the Councillors must reside in the Ward that they run in/represent. If they move during their term, fine but they need to run in the ward they live in for the next election. Reason being is if you reside in that Ward you have a vested interest on improving the area in which you and your family live in. City wide would loose the connection with the citizens in a smaller area Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:58 PM Councillors lives as my neighbour and lives the problems City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 103 of 275 Page 384 of 936 Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:15 PM They represent the interests of their ward. Anonymous 8/19/2020 05:36 AM Greater diversity of candidates. More accessible local government. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:01 AM There is a known and definable point of contact for citizens. The real problem comes when your Councillors don't even connect back with you. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:27 AM truly local candidate - more investature in Ward issues, easier for candidate to run Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:49 AM They are the folks that will represent you. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:57 AM Improves the engagement and advocacy of a councillor when they are local to the area and understand its unique challenges. With purely at-large voting, uneven population growth can lead to some areas of the city having a louder voice than others. Anonymous 8/19/2020 11:47 AM Knowledge of issues in a specific geographic area. Greater engagement and relatability with Ward councillors. Anonymous 8/19/2020 11:54 AM A couple of main advantages: having councillors elected from wards means residents know who to contact with their local concerns; and representing a ward means council candidates don't have to mount a city-wide campaign, making it less daunting to run for council and making it more likely that people with a wide range of backgrounds will seek office and get elected. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:08 PM Each ward has its own challenges and is best represented by someone from that area of Guelph. Anonymous 8/19/2020 03:42 PM I would know my own Councillor and they would be more familiar with the local issues in the area in which I live. Anonymous 8/19/2020 05:15 PM The council member lives in and advocates for their ward and taking into account city needs as a whole Anonymous 8/19/2020 06:10 PM Councilors know the ward, and its residents. Accountability. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:42 PM Direct understanding of issues in each area, councillors must live in this boundary Anonymous cause i don't care about who is not in my ward City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 104 of 275 Page 385 of 936 8/20/2020 04:43 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 06:01 AM Representatives that understand and share particular concerns. Anonymous Neighbourhood representation Have someone you feel you can contact directly who understands your neighbourhoods unique needs Residents know who exactly to contact on City Council if they have a need/question. This will also prevent Councillors who have a greater name recognition from being overtasked with requests. The advantage of having a ward election would be that the councillor would represent their citizens. This rarely happens though. The councillor usually does whatever they want, not what the citizens in the ward want. easier to know candidates and better for work on local issues. Better accountability This ward system should allow a citizen to speak to their council member vs being a voice in a crowd idea Clarifies specific responsibilities of representation for councillors in addition to their role representing the city at large. Allows clear avenues for resolution of more isolated issues by neighborhood. Ensures some amount of representation for wards whose issues/politics may differ from the city at large. Reduces burden of information among options necessary to be an informed voter. Ability to research indvidual candidates without party/open partisan affiliations is important. Councils will represent the Ward. They are more approachable. each ward needs to have a kind of relationship with it's counselor. No more ivory tower. That counselor should be living in that ward and easily accessible. This needs to be done to keep accountability. I believe it makes the councillors more accountable to their ward. In cities like Vancouver that has an at-large system, there is very little engagement between the citizens and their local council. There is a sense at the citizen level of not having the ear of their local government. 8/20/2020 08:42 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:45 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:15 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:01 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:52 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 12:57 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 03:35 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 05:40 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 07:22 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:28 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:33 PM Have each areas best interests addressed City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 105 of 275 Page 386 of 936 Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:40 AM Neighborhood concerns are represented. Anonymous 8/21/2020 07:00 AM we need to be represented by people who live in the area, and are dedicated to listening to and promoting the interests of those people. at large is not responsive to the parts, and too focused on the whole. the whole comes from and with the parts. Anonymous 8/21/2020 08:12 AM More responsive to the needs of individual communities. More opportunities for relatable politics/representatives and local participation. Anonymous 8/21/2020 08:38 AM more citizen access to council work, councillors better able to attend to constituent needs; more efficient campaigning because a smaller population needs to be contacted, listened to and citizens can know the candidates better Anonymous 8/21/2020 10:36 AM Everyone has 2 councillors who understand and can speak their issues, because they represent a specific area. Anonymous 8/21/2020 12:46 PM It helps "chunk" issues by councillor so that they can focus on certain areas of town, and don't have to be perfectly knowledgeable about the entire city. Anonymous 8/21/2020 01:12 PM Only way to ensure the voices of that ward are heard; no need for “councillors at large” (who do they represent anyway?) Anonymous 8/21/2020 02:05 PM Councillor more focused on issues important to ward. But I expect them to also be mindful of city wide issues and governance. I lived through Guelph's at large system. It was sadly a mess. The council was very pariochial and divisive. Anonymous 8/21/2020 04:14 PM The at large system of election generates multiple-term councillors based on name recognition - a bad outcome. A mixed election system leads to an unwarranted sense of superiority of the at-large- elected councillors. Having only ward-based councillors promotes equality . Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:30 PM Order of preference 1) ward based, 2) mixed and 3) city-wide. I think it's important to recognize that there are distinct communities within Guelph that have varied interests. My concern is that in the case of city-wide elections, there would be an overrepresentation of individuals from privileged positions that do not have the experience or knowledge of the needs of individuals from diverse areas of city. Ideally, all councillors would work in the best interest of all citizens in Guelph. However, I believe that a Ward-based system is the best way to ensure fair representation for all. Anonymous 8/22/2020 09:58 AM Councillors are more likely to be knowledgeable and interested in issues in their neighborhood. They will be more familiar with the residents and more likely to advocate for their community Anonymous Having councillors that actually understand the context of residents, ensuring City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 106 of 275 Page 387 of 936 8/22/2020 11:15 AM a major subset of the population isn't neglected and ignored Anonymous 8/22/2020 11:26 AM Ward voting allows for an advocate for respective sections of the City. With general overall voting, the councillors can and will focus solely on the downtown core and make decisions accordingly. Eg. Instead of building a new arena in the west end that would have been larger and have available parking and no cost to taxpayer, the decision was made to place one downtown, much smaller, with no parking and at a substantial cost to all taxpayers. This seems to be repeating itself with a very expensive, new library downtown, removing parking, at substantial cost to taxpayers, at a time when all residents are facing their own income loss. This is not the time for a new library. Anonymous 8/23/2020 10:45 AM The councillor is responsible to the citizens in his or her ward. Anonymous 8/23/2020 04:15 PM Personal contact and involvement Anonymous 8/24/2020 07:38 AM It ensures that local issues don't get lost when one area or subject becomes a hot topic. It is easier to involve people locally when you have a local representative as well. Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:36 AM As a per of the ward they would have better understanding of the requirments of their ward Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:55 AM Understanding of the issues of that ward and knowledge of the history of the area. Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:26 AM Keep the ward system! Local representation is crucial. The city web site lists some supposed "advantages" of an at-large system. 1. "Electors have greater choice". Well, yes ... but it is not a choice that we need or want. I used to live in Vancouver, which has an at-large municipal election system. On election day, I was given a ballot paper as long as my arm, with more than 100 candidates running for ten positions. No-one bothers to study the qualifications of 100 diffeent candidates! So the “greater choice” becomes an obstacle, not an advantage. Either the election turns into a lottery, with many voters simply checking off the names from the top of the alphabetical list (a great advantage for Mr Abercrombie but an impossible hurdle for Ms Worthington!); or else the candidates form political parties, and most voters just vote for the candidates on their preferred party. The result is intense politicization and partisanship. 2. “Residents will have a larger number of councillors to approach with their concerns.” This is misleading. Yes, one will be able to “approach a larger number of councillors” ... and so will every other resident of Guelph! The result will surely be less, not more, opportunity for citizens to have personal interactions with Councillors. 3. “The system promotes the concept of a municipal-wide focus ... rather than placing a City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 107 of 275 Page 388 of 936 priority on more parochial interests.” It is unfair to describe ward interests as “parochial”. The concerns of residents in particular wards can be very different, and for understandable reasons. Each ward has a distinctly different character. Recognizing these differences via ward representation is not “parochial” - it is an expression of respect for diversity! Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:35 AM Reasons outlined in background documents, including reducing barriers to entry, proximity to the people being represented, less duplication of effort. The needs of the wards in Guelph can be quite distinct, it is valuable to have a councillor who is aware and advocates for the needs of each specific area. Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:49 AM Personal connection between residents and ward councillors. Ward councillors live in the neighbourhood. Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:51 AM they are truely representatives. It helps ensure that the councilor knows and understands the issues of the ward they are elected in. Anonymous 8/24/2020 12:58 PM There is one point person to advocate for the constituents of their ward. One main point of contact . much like an MP for Parliament Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:39 PM Having local ward elections is more personal because in our city some issues to ward 4 and 6 will differ and as such ward elections are best to represent those differences Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:48 PM More in tune with neighbourhood issues, accountable to a smaller group of people so in theory fewer conflicting interests Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:59 PM Different areas of our city are different from each other and have unique needs. The ward system ensures citizens from diverse parts of the city are represented. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:16 PM A councillor for a Ward can get to know that area intimately, the specific issues in that area, the general views of the population in that area... And we, the voters can get to know our councillors well, knowing whether we will, or will not, vote for them again. Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:00 PM it ensures that local concerns are properly reflected, and provides accountability for this; having any at large members of council (other than the mayor) also opens up the door to political party based alliances- we get enough of this at the provincial and federal level, and I don't want to see that here Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:37 PM I perceive I have a relationship with our local councillors. I believe that municipal politics is the learning ground for a more participatory democracy. I have not experienced councillors who are parochial in their thinking, Instead they look at what is good for Guelph as a whole. Anonymous 8/24/2020 04:25 PM some of the advantages, 1) they know the hood 2) easy to find them if needed, they have a sincere concern for the ward and 3) flip the question, the disadvantages are countless, you fill in the blanks, another dum question, City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 108 of 275 Page 389 of 936 Anonymous 8/24/2020 05:39 PM Ability to know your councillor and get response when concerns. That councillors knows and lives in the ward and knows issues. Personal approach. Anonymous 8/24/2020 06:00 PM Guelph has expanded radically over the past 35 years — so the reasons why citizens fought long and hard to switch to a ward system are even more valid: one area’s concerns are not the other areas. The previous system didn’t ensue that all regions were represented at Council so many weren’t. Also, the ward system has fostered more gender diversity and is more likely to create a diverse Council than the at-large system. The at-large system also makes money more of an influence, as running a city-wise electoral campaign is far more expensive. Anonymous 8/24/2020 07:57 PM They should live in the Ward they serve in order to understand the issues of that ward. Never should a councillor be elected to represent a ward that they do not live in. Anonymous 8/24/2020 08:27 PM Ward councilors can represent more local interests and debate them with councilors from other wards. General councilors would not be tied to the interests of particular wards, raising the danger that the interests of some wards, especially the poorer wards, would be overlooked. Anonymous 8/24/2020 09:03 PM Not all neighborhoods would run candidates. Elites from wealthier wards could win all the seats. All neighborhoods deserve equal representation. Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:15 PM Better representation of citizen concerns, More manageable for councillors. Easier for citizens to identify who to contact with concerns. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:03 AM IF councillors truly engaged residents of the wards and lived in the wards they aim to represent, I feel they would be in the best position to understand the needs of that region. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:24 AM We need diversity and representation of all areas and all citizens of Guelph. The at-large system will simply turn into a popularity / party politics which is what we DO NOT WANT. There is no space for party politics in city representation. Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:38 AM Local ward elections means that we are electing local councillors who know who we are and who we all know. If there were general councillors, communications would be all mixed up and some councillors would be more stretched than others based upon their communication strategy. It is also likely that those 'popular' councillors would not be representative of the population of Guelph and therefore our concerns would be filtered through the interpretation of someone who doesn't represent us. Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:57 AM The local WARD elections provides an opportunity for the elected candidates to bring forward the concerns of the ward residents in an effective way as they can relate to the issues first hand. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:03 PM The Ward system has increased diversity on council and provides a far better representation of each area in the city. Under the former at-large system, City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 109 of 275 Page 390 of 936 which was scrapped in the early 90s, most councillors were white men living in downtown. (Now there more women, still white though.) • Let's keep the Ward system and consider making city councillors full time and/or increasing the numbers, because the city is growing quickly – about 40% from when our current system was implemented. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:09 PM Each area of a city is unique and has its own strengths and challenges. It feels good as a citizen to be represented locally. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:09 PM This way I know who I can speak to and that person would be able to focus on advocating for me and my neighbours. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:18 PM Councilors represent the views of the people of that ward. The councilors are hopefully local to the ward they represent. The councilors know more about the issues within the ward they represent. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:27 PM Local representation Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:31 PM Responsiveness. If we moved to an at-large system, I feel as though there would be less responsiveness to hyper-local issues. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:36 PM Retains a sense of neighbourhood and sensitivity to local concerns, while simultaneously acting on behalf of the City at large. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:41 PM They are more in tune with what is going in that specific area of Guelph and could speak to it better. Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:16 PM If councillors live in the wards they represent, the neighbourhoods will have their unique needs brought to city hall, more diversity in council, Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:22 PM Most Councillors will live in the ward they represent and will be better able to understand its citizens concerns. Anonymous 8/25/2020 02:45 PM I think ward based elections allows a clearer responsibility and advocacy point of contact for residents when an issue arises - I know who to call and feel less like the issue can be passed to any number of Councillors as with an at large system. Wards ideally align with community neighbourhoods and identity to allow more direct representation of the opportunities and challenges faced in my ward. Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:16 PM councillors are more connected to specific needs and issues in particular areas of city councillors live in all parts of the city (ideally if they live in the ward they represent) Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:21 PM Council know the residence of their area/territory and their requirements and same way the residence know their Councilors and how to contact them. Easily accessible and available. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 110 of 275 Page 391 of 936 Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:32 PM Different areas have varied needs and it’s better to have accountability for them. Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:42 PM Different wards have different priorities, it is important that representation is by someone who lives in the neighbourhood Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:22 PM Representation. Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:28 PM As Guelph continues to grow, ward representation will be important to ensure the interests and needs of the various neighbourhood are being met. Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:44 PM Every region of Guelph would be guaranteed representation Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:58 PM Majority of people will be better represented if they vote for their councillor rather than have no choice but to vote by a team, citizens might not necessarily agree with the team composition Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:11 PM Different areas of the city have different make-ups and issues. Having someone familiar with the specific issues in an area is most beneficial. Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:13 PM Conflicting needs ie the parking bylaws being applied to support new neighbourhoods while at the detriment of older neighbourhoods Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:28 PM Additional representation from the community. Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:34 PM I like the Ward elections. It feels comforting that your councillors live in your Ward and potentially are dealing with the same issues the residents are. A councillor in the West wouldn’t necessarily care what’s going on in the South or at least not much. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:11 PM To represent the people living within the specific Ward Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:31 PM A voice for specific areas of the city. Allows councillors to focus on that area and not have these areas disappear from view Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:55 PM It's the only way to prevent a concentration of power and influence from a single neighbourhood. Anonymous 8/25/2020 09:06 PM Knowing who to go to for help and they are familiar with ward to help. Too often when councillors are elected at large, citizens go only to the responsive ones and those councillors become overwhelmed and the others sit back and enjoy doing nothing. It did not work the last time it happened here. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 111 of 275 Page 392 of 936 Anonymous 8/25/2020 11:37 PM Representation on council that accurately reflects the unique needs of my neighborhood. Anonymous 8/26/2020 06:58 AM Having a point person to contact, knowing there is someone who understands the issues where I live. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:00 AM The person would represent the area and bring these areas concerns to council. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:24 AM Councillors are more engaged with their community / neighborhoods to understand our needs. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:26 AM Representation from all areas of the city instead of strictly concentrated ones. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:22 AM Each ward in our city is very different and the needs of the populations in each ward are different. Therefore it makes sense to elect councillors who can represent our interests at council. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:27 AM Representation and knowledge of local neighbourhood needs and concerns that might be overlooked if no councillors are elected for that specific area. If all/most councillors live downtown or in a more high income area, they will not be the best representatives for many citizens living in lower income areas. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:32 AM This would enable more people to run for office, as a ward campaign is more accessible than a city wide campaign, from a financial and resources standpoint. Once elected, a ward councillor is better able to represent a more focused population, rather than be over-extended by city-wide representation. The strength of the council would be based on the ward councillors' in depth knowledge of their ward. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:04 AM Local representation, advocacy for ward specific issues, point of contact for municipal issues. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:17 AM It ensures that the people running for these positions know their neighbourhood and their constituents. It makes us feel like they know what are various wards/neighbourhoods are experiencing and can represents us better. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:31 AM Better representation for wards, instead of just looking out for the Mayor's pet projects. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:35 AM If candidate lives in ward they are more aware of needs in that ward. Underserviced wards will get their voices heard and not lost in th clamour of wealthier wards. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:58 AM Smaller area to represent. No "unrepresented" areas that don't happen to have a councillor near them. Focus on community specific issues that don't City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 112 of 275 Page 393 of 936 affect the whole city. Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:42 AM they in theory will know the issues that impact their ward. Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:44 AM Can better represent a particular area of the city, allows citizens to know who to reach out to, means that no area of the city is unrepresented just because a councillor doesn't happen to live there. Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:46 AM Guelph is a small but very diverse city. The issues impacting many of the older neighborhoods are different than new subdivisions. Local ward representation allows diverse ideas and community representation. Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:32 PM As above Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:36 PM The councillors are from our neighborhoods and understand the nuisances that pertain to the people around them. People who live downtown do not have the same challenges as those in the south and folks in the south so not representing folks who live downtown. It is important to have that diversity in experience. Please do not destroy that. Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:10 PM Ward systems demand that councillors are accountable to citizens in their wards while at-large has no such accountability. An at-large system lacks true democracy or representation and has no checks and balances to guard against political ganging and special interests to serve political interests. Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:22 PM Representation by someone who knows the specific issues faced by their ward. It also add diversity to the council. Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:28 PM Better representation and understanding of issues facing citizens in each ward. Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:32 PM They know the area. They listen and understand specificities of the people of the area. Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:48 PM More likely that the Councillor can make a personal connection with the people in his or her ward and argue on behalf of that Ward's most pressing needs as well as how that Ward is impacted by other City initiatives. Anonymous 8/26/2020 05:41 PM None Anonymous 8/26/2020 06:21 PM Being able to speak to neighbourhood issues and move projects forward that speak to specific communities within the city. Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:29 PM The advantage of a ward system is that councilors at least nominally have some responsibility for a particular group of constituents ie the residents of that ward. A point of contact for residents. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 113 of 275 Page 394 of 936 Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:32 PM Not all wards have the same issues. Having citywide elections also makes it harder for people from poorer wards to have adequate representation. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:03 PM Local representation Anonymous Gives representations from areas across the city, brings perspectives of unique challenging each ward faces8/27/2020 07:11 AM Anonymous 8/27/2020 10:15 AM You have a 'point person' that each citizen can get to know and makes it easier to contact one or two people since most people have local concerns that they want to address with a Councillor. It also avoids the possibility of electing several people who all live in one part of the city leaving people living in other parts of the city feeling under-represented or ignored. Councillors are more accountable in a ward system. I think most people expect that Councillors are able to balance helping with local concerns vs city wide issues. Anonymous 8/27/2020 01:34 PM It makes the reaching out to voters much easier if you don't have to canvas the whole City, and the cost of getting elected is bearable. It also means a lot less trash at election time. Can you imagine all 30 candidates posting election signs throughout the City!!! Anonymous 8/27/2020 02:20 PM Actual representation for residents in the ward. Everyone should vote for the mayor. Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:09 PM Different areas of Guelph have different needs, it's important for each area to have representation. Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:24 PM More responsiveness to neighborhood concerns; we have a specific person to contact with a question or for advocacy. The old at-large system was not good so please do not return to it. Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:36 PM There would be dozens of council candidates trying to knock on every door in Guelph during a municipal election. Chaos. It's hard enough getting to know the ward candidates as it is. I want to know that at least two councillors feel a particular responsibility for my ward. Anonymous 8/28/2020 03:42 AM Economic and Racial Diversity across municpal government. Anonymous 8/28/2020 07:18 AM Councillor would be full time , and not have to worry about having another job. Also working full time requires a pay increase Anonymous 8/28/2020 07:21 AM it is hard enough to keep track of the 5-8 candidates in one ward and what the support/represent. It would be impossible to get a good understanding of all 30-40 candidates. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 114 of 275 Page 395 of 936 Anonymous 8/28/2020 08:42 AM The ward system makes it far easier for councillors to maintain contact with their constituents, and it allows for councillor candidates to canvas most voters in their ward prior to election. If elections were city-wide, only the candidates with the deepest pockets and name recognition could hope tobe elected. Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:14 AM The election of Ward Councillors encourages a greater depth of representation. It's not just the loudest voices that get heard, but the many points of view that are encouraged and new sources of information considered. In identifying with a neighbourhood, Councillors are more accessible to their electors. That said, I believe that all Councillors have the best interests of the City at heart, not just the localized concerns of their constituents. Many studies have proven that a Ward system also makes it easier for women to run for political office, which is an extremely important issue for me. A Ward system also encourages members of visible minorities to run for office. This is also an important consideration for me in building a city Council for the future. We need to remove barriers to ensure greater diversity on city Council and I believe that moving to at at-large system would be a significant barrier to achieving these goals. Anonymous 8/28/2020 11:32 AM Different parts of the city have different issues. It would be awful if the majority of councillors were from one part of town while other areas felt that they had no representation at council Anonymous 8/28/2020 12:00 PM Hopefully there is a specific geo-area for councillors to engage in w residents; councillors should live in the ward, meeting people at the grocery store, park and regular engagement; this has not been my experience w Ward 4 councillors only hosting a budget meeting this year; wards, live in the neighborhood and hopefully are willing & able to engage Anonymous 8/28/2020 12:13 PM it keeps the balance of power more evenly distributed across the City's diverse neighbourhoods. my fear with city wide is that it would mean we see over-representation from Guelph's "ends" (North end, South end, etc) Anonymous 8/28/2020 01:46 PM As the primary concerns of various locales within the city vary, it stands to reason that they should be represented. The ward system is the best way to achieve this. Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:18 PM Equal representation for all areas of Guelph with councillors who actually live across the whole city Anonymous 8/29/2020 04:14 AM A representative for my part of town with its own needs and concerns Anonymous 8/29/2020 06:15 AM People know who to contact for help in their ward. Every ward has 2 councillors so all wards are represented. Representation of the constituents of their ward does not mean that the councillors are blind to what is happening around the city. The ward system is the best of both worlds Anonymous Given the size of our city and the cost to participate in the democratic City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 115 of 275 Page 396 of 936 8/29/2020 07:29 AM process I think local representation makes the most sense. It also creates accountability and engagement at a local level for the representative of each Ward area. This allows residents to specifically understand WHO represents their interests for their area of the city. This also ensures there is a balance of city-wide AND local area voices. Anonymous 8/29/2020 08:12 AM Accountability is clear. Potential for accessibility of the councilor is highest. I cannot believe we are revisiting this issue. At-large councilor elections violate democratic principles. Anonymous 8/29/2020 11:23 AM More local representation and ensures Councillors are elected from different areas. Anonymous 8/29/2020 04:23 PM Guelph is a diverse city and different neighbourhoods have different needs and wants. For example, our mayor seems very preoccupied and excited about development in the south end and uninterested in pushing for the overdue new library branch downtown which is my closest branch (I am in Ward 1). I don't want the needs and interests of my neighbourhood, which is less wealthy, do get lost in a non-local council model Anonymous 8/29/2020 05:23 PM The city is diverse Anonymous 8/29/2020 05:52 PM They have a better understanding of the needs of the area. Anonymous 8/29/2020 08:30 PM More democratic Anonymous 8/29/2020 11:24 PM If we make the Wards smaller, it would allow each Councillor to do a better job of representing that area. Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:54 AM Having a councillor that truly represents and understands the issues of the neighbourhood. Anonymous 8/30/2020 07:43 AM I would draw your attention to Karen Farbridge's community editorial in the Mercury on this matter. I agree with her views. Anonymous 8/30/2020 11:29 AM All Wards have their own problems, needs etc. They are unique. Anonymous 8/30/2020 12:09 PM Our representatives need to know what's happening 'on the ground' in each locality. We need input from across the city that will result in the best decisions for the city as a whole, and not neglect any particular areas such as those that might have a harder time voting or mounting candidates. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:02 PM Better representation, community engagement. Preferred citizen choice historically City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 116 of 275 Page 397 of 936 Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:03 PM The primary advantage would be the facilitation of citizen engagement; that would be much harder if each councillor had to attempt to engage with the entire city. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:55 PM Better representation of local issues Easier access to individual Councillors on important local issues Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:46 PM Same as outlined in the background doc. I think either system could work, but I don’t see enough benefits to change from the current approach. Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:57 PM Because the people who represent us actually live in the neighborhood. It would make NO sense for someone from the south end making decisions on behalf of the downtown core, for example. Anonymous 8/30/2020 04:46 PM I think from a citizenry perspective you know which Councillor is yours. In the non-party system we have, it allows unknown candidates an easier entry into running due to less citizens to talk to and less ground to cover. It would also allow the Councillor to bring up ward-specific issues Anonymous 8/30/2020 04:57 PM Represents local as well as city wide interests, knows their ward Anonymous 8/30/2020 05:00 PM More democratic because councillors are directly involved in a particular ward and answer to their particular constituents Anonymous 8/30/2020 05:46 PM This way you don't end up with the majority of council only concerned about a certain district. Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:17 PM Councillors have a more defined area that they are asked to represent. They aren't spread thin, and it avoids preference for some areas over others. Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:21 PM Encourage women, racialized citizens, and others who may have limited resources compared to white, male counterparts to run. Potential candidates may be less inclined to run with fewer resources if they have to campaign city-wide as opposed to in a single ward. Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:25 PM Because the two councillors presumably have an interest in that part of the town, they can become well known personally to the residents and, also, that their campaign expenditure in time and money at election time is necessarily less. Anonymous 8/30/2020 08:35 PM Firstly living in a ward makes a representative of that ward representative of & responsible to the constituents in that designated area, ensuring no area of the city is under-represented. Secondly campaigning in a given ward is a more manageable venture than doing it city wide. Thirdly in a time where it is crucial to ensure diversity, going to a city wide election system would be a move backward ensuring only those very well known individuals in the city would get elected rather than learning about and electing newer and City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 117 of 275 Page 398 of 936 potentially better candidates who might better represent their respective ward. Anonymous 8/31/2020 06:27 AM I can take issues specifically affecting my neighborhood directly to my councillor and know that they will work to have them resolved, etc. Ward councillors will advocate for much needed services for their under serviced wards. Anonymous 8/31/2020 06:58 AM See my answer in Question 5. Also, know my local ward councillors. Because they live in my neighbourhood I know that they will care about or at least listen to local issues, very local issues. For instance, I never, ever go to the south end so why would I want to elect anybody from there? Most of what goes on there has nothing to do with how I live here. Different neighborhoods, different issues and situations. I am still free to read about in question what’s going on in other parts of Guelph, but I know that what’s going on in my ward will be looked at in more detail then if it’s an at-large system. Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:04 AM I believe that residents need to have one Councillor who knows the ward, who knows the particular issues and problems in the ward and someone who will champion their cause at City Councillor. I think we should have one councillor per ward, fewer councillors, part time councillors and perhaps a little better paid. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:18 AM They know issues, concern, or opportunities in their area of the city Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:23 AM Two factors. The first is about representation. Councillors should live in and serve those within their ward's geography. Second is about upholding a fair democracy. Under an at-large election, interest groups will undoubtedly mobilise either against/for prospective councillors. Also, highly-engaged parts of the city can consolidate power in council and give a disproportionate voice to the areas where they live. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:25 AM Engaging with constituents is a central part of Councillors' role. This becomes much harder to do with at-large elections than ward elections; you want folks to feel like they have a point of contact and Councillors need to have a clear idea of the needs and priorities they represent. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:34 AM Better representation of Ward needs, if the Councillor bothers to listen and not follow their own agenda. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:39 AM Not so overwhelming to listen to all the wards. Get to know the area where you live better and making neighbourhood decisions as applied to city Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:59 AM Having Ward Councillors means you know who represents your area and interests and is available to you when you have questions or need assistance. Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:21 AM Avoidance outside interference. Creates focus on ward issues-ie ward 2 and traffic on Victoria City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 118 of 275 Page 399 of 936 Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:31 AM No taxation without representation... Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:08 PM councillors live among the people they represent. it makes absolutely no sense to me to go to an at-large system. the needs of the south end are very different from the needs of downtown, for example -- they are like two different cities. If we elect members at large it's possible we'd have a makeup of council that was entirely from one area or the other, and was completely unresponsive to the concerns of residents outside their area. Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:14 PM I am frankly upset that the city is asking this question at all. The current system was instituted after years of significant citizen activism, and was confirmed by a ballot question in 2006. I would like to know who precisely is responsible for asking this question at all, especially given the circumstances (online format only, short time frame for responses, no public meetings), and I think it is irresponsible to ask it in such a nonchalant way. This is a shameful part of this survey. Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:26 PM Personal relationships and interests Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:08 PM Have experience with both "At large" and "ward" and prefer the Ward as Councillor more in touch with constituency and any issues local to that Ward. it seems more equitable to have ward representation Anonymous 8/31/2020 02:18 PM The number of residents in each ward is large. Better opportunity for a candidate for ward councillor to know the ward residents, planning, issues going forward. Clarify that candidates in fact live and/or work in the ward. Anonymous 8/31/2020 03:15 PM Currently, it is easy to raise issues with and approach the ward counselors - especially with issues related to the ward. The counselors more likely have a vested interest to represent the concerns of the ward. Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:28 PM The ward system ties counselors to a specific area which helps keep a better balance of power across the city, especially when taking in wealth distribution across the city (it could seriously tip the scales to benefiting candidates who are backed by certain industries). Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:11 PM having someone understand what, as a ward, the issues are Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:34 PM The city is too large area wise and nearly impossible for a city councillor to properly represent its constituents Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:42 PM Each ward has an equal voice. This would create transparency and equality no matter where you live in Guelph Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:09 PM Assuming the councillors from a ward actually live there, because not all do now, they would be more aware of issues within their ward because they City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 119 of 275 Page 400 of 936 would be able to see and experience the same issues. Each ward in Guelph is slightly different and i'd like to see aclear representation of that on council. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:26 PM Candidates would need to be familiar with neighbourhood issues, and could serve as effective advocates. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:31 PM Representation of people who actually live in the neighborhoods they represent Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:15 PM councillors who understood the areas that they represent. They know that "annoying pot hole that has been on farley for the last six months" etc. I also like the ability of the "average joe" being able to run and have visability in elections. A large field may swamp out some. Anonymous 9/01/2020 01:40 AM It is easier to reach the Councillor, and he/she will be more knowledgeable of the particular circumstances of localized area. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:45 AM Maintaining the Ward system is preferable. Being residents of my Ward my two Councilors can best appreciate the values, benefits and issues of our area of the City. They know what is like to live in the central area of Ward #3. I know who I can reach out to discuss my issues or concerns - both of whom are very responsive and listen well. This is an asset for us residents in this Ward. The same is likely true for residents in other areas of the City. Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:58 AM There would be more diversity of councillors. City-wide elections would cost individuals more money and could result in a concentration of elites who have the connections and financial support and who could be drawn from similar areas of the city where they have specific goals not represented by all wards. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:44 AM I see that the local ward system allows us to vote for the person that will represent our ward. Anonymous 9/01/2020 10:12 AM In Ward elections, councillors do not have to compete across the whole city which is much more expensive than just campaigning in one ward...and this would mean women and BIPOC would be at a disadvantage in the general voting system. Anonymous 9/01/2020 10:31 AM Under at large you are excluding some minority populations who would have a better chance of getting elected in a ward which has a large population of their cultural group. Also, with an at large system you risk loading council with people from one area like it was before. It is a step back to change from a ward system. Anonymous 9/01/2020 11:07 AM More likely that specific ward issues will be addressed. Anonymous 9/01/2020 01:59 PM Knowing who to talk to about an issue City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 120 of 275 Page 401 of 936 Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:06 PM See the comments under #5. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:24 PM When you elect people who pay the same rate as you, your neighbours, they should wish to protect their citizens, not the 'council'... Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:29 PM Local knowledge, feel for the neighborhood. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:40 PM With local ward elections, each Councillor is accountable to a specific group of residents. It's clear that different areas of the city have different needs, which are fairly represented on Council with the ward system. I believe that it's important for each resident to have a designated local representative or representatives to turn to when they need assistance with municipal matters. With ward Councillors, I feel that someone has my back in Council and can help me understand municipal issues, particularly those specific to my area of residence; with at-large Councillors, I wouldn't feel supported this way. Changing to ward Councillors would remove some of the sense of community connectedness that I enjoy in Guelph. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:23 PM Ideally these councillors would live in the community and would be best to represent the needs and concerns of the residents. Local ward elections allow for communities to pick the representative they feel can best represent them. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:32 PM Feels like less of a popularity contest and more of the candidates getting to know their neighbourhood Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:52 PM Because not all parts of Guelph are equal...eg the East End has no amenities compared to downtown or the South end Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:25 PM Better able to understand citizen needs and concerns. And be accountable. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:30 PM There is accountability to a geography of the city. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:39 PM for me this draws on riding system in prov and federal government elections. wards are mini-ridings. areas of rapid growth i.e. south end, could have a disproportionate influence on elections. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:43 PM The councillors represent a certain area of the city and they should have a better understanding of issues there and the concerns of their constituents. It is easier to have a more granular picture of the concerns of your constituents when you have less of them. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:45 PM It is difficult enought to follow the election process (debates, platforms, etc) for your ward. Having to expand that engagement and information to include City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 121 of 275 Page 402 of 936 potentially hundred+ hopefuls would be stressful. Local ward representatives should understand their neighbourhood very well - what is important to the people they represent as well as the city at large. If you take from a large pool, every councillor may end up living in the lush, wealthy south end and not even know what it's like living in another area. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:50 PM The councillor will have a more vested interest /pride of leadership in their particular ward. They can get to know the residents in that area better, have a better understanding of issues in that community. Easier voting system, creates relatively even representation across the city (hopefully!). Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:14 PM Having the ward system and two councillors from each ward gives all sections of the city and the population representation. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:04 PM People within the neighborhood and know the actual issues inside it Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:08 PM Place based Anonymous 9/01/2020 11:46 PM Should be representing a section that they can have the time to understand the wants and needs of that ward. Anonymous 9/02/2020 04:47 AM More effective representation on ward issues. Skin-in-the-game, the expectation would be that councillors live in the ward the represent. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:18 AM The councillors should live in the ward they represent, that way the citizens of that ward are accurately represented Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:30 AM Certain areas of the city that have different needs will have their voices heard and represented. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:12 AM Accurate representation of each ward's interests. More diversity of opinions. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:52 AM Localized engagement. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:55 AM Local wards put emphasis on the local issues. I would like to see a requirement that the councilor actually must live in the ward they are representing. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:59 AM Ensures that council represents the interest of the ward they serve. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:13 AM Ward councillors can represent the concerns and priorities of citizens in their neighborhood which may not be shared by those of other neighborhoods. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 122 of 275 Page 403 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:19 AM Each Ward has different characteristics, needs and issues. Ward councillor should better represent this. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:23 AM Better representation for different segments of the community. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:39 AM It is critical to represent the different parts of the city properly. Different neighbourhoods and areas have different demographics and concerns. Only a ward-associated councillor can understand and address to council matters as they are experienced in a given part of the city. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:41 AM A ward based councillor should have a better understanding of issues related to that geogography. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:50 AM Each ward of the city has councilors that are advocating for their specific needs (hopefully) Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:17 AM - A more level playing field for candidates, particularly non-incumbents, because there is less need for campaign financing - Respects the 2006 referendum outcome - Encourages voter turnout and democratic participation by making the amount of information facing voters more manageable Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:26 AM to know your councilors Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:16 AM hopefully that councillor would have a vested interest in the ward they represent and the councillor should live in the ward that they represent Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:19 AM We need candidates who are in tune with - and responsible to - the needs of each Ward. At-large councillors can be easily "lobbied" by the people pushing what they feel are the most important issues for the City, meanwhile leaving certain areas without a voice. Anonymous 9/02/2020 10:36 AM If I have an issue in my neighbourhood, I want to be able to reach out to a person who has been elected to represent my neighbourhood. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:02 AM A Ward Councillor represents their specific area. Different areas of the city have different problems and issues that affect them. Having a general Council of at-large members would risk biasing its outlook towards some areas, at the expense of others, as well as making it harder for citizens to connect locally with Council. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:32 AM I feel strongly that the city should stay with the ward system. Guelph's neighbourhoods are distinctive in many ways. Some are more affluent than others. Some are more diverse. Some are old and have old infrastructure. Some are new and lack necessary amenities. Ward representation means that these distinctive features, and the issues they give rise to, each have a City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 123 of 275 Page 404 of 936 voice in the deliberations of council. This is vital to the wellbeing of the whole city. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:40 AM Individual concern from a ward Councillor is important to me. It is important to have a good rapport with our own councilperson on issues in our ward. I feel it would offer more personalized management. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:44 AM While I really see some advantage to members at large because I do think sometimes Councillors are too Ward-centric, the disavantages outweigh. I understand the implications of campaign issues and overwhelming these individuals with specific concerns. My worry with the two-per-ward system is that I can see that they are not always equally representative, or available - and then one councillor ends up always having to address residents' concerns. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:45 AM Hopefully balance planning for all areas of the city Anonymous 9/02/2020 12:40 PM city wide elections simply do not work because one does not have the opportunity to evaluate all possible candidates for office Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:04 PM • Councillors are more likely to be truly local representatives, easily accessible to residents and aware of local issues. • Distinctive communities of interest are more likely to be represented. • It is less likely that one particular point of view or sectional interest will dominate the Council. Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:53 PM each neighbourhood is represented and it is easier for citizens to vote from a smaller pool of candidates during an election Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:58 PM Councillors elected by ward are responsible to their constituents. Councillors elected at large are responsible to the political parties or special interest groups that organize and fund city-wide campaigns. Ward elections result in a city that is like a large family with common interests. At-large elections will divide the city into Republicans and Democrats. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:25 PM I know who my neighbours support and where my neighbourhood stands. This promotes well being and a feeling of being a part of a system that I can feel a part of. I know my councillor will have an understanding of my ward specifically and who to spend my time petitioning or who will have my best interest at heart. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:46 PM Councilors representing a particular ward should have knowledge of their area, easier for residents to interact with them. Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:58 PM It works Anonymous 9/02/2020 04:31 PM Each area of the city has unique challenges. I like that my councillors live in my area and are familiar with its character and needs. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 124 of 275 Page 405 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:20 PM In theory it makes the councillors accountable to the residents. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:28 PM A councillor representing a ward would be able to have a more in-depth understanding of local issues. An at large representative could be spread thin. The mayor is the at large representative on council. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:37 PM Way of connecting personally with councillor and having him/her know the local issues. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:55 PM Guelph is not a homogenous city. It needs representation from different areas so organizations and citizens based in the fringes or in marginalized communities have an easier time making their voices and concerns heard. At large councillors will all be responsive to the largest voices in town which privileges people who are highly politically active. Downtown and wealthy suburban voices tend to be heard loudest even with a ward system. Removing the ward would exacerbate that problem. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:15 PM -more democratic -more voices to be heard and more issues brought to the table so things are not rushed through council Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:30 PM A representative responsible for ward representation, better inclusivity Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:51 PM Lived here during the at large, doework. Too many to choose from, and no issues in a particular area to address properly. Issues in the south end may not affectvthe north end. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:18 PM Would know local ward issues and be able to advocate for them. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:08 PM At election time I can spend more time deciding on my candidates and I have specific people to reach out to if I have an issue and they know they have a special responsibility to listen to me because I am in their ward. Additionally there is nothing stopping me from contacting all the councillors if I feel it's necessary. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:07 AM The ward system ensures that each area has a voice at the table. Each ward will have unique concerns and/or needs Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:23 AM Councillors will be more familiar with the needs and concerns within their ward. Citizens will have a more personal connection to their councillors. Ward elections make it easier for newcomers and diverse populations to run for office. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:53 AM They are more familiar with the areas and concerns of the people in their ward. Kinda like specialists. I.e Margaret greener park. Our councilors know of our concerns whereas a south end councilman may not care as it's not in their area City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 125 of 275 Page 406 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:11 AM Because local councillours must then be responsible to ther constituents. Plus this prevents or at least lesens the far right from buying their way into council en masse and then from making retrogressive policies to promote their, and their families' own self interests, all at the cost of making an unliveable city for everyone else. A ward system is a good backstop for democracy against this creeping and poisionous peril . Anonymous More local issues i think this way councillor will be committed to its ward and will be more responsible to its people There is the potential for better communication about issues that affect the ward and it is possible for better advocacy of local issues. Each part of the city has different concerns. Those concerns need to have designated representation on the council. No one person is ever going to represent the whole city and its local concerns. Also, if you are not designated to a ward, you do not necessarily have accountability to that ward or familiarity with that ward. If there were no ward councillors, councillors would not be held accountable to electorates in different parts of the city. Local representation they would know the issues, concerns and opportunities from their area of the city and be better able to represent the people. otherwise, you could have a council focused on special interests of one particular area. Citizens would have better opportunity to get to know their councillor. Different neighborhoods have very different needs and all deserve representation. better geographic representation across the City given if the councilor is a resident of their ward, I feel they would have a more vested interest in seeing the local neighborhood success. I do not trust someone who spends little to no time in my neighborhood to make decisions that would adversely affect my surroundings. It would also give added opportunities to engage with them if they live close by as our kids might go to the same school etc. 9/03/2020 07:52 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 08:55 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:15 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:50 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:22 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:33 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:42 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:53 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:00 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:37 AM More cost-effective for candidates => at-large and mixed options have increased costs for candidates which might discourage some from running. The advocacy and engagement roles of Councillors are more effective when they have greater "buy-in" for a particular area (ward). City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 126 of 275 Page 407 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:51 AM Definitely not city-wise, we did that and it was terrible, those who could run, with $ for campaigns win & did not engage w residents in decision making l; Wards in theory hold councillors accountable and in theory councillors are visible and approachable in the Ward, we definitely do not want to go back to city-wide councillors Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:37 PM It’s not a popularity contest. This seems fair. You are voted by where you live, not who you know Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:14 PM Local representation Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:18 PM Councillors will be familiar with the issues of their wards and focus on respires ring their interests at council. It will help ensure distribution of funds and priorities across the city. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:19 PM Better representation Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:24 PM You can leave the left wing, James Gordon, downtown Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:27 PM Although imperfect, the Ward system (in principle) inhibits the systemic inequities that often arise from the 'At Large' system, such as homogenous candidates, incumbency, and voting blocs. The Ward system also promotes neighborhood/community based advocacy and individual accountability of the elected representative, in a manner that is less achievable within the 'At Large' system, However, continuing to elect part-time councillors, even within the Ward system, tends to promote many of these same inequities. Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:54 PM Although Guelphites share many common experiences with regard to public operations each ward also experiences very different and nuansced issues. The rate of intensification in development, the geographic characteristics, and the economic demographics are some of the ways in which wards differ. Having city wide elections would dampen the voices of specific wards and contribute to a council which acts on an overgeneralized representation of the needs of all of Guelph. Who better to weigh in on issues for each ward then those that were elected by the direct citizens of each ward. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:16 PM People that are knowledgeable about and invested in local issues Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:48 PM Local interests vary for each ward, what one wants another might not. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:02 PM Micro local connection, understanding of the ward they represent etc.... City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 127 of 275 Page 408 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:14 PM Councillors need to listen to citizens as I don't think City staff do. For example, in my Ward, Hugh Guthrie park play ground was take out and replaced after "consultation" with citizens but most of the recommendations were not included, the park is worse than it was before, the old equipment was fine and the swings worked great (gone and not replaced). Looks like they worked to what the contractor was offering and not what people wanted. Don't do things to waste money just because the budget (or limited budget) has it. Anonymous 9/03/2020 07:15 PM I think having some wards ensures voices from different parts of the city. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:27 PM Working for the ward they live in Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:52 PM Understanding the unique characteristics and challenges faced by residents in the ward Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:52 PM local councillors , local problems and issues, out of site out of mind! Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:02 PM Your Councillor living in your neighborhood may have the same experiences giving insight into possible concerns. Councillor accessible. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:26 PM A smaller pool of potential voters requires less advertising and therefore less money be raised. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:42 AM More localized representation Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:07 AM I like dealing directly with 2 councillors Who understand the character of the ward and the sometimes-unique problems of specific neighborhoods. Ward councillors can better advocate on behalf of an area they know well. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:56 AM It ensures each ward is represented fairly on council, and I would guess it makes “running for council” more accessible/affordable to candidates Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:10 AM City-wide elected councillors will require deeper pockets to run for office which will inevitably privilege councillors that have closer ties to the development and home building industries. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:15 AM More opportunity for Councillor to get to know their constituents. Easier to get to know 1/6th of Guelph residents, than to have to be available to meet any Guelph resident. Also, there may be issues that only affect specific Wards, and having local representation will ensure these issues are identified to Council. Anonymous It fairly represents the various opinions and needs of the different City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 128 of 275 Page 409 of 936 9/04/2020 07:14 AM neighbourhoods in Guelph. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:23 AM They have a vested interest in informing themselves of the issues locally that are important. For instance they will also have personal experiences from their ward if they live there, like the mess the ward streets become in the winter when snow plows can not adequately remove snow due to parked cars left overnight, or the increased safety risk to residents and children when cars parked on roads obscure a clear view of the road. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:32 AM Neighborhoods have unique needs. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:33 AM Ward elections to me mean all areas of Guelph are represented, not just smaller clusters of areas. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:44 AM They represent the local interests of the Ward. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:01 AM Being able to deal with smaller issues in the ward. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:07 AM familiarity with area Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:10 AM More manageable for someone to campaign - especially first-timers. Provides more local knowledge of specific concerns (ie trains or more intensification or poverty concentrated in certain areas). What prompts people to run is often an issue close to home. At-large is confusing for people to research all the candidates and can concentrate power to a small group/ideology or geography. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:14 AM The Ward system allows counsellors to engage with and represent the interests of their constituents, I believe this is important as different geographical areas of the City face different challenges and it's important to make sure all areas are represented equally. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:20 AM municipal politics are the most intense level of social organization dependent on geographical specifics. we must concentrate representation based on the area represented. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:28 AM Greater accountability, better representation Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:33 AM Local needs can be represented more effectively. A ward based system will also help make it more manageable for under represented groups (women, lower income, POC, people with disabilities, etc.) to participate (city-wide campaigning, travel, etc may be inadvertently limiting). Local ward based councillors are also more accessible to citizens because you k ow who your City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 129 of 275 Page 410 of 936 primary contacts are. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:43 AM It helps to ensure that citizens in a specific geography/ward can vote for those individuals whom they fell will best represent their ideas of what is needed in the ward and the City as a whole. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:45 AM Local, community input. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:47 AM These councillors live in the ward I live in and therefore understand the issues in that ward. It also allows for quick access to the councillors and an opportunity to be more familiar with each other. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:52 AM Ward voting allows the councillor to focus on the needs of their specific part of the city. Each ward is unique and represents different needs and wants. To this point, councillors should live with in their specific ward that they are running. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:00 AM More representative of local ward issues. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:07 AM Individuals don't need as much $$ to run for election versus at-large Councillors are more likely to be truly local representatives, easily accessible to residents and aware of local issues. Distinctive communities of interest are more likely to be represented. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:13 AM People are best represented by people living closest to them, who may be better positioned to understand local issues and balance them against city- wide concerns. As an example, no one would want all 12 councilors living within 2 blocks of each other. However, I may be open to a mixes system but it will not be my first preference. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:20 AM Municipal issues are local issues. They need to be understood and represented at the neighbourhood or ward level. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:43 AM Those citizens in a Ward hen know WHO to contact when they need help, or they want to share their ideas or feelings. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:02 AM 2 city Councillors per ward encourages a much more diverse opinion base being represented 2 councillors per ward means that local people can speak to a councillor who knows the community and can with knowledge respond to their concerns Ward councillors gives the opportunity those of modest means to run of office to represent their own community - something that would be much less likely if they had to fund a city wide campaign Ward councillors encourages local people to give small donations to people they are likely to ahve heard of or could be their neighbour - it means that councillors would not feel obliged to represent donors who provide large donations - this is to protect councillors and the mayor for that matter from being accused of responding to the needs of those who donated large amounts to their campaigns and frees the politicians to vote on issues that represent the City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 130 of 275 Page 411 of 936 public good rather than a particular community or corporation. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:15 AM 1) The Ward System reflects the character and diversity of Guelph City neighbourhoods. This diverse character of neighbourhoods is what makes the city what it is and gives it life. Part of the role of councillors is to bring this diversity of views to City Council Meetings and decisions. 2) Councillors deal with and attempt to resolve neighbourhood issue. Whether it is pot holes, cracked sidewalks, neighbourhood celebrations, new green spaces, etc., etc., etc. This is what councillors consider on a daily basis. There is no other individual at the municipal, provincial or federal level that exists and has the necessary knowledge to provide these needed services. People are ATTACHED to their NEIGHBOURHOOD and need representatives who are also ATTACHED to and KNOWLEDGABLE about THE NEIGHBOURHOOD. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:25 AM I will elect a person who I believe represents me and the community I live in - each neighbourhood in Guelph is really it's own community, with differing issues it faces, unique to the city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:56 AM City councillors need to be focused on the needs of their ward. The city is big enough that the needs of Ward 4 will be different from those of Ward 5, etc. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:14 AM Easier to learn about the candidates. Reduced campaigning costs and so more opportunity for marginalized candidates. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:36 AM You have more opportunity to at least have heard of the ward representatives and perhaps know them. It gives citizens an opportunity for a personal interaction with a councilor. I also believe that councilors who live in their wards are more aware of the issues that affect their ward. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:59 AM Because they hopefully would want to better the same ward Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:03 PM It's crucial to represent our area. If it were an at large, I could see most of our council coming from the more affluent areas. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:07 PM It allows for citizens to elect the councillors that focus on their needs in that ward instead of having councillors having people who are friends with them or have invested interest in them being elected but don't live in that area. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:37 PM people that live in our neighbourhoods and understand the unique concerns of local citizens Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:43 PM In an ideal system, Councillors elected for their ward would have an intimate relationship with their constituents, and advocate for things that best meet their needs. For example, Ward 1 may have drastically different needs than Ward 4, and that needs to be represented. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:47 PM I like having a councillor that is tied to my local area - it helps to ensure that certain neighbourhoods are not left out of consideration when council is City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 131 of 275 Page 412 of 936 making decisions. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:58 PM Smaller issues that an at-large official may be too removed from can be handled with more care by a local ward councilor. Ex. Small roads in a suburb are run down and damaged, a ward councilor may be more likely to deal with it as opposed to an at-large councilor which could ignore the issue as it doesn't affect the majority of the city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:10 PM Issues change drastically by location Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:20 PM Immediacy of contact, knowledge of the area of the ward, interest in the issues in the ward, acquaintance with many residents of the ward, awareness of the strengths and weaknesses, needs and wants of the ward Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:30 PM Different neighbourhoods/wards may have different needs. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:36 PM Councillors need to be familiar with their wards issues or needs (ie downtown ward needs to be aware of homeless issue and small business concerns) not to say other wards don’t also but those issues would especially apply downtown. ) Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:43 PM Councillors should live in the areas they represent to truly understand the concerns. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:42 PM They know what is going onnmy neighborhood. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:54 PM Each neighbourhood has its own distinct challenges. One specific person who can focus on those issues is most advantageous. Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:05 PM Then EVERYONE is represented not just rich people. Each ward deserves 2 voices to share their concerns Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:07 PM Access to someone who understands isolated neighbourhood issues. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:09 PM It is important the each area of the city be represented at council. With al large systems it is possible that some areas could be left out of representation while others will be over represented. Ward elections make running for council less expensive that running across the whole city. We can't have a system that is only open to those with wealthy backers. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:36 PM It is helpful to know who you can call on in any situation - if the Councillor is specific to an area they are more in tune with what is going on in a small area and know the people involved Anonymous Advocate for the needs of each area of Guelph City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 132 of 275 Page 413 of 936 9/04/2020 05:56 PM Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:13 PM It is imperative to retain the current Ward system to help ensure diverse representation on Council. Guelph citizens reaffirmed the current ward system with overwhelming support in the 2006 referendum that took place as part of the municipal elections that year. No clear rationale has been presented that would warrant a change to an At-large voting system. Research has shown that campaign spending is a determining factor in the success of candidates running for municipal office (Kushner, Siegel, and Stanwick, 2009). At-large elections require more financing to be able to campaign effectively over a larger area, making it more difficult for women and new candidates from diverse backgrounds to win Council seats. Research also shows that the development industry is a significant source of funding for candidates who represent its interests and that this funding is associated with increased vote shares for those candidates (McDermid, 2007). At-large elections amplify the influence of development industry funding in municipal elections because of the greater cost of campaigning city-wide. Candidate financial filings reveal that in 2018, individuals with ties to the housing development industry funded 25% of all campaign costs in Gueph. In an At-large election, candidates representing the interests of developers would be more likely to garner the financial resources to run effective City-wide campaigns. Other candidates would need to rely on self- funding and donations from community members. Further, it’s well-known that one of the factors that reduces voter turnout is barriers to information about candidates and their positions. In Ward elections, voters only need to familiarize themselves with the perspectives and platforms of perhaps 5 – 7 candidates. If we have the same number of candidates in an at-large election, voters may need to familiarize themselves with the platforms of 30 – 40 candidates which would be likely to overwhelm voters and reduce turnout. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:15 PM - councillors can be more engaged with their local "ward" and ensure that they are representing that areas concerns Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:26 PM Each ward is unique and Councillors elected within their own specific wards can represent the unique needs of their ward members, hopefully with understanding and with the wisdom of lived experience. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:01 PM The elected 'ward' council person advocates on behalf of representatives in that area of Guelph. I feel there is more responsibility of that person to present concerns of the people from that area. As well, I feel the person elected from my ward is one who I would contact first if have a council person to talk to Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:21 PM It keeps it SIMPLE and FAIR for both Councillors AND citizens. Campaigns are done in wards, rather than across the entire city. Citizens know who to contact: their Councillors. Councillors are able to engage more meaningfully with their constituents - they don't have to engage the entire city. More effective representation because each Councillor represents a "chunk" of the City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 133 of 275 Page 414 of 936 city. Better representation of communities. Constituents in each ward are represented DIRECTLY in Council. (Who exactly do "at-large" Councillors represent?) Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:58 PM Voter turn out would be higher because folks will be looking at their local candidates rather than city wide candidates. The greatest impact is made locally. Plus, a diverse and more accurate representation of constituents and their interests. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:13 PM Smaller geography for a councillor to cover, fewer citizens means better engagement per citizen, at-large seats increase exposure to special interest lobbying and require larger campaign budgets that exclude democratic participation / decrease diversity and representativeness of council. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:26 PM Holistic city representation Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:27 PM Best representation and allows many folks to run for council - not limited by finances or geography. (But in the age of Trump and For, it may be time to have folks take a psychological test to ensure they are stable enough to take on the responsibility of governing the city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:02 PM Closer representation. Easier and less expensive to run an election campaign for new candidates Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:06 PM Local representation, a single person to bring your concerns to, local input on city wide issues Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:06 AM The idea of ward councillors can be useful as each councillor should (in theory) have a more complete understanding of their neighbourhoods' unique challenges. Right now ward boundaries are large and so the challenges are really diverse. If we continue by ward, boundaries need to be reviewed and redone, and with growth in Guelph, we need more wards. On the other hand, ward Councillors can create more division, each representing the classic NIMBYism regularly seen in Guelph. Councillors who have to represent everyone might take a more holistic view of what the community needs and may better represent Guelph's diversity than wards do now. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:52 PM New candidates would have a greater chance of being elected and we certainly need some fresh blood in council. As well, I feel it is beneficial to have counsillors that keep all the citizen's interests into consideration rather Optional question (397 response(s), 259 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Q12 From your perspective as a citizen of Guelph, what would be some advantages of having CITY-WIDE elections for city Councillors at-large? City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 134 of 275 Page 415 of 936 than just their ward. I dislike only being able to vote for 2 councilors in my ward as in some years I feel there is no good choice and would like to have a greater number of options from across the city. Anonymous 8/17/2020 04:59 PM Councillors are accountable to the entire city and all Interests are taken into account. Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:51 PM You would not be hindered by the voices only available in your ward. So say you are an environmentally conscious person, but your ward only offers people who fail to understand the importance of going green, and naturalized areas, ect.. well your vote wont speak for you. But say another ward(s) have decent candidates that would represent your views for the city, you could vote for that voice and still be represented in the big picture. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:52 AM There is way too much downtown separation. There is a whole city here that is not represented well. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:41 AM To have a more unified Council. Also, possibility of more true representation of our city. Anonymous 8/18/2020 01:29 PM They would represent view of all citizens not just ward views. They would govern in the best Interest of the whole city Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:10 PM No barriers to having a leadership election to elect the most dedicated to civil service. Anonymous 8/19/2020 08:45 AM What happens in another ward impacts me as well. I drive around the city for services. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:27 PM This city while rather large in citizen size - you can basically drive 15 minutes and any direction and be in a new ward. I think it important to have a say. Especially when some wards do not represent the diversity of the city. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:36 PM - The incumbency advantage would likely be reduced, or at least we may see modestly lower barriers to entry for some non-incumbents, resulting in more fresh talent in local governance. - All of the above would generate more dynamic elections with greater voter choice. - Councillors would likely be more policy- and governance-focussed, and less consumed with doing customer service work on behalf of the city administration. - It would create an opportunity for stronger representation of non-geographic communities within Guelph, who could coalesce behind a candidate. Geographic communities could do the same when they had strongly defined interests, which is the case sometimes but not always. Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:12 AM make sure not same old same Anonymous Less favorites...other constituents can often see the flaws in other wards, City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 135 of 275 Page 416 of 936 8/20/2020 05:06 PM often the issue being the councillor Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:01 PM for the good of the entire city should be top of mind for all council Anonymous 8/20/2020 09:06 PM Less bias and councillors cannot be elected just by their neighbors and friends Anonymous 8/21/2020 09:07 AM everyone has a fair shot to be on councillor with a city wide vote the public can see more candidates vote for more people in election Anonymous 8/24/2020 08:41 AM As councilors vote on issues of the city as a whole it seems much more sense for councilors to be responsible to the whole city rather than they re ward alone. of course all will than be responsible for all wards all the time Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:23 AM More focus on good of the City as a whole. Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:15 PM Councillors would have to be accountable to all the citizens not just special interest groups in their ward Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:01 PM Then there is no NIMBY. Not in my back yard!! Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:36 PM All of guelph would know where they stand Anonymous 8/25/2020 02:50 PM You would not need 12 councillors. Anonymous 8/25/2020 09:52 PM I think having city wide elections will help us find really strong and passionate members who are in it to make a difference in Guelph! Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:21 AM Some Councillors won their Ward because they were the only one running in that Ward and not because they were the best person for the job. Anonymous 8/26/2020 02:29 PM All councillors would work for the benefit of the citizens as a whole Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:15 PM Its not that big of a city. I travel and use every part of this city on a regular basis. I think it would be far more practical to have decisions that make sense for the entire city not just one neighbourhood. Anonymous 8/27/2020 06:50 AM Less politicking for very localized issues. We need big picture governance. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 136 of 275 Page 417 of 936 Anonymous 8/27/2020 12:12 PM Councillors focus on what's best for the whole city Anonymous 8/29/2020 01:05 PM Better budgeting Anonymous 8/30/2020 11:59 AM Local ward system in no way ensures representation of local concerns. A system allowing us to vote for members who we feel reflect our concerns and beliefs would be beneficial and would allow for reduction in size of council. Anonymous 8/30/2020 08:44 PM Doesn't divide communities within our city. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:28 AM Potentially better/more qualified candidate pool. Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:22 AM Allows for the best representation from councillors as a whole Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:42 PM Get to see what the people stand for and make the best judgement of who represents the people of Guelph. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:46 AM Having representation and the ability to speak to any Councillor regardless of where you live in the city. No concerns over a vacant council seat. Anonymous 9/01/2020 05:34 AM Councillors would be more likely to represent the best interests of the city and not fall prey to parochial local issues and special interests. Anonymous 9/01/2020 11:32 AM - ability to vote councillors in you agree with regardless of their ward - there are sometimes councillors you really like but you can't vote for them because they aren't in your ward Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:03 PM They would have to appeal to the entire city and not a single constituency. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:14 PM Again, there are people set in their ways and a few councilors who I believe have run their course. Let the city as a whole decide who is elected. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:31 PM Sonthat we can vote for who were would like to address city wide concerns instead of just who we clean to advocate for our own backyard Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:27 PM They can think more strategic and not be beholding to small local groups. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:52 AM Hopefully better representation for the different populations in our city City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 137 of 275 Page 418 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:35 AM I don't think a specific councilor needs to represent a specific geographic area. They need to be accessible to the public for feedback and input, but to be constrained to specific arbitrary boundaries makes no sense to me Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM You pick all of the people to represent you on council. There are councillors now that are only on because the rest of the city did not get to vote for or against them Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:14 AM Eliminates (potentially) competition between Councillors focused on their ward goals, instead of City-wide goals that would be better suited to long- term thinking necessary for government operations. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:44 AM The ability to support and vote for candidates in all riding's for those people that share our views for the betterment of the city. Anonymous 9/02/2020 12:24 PM city wide Councillors put the city of Guelph first, not look at how it will benefit their ward. Councillors need to work together for all of Guelph Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:35 PM Gets rid of the comfortable council cliques that stifle progress and promote selfish policies. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:42 PM We can choose who in , as no many people vote and there needs to be a change in it . New council members are so needed Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:42 AM Councillors need to understand the impact of their decision on the entire City. Not just focused on individual needs of a specific Ward Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:59 AM Certain wards keep voting in the same counsel who won’t listen and have their own agenda if it was city wide those people wouldn’t get voted in. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:39 AM Prevent NIMBY neighbourhood groups from wasting time Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:38 PM People can vote for councillors running on their important issues and know they are supported. City will then have someone with that view. It doesn't have to be your area person . Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:12 PM We are limited to who we can vote for with the ward system. They don’t necessarily reside in the ward they are running in .... which makes no sense at all. Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:08 PM The city wide system avoids favoritism and bias by a counselors specific ward they represent. The city as a whole is recognized Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:51 PM Better overall planning and policy rather than smaller divided approach Anonymous It would focus councillors to look at the city as a whole and represent City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 138 of 275 Page 419 of 936 9/04/2020 05:57 AM everyone equally and not just their ward Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:22 AM This way I think the interest of all citizens are taken into place. Instead of rich neighborhoods battling poor neighborhoods or white neighborhoods vs BIPOC neighborhoods. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:58 AM City-wide elections mean that candidates need to campaign on city-wide interests. No favouring of narrow local issues to get elected. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:05 AM .. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:35 AM If you include everyone it’s always more interesting. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:54 AM People don't pay attention to wards. It's arbitrary. Councillors make decisions for the entire City, not just their ward. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:55 AM You get to actually choose the individuals you want Anonymous 9/04/2020 12:30 PM Stops the NIMBY and focus on the good for everyone in the city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:20 PM It would allow for citizens to have influence beyond their wards. Many councillors from other wards influence policy and push personal agendas that those in other wards have to no voice or ability to effect. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:03 PM All councillors are voting on all city wide issues, ie. libraries, rec centres, etc not just what will be affecting my neighbourhood. Whether it affects my neighbourhood or not, it will ultimately affect my taxes. I want the choice of being able to vote for those councillors who have a better sense of fiscal responsibility. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:07 PM Advantages? Council would be comprised of the top candidates in the city. Councillors could get involved in issues in every area. Elections could be more interesting with all candidates talking about city-wide issues. Councillors would have greater legitimacy speaking on behalf of the city. Committee work would be more dynamic with councillors taking greater interest city issues. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:43 PM Levels the playing field, no special advantages for particular regions of city. Will be accountable to city at large rather than small section of itm Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:16 PM A wider variety of choice by ward. Optional question (69 response(s), 587 skipped) City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 139 of 275 Page 420 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:46 AM Larger wards for those elected specifically for a ward with more emphasis on residential concerns and growth. City wide councillors could concentrate on more specific unique issues such as downtown, industrial/manufacturing areas. somewhat of a rural and industrial mix. Suggest 2 at large, 4 ward councillors and one mayor. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:12 AM Although local wards are important, decision making around the horseshoe requires majority votes. As such, having a say in all the candidates that represent our city seems only reasonable. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:20 AM Local reps -- plus a chance for additional terrific candidates, even BIPOC persons. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:33 PM City wide councillors can have a broader view Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:57 PM Provides a say in matters that are not just in the Ward that you live in. We are also participating in events/activities hosted in other Wards. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:57 PM We may have great leaders in this community who have a heart for Guelph, we should not limit their passion based on Geography. Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:22 PM The combination allows for some focused representation from the variety of wards in the city plus gives ‘at large’ representatives who can be counted on to see decisions in a more wholistic manner Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:42 PM Being able to vote for the best representative and someone that shares your ideals. Those two are aren't always the same. Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:04 PM Ward councillors are too focused on the individual ward, general counselors could help with a broader focus on overall city development Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:51 PM Each ward can have unique interests, viewpoints, and experiences, which necessitates having ward councillors. A couple of citywide councillors could provide balance by representing the city as a whole. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:37 AM Diversity. We need some councillors who specialize and know the issues of one particular part of the city. But also some that understand the city, as a whole. Plus, candidates of colour don’t have a hope in hell of being elected in a ward when each ward is primarily white. Anonymous public having a larger say in the city beyond just where they live. Perhaps Question type: Essay Question Q13 From your perspective as a citizen of Guelph, what would be some advantages of having a combination of ward-based AND city-wide at-large elections of Councillors? City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 140 of 275 Page 421 of 936 8/18/2020 05:07 AM their jobs are in other wards that they can't vote for now Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:53 AM First and foremost, I believe that maintaining some parts of a ward system are essential to ensuring that there is a mix of representation on Council and to ensure that not only those from the richest areas of Guelph are elected. I also believe that having a larger city-wide based category allows for the City to consider and elect individuals that are operating on platforms that encompass more than just the needs of their particular ward. Hyper-localized politics and ward advocacy have their role, but I believe that individuals who are thinking of a larger picture should also be offered the opportunity to present that agenda without having to tailor it to a particular ward. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:41 AM It would ensure that specific areas of the City, even if they have a smaller population, are fairly represented on the City Council. On the flip side, electing City Wide may allow for a more balanced approach that removes narrow NIMBYism activism from the Council and ensures a focus that goes beyond particular interest groups. Both dynamics are important for local governance, and both can be damaging. Anonymous 8/18/2020 12:48 PM It would ensure council looks at what is best for the city and not just parts of the city. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:15 PM Much more flexibility in choice of our elected officials. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:46 PM Need councillors to focus on both community issues and the whole city together Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:37 PM A mixed system would give the benefits of each type of election while allowing for more flexibility Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:11 AM Ward elections are better for candidates. They can focus on a smaller area. They are better for voters too. They don't have to sift through 30 Candidates. But sometimes not being able to vote for somebody in another ward that you believe has merit and represents your views better than any of your ward choices is frustrating. Have a system that allowed you to cast an additional ballot would allow for the election of candidates who, if unsuccessful in their ward may nonetheless be elected from voters across the city. Also, there is a tendency for ward councilors to advocate for their ward sometimes to an unhealthy extent. We need more who have, by definition, with a cross-city focus. Anonymous 8/19/2020 03:43 PM It seems there are vast differences concerning the priorities of wards. For ex. Heritage might be hugely important to Ward 1 while insignificant to ward 6. However in the long term (hundreds of years) both wards need to be concerned with heritage equally. Same with transportation. Mobility is important throughout the entire city yet cars/trucks are only effective where road infrastructure can accommodate. Ward 6 will one day be as congested City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 141 of 275 Page 422 of 936 as ward 1. We need a plan that accommodates public transit eliminating dependence on cars/trucks. Old ideas such as the toronto suburban railway if still available and expanded would have served all quite well the entire city. but individualism (cars) robbed the 'good for all' best for the entire community model. Leaving us with a hodgepodge of transportation rather than a strategy that accommodated everyone equally. Anonymous 8/19/2020 09:11 PM If a citizen could vote for a ward councillor and several at large councillors, there is a good chance one of their votes would be successful in electing a representative. This would have more voters connected with more councillors. In the current model, often the 2 "winning" councillors have a combined vote total of less than 50% - so most voters feel unrepresented. Anonymous 8/20/2020 09:35 AM I would not be limited to candidates who may not represent my view of how they think. Allows me to vote for what I want, not what I don't want. If someone outside my ward represents me better, I would vote for them. Anonymous 8/20/2020 11:12 AM Someone to focus on our ward issues but more people concerned with the city as a whole then The current System Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:44 PM You'd have at least one councilor per ward but the other 6 being city wide would allow for the best possible candidates regardless of location. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:01 PM You can show your opinion as to how you wish certain skills be utilized. One candidate may be better with certain local issues whereas another may offer a balance with a broader holistic view of the city. There may be more candidates from the same ward that may have good ideas and strategies to benefit the whole city that may be left out if they aren't making the cut. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:15 PM Constituents would have a ward councillor who takes ward concerns seriously and at large councillors would be the ears for concerns of the city as a whole Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:54 PM I would like to see a mix, where you have one vote designated for a local representative and one vote for any candidate. We must have representation at the ward level. Guelph is a large enough city that it is imperative that each ward is represented by at least one person who is knowledgeable about that ward, and is also directly accountable to those who live in it. It would also be of value to be able to vote for a councillor who does not represent the ward you are in, but who has a vision for the city's future that aligns with your own. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:57 PM The awards of the city have different demands and it is great to have representatives from those areas, looking out for those areas. However I think those positions should be part time and the other councillors should represent the entire City and be full time. Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:01 PM Candidates in your ward are not always representative of what people in that wars want Anonymous The ward based councilors would give a very focused neighbourhood view City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 142 of 275 Page 423 of 936 8/24/2020 04:15 PM and the at large can look at what is best for the city overall. It seems like a balanced approach. Currently the councillors must struggle with what is best for their riding and what is best for the whole city. Anonymous 8/24/2020 06:19 PM There are certain issues that effect certain wards and certain issues that effect all of Guelph. It would be nice to be able to have councilors that I could bring up out of ward problems to. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:43 AM Ability to represent ward issues and also see the bigger picture for the whole community Anonymous 8/25/2020 08:25 AM Ward-based councilors have their priority focused on their specific ward. That's the whole point. Talk to your constituents, take their ideas to council, and fight for what makes their ward a better place. However, we by also having city-wide representatives, who have no "allegiance" to a specific ward - but rather, the city as a whole - they can provide "unbiased" perspectives (along with the Mayor) to ensure that one change that may benefit one ward, does not have negative outcomes elsewhere. In a word: balance. Anonymous I would like proportional representation. This would mean that every ward still has a representative and isn't left without a voice. But it also means that if a ward happens to have a few good candidates that everyone in the city likes, we are not forced to only have one of them. This way we can have all of the good people running instead of at most 2 from a certain ward. a) Wards need an individual who both lives in and represents the ward's interests whom they can contact for information and concerns - this needs to be a full time position, voted within the ward. b) To cope better with conflicting local concerns, the city needs individuals whose primary interest is the whole city. These should be elected at large, but preferably should be half-time ( good training ). c) So I'm suggesting 6 full time ward reps, and 6 full city reps, all half time. Ward based means you have a clear line of communication to the city through your local representation. Adding some at large roles could help to add some diversity. This could also lead to feeling that you have representation on council. In a two person per ward system and a lot of people vying for the role, a person could have voted and not had either person be their choice. If you feel your ward councillors don't represent you, rather than disengage, you have at large councillors who might be elected. I am able to vote for people who represent Guelph and not just one area and have only their focus and ideas for one ward 8/25/2020 10:15 AM Anonymous 8/25/2020 11:26 AM Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:25 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:23 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:13 PM Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:30 AM Your ward councillor should know the businesses, neighbourhoods and general concerns of the area. They need to live in that ward or be familiar with the ward. Engage with these citizens. Having some councillors at large City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 143 of 275 Page 424 of 936 would allow for a more broad approach that would take into consideration the thoughts of multiple wards and Guelph residents as a whole. Often times it feels like some councillors care more about other wards than their own - this may help eliminate that. This would also allow councillors who may not live in the ward they want to run in, to run for the city. Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:42 PM I see my local Councillor's role as being an advocate for my community. They should be focused on the issues that their constituents hold to be important. A city-wide councillor should be focused on issues that affect the whole citizenry or issues that have multi-ward considersations. I would like to see 6 ward based councillors and 2 city-wide councillors. To me this is brings more perspective to the table. My understanding is that mixed systems are often equal, ie. 4 ward based and 4 city wide. I believe the bias should still be the ward based model, but there is value in a full city vision. Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:59 PM I;d like to be able to keep the ward element - as that increases geographic representation - while also having an extra vote or two to throw behind whichever councillor I find most inspiring. Anonymous 8/26/2020 05:12 PM Broader consideration for the City as a whole Anonymous 8/26/2020 06:50 PM Each voter would have more say in the composition of the council. Anonymous 8/27/2020 06:42 AM Balance with city wide overview ( what is best for the city) but some local. Don't want a not in my backyard silo sections of Guelph. Anonymous 8/27/2020 08:22 AM Race for ward representatives and city wide race for board members such as finance, chairman, mayor is how European countries like Berlin typically elect city officials. Not to sound like a european-phile but that seems pretty reasonable to me. Anonymous 8/27/2020 09:30 AM There are times that decisions for the whole city need to be made and with only ward based councillors they may look at the issue based only on their ward, not for the good of the whole city. Anonymous 8/27/2020 09:39 PM To allow for a more diverse council Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:43 AM Continuing with some ward councilors ensures every area continues to have a specific voice. By combining some city-wide councilors allows a stronger non-bias voice for larger issues in specific areas. Anonymous 8/28/2020 01:08 PM Hopefully a better representation of the citizens and what is wanted for the city as a whole Anonymous 8/28/2020 06:26 PM Some people running for council in another would be great for the city in my opinion but I am not able to support them if they aren't in my ward. And, City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 144 of 275 Page 425 of 936 some people running in my ward don't resonate me. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:50 PM Electing a Councillor for a specific ward would allow for residents to have a close relationship with a Councillor who understands local community needs and can address those through policy at city council. their role would be to address the issues of local residents specifically. As for a city wide Councillor, their role would be more focused on city wide issues that concern or impact all residents and their role would be to not only address local community issues but those bigger specific issues as well. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:59 PM There would be councillors invested in the well being of the city in a more holistic and organic way, not simply in the issues concerning their ward and their "constituency". Cities are living organisms and the well being of an organ determines the well being of the whole. At least this is how we should think of them. Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:51 PM some Councillors to vote reflecting ward concerns and some for overall city concerns. Anonymous 8/30/2020 07:03 PM - This would create a council which represents both the specific neighbourhoods , as well as the city as a whole. - Having both ward based and city wide councillors creates a system where change can easily happen in specific areas as well as across the whole city. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:29 AM We are apt to have better candidates emerge from some wards who can both be elected as one could be ward-based and one, city wide. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:08 AM Citizens would be able to freely choose whom to vote for across all candidates, as well as have a local representative to contact when issues arise in their neighbourhood. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:18 AM More critical view of what is best for the City. Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:07 PM There may be issues where what a particular ward wants it addressed in a way that best serves their needs but it may not always be the best resolution for the City as a whole. Having a mixed system would allow a voice for the City as a whole. Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:15 PM Easy to comprehend representation and better representation than we have now! "History is written for our example". In other words we are to learn from history, especially if we realize that is the BEST way to apply a decision (decision means to "cut off"). We have tried more complex solutions and it is time now in 2020 to go back to the basics (KISS - "Keep It Short and Simple") Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:57 PM some issues need a local approach (like speeding on my street) - it is good to have a councillor to pay attention. Other issues are better dealt with city- wide Anonymous Some Councillors tend to only focus on what their ward needs sometimes at City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 145 of 275 Page 426 of 936 8/31/2020 07:01 PM the expense of the city as a whole. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:21 PM Better able to vote for people who represent you as a person in your community. Anonymous 9/01/2020 06:07 AM This would allow for ward representation and a voice at the table while enabling possibly 3 or 4 strong candidates from a particular ward to be elected. This does bring up the question of a possible imbalance of how certain areas of the city are represented which I can see is the argument to maintain only ward Councillors. The combination of both would be with a vision of increasing the quality of Council and not swing the balance of representation. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:01 AM the overall interests of the City would take more precedence over ward issues. the whole is the focus not the ward or special interests. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:59 AM You would not have areas pitted against another. Too much NIMBY currently going on in the City. The dog parks are a disaster and the building heights of apartments in certain areas is another ruinous eye sore. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:21 PM You want the best people on city council but you also need a connect with the populace. A hybrid system seems the best way of achieving this. Anonymous 9/01/2020 05:42 PM Individual wards need at least one councilor to be sure citizens have someone to represent them and also at large could help to make decisions for whole city. Important to have at large councillors not to just listen to one ward Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:15 PM 1 councillor per ward that talks to residents and gets feedback to properly advocate and a couple of councillors that support the mayor and the entire city Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:07 PM local representation for each ward, and the ability to elect "position" or "issue" Councillors as well. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:45 AM I FIRMLY believe we need a councillor who intimately understands a ward. Each area of this city has unique interests and needs. The South End is entirely different from downtown, and ALL areas need to be heard and represented. At-large councillors could help to move decision making forward from the “big picture” perspective when there are conflicts between the needs of the different wards and their representatives. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:51 AM Would help even out the playing field between councillors and their own agendas Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:07 AM This means that ward councillors will remain connected and anchored to their communities so they can better represent them, while the city-wide councillors can bring a city-wide perspective and provide additional point of contacts for citizens in case ward councillors are underperforming. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 146 of 275 Page 427 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM A larger pool of public office minded citizens not impacted by where you live, while still having individuals focused on smaller municipal segments and their unique needs. I see this option as the ‘best of both ‘. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM Many issues are relevant to my ward only and myself, traffic calming etc, but I would also like a say on how decisions are made that affect me in other wards. I would like to be able to directly impact, through voting or as a voting citizen having influence on a councillor, issues in other wards. I work in ward 4, shop in other wards as well, travel all over the city and use services and infrastructure throughout. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:16 AM "Local" concerns could be addressed by ward councilors while those chosen "at large" could focus more on larger issues concerning the entire community. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:44 AM encouraging a variety of perspectives - not ward politics, but city politics can be considered. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:22 AM Now, I am not an expert on this stuff so I may not fully appreciate all potential outcomes. Are we considering instant run-off or ranked voting? I'd like to maintain ward-specific representation, but often I find candidates in other wards more aligned with my political preferences. I understand there has been a lack of diversity among at-large councillors in the past, and people may feel that ward-specific representation helps address that concern. What if I was allowed to vote for a mayor, a candidate in my ward, and a second candidate running in any ward? Elected councillors would still represent their wards, and community members could support policies rather than just politicians. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:23 AM What happens in another end of town matters to all. Guelph area are still common to all. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:33 AM The ward system allows for individual groups and voices to be heard. It is also less expensive to run in just a ward so allows for those with less financial resources to also get elected. However, just wards do not necessarily have councillors making decisions in the best interest of the city. A combination would allow for individual input, however, they must also make sense for Guelph. Realistically, just a city at large system could result in people whose names are most prominent to get elected, as the majority of citizens do not invest a lot of time and energy into municipal politics. Anonymous 9/02/2020 10:24 AM Wards have particular issues and need to be represented but we also need broad city wide representation beyond the mayor. I like this mix a lot. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:32 AM a fairer and more accurate representation of the residents of the city, and a way to keep the council from being too large. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:31 PM To have only the mayor as the single person on council elected by the whole city places an unfair burden on that person. I would like to see at least a City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 147 of 275 Page 428 of 936 couple of other people who are city-wide. Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:41 PM It is the qualities of the candidate that is important to me. We have had no choice since the award system was introduced they have hogged the positions and do not return calls and generally unavailable! Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:32 PM That way the two councillors in a ward can't dominate as a pair within their ward, because as it stands now, other individuals wishing to challenge them at election time may be at a disadvantage. A combination plan might also ensure that more councillors are seeing the bigger picture for the city as a whole. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:48 PM It allows more diversity of skills and ability of councillors available Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:45 AM The local ward representative would be able to reflect the needs of that specific group. The city wide councillors could then consider matters from the city wide perspective. The dog parks are a great example. They are only located in 2 wards but benefit the city as a whole. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:23 AM There are ward specific issues and citywide issues. A combination could address both. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:35 AM Some elections make sense for city-wide and some don't. Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:46 PM Representation for different needs in different areas, east v south Guelph for example. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:05 PM 1 representative of local concerns and ideas - wider view of the personality of the citizens that are engaged. Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:14 PM Ward based should be focused on the concerns of their citizens who vote them into that position, the at-large should be non-biased as far as Ward issues, concentrating on the larger overall picture for the good of the City as a whole. Anonymous 9/03/2020 03:34 PM To help elect voices that represent our specific communities well in addition to specific concerns we have on top of that, relevant to the whole city. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:15 PM Best candidates out of the pool and removing greater focus on candidates in an area. Councillors can learn about the area by connecting with residents. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:21 PM Currently, most incumbents win, it is very difficult to have new people on council. City wide at large positions positions would provide an opportunity for some additional representation. All positions should be based on a ranked ballot not first past the post. Anonymous It would help eliminate the concept that one ward is getting more than City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 148 of 275 Page 429 of 936 9/03/2020 06:22 PM another ward. Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:00 PM Simply there would still be local ward representatives but also the ability to elect intriguing candidates to rep the city as a whole. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:21 AM Prevent NIMBY mentality but maintains live experience in regions. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:29 AM Why would a bright councilor who brings talent to the table be regulated to a small geographic area? There are issues and considerations that impact the entire city and need to be viewed accordingly. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:00 AM My wars councillors have never listened to my comments. It's always 'thats not my job's. Having floaters to address issues in different areas would make the process more democratic Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:16 AM Sometimes there are several excellent candidates in one ward and we are losing their talents. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:23 AM Having primary councillors elected by the city and then secondary councillors that are more ward specific. This brings more awareness to who is actually in council (if they're not in my ward I probably have no idea who they are or what they stand for), so by voting for primary councillors as a city, you get a better idea of who is actually making decisions about the city. The secondary councillors would be elected by the ward, and would be part of the expanding the # of councillors but these would have a more community focus. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:51 AM Some wards appear to have numerous great choices, and only 2 make it in. Others have poor choices, so they still end up being elected. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:22 AM increases accountability towards both the ward and the city Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:22 AM Help certain areas but also look out for city in general Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:44 AM You need ward based councillors to represent constituents concerns in their own wards. However, it would be advantageous to be able to vote for other candidates outside your own ward that you feel have excellent qualities and ideas. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:06 AM Allows everyone to be involved in the entire city ! As we all travel /conduct some sort of interaction in all area's of the city no matter what part we live in . Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:08 AM Full time city wide acting primarily to oversee city operations, part time Ward councillors focused on resident concerns City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 149 of 275 Page 430 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:05 AM See larger picture of whole city versus ward focus. When an issue happens currently in a word citizens say oh we'll remember this - for good or bad and that's often not the councillors fault or heroics. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:48 AM Allows most ward to be represented while allowing people to elect councilors that will do what's best for all of guelph. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:56 AM Wards express the vested interest of a neighbourhood, but city wide could be the deciding factor in municipal progression as a whole. Less infighting. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:12 PM More over sight as a city as a whole Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:31 PM The ability to support a strong candidate who may not be my ward representative Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:57 PM local representation is still important, but there are city-wide issues that affect us all, and i like the idea of 'representation' based on bigger picture as well. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:58 PM Ward based allows community's properly reprinted, but having a pool would allow areas with no representation the chance for there word Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:29 PM Responsive to hyper local specific geographical issues and also balance with overall city-wide Vision. Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:44 PM until the population stabilizes, I would like to see a combination - advantages listed above Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:18 PM Constituency work my require the ward-specific knowledge held by ward Councillors, while some issues are clearly City-wide. Importantly, I think it would be a serious mistake to have exclusively at-large Councillors since consituency work would then naturally gravitate to a subset of Councillors who are perceived by citizens to be especially good at this work. This would lead to an imbalance of Councillors' workloads which, in turn, would land on The Horseshoe in the form of political gamesmanship. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:59 PM The city has regions that are quite different. So local representation is important. At large positions could focus on city wide issues. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:55 PM A city-wide election would allow representation of demographics which are not geographically concentrated. However, it's also important to have some geographic representation -- people would be unhappy otherwise! We need a combination of both. Maybe an at-large election where the top six candidates win, and the person with the most votes overall becomes mayor? In addition to the two candidates per ward system. Optional question (119 response(s), 537 skipped) City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 150 of 275 Page 431 of 936 Question type: Essay Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 151 of 275 Page 432 of 936 Q14 From a citizen of Guelph perspective, how many Councillors should be elected from each ward? 229 (34.9%) 229 (34.9%) 345 (52.6%) 345 (52.6%) 9 (1.4%) 9 (1.4%)25 (3.8%) 25 (3.8%)48 (7.3%) 48 (7.3%) Elect one councillor per ward Elect more than one Councillor per ward It doesn't matter to me I am unsure Other (please specify) Question options Mandatory Question (656 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 152 of 275 Page 433 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:41 AM should always be more then 1 Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:46 AM Less of a chance for competing interests and focus. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:15 AM It's hard enough getting in touch with my ward councillor now and I have two. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 AM If full-time then 1 per ward, if part-time then 2 Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:06 AM I think we need one full-time Councillor per ward, not two councillors doing this work part-time/off the side of their desk. We need Councillors to be fully engaged in understanding the work of the city and representing their constituents. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:19 AM gives one voice to a local community. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:52 AM A balance between maintaining the ward system of the city while recognizing the city has grown. Anonymous 8/17/2020 10:08 AM If full-time, having one councillor (and the associated staff for said councillor) per ward should suffice for community engagement. If part-time, with no associated staff as per the current model, there should be multiple options available to reach a councillor, as one may not be available due to other commitments. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:10 AM Smaller wards with one councillor reduces the overlap and shrinks the citizens per ward. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:27 AM See above Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:15 PM - If one is unable to do their job for some reason such as illness, holiday, etc you can go to the other one. - If one doesn't really represent your views, you have someone else to go to. - Two member wards have generally done well for Guelph for a long time, why change it now Anonymous 8/17/2020 12:23 PM I'll say that i think it facilitates a more robust debate. It allows the Councillors to be prepared and focused on their full time job rather than splitting it Q15 Please share your ideas about WHY you recommended that number of councillors per ward. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 153 of 275 Page 434 of 936 between 2. Not to mention 2 councillors from the same ward may disagree on the best course of action. This would again help facilitate a better ability to communicate between constituents and councillors. IMO. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:15 PM More than one Councilor---if the votes are counted properly---allows different points of view to be reflected from one Ward. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:33 PM two currently, need that to continue Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:33 PM Smaller wards with 1 Councillor would allow for more connections to that area and easier on Council members to manage. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:15 PM One councillor per ward means better accountability. A single full-time councillor can focus their efforts on a particular ward and if they citizens find them to be unavailable, they can be held accountable. There isn't the option to go to the other councillor such as in the two per ward system which I fear can hide poor representation and work. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:47 PM So they can be full time Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:52 PM We need to keep costs in check and I question what value we get from having 2 versus 1. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:28 PM One councillor is all that is needed. Two councillors per ward is unnecessarily redundant. The two councillors may not even agree with each other, essentially canceling their vote. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:57 PM Only ONE Councillor per Ward is needed to engage with the public to understand the interests of citizens and to represent those interests when making decisions. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:57 PM Allows for teamwork, diversity, new ideas Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:00 PM That's the best way Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:04 PM already discussed that Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:17 PM Succession planning for one — an experienced councilor as we had with Karl, along with incoming councilor in Mark, and now Dominique in Ward 6. Provides diversity of experience, opinion, and long-term continuity. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:43 PM Two or more Councillors per ward provide additional perspectives for concerns that arise within their community. Citizens have the opportunity to City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 154 of 275 Page 435 of 936 work with Councillors with different views. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:48 PM I believe that residents require access to their councilors so more than one per ward sounds appropriate. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:49 PM Efficient representativeness. Our population rose from just under 96,000 in 1996, giving a ratio of 7985 residents per 1 councillor (with a council of 12). Today, with a population of 131,794 (2016 census) that ratio is 10,983 residents per councillor. To achieve a number closer to the 7985, we would need at least 16 councillors to get 8237 residents per councillor. My suggestion of a 17th seat is to entertain the idea of a single rep dedicated to University of Guelph students. As for 2 per ward, I think it is essential if the part-time role continues, and I do not think Guelphites want more full-time, career politicians. The advantage of 2 per ward is if you have a ward like Ward 1 (Two Rivers, Grange Hill East, St George), you have a mix of very affluent with new suburban with poor. Having the chance to elect a councillor who understands your needs is more likely with more than 1 councillor. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:50 PM From my experience working in municipal government, one per ward is enough. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:51 PM Number of councillors per ward depends on if part-time vs full- time and the budget cost for annual salaries. Anonymous 8/17/2020 04:57 PM One person does not represent, the residents of a ward. The council could be more representative or even diverse. Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:11 PM Some wards are quite large and Guelph is growing. Wards are getting more diverse and they need to have more than one representative. Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:22 PM This allows for the combo of ward and members at large without significantly expanding the size of council. You can actually reduce the size Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:42 PM One of my councillors hasn't been responsive and the other has. If I only had one, I worry if get stuck with the unresponsive one. Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:51 PM Better chance of success? Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:04 PM Two councillors per ward add to a "hung jury" mentality in council. There is less need to cooperate with other councillors when you have a built-in partner for support Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:38 PM See above Anonymous To allow everyone the ability to contact and communicate with their City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 155 of 275 Page 436 of 936 8/17/2020 08:51 PM representative, there should be more than 1 councillor per ward, or smaller wards. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 PM As noted above, our population is growing rapidly. There is no way one person can respond to all concerns Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:33 PM We need new blood Current views and people not directly benefit from planning. Take the blinders off and move forward Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:44 PM - It is critical that there be an alternate in case one councillor is unable to fulfill their duties due to illness, injury, etc. - it forces some dialogue within each ward at least between the two councillors instead of one person speaking for an entire ward with one voice (if two councillors from the same ward agree that is a good indication of broad support, if they don't that is an indication of unresolved differences that need to be addressed, NEITHER situation is possible with single member wards) Anonymous 8/17/2020 10:36 PM one is no good. 2 is good. during last 50 years . some years one Councillor is hard working and responsive and the other isn't. sometimes both Councillors are good. need the security of two per ward. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:37 AM It depends on how many wards. Our wards are too large. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:07 AM fewer personal agendas Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:31 AM Diversity of opinion. It is the way municipal government works. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:52 AM I still think it should be smaller and city wide , but if we have to have wards, we still need less people and more accountability. Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:03 AM gives balanced perspective on ward issues. Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:53 AM In my previous answers, I indicated my support for a mixed approach. Given this, I believe that each ward could be served by one councillor. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:39 AM as noted above Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:41 AM Two Councillors ensure interests are not captured by any one group. It allows more discourse, which is important in local governance. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:41 AM If we must stay with the Ward system, it gives citizens a better chance of being represented. For instance, in my Ward, there has traditionally been City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 156 of 275 Page 437 of 936 one councilor who is more "left-leaning" and one who is more "right-leaning". If only one councilor per Ward, the divisiveness may be exacerbated. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:59 AM If you make Councillors full-time, then you may only need one per ward. Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:02 AM Councillors can work together, sharing the load to keep the job part-time. Helpful backup for each other during vacations or every day work. Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:51 AM This allows for a little bit more diversity, opportunities for teamwork, and perhaps even gender parity. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:06 AM One per ward isn't sufficient. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:08 AM duplication of efforts.single source of truth and information. Sometimes both councilors are not aligned. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:18 AM 1 per-ward so each ward is represented Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:29 AM answered above. 1 per 20K Anonymous 8/18/2020 11:58 AM I have found that over the years that councillors may enter local politics for selfish reasons-perhaps to prevent or encourage certain goals. With 2 councillors that goal may be harder to achieve. Anonymous 8/18/2020 01:15 PM Again, I think that's all we need especially if those councillors are full time. Anonymous 8/18/2020 12:48 PM If it remains a ward system then having more voices around the horseshoe is a more democratic council. Anonymous 8/18/2020 01:29 PM Don't need 2 , not enough to do añd only causes problems if they dont agree Anonymous 8/18/2020 02:48 PM Two councillors per ward allows for diversity within the ward. Some wards can be quite large and be very diverse, socially. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:05 PM One full time councilor is more engaged than two part time councilors and reduces duplication in communication from constituents. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:18 PM It makes sense to have two people with different strengths, experience and points of view to offer insights and to back each other up to ensure the needs of the people they represent are met. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 157 of 275 Page 438 of 936 Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:15 PM We need more than one voice on council for our concerns, if there are only ward-based elections. If ward plus city-wide, one per ward will do. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:46 PM 1 per ward + 6 city wide seems like a good mix of local and whole community to address issues Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:51 PM Possibly have better individuals getting involved that might be more fiscally response. People with business common sense. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:10 PM I have never met my councilors, they are not visible in the community as lime our amazing Mayor. 2 or 3 (depending on the Ward size) Part Time Councilors will be able to hold down a regular job and family commitments as well as the city commitments. Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:58 PM Wards are not small and neither are the problems. 2 councillors can pool ideas and also support each other Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:10 PM I object to a ward system to prejudice me with this question as wards create barriers, competition and prerjudice. The whole of the city is greater than the sum of the ward parts. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:15 PM I is more then adequate. Anonymous 8/19/2020 05:36 AM Greater diversity of councillors representing a ward. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:11 AM I would like to see 6 ward councilors, 2 at large, all full time. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:27 AM More balanced representation, esp. if one councillor unavailable Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:49 AM One person is enough to represent us. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:57 AM If the job remains part-time then 2 Councillors makes sense, if it were to go to full time, then 1 per ward makes sense. Anonymous 8/19/2020 08:45 AM If we cut the number of councillors in half then there will be no room for diversity, for the inexperienced. Anonymous 8/19/2020 11:47 AM I believe that 2 councillors elected per ward is the correct number. I do however believe that the city has grown to the point that we should re-draw the ward boundaries and increase the number of Wards from 6 to 7. Anonymous Having two councillors per ward has been working well in Guelph and I think City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 158 of 275 Page 439 of 936 8/19/2020 11:54 AM we should stick with the current council composition. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:08 PM There are many issues to cover in each ward. As the population increases and the growth continues, more than one councillor helps share the responsibilities. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:27 PM Unsure what would be best. Maybe 1 or 2 would be good. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:36 PM Particularly paired with ranked ballots, you could end up with more positive elections, reduced barriers for new candidates, and potentially representation of a wider swath of views in the community. This is highly preferable to very small, somewhat arbitrary geographical blocks electing single councillors, which often results in impenetrable incumbency advantage, little turnover, and less diverse representation. Anonymous 8/19/2020 03:42 PM More representation Anonymous 8/19/2020 03:43 PM See above. Anonymous 8/19/2020 05:15 PM Two council members in wards have demonstrated working against each other And cancel out their votes Anonymous 8/19/2020 06:10 PM Allows for some differences within each ward. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:42 PM Shadowing,resources,redundancy Anonymous 8/19/2020 09:11 PM Having more than one councillor per ward is a key strength for Guelph. Cities are complex and having thoughtful discussions require more than one voice speaking for issues. Also, it is about the voter's experience of being represented and having their vote be effective. If more votes are effective the representation is better as I have explained in #7. Anonymous 8/20/2020 04:43 AM i've contacted my current councillor about issues and she is doesn't get the ball moving. it's "oh well, i'll email this GENERAL CITY EMAIL " um no. PICK UP THE PHONE AND GET THINGS DONE Anonymous 8/20/2020 06:01 AM With 2 councillors per ward, it is allows for collaboration, a variety of perspectives, and allows citizens some choice when contacting their representative. Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:42 AM I think it would help if they were full-time councillors, one per ward. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 159 of 275 Page 440 of 936 I find that two provides a balanced approach - it means that one councillor may not empathize with you but the other does. It allows shared work between Councillors and can ensure that at least one Ward Councillor is available to attend Council meetings. Better representation, for all voters. It only takes one councillor to effectively represent each ward. Provided that the councillor actually votes the way that the citizens in their ward want. two in my ward seem to bot have a ward vision, only after own interests (?) allows councillors to work together on town halls. Allows for representing diverse views within a ward Can have differing opinions or focus One councillor one ward. Avoids regression in democratic representation. Multiple councillours per ward allows work burden on addressing ward-specific issues to be spread between multiple representatives. Allows voters in each ward more opportunitty to have their opinion on an issue represented in council. Councillors from a single ward can differ or share views on an issue, potentially better representing the consensus/division of the ward's voters. Fulltime councillors Don’t understand why we need two councils per ward. Totally waste of salary. less government the better as in our private life we need to learn to live within our means. Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:45 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:15 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 09:35 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:01 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:12 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:52 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 11:12 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 12:57 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 03:35 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 05:06 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 05:40 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 07:22 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:01 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:28 PM Having 2 councillors per ward allows more work on behalf of and responsiveness to the concerns of the ward residents. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 160 of 275 Page 441 of 936 Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:33 PM Elect 2 so we have options Anonymous 8/20/2020 09:06 PM See above Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:40 AM Fuller representation of concerns of citizens Anonymous 8/21/2020 07:00 AM lots of reasons - many issues, personal availability, multiple persectives - it's too much for one person. they'd end up needing staff ($), and that person would not be accountable. Anonymous 8/21/2020 08:12 AM I like having two councillors for our ward. They work well as a team and find room for different perspectives. Anonymous 8/21/2020 08:38 AM Councillors bring some diversity of views and approach to each ward; redundancy is important e.g. when one councillor may be ill, away for conferences or other reasons; the workload is significant and should be shared Anonymous 8/21/2020 09:07 AM more ideas better for the city with more coucillors onboard Anonymous 8/21/2020 10:36 AM Because it works. More than 2 would be inefficient, but having 2 councillors means you probably always have some level of representation, even if one of the two is a dud or is absent for some reason. Anonymous 8/21/2020 12:46 PM It is often nice having a teammate to confer with before making decisions, so why not have a fellow ward councillor to help make decisions with? Anonymous 8/21/2020 01:12 PM As stated above - to ensure there is availability of a councillor when a citizen has an issue. Anonymous 8/21/2020 02:05 PM Allows City to increase number of wards as it grows but still maintain 12 councillors or close to that number. Anonymous 8/21/2020 04:14 PM Two councillors per ward gives better choices to the voter first past the post prevents a voter from expressing support for two very well qualified candidates each of whom deserves support. Having two councillors per ward allows for the possibility of the two working co-operatively together to better represent the expressed interests of residents in their ward on contentious issues. Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:30 PM As per the attached document, I am more inclined to err on the side of having more representation than less. In the case that one councillor is unresponsive to a citizens needs, having a second councillor would provide additional avenues for citizen engagement. Having two councillors approach city staff to City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 161 of 275 Page 442 of 936 advocate for their constituents would be preferable to one councillor forgetting to do so. However, I am inclined to prefer the Chatham-Kent model of having the number of councillors be dependant on the size of the ward if they were to be developed in a way that led to population size differences. Anonymous 8/22/2020 09:58 AM Better chance of representation of ALL ward residents, not just the loudest or wealthiest or most influential. Councillors also have an individual to discuss issues of the ward and how best to strategize to meet the demands and solve issues. Two heads are better than one Anonymous 8/22/2020 11:15 AM Single voices that don't have validation or correction from another are dangerous. Having 3 per ward might be best. Anonymous 8/22/2020 11:26 AM Best representation by equal population size to make up eight members Anonymous 8/23/2020 10:45 AM This allows for greater number of positions on policy to be given consideration and for opposing views to be debated. Anonymous 8/23/2020 04:15 PM Need for ability to get involved and know what is going on, to be an advocate of your community'needs. Anonymous 8/23/2020 07:09 PM Better and fairer representation. Anonymous 8/24/2020 07:38 AM We're too big to have just one - that's a lot of people and a lot of work for one councillor! Anonymous 8/24/2020 08:41 AM Again it is a cost situation and more importantly if there is a move to full time councilors Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:23 AM Less councilors but paid full-time. Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:36 AM I feel it should be one per ward on a full time basis Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:55 AM see above Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:26 AM The present system of two councillors per ward works well. It isn't broken, so let's not try to fix it. In particular, having two councillors per ward means that one councillor is usually available to "cover" for another, in cases of illness, vacations, travel to meetings, etc. Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:35 AM Providing just one contact ensures clarity, consistency and a single point of focus for community members and City staff alike. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 162 of 275 Page 443 of 936 Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:49 AM I am very pleased with Guelph's electoral system of 2 councillors per ward, plus the mayor elected at large. I work for a smaller municipality that is elected at large and it has the drawback of becoming more partisan v. focused on local/neighbourhood concerns. Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:51 AM If ward sizes are reduced i think 1 is fine if they are not then two is better. Each councillor should represent roughly the same number of people. Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:15 PM There is too much grouping up of Councillors with an agenda Anonymous 8/24/2020 12:58 PM are the wards too big one Councillor? is two too costly and unwieldy ? we could eliminate 1/2 the Councillors and make the job full time my fear with that is that Councillors become career politicians . that s not good for any anyone Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:39 PM Having two voices and two ideas for how our ward should tackle issues is a great way to engage a wide variety of differences of opinion on matters that affect the city and our wards Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:44 PM To have at least one councilor represent the needs of that ward. Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:48 PM What country doesn't have two presidents? What riding doesn't have two MPs? Where would catholicism be without the popes? Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:59 PM A minimum of two Councillors per ward ensures a Councillor from a particular ward is always available, even in the case that a Councillor is on vacation, ill, etc. Furthermore, a single Councillor shouldn't be relied upon to represent a ward in case of conflicts of interest. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:01 PM No Wards Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:01 PM There need to be more voices to facilitate discussion and critically evaluate all sides of an issue. it doesn't mean every side of an issue needs to be addressed and implemented, but it at least needs to be given a forum to let us decide why is needs to be heard or not. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:15 PM 1 councillor per ward and the remainder at-larger councillors Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:16 PM In my view, each Ward should have roughly the same number of residents.... We live in Ward 2 and I know that the volume of work -- for part-time Councillors -- definitely justifies two. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:54 PM Multiple councillors per ward makes it more likely that ward representation is more diverse, and represents a greater number of the people of the ward. In City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 163 of 275 Page 444 of 936 a 'winner takes all' electoral system, limiting ward representation to just one councillor makes it highly likely that a large number (or even a majority) of constituents are not represented by the person they voted for. That's not acceptable. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:57 PM 2 part time people per ward are needed for the number of people they represent and can respond to. I’d rather have 2 part time people than one full time. Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:00 PM lets be realistic- one person can't possibly reflect the needs and desires of 20,000 people! two seems reasonable Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:37 PM Increasing the number of wards to e.g. nine means fewer councillors, if only one per ward, and having them work more hours but not full time, keeps the integrity of our current system of accountability but leads to less confusion. Please note my answer in relationship to Q9. Anonymous 8/24/2020 04:25 PM the pay is around $40K for part time work, thats enuff for council member considering they could work less and get more done if they stop talking and not working, they dont work that much Anonymous 8/24/2020 05:39 PM Two councillors works well to share responsibilities. Support for each other. Divide workload. Anonymous 8/24/2020 06:00 PM Because it encourages gender diversity. Also, it allows more informed voices at council for each ward, ensuring that a wider range of input in running the city. Anonymous 8/24/2020 06:19 PM It's important to have multiple voices to reduce bias. Anonymous 8/24/2020 07:57 PM It is unnecessary and too costly to have more than one councillor per ward. Anonymous 8/24/2020 08:27 PM As I argued above, one councilor per ward would be have difficulty listening to and representing the interests of everyone in that ward. It's too big of a job. Anonymous 8/24/2020 09:03 PM More than one councillor per ward allows for diverse opinions within a ward. But the ward system should be maintained. Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:15 PM 2 councillors per ward means spreading out the work load and someone to cover the ward if one gets sick, etc. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:03 AM The wards are large so I feel at least 2 councillors are necessary to handle true community engagement as well as the work load. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:24 AM To allow for diversity of representation within a ward and to provide citizens with greater access to city government and decision that affect their lives. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 164 of 275 Page 445 of 936 Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:38 AM It's about representation. Two councillors per ward means that it is more likely that at least one of them will be from an equity-seeking part of our community. This is important to me. Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:57 AM More representation of the ward residents and the work load is divided equally between the Councillors so that they can get more coverage of their Ward. Anonymous 8/25/2020 08:25 AM Councilors are currently "part-time" but they're expected to put in well-beyond full-time hours. This is lunacy. This system, which requires councilors to likely maintain a full-time job at the same time, creates a problematic working environment. They're overworked and expected to juggle city council and a job. Insane. Cut it to one full-time councilor per ward so that they can actually put their entire focus on bettering their ward, serving their constituents, and benefiting our city. If you continue the part-time model, we'll continue to get half-baked ideas that aren't well-thought-out because they simply don't have the time to do the proper due-diligence and back-end work. Anonymous I don't see engagement or contribution form either of my councilors so, why have 2? Because then you have 6 councillor seats that go to whoever is voted as the best, and 6 seats for the various wards to ensure representation. This way someone running with a specific platform thats universal to the whole city, can possibly get elected if enough Guelph ppl think its a good idea. They will represent ppl who are not grouped by location, but by ideals. The City has grown both in size and diversity. Two Councilors per ward has worked well so adding one more Ward with two additional Councilors for that ward would seem logical There are currently 2 councillors in my ward and I find this confusing and wasteful. The second councillor is redundant. Fewer Councillors and smaller wards makes sense to me. I don't see the benefit in duplicating the number of representatives for an area. It just makes one of them superfluous. Having two councilors per ward gives good representation for the people of the ward. There is more than one view to represent the people. I think this promotes more diversity on council. To support full time councillors I feel like 1 full-time councillor with a smaller ward could do the job of 2 part- time councillors with a larger ward. Also, helps when there is just one contact for issues. 8/25/2020 10:15 AM Anonymous 8/25/2020 11:26 AM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:03 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:09 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:09 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:18 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:27 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:31 PM Anonymous In my ward that works well. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 165 of 275 Page 446 of 936 8/25/2020 12:36 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:16 PM Again, I think that this will encourage participation on council from a more diverse population; geographically, and by gender and other measures of diversity Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:22 PM Please see answer to question #1 Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:36 PM Might get along better and make wise decisions Anonymous 8/25/2020 02:45 PM I support 1 full-time Councillor per ward - this would provide the same level of political and policy support at Council and to the community with greater capacity to do this work professionally rather than around existing work responsibilities. I've heard comments that we should maintain 2 Councillors per ward so that residents can go to an alternative Councillor if they don't get along with one. Let's be adults - we all have to get along and work with people politically and professionally that we have differing views from. We don't have 2 MP's or MPP's. Only one is needed. Anonymous 8/25/2020 02:50 PM If it is going to be a full time position, 1 per ward is plenty. Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:16 PM Just not sure we need two, especially if number of constituents per ward goes down. Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:21 PM RACI - Responsible, Accountable, Consulted and Informed Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:25 PM Effectively functioning groups decline rapidly as the number increases. Boards which are too small become self-serving. For a city the size of Guelph , six wards of 20,000- 30,000@ 2 each = 12 councillors Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:32 PM Similar to now, but smaller ward boundaries. Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:42 PM Brings more voices to the table Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:23 PM I think 2 per ward is fine if the make-up of council is larger through adding at large councillors. If not adding at large councillors, 3 per ward would be better, but still feels like a lot. Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:28 PM Not all councillors are responsive and engaged with their community. Having more than one will hopefully ensure each ward will at least have one good councillor City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 166 of 275 Page 447 of 936 Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:44 PM I like our current system Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:48 PM Less drama and more actual debates Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:58 PM If we have only one, what would happen if that councillor is sick or in the hospital?, the ward would have no representative at all, I don't think Guelph is big enough to go for three, and two seems to be the average on similar cities so two would be good. Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:13 PM We need more diversity and more ideas Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:13 PM To reflect more accurately the population Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:28 PM To increase the chances that people from visible minority groups, and other marginalized communities will have a place at the council table. Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:34 PM Too much work for one person. City and citizens would suffer Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:11 PM To represent a spectrum of needs and ideas across a Ward Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:31 PM Allows for difference of opinion leading to healthy discussion Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:55 PM A single councillor per ward, elected under out first past the post system, could win with the support of a small minority of ward voters. Anonymous 8/25/2020 08:03 PM Collaboration and balanced perspective is important to me, as well as a safe guard against error and intent. Anonymous 8/25/2020 09:06 PM Because if One councillor is unresponsive, then perhaps the other could pick up the slack. I recently wrote to my Ward councillors about a concern and only one responded. Anonymous 8/25/2020 09:52 PM Because you can’t please everyone. It’s better to have more voices at the table. Anonymous 8/25/2020 11:37 PM An opportunity to be engaged with a councilor without them being over burdened. Anonymous Because then the 2 councillors can collaborate if needed, or even represent City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 167 of 275 Page 448 of 936 8/26/2020 06:58 AM opposing views within their ward. The representation would be greater, and a greater chance for diversity in our representatives and their ideas. Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:21 AM To help provide a broader perspective than one individuals opinion. Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:30 AM Elect one councillor per ward, and 6 councillors at large. The one councillor per ward should take a resident/humanistic approach and really get to know the people, neighbourhoods and businesses. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:00 AM We need less government not more also our city council needs to be held more accountable for their spending and policies/by-laws need to be better enforced. Also, can the people of Guelph afford another tax increase to support a larger city council on a full time basis? Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:24 AM Number of Councillors depends on full time, part time and number of wards. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:26 AM Again, one person cannot represent a full range of diversity of individuals even within a ward. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:22 AM See my answer in response to question 6 above. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:27 AM As long as there is at least one per ward and they are elected, the area is having a chance to have their voices heard. I would hope that individual councillors would be able to represent/consider more than one perspective from within their wars b Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:32 AM A city councillor partnership in each ward would increase the capacity to respond to issues, given the ebb and flow of city council work, and the integration of city councillors into the communities. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:04 AM Ensures ward sizes (population wise) are too small. clwoolley 8/26/2020 10:17 AM I think we have too many "seat fillers" on council right now. We're bringing forth motions that have already been discussed and debated numerous times, taking away time and energy from the real issues at hand. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:31 AM More representation for our ward. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:58 AM 1. It's working as is. Not sure why this issue has come up for discussion. 2. Less seems unreasonable. The wards are huge already. 3. People are cash strapped. Our lives are more expensive than ever, and our wages are stagnant. No need to be paying more for government than we need to be. Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:42 AM one is enough...guelph is a small city. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 168 of 275 Page 449 of 936 Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:44 AM Because it increases the diversity of perspectives at the table, ensures a councillor will always be available even when one cannot serve, there will be more robust discussions at council. Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:46 AM I prefer 2-3 part- time councilors to one full-time. Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:36 PM I think it works and helps hold people accountable so there isn’t a monopoly. Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:42 PM Having engaged with my councillors, I see no value in the redundancy of two councillors. I had to meet with them both. I had to convince two people that my issue had merit. I had to manage two relationships. It is ineffective. Anonymous 8/26/2020 02:29 PM I prefer getting rid of ward system if not done we need less people anyway Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:10 PM More councillors per ward insures a balance of representation and guards against a lame councillor or one with other political aspirations. Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:22 PM Two councilors per ward allow for the ward to elect both a man and a woman, again adding to the diversity of the council. Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:28 PM Having more than one councillor per ward seems redundant and unnecessarily expensive. Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:32 PM They can help eachother and three could be the deciding voice if needed Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:48 PM I have been here long enough to remember the old at large system which I felt favoured the current group simply due to name recognition. So Ward elections and two per Ward seems adequate. Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:59 PM I;d have to look at data to see if this is evidence-based, but general trends in politics result in white men winning single races, for a number of reasons (access to resources, sexism, racism, etc.) However, with a second spot, it allows people to broaden the base of councillors. Anonymous 8/26/2020 05:12 PM One per Ward and possibly one at large Anonymous 8/26/2020 05:41 PM Focus of energies, perhaps better knowledge of ward issues Anonymous 8/26/2020 06:50 PM Already answered this question previously. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 169 of 275 Page 450 of 936 Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:15 PM I think that having too many voices at the table can sometimes stall and delay the agendas. If there were less councillors and they were very educated on what their constituents wanted the process would move more effectively. There would be no cost savings as I believe this should be a full time position to allow them to properly research these costly decisions. Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:29 PM with 6 wards a single councilor can comfortably represent 25,000-30,000 people. Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:32 PM It would be too easy to ignore citizen requests with only one councillor. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:03 PM Because it preserves local representation and provides a measure of choice for the population Anonymous 8/27/2020 06:42 AM We are not a Hamilton or Toronto Anonymous 8/27/2020 06:50 AM See above. Anonymous 8/27/2020 07:11 AM Differing opinions, different insights Anonymous 8/27/2020 07:58 AM I think even within the wards there are multiple communities at large that need to be thought of and supported. Diverse representatives are required in order to meet the needs of people. I recommend that there is a person of colour elected from every Ward and a councilor with experience in the municipal governing elected. Ideally, having a rather equal non-POC to POC ratio, this way our communities at large are being heard and understood. Anonymous 8/27/2020 08:22 AM Until wards exceed 200,000 constituents, I think that's plenty. Anonymous The wards aren't huge and I feel that one ward councillor is sufficient and have the citizens choose one city wide councillor as well. That will leave 12 on the council 8/27/2020 09:30 AM Anonymous 8/27/2020 10:15 AM Councillors from the same ward should see themselves as colleagues, so that if there is specific ward related issue they have 'backup' when meeting with the community or approaching council as a whole. Someone to brainstorm with. Also for the public, there are many different viewpoints and have two would allow for more choice so that everyone feels they have elected at least one person they feel confident represents them and their viewpoints. Anonymous 8/27/2020 12:12 PM We don't need 2 per ward so they can disagree! City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 170 of 275 Page 451 of 936 Anonymous 8/27/2020 01:34 PM The election is to choose the best people to fill council and after the election, to provide a contact for the citizenry. However, once elected, councillors should understand that they work on behalf of all residents in the City, not just those in their Ward. Anonymous 8/27/2020 02:20 PM I've explained this above. More diversity, means more collaboration toward unity, and true representation. :) Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:24 PM Because no one person should have a monopoly on the voices of a neighborhood; there are a variety of interests. Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:36 PM Councillors are human beings and sometimes they take holidays or they're of sick or I may not like one of them. We need more than one per ward and Guelph does not need more than a dozen councillors. One of the councillors per ward should be full time. Anonymous 8/27/2020 09:39 PM So that different voices can be heard Anonymous 8/28/2020 07:18 AM I believe councillor be able to devote all their time to the job Anonymous 8/28/2020 07:21 AM With the current ward boundaries there are very different demographics within the same ward so multiple councillors are required to serve all demographics. e.g. Ward 1 downtown has much different concerns than Ward 1 East of Victoria but for some reason they're the same ward. Anonymous 8/28/2020 08:42 AM Assuming that only one councillor were elected per ward, that councillor would reflect the ideologies of those who voted for him/ her. Given the exceptionally low turn out at municipal elections, it can be assumed that the single elected councillor would not reflect the diversity of opinion of those in the ward. If two councillors are elected, there is a much better prospect of adequate representation for ward residents. Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:14 AM There is too much work to be done to have just 6 Councillors and a Mayor, even if the Councillors are full-time. Guelph is a rapidly growing city and the complexity of the issues facing us is increasing as well. There was a tone throughout the background material that suggested that one of the intentions of these changes was to smooth out the democratic process, spending less time on discussion and discovery and just getting on with things. Democracy is messy, and sometimes makes halting progress towards its goals. I don't always see this as bad; in fact it is an often necessary activity so that we can reach the right solution together. Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:43 AM see above Anonymous Having more than means that each ward has more than one voice on City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 171 of 275 Page 452 of 936 8/28/2020 11:32 AM council. This is important, since reasonable people can still have different ideas for the best way to deal with issues. By having more than one rep, we are more likely to have councillors that work together to find consensus and really see issues from many angles. I also like that when one councillor decides to retire or is not re-elected, there is often still some continuity. Anonymous 8/28/2020 12:00 PM Wards are large and as part time politicians two can work together Anonymous 8/28/2020 12:13 PM two Councillors per ward to balance each other out and hopefully bring more diverse perspectives. (ideally!!) Anonymous 8/28/2020 01:46 PM This will mitigate some of the distortionary effects of a first-past-the-post system. Anonymous 8/28/2020 06:26 PM If there are only 6 wards I don't feel like that is enough councillors for our city. Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:18 PM It is important to have more than a single voice from each Anonymous 8/29/2020 04:14 AM Explained above in #5 Anonymous 8/29/2020 06:15 AM It gives those people in each ward 2 people to contact, if one is not available, or is not approachable. It allows a fairer perspective of issues in the ward. Anonymous 8/29/2020 07:29 AM I think we can shrink the size of the Wards, increase the # of Wards and then have 1 representative per Ward. Anonymous 8/29/2020 08:12 AM There are pros and cons to each model. I like having 2 councilors but one per ward may be better for accountability. Anonymous 8/29/2020 11:23 AM More wards and 1 Full Time Councillor, perhaps 10 instead of 12. Only need one. Distribution of work. Anonymous 8/29/2020 01:05 PM I don’t like ward system Anonymous 8/29/2020 04:23 PM 1) I like having a choice of who I can get in touch with. I like both my councillors for different reasons; I am grateful to have Bob Bell at the council table representing the interests of Ward 1, but on the other hand when I have a personal issue with municipal matters I prefer to contact Dan Gibson and he's great at fielding those calls. It's good to have two people who can cover both roles 2) having two per ward also makes election time more comfortable. Knowing that the top two will get elected, you don't have to City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 172 of 275 Page 453 of 936 worry so much about "strategic voting" and we can just vote for the candidates we like best. It makes the elections more democratic in that way Anonymous 8/29/2020 05:23 PM One is enough Anonymous 8/29/2020 05:52 PM More than one councillor means more diversity of voices (hopefully). Anonymous 8/29/2020 08:30 PM 2 can cross cover each other and bring varying view points; Anonymous 8/29/2020 11:24 PM Maintain 12 wards but make them smaller so Councillors can do better at representing their area Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:54 AM Having at least two per ward means that they can together meet the needs of the neighbourhood and if one is unavailable the citizens are not left unrepresented. Anonymous 8/30/2020 07:43 AM I would draw your attention to Karen Farbridge's community editorial in the Mercury on this matter. I agree with her views. Anonymous 8/30/2020 11:29 AM Different perspectives, experiences, philosophies, genders, race religion etc Anonymous 8/30/2020 11:59 AM Reduction in size of council (which I support) would require a change to 1 member per ward if the ward system is maintained. Anonymous 8/30/2020 12:09 PM 2 is sufficient, they bring different perspectives and can share the work of constituent service. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:02 PM The system works well as is on behalf of each ward. It has proven to be the best choice Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:03 PM One councillor is insufficient to represent citizen diversity. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:50 PM There doesn't need to be 2 or more Councillors fulfilling the role of ideally 1 person, it creates unnecessary bureaucracy. One Councillor and their staff is good enough to serve the residents of each ward. Each of Guelph's 6 wards can have one Councillor and another elected Councillor could be elected to assist the Councillor of each ward to address resident issues but their main focus would be more on city wide issues. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:55 PM Better representation at the table and if one is not doing his or her job , the other representative can step up to the job. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 173 of 275 Page 454 of 936 Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:59 PM I think that to have a balance between wards and city-wide councillors would keep councillors focused on local issues and also on the well being of the city as a whole. Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:46 PM Because I don’t think shrinking the size of Council to 6 is a good idea. Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:51 PM same as above, current system has worked for decades Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:57 PM Because then there is a better chance of a wider variety of perspectives represented. Anonymous 8/30/2020 04:46 PM If you do not like your Councillor then you can talk to another one. It also allows different views for a ward to be representative in the council Anonymous 8/30/2020 04:57 PM The current system works well and gives balanced representation Anonymous 8/30/2020 05:00 PM Better representation Anonymous 8/30/2020 05:46 PM I think we should have a smaller council but don't necessarily want larger wards. The most logical then is to create a few more wards and vote in one each. Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:17 PM More than one councillor per ward brings balance to perspectives Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:21 PM For budgetary reasons, and supposing financial constraints require it, I would opt for fewer Councillors paid for full-time work than a higher number of Councillors filling part-time roles. The full-time model would allow for a more diverse group of citizens to consider the Councillor role if it were structured as a full-time position. Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:25 PM Two councillors per ward in a six ward area results in twelve councillors, which we now have and which seems to be a winning calculation. Anonymous 8/30/2020 07:03 PM - Having at least 2 councillors per ward makes it more possible for everyone to be represented. Anonymous 8/30/2020 08:35 PM See my answer to question #5. Additionally by having two part-time councilors per ward means that constituents are well represented. Anonymous 8/30/2020 08:44 PM I don't think we need wards City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 174 of 275 Page 455 of 936 Anonymous 8/31/2020 06:27 AM I think that ward sizes should be adjusted so 1 councillor per ward can service each ward. This to me would be the most cost effective sokution for a city tgat is destined to grow so much in the next decade Anonymous 8/31/2020 06:58 AM Again, diversity! As a woman I want to see more women on Council, if I were a black man I would want to see more black men on council, if I were transgender I would like to see a transgender person on Council and if we have less counsellors per ward there will be less diversity. Look around you. The world is on fire with injustice. My worry with less counsellors will be a all male white council and that would be absolutely shameful. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:29 AM I don't want an unwieldy number of counsillors. Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:04 AM I can't think of a single reason why two councillors are better than one. City Council is a DECISION MAKING BODY. The focus should be on making good decisions. I don't see how 2 councillors contribute to making better decisions. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:18 AM See above Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:23 AM Having one councillor per ward allows the responsibility of that ward to fall directly on the shoulders of that councillor. It will also make it easier for citizens to reach out to their representative as there will only be one. There's no guessing involved with respect to which ward councillor to contact and why. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:25 AM The wards are large enough that one person does not seem like enough, especially given the multiple roles of a Councillor (i.e., engagement, advocacy, policy, administration, etc.). The number of Councillors should be proportional to the number of people in each ward, or better yet, the ward boundaries should be modified so that they are approximately equal in size. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:28 AM 2 provides adequate representation. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:34 AM Life can be busy and a Councillor might be unable to attend all meetings. Two per Ward would be more effective, if they bother to work as a team and ensure a rep is at each meeting. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:39 AM Have one councillor listen to and voice that neighbourhoods thoughts Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:59 AM 2 councillors per ward is reasonable. Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:21 AM Diverse opinions. Need two to keep engagement. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 175 of 275 Page 456 of 936 Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:22 AM If you have wards, only one is needed per ward Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:31 AM There should be 2 part-time councillors per ward to balance out the decisions... Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:08 PM opportunity to have dissenting voices within a ward represented at council. Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:26 PM Because we are big enough that only one person cannot fully address al our issues. But I would want them to be united in their support of US and not simply try to push their own personal or party agenda Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:07 PM This is not an easy question to put a blanket answer to. The system we have now works well with 2 Councillors but if we added Councillors elected at large this may change the need in some wards. More evaluation would need to answer this question with proper insight. Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:08 PM I think that 2 is good for representation. Councillors may not agree on all issues that affect the City or the ward and having more than one representative allows for discourse and debate. It can also spread the workload for each Councillor Anonymous 8/31/2020 02:18 PM For balance between the experiences & backgrounds & availability of each councillor considering they work at a job in addition to role on council. Ideally they work well together, communicate clearly. Anonymous 8/31/2020 02:23 PM Make the councilors full time enabling them to do proper research to make informed decisions Anonymous Given the size of the wards and the number of constituents that have to be represented, having two councillors provides a better perspective plus it assists to distribute the work load in a part-time role, see below One male and one female (husband and wife is okay) to better represent all of the citizens. Only one counsellor per ward doesn't reflect the diverse range of views in a ward. I think if each citizen got a local and a city wide vote they could balance their interests but have a more 'whole guelph' approach than the current. 2 is too many 8/31/2020 03:15 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:15 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:28 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:57 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:11 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:34 PM 6 wards 6 full time councillors City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 176 of 275 Page 457 of 936 Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:42 PM Each ward has conservative and liberal population that needs to be represented equitably Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:01 PM Answer is the same as above. What duties will Councillors do better with more, and what would suffer with fewer Councillors?? Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:09 PM We have too many now. My ward has two very different councillors, with different views and i feel like their votes cancel each other out. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:21 PM Some ward have far larger populations that others but are still represented by only two people. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:26 PM Candidates would be able to contact almost every resident of the ward they wish to represent. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:31 PM One councillor per Ward is not enough to represent the diversity of the residents in each neighbourhood Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:42 PM I don’t care. I want them to equally represent the people of a Guelph and stand up for individual rights and freedom of choice. Otherwise it’s just a bunch of people getting paid to make decisions without engagement with the people who pay their wage. Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:15 PM I think that having the two Councillors gives availability and as mentioned in the article can help residents put forward their views more readily. Anonymous 9/01/2020 01:40 AM Less confusion on which one to contact, and he/she will be more knowledgeable of the particular circumstances of localized smaller area. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:46 AM To have representation even when one councillor isn't available. Anonymous 9/01/2020 05:34 AM See above Anonymous 9/01/2020 06:07 AM There needs to be more than one voice to represent an area/ward. One voice (vote) for a ward is possible to not represent what is best and I suppose having a second voice reduces that risk.....somewhat. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:01 AM one councilor is available on a full time basis to look after ward constituents. the over all elected at large make the City government more general and focused on the entire City. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:45 AM Maybe it is best to create more Wards in this increasingly diverse City. If the number of Wards does not increase than keep two Ward representatives. Anonymous The minimum of two councillors is important. However, as the city population City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 177 of 275 Page 458 of 936 9/01/2020 08:58 AM increases, consideration might be given to three per ward unless more wards are created by boundary distribution changes. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:44 AM We have 2 per word now and I feel that is a good number. If one counsellor is away we still have representation Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:59 AM I only recommend the number of councillors of 7 so the City can hold them accountable for decisions made on behalf on its citizens. City staff need to know that their actions on the job will reflect on how the Council is viewed by the citizens. Anonymous 9/01/2020 10:12 AM Most wards would also be diverse and having 2 councillors would mean that more of the constituents would be represented by their councillors. Anonymous 9/01/2020 10:31 AM If they are part time, which I feel they should be to bring a more diverse view, you need a few per ward to ensure all the work can be done and split equitably. Anonymous 9/01/2020 11:07 AM 2 per ward is effective. Anonymous 9/01/2020 01:59 PM So that it is clear. Why should i email two councillors to be aware of an issue. It would be easier to know who has responibility for my area of the city. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:06 PM More review of each wards needs and not restricted to one persons personnel views. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:21 PM The best approach would be to have one councillor per ward and 6 at-large councillors. This would ensure the best (rather than second best ) get elected. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:24 PM Representing people is a lot of work....BUT NOT A FULL TIME JOB Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:29 PM Cost savings. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:40 PM Having two Councillors per ward adds a greater diversity of voices to Council, but it's unclear whether this would be necessary should Councillors be changed from part-time to full-time. It's possible that there is a duplication of effort, or inequality of effort, with two Councillors per ward. That said, I enjoy the current system of two Councillors per ward. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:14 PM I believe I just did. If one ward is larger than another have two councilors. If one is slightly or considerably smaller have one. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:23 PM Because we only elect one councillor, if you want 2 councillors per ward then elect 2 councillors. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 178 of 275 Page 459 of 936 Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:32 PM Because one is not enough! Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:52 PM It would force them to be directly accountable. No 'hiding' behind a more active Counsellor. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:15 PM I have ever seen communication from any councillor therefore they do not seek to represent me. If there was only 1 there are no miss understandings if residents have communication Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:25 PM Better representation. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:27 PM Smaller numbers can focus on the work at hand, Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:30 PM Again I do not see any evidence that this system does not work. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:39 PM 2, it provides for competing voices from the same area. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:43 PM Less constituents means more direct democracy. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:45 PM More balanced representation. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:50 PM One full time councillor per ward will increase efficiencies, no need for 2 councillors to communicate with each other, no duplication of efforts. Having 2 can also be troublesome if councillors have opposing views and make if tough for decision making. Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:07 PM If ward system only, then 2 per ward so that voices are still heard when one Councillor is absent, and also spreads the load between two people. Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:14 PM The wards are fairly big and the population is growing. Having two councillors from each ward hopefully gives a broader representation. It would also give easier access to at least one of the councillors. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:04 PM Easier way by having just one point of contact Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:08 PM More participation. More opportunities for a greater diversity of skills and experience Anonymous Full time, single ward makes sense. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 179 of 275 Page 460 of 936 9/01/2020 11:46 PM Anonymous 9/02/2020 04:47 AM If shrinking ward size, a second councillor is not necessary. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:18 AM Two councillors bring two opinions and differing opinions and two voices to represent the citizens of the ward, one voice just isn't enough and not enough diversity Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:30 AM I don't know enough about why more than one councillor would be necessary. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:45 AM Cost reduction-our country is entering an economic disaster due to the pandemic. Many tough decisions lie ahead, including this one. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:51 AM I think 2 is sufficient Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:12 AM To provide more democratic and diverse decision making within each ward. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:52 AM 1 is enough. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:52 AM For diversity and balance in decision making Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:55 AM The number of councilors should be informed by the number of residents in that ward. Two councilors allows for a part time system to exist in a more effective way? Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:59 AM More efficient representation in council. Councilors could be supported by staff that can fuel engagment process that could be brought to council. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:07 AM It all depends on the wards map. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:13 AM Having a second person makes it easier to have a neutral view and see multiple sides of issues at hand. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:19 AM 2 councillors per ward will hopefully prevent councillors from doing things that their constituents may not support. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:23 AM See above. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 180 of 275 Page 461 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:23 AM Should be based on population size Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:35 AM We need smaller government, not larger. adding councilors per ward further makes the job of getting stuff done more difficult. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:39 AM As the size of the city grows, it is important that councillors can manage the work. Also, councillors should be have someone with whom they can discuss the issues in their ward so that they can have a better idea if they are reacting correctly. One councillor to figure out how a ward issue should be treated seems to likely to create inapt representation. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:41 AM I think the wards should be smaller in geography representing a smaller number of Guelphites. If smaller and representing a smaller number of constituents, one councillor would be easier to know who to contact. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:50 AM I think the way we are electing councilors currently is working well, not just one voice from each ward is heard, there is a lot of diversity within each ward and that is better represented by elecing multiple councilors per ward. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM To allow councillors at large while not more than 12 on council. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM 1st and 2nd choice both making it to city hall allows differing viewpoints, and as inevitably people are classed or class themselves as left or right leaning, this allows wards to avoid being the liberal ward or the conservative ward, but rather better representing the viewpoints of all or more constituents. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:16 AM 2 councilors per ward are preferred so that there is an element of "checks and balances." Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:16 AM At large may attract more innovative candidates Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:17 AM - It's working well now, provides greater likelihood of diversity on Council Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:26 AM the cost Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:44 AM obtain variety of perspectives in policy setting for the municipality Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:14 AM 6 full-time and 'at large' would ensure focus on the job and a more thorough understanding and appreciation of the issues. A 6 Council composition would also assist in the decision-making process (i.e. rather than having to consider 12 councillor's blah blah). City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 181 of 275 Page 462 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:16 AM I think we should have smaller wards and one councillor per ward 12 wards and one councillor per ward Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:19 AM It is difficult to get a representative perspective from only 1 councillor per ward. Having at least 2 allows the opportunity for multiple views to be expressed and worked on right within a Ward. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:22 AM It depends how they are elected ward-specific or at large or ranked voting would give very differnt results. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:23 AM Two can communicate, share the load and opposing views may come to light. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:33 AM I actually only want one councillor per ward and 6 additional councillors at large for a total of 12 councillors Anonymous 9/02/2020 10:24 AM As above. One per ward is good only if we also have city wide reps - we need more and better representation - not less. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:02 AM It allows voters in a ward to support several different personalities and outlooks in their representation. It increases the diversity of opinion on Council. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:32 AM As your background material suggests, the present system - two councillors per ward - means that there should be a councillor available if one is absent for some reason, and citizens have an alternative if, for some reason, their relationship with one councillor is strained. This system has been working well: why fix it if it ain't broke? Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:32 AM One is not equitable. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:40 AM Depending on the ward I feel that if the number of issues in each ward are too numerous it is better to have 2 Councillors elected. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:44 AM This will allow councilors to work full time hours to deal with matters quicker and result in decisions being made so one councilor can not cancel out the 2nd councilor as they can now by voting in opposing views. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:44 AM I veer towards the one per ward which means reoragnizing the city into many smaller wards. But I think two per ward could work. It does provide a system of checks and balances, and shared work load. But it certainly assumes cooperation and colloboration. Anonymous 9/02/2020 12:24 PM for the population of Guelph, the number is okay Anonymous one is not sufficient and more than two lead to a number that is not City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 182 of 275 Page 463 of 936 9/02/2020 12:40 PM manageable Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:04 PM Two councillors per ward increases the size of council which assists in providing diversity in representation. Two councillors also provide some assurance that a councillor will be available when one councillor is unavailable. This system also provides a constituent with an alternative when one councillor is not sympathetic to the constituent’s concerns Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:53 PM I'd prefer one full-time councillor for a smaller ward Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:58 PM Two councillors per ward seem to be an adequate number. The main objective is to keep the wards equal and manageable in size and representative of contiguous neighbourhoods. That is, avoid gerrymandering. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:25 PM One councillor who will receive a full time salary and do the work full time. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:31 PM I am OK with one person per ward although I recognize that this might place an unfair burden on that one person. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:46 PM Two per ward seems to be working; offers different perspectives, thoughts on issues allowing for residents to make knowledgeable decisions as needed as well. Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:35 PM Odd number creates an imbalance for vote counting. Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:41 PM Two heads better than one, always! Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:58 PM I have no problem with two per war . If changing would suggest 1 per ward and 6 at large Anonymous 9/02/2020 04:31 PM Two heads are better than one. My ward councillors seem to work well together and build on each other's ideas. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:20 PM Give them smaller areas and let them get closer to the residents. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:32 PM As I said earlier, I think one is enough per ward and having some at large would give a wider perspective on city-wide issues. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:08 PM At least as much local representation as the current system is needed. Anonymous They can co-operate in bringing forward ward concerns and handle citizen City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 183 of 275 Page 464 of 936 9/02/2020 06:37 PM concerns. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:48 PM One per ward - have 7 wards and then 7 councillors at large Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:55 PM Gives citizens of different political persuasion the opportunity to choose which councillor(s) they would like to engage with. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:15 PM The role of the councillor is a challenging one with a wide range of issues to be informed about. With Guelph’s population growing so quickly, if the role is shared, this could be better for constituents allowing each councillor more time to effectively perform their role. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:30 PM Different perspective, better access for citizens to council Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:51 PM Gives a proper perspective to issues Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:18 PM 2 per ward make sense if both working part time. Having 1 per ward but working full time makes sense since the demands of the job has increased over time. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:40 PM Save city money...most dont vote based on who they are representing anyways...just on personal preference and what benefits them....(most..not all) Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:42 PM As said before half of them don’t listen to the people living here in Guelph Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:08 PM If I have a problem with one there's an alternate person I can reach out to. Also when I'm electing councillors I could choose people with different strengths. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:07 AM One councillor per ward but with more, smaller wards (still 12 councillors total) might allow for more fine tuned representation. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:42 AM Keep expenses down. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:59 AM No wards sorry but certain wards go out of their way to make sure people go vote for them in their ward. Make it city wide Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:23 AM Share the workload, more diverse voices on council, more opportunities for citizens to interact with their representatives. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:45 AM To keep the size of council manageable, one per ward = 6 plus 4 at large plus mayor City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 184 of 275 Page 465 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:53 AM Each ward needs a tandem team as too much responsibility for one. Every ward seems to be growing which means more work Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:11 AM Because that's what we have now and it allows for divegent ideas to get expressed as seats on council. Anonymous 9/03/2020 07:27 AM Avoids Council becoming cliquey Anonymous More people with different views and connections in the community To get views of people properly With at least two councilors there is a chance to find at least one that supports my point of view on an issue. Many times in the last 30 years at least one of the two councilors has consistently voted in a manner that was in direct opposition to my views on a particular matter. If that councilor were my only representative on council I would feel that I had no voice. Each ward should have at least two councillors. Two are needed in the event that one is out of commission due to illness/other reason. They are also needed because there are likely people with different politics in each ward - you want more than just one person's specific opinions and politics represented in each ward. Having more councillors makes for more representative voices at the city's decision-making tables. Seems to work fine now One from each ward bringing issues forward that have citywide implications. They gain support from the at large members where and when required. Not all areas of the city are busy with issues while others have greater issues to deal with i think councillors should be full time and in that capacity one per ward is appropriate. One per ward also decreases division in opinion and allows for one proponent for the areas interests. If there is more than one councillor and they disagree on an issue, their votes cancel each other out. It's not bloated, but it allows more than one person to speak for each ward. 9/03/2020 07:52 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 08:55 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:15 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:50 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:22 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:23 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:33 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:35 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:39 AM Time savings City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 185 of 275 Page 466 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:42 AM Provide back-up for each other as well as accountability. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:53 AM 1 full time is sufficient Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:59 AM One per wars plus at-large councillors should provide access to constituents when they have concerns. Also, the councillors should have to live in the ward he/she represents. Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:00 AM I feel that given the current population that it is sufficient. for populations less than 50k, I believe the model of the city wide approach would be in best interest of everyone. 1 councilor per ward for 50k-100k, 2 councilors per ward for 100k-150k, and 3 councilors per ward for 150k-200k Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:37 AM More than one Councillor per ward (I recommend remaining at 2) allows for more diverse representation within each ward. Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:51 AM Two has worked, again when you have good councillors; perhaps in larger wards (pop) there could be an additional representative, or ‘weighted votes’? Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:37 PM Wards are big and have many people living within the boundaries. 1 person can’t possibly manage everything Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:38 PM I want a councillor who views my priorities as important it doesn't matter if they are from the north or West Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:46 PM Fewer councillors but full time. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:05 PM One representative of the interest of the ward Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:12 PM 12 council members are too many Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:18 PM Having two is redundant. We can manage with one who is full-time dedicated. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:19 PM Proportional representation Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:24 PM See above Anonymous The different views of the members of the ward should be considered by two City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 186 of 275 Page 467 of 936 9/03/2020 02:08 PM individuals so that all opinions can be expressed without a monopoly. Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:14 PM Make this a full time position and increase the number of Wards to 8. This makes more sense than citizens communicating with 2 councillors and queries being duplicated . All of these suggestions must make fiscal sense though! Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:27 PM Currently, Guelph has six Wards. Again, my recommendation infers that Councilors are full time. One representative per. Ward. Straightforward. Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:54 PM As shared above, having a plurality of choice for ward councillors allows for a diverse set of policy stances to reflect various voices within the community. Anonymous 9/03/2020 03:34 PM To better represent the community and allow for more voices to have a representation. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:15 PM Increased population in those wards needs greater representation gmhunter 9/03/2020 04:12 PM Less expensive. In the past some councillors have coasted and left all the work to the second councillor. We would know exactly who to call. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:16 PM May get one councillor that you agree with and others will have someone to advocate for their perspective. Not winner takes all. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:48 PM Want to split wards. Keep same number of total councilors. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:02 PM It is a lot of work; different perspectives from two people, more opportunity to have representation/diversity. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:14 PM Please see my earlier comments. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:22 PM Eliminating the number of wards will help control the cost to help pay for full time members. With one part time councilor per ward the costs can be controlled. The new system should not increase the cost by a great deal. Anonymous 9/03/2020 07:15 PM It is essential to have more than one councillor per ward. I would prefer 4 wards with 3 councillors each. Electing three people per ward using a single transferable vote system would likely result in a representative council. The less number of councillors per ward, the less likely the resulting council will be representative. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:27 PM Half the time you never hear from either councillor until election time and then they are knocking on your door. After the election you hear nothing from either one City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 187 of 275 Page 468 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:51 PM One is enough to voice neighbourhood specific concerns Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:00 PM I am hoping for a mixed 6 ward 6 at large system. Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:52 PM one councillor for each ward is enough, maybe reduce the size of ward if it is to large. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:02 PM Councillors share workload Gives residents option of who to contact /connect with. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:26 PM Because I think there should more, smaller wards. I only want to make one phone call if I have a political concern to raise or a local issue that needs to be addressed. Also, fewer voters, less comparing $$, better democracy. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:42 AM Lower cost with only having 1 Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:57 AM Save money, easier to make policy, but you would never do this Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:07 AM Two per ward works well. Some wards are growing and with Increased development comes issues that require research, meetings with constituents etc. It can be a lot for only one councillor to undertake. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:56 AM It seems to be working now, why change? Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:10 AM Current approach is working as it promotes teamwork between the two elected councillors for each ward. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:15 AM Two Councillors/ward can share the load. What if one gets sick or needs a leave of absence? Also, if one Councillor seems unresponsive to an issue, there is a second opportunity to reach out. The Ward boundaries should be recalibrated so that they contain roughly the same number of constituents. Right now they seem very uneven. This is unfair to both Councillors and residents of the bigger wards. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:14 AM 2 councillors per ward allows for a proper democratic process at the ward level. Having only 1 councillor per ward would monopolize that vote into the hands of 1 person. It would easily fall into the hands of large property developers and other foreign interests. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:21 AM Promotes diverse representation. Anonymous Why waste more public dollars? Save the money and spend on community City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 188 of 275 Page 469 of 936 9/04/2020 07:22 AM services that need it. Make the one councilor acxountbale so there is o arguing between multiple ones. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:23 AM Back up and succession planning reasons. Also Allows for work sharing and various view points to be engaged Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:29 AM Once again, when it comes to making important decisions that impact the citizens of a city, smaller is better. This is basic knowledge, all successful organizations keep their decision-making bodies small. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:32 AM As above. Responsiveness to the needs of the community. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:33 AM Two councillors per ward is ideal. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:44 AM With 2 councillors you have a better chance of finding a representative that can advocate on your behalf. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:58 AM Keep costs down but maintain representation. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:00 AM More perspectives Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:01 AM It’s better to have two different individuals. Just so it’s not there way or the highway. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:05 AM .. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:05 AM Having more than one per ward ensures better representation. For example, in my ward one of the councillors is more focused on a certain section of the ward and doesn’t care about the rest of the area. The other councillor makes sure the needs of all are taken into account. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:07 AM not enough exposure right now with 2 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:10 AM It's difficult. Two councillors give people a choice on whom to approach and potentially separates the workload. Two councillors who disagree also cancel out each others' votes. Two councillors allows for more diversity (women at this point). Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:14 AM Having more than one counselor per ward would allow for democratic debate and ensure that representatives are not pushing through personal interests, but focusing on the interests of their constituents and the City. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 189 of 275 Page 470 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:16 AM Every ward needs an advocate. In the past some areas of the city were ignored. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:20 AM I would like to see councillors be full time and remunerated thusly so they can concentrate on the best representation for their constituents. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:23 AM 18 councillors. Each ward would have a primary councillor and 2 secondary councillors. Better chance to connect with the community and actually be representative of where they are elected. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:28 AM Less confusion for voters, more accountability, Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:33 AM At least 2 per ward helps to create a more balanced perspective and also means that there is a second person always available to represent the ward. In the era of Covid and with all the challenges our municipality is facing (especially financially) the workload isn’t going to get lighter. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:35 AM It’s always good to have checks and balances Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:43 AM It helpd to offer a balance of opinions. Not everythign rests in one persons hands. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:45 AM Less bureaucracy, red tape. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:47 AM Two people that are familiar with the ward is better than one and it also helps to lighten the load for just one councillor. You also will get two perspectives within the ward and that is better for conversation and decision making. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:51 AM One councillor can have personal anmity with constituent, more than 0ne gives constituent options. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:51 AM Thinking, as the city is expanding, perhaps more wards, and 1 councillor who can be more dedicated to their specific area. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:52 AM Two councillors dose not make sense. Information gets lost between the two representatives. You may talk to one and the other is the one that votes due to being absent at a particular vote. All issues should be funnelled through one. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:00 AM Keep same. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:07 AM Helps if one individual is ineffective or biased. More chance of ensuring diversity City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 190 of 275 Page 471 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:20 AM If the number of wards is not increasing, then the number of elected representatives needs to increase beyond 1 per ward. To be clear, this question (10) is asking about "that number", which I did not specify above. I simply selected greater than 1. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:43 AM One councilor would likely lead to excessive work demand, no back-up in case of a single-councilor illness, and no alternative if a citizen has difficulty dealing with ONE of the elected ward representatives. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:44 AM Falls into my goal of smaller council of a mixed ward and at large voting system Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:02 AM we have 2 and they actually work really well - see answers to question 8. Just because a system has been in place for some time does not mean that it needs to be changed. Its definitely worth looking at, but from the information you have provided and my own research both in Canada and beyond I see absolutely not reason for changing a system that is working well for Gueph citizenry. i would remind the experts who are managing this process that the point of this review is to ensure that the needs of Guelph citizenry (who pay the bills) MUST be foremost. This is not an exercise in efficiency for staff. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:06 AM only one is required Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:08 AM One elected part timer in each of six wards, six full time at large Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:15 AM Having two councillors per ward provides more opportunities to reflect the diverse nature of the ward. By keeping the wards small PLUS having two councillors per ward encourages a greater range of views to percolate to the surface. This in turn encourages more individuals to express their views because they will at least be heard and may consider running in an election. Furthermore, having small wards and 2 or more councillors per ward, keeps the cost of elections lower. People power is more important then financial power. Anonymous 2 is good, 3 is too many, 1 is simply hard to gather all the info and properly represent thousands of people with only 1. - more than enough work for multiple councillors per ward - gives residents a difference of opinion in their councillors 2 councillors per ward ensures that people are well represented. 9/04/2020 10:25 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:32 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:56 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:56 AM One per ward if full time and 2 per ward if part time City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 191 of 275 Page 472 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:05 AM A combo of population and geography Should dictate number per area. Ward 6 needs at least 2 councillors Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:14 AM Variety. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:36 AM To share the workload and to eliminate bias in ward decisions Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:48 AM There is no need for more than one councilor per ward. Citizens elect who they want to represent them, adding more councillors in my opinion is allowing council to be inefficient and waste taxpayers money. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:54 AM One point of contact for folks. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:55 AM We do not need 2 the work can be done by one ☝ Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:56 AM One councillor to represent a ward, the rest to represent the city. Good balance. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:59 AM Idk, maybe two, one to keep the other accountable Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:03 PM One per ward with smaller wards to make it more representative of your area Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:07 PM Unless you divide the wards up even more, with the city growing having one councillor would just overwhelm them and so many voices would be lost, currently the only way to get any help in the city with anything is tweet Mayor Guthrie a tonne and get lots of others in the community. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:12 PM Should be one per ward on a fulltime bases Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:20 PM One councillor bears the responsibility and accountability to the citizens of their ward. Again, there is not pointing the finger that the other councillor had the greater influence.One councillor owns the outcomes/results accordingly. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:31 PM With Guelph's population increasing, one councillor per ward is not realistic. Plus, based on my experience as well as the experience of others, usually one of the 2 councillors is more responsive - it is helpful to have an alternative Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:37 PM allows for a balanced approach City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 192 of 275 Page 473 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:47 PM If we only had one per ward, then council would be too small unless there was a hybrid model. Electing two per ward can help to bring a diversity of voices to council. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:57 PM not sure what the purpose of 2 per ward is/was. i'd rather see better, more community-based representation. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:58 PM Less, full time should cost less Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:58 PM More than one prevents corruption while taking work off of each other so smaller issues and larger issues can both be dealt eith more efficiently. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:03 PM One councillor per ward is fine. Some of the comments councillors have made have been offensive and insult the intelligence of residents. With one councillor per ward hopefully, with responsible residents informing themselves, these councillors will get weeded out of council. Also this means one councillor per ward will need to make sure they hear all the people and not just those that they agree with. Then it will certainly become clear whether a councillor is listening or not everyone. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:07 PM I'm not sure having two councillors per Ward increases representation, access or outcomes. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:10 PM Fairness Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:20 PM Better representation. The numbers of citizens in each ward would be too many for one person to represent. If we elect a bad councillor, we would have a second chance with a better one. The opinions would be better formed and more representative. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:36 PM The best representation. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:43 PM Better value to the taxpayer and quicker decisions will be made. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:29 PM Two per can cause disunity and confusion, pitting Ward counsellors against one another. Take a single issue even if on a hard subject. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:42 PM A good councilor is engage with constituents regularly. In a city the size of of Guelph, it takes two or more depending on the (currrent) ridings Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:43 PM See question 6 City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 193 of 275 Page 474 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:43 PM One per ward, but make the wards smaller. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:54 PM Wards are not small and people have different opinions and needs. Having more than one representative is ideal Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:05 PM Again....the fewer councilors the fewer voices....I don't want a council full of Cam or Dan's! We need devirsity..bright now we have greens. NDP. Liberals n conservative opinions....too few could cause one sidedness Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:07 PM Greater diversity of perspective and back-up person if one councillor is not available. Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:44 PM spoke to this above - 1 councillor currently represent 11,000, would like to see that decrease to a minimum of 1/10,000 Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:09 PM If there are more than 1 councilor there is more likelihood that one of them will share my views. More than 1 councilor makes it more likely that one of them will be available to deal with an issue or be knowledgeable on a particular issue. Having more than 1 councilor per ward can potentially deliver more proportional results by allowing differing views from the same ward. If multiple member wards are combined with ranked balloting, a much more proportional system is possible Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:36 PM There is too much work for one person - ie phone calls, meetings, agendas - you need a team Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:13 PM -The two Councillor per ward system has worked well for our community. - Two Councillors per Ward enhances the proportional representation impact of ranked ballots, resulting in successful candidates who are supported by the broadest possible number of constituents in a Ward. - Two Councillors per Ward increase the likelihood at a range of political opinions in the Ward are represented at Council. Since 1991, a number of Wards have had both a conservative-leaning and a progressive-leaning Councillor. This means that all Ward residents have someone to go to who will understand and be sympathetic to their concerns. - Duplication of staff responses to Councillor inquires is currently avoided by updating all members of Council with staff responses when information is sought. - Two Councillors means that they can spell each other off for vacations, illnesses, scheduling conflicts, etc; - Two Councillors allows for a kind of informal succession process. Typically both seats will not turn over in a ward in the same election. This means that citizens will have a more experienced councillor to turn to, as well as someone with fresh ideas. When Councillors are open to working as a team within a Ward, there is an opportunity for mentoring. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:18 PM Two heads are better than one. Two Councillors gives citizens choice of whom to approach when dealing with issues. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 194 of 275 Page 475 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:15 PM - increases accessibility for citizens looking to engage the councillors in their ward - different perspectives with two councillors Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:26 PM Two ward members seems to work well. They can offer better outreach as people might gravitate to one Councillor over the other. Two can bounce ideas off each other, and they can also offer varied perspectives within their ward. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:21 PM Two (or more) Councillors can bounce ideas off each other. The weight of the ward is distributed on more shoulders. If one Councillor is unavailable, the other Councillor is there. Barring disaster, constituents will always have someone to contact. More Councillors = more varied input during Council meetings, and more thorough representation of the ward Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:58 PM Again, diversity! In order to accurately represent constituents, there has to be more than one council to represent each ward. Plus with this, there’s a level of accountability. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:59 PM So that the at large positions can be created without increasing the total number. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:13 PM The vote is more representative of citizen preferences. WIth one Councillor it is a winner-take-all result, and with many campaigns having many more candidates than seats a candidate can win with a weak plurality and rarely a majority. Two or more Councillors results in better representation and fewer wasted votes, especially with a Ranked Ballot. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:26 PM Diversity of thought Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:27 PM Need to continue at 12 councillors - 2 per ward -- until population hits 150,000 when size of council should be increased (as well as m# of wards). See above. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:55 PM Having multiple councillors win in an election allows for more minority voices on council. One winner-take-all will please a (possibly small) plurality, but leaves many people unrepresented. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:02 PM The current method works to get elect the top two for each ward Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:06 PM Only require one person to hold to account, avoids disagreement within wards Optional question (562 response(s), 94 skipped) Question type: Essay Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 195 of 275 Page 476 of 936 Q16 From a citizen perspective, how do you recommend that the role of city Councillor be viewed in Guelph? 257 (39.2%) 257 (39.2%) 322 (49.1%) 322 (49.1%) 16 (2.4%) 16 (2.4%)61 (9.3%) 61 (9.3%) It is a PART-Time responsibility It is a FULL-Time responsibility It doesn't matter to me I am unsure Question options Mandatory Question (656 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 196 of 275 Page 477 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:10 AM Keeps costs down. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:33 PM not sure it requires full-time commitment. my view might change though if being part-time constrains the pool of potential councillors with the skills, experience required. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:33 PM Having smaller wards and 1 Councillor per ward would take some of the workload of their plate. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:52 PM No increase in salary costs, office space, assistant salary etc. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:57 PM Less of a burden on the tax payer due to lower salaries. The City of Guelph's Councillor positions are not full time jobs. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:49 PM I do not think Guelphites want more full-time, career politicians. I also personally like the idea that the councillor will continue to have a "real world" job that keeps them connected to the people, whether that be SAHM/caregiver, retail, profesor, business owner, what-have-you. I think we risk having City Council become too insular with full-time councillors. Anonymous 8/17/2020 04:57 PM Wouldn't be paying for jobs for life. Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:42 PM I believe there should be separation between governance and operations. Full time councillors will probably be much more involved in operations and therefore unable to properly govern from the right distance. Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:38 PM Not sole source of income, could attract broader spectrum of candidates that dont have to leave a career or calling Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:33 PM Cost less. No ministry placement is full time as an executive decision maker. Why should our tax dollars support full time when little is done with the time already paid Anonymous 8/17/2020 10:36 PM advantage of part time is that you can easily afford two councilors. that way you always have one good or helpful ones Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:07 AM lower pay...makes more fiscal sense Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:31 AM They remain connected to the city, and are not career politicians. Q17 What would be the advantages of having PART-time city Councillors? City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 197 of 275 Page 478 of 936 Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:52 AM Pay for the work they do.. not for the title. Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:03 AM - still working in the community; doesn't incentivise politics for money. Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:02 AM Keeps council as oversight, with the majority of heavy operational listing done by paid professional staff. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:08 AM based on today's numbers its part time, if you have 1 per ward could consider fulltime Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:18 AM No need to waste tax-payers $$ paying councillors full-time - their function is not that time-consuming Anonymous 8/18/2020 11:01 AM Cost, councilors having additional and current other knowledge/expertise,\ Anonymous 8/18/2020 11:58 AM Councillors have more background experience/knowledge of the working world around them. Anonymous 8/18/2020 01:29 PM Not enough work to be 40 hours a week Anonymous 8/18/2020 02:48 PM Full time councillors would be considered “city employees”. In the past aldermen or councillors had full time employment elsewhere, and represented citizens on council on a part time. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:10 PM They only really work Part-time anyways, meetings are not held 8 hours a day. They can still work full time or part time in their existing career. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:15 PM There is not enough for a fulltime. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:49 AM If only one per ward, it could be full time, but with two it is definitely part time Anonymous 8/19/2020 11:54 AM A big advantage of allowing it to remain a part-time role is that it allows people who have other jobs to be on city council, which increases the talent pool for council and promotes diversity on council. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:27 PM Able to have 2 people doing the role and then creates discussion and diversity. Anonymous The individual could also work within their chosen field and then bring City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 198 of 275 Page 479 of 936 8/19/2020 03:42 PM balance to the City Hall Anonymous 8/19/2020 05:15 PM City staff run the cit6 with council oversight. Council is not a full time job Anonymous I prefer 2 councillors per ward. If all of these positions were full-time, I'd be concerned about the growing cost. I don't think this requires they do this full time. I think their current role and compensation makes sense Allows those who are not just in it for money, to think about running. Less biased councillors. It would save the tax payers money. An example is the mayors position. Once it became full time, the salary for the position went through the roof. The wage that the mayor makes for a city the size of Guelph is embarrasing. so they stay focused, and serving People can continue their work while working as a council. We don’t need full time professional politicians. living within our means It is not a full time job They have other jobs that help root them in the community. However, I don't know how much time commitment is currently being asked of them or if that is realistic compared to work done. Attracts more people to the role and is more efficient than having full timers. I favour part-time councillors based on current experience that well-qualified people with an adequate range of social backgrounds find it possible to run for office. The drawback to this choice is that economically disadvantaged sectors have to find representatives outside their social grouping to represent their interests. Its a part time job full time responsibility. NO TO FULL TIME COUNCILLORS 8/20/2020 06:01 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:45 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 09:35 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:01 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:12 AM Anonymous 8/20/2020 05:40 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:01 PM Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:33 PM Anonymous 8/21/2020 08:12 AM Anonymous 8/21/2020 10:36 AM Anonymous 8/21/2020 04:14 PM Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:02 PM Anonymous Part time hopefully means that they also spend part of their time living life City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 199 of 275 Page 480 of 936 8/22/2020 11:15 AM and working as a real resident, not detached from the context of their Ward's residents. Anonymous 8/22/2020 11:26 AM Cost less money to taxpayer. Would allow more participants to throw in their chance to run for office without giving up their main income stream. Would make members less political and more focused on issues for the benefit of Guelph residents. Anonymous 8/23/2020 07:09 PM We don’t have to pay them as much to not listen to us. Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:49 AM The number of hours do not justify making the position (beyond Mayor) full- time at this time. Financial compensation does not become one of the primary reasons for becoming a councillor. Giving back to your community or advancing a local cause takes precedence. Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:15 PM It would be cheaper not to pay full time wages and they could have an outside job Anonymous 8/24/2020 12:58 PM see above. Council would become too political. Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:44 PM I would hope councilors are more imbedded in their neighbourhoods / wards and what goes on there, not just applying for a full time job as a councilor. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:01 PM No benefits. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:16 PM They are already part-time and that makes sense in a small city of only 130,000 people. I know some that DO work full-time hours while other Councillors need to be employed elsewhere too, in order to earn enough to fully support their families and lifestyles. The part-time concept also allows for some high profile business people to be on Council ... they do not want to give up their businesses to work full time on Council. This is a Win/Win situation in my view. Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:01 PM Currently my councillor never responds to my emails so I wouldnt want to see that happening should they be full time. Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:37 PM We want councillors who are engaged in other community activities and who do not see being a councillor as a lucrative job. Anonymous 8/24/2020 05:39 PM Salary. Works fine. Why fix what’s not broken? Our councillors work hard, are available. Don’t need full time. Whose idea is this anyway? Leave well enough alone. We are not a big city. Anonymous 8/24/2020 07:57 PM Spending less tax dollars on members of council. They only work part time and have very few issues to deal with. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 200 of 275 Page 481 of 936 Anonymous 8/24/2020 08:27 PM I think we should have councilors who can pursue their work and lives and take time to represent their ward on the side. Having multiple part time councilors per ward would give a richer perspective on each ward rather than fewer full time councilors. Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:15 PM Guelph is a relatively small city. It is city staff that propose and prepare policies for council's consideration. Part time means less politicization of issues. Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:57 AM If this role is a full time responsibility, it will limit the possibility of the interested candidates to consider for this role if they are already in another full time job which they would like to still continue. A part time role will generate more interest from a larger pool of demographics where retired, part time workers, homemakers and full time workers would like to be the voice for their Ward! Anonymous 8/25/2020 11:26 AM Frankly, $40,000 for part time work is already more than minimum wage with full time hours, and we expect our minimum wage workers to survive on less while spending more time working. If someone really wants to be a councillor, then this is plenty of compensation for the job. Especially when they can still have a side hustle to earn even more income if they want to. I do support making sure that the income rises every year to keep up with inflation, and I think that would help keep the wages fair. How long has it been $40k? Because if it's been a few years then it's due for an increase. That would be more useful than trying to find make-work for councillors and having them sit in an office all day with not much to do, simply because you want to increase their hours but not their workload. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:18 PM I think having part time staff increases the pool of potential councilors. If the role of Councilor was a full time position then Councilors would either have to be retired or take a break from their careers. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:36 PM Perhaps just for now. As the city grows I suspect it may need full-timers. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:41 PM Similar to my comment above about the cost factor. Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:16 PM Financial. Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:11 PM Rather than having someone focused solely on ensuring they are re-elected as it is their job, part time councillors are part of the working community and have a better sense of the issues of residents. Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:13 PM They are not full time city workers. They are connecting part time Anonymous We have a large city staff to run the city. Councillors bring opinion and input: City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 201 of 275 Page 482 of 936 8/25/2020 05:13 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:28 PM 2 part time councillors from each ward makes one "full.time" position working on behalf of their ward. I think this is adequate but should be revisited depending on population growth. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:11 PM More cost effective to have multiple view points represented Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:31 PM The city is t big enough for full time. Soon though maybe Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:55 PM There are drawbacks to both in terms of who can afford to take adequate time from their full time job to be a part time councillor, or who can afford to leave a career completely to be a full time councillor. But part time will discourage councillors from getting too involved in day to day operations of the city. That's not council's role. They should provide guidance to staff and authorize budgets only. Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:21 AM You would have much better candidates if they were professionals who didn't have to leave their existing careers. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:00 AM One of the advantages of having part time city councillors is less salaries to be paid. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:26 AM Efficiency of tax-payer dollars - only attract people that actually want to do good within the city. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:58 AM Full time will required them to be paid more. As I mentioned above, now is not the time to be paying more. Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:46 AM Part-time coulcillors allow for better ward representation. Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:36 PM They are also then active in their respective jobs and communities. Providing us with more representation and voice as outlined in your document about the benefits of two of two councillors. Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:48 PM They are more like citizens who still have to find a way to make a living in this City. Full-timers become politicians, in my opinion. Anonymous 8/26/2020 05:12 PM The work of the Councillors should only be part time. Staff are doing much of the background work and presenting it to them before they meet. Anonymous 8/27/2020 06:42 AM The city administrators should be running the city, this is an board to oversee City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 202 of 275 Page 483 of 936 Anonymous 8/27/2020 07:11 AM 2 p/t representatives per ward are the equivalent to 1 full time Position Anonymous More cost effective as I don't feel Guelph is big enough that we need 12 full time councillors.8/27/2020 09:30 AM Anonymous 8/27/2020 10:15 AM Work life balance for Councillors. There are many people who might feel that leaving a current occupation to serve on council full time would have a detrimental effect on their career/ employment and so would choose not to seek election even though they would be good in the position. I think a part time commitment makes it easier for more people to consider running for election. Anonymous 8/27/2020 12:12 PM Not enough to do to be full time. Board of directors don't work full time. Councillors don't run day to day Anonymous 8/27/2020 02:20 PM More voices, more delegation of work load. Teammates who then come together to collaborate. Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:24 PM Doesn't seem like there is enough work that requires more than what is being done now. Full-time jobs turn them into politicians, not community servants. Plus, costs go up and the result will be worse. Anonymous 8/28/2020 07:21 AM part-time councillors apply and run because they believe in making Guelph a better place. Full-time councillors will campaign based on trying to get, and even worse, keep a job and a paycheque not what is best for the city but what keeps them employed. Anonymous 8/28/2020 11:32 AM I could see the value of both ideas. The nice thing with part time is that people running for council are not likely to be doing it as a way to earn a living and so are more likely to be doing it because of a passion for community. Anonymous 8/28/2020 12:00 PM Same as present Anonymous 8/29/2020 04:14 AM It limits people thinking that it is a career. Part of our democratic problem is people using politics as a career and looking how best to hold themselves up through their life. Especially at the local/municipal level, politics should be seen as a service to community. Not a lifelong career to aggrandize oneself. There should be a burnout feature built in so that fresh voices roll in regularly. This is maintained through part-time councils. Anonymous 8/29/2020 06:15 AM Part time councillors work other jobs, which means they directly understand the problems that their city faces. I would worry that full time councillors eliminates the opportunity for some very capable people to run. Also, I'm worried that people who apply for full time councillors are more interested in becoming "career politicians", where they are just using it as a stepping stone to further political careers, instead of being most interested in serving their City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 203 of 275 Page 484 of 936 community. Anonymous 8/29/2020 04:23 PM I did not pick "part time" as a cost-saving measure. Assuming cost was held constant, I would rather have more part-time councillors than fewer full-time councillors. I like having part-time councillors because it makes the councillors more like everyday people with other jobs, and less like career politicians. Furthermore, I think this model also makes being a city councillor more approachable for regular people who are interested. In short, I think the part-time model attracts more of the right kind of people I would like to represent me as city councillors Anonymous 8/29/2020 05:23 PM We don’t need professional politicians Anonymous 8/29/2020 08:30 PM Councillors have other careers and interests which inform they positions at city councillor Anonymous 8/29/2020 11:24 PM With smaller wards, the workload should be a bit more manageable. Anonymous 8/30/2020 07:43 AM I am wary of turning the city councillor role into a full-time job, as this would tend attract opportunistic career politicians more concerned with their own re- election rather than with the concerns of their wards. It's not a job, really. It's a form of community service for which councillors should receive honoria and expenses rather than salaries and benefits. This is an argument for keeping our ward-based system with two councillors per ward. City council should not be populated by the same people year in and year out. But there are problems with part-time in that business people and retirees tend to have the time and flexibility needed to serve. And regardless of full- or part-time status, huge swathes of the community have little incentive to serve and would not / cannot take a break from family commitments and/or career commitments. Anonymous 8/30/2020 11:29 AM Focus Anonymous 8/30/2020 11:59 AM Less cost. Also, becoming a councillor shouldn't be seen as a career, but more about serving the city. Anonymous 8/30/2020 12:09 PM They are able to retain some earning ability and work in the community, and are not depending on amassing political power to hold political jobs. This is why 2 councillors per ward make sense. Don't make it so only richer people can afford to run for office and quit their day jobs. Why do you want to fix what isn't broke? Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:55 PM They can still earn a part time salary from their existing job. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 204 of 275 Page 485 of 936 Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:51 PM full time politicians eventually only serve themselves, make a career out of it, pandering to special interest groups instead of doing what is best for the average tax payer Anonymous 8/30/2020 05:00 PM Cost reduction Anonymous 8/30/2020 08:35 PM The number of hours devoted to the work of city councilor with the population of Guelph does not mandate a full time position. Anonymous 8/30/2020 08:44 PM Being a councillor is open to more people (those with jobs). It avoids people from trying to become 'career politicians' It helps avoid councillors from evolving into a staff type role. Anonymous 8/31/2020 06:27 AM It is my understanding that treating the city councillor position as part-time allows the city to save on paying these positions the benefits that would come with a full time job which I for one would never support. These positions do not support a full time job classification. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:29 AM Money. Can Guelph support a council of people whose only job is being councillors? Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:04 AM Having full time councillors means we get full time POLITICIANS like our current mayor. Council is not a full time job and should not be a full time job. We want people representing us and making decisions whose career and livelihood is totally wrapped up being a councillor. MAKING DECISIONS is not a full time job. It doesn't take any more time to make a good decision than it does to make a bad decision. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:08 AM I would support expanding the council if councillors were part-time. Having more councillors would allow for more diversity in viewpoints, and I think keeping them part-time would reduce redundancy and also allow for more people to run for council. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:28 AM It’s a calling to ones civic duty not a job. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:34 AM Cost-effectiveness. Considering the current 2 in Ward 4 seem to do nothing, there must not be enough work for full-time. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:39 AM As a taxpayer save money Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:31 AM 2 part-time councillors should be enough... Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:26 PM We also have many city department to do their jobs, but with oversight City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 205 of 275 Page 486 of 936 Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:07 PM Part time City Councillors provide the least number of opportunities for exclusion. If we went to full time Councillors -potential candidates would be required to give up their current full time job for a term with no guarantee of re-election. We would also eliminate potential candidates whose salary is currently greater than what the full time Councillor salary would be. We would also eliminate a number of retirees who retired because they do not want to work full time anymore. I realize part time Councillors may exclude potential candidates whose employer will not offer the flexibility needed to accommodate the needs of this part time position. I believe there are more options for potential candidates if the Councillor position is a part time position. Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:08 PM I understand that any person who is a part-time Councillor makes a huge commitment of time and energy to fulfill the role. I respect that and admire the commitment. However 12 full-time Councilors would seem like we have simply added to City Bureaucracy and they look more like employees than a Board of Directors. Anonymous 8/31/2020 02:18 PM More likely to recruit interested new people who would prefer to maintain their primary source of income. If full time, salaried, benefits, the costs would mean fewer councillors rather than more, part time. Anonymous We currently have PART-time city councillors, which I find represent me well. I further believe that a PART-time city councillor will better represent me than a FULL-Time councillor whose self-interests might change over the years because s/he will not necessarily have a fallback role to go to and as such will potentially do everything necessary to hang on to her/his councillor FULL- Time role. This raises concern that "serving the constituency" might become secondary to remaining in the role. I rather avoid upfront putting a councillor in such a potential conflict of interest position. Two part-time city councilors (20 hours per week, scheduled) for the price of one full-time councilor (40 hours per week, scheduled) Reduce overall cost of municipality councillors don't seem to change, if it was FT work they might never leave. It is true that the disadvantage of part time is that only relatively wealthy people can do it. so there are pros/cons. They have to make decisions which help the workplace or neighborhood they are in, but it shouldn't be their whole life. Less money to be paid by tax payers 8/31/2020 03:15 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:15 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:28 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:57 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:42 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:42 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:15 PM I think that if you increased the amount of councillors to represent the people of guelph more representively that Councillors would still be able to work City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 206 of 275 Page 487 of 936 part-time. Also if you increase the number as I suggest the number of hours worked would not require full time positions. Anonymous 9/01/2020 01:40 AM Because it is less political and more pro the inhabitants of a ward, since even though they are pay for their time, they don't depend solely on the Councillor job, and that makes them more in tune with the actual leaving conditions/struggles of the community they represent. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:46 AM They are still engaged in the community and not in a bubble in city hall. Anonymous 9/01/2020 05:34 AM Less expensive, less political Anonymous 9/01/2020 06:07 AM It would entice a greater number of citizens to run because it would not require them to decide between their full time employment job and being a councillor. Full time would also lead to less councillors I would imagine and that is not preferable in my opinion. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:01 AM cost saving and only support full time if some councilors elected at large and size of council reduced. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:44 AM People have other responsibilities this allows more people to run as counsellor Anonymous 9/01/2020 10:31 AM We don't need professional politicians Anonymous 9/01/2020 11:07 AM It's not a full-time job so tax payers shouldn't be paying full-time salaries. Anonymous 9/01/2020 11:32 AM if they are full-time they should not be able to run other businesses Anonymous 9/01/2020 01:59 PM less expensive, and not sure it should be full-time other than the mayor. It could get messy and we want the city staff to be able to make decisions and not have the councillors weighing in on everything. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:06 PM You will always have representation by someone who is not after a PAID position, and seeks to better our city above personal gain. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:24 PM POLITICS IS NOT A CAREER AND THEREFORE A FIEFDOME.... Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:29 PM Keep costs low. Anonymous Less money spent and perhaps it would force a more direct approach. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 207 of 275 Page 488 of 936 9/01/2020 04:14 PM Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:23 PM No council position is a full time position, I doubt even the mayor is working 40 hrs per week. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:15 PM I actually think a mix. Councillors should be held accountable to the residents and better communicate and act Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:39 PM cost, and deterring the career councillor from rooting. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:45 PM I know you said don't mention cost but they get paid a lot for part time work. They do a good job now. They do not need to work more at the cost of the new main library project. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:04 PM I do not like the idea of having full time "politicians" deciding on our future. Let it be some people with a great sense of community and who show their love for our city and neighborhoods Anonymous 9/02/2020 04:47 AM Improves the turnover rate among councillors. 20 hours per week is not a full time job. Would not be opposed to full time if term limits are set and the level of engagement doubles (eg. Min levels of expected community engagement by councillors such as one major event per quarter, one minor event per quarter, 2x door visits per term, time and access to investigate citizen concerns/questions) Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:18 AM They are still to able to keep their other job if they choose Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:45 AM I think that councillors will have a deeper knowledge of the community if they stay in touch with the realities of their citizens by other day to day involvement such as working a non political job. Career/full time politicians can be blinded to a lot of what the people they represent are living. Also, keeping it part time opens up the pool of potential councillors, as most people who may be considering public office can’t simply leave a career on the gamble that they can return to it after they have completed their term. Keeping the role part time allows people who are often underrepresented to consider entering politics. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:12 AM Cost savings. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:52 AM Tax dollars will not be spent on individuals who are not qualified to make decisions on behalf of the City. A full time job requires qualifications or expertise. Our councillors have neither, they ran and were voted in. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:52 AM They can continue their other business and/or interests City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 208 of 275 Page 489 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:55 AM Part time builds in flexibility for the positions and makes it possible for anyone, even full time employees to be able to represent their community. This could mean quality people. Also, we have an entire city hall of city employees to handle the day to day operations. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:50 AM More citizens are able to see a potential as a councilor. There are likely great candidates with family or career responsibilities that would be put off by it being a full time responsibility. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM cost savings mostly. form observations I don't think there is full-time work needed, but I don't know really. track their hours and make it full time if they are too busy, just like any other contracted employee. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:16 AM Working in the city can give a broader perspective Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:26 AM savings Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:44 AM part time decision makers on behalf of the citizens of Guelph; Most important qualification is for the councillor to be a full-time citizen of the community Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:16 AM cost savings if you keep 6 wards, maybe have one full time and one part time per ward. the voting would have to be looked at if this happens Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:40 AM If 2 Councillors are elected it would help offset the load. Presently , I have no idea what the caseload is for the Councillors and knowing that would shed more light on a more accurate answer to this question. corrieod 9/02/2020 11:44 AM cost more level playing field Anonymous 9/02/2020 12:40 PM prevents "institutionalization" of the counsillors. However, with increasing responsibilities full time might in the end be required. Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:35 PM We don't have to listen to the all day. Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:41 PM They are doing community service and not in it for the income. It is not a professional position. Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:58 PM No advantage . But don’t feel work load warrants more Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:20 PM It should be cheaper. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 209 of 275 Page 490 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:37 PM Does not make it into a professional politician. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:48 PM Cost Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:30 PM Councillors who work outside of council responsibilities are more in touch with the needs of the city Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:42 PM They cannot complain they do not have time to make things happen. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:35 AM Tax reduction and less opposition Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:11 AM Becuase of the amount of actual work we task them with. Plus it avoids graft. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:39 AM Reduce council time debate Focus more on the City Adminsitration accountabilities Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:59 AM The ward councillors would be part-time, as they are now, and the at-large councillors, who presumably would be tasked with more work, would be full- time. Part-time allows a wider variety of candidates to apply for the position, as candidates can still hold another job. Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:00 AM Less costs to taxpayer. Less opportunity for corruption of office. Greater chance to have work life balance for our councilors so that they do not become jaded. Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:37 PM They still need to work in their city as a regular worker to keep level headed. Keeps egos in check! Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:12 PM Save tax payers money. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:24 PM No one makes it a career Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:08 PM Why do we need full-time counselors? It is the mayor’s job to represent the city full-time. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:16 PM Affordable and gets people that are committed to the community and aren’t looking to do the work of the staff. If we were to have full time councillors then it should only be one. Anonymous Keep costs down. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 210 of 275 Page 491 of 936 9/03/2020 05:48 PM Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:22 PM You have not provided all alternatives in your choices. Please refer back to previous answers. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:27 PM It should may be full time but it has yet to be proven that there is enough for them to do Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:51 PM Cost savings Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:52 PM its important for local government representatives to be working in the community as well serving it! Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:02 PM Salary costs to the city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:42 AM Lowers the cost Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:07 AM More diversity on council, allows a greater # of persons to run for office Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:23 AM May attract a broader group of individuals to apply for the position Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:44 AM It allows for a broader range of people that can take up the position. It is full time then, it limits the number of people that can run. Fewer people would be willing to give a full time job or career to be a full time councillor. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:58 AM The survey provided suggested that the hours that councillors spend on the job add up to, on average, 80 a month. That’s 20 hours a week - a half-time job. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:05 AM Save tax dollars. We are rarely listened to anyways Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:14 AM With the current role of City staff in providing research and information to councillors, I do not think this role justifies a full-time position. If councilors were to become full-time I would expect their engagement to extend beyond only meeting and policymaking into a more operations based role within the city as well. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:16 AM We are not a large city, keeping up with say Mississauga or London is not necessary. They need to be efficient. Our taxes are high enough now without having to add full time salaries to the mix. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 211 of 275 Page 492 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:23 AM More people instead of just 1 fulltime person. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:45 AM Less financial waste. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:47 AM The councillor still has the opportunity to work and/or volunteer in the community. Thus, giving the councillor a better understanding of the community. I like that the person has one foot planted in the City piece and the other foot planted in the community. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:07 AM Save tax payer $$. Individuals become Councillors for public service and not a full-time position. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:13 AM encourages more "everyday" people to run for office and encourages better representation. Not everyone can afford a 4 year "gap" in their careers to be a full-time politician. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:20 AM We could have more of them. They would be more accessible therefore. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:22 AM less expensive Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:22 AM Cost less. Get a job in city you represent Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:18 AM its not a full time job Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:25 AM It's a big job, but there are 2 people per ward. It's now not as big a job in that way. And the reality is that the Mayor is full-time, so the city is already paying that salary. The city should not pay even more full-time salaries of councillors. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:56 AM Can pay them less so we have more councillors Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:48 AM The need for full time councillors is not there. So allowing councillors to work amongst the citizens they represent allows them to be seen by the public more. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:31 PM You would widen the pool of potential candidates. There are many citizens with wonderful skills and experience who would not throw their hat in the ring if they had to give up their career Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:37 PM less cost councillors remain citizens first and foremost, rather than politicians City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 212 of 275 Page 493 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:47 PM By having 12 part-time councillors in a small city, I think we are most likely to get thoughtful, diverse councillors. I recognize the shortcomings of part-time unpredictable work, but feel that we get good councillors despite that because public service is likely an important motivations for councillors. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:58 PM With more councilors the job is split more. When its part time policies can be more reactionary to the people's wishes and needs at specific moments. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:36 PM I don’t think Guelph is the size of city that would require full time councillors yet Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:43 PM Cuts the fat. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:54 PM Cost. Taxes are too high as it is. Two part time Councillors is ideal. Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:05 PM Then the it's are committed to the city. They aren't in it for the money or to be used as a stepping stone. It's not about the money but commitment Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:07 PM They can hold down secondary employment (if needed). I don't not want councillors who are either career politicians, or all retired, or all unemployed, or all independently wealthy. Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:44 PM Councillors should not have to worry about the day to day running of the city - that is done by the staff - they should be providing the vision/plan - not implementing it Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:26 PM A snail grows to the size of its shell. They’ll be busy; but, the city will only get incremental value. I don’t want my taxes paying for 12 full time roles and all that comes with it - big difference between full time and part time employees. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:55 PM Councillors should come from all walks of life. If we vote in full-time councillors, people who already work for a living won't be able to participate in our representative government. There's no option here for "both". Some councillors need to be full time to devote the time required to understand policy nuances. Some councillors need to be part-time to make sure all demographics can be represented. Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:41 AM Devote more of their time to the job. Make better more informed decisions, more community engaugement Optional question (212 response(s), 444 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Q18 What would be the advantages of having FULL-time city Councillors? City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 213 of 275 Page 494 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:46 AM If one councillor, this would be their job, their main responsibility, not a part- time do when I have time job. The will work hard to keep that job as each 4 years they would want to keep their job. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:15 AM More time spent on local issues; less conflicts of interest perhaps? Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 AM Increase access to councillors; enable a more diverse group of candidates & councillors Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:06 AM We need Councillors to be fully engaged in understanding the work of the city and representing their constituents. They cannot do this part-time. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:19 AM More focus on the needs of the community. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:52 AM Levels the playing field for all residents of the city to consider running for office which will support encouraging diversity on council. Anonymous 8/17/2020 10:08 AM Having a representative available at all times, not just when they're free, is better for democracy. Some councillors are notoriously difficult to get a hold of because of other commitments, thus resulting in unequal representation at city hall. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:12 AM More time to engage with a broader base of citizens, not just the ones with the loudest voices. Anonymous 8/17/2020 11:20 AM Making the job a full-time role likely reflects the workload anyway. Taking on the job in the current 'part-time' manner is not economically feasible for many potential candidates...thus it represents a barrier for many in considering a run for council. Anonymous 8/17/2020 12:23 PM Every councilor i've spoken to has told me it's a full time job no matter how much they tell you it's a part time job. I believe them. I think that giving people the time to do their job and paying them well for it (not obscenely well, but a reasonable amount for taking the pressures of public life) will result in more thoughtful and better prepared representatives. Able to share and articulate the citizens needs because they have the time to understand them. Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:15 PM Far too many Council members don't have the time to really understand what they are voting on because they have too little time to really research a topic. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:15 PM A more diverse pool of candidates can run in elections. I'm having a hard time imagining a councillor can be anything but affluent if they are able to take a part-time salary. Full-time pay might bring out candidates who are passionate about their community and are able to dedicate themselves to city council business without sacrificing taking care of themselves and family. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 214 of 275 Page 495 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:47 PM They can avoid any conflicts because they are not working for other orgs. They can spend much more time on engaging our community. Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:28 PM We’re a big city. Big decisions, millions dollar decisions. If I was a councillor, I would want to be able to give the job my full time attention. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:00 PM Quicker responses and the council members can get more done Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:04 PM more time for their ward and only their ward Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:43 PM Few citizens can afford to devote part-time to the role of City Councillor. It seems to me that Guelph would be better served by representatives who could devote full time to this position. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:48 PM There are too many issues for any councillor to deal with and the more time they are able to spend on issues the better. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:50 PM Accountability and insight - they're more commited if it's a full time gig. Anonymous 8/17/2020 04:59 PM Completely focused on the job - have time to do it Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:22 PM We are a single tier city. The issues of a city are complex and require full time Councillors who are compensated to do the needed reading, attend a range of meetings /locations without conflicting schedules. They also might take the job of working collaboratively seriously if they worked together everyday Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:04 PM Full-time employment = full-time commitment and focus Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:51 PM There are enough issues to be dealt with and need to hear from constituents that I don't believe it to be a part-time job. As the world gets more complex, the need to focus on solving problems quickly means suitable time needs to be spent each week doing so. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:02 PM More time to focus on the job of representing the needs of the community Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:44 PM The responsibilities of a councillor for a city of 130,000 (soon to be 150,000+) is certainly a full-time commitment. Also, if we want a council that accurately reflects the whole community then the running for and holding office needs to be accessible to ANYONE who meets the legal criteria. Having the position part-time and compensated as such makes the position untenable for City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 215 of 275 Page 496 of 936 working poor, single parents, etc. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:37 AM They could actually dig in to policy research, represent citizens, etc. Plus, PAY PEOPLE FOR THE WORK THEY DO. councillors are not putting in part-time hours. They do much more. Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:46 AM More time available to learn, educate and engage themselves on important policy decisions and become advocates for a better city, rather than relying too heavily on city staff recommendations Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:53 AM Many individuals of certain economic backgrounds are unable to enter local politics because they cannot balance the roles of Council with their jobs. This leads to a disproportionate number of retired and/or self-employed individuals sitting on Council since they have the flexibility to manage the role. By allowing for councillors to be a full-time role, this permits more individuals to consider running for Council since they do not have to worry about finding a balance between their economic needs and the demands of Council. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:39 AM as noted above Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:41 AM It is silly to me that Councillors are part-time. This is a full time job that requires many hours of work, and the City of Guelph has a responsibility to ensure that Councillors are doing their work effectively, and spending an appropriate amount of time on it. Having a part-time system is irresponsible, and reduces the City's ability to ensure transparency in Governance, and its ability to fairly and equitably support and serve its constituencies. The money involved should not even be part of this debate, and seems to be setting the discourse up for failure. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:59 AM They can focus more attention on their role, have more time and resources to learn about the issues facing their ward and their city, and come up with well thought-out, fact-based solutions. Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:51 AM Higher level of engagement that goes along with increased time and formal mechanisms for citizen engagement. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:06 AM Diversity. Currently your study shows that you can't hold down a full time job and do your job as a councillor, so by default you are down selecting to people who have enough money already. This leaves out a broad swath of the city who could have important voices and do excellent jobs, but they simply can't afford to be a city councillor. I would be okay with having one councillor per ward if they were full time. Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:29 AM fewer council but full time attention Anonymous 8/18/2020 01:15 PM They can fully dedicate themselves to this work and not have to divide their time. Perhaps less conflicts of interest. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 216 of 275 Page 497 of 936 Anonymous 8/18/2020 12:48 PM It opens up the job to more people. It reflects the actual work of a councillor who are expected to be available 24/7. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:05 PM Total time and energy dedication as they wouldn't need to hold a full time job in addition to being a councilor. You can also reduce the number to one per ward, which cuts down on communication duplication and duplication of efforts when a citizen contacts both their councilors. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:18 PM Whether or not they are deemed full-time, they are ALWAYS on duty. It’s a full time job by nature. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:15 PM They would be able to devote more time to their valuable work. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:46 PM You need to invest to get things done. Higher investment, higher accountability, hopefully stronger outcomes Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:51 PM Full time dedication to the role. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:37 PM Full-time positions allow the officials to commit to their roles and give it the attention and resources deserved for such a responsibility Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:58 PM Total dedication to the city and citizens. More indepth understanding of complex legislation and studies and more time to get proper answers. Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:10 PM Dedication in making the city work well for its citizens assuming that there will be an inter-jurisdictional quality management system such that city councillors work with provincial and federal elected officials on the 6 priorities....food, shelter/transportation, work/income, children, environment and governance. Anonymous 8/19/2020 05:36 AM Reflects the complexity of the role. Would allow more time for councillors to fulfill their governance role as well as representing constituents to hold the administration accountable to citizens. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:11 AM The job is already a full time one for those that take is seriously. The time needed to be fully informed of issues, consult with constituents, attend meetings is more than a part time roll. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:57 AM Allows for more people to run without fear of financial challenges. Allows them to be able to focus better on their role as a city leader. Anonymous 8/19/2020 08:45 AM They could do more. They could actually have time to read the kind of things that take representatives of organizations months to put together, and their decisions would be more informed. It would be accessible to more people. That said I make less working full time than the councillor's part time wage, so I'm not really saying they should make $80,000 per year. But I would be City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 217 of 275 Page 498 of 936 good with $65,000 . I don't think they need offices, or secretaries at this point, we'd be giving them more time to do their own stuff. Anonymous 8/19/2020 11:47 AM My belief is that to be completely accessible and effective in the role, it probably takes 40+ hours per week. I would define that as Full-time. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:08 PM This is a full time position that demands so much of our councillors. They should be able to give all of their focus to this important work. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:36 PM Local governance is growing in importance and complexity. High-quality representation, scrutiny, and policy deliberation require unique skill sets and full attention. A professionalized council would produce better quality governance, which would result in all kinds of positive outcomes in how the city operates--making the marginal additional public expenditure more than worthwhile. Anonymous 8/19/2020 03:43 PM Less conflict of interest. Since they have nothing to gain personally making decisions that can affect business, they hopefully are going to make decisions based on the good of the city, not for the good of the business they have a personal interest in. Anonymous 8/19/2020 06:10 PM I can tell that some councilors don't do their homework, i.e. read all of the staff reports, citizen input, and research other cities. They need more time. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that they would do their homework even if they were given the time. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:42 PM You can attract from a bigger pool and they can focus on city issues all the time Anonymous 8/20/2020 04:43 AM MAYBE THEY WILL ACTUALLY GET THINGS DONE AND WE WILL HAVE A SOUTH END REC CENTRE Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:17 AM The advantage of full time councillors is that they can dedicate their full attention to the role. It makes the role open to more candidates who can't afford to work part-time or who can't juggle two part-time jobs. Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:42 AM They would be able to focus more on city matters for better incentive. Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:15 AM Being able to focus entirely on Council business. As the City grows, the demands on Councillors time will increase. Anonymous 8/20/2020 11:12 AM More focus. It is time consuming anyway Anonymous 8/20/2020 12:57 PM To be available to the constituents at any time City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 218 of 275 Page 499 of 936 Anonymous 8/20/2020 05:06 PM More focus of the issues Anonymous 8/20/2020 07:22 PM Accessibility Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:28 PM They could focus on their jobs as councillors and handling the concerns of their ward residents without the worries and stresses of holding another job. Anonymous 8/20/2020 09:06 PM Could have one good representative instead of one that works and one that does nothing Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:40 AM It would allow individuals of lesser means to serve the public interest. The current system is more middle-upper class centric and structurally discriminatory against BIPOC individuals. Anonymous 8/21/2020 07:00 AM It's prolly already a f/t gig, might as well pay them for it. but, do it on the low end - pay should be just enough to be fair but not so much that anyone would do it just for the cash. Anonymous 8/21/2020 09:07 AM better ideas better for the city Anonymous 8/21/2020 12:46 PM Why force working-age citizens to find another job when they could be caring for our city with reduced distractions? Anonymous 8/21/2020 01:12 PM Ensures the councillor has the time and energy to properly represent the citizens. Only downside is that we may lose great qualified people who cannot afford to give up regular work to be a councillor. If that is an issue then part time is fine Anonymous 8/21/2020 02:05 PM Allows them to commit to job and not be caught between city responsibilities and professional responsibilities. Also would allow more diversity. Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:30 PM 1) Currently, we receive little to no communication from councillors. Having lived in 4 different wards in the past 6 years, I cannot recall ever being approached by a councillor, and I am quite amenable to public engagement activities. Ensuring this is a full-time responsibility would allow councillors to have more time to ensure their voting records align with the 2) Having the position as a part-time job precludes certain individuals from applying. As documented in the attached survey, attempting to take on a part-time job or full-time job in addition to this role is unrealistic. I think that ensuring full-time compensation would allow BIPOC, mothers, lower-income folk and in general, a more diverse and representative group of councillors that more accurately portray the population of our city. Anonymous 8/22/2020 09:58 AM More time and energy to dedicate to our community. The issues Guelph faces with increasing density, affordable housing, water resources etc, we City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 219 of 275 Page 500 of 936 deserve to have individuals who’s focus is only on the city. Anonymous 8/23/2020 04:15 PM they would be available. Anonymous 8/24/2020 07:38 AM I think most councillors would say that they're spending more hours on this than a part time job. It is also hard to find people who can juggle part time hours with another job so you are eliminating a lot of people who might otherwise make good councillors because they can't split their time easily or live on part time wages. Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:23 AM Always available. Shared the burden more effectively. Better work-life balance including for mayor. They should take over some of his attendance at functions, et cetera to support his family life. Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:36 AM They can give better focus on ward concerns Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:35 AM Removing barriers by acknowledging the work involved, opens up the potential for new entrants, recognizes that municipal politics is the most important vehicle impacting the day-to-day lives of city residents. In many ways this has greater impact that other levels of government, and should be valued accordingly. Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:51 AM councillors would not need to supplement their work and could focus fully on serving the community. Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:39 PM At this point they’re basically working as full-time staff being paid as part-time workers and the advantage of calling them full-time is if they would be paid full-time wages Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:48 PM Minimize conflict on interest, councillors would be able to devote 100% of their working time to the business of representing their constituents Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:59 PM More involvement in city building and working with citizens Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:01 PM Full time would allow for and OBLIGATE the individual to focus their energy on providing the citizens with the best representation possible. If we had a combination of full and part time then there would be infighting and resentment as in all jobs where one person may do more or less, a part timer may do more work than a full timer but get paid less or less credit, or a lack of representation may be excused away with the idea that it isn't their full time job or responsibility. Ultimately this position is more than just a job, it is a position that carries a heavy weight and burden of representing many lives and their decisions could shape peoples livelihoods and health/finances/rights and must be given the highest level of dedication. Ensure these needs are met and responsibilities are taken seriously by making it a contractual, full time obligation, with real consequences should City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 220 of 275 Page 501 of 936 one fail their community or shirk their responsibilities. People's lives depend on the work you all put in at city hall and you need to understand that. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:15 PM Serious focus on the city as their full-time job, more accountability Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:54 PM I believe many of the councillors are already working full time, or close to it, in order to keep up with the demands of the role and staying in touch with constituents. Therefore they should be paid accordingly. It has also become apparent that many councillors who truly treat the role as a part-time role while they work in other jobs, are unable to keep up with the demands of the job and too frequently come to meetings unprepared. Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:00 PM would not have 'hidden' agendas, like being a councillor AND a developer, etc.; full time would also allow some of the duties that might in future be done by city staff to be taken on by councillors, which could streamline things and also increase direct accountability; a full time position may be more attractive to more people to run- our current council is not very reflective of the actual city demographics as to race, sex, age (especially age!!) Anonymous 8/24/2020 04:25 PM none, unless you get them to work, I think our council members and other politicians are wanna bes and they talk talk talk and act out like they care. not many do its an easy gig full time mayor and full time city admin staff already WTF dumb question # 12 Anonymous 8/24/2020 06:00 PM They have time to devote to what really is a full-time job. The population is expected to reach 144,500 in the next four years. I can’t find the figures for 1990, but it has grown 8% since 2011, so I would imagine the population has grown by at least 25% since the ward system was introduced. Anonymous 8/24/2020 06:19 PM More time to focus on citizens. Maybe some could be full-time and some could be part-time, because it still feels like not all of Guelph is being heard. Anonymous 8/24/2020 09:03 PM It’s an important job and requires many hours of work. It shouldn’t be a part time job for elites in high income jobs. If it was full time, even people from poorer areas could do the job for appropriate compensation. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:03 AM Councillors would have the time and focus to do the job thoroughly and effectively. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:24 AM As the city grows in size, complexity, and diversity councillor must not only represent and engage their ward constituents but also need to understand the series of interconnected systems we call a city. Policies must reflect a systems approach to looking at problems and solutions. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:43 AM Dedicated to resolving issues quickly and ability to focus on best resolutions. Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:38 AM Full time means more engagement with citizens, more opportunity for making evidence-informed decisions, more opportunity to fundraise, to awareness City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 221 of 275 Page 502 of 936 raise, to build a sense of community. This is not the time to do the minimum! now is the time to ramp up. Guelph has so much going for it and with more investment in our community, in our people, and in our representation, we can outpace other municipalities and become leaders in a what defines a caring community. Anonymous 8/25/2020 08:25 AM They can provide their full focus to the job. They don't have to balance outside work. In the current model, you're expecting people to put full-time hours into a part-time role. This is toxic and doens't do us any good. Fix it. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:03 PM Full-time pay for full-time work. As it is right now, with part-time pay they have to have other jobs but with full-time they would be able to engage more with their constituents Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:09 PM Sometimes I don't hear back from my Councillors right away and I get that it's a part-time job. With full time COuncillors, I would have greater access to them and know this is their primary focus, instead of being a side job. Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:27 PM Focus on the job, more time to interact with constituents and city staff Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:31 PM This city is growing, and governance seems to no longer be a part-time job. Also, full-time employment may attract a broader range of candidates. Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:16 PM Many councillors already spend full-time hours on the job. Full-time pay would allow participation by a wider range of citizens who could not otherwise afford to do this work. It's an important job and needs to be given the time and money to be done well. Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:22 PM 1/2 the number of Councillors means more work for each of 6, thus full time makes sense Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:36 PM More time to look into real issues that effect the whole city Anonymous 8/25/2020 02:45 PM The range of candidates for Council would increase - very few people have the ability to maintain current employment and take on part-time Council work. Our existing and past Councils have represented largely middle to upper class white citizens that were retired or were in favourable financial and professional positions that were flexible to work around Council's schedule. But this rules out many qualified and good candidates in the community who can't make ends meet on a part-time salary. The advantage of having full-time professional expectations from the community would also serve to make our Council more professional and standardized with clear expectations - just as I have work hours and am expected to respond in a certain time, so too would my Councillor. The variation of hours input into Council work indicated in the background document is huge. You shouldn't have one Councillor putting in 1/3 of the time that other's are. Standardization of expectation and professionalism would significantly advance Council and City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 222 of 275 Page 503 of 936 the City. Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:21 PM RACI - Responsible, Accountable, Consulted and Informed (Guelph is now growing ) Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:25 PM I would prefer having BOTH full-time councillors (1 per ward) and part-time (1 per ward but elected city-wide). Being available and accountable to ward residents is a full time job. But we also need to allow for encouraging political engagement for people concerned about the whole city's balance and growth - hence the recommendation of a matching number of part-time councillors to be elected city-wide. Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:23 PM Let's be honest, the job already borders on full time hours, and for some well over. They should be compensated appropriately so that they can devote their full work availability rather than having to have a full time job and do council work in the off time. It's not fair to us as citizens and it's not fair to the councillors. Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:48 PM Main focus is their ward and not other stresses Anonymous 8/25/2020 09:06 PM This City has enough population now and in the future to warrant full time work, particularly if council remains at the same size or shrinks. Anonymous 8/25/2020 09:52 PM Because then that would be their SOUL job. It’s probably a mountain of work. Let’s pay them a living salary, perhaps upwards of 55k per year, get them set and be able to focus on making Guelph amazing. Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:30 AM They would be able to talk to citizens more, make accessible "town hall" hours, have more time to respond to email and phone requests and be more accountable to the citizens of Guelph. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:24 AM Councillors require more time to fulfill their responsibilities including more community engagement, preparation time and research for important votes / decisions and time to work / meet with City staff. Full time Councillors should have an office at City Hall with regular office hours. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:32 AM This would significantly broaden the base of candidates and be a more level playing field, in addition to addressing the increased workload and the need to be available, both within council and within the community. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:04 AM Clear focus on council duties, possibility for lower stress and increased engagement on the part of councilors. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:17 AM I would support full time Councillors if we had less of them so we could have their full attention on the needs of the citizens of Guelph. I also think I would feel more comfortable with individuals serving multiple years on council if they worked full time. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:31 AM They're already making full time salaries, so they should be putting in the full time work. The Mayor is massively overpaid. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 223 of 275 Page 504 of 936 Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:42 AM They would be accountable and have in theory a good working knowledge of what is going on. Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:42 PM They are focused on just their duties of guiding the city and representing their constituents. They are not distracting by other activities. This isn't a small town any more. Anonymous 8/26/2020 02:29 PM Councillors would hopefully put more effort in to the job if they viewed it as a full time position Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:10 PM Currently, the amount of time and work councillors are expected to provide to fulfill their duties is already a FULL-time city councillor. If councillors agreed to FULL-time and were paid FULL-time (currently a meager PART-time salary for FULL-time work), the attraction of skilled councillors with a firm focus on their fiduciary duties would make for a more highly functioning council and city as a whole. Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:28 PM Attention to and awareness of ward and City-wide issues. Improved accountability. Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:32 PM Focus, accountability Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:59 PM Full-time means a councillor does this as their job. As a part-time role, someone will be required to look for other work. This will naturally weed out folks who require financial stability and, again, select for richer folks from privileged backgrounds. Anonymous 8/26/2020 05:41 PM Cut # in half, full time. More professional attitude to job Anonymous 8/26/2020 06:21 PM Accessible to people to who don't aren't business owners, independently wealthy, or have a supporting spouse. Anonymous 8/26/2020 06:50 PM It is a big job given the depth and breadth of the problems we have to face. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:15 PM Allow them to better educate themselves on the decisions before them and to allow them more time to effectively engage the public to know where people stand not just their own opinion on things. Digital votes within their wards are very simple to conduct now and should be done to allow them to get a feel for the public interest in things Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:29 PM Guelph has too many dabbling yahoo's on council. Make councilors full time, clear out the dead wood and make individuals responsible for their ward. Now free loaders and activists are provided a municipal UBI to subsidize their slacktivism. We have a municipality to run and council gets regularly City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 224 of 275 Page 505 of 936 derailed, tim, lives and money wasted, on matters that are not under municipal jurisdiction. To get serious about municipal affairs we need serious people around the horseshoe. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:03 PM They could more full represent heir elctorate Anonymous 8/27/2020 06:50 AM Too obvious for comment Anonymous 8/27/2020 08:22 AM members are subject to oversight, scrutiny and are empowered to improve guelph infrastructure and policy. Anonymous 8/27/2020 01:34 PM I think reducing the number of Councillors, but making the role a full-time job makes a lot of sense. Many councillors spend as much time as many full-time employees on council related matters. Making these jobs full-time also means additional responsibilities can be undertaken for each Councillor position. Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:09 PM Their full time job should be the city, rather than it being a side job. Anonymous 8/27/2020 09:39 PM They should be focused on the job at hand and it feels like running a city should be a full-time job Anonymous 8/28/2020 07:18 AM The city is growing and full time councillors are required to deal with daily issues Anonymous 8/28/2020 08:42 AM It seems that currently, unless retired, most councillors must devote their energies to their main occupations, and not the task of keeping in touch with constituents and doing the research necessary to be informed when making decisions. Some of our current councillors neither return inquiries from constituents nor come to Council meetings prepared for reports and delegations - they ask questions of matters that are clearly laid out in staff reports. We need better representation that can only come if the positions are full time. Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:14 AM City Councillors have an increasingly complex job. It's not just about dog parks and fixing potholes but figuring out what it takes to build a healthy and safe community, managing the social and economic costs of growth, and planning for the future. It's also about navigating politics at the provincial and federal level. If we want to level the playing field, making Councillors full-time would be a good place to start. Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:43 AM we are a large city with a large expectant growth- many issues just take too long to get through. We have a notoriously bad reputation for being very slow-moving. Full time would allow more work to be done quicker Anonymous If they have to be both a board of directors and a parliament, then perhaps City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 225 of 275 Page 506 of 936 8/28/2020 12:13 PM recognizing the weight and importance of this role with a full time position is more appropriate Anonymous 8/28/2020 06:26 PM I really feel that Guelph needs the commitment and engagement from full time councillors. I feel that full time council would make quicker decisions. Anonymous 8/29/2020 08:12 AM It focuses the councilor's work and make accountability clearer. Councillors have to be close to full time anyway now. SO in a sense making it officially full time just recognizes the reality. However, there is a tradeoff with ward size. It would be better to have more wards adn part-time councilors compared to fewer wards and full time councilors. Anonymous 8/29/2020 11:23 AM A Councillors would be solely devoted to this job rather than seen as a paid hobby, more accountability. It is really full time to do all the work required even if some only spend 20 hours. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:02 PM Full-time councillors can provide better service and as the City grows they can take on the added duties required - such as sitting on committees, considering submissions etc. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:03 PM They would have the time to devote to a growing city without sacrificing too much of their personal lives, and be adequately compensated. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:50 PM Having full time city Councillors gives residents more time to meet with a ward Councillor and discuss policy and concerns and have those issues addressed. They could allocate more time to study policy and regulations that people would like to see changed or adopted to meet their needs. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:59 PM More focus, more commitment and determination to consult with citizens. In the end, there would be more at stake for each of them and citizens would benefit. Anonymous 8/30/2020 04:46 PM It reduces corruption (i.e. second job and business interests). Also, we should respect those that choose to give their lives to the people in public service since it is a difficult job. Anonymous 8/30/2020 05:46 PM Full time councillors will be focused on the city and hopefully that will mean better decision making. Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:17 PM Dedication Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:21 PM In addition to my earlier points regarding greater diversity, Councillors need to dedicate their full attention and focus to the job at hand - most importantly, engaging with citizens and ensuring responsible governance over City resources. Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:25 PM Obviously the members would be able to focus all their available time on council matters. As this calling appeals to retired people who have more free time, the full-time aspect would surely attract younger people, creating a wider range of ages around the table. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 226 of 275 Page 507 of 936 Anonymous 8/30/2020 07:03 PM - Guelph is a growing city, and having full time councillors can create a system where issues are looked after and people are represented to the fullest - Having councillors work part time may mean they have to take on other jobs, which means they may be more distracted as a councillor, or create bias as they work Anonymous 8/31/2020 06:58 AM A big city needs proper looking after. It’s a full time job. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:23 AM Engaging with citizens and upholding their will ought to be something that every councillor is wholly dedicated to. Making the position full-time will also allow for councillors to be fully invested in knowing/understanding their position and how best to serve the public. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:25 AM I am confident that there is enough work for these positions to be full-time; the tradeoff, of course, is the cost. One option may be to designate one full- time individual per ward and the others as part-time. This can be decided after the election through discussions and voting amongst Councillors and the Mayor. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:59 AM Less conflicts of interest for councillors with business interests in the City. More time to devote to their Council business. Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:21 AM Faster engagement for citizens. More chnage to advocate to new businesses for Gurlph, greater Gielph promotion outside of city Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:22 AM Full time councillors are more engaged. If you had a smaller number, the cost would be negligible. Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:08 PM From interacting with my local councillors, this seems like a lot of work. I can't imagine trying to do it as a part-time job and tacking another job on top. This should absolutely be a full-time job. Anonymous 8/31/2020 02:23 PM As above Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:11 PM more focused on resident issues Anonymous 8/31/2020 05:34 PM Proper focus on the issues at hand Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:09 PM It's a big role that should not cater to people who can "make do" on a councillor's salary. We need to take a business like approach, something badly missing in our current council. I expect full time level engagement with the people who live in their ward and i am willing to pay for it. Anonymous Councillors have the full-time resources they need to do the job they are City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 227 of 275 Page 508 of 936 8/31/2020 07:31 PM already doing now. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:45 AM We are rapidly changing City. This requires attention from our elected officials who will lead the City into the future. The demand on their time is intense and being full-time (also fully compensated at say $100k/year) they can best respond to constituent questions and concerns and help us to reach appropriate City staff for any particular situation. As we grow and undergo change this is no time for part-time Councilors or Mayor. We need full-time attention because the consequence of poor decisions will live with us for a very long time. Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:58 AM More time for the many complex decisions that are before city council. I know councillors who already put in full time hours. Anonymous 9/01/2020 10:12 AM Councillors would be paid fairly for the work they do. I expect most Councillors work more hours than they are paid for. Many women and BIPOC people may be employed in jobs where they do not have flexible work hours and so attending commitee and other meetings would be difficult. If they were employed full time as councillors, they may be able to leave their other jobs and focus on the councillor job. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:21 PM More dedicated folks willing to put the time and energy into the job. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:40 PM It would ensure that anyone interested in running for a Council position would not be impeded by financial considerations. It doesn't seem realistic for Councillors to maintain other employment, so the current level of compensation could be a barrier and favour those of greater socioeconomic status. As well, the current pay level does not seem to be reasonable given the level of responsibility and prestige associated with Council positions; Councillors should be paid more. This is particularly true given that Guelph is a single-tier municipality, so Councillors do not have the ability to supplement their income with higher-tier municipal council positions. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:52 PM Dedicated full-time Councillors would promote accountability, and would encourage more women and less wealthy candidates to run. Anonymous 9/01/2020 05:26 PM The requirements of governance are getting more complex. I think it is unfair for a city this size to expect a part time councillor to handle all these issues. I want my rep to have time to read all the meeting materials, and reference materials, and be well prepped for meetings. It IS already a full time job in my opinion. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:27 PM They are currently doing full time work, this acknowledges that fact Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:30 PM Given the location of Guelph and Guelph’s growth there are probably a number of issues that require a fair amount of attention and time. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 228 of 275 Page 509 of 936 Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:50 PM Councillor will be more readily available throughout entire day, could open up opportunity to more people (current PT system hinders # of candidates), increased and dedicated engagement from one person. Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:07 PM Councillors who are full time could be better prepared for meetings, read through all the material personally instead of relying on summaries or only reading those bits that interest them, and be available to constituents when administrative persons in the City are also available. Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:14 PM Gives councillors more time to devote to represenation and the work of council rather than having to fit it into a schedule which may include other employment. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:08 PM Time. They also need staff moving to full time. Anonymous 9/01/2020 11:46 PM They can engage the citizens. Anonymous 9/02/2020 05:30 AM Councillors will be able to devote their time to making the city a better place to live in. Juggling a job and being a councillor seems unrealistic. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:59 AM No competing interests. More accountability to council position. Proper compensation for busy work. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:07 AM - First, they can focus on the job without worrying about seeking other employments to pay the bills. - Second, it allows for more diversity and better representation as the part-time status excludes the vast majority of the population who needs full-time job to keep a roof over their families and cannot run for councillors position. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:19 AM Full time means that presumably my councillors will be available more often when constituents want to speak with them. Full time councillors would also have more opportunity to focus on city issues. I feel that part time councillors have other interests that can affect the decisions they make on behalf of their constituents. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:23 AM See above. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:23 AM The City is growing and we need to attract people to this job. This can only be done as a full time job to get more diversity in council compasition Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:35 AM Full time ONLY if we have fewer councilors Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:41 AM The amount of time and effort that our current councillors dedicate to their jobs is a lot. They should have the time and space to do this full-time. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 229 of 275 Page 510 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM Higher expectations re local engagement, better study of background information for complex issues and decision making, not distracted by the need to maintain sufficient employment/income sources. This role is a job, not a hobby, although it is/can be a vocation. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:16 AM There are enough complex issues for councilors to consider and deal with that they require full-tinme attention to their jobs. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:17 AM - Dedicated Councilors able to devote their full attention to the work of representing Guelph citizens and managing the demanding decision-making and City Hall oversight role - Increases representation without increasing the size of Council Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:14 AM They are probably already working more or less full time, but are likely distracted with other jobs/careers/things. A more focused approach would be good, and would require that they actually read council reports and understand the issues more thoroughly. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:22 AM More diversity among candidates. A full time job would appeal to more and different kinds of people Most people can't afford to live on a part time salary and would have to work another job or rely on another income on top of this one. More people may want to participate, but can't afford to live with a part- time income. Part time jobs are most attractive to retired people or people with other sources of income. Then, if elected, their commitment may be split between their "real" job and being a Councillor. Being a Councillor is important, requires full time commitment, and warrants a full-time income. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:23 AM There will be full communication with residents, other councilors, and private interest. The increased population and load and expectations would justify this. As a caution...Just because it is a paid position I would not want to see either the elite or money seekers taking the job. The dedication of the present councilors cannot be ignored. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:33 AM When i look at the number of hours councillors indicated they put in, if they were paid full time then it would be job, that someone other a retiree or an independent person could work at Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:02 AM It would allow/encourage more people to get involved and run for municipal politics regardless of current job situation or income. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:32 AM The job of councillor makes enormous demands on their time and intellect. I've seen some of the mind-boggling material they are expected to absorb before a council meeting. It's a significant responsibility to make some of the decisions required - legal, technical and financial. I'm also aware of the demands constituents make on their time (and patience). Recognition of the full-time nature of the job is overdue. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:32 AM They can more successfully focus on their representative role and without conflict of interest from their employment/business. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 230 of 275 Page 511 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:44 AM This will allow councilors to work full time hours to deal with matters quicker and result in decisions being made so one councilor can not cancel out the 2nd councilor as they can now by voting in opposing views. Anonymous 9/02/2020 01:53 PM opens the role up to more people and citizens would have someone who is fully dedicated to the job Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:25 PM Full commitment and focus on making Guelph a city to be proud to live in. Some one who can work and advocate for issues that need addressing and providing better service and constituent commitment. This is a no brainer. I don't wish to have a councillor being paid for parttime work when I expect fulltime results. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:31 PM Truly, I am guessing that a part-time Councillor is really working full-time in actual fact. I haven't asked any Councillor that question but it is the kind of job where there is no end because there is always one more person to phone, one more document to read, etc. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:46 PM Total focus would be on their responsibilities related to their respective wards. Anonymous 9/02/2020 04:31 PM To allow proper consideration of issues - review documentation, consult with experts / residents. Meet with other councillors to come up with solutions that benefit the most parties. This might help reduce some of the crazy long council meetings that happen! Good decisions don't happen at 1 am!! Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:28 PM The city is growing. A part time councillor would not be able to fully understand any issues that may come up. A part timer also wouldn’t be available to the citizens in the ward Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:55 PM Ability to do meaningful, comprehensive community engagement, which Guelph severely lacks. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:15 PM All their energies would be focused on performing their role--better for the councillor, the constituents and the city. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:51 PM We are groat an alarming rate. Need 2 per ward Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:18 PM More time is needed to devote to issues. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:08 PM They could listen to the people in their ward more and spend more time seeking out their input into city issues their ward members should be aware of. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:59 AM If we took it down to 4 but full time they could devote themselves more to the city City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 231 of 275 Page 512 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:23 AM Councillors would have time to research and understand complex issues and be better prepared for council meetings. It would give them more time to interact with their constituents.It would recognize the importance and value of the work and may attract a more knowledgeable and younger demographic. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:45 AM This would open a larger group who could take on roles. However, this would also rely on those becoming councillors to pause or give up their current career. In a mixed system, I would propose the at-large councillors be full time but ward councillors be part time. Anonymous 9/03/2020 07:27 AM More time to dedicate to city matters Anonymous More dedication on their part and they are better compensated More dedication, interaction with people We could really hold the councilors accountable for actually paying attention to issues and doing the job. I think if the position of council is full-time there should also be a method to evaluate the effectiveness of the councilor in meeting the needs of the constituents; a mid-term review for example. It would not necessarily be binding but could provide some feedback to the councilor about how well they are serving their constituents. There should also be a recall mechanism if a councilor is deemed to be ineffective or incompetent. It is not financially feasible for most underprivileged communities (women, BIPOC folks, lower income, disabled, etc.) to hold the position of councillor at the current rate of pay it is, considering the time commitment it requires to be a fully engaged city councillor. That salary does not cover the costs of living in that ward and supporting a family. I would want the people representing me at council to be compensated for the time needed to fully engage with the issues raised in the community and to be fully informed about them. I want there to be clear expectations of what their job is with respect to advocacy, engagement, and accountability. There are some councillors who are more engaged than others, and it shows. Focused efforts and greater priority they would be available at regular hours, would have time to fully understand recommendations before them, they would be reachable and less conflict of interest since this would be their full time job. 9/03/2020 07:52 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 08:55 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:15 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:50 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:23 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:33 AM Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:35 AM Full focus is on the task at hand City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 232 of 275 Page 513 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:42 AM Less risk of conflict of interest (if you run a business in your ward you might make decisions just to benefit yourself). Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:49 AM Better engagement Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:53 AM Municipal issues have become increasingly complex. A full time Council will be more accessible. Anonymous 9/03/2020 11:37 AM Current demands of the position make it almost impossible to be a part-time Councillor and full-time employee. This limits the pool of potential candidates. It is telling that only 2 of the current Councillors hold full-time employment. Note that I DO NOT, in any way, shape or form, support the notion of reducing the number of full-time Councillors in order to mitigate the cost of moving from part-time to full-time positions. Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:38 PM More of a priority and focus ... Less people being more effective Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:46 PM Availability to citizens. Hopefully better quality candidates as opposed to topping up other salaries, pensions etc. Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:05 PM The are many reports to read and so little time Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:14 PM More representation Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:18 PM They will be focussed on Council issues. Reduces conflicts of perceived conflicts of interest. It will allow for more diversity of experience on Council (those that work 9-5) and cannot work part time or juggle two part time jobs. Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:14 PM See survey question # 10. Plus perusing the amount of time spent currently on various items from the chart, a full-time councillor would and should become more well-versed in all things Guelph, and should be compensated accordingly. Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:27 PM A rapidly growing and complex City demands a dedicated and highly focussed City Council. A Full Time Councillor focusses on their public service, over and above any of their other conflicting vocational priorities. A Full Time Councillor role encourages more women, racialized, and young persons to run for Office. A Full Time Councillor role encourages greater representation from people with professional backgrounds and lived experiences - as well as the independent business persons, civil servants, and semi-retired persons who are often more typically represented on municipal councils. A Full Time Councillor has more opportunity to focus deeply on legislation, policy development, Committee Work and advocacy in City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 233 of 275 Page 514 of 936 a manner that is often impractical, and often impossible, in a part-time position. A Full Time Councillor has one job and is more accountable to their constituents. To be clear, IMHO, if the City of Guelph continues with part-time council, we will not move beyond the current status quo. Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:54 PM There primary concern is the engagement of citizens and the careful consideration of policy decisions. Perhaps their role could be expanded in regards to the above concerns. Making thselves regularly available for public input in person and working more closely with city staff. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:15 PM Greater focus on city governance and development. Greater accountability to wards they serve as their time is city compensated. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:14 PM I expect more focus and dedication to each ward Anonymous 9/03/2020 07:15 PM It opens up the job to more people. Likely there are those interested in the job who simply cannot do it because it is part time. Although it is not unreasonable to have part-time councillors for a city our size. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:52 PM I believe if we have one full time councillor per ward they could better represent the citizens in the ward. Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:00 PM Guelph is large enough and the ability to focus on the job without juggling a 9-5 would advantageous for both the councillors and the citizenry Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:26 PM A full-time councillor has more time to devote to studying issues, consulting voters, engaging other communities. I think you’d get better results. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:57 AM There’s lots to do Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:56 AM It would mean they are dedicated to their ward & city, and have more time to devote to the job, rather than having to maintain another part-time job or business Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:10 AM Councillors would be better prepared for Council meetings and better able to represent their constituents. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:15 AM They would not have to juggle other jobs. Currently, there are a mix of situations where some councillors work full-time elsewhere, thus putting in much less time/effort as Councillor than others, who are treating this as full- time work, and are not getting paid for the effort they are putting in. It would equalize expectations of what a Councillor is expected to do. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:14 AM It's more than a full time job. Any councillor who is only working part-time is not properly representing the people. It takes work, you can't sit at home and play your guitar each day at noon. I'll gladly take the place of any councillor who doesn't want a full time job working for the people. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 234 of 275 Page 515 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:21 AM Focused commitment to the work at hand. Accessibility. Greater opportunity to participate in community activities, wider availability, better presence, Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:22 AM This allows someone who truly wants to do this to take the job and put their all into it. They will spend their time actually doing their job and not worrying about whatever other jobs they have. This needs to be someone who is fully committed to their ward. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:32 AM Not dividing their time and energy between another job and their work for the city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:33 AM They can do more to be actively engaged. While I support Full time councillors, I would not support them having full time responsibilities outside of acting as councillor. For example if someone was elected to a full time councillor role, I would not like them to have a full time job, say, selling insurance, or own and operate a full time business of their own. If they're elected to a full time role, I'd like them to devote their full attention. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:00 AM They can focus on the role and spend more time in/with their communities rather than at other jobs Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:05 AM They can devote all of their energy to serve the needs of the city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:07 AM Exposure to the community Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:10 AM Difficult. It's more like 3/4 time. People expect more than full-time service but begrudge the part-time pay. They want someone who has legal, planning, governance, communication skills, etc. Difficult to attract someone like that at a part-time salary unless they are retired w a pension or have another source of income. The salary and time commitment precludes a lot of people from running. If they go full time they have to do more than the part-time expectation without starting to get into operations. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:20 AM better able to concentrate on their duties without trying to maintain a second job. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:33 AM I think this might help ensure more diversity if they are paid full time positions. It will also attract people who are serious about the job, and who are capable and willing to dedicate themselves to being a councillor. I think that, as mentioned earlier, the pressure and workload for city council is going to increase as we continue to deal with Covid and recovery from Covid. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:35 AM If you are being paid full time to do a job you SHOULD be putting in more time and effort to do it right. Also, you are representing your ward and it should be a job not a hobby. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 235 of 275 Page 516 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:51 AM More time to consider and review matters. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:51 AM Ability to dedicate the time required to satisfy constituent needs and focus on the job at hand. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:52 AM Full time paid councillors would keep the needs of their constituents focused and centric based. Less clear responsibilities and point of contacts. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:00 AM It would only be more democratic (more time they can afford to doing the job of Councillor). Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:43 AM Then a person who does not have an alternative source of income could take on the position of Councilor and still pay the bills. As it is, Councilors need another source of income, like a pension. This leads to a skewing of the age of Councilors. I'm OK with older, smart people, but I don't like to exclude younger, smart people. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:44 AM Councillors would have full and undivided attention to issues and must be available to respond to constituents as a full time position Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:02 AM I started from a position that positions should be part time, as I was worried that people who see themselves has career politicians would now be the only people who would run. However, I have been convinced that full time positions would provide an opportunity for those of modest means - and this could mean any part of our diverse population would consider running for office and providing service to their community. It would mean that councillors could actually have the time to read all of the material that staff provide them with, it would mean that they could engage with staff to be more informed about the details of issues, it would mean that councillors could help individual means who have an issue that would best be resolved at the municipal level. As a bonus if we have councillors who are full time, with some physical space at city hall where they could meet with their constituents it would help make Guelph city hall feel less like Fort Knox - it is THE most unfriendly municipal public space that I have come across having lived in large cities (London UK Paris France, Toronto Canada) Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:06 AM Focus , commitment , is required part time is not enough . Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:08 AM Ability to focus and engage. Suggesting half part time, one from each Ward, and six full time at large Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:15 AM To have the knowledge required to really know your ward and its people and the various views on the issues, requires a lot of attention and time. Being informed about neighbourhood issues and helping resolve these issues is a full time job. Knowing your ward and representing your ward at City Hall City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 236 of 275 Page 517 of 936 meetings including Council Meetings is a full time job. Being well briefed on matters coming before Council, including City Transportation, the Library, the City Budget, Affordable Housing, Homeless and vulnerable people issues, etc., etc. is a full time job. Having full time city Councillors is not a luxury, it is a NECESSITY. This is not simply an "advantage" It is a necessary requirement for someone to carry out their job responsibilities fully. - get more things attended to, more things running better, get answers back more quickly Properly compensated, full time councillors would be able to put all their efforts into ensuring proper management of this city. They'd get paid for all the work they do Keeps the job from being only available to affluent candidates. The larger the city becomes the workload increases and I believe the councilors need to have the opportunity to participate fully in their role. They might read the background materials about decisions they are making. Given that the number of councillors shrinks, the extra work would make it full time. Less conflicts of interest, more focus on issues. Allows for focus and time on larger issues. Full-time councillors would allow more people the opportunity to run. It's hard to manage a full-time job, and being a councillor putting too much pressure on a person. Part-Time councillors tend to be financially able only to have this one job, which doesn't adequately represent our city. no divided interests or time restraints This is only with the proviso that city council is reduced to six councillors instead of the current twelve. Should council be retained at twelve or increased I would only support part-time. We don't need any increased costs to the city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:32 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:56 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:05 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:14 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:36 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:54 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:56 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 12:30 PM Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:03 PM Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:12 PM Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:20 PM Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:43 PM Likely to get more qualified candidates if it is a full-time, well-compensated position. Full-time would also facilitate more engagement with the public, which is never a bad thing :) City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 237 of 275 Page 518 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:58 PM They wouldn't be distracted by other things Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:03 PM FULL-tme ONLY if there is one councillor per ward. I would think full-time would give both councillor and resident better opportunities and more time to be able to connect. If we do not change to one councillor per ward and keep two, then it should remain as PART-Time. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:07 PM Better candidates running for council. Full time attention to council work. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:10 PM Dedication to the position, a ‘job or career’ would always be priority Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:20 PM To give them adequate time to read huge Council reports and to hear from and talk to their constituents. Having another job means they may not be fully attentive to issues and people. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:30 PM Councillors can dedicate full time to addressing citizen concerns. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:43 PM If only one councillor per wsrd this should adequately cover concerns from taxpayers and to get involved in the wsrd Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:29 PM Part time work for part time pay limits the job to those who can afford it. Spend full time attention on important work. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:42 PM Councillors have a lot of work to do and should not be distracted by another position. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:09 PM Full time counselors opens the door to more potential candidates who may not be able to afford to leave their current employment. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:36 PM Councillor are over worked trying to balance the City job and a personal job- however I am not sure that at this time Guelph is large enough to warrant full- time councillors Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:13 PM Full-time councillors will provide better representation for citizens at City Hall As the population of Guelph has grown, full-time positions have been added at City Hall to respond to needs like policing, emergency services, libraries, waste pick-up, etc; However, in more than a century, the full-time-equivalents (FTEs) around the Council horseshoe have remained essentially unchanged. In 1909, we had a population of 11,500. In the early years of the 20th century, the number of Councillors went back and forth between 12 and 18. Assuming they were part-time, that works out to an equivalent of 1 part-time Councillor for 640 – 960 citizens, or one FTE for 1,280 – 1,920 citizens. In 2016, we had 12 councillors for a population of 136,000, which works out to City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 238 of 275 Page 519 of 936 one part-time councillor representing 11,330 people, or an FTE representing 22,660 citizens. Our democratic representation has been diluted as the City has grown. I anticipate that there will be a backlash to the concept of increasing annual funding for 12 full-time councillors, which would be in the order of $500,000 annually. I would like that to be considered in the context of the 2019 decision to add $4.1 million annually to the City budget to finance 30.5 FTEs for the Police Service. Making the current 12 Councillor positions full-time would effectively be equivalent to adding 6 FTEs to the Council payroll. We also need to look forward to the expected growth of our City to a population of 190,000 in the coming decades. It is of note that in 1867, the Provincial legislature had 82 members. It now has 124.In 1867, the House of Commons had 181 members. It now has 338. Accessibility Working conditions and the part-time nature of Council work preclude many people from serving on Council. This impacts diversity of representation and points of view. Not everyone is able to combine a part-time Council job with their existing employment or family duties. The possibility of serving on Council should be available to everyone. If all Councillors were full-time, it would be possible to schedule more frequent meetings, ie: weekly. This would make for shorter agendas for citizens who wish to participate as delegates and fewer late nights for the staff who are required to be present. Fairness The answers to the questionnaires present the possibility that some Councillors are putting in around 10 hours per week, while others are working 36 hours a week on Council and Council-related activities. This means that some members of Council are subsidizing their Council work through pensions or family income. Or, they are essentially volunteering 50 per cent of their time. At the low end of the spectrum, it is unlikely that someone who is already working a 50-hour work week at another job can put in more than 10 hours a week of Council-related work. In this situation, citizens may not be getting value for their tax dollars as the Council member may not be regularly working the 17.5 hours for which they are being remunerated. Full-time Councillors would be accountable to citizens for giving their full-time attention to the role. Complexity of the role. The roles and requirements of Council members have become more and more complex. A recent Council agenda was more than 900 pages long. I believe that full-time hours are required to do the job properly. It is clear to citizens who frequently attend Council meetings that some members of Council have read the agenda package in advance and some have not. The length of Council meetings could shorten considerably if questions were not asked by members of Council which had already been answered in the staff background reports. Council members need to be familiar with Provincial legislation, as well as local By-laws. Oversight: It is clear that we have reached a point where part-time councillors are not able to provide effective oversight of full-time staff, as required by the Municipal Act. A recent example is the vote on the By-law to close Dublin St. Many Councillors appeared to be unaware of the content of the By-law and that other options had not been explored by staff. Lack of awareness of the selection of Margaret Greene Park for major Provincial infrastructure is another glaring example, as are 11th-hour revelations of problems with the City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 239 of 275 Page 520 of 936 Police Station renovation. Office space: Office space for 12 Councillors was built into our relatively new City Hall. I was shown these offices when I toured the building after the official opening. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:16 PM More time and autonomy for managing the city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:18 PM The Councillors I've spoken with are PAID for part time work but are doing essentially full time work, so this is really a question of fairness. In addition, if we are concerned about equitable access to the job of Councillor, a part time role (and pay) is a barrier to some citizens who may want to join Council. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:15 PM - the councillor can increase their engagement and availability to citizens - they can spend their time learning about local issues and opportunities to make Guelph even better - accountability-- with part time roles, the level of commitment can really vary but with full time, the councillors will be focused on building a great city Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:21 PM Councillors can focus all of their energy on being a Councillor. Full-time Councillors will be paid a full-time wage; thus, the opportunity to become a Councillor is available to more citizens. An "average" citizen can become a Councillor, rather than someone who happens to have a lot of free time and a healthy savings account. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:58 PM Councillors are overworked and put a full time effort into a part time job. Their labour must be adequately compensated. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:59 PM More time to engage with constituents and work with city staff. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:13 PM The responsibilities of Councillors are extensive, City operations are complex, and the combination of research, consultation, informal and formal meetings / committees, informal and formal events, and more it is a significant burden for Councillors to effectively deliver on the full responsibilities required of the role. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:27 PM If Guelph has a full-time mayor and full-time bureaucracy, councillors should also be full-time. Otherwise the councillors are at a major disadvantage -- especially when staff can take up to 4 years to work on a report/EA and then give council and citizens only a week to respond. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:02 PM Represents the amount of work they are doing Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:06 PM More direct full time study of issues by elected representatives versus city staff (who would be best situated as SMEs and operational staff). Direct control of city business by elected representatives. Optional question (296 response(s), 360 skipped) Question type: Essay Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 240 of 275 Page 521 of 936 Q19 What is your age range? 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%) 12 (1.9%) 12 (1.9%) 100 (15.5%) 100 (15.5%) 157 (24.4%) 157 (24.4%) 143 (22.2%) 143 (22.2%) 122 (18.9%) 122 (18.9%) 85 (13.2%) 85 (13.2%) 24 (3.7%) 24 (3.7%) under 18 years old 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years old Question options Optional question (644 response(s), 12 skipped) Question type: Dropdown Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 241 of 275 Page 522 of 936 Q20 What is your postal code? 5 (1.1%) 5 (1.1%) 5 (1.1%) 5 (1.1%) 4 (0.8%) 4 (0.8%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 3 (0.6%) 2 (0.4%) 2 (0.4%) 2 (0.4%) 2 (0.4%) 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%)1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%)1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%)1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%)1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%)1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%)1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%)1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%)1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%)1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%)1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%)1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%)1 (0.2%) 1 (0.2%) skipped Guelph, ON, N1G2X5 Guelph, ON, N1H5T8 Guelph, ON, N1G4S7 Guelph, ON, N1H8H5 Guelph, ON, N1E3E2 Guelph, ON, N1H2Y7 Guelph, ON, N1G2L6 Guelph, ON, N1L1R5 Guelph, ON, N1G3N9 Guelph, ON, N1H6A8 Guelph, ON, N1L0G1 Guelph, ON, N1G5G8 Guelph, ON, N1E4J6 Guelph, ON, N1E5Y1 Guelph, ON, N1L1M2 Guelph, ON, N1E0P5 Guelph, ON, N1K1S1 Guelph, ON, N1H2L7 Guelph, ON, N1E0C7 Guelph, ON, N1E2J7 Guelph, ON, N1E0G6 Guelph, ON, N1H1H6 Guelph, ON, N1E5S9 Guelph, ON, N1L1L8 Guelph, ON, N1G5H4 Guelph, ON, N1E7B9 Guelph, ON, N1G3K5 Guelph, ON, N1E5W7 Guelph, ON, N1E7J2 Guelph, ON, N1L1A9 Guelph, ON, N1L1E7 Guelph, ON, N1H1G9 Guelph, ON, N1G4R4 Guelph, ON, N1G0A7 Guelph, ON, N1H6X3 Guelph, ON, N1E2J6 Guelph, ON, N1H3Z5 Guelph, ON, N1H3C6 Guelph, ON, N1G4T9 Guelph, ON, N1C1H1 Guelph, ON, N1E0C9 Guelph, ON, N1G4Y3 Guelph, ON, N1H2N9 Guelph, ON, N1H5W8 Guelph, ON, N1H2Y1 Guelph, ON, N1H8B4 Guelph, ON, N1K1R4 Guelph, ON, N1G2V9 Guelph, ON, N1G2S9 Guelph, ON, N1H7R4 Guelph, ON, N1H4G7 Guelph, ON, N1G4A8 Guelph, ON, N1H7Z5 Guelph, ON, N1G4X7 Guelph, ON, N1G2Z9 Guelph, ON, N1H4N6 Guelph, ON, N1H3P4 Guelph, ON, N1C1G6 Guelph, ON, N1C1E3 Guelph, ON, N1E6W5 Guelph, ON, N1H7C3 Guelph, ON, N1C1G7 Question options Guelph, ON, N1G2G2 Guelph, ON, N1K1R9 Guelph, ON, N1H3B6 Guelph, ON, N1H7H7 Guelph, ON, N1L1P6 Guelph, ON, N1L1H1 Guelph, ON, N1E2Z2 Guelph, ON, N1H8M5 Guelph, ON, N1H3L6 Guelph, ON, N1H8N8 Guelph, ON, N1H6C2 Guelph, ON, N1L1M3 Guelph, ON, N1L1G6 Guelph, ON, N1G3N8 Guelph, ON, N1G5A3 Guelph, ON, N1E7M4 Guelph, ON, N1E7L4 Guelph, ON, N1L0K8 1/6 Optional question (467 response(s), 189 skipped) Question type: Region Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 242 of 275 Page 523 of 936 Q21 Did you learn anything from this survey experience? 331 (52.1%) 331 (52.1%)304 (47.9%) 304 (47.9%) Yes No Question options Optional question (635 response(s), 21 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 243 of 275 Page 524 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 08:46 AM Awesome job. Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:19 AM Fewer councillors, full time councillors, more wards, smaller wards is a happy medium for cost vs result. Anonymous 8/17/2020 12:23 PM Why is there no sunset clause on the mandatory mask order? What criteria do we need to accomplish to repeal the mandatory masks? Why does 1 person unilaterally decide about mandatory masks and what criteria are they making this decision? How often is the mandatory mask order revisited and what criteria is it measured by? Anonymous 8/17/2020 01:33 PM Hopeful that this will mean better management of Staff Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:15 PM My overall thoughts: - Less councillors but more wards - One councillor per ward - Full-time salary for councillors Anonymous 8/17/2020 02:28 PM I’m glad that city hall is reviewing this issue. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:00 PM Cam for Mayor, Dan Gibson for Ward 1 Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:04 PM no Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:17 PM I hope the Council has put some thought towards succession planning —For the Mayor’s position Specifically. It was unfortunate that no one was going to run as an alternative (until very young Aggie opted to preserve democratic debate by running even though unqualified.) How do we ensure our future leadership is being planned for? Are the most qualified people willing to run? Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:43 PM This is an important discussion, thanks for letting us participate! Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:49 PM I wish I could have picked a top two for the "role of" question, because I believe advocacy+engagement are fused together as the "primary" role of councillors. Policy is an important third, but it must be in service of the first two. What I strongly do NOT believe is that council should be involved in day-to-day operations and administration. That is for full-time staff with the proper expertise in their respective fields. Q22 Do you have any further comments? City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 244 of 275 Page 525 of 936 Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:50 PM Guelph council is very unresponsive compared to other areas I've lived and worked..they should respond to emails within 2 business days and they should respond to every email. Anonymous 8/17/2020 03:51 PM Ensure that promoting this survey is across all mediums, not all residents have access to electronic surveys. Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:22 PM Do the right thing for us and don’t say we cannot make the needed changes just because other similar size cities are doing something different Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:42 PM If we move to full time councillors, I believe there should be fewer. Anonymous 8/17/2020 06:51 PM No Anonymous 8/17/2020 07:38 PM That this is a poorly functioning survey for an android device Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:33 PM Tighten your belt Start being decisive and repair what we have first. Extremely disappointed with the direction we are going and short sighting planning. Might just divorce my relationship with our sinking city despite lipstick of such a great place to live. Wasteful Anonymous 8/17/2020 09:44 PM Most important goal: avoid single member wards! This would effectively silence all residents not in agreement with the position of their one representative! Total number of councillors should depend on if they are full- time or part-time. If we keep part-time any reduction in the size of council is a reduction in representation and governance capacity and that is not acceptable. If the total number of councillors were reduced (say to 10) but they were considered full-time and compensated as such (say 1.5x the living wage which is approx $53,000 plus benefits and maybe a child care subsidy) that would increase representation and governance capacity to a level that would meet the current and future needs of the city and it would only require a negligible increase in the council compensation budget. Anonymous 8/17/2020 10:36 PM wow was the wording top to bottom in this survey and all accompanying information paragraphs done poorly. horrible. lacked simplicity most of all and it lacked clarity. you have to stop using people with grade 8 education. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:37 AM I didn’t learn anything because I’m pretty well-versed on this already. Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:31 AM There needs to be much more transparency and accountability at the city department level. There needs to be direct, transparent reporting to the citizens of the city regarding how administrative departments are furthering city goals. I'm not seeing anything beyond statements of fiscal management. The city isn't here to move money around. It is here to provide service to the City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 245 of 275 Page 526 of 936 citizens. Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:53 AM The dynamics and politics of Guelph are set to drastically change over the next decade. As the city continues to expand as more and more individuals move here from the GTA, serious consideration will need to be given to the dynamics of the city moving forward. I believe that it is extremely important for the City to consider how they encourage a wide range of individuals to run for municipal government, especially young people who are the most invested in the future of the City. Additionally, I believe that the City should continue to, and in fact increase, its funding and dedication to providing good governance training. Public representation is only strong when it is also smart and aware. Governance training is an essential aspect of this. Perhaps the City could consider looking into the concept of Right Tough Regulation as developed by the Professional Standard Authority in the UK. While not directly applicable, I believe that the concepts of risk analysis and mitigation are essential and could help train Councillors on the principles of good governance. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:39 AM thansk! Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:41 AM This is a great initiative and needs to be supported fully by Council and City Staff. Not enacting this reform would be irresponsible to Citizens who may not have a full understanding of how local governance works. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:41 AM Diversity in our society and the world make it such that we have to move away from the "winner-takes-all" model in any form of government. It is the more democratic model. Anonymous 8/18/2020 07:59 AM Good luck! Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:02 AM Current situation of 6 wards and 12 councillors isn't perfect, but it is probably the best governance model for Guelph. Advantages and disadvantages to all models, but more pros than cons Anonymous 8/18/2020 08:51 AM Should look into things like: - Equitable representation in terms of identities of those chosen - How to engage the grassroots and make councilors more like links than executive thinkers/actors - Questioning eurocentricism of approach to making decisions Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:08 AM Any change needs to be cost neutral Anonymous 8/18/2020 09:29 AM no Anonymous 8/18/2020 11:01 AM With the growth of Guelph, the 'borders' for wards should be considered in this survey. The population within each ward should be fairly consistent. With the growth of South Guelph, it would be my assumption that South Guelph is City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 246 of 275 Page 527 of 936 under-represented on city council currently. Anonymous 8/18/2020 11:58 AM Guelph is growing at such a fast pace that the infrastructure in our city is not able to keep up. Take note of the growth in the south end of Guelph. Roads are congested; parks are few and far between, and since this area has become a transient community, property standards have decreased. Many home owners rent out/are absent and do not cut their grass, shovel their sidewalks or take pride in their homes. Vehicles are parked everywhere on some streets leading to concern for access for emergency vehicles. Guelph prides itself in believing that it is a "green" community; it is not. People need and will continue to use vehicles to get around. Bicycles and buses are inconvenient and infrequently used by the majority of Guelph citizens. More attention has to be given to adequate road development-now and in the future!!! You cannot keep widening roads that were completed a couple of years before-where are the city planners???? Our mayor is not qualified to administer a city of this size and growth. The mayor should be more concerned with the present citizens of Guelph and not encouraging more and more development. Anonymous 8/18/2020 12:38 PM I feel the councillors don't actually do work. I have called numerous times to get something fixed and I was constantly passed to different people. This has happened many many times. So from my perspective they so nothing NOTHING. So many business owners who have minor issues that need to be resolved. Never get resolved. Anonymous 8/18/2020 12:48 PM Keep democracy empowered. Anonymous 8/18/2020 01:29 PM City needs to cut all unnecessary spending like library, park equipment replacement etc. Need to tighten budgets and not just keep raising taxes Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:05 PM Guelph is big enough that it needs full time, dedicated councilors. However, a full time councilor means that there need only be one per ward. Anonymous 8/18/2020 04:51 PM A full review and some serious adjustments need to be made ASAP Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:10 PM Thank you for involving the citizens on this issue Anonymous 8/18/2020 05:37 PM Thank you for this opportunity to communicate thoughts as a citizen, we are very lucky to have this freedom Anonymous 8/18/2020 06:58 PM Dominquic is a wonderful, smart councillor. Lucky to have her! Anonymous I no longer vote because there is no quality management system across the City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 247 of 275 Page 528 of 936 8/18/2020 08:10 PM jurisdictions that corroborate intelligence (data, information, knowledge), agree on rule of law (Act, Regulation, Section to be at odds) and has no consensus on moral, ethical and social behaviour to coopertae, coordinate and collaborate to beget a dying nation (few children to be replaced by rich immigrants) overun by political allegiance to the 1% to destroy the economy and the environmet The proof is in front of our eyes where things (money, investments and investors) are more important than people to turn a democracy into a dictatorship, where voting is not that important and neither is leadership to address priorities such as hunger for more food banks, homelessness for more police, more taxes for less income to afford the cost of living and children, an environmental mess and a squabbling governance infrastructure competing for attention of their ONE taxpayer, citizen and voter stretched to the limit of tolerance. I am watching and hoping for a miracle. Anonymous 8/19/2020 05:36 AM Question 3 should have allowed ranking of the roles. This is such an important decision that this should not be an online survey but a randomized survey of the community. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:11 AM The wording of this question "Do we need to redraw our ward boundaries to keep our democracy healthy?" is leading. So if I say no, I don't care about a healthy democracy? A better way to put it might be "should ward boundaries reflect as near a possible an equal number of voters in each of them?" Anonymous 8/19/2020 11:47 AM Just to reiterate, I believe the City of Guelph should move forward with 7 Wards, represented by 2 Councillors per Ward. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:08 PM Please maintain the ward system in Guelph. Additionally I would like to thank our city councillors for all of their time and energy. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:27 PM Really important survey - this should be more accessible through the city so we can truly get an opinion. Anonymous 8/19/2020 12:36 PM These kinds of processes often get derailed by politics. It's hard politically for councillors to give themselves a pay raise, for example. But there's a misguided kind of populism in that instinct to oppose. Ultimately, councillors have no right to deny the public a higher quality of council. I'd suggest looking at how citizens' assemblies have been used to address these kinds of questions around institutional and electoral change. Another alternative is to appoint some kind of independent expert commission to do render some quick advice. That way, you can be guided by evidence and citizens' true preferences, and avoid the politics of lazy populism. Anonymous 8/19/2020 03:42 PM I feel that that the councillors work very hard on our behalf. Anonymous 8/19/2020 03:43 PM Please share with me the findings/results City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 248 of 275 Page 529 of 936 Anonymous 8/19/2020 06:10 PM Good to review this question. We do not need bigger government. Anonymous 8/19/2020 07:42 PM Thanks for listening. Anonymous 8/20/2020 04:43 AM Guelph does NOT provide value for money in taxes. 2 rec centres that full time staff aren't even present in in the evenings when things are busy. there is no accountability. all i see is a bunch of people pointing fingers at each other and no one doing work. you spend money on STUPID THINGS (like those fire trucks) and leave things that need to get done with no money. Guelph is NOT a good place to live, and i never recommend it. Anonymous 8/20/2020 09:35 AM More representation is always better for "the people" less is in my view for a few people's self interest. Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:01 AM I council should actually represent the wishes of the people that they were elected to represent. It is not their position to push their own agendas. Anonymous 8/20/2020 10:12 AM what kind of idiotic thoughts, full time council when transit is being reduced! Anonymous 8/20/2020 11:12 AM Afraid that new wards will mean some neighbourhood that aren’t large will lose a voice Anonymous 8/20/2020 12:57 PM Do not put my tax dollars into the library. We as a city can’t afford it Anonymous 8/20/2020 05:06 PM Fix the God damn roads!! Anonymous 8/20/2020 05:40 PM Every councilor should have a website so concern citizens can contact them. Anonymous 8/20/2020 07:22 PM I want my city's government to protect my rights. Period. The current council has been a huge disappointment through this crisis. Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:01 PM please stop spending money we dont have. Anonymous 8/20/2020 08:28 PM I appreciate the opportunity to engage with city building in forums such as these. Anonymous 8/20/2020 09:06 PM Would like more forward thinking like the library that could revive downtown and provide much needed services. More people use libraries than sports complexes that some cannot afford to use City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 249 of 275 Page 530 of 936 Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:40 AM That which serves greater equity serves all in the long term. Anonymous 8/21/2020 04:14 PM While I favour part-time councillors I strongly favour the City providing councillors with some office suppport staff to handle contact with citizens with enquiries much like constituency offices for MPs and MPPs. Anonymous 8/21/2020 05:30 PM From a public engagement perspective: Each one of these questions represents a value trade off. Making these values evident and the trade-off clear is important. 1) Having folks consider the disadvantages of their suggestions/positions and 2) Priming folks to think about all citizens, not just themselves can lead to more democratically legitimate engagement. Anonymous 8/22/2020 11:15 AM Debate and scrutiny are key to making good decisions. Anonymous 8/22/2020 11:26 AM I have lived in Guelph for awhile now, and although I have seen it expand, I have found it to be less of a nice place to live than it once was. I do not want it to be competing with other municipalities but unique unto itself. I would also like to see the fire department under more scrutiny and limiting the daily joy riding, and using the biggest truck to shop for groceries or pick up chicken wings for lunch. I would like to see more volunteer firefighters as we may get to the point of not being able to support /pay for the service anymore as has been the issue with other towns. Anonymous 8/23/2020 04:15 PM Communitiy theatre is an essential part of this community and has been for 85 years, with covid we have no income, yet little support from agencies. What is council going to do to help us survive. We have been an important back bone of arts and culture, but because we are all volunteers we do not qualify for government subsidies, other municipalities have given grants to their communnity theatres to help keep them alive, because the groups are important to the community......what can we expect from our council. Anonymous 8/24/2020 07:38 AM One councillor full time and one part time, per ward, might also work. Municipal politics has a big impact on our day-to-day quality of life and why we like to live in Guelph, let's put in the time it deserves. Anonymous 8/24/2020 08:41 AM The city of Guelph needs to do a whole lot more listening to all of Guelph rather than special interest groups . It should not be about the sqeaky wheel getting the grease . A lot more needs done to look at allowing for what will be continued auto traffic in Guelph Not bike lanes which the taxes on gasoline should not be paying road infastructure to bikes Check out cambridge recently cancelling temporary bike lanes for lack of use . Someone on council actually studied the bike traffic and found not being used hardly at all. By making sound decisions on policing costs and road infastructure . And serious looks at spending the city will do quite well . I suggest looking at practical needs VS wants is a prudent step towards responsible stewardship. Also transit costs ie buses if they are not being used cut back dont try force the city ppl to take buses vs driving a car we arent interested as a whole . City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 250 of 275 Page 531 of 936 Also take another look at plans to electrfy buses scale it back to many eggs in the basket IF a move is made to full time salaried councilors than definately reduce to 6 for the city or one per ward . They will have a full time job than. if staying at 12 than no way full time . it might be possible to split hairs as well to 8 with some wards having two and some with one . But again no way for full time a that number . I also think the concept of believing once a council is elected it is a mandate to do as u want without extreme broad consultation of all not special interest groups is presumptious if not fool hardy . if guelph as a whole does not get more cost prudent and look more closely at its road maintenance as priority VS green infastructure our growth plan will suffer going ahead . Stop trying to win global green intiative awards Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:55 AM I have two different roles in this. I am a taxpayer/home owner and President of Guelph Little Theatre. However, I still see the same issues surfacing. Parking will always be an issue, especially at the theatre. Anonymous 8/24/2020 11:26 AM Keep the ward system! Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:15 PM I really think that the ward system needs to be revisited and redesigned since the expansion of the city Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:44 PM I'm not as invested in local politics as I could be but want to see Guelph improve in all aspects of living here. Anonymous 8/24/2020 01:48 PM Cam Guthrie is a margarita pizza. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:01 PM Two terms only for every elected position Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:01 PM I moved here from a big city and the draw was the people, the space, the peace and quiet, and the fact that it was a smaller city with progressive values that seemed to include every walk of life. But with recent years there has become a drastic increase in development, corporate drives for expansion, and a seemingly increasing abandonment of that small town feel in hopes of being more profitable and more popular. It even feels less progressive and less representative than it did when I moved here and that is very hard to convey. Please don't coast on your past reputation as a green, progressive city like may areas and businesses do and realize that there are always tipping points where identity is lost and profit only takes us so far. Oh and I understand there is a need for a better building, but please don't build a 60+ million dollar library. Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:16 PM There are 6 Wards and 12 Councillors... this makes sense but particularly if the number of residents in each Ward is similar. If there are major inequities in this regard, then the Ward boundaries should be amended so each Ward contains roughly the same number of residents. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 251 of 275 Page 532 of 936 Anonymous 8/24/2020 02:57 PM I couldn’t answer #11 clearly because I feel council needs some of both part time and full time. Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:00 PM this survey would have been more useful if you had provided the population density, and say 10 yrs worth of changes in that, for each of the 6 wards Anonymous 8/24/2020 03:37 PM the survey feels a bit clumsy, especially with out the recommendations of the consultants. Anonymous 8/24/2020 04:15 PM I feel that the decisions of council are often based on the input from the same group of retired educators. I would like to see a way of getting more voices heard. I think the old way of delegations registering a head of time and showing up and sitting there for sometimes hours to talk about why they feel this way or that just doesn't work for most of the residents of Guelph. It's the same delegations talking about buildings are too tall, we need less density, dog park is too close to my house and blah blah blah. I would like a way to discuss why it's so hard for some businesses in Guelph to call home and others get special treatment. I want to know why I can't access city services that others can. There needs to be a way forward for all discussions. Anonymous 8/24/2020 04:25 PM get some better questions, these are typicall lame brain stuff Anonymous 8/24/2020 05:39 PM No need to change things when what we have is fine. Crazy idea. Why don’t you poll councillors to see how they feel? If they want change, then let us hear their suggestions. This would be the main reason for change. Anonymous 8/24/2020 06:00 PM Only: why August, when many are away and most are not paying attention? And why only three weeks? And why is the Ward system again being debated, despite a referendum 15 years ago that was soundly in favour of it? Anonymous 8/24/2020 07:57 PM Get rid of the mayor's position. It is absolutely not needed. There should be one councillor per ward. Anonymous 8/24/2020 08:27 PM This is an interesting survey, and I am glad that input is being sought in this format. Anonymous 8/24/2020 09:03 PM Don’t lose the broad, diverse representation the ward system protects. Putting local governance in the hands of only wealthy elites is wrong for Guelph. Anonymous 8/24/2020 10:15 PM At this time we cannot afford to increase the size of council or pay full time salaries plus office staff, etc. We have to pay for the damage of the pandemic. Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:03 AM I very much appreciate the opportunity to share my opinions. Guelph is growing very quickly and I do feel that councillors must be able to focus on the needs of their wards as each ward faces unique issues. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 252 of 275 Page 533 of 936 Anonymous 8/25/2020 06:24 AM The ward system MUST be kept to preserve the integrity of city council as councillors will be held accountable by their ward. Anonymous 8/25/2020 07:57 AM None. Anonymous There has to be a referendum about the new library. I read on fb a lot of disapproval. 65 million which will be a few million more, is unrealistic. People are struggling now and will still be in the future. What were the councilors who voted for this THINKING???? If you do end up going with less councilors, then you have to increase their hours and pay, to full time, as less people need more time to do the same work. You cannot separate these two questions, as they are linked together. My question is: this has already been decided so why waste citizen, staff and Council time rehashing it? People like the Ward system. It is more democratic. The at-large system is less focused on individual wards, which can vary greatly in make-up, and it encourages big money to influence city politics, as each councilor needs more resources for an election campaign. I think that the ward boundaries need to be amended such that Councilors represent the approximate same number of residents. I think that when redrawing boundaries, consideration should be taken to future development within Guelph. Possibly at the next stage! The city did a good job advertising this survey, I saw it on a road sign as well as via Guelph Today. Disappointed to see this engagement only online, and during the summer. I can't imagine that you'll get a good cross-section of citizens responding. Sure...do not be ridiculous and build a $67 million new library!! They are not revenue generating for the city and so much more can be done with that kind of budget. Thank you! Don't need a new library!! The guelph hospital is a mess and needs more money and our streets are a mess and needs more maintenance not at this time. 8/25/2020 08:53 AM Anonymous 8/25/2020 11:26 AM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:03 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:18 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:36 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 12:41 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:16 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:22 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 01:36 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 02:50 PM Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:21 PM I am interested to work with ward boundaries for particular my ward No. 1 City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 253 of 275 Page 534 of 936 Anonymous 8/25/2020 03:25 PM Thanks for encouraging open ended responses - forced choices can often lead to misinterpreted results because of the ignorance or bias of the survey designer Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:48 PM Too many questions. Just want to vote or have a say about numbers. 1 FT per Ward. Anonymous 8/25/2020 04:58 PM Thanks for the survey, hope you consider the feedback and do not take our representatives away. Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:13 PM Please consider stopping the 67million dollar library. This is NOT something most of Guelph supports. This is why you must have council members serving a limited term. There must be diversity. There must be changes in ideas and processes. This council should not be the voice of such a specific set of Guelph individuals. Members must be available for citizens who wish to express their views via email and telephone or they should not serve at all Anonymous 8/25/2020 05:13 PM It is a waste of resources to be revisiting this right now Anonymous 8/25/2020 09:52 PM Our mayor rocks and we need a council that is just as awesome. To be honest I’m even considering running for council next election. Anonymous 8/26/2020 07:30 AM Councillors need to be held accountable to the citizens they are representing. I have one great councillor who is responsive and kind, and one who nobody ever hears from. Councillors need ti understand the needs, opinions and concerns of their residents, not just make their own decisions based on their own thoughts and values. We need a community-driven council, not a council that is basing their opinions on their own agendas. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:00 AM I am not sure why we need a full time city council in the first place? What say does the city council have on anything, since it is mostly the developers who seem to be "running the city". When was the last time our city had a major employee come to set up their business? Why are we being by passed for large companies to set up shop here? Would this not help alleviate the tax burden on the citizens of Guelph? We have far too many housing developments and our taxes are too high. Every year our services become depleted, such as, snow removal, yard waste removal and street sweeping. I would like to see my property taxes go down in value not up. We also need fewer working a city hall in general. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:26 AM Keep the ward system! Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:22 AM The design of this survey is HORRIBLE. For a publically-funded, PUBLIC CONSULTATION you are expecting your respondents to read a large volume of fairly technical background documents in order to be able to complete the survey. This assumes that your respondents read and understand English City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 254 of 275 Page 535 of 936 fluently, that they have the time to complete this exercise prior to the survey, and that they will understand the material well enough to make informed replies to survey questions. The questions of size of council and local democracy are significant, particularly in these highly unpredictable and turbulent times. Local government and citizen representation has never been more important. Yes, this survey says that you are not actually interested in an engaged citizenry, because the survey design excludes so many people from participation. Public consultation looks like: information that is easy to read and has been already digested for the public by the survey administrators; is easily available (like a colourful leaflet put into everyone's mailbox explaining where and how to complete the saurvey, for example); is available in alternate formats and in different languages; and explains the goal and purpose of the survey (aka: why we should care and why we should complete it!). You can do better, City of Guelph. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:27 AM While I think full time work is important and would be a benefit to allowing councillors to focus on their responsibilities and have quality of life, I think it is also not representative of the work situation of many citizens, and might therefore lead councillors to make decisions without recognizing the overwhelming burden of part time employment that many citizens face, and which defines large parts of their lives. Anonymous 8/26/2020 09:32 AM I am hoping this review will result in the reinforcement of the critical importance of city council and the need to put more resources into city councillors, in order to move forward as a city. Given the current climate, just keeping our heads above water is a major feat. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:17 AM I really enjoyed the town hall last night. Very informative and made completing this survey much easier. My other comment is that if we continue with 12 part time council members, we need to limit to how long they can sit on council. We need to ensure the council represents the community well and does not become an "olds boy club". I know they are elected and there is not much (or any) competition in some wards. Anonymous 8/26/2020 10:58 AM Sortition! Not sure why communities don't use sortition. It works in the judicial environment. It should be used for governance as well. This would make for less "cocky" elected officials who think their minimal knowledge of government administration should overrule the hard work of professional planners, engineers and administrators on staff. THAT ARE TRAINED IN THESE MATTERS. Really irks me when staff gives oodles of solid information on a file to council and the Mayor just says, "NOPE, I'm going with my gut". Ugh. Sortition Part-Time Paid 2 year term Let staff do their jobs. Anonymous 8/26/2020 11:46 AM I worry that the review of the current council structure is an attempt to greatly reduce local representation and erode our representation on city council. The time allowed for feedback is insufficient for this very large decision. Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:36 PM This is a really big decision that is not really being given the time or advertisement. I have seen signs around Guelph “should councillors be part City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 255 of 275 Page 536 of 936 time or full time” which is sort of misleading to what is really at stake here. These kinds of decisions should be voted on and you should be representative of most of the population of Guelph, not just those who have time and space to be socially aware. Also doing this while the students are away to keep their voices absent seems a bit underhanded as well. It really makes folks wonder about the underlying reasoning behind the need to do this now. Let’s be more transparent please. We didn’t elect Ford and we clearly don’t want his conservative political tactics being used in our municipal politics. Anonymous 8/26/2020 12:42 PM Offering this survey during the summer, during covid, was a mistake. This is an important conversation and should have been done during primetime, after summer. Anonymous 8/26/2020 02:29 PM You made this very compatible to do this survey thks Anonymous 8/26/2020 03:10 PM I have grave concerns that administration or wherever the question of ward vs at-large is coming from has a political agenda. Guelph ward system works, just need realignment for better representation considering different areas of the city require different representation and focus. Why is there no Downtown ward or a central north and south or an east north and south or a west north and south ward being considered? Where is the discussion about adjusting ward boundaries to make the current ward system more efficient? Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:48 PM We need to do more to keep Council out of day-to-day business and focus more on long term issues of the City - hire competent staff, orient them and manage them and then let them do their work within the overall guidance of the Council. We need to do more to engage citizens regularly rather than just when some NIMBY issue arises and everyone has to be heard at a Council meeting, wasting a lot of time. The input is not always helpful and it is often coming from the same disaffected individuals. The time for public input is long before an issue hits the Council agenda. Anonymous 8/26/2020 04:59 PM A backgrounder to suggest pros and cons/provide education prior to completing the survey is sorely missing. Anonymous 8/26/2020 06:21 PM Whatever system leads to better representation. Ranked ballot for mayor would be a big improvement for example. Anonymous 8/26/2020 06:50 PM I answered question 1 in alignment with the title of that section: hopes and dreams, not in response to question number 1. Anonymous 8/26/2020 08:15 PM This survey is exactly what I expect from my municipal government. These are so much easier with the use of technology and you can now base your opinion on data collected instead of just a couple peoples opinion. Feed back from the end users is essential in 2020 Anonymous I don’t think this is an appropriate time to be thinking about changes to the City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 256 of 275 Page 537 of 936 8/26/2020 07:32 PM council structure. There are far more pressing issues right now and this seems like a big waste of time and money. Anonymous 8/27/2020 06:50 AM The inefficient Ward system sacrifices the good of the whole for localized self interest Anonymous Listen to your young people councilors. There are many who have grown up in this town and wish to stay, and they will make up the bulk of the next generation of home owners and renters. Accessibility is key for everyone, including your locals. A reasonable market should be a priority. I think surveys like this are a good way to get pubic feedback. I think every effort should be made to engage the community in this way. This might mean more advertising, a greater effort at engagement. City council should not be the ones to vote on the final results. Why would they vote to eliminate some of their positions and to only keep their positions part time. Huge conflict of interest giving them the final vote I learned that Council is reviewing this matter that is now long past due. Thank you for asking our opinion! Do not turn the city council into a boardroom. That is a terrible terrible idea. Cities are not profit making corporate entities -- they are human spaces and should be structured to serve the people who live there and the environment. Stay local and connected Question 10 did not offer an option for mixed full and part time councillors. That is my choice. Candidates for each ward would run either as full or part time. There would be one full time and one part time councillor per ward. I feel like a big problem is the first-past-the-post nature of our current election system. The survey title indicated that this was a ward boundary review and that is what I cared most about. Guelph city council doesn't really do much that is useful, staff make all the decisions and they only care about adding more development to the south end because there's more tax revenue. the survey experience was not informative, as that hopefully wasn't its intention. I rather thought that the survey was intended for we, the voters, to inform the City... your last question (15) is bizarre 8/27/2020 07:58 AM Anonymous 8/27/2020 10:15 AM Anonymous 8/27/2020 12:12 PM Anonymous 8/27/2020 01:34 PM Anonymous 8/27/2020 02:20 PM Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:24 PM Anonymous 8/27/2020 03:36 PM Anonymous 8/27/2020 09:39 PM Anonymous 8/28/2020 07:21 AM Anonymous 8/28/2020 08:42 AM Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:14 AM I'm curious as to the impetus for this review. Who is agitating for this? (It wasn't clear from the background material, other than a nod as to the last time it was discussed.) If the issue is better representation for our citizens, then I think the considerations should not just focus on the number of people represented in each Ward but WHO is representing us and making it easier City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 257 of 275 Page 538 of 936 for women and people of colour to run for office. Anonymous 8/28/2020 09:43 AM no Anonymous 8/28/2020 12:13 PM Diversity and equity for all members of our community should be the # 1 priority of our City Counsel Anonymous 8/28/2020 06:26 PM Thanks! Anonymous 8/29/2020 04:14 AM Given growth since the 90s, maybe another ward or 2 needs to be added. Guelph council usually works well as is. It would be good to have some more diversity, but to also maintain the care for the communities within the city. Personally I think the way the current ward system is set up is the best way to achieve balance and community consideration. But I concede balance might involve a mix of at large/ward system, but I really don’t think so - I think at large leads to too much micromanaging of the city overall and less leadership opportunity for the mayor. I think the 2 councillor system can help to create that balance if marketed the right way so that people elect their different interests within their wards. Either way, I definitely do not want to see full time councillors. Anonymous 8/29/2020 06:15 AM The comment period should be longer. This is a very important issue that will impact Guelph for years to come. Anonymous 8/29/2020 07:29 AM I think it will be important to share the cost structure of each of the options for part-time vs. full-time councillors, more Wards vs. less Wards, etc. as each model potentially changes the cost of operation of the city and has both pros/cons. This needs to be transparent to the community at large. Anonymous 8/29/2020 08:12 AM I fear that this will not result in positive changes, given the type of questions being asked. Perhaps the status quo is better than the direction this seems to be headed. Anonymous 8/29/2020 05:23 PM Council needs to ignore left wing pet projects Anonymous 8/29/2020 08:30 PM I wonder if we could have fewer wards and more councillors per ward Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:54 AM I strongly disagree with shrinking the size of our council. Anonymous 8/30/2020 12:09 PM Why is this necessary? Guelph has larger issues of concern, such as reconstructing business through and after this pandemic, providing affordable housing, reducing poverty, and expanding the hospital and other health-care facilities. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 258 of 275 Page 539 of 936 Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:02 PM This consultation should be extended by 2 weeks Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:50 PM As a resident i would like to see the city of Guelph adopt a system whereby each ward has one elected Councillor to focus more on local, community issues and one elected Councillor to focus more on city wide issues that residents of each ward are concerned about. The people of Guelph need to have a greater say when it comes to forming policy in the city of Guelph. Decisions made by city council should take citizen concerns more seriously and adopt those policies specifically over what city council feels is the best course of action. Residents should be allowed to vote on specific policies, not just rely on city Councillors to do that for them. Anonymous 8/30/2020 01:55 PM I like the current system but we need to add Councillors or a another Ward in new areas of Guelph. Anonymous 8/30/2020 02:51 PM don't change what isn't broke Anonymous 8/30/2020 06:25 PM I realise that making council membership a full-time occupation would add significantly to cost, so reducing the number of councillors would ease that problem, but how to divide a smaller number of councillors into six wards equally and fairly? Anonymous 8/30/2020 08:35 PM Why is the ward question being raised when the citizens of this good city vehemently challenged council in the 90's to eliminate the city wide system because it was unrepresentative of all constituents? The ward system has been working very well since. Anonymous 8/30/2020 08:44 PM In relation to part time vs full time roles, the city should look at reducing the time commitment so more people that want to get involved can run. Maybe look at increasing council to 18 to achieve this. It is desirable that our councillors have other real jobs. If you move to full time, who is going to quit their job if they have a successful career already? No one. This will lead to poorer representation overall by eliminating the very people that have the skills to be great representatives. Anonymous 8/31/2020 06:27 AM No Anonymous 8/31/2020 06:58 AM Is this going to reach many people? If you are surveying people online just before we are sending our children back to school then you were not going to get very many answers. It’s a very stressful time for parents, well for everybody! I think you need to do this survey later in the year as well to make it fair. Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:04 AM I think we need better councillors, not more councillors or councillors spending more time making poor decisions. The zoning situation in Guelph is out of control. Who on council encouraged a builder to put forward a City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 259 of 275 Page 540 of 936 proposal for a 25 storey building on a lot zoned for 6. Guelph received an award for preparing a top quality city official plan. A great deal of time and effort was put into this plan by a lot of people - the City Planning Department, City Council, citizens, business groups, etc. The ink wasn't wet on this highly lauded plan and City Council was already accepting requests for zoning changes from builders. Ten stories goes to 14, etc. The city's zoning by laws are surrounded on three sides by a 2 foot fence topped by razor wire, but the fourth side is wide open, no fence. The city's zoning by-laws are a farce. Who's responsible for that? City Hall. the City Planning Department. This city needs councillors who are focused on making good decisions. We have, or should have, competent management and staff, who are well paid, to look after the operation of the city. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:18 AM I respect and appreciate the job our councillors (mostly) and council as a whole does....however change isnt a bad thing and may help with cohesiveness with less "special interest" of certain council members Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:25 AM I attended part of the online seminar (Facebook Live) on this matter, and I was disappointed to see that there were no women or BIPOC represented among the consultants and staff present at that session. How can we trust that the recommendations that come out of this review will appropriately honour the needs and priorities of everyone in our community? Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:34 AM I think this is a very effective platform for Citizen feedback. Thank you. Anonymous 8/31/2020 10:39 AM Not every home resident has the luxury of 2+ incomes or a bountiful pension supplement. Being a single senior who has lived in the city 35 years I can afford my home but not the ever increasing taxes! City taxes are higher monthly than all my amenities combined..... groceries heat hydro insurance automobile gas. And yes I still have a bit left to splurge on the odd bottle of VQA for a treat. Let’s reconstruct property taxes to not only include the home value but to think about the household income as well. Maybe a discount to single home owners Anonymous 8/31/2020 11:31 AM No Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:08 PM Just to reiterate, going to an at-large system could potentially disadvantage many Guelph citizens if the balance of councillors are elected from a single area. This is a bad idea and should not go forward. Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:14 PM I think this survey was conducted in an arrogant and antidemocratic way. This is not the way the city should be soliciting feedback for such a vitally important discussion. There should be opportunities for in-person involvement and town halls, and under no circumstances should it be rushed. Anonymous 8/31/2020 12:26 PM I like living here and I hope the growth becomes more manageable City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 260 of 275 Page 541 of 936 Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:07 PM it is nice to see Council structure being looked at as it has been the same for many years. Always nice to look at options to continuously improve the service. Anonymous 8/31/2020 01:08 PM Felt there is some built in bias to some of the questions, perhaps not intentional, but the wording of some questions felt could have been better. Question 3 about Primary Role should have allowed multiple responses to prioritize perhaps top three or to scale from 1 to 5. Also could have included a comment box on Question 3. I understand this survey is only available online, seems limiting as not all voters have access to online and this has tight timelines of only a few weeks at a time when many people are more concerned about back to school issues than City surveys. Anonymous 8/31/2020 02:18 PM My complements to ward 6 councillor, Dominique O'Rourke, for her excellent regular communication with residents. Many of my neighbours are on her communication list as I am. The Mayor stated during the last election campaign he had plans after the second term, rather than continuing in municipal politics. I agree that number of terms be limited for positions of mayor, premier, prime minister. With our tax bills as high as they are, expenses well over budget, eg police station, legal costs, city population expected to increase, it is unacceptable that the library is being deferred by this council while spending elsewhere is ongoing. Anonymous 8/31/2020 02:23 PM no Anonymous If council intends to change the existing ward system, I would like to see that this issue would go through a referendum given that it impacts directly all citizens. Thank you. 8/31/2020 03:15 PM Anonymous 8/31/2020 04:15 PM Elect 1 city councilor at large per 50,000 citizens. For Guelph, at approximately 140,000 citizens in 2020, that would be 2 city councilors at large. 1 Councilor could focus on Guelph East for the upcoming term and 1 Councilor could focus on Guelph West for the upcoming term. For this term, make the 2 Councilors at Large part-time (20 hours per week scheduled and same pay as the Ward Councilors) and proratedly reduce the other 14 Ward Councilors wages to pay these 2 councilors at large. This makes remuneration revenue neutral for all of the councillors. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:01 PM I’d like to better understand what the job of a Councillor would look like with more elected, and/or if they were full time. What would they do given 35 hours a week devoted to Council? How would this benefit citizens, and what measurements or evaluation (besides an election every four years) would be in place to review Councillor performance? Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:09 PM I didn't see a question about the number of wards. We need to make sure ward sizes are adjusted to reflect their respective population sizes. In my opinion some wards should be split to make that happen (south end, east end). This would ideally be one councillor per ward, but more wards. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 261 of 275 Page 542 of 936 Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:26 PM Politicians make important decisions that directly affect people's lives. All people should be represented fairly using districts that follow clear boundaries and avoid splitting neighbourhoods. The people should decide who will speak for them, and the wards should be created to serve the needs of the electors, not the elected. Single-member wards would make it easier for councillors - and those seeking to become councillors - to meet and speak with the voters they want to represent. When wards become too large this personal connection isn’t always possible, making money and party affiliations a larger factor in who gets elected. Most Guelph City Council candidates run their campaigns out of their own basements, using mostly their own money, with help from their friends and neighbours. Cutting the size of wards in half will make it easier (and cheaper!) for them to run a credible campaign, and do more door-knocking and less fund-raising. Anonymous 8/31/2020 07:31 PM I strongly oppose changing to a city-wide council system, as this would lead to a reduction in the diversity of council and reduce representation of those who actually live in each neighbourhood. Anonymous 8/31/2020 09:15 PM I didn't see the number of wards discussed (maybe this is at a different phase?). I would suggest increasing the number of wards to 8, dividing up the population more equally amongst these 8 wards and having two part time Councillors per ward. This increases the number of Councillors to 16. There maybe sight for future population increases that don't currently exist (e.g. Clair maltby expansion) and this should be planned in any change to the ward system that currently operates. Thanks for allowing me to contribute to this process. It is thought provoking and a challenging issue. Anonymous 9/01/2020 05:34 AM This survey wasn't designed the best. Some answers should have ranked answers rather than either or. Anonymous 9/01/2020 06:07 AM I believe the functionality of Council is increased through the true commitment and desire for collaboration in working towards what is best for Guelph. From watching our council for many years it’s apparent that this can fluctuate. As with any team the leader is key to setting the tone. The elected full time Mayor is this lead and I believe is why we don’t require full time councillors. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:01 AM Have a question on the ballot next election re: at large and ward composition of council. Size and whether full or part time as well. this is a fundamental change and should be determined by the electorate...not the sitting council as there is an obvious bias. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:45 AM See my response to question #11. Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:44 AM This is the first time ai have responded to anything like this Anonymous Do not do anything to make it more difficult for women and members of other City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 262 of 275 Page 543 of 936 9/01/2020 10:12 AM under-represented groups to run for City Council....it is already very different and we need these voices at our Council table! Anonymous 9/01/2020 10:31 AM This is a hard process because sometimes you get what you pay for. It was interesting to see the variety in hours councilors spend on city business. I wonder about the people who spend so little time on preparing for meetings. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:06 PM Please put this to bed permanently . Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:21 PM Happy to have had the opportunity to express my opinion. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:24 PM THIS IS PROBABLY JUST AN EXERCISE TO 'SHOW' IMPUT IS WANTED..... but decisions are / have already been determined.. Anonymous 9/01/2020 02:40 PM Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this decision-making process. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:14 PM Start treating taxpayer money with respect. It's not your money. It belongs to the citizens. There is only one taxpayer for three levels of government. If certain pet projects require a tax increase then forego that project. Anonymous 9/01/2020 04:32 PM I realized how much I don't know about city council, or the councillors' roles... Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:25 PM There should be incentives for citizens to contribute to campaigns. That is gain a tax credit. Similar to federal/provincial elections. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:27 PM Term limits, and financial assistance to run city wide. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:45 PM We should also put firm term limits on mayors. Anonymous 9/01/2020 07:50 PM I moved to Guelph from Mississauga last year and found it really odd that there were 2 elected councillors per ward, I would prefer 1 per ward so was really excited to see this survey. Thanks for hearing us out! Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:07 PM The current system works fine, but there is always room for improvement. I'd be interested in seeing a system evaluated where we elect one Councillor per ward, 7 Councillors at large, and then the mayor is selected by that body of 13 elected persons. The mayor should be carrying out the will of council, not exerting extra influence on Council directions. Anonymous 9/01/2020 08:14 PM At some point, it may become necesary to increase the number of wards as the city grows, which may also involve changing the borders of some of the existing wards. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 263 of 275 Page 544 of 936 Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:04 PM Please, let's make ot a true community leadership board with people who love our city and the people who live here Anonymous 9/01/2020 09:08 PM This is a pretty narrow consultation. They are far better ways to improve city governance Anonymous 9/02/2020 04:47 AM I appreciate this opportunity for review. I think a great next step would be an examining the interaction between city staff and the public. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:52 AM I do not endorse full time councillors. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:52 AM Thanks for the good work done so far this year. It's not been easy to manage this pandemic but it has been done well in Guelph. Thank you for being a leader to mandate masks from early on Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:55 AM No Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:59 AM My Postal Code cannot be selected by survey method, it is not N1H0A5, it is N1H 2J3. Thank you for facilitating an engagement process for this project. Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:35 AM Small, small, small Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:39 AM Going to an 'at-large' system tends to create a political establishment that develops one or two general approaches to issues. It is more likely to represent ideas or ideologies than to represent the real matters and interests that arise in wards and neighbourhoods. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:02 AM This survey forced me to consider what I believed. And, I differ somewhat from my spouse!! Thx for doing this and for including the link in the Ward 5 newsletter. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:44 AM a useful exercise; thank you Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:14 AM I have witnessed both politicization of professional staff (i.e. political influence over what should be objective professional opinions and recommendations. I have witnessed short-term thinking (expedience) rather than long-term thinking (for potentially better results). Government provides the goods and services that are not typically provided by the private sector, but always ensuring appropriate due diligence, safety, security and reliable effectiveness of operations; government should not be run like a business (i.e. not competitively nor for profit nor for growth), although efficiency is important and should continuously be pursued. And Guelph should strive to set an example of a no-growth urban area, focused on creating a reliable and City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 264 of 275 Page 545 of 936 sustainable economy that supports a high quality of life (i.e. not just growing continuously and recklessly). Thanks, J. Stokes. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:16 AM I hope that more people would be interested in becoming councillors so we can have more diversity. I think there is too much money wasted on projects that only serve a few people. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:19 AM Regarding P/T vs F/T ... I am unsure because I know that some Councillors treat the job as F/T while only being compensated for P/T. It's great if they have a lifestyle to support that, but it might put pressure on those who can only offer P/T effort. It might also prevent good candidates from running because they can't afford the job. On the other hand, a F/T job is a large increase in overhead expense. And, what additional work would a Councillor do if they were F/T? Certainly we wouldn't expect to move someone from a P/T to a F/T role and not increase their responsibilities. Where is the information on this? Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:22 AM Thank you for the opportunity. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:23 AM As seen above. Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:33 AM i would like to see the bylaws changed irrespective of the system, so that you have to reside in the ward you are running for in order to be a councillor for that ward. Anonymous 9/02/2020 10:24 AM Thanks for asking! I would love to learn more about council - maybe even jump in the race myself someday. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:32 AM Keep the ward system. Accept the fact that councillor is a full-time job. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:32 AM There should be a strict limit on how many times/how many years an individual can be on council. Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:40 AM More information on a couple of questions, for example, what is the current amount of time that Councillors spend working on city matters in a month. this information would have helped me answer question number 8 and 10. Thank you Anonymous 9/02/2020 11:44 AM This is a great format and I encourage you to continue and expand this to allow for input from the public. Thank you Anonymous 9/02/2020 12:40 PM I learned about this survey only by reading the the Guelph Today online service. I am concerned that there is no adequate vehicle to bring this kind of survey to general attention. Anonymous « Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien ». Don't spoil a good thing. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 265 of 275 Page 546 of 936 9/02/2020 01:58 PM Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:25 PM This survey seems to be set up to serve a predetermined agenda. The survey assumes all citizens have the same knowledge of how Guelph is governed and how the city operates. It seems set up for those in the know. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:31 PM Any system will work with the good will of its participants. That doesn't mean that these systems should not be tweaked but the quality of the people is the most important ingredient. Anonymous 9/02/2020 02:46 PM The elected Mayor must also show that he/she makes decisions based on facts, community input and not on personal biases. Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:35 PM Would like to make it policy that all councillors and staff managers must reside in Guelph. For example: maybe that way they might have some idea of Guelph's embarrassing crumbling roads. Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:41 PM No, except Guelph City Council does need re evaluation especially over spending tax dollars! Anonymous 9/02/2020 03:58 PM No Anonymous 9/02/2020 04:31 PM Having this consultation during the summer and during a state of crisis doesn't seem like a great idea. People are not super available to turn their minds and consideration to this issue. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:08 PM Do not reduce the size of council or remove wards. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:28 PM My postal code didn’t appear on the list. Here it is N1H 0B5 Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:37 PM Not sure why this review is taking place. If it is not broke . . . don't fix it. Not persuaded that there is an issue. Anonymous 9/02/2020 06:48 PM No thanks Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:15 PM This was a challenging survey to complete since it required much background knowledge and becoming informed in order to complete the survey. It is very much geared toward folks who have an indepth knowledge of the workings of municipal government. I believe that, because of these reasons, many would be dissuaded from completing the survey. Perhaps simpler questions requiring multiple choice answers rather than requiring short answers would encourage a larger number of respondents from a more varied background. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 266 of 275 Page 547 of 936 Anonymous 9/02/2020 07:51 PM Start listening to the citizens. Do not go backwards, move forward. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:18 PM Nope. Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:40 PM Full time if one position, part time if 2 Anonymous 9/02/2020 08:42 PM Making it a smaller size would benefit people and most likely will vote. We need more people to vote Anonymous 9/02/2020 09:08 PM I'd like to hear from and engage with my councillors more. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:42 AM No Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:59 AM Please make voting online. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:23 AM The timing of the survey is problematic with COVID-19 top of mind and back to school concerns the end of summer is not a good time for a public engagement exercise. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:11 AM You should hire unbiased folk to design your surveys if you want a realistic reflection of the public's mood. Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:15 AM If we move toward full-time councilors I would like to see a mechanism for recall or at least a mid-term review of the councilors' effectiveness in fulfilling the role. Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:50 AM I think reducing the number of councillors and having city-wide councillors instead of ward-specific ones is a terrible idea that will hurt the most vulnerable people in our community. I do not think this consultation process was adequate. It needs to be voted on. I will be spreading this survey around and encouraging community members to take part in it. I know many are not aware of what is going on and where to find this survey. They do not understand how the city works, and why it is important. There is a huge lack of civic engagement on the part of the city when it comes to decision making. How far is reach in proportion to the city's population? Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:22 AM keep it the same and adjust boundaries for population growth Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:35 AM Pave Rhonda Road! City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 267 of 275 Page 548 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:39 AM City hall is over staffed Why do we keep having future generations pay our bills? Political reasons (!getting re elected Supersedes fiscal responsibility) Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:49 AM I think our councillors need to be full time so that they can be better dedicated to the wards they serve Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:59 AM I think consideration should be given to term limits for councillors. Some are being elected on name recognition only. In my ward, one councillor doesn’t reply to emails at all. I’ve contacted three councillors outside of my ward on a variety of matters and they’ve all be very helpful. I’d like to have a hand in helping them get elected. Anonymous 9/03/2020 12:38 PM Go Guelph! Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:14 PM Change is needed in Guelph. The old ways accomplish little Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:19 PM No Anonymous 9/03/2020 01:24 PM Lower taxes Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:14 PM Having been on the Council Remuneration Review Committee and having our findings re: the mayor totally ignored, I am doubtful that this survey will have any real true effect on what really happens. I have lived here since the early 70's prior to the Hanlon) and have been in the same house since 1976, and I hope that good decisions prevail. Thank you for this opportunity to have my say. Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:27 PM I appreciate the opportunity to comment. However, I'm often skeptical of this sort of public consultation. In my view, most people do not have the time or inclination to become deeply informed and engaged with municipal governance. As such, important initiatives such as this tend to get reduced to quasi-referendums, facile 'dollars and cents' arguments and an opportunity to air superficial populist viewpoints about government in general. In other words, I hope that this isn't just a status quo, checking the box exercise, and you will give appropriate weight to the quality and depth of the community perspectives, not merely the volume. Good luck! Anonymous 9/03/2020 02:54 PM Diversity of opinion and deliberation on policy is a strength of democracy. Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:15 PM Better understanding of ward system. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 268 of 275 Page 549 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 04:12 PM I believe that the number of wards should be determined by first determining a desirable average size for each ward. This would be similar to the way in which provincial and federal ridings are established. Anonymous 9/03/2020 05:21 PM Public engagement of an issue this important should not be undertaken during the summer and during a pandemic. I am furious this is occurring with so little engagement and next to no education. Shame. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:14 PM Please actually listen to everyone who has made comments. Please publicize this huge change that is being considered and allow more time for citizens to actually absorb it and have their voices heard and ACTED on. Please get working on Police reform. We need more social workers and no more increases in policing. We need police, fire, paramedics and social workers working as a team and not as individual silos. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:22 PM Council must be made up of individuals who will treat decisions as if it was their business they are operating. Municipalities cannot and should not be the delivery of all services. If council wishes to provide services in unlegislated areas, they must choose which will be operated by public funds or delivered via private operation. To do this, you need to have council and staff who are not afraid to make tuff choices. If this means thinking outside the box and hiring staff from the private sector to provide guidance, then do it. There is only one tax payer whether the federal, provincial or municipal government comes calling for our dollars. The dollar can only be divided so far. Council must place limits on what services can be provided beyond those that are legislated. Anonymous 9/03/2020 07:15 PM I realize electoral reform is not part of this survey, but that is my primary motivation. Our democracy in Canada is woeful in terms of the way we elect our representatives. The big parties and the lobbysts who hold their pockets work hard to prevent electoral reform at the national and provincial levels. We need to start at the municipal level so people see alternative voting systems in practice. Anonymous 9/03/2020 06:51 PM We have no money to waste on building a library Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:00 PM Thanks for doing this! Best of luck with it all Anonymous 9/03/2020 09:52 PM its important for the city to be dedicated to public transport, the cities roads and streets are being cloaked with to much traffic. the city needs to encourage its citizens to use the transit system in the city, and for traveling to other areas. traveling to areas like cambridge,fergus and kitchener isnt convenient. Seniors should be encouraged to give up the car and to use public transport. Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:02 PM The survey should have been made available for more than 3 weeks at the end of the summer when many residents are out of town and focus is elsewhere. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 269 of 275 Page 550 of 936 Anonymous 9/03/2020 10:26 PM For goodness sake, don’t go to at-large council. I lived in Oshawa during that failed experience. A real gong show. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:42 AM The primary role of any city government is to keep homeowners property taxes low or lower than what they presently are and to downsize the city workforce. At present the cost of running it with all of it's legacy expenditures are quite unsustainable and it should be outsourcing as much as possible. Socialism is bad. Capitalism is the way to go. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:15 AM Please continue to ask citizens for input. This is great! Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:14 AM This survey is unnecessary. Keep the councillor & ward system the way it is. The ward system is ingrained in our local Guelph language. You can say "I live in the Ward" and people know what you mean. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:22 AM Councillors cannot be politicians. They need to be real people who are ready to fight for the poor, marginalized and most vulnerable in our communities. Not the rich. Not corporations or big businesses. The majority of guelph. We need affordable housing. Not townhomes that cost 500 grand. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:23 AM l oppose the reversal of winter street parking rules as noted above. Not sure why consultation is happening during the summer and a pandemic...not a very efficient nor effective consultation strategy. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:29 AM The objective is to make Guelph a great city to live and work in the most cost effective manner possible. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:33 AM Thank you for having a survey, it allowed me to feel engaged during the pandemic. Please provide 12 ward based councillors + Mayor all at full time responsibility levels. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:05 AM No Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:14 AM I'm frequently disappointed with the decisions made by the council. So much money is wasted on projects that do not serve the needs of citizens in Guelph. Often decisions are made against recommendations of city staff and need to be reversed at great cost due to public backlash. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:16 AM Our ward 6 Councilor is excellent in keeping us up to date and informed with ALL issues in Guelph!!! I would hate to lose her to a city wide voting system. Her commitment helps the whole city also, so I don’t feel the ward system is a negative thing. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:35 AM Please ensure decisions are made without stakeholder influences and stay true to your missions statements and visions. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:43 AM Citizen representation is critical. We must not let it erode in these bizarre times. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 270 of 275 Page 551 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:47 AM Don't fix what isn't broken! Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:51 AM The Mayor has had such a difficult time, trying to accomplish what is best for this city. It's time for a shake up. Wish we could get Andy VH back on council. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:13 AM For the love of all things nice, please have a wider window for engagement on this important topic. Everyone is freaking exhausted with everything that is going on, not sure how you think you will get any meaningful engagement in a fundamenally transformative process in just a 3 week comment window. Defies common sense. Do better! Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:20 AM For reconsiderations of wards, numbers of councillors, etc., we need to find ways to more thoroughly engage our citizenry. That will make Guelph a more vibrant and livable city. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:43 AM We need reasonable, intelligent, willing, capable people in both City staff, and in our Council representatives. Their vision needs to respect the on- going viability and livability of the special city we call our home, Guelph. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:44 AM Current council lacks transparency and accountability. There is also an over- representation of downtown and surrounding area due to ward layout and electing 2 councillors per ward. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:02 AM I really wish you had given more time for public input on this issue. The democratic process and how it functions is qualitatively different for most other issues. It is, in my opinion, the basis for good governance at all levels of government. The worst pandemic in 100 years has made things difficult and more complicated, but we are all learning to be innovative in this 'new normal'. humans have an enormous capacity for creativity, now is the time to use it. The pandemic has provided an opportunity for some governments to flout open and transparent processes under the guise of health and safety of the community - I trust that Guelph is not one such government. Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:15 AM I did not always agree with how a question was framed with regard to an issue. In many cases I did not agree with the options provided. Both the questions and the options seemed to be geared to a quick tabulation of the survey results and not the rich diversity of voter views.The ability of this survey to capture voter views on the issues and questions confronting the City, is concerning. Anonymous Moving away from Wards would be an error for this city. It's presumptuous to think people can represent the entire city. - upset that the mayor does not answer call or follow-up based on calls received. 9/04/2020 10:25 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 10:32 AM Anonymous councillors must live in the ward they represent. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 271 of 275 Page 552 of 936 9/04/2020 10:56 AM Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:05 AM Municipal politicians should try to keep their political leanings aside left/right More diversity is needed & should be sought out - age/ race/ culture/ education. It's mostly white Caucasian males making decisions. As a minority it does not feel representative and I feel my experiences are worlds away from the Mayors/his group Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:36 AM I appreciate the opportunity to provide input in a timely fashion. The background information would be very helpful for many. Hopefully this encourages more citizens to take an interest in their city and their civic responsibilities. Anonymous 9/04/2020 11:56 AM Don't spend $67 million on a goddamn library. There is absolutely no justification. If you can't make a good library for under $30 Mil, try again, because you aren't doing your job Anonymous 9/04/2020 12:30 PM Please fix some.of the long standing issues instead of just focusing on your riding area. Its the city of Guelph, not my section of Guelph and the rest is someone else's problem. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:07 PM Seriously divide the wards up or add more councillors or get councillors who actually work for the citizens in their ward. People shouldn't have to just spam the mayor on social media for the councillors of that ward to do something. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:20 PM I would agree that we need to consider the current configuration and role of council. However, more is not necessarily better. I would also like to add that councillor should maintain complete authority over city administration including the retention and dismissal of all city employee's, departmental budgets, and the enforcement of austerity measures when they are required. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:37 PM As the city expands, look into whether wards need to be redrawn (or new wards created) to balance based on population numberes Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:43 PM This is a very good public outreach tool. Thank you for making democratic decisions that are based on data and evidence. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:47 PM By and large I think Guelph has had good councils and mayors in the 13 years I have lived in Guelph. I have not supported every decision made, but I don't feel like we are ever governed by ideologues. Anonymous 9/04/2020 01:58 PM Perhaps not having life time people in there. Couple terms and done Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:03 PM i think it would be good if we could get to a place where residents felt comfortable to contact councillors and the mayor whenever they need to. Councillors seem to be better than the mayor. There doesn't seem to be any way to touch base with the mayor personally. Emails just get rerouted. How do you get a message to the mayor without having to post on a social site. City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 272 of 275 Page 553 of 936 He should be available to residents questions. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:10 PM I think the Mayor is doing a fantastic job. Fully engaged and deeply cares about the city of Guelph. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:20 PM I hope you will consider the input of Guelph's citizens, as well as the expert research on this issue. I hope you will make sure that it is citizens who are replying to this engagement and not those with pecuniary interests in the outcome. I wish you had extended the reply period into September. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:36 PM I think councillors should have an office in their ward. Anonymous 9/04/2020 02:43 PM Thank you for asking my opinion Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:42 PM Don't be intimidated by the provincial government when considering council size. Do what is right for the city and make them fight you if they want to take away our collective muncipal democratic power. I think folks underestimate the power of city council, but we should all know that you have an immense ability to improve our city; our piece of the planet we call home. Anonymous 9/04/2020 03:43 PM This council voted for a $67 million dollar library..Really? That shows how out of touch with the people they are. This is not what the people of this city want, take the temperature of any Guelph facebook group, which has 1000s of members. Not to mention it was a corrupt conflict of interest that one of the council members voted as he was on the Guelph Library board.Repair some of the roads (Gordon..Edinburgh and Paisley..) Get rid of the lights clogging up the Hanlon and install overpasses to make it a real highway. Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:05 PM Yes.....please keep it part time. People making $100,000 are only in it for the money but if they choose to run as a part time position you know they are committed n dedicated to our City. Anonymous 9/04/2020 04:07 PM Even with 12 PT councillors in a growing city, a significant amount of their workload could be diverted if citizens knew who to contact for administrative matters (like potholes or garbage pickup). They need HELP!! A constituency assistant or administrative person who can divert the non-policy issues to the right area would lessen their workload so that they can focus on policy and civic engagement. Anonymous 9/04/2020 05:09 PM Retaining multiple member wards is most important to be preserved Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:13 PM At the town hall, no one was aware of research relating to the participation of women and minorities in municipal politics. Please take into account the findings of this local research document from "The Research Shop" at the University of Guelph: Women and Politics: Overcoming Barriers to Participation in Leadership: https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10214/10505/CowperSmi City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 273 of 275 Page 554 of 936 th_etal_WomenAndPolitics_AODA.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y Regarding the role of Council: This question might yield better results if people were able to choose several options they felt mattered most. By asking for one choice, it artificially limits people’s options. Advocacy: While many citizens appreciate this work performed by Councillors, if citizens require advocacy in dealing with City Hall, it suggests that the bureaucracy is not functioning efficiently and not serving the needs of citizens. Councillors should serve as way-finders, helping their constituents navigate the organization to get the answers and service they need from the administration. Autonomy: This choice suggests an inactive and unengaged community that wants to vote and then tune out. This is not the reality in Guelph. No self-respecting board would do this. Engagement: This is a desired quality in Councillors, but community engagement is something that should be structured into every decision at City Hall, not conducted ad hoc by Councillors via social media or personal contacts. Properly structured community engagement ensures that everyone’s voice is heard and that all perspectives are represented. This should be carried out by the Community Engagement team at City Hall. It is an administrative role. Administration: As the complexity and volume of matters requiring Council approval increases, the greater the need for a clear vision and policies to guide decision-making and city staff conduct. Administration of day-to-day operations should be left to city staff. Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:18 PM I do. While I appreciate your having provided this opportunity for input I have deep concerns about the process of making these decisions. First, it is a TERRIBLE time to expect a broad band of the citizenry to engage in this topic. For the last several weeks the prime focus of families in Guelph has been the reopening of the school system and the problem of child care during this week and next, as well as before and after school care. This preoccupation is on top of the economic impacts on families of the pandemic, and the health and general well being of themselves and their families. People are rightly putting their priorities elsewhere, meaning that whatever information you're trying to collect right now is profoundly unrepresentative and does not form a satisfactory basis for decision making. Second, as I understand it, Council itself, i.e., 13 people, will make the decision. That's 0.01% of the City's population. On something like this, the essence of municipal democracy, surely EVERY voter should be given the opportunity, not to INFLUENCE the decision, but to MAKE the decision. If ever there was an issue that called for a properly-managed referendum process, this is it. Notwithstanding the desire to have this issue resolved in time for the 2022 municipal election, I strongly recommend that the impact of the pandemic be acknowledged as rendering this project defunct, and that whatever resources have been allocated to it be redirected to developing a full referendum program for implementation in the 2022 election, so that implementation for the 2026 municipal elections can proceed on the basis of the outcome. Anonymous 9/04/2020 07:15 PM Please prioritize diversity on city council and consider how council can be more accessible. Guelph still has a long way to go in this area and it needs to be prioritized in order to ensure that Guelph can reach its full potential City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 274 of 275 Page 555 of 936 Anonymous 9/04/2020 06:26 PM I am unsure about recommending having full or part time city Councillors. If they are currently able to meet their responsibilities, then it should remain as is, part time. It is my sincere hope that the City of Guelph maintains the feeling of being it's own city, with a downtown that is a welcoming hub for its citizens, strong community values and a vision for a sustainable future. I'd like to see our city Councillors represent this vision. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:01 PM Sorry no extra comments. I am proud of how Guelph is running. Thank you!!! Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:21 PM Questions 2 and 3 were difficult to answer. #2: I chose "parliament" because I see City Council like a mini-Canada, and Canada is governed by a parliamentary democracy. (But then I see the word "governance," and I wonder if the analogy to a Board of Directors is a better one.) A Board of Directors appoints the Chair, the leader of the party with the most seats is the Prime Minister, whereas the Mayor is directly elected by the people. (Even then, city council is more like a parliament.) Now that I think of it, I analyzed my choice of "parliament" AFTER I made it. #3: I chose "advocacy" because unless a Councillor makes himself available to his constituents, he's NOT doing his job AT ALL. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:58 PM The city CANNOT move to an at large system without a referendum. Anonymous 9/04/2020 08:59 PM Taxes are much higher here than other places I've lived. That's okay, but it doesn't seem to result in support for those who need it most at the fringes of society. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:27 PM During one of the presentations, Guelph was compared to other municipalities. Some of these comparisons made little sense. For example, Sudbury is one of the largest municipalities in Ontario at almost 4,000 square km and Guelph is less than 600 square km. This difference alone means that each requires unique governance. Anonymous 9/04/2020 09:55 PM Any system we propose must be crafted to result in an inclusive and representative council, that shares power with minority interests. We must measure any proposal against this yardstick, and reject it if the system will fail to meet this goal. Optional question (324 response(s), 332 skipped) Question type: Essay Question City Council Composition Review Survey : Survey Report for 17 August 2020 to 04 September 2020 Page 275 of 275 Page 556 of 936 Niagara Falls Ontario June 12, 2023 Clerk's Office, City of Niagara Falls 4310 Queen Street, Box 1023 Niagara Falls, ON, L2E 6X5 Dear Sir: I am writing to you to express my support for undertaking a review of the current system we have in place for electing municipal politicians due to the increase in our population and projected future growth. Although I personally support the ward system versus city wide voting (as noted below) at the very minimum, a review is in order given the length of time since one was last undertaken and the changing demographics. I am aware of the pros and cons of both systems but am personally in favour of a ward system as it allows citizens to: Get to know their local representative(s) better and vice versa thus ensuring that representatives are more accountable; Vote for people who know their area well and understand the issues associate d with different parts of the city; and Become more engaged in municipal politics as there is a trust and comradery associated with better knowing their individual representative(s). A ward system is more cost effective as candidates can focus their spending on issues of major concern to their local constituents. This system also makes it easier for more people to run for office knowing that the budget is not prohibitive, thus, it encourages more active participation. It also allows candidates to meet more people, assess their needs, and better represent constituents, while making sure that what is good for one community is good for the city as a whole as well. The ward system levels the playing field in regards to wealthy vs less wealthy neighbourhoods as all have equal representation. It reduces the potential for some neighbourhoods to access resources that might be better situated in areas where residents need access to free, or low cost, facilities. I appreciate your consideration of my thoughts. Regards, Frances Chandler PhD Page 557 of 936 1 Heather Ruzylo Subject:-Electoral system review From: judydoerr505 < Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 8:28 AM To: Bill Matson <billmatson@niagarafalls.ca>; CouncilMembers <councilmembers@niagarafalls.ca> Subject: [EXTERNAL]-Electoral system review I fully support Councillor Lococo's motion to review our electoral system options. It's well "overdue" for voters to be fully aware of our options and to have a public discussion based on a full review. That is the democratic process and why all councillors should support this motion that encourages public engagement and awareness. Sent from my Galaxy CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 558 of 936 From: Linda Manson Niagara Falls, ON L2E 1C2 Sent: June 16, 2023 To: City Clerk, Bill Matson (clerk@niagarafalls.ca) - for posting on Agenda Subject: Agenda Item 8.1 - “Electoral System Review” Motion - June 20th City Council Meeting Councillors: Initiating an Electoral System Review would help prepare our city ... for whatever lies beyond Ontario’s pending review of governance for the Niagara Region. Given our swift-moving current provincial government, the motto “Be Prepared” seems a wise plan of action for Niagara Falls City Council to take. Be prepared — with answers in advance, ready to respond ... Able to anticipate, identify and seize opportunity when it knocks. A key principle of ‘fair representation’ is ensuring that council composition keeps up with changing population demographics and geographic distribution — that requires periodic review. Beyond that ... The data collected as part of an Electoral System Review could have far-reaching spin-off benefits with regard to anticipating and being prepared to meet evolving community needs in municipal services — from infrastructure, parks and recreation to housing and social programs. The goal of the process should be to ‘best serve’ constituents via whatever system ... At-large, ward or (perhaps?) a creative, customized (‘unique to Niagara Falls needs’) combination of the two. Public input matters, but the bottom line should be factually defendable and fiscally responsible. The process will need to be open-minded ... Focused on finding the best, most practical solution for our city by critical analysis of existing data plus input from other municipalities to minimize cost. NOT re-inventing the wheel ... NOT recycling theories. As for creation of an ad hoc committee? A great place to start. With Councillor Lococo as chair? Seems a logical choice ... As would having her as a co-chair — if another councillor were willing to co-share the (anticipated) intense focus and work load involved. Thank you for reading this. Respectfully, Linda Manson Page 559 of 936 June 16, 2023 Mayor Diodati and Members of City Council: Re: June 20th Agenda Item 8.1 : Motion for Niagara Falls Electoral Reform I have read recent articles in our local newspaper about our “at large” municipal electoral system and was pleased to see a motion being brought forward on the June 20th Council agenda to initiate a review. It has been 20 years since the system was reviewed and changed from a “ward” to an “at large”. In my opinion, this has not served local ratepayers well as Niagara Falls is comprised of several communities (i.e. Stamford Centre, Chippawa etc.) each with distinct characteristics and varying levels of changes or matters that need to be addressed. Given existing and projected population growth a change is essential to better serve residents and to manage the accountability of elected officials. I find it quite concerning that Niagara Falls is the largest City in the Province that continues to use an at large system. From my experience working in the City of St Catharines and Niagara Region for over 35 years, a ward system has a number of benefits not only for ratepayers and Councillors, but for staff who are dealing with concerns or issues. While Niagara Region doesn’t have a formal ward system, I’m certain that anyone would have a serious problem if it changed to an “at large” system rather than respecting municipal boundaries and population differences. Also, given potential municipal reform being undertaken by the Province, it would be an appropriate time for the City to undertake a review of its electoral representation. I would strongly encourage City Council to move forward with this review as soon as possible to proactively set the agenda for improvements that will facilitate better local governance in the future. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Peter Colosimo Page 560 of 936 1 Heather Ruzylo Subject:RE: [EXTERNAL]-Motion 8.1 - Niagara Falls Electoral System Review From: Heather Gifford < Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 1:00 PM To: Bill Matson <billmatson@niagarafalls.ca> Cc: CouncilMembers <councilmembers@niagarafalls.ca>; Jim Diodati <jdiodati@niagarafalls.ca> Subject: [EXTERNAL]-Motion 8.1 - Niagara Falls Electoral System Review To Mr. Matson, City Clerk and City of Niagara Falls Councillors, I am writing today to voice my support for Motion 8.1 for council to direct city staff to initiate a review of the current electoral system in Niagara Falls. As the population of our city approaches 100,000 citizens and as our suburban areas continue to expand, it is time to review the manner in which our city councillors are elected. With all of the proposed development projects starting to get underway, the population of Niagara Falls is expected to grow at an even faster pace going forward. The time for reviewing our electoral system is now, so that appropriate time can be given to implement any changes before the next election cycle. Waiting too long may result in under-representation for certain areas of the city. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to this matter. Regards, Heather Gifford Niagara Falls, Ontario CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 561 of 936 June 18, 2023 Bill Matson City Clerk Re: At Large vs Ward system voting Mayor and Council of Niagara Falls For the past 45 years I have been given the right of vote here in the City of Niagara Falls. In that time I have voted within both the Ward system and the At Large. However, regardless of the system, both have failed. I am not here to cover all the pros and cons of either system. For myself personally I have always been for the Ward system. I know that many of the new residents in Niagara Falls were very confused by the Lack of the Ward System in the last election. BUT, there is one major issue, what if there is no one you want to vote for? This can happen in either system. In the ward system, if there is only one candidate and you can’t vote for them, for whatever the reason. This can also happen even when there is more than one. In the At Large, the same thing can happen as well as no one in your area at all. Or you don’t like who is running. I know I am not alone when I say that many voters found themselves with no one to vote for at all in their area during several elections. I know that I have. Suddenly I cannot vote all. That is not okay. Perhaps we need a Hybrid of the two systems. So here is a “what if”. Draw the lines for a Ward system Each voter within their Ward gets to vote for the candidate in that Ward ( if there is a candidate) Each voter also gets to choose 1 candidate at large. This takes care of 2 things. Firstly if there are no one you wish to vote for or there isn’t a candidate at all. At least you have an option. Secondarily, it allows voters to vote for another candidate who has been an asset to their area, but may not live there. As to voter input on this topic. I agree that this need to be done. It can be done through a Community focus group and also a survey. But keep in mind that surveys can be self serving to those who choose the questions. Often the respondents never have enough information on what is being asked. Sometimes yes or no cannot work either. The most critical thing though is getting a survey out. Many people do not take a paper. And social media is a fail as well. I can guarantee you that most of the residents have no idea that there is a facebook site or even a City site or even care that either exist. If you truly want to have a good response then it has to at least go out in the mail to either direct them to a site or provide a physical copy that they can mail in. There are still lots of people who are not online. As to online. PLEASE make it that you can skip a question. Many online surveys do not allow you to continue if you do not answer. I would like for the following item to be put on the survey Ask about how they feel about signage. Also provide an area that one can just address any issues that they may have with voting. I have other items to address concerning voting, but will leave it at this. Thank you for your time Stanlee Hickey Niagara Falls, L2G6L8 Page 562 of 936 CLK-2023-05 Report Report to: City of Niagara Falls Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: Fee Waiver Applications - June 2023 Submissions Recommendation(s) THAT Council consider approving, approving in part or denying the Fee Waiver Applications received for the June 20, 2023 submission date, listed as follows: 1. Chippawa Volunteer Firefighter's Association - SPN Slo-Pitch Championships - in the amount of $4,112.10 for the waiving of the costs associated with the floor rental at the Chippawa Willoughby Arena. 2. Chippawa Volunteer Firefighter's Association - Chippawa Volunteer Firefighters Slo- Pitch Tournament - in the amount of $665.44 for the waiving of the costs associated with the baseball diamond rental at Chippawa Lion's Park and Patrick Cummings Park. 3. Niagara Children's Centre - Plasma Car Race - in the amount of $342.68 for the waiving of the costs associated with the arena floor rental. Executive Summary Niagara Falls City Council adopted the Council Discretionary Spending report on February 12, 2019. This included the Fee Waiver Policy that accompanied the report. The City of Niagara Falls is committed to supporting volunteer, community-based organizations in order to maintain a quality of life for its residents. This policy aims to protect the City’s assets, interests, goals, facilities, programs and services while also ensuring that festivals and events grow and prosper, positively impacting the qual ity of life of Niagara Falls residents. The financial scope of this policy is limited to the Council approved budgetary amount for the corresponding year. The City of Niagara Falls will waive fees to eligible applicants to help offset the fee(s) that would have been charged by the City related to the delivery or presentation of a festival or event. Examples of City fees that can be waived include, but are not limited to: •Park permit fees •Rental of City Property •Road Closure Fees •Staffing costs outside normal operations Page 1 of 18 Page 563 of 936 Eligible groups must be not-for-profit organizations which demonstrate a degree of community support and representation including, but not limited to: •Registered charities •Arts and culture organizations •Athletic and social clubs •Service clubs •Neighbourhood groups and organizations, •School associations Based on the results of the 2022 fiscal year and the 2023 Budget process Staff has adopted a change in the processing of these requests. Council in 2022 e xceeded their budget by a significant amount. In order to provide Council with better tools to control their budget a change in process is suggested. Background CHANGE FOR FEE WAIVER REQUESTS: The changes in process, as adopted by Council at the February 28, 2023 Council Meeting, are as follows, 1) That Council consider Fee Waiver Requests three (3) times per year. The consideration dates would be March, June and September. By considering requests in a bundled fashion, Council will be able to better allocate their budget evenly across the calendar year and to organizations. If an organization misses an approval meeting, the organization can apply for a fee refund (or, in other words, pay the fee and then ask Council to refund all or a portion of the fees paid). 2) That Council consider the granting of partial fee waivers, for example approving a portion of a fee waiver request rather than always approving the full fee waiver. GRANT REQUESTS: 1) A review of the attached completed Fee Waiver Application from the Chippawa Volunteer Firefighter's Association, SPN Slo-Pitch Championships - in the amount of $4,112.10 for the waiving of the costs associated with the floor rental at the Chippawa Willoughby Arena. The Event Description details the following: This event brings hundreds of teams to visit the Niagara Region, as a result, over 600 teams will be booking rooms for accommodations and eating at local restaurants. The teams will also be visiting city amusements and attractions. The money raised from hosting this tournament is put back into the community for schools, charities, projects. The event is hosted out of Chippawa Willoughby Arena and Page 2 of 18 Page 564 of 936 Patrick Cummings Park, of which both locations are accessible to all residents and visitors. 2) A review of the attached completed Fee Waiver Application from the Chippawa Volunteer Firefighter's Association, Slo-Pitch Tournament - in the amount of $665.44 for the waiving of the costs associated with the baseball diamond rental at Chippawa Lion's Park and Patrick Cummings Park. Event description details the following: The event brings many teams to our local area and will support local businesses. Funds raised will help local charities, sports and community projects. The event is hosted at City parks, which are accessible to all residents and visitors. 3) A review of the attached completed Fee Waiver Application from the Niagara Children's Centre - Plasma Car Race - in the amount of $342.68 for the waiving of the costs associated with the arena floor rental. Event description details the following: Niagara Children's Centre Plasma Car Race is an annual fundraiser that brings together the community for a fun and active event. Plasma Cars are a small-kids motion- propelled car. They move slowly and require careful timing of steering and the body in order to move them. It is perfect for anyone and any age and is a fun team -building activity. Niagara Children's Centre serves 5,800 children and youth from across the Niagara Region and provides physical, developmental and/or communicative delays. This event is projected to raise $25,000 for the Centre and brings together 25 teams of individuals and/or corporate partners. Niagara Children's Centre will have to use funds that were raised by the event to offset the cost of the facility. Niagara Children's Centre supports children with special needs and accessibility is at the forefront in planning events. We will have many children who will be watching the event who use adaptable devices for mobility or communication at the event. The event itself is only open to adults. Analysis Grant Requests These fee waiver requests amounts to a substantial portion of the total fee waiver budget that Council has, so this is a significant portion of the total budget for the first quarter of the year. Council can also consider some alternatives to the staff recommendation: 1) Council can approve the full amount of the request understanding that additional requests may not be satisfied this year. Page 3 of 18 Page 565 of 936 2) Council can approve a portion of the request currently and then if there is budgetary room later in the year consider a refund of the portion paid. Financial Implications/Budget Impact If approved, the $29,303.93 fee waiver total would be withdrawn from the $51,000.00 allocated from the 2023 operating budget. Organization/ Event Fees Waived By Council (2023) 2023 Budget - Fee Waiver Requests $51,000.00 Women's Place of Niagara - 44th Annual Book Riot $6,154.50 Stamford Centre Volunteer Firefighter's Association (Business Licence Fees - 3 food trucks - motorized) 2023 Summer Season. $630.00 Rotary Club of Niagara Falls Sunrise - Niagara Falls Rotary Ribfest $325.00 Irish Music Niagara - Niagara Irish Festival $1,680.00 Heart Niagara - Cruising the Q $7,404.00 Crazy Macaws Bike Night $4,750.00 Jaida Lee Recognition - expenses $3,240.21 Total Approved for 2023 $24,183.71 Requests for Consideration: June 20, 2023 Chippawa Volunteer Firefighter's Association - SPN Slo-Pitch Championships $4,112.10 Chippawa Volunteer Firefighter's Association - Chippawa Volunteer Firefighters Slo- Pitch Tournament $665.44 Niagara Children's Centre - Plasma Car Race $342.68 Total if approved in this report: $29,303.93 List of Attachments Page 4 of 18 Page 566 of 936 Fee Waiver Application - Chippawa Volunteer Firefighters Slo-Pitch Tournament - Arena Rental Fees (Completed) Fee Waiver Application - Chippawa Volunteer Firefighters Slo-Pitch Tournament - Diamond Fees (Completed) Fee Waiver Application - Niagara Children's Centre Plasma Car Race (complete) (2) Written by: Heather Ruzylo, Clerks & Council Services Coordinator Submitted by: Status: Bill Matson, City Clerk Approved - 14 Jun 2023 Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 15 Jun 2023 Page 5 of 18 Page 567 of 936 Fee Waiver ApplicationForrri Niagarafalls F (:\a\'.\l)r\ Applicant |nfo'rmatio'n-" NameofEvent:‘ESPN S\O'E‘l&¢\r\gi\c-:N\Exor\s&\.'§;3"(.0mn\w\-u'Jt\, OrganizationName:C,§:.9$Q EH9 ,\—'J[{Q\(\(\\3C3 A $5.; OrganizationAddressi 0\la 0.n \Sc v 4.. City:Xdmgc\»ro\V-at,\\s Postal Code:L3 Q-»‘E,Z.'7 I ContactName::2‘,.._.:K ;,q\ge_§Position: PhoneNumber (days):°\B €‘°\‘s 3 ’(6‘\15 Phone Number (evenings): Email:SidSAFQQ L W!‘A U3 ‘1‘—“'~Website: '‘.'A.v 4'2 Type of Organization: F El/Not-for-profit Incorporation #: El Charitable Organization Registration #1 * _V'___ .§..- D Other (please specify):, ' _A waiizingor Fe*es*’=*, " ~ l *‘ The City of Niagara Falls willwaive fees that would have been charged by the City for eligible non-profitgroups" or organizations that provide programs,services or events that are of a general benefit to the community.Fee. Waiver Policy (700.22)is to ensure that the City's support of functions and events through the waiving of fees is facilitated in a "fairand equitable manner and does not burden the City's annual operating budget‘. Examples of City fees that can be waived include,but are not limitedto:'-'’' -Park permit fees -Rental of City Property i A --RoadClosure Fees f “' -Staffing costs outside normal operations ‘?“' The Cityof NiagaraFalls Rates &Fees can be found on the City's website at: Note:Insurance fees willnot be waived..''.Page 6 of 18Page 568 of 936 C¢\Nc\I)r\ Niagara?alls ?if FormSubmissionInformation Applicationscanbe submitted by email to:clerk@niagarafa|ls.ca In person or by mail to:City Hall 4310 Queen Street Niagara Falls,ON L2E 6X5 ' ‘L Clerks Department '.V 5“.Qt;/*;:_'é}: Hours:8:30am —4:30pm vityxoEvent'|'riférrnatien".;:.‘Aci C Fees to be Waived (i.e.facility rental,park permit,etc.):,AFQAQrexér DatesandTimes:gm 35.31%[8913garb [5991(5-12 202?251/wx5/_.Z)g,n Purpose ofEvent:‘l —‘,\¢,\\\l\u ‘5 Are you serving food?¥C,5 Are you sewing alcohol? 'Actiity’or‘Event‘D’eslc 1.How will.youractivity or event enhance recreation and community services in the City of Niagarav - Falls?'"''" .'Ev~bv\,\\>\'\.\’j\\uno\«-A3 lug )r€.ovW\\’<s vigil +}\,a l\)I6w3clro\flu‘-€-0; ‘i 2.Please describe the projected social,cultural,economic and environmentalimpact that thé"actilvity‘"6r"' -;,event willhave on the qty and its residents...; ‘ u 2-v Plag.e4lii‘-..':.‘Page 7 of 18Page 569 of 936 Niegretie Fee Waiver Applicattotrr T.‘,. 3 5."-‘Whatwilltheimpact on the event be ifthe fee is not waived?-‘ ¥‘{i\.g(”[\,\»,»A,0/3I ('A\,c\_/\,J\);‘\5J'h I (‘0 ‘B-'é:‘?.k/31 \‘)"f\.5!»v\\'~r\/bvc/‘xt£t\‘i”~3M\f\-6-‘gtHY.‘3%{AVEtors./LA’!(‘,Yt2J\l',»\(,,[)—';{{\'j%( t ‘.._ V!/vi,. 4.Are youseeking funding from any other sources?(Fundraislnggrants;sponsorships) U\\.>~uh/\t~vvwx‘-~’5J?—$L/\‘3’\/.~3‘~x‘<=wv\»\t>“\)‘i‘~t»xL;.,r\¢§.2\z~i{.S. . I ;_~'.‘V-Iwitlciciisabilities)?‘- H ‘ .._. A‘‘\/K)/‘Q_A“U\’\eN\/\«o_.\,J§RRQjiv./\{J-(Q(A)f\‘.u\\v"i/~<Q\'kb4/3 T.‘5,1Whatfeatureswlllyouhave In‘placeto"ensurethatyour‘e\{enttsaccessibie_to_ail»restde.r'rt_V\''‘\‘|“.‘;I ‘O.z\l\./a-)\‘{"\-/\_0/6\;[\,.. ‘ 0'\T\A/UV:C-t.\J‘\~r~J\'~r’(‘4{\5pat/\)i’.I T"“Ag”2-J\"\‘(‘K/(/QM ?/(A/on7l~O4 ’\-V‘~vr>U»t\§'ow‘-r‘)U ,r'/mi’/cnxt pl Pleasesubmit one copy of each of the following documents. Mandatory Documents ;_ :'Adetaiied budget,showing‘revenues and expenditures 13/Documents relating to City rental permit (it applicable):UJ9/tbj.Dates,times and locationof event £0 (7 W;5.A,,,M,__M ~AllCity fees associated withthe event El:Confirmationletter from charity (if applicable): 4 O _=i.-,con?rmationletter from that charitymust accompany the application For ‘internal.Use Only: lrrw).1/kwwg.I =.;.,r~::.t For special events whereby a portion or all of the proceeds are being donated to chétrltygt. on page 2:.f ' .._ Q‘/(:3.F14 <.A /\/6t,7Z)A-¢V‘~5iC°mr'etedbv=K4 /on C/Dana /4”Ksignature:Page 8 of 18Page 570 of 936 Fee Waiver Application LANAHA Niagara alls Autlorizti‘on',for‘N$p‘|i§=ation7*--§_.‘ On behalf of,and with the authority of,the above-mentioned organization,we certify that the informationgiven: in this application for waiving of City fees is true,correct and complete in every respect. /weld gm 05,1241 SI nature of Se iorStaff Person Name and Title SignatureofBoard ChairIRepresentative Name and Title ,Ii=,e:‘rso:‘naI"I'nform‘ati6ri7Consentr I Personal information,as defined in the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Priva<l;y../-_\_c't..._L.‘. (MFIPPA),is collected under the authority of the Municipal Act,2001,as amended,and in accortfl'an{ce‘:?‘ii{2i‘th' MFIPPA.Personal informationcollected on this application form willbe used to assist in granting fee waivers and willbe made available to the members of City Council and staff and used for administrative purposes. Informationcollectedmay be subject to disclosure in accordance with the provisions of MFIPPA.The-City .-V reservesthe right to verify all information contained in submissions....-, ‘ -5''''."-ll--,v ’ Questions regarding the collection,use and disclosure of this personal informationmay be directed,to the»_Gity;-‘2 Clerk,BillMatson,at bmatson@niagarafa||s.ca By completingthis application form,you consent to the collection and disclosure of your personal' and to its use by the City of Niagara Falls,as described above. i "-3.-4“.'f ~«-Piae;4 of.4‘Kg???I ~i'f5‘.3lT:}Page 9 of 18Page 571 of 936 Niagara?alls (3 .~\N A I)/\l A‘plicant lnform’at'i”:(>i'nV‘-..‘-"VT' - NameofEvent: Organization Name: Organization Address:f‘ City:lg.C,re,V...\5 Postal Code: Contact Name:jj.rv\.KQ3 kgQ Position:r as o..\ PhoneNumber (days):Qag.3 gi -QQ6 S Phone Number (evenings): Email:fa]5_'_'};¢-_@.C 0 ca:2 (yo ,;‘.2 Website: Type:of Organiztion: Not-for-profit Incorporation #: D Charitable Organization Registration #: [:1 Other (please specify): wmnof Fees I \'-.. ‘‘:4’ The Cityof Niagara Falls willwaive fees that would have been charged by the City for eligible no '-'i’5fr,.ofitgroups}? or organizations that provide programs,services or events that are of a general benefit to the community.Fee._.' Waiver Policy (700.22)is to ensure that the City's support of functions and events through the waiving of fees is facilitatedin a fair and equitable manner and does not burden the City's annual operating budget.‘y ' ;,t:;--'- Examples of City fees that can be waived include,but are not limitedto:''' -.Park permit fees -Rental of City Property -Road Closure Fees -Staffing costs outside normal operations TheCityof Niagara Falls Rates &Fees can be found on the City's website at: NotezfInsurance fees willnot be waived.Page‘:_;l._'-‘of'4Page 10 of 18Page 572 of 936 Fee Waiver Application ic«.'.'~.'- I ‘.._ Niagara alls (.1\l\4\I)I\ Form.Submission-’li‘1;formation Applicationscan be submitted by email to:clerk@niagarafalls.ca '‘V ' In personorby mail to:City Hall I 4310 Queen Street Niagara Falls,ON L2E 6X5 Clerks Department Hours:8:30am —4:30pm ActivitorEvent-‘lr[1fk)frm'ati(9_n::l AmountofRequest:B\Mn 0 «VA V‘I46 Fees-itobeWaived(i.e.facility rental,park permit.etc.): Purpose of Event:E H :8 CAIQ3.5 .¢_5,_»,. '.-‘:=,«".»".-,ifA Number of People Expected:1 0 Tea ED 5 Admission Fee (If applicable):5“L).O D'?"g"Q.tum. Are_youserving food?§Z.¢5 Are you serving alcohol?.-Q S,_.., Acivit.or'Event‘~Des."cription~- ' 1.How willyour activity or event enhance recreation and community servicesin the City of Niagara '-— Falls?- ' ‘‘''" Scion)T.exvw\-3 \°(a.\\vX *6 §l-~/y0r“"*v“\l&cf~\E.,\§;,\¢3_,.:."‘_ .event willhave on the City and its residents. ' Cu,,,.,.~\.M'k§L1’.thePage 11 of 18Page 573 of 936 Nlagarafialls C l\N r\i).\ 2'3.W_hatwlilthe impacton the event be Iftheifee Is not waived?..... ‘ ‘.i.~;i)‘_,..~».4{,c.r«z,,;‘i\)\5”¢)’U~§'\°-Q Q,(f/3»;/3./r\‘\,B’v\£.~ko¢V~1,\r‘L;i,0i‘~Q( tr C'2\;Q/wtvcxxtza .4.Areyou‘seet<lng'fundlngfromanyother sources?(Fu’ndralsing;_grants,'sponsorships)‘ A --:;3‘§;‘.Whatfeatu're_s'wiIl,you haveinp_ia_cetoensnrethat,y_our*eventIs e_ccessibi_etoaii reslden'ta ‘:3-5with disabilities)?.‘3 "' »1 "..,'"-.r -‘"“ .var-J‘"@429(Jr poW§?»~5t»qJtv«{£\tvt/\Q.(}LjQ/Z CKXEMI‘\J2/—L»t/\5§i.m~)t33Y~'</V\—°/‘1\\/~i‘;\)\}\'r\O\l~’_«.3.J\3-\X("\-9x/:k'\’\./Vt) Pleasesubmit one copy-of each of the following documents.i ivtangetoryDocuments . I , D}A detailedbudget,showing revenues and expenditures _._3,._. 'Documentsrelating to City rental permit (if applicabie):LU %~),0£.5 7/*~-"4""., -Dates,times and tocation of event 19.;('2 "AM talc’.‘:.I "i -AllCityfees assoclatedwiththe event ?_._ '.; t :.:‘g V Confirmationietter from charity (Ifapplicable):.._E; o For special events whereby a portion or all of the proceeds are being donated to charitiiu confirmationletter from that charity must accompany the application « For InternalUseOnly:_. y .-é ‘ 9.1,'4 y if is‘IL:,‘m,\)3_1?/‘§a7L4"IC/1 Curmmi/?g ,',ICompletedby:/60;/h c;/J0 ha ‘Signature:_<iiPage 12 of 18Page 574 of 936 Niagztra?alls (.'I\s\'l\l)/\ 7A’futrization,=fo'I?"7~\l5"' On behalf of,and with the authority of,the above-mentioned organization,we certify that the informationgiven‘, in this application for waiving of City fees is true,correct and complete in every respect.‘'’" ~'-vi 2211Kagzgrtl Lggg/M ’(:y?_-oZ""'2.3 Name and Title Date ’_='Signature of Se ior Sta f Person Signature of BoardChairIRepresentative Name and Title ii?i=.-grécnai.|n'form‘éiti6?“§*CO'nslent“ Personal information,as defined in the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of PrivacyAct..: (MFIPPA).is collected under the authority of the Municipal Act,2001,as amended,and in accorc1la’n__cf‘_e__1w_ith MFIPPA.Personal information collected on this application form willbe used to assist in granting fee waivers and willbe made available to the members of City Council and staff and used for administrativepurposes.-A informationcollected may be subject to disclosure in accordance with the provisions of MFIPPA.The City . reserves the right to verify all informationcontained in submissions.= _ ‘_~g .1"- .:2’.1.'= Questions regarding the collection,use and disclosure of this personal informationmay be directed;to_the-Cifl/:3 Clerk,BillMatson,at bmatson@niagarafal|s.ca "' '7 if‘ By completing this application form,you consent to the collection and disclosure of your personalitiforrnatignig? and to its use by the City of Niagara Falls,as described above. ;,C:1-?y:xPage 13 of 18Page 575 of 936 /]Fee Waiver Application Form N iagarafalls ('A IN .\I).-\ Applicant Information Organization Name:Niagara Children's Centre Organization Address:567 Glenridge Ave city,St.Catharines postal Code,L2T 4C2 Co,,tactName:Marla Smith position:Director of Development Phone Number (days):9054012878 Phone Number (evenings): Ema“.marla.smith@niagarachildrenscentre.com website.vvvv\N.niagarachildrenscentre.com Type of Organization: I Not-for—profit Incorporation #: I Charitable Organization Registration #2 12342 8799 RROO01 Other (please specify): Waiving of Fees The City of Niagara Falls willwaive fees that would have been charged by the City for eligible non-profit groups or organizations that provide programs,services or events that are of a general benefit to the community.Fee Waiver Policy (700.22)is to ensure that the City’s support of functions and events through the waiving of fees is facilitated in a fair and equitable manner and does not burden the City’s annual operating budget. Examples of City fees that can be waived include,but are not limited to: -Park permit fees Rental of City Property Road Closure Fees Staffing costs outside normal operations The City of Niagara Falls Rates &Fees can be found on the City’s website at: Note:Insurance fees will not be waived.Page 1 of 4Page 14 of 18Page 576 of 936 W Fee Waiver Application Form Niagara all\I)A Form Submission Information Applications can be submitted by email to:c|erk@niagarafa||s.ca In person or by mail to:City Hall 4310 Queen Street Niagara Falls,ON L2E 6X5 Clerks Department Hours:8:30am —4:30pm Activity or Event Information Amount of Request:387-23 Fees to be Waived (i.e.facility rental,park permit,etc.):facility permit Dates and Times:May 25:2023 purpose of Event,fundraising event Number of People Expected:200+Admission Fee (If applicable): Are you serving food?yes Are you serving alcohol?no Activity or Event Description 1.How willyour activity or event enhance recreation and community services in the City of Niagara Falls? Niagara Children's Centre plasma car race is an annual fundraiser that brings together the community for a fun and active event.Plasma Cars are a small kids motion propelled car.They move slowly and require careful timing of steering and the body in order to move them.it is perfect for anyone and any age and is a fun team building activity. 2.Please describe the projected social,cultural,economic and environmental impact that the activity or event will have on the City and its residents. provides physical,developmental and/or communicative delays.This event is projected to raise$25,000 for the Centre and bring together 25 teams of individuals and/or corporate partners.Page 2 of 4Page 15 of 18Page 577 of 936 xg?mpletedby:/€06 /7,,.5/00”‘;/J Niaga its L :\N.-\I):\ Fee Waiver Application Form 3, ,What will the impact on the event be if the fee is not waived? developer. Niagara Children‘s Centre will have to use funds that were raised by the event to offset the cost of the facility.in years past,the Centre was able to get Ballhockeycom to donate their space to the plasma car race,however since Mr.Brian Broley‘s passing,the Ballhockey athletic centre has been sold to a 4.Are you seeking funding from any other sources?(Fundraising,grants,sponsorships) of $5,000. Niagara Children‘s Centre has Brokerllnkas a presenting sponsor for the event with a sponsorship with disabilities)? 5.What features willyou have in place to ensure that your event is accessible to all residents (residents Niagara Children's Centre supports childrenwith special needs and accessibility is at the forefront in planning events.We will have many children who willbe watching the event who use adaptable devices for mobility or communication at the event.The event itself is only open to adults. Please submit one copy of each of the following documents. Mandatory Documents A detailed budget,showing revenues and expenditures Ci Documents relating to City rental permit (if applicable): -Dates,times and location of event -All City fees associated with the event Confirmationletter from charity (if applicable): -For special events whereby a portion or all of the proceeds are being donated to charity,a confirmation letter from that charity must accompany the application For Internal Use Only: /trs,68Signature:Page 3 of 4Page 16 of 18Page 578 of 936 W Fee Waiver Application Form Niagara?ulls (.‘\.’\.\l)A Authorization for Application On behalf of,and with the authority of,the above-mentioned organization,we certify that the information given in this application for waiving of City fees is true,correct and complete in every respect. Marla Smith April 21,2023 Signature of Senior Staff Person Name and Title Date Signature of Board Chair/Representative Name and Title Date Personal Information Consent Personal information,as defined in the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (MFIPPA),is collected under the authority of the Municipal Act,2001,as amended,and in accordance with MFIPPA.Personal information collected on this application form will be used to assist in granting fee waivers and will be made available to the members of City Council and staff and used for administrative purposes. Information collected may be subject to disclosure in accordance with the provisions of MFIPPA.The City reserves the right to verify all information contained in submissions. Questions regarding the collection,use and disclosure of this personal information may be directed to the City Clerk,Bill Matson,at bmatson@niagarafal|s.ca By completing this application form,you consent to the collection and disclosure of your personal information, and to its use by the City of Niagara Falls,as described above. Page 4 of 4Page 17 of 18Page 579 of 936 Mbiggcxftz~{.2Js”:{,€>Q.‘i;)‘5a.5fY}o=xCCU"a R .. 0 Revenue 2023 Projected Presenting Sponsor 5,000.00 Sponsorship 5,950.00 Crowdfunding 7,338.00 Auction 790.00 Genera!Donations [ Expense 2023 Projected Food Trophies 17,438.00 Page 18 of 18Page 580 of 936 F-2023-18 Report Report to: Mayor and Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Taxes Under Section 357 and 358 of The Municipal Act, 2001 Recommendation(s) That Council approve the cancellation, reduction or refund of taxes on the various roll numbers per the attached summary and granted to the property owners listed. Executive Summary Property owners can seek remedy from property assessments that are not ac curate due to specific in changes to due or of Assessment the preparation in errors Roll circumstances. These remedies are available by virtue of s.357 and s.358 of The Municipal Act, 2001. This report is provided to Council periodically during the fiscal year to attain Council approval of the changes afforded under these sections. This is the first report for 2023. Adjustments totaling $318,635 are being recommended in this report with allocations to be made to City, Regional and School Board revenue. In the 2023 Tax Supported Operating Budget, an allowance has been established for these expenditures. At this time, the allowance provided in the Tax Supported Operating Budget is adequate to account for the City’s proportionate share of approximately $111,522. Background This report is the first report this year in relation to s.357 and s.358 reductions. Analysis Section 357 and 358 of The Municipal Act, 2001 provides for the cancellation, reduction or refund of taxes for persons who were overcharged by reason of any gross or manifest error in the preparation of the Assessment Roll. Appeals have been received and the applicants have been notified that the respective matters will be considered by City Council this evening. The Municipal Property Assessment Corporation has confirmed that the subject properties were assessed incorrectly in that these properties; had structures that had been demolished or removed, were damaged or razed by fire, have ceased to be liable at the rate it was taxed, Page 1 of 4 Page 581 of 936 underwent repairs/renovations preventing normal use for a period of longer than 3 months, became exempt, or a transposition, typographical, or clerical error was made. Financial Implications/Budget Impact The 2023 Tax Supported Operating Budget provides an allowance for tax write -offs due to assessment appeals and tax write offs. Attachment 1 is a listing of all the properties that staff is recommending receive adjustments due to successful appeals. An amount of $318,635 in adjustments is listed. The City’s approximate portion is $111,522 and has been accounted for in the 2023 Tax Supported Operating Budget. The balance of approximately $207,113 represents adjustments for the School Boards and the Region of Niagara. These adjustments will be made as part of the year end reconciliations. List of Attachments F-2023-18 Attachment 1 Written by: Stephanie Young, Water Tax Administrator Tiffany Clark, Director of Finance Submitted by: Status: Tiffany Clark, Director of Finance Approved - 09 Jun 2023 Shelley Darlington, General Manger of Corporate Services Approved - 09 Jun 2023 Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 13 Jun 2023 Page 2 of 4 Page 582 of 936 (Pursuant to Section 358 and 357 (1) (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (g) of the Municipal Act) Municipality CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS Assessment Region NIAGARA I hereby apply for the cancellation, reduction or refund of taxes as set out below and certify that the Regional Assessment Commissioner has verified that the information contained in this application is in accordance with her/his records. Appeal Roll Number Name Address Tax Year Reason for Application Refund 2023-27 2725 010 006 19000 0000 Lisa Goertzen 4124 Hickson Av 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $715.97 2023-4 2725 010 011 15200 0000 David & April Giesbrecht 4434 Sixth Av 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $36.91 2023-18 2725 010 013 11300 0000 Joel Maxwell 5411 Morrison St 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $30.42 2022-66 2725 020 001 07500 0000 James & Michelle Tredwell 4446 Morrison St 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $1,040.01 2022-63 2725 020 003 02700 0000 Alison Raspal 5073 Hutton Av 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $28.99 2023-28 2725 020 007 07400 0000 Michael Irvine & Maria Elrod 5170 Second Av 2022 RENOVATIONS PREVENTING NORMAL USE $619.17 2023-19 2725 020 011 06200 0000 Gabor Vaski 5128 Rosedale Dr 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $0.00 2023-23 2725 020 012 09200 0000 Kefayat Kabkab 5336 Mcrae St 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $2.66 2022-29 2725 030 006 11800 0000 Heather Cox & Barrington Timoll 5563 Slater Av 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $1,890.14 2023-22 2725 030 008 07025 0000 Niagara 21st Group Inc 5950 Victoria Av 2022 REPAIRS/RENOVATIONS PREVENTING NORMAL USE $281,026.43 2023-5 2725 040 005 08403 0000 2717981 Ontario Inc 3846 Portage Rd 2022 CHANGE IN TAX CLASS $0.00 2022-67 2725 040 015 28700 0000 Mark Fusco 3585 Varsity Av 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $1,143.19 2023-12 2725 040 016 02800 0000 5054803 Ontario Inc 2853 Dorchester Rd 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $387.06 2022-65 2725 060 005 10101 0000 Iglesia Ni Cristo Church of Christ 6085 Lundy's Ln 2022 BECAME EXEMPT $1,630.37 2023-33 2725 070 003 02000 0000 Paul & Lily Kranjac 5841 Dixon St 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $11.80 2022-62 2725 070 006 14200 0000 Marnie Newport 6329 Pine Grove Av 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $58.41 2023-29 2725 070 013 02100 0000 Michael Irvine & Maria Elrod 6437 Barker St 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $19.77 2023-6 2725 080 001 03100 0000 Saththiyanantham Kunaratnam 5668 Dunn St 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $106.21 2023-20 2725 080 002 00985 0000 Saima Abbasi 6867 Ailanthus Av 2021 GROSS OR MANIFEST ERROR $1,158.50 2023-21 2725 080 002 00985 0000 Saima Abbasi 6867 Ailanthus Av 2022 GROSS OR MANIFEST ERROR $2,557.43 2023-2 2725 080 002 09400 0000 Residence at Niagara Inc 5858 Dunn St 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $206.25 2023-3 2725 080 002 09600 0000 Residence at Niagara Inc 5882 Dunn St 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $156.62 2023-10 2725 090 001 13400 0000 Anthony & Natalino Vacca 5360 Royal Manor Dr 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $119.26 2023-13 2725 090 004 04900 0000 1000038254 Ontario Inc 5372 Hodgson Av 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $1,011.06 2023-14 2725 090 004 05000 0000 1000038254 Ontario Inc 5390 Hodgson Av 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $757.82 2023-25 2725 090 006 39600 0000 Elizabeth Cunningham 6240 Charnwood Av 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $14.90 2023-31 2725 090 007 03500 0000 Hilary & Silveste Bastiampillai 6316 Montrose Rd 2021 GROSS OR MANIFEST ERROR $0.00 2023-32 2725 090 007 03500 0000 Hilary & Silveste Bastiampillai 6316 Montrose Rd 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $296.12 2023-11 2725 100 003 11900 0000 Anthony Vacca 8178 Thorold Stone Rd 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $65.57 Page 1 of 2Page 3 of 4Page 583 of 936 (Pursuant to Section 358 and 357 (1) (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (g) of the Municipal Act) Municipality CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS Assessment Region NIAGARA I hereby apply for the cancellation, reduction or refund of taxes as set out below and certify that the Regional Assessment Commissioner has verified that the information contained in this application is in accordance with her/his records. Appeal Roll Number Name Address Tax Year Reason for Application Refund 2022-68 2725 100 006 09700 0000 Sam & Sandra Vecchi 6971 Garner Rd 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $602.16 2023-1 2725 110 001 08000 0000 Niagara Parks Commission 7805 Niagara Pky 2022 BECAME EXEMPT $0.00 2023-36 2725 110 002 05108 0000 1340258 Ontario Inc Brown Rd 2021 GROSS OR MANIFEST ERROR $7,211.75 2023-35 2725 110 002 05108 0000 1340258 Ontario Inc Brown Rd 2022 GROSS OR MANIFEST ERROR $7,415.77 2023-9 2725 120 003 26700 0000 Tamara & Raymond Simmons 8098 Sarah St 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $2,402.36 2022-61 2725 120 007 11500 0000 Alfred Bellehumeur 8765 Rodney St 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $65.94 2022-69 2725 130 001 00800 0000 Donald Swalm 12487 Niagara River Pky 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $1,121.86 2022-60 2725 130 003 13300 0000 13071189 Canada Inc 4336 Willick Rd 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $1,103.58 2023-7 2725 130 004 19402 0000 Patrick & Susan Pusiak 7511 Schisler Rd 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $1,485.44 2023-34 2725 140 002 05300 0000 Andrew Fisher 11329 Crowland Av 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $1,047.44 2023-16 2725 150 001 00700 0000 Daniel & Jane Deschamps 7998 Netherby Rd 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $289.54 2022-31 2725 150 001 01000 0000 Isaac Jiang 8486 Netherby Rd 2022 RAZED BY FIRE, DEMOLITION OR OTHERWISE $798.23 TOTAL $318,635.11 Approved this (date):Report No.:F-2023-18 JAMES M. DIODATI, MAYOR BILL MATSON, CITY CLERK [*Any individual items not approved must be struck out and initialed.] Page 2 of 2Page 4 of 4Page 584 of 936 L-2023-11 Report Report to: Mayor and Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: Insurance Renewal Report Recommendation(s) THAT Council approve the 2023-2024 Comprehensive Insurance Program from Intact Public Entities Inc. (IPE). Executive Summary The City requires a renewal of the municipal insurance program since the current coverage expires on June 30, 2023. Staff have reviewed the existing program for adequacy of coverages and recommends the City renew. The insurance program will be effective July 1, 2023. The proposed annual premium of $1,990,727 is an increase of 8.66% or $158,649 from the previous year's premium of $1,832,078. The premium increase for the 2023-2024 year is reasonable due to the current insurance market both in Canada and worldwide. Background The City requires an insurance program to mitigate potential liabilities incurred during the performance of its many services and responsibilities. On an annual basis, staff performs a and adequacy for coverages the provided charged rates the of review and completeness. The City has performed these reviews during this process. Please note, there is a complementary In-Camera report (Report L-2023-12) on this subject. Analysis For 2023 the municipal insurance market remains in a state of flux with many different drivers impacting rate, performance and market demands. Municipal insurance is complex and has unique elements when compared to traditional commercial and personal insurance. The most significant differentiator is the long term nature of municipal liability claims. In 2022 there have been various court decisions involving municipal claims that have had hesitant insurers making municipalities, effects adverse to for insure municipalities due to the unique risk profile associated with municipalities. Insurance is cyclical and municipalities are in a 4th year of a hard market. A soft market typically exhibits low rates, generous terms, abundance of capital and more competition. A hard market sees higher rates, restrictive terms, reduced levels of capital and less competition. It is anticipated the hard market will continue for the remainder of 2023. A n umber of Page 1 of 3 Page 585 of 936 factors that cause the hard market to continue include high inflation, supply chain interruptions and a potential global recession. Inflation is the highest it has been in decades, and most notably on the cost of construction. Building replacement cost values have been increased to reflect current inflation trends and Statistics Canada non - residential building index has inflation over 15%. Financial Implications/Budget Impact The insurance program is reviewed and renewed annually to ensure that the coverages are sufficient and that the City's municipal assets are properly valued in the program. The insurance program covers a one year period from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024. The cost of the City's insurance program has increased from $1,832,078 (2022/2023) to $1,990,727 (2023/2024). The year-over-year increase is $158,649 or 8.66%. The primary policies are General Liability, Property and Auto insurance. These policies are where the majority of municipal claims occur. The City added Community Gardens group exposure to its General Liability policy in May 2023. Although the additional premium has minimal impact overall, this coverage is still an increase in exposure that was not present in the expiring term. For 2023, the insurance industry outlook remains challenging in terms of capacity and pricing with lower appetite from insurers to cover specialty risks such as municipalities. The insurance market is cyclical between hard and soft markets. In a soft market, insurers have a greater capacity to take on risks and pricing is often more favourable. The commercial market including specialty lines like municipalities is in its 4th year of a hard market. A 'hard market' has higher rates, restrictive terms and less competition. It is anticipated that the hard market will remain for the balance of 2023. Although, there were signs of softening, there are a number of factors that caused the hard market to continue: high inflation, supply chain interruptions, geopolitical uncertainty and a potential global recession. Double digit premium increases have been typical for Canadian municipalities for the past 4 years. While all municipalities are facing increases in 2023, on average I PE is seeing premium increases between 10-20% for most municipalities across Ontario regardless of insurer. Given the current hard market and in accordance with the Procurement By-Law, the City negotiated renewal terms with the current provider in the interest of cost savings. As the renewal insurance policy increase premium is approximately 8%, Staff anticipate a favourable budget variance at year end of approximately $67,000 or 3.3%. Strategic/Departmental Alignment The City's municipal insurance renewal program best aligns with the City's Strategic Priority of "Financial Sustainability". Contributor(s) Matt Greenfield, Senior Financial Analyst, Corporate Services, Finance Written by: Page 2 of 3 Page 586 of 936 Janet McQuay, Risk Manager Submitted by: Status: Nidhi Punyarthi, City Solicitor Approved - 15 Jun 2023 Shelley Darlington, General Manger of Corporate Services Approved - 15 Jun 2023 Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 15 Jun 2023 Page 3 of 3 Page 587 of 936 MW-2023-18 Report Report to: Mayor and Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: Budget Amendment for John N Allan Park - Parking Lot and Lighting Improvements Recommendation(s) THAT - Council authorize staff to proceed with the design and construction of 48 paved spaces including lighting and drainage improvements to the south parking lot at John N Allan Park at budgeted cost of $320,000.00; and further. THAT - Council approve a 2023 Capital Budget Amendment to create Project P140-23 for John N Allan Park Parking Lot Improvements with total budget of $320,000 (inclusive of non-recoverable HST) funded from the OLG Reserve. Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to request authorization from Council to proceed with the design and construction of 48 paved spaces including lighting and drainage improvements to the south parking lot at John N Allan Park at a budgeted cost of $320,000.00. The report further requests Council to approve a 2023 Capital Budget Amendment to approve funding for the works in advance of the 2024 Capital Budget Process to allow the works to be completed before the winter season, to align with the tennis dome installation. Staff is requesting a 2023 Capital Budget Amendment of $320,000.00 (inclusive of non-recoverable HST). Background Currently there are two parking areas located within the property boundaries of John N Allan Park. The parking areas are currently granular base with precast concrete curbs and no lighting provisions or parking stall markings. Storm water drainage is free flowing and is generally directed to the outer edges of the parking lot. Tennis Clubs of Canada recently presented a proposal at the Council meeting on May 09, 2023 to install a dome structure over the tennis courts during the winter months and sign a lease agreement with the City. With this agreement the City would still be required to maintain the property (including the parking lots). Page 1 of 4 Page 588 of 936 The John N Allan Park parking area has previously been considered for upgrades due to maintenance costs and safety concerns, but has not yet been approved for capital funding due to higher priority capital investments. For the purpose of this lease agreement with Tennis Clubs of Canada, only the southern parking area near the main entrance off Kalar Road would be considered for upgrades. Analysis The addition of a tennis dome will increase the use of the parking lot during winter months when occupancy is normally at a decreased level. Staff recommends that the design and reconstruction of the John N Allan Park parking lot proceed immediately. If Council approves the requested budget amendment, staff will proceed with engaging an engineering consultant to complete the design and prepare tender documents. The anticipated tender date for this project will be late July 2023, with the expectation to meet substantial completion prior to the dome installation by Tennis Clubs of Canada for the 2023 winter season. Operational Implications and Risk Analysis Paving the parking lot will improve summer and winter maintenance requirements. The improvements will be measurable by the reduction of time and material costs required to maintain the parking lot to required standards. Paving, lighting and improving storm water drainage in the parking lot will increase public safety and may also decrease the City's liability. Financial Implications/Budget Impact Currently the City does not have a previously approved budget for these works. The budget required to fully execute the scope of these parking lot improvements estimated to be $320,000.00. (including non-recoverable HST) and will require a 2023 Capital Budget Amendment in order to proceed. Strategic/Departmental Alignment Implementation of this project meets the intent of Council’s Strategic Priorities by providing strong and resilient infrastructure in a healthy and safe livable community through engaging and accountable government practices. List of Attachments Attachment A: John N Allan Map Written by: Kurtis Bottrell, Project Manager David Antonsen, Landscape Architect Page 2 of 4 Page 589 of 936 Submitted by: Status: Erik Nickel, Director of Municipal Works Approved - 13 Jun 2023 Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 14 Jun 2023 Page 3 of 4 Page 590 of 936 Location Map Print Date:© City of Niagara Falls 6/5/2023 This data is provided "as is" and the City of Niagara Falls (the City) makes no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the data. The maps and drawings contained herein are intended for general layout purposes only and shall not be considered as official plans or drawings. For further information, please contact the City. The City shall not be held liable for special, incidental, consequential or indirect damages arising from the use of this data. Users assume all risks in using this data. No part of these digital images, or information, or hardcopies made from them may be reproduced and/or distributed without this disclaimer. South parking lot to be reconstructed. Page 4 of 4 Page 591 of 936 L-2023-13 Report Report to: Mayor and Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: Permanently Close and Declare Surplus of Lands Road Allowance between Lots 2 & 3, Concession 3, Willoughby being Morningstar Road; Niagara Falls Our File No.2023-79 Recommendation(s) 1. In the event that Council determines that it is in the public interest to do so, that part of Morningstar Road Allowance, between Sodom Road and Ort Road, north of Baker Road (the "Subject Lands"), as shown in blue on the map attached as Schedule "A", be permanently closed and declared surplus to the City's needs. 2. That any sale of the Subject Lands be conditional upon the lands being merged in title with the abutting lands. 3. That the City Solicitor and Chief Administrative Officer, or their designate, be authorized to execute all other documentation and take whatever steps necessary to carry out Recommendations 1 and 2. Executive Summary Description: PIN 64251-0036 (LT) - Road Allowance between Lots 2 & 3, Concession 3, Willoughby being Morningstar Road; Niagara Falls Total Area: Approximately 4.49 acres Zoning: Rural Type of Property: Unopened, unimproved road allowance Special Consideration: No infrastructure located on Subject Lands. Background The City has recently received a request from the Owners of 13773 Sodom Road and 4253 Morningstar Road, Vince Kerrio and Cathy Kerrio, to purchase the Subject Lands between their properties. Page 1 of 5 Page 592 of 936 In 2008 Vince and Cathy Kerrio had approached the City to inquire about purchasing the Subject Lands. At that time, Transportation Staff had raised concerns which resulted in the request not moving forward to Council. The concerns at the time were that this portion of Morningstar Road had a travelled portion of the road allowance, and that it provided a storm drainage outlet by road-side ditching along the north and south sides of the right-of-way. Although the area at issue was not being used as a through route at that time, Transportation thought it would have been premature of the City to dispose of the property. Several years have passed since that request and response. Staff have now received a fresh request and have assessed the request in light of current needs. Staff's updated comments follow later in this report. The Subject Lands are part of Morningstar Road, which is an unopened, unimproved road allowance that is not being utilized. Prior to any conveyance, the Subject Lands must be stopped up and closed and declared surplus to the City's needs. Public notice will be provided for in accordance with the City's By-law No. 2003-02. Analysis Information about the requested declaration of surplus was circulated to City departments for comments. The following summarizes the comments received to date : • Municipal Works No concerns from either a Transportation or Engineering perspective. • Planning Department 1. This portion of Morningstar Road is an unopened, unimproved right of way, with access only provided to abutting landowners. 2. There are no plans to open or improve this right of way under any transportation master plan. 3. The road is designated a collector road under our Official Plan, however, there are no plans to change the surrounding designation (Good General Agriculture and Environmental Protection Area) and the lands remain outside the City's urban area. 4. Planning staff have no objection to the sale. In the future Official Plan this portion of the road will be deleted from the list of collector roads. • Fire Services No objections. • Recreation & Culture No comments. Page 2 of 5 Page 593 of 936 Financial Implications/Budget Impact In the event that the Subject Lands are sold at their appraised value, the City will recognize a return in the amount of the sale price. Further, the Subject Lands will immediately start generating tax revenue and the City will no longer be responsible f or the costs relating to maintenance of the Subject Lands. The Purchaser will be responsible for all costs relating to the sale of the Subject Lands, including, but not limited to, public notice, reference plan, if required, appraisal and the by-law to stop up and close the road allowance. Strategic/Departmental Alignment The proposed transaction is in keeping with Council's commitment to customer service excellence, financial sustainability and economic diversification. List of Attachments Schedule A - Site Location Map Written by: Nidhi Punyarthi, City Solicitor Submitted by: Status: Nidhi Punyarthi, City Solicitor Approved - 14 Jun 2023 Shelley Darlington, General Manger of Corporate Services Approved - 14 Jun 2023 Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 15 Jun 2023 Page 3 of 5 Page 594 of 936 Location Map Print Date:© City of Niagara Falls 6/2/2023 Reference #:Part of Morningstar Road (between Ort Rd. & Sodom Rd.) This data is provided "as is" and the City of Niagara Falls (the City) makes no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the data. The maps and drawings contained herein are intended for general layout purposes only and shall not be considered as official plans or drawings. For further information, please contact the City. The City shall not be held liable for special, incidental, consequential or indirect damages arising from the use of this data. Users assume all risks in using this data. No part of these digital images, or information, or hardcopies made from them may be reproduced and/or distributed without this disclaimer. SCHEDULE "A"Page 4 of 5Page 595 of 936 Location Map Print Date:© City of Niagara Falls 6/2/2023 NotesReference #: This data is provided "as is" and the City of Niagara Falls (the City) makes no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the data. The maps and drawings contained herein are intended for general layout purposes only and shall not be considered as official plans or drawings. For further information, please contact the City. The City shall not be held liable for special, incidental, consequential or indirect damages arising from the use of this data. Users assume all risks in using this data. No part of these digital images, or information, or hardcopies made from them may be reproduced and/or distributed without this disclaimer.Page 5 of 5Page 596 of 936 PBD-2023-38 Report Report to: Mayor and Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: PBD-2023-38 26CD-11-2017-003 Extension of 7736-7746 Beaverdams Road Draft Plan of Condominium 7736-7746 Beaverdams Road Applicant: Kamlesh Patel Agent: Quartek Group (Susan Smyth) Recommendation(s) That Council grant a 1-year extension to draft plan approval of condominium (vacant land) with a new lapsing date of July 11th, 2024. Executive Summary Council approved the Draft Plan of Condominium on June 13, 2017 and granted a 3 year extension on April 2nd, 2020. The draft plan approval is set to lapse on July 11th, 2023. Kamlesh Patel is requesting Council consider extending their draft plan approval by 1 year to lapse on July 11, 2024 to provide adequate time for the Land Registry Office to review and approve the pre- registration of the Draft Plan of Condominium with the Declaration, which will enable the applicant to complete draft plan conditions and register the condominium plan. City Staff are currently reviewing a package submitted by the applicant to clear conditions. Staff have no concerns with granting a 1 year extension for the draft approved plan of condominium. The draft plan and conditions continue to conform to Provincial, Regional and City policies and applicable zoning and development standards. Background Proposal 13, (PBD2017 June On -2017-Zoning a for applications approved 20), ByCouncil -law Amendment (AM-2017-002) and Draft Plan of Condominium (Vacant Land) (26CD-11-2017-003) for lands that are 0.3 ha (0.74 acres) in size and located at 7736-7746 Beaverdams Road (see Schedule 1 for a location and Schedule 2 for the draft approved plan). A 3 year extension was granted on April 2, 2020 (PBD-2020-28). The draft plan lapses on July 11, 2023. The applicant has submitted a request to extend the draft plan approval by 1 year, which would provide for a new lapsing date of July 11, 2024. Page 1 of 10 Page 597 of 936 Analysis The applicant has submitted a request for an extension to draft plan approval (see attached letter). The draft plan approval was granted on June 3, 2017 and extended on April 2, 2020, subject to 29 conditions (see Appendix B). The applicant has submitted a package to clear conditions of the draft approval. Staff are currently reviewing the package to determine if the conditions can be considered cleared. The applicant has requested a 1 year extension to provide adequate time for the Land Registry Office to review and approve the pre-registration of the Draft Plan of Condominium with the Declaration, which will enable the applicant to complete draft plan conditions and register the condominium plan. Under Section 51(33) of the Planning Act, 190 R. S. O., Council can grant extensions to draft plan approval for a specified time period. Historically, Council has granted extensions for a specified time of 1 year. The applicant has requested an extension of 1 year. To date, no conditions have been cleared, but the applicant has submitted a package to clear conditions that is currently under review by City Staff. In conclusion, the applicant requested 1 additional year to clear conditions to extension to provide adequate time for the Land Registry Office to review and approve the pre-registration of the Draft Plan of Condominium with the Declaration, which will enable the applicant to complete draft plan conditions and register the condominium plan. The proposal remains in compliance with Provincial, development and regulations relevant zoning policies City and Regional and standards. For these reasons, Planning Staff is of the opinion it would be appropriate to grant an extension of draft approval for 1 year with a new lapsing date of July 11, 2024. The conditions of draft approval are listed in Appendix B. These remain unchanged from June 2017. Operational Implications and Risk Analysis There are no operational implications or risks. Financial Implications/Budget Impact The proposed development will generate City development charge contributions of $10,002/unit and property tax revenue. The City collected a fee of $2,000 to process this application. There are no other financial implications. Strategic/Departmental Alignment The proposed subdivision supports the Healthy and Vibrant Community Strategic Priority by providing additional housing for residents. List of Attachments Schedule 1 - Location Map Schedule 2 - Draft Approved Plan Appendix A - Request for Extension of Draft Plan Approval Page 2 of 10 Page 598 of 936 Appendix B - Draft Plan Conditions Written by: Alexa Cooper, Planner 2 Submitted by: Status: Andrew Bryce, Director of Planning Approved - 12 Jun 2023 Kira Dolch, General Manager, Planning, Building & Development Approved - 13 Jun 2023 Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 13 Jun 2023 Page 3 of 10 Page 599 of 936 SCHEDULE 1 (Location Map) Page 4 of 10 Page 600 of 936 SCHEDULE 2 (Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision) Page 5 of 10 Page 601 of 936 Date: 17 May 2023 Project No: 20020 City of Niagara Falls Planning, Building and Development 4310 Queen Street Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5 Attn: Ms. Alexa Cooper, Planner II Planning, Building and Development Re: Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium (File No. 26CD-11-2017-003) 7736 – 7746 Beaverdams Road Request for Draft Plan Approval Extension Dear Ms. Cooper, As you are aware, we provided the final draft plan of condominium application and written notification of clearing all draft conditions on April 5, 2023. As noted in the letter, it was suggested that Condition 3 for copies of the pre-registration plan be provided, in fact it was a draft version of the draft plan. It has come to our attention that the pre-registration of the Draft Plan of Condominium with the Declaration for review and approval by the Land Registry Office has not been completed. We are concerned that the timing to complete this process will go beyond the July 11, 2023, lapsing date for the final draft plan approval, particularly since the Condominium Agreement has not been prepared and reviewed and signed off by the Niagara Region or the Owner/Developer. Therefore, on behalf of the Owner/Developer (Kamlesh Patel), it is requested that the Draft Plan Approval be extended for one year until July 11, 2024. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me directly. Thank you, Susan Smyth, CPT Senior Planner cc: Kamlesh Patel – Owner/Developer Pushpit Manuja – Coordinator Craig Robson – Solicitor Mike Geremia – Architect Page 6 of 10 Page 602 of 936 APPENDIX B Conditions for Draft Plan Approval 1. Approval applies to the Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium prepared by Quartek, dated February 22, 2017, showing 10 units of vacant land for townhouses as well as a common private road, visitor parking and amenity areas. 2. The developer submit to the City’s Senior Zoning Administrator all necessary drawings and information, including but not limited to, site, elevation and landscaping drawings to confirm zoning compliance. 3. The developer provide five copies of the pre-registration plan to Planning, Building & Development and a letter stating how all the conditions imposed have been or are to be fulfilled. 4. The developer enter into a Vacant Land Condominium Agreement with the City, to be registered on title, to satisfy all requirements, financial and otherwise, related to the development of the land. Note: Should any other body wish to have its conditions included in the Vacant Land Condominium Agreement, they may be required to become party to the Vacant Land Condominium Agreement for the purpose of enforcing such conditions. 5. The developer submit a Solicitor’s Certificate of Ownership for the Condominium land to the City Solicitor prior to the preparation of the Vacant Land Condominium Agreement. 6. The developer dedicate a 1.5 metre wide road widening, free and clear of any mortgages, liens or other encumbrances, to the City of Niagara Falls along the frontage of Beaverdams Road. 7. The developer construct a 1.8 metre high wood fence along the lot line that abuts the single detached lots to the north and west and the commercial development to the south to the satisfaction of Parks Design. Details of this fencing shall be shown on the landscape plan required by Condition 8. 8. The developer provide a landscape plan, prepared by a landscape architect (OALA), showing fencing, entrance features, streetscape treatment, internal landscaping/lot landscape design, patios and driveway locations. 9. The developer pay the City cash-in-lieu of 5% parkland dedication. 10. The roadways, services, lot grading and construction be designed and constructed in accordance with City standards. Page 7 of 10 Page 603 of 936 11. The developer submit a lighting plan prepared by a professional engineer. The design is to be independently powered and metered. Photometric plans are to be submitted demonstrating zero impact on neighbouring properties. 12. The developer provide the City with the proposed site servicing and grading scheme for the subject property to Municipal Works for review and comment prior to approval of the plans for construction. 13. The developer pay the applicable development charges in place at the execution of the Vacant Land Condominium Agreement and at Building Permit issuance in accordance with By-law No. 2017-87, as amended. 14. The developer pay the City the applicable required fees for administration. 15. The developer’s engineering consultant provide written acceptance that the works completed conform with the City’s accepted drawings and in accordance with NPSCD and City construction specifications. 16. The developer ensure that the existing municipal infrastructure will adequately service the development as proposed. All underground services within the subject Land shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City standards. 17. The developer demonstrate sufficient hydraulic capacity within the combined sewer downstream of the site so as to accept the additional sanitary sewer flows. 18. The developer demonstrate a net-reduction in the untreated combined sewage overflow volume from the municipal sanitary sewer system to the natural environment will occur on an annual basis. 19. The lot grading must be designed and constructed in accordance with City standards. 20. The developer submit the necessary servicing drawings, identifying the locations of the fire hydrants, in accordance with section 3.2.5.7 of the Ontario Building Code. 21. The developer submit a request to the Fire Department to designate, through municipal by-law, a fire access route on the property; provide a drawing illustrating the fire route’s compliance with sections 3.2.5.4., 3.2.5.5. and 3.2.5.6. of the Ontario Building Code; and post the necessary ‘no parking’ signs. NOTE: parking shall be prohibited on both sides of the access road. 22. The developer provide the necessary drawings to Fire Services, to confirm compliance of the development with Section 3.2.5.5(1) of the Ontario Building Code. 23. The developer agree in the Vacant Land Condominium Agreement, in words satisfactory to Bell Canada, to grant to Bell Canada any easements that may be required, which may include a blanket easement, for communication/ telecommunication infrastructure. In the event of any conflict with existing Bell Page 8 of 10 Page 604 of 936 Canada facilities or easements, the developer shall be responsible for the relocation of such facilities or easements. 24. The developer meet the requirements of Enbridge Gas Distribution with respect to the provision of their facilities to the subject land including providing necessary easements, any necessary relocation of the gas main, provision of an exclusive use location for a pressure reducing regulator station, installation of gas piping and subsequent completion of landscaping, grading and paving, and service and meter installation details. 25. That a Community Mail Box (CMB) be located on Block 4, 20 metres west of the property line facing the driveway, or in an alternative location if determined by Canada Post, and that the developer identify this site on a display in the sales office prior to offering any units for sale. 26. The developer include in all offers of purchase and sale, a statement that advises the prospective purchaser that the mail delivery will be from a designated Community Mail Box (CMB) and that the developer will be responsible for officially notifying the purchasers of the exact CMB locations and easements granted to Canada Post prior to the closing of any home sales. 27. The developer satisfy all requirements of Canada Post regarding temporary and permanent CMB locations and associated works, engineering servicing drawings, installation, notification of the start of construction and providing mail service information to property owners. 28. That the owner select one of the following options for waste collection: a. Revise the plan to comply with the Niagara Region’s Waste Collection Policy by removing the visitor parking spaces at the end of the T-turnaround; b. The residents of each unit bring their waste and recycling to the Beaverdams Road curbside, as long as waste does exceed the collection limits of 1 bag/container and unlimited bins of recycling and compost per unit; c. Private waste collection be provided by the condominium corporation, and the following clauses be included in the Condominium Agreement to survive closing: “The Owner/Condominium Corporation agrees to include the following clause in all Offers and Agreements of Purchase and Sale or Lease for all units to survive closing: a. ‘Purchasers/Tenants are advised that due to the site layout, waste collection for the development will be provided through a private waste collector arranged by the Condominium Corporation and not Niagara Region.’” Page 9 of 10 Page 605 of 936 29. That the owner file a Record of Site Condition (RSC) on the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change’s (MOECC) Brownfields Environmental Site Registry, in accordance with Ontario Regulation 153/04 as amended by Ontario Regulation 511/09, and that the owner provide a copy of the MOECC’s acknowledgement of the filing of the RSC to the Niagara Region. Notes: • Prior to granting final plan approval, the City must be in receipt of written confirmation that the requirements of each condition have been met and all fees have been paid to the satisfaction of the Niagara Region. • Prior to final approval for registration, a copy of the draft condominium agreement for the proposed development should be submitted to the Niagara Region for verification that the appropriate clauses pertaining to any of these conditions have been included. A copy of the executed agreement shall also be provided prior to registration. • The format for all plans, studies and reports required to be submitted to the Niagara Region to satisfy these conditions shall be two hard copies and a PDF digital copy. Clearance of Conditions Prior to granting approval to the final plan, Planning, Building & Development requires written notice from applicable City Divisions and the following agencies indicating that their respective conditions have been satisfied: - Planning Division for Conditions 1 to 3 (inclusive) - Legal Services for Conditions 4 and 5 - Transportation Services for Condition 6 - Parks Design for Conditions 7 to 9 (inclusive) - Municipal Works Department for Conditions 10 to 19 (inclusive) - Fire Services for Conditions 20 to 22 (inclusive) - Bell Canada for Condition 23 - Enbridge Gas for Condition 24 - Canada Post for Conditions 25 to 27 (inclusive) - Regional Niagara Public Works Department for Conditions 28 and 29 Page 10 of 10 Page 606 of 936 CLK-2023-06 Report Report to: Mayor and Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: Updates to Council's Code of Conduct Recommendation(s) 1. THAT Council receive this report for information. 2. THAT Council adopt the suggested changes to the City's Code of Conduct as proposed by staff. Executive Summary The current Code of Conduct was last updated by Council in May of 2022. Since that time, staff have been made aware of some needed updates based on changes to provincial legislation as well as recommendations suggested by a recent Ombudsman report to Council. Staff have made some minor updates to the Code of Conduct when taking into consideration the requested comments of the Ombudsman. Council also met with the City’s Integrity Commissioner as part of their orientation at the start of the current term of Council and provided some feedback to the current Code. These updates are now depicted in a copy of the Code of Conduct attached as an appendix to this report. All potential updates to the code are clearly marked in red ink. Background In November of 2022, Council met with the City’s Integrity Commissioner as part of their orientation for the new term of Council. Part of this session included a walk-through of the current Code of Conduct with some discussion on some possible changes to the code. In February of 2023, Council received correspondence from the Ontario Ombudsman after receiving complaints about some aspects of the current Code of Conduct. Analysis During the orientation that Council received at the start of the term, discussions were held with staff, as well as our Integrity Commissioner, for some updates to the Code of Conduct. Most notably, the idea for some possible ‘mediation’ possibilities as part of the complaint process outlined in the Code of Conduct. Staff have made some suggested modifications to the code to reflect, “if both parties agree, individuals are Page 1 of 21 Page 607 of 936 strongly encouraged to participate in any informal process whereby the Integrity Commissioner may act as a mediator regarding the issues relating to a complaint. This informal complaint procedure is not a precondition or a prerequisite to pursuing the formal complaint procedure as laid out in this code.” The additional tool of mediation, overseen by the Integrity Commissioner, provides for a possible resolution to a complaint without the need for a full investigation. Another detail that is lacking from the Code of Conduct was the ability for the Integrity Commissioner to deal with complaints about local board members, such as complaints about members of local Business Improvement Area (BIA) boards. Recent changes to the Municipal Act require this authority of an Integrity Commissioner take place and the house-keeping matter of formally having Council adopt this within the Code of Conduct is now reflected in the proposed update to the code. The changes made to reflect this authority are scattered in several areas of the code to make it perfectly clear that the Integrity Commissioner can deal with any complaints received for this purpose. This same concern is raised in a letter from the Ontario Ombudsman earlier this year when his correspondence was listed on the Council agenda on February 28, 2023. Direction to staff was given at that meeting to have staff come back with a report on possible amendments to the Code of Conduct for Council’s consideration. Another concern of the Ombudsman was that the current code of Conduct has a residency requirement, listed in the definition of “complaint”, on page 2 of the code. The current definition states that a “complaint means a written objection filed with the Integrity Commissioner … and may be submitted by City Council, a member of City Council, a City employee, a resident of the City of Niagara Falls, or a person who owns a business or represents an institution within the City of Niagara Falls”. Under similar advice of the Integrity Commissioner, and in comparison to the rules set out for inquiries under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, it is suggested that the code be updated to include “ … or a person demonstrably acting in the public interest”. The Ombudsman also points out that the current code conflates complaints that are judged to lack sufficient information with those that are determined to be vexatious or frivolous. The code lacks a mechanism to suggest that the Integrity Commissioner be able to reach out to the complainant to clarify or obtain additional information. Staff have suggested that section 17.1 (e) of the code be update d to reflect this additional step before the Integrity Commissioner decides to proceed with the matter. Lastly, the Ombudsman raises concerns with the $500 filing fee that was established by Council in its previous term. In June of 2021, Council increased the fee from $200 to $500 after a series of unfounded complaints were investigated and paid for by the municipality. The Ombudsman simply suggests that there should be no fee or other barrier to make a complaint to the Integrity Commissioner despite also recognizing that other municipalities also charge a fee. While the number of complaints filed with the Clerks office have reduced over the past couple of years, they have not stopped. In fact, at the time of writing this report there are currently two active complaints that have been filed and both included the complainant paying the $500 filing fee. Staff will also point out that other examples of provincial legislation allow for fees to be collected by the municipality. For example, the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (MFIPPA), allows for fees to be collected for time needed to Page 2 of 21 Page 608 of 936 search for documents, copying fees, etc. Perhaps the most obvious fee collected that Council would be familiar with is the nomination fee that a candidate would have to pay to run in the municipal elections, as laid out in the Municipal Elections Act. Even a $500 fee to file a late Financial Statement is prescribed by the same Act. The current fee of $500 to file a complaint is mentioned in section 17.1 of the code. Staff have not made any proposed change to this fee and would only do so on a recommendation of this Council. Operational Implications and Risk Analysis There are no operational implications to report. Financial Implications/Budget Impact There would be minor financial impacts to the City if Council were to adjust the filing fee requirements currently set at $500 per complaint. List of Attachments Draft Code of Conduct - June 2023 Written by: Bill Matson, City Clerk Submitted by: Status: Bill Matson, City Clerk Approved - 15 Jun 2023 Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 16 Jun 2023 Page 3 of 21 Page 609 of 936 Draft Update: June 2023 City of Niagara Falls Code of Conduct for Members of Council PREAMBLE Niagara Falls City Council Members have the privilege of attaining elected office. That privilege carries significant responsibilities and obligations with respect to the public trust. In order to strengthen the role of Council and to enhance public trust with respect to the obligations of its Members, this Code is established to govern and regulate the ethical conduct of all Members and also supplements existing superior legislation, municipal by- laws and related corporate policies that govern Members’ conduct. 1. PURPOSE AND PRINCIPLES 1.1 The Code sets out and identifies the City’s expectations for its Members and establishes rules for appropriate conduct. 1.2 The public expects the highest moral and ethical standards of conduct from Members that it elects. The behavior and actions of Members is expected to reflect the principles of accountability, transparency, and public trust. Adherence to these standards will protect and maintain the City’ s reputation and integrity. 1.3 The key statements of principle that underline this Code are as follows: (a) the decision-making process of Council is open, accessible and equitable and respects the City’s governance structure; (b) public office is not to be used for the personal financial benefit of any Member; (c) City residents should have confidence in the integrity of their local government and of their Members; (d) the conduct of each Member is of the highest standard; and Page 4 of 21 Page 610 of 936 2 (e) the conduct of each Member demonstrates fairness, respect for differences and a duty to work with other Members together for the common good. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 In this Code: (a) “CAO” means the Chief Administrative Officer of the City or his/her designate; (b) “City” means The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls; (c) “City property” includes, but is not limited to, all real and personal property, facilities, vehicles, equipment, supplies, services, staff, documents, intellectual property, computer programs or technological innovations belonging to the City; (d) “Clerk” means the Clerk of the City or his/her designate; (e) “Code” means the “Code of Conduct for Council Members” as established by Council pursuant to Section 223.2 of the Municipal Act, 2001; (f) “Committee” means a committee, board, task force or other body constituted and appointed by Council; (g) “community groups and organizations” means any group, club, society, or organization and any non -profit or charitable group or organization operated for social welfare, civic improvement, pleasure, recreation or any other purpose except profit. Including but not limited to registered charities and non-profit organizations as defined by the Canada Revenue Agency. (h) “complainant” means an identifiable person who has filed a complaint in accordance with section 2.1 (g) of this Code; (i) “complaint” means a written objection filed with the Integrity Commissioner pursuant to this Code respecting a Member and may be submitted by City Council, a member of City Council , a City employee, or any identifiable person acting in the public interest . a resident of the City of Niagara Falls, or a person who owns a business or represents an institution within the City of Niagara Falls ; (j) “confidential information” means any information in the possession of or received in confidence by the City that the City is prohibited from disclosing or has decided to refuse to disclose under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act or other legislation, which includes but is not limited to: Page 5 of 21 Page 611 of 936 3 (i) information that is disclosed or discussed at a meeting that is closed to the public pursuant to subsection 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001; (ii) information that is given verbally in confidence in preparation for or following a meeting that is closed to the public pursuant to subsection 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001; (iii) personal information as defined in subsection 2(1) of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act; (iv) advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege or information that concerns litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the City; (v) information that concerns any confidential matters pertaining to personnel, labour relations, or items under negotiation; (vi) price schedules in contract tenders and information about suppliers provided in contract tender or requests for information, quotation or proposal submissions, if such information is given in confidence, implicitly or explicitly; (vii) sources of complaints where the identity of the complainant is given in confidence; (viii) information circulated to Members and marked "confidential"; or (ix) any information lawfully determined by the Council to be confidential or required to remain or be kept confidential by legislation or order. (k) “Conflict of Interest” means a situation in which a Member has competing interests or loyalties between the Member’s personal or private interests and his or her public interests as an elected representative such that it might influence his or her decisions in a particular matter; (l) “Council” means the Council of the Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls, comprised of the Mayor and Councillors; (m) “Councillor” means a person elected or appointed as a Member of Council, other than the Mayor; Page 6 of 21 Page 612 of 936 4 (n) “Frivolous” means something that is not worthy of serious consideration, or that is of little or no importance, due to its lack of seriousness or sense; (o) “gift” means cash, fees, admission fees, advances, vouchers, invitations, objects of value, services, offers, personal benefits, travel and accommodation or entertainment that are provided to and retained by a Member, that could be seen to be connected directly or indirectly to the performance of the Member’s duties; (p) “harassment” or “harass” involves engaging in a course of behaviour, comment or conduct, whether it occurs inside or outside the wor k environment, that is or ought reasonably to be known to be unwelcome. It includes but is not limited to any behaviour, conduct or comment by a Member that is directed at or is offensive to another person: i) on the grounds of race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, age, handicap, sexual orientation, marital status, or family status, as well as any other grounds under the provisions of the Human Rights Code; or ii) which is reasonably perceived by the recipient as an intention to bully, embarrass, intimidate or ridicule the recipient. (q) “Integrity Commissioner” means the Integrity Commissioner appointed by Council pursuant to Section 223.3 of the Municipal Act, 2001; (r) “meeting” means any legally-constituted meeting of Council or a Committee; (s) “Member” means a Member of a Local Board appointed by City Council as well as a Member of Council of the City and includes the Mayor. (t) “non-pecuniary interest” means a private or personal interest that a Member may have that is non-financial in nature and that would be considered by a reasonable person apprised of all the circumstances, as being likely to influence the Member’s decision in any matter in which the non-pecuniary interest arises, and may include, but is not limited to, an interest that arise from a relationship with a person or entity; (u) “pecuniary” means relating to or consisting of money or having financial or economic value; (v) “social media” means web-based applications and on-line forums that allow users to interact, share and publish content such as text, links, photos, audio and video; Page 7 of 21 Page 613 of 936 5 (w) “staff” means the CAO and all commissioners, officers, direcors, managers, supervisors and all non-union and union staff, whether full- time, part-time, contract, seasonal or volunteer, as well as agents and consultants acting in the furtherance of the City’s business and interest; and (x) “vexatious” includes something that is instituted without sufficient grounds and serving to cause annoyance, frustration or worry. 3. CONDUCT OF MEMBERS A Member shall at all times conduct themselves with propriety, decency and respect and with the understanding that all members of the public, other Members of Council or a Local Board, and staff are to be treated with dignity, courtesy and empathy, recognizing that a Member is always a representative of the City and of their elected office or appointment. A Member shall at all times conduct themselves with decorum and in accordance with the Board’s or City’s Procedural By-law during any meetings and in a manner that demonstrates fairness, respect for individual differences, and an intention to work together for the common good and in furtherance of the public interest. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE OF CONDUCT 4.1 This Code applies to every Member. 4.2 A Member shall: (a) observe and comply with every provision of this Code, as well as all other policies and procedures adopted or established by Council or Board affecting the Member, acting in his or her capacity as a Member; (b) respect the integrity of the Code and inquiries and investigations conducted under it; and (c) co-operate in every way possible in securing compliance with the application and enforcement of the Code. 4.3 No Member shall: (a) undertake any act of reprisal or threaten reprisal against a complainant or any other person for providing relevant information to the Integrity Commissioner or any other person required to participate in the investigation; or Page 8 of 21 Page 614 of 936 6 (b) obstruct the Integrity Commissioner, or any other municipal official involved in applying or furthering the objectives or requirements of this Code, in the carrying out of such responsibilities, or pursuing any such objective. 5. TRANSPARENCY AND OPENNESS IN DECISION MAKING Members shall: (a) conduct business and their duties in an open and transparent manner so that stakeholders can understand the process and rationale which has been used to reach decisions; (b) ensure the public has input and receives notice regarding Council’s decision making processes in accordance with the Procedure By-law; (c) ensure compliance with the Municipal Act, Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, and other applicable legislation regarding open meetings, accountability and transparency. 6. ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND CONFIDENTIALITY 6.1 A Member shall: (a) only be entitled to have access to information in the possession of the City/Board that is relevant to matters before Council/Board or a Committee or that is relevant to their role as Members of Council or local Board. Otherwise, they have the same access rights to information as any member of the public. (b) have a continuing obligation to keep information confidential, even if the Member ceases to be a Member. 6.2 No Member shall: (a) obtain access, or attempt to gain access, to confidential information in the custody or control of the City /Board except in accordance with the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act; (b) disclose, release or publish by any means, including social media any confidential information acquired by virtue of his or her office, in any form, except when required or authorized by Council or otherwise by law to do so; (c) provide to any other person to disclose, release, publish any confidential information acquired by virtue of his or her office, in any form, except Page 9 of 21 Page 615 of 936 7 when required or authorized by Council or otherwise by law to do so; (d) use confidential information for personal or private gain or benefit, or for the personal or private gain or benefit of any other person or body; (e) disclose or discuss, through written, electronic or verbal communication, to any individual or corporate third party, any information that has been or will be discussed at a closed session meeting of Council, Board or a Committee until such time that Council, the Board or a Committee has determined or has been advised by staff that the matter, or any part of the matter, can be made public subject to review by the head or designate under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act or if directed to do so by a court. 6.3 A member shall not disclose the content of any confidential information, or the substance of deliberations, of a closed meeting. A member has a duty to hold any information received at closed meetings in strict confidence for as long and as broadly as the confidence applies. All reports and supporting documents of a closed meeting are to be deemed confidential and wi ll be available to the members in advance of the closed meeting, as well as during the closed meeting. A member shall not, either directly or indirectly, in any way divulge any such information or any confidential aspect of the closed deliberations to anyone, unless authorized by Council or the Board or as required by law. There is to be no electronic recording of a closed meeting by any member. The City Clerk or his or her designate will make an audio recording of the Meeting to only be used by staff for the purposes of collecting the minutes of the meeting or to be used by the Integrity Commissioner or Ombudsman’s office when deemed necessary. 7. UNDUE USE OF INFLUENCE No Member shall use their status to improperly influence the actions or decisions of Staff or others to the private advantage of the Member or his or her family, staff, friends or associates, business or otherwise. Page 10 of 21 Page 616 of 936 8 8. STAFF RELATIONS 8.1 A Member shall: (a) respect staff and acknowledge that staff is required to provide objective advice while remaining neutral, carry out directions of Council/Board as a whole, and administer the policies of the City without undue influence from any Member. (b) respect the administrative structure and direct any staff performance concerns through the appropriate supervisory staff. 8.2 No Member Shall: (a) maliciously or falsely impugn the professional or ethical reputation of any staff; (b) compel staff to engage in partisan political activities, or subject staff to threat or discrimination for refusing to engage in such activities; or (c) use their authority or influence to threaten, intimidate, or coerce staff or improperly interfere the lawful exercise of the duties of staff. 9. GIFTS 9.1 No Member shall accept a gift or personal benefit that is connected directly or indirectly with the performance of their duties unless authorized by one of the exceptions below. 9.2 Notwithstanding Section 9.1 the following exceptions are applicable: (a) gifts received as an incident of protocol or social obligation that normally accompany the responsibilities of elected or appointed office; (b) gifts that are not connected directly or indirectly with the performance or duties of office; (c) compensation authorized by law; (d) a reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred and honorariums received in the performance of activities connected with a legitimate municipal purpose; (e) political contributions that are otherwise offered, accepted and reported in accordance with applicable law; (f) services provided without compensation by persons volunteering their Page 11 of 21 Page 617 of 936 9 time; (g) a suitable memento of a function honouring the Member or the City; (h) food, lodging, transportation and entertainment provided by provincial, regional and local governments or political sub-divisions of them, and by the federal government or the government of a foreign country; (i) food, beverages and/or admission fees provided by banquets, receptions or similar events if attendance is the result of protocol or social obligation consistent with the responsibilities of office, and the person extending the invitation has done so infrequently and that person or a representative of the organization is in attendance; and (j) communications to offices of a Member including subscriptions to newspapers and periodicals. 10. USE OF CITY PROPERTY 10.1 A Member shall: (a) only use City property for activities relevant to their role as Members of Council; and (b) no member shall obtain any personal financial gain or advantage from the use of City property. 11. POLITICAL ACTIVITY 11.1 Members may not use City resources for any type of political activity as outlined in the “use of corporate resources and election campaign activities policy” including promoting or opposing the candidacy of any person to elected office in any municipal, provincial and federal campaign. 12. PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY GROUPS AND ORGANIZATIONS AND THEIR EVENTS 12.1 A Member shall be entitled to: (a) organize, establish, participate in and support community groups and organizations and their associated events, (b) hold positions, including positions on governing boards, within community groups and organizations, and be subject to the published rules of each applicable organization; Page 12 of 21 Page 618 of 936 10 (c) solicit donations on behalf of community groups and organizations; (d) use their discretionary expense budget to support community groups and organizations and their events. (e) use staff in the executive offices, or additional staff as required in consultation with the CAO for organizing and supporting events and meetings connected to their role as Members of Council. 12.2 Members shall: (a) seek Council approval for the use of their name or position and title in the official name of any event where fundraising activities occur; (b) seek Council approval for the use of corporate resources beyond those provided for in Section 11.1 in support of any event organized by the Member where fundraising activities occur. The request shall be reviewed by the CAO, and a report provided to Council with an assessment of the associated costs; (c) ensure that any funds for external or non-Member organized community groups or organizations are not received using City staff, City email, or other City resources; (d) ensure that any funds, goods, or services received for community group or charitable events are not used for any other purpose; (e) respect the need for transparency with respect to their involvement in community groups and organizations and their events and perform their community service in a manner that promotes public confidence. 13. DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT 13.1 Members shall treat all members of the public, one another and staff with respect without abuse, bullying, or intimidation and ensure that the work environment for employees is free from discrimination and harassment. Page 13 of 21 Page 619 of 936 11 13.2 Members shall not use indecent, abusive or insulting words, phrases or expressions towards any member of the public, another Member or staff. Members shall not make comments or conduct themselves in any manner that is discriminatory to any individual based on the individual’s race, colour, ancestry, citizenship, ethnic origin, place of origin, creed or religion, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, disability, age of record of offences for which a pardon was not been granted. 13.3 Members shall comply with the City’s “Harassment in the Workplace Policy”. 14. ENCOURAGEMENT OF RESPECT FOR THE CITY, ITS BOARDS AND ALL APPLICABLE BY-LAWS 14.1 No Member shall use the influence of their office for any purpose other than for the lawful exercise of their official duties and for municipal purposes. 14.2 A member shall: (a) encourage the public, prospective contractors and lobbyists, and their colleagues to abide by the City’s or Board’s by-laws and policies, including this Code; and (b) accurately communicate the decisions of Council or the Board even if they disagree with the majority decision of the Council/Board, and by so doing affirm the respect and integrity in the decision -making processes of the Council/Board. 15. SOCIAL MEDIA 15.1 A Member shall: (a) adhere to all City policies and guidelines, regarding social media use; and (b) always identify themselves without any attempt to cover, disguise or mislead as to their identity or status as an elected representative of the City when using social media. 15.2 No Member shall: (a) use social media to publish anything, or allow anything to be published on their social media sites, that is dishonest, untrue, offensive, disrespectful, constitutes harassment, is defamatory or misleading in any way. Page 14 of 21 Page 620 of 936 12 16. ROLE OF THE INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER 16.1 The City shall appoint an Integrity Commissioner under Section 223.3 of the Municipal Act, 2001 who is an independent officer and who will report directly to Council and be responsible for carrying out his or her function s in accordance with the Municipal Act, 2001 and any other functions assigned by Council, in an independent manner with respect to the following: (a) The application of the code of conduct for members of council and the code of conduct for members of local boards; (b) The application of any procedures, rules and policies of the municipality and local boards governing the ethical behavior of members of council and of local boards; (c) The application of sections 5, 5.1 and 5.2 of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act to members of council and of local boards; (d) Requests from members of council and of local boards for advice respecting their obligations under the code of conduct applicable to the member; (e) Requests from members of Council and of local boards for advice respecting their obligations under a procedure, rule or policy of the municipality or of the local board, as the case may be, governing the ethical behavior of members; (f) Requests from members of council and of local boards for advice respecting their obligations under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act; and; (g) The provision of educational information to members of council, members of local boards, the municipality and the public about the municipality’s codes of conduct for members of council and members of local boards and about the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act. 2017, c. 10, Sched. 1, s. 19 (1). 17. COMPLAINT PROCESS Although not a pre-condition or pre-requisite of filing a formal complaint, any identifiable individual who believes that a member has contravened the Code of Conduct may wish to address the alleged conduct and behavior themselves through an informal complaint procedure as follows: Page 15 of 21 Page 621 of 936 13 Advise the Member of the behavior or activity that contravenes the Code Encourage the Member to acknowledge and agree to stop the prohibited behavior or activity. If desired by both parties, request the assistance of the Integrity Commissioner to facilitate an informal discussion with the Member to help resolve the issue. Further mediation methods offered by the Integrity Commissioner If applicable, confirm in writing to the Member that the response and agreement is satisfactory or advise the Member that his or her response is unsatisfactory. If the matter is still unsatisfactory, and if both parties agree, individuals are strongly encouraged to participate in any informal process whereby the Integrity Commissioner may act as a mediator regarding the issues relating to a complaint. This informal complaint procedure is not a precondition or a prerequisite to pursuing the formal complaint procedure as laid out in this code. Where a satisfactory agreement still can’t be reached, pursue a formal complaint under the procedures outlined in section 17.1 of this Code or consider pursuing the matter with another applicable judicial or quasi-judicial process or complaint procedure. 17.1 A complaint that a member has contravened the Code may be initiated by any person, any Member of Council, or by Council as follows: (a) a complaint along with the prescribed fee in the amount of $500 shall be made in the form attached as Appendix A and may be sent directly to the Integrity Commissioner by mail, e-mail, fax or courier or they may be filed in person at the Clerks Office within City Hall; (b) a complaint shall be made in writing and must be signed and dated by the complainant who shall be an identifiable individual (complaints may not be submitted by any group, organization or corporation); (c) the alleged Code of Conduct violation shall have taken place within six (6) weeks of filing the complaint with the Integrity Commissioner or the alleged Municipal Conflict of Interest violation shall have taken place within six (6) weeks of the complainant becoming aware of the violation; (d) a complaint shall include: (i) an explanation, with specific reference to sections of the Code, as to why the issue raised is alleged to be a contravention of the Code; (ii) any evidence in support of the allegation; (iii) any witnesses in support of the allegation must be identified; and Page 16 of 21 Page 622 of 936 14 (iv) personal and verifiable contact information including the resident’s current City address, phone number and email address, verified by provision of government issued identification. (example, driver’s licence). (e) In the event that the Integrity Commissioner determines that a complaint contains insufficient grounds to support an investigation, the Integrity Commissioner may reach out to the complainant to clarify or obtain additional information before deciding how to proceed. If the Integrity Commissioner determines that a complaint still contains insufficient grounds to support an investigation, or is frivolous / vexatious, the Integrity Commission, using his or her discretion, may determine that the complainant forfeit the filing fee. Otherwise, 50% of the fee shall be refunded. 17.2 The Integrity Commissioner shall undertake an initial review of a complaint that has been filed and shall determine whether the matter relates to non - compliance with the Code or other corporate policy applying to Members. The Integrity Commissioner shall have no power or jurisdiction to investigate or otherwise deal with the complaint, if the complaint is not alleging a contravention of the Code or other corporate policy applying to Members or if the complaint relates to the following matters: (i) Criminal Matter – if the complaint relates to an allegation of a criminal nature consistent with the Criminal Code, the complainant shall be advised that pursuit of such an allegation must be made through the appropriate police service; (ii) Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy – if the complaint relates to a matter under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, the complainant shall be referred to the Clerk or the Executive Director of any local board, if applicable; and (iii) Municipal Elections Act – if the complaint relates to the enforcement of the Municipal Elections Act, the complainant shall be referred to the Compliance Audit Process if the matter relates to campaign finances or to such other avenues of investigation as dictated by that Act. 17.3 If the Integrity Commissioner determines they do not have jurisdiction as described in Section 17.2 the Integrity Commissioner shall advise the complainant in writing accordingly. 17.4 The Integrity Commissioner may dispose of a complaint on the basis that it is not within the jurisdiction of the Integrity Commissioner in a summary manner and may report same to Council or the local board. The Integrity Commissioner may also seek further information or clarification from the complainant and Page 17 of 21 Page 623 of 936 15 shall endeavor to apprise the complainant of subsequent steps and the processing of the complaint and any ensuing investigation. 17.5 If the Integrity Commissioner is of the opinion that a complaint is frivolous or vexatious or is not made in good faith, or that there are no grounds or insufficient grounds for conducting an investigation, the Integrity Commissioner may choose not to investigate or, if already commenced, may terminate any investigation, or may dispose of the complaint in a summary manner. The Integrity Commissioner shall advise the complainant in writing of his or her decision and reasons for not undertaking an investigation or terminating it. 17.6 If the Integrity Commissioner has decided to commence an investigation of a complaint (except where otherwise required by the Public Inquiries Act, 2009, if applicable), the Integrity Commissioner shall provide a copy of the complaint and supporting evidence to the Member whose conduct is in question with a request for a written response to be provided within ten (10) days. The Integrity Commissioner may provide the response from the Member to the complainant with a request for a written reply within ten (10) days. 17.7 The Integrity Commissioner shall review the written responses and may, if necessary discuss the matter with anyone that the Integrity Commissioner considers is relevant to the complaint. The Integrity Commissioner may access and examine any of the information described in subsections 223.4(3) and (4) of the Municipal Act, 2001 and may access any workplace relevant to the complaint, including any documents or records under the custody or control of the City or local board. 17.8 Before finalizing a report to Council which recommends sanctions, the Integrity Commissioner shall provide the Member with the basis for their findings and any sanctions that may be recommended. The Member shall have the opportunity to comment either in writing, verbally or in person to the Integrity Commissioner on the proposed findings and sanctions. 17.9 Upon conclusion of a complaint investigation, the Integrity Commissioner shall: (a) issue a report to Council on the findings of the investigation and, where there has been a contravention of the Code, the report shall contain the detailed findings, any recommended sanctions, or any settlement; and (b) provide a copy of the final report to the Member at the same time as the final report is made available to the Clerk and to the complainant at the same time as the report becomes public. 17.10 The Integrity Commissioner’s report on a complaint shall be placed on an agenda for consideration at a public meeting of the Committee of the Whole or Council, in accordance with the Procedure By-law, as determined by the Clerk in consultation with the Integrity Commissioner. Page 18 of 21 Page 624 of 936 16 17.11 The Integrity Commissioner shall preserve confidentiality where appropriate and not disclose or confirm the name of a Complainant to the affected member of Council unless such information is relevant or necessary for the fulfillment of responsibilities of the Integrity Commissioner or such information is otherwise known or available to the Member or City Council. 17.12 No investigation shall be commenced or continued, nor shall the Integrity Commissioner report to Council respecting an investigation, within an election period and on/after election nomination day in the year of a municipal election. For example, in 2022 the election period would be from August 19, 2022 through to and including October 25, 2022, the date the election results are certified. 18. PENALTIES 18.1 Upon receipt of a final report and the recommendations of the Integrity Commissioner, Council may, where the Integrity Commissioner has determined there was a violation of the Code, impose either of the following two (2) penalties, as per the Municipal Act: (a) a reprimand; or (b) suspension of remuneration paid to the Member in respect of his or her services as a Member for up to ninety (90) days. 18.2 Council also has the authority to remove any Member from any appointed Boards, Committees or Commissions. 19. INTERPRETATION 19.1 This code shall be interpreted as follows: (a) the headings in the Code form no part of the Code but shall be deemed to be inserted for convenience of reference only; (b) all changes in number and gender shall be construed as may be required by the context; (c) the reference to any City official shall be deemed to include the City official who performs the duties of such referenced person from time to time, including their delegates; Page 19 of 21 Page 625 of 936 17 (d) the reference to Integrity Commissioner shall be deemed to include any person who has been delegated powers and duties by the Integrity Commissioner in accordance with subsection 223.3(3) of the Municipal Act, 2001; (e) the reference to a statute or regulation, except as may be otherwise provided, shall be deemed to include such statute or regulation as may be amended or re-enacted from time to time or its successor legislation, and, in each case, the regulations made from time to time pursuant thereto; (f) the reference to a by-law, resolution, policy or guideline made, enacted, established or adopted by the City, including the Code, except as may be otherwise provided, shall be deemed to include such by-law, resolution, policy or guideline as may be amended or re -enacted from time to time or its successor by-law resolution policy or guideline made, enact, established or adopted from time to time; and (g) if a court of competent jurisdiction should declare any section or part of a section of this Code to be invalid, such section or part of a section shall not be construed as having persuaded or influenced Council to pass the remainder of this Code and it is hereby declared that the remainder of this Code shall be valid and remain in force. 20. ATTESTATION Upon the adoption of this Code of Conduct and thereafter at the beginning of each term, Members of Council will be expected to sign two copies of the Code of Conduct (one for themselves and one for the Clerk’s Office) to convey to each other and all stakeholders that they have read, understood and accept it. Page 20 of 21 Page 626 of 936 18 Code of Conduct for Members of Niagara Falls City Council AND The Municipal Conflict of Interest Act ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE I hereby acknowledge that I have read and understand the City’s Code of Conduct for Members of Council (the “Code”) and the provisions of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act (the “MCIA”) both of which impose obligations on me in my role as a member of Council for the City of Niagara Falls. I further understand that if I have any question about what my obligations or responsibilities are under the Code or the MCIA, I can seek advice in that respect from the City’s Integrity Commissioner. I confirm that I will exert every effort to comply with the ethical standards, responsibilities and obligations of a member of Council set forth in the Code and the MC IA during my term of office. Signature Date _______________________________ Printed Name Page 21 of 21 Page 627 of 936 CAO-2023-05 Report Report to: Mayor and Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: Park Street Development Recommendation(s) 1. That staff be DIRECTED to develop a public process to solicit competitive bids for a joint venture partner to provide a housing development with affordable and attainable units at 4500 Park Street. 2. That Council SUPPORT in principal the contribution of land located at 4500 Pa rk Street to a joint venture arrangement subject to Council approval of terms in the joint venture agreement with the successful RFP proponent. Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to seek the approval of Council for the issuance of a Request for Proposal (RFP) to facilitate the construction of an affordable housing project in the City of Niagara Falls at 4500 Park Street under a joint venture arrangement with a development partner. Staff are recommending that the City-owned land located at 4500 Park Street be contributed into a newly formed joint venture and that a proponent be selected through a RFP process to build and maintain the property which includes affordable units. A joint venture arrangement with a developer will allow greater control over the development partner, development plan and long term operational plans as opposed to gifting the property to a developer or selling the property outright. There have been a number of material changes to the initial direction of the project since discussions with the Region began in 2019, including the property valuation and the introduction of mandatory developer exemptions, which are further discussed in the Analysis section. Given these changes, staff have been analyzing other options to develop this property with the ultimate goal of increasing affordable and attainable residential units in the City. In alignment with the original project direction, the City will seek partnership opportunities with the Region/Niagara Regional Housing to uti lize subsidy opportunities to keep a certain amount of units affordable and attainable in a long term commitment. Overall staff believe that a joint venture will also ensure the project is developed quickly and the project is sustainable and operating appropriately over the long term. Page 1 of 5 Page 628 of 936 Background In May 2019 through CAO 2019-07, Council authorized staff to partner with the Region to develop a public process to solicit competitive bids for a not for profit partner to provide an affordable housing development at 4500 Park Street in the City of Niagara Falls (former Market Square and Parking Lot). This process was designed to support the City's objective of providing a diverse and affordable housing market in partnership with the Region and NRH to provide attainable and affordable housing units to the City. As part of the proposal outlined in CAO 2019-07, the City was to donate the property in order to assist in the affordability of the project. The project would not be owned or operated by the City or Region, but instead owned and managed by the de veloper who was the successful proponent through an RFP process. The City and Region would have also exempted the property from property taxes and development charges should the property units remained affordable. Building permit fees, planning fees and studies would be waived by the City and Region to further incentivize development of the property. In April 2019, the NRH Board approved a commitment to fund up to 25% of the proposed units in this development project for a rent geared to income or housi ng allowance for 20 years. The value and number of units subsidized would vary depending on the size and configuration of the development. If the new joint venture structure is supported by council, staff will seek Council approval on the terms of the joint venture agreement for this development which will include reaffirming the commitment by Niagara Region/Niagara Regional Housing to the project. As outlined in MW-2021-50, an appraisal of the property was done in June 2021 by Campbell & Company Appraisals Inc. that estimated the market value of property at that time. In 2018, an Environmental Site Assessment was performed in support of remediating the site and ultimately obtaining a Record of Site Condition (RSC). A record of site condition was required to permit the proposed residential land use. In Q2 - Q3 2021, the site was appropriately remediated with a Record of Site Condition report on the property issued by the Ministry of the Environment in January 2022. The total cost of cleanup of the property was approximately $1,610,000. Analysis A number of material circumstances have changed since receiving direction from City Council in 2019 to partner with the Region to solicit competitive bids for the project. The intent of the initial development proposal was to gift the land owned by the City of Niagara Falls and offer a number of financial incentives to a developer or not -for-profit in order to incent the private construction of affordable housing rental units. The cost of land has increased significantly in Niagara since 2019 so the benefit provide has changed materially. Page 2 of 5 Page 629 of 936 The introduction of Bill 23 has now created a mandatory exemption of development charges for non-profit housing, affordable and attainable rental units instead of a discretionary exemption offered by the City/Region to incite a development of this nature. As a result, there would be more benefit provided to a successful proponent under the initial project structure than originally anticipated. Given the changes above as well as market changes since the initial direction of the project, staff have been analyzing other opportunities to develop these lands with the ultimate goal of increasing affordable and attainable housing in a sustainable manner in the community. These options are outlined below: Options Pros Cons 1 City develops property -control over the project -City could gain appreciation of property value/asset -significant capital outlay -limited expertise in the design and construction of this type of asset 2 Contribute land to developer for development - agreement to deliver and maintain affordable units -due to value of land gifted, City can ask for more in the provision of affordable units -no proceeds to City -limited control on what, how and when asset is developed -negotiation always open on long-term maintenance of affordable units 3 Sale of land with conditions for proponent to deliver certain affordable units -some sale proceeds back to City -limited control on what, how and when asset developed -open to re- negotiation on long term maintenance of affordable units 4 Contribute land into a partnership to build and maintain the property -greater control over development partner, development plan -counter-party risk with regards to the partnership Page 3 of 5 Page 630 of 936 including affordable units and long-term operational plan -benefit of appreciation in asset value -potential increased financial commitment Staff is recommending Option #4 - Contributing the land into a partnership to build and maintain the property including affordable units. There is significant value in the City maintaining greater control over the development partner/development plan. This ensures quality of the units constructed as well as some certainty over the operational plan to keep the units affordable and attainable. This structure also allows the City to maintain the benefit of appreciation in the property value. Fully divesting of the property limits the ability of the City to ensure units will be affordable in the long term which is a significant drawback of those options. Council should be aware that the cost of new construction of a unit can exceed $350,000 without factoring in the cost of the land. The reality is even with the contribution of the land and potential soft costs associated with support on planning matters, the City will remain a very minority partner in the development if the only contribution provided is the land. Due to this a properly constructed partnership agreement will be critical and will be part of the RFP process. Staff will still work with the Region/NRH on identifying partnership opportunities to subsidize units in the development to keep them affordable and attainable under a long - term commitment. As part of the preliminary evaluation framework staff will evaluate proposals based on experience of the proponents, design concepts, speed to market and transaction structuring and pricing. Operational Implications and Risk Analysis There are limited risks to enter into an Request for Proposal process, operational and financial risks would have to be re-evaluated after the City receives submissions. Council would have final approval authority on any transaction. Financial Implications/Budget Impact There is limited implications at this time, the implications will be better understood when (or if) any proposals are received. Strategic/Departmental Alignment Affordable housing has been a priority for Council and this is aligned with addressing this issue. Page 4 of 5 Page 631 of 936 Contributor(s) Dan Ane Written by: Jason Burgess, CAO Dan Ane, Senior Manager of Decision Support Submitted by: Status: Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 16 Jun 2023 Page 5 of 5 Page 632 of 936 HR-2023-01 Report Report to: Mayor and Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Committee Recommendation(s) That Council consider revising the current committee name (Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Committee), to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Advisory Committee Executive Summary In April 2021, Council approved the establishment of a new Advisory Committee (Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Committee). The committee recently renewed its membership for the 2023-2026 Council Term. At their May 29th, 2023 meeting, a formal motion was approved to recommend a committee name change to Council. The committee strongly feels it is important their name is also reflective of the work they are doing in the areas of diversity, equity and inclusion. Background The City of Niagara Falls is committed to fostering a diverse, equitable and inclusive environment for all employees, residents and visitors. We strive to create an inclusive culture in which differences are recognized and valued. The City is dedicated to ensuring respectful, and equitable service delivery and employment practices. Diversity – The concept of diversity includes acceptance and respect. It means understanding that each individual is unique and recognizing the differences along the various dimensions of race, ethnicity, gender expression and gender identity, socio- economic status, sexual orientation, physical and invisible disabilities, creed amongst many other dimensions. It is exploring these differences in a safe, positive and nurturing environment. It is about moving beyond simple tolerance to embracing and celebrating the rich dimensions of diversity contained within each individual. Equity – The rights of the individual to an equitable share of the goods and services in society. Equality of treatment will not guarantee equal results, creating equal results sometimes requires treating people differently from each other. Focusing on the results instead of treatment is the concept of equity. Inclusion – Acknowledging and valuing people’s differences to enrich social planning, decision-making, and quality of life for everyone. In an inclusive municipality, we each have a sense of belonging, acceptance, and are recognized as valued and contributing Page 1 of 2 Page 633 of 936 members of the society. Real inclusion takes place when those already included in the mainstream learn from those that are historically and currently excluded and then work together to initiate change. Operational Implications and Risk Analysis The new name if approved by Council, will be reflective of the work the committee is doing in the areas of diversity, equity and inclusion. Financial Implications/Budget Impact There is no financial impact or budget implications Strategic/Departmental Alignment Under the Guiding Principles of Council’s Strategic Priorities (2023 – 2026), the City is committed to applying various principles to shape decision-making, policy development and resource allocation. One of those specific guiding principles, includes using public engagement to collect diverse perspectives and to act fairly, responsibly and equitably on behalf of our residents. Written by: Jason MacLean, Manager of Client Services Submitted by: Status: Trent Dark, Director of HR Approved - 13 Jun 2023 Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 14 Jun 2023 Page 2 of 2 Page 634 of 936 PBD-2023-35 Report Report to: Mayor and Council Date: June 20, 2023 Title: Development and Housing Monitoring Report and Provincial Reporting Recommendation(s) 1. That Council receive the Quarter 1 Development and Housing Monitoring Report that reviews the status of current development and housing activity in the City for the first quarter of 2023. 2. That Council direct staff to forward the housing information to the Province as requested. Executive Summary As part of the More Homes for Everyone Act, 2022, the Planning Act was amended to give the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing the authority to require municipalities and planning boards to report information on planning matters. The purpose of this reporting Plan Action Supply Housing the to progress the measure is towards commitments which includes the City of Niagara Falls Housing Pledge to build 8,000 homes in the next 10 years. The Province has mandated specific data to be reported on a quarterly or annual basis. The information and data collected for the provincial reporting is included in this report for Council’s information. This report informs Council about building and development activity that occurred in the City during the first quarter of 2023. As part of the strategy to manage and plan for the City’s future, the report provides hard data to show how much development has occurred in the first three months of 2023. Analysis The report provides Council with a quarterly review of building and development activity that occurred in the City of Niagara Falls in the first three months of 2023 (ending March 31). In addition, it allows for benchmarking of service levels. The tables in Appendix 1 will set out the detailed statistics that are required to be submitted to the Provincial Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing quarterly. There is also additional data that is to be submitted annually. Page 1 of 15 Page 635 of 936 Residential Development: Building Permits Niagara Falls issued 6 residential building permits in the first quarter of 2023 which is in stark contrast to the 157 residential building permits issued in the first quarter of 2022. Four (4) single detached building permits were issued, and 2 semi-detached permits were issued in Q1 of 2023. This trend, although different than last year’s statistics, is not unusual as in the first quarter of 2019 six (6) single detached permits were issued and in the same period of 2017, 159 permits were issued. The average estimated value of a dwelling unit during the first quarter was $583,333. There are currently 939 building lots serviced and available for development. One new plan of subdivision, Garner Place (59M-510) was registered adding 47 single detached lots, 12 condominium units and 8 on-street townhouse units to the supply of available lots. Residential Development: Starts & Completions In the first quarter of 2023, 127 housing units were started (the beginning of the housing construction cycle) and no housing units were completed in Niagara Falls. Though there is not a direct correlation between housing starts and completions, the low number of completions in the first quarter of 2023 may be reflective of a shortage of building materials and skilled trades people. Non Residential Development: Industrial, Commercial & Institutional The value of new Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional (ICI) construction in the first quarter of 2023 was $8.2 million. Land Supply With a supply of 1,701 draft approved and 939 registered units, the City has a 4.6 year supply of readily developable land which exceeds the 3 year minimum provincial requirement. As of the end of Quarter 1, the City has 8,757 residential units located on 66 different sites across the City that have received Planning approvals and are waiting to be built. Quarter 1 Planning Applications During the first quarter of 2023, Planning and Development staff have processed the following numbers and types of applications: • 11 Zoning By-law Amendment applications,(includes Official Plan amendments); • 15 Minor Variances; • 6 Consent applications; • 2 Site Plan applications • 41 Pre-consultation meetings. Quarter 1 Building and By-law Services Statistics During the first quarter of 2023, Building and By-law Services responded to the following numbers of complaints: Page 2 of 15 Page 636 of 936 • 213 By-law complaints and issued 130 Orders • 83 Property Standards complaints and issued 45 Orders • 28 Building Code orders issued • 27 Rodent Rebate forms given out • 625 Calls/Counter inquiries through the Clerk's office • 28 Compliance letters issued • 10 FOI requests Financial Implications/Budget Impact This report has no direct financial implications for the City, however, metrics contained in this report help inform the City’s financial strategies. Strategic/Departmental Alignment The development of a quarterly Housing Report is consistent with the City’s Strategic priorities of Diverse and Affordable Housing. List of Attachments Q1 2023 Development and Housing Report Written by: Peggy Boyle, Assistant Planner Submitted by: Status: Andrew Bryce, Director of Planning Approved - 13 Jun 2023 Kira Dolch, General Manager, Planning, Building & Development Approved - 13 Jun 2023 Jason Burgess, CAO Approved - 14 Jun 2023 Page 3 of 15 Page 637 of 936 PLANNING BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS JUNE 20, 2023 Q1-2023 DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING MONITORING REPORT Page 4 of 15 Page 638 of 936 1 Table of Contents SECTION 1 – POPULATION...........................................................................................2 SECTION 2 – Q1-2023 BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY ..................................................3 New Residential Construction ...................................................................................3 Q1 – 2023 Residential Starts and Completions........................................................3 Current Registered Plans of Subdivision .................................................................4 Draft Approved Subdivisions.....................................................................................5 Q1-2023 Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Permit Activity..........................5 Q1-2023 Summary of All Permit Volumes and Estimated Value.............................7 SECTION 3 REAL ESTATE AND RENTAL MARKET....................................................8 Residential Real Estate Market..................................................................................8 Vacancy Rates and Rental Costs...............................................................................8 SECTION 4 Q1 -2023 BUILDING STATISTICS ..............................................................9 Page 5 of 15 Page 639 of 936 2 SECTION 1 – POPULATION Figure 1 Population projections Source: Statistics Canada The 2021 Census recorded a population of 94,415 people in the City of Niagara Falls which is a 7.2% increase from the 2016 population of 88,071 (or 6,344 people) (Figure 1). Statistics Canada projected a population estimate for the City of Niagara Falls as of July 1, 2022 to be 99,0071 people. Figure 2 Source: Niagara Region Population Projections 2041 (2051 Age-composition not yet available) Niagara Region, through its new Official Plan provided the City of Niagara Falls with a population target of 141,650 people by the year 2051. While Niagara Falls is projected to be considerably larger in 2051, the City’s age composition will be greatly different. 1 Source: Stats Canada Population Estimate for Niagara Falls as of July 1, 2022 Table 17-10-0142-01, Population estimates July 1, by Census subdivision, 2016 boundaries. Page 6 of 15 Page 640 of 936 3 Figure 2 illustrates that the largest increase in the population will be in the age category 65-100 years. Such a large growth in the senior population will put increased pressure on the City’s services, programs and facilities. Further, the aging population will also have impacts on transportation, housing mix and community design going forward. SECTION 2 – Q1-2023 BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY New Residential Construction The first quarter of 2023 was not as robust as other first quarters in past years. The six permits issued had a total value of $2,797,250. There were 6 new residential units created, 2 semi-detached and 4 single detached. There were no new apartments or townhouse units created. Of all the units built, four out of six were created in the Westlane neighbourhood of the City. Figure 3 Source: City of Niagara Falls Planning Division Q1 – 2023 Residential Starts and Completions Housing starts are the beginning of the housing construction cycle and completions are the end of the construction cycle. It should be noted that there is not a direct co-relation between housing starts and the number of units created through issued building permits. For example, there may be a time lag (up to six months) between the issuance of a building permit by the City and when a residential unit is started for construction. January Street Neighbourhood Type # of Units Registered Plan Jan 13, 2023 7330 Marvel Dr Westlane Semi- detached 1 59M-498 Blk 103 Jan 13, 2023 7332 Marvel Dr Westlane Semi- detached 1 59M-498 Blk 103 Jan 13, 2023 7334 Majestic Tr Westlane Single 1 59M-498 Lot 66 TOTAL 3 February None March Mar 6, 2023 4781 Lyon’s Pkwy Chippawa Single 1 Willoughby Con III Pt Lot 20 Mar 7, 2023 10501 Bailey Ave Willoughby Single 1 59M-443 Lot 10 Mar 31, 2023 7379 Sherrilee Cr Westlane Single 1 59M484 Lot 16 TOTAL 3 Page 7 of 15 Page 641 of 936 4 According to CMHC data, in the first three months of 2023, (Q1-2023) the number of residential housing starts (all types) was 127 which is up from the starts recorded for the first three months or Q1 of 2022 at 76. Residential completions in Q1 were recorded at 107 units which is just under one-half of the 216 units completed in Q1 of 2022 at 216. (CMHC data) Current Registered Plans of Subdivision There was one plan of subdivision registered during the first quarter of 2023. Garner Place (59M-510) added 67 residential units made up of 47 single detached units and 20 multiple residential units. The following table shows the vacant lots in Plans of Subdivision as of March 31, 2023. Figure 4 Source: City of Niagara Falls Planning Division FILE-REGSUBSTART2023 NIAGARA FALLS - VACANT LOTS/UNITS IN REGISTERED PLANS MARCH 2023 March 30, 2023 PLAN #SUBDIVISION NAME COMMUNITY SINGLE SEMI MULTIPLE TOTAL UNITS < 15 m 15-18 m > 18 m M-106 WESTWAY ESTATES NORTHWEST 0 0 0 0 32 32 M-186 MINGLE SUBDIVISION WILLOUGHBY ----4 ----4 M-251 NEIGHBOURHOODS OF ST.DAVIDS STAMFORD 1 –7 --12 20 RP-261 **WILLIAMS SUBDIVISION North side CHIPPAWA -- --4 -- --4 M-339 GOLIA ESTATES STAMFORD 1 1 1 -- --3 R-13461 BLKS 274&275 DEERFIELD WESTLANE 7 0 0 0 0 7 M-362 MILLER ROAD ESTATES WILLOUGHBY 0 0 3 0 0 3 M-370 FERNWOOD PHASE 1 WESTLANE 0 0 1 0 0 1 M-376 DEERFIELD ESTATES PH 8 WESTLANE 2 5 0 7 M-388 WARREN WOODS EAST WESTLANE 0 0 75 75 M-395 CHIPPAWA WEST CHIPPAWA 33 70 103 M-401 OPTIMIST PARK STAMFORD 12 12 M-407 WINDYLANE WESTLANE 4 0 4 M-408 FERNWOOD PHASE 3 WESTLANE 18 0 18 M-411 GERMAN VILLAGE WESTLANE 7 7 M-413 DEERFIELD ESTATES PH 10 WESTLANE 8 8 M-417 OLDFIELD ESTATES PH 1 DRUMMOND 28 15 43 M-421 OLDFIELD ESTATES PH 2 DRUMMOND 48 48 M-425 OLDFIELD ESTATES PH 3 DRUMMOND 4 0 4 M-427 SOUTHGATE ESTATES WESTLANE 6 0 6 M-443 MILLER ROAD ESTATES South WILLOUGHBY 5 5 M-447 CHIPPAWA WEST PH 2 STG 4 CHIPPAWA 2 0 2 M-463 WARREN WOODS PH 5 WESTLANE 8 56 64 M-467 TERRAVITA STAMFORD 41 41 M-474 WINZEN STAMFORD 0 0 M-484 FORESTVIEW ESTATES WESTLANE 5 24 29 M-485 WILLOUGHBY GARDENS SUB CHIPPAWA 2 2 M-487 GROTTOLA COURT STAMFORD 6 6 M-491 CHIPPAWA WEST PH 2 STG 5 CHIPPAWA 32 56 24 112 M-492 BEAVER VALLEY EXTENSION PH 1 NORTHWEST 0 0 M-493 5280 ROBINSON DRUMMOND 0 0 M-496 BEAVER VALLEY CORRIDOR PH 2 NORTHWEST 7 7 M-498 SPLENDOUR WESTLANE 60 14 120 194 M-510 GARNER PLACE WESTLANE 47 20 67 TOTAL SERVICED 11 389 20 70 448 938 Legend Built-Up Area: 324 units Greenfield Area: 602 units Outside UAB: 12 units Page 8 of 15 Page 642 of 936 5 Draft Approved Subdivisions With the combined vacant lots in Registered Plans of Subdivision and the Draft Plans of subdivision, the City has 2,639 lots which when divided by the City’s 10 year average housing demand (574 units) means the City has a 4.6 year supply of draft and registered approved units. Draft Approved Condominiums and Site Plan Approvals Other lands that have planning approvals include 638 condominium units approved to be built in the City and also another 346 units approved under the Site Plan process. These 984 units are approved and waiting to be built. Q1-2023 Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Permit Activity This section provides a brief summary for the first quarter of 2023. Industrial Q1 There were three (3) industrial permits issued during Q1-2023. A permit for the footings/foundation for a new industrial building with a value of $150,000, an addition to an existing building with a value of $1,100,000 and a renovation/alteration of an existing building valued at $50,000. The total value of all three permits was $1,300,000 which was up from the same period in 2022, where the total value of Industrial permits was $750,000. Commercial Q1 There were no new Commercial building permits issued, but 21 permits were issued for renovation/alterations and two (2) permits were issued for additions to existing buildings. The total value of Commercial permits was $6,452,000 up substantially from Q1 of 2022 value of $1,828,000. NIAGARA FALLS - DRAFT APPROVED SUBDIVISIONS -MARCH 2023 ORIGINAL DRAFT APPROVAL PLAN #SUBDIVISION NAME COMMUNITY SINGLE SEMI MULTIPLE TOTAL DRAFT APPROVAL EXTENSION UNTIL 26T-11-2019-003 ST THOMAS MORE 18 12 30 19-Jun-23 26T-11-2019-001 RIVERFRONT SUBDIVISION DRUMMOND 371 0 389 760 Oct 30/20 23-Oct-23 26T-11-2018-002 CHIPPAWA EAST SUBDIVISION CHIPPAWA 449 48 329 826 4-Jan-25 26T-11-2019-002 SODOM RD POLOCORP LANDS CHIPPAWA 18 77 85 31-Aug-25 TOTAL APPROVED UNITS 856 48 807 1701 Built-Up Area Draft Approved Subdivisions are considered to be a portion of the City's short-term supply of land. Once a subdivision is draft approved, conditions may need to be met in order to obtain approval and registration. These conditions may include: road widenings, the naming of streets, parkland requirements, rezoning of the area to reflect the new uses in the subdivision and any other municipal requirements. A part of the draft approval process includes a lapsing provision which establishes a time frame within which the conditions must be met or the draft approval will lapse. This time frame is noted above as the Draft Approval Extension. Draft approval amounts to a committment to go ahead with the subdivision, once all the conditions of draft approval have been met. Figure 5 Source: City of Niagara Falls Planning Division Page 9 of 15 Page 643 of 936 6 Institutional Q1 There were 3 permits issued in Q1. A new permit was issued with a value of $410,000 and two (2) renovation/alteration permits issued for a total value of $16,600. Overall, the total value of Institutional permits issued in Q1-2023 was $426,600. Q1 in 2022 was much higher and attributed to one permit with a value of $3,350,000. Figure 6 Source City of Niagara Falls Building Division Page 10 of 15 Page 644 of 936 7 Figure 7 Source: City of Niagara Falls Building Division Figure 8 Source: City of Niagara Falls Building Division Page 11 of 15 Page 645 of 936 8 Q1-2023 Summary of All Permits and Estimated Value The following chart provides the sum totals of each permit category covering the period of January 2023 to March 31, 2023. The table breaks down the entire quarter’s permits into various categories to assist in quick dissemination of volumes and values. Figure 9 Source: City of Niagara Falls Planning and Building divisions. CLASSIFICATION No. of Permits Estimated Value Total Value of all New Dwellings 6 2,797,250.00$ New Single Detached 4 1,850,000.00$ New Semi-detached 2 555,900.00$ New Multi Unit (Apt, Towns) 0 -$ Residential alteration/renovations 45 2,642,626.00$ Garages & Carports 2 18,000.00$ Accessory Buildings 2 125,000.00$ Indu strial New 1 150,000.00$ Additio ns/Alterations 2 1,150,000.00$ Commercial New 0 -$ Additio ns/Alterations 23 6,452,000.00$ Institutional New 1 410,000.00$ Additio ns/Alterations 2 16,600.00$ Demolitions 14 Other (signs/tents/tanks)2 19,000.00$ TOTALS 106 16,186,376.00$ Page 12 of 15 Page 646 of 936 9 SECTION 3 REAL ESTATE AND RENTAL MARKET Residential Real Estate Market The real estate market in Niagara Falls has shown a steady increase in housing prices during Q1 of 2023 rising from $612,000 in January to $633,700 at the end of March. The Niagara Association of Realtors is reporting that the number of new listings is also on the rise from a low in February which means more choices for buyers wanting to enter the housing market. Figure 10 Source: Niagara Association of Realtors Monthly Stats Vacancy Rates and Rental Costs The Canadian Mortgage and Housing Vacancy Rates and Rental costs are published annually in October of each year, so there are no new statistics to report. The vacancy rate reported at 2022 year end is 2.8% and the average rent for a two bedroom apartment is $1,197 per month in Niagara Falls. Page 13 of 15 Page 647 of 936 10 Figure 11 Source: CMHC Rental Market Survey 2022 SECTION 4 Q1-2023 BUILDING STATISTICS MUNICIPAL ENFORCEMENT COMPLAINTS RECEIVED STATISTICS BY-LAW Q1 Condition of Yards 104 Downspouts 8 Encumbrance 10 Fence/Hedge 11 Licenses 5 Noise 19 Other 5 Signs 3 Zoning 48 TOTAL 213 Orders issued 130 PROPERTY STANDARDS Water supply/drainage 16 Occupancy standards 13 Other 16 Tree Issues 3 Structural/Exterior 14 Lack of Heat 10 Zoning/Out buildings 2 Miscellaneous complaints 9 TOTAL 83 Orders issued 45 BUILDING CODE Building w/out permit n/a (Q1) Orders issued 28 RODENT REBATE PROGRAM Forms given out 27 Paid out 16 CLERKS Calls/Counter 625 Compliance Letters 28 FOI requests 10 Muzzle order appeals 1 TOTAL 664 Figure 12 Source: City of Niagara Falls By-law Services Page 14 of 15 Page 648 of 936 11 Page 15 of 15 Page 649 of 936 Community Services Legislative Services June 6, 2023 File #120203 The Honourable Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario Queen’s Park Toronto, ON L7A 1A7 premier@ontario.ca Honourable and Dear Sir: The Honourable Sylvia Jones, Ontario Minister of Health 5th Floor, 777 Bay St. Toronto, ON M7A 1Z8 Sylvia.Jones@pc.ola.org Honourable and Dear Madam: Re: Maintenance of Fort Erie Urgent Care Centre Hours of Operation The Municipal Council of the Town of Fort Erie at its Special meeting of June 5, 2023 passed the following resolution: Whereas the Town of Fort Erie has experienced continuously reduced hospital services since the Provincial Government implemented the Hospital Restructuring Plan in 1998; and Whereas on May 31, 2023, Niagara Health announced that they are reducing the hours of operation for the Fort Erie and Port Colborne Urgent Care Centres by half as of July 5, 2023; Now, therefore, be it resolved, That: The Council of the Town of Fort Erie calls on Niagara Health to reverse its decision to reduce hours at the Fort Erie Urgent Care Centre effective July 5, 2023, and ensure a continuation of full-service hours, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week; and further That: The Council of the Town of Fort Erie requests that Niagara Health work with the Town of Fort Erie to secure the necessary human resources and funding required to permit Niagara Health to continue operation of the Fort Erie Urgent Care Centre on a full- time basis; and further …/2 Mailing Address: The Corporation of the Town of Fort Erie 1 Municipal Centre Drive, Fort Erie ON L2A 2S6 Office Hours 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Phone: (905) 871-1600 FAX: (905) 871-4022 Web-site: www.forterie.ca Page 650 of 936 The Honourable Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario The Honourable Sylvia Jones, Ontario Minister of Health Page two That: The Council of the Town of Fort Erie calls on the provincial government to work with Fort Erie and Niagara Health to facilitate the creation of a provincially funded health team for Fort Erie, either stand-alone or in conjunction with the City of Port Colborne, to meet the immediate and long-term primary, urgent and associated health care needs of our residents; and further That: The Council of the Town of Fort Erie calls on the provincial and federal governments to immediately take all steps necessary to alleviate the chronic staffing shortages experienced in our hospitals and health care systems, including implementing streamlined processes to permit individuals qualified to practice as doctors, nurses and other health professionals in other countries to practice their profession in Canada; and further That: Council directs the Chief Administrative Officer to develop options for Council and the Community Health Services Committee to consider, on or before its July 24th Regular Council meeting for creation of the business plan, that would include identifying resources and funding required, to meet the immediate and long-term health care needs of residents of Fort Erie, and further That: Staff deliver a copy of this resolution to Ontario Premier, Doug Ford; Ontario Minister of Health, Sylvia Jones; President and CEO of Niagara Health, Lynn Guerriero; the Board of Directors of Niagara Health; Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau; Minister of Health for Canada, Jean-Yves Duclos; Mayor of Port Colborne, Bill Steele; Region of Niagara Chair, Jim Bradley; Niagara Regional Councillors; MPP Wayne Gates and all other Niagara Members of Provincial Parliament; Members of Parliament for Canada, Tony Baldinelli and Vance Badawey, and all other Niagara Members of Parliament; Executive Director of the Fort Erie Native Friendship Centre, Jennifer Dockstader; Executive Director of the Niagara Chapter of Native Women, Wendy Sturgeon; members of Fort Erie’s Community Health Care Services Committee; Niagara Health Coalition; and all municipalities in Niagara for their consideration and support. Trusting this information will be of assistance to you. Kind regards, Ashlea Carter, AMP Deputy Clerk acarter@forterie.ca AC:dlk c.c.: Lynn Guerriero, President and CEO, Niagara Health, Lynn.Guerriero@niagarahealth.on.ca The Board of Directors of Niagara Health; Danielle.Dube@niagarahealth.on.ca The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada Justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca …/3 Page 651 of 936 The Honourable Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario The Honourable Sylvia Jones, Ontario Minister of Health Page three c.c. cont’d: The Honourable Jean-Yves Duclos, Minister of Health for Canada jean-yves.duclos@parl.gc.ca Bill Steele, Mayor, City of Port Colborne mayor@portcolborne.ca Jim Bradley, Chair, Region of Niagara jim.bradley@niagararegion.ca Niagara Regional Councillors; Clerk@niagararegion.ca Jeff Burch, MPP, Niagara Centre jburch-qp@ndp.on.ca Sam Oosterhoff, MPP, Niagara West sam.oosterhoff@pc.ola.org Jennifer Stevens, MPP, St. Catharines JStevens-co@ndp.on.ca Wayne Gates, MPP, Niagara Falls wgates-co@ndp.on.ca Dean Ellison, MP, Niagara West dean.allison@parl.gc.ca Chris Bittle, MP, St. Catharines chris.bittle@parl.gc.ca Tony Baldinelli, MP, Niagara Falls,Tony.Baldinelli@parl.gc.ca Vance Badawey, MP, Niagara Centre vance.badawey@parl.gc.ca Jennifer Dockstader, Executive Director of the Fort Erie Native Friendship Centre, ExecutiveDirector@fenfc.org Wendy Sturgeon, Executive Director of the Niagara Chapter of Native Women edncnw@gmail.com Fort Erie’s Community Health Care Services Committee Members alice.preston@forterie.ca Niagara Health Coalition niagarahealthcoalition@yahoo.ca Local Area Municipalities Page 652 of 936 A Great City … For Generations To Come PLANNING, BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT Inter-Departmental Memo To: Mayor James M. Diodati & Members of Council From: Planning, Building and Development Date: June 5th, 2023 Re: PLC-2023-003, Request for Removal of Part Lot Control Blocks 104, 115, 118 & 119, Registered Plan 59M-498, 7340, 7342, 7350, 7351, 7352, 7353, 7354, 7355, 7356, 7357, 7358, 7359, 7360, 7361, 7370, 7372, 7374, 7376, 7378, 7380 Marvel Drive Mountainview Homes has requested Council pass a by-law to exempt Part Lot Control from Blocks 104, 115, 118 & 119, on Registered Plan 59M-498 to transfer the ownership of townhouse dwelling units that are under construction. Block 104 is proposed to be divided into 2 parts for 1 semi-detached dwelling unit on each lot, totaling 2 semi-detached dwelling units. Blocks 115, 118, and 119 are each proposed to be divided into 6 parts for 1 on-street townhouse dwelling unit on each lot, totaling 18 on-street townhouse dwelling units. The request can be supported based on the following: • The zoning permits semi-detached and on-street townhouse dwellings on the proposed parcel sizes; and, • The by-law will permit a deed to be created for each parcel containing a dwelling unit and permit each property to be sold separately. TG Attach. S:\PART LOT CONTROL\2023\PLC-2023-003 – MARVEL DRIVE, BLOCKS 140 115 118 119\Memo to Council – PLC-2023- 003.docx Page 653 of 936 A Great City … For Generations To Come PLANNING, BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT Inter-Departmental Memo To: Mayor James M. Diodati & Members of Council From: Planning, Building and Development Date: June 6th, 2023 Re: PLC-2023-004, Request for Removal of Part Lot Control Blocks 103, Registered Plan 59M-498, Splendour Subdivision 7330-7332 Marvel Drive. Mountainview Homes (Niagara) Ltd. has requested Council pass a by-law to exempt Part Lot Control Block 103, on Registered Plan 59M-498 to transfer the ownership of 2 semi-detached dwelling units that are under construction. Block 103 is proposed to be divided into 2 parts for 1 semi-detached dwelling unit on each lot, totaling 2 semi-detached dwelling units. The request can be supported based on the following: • The zoning permits semi-detached dwellings at the proposed parcel sizes; and, • The by-law will permit a deed to be created for each parcel containing a dwelling unit and permit each property to be sold separately. AC Attach. S:\PART LOT CONTROL\2023\PLC-2023-004 - SPLENDOUR, BLOCK 103/Memo to Council – PLC-2023-004.docx Page 654 of 936 1 Heather Ruzylo Subject:World Hepatitis Day 2023 Proclamation Request From: Usick,Karen <Karen.Usick@niagarahealth.on.ca> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2023 11:48 AM To: wayne.redekop@niagararegion.ca; marvin.junkin@niagararegion.ca; Brian.Grant@niagararegion.ca; frank.campion@niagararegion.ca; bill.steele@niagararegion.ca; Jdiodati@niagarafall.ca; sandra.easton@niagararegion.ca; jeff.jordan@niagararegion.ca; terry.ugulini@niagararegion.ca; Mathew.Siscoe@niagararegion.ca; Gary.Zalepa@niagararegion.ca; Cheryl.Ganann@niagararegion.ca; jim.bradley@niagararegion.ca; Jim Diodati <jdiodati@niagarafalls.ca>; mayor@stcatharines.ca; Terry.Ugulini@thorold.ca; billsteel@portcolborne.ca; wredekop@forterie.ca; frank.campion@welland.ca; mjunkin@pelham.ca; bgrant@wainfleet.ca; mayor@welland.ca; gary.zelepa@notl.ca; jjordan@grimsby.ca; cganann@westlincoln.ca; seaston@lincoln.ca Cc: dkelley@forterie.ca; SLeach@pelham.ca; adashwood@wainfleet.ca; theresa.ettorre@welland.ca; nancygiles@portcolborne.ca; Kristine Elia <kelia@niagarafalls.ca>; achambers@lincoln.ca; hsoady-easton@grimsby.ca; ginger@thorold.com; jhughes@stcatharines.ca; victoria.steele@notl.com; Jthrower@westlincoln.ca; erica.pretty@notl.com; 'BHutchinson@westlincoln.ca' <BHutchinson@westlincoln.ca>; BRavazzolo@pelham.ca; mciuffetelli@wainfleet.ca; Rachael.Babirad@welland.ca; brendaheidebrecht@portcolborne.ca; Sarah Conidi <sconidi@niagarafalls.ca>; RMunroe@forterie.ca; mciuffetelli@wainfleet.ca; brenda.larouche@welland.ca; Tessa Buonocore <Tessa.Buonocore@thorold.ca>; nancygiles@portcolborne.ca; Jacquie Miller <JMiller@pelham.ca>; Kristine Elia <kelia@niagarafalls.ca> Subject: [EXTERNAL]-World Hepatitis Day 2023 Proclamation Request Greetings everyone! Hope you are marvelous Monday so far! On behalf of the Hepatitis C Care Clinic Team, I would like to express our gratitude for your support in declaring Thursday May 11, 2023 Canadian Viral Hepatitis Elimination Day (Can Hep Day) throughout Niagara. The Team with the Niagara Health System-Hepatitis C Care Clinic is continuing our 2023 hepatitis and liver health awareness campaign to encourage individuals to seek testing at one of our community awareness events, or at one of our many clinic locations throughout Niagara. Our community awareness event at St Andrews Church in Niagara Falls, which raised awareness of Can Hep Day, was a huge success. We are busily preparing for our next community awareness event in St. Catharines at Montebello Park on Friday July 28th. We have hosted our community events annually since 2014 (except for 2020 and 2021) to recognize World Hepatitis Day… and to join our global partners around the world on this very important awareness day. While hosting our annual events, our program and community partners who join us, bring a street-based health, and social services fair to the community. Our residents here in Niagara need our support now more than ever. This is why the Hepatitis C Care Clinic Team and the many programs of our community partners feel it is Page 655 of 936 2 important to meet individuals where they are at . . . and to bring our care and services to them. Please join us on July 28th to learn more about the Hepatitis C Care Clinic’s program and services. In addition, you will also learn how easy it is to get tested for hepatitis C, hepatitis C treatments options, hepatitis and liver health. Our community partners would love to share with you about their program’s care and services. Are you wondering how you can help? Please join together with our awareness campaign to recognize World Hepatitis Day on July 28th. Can we count on your support to declare July 28th World Hepatitis Day in your municipality of Niagara? If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me! Please find enclosed our promotional flyer for the event. The flyer will provide you with all of the details for the event! Thank you so very much for your ongoing support to bring awareness to the 12 municipalities of Niagara! Hope you have a lovely day and a wonderful week! Take care and stay safe! Karen Karen Usick – Reg. N Hepatitis C Care Clinic | Community Coordinator Niagara Health System| Addiction Services W: 905-378-4647 x32555 | C: 289-696-2523 260 Sugarloaf Street, Port Colborne, ON L3K 2N7 HCCC Website Address - www.niagarahealth.on.ca/site/hepatitis-c-care NHS Addiction Services - www.niagarahealth.on.ca/services/addiction-recovery #HepCantWait I #WorldHepatitisDay I #NoHep From: Usick,Karen <Karen.Usick@niagarahealth.on.ca> Sent: 17-Mar-2023 15:50 To: wayne.redekop@niagararegion.ca; marvin.junkin@niagararegion.ca; Brian.Grant@niagararegion.ca; frank.campion@niagararegion.ca; bill.steele@niagararegion.ca; Jdiodati@niagarafall.ca; sandra.easton@niagararegion.ca; jeff.jordan@niagararegion.ca; terry.ugulini@niagararegion.ca; Page 656 of 936 3 Mathew.Siscoe@niagararegion.ca; Gary.Zalepa@niagararegion.ca; Cheryl.Ganann@niagararegion.ca; jim.bradley@niagararegion.ca; Diodati,Jim <Jim.Diodati@niagarahealth.on.ca> Cc: dkelley@forterie.ca; SLeach@pelham.ca; adashwood@wainfleet.ca; theresa.ettorre@welland.ca; nancygiles@portcolborne.ca; kelia@niagarafalls.ca; achambers@lincoln.ca; hsoady-easton@grimsby.ca; ginger@thorold.com; jhughes@stcatharines.ca; victoria.steele@notl.com; Jthrower@westlincoln.ca; erica.pretty@notl.com; 'BHutchinson@westlincoln.ca' <BHutchinson@westlincoln.ca>; BRavazzolo@pelham.ca; mciuffetelli@wainfleet.ca; Rachael.Babirad@welland.ca; brendaheidebrecht@portcolborne.ca; sconidi@niagarafalls.ca; RMunroe@forterie.ca; mciuffetelli@wainfleet.ca; brenda.larouche@welland.ca; Tessa Buonocore <Tessa.Buonocore@thorold.ca>; nancygiles@portcolborne.ca; Jacquie Miller <JMiller@pelham.ca>; kelia@niagarafalls.ca Subject: Proclamation Request - Canadian Viral Hepatitis Elimination Day (Can Hep Day) Greetings everyone I am touching base on behalf of the Niagara Health System’s – Hepatitis C Care Clinic to share with you about how we will be joining our national partners to raise awareness of viral hepatitis. In May 2016, Canada signed on to the World Health Organization (WHO)’s first ever Global Viral Hepatitis Strategy, with the goal of eliminating viral hepatitis as a public health threat by 2030. On Wednesday May 11, 2022, Action Hepatitis Canada was joined by CanHepC, CanHepB, the Canadian Liver Foundation . . . and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver to mark the inaugural “Canadian Viral Hepatitis Elimination Day / Can Hep Day” in Ottawa. To support the global strategy, all provinces and communities across Canada are working together to raise awareness. On May 11, 2023, The Hepatitis C Care Clinic will be joining our national partners to raise awareness of “Can Hep Day” here in Niagara. Our program will be hosting our inaugural Canadian Viral Hepatitis Elimination Day (Can Hep Day) to raise awareness of hepatitis and liver health. The Hepatitis C Care Clinic community awareness event will encourage individuals to learn about hepatitis, liver health, how to receive hepatitis C testing, hepatitis C treatment … and the care and services of our program. In addition, our community partners will be joining us at our street-based health and social services fair, which take place at St. Andrews United Church-5645 Morrison Street, Niagara Falls from 11:00 am. To 3:00 pm. Event attendees will learn about the care and services of the Hepatitis C Care Clinic . . . and the care and services of our community partners. Are you wondering how you can help! We are inviting you to join with our awareness campaign and national partners to proclaim Thursday May 11, 2023, as Canadian Viral Hepatitis Elimination Day throughout the 12 municipalities of Niagara. Together we are strong . . . we can join together to raise awareness and to help the residents throughout Niagara. If you have any questions, or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me! Hope you have a lovely afternoon and a wonderful weekend! Take care and stay safe! Page 657 of 936 4 Karen Karen Usick – Reg. N Hepatitis C Care Clinic | Community Coordinator Niagara Health System| Addiction Services Karen.Usick@NiagaraHealth.on.ca W: 905-378-4647 x32555 | C: 289-696-2523 260 Sugarloaf Street, Port Colborne, ON L3K 2N7 HCCC Website Address - www.niagarahealth.on.ca/site/hepatitis-c-care NHS Addiction Services - www.niagarahealth.on.ca/services/addiction-recovery #HepCantWait I #WorldHepatitisDay I #NoHep CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 658 of 936 WORLD HEPATITIS DAY July 28th, 2023 WHEREAS, approximately 204,000 Canadians are living with hepatitis C and over 250,000 people are living with hepatitis B; WHEREAS, people living with hepatitis B and C have an increased risk of developing cirrhosis, liver failure and related illnesses; WHEREAS, Ontario has over 110,000 people living with hepatitis B or C, both of which are slow and progressive diseases; and WHEREAS, there are vaccines available for Hepatitis A and B; effective Hepatitis C treatment therapies can cure over 95% of cases; and WHEREAS, World Hepatitis Day provides an opportunity to reach out to millions of Canadians and encourage hepatitis testing, provide treatment and care for those affected while paving the way towards elimination of hepatitis as a public health concern in Canada by 2030; THEREFORE, I, Jim Diodati, Mayor of the City of Niagara Falls, do hereby proclaim July 28th, 2023 World Hepatitis Day in Niagara Falls. JOURNÉE MONDIALE CONTRE L’HÉPATITE Le 28 juillet 2023 ATTENDU QUE, au Canada, quelque 204 000 personnes vivent avec l'hépatite C et environ 250 000 avec l’hépatite B; ATTENDU QUE le risque de cirrhose, d’insuffisance hépatique et de maladies connexes est plus élevé chez les personnes qui vivent avec l’hépatite B ou C; ATTENDU QUE l'Ontario compte plus de 110 000 personnes vivant avec l'hépatite B ou C, deux maladies lentes et progressives; et ATTENDU QU’il existe des vaccins pour protéger contre l'hépatite A et B ainsi que des traitements efficaces pouvant guérir plus de 95 % des personnes atteintes d'hépatite C; et ATTENDU QUE la Journée mondiale contre l'hépatite est une occasion de joindre des millions de Canadiennes et de Canadiens, d'encourager le dépistage de l'hépatite et de fournir traitements et soins aux personnes touchées tout en ouvrant la voie vers l'élimination de l'hépatite en tant que problème de santé publique au Canada d’ici 2030; PAR CONSÉQUENT, je, Jim Diodati, maire de la Ville de Niagara Falls, proclame par la présente le 28 juillet 2023 Journée mondiale contre l’hépatite à Niagara Falls. Jim Diodati Mayor / Maire Page 659 of 936 Administration Office of the Regional Clerk 1815 Sir Isaac Brock Way, PO Box 1042, Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Telephone: 905-980-6000 Toll-free: 1-800-263-7215 Fax: 905-687-4977 www.niagararegion.ca May 30, 2023 CL 8-2023, May 18, 2023 PEDC 5-2023, May 10, 2023 PDS 14-2023, May 10, 2023 DISTRIBUTION LIST SENT ELECTRONICALLY Niagara Region Highlights from the 2021 Census of Population PDS 14-2023 Regional Council, at its meeting held on May 18, 2023, passed the following recommendation of its Planning and Economic Development Committee: That this Report BE RECEIVED for information and BE CIRCULATED to Local Area Municipalities, Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority, Niagara Home Builders Association, Niagara Industrial Association, Local Chambers of Commerce and School Boards. A copy of PDS 14-2023 is enclosed for your reference. Yours truly, Ann-Marie Norio Regional Clerk js CLK-C 2023-060 Page 660 of 936 Niagara Region Highlights from the 2021 Census of Population May 30, 2023 Page 2 cc: C. Macdonald, Development Planner, Development Approvals Division M. Sergi, Commissioner, Growth, Strategy and Economic Development N. Oakes, Executive Assistant to the Commissioner, Growth, Strategy and Economic Development Distribution List Local Area Municipalities Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority Niagara Home Builders Association Niagara Industrial Association Local Chambers of Commerce School Boards Page 661 of 936 PDS 14-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 1 Subject: Niagara Region Highlights from the 2021 Census of Population Report to: Planning and Economic Development Committee Report date: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 Recommendations 1. That this Report BE RECEIVED for information; and 2. That this Report BE CIRCULATED to Local Area Municipalities, Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority, Niagara Home Builders Association, Niagara Industrial Association, local Chambers of Commerce and School Boards. Key Facts The 2021 Census of Population (2021 Census) was undertaken by Statistics Canada in May of 2021 and results were released incrementally throughout 2022 . PDS 9-2022 provided an overview of population and dwelling counts collected through the 2021 Census. This report, PDS 14-2023 provides highlights on the following Census indicators for the Niagara Region: o Age, Sex at Birth and Gender; o Families, Households and Martial Status; o Income and Education; and o Indigenous Peoples, Immigration and Place of Birth. Data related to Labour from the 2021 Census is excluded from this report, as report ED 5-2023 provides an update on current labour trends in Niagara Region, summarizing how labour in Niagara has rebounded since the COVID-19 pandemic and highlights employment growth since the Census was conducted. Financial Considerations There are no financial implications associated with this report. Census data is used throughout the organization to inform various business units on social, economic and demographic trends throughout the region and area municipalities. Page 662 of 936 PDS 14-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 2 ______________________________________________________________________ Analysis 2021 Census of Population The Census of Population is conducted by Statistics Canada every five years. The survey is sent out in May of the Census year to households across Canada for completion. The last survey was conducted in May 2021. Statistics Canada released the results from the 2021 Census throughout 2022 with the final release on November 30, 2022. This report highlights key statistics for Niagara Region and Area Municipalitie s. Results from the Census are summarized by Census theme as follows: Age, Sex at Birth and Gender; Families, Households and Martial Status; Income and Education; and Indigenous Peoples, Immigration and Place of Birth. Age, Sex at Birth and Gender Niagara Region had a median age of 46 years old in 2021, slightly older than the 2016 median age of 45.7. The pace of aging in Niagara has slowed since 2011, dropping from 5% every five years to less than 0.5% per year between 2016 and 2021. Niagara remains one of the oldest Census Divisions in the Greater Golden Horseshoe, ranking 12th out of 16, in median age. The median age across Niagara municipalities fluctuates by 20 years from 57.2 in Niagara-on-the-Lake and 37.2 in Thorold. Four municipalities in Niagara have a median age over 50, including Pelham (50.4), Port Colborne (50.4), Fort Erie (51.6) and Niagara-on-the-Lake (57.2). The change in median age over the last five years is also unique by municipality, with Niagara-on-the-Lake having aged the most (+2.2 years) and Thorold decreasing the most (-3.9 years). Appendix 1 provides an overview of key census results regarding Age, Sex at Birth and Gender. Page 663 of 936 PDS 14-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 3 ______________________________________________________________________ Families, Households and Martial Status Despite the increased cost to purchase a household in Niagara, there was a decline in proportion of adults, aged 20 to 34, and living with at least one parent in 2021. 41.3% of adults were living with at least one parent in 2021 compared to 42.0% in 2016. Regarding housing mix, Niagara Region maintains a significantly higher share of single - and semi-detached units (72%) compared to both Ontario (59%) and Canada (58%). Between 2016 and 2021, 59% of newly occupied units were single or semi-detached, followed by 20% townhouse and 21% apartment. Appendix 2 provides an overview of key census results regarding Families, Households and Martial Status. Income and Education Niagara had the second lowest Median Household Income ($79,000) and the lowest five-year increase ($13,900) compared to the other upper or single-tier municipalities in the Greater Golden Horseshoe. Median Household Income varies by municipality in the Region. Pelham, West Lincoln, Grimsby and Lincoln all had a median household income over $100,000. Port Colborne, Welland, St. Catharines, Niagara Falls and Fort Erie all had a median household income under $80,000. However, those same five municipalities (and Thorold) had the greatest increase in income compared to the last census in 2016. Regarding education, 25% of people aged 25 to 64 in Niagara had a bachelor’s degree or higher, compared to 37% in Ontario and 33% in Canada. Niagara has a greater proportion of adult population with a college certificate or diploma (38%) compared to Canada (34%) and Ontario (31%). Appendix 3 provides an overview of key census results regarding Income and Education. Indigenous Peoples, Immigration and Place of Birth In 2021, 13,960 persons identified as Indigenous people in Niagara Region, representing 3% of the Region’s population. In 2016, 12,250 persons identified as Indigenous peoples, representing an increase of 1,710 people. The 14% increase in Page 664 of 936 PDS 14-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 4 ______________________________________________________________________ Indigenous population is greater than both increases in Canada (8%) and Ontario (8.6%). In regards to immigration by year, Niagara has a larger share (40%) of pre-1980 immigrants compared to both Ontario (21%) and Canada (18%). Appendix 4 provides an overview of key census results regarding Indigenous Peoples, Immigration and Place of Birth. Labour Statistics from the 2021 Census of Population Statistics related to Labour from the 2021 Census are excluded from this report. As the 2021 Census was collected in May 2021, it identified a significant decline in employment compared to 2016. This decline was related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The staff report prepared by Niagara Region Economic Development (ED 5 -2023) provides an update on current labour trends in Niagara Region, summarizing how labour in Niagara has rebounded since the pandemic and highlights employment growth since the Census was conducted. Conclusion Niagara has experienced significant shifts in demographic, economic and societal trends over the past five years. These trends are highlighted by the results from the 2021 Census, a key primary resource of statistical information and used across all Regional departments. Alternatives Reviewed This report is for information purposes only and provides Planning and Economic Development Committee with a high level overview of the 2021 Census. No alternatives were considered. Relationship to Council Strategic Priorities The information in this report relates to the following Council Strategic Priorities: Page 665 of 936 PDS 14-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 5 ______________________________________________________________________ Priority 3: Responsible Growth and Infrastructure Planning The Census is the authoritative source for population data that is used by departments across the Region. This information is critical for monitoring the Official Plan and insuring to the Region plans growth and infrastructure responsibly. Priority 4: Sustainable and Engaging Government This report provides information from the 2021 Census so Council is engaged and aware of trends in Niagara. Other Pertinent Reports ED 5-2023 Niagara Economic Update PDS 9-2022 2021 Census Release: Population and Dwelling Counts ________________________________ Prepared by: Greg Bowie Senior Planner Planning and Development Services _______________________________ Recommended by: Michelle Sergi, MCIP, RPP Commissioner Planning and Development Services ________________________________ Submitted by: Ron Tripp, P.Eng. Chief Administrative Officer This report was prepared in consultation with Julianna Vanderlinde, Employment Inventory Coordinator and reviewed by Angela Stea, Director of Community and Long Range Planning. Page 666 of 936 PDS 14-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 6 ______________________________________________________________________ Appendices Appendix 1: Age, Sex at Birth and Gender Appendix 2: Families, Households and Martial Status Appendix 3: Income and Education Appendix 4: Indigenous Peoples, Immigration and Place of Birth Page 667 of 936 Niagara Region: 2021 Census of Population Appendix 1: Age, Sex at Birth and Gender The pace of aging in Niagara has slowed since 2011, dropping from around 5% every 5 years between 2001 and 2011 to less than 0.5% between 2016 and 2021. 12th Niagara had the 12th highest median age among GGH municipalities in 2021. 14.8% Of Niagara’s population are children aged 0 to 14 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 38 40 42 44 46 48 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 Pace of AgingAgeNiagara Region Median Age: 2001 to 2021 Median Age Pace of Aging Census Division Median Age (2021) Median Age (2016) 5-Year Change Waterloo 38 38.5 -0.5 Peel 38.4 38.1 0.3 Toronto 39.6 39.3 0.3 Durham 40 40.2 -0.2 Wellington 40 40.3 -0.3 Dufferin 40.4 40.7 -0.3 Halton 40.8 40.5 0.3 Hamilton 40.8 41.5 -0.7 Brant 41.6 41.7 -0.1 York 42 41.1 0.9 Simcoe 43.2 43.1 0.1 Niagara 46 45.7 0.3 Haldimand-Norfolk 46.4 46.5 -0.1 Peterborough 46.8 46.9 -0.1 Kawartha Lakes 51.6 51.2 0.4 Northumberland 52.4 51.4 1.0 Page 668 of 936 Niagara Region: 2021 Census of Population Niagara’s 65 plus population is 20% higher than the Provincial average and 23% higher than Ontario. 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 Population CountAge Group Population by Five-year Age Groups and Gender Men Women 16% 65% 19%16% 66% 19%15% 62% 23% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Under 14 Between 15 and 64 Over 65Population (%)Percentage of Population By Age Canada Ontario Niagara Page 669 of 936 Niagara Region: 2021 Census of Population Appendix 2: Families, Households and Martial Status 71.5% of dwellings in Niagara are single and semi-detached, higher than both the Provincial (59.1%) and National (57.6%) counts. 32% of dwellings in Niagara were constructed prior to 1960, again higher than both Provincial (23%) and National (20%) shares. Over 50% of homes in Canada and Ontario were build since 1981, whereas less than 40% of dwellings in Niagara were constructed in that time. 57.6%59.1% 71.5% 6.5%9.2%7.9% 35.9%31.7% 20.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Canada Ontario NiagaraShare of HouseholdsOccupied Households by Dwelling Type Single- and Semi-Detached Row House Apartment/Other 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Canada Ontario NiagaraShare of HouseholdsOccupied Private Dwellings by Period of Construction 1960 or before 1961 to 1980 1981 to 2000 2001 to 2021 Page 670 of 936 Niagara Region: 2021 Census of Population In comparison to Canada and Ontario, Niagara has a disproportionate share of households maintained by residents over the age of 55. Share of Households by Age of Primary Maintainer 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 15 to 24 years 25 to 34 years 35 to 44 years 45 to 54 years 55 to 64 years 65 to 74 years 75 to 84 years 85 years and overShare of HouseholdsPrivate Households by Age of Primary Household Maintainers Canada Ontario Niagara 41%The proportion of young adults aged 20 to 34 that were living with at least one parents in 2021. 68% of census families were married couples, 14% were common- law and 18% were one-parent families. 68% 73%of households in Niagara were owned in 2021. 27% were rented in 2021. Municipality Under 65 Over 65 Fort Erie 61% 38% Grimsby 68% 32% Lincoln 67% 33% Niagara Falls 67% 33% Niagara-on-the-Lake 49% 51% Pelham 60% 40% Port Colborne 63% 37% St. Catharines 66% 34% Thorold 75% 25% Wainfleet 66% 33% Welland 67% 33% West Lincoln 71% 29% Page 671 of 936 Niagara Region: 2021 Census of Population Appendix 3: Income and Education $79,000 Median Total Income of Households in 2020 by Local Area Municipality Municipality Median household total income 2020 ($) Median household total income 2015 ($) Change (%) Fort Erie 76,000 60,800 25 Grimsby 104,000 93,100 12 Lincoln 102,000 86,800 17 Niagara Falls 74,500 60,700 23 Niagara-on-the-Lake 98,000 85,500 15 Pelham 110,000 95,000 16 Port Colborne 70,000 57,200 22 St. Catharines 72,500 59,300 22 Thorold 82,000 64,700 27 Wainfleet 96,000 80,200 20 Welland 71,500 57,000 25 West Lincoln 106,000 91,300 16 Niagara Region 79,000 65,100 21 Median Total Income of Households in 2020 by Upper or Single-Tier Municipality in the Greater Golden Horseshoe Census Division Median household income 2020 ($) Median household income 2015 ($) 5 Year Change ($) Highest Median Household Income in 2020 Halton 121,000 103,000 18,000 York 112,000 96,000 16,000 Dufferin 108,000 89,600 18,400 Lowest Median Household Income in 2020 Kawartha Lakes 82,000 67,200 14,800 Niagara 79,000 65,100 13,900 Peterborough 78,500 64,400 14,100 In 2020, the median total income of households in Niagara Region was $79,000, an increase of 21.3% from $65,100 in 2015. Page 672 of 936 Niagara Region: 2021 Census of Population 71% In 2020, the percentage of persons 15 years and older in Niagara with income from any COVID-19 government income support and benefits was 70.8%. 10% 10.4% of individuals living in a household fall below the low income after-tax measure (LIM-AT). LIM-AT measures the population that earn less than half of the National median after-tax income. 14.5% of individuals in Niagara met the LIM-AT measure in 2016. 24.6% of people aged 25 to 64 in Niagara had a bachelor’s degree or higher, compared to 36.8% in Ontario and 32.9% in Canada. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 to 17 years 18 to 64 years 65 years and over Percentage of Population (%) Prevalence of Low Income Based on the Low-Income Measure, After Tax (LIM-AT) by Age Group 88% 34%33% 90% 31%37% 91% 38% 25% Completed high school College certificate or diploma Bachelor's degree or higher Proportion of Adults (25 to 64) By Education Level Canada Ontario Niagara Page 673 of 936 Appendix 4: Indigenous Peoples, Immigration and Place of Birth 3% In 2021, there were 13,960 Indigenous people in Niagara Region, making up 3% of the Region’s population. In comparison, there were 12,250 Indigenous people in Niagara in 2016, representing an increase of 1,710 people and 14%, a significantly higher increase than both Canada (8%) and Ontario (8.6%). Geography Indigenous Identity (2016) Indigenous Identity (2021) % Change Canada 1,673,785 1,807,250 8.0 Ontario 374,395 406,585 8.6 Niagara 12,250 13,960 14.0 Niagara Region has a significantly higher proportion of immigrants that arrived prior to 1980 compared to both National and Provincial averages. 40% of Niagara’s immigrants settled in Niagara prior to 1980 followed 25% between 1981 and 2000, and 34% between 2000 and 2021. Immigration by Period of Time 60 Before 1980 1981 to 2000 2000 to 2021 Canada Ontario Niagara 0 10 20 30 40 50 Proportion of Immigrants (%) Top 5 places of birth of immigrants in the Niagara Region Country Population United Kingdom 12,460 Italy 6,955 United States of America 5,850 Philippines 4,495 India 4,275 Niagara Region: 2021 Census of Population Page 674 of 936 Administration Office of the Regional Clerk 1815 Sir Isaac Brock Way, PO Box 1042, Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Telephone: 905-980-6000 Toll-free: 1-800-263-7215 Fax: 905-687-4977 www.niagararegion.ca May 30, 2023 CL 8-2023, May 18, 2023 PEDC 5-2023, May 10, 2023 PDS 12-2023, May 10, 2023 LOCAL AREA MUNICIPALITIES SENT ELECTRONICALLY Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control and Wet Weather Management (WWM) Program – 2023 Funding Recommendations PDS 12-2023 Regional Council, at its meeting held on May 18, 2023, passed the following recommendation of its Planning and Economic Development Committee: That Report PDS 12-2023, dated May 10, 2023, respecting Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control and Wet Weather Management (WWM) Program – 2023 Funding Recommendations, BE RECEIVED and the following recommendations BE APPROVED: 1. That staff PREPARE and EXECUTE the respective partnership funding agreements with the Local Area Municipalities for qualifying projects to reflect the terms and conditions set out in Appendix 2 and Appendix 3 of Report PDS 12 -2023; and 2. That Local Area Municipalities BE ADVISED of the results of Regional funding support, as outlined in Appendix 1 of PDS 12-2023. A copy of PDS 12-2023 is enclosed for your reference. Yours truly, Ann-Marie Norio Regional Clerk js CLK-C 2023-062 Page 675 of 936 Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control and Wet Weather Management (WWM) Program – 2023 Funding Recommendations May 30, 2023 Page 2 cc: I. Stetic, Manager, Water-Wastewater Infrastructure Planning M. Sergi, Commissioner, Growth, Strategy and Economic Development N. Oakes, Executive Assistant to the Commissioner, Growth, Strategy and Economic Development Page 676 of 936 PDS 12-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 1 Subject: Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control and Wet Weather Management (WWM) Program – 2023 Funding Recommendations Report to: Planning and Economic Development Committee Report date: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 Recommendations 1. That staff PREPARE and EXECUTE the respective partnership funding agreements with the Local Area Municipalities for qualifying projects to reflect the terms and conditions set out in Appendix 2 and Appendix 3 of Report PDS 12-2023; and 2. That Local Area Municipalities BE ADVISED of the results of Regional funding support, as outlined in Appendix 1 of PDS 12-2023. Key Facts The purpose of this report is to provide background information for the 2023 LAM projects under the Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control / W et W eather Management (WWM) Program; The CSO Control Cost Share Program has been in place since 2007 and is intended to facilitate shared funding with the Local Area Municipalities (LAM) to help mitigate the impacts of wet weather events on the Region -wide sanitary system and the environment. As a result, the Region benefits from this program by gaining capacity at regionally owned trunks, sewage pump stations and wastewater treatment plants, which in return, could be used for growth without oversizing Regional infrastructure; Representatives of the CSO/WWM Working Group developed administrative procedures and criteria to support and evaluate project submissions by LAM in accordance with the guiding principles; The Region supports this approach and has included funding annually in its budget. For 2023, an amount of $4,000,000 was budgeted in the Region’s Wastewater Operating Budget; Twenty-nine (29) eligible projects were submitted by LAMs for 2023; however, the total requested funding is more than the approved program budget of $4,000,000 by $1,043,250 for 2023, demonstrating the high demand to address wet weather issues in sanitary collection systems. Page 677 of 936 PDS 12-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 2 ______________________________________________________________________ Financial Considerations A gross budget of $4,000,000 has been approved as part of the 2023 Wastewater Operating Budget for the CSO Control Cost Share program. Funding for this program is partially provided through Development Charges (50%). The 29 eligible projects considered for funding under the 2023 CSO Control Program totaled $5,043,250. As the total requested amount is more than the approved program budget of $4,000,000 by $1,043,250 for 2023, six project applications will have to be declined for funding and one application will receive partial funding. Appendix 1 presents 22 municipal projects recommended for funding in full, one municipal project recommended for partial funding, and six unfunded projects. Prior to awarding the 2023 amounts, the Region currently has $11.4 million in outstanding commitments to 11 municipalities for approved but unspent CSO projects as per 2022 Year-End shown in Appendix 4. Analysis The CSO Control Cost Share program is intended to facilitate shared funding with LAM to help mitigate the impacts of wet weather events on the Region -wide sanitary system and the environment. These CSO projects help reduce potential basement flooding, overflows to the environment, and provide capacity for growth within existing infrastructure by removing excessive water entering the sanitary system. T he Region benefits from this program by gaining capacity at regionally owned trunks, sewage pump stations and wastewater treatment plants, which in return, could be used for growth without oversizing Regional infrastructure. The CSO Control Working Group is made up of at least one LAM representative with urban servicing an d is lead by Regional staff. The evaluation matrix is reviewed by the CSO Working Group for enhancements annually. Appendix 2 shows the distribution for the CSO Control Program funding options for project types. Twenty-nine (29) applications were received from 11 LAMs. Three applications from Fort Erie, two from Grimsby, two from Lincoln, five from Niagara Falls, two from NOTL, two from Pelham, three from Port Colborne, one from St. Catharines, two from Thorold, six from Welland, and one from West Lincoln. Page 678 of 936 PDS 12-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 3 ______________________________________________________________________ Regional staff reviewed and evaluated all 29 eligible projects and incorporated 21 of them into the final recommendation list presented in Appendix 1. Projects were awarded based on the program evaluation matrix following the CSO Control and Wet Weather Management Policy as approved by Council. The requested funding for all eligible projects totaled $5,043,250. The total requested funding is $1,043,250 more than the 2023 approved budget of $4,000,000 . Similar to other jurisdictions across Ontario, wet weather flows continue to negatively impact sanitary infrastructure resulting in potential basement flooding, overflows to th e environment, and reduced capacity for future growth. The removal of wet weather flow and inflow and infiltration reduction is important work that needs on-going focus and support over the long term to be successful. Alternatives Reviewed No alternatives were reviewed as the approved budget was fully utilized. Relationship to Council Strategic Priorities This report supports the Responsible Growth and Infrastructure Planning priority in establishing objectives of Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship and Maintenance of Existing Infrastructure. Other Pertinent Reports PW4.S06.0, September 2, 2014 – Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control & Wet Weather Management Policy ________________________________ Prepared by: Ilija Stetic, B.Sc., PMP, CET Manager W -WW Infrastructure Planning Planning and Economic Development _______________________________ Recommended by: Michelle Sergi, MCIP, RPP Commissioner Planning and Economic Development Page 679 of 936 PDS 12-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 4 ______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________ Submitted by: Ron Tripp, P.Eng. Chief Administrative Officer This report was prepared in consultation with Phill Lambert, P. Eng., Director, Infrastructure Planning and Engineering, Joseph Tonellato, P. Eng., Director of Water and Wastewater, Susan White, Program Financial Specialist, and reviewed by Renee Muzzell, Manager Program Financial Support. Appendices Appendix 1 Recommended 2023 CSO Control Program Funding Reque sts Appendix 2 Funding Options Appendix 3 CSO Control / WWM Policy Funding Conditions Appendix 4 Summary of CSO Project Remaining Budget Encumbrance by Municipality by 2022 Year-End Page 680 of 936 PDS 12-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 1: Recommended 2023 CSO Control Program Funding Requests Eligible Recommended Projects with Funding Municipality Project Description Category % Project Cost Regional Share Recommended Regional Funding Fort Erie 2023 Sanitary Sewer CCTV Inspection 2 50% $ 205,000 $ 102,500 $ 102,500 Fort Erie Flow Monitoring Program, Pre/Post (FLOMON) 2 60% $ 60,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 Fort Erie Bowen Road Watermain Replacement (BOWW19) 5 30% $ 301,000 $ 90,300 $ 90,300 Grimsby Sewer I&I Reduction Study - Drainage Area 5 & 7 2 50% $ 25,000 $ 12,500 $ 12,500 Grimsby Wastewater I&I Reduction - Drainage Area 5&7 5 30% $ 500,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Lincoln William Street Neighbourhood Sanitary Sewer Replacement 5 30% $ 210,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 Lincoln Targeted I/I Investigation - Beamsville Ontario St Catchment 2 50% $ 150,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 Niagara Falls Dorchester Rd. SS - Lundy's Lane to Royal Manor Dr. Construction 1 40% $ 2,000,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 Niagara Falls Hodgson Subdivision Sewer Separation Strategy Phase 1 Design 1 40% $ 160,000 $ 64,000 $ 64,000 Niagara Falls Armoury Street Sewer Separation 1 40% $ 649,576 $ 259,830 $ 259,830 Niagara Falls Ferry Street Reconstruction 1 40% $ 600,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 NOTL CSO Flow Monitoring (Post Repair) - (Phase 5- Mississauga Beach) 2 60% $ 50,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 NOTL CSO Flow Monitoring (Post Repair) - Dorchester North 2 60% $ 50,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Pelham Church Street Sanitary Sewer Planned Replacements 5 30% $ 4,000,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 662,992 Port Colborne Omer Sanitary Pipe Capacity Investigation 2 50% $ 150,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 Port Colborne Clarke Area Inflow and Infiltration Program - Part 2 3 50%/60% $ 250,000 $ 145,000 $ 145,000 St. Catharines Spring Garden Creek Trunk Sewer Lining 1 30% $ 1,484,954 $ 445,486 $ 445,486 Welland Fitch Street Area I/I Reduction Project 2 50% $ 75,000 $ 37,500 $ 37,500 Welland 2023 Flow Monitoring Project 2 50% $ 292,440 $ 146,220 $ 146,220 Page 681 of 936 PDS 12-2023 May 10, 2023 Municipality Project Description Category % Project Cost Regional Share Recommended Regional Funding Welland 2023 Private Side Disconnection Project 3 50%/60% $ 75,000 $ 41,250 $ 41,250 Welland Ontario Road Trunk Sanitary Sewer 5 30% $ 100,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Welland West Main Area Phase 1 5 30% $ 1,444,739 $ 433,422 $ 433,422 West Lincoln Post Sewer Rehabilitation Flow Monitoring 2 60% $ 50,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Total Available Funding $ 4,000,000 Eligible Unfunded Projects Municipality Project Description Category % Project Cost Regional Share Niagara Falls 2023 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project 5 30% $ 2,000,000 $ 600,000 Pelham Sanitary Capital Repair Program 5 30% $ 140,000 $ 42,000 Port Colborne Cured in Place Pipe Sanitary Sewer Lining 5 30% $ 500,000 $ 150,000 Thorold Private Sanitary Sewer 3 60% $ 150,000 $ 90,000 Thorold Sanitary Sewer Spot Repair Project (Trenchless) 5 30% $ 65,000 $ 19,500 Welland Sanitary Sewer Spot Repair 5 30% $ 472,500 $ 141,750 Total Eligible Projects $ 16,210,209 $ 1,043,250 Note 1: Funding % share is dependent on specific project component and related work. Appendix 3 has project cost share split details Note 2: Pelham received partial funding up to the limit of the 2023 budget amount. Page 682 of 936 Appendix 2: Funding Options PDS 12-2023 May 10, 2023 CSO Control Program Funding Options Project Category Project Types Funding % Region % Municipality % 1. Sewer Separation 40% Work Examples Disconnection of road drainage 40 60 Disconnection of private 60 40 Disconnection of road, previous disconnection of private or opposite 50 50 2. Studies 15% Work Examples PPCP as per the PPCP guide 50 50 I&I and extraneous flow investigation including cctv/smoke dye testing¹ 50 50 Mandatory flow monitoring -pre and post 60 40 Investigative work on municipal/private side 50 50 Public education/water conservation and efficiency measures 50 50 Sewer use by-law development/update and municipal policies 50 50 3. Source Control -Private Side 20% Disconnection of roof leaders to be done by homeowners/municipalities as a prerequisite for other works on the private side. Work Examples Disconnection of roof leaders 60 40 Disconnection of weeping tiles from sanitary including applicable works 60 40 Disconnection of private sump pumps 60 40 Backflow preventer installation on sanitary 40 60 4. Conveyance and Flow Control/Storage 15% Work Examples Real time control for detention 60 40 In-line flow controllers design and construction (e.g. weirs) 60 40 Off-line conveyance and pumping design and construction 60 40 In-line/ off-line storage 40 60 5. Repair/ Rehabilitation/ Replacement of Sewers 10% Estimated ≥50% flow reduction during WW events Work Examples Repair of sanitary/ manholes -gel sealing, spot repairs 30 70 Spot repair lining 30 70 Full length liner 30 70 Note 1: CCTV inspection -only site/project specific. Regular city wide inspections should be part of municipal O&M. Page 683 of 936 Appendix 3: Terms and Conditions PDS 12-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 3 CSO Control Program Terms and Funding Conditions The terms and conditions under which funding will be offered to the successful applications, include the following: 1 Amount of Funding, Studies -The Region shall contribute 50% of total study costs for the PPCP and I&I studies, and 60% for the Pre and Post Flow monitoring projects provided the Region participates on a committee overseeing the study and the study covers the entire area tributary to the Wastewater Treatment Plant(s) and includes both local and Regional infrastructure. 2 Amount of Funding, Design & Construction projects – The Region shall contribute defined percentage of the cost based on the Funding Options matrix, provided that; the facility or measure is supported by a recommendation from a current CSO study, life cycle cost comparisons of alternative solutions were undertaken and the Region agrees with the cost comparisons, the Region agrees with the ‘best overall solution’, and the Region participates on a committee overseeing the design. 3 Third Party Funding – The Region’s funding shall be net of any third party funding approved for the project. If third party funding is obtained after Regional funding approval, the amount of Regional funding will be adjusted to be net of any third party funding. Payment of the funding to the Area Municipality shall be based on actual expenditures incurred up to the maximum amount approved by Regional Council based on the budget submitted with the application. 4 Project Lead Studies – Lead by either the Area Municipality or the Region based on a mutual agreement prior to initiation of study. 5 Project Lead Design & Construction – A project located in the Area Municipal wastewater system shall be managed by the Area Municipality while a project in the Regional wastewater system shall be managed by the Region. On a case -by-case basis the Region may consider managing a project in the local system, if requested by the Area Municipality. 6 Ownership and Operation of Assets – The ownership and operation of all new and existing assets shall remain the responsibility of the current owner. The Area Municipality, on a case by case basis, may request the Region to operate and maintain an existing or new CSO control facility on behalf of the Area Municipality on a direct charge back basis. 7 Follow up Flow Monitoring – On a case-by-case basis, the Region may include a condition or approval of funding that requires follow up flow monitoring to assess project’s effectiveness. 8 Expiry of Funding – Funding of a project by the Region may expire if the local Area Municipality does not invoice the Region within three (3) years of the date of funding approval by Regional Council. Also, if an Area Municipality decides not to proceed with a project, the Region may revoke funding. The Region may also withdraw funding for future phases if a project does not proceed on a continuous basis toward completion. 9 Indemnity – The Region, or its directors, officers, employees, agents or consultants will not be held liable as a result of providing funding for any project. 10 Regional Recognition – The Area Municipality is to ensure that the Region is to be acknowledged in all advertising and publicity related to the project for which funding was provided. Page 684 of 936 11 12 Appendix 3: Terms and Conditions PDS 12-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 3 Project Deliverables – The Region shall receive copies of all project deliverables, including, but not limited to, reports, flow monitoring data, hydraulic modelling files, GIS layers/data, and technical memorandums. Funding Agreement -A letter formalizing the funding in accordance with the Region’s CSO Funding Policy will be issued to the Area Municipality for signature and used as the agreement to the terms and conditions of the funding. Page 685 of 936 PDS 12-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 4 Appendix 4: Summary of CSO Project Remaining Budget Encumberance by Municipality by 2022 Year-End Municipality Year Pre-2017 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Fort Erie 266,589 311,232 100,495 680,857 681,500 2,040,673 Grimsby 528,293 217,401 43,393 125,000 914,087 Lincoln 2,100 190,259 316,130 542,370 1,050,859 Niagara Falls 163,314 1,663 251,422 890,651 774,716 722,530 2,804,296 Niagara-on-the-Lake 85,292 30,000 51,594 79,356 100,000 346,242 Pelham 5,173 50,000 55,173 Port Colborne 366,948 205,000 571,948 t. Catharines S 63,374 124,431 8,000 201,512 222,012 307,000 144,100 1,070,430 Thorold 299,465 299,465 W elland 408,824 262,689 296,400 722,185 508,070 2,198,168 W est Lincoln 28,026 60,000 88,026 Total 596,841 289,845 1,310,092 1,372,986 1,806,579 3,576,824 2,486,200 11,439,367 Page 686 of 936 Administration Office of the Regional Clerk 1815 Sir Isaac Brock Way, PO Box 1042, Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Telephone: 905-980-6000 Toll-free: 1-800-263-7215 Fax: 905-687-4977 www.niagararegion.ca May 30, 2023 CL 8-2023, May 18, 2023 PEDC 5-2023, May 10, 2023 PDS 17-2023, May 10, 2023 LOCAL AREA MUNICIPALITIES SENT ELECTRONICALLY Climate Change Update PDS 17-2023 Regional Council, at its meeting held on May 18, 2023, passed the following recommendation of its Planning and Economic Development Committee: That Report PDS 17-2023, dated May 10, 2023, respecting Climate Change Update, BE RECEIVED and the following recommendations BE APPROVED: 1. That the recommended corporate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction target of net zero by 2050 BE APPROVED in principle; and 2. That a copy of report PDS 17-2023 BE CIRCULATED to the Local Area Municipalities (LAMs). A copy of PDS 17-2023 is enclosed for your reference. Yours truly, Ann-Marie Norio Regional Clerk js CLK-C 2023-058 Page 687 of 936 Climate Change Update May 30, 2023 Page 2 cc: B. Perna, Climate Change Specialist M. Sergi, Commissioner, Growth, Strategy and Economic Development N. Oakes, Executive Assistant to the Commissioner, Growth, Strategy and Economic Development Page 688 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 1 Subject: Climate Change Update Report to: Planning and Economic Development Committee Report date: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 Recommendations 1. That the recommended corporate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction target of an 80% emissions reduction below 2018 levels by 2050 BE APPROVED; and 2. That a copy of report PDS17-2023 BE CIRCULATED to the Local Area Municipalities (LAMs). Key Facts • Climate change is a global threat to infrastructure, human health, and biodiversity. Without significant GHG emissions reduction, 1.5°C warming will increase climate hazards and risks to ecosystems and humans. Setting GHG emissions reduction targets is crucial to mitigate effects and prevent risks. • This report updates on the Region's Climate Change Emergency Declaration of 2021, outlines staff progress on climate change action, and recommends a corporate GHG emissions reduction target. • Niagara Region joined the Partners for Climate Protection program in 2009, a five- step framework to reduce emissions and combat climate change. • Milestone 1: Completed a corporate emissions inventory (Appendix 3). As well, thoroughly evaluated climate initiatives, and successfully held a climate change summit. • Milestone 2: Recommends a corporate GHG emissions reduction target of 80% below 2018 levels by 2050. This would contribute to climate change mitigation and align Niagara Region with other municipalities working towards Canada's Net-Zero carbon emissions goal. • Next steps include developing a Corporate Climate Change Action Plan to achieve the target. Page 689 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 2 ______________________________________________________________________ Financial Considerations In 2021, Council approved a two-year program and funding initiative (CA0-21-2021) to advance the commitments outlined in the resolution. This funding was directed towards the creation of a Climate Change Specialist position and the allocation of consulting funds to develop a comprehensive Corporate Climate Change Action Plan. The initiative also encompasses the organization of an annual Climate Change Summit and other relevant programs, which are scheduled to be carried out in 2023. In 2023, Council approved a budget reduction of $50,000 to the Climate Change portfolio. Despite this, some planned initiatives for the year, such as the Corporate Climate Change Action Plan and the annual Climate Change Summit, are still being pursued with the remaining funds. However, the reduction will influence other intended initiatives, including the development of the Community Energy Plan/Municipal Energy Plan. As part of preparations for the 2024 budget, staff will assess the resources needed to carry out various climate change projects and initiatives. Based on this evaluation, specific areas will be identified where additional funding is necessary. Notably, there are currently no earmarked funds for the Climate Change portfolio, including the Climate Change Specialist role for 2024. Funding and Partnerships Regional staff will work to secure financial support from a diverse array of sources to fund climate change projects and initiatives, including the Green Municipal Fund (GMF) and various governmental entities. In addition, the Region is investigating alternative funding avenues, including provincial government partial funding for Community/Municipal Energy Planning, and partnerships with utilities, institutions, and private enterprises. Analysis 2021-2022 Climate Change Action Progress Climate change is a local, national, and global issue affecting individuals and systems around the world, such as infrastructure, human health, and biodiversity. If global GHG emissions are not significantly reduced by 2030, projections indicate that we would globally reach 1.5°C warming in the near-term, which would cause increases in multiple climate hazards and present multiple risks to ecosystems and humans. Page 690 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 3 ______________________________________________________________________ Progress has been made within the 2021-2022 year to address climate change. This can be attributed to the efforts made by Regional Council and staff to move the needle implementing key actions and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Notable initiatives include (a full-detailed list of initiatives can be found in Appendix 1): 1. Regional Council Climate Emergency Declaration 2. Climate Projections for Niagara Region Report 3. Niagara Official Plan Climate Change Policies 4. Corporate Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) 5. Long-term Region Climate Change Action Summary (a full summary is found in Appendix 2): • Examples: the Welland Waste Water Treatment Plant Boiler Upgrade and the 3450 Merritville Hwy, Thorold. EMS, LEED Certified 6. 2022 Niagara Climate Change Summit 7. Niagara Climate Change Action Network (NCCAN) 8. Niagara Climate Change Municipal Community of Practice (NCCMCP) As we look to 2023 and beyond, it is evident that significantly more work needs to be done at Niagara Region to combat climate change. Municipalities are already experiencing the impacts of climate change and are uniquely positioned to take action. Accelerating Climate Change Action at the Region Partners for Climate Change Protection Program (PCP) Niagara Region has been a member of the PCP program since 2009. The program consists of a five-step milestone framework that guides municipalities as they take action against climate change by reducing emissions. The five milestones are: 1. Creating a baseline emissions inventory 2. Setting emissions reduction targets 3. Developing a local climate action plan/strategy 4. Implementing a local climate action plan/strategy 5. Monitoring and reporting results Milestone 1: Corporate GHG Emissions Inventory (complete) Page 691 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 4 ______________________________________________________________________ In October 2022, staff began the process of completing a GHG emissions inventory for corporate operations and services. This included emissions generated by buildings, outdoor lighting and traffic signals, water and wastewater, waste and fleet. Members of the Climate Change Working Group (CCWG), representing various departments across the Region gathered and provided data to contribute to the development of the Niagara Region corporate GHG Emissions Inventory (Appendix 3). 2018 was selected as the baseline year for the emissions inventory, as it is the most recent year with a complete dataset. The corporate GHG Emissions Inventory helps track and anticipate emissions, energy use and spending, and measure progress over time. Having a forecast also allows to project future emissions based on assumptions about population, economic growth, fuel mix, and technological change. The GHG Emissions Inventory summarized that in terms of energy dollars, Niagara Region spent $18,350,788 on energy in 2018. As shown in Figures 1, 2, and 3, energy used for power and heating in Niagara Region’s building portfolio were the highest contributors to emissions and energy consumption, accounting for 56% of emissions, 47% of energy use, and 41% of energy costs. The second largest contributor was the water and wastewater sector, accounting for 28% of emissions, 45% of energy use, and 47% of energy costs. The municipal fleet contributed 16% to total emissions, 7% of energy use and 9% of energy costs. Outdoor lighting and traffic signals accounted for less than 1% of emissions, 1% of energy use, and 3% of energy costs. Figure 1: Scope 1 and 2 municipal GHG emissions by sector in 2018 Buildings, 12,668, 56%Outdoor Lighting and Traffic Signals, 91, 0.40% Fleet, 3,526, 16% Water and Wastewater, 6,280, 28% Operational Waste, 62, 0.27% 2018 Scope 1 and 2 Municipal GHG Emissions (tC02e) Page 692 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 5 ______________________________________________________________________ Figure 2: Scope 1 and 2 municipal energy consumption by sector in 2018 Figure 3: Scope 1 and 2 municipal energy costs by sector in 2018 Milestone 2: Corporate GHG Reduction Targets Having garnered an understanding of our corporate emissions via the corporate Emissions Inventory, the subsequent step within the PCP framework is to establish corporate emissions reduction goals. Corporate GHG emissions reduction targets set the foundation and direction for our emissions reduction efforts. Setting targets is essential to developing a Corporate Climate Change Action Plan, as the strategy will Buildings, 376,218, 47% Outdoor Lighting and Traffic Signals, 10,886, 1%Fleet, 53,004, 7% Water and Wastewater, 356,301, 45% 2018 Scope 1 and 2 Municipal Energy Consumption (GJ) Buildings, $7,597,162 , 41% Outdoor Lighting and Traffic Signals, $465,679 , 3%Fleet, $1,606,974 , 9% Water and Wastewater, $8,680,972 , 47% 2018 Scope 1 and 2 Municipal Energy Costs ($) Page 693 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 6 ______________________________________________________________________ determine how to meet the established targets, identify priority areas, propose recommended actions, and secure funding. To better align with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science, and the Niagara Climate Change Summit Call to Action, staff recommends that Niagara Region set the recommended corporate emissions reduction target of: • 80% corporate GHG emissions reduction below 2018 levels by 2050. Despite being an ambitious target, achievement is within our reach. Appendix 4 illustrates the GHG reduction targets set by other Ontario municipalities, some of which match or even surpass our proposed target. Furthermore, the proposed target is open to future review and updates. It serves as an excellent starting point and will be monitored and evaluated over time to ensure its efficacy. For the Region, achieving a corporate target of 80% GHG emissions reduction will require a comprehensive and integrated approach to reducing emissions across all sectors, including buildings, fleet, water and wastewater and waste. For an 80% GHG reduction in buildings by 2050, the Region could take practical steps such as retrofitting existing Regional buildings with energy-efficient technologies and materials, promoting the use of low-carbon energy sources, and incorporating sustainable design principles in new construction projects. For example, all new Regional buildings should be built with Net-Zero standards (Regional case study can be found in Appendix 5). To reduce emissions from water and wastewater systems, the Region could invest in renewable energy sources to power treatment facilities, implement water conservation measures, and explore innovative wastewater treatment technologies that minimize emissions. (Regional case study can be found in Appendix 5). In terms of fleet, the Region could investigate the feasibility to transition the corporate fleet to electric vehicles, implement fuel-efficient driving practices, and explore alternative transportation options, such as public transportation or active transportation for staff. In terms of waste, the Region should investigate alternative waste technologies, and continue to work with staff and residents to educate on the importance of reducing waste. To achieve an 80% reduction in Corporate GHG emissions by 2050, a collective effort is required from all Regional departments to transition towards sustainable practices and technologies. As previously mentioned, Regional staff will strive to obtain financial support from various sources to finance climate change projects and initiatives. By Page 694 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 7 ______________________________________________________________________ leading this transition, the Region can serve as a leader, set an example for other municipalities to emulate, and contribute towards a more sustainable and resilient future for all. Next Steps Following the adoption of the recommended corporate GHG emissions reduction targets, a Corporate Climate Change Action Plan will be developed (which will align with the new Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan [CDMP] 2024-2028), as well as other initiatives, to accelerate climate change work across the region. A full list of initiatives and timelines can be found below with additional details in Appendix 6. 2023-2024 Climate Change Regional Initiatives: • Niagara Climate Change Municipal Community of Practice (NCCMCP) • Corporate Climate Change Action Plan • Niagara Climate Change Action Network (NCCAN)- Community/Municipal Energy Plan Funding • Host an Annual Climate Change Summit • Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan (CDMP) Update In order for Niagara Region to effectively address and mitigate the impacts of climate change, it is imperative that the recommended corporate targets are fully integrated into the decision-making processes and operations. This requires a comprehensive approach, whereby a climate lens is applied to all relevant aspects of the Niagara Region's services and functions within all departments. By embedding the principles of sustainability and resiliency into the core of the Region’s operations, we will be better positioned to effectively address the challenges of a changing climate and create a more resilient and sustainable future for our staff, residents, and community. Alternatives Reviewed The Cost of Inaction Significant changes in our climate have already been seen globally and locally and are expected to become more severe in the future, affecting our natural and built environments. Lack of mitigation and adaptation will have significant negative impacts on municipal government budgets, which support public infrastructure, health care, and other vital services. These costs are expected to increase as the climate continues to Page 695 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 8 ______________________________________________________________________ warm, and municipalities must work to gain a better understanding of climate impacts and prioritize adaptive measures to limit costs. Options 1 and 2 serve as alternatives to the prescribed corporate target of an 80% GHG emissions reduction by 2050. Option 1: No set target Failure to set such a target would lead to a continuation of current emissions levels, exacerbating the impacts of climate change. Option 2: A more ambitious target (Net-Zero) In contrast, Regional Council could consider a more ambitious corporate target for Net- Zero by 2050 to align with the IPPC science. Return on Investment – Energy Cost Savings Upfront costs associated with climate adaptation and mitigation methods provide long- term savings.1 Implementing energy-efficient technologies and practices can reduce energy consumption, lower energy bills, and avoid potential energy cost increases caused by rising energy prices. Transitioning to renewable energy sources can also protect Niagara Region from the volatility of fossil fuel prices. Failure to implement corporate GHG emissions reduction targets can have implications for Niagara Region regarding carbon pricing and taxes in the long term. Therefore, it is crucial for Niagara Region to set GHG emissions reduction targets to ensure they are financially stable and environmentally sustainable in the long term. Relationship to Council Strategic Priorities This report and the recommended GHG emissions reduction targets contribute to and support all of Council’s 2019-2022 Strategic Priorities, which include: • Supporting Businesses and Economic Growth: climate change and increasing GHG emissions will exert economic impact across the globe. Damages caused by climate change will take a toll on the growth of business and the health of the economy in 1 Financial Accountability Office of Ontario, 2021. Costing Climate Change Impacts to Public Infrastructure: Building and Facilities Page 696 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 9 ______________________________________________________________________ Niagara region. Setting GHG emissions reduction targets will support the economy by planning for a healthier future. • Healthy and Vibrant Community: climate change has an immense impact on public health. Setting and committing to GHG emissions reduction targets will ensure current and future Niagara residents are protected against the dangers of climate change. • Responsible Growth and Infrastructure Planning: Niagara Region is committed to protecting our natural environment. To demonstrating this commitment, ambitious targets for reducing GHG emissions must be set. By investing in sustainable infrastructure, transit, and waste management, the Region will aim to reduce emissions and foster responsible growth. • Sustainable and Engaging Government: setting GHG emissions reduction targets will demonstrate Niagara Region’s commitment to being open, accountable, and responsive to the needs of residents. Other Pertinent Reports PLN Climate Projections for Niagara Region, February 15, 2023. CAO 10-2022 2022 Niagara Climate Change Summit Overview and Next Steps, August 25, 2022. CAO 21-2021 Climate Change Action Program Update, December 9, 2021. CAO 6-2021 Climate Change Work Program Update, January 13, 2021 ___________________ Prepared by: Beatrice Perna Climate Change Specialist Growth, Strategy & Economic Development ______________________________ Recommended by: Michelle Sergi Commissioner Growth, Strategy & Economic Development Page 697 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 10 ______________________________________________________________________ __________________________ Submitted by: Ron Tripp, P.Eng. Chief Administrative Officer This report was prepared in consultation with the Construction, Energy and Facilities Management Division, Frank Gazzola Water Wastewater Energy Management Project Manager, the Corporate Climate Change Working Group members, and reviewed by Suzanne Madder, Manager Corporate Performance & Strategy. Appendices Appendix 1 2021-2022 Climate Change Action Progress Appendix 2 Long-term Region Climate Change Action Summary Appendix 3 2018 Corporate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory- Summary Appendix 4 GHG Emissions Reduction Targets- Ontario Municipalities Appendix 5 Case Study- 80% Greenhouse Gas Reduction by 2050 Appendix 6 2023-2024 Climate Change Regional Initiatives Page 698 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 1 Appendix 1 2021-2022 Climate Change Action Progress Initiative Description 1. Climate Emergency In September 2021, Niagara Region Council declared a Declaration climate change emergency through a motion brought forward by the Chair. The motion directed staff to conduct a fulsome review of all Regional climate change initiatives, host a climate change summit, among other initiatives. Regional Council’s direction to take more action on climate change was partially informed by a 2020 report issued by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Insurance Bureau of Canada that estimated climate change will cost municipalities across the country $5.3 billion annually. That same report found that local government in Canada is responsible for, or could influence, 50 per cent of all greenhouse gas emissions. These studies, and others, show that local communities are directly impacted by climate change, and have a responsibility to act. 2. Climate Projections for Using a baseline period of 1971-2000, climate projections Niagara Region Report were generated for various climate parameters (e.g., temperature, precipitation, and growing season) over the short-term (2021-2050) and long-term (2051-2080) under both high emissions (RCP 8.5) and stabilized emissions (RCP 4.5) scenarios. The climate projections report informed the Niagara Official Plan and will also inform future climate change adaptation initiativ es and sub watershed planning. 3. Niagara Official Plan Climate Change Policies On June 23, 2022, Regional Council approved By-law 2022- 47 adopting the Niagara Official Plan (NOP). A dedicated climate change section within the NOP highlights additional commitments and actions on climate change, such as preparing a Community/Municipal Energy Plan, implementing a Regional Greening Initiative and developing a Climate Change Adaptation Plan, informed by regional climate projections, and more. On November 4, 2022, the Page 699 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 1 Initiative Description Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing approved the Niagara Official Plan. 4. Corporate Climate Change Region staff established an internal Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) Working Group (CCWG) in 2022 to drive the implementation of climate change projects, programs, policies, and initiatives across multiple departments. Comprised of representatives from various departments, the CCWG works to advance the Region's climate change action goals, and will align its efforts with the strategic direction and priority actions outlined in the forthcoming Niagara Region Climate Change Action Plan. With a collective focus on addressing the challenges of climate change, the CCWG is poised to make significant progress towards a more sustainable future for the Region. 5. Climate Change Action Summary The Climate Change Action Summary (Appendix 2) was completed in collaboration with all Regional departments. The Summary provides an overview and inventory of all climate related projects, programs, and initiatives the Region has undertaken in the last five (5) years. The objective of the summary is to showcase the meaningful climate action that Regional staff are undertaking, as well as any projects that are planned for the future, in one central location. The summary outlines the division, department, and lead who were responsible for each initiative along with the current status of the work, related energy and/or cost savings, applicable links, and a description of each initiative. 6. 2022 Niagara Climate Change Summit The 2021 Climate Emergency motion directed Regional staff to organize a climate change summit. The Summit hosted by Niagara Region, in partnership with Brock University and the NPCA took place at Brock University on June 28, 2022, and brought together hundreds of people from municipalities, institutions, and businesses. Concluding the summit, attendees were invited to sign a call to action as a demonstration of their commitment to form partnerships, share critical data, and accelerate climate action. Page 700 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 1 Initiative Description 7.Niagara Climate Change The Niagara Climate Change Action Network (NCCAN) was Action Network (NCCAN)also formed in 2022, which acts as a roadmap to integrate the efforts of the Region, local utilities, business, industry, institutions, and interested parties working towards world- class climate change action, energy performance, and sustainable development while realizing positive economic, environmental, social, and cultural outcomes. 8.Niagara Climate Change In 2022, the Niagara Climate Change Municipal Community Municipal Community of of Practice (NCCMCP) was formed to create a collaborative Practice (NCCMCP)group involving the Region, the LAMs, and the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) to focus on work concerning climate resilience and adaptation, land development, energy management, biodiversity, and more. One of the main objectives of the NCCMCP, is to bring alignment to climate change work across Niagara region. Page 701 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Appendix 2 Table 2: Long-term Region Climate Change Action Summary Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Community Services - Housing Services/Homelessness Services 2019- 2023 Housing and Homelessness Action Plan (HHAP) Action Items for 2019-2023 3.8j) (item 3.6d in the original plan) Align with actions specific to housing support under Niagara Sustainability Plan infrastructure goals (e.g. setting energy reduction targets consistent with those under the Niagara Sustainability Plan for affordable housing and establishing action plans to achieve them). 3.8k) Utilize capital retrofit programs that reduce greenhouse gas emission and create more energy efficient community housing, to reduce operating costs for buildings and improve housing provider sustainability. Page 702 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Community Services - Housing Services/Niagara Regional Housing 2018 Enbridge Savings by Design Affordable Housing New Construction: 207 Roach Avenue, Welland 12-unit townhouse development Building Energy Performance: 17% above OBC SB-10 base model. The Savings by Design Affordable Housing Program (SBD AH) encourages builders and developers of new affordable housing to integrate energy efficiency measures, features, and practices into their building designs, as a means to maintain housing affordability. The program provides financial incentives and technical supports to assist affordable housing builders to design and construct buildings that are more energy efficient than required by the Ontario Building Code. Community Services - Housing Services/Niagara Regional Housing 2019 Building Automation -Heating Management System: 5130 Portgage Rd, Niagara Falls 14 Centre St., St. Catharines 15 Gale Cres., St. Catharines 30 Robinson St., Grimsby 4520 Huron St., Niagara Falls 211 King St., Welland 3874 Portgage Rd., Niagara Falls Reduction in electrical and/or gas heating consumption for multi-unit apartment buildings with estimated savings at 30%-40% -third party verification in process. Heat Management Systems installed on apartment buildings with electric heat and hydronic heat at addresses indicated. Funding received through SHAIP program. Install of this system in 17 other NRH- owned apartment buildings is ongoing. When complete, 1734 total units will have heat optimization. Page 703 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Community Services - Housing Services/Niagara Regional Housing 2020 Enbridge Savings by Design Affordable Housing New Construction: 6388 Hawkins Avenue, Niagara Falls - 55 unit, 3-storey apartment 7180 Heximar Avenue, Niagara Falls - 18-unit 3-storey apartment 6388 Hawkins: 21% annual energy savings above OBC SB-10 baseline; 29.9% annual natural gas savings; 29,178 kg CO2e GHG reduction 7180 Heximer: 18.2% annual energy savings above OBC SB-10 baseline; 23.3% annual natural gas savings; 9,273 kg CO2e GHG reduction Hawkins / Heximer project is being used by Enbridge SBD as a success case study as part of a Royal Architectural Institute of Canada 2022 presentation. The Savings by Design Affordable Housing Program (SBD AH) encourages builders and developers of new affordable housing to integrate energy efficiency measures, features, and practices into their building designs, as a means to maintain housing affordability. The program provides financial incentives and technical supports to assist affordable housing builders to design and construct buildings that are more energy efficient than required by the Ontario Building Code. Community Services -2023-Affordable Housing New Development Develop a master specification to be Housing Services/Niagara Regional Housing 2028 Master Specifications used on future NRH/Housing Services Affordable Housing new development projects. Emphasis on energy Page 704 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes efficiency, carbon and GHG reduction, and sustainability through appropriate materials selection and construction methods. Master spec as living document, to be updated periodically based on new technologies, best practices, lesson learned, funding requirements, and Regional policies. Corporate Services 2022 Creation of the Niagara Region Energy Working Group The Niagara Region Energy Working Group (NREWG) is a sub-group of the Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) and will develop strategies to implement the goals set by the CCWG and the Conservation & Demand Management Plan as adopted by Corporate Leadership and Council. The Niagara Region Energy Working Group’s mandate is to ensure the effective and timely implementation of solutions and improvements to energy usage and emissions in Region buildings. Page 705 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Corporate Services -Asset Management Office 2022 2021 Corporate Asset Management Plan Risk identification The 2021 Corporate Asset Management Plan (2021 CAMP) provides details of maintaining and managing the $9.8 billion in assets that support the Region’s services. The plan considers climate change and presents examples of how it interacts with the delivery of service and management of assets. Corporate Services -Asset Management Office 2023 Asset Management System improvements for Risk and Lifecycle Asset Strategy Reduce risk and cost of service disruption, asset failure, and consequential damage. Best practice models the financial requirements of the level of service relative to the organizations risk exposure. To do so requires a comparative risk assessment including to climate change across the services and the associated portfolio of assets. Lifecycle asset strategy involves the analysis and selection of management options to preserve, restore or enhance asset performance considering risk, cost and timing. Corporate Services -CE & FM 2017 3450 Merritville Hwy, Thorold. EMS, LEED Certified 42% energy reduction, 42% cost reduction and 8,397 kg CO2 This is related to the construction of 3450 Merritville Hwy. The savings are Page 706 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes equivalent reduction (equivalent to 2 homes per year). from constructing the building with the requirements of LEED certification. Corporate Services -CE & FM 2017 445 East Main St., Welland. Provincial Ontario Court Facility, LEED Certified 30% energy reduction, 30% cost reduction and 25,654 kg CO2 equivalent reduction (equivalent to 6 homes per year). This is related to the construction of 445 East Main St. The savings are from constructing the building with the requirements of LEED certification. Corporate Services -CE & FM 2018 Energy Electricity Projects 256,506 kWh electricity reduction, which resulted in a cost avoidance of $38,476 in annual operating costs and 5,130 kg of CO2 equivalent Greenhouse Gas emissions avoided. This reduction contributed 11.2% towards the CDM electricity reduction goal for buildings. Projects consisted of LED retrofits for both 745 Doans Ridge Road (Phase 1) and Rapelje Lodge. Corporate Services -CE & FM 2019 Update to Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan In 2019, the Region updated the CDM plan with the goal to reduce electricity consumption by 8% and Natural gas consumption by 4.4%. If the Plan is implemented in its entirety, emissions will be reduced by Page 707 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes 496,212 kg CO2 equivalent and the energy cost avoidance will be $1M per year by 2023. Corporate Services -CE & FM 2019 Energy Electricity Projects 209,076 kWh electricity reduction, which resulted in a cost avoidance of $31,361 in annual operating costs and 4,182 kg of CO2 equivalent Greenhouse Gas emissions avoided. This reduction contributed 9.1% towards the CDM electricity reduction goal for buildings. Projects included LED retrofits at Campbell West and 2 Cushman Road. Corporate Services -CE & FM 2021 Energy Electricity Projects 594,086 kWh electricity reduction, which resulted in a cost avoidance of $89,113 in annual operating costs and 11,882 kg of CO2 equivalent Greenhouse Gas emissions avoided. This reduction contributed 26% towards the CDM electricity reduction goal for buildings. Projects included lighting retrofits/upgrades at 3547 Thorold Townline Road, environmental centre and police fleet. Also includes small business lighting projects at 32 locations. Page 708 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Corporate Services -CE & FM 2021 NRPS 1D new building/LEED Silver Certified 30,391 kWh electricity reduction and a 35,872 m3 (381,319 ekWh) of natural gas reduction , which resulted in a cost avoidance of $13,168 in annual operating costs and 6,953 kg of CO2 equivalent Greenhouse Gas emissions avoided. This reduction contributed 1.3% towards the CDM electricity reduction goal and 1.5% towards the CDM natural gas reduction goal for buildings. This is related to the construction of NRPS 1D. The saving are from constructing the building with the requirements of LEED Silver certification. Corporate Services -CE & FM 2021 HVAC/VFD Energy Project at 250 Thorold Rd., Welland SAEO 36,193 kWh electricity reduction and a14,487 m3 (153,997 ekWh) of natural gas reduction, which resulted in a cost avoidance of $8,906 in annual operating costs and 27960 kg of CO2 equivalent Greenhouse Gas emissions avoided. This reduction contributed 1.6% towards the CDM electricity reduction goal and 6.4% towards the CDM natural gas reduction goal for buildings. This is related to the HVAC upgrades which consist of boiler and controls upgrades. Page 709 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Corporate Services -CE & FM 2022 Energy Electricity Projects 88,401 kWh electricity reduction, which resulted in a cost avoidance of $13,260 in annual operating costs and 1,461 kg of CO2 equivalent Greenhouse Gas emissions avoided. This reduction contributed 3.9% towards the CDM electricity reduction goal for buildings. Projects included lighting retrofits such as 745 Doan's Ridge Road pole lights retrofit (Phase 3) and salt dome lights (Phase 4), Thorold Patrol yard exterior lighting and Public works service center outdoor lighting and storage dome lighting, Smithville yard roof insulation upgrade HQ wall packs, and Enviro Centre lighting. Corporate Services -Energy Management TBD LEED Silver Certification for Regional Facilities Climate Change Policy 3.5.2.2 in the adopted Niagara Official Plan states, "New Regional corporate facilities will achieve minimum Silver Level certification in the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) green building rating system." "Corporate facilities" is defined to exclude water/wastewater infrastructure buildings. Corporate Services -Energy Management TBD Solar Panel electricity production 1,956,223 kWh of electricity produced, which equals 39,124 kg CO2 equivalent GHG avoided (or 12 cars off the road) Niagara Region has 27 MicroFIT <10kW solar systems that produce electricity directly onto the grid, installed on Regional and NRH Page 710 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes buildings. They have been producing since 2015 (1/2) and 2016 (1/2). Corporate Services -Energy Management TBD EV Charging Infrastructure -Regional Facilities Climate Change Policy 3.5.2.3 in the adopted Niagara Official Plan states, "Public charging infrastructure should be provided at Regional and Local municipal facilities, where feasible, to promote uptake of zero emissions vehicles." Corporate Services/Administration TBD Apply for Provincial Municipal Energy Plan funding Climate Change Policy 3.5.1.1 in the adopted Niagara Official Plan states, "The Region will maintain its community-wide greenhouse gas inventory to monitor progress in emissions reduction planning." This work may be undertaken as part of a municipal energy plan. Corporate Services/Administration TBD Community Climate and Energy Plan Climate Change Policy 3.5.1.2 in the adopted Niagara Official Plan states, "The Region will establish new community-wide greenhouse gas reduction targets to work toward the Page 711 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes long-term goal of net-zero emissions." This work may be undertaken as part of a municipal energy plan. Corporate Services/Administration TBD Create a community Energy Task Force to guide development and implementation of the plan Climate Change Policy 3.5.1.3 in the adopted Niagara Official Plan states, "The Region will develop a municipal energy plan in consultation with the Local Area Municipalities, utility companies and organized interest groups to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, complement land use and infrastructure master planning, and support economic development opportunities in the region." Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2022 Climate Change Specialist Hired Page 712 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2022 Niagara Inaugural Climate Change Summit In September 2021, Niagara Region declared a climate emergency to accelerate action on climate change in the community. The inaugural Climate Change Summit was hosted by Niagara Region in partnership with Brock University and the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority. Summit objectives were to bring diverse community leaders together to develop a common understanding of climate change and its impact on the Niagara community, provide a snapshot of climate change action taking place in Niagara region and other communities, and give the opportunity for community leaders to commit to accelerating climate change initiatives in Niagara region. Page 713 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2022 Niagara Climate Change Action Network (NCCAN) Following the Niagara Inaugural Climate Change Summit, the Niagara Climate Change Action Network (NCCAN) has been formed. The NCCAN will focus on accelerating climate change action in the Niagara region. As well, to support the development and implementation of a Niagara Community Energy and Niagara Region Climate Action Plan. The NCCAN will ensure a progressive approach to addressing the effects of climate change by working in collaboration with Network members. The NCCAN will act as a roadmap to integrate the efforts of the Region, local utilities, business, industry, institutions and community stakeholders working towards world-class climate change action, energy performance, and sustainable development, while realizing positive economic, environmental, social, and cultural outcomes. Page 714 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2022 Corporate Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) The Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) is a multi-departmental group with the purpose of accelerating climate change projects, programs, policies and initiatives at the Region. As well, to guide and support the development of a Corporate Climate Action Inventory and Plan. Collectively, the group will work towards meeting the goals, strategic direction and priority actions as outlined in the Niagara Region Climate Change Action Plan, once developed. Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2022 Summary of Corporate Climate Change Action Inventory climate actions implemented to date at the Region. Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2022 Niagara Climate Change Municipal Community of Practice (NCCMCP) that includes all 12 Local Area Municipalities (LAMs) The purpose of the Niagara Climate Change Municipal Community of Practice (NCCMCP) is to create a collaborative group involving the Region and the Local Area Municipalities (LAMs) to focus on work concerning climate resilience and adaptation, land development, energy management and local generation, Page 715 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes biodiversity, and green infrastructure. The NCCMCP will ensure a progressive approach to addressing the effects of climate change and working in collaboration with members of administration, Council and stakeholder groups. Overall, the NCCMCP will strive to bring alignment regarding climate change work in Niagara. Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2022 Corporate climate action leadership brand to support engagement and education Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2022 Hire Climate Change Co-op Student The student will build understanding of the importance of climate change in Niagara, while contributing to high priority policies, programs, and actions to advance climate change adaptation and mitigation. This position will assist with advancing Regional climate change initiatives through collaborating with the internal Climate Change Working Group (CCWG); assist with developing the Regional Climate Change website and corporate Page 716 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes branding; assist with maintaining a Climate Action Summary and the Green House Gases (GHG) Inventory; develop the Climate Change Newsletter; and contribute to the planning of the 2023 Niagara Climate Change Summit. Other areas of responsibilities will include assisting with climate research, collecting qualitative and quantitative data from various sources, assisting with analyzing data, note taking and writing reporting. Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2023 Take Climate Action Summary and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventory Report to Council Recommended targets: 50% GHG reduction by 2030 Net zero by 2050 This report will provide Council with all Regional climate related projects, programs and initiatives that have taken place in the last 5 years. As well, the GHG inventory, will aid in Council's understanding of the baseline measure for Corporate GHG emissions and will help make decisions moving forward. Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2023 Review corporate policies related to climate change action and greenhouse gas mitigation Page 717 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2023 Refresh the partners for Climate Change Protection (PCP) program participation and plans Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2023- 2026 Update PCP Milestones #1-3. Update GHG emission inventory, corporate GHG emission target and Corporate Action Plan Corporate Strategy & Innovation -Corporate Administration 2023- 2027 Integrate existing actions from Region Master Plans, strategies, corporate planned actions and Energy Conservation Demand Management Plan into updated Plan Economic Development - Corporate Administration 2022 10-Year Economic Development Strategy going forward to Council The strategic direction of the Economic Development Strategy were established by combining input from the research conducted through the background review, the economic and industrial base analysis and the community and business engagement. The strategy builds on the strengths of the region, addresses weakness and identifies potential opportunities. The objective is to achieve a confident and Page 718 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes positive business environment that is necessary to grow a strong and sustainable economy. Keen on Green 2022 Office Supply Recycling program Keen on Green 2022 Battery Waste Diversion Program . Growth Strategy and Economic Development 2021 Niagara Region declared a Climate Change Emergency On September 15, 2021, the Planning and Economic Development Committee moved a motion to declare a Climate Change Emergency in Niagara. The minutes and approved recommendations were passed at the September 23, 2021 Regional Council meeting. Page 719 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Community and Long Range Planning 2019 Climate Change Discussion Paper for Niagara Official Plan Inform climate change adaptation initiatives. In November 2019, a Climate Change Discussion Paper was released to inform the development of the new Niagara Official Plan. The paper explores climate change risks and opportunities within various components of land use planning, such as growth management, infrastructure, transportation, energy, the natural environment, and agriculture. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Community and Long Range Planning 2020 Brock District Gateways Promoting active transportation. Installation of gateways, seating and planting along new multi-use path along Sir Isaac Brock Way/St. David's Road. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Community and Long Range Planning 2020 Glendale District Plan, NOTL, & St. Catharines Promotion of compact, mixed-use, complete communities, complete streets, sustainable public realm. The Glendale District Plan was endorsed by Regional Council in September 2020 through Report PDS 27-2020, and key policy direction was incorporated into the Niagara Official Plan adopted by Council in June 2022. The District Plan sets out a proactive land use strategy for the future growth, design and development of the Glendale area. This includes direction Page 720 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes relating to sustainable development and climate change (walkability, transit hub, compact built form, green buildings, and diverging diamond- active transportation support) to improve resiliency in the Glendale area. A secondary plan process has been initiated to implement the direction of the District Plan. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Community and Long Range Planning 2020 Ecological Land Classification Mapping Project Data source to form basis of several features in the Region's natural heritage system, identified in the Niagara Official Plan. This project was undertaken in collaboration with the NPCA and with funding from the Greenbelt Foundation through the Resilient Greenbelt funding stream. ELC is a provincially-accepted approach for mapping natural features. In addition, this project included a field verification exercise which involved participation from Local and Regional planning staff and staff from the NPCA. The ELC mapping exercise was undertaken primarily to support the environment work program for the new Niagara Official Plan. However, the data will also have supplementary uses Page 721 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes by the Region’s environmental planning team and the NPCA. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Community and Long Range Planning 2021 Brock District Placemaking Manual, Thorold, & St. Catharines Promotes LID techniques, active transportation. Implementation of the Brock District Vision identifies specific projects that address climate change through streetscaping, stormwater management, and active transportation. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Community and Long Range Planning 2021 Regional Greening Initiative Carbon sequestration to reduce emissions. The adopted Niagara Official Plan commits the Region to develop and implement a Regional Greening Initiative to restore and enhance vegetative cover to sequester carbon and mitigate climate change. Staff have initiated discussions with the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) and established a working group to develop a recommended Page 722 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes approach for Council endorsement. A pilot project was implemented in May 2021 where 7,400 native trees were planted at the Region's Decew Falls Water Treatment Plant. This project was undertaken in support of Land Care Niagara's 'Data Gap Analysis of Fragmented Parcels in the Niagara Region' project funded by the Ontario Trillium Foundation. In addition, the Region supported the development of the NPCA's submission to the federal 2 Billion Trees program. The submission was successful in receiving federal dollars to support the planting of 2 million trees over a 10-year period in Niagara. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Community and Long Range Planning 2022 Glendale Ecopark, St. Catharines Ecological restoration of Transport Canada lands, promote active transportation. Partnership with St Lawrence Seaway. UD team is assisting community planning staff to design an ECO park. Page 723 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Community and Long Range Planning 2022 Climate Projections for Niagara Region Inform climate change adaptation initiatives. The Region retained the Ontario Climate Consortium, a subset of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, to generate climate projections for Niagara. Using a baseline period of 1971-2000, climate projections were generated for various climate parameters (e.g., temperature, precipitation, and growing season) over the short-term (2021-2050) and long- term (2051-2080) under both high emissions (RCP 8.5) and stabilized emissions (RCP 4.5) scenarios. The climate projections informed the Niagara Official Plan and will also inform future climate change adaptation initiatives and subwatershed planning. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Community and Long Range Planning 2022 Niagara Watershed Plan Planning for natural resources to address climate change. The Niagara Watershed Plan was prepared to support the protection, enhancement and restoration of natural resources within Niagara's watersheds, with an emphasis on water resources. Watershed planning informs land use planning, including decisions relating to Page 724 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes growth and infrastructure, and planning for climate change. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Community and Long Range Planning 2022 Niagara Official Plan (Council Adoption) Intensification targets, strategic growth areas, protected major transit areas, transit supportive densities, complete streets, environmental protection. On June 23, 2022 Regional Council approved By-law 2022-47 adopting the Niagara Official Plan. The new plan has been sent to the Province of Ontario's Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for approval. The Niagara Official Plan is a long-term land use planning document that shapes and defines our community for future generations through policies that set out what we protect, where and how the region will grow, and policy tools for success. It includes land use planning policy direction relating to climate change, such as efficient use of land and infrastructure, opportunities for transit and active transportation, promoting green infrastructure and low impact development, ensuring strong environmental protections, and direction for local secondary planning and subwatershed studies. Page 725 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Community and Long Range Planning 2022 Natural Environment System-Niagara Official Plan (Council Adoption) Identification of a natural heritage system and water resource system for protection. Extensive background review and consultation resulted in policies and mapping that provide stronger protections for Niagara's natural environment system. The Niagara Official Plan, adopted by Regional Council on June 23, 2022, identifies a natural heritage system and water resource system for protection, and sets out policies to maintain, restore and enhance the biodiversity and connectivity of natural features, which exceed provincial requirements. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Community and Long Range Planning TBD Tree Canopy Inventory (baseline) The Region intends to undertake a baseline assessment of tree canopy coverage at a regional scale. This metric can be used to set targets and better understand the natural environment in Niagara. Page 726 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Growth Strategy and 2022 Smart Growth Regional Development promotes energy and water The Smart Growth Regional Economic Development -Charges Reduction Program conservation, compact, mixed-use, Development Charges Reduction Development Planning complete communities, active transportation Program, which is administered by Development Planning with input from Urban Design and Landscape Architecture, includes several criteria to promote/encourage design and construction materials that conserve energy and resources/reduce GHG emissions as well as strategies that reduce water consumption. It expires October 1, 2024; transition provisions are contained in PDS 3-2022. Growth Strategy and 2020 Woodland Conservation Bylaw Update Protecting Region's Canopy Cover. Section 135 (2) of the Municipal Act Economic Development -enables Regional Council to prohibit or Environmental Planning regulate the destruction or injuring of trees in woodlands as defined in the Forestry Act larger than one hectare in size. The Bylaw was 12 years old and as such the review considered legislative changes, alignment between the Bylaw and the Regional Official Plan, best management practices and operational needs. Page 727 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Growth Strategy and 2022 Environmental Impact Study (EIS) The Region’s Environmental Impact Economic Development -Guidelines Update Study (EIS) Guidelines were last Environmental Planning updated in 2018, but a more comprehensive update is now required to address updated natural heritage policies included in the Region’s new Official Plan. The updated EIS Guidelines are also anticipated to address the implementation of the climate change policies identified in the new Official Plan. Growth Strategy and TBD Restoration Plan Guidelines The Region intends to prepare a Economic Development -Restoration Plan Guideline to give Environmental Planning guidance on developing and implementing restoration on sites with active development applications. The focus of the Guideline is on the enhancement and restoration of natural heritage features, including native biodiversity and ecosystem functions. No guideline specific to the Niagara exists currently. Page 728 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Infrastructure Planning and Development Engineering 2020 Stormwater Management Guidelines Infrastructure design for climate resiliency, LID practices, advocates for a range of potential future rainfall trends, depending on numerous factors, "stress test" on storm infrastructure is recommended. The SWM Guidelines outline the desired attributes of stormwater infrastructure, as related to the Niagara Region overall governing policies and vision as outlined in the Niagara Official Plan. The SWM Guidelines enhance environmental principles in community and neighborhood planning, provide tools and resources to support infrastructure design on climate change resiliency, and requires an enhanced level of water quality treatment and a minimum of 5 mm stormwater retention to maintain the hydrology cycle through implementation of LID practices. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Infrastructure Planning and Development Engineering 2021 2021 Water and Waste Water Master Servicing Plan Update MSPU evaluates the ability of existing and planned water and wastewater infrastructure to continue to efficiently and effectively service the Region's existing service users, service anticipated growth out to 2051, and evaluate and develop recommended strategies. Climate change is considered a priority area within the Master Servicing Plan Update, the Region commits to be aware and consider the potential impacts of climate change on the planning and sizing of infrastructure. The update includes a Wet Weather Management Strategy for wastewater servicing as Niagara has a mix of separated and combined sewer Page 729 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes systems, which can be impacted by wet weather conditions and climate change. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Infrastructure Planning and Development Engineering 2021 Wet Weather Management/Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Funding Program To reduce the volume and frequency of stormwater from entering the wastewater collection system. Excessive inflow and infiltration results in overflows to the environment, potential basement flooding, and reduced capacity. This includes an annual cost sharing program with the local municipalities for projects to reduce CSOs and remove excessive inflow and infiltration. This CSO Funding Program has been ongoing since 2007. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - TBD TBD Green Development Standards Options Climate Change Policy 3.5.1.5 in the adopted Niagara Official Plan states, "The Region, in collaboration with the Local Area Municipalities, building and development industry, utility companies and organized interest groups will explore opportunities to elevate standards of green building development across the region." Page 730 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2018 Design assistance -Prudhommes Secondary Plan, Lincoln Promotion of compact, mixed-use, complete communities, complete streets, sustainable public realm. Design leadership to ensure sustainable streetscapes, Green Building and sustainable design direction. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2019 International Plaza, Niagara Region Headquarters Removal of turf areas, use of native plants, LID techniques. Implementation of the Green Brock District with bio-swales designed to absorb a 100 year storm. Creation of a pollinator garden, use of native pla nts and large scale trees. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2020 Niagara Biennial Design Awards N/A Bi annual awards program. Celebrates excellence in the design of the built environment. Judging criteria includes sustainable design of buildings, landscapes, public spaces, etc. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Region's Model Urban Design Guidelines Promotion of compact, mixed-use, complete communities, complete streets, sustainable public realm. Updates to the Region's 2005 design guidelines. Chapter on sustainability will be expanded and provide greater direction on designing for climate change, resiliency, etc. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Region's Terms of References for the Preparation of Micro-Climate Studies Access to sunlight for green energy and plant growth. Wind mitigation for active transportation and plant growth. Terms or References prepared for "Pedestrian Level Wind Comfort" and "Sun-Shadow Impact" studies for development and capital projects. Page 731 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 First Nations Peace Monument Landscape (2370 DeCew House Rd, Thorold) Increase in native plants, reduced lawn areas. Partnership with "Friends of Laura Secord, Niagara Parks Commission and Brock University. Installation of sustainable, native landscape surrounding the monument. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Lincoln's Ontario Street Urban Design Vision & Streetscape Master Plan Promoting compact, mixed-use community and complete streets approach Partnership with the Town of Lincoln that created a built form and streetscape vision for this intensification corridor. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Multifunctional Landscapes Research project (Vineland Research Institute) Sustainable landscapes in urban environments. Partnership with Vineland Research Institute and Town of Lincoln to create pilot projects to monitor sustainable landscape initiatives. Focus is on growing the urban tree canopy. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Public Realm Improvement Program (PRIP) De-paving of urban areas, increase in native plans and urban tree canopy Annual matching funding grant project for public realm projects along Regional roads. Began in 2016 and runs annually. Over 40 projects funded to date. Criteria for funding includes enhanced walkability, cycling use of recycled products, sustainable or innovative practices. Some examples include: Main Street, Grimsby (Street Page 732 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes trees in downtown), King Street, Lincoln (Streetscape), Prince Charles Dr, Welland (Multi-use path) Farmer's market (Welland), Smithville, West Lincoln (urban plaza), Smithville (roundabout), Bridge St Niagara Falls (roundabout), various tree planting projects: Rice Rd, Martindale Rd, Fourth Ave. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Gateway CIP Tax Increment Grant and Regional Development Charges Grant promotes energy and water conservation, sustainable development, active transportation The Gateway CIP program currently employs Smart Growth criteria to promote/encourage design and construction materials that conserve energy and resources/reduce GHG emissions as well as strategies that reduce water consumption. However, as these criteria are aimed primarily at residential/mixed use development, revisions to the criteria targeting manufacturing and industrial development are expected. Page 733 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Design assistance to Development Planning Team and Local Area Municipalities Sustainable streetscapes, LID techniques, increase urban tree canopy UD team provides urban design and landscape architectural comments for all development applications along Regional Roads. They also provide assistance for high value applications at the request of the LAMs. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Design assistance to Capital Buildings + Regional Facilities Sustainable landscapes, LID techniques, increase urban tree canopy UD team has assisted in conceptual design of several projects. Examples: Niagara Region Headquarters (Master Plan), Linhaven LTC, St. Catharines (re-development), Hawkins LTC, Welland (re-development), Gilmore Lodge LTC, Ft Erie, Grimsby Water treatment Plant (sustainable landscape and SWM design) Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Design assistance to GO Transit Facilities Sustainable streetscapes, LID techniques, increase urban tree canopy UD team has assisted in conceptual design of several projects. Examples: Niagara Falls, St. Catharines, Beamsville/Lincoln, Grimsby Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Design assistance to Capital road projects (EAs + Detailed design) Sustainable streetscapes, LID techniques, increase urban tree canopy UD team has assisted in conceptual design of several projects. Examples are too few to mention (over 25 EAs) Page 734 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Design assistance to Public Health initiatives Promotion of a safe, vibrant public realm to support active transportation UD team collaborates with various public health initiatives to apply an urban design and landscape architectural lens. Examples: Walking school bus routes, Health Impact Assessments (HIA), Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Project (HEPA) Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Design assistance to Local Area Municipalities for Public Realm Projects Design of sustainable public spaces and streetscapes to promote active transportation UD team has assisted several LAMs on the design of public spaces. There is an emphasis on de-paving, use of native plants and increasing the urban tree canopy. Examples: Lincoln: Rotary Park, Charles Daley Park, Angelina Prokich Park, Prudhommes Park, Jordan Hollow Park, Grimsby: Casablanca parks, Port Colborne: Lions Club Sports Field, Lock 8 Park. Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Design assistance to School Boards (Surplus Properties) Design of compact built form supported by public realm UD team has assisted school boards with conceptual designs of surplus school sites. Examples: St Martin School, West Lincoln, Secondary School, Grimsby Page 735 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Growth Strategy and Economic Development - Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 2022 Design assistance to Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) coordination of best practices in sustainable design UD staff has collaborate on research and workshops to determine best practices in sustainable landscape design, LID techniques (e.g. SWM practices) and the use of native plants. Public Health -CDIP & EH 2018 Climate Change Health Promoter hired Public Health -CDIP & EH 2020 Climate change portfolio work is resumed in Public Health. Kaitlyn Irving starts her MPH placement Jan 2020 MPH placement came to an end prematurely due to COVID-19 pandemic. Kaitlyn returned back to her role as a PHI but continued to work on climate change projects. Her work is stored in the N: Drive. Public Health -Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention 2018 Community Gardens The CASTLE program has supported the build of community gardens in social housing neighbourhoods since 2018. Public Health -Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention 2020 Students on the Move This research considers the transportation of Niagara’s 30,000 post- secondary students and the impact of transportation, or lack of transportation on wellbeing. Page 736 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Public Health -Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention 2023 Observational Study on Beaches (Smoking and Vaping) Observational study to examine non- compliance as it relates to smoking and vaping on beaches. Additional information was gathered including the presence of butt litter. Findings will help inform enforcement efforts and future discussions with LAMs and team. Public Health -EH 2022 Creation of climate change webpage on Niagara Region webpage Public Health -EH, CDIP, Medical 2022 Commencing the Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment as per the MOHLTC Working document is house in the N: Drive. Public Health -Emergency Management 2017 Emergency and Hazard Tracking Spreadsheet Regional Emergency Management tracks hazard and emergency occurrences. This includes climate- related hazards. Public Health -Emergency Management 2017 Emergency Preparedness Website EM website has safety information for hazards that can impact Niagara. This includes hazards that may be altered in terms of frequency and magnitude by climate change. Page 737 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Public Health -Emergency Management 2018 Niagara Region Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) The HIRA assesses risk through an examination of the frequency and the potential consequences that could arise should a hazard impact Niagara Region at a magnitude that is severe enough to result in a potential emergency. It also includes the variable of ‘changing risk’ which accounts for changes in vulnerability and frequency due to factors such as population demographic shifts and climate change. Public Health -Emergency Management 2019 Facility Closure Plan The Facility Closure Plan outlines the actions that are taken should a severe weather hazard warrant the potential closure of Regional facilities. Public Health -Emergency Management 2019 Hazard Monitoring Regional Emergency Management continuously monitors for hazards that could result in an emergency, including hazards related to climate change. This is reflected in the EM Standby procedure and other emergency plans. Page 738 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Public Health -Emergency Management 2019 Emergency Management Stakeholder Meetings Meetings were originally to collaborate with the LAMs and key stakeholders (e.g., Brock University) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This group now meets monthly to discuss emergency management issues and hazards occurrences that are often related to climate change. Public Health -Emergency Management 2022 Hazard Monitoring Regional Emergency Management continuously monitors for hazards that could result in an emergency, including hazards related to climate change. This is reflected in the EM Standby procedure and other emergency plans. Public Health -Emergency Management 2022 Emergency Management Stakeholder Meetings This event will be an opportunity for emergency management partners including the local area municipal CEMCs to provide input on the Region's COVID-19 response from an emergency management perspective. Although the catalyst will be the pandemic, climate change will be one of the factors that participants will be asked to consider when they share Page 739 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes what they would like to see regarding the way forward for emergency management in Niagara. Public Health -Emergency Management 2022 Niagara Region Emergency Response Plan The Regional Emergency Response Plan provides the framework for the Region to respond and recover from emergencies. This includes hazards that may have altered frequencies and magnitudes due to climate change. Public Health -Emergency Management 2022 Emergency and Hazard Tracking Spreadsheet Public Health -Emergency Management 2022 COVID-19 Hotwash -The Way Forward for Emergency Management in Niagara Public Health -Emergency Management 2022 Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) -Initial Intake The development and initial intake of a group of trained volunteers who can assist the communities in emergency responses including those related to climate change. Page 740 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Public Health -Emergency Management 2023 Update of Emergency Management Public Education Tools Public Health -Emergency Management 2023- 2025 Additional Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Intake Public Health - Environmental Health 2022 Healthy Environments Working Group (HEWG) The Environmental Health Division recently established a HEWG in April 2022. The committee consists of the healthy environments program manager and team leader, appointed climate change champion, health promotor, two PHIs, medical resident intern, and program assistant. The HEWG is a forum enabling staff to bring ideas and suggestions forward for the facilitation and improvement of the healthy environments portfolio. Their objectives include: Identifying, recommending, and implementing initiatives to help promote the Healthy Environments portfolio within the Division. -Implementation of a Climate Change Page 741 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes and Human Health webpage on the regional website. -Working collaboratively to develop the Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment. Making this document accessible to the public on our designated webpage. -Working collaboratively with the corporate Climate Change Advisor and existing Regional climate change committees with similar goals where they exist. Public Works 2017 Transportation Master Plan (TMP) The TMP is a long-term strategy to guide the planning, development, renewal, and maintenance of a multi- modal transportation system in a manner that is consistent with projected needs, and aligned with the region’s growth and vision for a sustainable Niagara. Public Works 2019 Go Train Implementation Niagara is working collaboratively with local area municipal partners, Metrolinx (MX), CN Rail, VIA Rail and the St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corp Page 742 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes (SLSMC) to lead, manage and coordinate the implementation of weekday GO train service. Public Works 2021 Niagara Region Council approved region-wide transit In November 2021, Niagara Region Council voted to approve the Moving Transit Forward proposal. The proposal brings together independently operating local transit systems in Fort Erie, St. Catharines, Welland, and Niagara Falls, as well as Niagara Region Transit and NRT OnDemand to offer consistent operating hours and fares, new digital payment technology, and better connections for riders across Niagara. Public Works 2021 Combined sewer overflow tank upgrades at Chippewa Low-Lift were completed in partnership with the City of Niagara Falls. This reduced the overflow events to zero. This was part of the CSO Funding program for Niagara Falls Page 743 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Public Works TBD Explore Opportunities to Transition to Zero-Emissions Vehicle Fleet Climate Change Policy 3.5.2.4 in the adopted Niagara Official Plan states, "The Region will explore opportunities to transition to a zero-emissions vehicle fleet." Public Works -Road Corridor Team 2018 Regional Street Tree Master List Addition of trees to the urban canopy. Every development application along a Regional road is required to provide street trees, where space permits. If trees are removed, two must be replaced. If there is no space then CIL of street trees is required. Public Works -Transit 2023 Zero Emission Busses (ZEBs) Both hydrogen and battery electric pilots/studies have been undertaken. Green fleet review -infrastructure required to implement. Orders will be placed for next generation fleet in 2024. Public Works -Transit 2023 Network Review Concrete plan for implementation of zero emission buses (ZEBs) to transit network. Review will determine which routed, areas, coverage can be optimized to best deploy ZEBs. Page 744 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Public Works - Transportation Planning 2021 Niagara Region Complete Streets Design Manual Complete streets application to road design making streets safe for all ages and abilities. UD team assisted in design comments for the public realm (streetscapes, street furnishings, street trees, and plant material). Public Works -W/WW 2018 Niagara Falls Water Treatment Plant LED Lighting conversion Phase 1 15892 Kwhr savings. Public Works -W/WW 2018 Niagara Falls Water Treatment Plant LED Lighting conversion Phase 2 7221 Kwhr savings. Public Works -W/WW 2018 Dain City Pumping Station LED lighting conversion 8301 Kwhr savings. The program provides financial incentives and technical supports to assist affordable housing builders to design and construct buildings that are more energy efficient than required by the Ontario Building Code. Public Works -W/WW 2021 Welland Waste Water Treatment Plant Boiler Upgrade Improve efficiency of boiler operations by upgrading to condensing type boilers for both natural gas and digester gas fuels. Estimated reduction of CO2 emissions of 387 tonnes annually. Page 745 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Public Works -W/WW 2021 Port Weller Wastewater Treatment Plant Boiler Upgrade Improve efficiency of boiler operations by upgrading to condensing type boilers for both natural gas and digester gas fuels. Estimated annual reduction of CO2 emissions of 387 tonnes. Public Works -W/WW 2021 Port Weller Wastewater Treatment Plant Exterior Lighting Upgrade Conversion of exterior lighting to LED with auto sensing Hi/Low. Reduction of 24,430 kwhr. Public Works -W/WW 2022 Niagara Falls Wastewater Treatment Plant Boiler Upgrade Estimated reductions of 350 tonnes of CO2 emissions due to improved efficiency of boiler operations by upgrading to condensing type boilers for both natural gas and digester gas fuels. Public Works -W/WW 2022 Niagara Falls Water Treatment Plant Boiler Upgrade Estimate a 67.8 tonne reduction in CO2 emissions due to increased boiler efficiency for building heating boilers. Public Works -W/WW 2023 Replacement for Port Dalhousie Wastewater Treatment Plant Estimated GHG reduction of 380 tonnes CO2. Public Works -W/WW TBD Renewable Natural Gas Feasibility Page 746 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Public Works -W/WW Engineering 2022 Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure ISI has developed resources to help communities and organizations navigate the complexities of sustainability, resiliency, and equity in infrastructure, ISI embraces strong partnerships and purposeful models of cooperation and collaboration. No single organization has the capacity to act alone to bring about global change, which is why we value consensus building and meaningful relationships. Public Works -Waste Management 2017 Keen on Green -Deskside Waste Diversion Program Per the results of an end of year waste composition audit at Regional headquarters in 2017, the implementation of the deskside waste diversion program at Regional HQ reduced the amount of recyclable and compostable material disposed in the garbage by 26%, compared to the 2016 waste audit data. Keen on Green is a multi-departmental committee with the goal to identify and implement initiatives to minimize waste and increase diversion at Regional facilities. In addition, the committee is dedicated to promoting current practices that demonstrate the Region’s commitment to waste reduction. While the focus of the committee will be waste reduction, it will keep within its consideration the larger impact that waste reduction has on energy efficiency and overall sustainability. Page 747 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Public Works -Waste Management 2020 Every-Other-Week Garbage Collection In the first year of every-other- week (EOW) garbage collection, tonnages of organics material collected curbside increase 23% compared to the same time period in 2019 and 2020. The amount of curbside collected garbage decrease by 18% in the year following implementation of EOW garbage collection, compared to the same period in 2019 and 2020. Curbside tonnages of recycling also increased 9.7%. A life cycle assessment completed by Sound Resource Management Group analyzed the environmental benefits associated with the increased diversion following the move to EOW garbage. For the one year period following the change, the assessment found a decrease of 18,400 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. After successful implementation of the Region organics diversion program in 2003 and full roll-out to all Local Area Municipalities by 2011, the Region approved every-other-week garbage collection in October 2020. Shifting to every-other-week garbage collection encourages residents to put their organic and food waste in the Green Bin for weekly collection. Page 748 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Public Works -Waste Management 2022 Humberstone Landfill Gas Collection and Control System The system is comprised of a series of gravel-filled trenches excavated into the waste with a perforated collection pipe in the gravel. The perforated pipes are connected to an underground solid pipe around the perimeter of the landfill that lead to a gas flare building. Blowers induce negative pressure (suction) which draws the gas from the waste into the gravel and perforated pipe, through the solid pipe and into the landfill gas flare. The methane in the landfill gas is combusted by an enclosed flare. Public Works -Waste Management 2022 Multi-Residential Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) Recycling Program As of 2015, this program has diverted 67,486 lbs of electronics from landfill. Currently have 37 multi-residential properties (high-rise apartments/condos with seven or more units) utilizing this program (including some NRH properties). Electronics are collected in carts by the contractor, EPRA, at regular intervals and recycled. Looking to continue to expand this program to other multi-residential properties across the Region. Page 749 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Public Works -Waste Management 2022 Special Events Recycling and Organics Program In 2019, Niagara Region serviced 176 Special Events with recycling and organics (no service in 2020 or 2021 due to COVID). In 2019, 22 tonnes of recycling was diverted from landfill and 33 tonnes of organics was diverted from landfill. Service is offered to community-based events free of charge (as long as the Region's guidelines are followed). Events can request recycling and organic carts to increase diversion and decrease the amount of recyclable and organic material going into the waste stream at their event, which have both environmental and financial benefits to the event itself. Niagara Region works with Niagara Recycling to service larger cart requests and 40-yard roll of containers, and the organics service is contracted out to Davidson Environmental. Page 750 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes Public Works -Waste Management 2022 Multi-Residential Textile Recycling program As of 2018, this program has diverted over 53 tonnes of textiles from landfill. Currently have 22 multi-residential properties (high-rise apartments/condos with seven or more units) utilizing this program (including some Region LTC homes and NRH properties). Textiles are collected by one of the Region's two Registered charities, Goodwill Niagara or Cornerstone to Recovery, at regular intervals. Material is then re-sold, or recycled. Looking to continue to expand this program to other multi-residential properties across the Region. Public Works – Waste Management 2022 Multi-Residential Organics program Currently have 164 multi- residential properties participating in the Region's organics cart program. Multi-residential properties are defined as high-rise apartments or condo buildings with seven or more units. This type of property has historically met many challenges when it comes to waste diversion. It is often easier for residents to put all materials down the garbage chutes in these buildings. Niagara Region has slowly expanded this program to multi-residential properties across the Region to increase organics diversion and reduce Page 751 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes the amount of waste in the garbage stream. When the property purchases organic carts, the Region provides each unit with a free kitchen catcher (for in- unit collection of organics) and information on the Region's organics program along with a sorting guide. Organic carts are collected weekly. Looking to continue to expand this program to other multi-residential properties across the Region. Public Works – Waste Management 2022 Multi-Residential Battery Recycling program As of 2017, this program has diverted 2,311 kgs of batteries from landfill. Currently have 71 multi-residential properties (high-rise apartments/condos with seven or more units) utilizing this program (including several NRH properties). Properties are provided with a 2 gal battery pail -once the pail is full, the building contacts the Waste Diversion Coordinate (Emily Hughes) and arranges to have the pail switched out. Waste Management staff take the full pail of batteries to the Thorold HHW Depot and deposit in a drum, which is collected at regular Page 752 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes intervals by the Region's contractor, Raw Materials Company (RMC). Looking to continue to expand this program to other multi-residential properties across the Region. Public Works -Waste Management 2023 Glenridge and Mountain Road Leachate Collection Systems The Glenridge and Mountain Road sites currently have operational leachate collection systems (LCS), but upcoming projects will improve the leachate collection efficiency and ensure pump stations never exceed their approved capacity. Design improvements consist of: -Modifying landfill grading to improve drainage -Revamping stormwater management ponds to separate leachate and surface Page 753 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes water -Installation of a small pumping station (Glenridge) -Addition of storage tanks adjacent to our pumping station to provide on-Site buffering capacity In new infrastructure designs, we are taking climate change into account and the more frequent/severe storms that come with it, in order to maintain capacity and efficiency during increasingly large storm events. Designs always have ecological responsibility and environmental conscientiousness at top of mind. Public Works -Waste Management 2023 Pollinator Program Will be working with the Canadian Wildlife Federation to establish pollinator gardens at the Region's landfills. The gardens will be a combination of native wildflowers and grasses to provide habitat for butterflies, bees, and other insects losing habitat due to climate change. Strengthening pollinator presence at Page 754 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes our sites will combat climate change by giving these species more opportunity to thrive in the face of critical habitat loss due to temperature changes. Public Works -Waste Management 2023 Waste Management Strategic Plan The Waste Management Strategic Plan will help guide the direction of waste management for the next 25 years. Mitigating the effects of waste on the environment/climate is intended to be an integral part of waste diversion goals. The plan will consider landfill GHG emissions, capital construction practices, collection vehicle emissions, etc. Development of the overall strategy will be broken up into a series of research and consultation activities that will take place during 2023. TBD TBD Greenhouse Gas Inventory (Community Sectors) Climate Change Policy 3.5.1.1 in the adopted Niagara Official Plan states, "The Region will maintain its community-wide greenhouse has Page 755 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes inventory to monitor progress in emissions reduction planning." This work may be undertaken as part of a municipal energy plan. TBD TBD New Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets (Community Sectors) Climate Change Policy 3.5.1.2 in the adopted Niagara Official Plan states, "The Region will establish new community-wide greenhouse gas reduction targets to work toward the long-term goal of net-zero emissions." TBD TBD Municipal Energy Plan Climate Change Policy 3.5.1.3 in the adopted Niagara Official Plan states, "The Region will develop a municipal energy plan in consultation with the Local Area Municipalities, utility companies and organized interest groups to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, complement land use and infrastructure master planning, and support economic development opportunities in the region." Page 756 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes 2017 Hosts Summit where there is a Climate Change section 2017 Niagara Region Asset Management Plan (AMP) approved by Council in March The Asset Management Plan addresses management of the Region’s approximately $7.4B worth of assets, including water/wastewater, transportation, waste management, police services and Regional facilities including housing managed by Niagara Regional Housing (NRH), long term care homes, and the Region’s administrative offices. In the AMP, climate change is recognized as an external factor that will affect level of service, and performance of assets. 2019 Niagara Region completed a Strategic Asset Management Policy and was approved by Council in May The SAMP commits the Region to consider actions that may be required to address municipal infrastructure vulnerabilities caused by climate change. Page 757 of 936 PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Division -Department Year Item Energy Reduction, Cost Savings, Avoidance Notes TBD Vulnerability Assessment and Climate Change Adaptation Plan Climate Change Policy 3.5.1.9 in the adopted Niagara Official Plan states, "The Region will assess anticipated climate change risks and vulnerabilities across systems, and develop and implement a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy, informed by Regional climate projections, to prepare for the impacts of climate change." Page 758 of 936 l J Region PDS 17-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 3 Milestone# 1 Niagara Region 2018 Corporate Baseline GHG Emissions Inventory Report Summary March 2023 Prepared by ICLEI Canada Page 759 of 936 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Partners for Climate Protection ................................................................................... 1 Baseline Energy and Emissions Profile....................................................................... 2 Corporate 2018 Energy and Emissions Profile ............................................................... 3 Municipal Buildings and Facilities ............................................................................... 4 Corporate Vehicle Fleet & Equipment ......................................................................... 5 Outdoor Lighting and Traffic Signals ........................................................................... 6 Water & Wastewater ................................................................................................... 6 Solid Waste ................................................................................................................ 7 Business-as-Usual Energy Use GHG Emissions Forecast ............................................. 8 Business-as-Usual Cost Projections ......................................................................... 10 Monitoring and Reporting ......................................................................................... 10 Figures Figure 1: The PCP Five-Milestone Framework ............................................................... 1 Figure 2: Projected municipal energy use under a business-as-usual scenario by sector to 2051........................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 3: Projected municipal GHG emissions under a business-as-usual scenario by sector to 2051 ................................................................................................................ 9 Figure 4: Projection of energy expenditures under a business -as-usual scenario, under a low and high-cost scenario for the Niagara Region ................................................... 10 Tables Table 1: Total scope 1 and 2 municipal energy use, energy costs and GHG emissions in 2018............................................................................................................................... 3 Table 2: Total scope 3 municipal energy use, energy costs, and GHG emissions in 2018 ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Table 3: Total scope 1 and 2 municipal energy consumption and costs by fuel type in 2018............................................................................................................................... 4 Table 4: Total municipal building energy consumption, costs and GHG emissions by asset in 2018 ................................................................................................................. 4 Table 5: Municipal fleet fuel use, energy costs, and GHG emissions in 2018 ................. 6 Page 760 of 936 Niagara Region 2018 Corporate GHG Inventory Summary Table 6: Municipal vehicle fleet fuel use and GHG emissions by vehicle type ................ 6 Table 7: Water and wastewater treatment process total energy use, emissions and energy costs in 2018 ...................................................................................................... 7 Table 8: Non-treatment process related energy use, costs and emissions ..................... 7 Page 761 of 936 1: CREATING AN INVENTORY MILESTONE 5: MONITORING THE IMPACT ADVANCING THE COMMITMENT MILESTONE 2 : SETTING A TARGET MILESTONE 3 : DEVELOPING A PLAN MILESTONE 4 : IMPLEMENTING A PLAN Introduction This document is a summary of the Niagara Region (the Region) 2018 Corporate Baseline Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Inventory. The GHG Emissions Inventory (Hereon referred to as the Inventory) encompasses data on municipal energy use and GHG emissions, in addition to a business-as-usual emissions forecast for Niagara Region’s corporate operations. Partners for Climate Protection The Region’s Inventory was developed in compliance with the Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) program requirements. PCP is a partnership between the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) and ICLEI Canada – Local Governments for Sustainability. This program helps local government reduce municipal emissions by guiding municipalities through a five-step Milestone Framework (Figure 1). Figure 1: The PCP Five-Milestone Framework The PCP program offers two streams: Corporate and community. A corporate inventory encompasses all energy use and GHG emissions stemming from municipal operations, including buildings, fleet, outdoor lighting and traffic signals, water and wastewater, and solid waste. 1 Page 762 of 936 Niagara Region 2018 Corporate GHG Inventory Summary Baseline Energy and Emissions Profile To develop the baseline energy and emissions profile, this report followed the PCP Protocol1, which applies industry best practices for quantifying emissions at the local level (Greenhouse Gas Protocol2 and IPCC Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Inventories3) to the context of municipal operations. The baseline energy profile and GHG emissions inventory tracks three principal GHGs that arise from municipal operations: carbon dioxide (C02), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N20). Emissions fall into one of three scopes: Scope 1 GHG emissions: Direct emissions from sources owned or operated by the corporation. Scope 2 GHG emissions: Indirect emissions from sources owned or operated by the corporation. Scope 3 GHG emissions: Emissions from sources neither owned nor operated by the corporation but are related to the corporation activities. This Inventory’s boundary has been determined using an approach known as operational control, which requires local governments to report 100 per cent of GHG emissions from operations over which it has control (scope 1 and scope 2 emissions). Indirect (scope 3) emissions included in this Inventory are sources of emissions associated with Niagara Region’s operations but are not under full operational control and decision-making authority (i.e., police vehicle fleets, the contracted community waste collection vehicle fleet and landfill emissions). Energy and GHG emissions totals will include only scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 3 emissions will be reported separately. Energy consumed outside the municipal boundary (and the associated emissions generated) as a result of activities taking place within Niagara region are excluded. The following information will be presented in this report: Total energy consumed by Niagara Region in 2018, by sector and by source. Total energy dollars spent by Niagara Region, by sector and by source. Total emissions generated by Niagara Region, by sector, source, and scope. A business-as-usual GHG emissions forecast for 2032, 2041 and 2051. 1 ICLEI Canada. (2014). PCP Protocol: Canadian Supplement to the International Emissions Analysis Protocol. 2 Greenhouse Gas Protocol. (2015). The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. 3 IPCC. (2006). Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. 2 Page 763 of 936 Niagara Region 2018 Corporate GHG Inventory Summary Corporate 2018 Energy and Emissions Profile In 2018, Niagara Region scope 1 and 2 sources used 796,410 GJ of energy, which resulted in $18,350,788 of energy costs and 22,626 tC02e GHG emissions. Scope 1 and 2 energy consumption, costs, and GHG emissions are disaggregated by sector in Table 1. Table 2 displays the equivalent data for scope 3 emissions. Table 1: Total scope 1 and 2 municipal energy use, energy costs and GHG emissions in 2018 Sector Energy Consumption (GJ) Energy Costs ($) GHG Emissions (tC02e) Buildings 376,218 $7,597,162 12,668 Fleet 53,004 $1,606,974 3,526 Outdoor Lighting and Traffic Signals 10,886 $465,679 91 Water & Wastewater 356,301 $8,680,972 6,280 Operational Waste4 N/A N/A 62 Totals* 796,410 $18,350,788 22,626 *Values may not sum to total due to rounding Table 2: Total scope 3 municipal energy use, energy costs, and GHG emissions in 2018 Sector Energy Consumption (GJ) Energy Costs ($) GHG Emissions (tC02e) Niagara Region Police Vehicle Fleet 31,991 $1,015,872** 2,074 Contracted Waste Collection Vehicles 86,931 $2,500,845 5,910 Landfilled Waste N/A N/A 37,492 Totals* 118,922 3,516,717 45,477 *Values may not sum to total due to rounding **Estimated based on total per L fuel cost of the vehicle fleet Table 3 shows scope 1 and 2 municipal energy consumption, costs, and GHG emissions by fuel type. According to this data, while Electricity is the largest source of fuel-derived energy consumption (46%), Natural Gas is responsible for producing the 4 Operational waste refers to waste collected from waste bins at municipally owned facilities. 3 Page 764 of 936 Niagara Region 2018 Corporate GHG Inventory Summary largest quantity of GHG emissions amongst fuel types. In fact, Natur al Gas accounts for 70% of fuel-derived GHG emissions. Table 3: Total scope 1 and 2 municipal energy consumption and costs by fuel type in 2018 Fuel type Energy Consumption (GJ) tC02e Energy Costs ($) Electricity 370,355 3,083 $13,992,339 Natural Gas 309,787 15,775 $2,751,475 Gasoline 24,854 1,604 $797,177 Diesel 28,149 1,936 $809,797 Biogas 63,264 19 N/A Totals* 796,410 22,4035 18,350,788 *Values may not sum to total due to rounding Municipal Buildings and Facilities As displayed in Table 1, municipally owned and operated buildings and facilities are the Region’s top energy consumer and greatest producer of GHG emissions, accounting for 47% of municipal energy consumption and 56% of municipal scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions. Moreover, Buildings account for 41% of energy costs, second only to Water and Wastewater. There are 10 asset categories included in the Region’s building portfolio; Energy consumption and total GHG emissions from each category are presented in Table 4. Table 4: Total municipal building energy consumption, costs and GHG emissions by asset in 2018 Electricity Natural Total Electricity GHG Natural Gas Gas GHG Total Energy GHG Asset Consumption Emissions Consumption Emissions Consumption Emissions Category (kWh) (tC02e) (m3) (tC02e) (GJ) (tC02e) Niagara HQ 2,869,344 86 168,148 319 16,602 405 Child Care Services 272,681 8 49,802 95 2,839 103 Long-term Care Facilities 11,104,930 333 1,721,107 3,269 104,175 3,602 Health Care 350,299 11 54,842 104 3,307 115 Niagara EMS 400,946 12 124,073 236 6,446 248 5 Excludes emissions from operational waste and flaring. 4 Page 765 of 936 Niagara Region 2018 Corporate GHG Inventory Summary Electricity Asset Consumption Category (kWh) Electricity GHG Emissions (tC02e) Natural Gas Consumption (m3) Natural Gas GHG Emissions (tC02e) Total Energy Consumption (GJ) Total GHG Emissions (tC02e) Niagara Regional Housing 16,314,940 489 2,882,768 5,475 166,261 5,965 Niagara Regional Police 5,860,042 176 507,651 964 40,032 1,140 Transportation Patrol Yards 1,051,934 32 161,889 307 9,825 339 Employment Offices and Court Services 944,137 28 125,480 238 8,079 267 Waste Management Facilities 3,035,775 91 207,056 393 18,652 484 Totals* 42,205,026 1,266 6,002,816 11,401 376,218 12,668 *Values may not sum to total due to rounding Corporate Vehicle Fleet & Equipment Niagara Region owns and operates a fleet of 317 vehicles consisting of gasoline and diesel cars, vans, pickups, heavy duty trucks, and snowplows, EMS vehicles, as well as off-road equipment such as loaders, graders, backhoes tractors, and riding mowers. Corporate fleet accounts for 7% of scope 1 and 2 energy consumption, 9% of municipal energy costs, and 16% of scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions. Table 5 displays fleet energy use, costs and GHG emissions by fuel type, and Table 6 presents this data disaggregated by vehicle type. 5 Page 766 of 936 Niagara Region 2018 Corporate GHG Inventory Summary Table 5: Municipal fleet fuel use, energy costs, and GHG emissions in 2018 Fuel Type Energy Consumption (L) Energy Consumption (GJ) Energy Costs ($) GHG Emissions (tC02e) Gasoline 728,720 25,257 $797,177 1,604 Diesel 730,015 28,237 $809,797 1,922 Totals* 1,458,735 53,494 1,606,974 3,526 *Values may not sum to total due to rounding Table 6: Municipal vehicle fleet fuel use and GHG emissions by vehicle type Total Diesel Diesel Gasoline Fuel GHG Fuel Fuel Use Use Emissions Vehicle Type Use (L) (L)(GJ) (tC02e) Gasoline GHG Emissions (tC02e) Total GHG Emissions (tC02e) Light Duty (Cars/Vans/Pickups) 3,276 448,272 15,416 9 987 996 Medium Duty (Ford F450/550) 29,439 77,517 3,779 78 171 248 Heavy Duty (Large trucks/snowplows) 307,030 0 11,839 805 0 805 OHEV (Loaders/Graders/Backhoes) 30,781 0 1,187 81 0 81 OMED (Tractors) 41,895 0 1,615 111 0 111 Misc. (Riding Mowers) 2,844 24 110 7 0 7 EMS 314,750 202,907 19,057 831 447 1,278 Totals* 730,015 728,720 53,004 1,922 1,604 3,526 *Values may not sum to total due to rounding Outdoor Lighting and Traffic Signals Niagara Region owns, operates and maintains 282 traffic signals, 115 warning beacons and over 1,550 roadway lights. Outdoor lighting consumed 10,886 GJ of energy in 2018 accounting for 1% of energy consumption, at a cost of $465,679 or 3% of energy costs (Table 1). Electricity usage for outdoor lighting generated 91 tC02e, contributing less than 1% to scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions. Water & Wastewater The Region operates 10 wastewater treatment plants, 6 water treatment plants, 132 remote wastewater facilities and 84 remote water facilities, as well as non-treatment process related buildings including the central maintenance building and environmental services centre. Water and wastewater collection and distribution facilities are not 6 Page 767 of 936 Electricity Use (kWh) Natural Gas (kWh) Total Energy GHG Emissions Use (tC02e) Energy Costs ($) Water 19,379,719 669,389 94,735 1,853 2,708,759 Wastewater 37,552,971 1,518,708 191,839 4,011 5,855,754 Totals* 56,932,690 2,188,097 286,574 5,864 8,564,513 Niagara Region 2018 Corporate GHG Inventory Summary included here as they fall under member municipality jurisdiction and are not under operational control of Niagara Region. Water and wastewater accounts for 45% of municipal energy consumption, 28% of scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions, and 47% of energy costs. Table 7 provides an overview of energy use, costs, and GHG emissions in the water and wastewater treatment process. This table does not include non-treatment process related energy use, costs and emissions. Information regarding non-treatment processes is displayed in Table 8. Furthermore, anaerobic digesters at the wastewater treatment plants produced an additional 19tC02e, and fugitive emissions from flaring accounts for 161 tC02e. Table 7: Water and wastewater treatment process total energy use, emi ssions and energy costs in 2018 *Values may not sum to total due to rounding Table 8: Non-treatment process related energy use, costs and emissions Building Name Electricity Use (kWh) Electricity Electricity Emissions Cost ($) (tC02e) Natural Natural Gas Use Gas Cost (m3) ($) Natural Gas Emissions (tC02e) Central Maintenance Building 252,721 $ 28,244 8 48,165 $ 12,993 91 Environmental Services Building 357,834 $ 57,996 11 66,209 $ 17,227 126 Totals* 610,555 $ 86,239 18 114,374 $ 30,220 217 *Values may not sum to total due to rounding Solid Waste Due to the operational control of the landfills by Niagara Region, corporate waste emissions are divided into total emissions from active municipally owned and operated landfills, and emissions from operational waste which is waste collected from corporate waste bins at municipally owned facilities. Operational waste is a subset of total landfill emissions and therefore is not added to total landfill emissions. Operational waste 7 Page 768 of 936 Niagara Region 2018 Corporate GHG Inventory Summary includes emissions from green bin collection delivered to composting facilities . Operational waste contributed less than 1% to total landfill emissions. Niagara Region is also responsible for 12 inactive landfill sites. Inactive landfill sites can continue to produce GHG emissions for years after their closure. For the purposes of GHG baseline inventories, the methane commitment model is used to calculate landfill GHG emissions from the decomposition of biomass into methane (CH4). As waste decomposes a portion of emissions are released every year. The methane commitment model calculates the amount of GHG emissions from landfills by using the annual waste disposal amount, regardless of when the emissions actually occurred. In other words, future emissions from waste disposed in a certain year are attributed to that specific inventory year, even though the decomposition of waste and the resulting emissions can take place over many years. Using this method, closed landfills are not included in the Inventory. Total emissions from Niagara Region’s two landfills account for 55% of scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions. The Humberstone landfill uses a partial landfill gas collection which significantly reduces emissions. Table 9: Landfill waste, open burning, and operational waste GHG emissions in 2018 Asset Category Tonnes of Waste GHG Emissions (tC02e) Humberstone Landfill 54,420 14, 693 Niagara Road 12 Landfill 16,888 22,799 Operational Waste* (not added to total) 62 62 Totals** 71,308 37,492 *Includes 19 tonnes of compost collected from municipal facilities **Values may not sum due to rounding Business-as-Usual Energy Use GHG Emissions Forecast The purpose of the Business-as-Usual (BAU) scenario is to understand future energy consumption, energy costs and emissions for the Niagara Region, assuming no action is taken to reduce energy or emissions. Energy consumption, costs and GHG emissions were modelled from 2018 to 2032, 2041, and 2051, in line with population forecasts in the Watson & Associates Economist Ltd. Niagara Region Development Charges Background Study. The BAU forecast is not an absolute picture of future energy use and GHG emissions but instead serves as a tool to guide decision making on energy and emissions mitigation strategies. Figure 2 shows that energy use is projected to steadily increase throughout the Region between 2018 and 2051. The greatest expected increase is observed in Outdoor Lighting and Traffic Signals, increasing by approximately 46% from 2018 to 2051. 8 Page 769 of 936 ■ ■ T ■ ■ - 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 2018 2032 2041 2051Energy Consumption (GJ)Projected Energy Use to 2051 Outdoor Lighting and Traffic Signals Water & Wastewater Buildings Fleet Scope 3 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ - 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 2051GHG Emissions (tCO2e)Projected Total Emissions to 2051 2018 2032 2041 Outdoor Lighting and Traffic Signals Water & Wastewater Fleet Buildings Scope 3 Operational Waste Niagara Region 2018 Corporate GHG Inventory Summary Figure 2: Projected municipal energy use under a business-as-usual scenario by sector to 2051 Figure 3 displays projected GHG emissions from 2018 to 2051. Significant increases are observed in Outdoor Lighting and Traffic Signals (357%), and W ater and Wastewater (132%). Total emissions are expected to increase 54% by 2051. Figure 3: Projected municipal GHG emissions under a business-as-usual scenario by sector to 2051 9 Page 770 of 936 $- $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 $40,000,000 $45,000,000 2018 2022 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051Energy Dollars ($CAD)Cost Projections to 2051 Low Cost Scenario High Cost Scenario Niagara Region 2018 Corporate GHG Inventory Summary Business-as-Usual Cost Projections Canada Energy Regulator projects future energy prices under two scenarios: a “high cost” future where energy prices increase considerably, and a “low cost” future where energy prices increase by a smaller amount or decrease, depending on the fuel type and sector. Under the low-cost scenario energy costs rise by 37% by 2051, and under the high-cost scenario, energy costs increase by 86% by 2051 (Figure 4). Figure 4: Projection of energy expenditures under a business-as-usual scenario, under a low and high-cost scenario for the Niagara Region Monitoring and Reporting The Corporate Inventory serves as an indispensable tool for Niagara Region to track energy use and GHG emissions. Using the business-as-usual emissions forecast Regional staff can anticipate future emissions trends, which will inform the development of effective strategies to mitigate GHG emissions. Continual monitoring and updates to this Inventory is necessary to ensure that the Region remains on track to meet emissions targets and make meaningful contributions to the fight against climate change. The Inventory also serves as a powerful communication tool for Niagara Region. By publicly reporting on GHG emissions and the progress made towards corporate emission targets, the Region can engage and inform the public and other stakeholders regarding sustainability efforts. This transparency and accountability not only increase public awareness of the challenges posed by climate change but also foster public trust in municipal leadership. 10 Page 771 of 936 Appendix 4 Table 3: GHG Emissions Reduction Targets- Ontario Municipalities Municipality GHG Emissions Target Baseline Year City of Brantford Net-zero by 2050 2018 City of Burlington Net-zero by 2040 2018 Region of York Net-zero by 2050 2014 Region of Durham Net-zero by 2045 2019 City of Hamilton Net-zero by 2050 2016 City of London Net-zero by 2050 1990 City of St. Catharines Net-zero by 2050 2018 Region of Waterloo 80% reduction by 2050 2010 Town of Lincoln 80% reduction by 2050 2011 Page 772 of 936 Case Study: 80 Per Cent Greenhouse Gas Reduction by 2050 May 2023 | niagararegion.ca Page 773 of 936 2 | Niagara Region Case Study: 80% Greenhouse Gas Reduction by 2050 The following information discusses strategies to achieve an 80 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 from the Niagara Region’s Building and Water and Wastewater portfolios. According to the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory, in 2018 the Building portfolio was the largest emitter at 56 per cent, followed by Water and Wastewater at 28 per cent. Figure 1: Niagara Region Building Portfolio- Greenhouse Gas Emissions 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (tCO2e) 2018 2018-2023 2050 Net (1.3%) Niagara Regional Housing 5,965 tCO2e Waste Management 484 tCO2e Long- Term Care 3,602 tCO2e CE&FM 2,617 tCO2e 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1 Building Portfolio: Construction, Energy and Facilities Management (CE&FM), Long-Term Care, Niagara Regional Housing, Waste Management Projects/ Initatives 2 Niagara Regional Housing new buildings..............169 tCO2e 3 Decommission 68 Church St Niagara Regional Police Services 1D..................................160 tCO2e 9,974 tCO2e (78.7%) Annual reduction goal 384 tCO2e (3.8%) 4 CE&FM, Long Term Care, Niagara Regional Housing Capital Projects...............................................160 tCO2e 5 Proposed project – Headquarters Geothermal ..........309 tCO2e 6 Proposed project – Headquarters Window Replacement..........................................................47 tCO2e 7 Change in building occupancy during COVID-19.......229 tCO2e Niagara Region's Greenhouse Gas emissions Years Page 774 of 936 Niagara Region Case Study: 80% Greenhouse Gas Reduction by 2050 | 3 Building Portfolio The graph (Figure 1) on page 2 illustrates the reductions realized since 2018 in the Buildings portfolio as well as possible strategies. The first bar in Figure 1 displays the Niagara Region’s building portfolio, comprising various building types with a total Greenhouse Gas emissions of 12,688 metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) in 2018. The middle bar presents changes to emissions, including capital projects and proposed initiatives, while the right-hand bar represents the 80 per cent reduction target. Meeting this ambitious goal entails reducing about 384 tCO2e annually, over 26 years (2024-2050). A multi-pronged approach is necessary to achieve this target, such as growth strategies, rightsizing the building portfolio, deep retrofits and strategic building utilization. Growth Projects- Niagara Regional Housing New Buildings Since 2018, Niagara Regional Housing has added three energy-efficient buildings with a combined net increase of 107,000 square feet. However, the addition of these buildings have increased Greenhouse Gas emissions by 169 tCO2e annually (item 2), despite their improved building envelope (insulation and windows) and high-efficiency hot water and HVAC systems. If the buildings had been designed according to the minimum energy efficiency requirements specified in the Ontario Building Code, an additional 50 tCO2e would have been added. To maintain service levels as the region’s population grows, new buildings will be necessary, and the adoption of energy-efficient design and building practices should continue to promote sustainable and resilient built environments. Although the Niagara Region currently prioritizes LEED Silver for new construction, achieving the proposed 80 per cent Greenhouse Gas reduction target by 2050 may require a commitment to Net-Zero Greenhouse Gas for all new construction. Without this commitment, new building additions would nullify emission reductions to the existing portfolio (as depicted in Figure 1, items 1 and 2). Moving to Net-Zero has numerous benefits including reducing the carbon footprint of the built environment, lowering energy consumption and costs and enhancing the resilience of new buildings to changing climatic conditions. Rightsizing - Decommission 68 Church Street To achieve the 80 per cent Greenhouse Gas reduction target by 2050, the Niagara Region must consider both Net-Zero construction standards and rightsizing the existing building portfolio, as well as applying these standards to future growth projects. Rightsizing the new Niagara Regional Police Services 1 District in St. Catharines (relocated from 68 Church Street to 198 Welland Avenue) and building to LEED Silver standards resulted in a net reduction of 1.6 per cent in Greenhouse Gas emissions (160 tCO2e annually), item 3. Although not statistically significant, the reduction is comparable to the savings generated from all of the energy-related capital projects completed over the past four years. Staff recommends a review of the Niagara Region’s building portfolio in order to reduce it where possible as well as exploring opportunities to partner with local area municipalities for shared services. Deep Retrofits to Existing Building Stock Item 4 shows a 1.6 per cent reduction in Greenhouse Gas emissions from capital projects in the last four years. Most of the projects focused on end-of-life renewal and energy reduction initiatives linked to Provincial grants/incentives. To date, projects have been focused on reducing the use of electricity and meeting the goals of the Niagara Region’s Conservation and Demand Management Plan as per Ontario Regulation 507/18 under the Ontario Electricity Act. Deep retrofits, which involve upgrading multiple building systems, offer a more comprehensive approach, and the proposed items 5 and 6 within Figure 1 could potentially reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions by 356 tCO2e, nearly achieving the annual reduction goal of 384 tCO2e (3.8 per cent). To reach the 80 per cent Greenhouse Gas reduction target, a long-term deep retrofit plan with achievable annual targets is required, taking into account the Niagara Region’s Asset Management Plan, building performance, and new technology integration Page 775 of 936 4 | Niagara Region Case Study: 80% Greenhouse Gas Reduction by 2050 Building Utilization – Impact of the Pandemic Figure 1 item 7 presents an unexpected outcome during the pandemic. Due to the remote work policy, the Niagara Region achieved a reduction of 229 tCO2e in the first year of the pandemic despite not closing any facilities and increasing the HVAC requirements in all Long-Term Care facilities. In 2022, with staff returning to the office, Greenhouse Gas emissions returned to pre-COVID-19 levels. This pattern highlights the importance of building utilization and suggests a possible path forward. To decrease the Niagara Region’s building portfolio, hybrid workplace policies and alternative service delivery strategies should be considered as part of the Climate Change Action Plan. Water and Wastewater Portfolio To meet the Niagara Region’s 80 per cent emission reduction target by 2050, the Water and Wastewater division is reviewing potential opportunities to reduce energy consumption, improve efficiency and use renewable sources. It is critical that all measures comply with regulations and maintain water quality, system reliability and meet the increasing demand for treated water. Achieving emissions reductions within the Water and Wastewater division will consider Table 1. Overall, meeting the goal of an 80 per cent reduction of emissions in Water and Wastewater operations will require a combination of strategies and continuous efforts to reduce emissions and increase energy efficiency. Table 1- Emission Reduction Example Opportunities Category Theme Action Items 1- Carbon Footprint Inventory Identify the sources of greenhouse gas emissions associated with water and wastewater operations. Identify areas where emissions can be reduced and where renewable energy sources can be implemented. 2- Increase Energy Efficiency Implementing energy efficiency measures is an essential step toward reducing emissions. Measures include optimizing aeration blower systems, pumping systems, improving treatment processes and reducing water loss through leaks. 3-Renewable Energy Renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and geothermal energy can be used to power water and wastewater treatment plants. Maximizing the use of digester gas as a fuel source or upgrading the quality of the digester gas to produce renewable natural gas can yield significant emissions benefits. 4-Design & Construction Design and construction of new facilities to incorporate green/LEED standards. Use life cycle assessment to evaluate the impacts of the facility design and construction and identify areas where further improvements can be made. Page 776 of 936 Niagara Region Case Study: 80% Greenhouse Gas Reduction by 2050 | 5 Maximizing Emissions Reduction Niagara Region operates six water treatment plants, 84 water pumping stations, 10 wastewater treatment plants, 132 wastewater pumping stations and one facility for processing bio-solids. In aggregate, these facilities comprise 28 per cent of the total greenhouse gas emissions for Niagara Region. A further breakdown of these emissions reveals that Water represents 32 per cent of the emissions and Wastewater operations is 68 per cent. Electricity consumed is 29 per cent of the total emissions and 71 per cent comes from natural gas consumption. The utilization of these values is pivotal in crafting a comprehensive strategy to optimize emissions reduction by pinpointing key opportunities to achieve an 80 per cent reduction emissions goal. Therefore, in terms of priority of effectiveness for achieving emissions reductions, they rank as seen in Table 3. Figure 2- Emissions from Water and Wastewater Operation Sources Wastewater________68% Water_______________ 32% 68% 32% Figure 3- Emissions from Water and Wastewater Fuel Sources Natural Gas________71% Electricity___________ 29% 71% 29% Page 777 of 936 6 | Niagara Region Case Study: 80% Greenhouse Gas Reduction by 2050 Table 2- Energy Consumption and Emissions- Water and Wastewater Pumping Stations and Treatment Plants Pumping Stations Treatment Plants Electricity Kilowatt-hour (kWh) Emissions Tonnes (tC02e) Natural Gas Cubic Metre (m3) Emissions Tonnes (tC02e) Electricity Kilowatt-hour (kWh) Emissions Tonnes (tC02e) Natural Gas Cubic Metre (m3) Emissions Tonnes (tC02e) Wastewater 10,013,534 300 116,821 222 27,539,437 826 1,401,887 2,663 Water 2,909,067 87 16,645 32 16,470,651 494 652,744 1,240 Table 3- Water and Wastewater Emissions Reduction Priorities Priority Facility Type of Gas Emissions Tonnes (tC02e) 1 Wastewater Treatment Plant Natural Gas 2,663 2 Water Treatment Plants Natural Gas 1,240 3 Wastewater Treatment Plants Electricity 826 4 Water Treatment Plants Electricity 494 5 Wastewater Pumping Stations Electricity 300 6 Wastewater Pumping Stations Natural Gas 222 7 Water Pumping Stations Electricity 87 8 Water Pumping Stations Natural Gas 32 Note: These figures are based on energy consumption for the 2018 base year and exclude non-treatment process related users of energy. Historically, Water and Wastewater operations has implemented various measures to reduce energy use and their associated emissions and are currently evaluating other measures that will work towards these reduction targets. Example measures are included in Table 4. Page 778 of 936 Niagara Region Case Study: 80% Greenhouse Gas Reduction by 2050 | 7 Table 4- Water and Wastewater Energy Reduction Measures Measure Description High-Efficiency motors Motors for all pump and fan systems must be a minimum of 94 per cent efficiency. This is standard for all applications. Variable Frequency Drives controls All high-lift and low-lift pumping systems utilize a Variable Frequency Drives to regulate pumping speed to reduce electricity consumption. As per engineering design standards. High-Efficiency Aeration Blower systems Technology advances have improved the efficiency of the single largest source of energy consumption in wastewater treatment. Each application is carefully evaluated for efficiency. LED Lighting The majority of Water and Wastewater facilities have been converted to LED lighting and in going forward, all new construction projects utilize LED lighting systems. As per engineering design standards. Digester Gas Use Use of duel fueled boiler systems at wastewater treatment plants for space heat and process heat. Avoidance of 3,167 tCO2e but replacing consumption of natural gas with digester biogas. Condensing Boilers Increase fuel efficiency consumption for process heating and space heating boilers. Four recent boiler upgrades will yield roughly 387 tCO2e reduction. Renewable Natural Gas Surplus digester gas can be upgraded to pipeline quality. This initiative is currently being investigated. Potential for revenue generation or to reduce an estimated 4,800 tCO2e of emissions. In Summary Achieving an 80 per cent reduction in Greenhouse Gas emissions by 2050 in the Buildings and Water & Wastewater portfolios requires a cohesive and integrated approach. This entails recognizing existing successes and building off them through an integrated and comprehensive plan, including the development of energy-efficient buildings, deep retrofits and including the Water and Wastewater Greenhouse Gas reduction opportunities. Ongoing measures demonstrate the feasibility of the recommended target and highlight the need for continued Niagara Region wide support. Collaborative emissions reduction efforts in both portfolios are necessary for Niagara Region to achieve its ambitious goal. Page 779 of 936 Case Study: 80 per cent Greenhouse Gas Reduction by 2050 May 2023 | niagararegion.ca Page 780 of 936 Appendix 6 Table 4: 2023-2024 Climate Change Regional Initiatives Action Description Timeframe Niagara Climate Change Municipal Community of Practice (NCCMCP) The LAMs will be encouraged through the NCCMCP to adopt the recommended corporate GHG emission reduction targets. Q1 2023 and on-going Corporate Climate Change Action Plan The Region will initiate a Corporate Climate Change Action Plan (once targets are approved). The strategy will determine how to meet the established targets, identify priority areas, propose recommended actions, and secure funding Plan will align with the CDMP, fleet and infrastructure planning, and waste reduction initiatives and programs in Regional buildings etc. Q2 2023 Niagara Climate Change Action Network (NCCAN)- Community/Municipal Energy Plan Funding The Region will initiate the process to develop a Community/Municipal Energy Plan, with support from the Province through its Municipal Energy Plan Program Funding (https://www.ontario.ca/page/municipal- energy-plan-program#section-3). Collaboration with the NCCAN is essential. The Plan will be community-wide and be broken down by municipality. Q2 2023 Host an Annual Climate Change Summit The Region and partners (Brock University, Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority, and Niagara College) will host the annual Climate Change Summit. Q3 2023 Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan (CDMP) Update Ontario Regulation 507/18 under the Electricity Act requires public agencies, including Municipalities, to report on their energy consumption and GHG emissions annually, to develop and implement a CDMP, and to update the Plan every five years. 2024 Page 781 of 936 Administration Office of the Regional Clerk 1815 Sir Isaac Brock Way, PO Box 1042, Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Telephone: 905-980-6000 Toll-free: 1-800-263-7215 Fax: 905-687-4977 www.niagararegion.ca June 9, 2023 CL 8-2023, May 18, 2023 PEDC 5-2023, May 10, 2023 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 DISTRIBUTION LIST SENT ELECTRONICALLY 2022 Reserve Water and Wastewater Treatment Capacities PDS 13-2023 Regional Council, at its meeting held on May 18, 2023, passed the following recommendation of its Planning and Economic Development Committee: That Report PDS 13-2023 BE RECEIVED for information and BE CIRCULATED to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and Local Area Municipalities A copy of PDS 13-2023 is enclosed for your reference. Yours truly, Ann-Marie Norio Regional Clerk js CLK-C 2023-059 Page 782 of 936 2022 Reserve Water and Wastewater Treatment Capacities June 9, 2023 Page 2 cc: I.Stetic, Manager, Water-Wastewater Infrastructure Planning M. Sergi, Commissioner, Growth, Strategy and Economic Development N. Oakes, Executive Assistant to the Commissioner, Growth, Strategy and Economic Development Distribution List Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Local Area Municipalities Page 783 of 936 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 1 Subject: 2022 Reserve Water and Wastewater Treatment Capacities Report to: Planning and Economic Development Committee Report date: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 Recommendations 1.That Report PDS 13-2023 BE RECEIVED for information; and 2.That Report PDS 13-2023 BE CIRCULATED to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and Local Area Municipalities Key Facts •The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the reserve treatment capacities at Niagara's Water and Wastewater Treatment facilities. This reporting is required by the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). •The data contained in this report assists in commenting on new development proposals and related servicing as well as planning for future treatment capacity. •All of Niagara Water Treatment Plants (WTPs) and Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) are positioned to accept growth beyond the minimum ten year horizon. Financial Considerations This report provides Council with historical and projected treatment capacity and flow data. There are no direct financial implications in receiving this report. The reserve treatment capacities at the water and wastewater (W&WW) facilities are considered in commenting on new development proposals and related servicing and, as a result, could result in a financial impact related to specific future applications. Analysis The Infrastructure Planning and Development Engineering Division annually reports on an assessment of the average daily W&WW flows based on the previous five years, as recorded at our various facilities compared to MECP rated capacities for the facilities. A key objective of this report is to highlight potential capacity constraints and allow Page 784 of 936 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 2 ______________________________________________________________________ sufficient lead-time to plan for future capacity increases through the W&WW capital programs so that development may continue unencumbered. This assessment is completed as a desktop exercise, which compares five-year (annual) average flows to the respective MECP Environmental Compliance Approval(s), formerly known as Certificate of Approval(s) for each facility, and then incorporates ten year growth forecasts into the calculation. Ongoing phasing and staging strategy works with our local municipal partners will further refine this assessment for understanding development capacity. This assessment does not reflect specific compliance, quality, sustainability, risk, or operational deficiencies at the treatment plants or trunk conveyance/transmission systems, which may affect the Region’s ability to approve new development or permit servicing extensions. For municipal wastewater treatment, weather is the key factor that results in peak wet weather flow, which impacts the collection and trunk sewers in both local and regional systems through “Rainfall Derived Inflow and Infiltration” (RDI&I). Wet weather flows can have substantial impact on available WWTP capacities and a direct impact on the limitations of available servicing capacity for future growth. Appendix 1 and 2 provide the annual average daily flows, five year average flows from 2018 to 2022 for the water and wastewater treatment plants, respectively. Appendices 3 and 4 provide a summary of Niagara’s six water treatment facilities and eleven wastewater treatment facilities presenting their respective reserve capacities. It is worth noting that growth rates in recent years have increased, which consequently can affect the way this desktop exercise conducts the reserve capacity calculations. For the WTP’s, the averaging daily flows over a five year period versus a three year period in the Reserve Capacity calculations for 2022 does not show a compelling difference or significant trend. For the WWTP’s, there is a general trend of a slightly reduced annual average daily flow when comparing the three year to the five year average flow except for NOTL WWTP. This can partially be due to a number of infill and infiltration (I&I) reduction and capacity restoration projects within the recent years. Figure 1 shows a comparison of the total capacities used for WTPs and WWTPs when daily flows are averaged over the last three and five years. Page 785 of 936 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 3 ______________________________________________________________________ Figure 1: Total Capacity Used – Annual Flows Averaged over 3-Year and 5-Year Period 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Decew Falls WTP Grimsby WTP Niagara Falls WTP Port Colborne WTP Rosehill WTP Welland WTP% Total Capacity UsedWTP -Total Capacity Used 3 Y Average 5 Y Average 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 % Total Capacity UsedWWTP -Total Capacity Used 3 Y Average 5 Y Average Page 786 of 936 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 4 ______________________________________________________________________ At present, all of Niagara’s WTPs and WWTPs are positioned to accept growth beyond the minimum ten year period (Appendix 3 and Appendix 4). Niagara Official Plan and Water/Wastewater Master Servicing Plan The new Niagara Official Plan was approved by the Regional Council and subsequently approved and adopted by the Province on November 4, 2022. As part of the Plan, the Region completed extensive background review, consultation, and supporting studies in 2022, which resulted in policies and mapping to managing growth and the economy while protecting the natural environment, resources and agricultural land, and providing infrastructure to support developments of the whole region. The approval of the Niagara Official Plan helps the Region prepare for the anticipated population of 694,000 people and 272,000 jobs by 2051. The anticipated growth out to 2051 from the Niagara Official Plan process was utilized in the 2021 Master Servicing Plan Update (MSPU) to determine the required water and wastewater growth related capital projects for the future while maintaining the existing infrastructure. The 2021 MSPU is a critical component in the Region’s planning for growth and provides the framework and vision for the water and wastewater servicing needs for the lake based service areas of the Region to 2051. The 2021 MSPU evaluates the ability of the existing and planned water and wastewater infrastructure to continue to efficiently and effectively service the Region’s existing users, service anticipated growth, and to evaluate and develop recommended strategies. This work considered the alignment of Regional water and wastewater infrastructure with the urban expansion and intensification areas identified through the Niagara Official Plan review. Additionally, the potential impacts of estimated growth beyond 2051 were considered due to the longer useful life of water and wastewater infrastructure assets. Wet Weather Management The Niagara wastewater systems are a mix of separated and combined sewer systems. Each system is experiencing varying levels of impact during wet weather conditions. Climate change continues to create changing weather conditions and the wastewater systems are experiencing, in most cases, high peak flows under rainfall events. In order to accommodate the anticipated growth from Niagara 2051 and to maintain an existing servicing level for the wastewater infrastructure, system capacity upgrades (upgrades to trunk sewers, pumping stations, etc.) and the upstream management (storage, peak Page 787 of 936 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 5 ______________________________________________________________________ shaving, diversion) together with peak flow management (I&I reduction projects) for every wastewater system were investigated. Based on this review, there are wet weather projects listed with identified areas for targeted I&I removal to offset the requirement to upgrade and expand more expensive infrastructure all the way to the WWTPs. It is crucial to achieve I&I reductions in order to offset the capacity needs from growth, to protect the environment, and mitigate potential basement flooding. The wet weather management program currently identifies overall preliminary priority, staging of location and target amount of I&I reduction across all systems. This program provides for a proactive and targeted approach to addressing wet weather impacts. The Region has been aiding Local Municipalities by funding the Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Program as a part of the overall Wet Weather Management Strategy to support various I&I related projects and programs on the municipal side. This program has been reducing the impacts of I&I and has been a benefit to both, the Region and the Local Municipalities. Therefore, it is important to continue working collaboratively to facilitate ongoing development throughout the region and provide the requisite servicing and capacity allocation in a responsible way to service the communities. The available funding for the 2023 CSO Control Program has been fully utilized and subscribed with applications from the Municipal partners. A separate report on the 2023 CSO Control Program is anticipated to be presented to the Planning and Economic Development Committee as well. Staff is working with the Development Industry including Public Works Officials, Building Officials, Developers, Consultants and Contractors to raise awareness of wet weather management issues and potential upcoming changes to address this. The Region is also represented at the Expert Stakeholder Committee (ESC) for the Guideline to Undertaking Flow Monitoring of New Construction and will work with all stakeholders to move forward with a consistent approach for the review the flow monitoring of new subdivisions. South Niagara Falls Wastewater Treatment Plant While this report identifies there is short term capacity available at the existing Niagara Falls WWTP, it only considers the treatment capacity at the plant for the next ten years. It does not consider the constraints in the existing sanitary collection system, wet Page 788 of 936 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 6 ______________________________________________________________________ weather flow issues, consideration for development demands and longer term growth, or the required infrastructure improvements to get the flows to the plant. The MSPU used updated population and employment growth forecasts based on a 2051 planning horizon. Based on the Niagara 2051 planning review, the implementation and timing of the preferred solution for the new South Niagara Falls (SNF) Wastewater Treatment Plant and Servicing Solution (SNF Servicing Solution) continues to be supported and is necessary to accommodate growth. In Niagara Falls, there is not enough capacity in the existing sewer system nor at the existing treatment plant to meet the increasing system demands resulting from growth as well as the increased wet weather flows due to aging infrastructure and climate change. The SNF Servicing Solution is essential to unlocking the development potential in the broader South Niagara area. The ability to redirect existing flows to the south, provide additional capacity in the new trunk sewer, provide flexibility for storage in the trunk sewer, and ultimately treat the wastewater flows at the new WWTP all contribute to a significant wet weather management program. In addition, the location of the new WWTP will provide flexibility for the potential for additional wet weather management through potential connections of other service areas such as Chippawa. Through the analysis undertaken as part of the Class EA process, it is estimated that the new South Niagara Wastewater Solutions strategy, will result in a reduction of over 60% of wet weather volume overflow to the environment. It should be noted that despite the limited capacity within the south Niagara Falls system, the Region and City have committed the necessary sanitary capacity and any required improvements to accommodate the new South Niagara Hospital to Infrastructure Ontario and Niagara Health. This new WWTP is integral to the overall growth servicing strategy that supports the anticipated residential and employment growth in the Niagara Falls, NOTL, and Thorold South service areas. This total growth is estimated to be over 90,000 people and jobs in the area out to the year 2051. The new WWTP and collection system strategy is also considering potential long term growth beyond 2051. The capital program to support the new WWTP will provide greater flexibility for development servicing in St. Catharines, Niagara Falls, Thorold, and Niagara-on-the-Lake. The Notice of Study Completion for the SNF WWTP, Class C EA was issued on July 28, 2022 for the public review period ending on September 26, 2022. Page 789 of 936 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 7 ______________________________________________________________________ Queenston Wastewater Treatment Plant The South Niagara Falls wastewater strategy presented opportunities for adjacent systems. Based on this, the redirection of the Queenston flows to Niagara Falls and decommissioning of the Queenston WWTP is to be explored further and confirmed through the ongoing Queenston – St. David’s Wastewater Servicing Strategy EA. Alternatives Reviewed No alternatives reviewed. Relationship to Council Strategic Priorities The report aligns with Council’s Priority of Responsible Growth and Infrastructure Planning by highlighting the reserve capacity available for growth at all Regional Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities. The report also provides MECP and local municipal partners operational summary and reserve capacity projections for Region’s Water and Wastewater Treatment facilities. Other Pertinent Reports • PW 39-2021, September 9, 2021, South Niagara Falls Wastewater Treatment Plant – Budget and Property • PDS 20-2022, April 6, 2022, 2021 Reserve Water and Wastewater Treatment Capacities • PDS 17-2022, June 15, 2022, Official Plan Recommendations Report for Adoption ________________________________ Prepared by: Ilija Stetic, B.Sc, PMP, CET Manager W-WW Infrastructure Planning Planning and Development Services _______________________________ Recommended by: Michelle Sergi, MCIP, RPP Commissioner Planning and Development Services Page 790 of 936 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 Page 8 ______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________ Submitted by: Ron Tripp, P.Eng. Chief Administrative Officer This report was prepared in consultation with Phill Lambert, Director Infrastructure Planning and Development Engineering, John Brunet, AD Water Operations & Maintenance, Robert Daw, AD Wastewater Operations, Maintenance & Lab Services and Jason Oatley, Manager WW Quality & Compliance. Appendices Appendix 1 Annual Average Daily Flow 2018 to 2022 WTP Appendix 2 Annual Average Daily Flow 2018 to 2022 WWTP Appendix 3 Water Reserve Capacity Calculations for 2022 Appendix 4 Wastewater Reserve Capacity Calculations for 2022 Page 791 of 936 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 1 Appendix 1: WTP Annual Average Daily Flow 2018 - 2022 Water Treatment Plant Rated Capacity 3(m /d) Average Daily Flow (m3/d) 5 Year Average 2018 / 22 3 Year Average 2020 / 22 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Decew Falls WTP 227,300 56,090 53,303 53,390 50,824 52,970 53,315 52,395 Grimsby WTP 44,000 14,919 14,029 15,726 14,872 14,809 14,871 15,136 Niagara Falls WTP 145,584 44,835 43,400 40,145 40,125 42,164 42,134 40,811 Port Colborne WTP 36,000 8,864 7,282 6,870 6,387 6,953 7,271 6,737 Rosehill WTP 50,026 12,872 11,188 11,024 11,710 13,025 11,964 11,920 Welland WTP 65,000 22,538 22,579 24,670 24,675 24,162 23,725 24,502 Page 9 Page 792 of 936 Page 10 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 2 Appendix 2: WWTP Annual Average D aily Flow 2018 - 2022 Wastewater Treatment Plant Rated Capacity (m³/d) Average Daily Flow (m3/d) 5 Year Average 2018 / 22 3 Year Average 2020 / 22 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Anger Avenue WWTP 24,500 14,624 15,146 13,580 13,171 13,614 14,027 13,455 Baker Road WWTP 31,280 19,975 20,910 17,952 17,081 20,739 19,331 18,591 Crystal Beach WWTP 9,100 5,874 6,276 5,688 5,256 5,352 5,689 5,432 Niagara Falls WWTP 68,300 41,489 41,360 35,242 35,197 39,696 38,597 36,712 NOTL WWTP 8,000 4,687 5,237 5,142 5,602 6,398 5,413 5,714 Port Dalhousie WWTP 61,350 35,095 36,681 34,113 31,793 29,332 33,403 31,746 Port Weller WWTP 56,180 36,881 39,211 33,751 33,176 36,130 35,830 34,352 Queenston WWTP 500 198 213 135 142 168 171 149 Seaway WWTP 19,600 12,580 13,472 11,299 10,200 10,303 11,571 10,601 Stevensville/Douglastown 2,289 1,670 1,729 1,592 1,552 1,496 1,608 1,547 Welland WWTP 54,550 34,643 37,137 33,617 34,288 36,222 35,182 34,709 Page 793 of 936 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 3 Appendix 3: WTP Reserve Capacities for 2022 Water Treatment Plant Permit To Take (1)Water Rated Treatment Capacity Theoretical Ave Day Capacity 90% of Ave Day (2)Capacity 5-Year Ave Day Flow Peaking Factor Total Capacity Used Reserve Treatment Capacity 90% MLD Design Flow (3)Rate 246 Lcd Reserve Serviceable Population Equivalents 10-Year Forecast Population Res & Emp Surplus Population 10-Year Projection MLD DeCew Falls 227.0 227.3 147.2 132.5 53.3 1.544 36% 79.2 246 321,951 30,223 291,728 Grimsby 44.0 44.0 26.6 23.9 14.9 1.656 56% 9.1 246 36,992 17,037 19,955 Niagara Falls 145.5 145.6 90.8 81.7 42.1 1.604 46% 39.6 246 160,976 28,700 132,276 Port Colborne 45.5 36.0 20.8 18.7 7.3 1.727 35% 11.4 246 46,341 2,032 44,309 Rosehill 78.0 50.0 32.8 29.5 12.0 1.524 36% 17.6 246 71,545 7,151 64,394 Welland 110.0 65.0 43.5 39.2 23.7 1.493 55% 15.4 246 62,602 18,388 44,214 Note 1: Original MOE approved quantity of raw water permitted (Permit To Take Water). Note 2: Region's 2021 W&WW MSP requires planning process for expansion when plant capacity exceeds 80%, and expansion should be completed when capacity exceeds 90%. Note 3: Region's 2021 W&WW MSP new design criteria calls for 240 Lcd residential consumption and 270 Led employment consumption This is equivalent to 246 Lcd for both, using the 79% and 21% residential and employment share, respectively. Page 9 Page 794 of 936 PDS 13-2023 May 10, 2023 Appendix 4 Appendix 4: WWTP Reserve Capacity for 2022 Wastewater Treatment Plant MECP Rated Capacity 90% of Plant (1)Capacity 5-Year Average Daily Flow Total Capacity Used Reserve Treatment 90%Capacity 3m /d Design Flow (2) Rate 356 Lcd Reserve Serviceable Population Equivalents 10-Year Forecast Population Res & Emp Surplus Population 10-Year Projection 3m /d Anger Avenue (Fort Erie) 24,500 22,050 14,027 57% 8,023 356 22,537 4,730 17,807 Baker Road (Grimsby) 31,280 28,152 19,331 62% 8,821 356 24,777 20,442 4,335 Crystal Beach (Fort Erie) 9,100 8,190 5,689 63% 2,501 356 7,025 1,081 5,944 (3)Niagara Falls 68,300 61,470 38,597 57% 22,873 356 64,251 22,309 41,942 NOTL 8,000 7,200 5,413 68% 1,787 356 5,019 1,036 3,983 Port Dalhousie (St. Catharines) 61,350 55,215 33,403 54% 21,812 356 61,270 13,784 47,486 Port Weller (St. Catharines) 56,180 50,562 35,830 64% 14,732 356 41,383 9,392 31,991 (4)Queenston (NOTL) 500 450 171 34% 279 356 783 34 749 Seaway (Port Colborne) 19,600 17,640 11,571 59% 6,069 356 17,048 2,008 15,040 Stevensville/Douglastown 2,289 2,060 1,608 70% 452 356 1,270 994 276 Welland 54,550 49,095 35,182 64% 13,913 356 39,083 18,235 20,848 Note 1: Region's 2021 W&WW MSP requires planning process for expansion when plant capacity exceeds 80%, and expansion should be completed when capacity exceeds 90%. Note 2: Region's 2021 W &WW MSP new design criteria calls for 255 Lcd residential and 310 Led employment generation rate including 90 Lcd of extraneous flow allowance. An equivalent of 356 Lcd is applied using 80% and 20% for residential and employment growth share, respectively. Note 3: The Niagara Falls WWTP assessment includes the sewage flows from the St. David's area of Niagara-on-the-Lake. Note 4: The Queenston W WTP in Niagara-on-the-Lake has a unique capacity commitment of 226 m³/d for the following properties: Niagara Parks Commission (75 m³/d), Niagara Falls Bridge Commission (63 m³/d), Shalamar Campground (38 m³/d) and Ontario Power Generation (50 m³/d). Due to these commitments and limited UAB, limited residential growth is expected withinthe next 10 years within the tributary area. Page 12 Page 795 of 936 Administration Office of the Regional Clerk 1815 Sir Isaac Brock Way, PO Box 1042, Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Telephone: 905-980-6000 Toll-free: 1-800-263-7215 Fax: 905-687-4977 www.niagararegion.ca June 14, 2023 CL 8-2023, May 18, 2023 DISTRIBUTION LIST SENT ELECTRONICALLY Motion respecting Enhancing Canada’s National Adaptation Strategy Through a Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Basin Coastal Resiliency Study Regional Council, at its meeting held on May 18, 2023, passed the following motion: WHEREAS climate change is a clear and present danger to communities, residents and businesses across the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Basin; WHEREAS climate adaptation and disaster mitigation and response in Canada are shared responsibilities between municipal, provincial/territorial, federal and Indigenous governments and agencies; WHEREAS the Canadian side of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River has more than 10,000 km of shoreline which are at increasing risk of flooding, erosion and severe storm impacts; WHEREAS municipalities are frontline actors that will bear the most costs for adapting their infrastructure and communities, while having access to the least amount of resources to fund these activities; WHEREAS improving coastal resilience in the basin has been identified as a key priority of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative; WHEREAS the Cities Initiative completed a coastal resilience needs assessment survey in 2021 that received more than 300 responses from local governments in Canada and the U.S. which revealed that the participating communities would spend a cumulative $2.56 billion over the next five years to respond to coastal hazards impacting their shorelines, with more than $320 million in planned investments for Ontario and Quebec respondents, a fraction of the total amount all communities in the basin will need to spend over the coming years to protect their shoreline communities; Page 796 of 936 Motion respecting Enhancing Canada’s National Adaptation Strategy Through a Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Basin Coastal Resiliency Study June 14, 2023 Page 2 WHEREAS a follow-up survey issued in 2022 found that the majority of local governments that responded anticipate having to each spend more than $1 million to address coastal hazards impacting their shorelines between now and 2026; WHEREAS a 2019 report by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Insurance Bureau of Canada found that avoiding the worst impacts of climate change at the municipal level will cost an estimated $5.3 billion per year shared among all three orders of government; WHEREAS in response to this issue being a priority for the organization and its members, a Mayors Commission on Coastal Resilience was established with Canadian and U.S. members to identify sustainable workable solutions to address coastal erosion, flooding and storm impacts; WHEREAS in 2022, the Mayors Commission on Coastal Resilience issued its recommendations calling for the Government of Canada to partner with the Ontario and Quebec governments to accelerate the development of regional shoreline adaptation plans across the basin; WHEREAS the Cities Initiative is a key partner in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Collaborative which developed the Action Plan to Protect the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence 2020-2030 that recommends for enhancing shoreline climate adaptation in the basin; WHEREAS the Government of Canada released its final draft National Adaptation Strategy in fall 2022, with a commitment of a $1.6 billion “down payment” to support the implementation of the strategy; WHEREAS the Cities Initiative welcomes the investments made in the National Adaptation Strategy, namely the top up funding for the Disaster Mitigation and Adaptation Fund, the new Climate Resilient Coastal and Northern Communities Program pilot and the investments in flood mapping to ensure that all Canadians have access to free, up-to-date and authoritative flood-hazard maps; WHEREAS the funding announced for the National Adaptation Strategy represents only a fraction of the total investment that will be necessary by all levels of government; WHEREAS flood mapping, though a critical tool for communities and residents across the basin, represents only one measure of coastal resilience and that a more comprehensive assessment will need to be completed to assist all levels of government in prioritizing shoreline adaptation measures and investments; Page 797 of 936 Motion respecting Enhancing Canada’s National Adaptation Strategy Through a Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Basin Coastal Resiliency Study June 14, 2023 Page 3 WHEREAS the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has been authorized to complete a Great Lakes Coastal Resiliency Study (GLCRS) and it has signed a cost-share agreement with the eight Great Lakes States for the estimated $10.6 million study; WHEREAS the GLCRS will assess Great Lakes coastal resources over a range of future conditions and develop a watershed plan to support the management of those resources and identify, select and prioritize investments that will promote coastal resilience; WHEREAS without proper coordination, coastal resilience efforts in the Canadian Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Basin will be done in an inefficient, inconsistent and piecemeal fashion; WHEREAS investments announced by the Government of Canada for the National Adaptation Strategy, Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River protection and to establish the Canada Water Agency provide a sound foundation on which it can help lead a similar study for shoreline communities in Ontario and Quebec; WHEREAS the Government of Canada has an opportunity to reinforce the National Adaptation Strategy by working with regional actors to identify and address climate change impacts on water levels, erosion, flooding and storm activity in the basin. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That Regional Council ENDORSE the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative request to the Government of Canada to: a) Designate a multi-ministry team to liaise with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on their GLCRS to determine how Canada can support and learn from the study to improve coastal resilience in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Basin; b) Designate a budget and develop the scope of a similar study to the GLCRS for the Canadian Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River and engage the Governments of Ontario and Quebec to partner, co-fund and execute this work; c) Examine the possibility of having the Canada Water Agency coordinate this Canadian coastal resiliency study in the basin; d) Ensure that municipalities, Indigenous communities and key regional and local watershed stakeholders are also consulted in the development and delivery of this study; and Page 798 of 936 Motion respecting Enhancing Canada’s National Adaptation Strategy Through a Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Basin Coastal Resiliency Study June 14, 2023 Page 4 e) Build on the investments made in the National Adaptation Strategy to rapidly accelerate federal funding for adaptation measures in Canada, including a dedicated $1 billion per year enhancement in disaster mitigation and green infrastructure programming. 2. That Regional Council further ENDORSE the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative requesting the governments of Ontario and Quebec to support the development of an integrated coastal resiliency study for the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Basin; and 3. That copies of this resolution BE CIRCULATED to the federal Ministers of Environment and Climate Change, Natural Resources, Emergency Preparedness, Fisheries and Oceans, Intergovernmental Affairs, Infrastructure and Communities and Transport, as well as the Canada Water Agency Transition Office; Ontario Ministers of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Natural Resources and Forestry, Infrastructure and Municipal Affairs and Housing and Transport; Quebec Ministers of the Environment, the Fight Against Climate Change, Wildlife and Parks, Public Security, Municipal Affairs, Infrastructure and Transport. Yours truly, Ann-Marie Norio Regional Clerk :kl CLK-C 2023-064 Distribution List: Hon. Steven Guilbeault, Minister of Environment and Climate Change Hon. Jonathan Wilkinson, Minister of Natural Resources Hon. Bill Blair, Minister of Emergency Preparedness Hon. Joyce Murray, Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Hon. Dominic LeBlanc, Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, Infrastructure and Communities Hon. Omar Alghabra, Minister of Transport Hon. David Piccini, Minister of the Environment, Conservations and Parks Hon. Graydon Smith, Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry Hon. Kinga Surma, Minister of Infrastructure Hon. Steve Clark, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Hon. Caroline Mulroney, Minister of Transportation Hon. Benoit Charette, Minister of Environment, the Fight Against Climate Change, Wildlife and Parks Page 799 of 936 Motion respecting Enhancing Canada’s National Adaptation Strategy Through a Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Basin Coastal Resiliency Study June 14, 2023 Page 5 Hon. François Bonnardel, Minister of Public Security Hon. Andrée Laforest, Minister of Municipal Affairs Hon. Jonatan Julien, Minister Responsible for Infrastructure Hon. Geneviève Guilbault, Deputy Premier/Minister of Transport and Sustainable Mobility David Leech, Director, Canada Water Agency Transition Office Dean Allison, Member of Parliament, Niagara West Vance Badawey, Member of Parliament, Niagara Centre Tony Baldinelli, Member of Parliament, Niagara Falls Chris Bittle, Member of Parliament, St. Catharines Jeff Burch, Member of Provincial Parliament, Niagara Centre Wayne Gates, Member of Provincial Parliament, Niagara Falls Sam Oosterhoff, Member of Provincial Parliament, Niagara West Jennie Stevens, Member of Provincial Parliament, St. Catharines Local Area Municipalities Page 800 of 936 4141 Yonge Street, Suite 401 Toronto, Ontario M2P 2A6 June 6, 2023 His Worship Jim Diodati, Mayor of Niagara Falls & City Council Members 4310 Queen St. Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 6X5 Subject: Helping local small businesses affected by major construction Dear Sir: The Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) is Canada’s largest association of small- and medium-sized businesses with 97,000 members in all sectors and parts of the country, including 38,000 in Ontario. On behalf of small businesses, we are calling on all municipalities to implement a construction mitigation program for lengthy projects that cause major disruptions. This initiative should include direct funding to small businesses for income losses. Lengthy construction projects have wreaked havoc on many of our members. Reduced accessibility has resulted in decreased foot traffic, leading to lower sales and forcing some businesses to close. Small businesses are willing to put up with some frustration to reap the rewards of improved transportation. The problem is that they must somehow manage to survive until the project reaches the finish line. The glossy project images never show the mess businesses are forced to go through to get there. According to a report we published in 2018,1 41% of Canadian small- and medium-sized businesses were disrupted by local construction projects between 2012 and 2017. In that time, nearly 65,000 businesses were significantly affected by construction, forcing business owners to take out loans, relocate, or even close their doors. Over two-thirds (69%) of survey respondents indicated that their local government 1CFIB, Paving a Smoother Road: Helping Small Businesses Survive Infrastructure Work, May 2018: https://20336445.fs1.hubspotusercontent- na1.net/hubfs/20336445/research/report-paving-a-smoother-road-construction-mitigation-policy.pdf Page 801 of 936 2 should adopt a comprehensive construction mitigation program, including compensation for business losses. In 2018, Montréal became the first municipality in Canada to launch such a program permanently, offering up to $40,000 in financial assistance to eligible businesses. Montréal recently announced that in addition to the up to $40,000 per year based on income losses already provided, the city will also offer a $5,000 grant to businesses with construction disruptions lasting six months or longer. The money will be available from the start of a project without any lost income strings attached. We encourage you to visit the City of Montréal’s website for further information and to contact us through Riley Locke (riley.locke@cfib.ca) to discuss a similar program for your municipality. In addition, we would be happy to connect you to bilingual contacts at the City of Montréal who can answer questions and help guide you through the implementation of a successful construction mitigation program. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Sincerely, Original signed by Original signed by Julie Kwiecinski Riley Locke Director of Provincial Affairs (Ontario) Policy Analyst (Ontario) Cc: City Clerk Page 802 of 936 The Niagara Falls Shadow Council A registered Independent Social Counseling organization "Holding Governments Accountable" Lady Justice Do not redact the contents of this document This document can be freely distributed #06-20-2023-24 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Comments concerning the 06/20/2023 Council Meeting Agenda Item #9.6. CLK-2023-06 (Added) Updates to Council's Code of Conduct Council, Firstly, I wish to bring your attention to a system that works. Within this document you will read how an ordinary citizen who seeks justice and desires to change the system for the better can achieve it. An excerpt from a completed Ombudsman's Office investigation initiated by myself concerning the errors within the Niagara Falls Code of Conduct is included below. It, in my opinion, validates that the city was prejudicing the right of citizens. When those that either do not or can not defend there rights and stand up and fight for themselves The Niagara Falls Shadow Council and I will. The outcome of the Ombudsman's Office investigation proves I was right that the City process was wrong and everyone deserve to know this. Basic freedoms and rights have again been restored, not on the initiative of Council but by a resident that was willing to stand up and defend those rights. So you see, even when persons see errors in the system there is still a mechanism available to correct that error, they only need to exercise it. Without further ado, The failure to reduce the filing fee to $0 is a blatant disregard to the Ombudsman's Office. Page 803 of 936 The Ombudsman's Office has the resources of a $30 million budget and their resources are solely focuses on analyzing and consulting on matters such as this, for the city to totally disregard the PRIMARY concern of the Ombudsman's Office and dismiss it like trash is reckless. I am disappointed by city staff to not propose a reduction if not the total elimination of the filing fee and I will be of Council if it adopts staffs recommendations on this matter. Niagara Falls staff uses the defense that other municipalities do this and do that so often, it picks and chooses those municipalities that conform to their solutions and disregard the others, of course their are municipalities that do not charge for Integrity Commission services, The City of Niagara Falls very own upper tier municipality, the Niagara Region does not charge for the service, but that will not be presented in staffs report. The City relies upon and commissions consultants for land planning advice amongst others, so why would it conclude that the largest and most powerful consulting agency concerning these matters in the Province of Ontario is wrong. The City could only dream of having these resources in-house, fortunately the Ombudsman's Office offers this advice for free. The City reasons that the fee reduces the number of complaints, good councilors reduce the number of complaints, not the fee. As pointed out by staff, despite the $500 filing fee you have two active complaints. It appears that Council is more concerned about protecting themselves then being accountable for their actions. The Ombudsman's Office solution was valid, remove the fee and allow the Integrity Commissioner to use its discretion to void a complaint before investigation. What is so difficult to understand? The filing fee only prevents financially challenged individuals from filing complaints. As an individual familiar with the process I could file a complaint every council session and not even notice the expense, in fact many people could but we do not because most of the interactions with members does not elicit such responses. But when it does your going to get them fee or not. This most likely could not be said for all the new Canadians we welcome to our city and are in desperate need of attainable resources to integrate into our society. That fee imposes a significant financial barrier should these individuals be subjected to indignities and wish to seek justice and remediation. Page 804 of 936 I would gather that most of the people making the filing fee policy are financially well off, city employees and council members make a decent wage, and may not be able to appreciate the situation of the possible disparity they are imposing upon those not so fortunate. The Ombudsman's Office clearly understands this. I suspect out of the entire Council only Councilor Lococo understands this as it appears she is the only sitting Councilor to have voiced opposition to the fee. The last two Councilors to champion the $500 file are no longer Councilors. The Niagara Falls Shadow Council will not let the voters forget what Council decides today when the time to reminisce of councils achievements arrives. A $500 filing fee Integrity Complaint is not an attainable resource. Some complain about the cost to tax payers of invalid complaints, in a democratic society we share the effects of incompetentcy and inefficiencies of services equally, we do not isolate and segregate, which is what this city is doing by imposing such a fee. The incompetentcy and inefficiencies within the service are not the applicants of the complains but the recipients. You already have the advice of the Ombudsman's Office, as the one who exposed many of the errors in the City's Code of Conduct I recommend you take that advice and institute a no fee policy. Below is an excerpt of the correspondence from The Ombudsman's Office to myself. It's not a confidential response so go ahead and educate yourselves. "Integrity Commissioner’s authority to review complaints about local board members. In June 2022, you asked the Clerk to clarify whether the Commissioner can review complaints about board members for a Business Improvement Area (BIA). The Clerk initially responded to you and committed to clarify this with Commissioner, but you complained to our Office that you received no further response. When you contacted the Commissioner directly, their office could not confirm their jurisdiction over the City’s local boards. We spoke with the City about this concern, and the Ombudsman addressed this issue in his February 21, 2023 letter to council. Our Office was told that council intends to amend the Code of Conduct to grant the Commissioner authority to investigate complaints regarding the ethical conduct of members of local boards. In the meantime, complaints of this nature may be submitted to the Clerk or directly to the Commissioner, and will be addressed once the Code of Conduct has been updated." Page 805 of 936 Our Office discussed your remaining concerns with Commissioner and the City. On February 21, 2023, the Ombudsman wrote a letter to council for the City of Niagara Falls sharing best practices related to integrity commissioners and codes of conduct. You can access a copy of the letter here: https://niagarafalls.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/54621/?preview=57238&attachment url=%2Fdocument%2F57022. The City’s Code of Conduct at the time of your complaints stated that the filing fee of $500 would be forfeited if the Commissioner concludes that a complaint is, “frivolous, vexatious or contains insufficient grounds to support an investigation”. In the letter to council, the Ombudsman explained that complaints that contain insufficient information to support the allegations should not be conflated with those that are frivolous or vexatious. The Ombudsman also noted that members of the public making a complaint to the Integrity Commissioner may not be familiar with how to frame a complaint or the kind of information required to support an allegation. He advised council that the City should put a process in place that enables the Integrity Commissioner to obtain additional information from the complainant in order to fully understand and assess the complaint." Further, I have read over the Code and their are still deficiencies, concerns and ambiguities. Here are just a few, I will not reveal them all, for you most likely will not take my advice anyways, beside if need be the Ombudsman's Office can just look into it again. It looks like all board and commission members are now under the umbrella of the Code. The number of individuals subjected to the Code has increased perhaps tenfold if not more. That's quite the financial liability considering they are not trained and educated like Council members to avoid such, not that that is any guarantee it wont happen as has been demonstrated by council members in the past. You may want to look into acquiring a data base of all persons subject to the Code and implement a mandatory training program requirement. One wrong word from a committee or board member could now cost tens of thousands of dollars, the days of free Ombudsman's Office investigations are over. They all get to ask the Integrity Commissioner for advice as well, every person of every committee and board, and that's not a free service to the city. That could amount to an astronomical value, budget well for that one. Your penalties need to be addressed, the wording has been invalidated by the inclusion of individuals that do not receive remuneration. You could default to only one reprimand in Page 806 of 936 those instances but the wording appears that the authors did not do due diligence in wording it correctly. I really suggest you address this issue as it has recently been questioned before the Integrity Commissioner, does the conditional statement "there was a violation of the Code, impose either of the following two (2) penalties" imply a penalty shall be imposed for each and every individual count of a violation? This should be precisely clarified. As the wording could have read "there were violations of the Code, impose either of the following two (2) penalties" but explicitly does not, it would be a strong argument that indeed each and every count imposes a penalty. Why leave that up to an eventual Ombudsman's Office complaint when you can address it right now. To be fair the code should address multiple complaints from different applicants concerning the same complaint. If an eligible individual was found to have made a validated Code violation and several individuals filed separate complaints, would the violator be liable for multiple impositions of the penalty, each applicant did after all pay a fee and should be entitled to a service result. Concerning the latter, do multiple complainants of the same complaint share the cost once it is determined such an event has occurred or are you going to take all their monies for the same process. When Councilor Lococo most likely addresses this topic we all know if the Mayor speaks to it he is going to reminisce about the "good old days" of exorbitant costs to the tax payers, and so on and so on, I point out progress can just as easily be hindered by historians as it can be helped. It does appear the Niagara Falls code does not protect the Mayor, as a sitting member of Regional Council, Integrity complaints against him made through the Region are a free process and it blankets even his actions preformed in his duties as Mayor of Niagara Falls. It appears anyone who wants to file Integrity Complaints against the Mayer may do so free. I sense it is hard for individuals with authority to relinquish oversight of it. Page 807 of 936 As it would appear it is self-serving for Council to maintain the fee and despite its hindrance to holding officials accountable for their inappropriate acts, I suspect Council will not disappoint and maintain the fee despite the advice of the Ombudsman's Office. Expenditure Estimates for Ombudsman Ontario (2022- 23) The 2022-23 Estimates set out details of the operating and capital spending requirements of ministries and legislative offices for the year starting on April 1, 2022. On this page Skip this page navigation 1. Summary 2. Ombudsman Ontario Program - vote 2301 Summary The Ombudsman of Ontario is an Officer of the Provincial Legislature who is independent of government and political parties. The Ombudsman's job is to ensure government accountability through effective oversight of the administration of government services. The Ombudsman's authority to investigate complaints is set out in the Ombudsman Act. Individuals may contact the Office of the Ombudsman to lodge a complaint through multiple avenues. Complaints can be received in person, in writing, via toll-free telephone, email, or online complaint form. The Office provides extensive information about its operations and specific investigations in both English and French, on its website. Program summary Vote Program Estimates 2022-23 Estimates 2021-22 Difference between 2022-23 and 2021-22 Actual 2020-21 Page 808 of 936 Vote Program Estimates 2022-23 Estimates 2021-22 Difference between 2022-23 and 2021-22 Actual 2020-21 Operating expense 2301 Ombudsman Ontario Program $31,280,100 $30,468,600 $811,500 $23,080,167 Total operating expense to be voted $31,280,100 $30,468,600 $811,500 $23,080,167 Total operating expense $31,280,100 $30,468,600 $811,500 $23,080,167 Total including consolidation & other adjustments $31,280,100 $30,468,600 $811,500 $23,080,167 Total operating and capital including consolidation and other adjustments (not including assets) $31,280,100 $30,468,600 $811,500 $23,080,167 Ombudsman Ontario Program - vote 2301 The Ombudsman is an officer of the Legislature whose mandate is set out in the Ombudsman Act. The Ombudsman promotes fairness, accountability and transparency in the public sector by investigating complaints and systemic issues within his jurisdiction, and making recommendations to improve the administration of public policy, programs and services. The Ombudsman resolves and investigates complaints about provincial government ministries, corporations, agencies, boards, commissions and tribunals (with some exceptions), as well as French language services, child protection services, municipalities, universities and school boards. During the 2021-2022 fiscal year, the Office of the Ombudsman received more than 25,000 complaints. The Office’s approved staff complement in 2021-2022 was 186 FTEs. Vote summary Item number Item Estimates 2022-23 Estimates 2021-22 Difference between 2022-23 and 2021-22 Actual 2020-21 Operating expense 1 The Ombudsman $31,280,100 $30,468,600 $811,500 $23,080,167 Total operating expense to be voted $31,280,100 $30,468,600 $811,500 $23,080,167 Total operating expense $31,280,100 $30,468,600 $811,500 $23,080,167 Page 809 of 936 Standard account by item and sub-items Vote- item number Standard account by item and sub-items Amount Operating expense 2301-1 The Ombudsman Salaries and wages $18,693,500 Employee benefits $4,468,900 Transportation and communication $1,520,500 Services $5,766,800 Supplies and equipment $830,400 Total operating expense to be voted $31,280,100 Total operating expense for Ombudsman Ontario Program $31,280,100 Updated: December 05, 2022 Published: December 05, 2022 Treasury Board Secretariat Leading the government’s efforts on accountability, openness and modernization, we help deliver good government and excellent public services in the most effective and efficient way possible. Questions or comments There are many ways to contact the Government of Ontario. Contact us About Ontario Accessibility News Privacy Terms of use © King’s Printer for Ontario, 2012–to23 Page 810 of 936 Complaint Process for Council Code of Conduct If you see behaviour or activity that you believe violates the Code of Conduct, you can submit a complaint. There are two complaint processes: Informal Formal Proceeding with the informal process is not required to submit a formal complaint. An individual can use one or the other, or pursue one (such as informal), followed by the other (such as formal). Informal Complaint Tell the Member that their behaviour appears to violate the Code of Conduct. Request that the member stop the behaviour. Document relevant information such as date, time, location and other people present. We encourage you to use the informal complaint process as a way to immediately address behaviour and settle the matter. Formal Complaint To file a formal complaint, you must complete a Request for Investigation Form / Affidavit. Step 1 - Complete a Request for Investigation Form / Affidavit Fill out the Request for Investigation Form/Affidavit and include: Information to support the claim made against the Member, including dates and locations Names and contact information for any witnesses of the event Your name and contact information; anonymous complaints will not be accepted Do not sign the form until you are before a Commissioner of Oaths to swear / affirm the affidavit Step 2 - Bring In-person to our Clerk's Office Place the completed form in an envelope and bring it in-person to the Office of the Regional Clerk: 1815 Sir Isaac Brock Way, Thorold Monday - Friday, 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m., excluding holidays Do not seal the envelope at this time (unless the affidavit is already properly sworn before a Commissioner of Oaths). Individuals should call the Office of the Regional Clerk at 905-980-6000 ext. 3221 to make an appointment. Step 3 - Swear / Affirm the Affidavit to the Regional Clerk Page 811 of 936 When you arrive at the Office of the Regional Clerk, you must swear / affirm the affidavit to indicate that the information you provided is accurate and truthful, unless it has already been sworn / affirmed before a Commissioner of Oaths elsewhere. Step 4 - Seal the Envelope Once the affidavit has been sworn / affirmed, you will seal the envelope and give to the Regional Clerk. The Regional Clerk will forward the complaint to the Integrity Commissioner who will contact you regarding your complaint. The Integrity Commissioner will enter into a "Consent and Confidentiality Agreement" with the complainant before beginning their investigation. The Regional Clerk and other necessary individuals will maintain confidentiality. Reports to Council The Integrity Commissioner generally completes investigations within 90 days or less. After the Integrity Commissioner has completed the investigation, a final investigation report will be provided to Regional Council on an open session council agenda. This final investigation report will identify the complainant and the Member of Council involved. An annual report is also submitted to Regional Council summarizing the number of complaints and findings. Page 812 of 936 Joedy Burdett President of the Niagara Falls Shadow Council Former 2022 Candidate for The Niagara Falls City Council election. Qualified Ontario Independent Designer (BCIN 38837) Building Services, Plumbing-All Buildings, Small Buildings Owner Niagara Tinting 4480 Bridge Street, Niagara Falls, ON, CA, L2E 2R7 (905) 353 8468 Niagara Falls Shadow Council.ca (TNFSC.ca) The Niagara Falls Shadow Council is a registered Independent Social Counseling organization (BIN 1000515774). The Niagara Falls Shadow Council is not associated with The City of Niagara Falls Altering or Redacting this document will be viewed as a violation of Section 2(b) of The Canadian Charter of Rights 1. Page 813 of 936 Page 814 of 936 Page 815 of 936 Page 816 of 936 Page 817 of 936 Page 818 of 936 Page 819 of 936 Page 820 of 936 Page 821 of 936 Page 822 of 936 Page 823 of 936 Page 824 of 936 Page 825 of 936 Page 826 of 936 Page 827 of 936 Page 828 of 936 Page 829 of 936 Page 830 of 936 Page 831 of 936 Page 832 of 936 Page 833 of 936 Page 834 of 936 Page 835 of 936 Page 836 of 936 Page 837 of 936 Page 838 of 936 Page 839 of 936 Page 840 of 936 Page 841 of 936 Page 842 of 936 Page 843 of 936 Page 844 of 936 Page 845 of 936 Page 846 of 936 Page 847 of 936 Page 848 of 936 Page 849 of 936 Page 850 of 936 Page 851 of 936 Page 852 of 936 Page 853 of 936 Page 854 of 936 Page 855 of 936 Page 856 of 936 Page 857 of 936 Page 858 of 936 Page 859 of 936 Page 860 of 936 Page 861 of 936 Page 862 of 936 Page 863 of 936 Page 864 of 936 Page 865 of 936 Page 866 of 936 Page 867 of 936 Page 868 of 936 Page 869 of 936 Page 870 of 936 Page 871 of 936 Page 872 of 936 Page 873 of 936 Page 874 of 936 Page 875 of 936 Page 876 of 936 Page 877 of 936 Page 878 of 936 Page 879 of 936 Page 880 of 936 Page 881 of 936 Page 882 of 936 Page 883 of 936 Page 884 of 936 Page 885 of 936 Page 886 of 936 Page 887 of 936 Page 888 of 936 The Niagara Falls Shadow Council A registered Independent Social Counseling organization "Holding Governments Accountable" Lady Justice Do not redact the contents of this document This document can be freely distributed #06-20-2023-32 Monday, June 19, 2023 These are comments to be attached to the 06/20/2023 Council Meeting Agenda Item. City of Niagara Falls Affordable Housing updated Report Council, Every day, Council Members (as of the beginning of your term, November 15, 2022) Every day that brings us closer to October 26, 2026 (the end of your term in office), Every day that no affordable housing is created by this Council is one more failure, 216 days Council Members, 216 failures ... Page 889 of 936 Thank you. Joedy Burdett President of the Niagara Falls Shadow Council Former 2022 Candidate for The Niagara Falls City Council election. Qualified Ontario Independent Designer (BCIN 38837) Building Services, Plumbing-All Buildings, Small Buildings Owner Niagara Tinting 4480 Bridge Street, Niagara Falls, L2E 2R7 (905) 353 8468 Niagara Falls Shadow Council.ca (TNFSC.ca) The Niagara Falls Shadow Council is a registered Independent Social Counseling organization (BIN 1000515774). The Niagara Falls Shadow Council is not associated with The City of Niagara Falls Altering or Redacting this document will be viewed as a violation of Section 2(b) of The Canadian Charter of Rights Page 890 of 936 The Niagara Falls Shadow Council A registered Independent Social Counseling organization "Holding Governments Accountable" Lady Justice Do not redact the contents of this document This document can be freely distributed #06-20-2023-31 Monday, June 19, 2023 These are comments to be attached to the 06/20/2023 Council Meeting Agenda Item. Mayor Diodati and Councilor Strange comments concerning 15,000 students updated Report Council, During the December 13, 2022 meeting, Mayor Diodati and Councilor Strange collectively stated that 15,000 students and faculty were going to be living and working in the downtown. It is important that this council, as respected officials and representatives of the City of Niagara Falls, refrain from making speculative statements that may mislead residents (Elon Musk's Twitter statements are a good example of the repercussions that can occur). As only time can verify if these statements were true or false, a report will be made to council at each meeting to update the progress of the claim. It has been 188 days since Mayor Diodati and Councilor Strange claimed 15,000 students and faculty were going to be living and working in the downtown. The claim remains false. The current occupancy, as researched, is 0. Page 891 of 936 Page 892 of 936 Thank you. Joedy Burdett President of the Niagara Falls Shadow Council Former 2022 Candidate for The Niagara Falls City Council election. Qualified Ontario Independent Designer (BCIN 38837) Building Services, Plumbing-All Buildings, Small Buildings Owner Niagara Tinting 4480 Bridge Street, Niagara Falls, L2E 2R7 (905) 353 8468 Niagara Falls Shadow Council.ca (TNFSC.ca) The Niagara Falls Shadow Council is a registered Independent Social Counseling organization (BIN 1000515774). The Niagara Falls Shadow Council is not associated with The City of Niagara Falls Altering or Redacting this document will be viewed as a violation of Section 2(b) of The Canadian Charter of Rights Page 893 of 936 The Niagara Falls Shadow Council A registered Independent Social Counseling organization "Holding Governments Accountable" Lady Justice Do not redact the contents of this document This document can be freely distributed #06-20-2023-30 Monday, June 19, 2023 These are comments to be attached to the 06/20/2023 Council Meeting Agenda Item. Mayor Diodati comments concerning Development Downtown updated Report Council, On December 31, 2021, a Niagara Falls Review news article was published, with Mayor Jim Diodati stating: "You’re going to start to see high-rises, residential apartments, and condos being built in our downtown." "You're going to start to see cranes in downtown." "That’s what’s missing downtown." "You need people to live there, then you’ll need a grocery store for people to buy their food there." It is important that the mayor chooses his words carefully. As a respected official and representative of the City of Niagara Falls, making speculative statements may mislead residents (Elon Musk's Twitter statements are a good example of the repercussions that can occur). As only time can verify if these statements were true or false, a report will be made to council at each meeting to update the progress of the claim. It has been 535 days since Mayor Diodati made that claim, and it remains false. There are currently no high-rises, residential apartments, condos, cranes, or grocery stores being built in our downtown. News article link (https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/news/council/2021/12/31/announcement -for-falls- downtown-university-could-come-this-spring-diodati.html) Page 894 of 936 Page 895 of 936 Thank you. Joedy Burdett President of the Niagara Falls Shadow Council Former 2022 Candidate for The Niagara Falls City Council election. Qualified Ontario Independent Designer (BCIN 38837) Building Services, Plumbing-All Buildings, Small Buildings Owner Niagara Tinting 4480 Bridge Street, Niagara Falls, L2E 2R7 (905) 353 8468 Niagara Falls Shadow Council.ca (TNFSC.ca) The Niagara Falls Shadow Council is a registered Independent Social Counseling organization (BIN 1000515774). The Niagara Falls Shadow Council is not associated with The City of Niagara Falls Altering or Redacting this document will be viewed as a violation of Section 2(b) of The Canadian Charter of Rights Page 896 of 936 1 Heather Ruzylo Subject:RE: [EXTERNAL]-Outdoor wedding request on a property From: Nancy Howe < Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2023 3:55 PM To: Bill Matson <billmatson@niagarafalls.ca> Subject: [EXTERNAL]-Outdoor wedding request on a property Per the email sent on May 12 of which you were copied in on, we would like to have an outdoor wedding for my son and his fiance. The details are as follows: Date: October 12, 2024 Location: 5041 River Road, Niagara Falls, L2E 3G7 Guests: Approximately 60-70 Time: Approximately 2p to 100am The wedding will either be catered or possibly Food Trucks in the driveway. There will be a tent as well and portable washroom facilities brought in. Also there will be either a DJ or a band. As mentioned by Heather in her email to me, council must approve an exemption to the noise bylaw to which we are seeking and any other by laws, ordinances we need to follow. Thank you, Nancy Howe CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 897 of 936 A Great City … For Generations To Come CLERKS DEPARTMENT Inter-Departmental Memo To: Mayor James M. Diodati & Members of Council From: William Matson, City Clerk Date: June 20, 2023 Re: Petition for Drainage Works by Owners – Drainage Act, 1990 The attached Petition for Drainage Works by Owners – Form 1, was received in the Clerks Office on June 6, 2023, by Mr. David White of 5981 Willow Road. The form is used to petition Council for a new drainage works under the provincial Drainage Act. It is not used to request the improvement or modification of an existing drainage works under the Act. As background, the Drainage Act provides a legal procedure by which an “area requiring drainage” may have an outlet drain constructed to dispose of excess water. The drainage work is initiated by interested individuals, in this case, just one property owner, who would benefit from the construction of the drain. By signing the petition, it is presumed that the land owner has made a decision that the drain will be of benefit to him and that the probable cost will be lower than the anticipated benefits. The initial benefit-cost decision is made at this point by the landowner(s), not the engineer or Council. It should be noted that the affected landowner(s) pay all costs of construction and maintenance of the system they benefit from if the drain is constructed. The petition is presented to and considered by Council. If the petition represents a proper “area requiring drainage”, that is a real drainage basin, and appears to be valid, the Council may decide to proceed. This can be very difficult without first hearing an opinion of staff. Therefore, staff are making the following recommendation: RECOMMENDATION: That Council refer this petition to Staff for review in accordance with the Drainage Act, and that Staff report back at the next Council meeting. attach Page 898 of 936 Ontarlo ®ygg'g*;y,g;f,§;{°,;*;;;,;:-Petition for Drainage Works by Owners Form 1 Drainage Act,R.S.O.1990,c.D.17,clause 4(1)(a)or (b) This form is to be used to petition municipal council for a new drainage works under the Drainage Act.it is not to be used to request the improvement or modification of an existing drainage works under the Drainage Act. T0:The Council of the Corporation of the '\?QXs*\1 of \Q1c\C>3C.\(‘C\¥:—\\\3 The area of land described below requires drainage (provide a description of the properties or the portions of properties that require drainage improvements) -A??(-Q,7("(rnC\>‘C/\>mcn\y-vhrcg C\crt3 o’?Lend Ox)\\nc odresis 0‘? ‘S‘\8\\\\\\ow Qtcd,6\€:\ie<\3\J\\\:,O“1-05 V90 in accordance with section 9(2)of the Drainage Act,the description of the area requiring drainage will be confirmed or modi?ed by an engineer at the on-site meeting. As owners of land within the above described area requiring drainage,we hereby petition council under subsection 4(1)of the Drainage Act for a drainage works.in accordance with sections 10(4),43 and 59(1)of the Drainage Act,if names are withdrawn from the petition to the point that it is no longer a valid petition,we acknowledge responsibility for costs. Purpose of the Petition (To be completed by one of the petitioners.Please type/print) Contact Person (Last Name),(FirstName)Telephone Number Add \4‘n'\\;Bcwkcl 05-as l’\Clzgxc. Road/Street Number Road/Street Name 5<le\xtmmecm ?"’c 3°’/”7Z”p’ Location of Project Lot Concession Municipality Yd}0?\_g>r\l w\C1(§C,\tC\EMS What work do you require?(Check all appropriate boxes Construction of new open channel Construction of new tile drain ZrDeepeningorwidening of existing watercourse (not currently a municipal drain) fnclosureofexistingwatercourse (not currently a municipal drain) Former Municipality (if applicable) Other (provide description V) ?ttd C\d?itn *0 C§l‘C\\r\Wu’gctrm Name of watercourse (if known) ‘WeCtccsn?tammgllacagglhfC)rl1r°r\[a.‘l:[_Qr»lctlcrl(‘_Q'rmt:dt:d to B‘r.Elmn‘r Estimated length of project CDFCLin k?iititiil?f3'3 VC<t.&_z.1r€d,Q(2(1I;;amm‘{:\Acmc\c\'S General description of soils in the area Wh is the purpose of the proposed ork?(Check appropriate box)Tile drainage only water drainage only BothH1~Petition?led this 6 day of \)Utr\€,2o 13NameofClerk(Last,?rst name)SignatureM47\J5/\//A//LL04’/Vt ?§,,..__»0173E (2022106)©Queen's Printer for Ontario,2022 Disponlbleen francals Page 1Page 899 of 936 Property Owners Signing The Petition Page 2.9?1 -Your municipal property tax billwill provide the property description and parcel roll number. -in rural areas,the property description should be in the form of (part)lot and concession and civic address. -in urban areas,the property description should be in the form of street address and lot and plan number if available. -if you have more than two properties,please take copy(ies)of this page and continue to list them all. Number Property Description Ward or Geographic Township Parcel Roll Number \”t\\\t5‘be ’Yowyt.s)q'.Q 7.12.5 no oouuooooooo I hereby p lonf drainage for the land described and acknowledge my ?nancial obligations. Ownership Q/SoleOwnership Owner Name (Last,First Name)(Type/Print)Signature ‘Date (yyyy/mm/dd) \«~\‘n'.\n=_C),,&a..//eézé.2023 /o¢L/06 3 Partnership (Each partner in the ownership of the property must sign the petition form) Owner Name (Last,First Name)(Type/Print)Signature Date (yyyy/mm/dd) Eforporation(The individualwith authority to bind the corporation must sign the petition) Name of Signing Of?cer (Last,First Name)(Type/Print)Signature /vc»<i~<r»°or~44./7/cf/6-4-a~\_ Name of Corporation /K Cl‘!7 5/5"/t/c/4£¢?/4-/-446)I have the authority to bind the Corporation. Position Title Date (yyyylmm/dd C;7‘?646%/C Number Property Description Ward or Geographic Township Parcel Roll Number I hereby petition for drainage for the land described and acknowledge my financial obligations. Ownership E Sole Ownership Owner Name (Last,First Name)(Type/Print)Signature Date (yyyy/mm/dd) Partnership (Each partner in the ownership of the property must sign the petition form) Owner Name (Last,First Name)(Type/Print)Signature Date (yyyy/mm/dd) Corporation (The individual with authority to bind the corporation must sign the petition) Name of Signing Of?cer (Last,First Name)(Type/Print)Signature Name of Corporation I have the authority to bind the Corporation. Position Title Date (yyyy/mm/dd) Check here if additional sheets are attached Clerk initial -Once the petition is accepted by council,an engineer is appointed to respond to the petition.Drainage Act,R.S.O.1990,c.D.17 subs.8(1).-After the meeting to consider the preliminaryreport,ifthe petition does not comply with section 4,the project is terminated and the originalpetitionersareresponsibleinequalsharesforthecosts.Drainage Act,R.S.O.1990,c.D.17 subs.10(4)._-After the meeting to consider the ?nal report.if the petition does not comply with section 4,the project is terminated and the originalpetitionersareresponsibleforthecostsinsharesproportionaltotheirassessmentintheengineer's report.Drainage Act,R.S.O.1990,cD.17 s.43.-if the project proceeds to completion,a share of the cost of the project will be assessed to the involved properties in relation to theassessmentscheduleintheengineer's report,as amended on appeal.Drainage Act,R.S.O.1990,c.D.17 s.61.Notice of Collection of Personal informationAnypersonalinformationcollectedonthisform is collected under the authority of the Drainage Act,R.S.O.1990,c.D.17 and will be used forthepurposesofadministeringtheAct.Questions concerning the collection of personal information should be directed to:where the form is addressed to a municipality(municipality to complete)and where the form is addressed to a territory without municipal organization,the Drainage Coordinator,Ministryof Agriculture,Food and RuralAffairs,1 Stone Rd W,Guelph ON N1G 4Y2,519 826-3552.01735 (2022/oa)Page 900 of 936 1 Heather Ruzylo To:Clerk Subject:RE: [EXTERNAL]-Seeking Exemption from Noise By-Law for community events at Taps Brewhouse From: Eric Martin <emartin@tapsbeer.ca> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2023 12:01 PM To: Clerk <clerk@niagarafalls.ca>; Bill Matson <billmatson@niagarafalls.ca> Subject: [EXTERNAL]-Seeking Exemption from Noise By-Law for community events at Taps Brewhouse Hello Mr. Matson, Taps is again seeking exemption from the Amplified Noise By-Law for a few events this summer(listed in BOLD below with dates and times). Please add this request to the next council meeting for consideration. Thank you, Eric Martin Taps Brewing Company Inc. From: Eric Martin <emartin@tapsbeer.ca> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2023 11:54 AM To: 'Dean Spironello' <dspironello@niagarafalls.ca>; billmatson@niagarafalls.ca <billmatson@niagarafalls.ca>; planning@niagarafalls.ca <planning@niagarafalls.ca> Subject: Seeking Approval for AGCO for Parking Lot Events at Taps Brewhouse Hello, As you may know, each summer for the last 14 years, Taps Brewhouse has hosted many licensed, outdoor, community based events in our adjacent privately owned parking lot. In the past, we were able to do this without City approval or AGCO notification under our Tied House Manufacturer's/By The Glass license. Beginning this year, the AGCO has required licensee's has City Approval to do this. Just to be clear, we are not seeking a temporary patio extension, only approval for specific event dates. These events always have security, controlled access, extra seating, portable washrooms, and are enclosed is within portable fencing. The exact size of the fenced area varies based on the event requirements but is never bigger than our private parking area and is adjacent to our permanently licensed patio. The only 3 events that we have currently planned are below. We may add more later in the year and would seek approval then: -Super Heros of Autism Talent Showcase on June 25, 11am to 11pm Page 901 of 936 2 -One Big Day Music Festival with Innvitico(supported by Niagara Falls Cultural Grant) on July 22, Noon to midnight -Rise Against Bullying fundraiser with Just Preston (who was just at the City's Pride flag event) on July 29, 11am to 9pm Please let me know if you have any questions or require more information. Thanks, Eric Martin Taps Brewhouse Requirements for temporary outdoor physical extensions (temporary patios) reminder Liquor licensees and manufacturers that hold a by- the-glass endorsement are reminded that new requirements for temporary patios came into effect on January 1, 2023. Licensees located in municipalities must get approval of their temporary patio from their local municipality and must notify the AGCO of the approval, the duration of the approval and any conditions on the approval. The AGCO no longer accepts applications or approves temporary patios for licensees in municipalities. Licensees on First Nations Reserves should view the following link for more information. Licensees in Unorganized Areas must apply to the AGCO for approval of their temporary patio. Page 902 of 936 3 For more information: Information Bulletin: New Requirements for Temporary Outdoor Physical Extensions (Temporary Patios) come into effect on January 1, 2023 Information Bulletin: Municipalities and First Nation band councils can approve temporary outdoor extensions beginning January 1, 2023 Notifying the AGCO of an Approved Temporary Patio From: do-not-reply <do-not-reply@agco.ca> Sent: Friday, June 9, 2023 11:20 AM To: Eric Martin <emartin@tapsbeer.ca> Subject: Summer Reminder to Liquor Licensees: Requirements and Permissible Activities/Rappel estival aux titulaires de permis... Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario 90 Sheppard Avenue East Suite 200 Toronto ON M2N 0A4 June 9, 2023 (La version française suit la version anglaise) Summer Reminder to Liquor Licensees: Requirements and Permissible Activities With the arrival of the summer season, the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) reminds liquor licensees of their requirements relating to: Tax compliance verification Smart Serve recertification Temporary patio approvals Takeout and delivery eligibility Grocery store shelf space requirements New Tax Compliance Verification requirements come into effect July 1, 2023 Liquor licensees are reminded that effective July 1, 2023, all new applicants and existing licensees applying for, or renewing an AGCO liquor licence (excluding Special Occasion Permits) must complete the tax compliance verification process and obtain their tax compliance verification (TCV) number through the Ministry of Finance’s Tax Compliance Verification portal. Don’t wait until it’s time to apply or renew. Visit the Tax Compliance Verification Portal now to get started. Page 903 of 936 4 For more information, see Information Bulletin: New Tax Compliance Verification requirements for liquor licensees come into effect July 1, 2023 Smart Serve recertification requirements are now in effect The AGCO reminds liquor licensees that Smart Serve recertification requirements are in effect: Smart Serve certificates issued before July 1, 2018, will expire on June 30, 2023, at 11:59pm. This includes certificates issued prior to 1995 from the Server Intervention Program. Smart Serve certificates issued on or after July 1, 2018, will expire five years from the date of issuance (e.g., if you were certified on July 2, 2018, your certificate will expire on July 1, 2023 at 11:59 pm). All licensees must ensure that the following persons hold a valid certificate demonstrating the successful completion of Smart Serve: Anyone involved in the sale, service, delivery or sampling of liquor, or who takes liquor orders from customers, must hold a non-expired certificate. Security staff whom the licensee employs or, in the case of a stadium, uses; and Employees involved in the sale and service of liquor from motorized vending carts, as well as course marshals, for Golf Course Endorsement holders. Smart Serve certificate holders can check their certificate expiry date by logging into their Smart Serve account. Smart Serve offers a discounted price of $29.95 for those who recertify before their existing certificate expires. The Smart Serve training program is available online and in-person at various approved training sites across the province. Note: The final exam is only available online via an online proctoring service. For more information: Visit the Smart Serve website for information on how to renew your Smart Serve certificate, Smart Serve My Certificate, and in-class group Smart Serve training Contact Smart Serve Customer Service anytime at info@smartserve.ca or call Monday-Friday from 8:30 am – 4:30 pm at 416-695-8737 / 1-877-620-6082 (toll- free) Visit the AGCO website to view the Reminder to Liquor Licensees on Smart Serve Recertification Requirements, Information Bulletin: Mandatory Smart Serve® Recertification Will Begin July 1, 2022 and Responsible Liquor Sale, Service and Delivery Training web page Contact North | Contact Nord operates 78 online learning centres in communities throughout Ontario. They can provide support with accessing computer Page 904 of 936 5 workstations equipped with high-speed internet, webcams, and up-to-date browsers. Requirements for temporary outdoor physical extensions (temporary patios) reminder Liquor licensees and manufacturers that hold a by-the-glass endorsement are reminded that new requirements for temporary patios came into effect on January 1, 2023. Licensees located in municipalities must get approval of their temporary patio from their local municipality and must notify the AGCO of the approval, the duration of the approval and any conditions on the approval. The AGCO no longer accepts applications or approves temporary patios for licensees in municipalities. Licensees on First Nations Reserves should view the following link for more information. Licensees in Unorganized Areas must apply to the AGCO for approval of their temporary patio. For more information: Information Bulletin: New Requirements for Temporary Outdoor Physical Extensions (Temporary Patios) come into effect on January 1, 2023 Information Bulletin: Municipalities and First Nation band councils can approve temporary outdoor extensions beginning January 1, 2023 Notifying the AGCO of an Approved Temporary Patio Liquor takeout and delivery eligibility requirements reminder Did you know? Not all businesses that hold a liquor sales licence are eligible to sell liquor for takeout and delivery. To help determine if you are eligible, see the Liquor Takeout & Delivery Eligibility Requirements web page. Review Regulation 746/21 (Licensing) under the Liquor Licence and Control Act, 2019 (LLCA) and the Registrar’s Interim Standards and Requirements for Liquor to ensure you are in compliance. Grocery store shelf space requirements Beer and wine grocery store licensees are reminded that effective July 1, 2023, 40% of containers of wine, excluding cider, on display must meet the criteria set out in subsection 89(10) of Regulation 746/21 under the LLCA. These changes apply to eligible grocery stores outside of any wine boutique. Previously 45% of wine products were required to meet the criteria. Page 905 of 936 6 Licensees can request a list of wine that meets the criteria set out in subsection 89(10) and that is available for sale to eligible grocery stores from the Liquor Control Board of Ontario. For more information, see Information Bulletin: Liquor Retail Hours of Sale and Grocery Store Shelf Space Requirements For more information If you have questions, your local AGCO Inspectors are here to help and support you with additional information and education. If you are unsure who your Inspector is, or have misplaced their contact information, please email Compliance@agco.ca with your licensed establishment address to get connected. AGCO Customer Service Representatives are available anytime via the iAGCO online portal or Monday to Friday from 8:30 am – 5:00 pm at 416-326-8700 or (toll free) 1-800- 522-2876. Did you know? The AGCO is redesigning its website to make it better. If you’d like to share your thoughts on how we can improve your website experience, please visit: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/YXGQQNQ 9 juin 2022 Rappel estival aux titulaires de permis de vente d’alcool : exigences et activités autorisées Avec l’arrivée de la saison estivale, la Commission des alcools et des jeux de l’Ontario (CAJO) rappelle aux titulaires de permis de vente d’alcool leurs obligations en matière de : vérification de la conformité fiscale renouvellement de la certification Smart Serve approbation des terrasses temporaires admissibilité en matière de plats à emporter et de livraisons exigences en matière d’espace dans les rayons des épiceries Les nouvelles exigences de vérification de la conformité fiscale entrent en vigueur le 1er juillet 2023. Page 906 of 936 7 Nous rappelons aux titulaires de permis de vente d ’alcool qu’à compter du 1er juillet 2023, tous les nouveaux demandeurs et les titulaires existants qui demandent ou renouvellent un permis de vente d’alcool de la CAJO (à l’exception des permis de circonstance) doivent suivre le processus de vérification de la conformité fiscale et obtenir leur numéro de vérification de la conformité fiscale par l ’intermédiaire du portail de vérification de la conformité fiscale du ministère des Finances. N’attendez pas que soit le moment de faire votre demande ou de la renouveler. Consultez le portail de vérification de la conformité fiscale dès maintenant pour commencer. Pour plus d’informations, lisez le Bulletin d’information : De nouvelles exigences de vérification de la conformité fiscale pour les titulaires de permis d’alcool entreront en vigueur le 1er juillet 2023. Les exigences en matière de recertification Smart Serve sont désormais en vigueur La CAJO rappelle aux titulaires de permiss d’alcool que les exigences de recertification Smart Serve sont en vigueur : Les certificats Smart Serve délivrés avant le 1er juillet 2018 expireront le 30 juin 2023 à 23 h 59. Cela inclut les certificats délivrés avant 1995 dans le cadre du Programme d’intervention des serveurs. Les certificats Smart Serve délivrés à partir du 1er juillet 2018 expireront cinq ans après la date de délivrance (par exemple, si vous avez été certifié le 2 juillet 2018, votre certificat expirera le 1er juillet 2023 à 23 h 59). Tous les titulaires de permis doivent s’assurer que les personnes suivantes détiennent un certificat valide attestant qu’elles ont suivi avec succès le programme Smart Serve : Toute personne engagée dans la vente, le service, la livraison ou l’échantillonnage de boissons alcoolisées, ou qui prend des commandes de boissons alcoolisées auprès de clients, doit être titulaire d’un certificat non périmé. Le personnel de sécurité que le titulaire de la licence emploie ou, dans le cas d’un stade, utilise, et Les employés chargés de la vente et du service de boissons alcoolisées à partir de chariots motorisés, ainsi que les commissaires de terrain, pour les détenteurs d’une licence de parcours de golf. Les titulaires de certificat Smart Serve peuvent vérifier la date d’expiration de leur certificat en se connectant à leur compte Smart Serve. Smart Serve propose un prix réduit de 29,95 $ si vous vous recertifiez avant l’expiration de votre certificat existant. Page 907 of 936 8 Le programme de formation Smart Serve est disponible en ligne et en personne dans divers sites de formation agréés à travers la province. Note : L’examen final n’est disponible qu’en ligne via un service d’examen sous surveillance en ligne. Pour plus d’informations : Consultez le site web Smart Serve pour obtenir des informations sur la manière de renouveler votre certificat Smart Serve, sur Mon certificat Smart Serve et sur la formation Smart Serve en classe. Contactez le service à la clientèle de Smart Serve en tout temps à info@smartserve.ca ou appelez du lundi au vendredi, de 8 h 30 à 16 h 30 au 416 695-8737 / 1 877 620-6082 (sans frais). Consultez le site web de la CAJO pour y lire le Rappel aux titulaires de permis de vente d’alcool relatif aux exigences de recertification Smart Serv e, le Bulletin d’information : La recertification obligatoire de la formation sur les boissons alcooliques débutera le 1er juillet 2022 et la page web Formation pour la vente, le service et la livraison responsables d’alcool. Contact North | Contact Nord gère 78 centres d’apprentissage en ligne dans les communautés de l’ensemble de l’Ontario. Le service peut vous aider à accéder à des postes de travail équipés d’une connexion Internet à haut débit, de caméras web et de navigateurs récents. Rappel des exigences relatives aux agrandissements extérieurs temporaires (terrasses temporaires) Il est rappelé aux titulaires de permis de vente d’alcool et aux fabricants titulaires d’une autorisation de vente au verre que les nouvelles exigences relatives aux terrasses temporaires sont entrées en vigueur le 1er janvier 2023. Les titulaires de permis situés dans les municipalités doivent obtenir l’approbation de leur terrasse temporaire auprès de leur municipalité locale et doivent informer la CAJO de l’approbation, de la durée de l’approbation et de toute condition relative à l’approbation. La CAJO n’accepte plus de demandes et n’approuve plus les terrasses temporaires pour les titulaires de permis dans les municipalités. Les titulaires de permis dans les réserves des Premières Nations doivent consulter le lien suivant pour plus d’informations. Les titulaires de permis dans les zones non organisées doivent demander à la CAJO d’approuver leur terrasse temporaire. Pour plus d’informations : Bulletin d’information : Nouvelles exigences pour les agrandissements extérieurs temporaires (terrasses temporaires) en vigueur à compter du 1er janvier 2023. Page 908 of 936 9 Bulletin d’information : Les municipalités et les conseils de bande des Premières Nations peuvent approuver des agrandissements temporaires extérieurs à compter du 1er janvier 2023. Informer la CAJO de l’obtention d’une approbation d’agrandissement extérieur temporaire (terrasse temporaire) Rappel des conditions d’admissibilité pour la vente à emporter et la livraison de boissons alcoolisées Le saviez-vous ? Les entreprises titulaires d’un permis de vente d’alcool ne sont pas toutes autorisées à vendre de l’alcool à emporter et à livrer. Pour vous aider à déterminer si vous êtes admissible, consultez la page web Boissons alcoolisées à emporter et à livrer – Critéres d’admissibilitié Examinez le Règlement de l’Ontario 746/21 : Délivrance de permis de la Loi de 2019 sur les permis d’alcool et la réglementation des alcools (LPARA) et les Normes et exigences provisoires du registrateur pour les boissons alcoolisées , afin de vous assurer que vous êtes en conformité. Exigences en matière d’espace dans les rayons des épiceries Nous rappelons aux titulaires de permis de vente de bière et de vin qu’à compter du 1er juillet 2023, 40 % des contenants de vin, à l’exclusion du cidre, exposés doivent satisfaire aux critères énoncés au paragraphe 89(10) du Règlement 746/21 pris en application de la LPARA. Ces changements s’appliquent aux épiceries admissibles, à l’exception des boutiques de vin. Veuillez noter qu’auparavant, 45 % des produits de vin devaient répondre aux critères. Les modifications apportées au paragraphe 89(10) du Règlement 746/21 pris en application de la LPARA, qui modifient les exigences relatives à l’étalage des produits, sont entrées en vigueur le 1er juillet 2022. Les titulaires de permis peuvent demander à la Régie des alcools de l’Ontario une liste des vins qui répondent aux critères énoncés au paragraphe 89(10) et qui peuvent être vendus aux épiceries admissibles. Pour plus d’informations, lisez le Bulletin d’information : Heures de vente d’alcool au détail et exigences en matière d’espace d’étalage dans les épiceries Pour plus d’informations Si vous avez des questions, vos inspecteurs locaux de la CAJO sont là pour vous aider et vous soutenir avec des informations supplémentaires et de la formation. Si vous ne savez pas qui est votre inspecteur ou si vous avez égaré ses coordonnées, envoyez un courriel à compliance@agco.ca en indiquant l’adresse de votre établissement sous permis pour vous mettre en contact. Page 909 of 936 10 Les représentants du service à la clientèle de la CAJO sont disponibles à tout moment via le portail en ligne iCAJO ou du lundi au vendredi de 8 h 30 à 17 h au 416 326-8700 ou sans frais, au 1 800 522-2876. Le saviez-vous ? La CAJO est en train de remanier son site web pour l’améliorer. Si vous souhaitez nous faire part de vos idées sur la manière dont nous pouvons améliorer votre expérience sur le site web, veuillez consulter : https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/YXGQQNQ View online - agco.ca - Unsubscribe CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 910 of 936 Lundy's Lane BIA 2023 Annual Budget - Approved by LLBIA Board May 30, 2023 REVENUE 2023 Budget Tax Levy Requisition from City 220,000.00 Investment Income 3,500.00 Net Revenue 223,500.00 Less: Expected Taxes written off by City 5,000.00 TOTAL REVENUE 218,500.00 Marketing Website 7,000.00 Artwork & Production 7,500.00 Social Media Ads, Adwords 5,000.00 NFT Shopping & Dinning Guide 3,600.00 NFT Visitor Guide 4,600.00 TODS Signage 10,750.00 Website Hosting 850.00 Website Domains & Maintenance 300.00 Out of Town Marketing 5,000.00 Media Library / Videos 10,000.00 Contingency 10,000.00 Total Marketing 64,600.00 Events Restaurant Week + New Event 10,000.00 Total Events 10,000.00 Page 911 of 936 Memberships & Conferences OBIAA 675.00 OBIAA Convention + Professional Development 1,285.00 FEO - FEO Convention - Total Membership & Conferences 1,960.00 Beautification Banners, Brackets & Bus Shelter Branding 2,000.00 Planters & Winter Greens 35,000.00 Street - Benches / Recepticles / Utility Box Art 20,000.00 WFOL Decorations / Supplies / Installation 120,000.00 Member Incentive for WFOL 10,000.00 Total Beautification:187,000.00 Administration Project Administrator 40,000.00 Project Administrator - Expenses 1,000.00 Digital Marketing & Website Coordinator - Audit Expense 4,800.00 Bank Charges & Interest 140.00 Book Keeping 3,050.00 Insurance - Director's Liability $5M 3,000.00 Legal Fees 1,000.00 Mail Box 200.00 Meeting Expenses 250.00 Office Expenses 1,000.00 Misc Expense 500.00 Total Administration 54,940.00 Page 912 of 936 Total Operational Expense 318,500.00 NET OPERATIONAL INCOME 100,000.00- Use of Reserve Funds for Operational Income Shortfall Capital Project Funds 20,000.00 Illuminated Street Fixtures Fund 80,000.00 Total Reserve Fund Expenditures 100,000.00 Net nil Page 913 of 936 Clifton Hill BIA 4960 Clifton Hill,Box 60 Niagara Falls,Ontario,L2E 688 (905)357-5911 email:hoakes@c|iftonhi||.com Memo To:BillMatson billmatson@niagarafalls.ca City of Niagara Falls From:Harry Oakes Date:June 16,2023 Re:2023 Budget Please find attached our 2023 budget request for city council consideration 2023 Budget TODS Highway Signage $12,000 Streetscape Maintenance $5,000 Accounting &Contingency $5,000 Sidewalk Expansion Project City of Niagara Falls Repayment $112,000 2023 Budget Total $134,000 Deduct 2022 funds carried forward ($100,000) 2023 Tax Levy Request $34,000 Page 914 of 936 The City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Resolution No. 7 Moved by: Seconded by WHEREAS subsection 34(13) of the Planning Act, 1990 R.S.O requires written notice of the public meeting to be given to prescribed persons and public bodies, in the prescribed manner, and accompanied by the prescribed information; and WHEREAS notice was given to the prescribed persons and public bodies, in the prescribed manner on May 19, 2023 for Council to hold a public meeting to consider a Zoning By-law application by 800460 Ontario Limited for lands known as 9304 McLeod Road; Parts 1 & 2 59R-16846; and WHEREAS since that time the applicant revised the zoning by-law amendment due to a revision of the proposed McLeod Meadows draft plan to address City Transportation Services request for one municipal street to be provided onto Beechwood Road; and WHEREAS no changes are requested to the proposed by-law other than amending Schedule 1 of the proposed by-law to incorporate the minor southerly extension of the proposed site specific R5B zone; and WHEREAS notwithstanding the requirement for the written notice of a public meeting, subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act , 1990 R.S.O allows a municipality to deem such requested changes minor and determine that no further notice is required to be given and by passing a resolution; and WHEREAS the applicant requests Council consider passing a resolution that would deem the giving of further notice is final and that no further notice is required to be given; and WHEREAS Council determined that the proposed change to the by-law to include the minor extension of the proposed site specific R5B zone is minor and does not require further notice to be given. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that subject to subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act, 1990 R.S.O Council deems the change in the zoning by-law minor and exempts the requirement for further written notice. Page 915 of 936 AND The Seal of the Corporation be hereto affixed. ........................................................... ............................................................. WILLIAM G. MATSON, CITY CLERK JAMES M. DIODATI, MAYOR Page 916 of 936 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By-law No. 2023 - 058 A by-law to designate Block 103, Registered Plan 59M-498, not to be subject to part-lot control (PLC-2023-004). WHEREAS subsection 50(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, provides, in part, that the council of a local municipality may by by-law designate lands that would otherwise be subject to part-lot control, not be subject to such part-lot control; AND WHEREAS such by-laws are required under subsection 50(7.1) of the Planning Act to be approved by the appropriate approval authority, that being the Regional Municipality of Niagara as per subsection 51(5) of the Planning Act, subsequently delegated to the City of Niagara Falls by Regional Municipality of Niagara By-law No. 8819-97; AND WHEREAS the said lands are zoned by By-law No. 79-200, as amended by By-law No. 2020-021, to permit semi-detached dwellings; AND WHEREAS the owner of the said lands proposes to divide Block 103 into 2 parcels for 2 semi-detached dwellings to be sold separately; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls deems it expedient to designate that the said lands not be subject to part-lot control. THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. That subsection 50(5) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, not apply to Block 103, Registered Plan 59M-498, in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara. 2. This by-law shall remain in full force and effect for two years from the date of passage of this by-law, after which time this by-law shall expire and be deemed to be repealed and of no effect. Read a First, Second and Third time; passed, signed and sealed in open Council this 20th of June, 2023 ........................................................... ............................................................. WILLIAM G. MATSON, CITY CLERK JAMES M. DIODATI, MAYOR S:\PART LOT CONTROL\2023\PLC-2023-004 - SPLENDOUR, BLOCK 103\5 By-law\By-law – PLC-2023-004.docx Page 917 of 936 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By-law No. 2023 - 059 A by-law to designate Blocks 104, 115, 118 & 119, Registered Plan 59M-498, not to be subject to part-lot control (PLC-2023-003). WHEREAS subsection 50(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, provides, in part, that the council of a local municipality may by by-law designate lands that would otherwise be subject to part-lot control, not be subject to such part-lot control; AND WHEREAS such by-laws are required under subsection 50(7.1) of the Planning Act to be approved by the appropriate approval authority, that being the Regional Municipality of Niagara as per subsection 51(5) of the Planning Act, subsequently delegated to the City of Niagara Falls by Regional Municipality of Niagara By-law No. 8819-97; AND WHEREAS the said lands are zoned by By-law No. 79-200, as amended by By-law No. 2020-021, to permit semi-detached and on-street townhouse dwellings; AND WHEREAS the owner of the said lands proposes to divide Block 104 into 2 parcels for 2 semi-detached units to be sold separately, and Blocks 115, 118, and 119 each into 6 parcels for 6 on-street townhouse units to be sold separately; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls deems it expedient to designate that the said lands not be subject to part-lot control. THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. That subsection 50(5) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, not apply to Blocks 104, 115, 118 & 119, Registered Plan 59M-498, in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara. 2. This by-law shall remain in full force and effect for two years from the date of passage of this by-law, after which time this by-law shall expire and be deemed to be repealed and of no effect. Read a First, Second and Third time; passed, signed and sealed in open Council this 20th day of June, 2023. ........................................................... ............................................................. WILLIAM G. MATSON, CITY CLERK JAMES M. DIODATI, MAYOR S:\PART LOT CONTROL\2023\PLC-2023-003 - PLC-2023-003 - SPLENDOUR, BLOCK 104, 115, 118, 119\5 By-law\By-law - PLC- 2023-003.docx Page 918 of 936 A by-law to provide for the adoption of Amendment No. 156 to the City of Niagara Falls Official Plan (AM-2022-031). THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANNING ACT, 1990, AND THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA ACT, HEREBY ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1. Amendment No. 156 to the City of Niagara Falls Official Plan, constituting the attached text and map, is hereby adopted. Read a First, Second and Third time; passed, signed and sealed in open Council this 20th day of June, 2023. ........................................................ ...................................................... BILL MATSON, CITY CLERK JAMES M. DIODATI, MAYOR S:\OFFICIAL.PLN\AMEND\#156 - 7085 Morrison (Optimist Club)\! By-law - OPA 156.docx CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By-law No. 2023-060 Page 919 of 936 S:\OFFICIAL.PLN\AMEND\#156 - 7085 Morrison (Optimist Club)\1 PART 1 Preamble - OPA 156.docx OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 156 PART 1 – PREAMBLE (i) Purpose of the Amendment The purpose of the amendment is to allow for the redevelopment of the land for commercial purposes. The subject lands are approximately 0.98 hectares in size and are located on the north side of Morrison Street, east of the QEW, municipally known as 7085 Morrison Street. (ii) Location of the Amendment The amendment applies to lands outlined and shown as Major Commercial on Map 1 to Amendment No. 156 to the Official Plan. (iii) Details of the Amendment Map Changes MAP 1 - Schedule “A” to the Official Plan – Future Land Use has been amended from Open Space to the Major Commercial designation. Text Change There are no text changes as part of this amendment. (iv) Basis of the Amendment The applicant (River Realty Development (1976) Inc.) proposes to utilize an area of 0.98 hectares to use the existing building for commercial purposes and to construct a new 9-unit commercial building. The subject lands are being redesignated from Open Space to Major Commercial as shown on Schedule A – Future Land Use of the City’s Official Plan. The amendment meets the intent of the Official Plan as it makes efficient use of existing infrastructure, land, and repurposes an existing building and facilitates the construction of a new building for commercial uses. The site is suitable for the proposed Major Commercial designation as it is located within the Morrison- Dorchester Intensification Node, which envisions a mix of major commercial/institutional uses with a range of residential uses/densities and directs higher employment densities to where the property is located. Finally, the redesignation of the subject land helps to create a complete community. Page 920 of 936 S:\OFFICIAL.PLN\AMEND\#156 - 7085 Morrison (Optimist Club)\2 PART 2 BODY - OPA 156.docx PART 2 - BODY OF THE AMENDMENT All of this part of the document entitled PART 2 - BODY OF THE AMENDMENT, consisting of the following text and attached map, constitute Amendment No. 156 to the Official Plan of the City of Niagara Falls. DETAILS OF THE AMENDMENT The Official Plan of the City of Niagara Falls is hereby amended as follows: 1. MAP CHANGE The "Area Affected by this Amendment", shown on the map attached hereto, entitled "Map 1 to Amendment No. 156", shall be designated as Major Commercial on Schedule A – Future Land Use the Official Plan. 2. TEXT CHANGE There are no text changes proposed as part of this amendment. Page 921 of 936 Page 922 of 936 (b) Minimum rear yard landscape strip 3 metres (c) The balance of regulations specified for a GC use. 6. No person shall use the Lands for a use that is not a permitted use. 7. No person shall use the Lands in a manner that is contrary to the regulations. 8. The provisions of this by-law shall be shown on Sheet C3 of Schedule “A” of By- law No. 79-200 by redesignating the Lands from OS to GC and numbered 1194. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By-law No. 2023-061 A by-law to amend By-law No. 79-200, to permit the use of the lands for commercial purposes and to permit the construction of a 9 unit commercial building (AM-2022-031). THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1.The Lands that are the subject of and affected by the provisions of this by-law are described in Schedule 1 of this by-law and shall be referred to in this by-law as the “Lands”. Schedule 1 is a part of this by-law. 2.The purpose of this by-law is to amend the provisions of By-law No. 79-200, to permit the use of the Lands in a manner that would otherwise be prohibited by this by-law. In the case of any conflict between a specific provision of this by-law and any existing provision of By-law No. 79-200, the provisions of this by-law are to prevail. 3.Notwithstanding any provision of By-law No. 79-200 to the contrary, the following uses and regulations shall be the permitted uses and regulations governing the permitted uses on and of the Lands. 4.The permitted uses shall be the uses permitted in the GC zone. 5.The regulations governing the permitted uses shall be: (a) Minimum rear yard depth 12.5 metres Page 923 of 936 2 ....................................................................... ..................................................................... WILLIAM G. MATSON, CITY CLERK JAMES M. DIODATI, MAYOR S:\ZONING\AMS\2022\AM-2022-031 Morrison Street, 7085 (Optimist Club)\9 By-law\Bylaw - AM-2022-031.docx 9. Section 19 of By-law No. 79-200 is amended by adding thereto: 19.1.1194 Refer to By-law No. 2023-061. Read a First, Second and Third time; passed, signed and sealed in open Council this 20th day of June, 2023. Page 924 of 936 061 Page 925 of 936 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By-law No. 2023-062 A by-law repeal By-law 2002-156 and to amend By-law No. 79-200, to permit the use of the lands for an 8 storey mixed-use building with 3 ground floor commercial units and 77 dwelling units subject to the removal of a holding (H) symbol (AM-2022-018). THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Lands that are the subject of and affected by the provisions of this by-law are described in Schedule 1 of this by-law and shall be referred to in this by-law as the “Lands”. Schedule 1 is a part of this by-law. 2. The purpose of this by-law is to amend the provisions of By-law No. 79-200, to permit the use of the Lands in a manner that would otherwise be prohibited by this by-law. In the case of any conflict between a specific provision of this by -law and any existing provision of By-law No. 79-200, the provisions of this by-law are to prevail. 3. Notwithstanding any provision of By-law No. 79-200 to the contrary, the following uses and regulations shall be the permitted uses and regulations governing the permitted uses on and of the Lands. 4. The permitted uses shall be: (a) The uses permitted in the GC zone, and (b) Dwelling units in a building in combination with one or more of the uses listed in the GC zone provided that such dwelling units except entrances thereto are located entirely above the ground floor. 5. The regulations governing the permitted uses shall be: (a) Minimum front yard depth In accordance with section 4.27.1, where applicable, plus 3 metres to the portion of the building above 15 metres in elevation from grade. (b) Minimum interior side yard width 0.4 metres to the west interior lot line (c) Location of the various components of the building or structure on the Lands, their maximum height and maximum number of storeys Refer to the plan on Schedule 2 of this by-law and clause (d) of this section Page 926 of 936 2 and minimum yards (d) Maximum height of buildings or structures, 26 metres or eight storeys, whichever is less, subject to section 4.7 of By-law 79-200, and shall include a roof feature as required by clause (e) of this section and is subject to section 6 of this by-law. (e) Roof feature The building, as shown on Schedule 2, shall have a roof feature which has a height of not less than 4.8 metres above the top storey. The roof feature shall be a distinct architectural element of the building. (f) Parking requirements 1.25 parking spaces per dwelling unit 1 space per 32 square metres of commercial floor area (g) Fencing requirements 1 metre abutting the adjacent west property’s front yard Minimum 2 metres for the remainder of the property line abutting the adjacent west property (h) The balance of regulations specified for a GC use. 6. For the purposes of this by-law: ““roof feature” means a distinct architectural element erected above the top storey and shall be provided for the purposes of enhancing the design of the buildings and may enclose any roof mounted mechanical equipment, mechanical penthouses, or other similar elements. Notwithstanding section 4.7 of By -law No. 79-200, and except for any flagpoles, or other similar decorative roof features, and radio, telephone, television or telecommunication towers or antennae, no water tank, elevator or other mechanical penthouse shall have a height greater than the roof feature unless clad to be aesthetically consistent with the roof feature. 7. The holding (H) symbol that appears on Schedule 1 attached hereto is provided for in the City of Niagara Falls Official Plan pursuant to Section 36 of the Planning Act. No person shall use the Lands described in section 1 of this by-law and shown hatched and designated GC(H) and numbered 1193 on the plan attached as Schedule 1 hereto for any purpose, prior to the H symbol being Page 927 of 936 3 removed pursuant to the Planning Act. Prior to the H symbol being removed, the landowner or developer shall submit an updated Functional Service Brief and complete Third-Party Modelling for sanitary services in accordance with the schedule of fees to the satisfaction of Municipal Works. 8. No person shall use the Lands for a use that is not a permitted use. 9. No person shall use the Lands in a manner that is contrary to the regulations. 10. That By-law 2002-156 is hereby repealed. 11. The provisions of this by-law shall be shown on Sheet C4 of Schedule “A” of By- law No. 79-200 by redesignating the Lands from GC and numbered 590, in part, and P and numbered 590, in part, to GC(H) and numbered 1193. 12. Section 19 of By-law No. 79-200 is amended by adding thereto: 19.1.1193 Refer to By-law No. 2023-062. Read a First, Second and Third time; passed, signed and sealed in open Council this 20th day of June, 2023. ....................................................................... ..................................................................... WILLIAM G. MATSON, CITY CLERK JAMES M. DIODATI, MAYOR \\NFFILE1\Pln$\ZONING\AMS\2022\AM-2022-018 Ferry St, 5687\9. By-law\Bylaw - AM-2022-018.docx Page 928 of 936 062 Page 929 of 936 062 Page 930 of 936 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By-law No. 2023 - 063 A by-law to declare PIN 64251-0036 (LT), Road Allowance between Lots 2 & 3, Concession 3, Willoughby, being Morningstar Road, in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara, as surplus. WHEREAS City of Niagara Falls By-law No. 2003-16 governing the sale of land by the City of Niagara Falls provides that prior to selling any land, the Council of The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls shall by by-law or resolution declare the land to be surplus; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls, at its meeting of June 20, 2023, adopted the Recommendations of Council Report L-2023-13, to permanently close and declare surplus PIN 64251-0036 (LT), Road Allowance between Lots 2 & 3, Concession 3, Willoughby being Morningstar Road; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls now deems it expedient to pass this by-law; THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. PIN 64251-0036 (LT), Road Allowance between Lots 2 & 3, Concession 3, Willoughby being Morningstar Road, in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara, hereby declared surplus. 2. The Mayor and City Clerk and City Solicitor are hereby authorized to execute all documents that may be required for the purpose of carrying out the intent of this by-law and the Clerk is hereby authorized to affix the corporate seal thereto and to deliver such documents. Read a First, Second and Third time; passed, signed, and sealed in open Council this 20 day of June 2023. ................................................................ ................................................................ WILLIAM G. MATSON, CITY CLERK JAMES M. DIODATI, MAYOR Page 931 of 936 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By-law No. 2023 - 064 A by-law to permanently close part of a highway. WHEREAS Section 34 of the Municipal Act, provides, in part, that the Council of every municipality may pass by-laws to permanently close any highway; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls now deems it expedient to pass this by-law; THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. PIN - 64251-0036 (LT), Road Allowance between Lots 2 & 3, Concession 3, Willoughby being Morningstar Road, in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara, is hereby permanently closed. 2. The Mayor and City Clerk and City Solicitor are hereby authorized to execute all documents that may be required for the purpose of carrying out the intent of this by-law and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to affix the corporate seal thereto and to deliver such documents. Read a First, Second and Third time; passed, signed, and sealed in open Council this 20 day of June 2023. ................................................................ ................................................................ WILLIAM G. MATSON, CITY CLERK JAMES M. DIODATI, MAYOR Page 932 of 936 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By-law No. 2023 - 065 A by-law to amend By-law No. 2002-081, being a by-law to appoint City employees, agents and third parties for the enforcement of provincial or municipal by -laws. THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1 . By-law No. 2002-081 is amended by deleting Schedules “A” and that Schedules “A" attached hereto shall be inserted in lieu thereof. 2. That by-law 2021-053 be hereby repealed. Read a First, Second and Third time; passed, signed and sealed in open Council this 20th day of June. ............................................................... ........................................................... WILLIAM G. MATSON, CITY CLERK JAMES M. DIODATI, MAYOR Page 933 of 936 SCHEDULE “A” 1. Chief Building Official: Luciano Chieca 2. Deputy Chief Building Official: Kira Dolch 3. Inspectors: Ned Mijatovich Gary Graziani Jehad Ochana Louie Baldinelli Fred Sacco Sandro Elia Effat Effat Cesar Ramires Jesse Mancino Kendra Cockhill Ellen Roupas Tyler Esau Cesar Ramires Frank Genovese Kathy Repergel Jim Boutilier Jo Zambito Ben Trendle Frank Devereaux Kellie Kubik Doug Collee Ron Massolin Ken Henry Kadri Lambert Meghan Edgar Karen Borne 4. Municipal Enforcement Officers: Gerald F. Spencer Doug Evans Mike Formica Brian Sparks Heather Stones Page 934 of 936 Patrick Vernon Jana Mills Jonathan Cook Page 935 of 936 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By-law No. 2023 – 066 A by-law to adopt, ratify and confirm the actions of City Council at its meeting held on the 20th day of June, 2023. WHEREAS it is deemed desirable and expedient that the actions and proceedings of Council as herein set forth be adopted, ratified and confirmed by by-law. NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The actions of the Council at its meeting held on the 20th day of June, 2023 including all motions, resolutions and other actions taken by the Council at its said meeting, are hereby adopted, ratified and confirmed as if they were expressly embodied in this by-law, except where the prior approval of the Ontario Municipal Board or other authority is by law required or any action required by law to be taken by resolution. 2. Where no individual by-law has been or is passed with respect to the taking of any action authorized in or with respect to the exercise of any powers by the Council, then this by-law shall be deemed for all purposes to be the by-law required for approving, authorizing and taking of any action authorized therein or thereby, or required for the exercise of any powers thereon by the Council. 3. The Mayor and the proper officers of the Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls are hereby authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to the said actions of the Council or to obtain approvals where required, and, except where otherwise provided, the Mayor and the Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute all documents arising therefrom and necessary on behalf of the Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls and to affix thereto the corporate seal of the Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls. Read a first, second, third time and passed. Signed and sealed in open Council this 20th day of June, 2023. .............................................................. ............................................................. BILL MATSON, CITY CLERK JAMES M. DIODATI, MAYOR Page 936 of 936