The URL can be used to link to this page

2007/07/09SEVENTH MEETING Monday, July 9, 2007 4:00 p.m. City Hall, Committee Room #2A & B 1) Approval of the June 25, 2007 Community Services Minutes. 2) REPORTS: a) MW-2007-62 Union Marsh b) MW-2007-79 Sign By-law Copy of By-law in By-law section of Council Agenda c) MW-2007-83 Lead Water Service Investigation d) R-2007-18 Highway 420 & Stanley Avenue Raised Median Appearance 3) NEW BUSINESS: 4) ADJOURNMENT: STAFF CONTACT: Ed Dujlovic Ed Dujlovic Ed Dujlovic Denyse Morrissey a) Resolution to go into Closed Meeting. MINUTES OF COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, June 25, 2007, City Hall, Room 2 at 4:00 p.m. PRESENT: Chair-Councillor Carolynn loannoni, MayorTed Salci, CouncillorJim Diodati, Councillor Victor Pietrangelo, Councillor Vince Kerrio, Councillor Wayne Thomson, Councillor Janice Wing, Councillor Shirley Fisher. ABSENT: Councillor Bart Maves, John MacDonald, Lee Smith, Ed Dujlovic STAFF: Ken Burden, Ken Beaman, Geoff Holman, Denyse Morrissey, Dean lorfida, Karl Dren, Serge Felicetti, Marianne Tikky- Secretary GUESTS: John Stranges -Oasis Motel, 5107 Centre Street, Mike Piccirillo Sr. - 5619 Ellen Street, Mike Piccirillo Jr. - 5065/5071 Centre Street, Pat Ramumo - 5020 Centre Street, Heather Minow-Niagara College, Ray Desormeaux -Niagara Transit, Carol Bilodeau - 8246 Lexington Court, Peter Petraris -Golden Steer, Rob Capitano - HOCO, Sue McDowell -Victoria/Centre BIA, Frank LaPenna -Victoria/Centre BIA, CST. Steve Ballard -NRP, SGT. John Curra -NRP, SGT. D. McMenamin -NRP, Faith Lowe - 4239 Brookdale Drive, Frank Falnena - 5612 Ellen Avenue, John Bacher - 134 Church Street, St. Catharines, Jean Grandoni -R.R.#1 Garner Road. PRESS: Corey Larocque, Niagara Falls Review, Rob Lapensee, Niagara This Week MINUTES It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson, seconded by Councillor Pietrangelo, that the May 14, 2007 minutes be approved. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2007-06-25. REPORTS a) MW-2007-76 -Police Request Road Closure -Revised It was ORDERED on the motion of Mayor Salci and seconded by Councillor Thomson that the Revised Police Request to Close Centre Street the July 1 weekend at the discretion of the Niagara Regional Police be received for the information of Council. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2007-06-25. Community Services Committee - 2 - June 25, 2007 b) MW-2007-68 -Amendments to By-law 89-2000 Large Vehicles -Overnight and Boulevard It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson and seconded by Councillor Wing that; 1. section 205.01 of By-law 89-2000 of the Traffic & Parking by-law, be amended to include the following: 205.01.12 If it is a large vehicle and is parked between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. unless permitted by sign. 205.01.13 If it is a large vehicle and is parked on a boulevard. and that; 2. Staff apply to the Ministry of the Attorney General's office for approved short form wording and a set fine of $80.00 to reflect this amendment. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2007-06-25. c) MW-2007-64 - Kalar Road Pumping Station Decommissioning of Temporary Relief Pump It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Fisher and seconded by Councillor Thomson that the matter be deferred. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2007-06-25. d) MW-2007-70 -Weeping Tile Disconnection Policy & Implementation Program It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Wing and seconded by Mayor Salci that the City of Niagara Falls adopt the recommendations set out in the Weeping Tile Monitoring Program (February 2007) prepared by Associated Engineering and proceed immediately with the implementation program as set out in this report. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2007-06-25. e) MW-2007-71 -Municipal Boulevard Maintenance Policy -Hydro One Networks Inc. Corridors It was ORDERED on the motion of Mayor Salci and seconded by Councillor Fisher that the report be received for the information of Council. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2007-06-25. Community Services Committee - 3 - June 25, 2007 f) MW-2007-63 -Biggar Road between Montrose Road and Western Limit Speed Limit Review It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson and seconded by Councillor Fisher that the speed limit on Biggar Road between Montrose Roadn and the City's western boundary be maintained at 80 km/h. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2007-06-25. g) MW-2007-77-Niagara College Bus Service Contract -Fall 2007 It was ORDERED on the motion of Mayor Salci and seconded by Councillor Diodati that; 1) That City of Niagara Falls enter into a four (4) year agreement with the Niagara College Student Association Committee (NCSAC), to provide Bus Service to the Welland Campus; and; 2) That the Mayor and the Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary agreement. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2007-06-25. h) MW-2007-61 - Hiring a Supervisor of Traffic and Parking Field Services It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson and seconded by Councillor Pietrangelo that the hiring of a full-time Supervisor of Traffic and Parking Field Services position, be approved. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2007-06-25. i) R-2007-10 -Recreation Property & Building End Use It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Pietrangelo and seconded by Mayor Salci; 1. That Council approve the expansion of Lundy's Lane Cemetery and the development of a pedestrian gateway with enhanced beautification on the property located at 7565 Lundy's Lane (former Recreation Commission Building) by conversion of this properly. 2. That an application for the expansion of the cemetery be submitted to the Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations, Cemeteries Branch, for review and approval. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2007-06-25. Community Services Committee - 4 - June 25, 2007 NEW BUSINESS a) It was ORDERED on the motion of Mayor Salci and seconded by Councillor Diodati that staff coordinate with the proper authorities to update the population statistics on the Welcome to the City of Niagara Falls signs. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2007-06-25. b) It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Fisher and seconded by Councillor Thomson that staff provide an information report on the re-installation of a pathway along Portage Road to Chippawa by Marineland. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2007-06-25. ADJOURNMENT It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson and seconded by Councillor Wing that the regular meeting of the Community Services Committee be adjourned at 5:38 p.m. and enter into an In-Camera Session Motion: Carried July 9, 2007 Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: MW-2007-62 Union Marsh Municipal Drain Final Engineer's Report Consideration Meeting -Reconvened - RECOMMENDATION: MW-2007-62 1. That the City adopts the Final Engineer's Report on the Union Marsh Municipal Drain prepared under the authority of Section 78 of the Drainage Act, R.S.O., 1989 2. That the City gives two readings to the by-law (provisional) which will initiate the appeal process. BACKGROUND: This is a reconvening of the initial Report Consideration Meeting held on April 3, 2006 which resulted in the decision being deferred pending further information on alternative funding options. These options were summarized in a report to Council dated April 24, 2006 that was received and filed. Staff had then prepared a report for Council dated April 30, 2007 requesting direction on proceeding with the project in which Council reaffirmed its decision to proceed under the terms of the Drainage Act (all reports attached). The Drainage Engineer estimates the cost of works, which in turn is assessed to all landowners within the tributary area resuming drainage. In determining the landowners assessment, the Drainage Engineering considers factors that contribute to the land's flow generation to the improved watercourse such as land area, topography, soil type and land use as well as length of drain improvement benefitting the lands. A fact sheet from the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Titled: Understanding Drainage Assessments has been appended providing fortheir information on how assessments are calculated. ,.. ~ - YN' IY Working Together to Serve Our Community ~ Community Services Department - ~" ~. _-.,_. July 9, 2007 - 2 - MW-2007-62 City policy has been to complete the improvement of Municipal Drains under the provision of the Drainage Act and assisting landowners with payment of their assessments over a longer term with no carrying charges. Pursuant to the Drainage Act, the passing of the provisional by-law (two readings), which has been included in this evenings agenda, will initiate the appeal process with the mandated scheduling of the Court of Revision. Once all appeals are settled, a third reading of the by-law will be necessary prior to initiating the tender and construction phase of this project. The City had received a petition (attached) to abandon a portion of the drain described as the west branch south of QEW after the April 2006 public meeting. The City's consultant, John Kuntze of KSmart & Associates has provided written response to the petition (attached) and will address its validity with respect to the Drainage Act at the public meeting. The details and design parameters are appropriately described in the attached Engineer's Report which has been provided to all assessed landowners. (The estimated net assessment costs are summarized in Schedule C of the report. Final assessment will be calculated once construction of the drain is complete.) Funding for the City's share of this project has been included in the 2007 Capital Works Budget with the Major Drain Maintenance Program R2 G/L #31002 030000. Council's concurrence with the above recommendations would be appreciated. 1 ~.--_, Recommended by: Geoff Hol Approved by: _ Ed Respectfully subm' ed: _ Attach: n, Director of Municipal Works acDonald, Chief Adm of Community Services Officer R. Volpini S:IREPORTS12007 ReportslMW-2007-62 -Union Marsh.wpd Understanding Drainage Assessments Page 1 of 4 ' MbY off' ~~1CUlttltB, ~ C3r~tar~c~ F~a ~a ~~ ~ff~~~~ I cer~kra{ site I Feedback I search I site map I FranGais I i i ~ IM^ ~~~~~r-~-~ ggdex#: 557 Publication Date: 02/92 assn/ to -7a2x axtueert's Pdd+~er ror oneariio Order: 92-035 Last Reviewed: 02/92 Title: Understanding Drainage Assessments .History: Original Factsheet Written by: Sid Vander Veen -Drainage Coordinator/OMAFRA Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Responsibilities Under Common Law 3. ResQonsibilily Under the Drainage Act 4. Enoineer's Report Introduction The Drainage Act provides a legal procedure by which an "area requiring drainage" may have an outlet drain constructed to dispose of excess water. The drainage work is initiated by interested individuals within an "area requiring drainage" who will benefit from the construction of the drain. A petition form, obtained from the municipal clerk, is signed by interested landowners. In order to be valid or sufficient, the petition must be signed by the majority of the owners in the "area requiring drainage" or by owners that represent at least 60% of the lands in this area. The "area requiring drainage" is usually described by lot and concession, or other legal land description. By taking this action, it is presumed that the owners signing the petition have made a decision that the drain will be of benefit to them and that the probable cost will be lower than the anticipated benefits. The initial benefit-cost decision is made at this point by the landowners, not the engineer or Council. The petition is presented to and considered by Council. If the petition represents a proper "area requiring drainage", that is a real drainage basin, and appears to be valid, the Council may decide to proceed. Council then notifies each of the petitioners of this decision as well as any other municipality affected and the local Conservation Authority and the Ministry of Natural Resources. Council then appoints an engineer. The engineer is an employee of Council, hired to design this specific drain. Under The Drainage Acf, Section 9(2), the engineer is required to hold an on-site meeting to determine (1) the area requiring drainage, (2) if the petition is valid, (3) the drainage needs of the area. The engineer is then required "to make an examination of the area requiring drainage as described in the petition and to prepare a report which shall include: (a) plans, profiles and specifications of the drainage works; (b) a description of the area requiring drainage; (c) an estimate of the total cost thereof; (d) an assessment of the amount or proportion of the cost of the works to be assessed against every parcel of land and road for benefit, outlet liability and injuring liability; (e) allowances, if any, to be paid to the owners of land affected by the drainage works and (f) such other matters as are provided for under this Act." The engineer's report is presented to Council, who then notifies a{{ persons assessed and ca11s a special meeting where the report is considered. General objections to the report may be raised at this time. At this Understanding Drainage Assessments Page 2 of 4 meeting signatures may be added or removed from the petition and this determines if the project will continue. Unresolved problems, depending on the subject, may be appealed to the Court of Revision, the Ontario Drainage Tribunal or the Drainage Referee. Details on appeal procedures may be found in The Drainage Act` or in Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food Factsheet, Drainage Legislation. The engineer's report includes two important items: 1. The estimated cost of the work - No matter how individual assessments are arrived at, this total estimated cost must always be equal to the total amount assessed, otherwise the work cannot proceed. 2. The assessment liability -This may be spread over several pages if an owner owns several parcels of land and if there are branch drains. It may be summarized. Let us examine the obligations regarding this assessment. 'The Drainage Act maybe found in the Revised Statutes of Ontario 1980, Chapter 126, available in most public libraries. Individual copies maybe purchased from the Ontario Government Bookstore, 1-800-668- 9938. ~ Top of Paae ~ Responsibilities Under Common Law A natural watercourse is defined generally as a stream of water which flows along a defined channel, with bed and banks, for a sufficient time to give it substantial existence. This may include streams that dry up periodically. A riparian landowner (owner of lands that abut upon a natural watercourse) has the right to drain his or her lands into the natural stream, but may not bring water in from another watershed. He or she can collect water in ditches and drains and discharge it into the watercourse even though it results in an increase in volume and rate of flow. Where a natural watercourse becomes a part of a drain, it is no longer a natural watercourse. When this occurs, the riparian rights, as described earlier, are lost. Surface water not flowing in a natural watercourse (i.e. not having discernible bed and banks) has no right of drainage. An owner of lower land may, at his or her own choice, either allow the water from higher land to flow over it or by dams or banks, keep such water off his or her property. No owner has the right to collect such surface water by ditches or drains and discharge it on lands of another. He or she has a responsibility to take this water to a sufficient outlet, i.e., a natural watercourse or a drain constructed under The Drainage Act. Since there is no right to drain surface water, the owner of each parcel of land in the watershed is generally assessed for "outlet liability". In other words, his or her Common Law liability is removed by paying for the increased size or cost of the drain due to the volume of water which is discharged from his or her property, even though the drain may not provide a direct outlet for this water. The authority for this liability is set out in Section 23(1). Since, through Common Law, a landowner is also liable for any damage he or she may cause from water which he or she collects in drains and discharges on other land without a sufficient outlet, he or she may be assessed for relief from such "injuring liability" if the new drain serves as an outlet for his or her drains and prevents this injury from occurring. The authority for this liability is set out in Section 23{2). Injuring liability is frequently difficult to distinguish from outlet liability, consequently many engineers' reports do not contain such an item. The assessment for outlet liability and injuring liability is based on the volume and rate of flow of the water artificially caused to flow from an owner's property. Generally, the assessment is based upon a unit value Understanding Drainage Assessments Page 3 of 4 per hectarage. Owners at higher elevations on a watershed may have a higher unit charge than those owners near the outlet since the water from their land makes use of a greater length of drain. A difference may be made in the unit outlet charge due to varying types of soil or land use, or the distance to the drain. Responsibility Under the Drainage Act In addition to the Common Law responsibility, an owner may also be assessed for benefit. i Too of Page ~ Benefit will vary between different lands, according to their differences of elevation. quantity of water to be drained from each, distance of undrained land from the course of the proposed ditch, and the presence or absence of existing drains, and other like factors. To consider whether a parcel of land will receive any benefit from the construction, it is proper to consider whether any enhanced financial value will accrue to it as a result of the drain construction. This may occur through the increased productive power of the land or by rendering it more salable and at a better price, or by preventing water from entering on to it. If the proposed drainage works can be of no possible benefit to the owner, or is of no commercial or agricultural value, the Act does not authorize a contribution for benefit. Sometimes, an owner has an undeveloped area that he or she intends to leave in this condition. The owner may feel that he or she should not be assessed since the drain will be of no benefit. However, the property could change hands and the new owner might want to drain and develop it. It is with this in mind that the engineer must make an assessment, regardless of the present owner's intentions. It is the duty of the engineer to determine whether or not a parcel of land will benefit from the project. When appealing a benefit assessment, the landowner must prove that the land does not benefit from the drain. An owner has no responsibility for work done upstream from his or her property unless the work provides a benefit by "cutting off' a harmful flow of water across the property. In some instances, a "special benefit assessment" may be levied against the property. This value usually represents the difference in cost between that which was originally designed and the increased level of design requested by a landowner. Examples include a closed or the drain where open ditches would ordinarily suffice, or the construction of ponds beside the drain, or other special requests by a landowner specifically for this benefit. The authority for this liability is set out in Section 24. Engineer's Report ~ Top of Page ~ The Engineer's report should contain a plan and profile of the drain, as well as details on the drain design and the assessment schedule. The plan shows the location of drains and the limits of the watershed. The profile shows ground elevations along the drain and the present and proposed drain bottom. The specifications give details on how the drain is to be constructed. The Schedule of Assessment contains several columns. The first group contains the names of owners with a description of each parcel of land assessed. The hectarage shown in the schedule for which an owner is assessed is only approximate. No survey is made to accurately establish the watershed boundary or farm areas. Any minor error in hectarage assessed is not a valid basis for appeal nor does it greatly affect the assessment. The other columns in the Schedule set forth the assessment liability for each drain and/or branch drain. These values are only Understanding Drainage Assessments Page 4 of 4 estimates. The final value will not be known until the construction work is finished. The assessment will then be prorated to recover the actual cost. Allowances to lands injured by the work are set out in a separate schedule by the engineer as authorized in Sections 29 to 33 of The Drainage Act. Damage to crops during construction and disposal of waste material will vary depending on the time of year that the work is constructed. Crop damage due to spreading the spoil on the banks is based on a decreasing yearly loss of crop over several years. All or part of the cost of access bridges from a public road to the property may be assessed to the property owner. Farm bridges are constructed as a part of the work. In certain circumstances a severance allowance may be paid instead of building the bridge. The allowance will depend upon the value of the land severed, or the cost of the bridge that would be required. The cost, or part of the cost of farm bridges or the severance allowance may be assessed across the property. Where private drains are incorporated into the new drain, a nominal allowance may be paid based on any saving that may result from using the private drain. These allowances may not be included in the Summary of Assessments but are usually shown in a separate Schedule of Allowances. ~ Top of Page i Related Links • Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food Factsheet, Drainage Legislation ~ Top of Paye ~ For more information: Toll Free: 1-877-424-1300 Local: (519) 826-4047 Email: ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca Engineering Home Page ~ I Oentral Sile I edba k ~ Search ~ Site Mao ~ Francais I ~ Home ~ What's New I alendar ~ Products I News Releases ~ ~ C?ntar~ This site is maintained by the Government of Ontario, Canada. This information is provided as a public service, but we cannot guarantee that the information is current or accurate. Readers should verify the information before acting on it. Feedback and technical inquiries to: a~.info.omafra(a~ontario.ca O Copyright 2007 Queen's Printer for Ontario Last Updated: June 14, 2007 April 30, 2007 Niag.ar Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario- (~ Members: ~ ' ~ Re: -~ Rural Municipal Drain Maintenance Program RECOMMENDATION: -20D7~8 The recomm ation{s) contained in this report were adopted in committee and ratified by City Council 1. That City Council reaffirm the use of The Drainage Act to secure access and resolve drainage issues in the City's rural area, and further that, 2. The landowners be assessed for their portion of the costs as set out in The Drainage Act. BACKGROUND: The City has developed a strategy to address flood prone areas in our rural community based on a report prepared by Wiebe Engineering Ltd. in 1987 which was adopted by Council. It identified twelve (12) areas where periodic flooding of the roadway occurred to the point that it was impassable. Ta date, three (3) of these areas have been improved with the construction of the drainage course through the provisions of the Drainage Act. This provincial legislation allows far the provision and maintenance of proper drainage for those watercourses that transverse private rural lands. They act as storm water outlets for agricultural lands which are critical in maximizing crop yields. The Drainage Act is therefore an effective tool in securing a drainage outlet that provides an outlet for both agricultural farm land and roadside ditches. Proper roadside drainage is integral in maximizing the road's structural stability. The Drainage Act provides far assessments to be paid. by all landowners in the drainage area based on a user pay basis. Those landowners that derive the most benefit from the improvements are assessed the greatest share. The final assessmen# considers available credits in the form of provincial grants and allowances far those who qualify. Council has directed staff Drainage Act which invoJ~ to investigate an alternative funding model to The paying the landowners assessments C~ou lsil Working Together to Serve Our Community I Community services Department Muniapal Works April 34, 2047 - 2- MW 2007-38 The City has developed a strategy to address flood prone areas in our rural community based on a report prepared by Wiebe Engineering Ltd. in 1987 which was adopted by Council. It identified twelve (12) areas where periodic flooding of the roadway occurred to the point that it was impassable. Presently, three (8) of these areas have been improved with the construction of the drainage course through the provisions of the Drainage Act. Council has directed staff to consider the landowner's request to investigate alternative funding models to offset the landowners cost far improvement works to the Union Marsh Drain. Report MW-2006-47 was prepared for Commit#ee dated April 24, 2006 identifying the impact that this precedent would set. In addition to the initial increased cost to the City, approximately $425,000.00, there area also procedural inconsistences that may result in appeals by road authorities and other municipalities to the Court of Revision or the Drainage Tribunal. This precedent would also result in the loss of Ministry funding to the project in the form of grants and allowances which would then be shifted to the municipality. It is evident that this major shift in funding policy for these drain projects will have a great impact on the City's current and future budgets for new construction and future maintenance. The City will need to budget not only for City drains but also external drain improvements in adjacent municipalities to which Niagara Falls is tributary. Assuming that the budget for rural drain maintenance remains consistent, the expected time frame to complete the improvement of the remaining drains would be prolonged. extensively. Therefore, it is staff s recommendation that the current policy which is consistent with provincial legislation, be maintained requiring the landowner to pay their net assessed value which considers applicable grants and allowances. Council has provided payment options over a longer time period with no carrying charges on previous drain projects to assist landowners. Council's concurrence with the above recommendation would be appreciated. Recommended by: Respectfully submitted: Attach: Ed Dujlovic, Exe(clritive Director of Community MacDonald, Chief Officer R.Volpini C:IDocuments and Settings1mk2221Local Settings~TemplXPgrpwiselMw-2o07-38 -Rural Municipal Drain.2wpd.wpd Community Services Department .~fT@ Clty 4f Municipal Works Niagara Falls 4310 Queen Street P.O. Box 1023 Canad~ Niagara Fails, ON L2E 6X5 ',s~~ web site: www.city.niagarafialis.on.ca Tel.: (905) 856-7521 Fax: {945)356-2354 E-matt: edujiovi~city.niagarafiaits.on.ca Apri124, 2046 Alderman Selina Volpatti, Chairperson and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Onta~`io Members: Re: ~: ~ -Union Marsh Drain Fnncling RECOMl1AENDATIQN: That this report be received and filed. BAGKGRUUNiJ: -2o0~3i7 Ed t7ujlovic Director ..~.... The recarttmendation{s) contained inthLs repar#we astopted in committee ant ratified by City Cesuncil At the April 3, 2406 Community Services Committee meeting, a motion was passed that staff investigate alternative funding to offsetproperty owner's costs for improvements to the Union Marsh Drain. Past practice bas been that property owners have been assessed for works carried out by the City under the Drainage Act. In addition property owners in Niagara Falls have also been assessed costs as a result of work carried out on drains in neighbouring municipalities that property owners in Niagara Balls have received and benefitted from. The fallowing chart lists the works chat have been completed recently within the City and neighbouring municipalities under the Drainage Act. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS TEE CREEK -1995 City Road Allowance $145,760.00 . Landowners -City $60,290.00 Total - City of Niagara. Faits Assessments $206,050.00 NOTL - 1RPORT DRAIN MA~NANCE -1997 DRAIN NO.2 City of Niagara Falls Road Allowance $ 2,775.00 City of Niagara Falls Landowners $17,055.00 Total - City of Niagara Falls Assessments $19,830.00 Wor~Cing T'oge;her;o Serve Our Communfty Muntcipal tNorks • Fira Services • Partcs, Recreation & Cutiure • Business t7eveiopment • 8w7ding & S~t.sw 5ervfces Apri124, 2008 7"AOROLLI- Allangort Ifrain Mainten once -1999 City of Niagara Falls Allowance $27,693.00 City of Niagara Falls Landowners $19,282.00 Total - City of Niagara Falls Assessments $46,975Att CIT~O,X' ~+JIAGARA FALLS DRAIN NO 6 - 2002 City Road Allowances $22,900.00 Landowners -City $37,370.00 Total -City of Niagara Falls Assessments $60,270.00 NOTI, -AIRPORT DRA~y MAINTENANCE 2006 DRAIN N0.3 ~--.~._ City ofNiagara Falls Allowance $ 1,155.00 City ofNiagara Falls Landowners $10,150.00 Total -City of Niagara Falls Assessments $11,305.00 ~w-xoos-~r Nuts: Landowners had the option of spreading the payment over ten years to the municipality on their taxes interest free. In addition to the work being proposed by the City on the Union Marsh Drairi, the City is proceeding with work on the Boyer's Creek Drain and Hun#er's Ihain under tt-e Ihainage Act. As indicated in the 2006 Capital Budget the costs for Bayer's Creek is anticipated to be $580,004.00.. The preliminary assessment for the works is as follows. • . City of Niagara Falls Road Allowance $107,000.00 . • Assessment other roads (Niagara Region & MT©) $121,100.00 • Assessment to Fort Erie Landowners $ 43,200.00 • Net Assessment to Niagara Fads Landowners ~ $269,100.00 Hunter's Drain City Road Allowance $ 50,000.00 City Landowners $106,000.00 It is planned that the work for the two projects will be carried out in 2006. At the Committee meeting the residents requested that the City pick up the entire costs of the drainage woxks as they felt that part of their tax dollars is going to the construction of storm sewers in the urban area afthe City. Funding far stone and drainage works is provided through the General - TaxRate and the Urban Tax Rate. The General Tax Rate is applied to all properties in the City. In addition to the General Tax Rate, those properties that receive an urban service the Urban Tax Rate is also applied The General Tax Rate provides funding for road side ditching, and funds the City's assessnien# for work carried out under the Drainage Act. The Urban Tax Rate p ays the Capital costs for construction of new or replacement storm sewers and the maintenance of storm sewers. Accordingly, the rural residents are not paying for the construction ormaintenance of stone facilities in the built up area of the City. For example the Storm Sewer Separation Proj ect on Stanley Avenue ,April 24, 2006 ~nw-zoos-a7 ' ' has been funded by taxes through the Urban Tax Rate. and the Utility Budget respectively. City staffdid undertake a review of possible alternative funding methods. Tn addition to the City of Thorold and the Town ofNiagara-on-the-Lake tho Town of Fort Erie and the City of Port Co3borne have also used the Drainage Act and have assessed private landowners for the works carried out, In addition to the information provided by the consultant wot~king on the Union Marsh Drain, K Smart Associates Limited, we also contacted Weibe Engineering and Spriet Associates who have worked on City's Drainage Actprojects as well as hundreds ofothers throughout Ontario. The consultants have never encountered a project done under the Drainage Act where the municipalitypaid all of the assessment from the municipality's budget. One consultant did indicate that in Grimsby, the Town did pay for a portion of the landowner assessment. This was only for properties in the urban area and the funding was provided via the storm sewer budget. Concerns have been raised should the City proceed fa offset the assessment against landowners in the City of Niagara Falls. This may result in an appeal by other road authorities such as the Ministry of Transportation and the Region of Niagara and in the case af~oyer's Creek those pxoperty owners in the Town of Fart Erie. There could be difficulties before the Court of Revisions and the Drainage Tribunal in regards to the division of casts. One possible way to minimize the matter would be to provide a gram to property owners in the City of Niagara Falls only. Should Cauncilwishtoproceedinthismanneritwillhave animpactonthsCity'scurrentandfuture budgets not Duly for the major clean out of the drains but future maintenance costs. Not only will the City have to budget for its own projects initiated under the Drainage Act it will also have to monitor neighbouring municipalities and the works that they will be undertaking under the Act and the impact that it will have on landowners in the City and budget funds to cover their assessments. The assumption of the costs to private landowners for drainage works is a major shift in current policy and is canhrary to the public survey. Tn the survey carried out by Leger Marketing the public responded that, "within budgetary contexts, 62°!o want to rnaintain/increaseeervices, with plurality 44% preferring to do so via User Fees °' This policy shift also has an impact upon Local Improvement. Currently, in those areas where the Cityundertakes a road reconstruction and the road does not have any curbs, the residents are offet~i the opportunity to install curbs at their costs. Based onthe above informationit is staffs recommendation #hatthe curientprac#ce for thepayment of landowner assessment of works under the Drainage Act be maintained. As indicated private propertywill be provided the option to pay fortheir assessment via their tax bills over ten years with no financing charges. Committee's concurrence with the above recornmeadation would be appreciated. Prepared b Ed Dujlovic ' submitted: Director of Municipal Works //Chief Administrative 1. See ratification a public meeting be held with the landowners ' Community Services Qepartment The Cify 4f Municipal Works NiaQ~ra pulls 4310 Queen Street Canad~ P.o. Box 1023 Niagara Fatts, ON L2E 6X5 web site: www.city.niagarafatis.on.ca Tel.: {905) 956-7521 Fax: (905}356-2354 E-mall: edujlovi®ctty.niagarafalls.on.ca April 3, 2006 tiaw•2oos.26 Ed Aujiovic director The rectsmmendatton{s} contained to this report were adapted as Alderman Seline Volpatti, Chair amended toy City Couaacil and Members of the Community Services Committee City of 1'3iagara Fails, Ontario Members: Re: MW-2006-28 - Municipal Drain - Engineer's Report Section 78 -Drainage Act -Union Marsh Drain Willouglzby Township RECOMMENDATION: That the City adopt the Engineer's Report for the Union Marsh Drain prepared under the authority of Section 78 of the Drainage Act, R.S.O., 1989 and that staff be directed to prepare the , provisional by-law as prescribed in the Act. -i'F,ee.~' s-4tt~ ~{~~` r'r` a.t~er3nc~~i ~' `ng -io(' Woc'l~, Cx1 fh~ Gtn ion /Ytarsh ~a.iti. BACKGROUND: In March 2003, the Director ofPublic Works signed a Petition for Drainage Works to investigate the need for repair and improvement of drainage for the Union Marsh Drain for those lands within its watershed as shown in the attached report. In June 2003, the City engaged the services of K Smart Associates to prepare the Engineer's Report under the authority of the Drainage Act. During the design period rivo public meetings were scheduled #o famikiarize the landowners with the project, the Drainage Act process and respond to public inquires. The second public meeting was scheduled to report on the current findings and recommendations based on the completed fieldwork. A preliminary assessment schedule was presented at this meeting. The public comments from those in attendance were generally supportive of the project with no major objections to the work being noted. The City commissioned a report that completed a comprehensive review on the status of the rural drains in 1987. The report identified rivelve (12} drains that were in need of repair from the perspective of providing a sufficient outlet for roadside drainage. Due to budgeting constraints, staff has been completing these drain improvements on a FYorking Together to Serve our Community Municipal Works • Fire Servkes • Panics. Recreagon & Culture • 8usinass Development • Bulldlrrg & By-Law Servkes April 3, 2006 - 2 - MW-200fi-28 priority basis as determined in consultation with Operations staff. To date, two rural drain improvements have been constructed through the Drainage Act process, being the Tee Creek Municipal Drain { 1995) and Drain No, b (2002). The total assessment to private owners has been $60,290.00 and $37,370.00 respectively. The Drainage Act provides for the Ministry, OIvIAFRA, to subsidize agriculturally zoned lands for up tonne-third of their assessment as well a direct benefit grant assessed to those lands that are traversed by the drain. In the past, Council approved a ten (10) year payment plan for al I assessments to landowners interest free. The Final Report estimates the total assessment for this project to be $233,245.00 of which $143,697.00 will be assessed against property owners. (see schedule C) There has been some discussion that has taken place in regards to the financing of this project in particular it has been requested that the City assume all of the cost. As indicated above the past practice has been for the property owners to pay their costs based on the benefit that they received. The City's budget has not and does not include funding for works on private property but does for City otivned lands and roads. Committee should also be aware that under the Drainage Act the initiating municipality can assess lands beyond the municipal boundaries that are deemed to benefit by drainage works. Recently, works have been undertaken by the City of Thorald and the Town of Niagara.-on-the-Lake which resulted in assessments against both the CityofNiagara Fa1ts and private property within the City. These assessments were paid for by the City and private properly owners respectively. Pursuant to the Drainage Act, the ne:ct step in the process after the adoption of the Engineers's Report wilt be to schedule the Court of Revision meeting to decide on any assessment appeals. The passing of aprovisional by-la~v (two readings) which has been included in this evening's agenda for your consideration, is necessary in order to proceed. The details and design parameters are appropriately described in the attached Engineer's Report. Funding for the City's share of this project has been included in the 2006 Capital Works Budget being account 12-3-310002-030000. Your favourable consideration of this report is appreciated. P p b r^ spe ful~ sub fitted: ~~ ip' C. .T. ohn MacDonald Drainage Sup 'n ndent Chief Administrative Officer Recomme ed by: ~y~ Q Geoff Hol an, C.E.T. E~' ~ Manager of Development A~ rDV y: Ed Dujl is Director of Municipal Works ENGINEERING REPORT UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls (Willoughby Township) Regional Municipality of Niagara January 30, 2006 File No. 03-039 K SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED Kitchener Sudbury Englehart F:103-0391ReportlFina1103-039-Report O1-30-06.doc ~ K. SMART ASSOCIATES I.IMITE~ // CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS / KITCHENER SUDBURY ENGLEHART RAINY RIVER 85 McIntyre Drive Tel: (519) 748-1199 Kitchener, Ontario N2R 1 H6 Fax: (519) 748-6100 January 30, 2006 File No. 03-039 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City oFNiagara Falls SUMMARY In January 2003 the Director of public Works for the City of Niagara Falls signed a petition requesting repair and improvement of the Union Marsh Drain to ensure proper drainage for all City roads within the Union Marsh Drain watershed. On June 4, 2003 the City of Niagara Falls advised that K. Smart Associates had been appointed to prepare the report for repair and improvement of the Union Marsh Drain. This report is prepared under Section 78 of the Drainage Act RSO 1990. The recommended work to provide for the repair and improvement of the Union Marsh Drain is summarized as follows: Main Drain McCredie Road to Willoughby Drive Work on the Union Marsh Drain will commence at McCredie Road (a closed road allowance in the Legends of Niagara golf course -Lot 18-19, Concession 1, Willoughby). The first 425m requires a minor bottom cleanout. On the remaining 65flm upstream to Willoughby Drive excavation is required to re-establish a defined channel. No work is recommended downstream of McCredie Road as there is a well defined channel downstream from McCredie Road and the water level at McCredie Road appears to be a static water level equal to the water level in the Niagara River. Willoughbv Drive to Miller Road Minor work required, minimal bottom excavation mostly in spot locations. Work will be mainly to remove debris from the existing channel. A 10m wide path will be cleared along one bank to permit work. East Branch Drain cleanout is required on of the entire length of the East Branch from the outlet into the Main Drain upstream to the head of the East Branch at the northeast limits of the QEW just west of Ort Road (untravelled road allowance). Depth of cleanout will vary from 200mm to 500mm. A lOm wide path will be cleared along one bank to permit the work. An existing farm access culvert near at the Lot 11-121ot line in Concession 2 {Station 1+265) is to be replaced with twin 1400 diameter corrugated steel pipes by 12m long. An existing undersized access culvert in the channel along the south side of Bossert Road (Lot 8, Concession 3) will be removed. Substantial cleanout will be required through the Detenbeck and Bossert Road culverts. Minor cleanout will be required through the Marshall, Sodom and Ort Road culverts. Treadle Branch This branch is located along the north side of the QEW in Lot 7, Concession 3. Bottom cleanout depth will range from 100mm to 300mm. West Branch Drain cleanout is required on the West Branch from the outlet into the Main Drain upstream to the north limits of the Brouillette property in Lot 7, Concession 5. Depth of cleanout will average 250mm. In some locations no bottom excavation will be required. In many locations it will be necessary to clear the channel cross-section of all brush and fallen trees. A 10m wide path will be cleared along one bank to permit the work. Minor cleanout map be required though the road culverts on the West Branch. No cleanout is required on the QEW culvert. F:103-039\Repor[~Fina1103-039-Report O1-30-06.doc Consulting Engineers Union Marsh Drain 2006 Page 2 January 30, 2006 City of Niagara Falls Total length of drain to be cleaned out: 12,507m Main Drain 3,250m; East Branch 3,838m; Txendle Branch 580m; West Branch 4,839m The estimated cost of the project is $264,400. The Union Marsh Drain watershed is approximately 1,540 ha (3,805ac). Schedule A shows the assessment of the total estimated cost for the Union Marsh Drain 2006 to the affected lands and roads. Under Section 74 of the Drainage Act the City of Niagara Falls will he responsible fox maintaining the Union Marsh Drain 2006 in accardance with the maintenance provisions in this report (refer to page 12). Schedule B will be used to prorate future maintenance cost on the Union Marsh Drain 2006. Schedule C will be used to prorate the final cost for the Union Marsh Drain 2006 (refer to page 12). Schedule C illustrates estimated net assessments after deducting grants and allowances where applicable DRAIN HISTORY A review of Cite of Niagara Falls records on the Union Marsh Drain provided the following history on the drain. • The Union Marsh Drain was originally constmcted under Willoughby Township Bylaw 1014 which was adopted April 6,1929. A copy of this bylaw or the Engineer's report could not be located. Other reference noted that the 1929 Engineer's report provided for improvement of the Union Marsh, P. Ort and Sodom Road Drains. • In 1941 Willoughby Township requested R. Blake Erwin to update the assessment schedule from the 1929 Bylaw and to address a petition from the Department of Highways for improved drainage outlet for the QEW. R. Blake Erwin submitted a report dated November 11, 1941 which was adopted under Willoughby Township Bylaw A-56 on December 29,1941. • The 1941 report primarily provided fox improvement to what was known as the Sodom Road Branch (identified as the East Branch in this report) to provide improved outlet fox the QEW. The Sodom Road Branch was improved up to the north side of the QEW. It appears that in the 1929 report the Sodom Road Branch may have continued south of the QEW but this cannot be confirmed. In Lot 7 and 8, Concession 3 two new branch drains were to be constructed to provide further outlet fox the QEW. The first was the Txendle Branch which commenced at the Bossert Road crossing and continued southwesterly across Lot 7 to the north side of the QEW. The second was the Concession Road Branch which continued south along the east side of Ort Road to the north limits of the QEW. (When tlae land in Lot 7 was taken over fox an airfield near the end of World Wax II the Sodom Road Branch and the Txendle Branch were combined into one ditch which continued upstream azound the perimeter of the airfield property as exists today. This relocation was not done under an Engineer's report.) The 1941 report provided for a new culvert on Bossert Road on the East Branch and provided for repair on the Main Drain in Lot 18, Concessions 1 and 2. The 1941 report provided for a new schedule of assessment fox the Union Marsh Drain and indicated previous expenditures on the Main Drain (now shown as the West Branch) would also be assessed out under the 1941 report. • Correspondence in the file indicates that Willoughby Township had requested R. Slake Erwin to prepare a report fox the need fox a cleanout of the Main Drain (West Branch) is the area of Lot 13 and 14, Concession 4. No report, plan or profile could be Found fox this work but correspondence indicates that a contract for the work was to be let in March 1941. The extent of the cleanout on the West Branch in 1941 could not be determined. • Correspondence in the file indicates that in 1956 Willoughby Township received a request from Lots 11,12, and 13, Concession 4 fox a cleanout of the Union i~tazsh Drain and council requested a report from R Blake Erwin for this cleanout. No record of the report was found but information in the file indicates a tender call for 3.4 miles (5.5 km) of ditch cleanout with a contract fox this work awazded to Vernon Beam in November 1957. Records in the file indicate that this cleanout was completed by the end of 1959 and the cost of the cleanout was assessed out using the schedule in Bylaw A-56 from 1941. • Remaining correspondence in the file from 1960 to present indicates some investigation completed on the Union Marsh Drain but no record of any work being completed on the drain. ON-SITE MEETING On October 23, 2003 an on-site meeting for the Union Marsh Drain was conducted. All owners in the Union Marsh Drain watershed plus the Conservation Authority, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Ministry of Natural Resources, Niagara Parks Commission, Ministry of Transportation, the Regional Municipality of Niagara and the City of Niagara Falls were notified. The on-site meeting was attended by many of the F:\03-039~ReporflFinal103-039-Report O1-30-06.doc Union Marsh Drain 2006 - Page 3 January 30, 2006 City of Niagara Falls landowners within the Union Marsh Drain watershed. Owners present confirmed that the Union Marsh Drain has not been maintained fox many pears. Some owners noted that the drain has become overgrown in many locations and should be cleared and cleaned out. Isolated area's of flooding and poor drainage were noted by several landowners along the drain. SITE EXAMINATION and SURVEY The Union Marsh Drain was examined on-site commencing at McCredie Road (closed road allowance in the Legends of Niagara Golf Course). The length of drain from this point upstream to the tributary junction point to the south of Miller Road is referred to as the Main Drain. The tributary that continues south from this junction point was originally referred to as the Sodom Road Branch but has been renamed the East Branch, The tributary that continues westerly from this junction point was originally referred to as the Main Drain but has been renamed as the West Branch in this report. A profile survey was completed on the Main Drain from McCredie Road to the junction of the East and West Branch drains. Elevations and water levels were also recorded downstream of McCxedie Road at the bridge on the roadway within Legends of Niagara Golf Course and at the bridge on the Niagara River Parkway at the outlet of the watercourse into the Niagara River. A profile survey was completed on the East Branch to Bossert Road along the route of what was previously the Sodom Road Branch. The East Branch survey was then continued westerly along-the channel that continues around the north and west perimeter of the large parcel imLot 7 and 8, Concession 3, ending at the northeast limits of the QEW at what is considered to be the head of the original Sodom Road Branch. A survey was also completed on the channel that continues southerly along the west limits of Lot 7 and along the north limits of the QEW to what is considered to be the head of the original Trendle Branch. In this report this channel is referred to as the Trendle Branch. - A profile survey was completed on the West Branch from the Main Drain outlet southerly to the south limits of the Brouillette property in Lot 7, Concession 5. The historic record fox the Union Marsh Drain would indicate that the Main Drain (now the West Bxaneh} ended at the line between lots 5 and 6, Concession 5 to the south of the untravelled Sherk Road road allowance. This latter length of drain was not surveyed as there was no request for improvement on this part of the West Branch. WATERSHED The perimeter limits of the Union Marsh Drain watershed was established based on the available records for the 1941 report on the Union Marsh Drain. This perimeter watershed was then compared to more recent adjacent drain watershed boundaries and coiripared to the watershed boundary evident on available topographic maps. In some locations site examination was required to confirm the watershed boundaries. The Union Marsh Drain watershed contains a wide range of landuse including cultivated agricultural land, vacant or idle agricultural land, woodlots and numerous small residential lots. A number of road allowances exist within thewatershed-some of which are open and travelled and others which remain unopenedand/or untravelled. The Queen Elizabeth Wap (QED passes through the southwesterly part of the watershed. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT Section 78 of'the Drainage Act provides fox the repair and improvement of ari existing drain constructed- under the Drainage Act through `a new Engineer's report. The Union lVtarsh Drain was previously constructed under the Dixainage Act and it has been determined from the on-site meeting and site examination that the Union Marsh Drain does require repair and improvement The petition by the Director of Public Works fox the City of Niagara Falls further supports'the need for repair and improvement of the Union Marsh Drain. Therefore, this report is properly initiated under Section 78 of the Drainage Act F:103-0391Report\F'inal\03-039-Report 01-30-06.doc Union Marsh Drain 2006 Page 4 January 30, 2006 Cite of Niagara Falls DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS The work proposed on the Union Marsh Drain is intended to maintain the drain to the depth and grade established under the Engineer's reports from the early 1940s. Though profiles from previous Engineer's reports were not available in the Citp file fox the Union Marsh Drain it is felt that the grade lines established in this report fox the Main Drain and the East and West Branches aze close to the approximate grade and drain depth as had been established under the previous Engineer's reports. This conclusion is based on the proposed grade line matching existing ditch bottom elevations at many of the road culverts along the Union Marsh Drain. For example on the East Branch the proposed grade matches the existing ditch bottom or culvert invert at the Mazshall, Sodom and Orr Road culverts. The same applies on the West Branch where the proposed grade matches the existing ditch bottom or culvert invert at the Sodom, Marshall and QEW ClllvertS. The grade line established on the profiles fox the Union Marsh Drain indicates that the cleanout depth will vary from 200nun to 500mm which illustrates that a uniform channel bottom grade is required to efficiently carry the channel flow and help prevent flooding along the drain which map occur presently due to the erratic existing channel grade. Site examination also indicated that extensive clearing is-required in mane locations along the Union Marsh Drain to ensure that the channel cross-section is free of brush, fallen trees and other debris which greatly impedes the flow of water and can lead to flooding along the drain. It was determined that no work would be requixed_from McCredie Road: downstream to the Niagara-River as a well defined open_ channel currently exists on this length and the water level elevation at McCxedie Road is identical tq the water level at the Niagara Rivet. One farm access culvert on the East Branch on a property owned by 708020 Ontario Ltd. in Lot 11, Concession 2, identified by assessment roll number 002-179 was found to be undersized and needs to be lowered approximately 300nvn to match the design grade proposed. This culvert will be replaced with twin 1400mm diameter corrugated steel pipe. A secoad undersized culvert which is also above the design grade was noted on the East Branch in Lot 8, Concession 3 on the south side of Bossert Road on a property owned by Old, Willoughby Realty. The access lanewag aver this culvert is no lorigex used so this small culvert w~71 be removed and not replaced. One new farm access culvert was requested:on the West Branch on a parcel owned by Jeffery Susin, Lot 14, Concession 3 identified by assessment roll number 003-145-01. A 1400mm diameter cornigated steel pipe culvert would be required in this location. The farm access culverts were designed fora 2 year storm frequency using the Rational Method for flow calculations. All road culverts were detemuned to be adequate and most culverts only require a minor cleanout tlixough the culverts. Only the Detenbeck and Bossert Road culverts on the East Branch require a substantial cleanout. The cleanouts will serve to restore the design end areas of these two culverts Environmental Impact The most significant environmental feature in the Union Mazsh Drain watershed is the Willoughby Marsh, a provincially significant wetland located at the headwaters of the Tee Creek Drain, the Black Creek Drain and the Union Marsh Drain. Designation of lands as part of the Willoughby Marsh was noted along the West Branch of the Union Marsh Drain. south of the QEW. The cleanout proposed in this report on the West Branch is not expected to have a significant impact on the Willoughby Marsh as it;is nbt proposed to deepen.: the West Branelt, only to match the grade as:establi~hed under previous Engineer's,repoxts.. The channel gradient south of the Q}W is 0.04% and north of the QEW is 0.05% ('/z"per 100' fall}. Only a minor bottom cleanout (200mmdepth on average} is xec}uired on the West Branch south of the QEW. The- primarymaintenance activity south of the. QEW is to maintain a channel cross=section clear of brush and. fallen debris. Also; approximately 700m of the upper end of the Uxuon Marsh Drain West Branch will not have any work done on it under this report Natural storage areas that exist at present on the West Branch will remain after the cleanout. These natural storage areas exist downstream of Bossert, Marshall and Ort Roads. Union Marsh Drain 200b Page 5 January 30, 2006 City of Niagara Falls On the Union Marsh Main Drain the grade line proposed in a number of locations is above the existing channel bottom. These areas will serve as sediment traps and maintain areas o€ refuge fox aquatic species during periods of low flow in the drain. Current landuse along all parts of the Union Marsh Drain results in a vegetated buffer along both banks of the channel. In a few areas where cultivation of agricultural land occurs along the drain the cultivation is well back from the top of bank of the ditch ox is in areas where runoff from the field would not enter directly into the channel. No livestock pasturing was observed along the drain where livestock would have direct or unrestricted access to the drain. It appears unlikely that this characteristic of the drain will change in the future, therefore, it was determined to not be necessary to establish buffer strips along the Union Marsh Drain. - Construction timing and sediment control during construction may be required to address concerns of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Overall, the maintenance work proposed on the Union Marsh Drain should not have a negative impact on the local environment. The maintenance work proposed will have a positive impact on drainage along the drain which will have a positive impact on the agricultural and residential lands along the drain and within the Union Marsh Drain watershed. The Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority will receive a copy of this report for further review and comment. SECOND SITE MEETING On March 3, 20Q5 a second site meeting was conducted. All landowners in the watershed of the Union Marsh Drain were notified along with the Conservation Authority, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Ministry of Natural Resources, Niagara River Parks Commission, Ministry of Transportation and the Regional Municipality of Niagara and the Citp of Niagara Falls. The purpose of the second meeting was to review the findings and recommendations to-date based on the survey work completed. Owners had a opportunity to review and comment on the proposed work. A.preliminary total estimated cost was also presented at the meeting along with a preliminary schedule of assessment showing the assessment of the cost to the lands. and roads within the Union Marsh Drain watershed. No major objections to the work proposed were noted at the site meeting. RECOMMENDED WORK As a result of the on-site meetings, on-site examination and survey and the design conssderations the following work is reconvnended for the repair and improvement of the Union Marsh Drain: Main Drain The Main Drain deanout is to commence 100m upstream from the McCxedie Road bridge in the Legends of Niagara golf course and continue upstream to the junction of the East and West Branches south of Miller Road. From Willoughby Drive downstream for 600m substantial excavation is required to create a 4m wide low flow channel to match the existing channel upstream and downstream of this point On,the balance of the Main Drain only a minor bottom cleanout is required along with removing all brush and debris from the channel cross-section. No work is recommended downstream of McCredie Road as there is a well defined. channel downstream from McCxedie Road and the water level at McCxedie Road appears to be a static water level equal to the water level in the Niagara River. East Branch . The East I3xanch is to. be cleaned out from.the Main Drain outlet upstream to the rYOrtheastlimits of the QEW just to the west of Ort Road (untravelled} in Lot 8, Concession 3. Cleanout depth on the East Branch varies from 200mm to 500mm and is continuous throughout. Twin 1400mm diameter corrugated steel pipes by 12m long to be installed to replace the existing farm crossing at Station 1+259 to-1±271.. This culvert is located on a parcel identified by asse_ ssment roll number 002-179 owned by 708020 Ontario Ltd. A 300mm diameter culvert at Station 2+918 on a parcel owned. by Old Willoughby Realty Ltd will be removed as the existing culvert is undersized, does not match the design grade proposed and the access laneway is not used. F:103-039~ReportlFinan03-039-ReportOl-30-06.doc Union Marsh Drain 2006 Page 6 January 30, 2006 City of Niagara Falls The original East Branch channel from Bossert Road to Ort Road was located well to the south of Bossert Road on the property owned by Old Willoughby Realty -Rolf # 001-141. This channel has been abandoned and filled in and replaced with a channel along the north and west limits of the property to the Ort Road culvert. This original channel is hereby abandoned of status under the Drainage Act with the channel along the edge of the property recognized as the East Branch: The relocated channel along the east side of Ort Road (untravelled) also replaces the Concession Road Branch from the 1941 report on the Union Marsh Drain. The Concession Road Branch of the Union Marsh Drain is hereby abandoned of status under the Drainage Act. Trendle Branch A 1941 report on the Union Marsh Drain provided for a the Trendle Branch to be constructed as a ditch from the Bossert Road crossing southwesterly across the property owned by Old Willoughby Realty -Roll # 001-141 to provide outlet for a culvert across the QEW. This. channel has been abandoned and filled in and replaced with a channel along the west limits of the property from the QEW culvert north to the East Branch at the Ort Road crossing. The original Trendle Branch is hereby abandoned of status under the Drainage Act and the existing channel along the west'edge of the property to be recognized as the Trendle Branch. This channel is to be cleaned out from the East Branch upstream to the point at which the channel enters the QEW road allowance. West Branch The West Branch is to be cleaned out from the Main Drain outlet upstream to the south limits of the Bxouillette property in Lot 7, Concession 5 =Roll # 004-080. From the Main-Drain to the QEW the cleanout depth will vary from 200mm.to SDOmm. The cleanout will not"be continuous. as in many locations the existing channel bottom is at or below the proposed grade. From the QEW south for 300m a minor bottom cleanout (150mm depth} is: requited. No excavation work is currently recommended fox the balance of the channel south to Bossert Road across the MacDonald property (Roll # 004-058-01). The need for a bottom cleanout on this interval will be determined after the existing channel is cleared during construction. The West Branch south of Bossert Road is to have a cleanout with an average cleanout depth of 200mm. Primary work on this interval will be to clear the channel cross-section of all brush and fallen debris. The estimated cost for a new crossing for Jeffery Susie (west part of the north part Lot 14, Concession 3 - Roll # 003-145-01) was presented to Mr. Susie prior to completing this report Mx. Susie elected` not to have a culvert installed under this report. If a culvert is installed on this property it should be a 1400mm diameter pipe or any other type of crossing that will have an end area equal to that fox a 1400mm diameter pipe (1.5 square metres or 1G square feet}. Construction Methods Throughout the length of the cleanout work on the Union Marsh Drain it will first be necessary to clear a 10m wide path along one bank of the channel and to clear all brush and fallen debris within. the channel cross-section. Clearing to be completed with an excavator equipped with a brush tatter or a grapple: Where possible large trees that do not interfere with the cleanout work can remain. Large trees that need to be removed will be cut flush with the ground either by chain saw ox tree shear. The stump will not be removed. Stump removal would only be required when the stump will interfere with excavation within the channel Large trees removed will have all limbs removed. The remaining tree is to be cut into 2-3m length§ and left- piled along the cleared path. All-brush to be ehippecY ixsing ai portable chipper or as `excavator mounted blush cutter. The ditch cleanout work will be done with an excavator equipped with a ditchitig or grade-all type bucket Where possible bank slopes are to xeinain undisturbed. However, in many locations in order "to create'a uniform channel cross-section some sloping of one or both banks will be required No channel widening should be required fox the cleanout proposed. New channel bank slopes and leveled excavated material is to be manually seeded as construction proceeds. F:103-039lRepoRlFina1~03-039-Report 01-30-06.doc Union Marsh Drain 2006 Page 7 January 30, 2006 City of Niagara. Falls Additional detailed information on the cleanout work proposed is outlined in the Construction Notes on Drawings 16 and 17 with this report and on the various profile and cross-section drawings included with the report. Construction Scheduling Construction cannot commence until after the statutory requirements of the Drainage Act have been satisfied. If there axe no appeals after the Court of Revision, construction could commence, weather permitting, approximately three months after the date of this report. Appeals under the procedures in the Drainage Act could result in a latex starting date as no construction can take place until all appeals are settled. No construction can take place until all necessary permits have been obtained through the Conservation Authority / DFO. Crnce construction commences, if the work is proceeded with continuously, it should be completed in approximately 45 working daps. The Engineer may supervise the construction-of the drain and map conduct at least two meetings with the contractor and landowners affected by construction: at the commencement and completion of construction. The contract for construction of the drain will be awaxdecl by public tender. Unless construction commencement and completion dates are requested prior to the tender call the Contractor will specify in the tender the starting and completion dates for construction. DRAIN LOCATION AND WATERSHED PLAN The Iocation of the Union Marsh Drain and all of the affected properties identified by assessment roll numbers are shown on Drawing No. 1 included with this report. Drawings No. 2 and 3 are enlargements of the North and South portions of the watershed. A heavy solid line indicates the location of the channels ~to be leaned out under this.xeport. The numbers adjacent to the lines are station nutiubers, which indicate in' metres the distance_along the drain from the outlet. The heavy broken line indicates the approximate perimeter watershed boundary for the Union Marsh Drain. The plans also show other existing drains, property boundaries, City assessment roll numbers, property owners` names from the assessment roIl at the time of this report and hectares affected for each parcel. PROFILES and CONSTRUCTION DETAILS The profiles for the Union Marsh Main Drain, East Branch, Txendie Branch and the West Branch are shown on Drawings No. 4 -12. The profiles show the depth and grade of the proposed drain improvements. The upper solid line represents the existing top of bank. ground elevation. The dashed line indicates the existing- ditch bottom elevation. The lower heavy solid line is the proposed grade Line for the bottom of the ditch. The numbers above the profile line for the existing ground indicate the depth of the ditch in metres after the cleanout and the numbers below the existing ground line indicate the depth of the cleanout from the existing ditch bottom to the new grade line. Drawings No. 13 - 15 contain typical cross-sections at various points along the ITnion Marsh Drain: Typical construction details for new access culverts are shown on Drawing No. 13. Drawings 1Vo. 16 and 17 contain specific and general notes fox construction. COST ESTIMATE The cost estimate on this project consists of the allowances to owners having work on their properties, the consthtction cost including contingency items, the engineering cost and an estimate of`the administration cost which is primarily for interim financing. . Allowances Section 29 of the IDrainage Act provides for the payment of allowances for right of way to Landowners whose ._ ,_ __ property becomes part of the drain to be constructed In this report the 10m wide working area is to become a permanent easement along the drain to allow fox future maintenance. Each owner is granted an allowance fox right of way based on a 10m width at a rate of $1,500 per hectare. F:103-039\Report\Fipa1103-Q39-Report O1-30.06.doc Union Marsh Drain 2006 Page 8 January 30, 2006 City of Niagara Falls The allowances under Section 29 payable to the owners entitled thereto on this project are as follows: ~ Main Dr ~ West Br ~ East Br & ~ Total 1 18 209400 Niagara Parks Commission 600 I 18 209500 City of Niagara Falls 50 I 18 209600 Niagara Parks Commission 800 1 18 209700 Barry & Heather Trendle 50 I 18 212200 Milena Jovicic 100 II 17,18 215101 563272 Ontario Ltd. 700 II 17 215600 Gary Landry 300 II 15 &16 215900 Rosina Costa 700 II 16 216300 Carl Adams 600 II 15 216400 Grand Niagara Legends Est. 700 II 14 216600 Wilfred & Maria Weber 300 200 if 13 216900 Rosanne Federow II 13 216902 L. Knofe & J. Herrmannhans - II 12 217100 Jovo & Rajko Maslek II 12 217700 Ralph Biamonte II 12 217703. Richard & Donna Chamberlain II 11 2h 7800 SfeVen & Heather Barnett II 11 217900 708020 Ontario Inc. II 10 218200 Natale & Lana Giampa II 9 218500 Olga & Norman Watson II 9 218503 Bertram & Susan Watson !I 9 218600 TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. 11 10 219000 Catharine Lapenna II 10 219100 Frank Lapenna III 15 .: 314300 Gaston & Madeleine Jeaurond 400 III 14 314501 Jeffery Susin 1,300 NI 9 317600 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. III 7,8 114100 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. IV 13 319300 Gertrude Locher 900 IV 12 319500 Robert Thiel 700 IV 11 319600 789702 Ontario Ltd. 900 V 11 322400 Ryszard & Alice Rydygier 100 IV 8 402000 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. V 10 404701- Hans Zapp, ,, 300. V 10 404900 Ryszard & Alice Rydygier 300 V 9 405801 Gregory&Pamela MacDonald 700 V 8 407800 Vera Bowman 500 V 8 407801 Clifford & Brenda Ballinger 100 V 8 407901 Richard & Laurel Waldick 100 V 7 408000 R. Levesque & J. Brouiliette 400 $ 4,900 ~ $ 6,900 500 200 400 300 300 200 400 300 200 100 100 400 200 200 500 2,200 200 G00 50 800 50 100 700 300 700 600 700 1,000 200 400 300 300 200 400 300 200 100 100 400 200 200 400 1,300 500 2,200 900 700 900 100 200 300 300- 700 500 100 100 $ .6,700 $ 18,500 F:103-039~ReportlFinal\03-039-Report O1-30-06.doc Union Marsh Drain 2006 Page 9 January 30, 2006 City of Niagara Falls Section 30 of the Drainage Act provides for payment of allowances to landowners along the drain for damages to lands and crops caused by the construction of the drain. No allowance for damage to crops is provided for in this cost estimate due to the allowance for right of way outlined above and since the work proposed will not directly impact on any cropped land along the route of the Union Marsh Drain. The allowances are a fixed amount and axe not adjusted at the conclusion of construction. Allowances can only be changed if the report is modified prior to adoption of the report by bylaw ox in accord_ ance with the paragraph in this report that deals with changing the scope of work after the bylaw is passed. In accordance with Section 62(3) of the Drainage Act RSO 1990, the allowances shown map be deducted from the final assessment levied (see Schedule C). Payment to the owner would only be made when the allowance is greater than the final assessment. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE The estimated cost fox Labour, Equipment and Materials to construct the proposed drain is outlined in detail in the following section. The final cost of drain construction cannot be established until the construction is completed. The Contractor is to supply all labour, equipment and materials to construct the following. Interval Work description ost - Main Drain McCredie Road to Willoughby Road 100 to 1+074 Minor clearing, bottom cleanout, excavate new low flow channel ~ 14,000 Willoughb~Road to Branch }unction 000 to 2+176 Clear a 10m wide path. Remove debris from channel, bottom cleanout 31,400 Minor cleaning through 2 concrete road culverts 1000 Subtotal Main Drain $ 46,400 East Branch Main Drain )unction to Marshall Road 000 to 731 Clear 10m wide path, remove debris from channel, ditch cleanout $ 10,200 713 to 729 Minor cleaning through concrete road culvert 500 Marshall Road to Detenbeck Road 850 to 1+693 Scattered clearing, remove debris from channel, ditch cleanout 10,200 1+259 to 1+271. New access culvert on 708020 Ont. Inc. property - remove existing arch cry, excavate for neav pis ,~ 500 -Turin (2) 1400mm diva. alumimiZed csp by 12m 5,404 - Partial neav GranularA surface (70 t) 200 - Installpipes and backfill 1,500 - Supply and install riprap cnd treatment (72 t) 600 LFpstaram and.dnrvnstream charmed transitions 500 8;700- 1+688 to 2+G93. Clean through 3m wide coriErete culvert: 1,000 Detenbeck Road to Sodom Road 1+698 to 2+510 Clear lOm wide path, remove debris from channel; ditch cleanout. 15,800 Sodom Road to_OEW 2+510 to 3+838 -Minor clearing, ditch cleanout 8,900 2+832 to 2+852 Clean through 3m wide concrete road culvert 1,000 F:\03-0341ReportlFina1103-039-Report 01-30-06.doc Union Matsh Drain 2006 Page 10 January 30, 2006 City of Niagara Falls 2+915 Remove and dispose of existing 300mm culvert. 3+709 to 3+718 Clean through one 900mm diameter concrete culvert Subtotal East Branch Trettdle Branch 000 to 580 Bottom cleanout West Branch Main Drain j~xnction to Ort Road 000 to 1+150 Clear lOm wide path. Remove debris from channel. Minor cleaning through two road culverts 1+150 to 1+392 Minor cleanout working within the channel 1+392 to 1+411 Minor cleaning through concrete road culvert 200 500 $ 57,000 $ 4,100 " " $ 14,700 600 1,200 300 Ort Road to QEW 1+411 to 3+507 Clear 10m wide path, remove debris from channel, bottom cleanout 15,800 OEW to south limits Brouillette 3+507 to 4+839 Glear 10m path, remove debris from channel, bottom cleanout 17900 Subtotal West Branch 5$ 0,500 Subtotal Construction $158,000 Contingencies -Lump sum allowance for miscellaneous work including sediment and erosion control as required during construction ~ 15,1Q0 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE: $173,100 ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE Rte. ort Preparation Gather background information, prepare for and attend on-site meeting, profile survey and site examination, prepare profiles andcross-sections, drain design, cost estimate, assessment schedules, specifications, second site meeting, write report, prepare assessment schedules, construction specifications and drawings, prepare for and attend open house, report consideration before Council and court of revision. Total Report Preparation $ 49,500 Construction Administration & Supervision Assist with tender documents and tender call, review tenders,. attend pre-construction meeting, periodic construction inspection, payme~ts~, final inspection; post. construction follow-up; review grant application Total Construction Administration & Supervision 17 500 TOTAL ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE. $ 67,000 The cost for report preparation is usually not altered at the conclusion of a project unless the report is referred back or the report is appealed to the Drainage Tribunal. - The estimate sliown for Construction Supervision is based on past experience and assumes good construction conditions and a Contractor who completes the construction in an efficient manner. The final cost for construction supervision will vary as per the actual time spent during the construction phase. F:\03-0391ReportlFinaR03.039-Report 01-30-06.doc Union Marsh Drain 2006 Page 11 January 30, 2006 City of Niagara Falls ADMINISTRATION COST ESTIMATE The administration cost estimate is included to cover items listed in Section 73 of the Drainage Act as eligible drain costs. The main aspect of this cost estimate is to provide for financing until the project is completed. The interest estimate for this financing is based on a past record of interest charges and assumes that a project will be completed within one year of report filing. The administration cost estimate can also cover municipal cost fox printing and mailing this report and the bylaw. The administration cost estimate does not cover legal expenses incurred by the Municipality ox assessed to the Municipality should the project be appealed beyond the Court of Revision, though such costs if incurred will form part of the final drain cost. TOTAL ADMINISTRATION COST ESTIMATE $ 5,800 ESTIMATED COST SUMMARY Allowances $ 18,500 Construction Cost ~ $ 173,100 Engineering Cost $ 67,000 Administration $ 5 800 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 264,400 ASSESSMENTS The Drainage Act requires that the total estimated cost. be assessed to the affected lands and roads under the categories of benefit (Section 22), outlet liability (Section 23), injuring liability (Section 23), special benefit (Section 24) and special assessment (Section 26). On this project assessments for benefit, outlet liability and special benefit assessments axe involved. To calculate the assessments for the Union Marsh Drain 2006 the drain was first divided into intervals. The intervals used for the calculations axe similar to the intervals contained in Schedule B. The estimated cost fox each internal is then determined. The first step in the assessment calculation is to apply benefit and special benefit assessments, if applicable, to the affected lands and roads in each of the drain intervals. After deducting the total benefit and special benefit assessments_from the interval cost, the balance of the cost is then assessed as outlet liability on a per hectare basis to allupstream lands and roads. The hectares affected axe adjusted before calculating the outlet liability. The basis fox this adjustment is 1 hectare of cleared agricultural land contributing both surface and.subsurface water to the drain, Areas which generate greater runoff such as roads and developed lots are increased by a factor of:2 to 4. Areas which generate less runoff such as woodlots are reduced by a factor of 0.5. The calculation spreadsheet as described above is not included in the report but a-copy is available upon request. Assessment Summary The assessments against the affected lands and roads are summarized in Schedule A. In Schedule A each . parcel of land assessed has been identified by the Assessment Roll-Number. for the municipality at the time of the preparation of this report. The size of each parcel was established using the assessment roll information. For convenience only, each parcel is further identified by the owner's name: from the last revised assessment roll. GRANTS .. In accordance witk. the provisions of.Secnon 85 of the.Drainage Act,.a-grant not exceeding.l/3 maybe available on the assessments against privately owned parcels of land which axe used for agricultural purposes. In July 2004 OMAF withdrew the 1/3 giant. In February 2005 OMAF reinstated the 1/3 grant but established new polity on grant eligibility which was published in September;2005. OMAF polity. states that for agricultural lands. to be eligible. for the 1/3 grant at least 85% of the assessed parcel area must have the Farm Property T'as Class including a Managed Forest Tas Class in the current assessment roll information. fox the Municipality. Parcels that meet the above criteria and thus. will be eligible fox the 1/3 grant have been identified with an asterisk (*) in the Concession column in Schedules A and C. This designation is based on City of Niagara Falls assessment roll information reviewed during the preparation of this report Section 88 of the Drainage Act provides for the municipality to apply fox this giant upon certification of completion of F:103-0391ReportlFinalv03-039-Report O1-30-06.doc Union Marsh Drain 2006 Page 12 January 30, 2006 City of Niagara Falls the drain provided for in this report. The municipality will first confirm the Farm Property Tax Class (ox Managed Forest Tax Class) for the parcel in the current assessment roll, then deduct the grant from the actual assessment prior to collecting the final assessment. If an assessed owner feels that their property should be eligible for the giant and they can provide proof to the municipality of this eligibility as outlined above prior to the final cost levy then the property could have the 1/3 giant deducted from the final cost levy. Please note that OMAFRA retains the final right to determine eligibility under the grant program, regardless of designation herein. In accordance with Section 85 of the Drainage Act, a giant not exceeding 1/3 may also be available in the future on the assessments against privately owned parcels of land used for agriculture fox maintenance and repair of the Union Marsh Drain 2006 if done on the recommendation and supervision of an approved Drainage Superintendent and using the same eligibility requirements as outlined above. The Federal Goods and Services Tax (GST) will apply to most costs on this project. However, the munidpalitp is eligible fora 100% refund on GST paid, therefore, the cost estimate in this report does not include any reference to GST. . FINAL COST Final assessments axe not levied until after the work is certified complete by the engineer. The final assessments will thus be levied to the owner of the identified parcel at the time that the final cost is levied. Schedule C will be used to' levy the final cost of -the drain which may vary, depending on final construction and engineering costs. As noted in the cost estimate section for allowances, the allowances shown will be` deducted from the final assessment levied. Also as noted above in the Grants section; properties which are eligible for the 1 /3 grant will have this grant deducted from the final cost if the property is eligible for the 1/3 giant at the time of the grant application. MAINTENANCE After completion, the Union Marsh Drain 2006 as outlined in this report shall be maintained by the City of Niagara Falls, with the cost of all maintenance to be assessed to the upstream lands and roads prorata with the assessments in Schedule B. Schedule B is divided into columns to reflect the different drain intervals upon which maintenance work may be undertaken. These column intervals assist in identifying upstream lands and roads to be assessed for future-repairs. The dollar amounts shown in Schedule'B axe not amounts to pay under this report nor an amount to be paid for future repairs. If farm access culverts identified in this report require future structural repair,. maintenance or replacement, 50% of the cost is to be assessed to the owner of the culvert and the other 50% is assessed pxoxata to the upstream interval assessments excluding the owner of the culvert. Future structural repair or-replacement of road culverts shall be assessed to the road authority. Removal of accumulated sediment or debris within all culverts shall be considered as normal maintenance and assessed as per other maintenance costs: All parties affected by the Union Marsh Drain are encouraged to periodically inspect tTie drain once constructed and report any visible ox suspected problems to the City of Niagara Falls. Repeated inspection and maintenance of the drain should allow the drain to provide a service for many pears. Each owner must provide an access route to the drain for access by the Municipality to undertake necessary repair ox = '~ maintenance'. As well; a-right-o~way along the.drain route equal tv the ivarking area descrilied`on the drawings witTi'tlris report; is-'also to be available far future rtiainteriance: . GI-IANGES'TO`DRAINAFlER BYLAW IS PASSED AND BEFORE COST IS LEVIED Should changes; deletions ox extensions' fo the drain proposed in this report lie requested or required after the bylaui is passed and the contract is awarded, there map be'some difficulty in attending to sucli. Since this drain is to be constructed iri accordance with a Bylaw of the.City of Niagara Falls, changes to the drain cannot be undertaken without a change to the bylaw. An exception would be minor changes that axe approved by the Engineer and the Mutucipality in accordance with Section E.7 of the General Conditions in the report and can be accommodated generally within 10% of the construction'estimate. The above F:103-0391Report~Fioal\03-039-ReportOl-30-06.doc Union Marsh Drain 2006 Page 13 January 30, 2006 City of Niagara Falls statement does not apply to the items listed in the contingency allowance section of the cost estimate which may exceed the quantities listed and may cause the cost to increase beyond 10% of the construction estimate. The cost of minor changes to the drain and increased cost from the contingency items may be prorated against some or all assessments as directed in this report. If it is desired to make a substantial addition ox deletion to the drain proposed in this report, it will be necessary that a revised report be prepared and processed through the Drainage Act, ox an application to the Ontario Drainage Tribunal would be required under the Drainage Act to obtain approval fox any modification. If any individual or group of owners require additional work on the proposed drain and are prepared to pay for such, they may make their own arrangements with the contractor to have such work constructed. The Engineer should approve additions and the work so added does not form part of the drain for the purpose of future maintenance. All of which is respectfully submitted, Q~ovsss ~oNq{\ K S T AS OCIATES LTD. 20 ~ ~y~ ~. w. KurrrzE J ( ~ ~1 John Kuntze, P.Eng. Q'~o~ L/ PR`o ;`vCE of ONE F:103-0391ReportlFina1~03-039-Report 01-30-06.doc January 30, 2005 SCHEDULE.A-SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS File No. 03A39 .. ~ l INIhN MARSH ORAIN 2006 Chv of Niagara Felis. MAIN DRAIM ~ WEST BRANCH EAST BRANCH TRENDLE BRANCH . .. ~ Approx ha Approz ha Approx ha Approx ha GRAND Con Lot Roll No. (272519000-) Owner ' ~ affected Benefit Outlet Total ~ Affected Beneryt Outlet Totai:. Affected Benefit Outlet Total Affected Benefit Outlet Total TOTAL II 7 171500 ~EsbiteoEFrenk Critelli & Mark Ramella 3.9 0 54 54 O:D 0 0 0 3,1 0 720 120 0 0 0 0 174 II 7 111800 MaryGodak'& Louann Singleton ~ 1.0 0 26 2fi O.D 0 0 0 1.0 0 56 58 0 0 0 0 84 III 7 11410D OId~Wlllodghby Realty Ltd. 70.4 0 2,083 2,083 0.0 0 0 0 ~ 70.4 3,800 5,436 9,236 8.5 1,200 211 1,417 12,730 III 7 114200 Arlh'uE B~Marilyn Kastuk ~ 3.2 0 82 82 0.0 0 0 0 3.2 0 215 215 3.2 0 79 79 376 III ~6 11430D ~ Haps'S Helga Zapp 10.5 0 270 27D 0.0 0 0 10.5 0 704 704 10.5 0 260 260 1,234 81 6 17440D BarbaraElson & RlchaM Swal 2.0 0 51 51 0.0 0 0 ~0 2.0 0 134 134 2.0 0 50 50 235 I 18 203900 Niagara Parks' Commission '~ 2,500 0 2,500 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,500 I 17;18 209500 ~Clty'o1Nlagare Falis 3.9 1,000 32 1,032 0.0 0 0 D 0.0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,032 I 17,18 209600 N(tlgsra~Perks Gommission 2,500 0 2,500 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,500 I 18 209700 Bajry 8v Heather Trendle 0.5 600 8 608 0.0 0 ~ 0 0 0.0 .D 0 0 0 0 0 0 608 I 18 209800 9adC8. Ifath~ Oui uero 0.2 300 3 303 0.0 0 0 0 D.0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 303 I 16 2100D0 RirflaN'iCBrian Mann 11.4 0 7 7 0.0 D 0 ~0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 I to zioioo :z^ ~ ~~ - 0.1 0 2 z o:o D 'o o o.o o D o a o 0 0 2 I 18 21020D 'Tiiitothy~Mchtillan 0.1 0 2 2. 0.0 0 D 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 I 18 210300 Gerald 80eboreh Mt neault D.1 0 2 2 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 I 17 211fi00 Michelle Sfranges '' 0.4 0 7 7 OA 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 I 17 21 7700 ~Irehi: Coul$g' 0.4 0 7 7 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 7 I 17 211800 .Micllelle~&Domenic Sfranges 7.0 0 8 8 0.0 0 0 l1 D.0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 8 I 17 211900 Philip ffiJennffer Priddle 0.4 D 7 7 0.0 0 0 D 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 ~I 17 212000 David~Nisbett & Elaine Moore 0.6 0 10 10 0.0 0 0 4 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 I 17 212100 Mark:&'~Elizabefh Caddis 0.6 0 10 10 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 D 0 0 0 0 10 I 17 212280 Milena JoVicic 4.0 300 33 333 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 333 I 16 212300 Rotiert2upan & Barbara Schoonings 1.8 0 32 32 0.0 0 0 D O.p t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 I 16 212500 Benson'&Ida Brooks 0.2 0 10 10 0,0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 I 16 212600 Albert`&'Beryl VDUt 0.1 0 6 6 0.0 0 0 l1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B I 16 212601 Rohert & Janice Watson 2:3 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0 O.D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 I 16 212700 Edc & Elleh Frende 0.1 0 3 3 0.0 0 0 0 ~0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 I 16 212800 Aiidra' Willick 0.1 0 6 6 0.0 0 0 0 O.D 0 D 0 0 0 l7 0 6 I 16 212900 Autlrey~Willidt & Ellen Francis 0.1 0 ' 1 1 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 272901 &DOrla Watson Robert 0.5 0 8 ~ 8 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 8 16 213300 : Kevih &Shlrley Hone 1.7 0 29 29 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 29 I 16 213301 James'8 Frencasp Zoretich 1.8 0 29 29 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 l) f1 l1 29 I 75 213302 DorofhyB Gordon MacDonald 1.7 0 29 29 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 I 15 213303 Carol!& Rodney Parker 4.7 0 29 29 0,0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 I 15 213304 Teesdale & Caroi Culled a 1.5 0 25 25 0.0 0 0 0 OA 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 25 II 16 215100 Josepb'8 Joseph L. Ferro 0.2 0 3 ~ 3 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 3 18 II 17 215101 5632720htario Ltd. 36.2 4,600 268 4,868 0:0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,868 , II 18 215200 NeIfN/ea4er' 19.1 0 156 15B 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 756 11 16 275500 GaryS.~AASrgaret Misner 0.9 0 15 15 0.0 0 0 D 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 II 17 215600 Gary Landry 8:9 2,300 63 2,363 D.0 D 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,363 II 77 215700 Heiif Wose& Estate of Keri Voss 8.8 0 67 87 0.0 0 0 0 0:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 11 17 215800 Nell Weaver ~ ~ ' ~ 6.9 0 56 56 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 56 II 17 215804 Shirley Brookson Os o 1D 10 0.0 D 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 II 18 215805 881'bare'S; David Maiden 0.6 0 70 10 0.0 0 0 D 17.0 0 0 0 ~D 0 0 0 10 16 11 15 215900 RosinaCosta 23.1 4,400 3511 4,758 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,758 , II 15 218000 Christopher& Lynn Graham 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 157 II 15 216100 G & C'etherina Jamieson fi.4 0 157 157 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 II 16 21 f10 Cart'Adariis 23.1 3,500 559 4,359 O.q o 0 0 0.0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 4,359 II 15 216400 Grand Niagara Legends Estates Ina 28.1 4,400 565 4,965 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,965 II 74 218401 Antoniof&PasqualinaFaso 2.1 0 28 28 '0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 II 14 216500 AMOnio'8'Ah'gela Bianceniello 2.3 0 37 31 0.0 0 0 0 17.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 ~II 14 2165Q1 Hang &gjtrud'Bauer 1:2 0 47 47 0.0 0 0 0 0,0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 47 II 14 216502 Mario &'Mara Criveller 1.2 0 47 47 0.0 0 0 _0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 47 II 14 216503 Giovanni'&iRliariaSiirpe 1.2 0 47 47 0.0 0 '';0 ' 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 II 14 216504 Donaid~;?<'-Judith Cockhum 1.2 0 47 47 0.0 0 0 q ~ 17.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 47 II 14 2166QD WUtrB,d.~Mgria Weper 22.4 2,300 551 2,851 0.0 900 D 9pq 0.0 1,700 0 1,700 0 0 0 0 5,451 II 19 216900 Rosamefiederaw 4.5 '0 105 105 0.0 ' ~' 0 0 0 ~ ~ 4.5 1,100 40 1,140 D 0 0 0 1,245 II 13 216902 Liselotte Krrofe & H.J. Henmann 28.1 0 687 fi87 0.0 0 0 0 28,1 2,800 259 3,059 0 0 0 , 0 3,746 •• II 12 217100 Jovo &~Ra'ko Maslek 9.9 0 255 255 0.0 , 0 0 0 9.9 1,300 188 1,468 0 0 0 0 1,723 II 12 217200 Clty of Niagara Falls ~ 1.4 "" 0 '~- ' ~ 3s 38 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 500 24 524 0 0 0 0 560 II 12 217400 Brian Cas;idy & Patricia Trendle 0.4 0 10 ip 0.0 D 0 0 0.4 100 7 107 D 0 0 0 117 II 12 217500 MartlnSomervilie 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 700 14 714 0 0 0 0 135 F:10SA391ReporflFi~IWS-099sdietlWas finelxls 1'A(5t A7 January 30, 2005 ~~ ~ SCHEDULE~A-SCHEDULE OFASSESSMENTS File No. 03.039 ' ~' UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Nlagare Falls ' ~ MAIN DRAIN'" WEST BRANCH EAST BRANCH TRENOLE BRANCH . ..., .. APPS ~ APProx Approx Rdl No. ha ha ha Approx he GRAND Con Lot 272513000-D Ovmei'~ Aifectetl Benefrt~ OWet TONaI Affecletl Benefit Outlet ~ Total ABectetl Benefd Outlet Total Affadetl Benefit Outlet Total TOTAL II 12 217600 Barijariiin Trendle 0.4 '0 21 2'i 0.0 ~ ~0 0 0 0.4 100 14 114 0 0 0 0 135 it 12 21 T700 Rdiph Bianioide 5.6 0 144 144 0.0 0 0 0 5.6- 1,200 95 1,295 0 0 0, 0 1,439 II 12 217701 Mara~Kosanovich 8.3 0 214 214 0.0 0 0 0 8.3 0 140 140 0 0 0 0 II 12 217703 Richard & Donna Chamberlain 1.4 0 36 36 O.D 0 0 0 1.4 900 24 924 0 0 0 0 960 II 11 217800 Steven'&`HeaOier Barnett 14.2 0 366 366 0.0 0 D 0 14.2 2,500 426 2,926 0 0 0 0 3,292 II 11 217815 Anne"Stevens 0.4 0 21 21 0.11 0 0 0 0.4 D 24 24 D 0 0 0 45 II 11 277900 708020Ontarto lna 9.6 0 246 246 0.0 0 0 0 9.6 6,450 288 6,738 0 0 0 6,984 II 10 218200 Nalale & Lana Giampa 8.5 0 180 180 0.0 0 0 0 8.5 2,100 405 2,505 0 0 0 0 2,685 II 10 218201 Mex,Kehl & Rhonda Kavanaugh-Kehl 0.6 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0 0.6 0 70 70 . 0 0 0 0 707 II 10 218210 FrankBCsihertne l.epenna 1.0 0 48 48 0.0 0 0- 0 1.0 0 770 110 ~ 0 0 0 0 158 II 10 218214 Haiol6~&Taresa'Nelson 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 D.4 0 48 4i 0 D 0 0 67 11 10 216216 Caflertne& Steven Piton 0.4 0 10 10 0.0 0 D o 0.4 0 12 12 ~ 0 0 0 0 22 II 9 218500 Olgs ~i Norman Wafson 2.3 0 48 48 0.0 0 0 0 2.3 1,000 110 1,110 0 0 0 0 1,756 II 9 21851)1 Petiida~3aoseph Mills 0.4 0 13 19 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 500 30 53 0 0 0 0 . 543 II 9 278503 Bertram & Susan Watson 0.9 0 36 36 0:0 0 0 0 0.9 1,000 81 1,081 0 0 0 0 1,117 II 9 218600 TrendCanada Pipelines Ltd. 48.6 0 1,154 1,154 0:0 0 0 0 40.6 3,000 2,597 5,597 0 0 0 0 6,757 II 10 218800 G~aMlne Howard 0.8 0 21 21 0:0 0 0 0 ~ 0.6 D' 24 24 0 ~ 0 0 0 45 II 10 216900 Jahnn ~- &'JOcal La enne 1'.4 0 94 34 0.0 0' 0 0 1.4 0 39 39 0 0 D 0 73 11 10 219000 Cafllanna'Lepenna 1.4 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 1,500 37 1,537 0 0 0 1,568 II 10 219100 Frenk't:apenna 1.4 0 34' 3A lt.ll 0 0 0 7.4 7,500 39 1,539 0 0 0 0 1,573 11 10 219200 Feltic & Kathleen Loshacco 1.4 0 36 36 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 0 42 42 0 0 0 0 78 II 10 279300 Mireslaw8:'JoannaWityk 1.4 0 36 3G 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 0 42 42 0 0 0 0 76 II 10 219401 Mionael ThevAiss & Tracey Donlan 7.4 0 36 36 ~ 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 0 42 42 0 0 0 0 7B II 10 279501 Gary^8 S11eron Hall 1.4 0 36 36 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 0 42 A2 0 0 0 0 78 II 10 219601 Jeffrey ffi Rosanne Somerville 1.4 0 36 36 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 0 42 42 0 0 0 0 78 II 10 219700 AntFlori' Badkowiak & Carol Bbu h 1.1 0 28~ 28 0.0 0 0 0 1.1 0 33 3 0 0 0 0 61 111 17 313700 Nadie'Kosta'~ 1.8 0 15 15 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 III 17 313800 Rudnlph$ Brtgiite Stegman 3.11 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 D 0 0 31 III 17 313801 Harry & Sandra Weaver 1.0 0 8 8 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 D 0 8 III 16 3140011 Costa'ISamilyHoldings Inc. 5.9 0 151 1St 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 157 III 16 314100 Cilu"14•P;ngela Cosfa 7.8 0 201 201 0.0 0 0 0 ' 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 "III 15 914300 Gaston~Jsaurond 39.8 0 944 944 39.8 2,700 570' 3,27 0.0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 4,214 III 14 3145110 M' ~ Msidnkowski & Lisa Trevers 0.8 0 41 41 f1.0 0 0 0 D:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 III 14 314501 JeBary Susin ~ 19.0 0 464 464 19.0 4,800 260 5,06 0.0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 5,544 III 14 314600 PaW'8:'Linda Weaver 0.5 0 26 26 0,0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 III 14 314601 Gary'&~LigdaBarkwill 0.5 0 26 26 0.0 0 0~ 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 III 14 3147D0 Ores(&idsry Szymanski 17:6 0 226 226 17.0 0 132 132 O.fi 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 361 III 14 ~ 314800 Ctuistine.TolOpal 0.8 0' 31 31 0.0 0 0 0 0.8' 500 12 512 l7 0 0 0 543 III 14 314801 John Audsle 0.5 0 26 26 0.0 0 0 0 0.5 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 36 III 13 31490(1 Martin &'Uiaula Blenzeisler 0.3 0 16 76 0.0 0 0 0 11.3 D 6 6 0 0 0 0 22 III 13 315000 Wayne. &`Pdna Slogge6 D.6 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0.6 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 43 III 13 315100 David & Cynthia Fowler 0.6 ~ 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0.8 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 43 III 13 315200 DaVI'd~&Michelle Pinkerton 1.7 0 44 44 0.0 0 0 1.7 0 16 i6 0 0 0 0 60 hl 13 375201 Keith & Sandra Waller 17.7 0 414 474 11.8 0 159 15 5.9 0 57 57 0 0 0 0 630 III 73 315300 Adonls'8'.Dianne~Somerville 0.2 0 10 10 0:0 0 0 0 0.2 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 14 III 13 315400 Jelin & Susan Pendergast 1.4 0 36 36 0.0 0 0 0 ~ 1.4 0 14 14 0 0 0 0 50 111 13 315402 Netale & Roceo Brtgante 1.5 0 38 36 ' 0.0 0 0 0 1.5 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 53 III 13 315500 Dennis'ddLee Sargeson 0.3 0 i6 16 0,0 0 0 0 0.3 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 ~ 22 III 13 3156110' Kimberly P,letrangelo 16.6 0 296 296 6.3 0 50 50 10.3 0 75 75 0 D D 0 421 111 12 315700 Bruce Nitligls~li Rhonda Mclnnis-Nichols 0.8 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0:6 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 32 - III 11 315800 Thomas&`"LeaWSmith 38.6 0 977 977 0.0 0 0 0 38.6 0 701 701 0 0 0 0 1,678 III 12 315810 ThorOes Y,'Valerte Smrih .0.3 0 16 16 0.0 0 0 0 , 0.3 0 6 6 0 0 D 0 22 III 12 315900 Jahn B~Jr~riJ(e~LOSan 0.1 0 6. 6 0.0 0 0 0 0.1 D 2 2 0 0 0 0 8 III 12 316000 Jupith.~&Oiuie,Id Canham 0.4 0 21. 21 0.0 q 0~ 0 0.4 D 8 8 0 D D D 29' III 12 316700 Henry:$`Ll.uft• Brideau ' 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 '0 0.4 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 29 III 12 376200 DsminiGi4141[o'~~NiceleCasolerw 9.1 0 234 234 D.D 0 ~ 0 0 9.1 0 166 166 0 0 0 0 400 III 12 316300 Adam BCerol Hemmin 0.8 0 41 41 D.0 ~ 0 0 0 0.8 D 16 16 0 0 0 0 57 III 12 316400 Joanne &~Kenneth Oisen 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 0 8 6 0 0 ~0 0 29 III 12 ~ 31B50p Kevin & TtaSey Cooper 4,3 0 105 105 0.0 0 ~ 0 0 4.3 0 40 40 0 0 0 0 145 III 12 316600 John & Deals Bimle 4.8 0 ~ ~ 123 123 0.0 0 ~ 0 0 4.8 0 67 67 0 0 0 0 180 III 12 316700 City of Nlagafa Fails 0.6 0 31 31 0.0' 0' . 0 0 0.6 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 43 111 11 ~ 318800 Richard &'fliresa Winger- 0.2 .;0' ~ 10~, 10 O.17 0• „0 0 0.2 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 14 F:1a:f-0991RBpofllFlna1103-03&SChetluleS finelxls PAGE A2 January 30, 2005 SCHEDULE A-SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS File No. 03-039 I INI(1N A,IARRN f1RAIN ~n(tF C:6v Dr Nlanara F911s MAIN DRAIN WEST BRANCH EAST BRANCH TRENDLE BRANCH ' Approx ha Approx ha APPS ha Approx ha GRAND Con Lot RosNo. (2725130po- Owger Afleded Benefit Outlet Total Affected Benefit Gullet Total Affected Benefit Outlet Total Affected Benefit Outlet Total TOTAL III 17 316900 Thomas &.$usanM he 3.1 0 79 79 0.0 0 0 ~ 0 3.1 0 6t 81 0 0 0 0 160 III it 316801 HansB.'Hella'Reinert 16.0 0 413 413 0.0 0 0 0 18.0 0 480 480 0 0 0 ~ 0 693 III tt 317000 tewlS $ Nancy Willick 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 0 24 24 0 0 0 0 45 III 11 317100 Ronald ~& June Willick 0.2 0 10 10 0.0 0 0 0 0.2 0 12 72 0 0 0 0 22 III 10 317300 gonald&'LOratta Allen 9.3 0 226 226 0.0 0 0 D 9.3 0 264 264 0 0 0 0 490 ill t0 317400 ~Edward~8;'Alicia Kravrayk 0:8 0 41 41 0.0 0 0 0 0.8 ,0 49 49 0 0 l) 0 90 III 1p 317500 ~Jdm Gatior 19.9 0 442 442 11.0 0 0 0 19.9 D 823 823 0 0 0 0 1,266 ' III 9 317800 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 19.9 0 512 512 0:0 0 0 0 19.9 1,600 1,249 2,849 0 0 0 0 3,369 III 9 317700 Anthony& Mary Cuviello 0.3 0 16 16 0.0 0 0 0 0.3 D 35 35 0 0 0 0 51 III 9 317800 Brad'B~Laure CdcMon 9.9 0 246 246 0.0 0 0 0 9.9 0 512 512 0 0 0 0 758 III 10 317801 James Bfandt 9.9 0 221 221 0.0 0 0 0 9.9 0 453 453 0 0 0 0 674 III 9 317802 Madene~Willick&Wend Schaeffer 9.5 0 229 229 0.0 0 D D 9.5 0 467 467 0 0 0 0 696 IV 14 319201 Dlatie Filer' 2.0 0 26 26 2.p ~ 0 16 18 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 IV 79 319300' Gettrude C,ocher 24.3 0 467 467 24.3 2,600 481 3,281 0:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,748 IV 13 319400 Ggod Gain Ltd. 7.0 0 18D 160 7.0 0 207 207 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 387 IV 13 379401 Robert Mewhinney 0:4 0 21 21 0.4 ~D 23 23 D.0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319420 ,Sandia Ventresce 3.7 0 95 95 3.7 0 110 11p 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 205 IV 12 319430 Anna OiCiemo 0.4 0 2t 21 0.4 0 23 23 '0.0 0 0 0 0 0 l7 0 44 IV 12 319433 Anthony Di Cienzo 0.4 ' 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 44 IV 12 379436 At%gie_3hayalief 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319439 ~MichaetDi Certao 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319442 Elnmy9azter 0.4 D 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319446 AndaMailza 3.8 0 96 98 3.8 0 112 112 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 210 IV 12 319500 ROdert Thlel 7.2 0 780 180 7.2 1,200 207 1,407 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,587 IV 12 319501 Michael'&Joen Stoll 19.1 0 388 388 19.1 1,200 '347 1,547 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,935 IV 12 3195p3 Anna Mama" ~~ ' ~ 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 379506 OinO~Di'Cianzo 0.4 0 21 27 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 ~ 0 0 Q 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319509 AtNhorty DI Cier¢o 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 as IV 12 318512 'Eminy Baxter 0.4 0 ~ 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319515 Anna DiCianw 0.4 0 2t 21 0.4 0 23 23 17.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 ' 319520 Alma ~ wczuk 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319523 Dino DtCtenw 0.4 0 21 2t 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 44 IV 11 3198Q0 789702Onlado Ltd. 80.4 0 1,251 1,251 37.7 2,700 827 3,527 22.7 0 272 272 0 0 0 0 5,050 IV 11 319700 CatharinaMiller & Jacqueline Boutin-Miller 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 11 319705 ~Bria11'&~~Bejlj~Sm6ti ~ 3.6 0 92 92 3.6 l7 106 tOfi ~ 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 IV 12 319800 Fwd & Catherine Devoe 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 " 23 0.0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 10 319900 Old Willoughby Realty Ud. 44.0 0 568 568 25.9 0 384 384 18.1 0 273 273 0 0 0 0 1,225 IV 9 320000 Old`WiIlOtl~hby Realty Ltd. 9.2 0 788 188 2.3 0 32 32 ' fi.9 0 188 186 0 0 0 D 406 IV 9 3201Q0 OId Wi6oligtipy Really Ltd. 9.1 0 218 218 0.0 0 0 Q 9.1 0 255 255 0 0 0 0 473 IV 9 320200 Cathartde: Venzon & William Reirh 9.1 0 160 1611 4.8 0 86 B6 4.3 0 99 99 D 0 0 0 345 IV 9 320300 Brock Unlverstt Foundation 11.8 0 246 248 11.8 0 283 283 0.0 0 0 0 Q 0 l1 0 529 V 13 321900 Beasts Poultry Inc. 1.5 0 38 38 1.5 0 44 44 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 V 12 322100 John Ma'tshalF 0.9 0 13 13 0.9 0 15 15 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2B V 11 322105 Steptied. kYairis 2.6 0 34 34 2.6 0 38 36 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 V 12 322201 Bauer's~RariBry loc.' 12.0 0 306 308 12.0 0 355 355 0.0 0 0 '0 D 0 0 0 663 V N 322400 R szard'8. AIIDeR ter 20.6 D 383 363 20.6 800 440 1,240 Q.D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,623 IV 8 402000 Old' Wiifoughhy Realty Ltd. 7.5 0 193 193 0.0 0 0 0 7.5 200 504 704 0 0 0 0 897 IV 7 402100 Estate'of ElTieheth0ollen ~ 4.6 0 119 119 D.0 0 0 0 4.8 0 308 308 0 0 0 0 427 IV 7 4023011 BiPalricia Simpson l'horilas 2.0 0 61 51 O.Q 0 0 0 2.0 0 134 134 0 0 0 0 165 IV 7 402400 . Kelly Rees`r. ~ 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 0 53 53 0 0 0 0 74 IV ~ 7 402500 An elo Rizzo 16.8 0 434 434 1.6 0 0 0 15.3 D 1,135 1,135 ' 0 0 0 0 1569 IV 7 402700 Michael"d~GAarlotteKerrio ~ 28.9 0 617 617 28.9 ~ 0 1,472 1,472 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,089 IV 8 402600 PaUI &Mpfgaret Stunning 72.2 0 185 185 . 12.2 0 269 289 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 454 IV 8 402900 Ronald & Dehorah Sebastian 4.8 ~ 0 123 723 0.0 '0 0 0 4.8 0 323 323 0 0 0 0 446 IV 8 403000 tdr Mapld~ROdt1~L 39.8 0 771 771 22.7 0 807 807 17.1 0 1,148 1,146 0 0 0 0 2,724 . IV B 403'100 . Jo ce &~WINam Rudd 1.2 0 47 47 0.0 0 D 0 1.2 0 121 121 0 0 0 0 168 V 10 ' 404701 Hans~Zapp ~ 21.3 0 275 275 21.3 1,900 315 2;215 0.0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 2,490 V 10 404800 Tronspo[tation Ministry 1.1 0 16 16 1.1 900 17 817 0.0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 933 V ~ 10 404900 Ryszard &~Alice Rydygier ~ ~ 5.4 0 69 89 5.4 1,100 00 1,180 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D ~ 1,249 V 9 4050011 John Waiter. 2.2 0 47 47 2.2 0 112 112 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 V 9 405100 Douglas Watchom & Dorothy Butter 0.5 0 18 18 0.5 0 44 44 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 V 9 405300 Robert Barry & Ewa Tiholdy ~ 0.4 0 10 10 0.4' 0 25 25 0.0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 F:ws939YtepontFneD0.1-D39Sd~edulas fineWs ~ ~ PAGE A3 January 30, 2005 SCHEDULE A -SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS File No. 03-039 " ~ UNION MARSH DRAIN2008 CKV of Niacare Falls MAIN DRAIN WEST BRANCH EAST BRANCH TRENOLE BRANCH ., , . .. APprox ,. APprn>< Approx ' Roll tJa ha ha ha ~ Apprax ha GRAND Con Lot (2725731300-) .Owner Affected Benefit Outlet Total Affected Benefit OWet Total' Atfectad Benefit Outlet Total Affectetl Benefit Outlet Total TOTAL V 9 405400 Michael 8 Margaret PreUy 0.5 0 18 18 0.5 0 44~ 44 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 V 9 405501) MidiaelB: Biien Kndasky 0.5 0 26 26 0.5 0 63 63 0.0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 V 9 405600 ~Mirilael 8 Ghdstina Faiakas 0.5 0 26 26 0.5 0 63 63 0.0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 V 9 405700' LaonaM Willams 0.1 0 8 6 0.1 0 13 t3 0.0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 19 V 9 405801 Grejjgiy.6 Pamela MacDonald 5.5 0 47 47 5.5 1,800 112 1,912 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,959 V 9 405803 M~ aretKenn 13.2 0 221 221 13.2 500 538 1,038 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,259 V 9 405815 Steven'Apostdos 14.3 0- 229 228 14.3 0 556 556 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 785 V 9 405900 Peel`&'RhaWa Coleman 0.4 0 21 21 11.4 0 49 49 0.0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 V 9 41)6000 Mane`&~Daborah Masonovlch 0.2 0 10 10 0.2 0~ 25 25 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 V 9 408100 Rptiert.$i'Mildred MaloB 0.3 0 16 16 0.3 0 37 37 O.D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 53 V 9 408300 William 8 Loma Watchom 0.3 0 16 16 0.2 0 37 37 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 V 9 406400 Jaok'& Detiorah Rush 0.2 0 10 10 0.2 0 25' 25 ~ 0.0 D 0 0 0 0 0 35 V 9 406500 ICafhlsett Watchom 0.6 0 23 23 0.6 0 57 57 0:0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 80 V 9 406600 Deroffiy &"William Beds 1.1 0 26 28 1.1 0 68 68 0.0 0 0 l1 0 0 0 0 96 V 9 4o67D0 Lucian 8!Rosa Rondeau 0.4 D 21 21 11.4 0 49 49 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 V 9 407900 Bill ~&' Pofa Apostolos 0.8 0 21 21 0.8 0 49 49 0.0 l1 0 0 D 0 0 0 70 V 8 407700 RorialA-&'N(argarat Ballinger 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 49 49 0.0 0 D 0 D D 0 0 70 V 8 4078011 Vera Bowmen 39.8 0 920 920 39.6 2,700 2,237 4,937 0.0 0 0 ' 0 0 D 0 0 5,857 V 8 407801 Chffard'8 Brenda Ballinger 0.8 0 41 41 0.8 500 100 fi0D 0.0 0 ~ 0 0 0. 0 0 0 641 V 8 407901 Rlollard~&' Laurel Waidick 2.8 0 72 72 2.8 1,700 175 1,675 ~ 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,947 V 7 " 408000 Rose~Laveaque & Jofln Brouillette 12.0 0 267 267 12.0 2,900 650 8,550 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,817 V 7 408100 Donald`&Holly Watchom 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 49 4B D.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 V 7 408200 VictofSidin"' 4.1 0 105 705 4.1 50D 256 756 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 861 V 7 408900 JohnHorlh~B. Samantha Gendron 7.6 0 146 146 7.8 500 357 '857 D.D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,003 V 7 408400 Adrian &'fYaaa'Fonnisano ~ 15.7 0 375 375 15.7 0 912 912 ~ 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,287 V 7 408500 Ann°Pelllged` 5.2 0 133 133 5.2 0 326 326 ' 0.0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 459 V 7 408502 Tracey Mari Wylick 0.5 0 28 26 0.5 0 63' 63 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 V 7 408504 Donald'&'PabirJa Krawec 3.3 0 85 85 3.3 0 208 206 0.0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 291 V B 408506 Tanya..Ai117d ~ 3:8 0 98 98 3.8 0 237 237 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 335 V 6 408600 Gordon&Melissa MacLeod 45.0 0 1077 1,071 45.0 0 2,607 2,607 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,678 V 6 408700 Ro6erk8'~Neflcy Collucci 4.0 0 103 103 4.0 0 250 250 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 353 V 5 408800 Viacant t4Hreflda Bang 4.8 0 100 100 4.8 0' 244 244 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 344 V 5 408800 Donald &~Delua Devlin 9.9 0 255 255 9.9 0 619 619 : 0.0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 874 V 5 409000 Amy'6.rer(ning & Michael Lynch 4.9 0 126 126 4.9 0 306 306 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 432 V 5 409100 Peter Wilson 4.9 0 12fi 126 4.9 0 306 306 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 432 V 5 409200 Bfaca~8 Ga11~Jacobs 5.0 0 129 129 5.0 0' 313 313 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 442 VI 4 416800 Everrett"& Sharon Fdskle 3.2 0 ' 82 82 ' 3.2 0 201 2D1 0.0 0 D o 0 0 0 0 283 V,VI 5,6 .416701] Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority ~ 44.6 0 573 573 44.6 0 1,393 1,993 0.0 l7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,966 .1 17 & 18 49'4000 Canadian Nia era Power Can an 0,0 400 0 400 0.0 D 0' 0 0.0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 400 Total Assessments on Lands: '-~ 1441.1 29,400 31,144 60,544 646.5 32100 22408 54,508 549.3 35,450 22,580 58,030 24.2 1,200 800 1,80 174,882 QEW MTO 37.2- 0 3,825 3,825 22.2 8,000 2,623 S,fi23 15:0 6,000 4,038 10,038 5.4 5,000 536 5,536 28,022 Willoughby Ddve City of Niagara Falls 3.6 3,000 167 3,167 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 3,167 Sedan Rcad(Region Rd 116) Reglon ofNiagara 9.0 0 699 698 1.1 2,000 '51 2,051 5.8 9,800 842 10,442 0 0 0 0 13,182 Ort Road ~ City of Niagara Fells 7.8 0 396 39fi 2.4 3,000 112 3,112 5.4 2,000 407 2,407 0.7 0 52 52 5,9fi7 Stanle Avenue C of Nl' Bra Falls 2.8 0 133 133 2.8 2,000 154 2,154 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,287 KirgrRoad ~ City of Nfagsia Falls 4.0 0 308 308 4.0 0 701 701 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,009 Beck Roed' ~ City of Niagere Falls 1.8 0 77 77 1.8 0 188 168 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 265 ' Sauer Road CBy of Niagara Falls 1.6 0 123 123 1.6 0 30q 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 423 Sheik Road City of tgig"ara Falls " 4.8 0 123 12S 3.3 2,000 206 2,206 1.5 0 102 102 0.5 0 12 12 2,443 BOSti&t Road C~ 00 Nie' era Falls 6.0 0 298 296 2.8 5,000 478 5,476 3.2 3,000 205 3,205 0 0 0 0 8,979 DelenberJc Raad GBy'ot Nlagara~FAlls 6.6 0 236 236 2.4 1,000 129 1,129 4.2 4,000 145 4,145 ~ 0 0 0 0 5,510 Marshall Road GBy of Niegare Falls 5.2 0. 463 463 2.7 3,000 189 3,189 3.3 3,000 131 3,131 0 0 0 0 6,783 Millar Road ~ ~ CBy of Magara Falls 3.8 4,000 154 4,154 2.0 3,000 31 3,031 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,185 Weaver Road CBy of Niagara Falls 2.9 4,000 208 4,208 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,208 Willlek Road ~ ~ GBY of Nias;#ra~ F811s 1.5 0 33 33 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 ' 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 33 Leman Road ~ GB of Nie ari Falls 0.5 0 13 13 0.5 0 32 32 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 Total Assessments on Roads: ~ ~ ~' 98.9 11,000 7,256 18,256 49.6 27,000 .5192 32192 38.4 27,800 5,670 33470 6.6 5,OD0 600 5600 89516 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS ON THE UNION.MARSH DRAIN 2008 1540.0 40,400 38,40D 78800 fi98.1 59,100 27,600 8870 567.7 63,250 28,250 91,500 30.8 6200 1,2D0 7400 284,400 Notes: f. All of the above ~nda ere WaeaiSad es non-egdcuflurel, ezcapt those as noted wllh an aalarisk (`) y41Rhare rtled egdeutturel• ReNralso ld page 12 in rcpod. 2. Sedien 21 of the Dreinege AQ RSO 1990 requires 01st asaessmerds ha shown oppoaile aech'peroel of tend eM road affected. The affected percel9 of land have assn wemtfied using the roll number from the last revlaetl assasemen[ roh fwlhe City. Fwawlwnlanrs only, the owner's names es shown by me last revisetl asaesemam roll, has Ueo been InUuded. " F:ws~os9lRepgmFirwws•9s9schadwos nnat.lds ~---...__~~'--.-.~,~,:„,.. PAGE A4 January 30, 2006 SCHEDULE B -Schetlule of Assessment fw Future Maintenance ~ File No. 03-039 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006, City of Nia®ara Falls ~' MA IN DRAIN WEST BRA NCH EAST BRANC H TRENDLE 000 !0 1+074 00010 2+776 TOTAL 000 b 1811 1+411 to 3+507 3+5W tc 5+550' T OTAL' 000 to 540 540 to 1+259 1 +259 W 7+698 1 +89810 2+510 2+510 b 3+838 T OTAL ~ BRANCH Roll No. (McCrdtlia to (wdbughby to (Outlet to (On la OEW) (OEW to ( 000 to 580) ' Con Lot (272513000.) Ow7iaf ~ Will h ~ Br unction OA Rd McLeod ' 15 27 SB - 120 - Il 7 111'500 Erefelk of F,rmk CMaW aMmkBamatla 17 37 54 - - - - - 20. 10 7 13 28 - 5a II 7 111609 t4pry8Raakataumm emaleren 8 1B 26 - - - - - 786 , 589 058 1 2 256 547 4 9,236 1,471 III 7 114100 o11WIMouaMyf??sky LM. 661 1,422 2,083 - - 31 23 , 42 , 89 , 30 215 79 III 7 114200 Arllara7daNy4.K?shd; 26 5a 82 - - - - 102 76 137 292 97 704 260 III 6 174300 Naha Halei,2app 88 184 270 - - - - 79 15 26 56 18 134 50 111 6 ' • 114400 Bamua FJaon aPwmre awd 16 35 51 - - - - l .18 2(13300 N e9P7 Parks CPmmhaio0 2,500 - 2,500 _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ 1 17,18 209500 Gry ol.tUape7p Fake;:, 1,032 - 1,032 _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - 17,18 208600 Niedarh Ryka G4mmksgn 2,b00 - 2,500 - - - - - - ~' _ _ I 18 209700 dalry5llw111er.7fgr,da 808 - fi08 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - 18 209800 l ack tcany;gta49ero 303 - 303 - - - - - ~ _ I 78 27000U Fidwraa&ian Mam. 7 - '7 - - - - _ - 1 18 210100 9 -• 2 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - 1 18 210200 TimodryMcMilaa~•, 2 - 2 - - - - - ' - - - 1 18 210300 Gpalaatlakwah Mfcneadk 2 - 2 - - - _ _ I 17 211600 Mldiaka Sgaapea.,,., : 7 - 7 - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 17 217,700 tran. codes, '. 7 - 7 - - - - - - - - I n zirfio6 Mtdmdea0omedd~sk.,mes. s - a - - - I 17 211900 Pk7P a,leadfanP/W4b 7 - 7 _ _ _ - - - - - 1 17 212000 IMwd dgbek A~Fhho'MOara~ 10 - 10 - - - - - - - - - _ I 17 212100 Maeka EUFehem cad,as 10 - 10 - - - - - - _ 1 17 212200 MHam 3ovidc.......;, 333 - 333 - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 18 •212300 IiobeRZUpana 9arham ed,owdneo 15 77 32 - - - - - - - - I 16 212500 Beruona Ma 7kaaka 3 7 ~ 10 - - - I 18 212600 Alberta Banl Vogt - 2 $ 8 - - - - _ - I 16 212601 7tabeda. Jadce Wabm 15 16 31 - - ' - - - ' 1 i6 212700 Sdoa EYen Fnndso ~.~ 1 2 '3 - - - - - I 16 212800 Audrey wYGCk ~ ~ 2 4 6 - - - - - - - - - 1 16 212900 AuareyWYeckamm Fmncls 1 - 1 - _ - ~ - - 18 212901 txobrta0ed. wagon'.. B 8 - 1 16 213300 KukrasNdey limin 14 15 29 ~ - - - - -~ - - - I i6 213301 Jemead Frarweaca Zoretich 14 15 29 - - - _ - - - 1 15 213302 oorouryacoden MecOaruM 14 15 29 - - - - _ - - I 15 213303 Carda RoNmy Parker id 15 29 - - - - - -_ - -_ I 75 213304 ieaaaelea Gerd Coded a 12 13 25 - - - 11 18 215100 Joseph aJoaeph Ll`erte 3 - 9 - - - - - II 17,18 215101 5aun oMMoLtd. 768 3,600 4,368 - - - - - _ ~ 11 is 215200 NasWwva 156 - 756 - - - - - - - - II 18 ~ 2155pp GaryaMmgarat Milner 15 - 15 - - - _ ~- - _ - - II 17 215600 GsN~dY fi3 2,300 2,363 - - - - - _ II 17 215700 Hal,2 VoxaEdatearKMVen 67 87 - - - - _ II 17 215000 NeY weaves ' 56 - 56 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 11 17 215604 ShHey &ookaan 10. - 10 - - - - - - - - II 18 215805 Bamam a Oada Mdaen 10 - 10 - - - - - - - 0 15,16 215900 RoWuCOeta ~ ~-~' 127 4,fi31 4,758 - - - _ - ~ - - II 15 216900 cgWephea4mn Gnhmn 7 14 21 - - - - - - - - - 11 15 216100 Gana Cearedne Jamiaw- ~ 50 107 157 - - - - II i6 216300 cad Adams "~ 188 4,171 4,359 - - - - - ~ - II 15 218400 Gerd Nlagera teeer,de E4ales ge. 204 4,781 4,865 - - - - - _ - 11 14 216401 Adodo a Peequalins FaHe 9 19 ZB - - - - ' - - II 14 216500 ANmdoaAnpale &mresdaNo 10 21 31 ~ - - - - - - 11 14 216501 tlamJapmud8auer '~ ~ 15 32 47 - - - - - - - _- _- II 14.' 216502 Medea Marta Cawga 15 32 47 - - - - - II 14 218508 Gbvsnrda Med. stlrpe, ~- 15 32 ~ 47 - - - - - - - _ _ II 14 2185D4 . OarMM aJU&tlr ccakbrun 15 32 47 - - - - - ~ - - - - 700 1 - II 14 ~ 216600 WNmdi Mads Weber 175 2,676 2,851 900 - - 900 1,700 - - - , 140 1 - 11 13 216900 Hotame Federow~, 33 72 105 - - - - 40 1,100 - - , 3 ~ II 13 216902 Oadotla Wm7na H.J. Hemmemr 218 469 687 - - - - - 3,059 96 - 1 372 - • 1,468 ' • II t2 217100 Jovo aRajko Medek ~ 81 174 255 - - - 14 , 510 - - - 5'24 II 12 21720D croj o7Ng0sra FeW 11 25 38 - - - - 4 103 - - - 107 _ .II 12 217400 gdaa70sasidyaPMddaTramlg 3 ~ 7 10 - - - - - 114 - II 12 217500 NsgM SOmervila-'~ 7 14 ' 21 - - - - 8 a 106 106 - - - - 114 - II 12 217600 0 aenjamN Teasels R 7 48 14 98 21 144 - - - - - - - - 64 1,241 - - - 1,295 - 11 12 ~ 2177 0 sbdr tsemong - - a0 60 - ~ - - 140 - • II 12 '_ 217701f Mad Kawnodch 68 146 214 - - - 924 - N 12 217703 Aidmrd a Domes ChembeMln 11 ~ "25 36 - - - - - 14 ~ 138 910 703 685 2 - 2,928 - II 11 217800 elovena Haetlw 9amea 116 250 366 - - - , rnu~ 07 UNIUN MARBH UWUN'LUU6, City Ot Nlegera Fella M AIN ORAIN WEST BR ANCH EAST BRANCH TRENDLE • ~ OOO l01+074 Aaa b 2#176 TOTAL 000 to 1+411 1+411 l0 3+507 3+507 to 5+550 TOTA4 000, to 540' 540 to 1+259 1+259 t01+698 1+698 to 2+510 2+510 fA 3+838 TOTAL BRANCH RoIIND. :,: ~ ~ (McCrodiefo (Wpioughbyto (OUOelto (Art to4EW) (gEW1o (000 to 580) Coo Lot (272519000.), OWllet-: ... ~ VJdou h 9r uncl'an Ort Rd McLeod Il 11 217815 girnsgaren. 7 14 21 - - - - ' 6 6 ~ 10 - - 24 II 11 217900 . 7as02a gded 4x. 78 168 ~ 246 - - - 93 70 2,225 2 388 II 10 218200 NsWaa L!na.Gmmw 57 123 ~ 160 - - - - 66 51 91 2,295 _ 2 505 II 10 218201 Mar KelY p,RhoodO KannaugMNere 10 21 31: - - - - 12 9 16 33 , 70 II 10 , 218210 ' FnNcaCaOieikisLq,emu 15 33 48 - - - - 19 14 25 53 - 110 II 10 218214 tWaM#7vep~•Nabon 7 14 21 - - - - B 6 10 22 - 46 II 00 218246 CatlwFe asmvenRpaH 3 7 10' - - 4 3 5 12 II 9 218500. ' peen Norman Waben 15 33 48 - - - - i6 14 25 1,053 - 1 110 II 9 218501 Mkldaa:JoeaphMae 4 8 13 - - - - 5 4 7 614 - , 530 II- .9 8 218503 tlutram aauwnWstion 11 25 ' 3B - - - - 14 t0 18 1,039 - 1 081 11 210600 7~aneDeddarPlppllnes Ud 366 788 1,154 - - - - 435 326 b88 4,250 - , S b97 11 10 29880p Aeraldn9:Hawv'd•~~~'- 7 14 21 - - - - 8 6 10 - - , 2q _ II 10 210900 ailocdynaka ema 11 23 34. - - - 13 9 17 39 II 10 219000 Caaurme7awmm~• ~ 10 21 31 - - - - 12 ~ 9 16 1,500 - 537 1 - II 10 219100 Fronk Lapeme: ~;'~ ~ it 23 34 - - - - 13 9 17 1,500 - , 1 539 II 10 219200 Faara WWeen:Gostracco 11 25 36 - - - - 14 t0 18 - _ , 42 _ it 10 219300 MtwmwaJwmmWayk 11 25 38 - - - - 14 10 i6 - _ q2 _ II 10 219401 MMadThevdme a7noey Donlan 11 25 36 - - - - 14 10 18 - _ q2 _ II 10 219501 G ashvooHae ~•~ 11 25 36 - - - - 14 10 18 - q2 II 10 219601 Je6royaROSUme 8omenrde 11 25 36 - - - - 14 10 18 - 42 - II 10 219700 ' Anrionyewcowmkacerd Blouph 9 19 28 ~ - - - - 11 6 14 - _ 33 _ III 17 313700 Nede Kosb ~ 15 - 15 - - - - _ _ _ - - Iil 17 313800 Rudapha Bdytla smOmen 31 - 31 - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - III 17 313801 asandn Wasver'~ 8 6 _ ~ _ - III 18 . 314000 Cesla Family HoMmee roc. 48 103 151 - - - _ _ - _ III 16 314100 ckeaMede coda 64 137 201 - - - - _ _ _ - ~ - III • 15 314300 Ream Jeevond 299 645 944 3,270 - - 3,270 - - _ - - - - - - III 14 314500 Muk Mudnkowakla lbaTmums 43 28 41 - - - _ _ _ - _ III 14 '314501 Jeaery sudn~ 147 317 464 5,080 - - 5,080 - _ _ - _ - - - - III 14 314600 PedaLlMs Waavae' 8 18 28 _ _ III 14 314801 GeryaLhds aedtwa~ 8 18 '26 - - - _ _ _ _ III 14 314700 ArW aMa@azymemM" ,.. 72 154 .226 132 - - 132 3 - - _ _ _ 3 _ III t4 314800. cmnWre ToapM. ... 10 21 31 - - - - 512 - - - - 512 III 14 914801 Jo1nAWaay a 18 28 - - - - 10 - - - - YO - III 19 314900 Mvuna Uraua BleraMaly 5 71 16 - - - _ g _ _ _ _ 6 _ III 13 315000 wnn.aF_dm>OVyc.n. ~•. 10 21 31 - - - - 12 12 III 13 315100 DaadaCynaue FOWer 10 21 31 - , - - - 12 - - 12 III 13 315200 DavM aMmhells Fnkartal 14 30 44 - _ _ 16 - - - - 16 - III 13 315201 lcam.a sands Watlv~ 131 283 414 159 - - 159 57 - - - ~ - 57 - III 13 315300 naw.a Amnee samervae 3 7 10 - - - _ q _ _ _ - 4 _ III 13 315400 JoMa9umm Pendu6ael 11 25 36 - - - - ~ 14 - - _ _ 14 ~ _ 111 13 315402 N+WeaRonao We, 12 26 38 - - - 15 - 15 III 13 31550.0 llervYedJ.ee avgaaon 5 11 16 - - - - 8 - - - - 6 III 13 315800 NmSedY Fiehangao •~. 94 202 29B 50 - - 50 75 - - _ _ 7g _ III 12 315700 epee Mdwma)ihonda'-MelmfaMdwla 7 16 23 - - _ _ g _ _ _ _ 9 _ III 11 315800 ThvmeeB Leas finder 310 667 977 - - - - 389 119 213 - - 701 III 12 315810 ThomoaVwdrandh ~ 5 11 16 - - - _ 6 _ _ _ _ 8 _ III 12 ' 315800 JoMaJennav LOnen 2 4 6 - - - _ 2 2 - III 12 316000, JedihaDOreMCeaum 7 14 21 - - _ _ g _ _ _ _ g - Iil 12 318100 1bmr.a Mnde eddaau-: 7 14' 21 - - _ - g _ _ - _ 8 _ III 12 316200 AomkevAkloaNicde Caedam 74 160 234 - - - - 88 28 50 - - i8g III 72 316300 6mm acerW Nemmmg 13 28 41 - - - - 18 - - - - 16 _ III 12 316900 JogmeaKameth Amen 7 14 21 - - - - 8 _ - - _ 8 _ III 12 316500 KavinaTmuy coopv 33 72 105 - - 40 40 _ III 12 ' 316600 JMna.Aeh+~,9k!rle.. :, 39 84 123 _ _ _ 47 7 13 - - 67 III 12 31¢7,00 clry of Meava Falls,. 10 21 31 - - - - 12 - - - - 12 111 11 318800 Ridwd aTNna Wmev ~ 3 7 ~ 10 - - - _ q _ _ _ _ q _ III it 316900 Tgmnaa}suwnMcca4v 25 54 79 ~ - - - - 30 18 33 - - 81 III. 11 316901 i+v.slwFrs<mut: 131 282 413 - - - - 155 11s 209 - - 480 III 11 317000 Lewma M.acyWdEak 7 14 21. - - - - 8 6 10 - - 24 III 11 ~ 317100 RonaM }JuneNeeck 3 7 10 - - - - 4 , 3 5 - _ 12 III 10 917300 AgmMBLorelm Aeon 72 154 226 - - - - 85 64 115 264 III 10 31Z40D,' EaMUrd aquae Kgwacyk 13 ~ 28 ~ 41 - - - - i6 12 21 - _ qg III 10. 317500 ' JehnGebpr ..,, ~ 140 ~ 302 442 _ _. - - 167 125 225 30fi _ 823 _ III 8 317., , ~ ~~ ` old:W!MaecMy Rsauy Wi I "' ' 162 "' ' 350 512 ' - - _ - 193 144 ~ 260 490 782 1 2 849 III 9 31770.0 1nlhorcJBMary CUUkAIo ~ 5 ~ 11 18 ._ _ _ _ 6 4 8 ' 17 , , ~ 35 III 9 317800 &adaGeura Crahoon 78 ~ 168 246 - . , - - - 93 70 ~ 125 224 512 - PAGE 62 «C« <GG«<Ct«C« <G«G< ZGCZ« @IC«« IZ<«< ~G <~.Z< ZZC<ZZ 000Z<GG <GGCG C==~ r lomb wm b wbw re wlow tDm mm m+ °wmm 0 0 0 V V V V V m w + ~ + N W b`o lo+ O N+++ lb O O N . NN N N N N N N W N N N N N N N W W W A a a yp an aaaooo p ~~ m. •~ ~ w gaAA O~O O~ + m V ~ yy yp p OOO~NN V~ A NA ~ N1 l~lNJN N N NN-N N +~ 000( pp ~ pp lD ~ +~ 0 ~+ ~ lDJ +pp m mb~ ~j1pp ~~p ~j~ Sm W ~ pp •~Wp'•pW1pa brt~m ~ V V N~i ~p SOS '~O S q o . O S SS S O m O S +S ~S S p W ..npp p SOVSS0 O O pp+p~ 0+U,S0 p t~ pO O SS W 00OOS V p yy (( ~1 V p O O O O N~ m W NfT I i, ++ pp pNNp O ~ p . A IAiI ~1 W S~ yy N O S S S ~ mpp $ Q Z - O O mNID O+ + NmmW O+ O+ N+ ~ •• O m ~ ~ . ~ ~ 9 S J~ g ; O r- p g P~ ~ A ~ -ti ; n y~,gg ~ x gg fi .~ W `~k~ ~ n Q ~ V C~ ~ ~53 :111 O g§ 3 yCA ; F O y~@p ~ ; •- O g~ . C P P F p g P ~~ $ m+~ O g P P p P m° g m' ' P .S F n~~ p p' c f ~ - S s e 4 p p Y p ~' ~ n ~ P9 6§ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < 3' m• ~ ~ g R m V n~ P ~ 3S $'M v~ s ¢ ~ ~ $ 47 a t 3 aP ~ ~ ~~~ E ~g m A g °°g yg l i ~~ ~~ ~ ^~ S y i p .s Q ~ ~ -3 6~ g S A -o ~. 41 ~ o '. ~~,as C mQ -2 ~3 A~ .~ q ¢ `2 ~g T 6 'gC~' Q rp- Q ' F ~c° ~ i_~6 ~ ~ e g l._~ 5 m ~ p S R"~ E ~ . ~+ S ~fi ii x F `L ~6F _ P.A p~ g.2i ~ s ~~~g c ..~ 5~ ~ ~ 1 ~C S~ ~:S. . ~ y 8 _ m A ~ V W V Wmw W V WONNwmw Wmfn 1~ yy N'wVfT mlWO f~O ((pp mS V'm OWC~ {{pp Nm+AN mm mm Vm~m00 V tNOV V V V V V V V V(NJ V~V V V V V O V VpaOm WO a$+ S8 S 3 Q m 5 ~ 2 §~ 1s~a o~±~ a"mm V++ cn Na Of a.S A+mm N V N N m V+mSONiA m A~~Npp ~~11 .~ABm~N NNNN ~0411DN + mWW m tOD b Nm m A W a~AA N A,A aAAlmf, + fNJ V AaaA 11~~1~ A Imi,a W [Om NN W u ~ $'tA Z ANN+++ mWOw~ +NNNa NN++~+A 0+10+VmwwmOmY V+~ Im +YAJNS tpmmV+W y[y.~~~~~ 2. WW W m.PWm LQ1+Q+pm wOmmm NfD N~N N~N +N++-+~+ NNNNNm ++++..+m m+bNNNN Om++++ NfpN aN +Uf+ m NN W + -1 D r . .. oo$ NVAm.w lD ((uu 11~~ mNmaNm W"mw~m+m NbOml'~ N N,"" ~~yy NVOwW aa mN'VN 11~~,,YY~11 NO1NmNN N N~NNN> pp tDNNNNN pp NSN1DNm " ~ + 6~ } + ° ~N W m m m _ +N1~ N N m+ A O w W A aA O w O N -` ~t~1 d ' C ' O W m W, , r r , , O~+ N m m m V+ _1~~ mm_ d,a.. ' NN w ~p~N r ~ ~+ +~ W ~~_pp. m m1~~+ ra ~~~ m b ' a m r~r~ W w J O w 4 l p V • ~OCS J + m ~~s N yy W N WW m-01.0 W~O O -N ~ ~ tmT Wt~ N ..1~ w W.w a.AWVWWWWWIO ~ O S , N r S m O v tml,, , , , , , r , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , m o O ' + O ppmp, NWW tOmV mV V N'..pp 1~0~~imif~+p~ maNA~ Ui tO OImN W WWaiTAN mm mmwIJ :, N O r m OVw V m JA, , ,. r' N >NW g W ~i Yi' m m ~' [[pp WW N O N N1~ N N N N N N a A+ O+N N N N NN N+ N O m+ '' ~' - . imm W.m NA WwWV (JW W W W W W V VNW W W W W O W V+m t , , , ,I , , , , , , , , , , r r ~m~ mf+o~~ , , , ~ Wi t°.{~1~ r 'a' , , , , i , , , , , , , nw 0 O m ao s , m a ~ ~ r~' m u w can , a ~1 u m , ~ , , , ~ ~ ~ N ~m ,w.l , , , , , , , , r , r , r r r , N pp~~ A W W , 1N~ ~p ' j O S O S , , , , , ~ j m ~ , , , ~ , , , , r , , , , , , , i . ' ~ + ~ w b m N m u L1 S , , r , , , , , , r , , , , , , O V A r 0i r N m m S , , , , , , , , , , , r r , , r , , , , , , , O N O N O m O O W V m A m V m N b W m O , r , r , , , , , , , , , , , r ~ , r , ~ W W 1 , ~~pp 4411 pp (T W A OC A' , 1 r , ~ , . S N S W I , , i N , , , , , , , , , , I• r , , i ' ~~ W r I I ~ I ~ I ~ ~ w D~ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ~ , , , , • , r , , , , , , , , , i , , , r , , , , , , , , , , , i , r r , , , D O x m S n 2 O ZC om zm = 6 m O 'z~ gN ~~i+ W3 n~ ~ o z~ d r N n~ m T (O~t b S ~...~....-...~.. ~._.... _-~_, ~..~ _. ...,.e..... _,._ M AIN DRAIN WEST BR ANCH EAST BRANCH TRENDLE 000101+074 000 to 2+178 TOTAL 000 W 1+411 ~ iN11 l0 3+507 3+507 to 5+550 TOTAL 000 td 540 540101+259 1+259 to 1+698 1+68810 2+510 2+51010 3+g3B TOTAL BRANCH Roo Nu. Q4cCradiab (WdMUghhy to. (Outlatm (Ort to qEW) (qEW to (000 to 580) Con LM (272519000.) Ovmar Waou h Br unction Ort Rd McLacd ` V 9 40 30p gpsPoti odpba 7 14 21 12 11 26 49 V 8 ~ 407700 fiwsldAMaranrM flpWnBU 7 14 21 12 11 26 49 - _ _ _ _ _ V 8 407800 veFamwqur ~, 292 628 920 558 500 3,881 4,937 - _ _ _ _ _ _ V 8 407¢01 cplfadd&enge apWnBer 13 28 ~ 41 25 22 553 fi00 - - - _ _ _ V 8 407901 RWm4 iLardW~ck 23 49 72 44 39 1,792 1,875 - - - _ _ _ V 7 408000 Rvta Lavaagne; John &outlieua 85 182 267 162 145 3,yF3 3,550 - - _ _ _ _ V 7 408100 ooiwdik HoY Wetdwm 7 14 21 12 it 26 49 V 7 40B20D NolarSidn 33 72 105 64 57 635 756 - - _ _ _ _ _ V 7 A08300 John HaM6aamanlhaOmNm 46 t0U 146 89 80 1,188 1,357 - _ _ _ _ _ _ V 7 gOB400 AMm 8 fiPM Fmraigpo 118 256 375 226 204 482 912 - _ _ _ _ V 7 408500 Nn 7etlasri_ 42 91 133 Bt 73 172 326 - - _ _ _ _ _ V ~7 408502 TaceyVan, vy>~ch" 8 18 28 76 14 33 63 - - - _ ~ - V 7 408504 Donelda f?ctilde Krewec 27 58 .85 51 4¢ 109 206 V 8 408508 7am/a Mod 31 67 98 59 53 125 237. - - ~ - _ ~ _ _ - • V 6 408fif10 Gadso4Metlan Ma¢nod 340 731 1,071 648 SB3 3,87fi 5,107 - _ _ _ - - _ V 6 406700 ~ RObmta NuwyOaWW 33 70 103 62 5fi 132 250 - - - _ - _ V 5 408800 vdcant.a &addeemy 32 6fl 100 ~ 61 54 829 744 - - - - _ _ _ V 5 408900 oonwaoanr.Owen fl1 174 255 154 138 327 619 - - - _ _ _ _ • V 5 ' 409000 apyermuiupaMiaiod Lyrdr 40 86 126 78 88 162 306 - - _ - _ _ _ V 5 409100 PtlerWigon ~ 40 86 126 76 68 162 306 _ - _ _ _ _ _ V 5 409200 BmmaOeY JacaM 41 80 129 78 70 185 313 _ VI 4 416800 Evri4aasevan Frfi6e 26 56 82 50 45 106 201 - _ _ _ _ _ V,V 5,6 416700 t4?ema PgninsWs conservatlonAUmaay 182 391 573 346 312 735 1,393 - - _ _ _ - - I 17&18 494000 cmaam Nle ra Powu Comm 400 400 ' Tota l Assess ments on Land s: 18649 41 385 60044 i6 350 15 714 25 944 58,008 10 280 6 410 0,810 18 015 7,165 53 680 1,800 OEW MTO 1,215 2,610 3,825 1,381 7,242 - 8,623 582 441 787 1,673 6,555 10,038 5,536 Willotphby Ddve City of Niaga~ Falls 3,088 79 3,167 - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ Sudan ROed(Re9i0n Rd 1 U Region of NfaBara 220 479 699 2,051 - - 2,051 3,969 94 137 6,242 - 10,442 Ort Road City of NiaBare Falls 126 270 396 3,112 - - 3,112 BO 51 81 139 2,046 2,407 52 Stanley Averwe ~ Cily of Niegare Falls 42 91 133 Bt 2,073 - 2,154 - - - _ - _ _ 10 Rued Ci of Nla are Falls 98 210 308 187 168 346 701 Beck Raed City'of Niagate Falls 24 53 77 47 42 99 188 - - _ _ _ _ _ Sauer Road City of Niagara Fella 39 84 123 75 67 158 300 - - - _ _ _ _ Shark Road City of Niagarapr{Ile 39 84 123. 51 46 2,609 2,706- 15 11 20 42 14 102 12 9esaert Road City of Niagara.Ffdls 95 203 298, 131 117 5,228 5,476 31 ~ 23 42 88 3,020 3,205 - DetenbeckROad Cil~of Nte~arii:Fells 75 161 236 60 1,061 - 1129 47 35 4063 4145 Marshall Road Cily of Niagara pally 147 316 463 126 . 3,063 - 3,189-, 98 3,035 - - _ 3,131 _ Miller Roed ~ Cily of NfaBara falls 40 .4;105 4,154° 3,031 - - 3,031 ' - _ _ _ _ _ _ Weaver Road ~ Clty of Nfepafa Fells 71 4,137 4,208 - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ Willick Road ~ City of Nia9ard F,ella~ 19 14 33~ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Lemon Road Cil of Nia are Falls '' 4 9 . 13` 9 7 16 32 Total ASSeasments On Roads: 5351 12,905 i825S 10,350, 13,886 8456 32692 4820 3,690 5140 8185 11635 33470 5600 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS ON THE UNION MARSH DRAIN 24 000 54300 8 300 2 700 29,600 34 400 90,700` 15100 t2 100 14 950. 26,200 18 fl00 87150 7 400 Note 7. Atdme show krds me demifiadmnon-sgdcdbrd, ezeept8roeeumtedwbhm estntHk(')vMmare raleA agnwtlual. rtefer oleo to papa 12 fn rcPOrt 2. ~ Sadlon2l oftlla DrgNaasAd, R90188014qukaatlmtaaaewmanb ba elman bppae8a mch parcel ofbndantl mad s0eded, 7ha afladad puosb dimdbsw bem Hen56eE UdnB thatdlnundwrfrom tlw lad revised aasewmed raA fm lha Cdy. Foraanvagsnce onFj, tlra own,Mmm~mmafmm bYtlm 4utrcdaed umsananf roll,hm elm hepn acbded. PAGE 64 January 30, 2006 SCHEDULE G-Schedule for Actual Cost Bylaw File No. 03-039 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City.of Niagara Falls PAGE C1 Roll No. Con Lot (272513000-) Owner Estimated Assessment Actual Assessment minus 1/3 Grant minus Allowances NET II 7 111500 Estate of Frank Critelli & Mark Ramella 174 174 174 II 7 111600 Mary Godak & Louann Singleton 84 84 $4 III 7 114100 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 12,730 12,730 2,200 10,530 III 7 114200 Arthur & Marilyn Kostuk 376 376 376 III 6 114300 Hans & HelgaZapp 1,234 1,234 1,234 III 6 114400 Barbara Elson & Richard Swol 235 235 235 i 18 203300 Niagara Parks Commission 2,500 2,500 600 1,900 I 17,16 209500 City of Niagara Falls 1,032 1,032 50 982 I 17,16 209600 Niagara Parks Commission 2,500 2,500 800 1,700 I 18 209700 Barry & Heather Trendle 608 608 75 533 t 18 209800 Jack & Kathy Ouiquero 303 303 303 I 18 210000 Richard & Brian Mann 7 7 7 t~ 18 210100 ? 2 2 2 I 18 210200 Timothy McMillan 2 2 2 I 18 210300 Gerald &Deborah Migneault 2 2 2 I 17 211600 Michelle Stranges 7 7 7 I 17 211700 Irene Coules 7 7 7 I 17 211800 Michelle & Domenic Stranges 8 8 8 17 211900 Philip & Jennifer Priddle 7 7 7 I 17 212000 David Nisbett & Elaine Moore 10 10 10 I 17 212100 Mark & Elizaheth Caddis 10 10 10 1 17 212200 Milena Jovicic 333 333 75 2.58 1 16 212300 Robert Zupan & Barbara Schoonings 32 32 32 I 16 212500 Benson & Ida Brooks 10' 10 1'0 f 16 212600 Albert & Beryl Vout 6 $ 6 I 16 212601 Robert & Janice Watson 31 31 31 t 16 212700 Eric & Ellen Francis 3 3 3 I 16 212800 Audrey Willick 6 6 6 I 16 212900 Audrey Willick & Ellen Francis 1 1 1 I 16 212901 Robert & Dorla Watson B 8 8 I 16 213300' Kevin & Shirley Hotte 29 29 29 I 16 213301 James & Francesca Zoretich 29 29 29 1 15 213302 Dorothy & Gordan MacDonald 29 29 29 I 15 213303 Carol & Rodney Parker 29 29 29 t 15 213304 Teasdale & Carol Colledge 25 25 25 If 18 215100 Joseph & Joseph L. Ferro 3 3 3 If 17,18 215101 563272 Ontario Ltd. 4,868 4,868 700 4,168 II 18 '215200 Nell Weaver 15fi 156 156 II 18 215500 Gary & Margaret Misner 15 15 15 II 17 215600 Gary Landry ~ 2,363 2,$63 300 2,063 II 17 215700 He1nz Voss & Estate of Karl Voss 67 67 $7 fl 17 215800 Nell Weaver 56 56 56 It 17 215804 Shirley Brookson 10 10 10 II 18 215805 Barbara & David Maiden 10 10 10 II 15,16 215900 Rosina Costa 4,758 4,758 1,586 700 2,472 II 15 216000 Christopher & Lynn Graham 21 21 21 II 15 216100 Gary & Catherine Jamieson 157 157 157 " II 16 216300 Cari Adams ~ 4,359 4,359 1,453 600 ' , 2,306 Il 15 216400 Grand Niagara Legends Estates Inc. 4,965 4;965" "` 700 4;265: It 14 216401 Antonio & Pasqualina Fazio 28 `2$ 28 It 14 216500 Antonio & Angela Biancaniello 31 31 31 IF 14 216501 Harry & Ortrud Bauer 47 47 47 If 14 216502 Marto & Maria Criveiler 47 47 47 _ 11- 14 216503 Giovanni i£ Maria Stirpe 47 47 47 It ' ` 14 216504 Donald & Judith Cockburn ~ 47 4T 4T If 14 216600 Wilfred & Maria Weber 5,451 5,451 1,000 4,451 II 13 216900 Rosanne Federow 1,245 1,245 200 1,045 It 13 216902 Liselotte Knofe & H: J. Herrmann 3,746 3,746 400 3,346 IP 12 ~ 217100 Jovo & Rajko Maslek 1,723 1,723 ~ 574 ~ 300 849 11 12 217200 City of Niagara Falls 560 560 560 II 12 217400 Brian Cassidy & Patricia Trendle 117 _ 117 117 II- 12 217500 Martin Somerville 135 135 135 II 12 217600 Benjamin Trendle 135 135 135 January 30, 2006 SCHEDULE C -Schedule for Actual Cost Bylaw Fife No. 03-039 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls PAGE C2 Roll No. Con Lot (272513000-) Owner Estimated Assessment Actual Assessment minus 1/3 Grant minus Allowances NET II 12 217700 Ralph Biamonte 1,439 1,439 300 1,139 * II 12 217701 Mara Kosanovich 354 354 118 236 II 12 217703 Richard & Donna Chamberlain 960 96D 200 760 II 11 217800 Steven.& Heather Barnett 3,292 3,292 400 2,892 II 11 217815 Anne Stevens ~ 45 45 45 II 11 217900 708020 Ontario Inc: 6,984 6,984 300 6,684 ', II 10 218200 Natale & Lana Giampa 2,685 2,685 200 2,485 II 10 218201 Max Kehl & Rhonda Kavanaugh-Kehl 101 101 101 II. 10 218210. Frank & Catherine Lapenna 158 158 158 II 10 218214 ~ Harold & Teresa Nelson 67 67 67 II 10 218216 Catherine & Steven Pilon 22 22 22 II 9 218500 Olga & Norman Watson 1,158 1,1.58 100 1,058 II 9 218501 Patricia & Joseph Mills 543 543 543 II 9 218503 Bertram 8 Susan Watson 1,117 1,:117 100 1,D17 II 9 218600 TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. 6,751 6,751 400 6,351 II 10. 218800 Geraldine Howard 45 45 ~ 45 II 10 218900 Johnny & Jocelyne Lapenna 73 73 73 II ~ 10 219000 Catharine Lapenna 1,568 4;5Ft8 200 1,368 tl 10 219100 Frank Lapenna 1,573 1.,573 200 1;373 II 10 219200 Felix & Kathleen Lostracco 78 78 •. 78 II 10 219300 Miroslaw i£ Joanna Wityk 78 > 78 78 II 10 219401 Michael Thewliss & Tracey Donlan 78 78 78 II 10 219501 Gary & Sharon Hall 78 78 78 II 10 219601 Jeffrey & Rosanne Somerville 78 78 78 II 10 219700 Anthony Bartkowiak & Carol Blough 61 61. 61 III 17 313700 Nadia Kosta 15 18 5 10 III 17 313800 Rudolph & Brigitte Stegman 31 31 31 III 17 313801 Harry & Sandra Weaver 8 8 ~ 8 III 16 314000 Costa Family Holdings Inc. 151 151 151 III 96 314100 Ciro & Angela Costa 201 201 201 ' III 15 314300 Gaston Jeaurond 4,214 4,214 1,405 400 2,409 III 14 314500 Mark Marcinkowski & Lisa Travers 41 41 41 ' III 14 314501 Jeffery Susin 5,544 : 5,544 ~ 1,&48 1,300 2,396 III 14 314600 Paul & Linda Weaver 26 28 26 III 14 314601 Gary & Lihda Barkwill 26 26 26 III 14 314700 Orest & Mary Szymanski. 361 361- 361 III 14 314800 Christine Tothpal 543 543 543 III 14 314801 John Audsley 36 36 36 III 13 314900 Martin & Ursula Bienzeisler 22 22 _ 22 III 13 315000. Wayne & Edna Sloggett 43 43. 43 III 13 315100 David & Cynthia Fowler 43 43 43 III 13 315200 David & Michelle Pinkerton 60 60 60 III 13 315201 Keith & Sandra Waller 630 630 630 III 13 315300 Adonis & Dianne Somerville 14 14 14 III 13 315400 John & Susan Pendergast 50 50 50 III 13 315402 Natale & Rodco 8rigante 53 53 53 III 13 315500 Dennis & Lee Sargeson 22 22 22 III 13 315600 Kimberly Pietrangeio 421 421 421 III:_ .. 12 . 315700 Bruce Nichols & Rhonda McInnis-Nichol .. _32 , .;32 ,; _ 32. Ill.- 11 315800 Thomas & Leala Smith 1,678 : ;1,fi7& .~ 1,678 Ifl 12 315810 Thomas &Valerie Smith 22_ 22. 22 III 12 : 315900 John & Jennifer Cogan 8 •8 8 III 12 318000 Judith & Donald Canham 29 29 29 III, 12 316100 Henry & Linda Brldeau 29 29 29 III 12 316200 DominicAielto & Nicole Casciano 400 400 400 III_ 12 .316300 Adam & Carol Hemming 57 57 . 57 _ Ili 12 316400 Joanne & Kenneth Olsen 29 29 29 III . 12 316500 Kevin & Tracey Cooper 145 145 145 . III 12 316600 John & Debra Bimie ~ 190 190 190 III . 12 316700 City of Niagara Falls 43 43 43 III 11 316800 Richard & Thresa Winger 14 14 : . 14 III 11 316900 Thomas & Susan McCabe 160 160 160 III 11 316901 Hans & Hello Reinert 893 .,893 893 t 4 t F January 30, 2006 SCHEDULE C -Schedule for Actual Cost Bylaw File No. 03-039 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 ' City of Niagara Falls PAGE C3 Roll No. Can Lot (272513000-) Owner Estimated Assessment Actual Assessment minus 1/3 Grant minus Allowances NET III 11 317000 Lewis & Nancy Willick 45 45 45 III. 11 317100 Ronald & June Willick 22 22 22 III 10 317300 Donald & Loretta Allen 490 490 490 III 10 317400 Edward 8 Alicia Krawczyk 90 90 90 III 10 317500 John Gabor 1,265 1,265 1,265 III 9 317600 OId Willoughby Realty Ltd. 3,361 3,361 500 2,861 III - 9 317700 Anthony & Mary Cuviello 51 51 51 * III 9 317800 Brad & Laura Crichton 758 758 253 505 III 10 317801 James Brandt 674 674 ~ 674 III 9 317802 Marlene Willick & Wendy Schaeffer 696 696 696 IV 14 319201 Diane Filer 42 42 42 * IV 13 3.19300 Gertrude Locher 3,748 3,748 1,249 900 1,599 IV 13 319400 Good Gain Ltd. 387 387 387 IV 13 319401 Robert Mewhinney 44 44 44 IV 12 319420 Sandra Ventresca 205 205 205 IV 12 319430 Anna DiCienzo 44 44. 44 IV 12 319433 Anthony Di Cienzo 44 44 44 IV 12 319436 Angie Shavalier 44 44 44 IV 12 319439 Michael Di Cenzio 44 44 44 IV 12 319442 Emmy Baxter 44 44 44 IV 12 319446 Anna Manza ~ 210 210 210 IV 12 319500 Robert Thiel 1,587 1,587 700 887 * IV 12 319501 Michael & Joan Stoll 1,935 1,935 645 1,290 IV 12 319503 Anna Manza 44 44. 44 IV 12 319506 Dino Di Cienzo 44 44 44 IV 12 .319509 Anthony Di Cienzo 44 44 44 IV 12 319512 Emmy Baxter 44 44 44 IV 12 319515 Anna DiCienzo 44 44 44 IV 12 319520 Alma Krawczuk 44 44 44 IV 12 319523 Dino Di Cienzo 44 44 44 IV 11 319600 789702 Ontario Ltd. 5,050 5,050 900 4,150 IV 11 319700 Catharine Miller 8 Jacqueline Boutin-Mill 44 44 44 IV 11 319705 Brian & Beth Smith 198 - 198 198 IV 12 319800 Earl & Catherine Devoe 44 44 44 IV 10 319900 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 1,225 1,225 1225 IV 9 320000 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 406 406 . 406 IV 9 320100 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd„ 473 473 473 IV 9 320200 Catharine Venzon & William Reich 345 345 345 IV 9 320300 Brock University Foundation 529 529 529 * V 13 321900 Bauer's Poultry Ihc. 82 82 27 55 * V 12 322100 John Marshall 28 28 9 19 V 11 322105 Stephen Harris 72 72 72 * V 12 322201 Bauer's Poultry Inc. 663 663 221 442 * V 11 322400 Ryszard &Alice Rydygier 1,623 1,623 541 100 -982 IV 8 402000 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 897 897 200 697 IV 7 402100 Estate of Elizabeth Bollen 427 427 427 IV 7 402300 Thomas & Patricia Simpson 185 185 185 IV 7 402400 Kelly Rees 74 74 74 IV 7 402500 Angelo Rizzo 1,569 1-;569` ' _ - 9:;569 IV 7 402700 Michael & Charlotte Kerria 2,089 2,08 " _ 2;089 * IV 8 402800 Paul & Margaret Brunning 454 ' 454" 151 303 N" 8 402900 Ronald & Deborah Sebastian 446 446 446 * IV 8 403000 Maple Road Ltd. 2,724 2,724 908 1,816 IV 6' 403100.. Joyce & William Rudd 168 168 168 V 1.0 404701 Hans Zapp 2,490 2,490 300 2,190 V 10 404800 Transportation Ministry 933 933 933 V 10 404900 Ryszard & Alice Rydygier 1,249 1,249 300 949 V 9 405000 John Walter 159 159 159 V 9 405100 Douglas INatchom & Dorothy Butler ~ 62 62 62 V 9 405300 Robert Barry & Ewa Tiboldy 35 35 35 V 9 405400 Michael & Margaret Pretty 62 62 62 V 9 405500 Michael & Brian Krutasky 89 89 89 V 9 405600 Michael & Christina Fazekas 89 89 89 January 30, 2006 SGHEDULE C -Schedule for Actual Cost Bylaw File No. 03-039 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls PAGE C4 Roll No. Estimated Actual minus 1/3 minus Con Lot (272513000-) Owner Assessment Assessment Grant Allowances NET V 9 405790 Leonard Willems 19 19 19 V 9 495801 Gregory & Pamela MacDonald 1,959 1,959 700 1,259 V 9 405803 Margaret Kenny 1,259 1,259 1,259 " V 9 405815 Steven Apostolos 785 785 262 523 V 9 405990 Paul & Rhonda Coleman 70 7D 70 V 9 406000 Diane & Deborah Masonovich 35 - 35 35 V 9 406100 Robert & Mildred Malott 53 53 53 V 9 406300 William & Loma Watchom ~ 53 53 53 V 9 406400 Jack & Deborah Rush 35 35 35 V 9 406500 Kathleen Watchorn 80 80 80. V 9 406600 Dorothy & William Betts 96 96 96 V 9 406700 Lucien & Rose Rondeau 70 70 7D " V 9 407300 Bill & Pota Apostolos 70 70 23 47 V 8 407700 Ronald & Margaret Ballinger 70 70 ~70 V 8 407800 Vera Bowman 5,857 5,857 500 5,357 V 8 407801 Clifford & Brenda Ballinger 841 641 100 541 V 8 407901 Richard & Laurel Waldick, 1,947 1,947 100 1,847 V 7 408000 Rose Levesque & John Brouillette 3,817 3,817 400 3,417 V 7 408100 Donald & Holly Watchorn 70 70 70 V 7 408200. Victor Sidin 861 861 881 V 7 408300 John Horth & Samantha Gendron 1,003 1,003 1,003 7 408400 Adrian & Rosa Formisano V 1,287 1,287 1,287 _ V 7 408500 Ann Pellitied. ~ 459 459 459 V 7 408502 Tracey Van Wylick _ 89 89 89 V 7 498504 Donak! & Patricia Krawec 291 291 291 V 8 498506 Tanya Mod 335 335 335 * V 6 408600 Gordan & Melissa MacLeod 3,678 3,678 1,226 2,452 V 6 408700 Robert & Nancy Collucci 353 353 353 V 5 408809 Vincent & Brenda Barry 344 344 344. V 5 408900 Donald & Debra Devlin 874 874_ 874 * V 5 409000 Amy Brunning & Michael Lynch. 432 432 144 288 V 5 409100 Peter Wilson 432. 432 432 V 5 409200 Bruce & Gail Jacobs 442 442 44'2 VI 4 416800 Everrett & Sharon Friskie 283 283 283 V,VI 5,6 416700 Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authori 1,968 1,966 1,966 17 & 18 494000 Canadian Nia ara Power Com an 400 400 400. Total Assessments on Lands 174,882 174,882 12 648 18,500 143,734 QEW MTO 28,922 28,022 28,922 Willoughby Drive City of Niagara Falls 3,167 3,167 3,167 Sodom Road(Region Rd 11 Region of Niagara 13,192 13,192 13,192 Ort Road City of Niagara Falls 5,967 5,967 -5,967 Stanley Avenue City of Niagara Falls 2,287 2,287 . 2,287 King Road City of Niagara Falls 1,009 1,909 1,009 Bedc Road City of Niagara Falls 265 265 265 Sauer Road City of Niagara Falls 423 -423 423 Sherk Road City of Niagara Falls 2,443 2,443 2,443 Bossert Road City of Niagara Falls 8,979 8,979 &979 Detenbeck Road City of Niagara Falls 5,510 5,510 5,510 Marshall Road City of Niagal'a,F.alls 6,783 6,783 8,7~ Miller Road City of Niagara-Falls 7,185 ..„ -- 7x1.85 _: - 7,185: Weaver Road City of Niagara Falls 4,208 , 4,20$_. ., 4,2~ ~Ilick Road City of Niagara Falls 33 33 33 Lsmon Rcad Cit o4 Nia ara Falls 45 45- .. - 45. Total Assessments on Roads: 89,518 89,518 - 89,518 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS ON THE UNION MARSH DRAIN 264,400 264,400 12,648 . 18,500 233,252 Notes: 1. All of the above lands are classlried as non-agricultural, except theme as noted with an asterisk (*) which are rated agricultu2l. Rafar also to page 12 in 2. Section 21 of the Oreinage Act, RSO 1990 requires that assessments be shown opposite each parcel of land and road aRected. The affected parcels of lend have been ident~ed using the roll numherfrom the Wst.revised assessment roll for the City. For convenience only, the owner's names as shown by the last revised assessment tall, has also been included. GENERAL and STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS for Construction of the UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls Region of Niagara January 30, 2006 File No. 03-039 :'-. - K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED Kitchener Englehart Sudbury F:103-0391Report~Fina1103-039-Report Specs.DOC PART E GENERAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS E. General Conditions E.1 Scope E.2 Tenders E.3 Examination of Site, Plans and Specifications E.4 Payment E.5 Final Inspection E.6 Commencement and Completion of Work E.7 Alterations and Additions E.8 Supervision E.9 Maintenance E.10 Contractor's Responsibility for Damages E.11 Liability Insurance E.12 Access to Properties Adjoining the Work E.13 Limitations of Operations E.14 Losses Due to Acts of Nature Etc. E.15 Sub-Contractors E.16 Character and Employment of Workman E.17 Road Crossings E.18 Laneways E.19 Fences E.20 Livestock, Etc. E.21 Standing Crops E.22 Surplus Gravel E.23 Permits, Notices, Laws and Rules E.24 Locations of Existing Utilities E.25 Railways, Highways and Utilities E.26 Termination of Contract by Municipality E.27 Errors and Unusual Conditions E.28 Excess Tile E.29 Replacement of Stakes E.30 Drainage Superintendent E.31 Tests E.32 Opening of Finished Work E.33 Notices Re Commencement of Work E.34 Municipality E.35 Definitions E.36 Cold Weather E.37 Working Area . E.38 Access E.39 Riprap E.40 Filter Fabric (Geotextile) E.41 Cleaning Up Before Acceptance E.42 Liquidated Damages F:\03-0391ReportlFina1103-039-Report Specs.DOC Part E -General Conditions E. GENERAL CONDITIONS Page 1 E.1 SCOPE The work to be done under this specification consists of supplying all labour, materials, equipment, etc., to construct the work as outlined on the accompanying drawings, in the estimate of quantities and on the form of Tender. E.2 TENDERS Tenders are to be submitted on a lump sum basis for the complete works or a portion thereof, as instructed by the Municipality. The Schedule with the Form of Tender must be completed and submitted with the Tender even though the Contract will be lump sum. A deposit as outlined in the Instructions to Tenders in the form of a certified cheque payable to the Municipality must - accompany each tender as a guarantee of good faith. All certified cheques, except that of the bidder to whom the work is awarded, will he returned within 10 days of the time the contract is awarded. The certified cheque of the Tenderer awarded the work will be returned with the Completion Certificate for the work or will be retained until the successful Tenderer filrnishes a Performance Bond and/or Labour and Materials Bond for 100% of the amount of the tender or other satisfactory security;. if required by the Municipality: A Performance Bond maybe required to insure completion of the work and maintenance of the work for a period of one year after the date of the Completion Certificate. E.3 EXAMINATION OF SITE, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The tenderer must examine the premises and site to compare them With the plans and specifications in order to satisfy himself of the existing conditions and the extent of the work to be done before submission of his tender. No allowances shall be made on behalf of the Contractor by reason of any error on his part. Any estimates. of quantities shown or indicated on the plan or elsewhere in the contract documents are provided-for the convenience of the Tenderer. Any use made of these quantities by the Tenderer in calculating his tender shall be done at his own risk. The tenderer for his own protection should check these quantities for accuracy. The tenderer must satisfy himself that he understands the meaning and intent of the plans and specifications before. submission of his tender.. In case of any inconsistency or conflict between the plans and specifications the following order of precedence shall apply: Form of Tender, Addenda, Special Provisions, Contract Drawings, Standard Specifications, General Conditions. E.4 .PAYMENT Progress payments in cash equal to about 80% of the value of the work done and materials incorporated in the work will be made to the Contractor monthly on the written request of the Contractor to the Engineer. An additiona117% will be paid 37 days after the final acceptance by the Engineer and 3% of the contract price may be reserved by the Municipality for one year. A. greater percentage of the contract price may be reserved by the Municipality. for the ;same period if in the: opinion of the Engineer, particular conditions of the contract require such.. greater holdbacl4:. Q#'ter the completion of the work; any part of this reserve may be used to correct ,defects developed within that time: from faulty workmanship and material and loose backfill, provided-that notice shall first be given to the Contractor and that he shall have the opportunity to make good such defects, himself if he desires, and within seven (7) days if so directed by the Engineer. F:103-039ULeport~Puiafl03-039-Report Specs.DOC103/01!06 Part E -General Conditions Page 2 E.5 FINAL INSPECTION Final inspection by the Engineer will be made within twenty (20) days after receiving notice in writing from the Contractor that work is complete, or as soon thereafter as weather conditions permit. All the work included in the contract must at the time of fmat inspection have the full dimensions and cross-sections. Prior to commencing the final inspection an on-site meeting maybe held with the landowners directly affected by the construction of the drain. The Contractor will be requested to attend this meeting upon written notice by the Engineer. E.6 COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION OF WORK The work must commence immediately after the Contractor is notified of the acceptance of his tender or at a later date, if set out as a condition of the tender. ff weather and ground conditions are unsuitable, work maybe started at a later date from either of these two dates if such delay is approved by the Engineer. The work must be proceeded with in such manner as to ensure its completion at the earliest possible date consistent with first class workmanship and within the time limit set out in the tender or in the contract documents. Failure to commence or complete the work as set out in the Form of'1"ender may result in a forfeiture of all or part of the Certified Cheque if the- Engineer deems that damages have been sustained to the Municipality or to any landowner because of the non-commencement ornon-completion of the contract as awarded and that the failure to meet the specified dates has been the fault of the Contractor. E.7 ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS The Engineer shall have the power to make alterations in the work as shown or de§cribed in the drawings or specifications and the Contractor shall proceed to make such changes without causing delay. In every~such case, the price agreed to be paid for the work under the contract shall be increased or decreased as the case may require according to a fair and reasonable evaluation of the work added or omitted. Where such changes involve work additional and similar to items in the main contract, the price agreed to be paid-shall be determined` after due consideration has been given to the ratio of the tendered amount to the Engineer's estimate of the contract. Such alterations and variations shall in no way render void the contract. No claims for variations or alterations in the increased or decreased price shall be valid unless done in pursuance of an order from the Engineer and notice of such claims made in writing before commencement of such work. In no case shall the Contractor commence work which he considers to be extra work before receiving the Engineer's approval. E.8 The Contractor shall give the work his constant supervision and shall keep a competent foreman in charge at the site. E.9 MAINTENANCE The Contractor shall repair and make goad any damages or faults in the drain that mayappear within one year after its completion (as evidenced by the fmal payment certificate) because of imperfect or defective work done ormaterials furnished if certified'bythe Engineer as being due - to one or-both of these causes; but nothing herein contained shall-tie construed as in any way restricting or limiting the liability ofthe Contractor under the laws of the country, province or locality in which the work is being done. Neither the final certificate nor payment thereunder, nor any provision in the contract documents shall relieve the Contractor from this responsibility. F:W3.0391ReportlF'vtaa03-039-Report Spece.DOCW3lOl/06 Part E -General Conditions Page 3 E.10 CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBII,ITY FOR DAMAGES The Contractor, his agents and alI workmen and persons employed by him or under his control, including Sub-Contractors, shall use due care that no person or property is injured and that no rights are infringed in the prosecution of the work, and the Contractor shall be solely responsible for all damages by whomsoever clannable in respect of any injury to persons or to lands, buildings, structures, fences, livestock, trees, crops, roadways, ditches, drains and watercourses, whether natural or artificial, or properly of whatever description and in respect of any infringement of any right, privilege or easement whatever occasioned in the carrying on of the work or any part thereof, or by any neglect, misfeasance or non-feasance on the Contractor's part or on the part of any of his agents, workmen or persons employed by him or under his control including Sub-Contractors, and shall bear the full cost thereof and shall at his own expense make such temporary provisions as maybe necessary to ensure the avoidance of any such damage, injury or infringement and to prevent the interruption of or danger or menace to the traffic in any railway or any public or private road entrance or sidewalk and to secure to all persons and corporations the uninterrupted enjoyment of all their rights, in and during the performance of the work and the Contractor shall indemnify and save harmless the Municipality from and against all claims, demands, loss, costs, damages, actions, suits or other proceedings by whomsoever made, brought or prosecuted in any manner based upon, occasioned by, or attributed to any such damage, injury or infringement. Wherever any work is of such an extent and nature that it must necessarily be confined to particular areas of a roadway, a working area, or private property, the Contractor shall use reasonable care.not to damage or deface the remaining portions of the property, and if any damage is occasioned as a result of the Contractor's operations, it shall be rectif ed by the Contractor at his own expense, to the satisfaction of the Engineer. Notwithstandirsg the indemnity provisions contained in this section, where in the opinion of the Engineer the Contractor has failed to rectify any damage, injury or infringement or has failed to adequately compensate any person for any damage, injury or infringement for which the Contractor is responsible under the contract, the Engineer, following notice in writing to the Contractor of his intention so to do, may withhold payment of any monies due the Contractor under this or any other contract until the Contractor has rectified such damage, injury or infringement or has paid adequate compensation for such damage, injury or infringement, provided however, that the Municipality will not withhold such monies where in the opinion of the Engineer there are reasonable grounds upon which the Contractor denies liability for such damage, injury or infringement and the Contractor has given the claimant a reasonable time in which to establish the validity of his claim, and provided further that the amount withheld under this section shall not exceed the amount of such claims against the Contractor. Where the Contractor uses privately owned lands for pits or waste disposal areas, the Contractor shall provide the Engineer with a release signed by or on behalf of the owner of each pit or waste disposal area used by the Contractor. If the said release is not obtained, then sufficient monies will be withheld from t1te..Contractor except, however, where the owner's signature is withheld solely on the basis of damage, injury, or infringement it will be dealt with as provided elsewhere in this subsection.- E.11 LIABII..ITY INSURANCE. ' The Contractorshall take out and keep in force until the date of acceptance of the entire work by the Engineer, a comprehensive policy of public liability and property damage insurance providing insurance coverage of at least $3,000,000 for each and every accident, exclusive of interest and cost, against loss or damage resulting from bodily injury to or death of one or more persons and loss of or damage to property and such policy shall where, and as requested. by the Municipality, name the Municipality as an additional insured thereunder and shall protect the F:103-039~Rapmt~F'malW3.039-&epott specs.DOCW3/01/06 Part E -General Conditions Page 4 Municipality against all claims for all damage or injury including death to any person or persons and for damage to any property of the Municipality or any other public or private property resulting from or arising out of any act or omission on part of the Contractor or any of his servants or agents during the execution of the Contract. E.12 ACCESS TO PROPERTIES ADJOINING THE WORK The Contractor shall provide at all times and at his own expense, adequate pedestrian access to private homes and commercial establishments unless otherwise authorized by the Engineer. Where interruptions to access have been authorized by the Engineer, reasonable notice shall be given by the Contractor to the affected property owners and such interruptions shall be arranged so as to create a minimum interference to those affected. E.13 LIlVIITATIONS OF OPERATIONS Except for such work as maybe required by the Engineer to maintain the works in a safe and satisfactory condition, the Contractor shall not carry on his operations under the contract on Sundays, or Statutory Holidays, without permission in writing of the Engineer. The Engineer may, in writing, require the Contractor to cease or limit his operations under the contract, on any day or days if the operations aze of such a nature, or if the work is so located, or if the traffic is of such a volume that the Engineer deems it necessary or expedient so to do. E.14 LOSSES DUE TO ACTS OF NATURE. ETC. All damage, loss, expense and delay incurred or experienced by the Contractor in the prosecution of the work; by reason of unanticipated difficulties, bad weather, strikes, wars, acts of God, or other mischances, shall be borne by the Contractor and shall not be-the subject of a claim for additional compensation: E.15 SUB-CONTRACTORS If the municipality so' directs, the Contractor shall not sublet the whole or any part of this contract without the approval of the Engineer. E.16 CHARACTER AND EMPLOYMENT OF WORKMAN The Contractor shall employ only orderly, competent and skillful men to do the work and shall give preference to available residents in the area of the contract. Whenever the Engineer shall inform him in writing that any man or men on the work aze, in the opinion of the Engineer, incompetent, unfaithful, or disorderly, such a man or men shall be discharged from the work and shall not again be employed on the work without the consent in writing of the Engineer. E.17 ROAD CROSSINGS All road crossings maybe made with an open cut unless otherwise noted. Open cut trenches are to be excavated in accordance with OPSD 802.010. The exact location of the crossing shall be verified and approved by the Road Authority or the Engineer. A one hundred & fifty (150) millimetre depth of pit run gravel, well compacted shall be placed as a base for each pipe crossing if required on the drawings. The pipe shall be backfrlled with a granular material for the width of the travelled portion plus one (1) metre on either side. The material shall be placed in lifts not exceeding three hundred (300) millimetres in depth and shall be thoroughly compacted with an approved type mechanical vibrating compactor where so required by the Engineer. The top one hundred & fifty (ISO) millimetres ofthe roadway backfill shall consist of a crushed granular material meeting the specifications of the Ministry of Transportation and Communications for Granular "A" material. Existing asphalt or concrete pavement, if any, shall not be replaced by the Contractor unless noted differently on the plan. The Contractor shall be responsible, however, for subsequent uneven joints in the pavement due to settling of the backfill. The Contractor should arrange with a local resident to-keep the crossing in repair if F:103-0391Report~FioaI103.039-Report Specs.DOC~03/01/06 Part E -General Conditions Page 5 unable to do such personally. A small load of Granular "A" gravel at the side of the road maybe advisable so that if any settlement does occur, the local resident can add some additional gravel. All road crossings shall meet the approval of the Road Authority. If any road crossing is not left in a safe manner at the end of the working day, such barricades, etc., shall be erected to guarantee the safety of the travelling public. A Road Authority will supply no labour, equipment or materials for the construction of the road crossing, with the sole exception of patching an existing asphalt surface and except where pipe on the contract is supplied by the Municipality. The excavated material removed from the travelled portion of the road and one (1) metre or the full width of the gravelled shoulder, whichever is greater, on each side of the travelled portion shall be removed. Excavated material maybe spread on the right-of--way with consent of the Municipal Road Superintendent and the balance shall be levelled equally on the private lands on each side of the road. If the Engineer deems a gravel. road to have been damaged by the construction of a drain, either across. or along the said road, the Engineer may direct the Contractor to supply and place sufficient crushed granular materials on the roadway to restore it to a safe and passable condition at no additional cost. Maintenance of Traffic If at all possible, the Contractor shall keep the road open to traffic at all times. The Contractor shall provide suitable warning signs and/or flagmen to the satisfaction of the Road Superintendent to notify motorists of work on the road ahead. If necessary to close the road to through traffic,. the Contractor shall provide for and adequately sign the detour route. If a detour is required, the Contractor shall submit a proposal as to the details of the detour to, and for approval by, the Road Superintendent, Any signing, barricades, traffic control shall be done in accordance with any specifications of the Municipality. Contractor shall undertake all notifications required for a road closure in consultation with the Municipality. E.18 ~ LANEWAYS _ All pipe crossing laneways shall be backfilled with material that is clean, free of foreign material or frozen particles and readily tamped or compacted in place. Laneway culverts on open ditch projects shall be backfilled with material that also is not easily erodible while gravel laneway culverts on closed drain projects shall be backfilled such that the upper six hundred (600} millimetres of material consists of four hundred & fifty (450} millimetres of pit run granular material and one hundred & fifty (150} millimetres of crushed granular material. All backfill materials shall be thoroughly compacted if directed by the Engineer. The backfill on access culverts (between buildings and the road} shall be surfaced with a minimum of one hundred & fifty (150} millimetres of crushed granular material. All backf~ll materials shall be thoroughly compacted if directed by the Engineer. AlI granular surface materials shall 6e placed. to the full width of the travelled portions. Any settling of backf~ll material shall be repaired by or at the expense of the Contractor during the warranty period of the project and as soon as required. Any existing bituminous pavement on laneways shall be replaced to its original condition by the Contractor at no additional cost. No less than a fifty (50) millimetre thickness of Hot Mix Asphalt shall be applied. F:~03-~79~ReportlFinet\03-Q39-Report Specs.DOC103/01/O6 Part E -General Conditions Page 6 E.19 FENCES No earth is to be placed against fences. All fences removed by a Contractor are to be replaced in as good a condition as existing materials permit. Where practical and where required by the landowner, the Contractor shall take down an existing fence at the nearest anchor post and roll the fence back rather than cutting the fence and attempting to patch it. The replacement of the fences shall be done to the satisfaction of the Engineer or Superintendent. Any fences found in such poor condition that replacement is not possible shall be noted and verified with the Engineer or Superintendent prior to commencement of work. Where directed by the Engineer, additional steel posts shall be placed to adequately support a fence upon re-erection. All fences shall be properly stretched and fastened. Where the Engineer directs that new fencing material be erected, additional payment will be provided. Any fences paralleling an open drain, that are not line fences, that hinder the proper working of the excavating machinery shall be removed and rebuilt by the landowner at his own expense. If such parallel fences are line fences they shall be removed and rebuilt by the Contractor. E.20 LIVESTOCK. ETC. If any construction will be within a fenced field containing Iivestock or other customary farm animals or fowl, (hereafter referred to as livestock, etc.) that are evident or have been-made known to-the Contractor, the Contractor shall notify the owner or attendant of the field or livestock, etc., thirty-six (36) hours in advance of his entrance into the field. Thereafter, the owner or attendant shall be responsible for the protection and damage to all livestock, etc., on said property during construction and shall also be liable for any damages causedbp such livestock, etc. Where the owner or attendant so directs or where the Contractor has failed to reach the owner or attendant, the Contractor shall adequately re-erect all fences at the end of each working day and shall have any open trench backfilled within seventy-two (72) hours including weekends and statutory holidays. In all cases the trench shall be backfilled within seven (7) days. Failure of the Contractor to notify or to attempt to notify the owner or attendant, or failure of the Contractor to erect the fencing or to backfill the trench as described in this paragraph shall render the Contractor responsible for the protection of or damage to livestock, etc., on the property and the damage they may cause. Where livestock maybe encountered on any property the Contractor shall notify the Engineer promptly so that arrangements may 6e made to inspect the drainage works before the time required for backfilling. E.21 STANDING CROPS The Contractor shall not be held responsible for damages to standing crops along the course of the drain with the exception of those crops ready to be harvested or salvaged, that are damaged by the placing and levelling of soil from an open drain and about which the Contractor has failed to, or has not attempted to, notify the owner forty-eight (48) hours prior to commencement of the excavation on that portion. E.22 SURPLUS GRAVEL If as a result of any work granular gravel or crushed stone is required and not all the gravel or crushed stone is used in the construction ofthe works, the Contractor shall haul away such surplus gravel or stone. This does not apply to a road crossing where surplus gravel is to be Left to allow for building up the trench after a settlement occurs. E.23 1'ERIVIITS. NOTICES, LAWS AND RULES The Contractor shall apply and pay for all necessary permits or licenses required for the execution of the work (but this shall not include the obtaining of permanent easements or rights or servitude). The Contractor shall give allnecessary notices and pay all fees required by the law F:103-0391Report~Fim1103A39-Report SpewDOC\03/01/06 Part E -General Conditions Page 7 and comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations relating to the work and to the preservation of the public's health and safety and if the specifications and drawings are at variance therewith, any resulting additional expense incurred by the Contractor shall constitute an addition to the contract price. E.24 LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES The position of pole lines, conduits, watermains, sewers and other underground and overground utilities and structures is not necessazily shown on the Contract plans and drawings, and, where shown, the accuracy of the position of such utilities and structures is not guaranteed. Before starting work, the Contractor shall have all utilities within road allowances and on private lands located. All utilities shall be exposed to the satisfaction of the utility company to verify that the construction proposed will not conflict with the utility structure. Additional payment will be allowed for relocation of utilities if conflicts should occur. Additional cost for utility relocation will be assessed to the utility company under Section 26 of the Drainage Act. The Contractor is responsible for protecting all located and exposed utilities from damage during construction. The Contractor shall assume liability for damage caused to all properly located utilities. E.25 RAII.,WAYS.I3IGHWAYS AND UTII.ITIES A minimum of forty-eight (48}hours notice in writing to any Railway's Division Engineer, MTO's District Engineer, or any Utility Company, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and Holidays, is required by the Contractor prior to any work being performed on or affecting the applicable property and in the case of a pipe being installed by open cutting or boring, a minimum of seventy-two (72) hours notice is required. E.26 TERMINATION OF CONTRACT BY THE MUNICIPALITY If the Contractor should be adjudged bankrupt; or if he should make a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed on account of his insolvency or if he should refuse or fail to supply enough properly skilled workmen or proper materials after having received seven (7) days notice in writing from the Engineer to supply such, additional workmen or materials in order to commence or complete the works, or if he should fail to make prompt payment to sub-contractors or for materials or labour or persistently disregard laws, ordinances, or instruction of the Engineer, or otherwise be guilty of a substantial violation of the provisions of the contract, then the Municipality, upon Certificate of the Engineer that sufficient cause exists to justifysuch action, may without prejudice to any other right or remedy, by giving the Contractor written notice, terminate the employment of the Contractor and take possession of the premises, and of ali materials, tools and appliances thereon, and may fmish the work by whatever method the Municipality may deem expedient, but without undue delay or expense. In such case, the Contractor shall not be entitled to receive any further payment until the work is finished. If the unpaid balance of the contract price will exceed the expense of finishing the work. including compensation to the Engineer for his additional services and including other damages of every name andnature, such excess shall be paid to the Contractor. If such expense will exceed such unpaid balance including.the certified-cheque deposit as._provided for by:E.2,:the Contractor shall pay the difference to the-1Vluncipakity, The expense incurred by the Municipalityri as,:herein provided, shalhbe certified by the Engineer. If the contract is terminated by the Municipality due to the Contractor's failure to properly commence the works, the Contractor shall forfeit the certified cheque bid deposit and furthermore shall pay to the Municipality an amount to. cover the increased costs, if any, associated with a new tender for the contract being terminated. F:\03-039uteportlFimR07-039-Report SpecaDOCM3/01/06 Part E -General Conditions Page S If any unpaid balance and the certified cheque do not equal the monies owed by the Contractor upon the termination of the contract, the Municipality may also charge such expenses against any money which is or may thereafter grow due to the Contractor from the Municipality. E.27 ERRORS AND UNUSUAL CONDITIONS The Contractor shall notify the Engineer immediately of any error or unusual conditions which maybe found. Any attempt by the Contractor to correct the error on his own shall be done at his own risk. Any additional cost inctitred by the Contractor to remedy a wrong decision on his part shall be borne by the Contractor. The Engineer shall make the alteration necessary to correct errors or to adjust for unusual conditions. The contract amount shall be adjusted in accordance with a fair evaluation of the work added or deleted. E.28 EXCESS TILE If the file is supplied by the Municipality, the Contractor shall stockpile all excess file in one readily accessible location for pickup by the Municipality at the end of the job. ~If the file is supplied by the Contractor he shall remove all excess file from the job site. E.29 REPLACEMENT OF STAKES The Contractor shall be held liable for the cost of replacing any stakes or bench marks destroyed during the course of construction. The drainage area shall be liable for the cost of replacing stakes prior to construction. E.30 DRAINAGE SUPERINTENDENT Where a Drainage Superintendent is appointed by the Municipality, the Drainage Superintendent will act as the Engineer's representative. The Superintendent shall have the power to direct the execution of the work and to make any necessary minor adjustments. Any instructions given by the Superintendent, which changes considerably the proposed work or with which the Contractor does not agree, shall be referred to the Engineer for his decision. E.31 TESTS The cost of testing materials, supplied to the job by the Contractor, shall be borne by the Contractor. The cost of testing materials, supplied to the job by the Municipality, shall be borne by the Municipality. The Engineer reserves the right to subject any lengths of any tile or pipe to a competent testing laboratory to ensure the adequacy of the tile. If any file or pipe supplied by the Contractor is determined to be inadequate'to meet the applicable A.S.T.M. Standards, the Contractor shall bear full responsibility to remove and/or replace all such inadequate file or pipe on the contract with file or pipe capable of meeting the A.S.T.M. Standards. E.32 OPENING UP OF FINISHED WORK If ordered by the Engineer, the Contractor shall make such openings in the work as are needed to re-examine the work, and-shall forthwith make the work good again. Should the Engineer find the work so opened up to be faulty in any respect, the whole of the expense of opening, inspecting and making°good shall be- borne by the Conti•aetor and should the Engiieer<-find the work opened iip to be in an acceptance condition; such expense will be borne liy the Municipality, unless the Contractor has been obligated` by any specification to leave the work open for the Engineer's inspection. E.33 NOTICES RE COMMENCEMENT OF' WORK The Contractor shall give the Engineer and Superintendent a minimum .of twenty-four (24) hours advance notice before commencement of work on any municipal drain. If the Contractor leaves the job site for a period of time after initiation of work, he shall give the Engineer and F:103A79VtepoR~FiveR03.039-Report Specs.DOC103/OIN6 Part E -General Conditions Page 9 Superintendent a minimum of twenty-four (24) hours advance notice prior to returning to the contract. If any work is commenced without the advance notice the Contractor shall be fully responsible for all such work undertaken prior to such notification and shall make good any works or materials used judged to be inadequate or constructed in any manner that may have been subject to alteration if made known to the Engineer prior to commencement of construction. E.34 MUNICIPALITY Municipality refers to a municipal corporation in the Province of Ontario. Where reference to Township, County, Region, Town, or Owner appears in the specifications it shall be deemed to the be same as the word Municipality. Where reference to owner appears in the specifications it is usually in reference to the owner of the property on which the drain is being constructed. E.35 DEFINITIONS i) M.T.O. means the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario. ii) A.S.T.M. means the American Society for Testing Materials. iii) C.S.A. means the Canadian Standard Association. iv) O.P.S.D, means Ontario Provincial Standard Drawings v) O.P.S.S. means Ontario Provincial Standard Specifications E.36 COLD WEATHER When work is permitted or ordered by the Engineer to be done in cold weather; the Contractor shall provide suitable means for heating and protection, and all the materials shall be heated and protected., Unless the Engineer directs otherwise; all work such as masonry, concrete and painting that maybe injured by frost, and which cannot be satisfactorily completed;; shall be put in a proper and satisfactory condition, and shall be protected from damage by frost: Unless otherwise specified, the cost of such protection shall be borne by the Contractor. All backfilling operations shall be done as soon as possible to avoid backfilling with.ground containing frozen particles. The Contractor will assume all responsibility for damages to-any the drains and for settlements or bank slippages that may result from work in cold weather. E.37 WORKING AREA Where any part of the drain is on a road allowance, the road allowance shall be the working area. For a.closed drain the working area shall be a ten (10) metre width on either side of the trench or any combination not exceeding twenty (20) metres. For an open drain the working area shall be twelve (12) metres on the side for levelling and three (3) metres on the opposite side If any part of the drain is close to a property line then the fence line shall be one of the limits of the work area. Restricted or increased working areas will be described in detail on the drawings. E.38 ACCESS The Contractor shall have access to the drain by entering the working area directly from road allowances or along access routes shown on the plan. All specifications governing.fences, livestock and crops during drain construction shall apply to access routes. No other access routes shall be.-used unless first approved. by the Engineer and the affected landowner. The Contractor shall contact each owner prior to. using the designated access routes. Contractor shall make good any damages caused by using the designated access routes. E.39 RIPRAP All riprap is to be placed on a filter fabric underlay (Mirafi P25Q is suggested) unless directed otherwise in the specific construction notes. Along upstream edges of riprap, where surface water will enter, underlay is to extend a minimum of 300mm upstream from riprap and then be keyed down a minimum of 300mm. The riprap is to be graded heavy angular stone (quarry stone is recommended) with particles averaging in size from 225mm to 300mm and is to be placed at F:\03A39uteport\Fioa1103-039•Report Specs.DOC103l01/06 Part H -General Conditions Page 10 300mm thickness. Sufficient fine particles aze to be included to fill voids. Wherever riprap is placed, the area is to be overdug so that finished top of riprap is at design cross-section, at design elevation or flush with existing ground. E.40 FILTER FABRIC (GEOTEXTILE) To be non-woven fabric that is rot proof, non-biodegradable, chemically resistant to acidic or alkaline soils and is dimensionally stable under different hydraulic conditions. The filter fabric is to be a material whose primary function is to act as a highly permeable, non-clogging soil sepazator for fine soils. Contractor is to'avail himself of manufacturer's recommendations for cutting, installation and precautions necessary to avoid damage to fabric. MIRAFI filter fabric is available from: Coldstream Concrete Ltd., Ilderton, ON (519) 666-0604 Other approved equals will be considered by the Engineer prior to construction. E.41 CLEANING UP BEFORE ACCEPTANCE Before any work shall be finally accepted by the Municipality; the Contractor shall make such replacements of improper materials and such corrections of faulty workmanship as have been directed by the Engineer and da such+trilnnling and disposal of rubbish and surplus materials as to leave the work neat and presentable. E.42 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES It is agreed by the parties to the Contract that in case- all the work called for under the Contract is not finished or complete within the period of time as set forth in the Tender Documents, damage will be sustained by the Municipality and that it is andwill-lie impractidable-and extremely difficultto ascertain and determine the actual damage which the Municipality will sustain in the event of and by reason of such delay and the parties hereto agree that the Contractor will pay to the Municipality a sum, if any is set out in the Form of Tender and Agreement for liquidated damages for each and every calendar day's delay; including Saturdays, Spndays and Statutory Holidays, in finishing the work in excess of the number of working daysprescribed, and it is agreed that this amount is an estimate of the actual damage to the Municipality which will accrue during the period in excess of the prescribed number of working days. The Municipality may deduct any amount due under this paragraph from any monies'that may be due or payable to the Contractor on any account whatsoever. The liquidated damages payable . under this paragraph are in addition to and without prejudice to any other remedy, action or other alternative that maybe available to the Municipality. The Contractor shall not be assessed with liquidated damages for any delay caused by Acts of God, or of the Public Enemy, Acts of the Province or of any Foreign State, Fue, Flood,. Epidemics, Quarantine Restrictions, Embargoes or any delays of Sub-Contractors due to such causes. If the time available for the completion of the work is increased or decreasedby reaso~of alterationsdr changes made underthe General Conditions; the nulnlier of workiirg days shall be increased or decreased as determined by the Engineer: - If the Form of Tender and Agreement do not show an amount for Liquidated Damages then Liquidated Damages do not apply for this contract. F.1 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR OPEN DRAINS TABLE OF CONTENTS F.1.1 Description F.1.2 Materials F.1.3 Construction t F.1 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR OPEN DRAINS F.1.1 DESCRIPTION Work under this item shall include supply of all labour, equipment and materials required for the clearing of all trees, roots, bush debris, the excavation of all open channels, the levelling or disposal as directed of all spoil, the cutting and re-erection of all fences, the construction of all roadway and laneway crossings required, the reconstruction of all intercepted drains as required, the supply and placement of all riprap protection required and all other items indicated in the Estimate of Quantities or shown on the drawings as being part of the Open Drain Portion. F.1.2 MATERIALS A) Corrugated Steel Pine, Corrugated Steel Pipe (CSP) shall be fabricated from steel coils with ahot-dipped aluminum coating for extended lifespan -Aluminized Steel Type 2 fmish. The pipe shall be helically corrugated for improved hydraulics, fabricated with alock-seam and shall be supplied with re- rolled annular ends. If required, any individual pipe sections shall be coupled with aluminized 2 piece, 1.6mm, 10 C annular corrugated standard bolt and angle couplers. Aluminized CSP shall comply with the following standards/specifications: CSA G401- 93 Corrugated Steel Pipe Products, ASTM A929 and A760, AASHTO Specification M274 and M36 and shall be to the diameters/length(s) indicated on the drawings. Unless otherwise specified, the CSP shall be supplied with a 68mm x 13mm corrugation profile for diameters up to 1000mm and a 125mm x 25mm corrugation profile for diameters 1200mm and larger. Unless otherwise specified, the CSP shall be supplied with a minimum wall thickness of 1.6mm for diameters up to SOOmm and 2.Omm for diameters 600mm and larger. B) Concrete Concrete shall be twenty (20) mega Pascal (mpa) concrete premixed. C) Stone for Riprap Riprap stone is to be graded, heavy angular stone (quarry stone is recommended) with particles averaging in size from 225mm to 300mm. Smaller stone particles can be included to fill voids. The stone is to be free of earth materials or any other rubbish or debris. F.1.3 CONSTRUCTION A) Stakes Stakes were set along the course of the drain at intervals of twenty-five (25) metres during the survey. The Contractor shall ensure that the stakes are not disturbed unless approval is obtained from the Engineer. If the Contractor is unable to locate any stakes along the drain, the Contractor shall clear, if necessary, a path for re-staking and contact the Engineer with regard to re-staking the drain. B) Excavation The bottom width and the side slopes of the ditch shall be as shown on the profile drawing. Side slopes are normally one and one-half metre horizontal to one metre vertical (1.5:1) unless otherwise noted on the profile drawing and/or cross sections. At locations along the drain where the specified side slopes change, a transitional length of not less than Sm between the varying side. slope profiles shall be constructed. Bottom widths may vary with the size of the upstream watershed. At locations along the drain where the specified bottom width changes, a transitional length of not less than 10:1 (Sm length to O.Sm width differential) between the varying bottom widths shall be constructed. In all cases, the transitional distance between varying bottom widths and side slopes shall be tapered over these minimum lengths to form a F:103-0391ReportlFina1103-039-Report Specs.DOC F.1 -Open Drain Specifications Page 2 smooth transition between the 2cross-sections. Where the bottom width of the existing ditch is sufficient to permit the required width excavation to be completed without disturbing existing banks (bottom cleanout), subject to the clearing of the channel cross-section as described in Section F.1.3 (F). C) Grade The profile drawing shows the depth of cuts from the ground beside the stake to the proposed ditch bottom in metres and also the approximate depth of cuts from the bottom of the existing ditch to the proposed ditch bottom. These cuts are established for the convenience of the Contractor but shall not be used for establishing grade control. Bench marks established along the course of the drain will govern the proposed grade for the ditch. The location and elevations of the bench marks are given on the profile drawings. A uniform grade shall be maintained between stakes in accordance with the profile drawing. The Contractor shall over dig the bottom by one hundred to one hundred and fifty (100-150) millimetres in depth to allow for sediment accumulation during or following excavation. A variation of twenty-five (25) millimetres from the required profile plus. over digging shall be sufficient to require the Contractor to remedy this discrepancy. D) Line.. , The drain shall be constructed in a straight line or shall follow the course of the present drain or water run except where necessary to straighten any unnecessary bends or irregularities in alignment. Where there-are such unnecessary :bends or irregularities on the existing course of the drain, the Contractor shall contact the Engineer before commencing work to verify the manner in which such irregularities or bends shall be removed from the drain. All curves shall be made with a minimum radius of fifteen (15) metres or_as specified on the drawings. E) Excavated Material Excavated material (spoil) shall be deposited on either or both sides of the drain as directed by the Engineer: Refer to the Specific Construction Notes for confumation of the designated working corridor for the Contractor's equipment -the spoil. shall be spread and leveled on the same side(s). Spoil upon excavation shall be placed a minimum one (1) metre back from the top of the bank, either existing or new. In general, the material shall be dumped on the low side of the ditch. or opposite trees and fences. No excavated material shall be placed in tributary drains, depressions, or low areas which direct or channel water into the ditch so that no water will be trapped behind the spoil bank. The excavated material shall be placed and leveled to a maximum depth of three hundred (300) millimetres; unless otherwise instructed. The edge of the spoil bank away from the ditch shall be feathered down to existing ground. The edge of the spoil bank nearest the ditch shall have a maximum slope of 2:1. Where the spoil is leveled on land currently under cultivation the material shall be leveled-such that it may be cultivated with ordinary equipment without causing undue hardship on farm machinery and faun personnel. Wherever clearing is necessary prior to leveling, the Contractor shall only grub or remove all roots where directed to do sn in the construction notes on the drawings. No excavated material shall cover any;logs, brush or r[ibbish of any kind. Large stones or boulders in the leveled spoil that are heavier than fifteen (15) kilograms shall be moved to the edge of the spoil.bank nearest.ta the. ditch but in general no closer than one (1) metre to -the top of bank. Where it is necessary to straighten any unnecessary bends or irregularities in the alignment of the ditch or to relocate any portion of an existing ditch, the excavation from the new cut shall be used for backfilling the original ditch. Regardless of the distance between the new ditch and old ditch, no extra compensation will be allowed for this work as it must be included in the Contractor's lump sum price for the ditch work. F.1 -Open Drain Specifications Page 3 If the Contractor obtains written permission from an affected landowner stating that the owner does not wish the spoil to be leveled and such is approved by the Engineer, the Engineer may release the Contractor from the obligation to level the spoil. If spoil is not leveled that was to be leveled as part of the Contract, the Engineer shall determine the credit to be applied to the Contractor's payment. No additional compensation is provided to the owner if the spoil is not leveled. The Engineer-may require the Contractor to obtain written statements from any or all of the landowners affected by the leveling of the spoil. A written statement from the owners indicating their complete satisfaction with the leveling of the spoil is sufficient to comply with this specification. The fmal decision, with respect to leveling of the spoil, shall be made by the Engineer. F) Obstruotions All trees, brush, fallen timber-and debris shall be moved from the ditch cross-section and to such a distance on each side to eliminate any interference with the spreading of the spoil. The roots shall be left in the banks if no bank excavation is required as part of the channel excavation. In wooded or heavily overgrown areas all cleared material may be pushed into piles:or rows along the edge of the cleared path and away-from leveled-spoil. All. dead trees along either side of the drain-that may impede the performanoe'bf the drain if allowed to remain and fall into the ditch, shall be removed prior to excavation and-put in piles, unless directed otherwise by`the Engineer. G) Excavation at Existing Bridge and Culvert Sites The Contractor shall excavate the drain to the full specified depth under all bridges and to the full width between abutments. Temporary bridges maybe carefully removed and left on the bank of the drain. Permanent bridges must, if at all possible, be left intact. All necessary care and precautions shall be taken to protect the structure. The Contractor shall notify the owner if excavation will expose the footings or otherwise cause the structure to undermine or collapse such that the owner may make provision for repair of the bridge. The Contractor shall clean through all pipe culverts to the `grade line and width=specified on the profile. Where the invert of any culvert is above the grade line; the Contractor will be required to dig up the culvert, clean and relay it, so that the invert of the culvert is one hundred and fifty (150) millimetres below grade for the bottom of the fmished ditch at this location: ITj Access Culverts The-size and material for any new drain crossings shall conform to Section F.12 (A) and/or as specified on the Drawings. Refer also to General Condition E.18. Unless otherwise specified, it is expected that the culvert be shop fabricated to length(s) suitable for shipping, by the manufacturer at the plant. Any crossings assembled on-site shall be assembled in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications for on-site assembly. - Wlteie a ner~ crossing replaces: an existing crossing the following shall apply: If directed on the drawings that the existing crossing is to be salvaged for the owner the Contractor shall carefully remove the existing crossing and leave along the ditch or haul to a location as specified on the Drawings. If the existing crossing is not to be saved then the Contractor-shall remove-and dispose of the existing crossing. Disposal by burying on-site must be approved by the Engineer. All new pipe crossings shall be installed a minimum of 50mm below design grade (not as-constructed grade) or at the invert elevations as specified on the Drawings. Normally the F.1 -Open Drain Specifications Page 4 degree of culvert embedment is related to the culvert diameter. If the ditch is over excavated greater than 200mm the Contractor shall confirm with the Engineer the elevations for installation of the new pipe crossing. When an existing crossing is being replaced the contractor shall save all granular and riprap. Reconstructed crossings which are substantially wider or deeper than the existing may require the use of additional approved native materials and/or imported granular B backfill. New crossings can be backfilled with compacted on-site native material that is free of large rocks or stones. Under no circumstances may rocks or aggregates with a diameter greater than 100mm be placed within 200mm of the pipe. The Contractor is responsible for any damage to a culvert pipe as a result of rocks or stones in the backfill, The excavation of the drain bottom shall be carefully shaped to receive the lower 10% of the pipe diameter, such that the pipe rests evenly on an undisturbed native soil bedding cradle. In the alternative, Granular "B" bedding material may be placed to a depth of 100 mm below the design invert of the pipe and shaped to receive the pipe. After pipe placement, approved native backfill (or Granular "B" backfill) shall be placed and compacted in maximum 300 mm thick layers equally on each side of the pipe, to the full width of the culvert. Each layer of native or granular backf 11 shall be compacted to 90% Standard Proctor Density. All new crossings shall have a minimum 6m laneway width and end slopes shall be at a 1.5:1 slope or flatter. Finished crossing elevation shall provide a minimum of 300mm pipe cover. Finished crossing surface shall_be a minimum 15Qmm depth of compacted Granular A for the minimum 6m width and extending from_top of-bank to topof banlcusing salvaged granular or imported granular as required. Granular surface will be part of the contract price for the new crossing. Further details on a culvert installation may be included on the drawings or within the construction notes on the drawings. In general, the complete culvert installation shall be done to the satisfaction of the Engineer. Installation of private crossings during construction must be approved by the Engineer before the culvert is installed. I) Road Culverts The size and material for any new road crossings shall conform to Section F.1.2 (A) and/or as specified on the Drawings. Installation should be completed to the minimum standards as described in Section F.1.3 (G) but must also meet the construction and traffic control requirements outlined in General Condition E.17. J) Rinran Protection for Culverts Where riprap protection is called for, it is required for both the upstream and downstream ends of a new culvert (unless otherwise specified) and such riprap shall be in accordance with General Condition E.39. Riprap is to be adequately keyed in along the drain bottom to a minimum depth corresponding to the culvert embedment and countersunk into both drain side slopes a minimum distance of 300mm. After backfilling/compacting the native backfill to the necessary end slope contours, the contractor shall lay a filter blanket (provide a minimum 300mm horizontal return distance at the Granular A interface) prior to placing the riprap. The riprap shall extend to the top of laneway or roadway surface or as directed on the Drawings. No riprap is required in the ditch bottom on the upstream side of a crossing. If riprap is required in the ditch bottom on the downstream side of a crossing it shall be specified on the Drawings. Any designated new end face slope not protected by riprap shall be seeded as per specifications for ditch bank seeding. F.1 -Open Drain Specifications Page 5 K) Work within a Road Allowance Any work done on the road allowance, with respect to excavation, disposal of materials, installation of culverts, cleaning under bridges, etc., shall be to the satisfaction of the Road Authority. If it is necessary to haul materials away, additional payment will be provided unless described on the plan. Where a ditch is being removed from a road allowance, it must be reconstructed wholly on the adjacent farmland with a minimum width of one (1) metre on the roadway side of the ditch, unless otherwise noted on the drawings. The excavated material shall be used to fill the existing open ditch and any excess excavated material shall be placed and levelled on the adjacent farmland. L) Tile Outlets The location of all existing file outlets may not be shown on the profile for the drain. The Contractor shall contact each owner and ensure that all file outlets are marked prior to commencing excavation on the owner's property. If a marked file outlet is damaged during or altered due to construction, the Contractor shall repair or replace the damaged or altered outlet as part of the Contact. If an existing outlet pipe is requires replacement the Contractor shall 'confirm the replacement outlet pipe with-the Engineer. Additional- payment will be allowed for the repair or replacement of any unmarked file outlets encountered during excavation. Where stone or concrete riprap protection exists at any existing file outlet such protection shall be removed and replaced as necessary to protect the outlet after reconstruction of the channel. )f any outlet becomes plugged as a result of construction; the Contractor shall be obligated to -free such outlet of any impediments. Where any damage results to file leading to and upstream of the outlet, as a consequence of such construction, the Engineermay direct the Contractor to repair such file and shall determine a fair compensation to be paid to the Contractor for performing the work. Ivi) Completion At the time of final inspection, all work in the contract shall have the full dimensions and cross-sections specified. ~ '~ 4 a a W~ ~ ~ ~ Z o ~ d ~~ ~oe,~ s~ o ~/ ~ ~m ~~~ ~ W~~ a~ "'~ N ~ ~<~ Z~~~~g l~~ y.t a ~<<j~x Y/ e ~ ~~ ~~ ~a b ~+t 8 lp'i yS@ 10T 1 S p ~ ~ tr+~ # w\ ~~ i s[ am ~[ 301 [[ SV1 i at SoT s 301 ~y - 9 ~ ~., ~ ; e~ a 1l 10'1 rl SOT 2L ~ ~ ' a s3 t[ tOt rt a wr~l 1[ JO'I 0t 101 8 SQY /Into, ai 1s ~~, Sm t SOT s SoT ~ __,_.~' ~ ~ LOl ~ 1 aal ~ ~ t 9 lOT & 301 ~ ; t9' r lOt 1 CON 2 CON 3 ~ 002-14]-00 / ~ D WILLICX ROA .. CON 4 002 751-0 1 D2-155-00 DDZ~ 702-DD 1 DDZ t8t-Do ~ DDZ-urs-DD DD2 loD-o0 I N. WEAVER 79 7 ho ODrs-We-DD~' 7- 1 . . W2-09]-00- O J 1 002-158-OS 1 002-156-04 p04-95 002-151-01 ~ 005-f3]-00 COSTA N ~ DD2-1S6-00 5832]2 ONTARIO LTO. Q N. E V E-R 3 h p .- . 20.3 h0. r 1.8 69 h D a. 6.2 ~ . - ~ DD2-IS]-Lm OOZ-158-00 g O -7 1 N. G Y O R & B. 3.8 „~ pF KARL VOSS B 9 hO. STEGMAN J 1 8.9 ha. 9.5 ha Ow-133-01 _ - p WRAVRR ROAD o0 m-DD ? 00.3_140-W COSTA F MI O D NC I 5'9 Ep~i ~ DD2-163-00 0 0 0 1 00 a P\~ P ? A LY H L IN 5 I . 20 3 ha I y 23 1 hos p p=j -0 f+D58~~ ~ ~j c . . . 005-ui-DD ~ I ~ E`'j ~ Doz-159-DD I COSTA H O C. k A. COSTA ~ Q W2_t6o ~ -DD .(, R. 23.1 htl. N 20.2 h0. - - DD2-f et- G & C fj, i . . JAMIEBON '4' rn t i ~~ ~ UD2-033-DO NIAGARA PARKS F- COMMISSION O 700.8 ha. J N O 6.4 ha. ODZ-In-m N 00]-145-00 ` ~ a: 002-18h00 1+504 ~ Dot-1 a- G. & M. E ROND ~ I'- ~ ~ ` GRAND NIAG A ~ ~ LEGENDS ES ATE tJ~ I ~ ® ~ O J AU 39.B ho. ,.~ ^~.I, E 3 A INC. 2y 4 ha. R ROAD\ ~~ -~ 003-794-00 COOD GAIN LTD. 18.7 ha. o; Owl-19,K00 ai 00]-& ~00 G LOCHER Er 77 ho 2 SZYMANSKI . . 0 ~ 17.8 ha. 7+BBS IR]3-152-m ~ 7 003-195-0D ~ WALLER ~® R. THIEL ~ ~tKIJ-te5-a1N / 17.7 hG. 7.2 h0. ~ e- ODs-7K3-DD 8. 8 ~ ~ GEL01 76E J1 O 6 ha. STOLL J 79.1 h0. --- ^t 2 3 ' A"`""'~5 / aw-133-10 J . F••!, 03-759_00 of 003-160-DO 1+961 Mr~ t+9r I n ~ n ~ n I n r.. PLAN LEGEND . ~ ~~MAN.R WATERSHED 1 BR ~OdbBW T S S ° S n i w - - -INiERME01AiE WATFASNED . NW EBR Z 3 O NEW OR flECCN91RUCiED ~-G1LN£RT LOLABON ~ ` ODZ-185-W - ~ PRDPGSED WORK ' 002-166-pp & M. WEBER ~ 002-164-01 Zl ---OiNER DRNNS Q4 WAIERCDUR9E5 22.4 htl. ~ -pEND1E5 PRI3PFRtt OWNERSHIP ON BOtH SIOEB OF LOT NNE 1 XECTARES 2.8 -APPRO% W2-I6B-02 L. KNOT-E P ~EO s z n -R LTA ES OWNED UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 . G. E R J HERRMANN F (OOx-I30-0]) -p95EG5YeENT ROLL NUMBER LIiY OF NIgGARA FANS (WILLWGHBY Tl1WN5HIP) . 36 0 Ifa O q REtlONgL MUNICIPANTY Cf NIgGARA . , . 0 N. OESIDNFD 9Y: AW uw:R 6 -0D , . p ~ e sCR~ NORTH PART OF WATERSHED JAN. 30, 2006 D?-1 9 MARSHALL ROAD 41ECKED BY: J.W.K. a4 4 n RAN/OD M _ N' W' NlMR6 ~ I f~ .roa I DD2-1]]-DO 002-1]]-DI ® 3 I ao . N WN m: .R ~~~o 0 150 .TOG GRIGWAL sGIE X. SMART A9500SATW5 L]N]TED COIIpIwiWG FA~GwEERS PND PLWIFNS uus•, D}(Np D M. N ~ CHECKED BY: C.J.h q 2 "" °"~ PW1 1:10.0m RIICHENER FNGLERMT 6UGBORf 0.VN! RNG ~a Iw. KOSANOViCH , 2 OF 17 [:\03-039\WSPUN03-m9Arg OU3R e' I3m603:3Ra M SMALL LOT LEGEND RIXL N0. NAME AREA AFFECTED A EDY-ms-m u)r ar Nu:pnA Fels xn xe ooz-ow-oo a e: R. msuEle aox-m3wD a t R mrouERD o.s D.x D.s a2 Om-IDe-m 0. R R NN1N mx-101-DO 7 a1 0.1 OA 0.; mx-Im-m Wx-IW-m a t D. NNx[.WLi 0.1 D.l ace-MC-oo u. sJRNlus am-m-oD 1 cmlRZ D.R D.o a. e.4 om-HS-m . a Y. smRNDEa pY-Ilp-m n.k 3 PNmIF 0.1 ID a0 a N69ER. E WLH pm-ixl~-m Y. a E fl-DR qe pb ODTIx360 Y. AxGt Oo}Ix]-m a zwJ.N t 3 saoeuwps .A AO e Dox-125-m RSpmS 002-12p~ A. 8 & VCU) 01 PI m2-IxR-OI R. a J WAlml OOY-Itl-m E k E. IPAM1m ).S 0.1 x.S D.t m•Jx-l•JU-De A. wlucx i OP R. Pt N N~µcIG W I B o.11 0 D.I PS R 60 2- R - ml-I]]- . ~ A ~rn .5 i B i'J p ~ cN mx-O]- mz-u}Dx w t w upcpmRln mt-I]]-O] G k R. PJRtLII . a I.) to .) mx-I]]-Ol i. t C. EdIFefE Poz-'sl-m 6 a J, iCiIXO I S 2 O I S y SYm a t 4. N&1FR I ]-m s. waOK•m~x[N ~e=,es=~ s t e ~/xuR .p ae a:a B as a~ mx-IC.-m e. a P. PAaO m2-IRS-m A, t A al.wcNRRm s a.s zl :a mx-IRS-w x. ~ a. ewm mi-1E5-eE WYEllER is .x is .x ' Mmix-IEg]-m p4 4ky Y1y. C~SIIRPE lEY-;69-00 R fECEADY~~Yµ 1.y13 ~.5 1.3 0~ R-m wtt ei III R F Dm-IJhOD G99OY6 W bE 1 0• 0 . ~ mY-IJE-m FAY9YE m1-IJn-m & )RFNCt£ 0.. 0A . Q1 al &.W miF m2-I]J-m R Se SA ~ S mAw+s R I m he ro g o ° . = : a-'L^x[ g. 0. g m]-IN-DI 4 BARI{MLl m]-lu-oo a~ (~L O.fi ae OS ae ,,,~ mh11M01 ~ x.~Y m}149-m t IErrmsMx a5 a] a5 Da se-m w: t E apmerr mhl~l-01~ 0. 8 C. fOM1FR mYl i- a L Y. P]MFRttY1 ae 0.A o.e 0.R .x m}I]]-m A k a SIYIETXIIE m]-1 h00 ~1~ 65, pF~~RW$} m}I~]-m 0. a l nIRHSON w2 q.. t 0.2 1.4 0.] m}I¢Sp]-_,7mp w gwpNA3 k R. YGXWFNCHMS 0. 0.b IN-m • L euxw s i m}TER-DD u REt1A a x. cASaRxO ~~$~=Z e't~a ~D qg. Te gagl 88 ~ m]-Iw-Y A IrtNIn~A }R , }B uwu q p Vim}}-N os n a. a. p p ~o p o]i =~ ~ w bl a ~:~ w~~ p p } D Sxp p R Ot LLI tlfMW D]}In5-x3 0 mhnNFm CINAOIA NwEIAA PO'RER CpWANY 0.0 0 17 ^ M "- EE...~ y~ `~1 °rvl ~ n $ a g ~ / _.. _. Om-t933~~00 ai OoYt4]-00 000-14fi-00 & M 0 \ ? 00x-IS5-m ~ V 002-tfi6-00 ~ SMALL LOi LECENO ~' F- ~. m3- 9-00 m B ER'S / ~ G. LOCHER 2$!7 ha. F . . m3-laero 21 SZ 6AN9KI ` mx-ISf-°I Qh'. & M. WEBER -. ~ ~ 22.4 ha. ftOLL N0. NANE ARE A AFFECTED O O PO TRY IN ~ ~ „ o ~ $ $ $ 8 8 ~ ~ P Oo3-148- m3 I5e- ' mx-le4-ol °°x-I65-m A a P. fAZw A k A ewwcAx4uo A3 zl a a s 9~d RCAd /.I~ ROAD 19.8 h° . © 0 1+9a5 - S m0- ~OOf14B- 1 2B. m2-169- 02 17 mY-lu-m 0°R-WB-m . Y. k P BALFR k It GiKLEN . a I.Y IS I 3 f / K. & S. 3- 92- I L KNOFE `- °0z-I6s-°s ¢ k u. sn9xf . ~.Y la 0°3-22z-ol om-Ins-m m i 0 ~ WALLER / / ~ 003-151-m . & ~fl~ m 6Rx a ~~° ~a ~ i ; ' ~ BAUER'S ~ ~ R. iHIEL 'OW-199-01 N 4].] h° J. HERRMANN ti - fic¢-I,Da-a6 tt x Fmuzs a s r~kx~ ' wms p ~ i N ~ POULTRY LNG H 16.2 ha. ~ k„, tea-3 !_"- ].2 ha. oa3-lu-w "'~~ AAS-ts3 I p~. 003-ISfi-00 / °OY15h """ K I ' O 66fi 36•D h°~ J mx-ns-o° WYi)p-°° -°° ° ~ vo . u. 1'~i""~ B, OiE u 10M .+ O.a u:~ ' . O~ ~ oo3-tw-a3 I .e ~ F- PI & J . ETRANGELOI ~ m3-155- 1 15 ~ 002-169-m 1 7 OAD $i iii- 66 6 °~ - n s o ' riAUermAw S IAVEN6 o:~ %i ~ J m3-184-35 opt-ISa > .... .._.00. - 4- x 6TOLLI O 16.6 h0.~ .-. _.....I , , R .. x1fARgNd o ._•~ •~°pi_ ~•. j1S 0 = 4 x ,• N9,k R. xAV3xAUa1-Nba 0. $ A¢ O - s / 003-194-46 19 J 1 he - I _I I W2-IN-ii f. k a IAxxxA x k i. xus°x 1 ria ai m3-194-42 OOY-195-00 . . _ _ - 003-150-10 ~ ' 002-m-OO Ooz-n]-m Q ~x_iss-oi i i i uiu~s ai ae 2nroo g}{55 I oo3-IB4-m I oo3-ISa-OO M. N o KO6ANONCH ~ I m3-t05-m B. e S WAISGN 0.B O.s J. ~ 1 om-161-co OW~'16P-0 and-1 0o I ooz-In 10 3 ha c m2J169-m ° ~i° o- o a H°WAW $ ui i "e6° B 0. s AB ^ AR6HALL ~ 2.9 he. / 00.}.18]-00 ~ at-la]-o ~ , °o3-Ip6- Q- ]89]02 D m I NT. LTD. 1 003-t03-m I m3-166 00 . - } -1]~-m ~002-1]t'oo F ° ° p ° mY-191-m Cm-192-°° fx lA G. tAPFH4A P. k x u59NACm 1.a if i. I.a i.~ `\ 0 m3-157-00 - mz-n _po 9.9 J. k R. O $$~-~$~0D $ 1gpII~iIWUS'$ s i o°aw i'i ~ mR &4A 0 ` c '~ ] © I F- °w-tsz-c0 ~os-ts>- I / M ] 8~M1° J °000$- ~-$~ I . $' $' ~" $xxue a:a l i 1 i i F- Q ~ RYDYGIER i O I I . mx_n2-co p>-°° Wi- A }ApM.Nf 8 C MW81 x. O J J 21 7 ha J ~ / \ __ WW,, 209 ]~aS~W m}~a6-m p. ~OB°mw6N k L iRAYFR4 ~~ pp wl 001-xx1-p5 5 HARRIS ~ ~ . . .. ~ / o t 9-Ot 3_369_ H. & L. ` 1+ 002-1A-1~ ]D8020 ONT LTD ~ °m-u6-°I ° 1 -m ~ ' °. e L e.VlltWLL c. rotxPU 5 o.6 p 5 6 A . 14 8 ha 0.6 ~' ~ ~\ ~ REINERT Oat-tae-m g® ~ 7 4 h ~ ~ oa> 'inx=w u s u°~ eiNZfnirx ai . og . ~ 3+162 Dos-oae-m f. R. & A. - \ / 16.0 hp, / 1 . a. f+435 .~------ Oal-Iw-m ms-ISIro° . , w. k 6 ewctETt a k a rox+ex °.e p6 °.a ° 6 O 1 RYDYGER ` 3.8 ~ ^' - ' 003-15fi-00 ~ ~ i ~ -t>0-t5 © a0z-ne-m ` F- 4. 5. & H. O ma-ISx-a° ss-60 0.k 4 PCUxfkipV A k ° L] ax . ) o.a ^ .- I ow-w] -m 5.4 h0. ^ TSMIIN / BARNETT ~ J mm ~~~^~ ~°T o' e ~ s } 'i ° F- O I H. ZAPP 34468 29 3 h 003-19p-00 38.6 h0. ~ °o3-PO-00 3 ] 002-188- 22.8 ho. ° ° °° 1 ]- ~IeSp_Qo° nx owl N uolxls- xiwLS ~ B v. a~'fl a 0~ o $:g O . -1 0. OLD WILLOUGHBY I a0 -I I-00 ~~ -- +W0 m]-159-°B y 4 a LOAN al °I J ~ 21.3 O REALTY 1713. 25.9 ~ , O ~ 18.1 ~ / m3-t]4-m 005-1 3-00 $ $ $ .-S a° ~ S 8 S m]-161-m m 16 k L 69°IEAV O. AEl1Ak11 CASWW 0.A 41 0.1 9.1 ED ms-On-m ~ B. & P. _ ~ 44.0 ho. G VENZON ~ OLD WIILOUGHBY ` - - ~ ±- _ ~ ~ m p u m m m ~~~~ ~ ~ A~ g~ ' OSTOLOv/ 4 h m4-OS6-m ~' ~ Y W. REICH REALM LTD. ~ oo3-t]s-Oa 002-tea-14 ~ i 1 ' Y T I ' i c _ 3 3 J 8 o°-i°ae-m 0 ~ ~k~wx°f"4'o'"A f~ qpi pa 0 .1 0. I 3i°]0 9.1 h°. 9.2 ha O I ~ 002-ID2-1 . m 003- 03-00 69-m ] 1) k s uecAaz W IIIX a.l ~ . a. (~ J J. GABO~ Oo2-tB2-0 19 9 ha ~ 1+BIfi N. - m 0-m °9s-m-m l k N. L a k z 9s31cu p4 ax °.1 ax I- F- ~-~_0 g q M N ° . . - ®GI P I ~ °m-1$Y-0° $$~i$i m P k l ALLFN 6' i A iu°v .] °°:i B.] $'~ O J O J' mI-osB-15 . t 3. h0. m ~ ~~ 003-200-m 00 t-m 003-1)8-01 ~ ~ 2 002-186-00 ~ T$ANSCANADA °ml-tie-roOi m]-I ]6-m e ip9ALw°H>Kx u. MLIIIX a M. sCNKiftP. °s:i 9.6 3'e xs JrCB1.5']iaR RD• 0.8 5. APOSTOL0 ~ m 00 4B `b ~ g-g ~ p]3-1]8-03 m}t]]-W I = PYaJ PI NES LTO. m.~ ~ x pNB4]0 y ~(Nltl~lq~S~A A d GEMO 0~ 01 004-00]-00 8 14.3 he. o0a-o5a- 001-055-0 ~ m3-201-00 m2-185-W I m'hl]0-m I Q 61:1 hp. ~ \ G) 342 ma-IBa-aa m3-Iphl6 tH-39 . a aqz° .1 ewVA11fR LL b CEN2N da O4 :4 o.• Ow °A ma-063-00 m1-008-00 C04-0.5]- ~ Oa-0.16-00 - - LD WLLOUGHB RE T O ~ I 486 ~ Iw-az m -t9s-aw 6 IOH u A $ °.. m4-063-m m+-m4-o° ma-mo_o 004-psa-ao AL Y LT . 9.1 ha. H O ow-1>B-m OLD WILLOUGHBY ST EP ~ - ooz-les-o0 ~ 0 k N aqq~y-1 40a 1R _ ~ ~ l µ~ i 0~. c x ° ~~ $'i a: $:i °°'i BDSSRRT R~3~p '^'bo4-o]B-ol ma-2o3-00 4.3 J ` REALTY LTL1. / 19 9 ha . . ` n WATSON ~ i _ G6i- °03-Ix I ° 0°- ~ A. a wNlza 0.6 ui I ~ A°AR V 80]V C' k B. aoe- ] o ~ --_-_ --- -- . B0.S9RRT 2.3 ha. ~ ma -m ~ 0°S - ° o I0 Dorm 60uw1-u6366 V°~ B ai $'t O 8 39 8 ha BALLINGER R. k M. C ' +861 \ m i -i ai-os om-196-°° VnW a k B. a w ° Q:e 4 o J ~ 00 . . 0.8 Np. eAWNG ~ ~ ~ ~°); ~ C /1 0.4 --. - ~ Om-:m-m x HOC ttfownAnCN ize li.fi .F 009-oas-oe 004-0)9-al R. k l 0.4 he. 009-028-m ~ P. & M. j Sy A ~ 4 , ~ _ ESTATE OF 9 ` p C'. M. GODAK ~ = ,~ nH mr s 3. \ ~ T. MOD O WALOICK ~~ BRUNNWG ~@ ~ 4 G \ O N k .._~- A9~.1p01 -_ _ ~ F. CRITELLI ~~ 2-189-m I d: °s-°° E 00 a wAlamx k o. aI11H k m~01OY M s xm a i O:i $ f~ J 3.8 he. 2.8 hw. ~ 12.2 he. ' S 7• ,1U ~ ~' M. RAMELLA x 10.0 ha. ~L SIN0.ETON ~ 10.0 h0. °a-MM ° o° m m° m H . E ' k $. ur Ou: a c $nma~"AS p u`3 A O.s p s ~~_m ~ i ~ ~ ~~EI ,~ 1 m1-115-0o h ~ om-ns-oo 0°$7~~" ~ $ o Ac 44a ~ , °5 F- ~ mP-04 R. LEVESOUE j f ~S 'r \ F; ~ ° m~m ° & ~ x~ 7 p k ~ KRA'I~C Ooa-pppp6-uuuu PEWTIERI A m4-o2]-00 M & C I 9 6 4 '$`°b~ \ 0o1-t41-m ~ F I ~ / ~ ~ ~ $$;-~ m~mi LL ° iu u " 3 p e aj $ 3 3 3 ha . 2 ° . . J. BRWILLETTE "I 6 & ~ \ OLD WILLOVGHBY ~ m ma-me-°° p ml0 w a011 w s x n 1 1 : . . 4+ew 12.0 ha. h ~ 28 9 c 4 @ ~ ~, REALTY LTD. 1,0~ ma-mx-m . 1. k n. eox0~.u . °w o i 004-OBfi-02 Wa-°ea-m k R A ma-oe2-°o j V. 51DIN m4-om-0o I 95.9 h°. y y~ ml-lag-oo -~ _--__ _ '- -- _ T. VAN WYLICK . . r ,r FORMISANO 4.1 ha. ~ D. & X. WATOHORN 1004-03S-m 1 A. RIZ20 ca-o23-m A. k M. / I \ KOBTUK / ~ 0.5 ha. ~ O 15.7 hw 04 h0. 18.9 he. T. & P. I 1' ~•2 h6/ -3 SIMPSON / NE ~ aoh083-m I ~,~ ~ BRER/C ROAD EASLl1ENi CORRIDOR O J ~ J. HORTH d: 5. GENDRON q C BBBRB ooa-024-w ! R I Ool-u3-oo ,p, H m m4-~6-m / 7.6 ha. o04-oe]-m ~ - ~ OA hps 1Z 1 ZAPP / I 133 h OfsWNFB 6v: J.xtN. 19P~`~4yR Q SCALB CON 6 / r. O MACLEDD R. & N. COLLUGGI v ~ N \ mhmt-m o. / I Q / cnmKm Im: aw,x. R A K 0 O ~ Q ~ 1 W' x91lY ~ • ~ N J 45.0 ho. 4.0 ha °01-030-m MAPLE ROAD LTD. .39 8 hp T 1 .L & W' ~ RUDD I I ~ ~ . . / . BAWN BY: aKtKm fiv: c.J.A QP ~Z. . d 0 fm 3m aRls]xAL scALE P1AN uts mo F- / . . Y 1.2 hA. / a~ww . , O / 44.fi ~~ .~~~ ~ ~~~'~~ 001-14a-o0 ~ ,~~ m4-090-m B. E~ ON ` p UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 ooa-009-°0 A BRUNNING h R SWOL , CON 2 0j /j,®{ON ROAD ma-oBB-m e0 D. k D. GEWN 9 hw 9 3J, LYNCH . p 4.1 h0. 0 REGIONAL u1W GPAUiY of WAGnRA (W1Ll0u0HBY TOVM5HIP1 I BARRY . . 4.9 hp. Q'i I a 4.8 fi0. ~ ma-opa-m eA+-ml-m •- SOUTH PART bF WATERSHED FEB. 8.'2008 aw-I68-m m4-t6]-CO ~ e. k G. P. 'm `~N ~ ^xtl P- E. 6: 6. ~ FRISKIE N P C A 232.1 hm. JACOBS 9.0 ho. 4.9 ha. SAVER RO p 1- w Y>FD wa O}iMp I J {.G h0. CON 4 BRA"°CON 3 CO 2 ~ KeN6LL1We FNfANEERS ANU P4N1&(S KaGH6~R RwxnwRt Se~* ~ nNH rW. ms I ~, s OF 17 ' O1p3-0393W5 PLAN 03-B39.6vg Ox29 /20m 03361 N S 17 TOP OF TOP F NIAGARA BRIDGE (GOLF CWRBEI PAR WAY BRIDGE 17 BERM TO DE CON TRUCTED ' BY OTHERS TOP ELEVATION: 171.40 17 4 777.40 171.40 Aug. 2804 Aug. 2604 ASSUMED DITCH BOTTOM NOT SURVEYED) 0. - ~ _- _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _- _ _ _ __ ~ _ a n 16 i6 a o 0 0 o n ~ o m o O0p 0 Ooo O_ m N Y b 0 O N Y I~q 0~G 'qw'm I I 1 1 1 I f + ~' ~' + ~+ I I I I I ~ I UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 USSHERS CREEK TO NIAGARA PARKWAY BRIDGE qTY CP WAGARA FALLS (NILLWGHBY TOWNSHIP) REGIONAL NuwgPMltt OF NIAGARA reNCHE'o ar: NW.F„ RNNw,Pay~ B~ faa PROFILE - U33HER'3 CREEK dAN. 34 1A06 a H g1ECKF0 B'h dW.K. ~° ~ uae¢ DFnWN BT: H.N.B. ~ a~ ~ E K. SNABT A980C14T8E L1NI'PED ~~ ~~ ~.° D 1m 9N6 [lWYNEERS AND PLLNNERS m~NPP g1ECKFD Bf: CJA: 9y~ , KRGHENER ENGIER^Ri SUDWRT RUNT RhFR ~ ' ~ a ~ ( ~ 4 OF 17 ... ..... Pae Parse .w. mnoaaWx Bnoa:>B PHPx BM i -CUTS NE CORNER OF CONC. SPAN BRIDGE E. SIDE Of' WILLWDHBY RD. AT STA OOO MAIN DRAIN EIEV. 175.217 T BM 2S ] 7BN 4 BM 27 AIL IN SE ROOT 200mm0 G K NPIL IN E SIDE OF FENCE POST M 2 TBM 1 x AIL IN W ROOT eWmmtl O~ TREE BM ~ MULTI-TRUNK TREE ON 50117H BANK AT ST0. 026 ~ ~ ~ SPAN RIDGE 11m WEST OF STA 925 ELEV. 172'710 NAIL IN N. 510E 3000 MUL TRUN TO NE CORNER OF GONG BRIDGE , 10m SE OF BTA. 425 NAIL IN SE ROOT 1.5mtl ELEV. 172273 (9. k40 OPEWNG) TREE 1Wn SOUTH OF STA. 3Q AT DLD ROAD (M<CREDIE) AT s ELEV. 172.35E MULTI-TRUNK MAPLE ON ElklC 72391 iT ST .000 ~y~ 773.383 m a ~ EAST BANK AT STA. 205 ~ _ i ELEV. 172.502 ~ M 3 c c ~ NAL IN S SIDE 3000 DECIDUO S ~ TREE Bm NOR1H OF STAB w L. > >~ a ~ o ~ ~ o g = 17' fx ~ 6 < ~- v qq Ct rc ~ ~~ u a ~ R n U ~ ~ 1-` u ~ g ~ R ~ :s ~ ~ H E ~ 3 m w a $ G `~' : G m ~ ~ 7C "o ~ ~ p N . ~ ~ ~ p ~{ ~ . . i . Q U on E ~ n. g k 0. 3 ~ ' - 0 3 0 0 2 . ; 0. 2 0 -1 2 0 - ) ~ °n C Y OE JO ICI C TY OF N AG R F L N AG R F LL ( 2 15 ) ( 0 1 1- i) TY O HO R 94 EO A A A A 77 A(~ pp 4R 3 R ~ G. LA D 6 27 T, L IA R F L S C M IS 10 CoO M ISS ON - 7 0 ) E DL LD 0 HA N L IN R BO O 5 0 C A O i 0 0 N UT S OT C OU O E CR A D C E O T N R 4 0 0 4 8 OM BO M 2: 1 ID OP S 3:1 ID 5 OP 5 :1 SI E PE •~~ G ° m G ,oz < ~ m m N = i ~~ < x R « o MAIN DRA IN i;a a i;z ;; S x S „ ~ x g S °o USSHERS ° o o m m 'wn° ° ~' m Q Q 1 R ~`+ ° CREEK (UPPER) a x~ B° ±~ w' I I~~ e+ m MAIN DRAIN (LOWER) UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 ~ ~ N GTY OF NIAGARA FALLS (59LLONGHBV TOWNSMP) S MARKED X STATIO REGIONAL MUNILTPAIITY-OF IAGARA SEE CROSS-SECTION ON oESwwfo maw.K '~ PROFILE -MAIN DRAIN IAN 30 z0D5 "" °" DWGS. 13-15 - ~ o w fo ~ , . , am GROwN 9l: N.N.B. CHELKEO BT: C.v.. ~ ~ /-.,•.~'9l 1 j(. SMART A9SaCIATBB LiY32SO .w xai ~7 0 1m CONSIIlTN6 EAY.INEEP$ ANO PVNNEflS u ~}~ ' Y RwFA euwro I BW ~ / Aq~ ~i L~ Y F N NRpIfNGt SIID OP 1 ,m'. 5 7 .: / U Z Q 0: 0) o N~ ao x do 0 2t X o 4 0 0 ~ ~ m ° o o ~ m n 3 + N o ~ g + m g 'ng zN ~ o . + e~ N G :Z $ + Y w~ oN 1y pLIN DRAIN UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 , EAST BRANCH ~ GITY GF WAGARA FALLS (WRLONGHBY TOWNSNIP) (UPPER) REGIONAL NIINXYPAMTY GF NIAGARA DESwNm fir: J.wK scelE PROFILE -MAIN DRAIN 1006 JAN 30 ' STATIONS MARKED '%' cmm~m en J wx 0 ~, ,~,,, , . SEE CROSS-SECTION ON DWGS. 1`~5-15 . . OMWN 8f: Nll.& GXECKm BN CJ A ~ ~ i Y. mwu ~A ~ 1'FNR X~" 44001 D ln: Ir_l\ 1(, ByApT A880CkT88 LTYITLO ~W CDNBULTN6 EHfANRERS AND PLWNGS "`°`° ~ xu4e 0.i-D38 . ~ aC ^h (~ ll NI(CXWbt ENELEXNR SVOfiD NYRNT~RNER '( - N"°V0 w ,m, ~ I 6 OF 17 o s ~ ~ BM 30 ~ BY / 26 Ly Ly ~ 3 3 ; CATS ON NW CORNER NAIL IN f ROOT of 600mmR i NAIL IN 3 SIpE OF 2DOmm0 c ~ I 3 t` CONCRETE CULVERT ~ 31 ELM TREE Sm W OF W/BK AT STA 1 3 5 a m ELM TREE ' i ~~ °d '- U AEIEVA•77A 5 NAI IN 5 ROOT OF 300mml.-, . + 6 -_ _, _ ELEV..172761_ .. .:._ _ .,. ° . 1Nn N OF STA. 1+003 .. ElF:.172781-~-~----- - ._........ ~ ~ D 1 z TW TRUNN TREE ON 5/fiK ~ ~ dZ i m 3 o- Q D- TJ3.M. Ai STA f+620 ELEV. 172608 w '" ~ ¢m #H w m NN MA IN $E SIpE OF 400mm0 lE TREE Ai STA 1+625 ~ u ~ ~ ~d rn ~d wn ~' N 3 . ELEV. 172571 _ ® ,j ~ ~ ~ m . °N. ~ v m ~ ' ~ I ° z_ o x ~ c STA 250 300 ~ x a c - TT e f OAK TREES ALONG W + a ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ / N ~ ~ y r ~ ~ <d m SODON r ~ ] 5 $ S$ ~ a flOAD. SH. 01 a STA 1+300 T 1+900 ~ n z i $ . z n * $ STA. 1+ E PONDED 0 TO 2+120 AREA ~ GRA36 AND GROWING IN EDS ,+- ~ DITGN ° ~ o 0 w $ u~ ~ ~ ~ + o r w ° ~ x ° ~ F ~ ~ o ° < ~ + m a E y ° N + 4 0 Fd ry j ~ ' a N U ~ o N ~ n O n g o. o xA ~, 6 e ~ 8 00 ~ N m r F ~- - .~47b g n 00 7 9 0 ) L N F & J. H R AN IT 0 IA A A AL 5 F ~tU I G A I C PA I 0 i O F A ~ & G N N AG (0 2 15 - 0) (0 2 i6 - ) W B LE N S ES AT S N O TA D MS S D OA 6 OM RI N U C O T AI LE N UT R N AN U ( 0 D IS) 0 0 4 OM 2:7 D S OP S :1 SI E P 2+~ O 7J4.tI ~ 2+29 LOW YtUNS (FROM 80TH 90E5 2 O ~. ~ Z O ~ 2+200 ~ D ° u 3 ° aN fo D w p Qn $ ~ ~ I q `~3 D r O STA 2+120 DITCH (Wj :INa 2+10D X O C m rn WOOD Ln BRIDGE (2 x Bm) ~ +oA > m p (.I Z+052 P/L FODTBRID STA. 2+D59 ST NANRAL GAS MARKERS P ~ Z^ A. 2+035 STA zz+021 qL P IP EONE STAKE BBTRIjC ON IN DITCH (~ N - . STA 2+020 ITCH `W~ 2+000 r A +99 O N U ~ O D ~I STA 1+9fi3 DITCH D'n m ~ G) m D ~ O ~ ~ N ST0.. 1+930 OBSTRUCTON IN DITCH A B 1+918 P/L In 0 WON y I u y O n 1.02 o a ~ IT N D ~ ^O STA 1+66] FALLEN LOGS IN DITCH 'P ym ° rN ~O ff ~ `< a Az ti 0 b r l y ° x O t+BDD Z I m m~ 0.4 u~ -i N z O zo ° 3u D aYg _o t°o. i+]14 P/L ~+ c Ana 1+698 P/L 1.14 STA. 1+fi9B Lgp5.1.1AgNE m~ G pyo 1+6]B P/L D CDNC. CutV. GWC ROAD (,,Do ~1Z0 ~ (3.im lNOE OPENING) C_+C 1+850 % r r0 . .ION f^ ~ ~ [~ t+BOO Sm ~. STA. 1+810 6WALE (E) ~ A Jim , 1+56D P/L O Z LTI InN ~ zlP.I r _'~~ y I -i- 1.35 i ~ 3 a • m ° O Z 1+435 P/L 0 1+4D0 s J ~ N m ~~ ryl STp. 1+392 IRIB TA T . W q y ~ pD C°+p m O ST0. 1+365 METAlS (RUB&SH) ON BK o a i y STA 1+355 SEWAGE GDDN 3pm ~z I °~ __ zz3 Yo, N _ f ~`= r ~a 02B V ~ ~ m ; y~N x' ~ 1950m 0.09 CULV. STA 1+268 SCRATCH DITCH ~-CIV~ ~ ~+.+~ H t+259 P/L { ~ --- LANEWAY (STA t+264) u am o AN 9 T'~ . I ~^ a ~n G t+ZOO X Di 0°N ~O N< m } ~ ~ () ~ O ANJ m m N °~ i : % t+t]2 P/L y o O m O'10 ,-per STa i+1]2 SIB (W B/k) ~ m P P ". N I m .O i ^' ~ k /+128 P/L UI D N ° STA t+126 518 (W 8/k) I 1+1D5 P/L 1 ~ O Iw 1+OBO P/L A °O BTA 1+090 LARCE CONC. BLOCKS (W BMJ ~ + Sd' ~ b 1+058 P/l r O m ~ - i o ' ~ m r m E ~ + ~ °'~ . „e P 1+000 m 9]5 BEND ° n o mo D_ DA N ~~ a ° m ~ V ZOm ~ ,I<~~ yyy PI D r. Z m° O STA. 930 WOOp FOOIBRIDCE A~2 m ~q NS u ~ r IIII~~~~ 1' 1.05 STA. B% DITCH (N) 3 ~ ~ I 1 O _ z y__ ~ R -+ ~ Om b -- 05D BEND-P/L K \ 3 AO . ~ a~m mN STA BOB SCRATCH PITCH (W) (~ ' BDD I BTA 000 POIAED (j '~~ ~ m~. SV N~ u J x ~ g~ ~° ~ m T S a C ]S1.SP/ v CONC. CULV. 2.95 _WIDE OPENING) ~3 ~ ~ A Z ]Ia SP/ - MARSt1ALL ° ROAD : µ ° ~ m 9 . , ~ q Q a III ~In 7' N ~O 55.~5~ o D ~ 0 0 'I D .. ` n io N i ~ ~rI m D ~ STA. 64p ENO OF POND :I j p ~ ~ ~ I/1 A R STA 636 POND OUTLET (STpJE' WALL DAM) N N ~ I n w fQ ~ ~ fi00 ° D N a< m ~ ~ C = O N 0.32 STA 582 STAR OF ADJACENT~PpNO (Sm W) '+~ ~ ~B~ ~ n 3r 4 ~ O 95o X s - °v ~Z ~ d tl = ~I T ~ C 5~ u u ~ u o STp. 540 STA 535 ND OF BRUSH TRIOUTAgqY W °~ V YY_ ~ ~ N 1 1] ~ i B . g STA. 515 ( ) DITCH (W) ~ y° Z 03 ~ z . ~ m y In m Y ~ J 'r ~ ~ N <p N O Z z ml Z ° Vp mmy O ~ o ape p VO D N v o e ~ g a 4OD N N 4O STA. 40 J SMALL RUN (E) J 2+864 BEND 2+851.5 P/L Z+&S1S P/L 2+800 BEND f. c ~ a ~ ~_ P':g $ 8~ .. 3 ~ 2+700 BEND +600 y p ( ~ I ~ ~4 ~~ NJ R 8 O 2 ~' W ~ ~ T m i' C 9 ~ Q 2+510 P/Li ~ H ~n ~2 z+aB] Ph 2+466 BEND m m o ~ gY y D 2+41~+P~L °~ ~ ~ ~ y 2+400 ~ C ~ S ° ~ p 2+3a2 E/P ~ _ ~ ~ 2+300 Z gg m W E €~ k P £ ,`~ K O F ~ A ~ ~ ~ J ~ 9 ~ ~a =~ 3 IANEWAY (s]a z 91e) U)AO 0.99 E 9T0. 2+096 LO RUN (SJ ~ m n STA. PteeD PRIVATE iORM SEWER (S) m ~ ~ _ ROBBERY ROAD i o '` _ --- ST0.. 2+8]fi RD. DITC ((~~ & W) (2.3 WIDE PENINC) STA. 2+025 LOW RON (W) 9Ta 2+BOD W UN N 0 Si0. 2 770 W R + LO UN (NW) O A o .. i Z 47 A _ mrl 0.3 0.91 ~g~ ~~z y j r0~ Amm \ ~ xo y ~lo TZ Kv y qp~ Z N_ 9 G7C a QoQ N'm ~B '1 ~ L ~ ~ D D7 > i O1 0.6 STA. 2+50] WEST R DITCHES N. k 5. T~ N ~ SODOM R 0 D CONC. CNLV (21m WIDE 0 ST A 2+ 485 FAST ENWD) D DITCHES (N, k 5.) y O ? y O yyj _ m Z O v STA. 2+408 SHED 2 x 7m) m m ~ y N 1.B (Jm W) sTa z+ as ABOVE cRO Poo ~ r yy I ~ O l (4.Sm D Z -I o Zv ° 174.11 182 182 180 i6U 176 176 176 176 174 174 ' 172 ~ 172 O x z \ J g ~r R ~ m TR ENDLE BRANC H " UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 Gtt OF NIAGARA FALLS (4WLLAVCHBY TOWNBHIP) REGIONAL NUNICIPALLTY 4W NIAGARA - OEEIGNEO BY: 1WK. .~"°'°w " VF PROFILE •TRENDLE BRANCH JAN. so 2aa6 ' CIECKED BY: J.W.K. ~Q4 G ~ ,~„ ~ , ORA4YN BM A.A0. GIECNED R,/, C.I./., . W Mu *a S" 1 T ° ~ E xx[ t'mmj ~: 0 1T p`N~ ' K. SYABT AHSCC]ATEB ISALLTEE ,A U1aMW ~B fAN511111NC FHCINEE0.5 NW %ANNQRS nr Rf 0. R ER ~ ~ i E~ KrtCHENE9 ENGLflNRT 9JYBY VHf N 90F 17 ~,y B~ ~ NAIL IN W/ROOT 6000 TREE 18m EAST OF STA 595 .. ..... .~. ... .. ._ ..............ELEV..in.Z9q_ ti STA 3+685 ~ ~~ ~ ' EAST BRANGI I ~ 33 OOJ ~ 3 O O ~~ s d ~ ~`G G`', d w c vg 0 .~ ~s o 'f fO n n ( ot t - o) OL LL U HB EA T 1. m 60 2: IU 5 OP 6 TT M CL AN U d fiu a 9u 9 9u 3 ~ 1 T78 CUTS ON SE CORNER OF CONC CULV. E/SIDE OF ORT RD NAIL ~~ NAP IN N R00T OF 90pmmP E TREE ON N/9K 9M 5 NAIL IN W ROOT OF OECIOUOUB TREE ON SOmmO /fiK NAIL IN NW ROOT OF NVLN TRUNK AT BTA 1+399 AT 5 A 1+036 NAIL IN NE OOT OF 400mm0 AT STA 350 POPLA 3m 5 TREE OF STA. 013 ' REV. 174.981 REV. 173.821 ATOSTA 895 EE ~ N/BK ELEV. 173.813 ELEy. 17A635 9M 9 9M 7 _ E1EV• 173._782 BN 4 ' NAIL IN S ROOT OF 300mm6 EE NAIL IN N ROOT OF 600mm NAIL IN S ROOT OF 50 m0 BN 2 fOm N OF STA 1+575 TREE ON N/BK DECIDUOUS TREE CN S K TOP SE CORNEfl OF CONC. CULV. EULV. 177997 AT BTA 1+178 AT BTA 556 E/SIDE OF SOD M RD AT STA O]3 ELEV. 174.108 REV. 173.589 REV. 174.727 76 °a .. a u, a: s < 1 rc y v " ac ° ~ z o rc ~ a ~ ~ r o`o W p ~ O BTA 1+580 111 1+]25 SWAMP AREA ~ + m m $ o ~ pp~I^ N ~ CG' r~ O ~ <" O i" - d ^ a + ~ m ~6 NzJ ~ UJ u IZzJ ~W E xG M h~ F~ G y ~o h€ ~o 7\ ~v ~ 3v - 174 o ° ~ d I I£ ~ d Z O " - ~ 1~ Im ~ U II ~ v II II G . n ~ II ji '~ v 4 I O W n '' ~ 5 n ro. 0 ~ - 172 o 0 n (0 3 1a - ) J. 5 IN CI Y F ~ IT F C OF IA A AL 5 IA AR L S NI G A A FA LS E 0 AL MU IC PA ITY OF NI G A ( 03 1 3 0 0 - 45 0 ) ( 0 -1 3 00 ( 0 -1 6 OD G. LO H US N J 0 0 W & M BE 170 .5 0 0 2: 1 D 5 OP S IN R 0 0 B TT M AN U N S O CL EA O T B TT M C AN U p T L N U 6 x O c J ~d o ~ °o ~ mn `o° o x ~ °o ~ x o a ~ uo x m a n m° a w u 3m t0 r0 '^- '^. d''^ N mn O o o mg m m O m II WEST BRANCH UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 CITY OF NtACARA FALLS (WILLDUGHBI~ TDWNSHIP) RECIONAI NUMCIPAUTY OF NIAGARA STATIONS MARKED 'X' ~s~n ~+'~ AWx. ~ ,.~1v~~, ~, ,,,,,, PROFILE -WEST BRANCH JAN. 30, zaD6 SEE CROSS-SECTION ON wECxm er: awlt ~q T~ -. DWOS. 13-15 6RAwN er: ao. ~. ~ I+ml~~ mm l xmm r suAxr Asaocurss LTAfTTED y:luwm ~_ya A 0 tm CONSULTLW ENCINEFAS NW PLWNEPS M~YOIP NECKED 9T: FJ I ~ `' S . j ~ KaCH[NDI EN9LEHNfT 9VOBURY RNNY RM1FR A. ( 10 OF 17 ,oT 7W ,6 TOP 5E CORNER OF CONC HWY CULV. AT STA 3+411.5 ELEV. 175.885 _ eN 18 BM 1 4 BM 10 7BM NAIL IN W/ROOT OF 400mms T NAIL I SCAN D N/SIDE OF 300mmm TREE ~ ~ 17 ~ O W NAIL IN E/ DECIWOU T OOT OF 1.Sm0 REE REE SLANTED tOm SE OF STA 3+200 15m OF STA 31050 8M 13 NAI IN E ROOT OF 400mm0 TREE GULV. N/SIDE ~ MAR6HALL RD pT STA 1+99] ' 12m W DF TA 3+6]6 ;^ ELEV. 175.580 ~ ELEV. 175.464 _ NAIL IN W ROOT OF ""TREE ON E/fiK AT' SOOmmo _ A 2+]4fi 1pm .W.OF--STA~2+238 • ELEV. 175.208 ELEV. 174.486 z 6 i ~ ELEV. 175.oB2 ELEV. 774.282 ,rC, ~8 ~ ; 9M 12 GDM T LET 48526 ~ 0 ~a ~ ~ NALL MAP IN E ROOT OF 1.5m0 TREE - Q TABLET N CONC NW CORNER OF % CULV UNDER QEW W m O $ < t0m OF STA 2+445 y . AT STA . +46D.3 C7 n ~ ~ N =O 3 ELEV. 174.571 3 ELEY. 175.920 d G. .. . r____7 « rom '" 8 Y 1 ' I ~Z D1~ m N qq~ o m r 5TA. 1+]25 TO 1+9]53 SWAMPY ORRIDOR 3 ~ I i 1 it Zp N r ] E+rc r ALONG W RK I Ka >~ I Nv n~ w CO rv `+ I IW ~ g STA. 1+61 T01+830 m ~$ i FS m NJ ~ r m w I ID POND AREA °m I C u3 2 I I a u m y m ~ ~ I ~` G m L < I 4 ~ 4 0. 5 % - ~~ _ _ - „ 00 - 5$ 0 ) AC O A (0 0 8 0 C OF CI OF I N ST Y NI A A FA LS NI G R F LL (0 3 19 - 0 ) CI OF NP T T N R. TH IL NI GA A F LS OD - 49 O ) ( 03 2 4-- & (0 4 04 - 7) .E. ~ R A. ( 03 i 6- ( 3 19 - 1 ) ( 0 -1 3 00 H . ZA P .T. . YD GI R R DY IE 89 0 0 T. L D. M. & Tft L G. L H R .0 0 0 2. m 80 M 2: D 5 :1 SI LO E N 0 0 K B M OU R OU R OT O B M CL A OU EO IR D o~ o o °o x ~' ~ 0~~ O M a a p i a K ~ O ~ d' O ~O O n n a s ~ np m S n C C} 'F < O ao N m q } + ,1, N lY N N N y "C A 'm m '± ~ M P ~ j yi n H~ Fi n n ~ M n ~ UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 L]TY OF NIAGARA FALLS (WILLONCHfiY TOVMSHIP) REGIQYAL MUNN:IPANTY OF NIAGARA ~/~ ' yYLsT BRA~cH coNr~ .~. DE9GNED BM J.W.IS f„~,,,,~ PROFILE -WEST BRANCH JAN 30 2006 , , ,~A o STA710N5 MARKED 'X' uECKm m Awm ~ ~"~q I~ ' SEE CROSS-SECTION ON ~ N4WH eY: o.R. ~ A W. nAmc ~ I0°"~"°°° 1 ~vam K. SOlABT ASSOCIA]'88 4E11T8D ~ wwEfA Qy.wB PWGB 73-15 ~ , 0 1m wlslnnxc DxaNEErss AlA PuNNERs CHKKEU BY: 4AA A °""'^'0 ~ w ~a (~ KNG~[NFR plp,pyRT EYOBNAY RAWY RHER 'h " 11 OF 17 ..._ as. .. --- __.... _- .: ~ - ~ 180 T9M E NAIL IN NW/ROOT 150 EAST OF L/ 178 178 174 172 770 DEAGNEG aA J.w.K „EEE:e,,, " SGELE CHFLNED BT: J.W.K ~ fb \ A - ~ a v wxtu ~ <~ ewOA ~ DRAWN BY: Asa WiEGY.EO aV: 4.LA . 'i,,Q,FP °~~ a.. eM cW+~~I,»7 N 2D06 UNION MARSH DRAI Gtt OF NIAGARA FALLS (WILLWGHBY TDWNSHIP) ftE010NA1 MUMCIPALLtt OF NIAGARA lsa PROFILE -WEST BRANCH IAN 2ao6 so , . , STATIONS MARKED 'X' \ °o " , ~ ~ $ 'e a °o ~^ `~ o o Nei ' J~em SEE CRO55-SECTION OIJ ~ O1 ~ ~ ° m ,~, + < ^a R ~ $ ~ + $ $ $ oo $ + x. _•:a: wsaoeTw7ea zxNmzn JNG PV NNEflS ,o. „.,cos-av DWGS, 13-15 N i $ a s < + ~ } J M M . CONSULIMO FNONEFRS A~ SGflG~ ~~ ~ ~ v WEST BRANCH CON T'D N~~~ mm ,2 OF it \03-A 9\A3-A39 RORLEPJg N/EN A 03AtA1 PNE6 TIEU c NAIL IN W/SID 3000 POPLAR TREE ESm WEST OF TA. 4+500 TBN D ELEV. 176.663 NAIL IN W/ROOT 1m NAPLE TREE 340 EAST OF 6Tq. +515 TBM 8 ELEV. 17k849 NAIL IN W/ROOT 00 DECIOV US TREE 9m WEST OF STA. 4+ 3000 SINGLE POPLAR TREE •'17&660 ' AT 5 A 4+661 ELEV. 176.130 ~ ~ ' - 'o Tfiu F Bw ~ Teu A NAIL IN W/SIDE FENCE CORNER ~a ~ 6¢ NW CORNER OF L C ROAD LULV 230 ST OF STA. 4+639 c~ c¢ AT STA. 4+126 ELEV. 176.663 ~¢ n ~Y 776 019 s ~ B 3r ~>G o ~~ ¢ c o_ g~ e ~ 8 ~m $~ d ~~ k 1~ ~~ .a 8m ~ ~_ P,° ,~ N ,_cRO. P ~ / AT L/F F GRD. A 7C a ~ ' v ADJAC T l/F ~ S S SZ ~ ~ '+' r 0 % / M / NI n NO SURVEY ( 0 -0 8 O1 C & B. B LU G R ( 04 0 0 0 (0 4- 7 - ) . L V 50 E L (0 4- 7 - ) (004-058-O1) & J. BR UI LE TE Al IC B W A G. & P. MACDONALO 2 B TT M :1 5 E L E E RI D AI A O T ON Y OTTOM CLEANOUT TO e R MO E RI DETERMINE AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTI Y m Y N ~ 172 ~ - ~ 172 ~. _ 1]1.00 Om PROPOSED DITCH 170 2:1 SS 170 0 1.7 4.2 7 9.2 LOWER MAIN ,GRAIN ' (STA. .300) 174 z __-___ _____ 1 1 ~-- 1]1.10 4. m PROPOSED oliCH 172 1700 26 7 I,QWER MAIN DRAIN (STA. 750) x 172 172 1J0 170 0 ~25 5 7.5 9.5 MAIN DRAIN (STA. 300) n4 na Y Y, w 3 172 _ - - _ - - 172 ~1]f.BS ~~_- 4.0 PROPOS ITCH 2:1 SS 0 4.b 6.4 8.3 10 MAIN DRAIN (STA. 1+800) w m 2 H' DITCHDgEO 12 174 172 170 15 TOP WIDTH (MIN. bm OR AS SPECIFIED) ~~ ALUMINIZED CSP OR SPECIFIED C/L CROSSING 150mm GRANULAR A PIPE MATERIAL (DIAMETER & COMPACTED OR AS SPECIFlED LENGTH AS SPECIFIED) NATIVE BACKFILL 1.5 MIN ) ~ MIN. 300mm 300mm MIN. -_T-- COVER _ --_--____ THICKNESS GRAIN DEPTH AT CROSSING FILTER BLANKET ~- FLOW AND RIP RAP AS REO'D. DRAIN BOTTOM/ ((TYPICAL FOR BOTH END SLOPES) GRADEUNE ._._..-_...r_..._...._-,.~- SET CULVERT ENDS TO INVERT ~~ ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ON PROFILE DWG. C/L CULVERT OR TD SPECIFIED EMBEDMENT DEPTH ACCESS CULVERT pETAiL N.T.S NOTE: REFER TO STANDARD SPECIFlCATION ITEMS F.1.3 (G) AND F.1.3 (I) FOR COMPLETE CULVERT/ENDWALL MATERIAL AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS DETAIL DRAWING NO. NE-7A UNION MARSH QRAIN 2006 CDY OF NIAGARA FALLS (WILLAUGHBY TOWNSHIP) REGIONAL MUNICIPPMtt DF NIAGARA oESrNNa<o er: e.w.K. ~ SECTIONS • MAIN DRAIN & 3q 2006 ~ • P1E<Hm BH J.W.N. Y°Q~' ~ STANDARD ACCESS CULVERT DETAIL M[xII6 Eauwn er: o.o. ~ A 14 XYMf6 P' I YL):M~1 [ mI R M. SMART ASSOCIATES ldMS1'ED ~vuW2 G~0lE Q ~ 'LN MN511LT4U ENOINEEHS AXp PVNXE55 LHECIIFD BY: C.J.h ~y 0511f0 ~ MICHFNER ENGlE1NRf SWBWtY FS " M aI O 1 ,a,,. 13 OF 17 .: / 1/4 172 pR0 Y Y w 3 1 P\ r_-___-- 1~1]2dB 3.0 06ED ~, 174 172 7.5 6 2 0 FAST BRA(~CH (STA. 175) Y 174 172 D 6 4.5 1.5 0 EAST BRANCH (STA. 550) 175 175 W 3 _ _ _ \ ~ ~\__ 1]3.1 173 1 9 25m - _ ~ 173 DITCCH 6E0 172 172 5.3 3.3 1.3 0 EST BRANCH (STA. 1+200) w \ / vs 2.sm PROPOS ITCH na 174 SED 5.5 4 1.5 0 FAST BRANCH (STA. 1+650) w 3 1 5 1 5 . ' 2.Om . 1]3.52) oIROmPn 178 m y 176 ~_ W \ / ~~ ~1 174 - _ - - 174 1]3.93 2.Om PRO OSED DIT 5.5 4 1.5 0 EAST BRANCH (STA. 2+100) Y Y ~ -_ rn - T7 176 \ 1 T 1]0.86 fl_ _i pROPOSED I_ _i DITCH' 174 174 0 2 4 6 EAST BRANCH (STA. 2+950) 178 x m 178 m ~ N Z ~~ \ ~ 176 T. 176 i]5.]BJ ~.i pR~ SEO 1.5:1 8 0 1.5 3.5 5 EAST BRANCH (STA. 3+500) 178 178 78 176 1 0 2 3.5 5 EAST BRANCH (STA. 3+800) 176 0 Y y w 3 \ \ / 11.Om I PROPOSED 1`-7 ortcH i:1 ss 25 4.5 TRENDLE BRANCH (STA. 200) 176 176 7.0 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 Wtt OF NIAOMA FALLS (W1LLW REWONAL MUNIGPADTY OF NIAGARA fiHBY TOWNSHIP) OESwxE6 n d w K T BR NCH : . . . g1ECKfD BY: Aw.K. f9 09 ~ A SECTIONS -EAS JAN, ao, goal PWWN BY: N 0. AY ~ Aw. YVM3( ~, (awA fvlw) J6Bi K gyAl{t A880CIATE3 I.tct{T&D x°' . LIEDKFD BY: CS0. 'Ay~a w '1n: ~ , CONSULlIN6 FNGINEEKS u:p PtNY1EN5 NRCHENER FNLLE1NRi 6UOBURY RAINY RNER ppwOfly O},N6 ~ l .~. ._. X14 OF 17 Y 3 Y m -- r1]6.Y3 ' PROPOSED DITCH 11 Om 1 Y f '1 1.SA 35 17e .: .. 174 x 172 _ Y 3 ~ w 1]219 ------- ~~ ~- L 2.5m I - PROPOSED I ~ DITCH 21 SS 174 17T 0 3.3 7.3 WEST BRANCH ' (STA. 375) Y 174 m - -'---- z 174 - - ~ - ~1] ao 172 PROPOSED 172 DITCH ' xl ss 0 2.3 4.8 WEST BRANCH (STA. 800) Y 174 172 9.8 12 Y ~ - ~ / ~ n ~ _r- ---- ~I]2.SB 2.Om S~E~FlEp I (NO EXCAVA710N) - - 174 172 174 172 5 0 WEST BRANCH , (STA. 2+200) Y w 3 ------ ~i]xc9 I ?.Sm J PROPOSED f -7 DITCH r.1 ss 174--- 172 s e WEST BRANCH z.5 0 (STA. 2+950) Y 174 172 0 2.8 5.5 8 10 WEST BRANCH (STA. 1+150) Y m ~ 174 172 _ - - - _ m ._.- 17281 2 ~T ~J PROPOSED I _ -I DITCH 2:1 SS - - 174 172 1]3.10-I 1---- -1C., 2 ---~1 -- 2 a' '^ PROPOSED DITCH i74 172 5 176 m "~--~---- -- x 176 _- w 3 na.z2~ ~ --_-_ ~ -- 174 I ~ 174 PROPOSED DITCH zn ss 0 2.3 6.3 ~ 7.8 ' WEST BRANCH (STA. 4+725) Y w 3 ._~- ~~ ~t7.1.]9 _ I t`-- ~ - f I_ - "7 PRWOSEO DITCH r.t ss 174 --- 172 8,5 4.5 2 0 WEST BRANCH (STA. 3+600) 174 176 ~ - x 176 Y 3 w _ '/ ___ 172 . - - _ _ 174 - - - 174 1]4.0 I_ 2.Om _I PROPOSED (~7 PITCH 3 0 2.3 ~ 5.7 7.3 10 2:1 SS WEST BRANCH 0 1.5 4.5 6.5 ' (STA. 1+625) ~ WEST BRANCH (STA. 4+275) '/-~ K. 61fART AS&OCIai83 •^•iT$D \,^fv~J) CONSUI]IN4'FNWNfERS INY PIANHER9 gfCMENEV QILIFWRT SYDWRT GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. Working Area -General Condition E.37 Working area sbafl ba as outlined is General Condidm E.37 and as funhtt modified in the apmific conswcdoh notes below. 2. Access-General Condition E.38 Each owner with the ditch m thetr propttty may be required m provide m aaess rook for the conhmtor W access the working area along the dimh. The Cmtracror shall oouErm with Ne orvntt the use ofm access rove bePora using the saes route. The fallowing property owners are dtraxly affected by the workproposed Wham possible mkphona numbers for coutaw are shown (Area Cade 905): RaH No. Owntt Phone iV b LowerMata DraM 002-033,-096 Niagara Parks Commission 004-094 Hydro Oae Networks Inc. 002-095 City ofNiagaraFills 002097 Berry&Hea[her lYmdle 002122 Mikoa 7ovicic Uoaer Afala Drmn , 002.1 S t-01 363272 Ontario Ltd 002-136 Gary Lmdry 002.163 Carl Adorns 002.159 Rosins Costa 002-164 Grand Nragam Legends Estates lnc. 002166 Wilfred & Maria Weber Eost Brunch 002.169-02 Liselotte Knofe c2 Joachim J[emman^ba^= 002169 Rosanne Padttow 002-171 Jovo & Rgjko Meslek 002.177 ~ Rilph Biamocte 002.177.03 Richard B: Donne Chambttlain 002-179 708020 Onrario l¢c, 002178 3hven & HeetherBerneU 002190,•193 Frank Lapema 002182. Natale & Lana Giampa 002186 TmnsCenada Pipelines Ltd 002-185.01 Narmm & loenne Watsm 002.185-03 Bertram & Susm Watson 002185 Alga & Normm Watson 003-176, 004-141 OW WflloughbyRealty Ltd West Branch 003.145-0i Ieffery Susin. 003-143 Gaston 8r Madeleine Ieauroud 003-193 Oarh>,de Lochtt 003-193 Robert Thiel 003-196 789702 Onterlo Ltd 003-224,004-049 Ryszerd&Alice Rydygiw 004-047-01 Hans Zepp 004-048 Ministry oflYmxsportation 004-058-01 (kegory & Pamela Ivlacponild 004-078-01 ClitTord & Brenda Billingv 004-078 Vera Bowmen 004-079-01 Richard & Lvtrel Weldick 004-080 Jodn BrouElette City of NkgaraFills, Rlck Volpini Drainagc Suparimendent 356-7521 exL 4221 PmlemEngineets, John Kmtu, PJ'atg. and Chds Alleq P.Eng. Ojfrce 519-748-3199 Ca(1519.635-5997 3. Pre and Pw[ ConaVUMion Meetlaga The Contreclormay be requhW ra anend pre-and posFCOmtructim site uteetings whh the P.nginwr mdieadowners before startlng cad after finishing the work ifrequested by the Enginett w Drainage SuperiutendeaL A Opeu Drain Construction' Refer to_E 1 Stmdard Speclflcadons for Oom Drains F 1 In cases of conflict between varying specifications mdlor the drawings, the following order of precedence sha0 apply: 1. Specific Construction Notes 2. Contram Drawings - 3. General Constructon Nohs 4. Standard Speaficafions for Open Drains F.1 5. Standacd Drawing Details 6. PartE-Gmeml Conditions If[he contractor is still m doubt as to proper interpretation, please contaw the Protect Engineerfor chvificadm. S Corrugated Steel Pipe Mahriab Corrugahd Steel Pipe (CSP) shell be fabricated from steal coOSwith shot-dipped aluminum coating-Alwpinized Steel'j'wwe 2 iinisb. The pipe shill be helially wrrugated, fabricated with a kek-seam and sha0 ba supplied with re-rolled emdar ends. , Aluminized CSP is avaiisbk from: Armtec Guelph, Onmrk 1-800.26SA391 Other approved equals w1E also be considered by the Engineu. Approvil must be obtained prior to construcdm. 6. Access Culvert Refer m the drain Pro51es aM the speci5c anstnulion notes for lacatlon of new eaess cWvena to be itu3talled. Bast Branch - I+259 to 1+271 Twin (2)1400mm diameter (2mm will-125x25mm armgadon) x 12m CSP Refer m Standard Specification F.1,3(g), Detail Drawing NH•7A (Sa Drawing 13) and Specific Consnuotim Notes for amplete derails. Cmiract mly proWdes Yor new Imeway over culvert ro match existing channel width ~Cansnucting new Imeway up m culvert is landowner's respaxsibilhy. 7. Bruabiag and Tree Removal In mmy locations i[ will be naessery to clew a lOm wide path akng the tienk of the camel ro permit excavatIon. All cleared materiil is to be cut Hush with existing gromd, m root or stump romoval required Use of a brush mtfer w a grapple oa m excavator is suggested for 6msh and small trees. Large trees that Head m ba ramavad era ro be cut flush with greuM either by chain saw w tree shear. Stump removal not required. Large trees (300mm diamahr w greater) that will not interfere with the channel clemeutw leveling of0u: excavated mmerlal cm rearain. The Contractor shall endeavour m maintain ar least erne mature tree every 20 m 25 metres near the top of beak Trimming of the lower trenches of a remaining tree m cecHiram mcess ro the drain is permitted. All small trenches and limbs are tc be removed from felled ones and pged so that Oils materiaicm be clopped using apormbk chipper orabrosh tuttermmexcevamr. All chipped rmtedel cm be spread on the lOm cleared path. All Hue tanks and 1®bs 200mm diameter or Bremer are m be m[ into 2 to 3m lengths and pAed ilmg the edge of the cleared path or widtin any remaining wooded area beyond the lOm wide path. Prior to cormnencing uny clearing work, confirm the side of the drain m which the working corridor is located by referring to the Specific Conatrucdon NOms. For remhesaloag the drain where the working aide has raw been detemdrsed the Contracror shell comet[ We effected hmdownttto detemrrae the side for completing excavation mNor clearing work Available bontact information is noted to tho left. The channel crws~seciim shell ilsb be cleared afill torah, tree4 deadfall and ether debris which shall ba disposed as described above for limbs and branches. Gmbb(ng ofstumps may be requtred witltinthe chamkl ttoss-section m pemtit excavation. Stumps removed, shall ba piled along the edge of me cleared path. Dead, damaged orpartiaily fallen trees m the opposite bank s6atl also be removed and disposed ofas described above. S. Seeding aPDitch Bank Slopes end Leveled Spotl Fw seeding use mechmicil (cyclme) spreader end the following shall apply: Seed mixture applied at 60kg/ha: 33%Creepkg Red Fesme 25%Birdsfcat Trefoil 25%Kenlucky Bluegress ' 10%Covtt Crop (Oats, Rye, Barley, Wheat) 5% White Clover Fmiliw to be 6:20;20 or 10:10:10 applied at 300 kgdm. Seed and fmtitiza k be eppged as nom as possible after excavatrm (the end afths day). To provide temporary cover for late faH planting add m additional ]0 kglha ofrye or winttt whew Contracror respmvble for additional seeding as raquvad during [ha 1 yew a¢trmt wemmty period 9. Silt Fence Silt fence shall be in acardmce witb Ontario Provincial Standard Drawing (OPSD) 219.]90 (1996) except that minimum height above ditch bottom shall be 500mm. Materials shall be kt aaordmce with Ontario Provincial Sraadard Specification (OPSS) 377.03.02.02 (1996) for geomxdk end OPSS 577.05.03 (1996) far stakes (L3m length minimum). The sib force shell remiln in place until the proJem Is completed end rite Contractor Is directed ro remove the ailtfence by the Projew Enginattorthe City Drainage Supttintmdent. The Genimel0r shall maintain the silt Yence m01 u u removed. Priorto removil ofthe silt forts, silt accumulation upstrmm of the fence shell be removed and leveled m adjacentlands as pu ditch demom leveling. The cost ofthe mpply, insmiratkq meiuhnma, removal and disposal ofthe silt fence and silt removil and kvelrag shall be paid as m extra. File No. 03.039 Drawing 16 of SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION NOTES MA1N DRAIN McL4adie Rnad m Wiilouehhv [hive 000 m 300 No work (Tlo not clear trees fm access corridor) 100m427 Minor boOOm cleanom requtrd. remove debrisfrom channel. Some cleerktg required. Side for work wW vary m minimize impact on golf course-north side assumed. Access m be confirmed in conmttation wim golfcoume mamgrf. 427 m 1+074 New low flow chemet m be crested (4m bottom width, 3:1 hank slope) by working from om bank Level and seed excavated materiel. Minor clearing requited. 427m 900 Side far workm be determined, possibly north bank 900 m 1+074 Wark m soutlr and east bank Wjl(oughby Drive [p~jeaver Road ~ ' OlOm 668 CkaralOm wide path on ono bank (sldcmbe determinedazt(me oY cousWOYim) Remove aU debris firm the channel 200m400 Bottom clamour required, minimum 4m bottom width 668m677 Migor cleaning Oaough 6.lm wide conmete CUlvertmgrade on profile Weaver Road m Mi1lmRaed 677m 1+000 Cleatmgrequired is minor and will dapeud on side for work Ramova aB debris fromthe cbamrel. Hoanm clemom required. '1+000m 1+959 CleazalOm wide paOr on olu bank (aidem6e determined aztime oP comshrrctim) Remove ail debris from the chnnel. Minor bottom clemom required, may hat be conimuous, 1+959 m 1+964 Clem through single cell only oflwin 3.65m wide opening cmerete - wlvert m grade m profile Milim Bond m Bra nch Irmclion 1+964 m 2+176 Minor clearimg a9 required will depend m side for wmk Bottom demout required. EAST BHANCH Main Drain iuncti m ro Marshall Rom OOOm 100 Clears lOm wide path as east buck. Bottom clemom. l00 m 565 $wttmed clearing is required on east beak including trees in bottom of chawei and m east bank Moaztraes m west beak cm remain. Remove all debris from channel prior m cManout 565m713 Minor clearing may ba requiredm permit work on east back, most large trees cm remain. IOOm 713 Wo~on east back. Drain clamour 713 0729 Minor eleaoingihrough 2.45m wide concrem culvert to grade on profile Mlprr{bg 1~oad lq~ atenbeckRaad 729 m S50 Drain clamour Wmk m west beak. 830 to 973 Work on souo bmk. Drain demout 975 m 1+239 Work on east beak Gearing is requved on east back including trees in bottom ofchmnel and m east 6adc. Most trees m west book cm remain. Remove all debrisfrom chmnelprtoro drain clamour. 1+259 m 1+271 Remove e~dsting 956z1300mm arrtr culvert, dispose of broken conmeWdebru and salvagelreuse any existing Ime surface material. Supply and instaE twat (2)1400mm diameter CSP by 12m long. Culverts m have a minimum 700mm separadm. Lmeway surface is m be huiltup m elevation 174,65m to provide mbdmum 300mm cover Sox new pipes. Charnel excavation o provide for a bottom widen tmnaition over lOm bot4 upstruam and downstream of the culverts. 1+271o IM35 Work on eas[bmk. Drain cleenout 1+435 m 1+688 Wmk on east bank Clearing is required an east bank including trees in bottom of channel and on east bank. Most trees m west bank can remain Remove all debris from channel prior m drain cmmout 1+688 to 1+693 Clean Uvough 3m wide.coocrete culvert m grade m profile. Lava] material removed along ditch bank, upstream and downstream of road. 13etenbeck Road to I+693 fb 2+342 Sodom Road ' Cleaz a lOm wide porn on one bank (side m be determined az time of construatian) including trees ip bottom of channel. Remove all debris from channel prim m cleanout 1+698 m 1+918 Location of drain to be coal-umed wit4 owner al time of conslmcfim as ditch is to ba parallel m bt line mr a dismnce upstream from the road. 1+693 m 2+000 ~ Bottom cleanout 2+000 m 2+200 Dreier cleanout 2+030 m 2+074 CAUTION Dimh arosses right ofway with three buried pipelines 2+033, 2+(OS Clemom out below smaO wooden moduidges 2+200m2M88 Bottmn cleenout or spo[cleamm 2x342 m 2+480 Gear a IOm wide path m east end south beak Sodom Road to Bosaurt Road 2+506 m 2+637 Drain clesnout Side for work to be detemtiaed et tithe oY crostrucfim. 2+837 m 2+846 Clem through 2.3m wide concrete culvert m grade m profllc. Level mstarial removed along ditch bank upmeam and downstream of mad. H°ssertRnad m Ort Road 2+846 m 2+930- Drain clesnout Stde fm work m be determined at tiara oY construction 2+913 Remove sdating 300mm gilvert in draw end lem~e on bank fm oumms selvage (abmdon Imeway crossing). 21950 m 3+709 Bottom cleanom. Side forwark to be determined az time of runstruction 3+709 to 3+718 Clem through noM mdvert only of twin 900mm rite eoncrcte culverts m grade on proflla , Ort Road m OEW 3+718 m 3+838 Bottom clemoua Side for wmk m be determined at time oY ~ . constrvction. TRENDId3 BRANCH 000 m 560 Bottom demout. Side far work o be detemtkmd az time of cntstruction, WEST BRANCH Main Drain imctim to Sodom Road 000 m !73 Clem tOm wide porn on me bank (side m be determined az time of croshuctim) Remove alt debru ffom channel. No bottom excavation required. 173 m 192 Minor cleaning through 4.SSm wide concrete culvert o grade m profile. Sodom Road to Ok Road l92 m 565 Clear lOm wide path on me book (sideto be determined az tune of corenucdon) Remove all debris from channel Bonom clemom. 565 to 571 Clem through 1 oft pipes only (twin 1500mm die culverts) m grade an profile 571 m 1+950 Bottom clcanout Side for work to be determined az time of consuucdon. Clearing wiH be mirror depending oa side for wmk, I+OSOm 1+150 ClearalOm wide path on north beak. Bottom cle®out I+150 m 1+398 No work rcqu'vad, except m remove debris from channel by brad m using small equ(pmmt working within the chancel. No clearing on eimm book 1+398m IMOS Minor cleaning Uuough 3.65m wide concrete culvm to grade on profile Ort Rcad m Marsh all Road 1+405 m 1+500 Minor bottom cleanout remove debris from channel and limited clearing immediately west ofOrt Road. Work from south bank 1+500 m 1+800 Bottom clamour, work on southeast bank. Access working corridor from Ort Road only 1+800 m 1+995 No work required Marshall Road to O EW 2+016 m 2+350 Bottom clemout, work an west bank 2+350 m 2+430 Geer lOm wide path on west bank, level old spoO bank Bottom clemout, 2+450 m 3+940 Bottom cleenout Side fm work m he determined az time of construction. Clearing will be minor depending oa side fm wmk 2+895, 2+899 CAUTION Ditch mosses two buried pipelines 3+040 m 3+060 Excavate charnel amass mopmed Stmley Road road a0owmce. May be necessary m remove existing culvert. 3+060 to 3+325 Clearing required m re•esmblish lOm wide path on warn bank May be necessarymlevel old spoO. Bottom demout 3+325 m 3+411 No work 3+411 m 3+460 No wmk required acro~ traveled portion OfQEW. QEW m Bassett Roa d 3+460 m 3+735 Clear lOm wide path m me bank (side m be determined az time of construMbn) Bottom cloanout 3+735 m 4+123 Clear lOm wide path m one bank (side m be detmWned az time of conslmcdon) Remove ell debris from chmnel. Need for bottom clemom m be determined a[ time ofconsWCtion (hat surveyed). 4+123 m 4+143 No work required amass BassartROad. ' Bosaert Road Uosh eem 4+143 m 4+250 Cleu 8m wide pWr along west bank. Remove debris gum channel No ahamel excavator rcqured. 4+250 m 4+510 Clear 8m wide path along west haNC. Remove a0 debris from channel before rnmmmcutg bottom cleenout 4+530 m 4+604 Wmk on east bank. May be necessary W remove existing Vance. Replacement force m be determined az time ofemstruction Clear path along west side of force line and remve ell debris from Ore channel. Batmen clamour 4+604 m 4+839 Wmk on east bank. Cher Bra wide path almg east bank Remove debris firm thermal. Bottom demon 4+694 ~ CAUTION Exposed private gas line crosses the ditch. UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006, City ofNiagaza Falls File No. 03-039 Drawing 17 of 17 ~ / To: Clerks Office °"~ ~~~ ~~ City of Niagara Falls ~~~. ~ ~q `~~~ Abandonment of all or part of drainage works ~- , (Section 84,(1)) ~ -_-_~,,~ ~,~ This petition is fl~om the landowners South of QEW along the West Branch of the Drain (Ushers Creek). We the land owners of the above described area are requesting under section 84 of the drainage act that this section be abandoned based on the follow facts. (la)Cleaning of the West Drain (Ushers Creek} will cause significant disturbance and lass of habitat to wild life and biological species in what is listed as one of Canada's 38 Provincially Significant wetlands. This is supported by the following: 1n 1984, 38 sites were identified as critical natural areas in a study by the identification sub-commiftee of Carolinian Canada. These sites total 40,800 acres hectares in area. Since 1984, conservation efforts in Carolinian Canada have been directed towards securing these sites through a number of mechanisms thatincluded purchase, municipal designation, landowner contact and private stewardship, and education and public awareness, A land acquisition and stewardship program from 1987-9992 secured over 15,000 acres through voluntary agreements with landowners. This landowner contact program was an Innovative, ground-breaking program thatspawned manysubsequentsuch initiatives. A further 2,000 acres was purchased for conservation. Today a total of 94,5p0 acres of the sites is owned by conservation groups. These sites are managed by different conservation organizations and by private landowners for conservation purposes. .,, Ushers Creek is one of those area's !I!! Ministry of Natural Resources in accordance with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs The Wetland Policy Statement reads as: The Wetland Policy Statement reads as: On AdJacettt Lands Development may be permitted only f it does not result in airy of the following: a)loss of Wetland Functions; b)subsequent demand for future Development which will negatively impact on existing Wetland Functions; c)conJtict with existing site-specifrc Wetland management practices; and d)loss of contiguous Wetland Area.(MNR and MNA 1992) In discussions with the engineer from K.Smart Associates Limited the proposed work south of the QEW is based on one landowners request to access his property across a section of Cattails/marsh which. is clearly contrary to the intent of wetland policy and their original intent was not to do any work in this area prior to this landowners request. (lb) This area has some very sensitive ecological issues: CoreArea: Willoughby Marsh is considered to be a core area (node) due to the fact that it contains self sustaining blacks of habitat which have distinctive bioilc and landform characteristics Biota: Willoughby marsh is a unique and fragile Provincially Significant wetland area and these biological saes are rare in the Niagara region. Wetlands are much appreciated by naturalists in the Peninsula as they provide important habitat for a wide variety of wildlife and plant species ~ _ 2 Plant species Willoughby Marsh supports a large diversity of plant species within its boundaries Natural hardwood forest stands are present within the marsh. These stands represent the relatively small Deciduous Forest Region of Canada and several Carolinian forest species are located throughout The forest region is characterized by the abundance of broad-leafed species which represent the northern limit for many trees in the province of Ontarto. Willoughby marsh includes the following species: Red Oak White Oaly Swamp White Oal~ Black OaJ~ Pin Oak, Sugar Maple, Black Maple Silver Maple, Red Maple White Elm, Slippery Elm, RockElrn, American Beech, BlueBeech,Hop-hornbeam, Shagbark Hickory, Pignut Hickory, Red Ash, ll'Itite Ash, Black Cherry, Basswood, Serviceberry, Witch hazel, Yellow Birch, Speckled Alder, Domestic Apple, Black Willow, Peach-leaf Willow, Hawthorne, Camman Alder, Grey stemmed Dogwood, Alternate-leaved Dogwood, Stagharn Sumac, Elderberry, Arrowhead, Tremling Aspen, Bu#anbush, Duckweed, Potamageton, Cattail, Herbs, Grasses and Sedges. Within the boundaries of the marsh the successional areas have dense growth. This vegetation includes: Trembling Aspen, Langetooth Aspen, Willows, Hawthorne, Wild Raspberries, Wild Strawberries, Shrubs, Grasses and Seedli>4gs, The dense ground cover of the marsh includes: Mandrake, Ferns, Bdue Flag Iris, Brambles, Arrow wood, Arrowhead and Jaclt-and- the Pulpit In the northern region oak maple grasses and sedges are found clustered together. Similarly a few groupings of the aforementioned species can be located with Dogwood atul Elderberry in the northern and central regions. The aspen stands are found in the central-western portion of the conservation area. Toward the southern regions, old Feld and swamp canvnunities meet, with ca#ails, grasses and sedges prevalent Oak and maple are the dominant species with intermi#enf swamp communities located throughout Animal species As well as the vegetation there are numerous wildl fe species associated with this area. These species include: 3 Birds Red-winged Blackbird Indigo Bunting, Grey Catbird, Cardinal, Black-capped Chickadee, Common Crow, Blacl~billed Cuckoo, Mourning Dove, Mallard Duek, Common Flicker, American GolaTfinch, Common Grackle, Evening Grosbeak, Ruffed Grouse, Herring Gull, Marsh Hawk, Red-tailed Hawk, Sparrow Hawk, Blue Jay, American gestrel, gilldeer, Eastern Singbird, Eastern Meadowlark, White-breasted Nuthatch, Northern Oriole, Eastern Wood Pewee, Eastern Phoebe, American Robin, Upland Sandpiper, Savannah Sparraw, Song Sparrow, Starling, Tree Swallow, Scarlet Tanager, Brown Thrasher, Wood Thrush, Rufous-sided Towhee, Red-eyed T'ireo, Turkey Vulture, Prothonotary Warbler, Yellaw Warbler, Ceder Waxwing Downy Woodpecker, Hairy Woodpecker, Redheaded Woodpecker, House Wren, Great Horned Owl, Screech Owl, Coopers Hawk, Sharp-shinned Hawk, Widgeon, Green . Teal, Blue Teal, American Bittern, Green Heron and American WoodcoeJ~ Mammals Eastern Chipmunk Eastern Cottontail, White-tailed Deer, Red Fax, Deer Mouse, Muskrat, Opossum, Raccoon, Skunly Eastern Grey Squirrel, Weasel, Woodchuck, Coyote, Meadow Vole, Shrew. Reptiles and Amphibians Green Frog, Pickerel Frog, Wood Frog, Bullfrog, Snapping Turtle, Spotted Salamander, Eastern Garter Snap American Toad Fish Fathead Minnows and Shiners Rare and Sign cant Species Willoughby marsh is a feeding and breeding habitat for several Provincially Significant Species These species include the Virginia Opossum; Prothonotary Warbler, Pin Oak, Sessile Bellwor~, Regionally Significant Species also inhabit this marsh such as Evening Grosbeak, Marsh Hawk (Northern Harrier -see photo at top), Upland Sandpiper and Pickerel Frog. Rare plant species found in this area include Swamp White Oak, Slippery Elm, Pdgnut Hickory, Shagbark Hickory, Arrowhead and Trembling Aspen. Other significant species and interesting wildlife species found in the marsh include Bobalirtly Great Bhee Heron, Red-tailed Hawl~, Red-headed Woodpecker and Tlrerkey Vulture This area also includes the locally significant winter cover for deer and is locally sign~ant jor waterfowl staging and produc#on. 4 {2a) This project to repair and improve the Union Marsh drain puts excessive costs on a few land owners when the benefit as stated in the engineer's awn report is to ensure proper drainage for city roads within the watershed benefiting all landowners and the Municipality within the watershed. (2b) In 1984 a Ministry of Natural Resources Study had the following findings: Willoughby Marsh Hydrology/Hydrogeology.Study for Habitat Rehabilitation Start Date: 1994 Project Contact: Anne Yagi Status: New project Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources >Mlloughby Marsh is a provinc/al/y significant wetland. The marsh and its tributaries provide habitat for fish and wildlife Extensive municipal drainage systems surround the marsh. The water supply to Willoughby Marsh has been altered by the change in drainage patterns associated with the development of its watershed, which contributes significantly to diminished water quality and the loss of wetland and creek habitat This project will determine the hydrologic function of Wrlloughby Marsh in order to restore or enhance this function to improve habitat The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources is also funding this project Based on the above report by the Ministry of Natural Resources it would be prudent to conduct impact studies before creating further damage to this natural area when it has suffered already due to watershed management practices of the past. (3} This work is not supported by the landowners along Ushers creek and their signatures appear below: . - 5 .., ~r ~ aa...,~a. Unetfal ('nrip Phnne # 1~ilfLLG~ ~( Q q ~t~rt ~ 5~a ~g~~~~-~ , /~. ~. 9~ "- - ~~ ~s ~ q~S.. d 9 S ~ ~ y~rlV earlllL3 ~b I ~SS~" ~v-'~o 3~ °JGSc~•9S6Sd- !J l ~ i , y~~J ~"5eC t L.2.G ~ 5~ GIc7'i.2 4S-re~i Q f == U A3 m~~.r~ ~a~ ~ ~~a- ossen-r ,eo !V. F•U ~~c 6sb ~oS-ads-~iti7 ~E(rj pln~~a~..rk~-e ~'3/ r?dSS~f.~.i ~ ~yt~bSG Lj'v~~~iS`r!~'`?~ 4 ,~. ~~,.~ ~ i244-~ ~,.~~~.~. ~a~ Esc 9©~-. 3~Z-~~ ~ ~ 1~~.~r~ 0 N R ~ ~ n ~9 ko ~ '~ ~~ ~ qa5 = 3~~°c ~ ~ ~ 127 1-~-~ ~S6 as3~a ~Ga ~ h ,~ T c3 ~ ~~+ .~ L~ ~ G56 C~~ - ~ C,~~.~ _ r1 F ~ 6' 1 ~'~ . //~7SXi,uG ~D , ~.a~ ~ S~ 90~ -~93-38~ ~ i • ~~ !~°cQ . ~ ~~ ~s ~~ • 7 9 ~ l l ~ z~ l2iJ ,L2 ~ G S ~ 2~f ~ ~`~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~', ~~ j _ t~ 9°~f"~~S ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ b .. > June 7, 2007 K. SMART ASSOCIATES LTD. File No. 03-039 85 McIntyre Dr, Kitchener, ON N2R 1H6 519-748-1199 -Fax: 519-748-6100 MEMO TO: Rick Volpini, Drainage Superintendent City of Niagara Falls FROM: John Kuntze P.Eng. j_kuntze(a~,ksmart.on.ca ItE: Union Marsh Drain, West Branch -Section 84 petition Rick This memo is a follow up to a fax you sent dated May 11, 2006 which contained a petition that had been submitted to the City under Section 84 of the Drainage Act. The petition indicated that the petitioning owners wish to have the City consider abandonment of the Union Marsh Drain West Branch from the QEW south. Before proceeding with an analysis of the current Section 84 petition it is first necessary to clarify a fundamental requirement of the petition process under the Drainage Act. The Drainage Act gives no clear indication on how to determine if a parcel of land is properly represented on a petition if the parcel of land in question has more than one owner. However, the Ontario Drainage Referee in past decisions on appeals on the validity of petitions submitted under the Drainage Act has stated innumerous decisions that in the case of a property in joint ownership, the petition must contain the signatures of both owners for the parcel to be represented on the petition. The Referee has also stated that the joint owners are counted as one landowner when evaluating a petition on the basis of a number of landowners since the joint owners represent one parcel of land. In the first tab of the attached spreadsheet I have completed an analysis of the signatures on the current petition and the parcels of land represented. The first two columns of the spreadsheet indicate the current ownership of the property based on City assessment roll records at the time of preparation of my Union Marsh Drain report dated January 30, 2006. The next two columns indicate the individual signatures that appear on the petition. The petition appears to represent 28 parcels of land. However, only 11 of the parcels have valid signatures based on the above referenced criteria with respect to joint ownership. In any process to evaluate the current petition only the 11 parcels with valid signatures will be considered. It is also aclmowledged that location information for one of the signatures is not legible and thus the signature cannot be identified with a parcel. The first evaluation criteria in determining the validity of a Section 84 petition is that the petition is to represent three-quarters (75%) of the owners of land assessed benefit in the current bylaw for the drain to be abandoned Since my report has not yet been adopted by bylaw the current petition will need to be evaluated under the last bylaw for the Union Marsh Drain which is Willoughby Township Bylaw A-56 from 1941. In the second tab of the attached spreadsheet I have listed the properties assessed benefit under the 1941 report for the section of the Union Marsh Drain identified in the current petition which is from the QEW south to the upstream end of the West Branch of the Union Marsh Drain. As would be expected numerous severances has taken place on the parcels assessed benefit under the 1941 bylaw. Since I am not aware of any record to reapportion the assessments in the 1941 report under Section 65 of the Drainage Act whenever a severance took place, therefore all current parcels within the 1941 parcels are considered to be assessed benefit for the purpose of evaluating the validity of the current petition. Union Marsh Drain - 2 - June 7, 2007 Section 84 petition memo The spreadsheet contains the following summary of the current petition keeping in mind the criteria described above that joint landowners are considered as one landowner. - 281andowners are assessed benefit under the 1941 bylaw - 75% criteria in Section 84 would require 21 landowners on the petition - Current petition has valid signatures for l O landowners - Even if all signatures were made valid (joint owner signed) the petition would only represent 20 landowners In my opinion the current petition submitted for abandonment of a portion of the West Branch of the Union Marsh Drain under Section 84 of the Drainage Act is not a valid petition. Therefore the City does not need to proceed with the further provisions of Section 84 of the Drainage Act with respect to abandonment. The second criteria in Section 84 that states that the petition must represent 75% of the azea assessed for benefit under the current bylaw for the drain does not apply until such time as the fast criteria as outlined above is satisfied. The second tab of the spreadsheet does provide some analysis on this second criteria. On the third tab of the attached spreadsheet I completed an analysis of the current petition based on my 2006 Union Mazsh Drain report. The current petition is also not valid under the 2006 report. One fmal point that the petitioning landowners may not be aware of is that a valid petition under Section 84 does not automatically cause a drain to be abandoned of it's status under the Drainage Act. A valid petition only allows for the rest of the Section 84 process for abandonment to take place as noted below - all owners in the watershed of the drain to be abandonment have to be notified of the proposed abandonment If one or more owners that were notified file a written objection to the abandonment then the municipality must appoint an Engineer to deal with the abandonment of the drain The appointed Engineer must then make a decision on whether or not the drain can be abandoned Since my report on the Union Marsh Drain has recommended work on the portion of the drain that has been requested for abandonment it is unlikely that that portion of the drain can be recommended for abandonment in an Engineer's report unless the owners who requested work on the is portion of the dran withdraw their requests for work. At this stage I would suggest that the City should send a notice to the landowner who circulated and submitted the current Section 84 petition to advise that the current petition is not valid under Section 84. Please feel free to included this memo and the attached spreadsheet with the above notice if you so wish. I would like City staff to update the property ownerships in the spreadsheet using the current assessment roll information and let me know of any changes. The update should be done prior to release of the spreadsheet information. Union Marsh Drain Petition to abandon West Branch South of QI -00 1-00 -00 -00 1-00 :r 1 Owner 2 dd Devlin Deborah Develin ;nt Barry Brenda Barry art Collucci Nancy Collucci on MacLeod Melissa MacLeod Horth Samantha Gendron r Sidin dd Watchorn Hotly Watchorn and Waldick LaurellJValdick rd Ballinger Brenda Ballinger Bowman ild Ballinger Margaret Ballinger een Watchorn im Watchorn Lorna Watchorn Masonovich Deborah Masonovich Coleman Rhonda Coleman aretKenny MacDonald Pamela MacDonald and Willems ael Fazekas Christina Fazekas ael Krutasky Brian Krutasky ael Pretty Margaret Pretty alas Watchorn Dorothy Butler Walter ie MacKinnon ael Kerrio Charlotte Kerrio wn signature Signatures on Petition rner 1 Owner 2 Wald Devlin Deborah Develin scent Barry ncy Figler rdon MacLeod Samantha Gendron .tor Sidin Wald Watchorn Laurel Waldick (ford Ballinger Brenda Ballinger ra Bowman Wald Ballinger Margaret Ballinger thleen Watchorn Iliam Watchorn ine Masonovich Rhonda Coleman Joan Kenny ~g MacDonald Pamela MacDonald mard Willems Shane Fazekas :hael Krutasky :hael Pretty Margaret Pretty uglas Watchorn in Walter ndie MacKinnon :hael Kerrio File No. 03-039 signature(s) UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 Petition to abandon West Branch south of QEW From Bylaw A-56 Parcels assessed Benefit FROM 2006 R EPORT Valid area Valid parcel Invalid Con Lot Owner 1941 Acres Benefit Roll No Owner Si nature area ha acres area parcel area 5 N 1/2 5 J. Somogyi 50 8.00 1 004-089-00 D. & D. Devlin Yes 9.9 24.5 9.9 2 004-088-00 V. & B. Barry No 4.8 11.9 4.8 3 004-157-00 NPCA 5.5 13.6 50.0 5 6 F. King 100 30.00 4 004-087-00 R. & N. Gollucci No 4.0 9.9 4.0 5 004-086-00 G. & M. MacLeod No 45.0 111.2 121.1 45.0 5 SE 1/4 7 J. McGourt 25 10.00 6 004-083-00 J. Horth, S. Gendron No 7.6 18.8 7.6 7 004-082-00 V. Sidin Yes 4.1 10.1 28.9 4.1 5 NE 1/4 7 E. Ort 25 10.00 8 004-080-00 R. Leves ue, J. Brouillette 12.0 29.7 5 Pt 8 Royal Trust 19.5 8.00 9 004-085-06 T. Mod 3.8 9.4 10 004-079-01 R. & L. Waldick No 2.8 6.9 2.8 11 004-078-01 C. & B. Ballinger Yes 0.8 2.0 0.8 12 004-077-00 R. & B. Bailin er Yes 0.4 1.0 19.3 0.4 5 Pt 8 M. Dell 60 16.00 13 004-078-00 V. Bowman Yes 39.8 98.3 39.8 5 E pt 9 H. Betts 75 16.00 14 004-061-00 R. & M. Malott 0.3 0.7 15 004-060-00 D. & D. Masonovich No 0.2 0.5 0.2 16 004-059-00 P. & R. Goleman No 0.4 1.0 0.4 17 004-058-03 M. Kenny Yes 13.2 32.6 13.2 18 004-058-01 G. & P. MacDonald Yes 5.5 13.6 5.5 19 004-057-00 L. Willems Yes 0.1 0.2 0.1 20 004-056-00 M. & C. Fazekas No 0.5 1.2 0.5 21 004-055-00 M. & B. Krutasky No 0.5 1.2 0.5 22 004-054-00 M. & M. Pretty Yes 0.5 1.2 0.5 23 004-053-00 R. Barry, E. Tiboldy 0.4 1.0 24 004-051-00 D. Watchorn, D. Butler No 0.5 1.2 0.5 25 004-050-00 J. Walter Yes 2.2 5.4 59.8 2.2 5 E pt 10 M. Dell 36 6.00 26 004-047-01 H. Z~pp 21.3 52.6 27 004-048-00 MTO 1.1 2.7 55.3 Sideroad 8-9 Willou hb 10 14.00 28 Bossert Rd Nia ara Falls 2.8 6.9 4UU.5 ~~ 190.0 469.3 76.5 66.3 75°10= 21 Valid parcels on petition = 10 142.5 =75°1° 142.8 Parcels if all signatures valid = 20 UNION MARSH DRAIN oen+~.,~ +n oF»n!!nn lAlcet Rroneh cnnth of r)FW FROM 2006 REPORT Valid Valid parcel Invalid Roll No Owner Signature area ha Benefit area arcel area 1 004-083-00 J. Horth, S. Gendron No 7.6 500 7.6 2 004-082-00 V. Sidin Yes 4.1 500 4.1 3 004-080-00 R. Levesque, J. Brouillette 12.0 2900 4 004-079-01 R. & L. Waldick No 2.8 1700 2.8 5 004-078-01 C. & B. Ballinger Yes 0.8 500 0.8 6 004-078-00 V. Bowman Yes 39.8 2700 39.8 7 004-058-03 M. Kenny Yes 13.2 500 13.2 8 004-058-01 G. & P. MacDonald Yes 5.5 1800 5.5 9 004-047-01 H.Zapp 21.3 1900 10 004-048-00 MTO 1.1 900 11 Sherk Rd Niagara Falls 3.3 2000 12 Bossert Rd Nia ara Falls 2.8 5000 9 =75% ~riw.s ~J.Y IV.Y Valid parcels on petition = 5 85.7 =75% 73.8 Parcels if all signatures valid = 7 July 9, 2007 -_ Niagara,Falls Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: MW-2007-79 Sign By-law RECOMMENDATION: MW-2007-79 That the by-law appearing on tonight's agenda, being a by-law to prohibit or regulate the placing or erecting of signs, notices and advertising devises on public property within the City of Niagara Falls, be approved. BACKGROUND: As Council is aware, City staff has undertaken a review of the current City Sign By-law as it did not adequately address current sign issues and needs. The executive summary by the MBTW Group (attached) provides a synopsis of the purpose of the study and the guiding principals which resulted in the new recommendations being made. As a result City staff undertook a review of the recommendations and developed the Draft Sign By-law. Although the recommendations contained in the study were based on the needs as perceived by the Consultant, City staff did not implement all the recommendations as, after considerable public consultation, they felt it did not best represent the needs of the City as a whole. Public Participation Following the completion of the Draft Sign By-law, a series of public meetings was held with various stakeholders which included Industry Representatives on March 21, 2006, BIA's and the Business Community on March 29, 2006, and a general public meeting was advertised in the newspaper on March 30, 2006. At these meetings, it was indicated that additional comments could be provided to the Gity and the cut off date was to be April 30, 2006. As the City had not heard from a number of stakeholders, an additional letter was sent out on October 13, 2006 requesting additional comments. Subsequently, additional comments were received and additional meetings held with stakeholders. In order to ensure that all relevant comments with respect to the by-law were received, an additional mailing was done in January 2007 with a copy of the proposed draft sign by-law and once again requesting comments from the stakeholders. Subsequently, addi ' inas were held early in the'with various stakeholders with respect to the D ft Sign By-law. Working Together to Serve Our Community ~~. - . ~.~ ~. _. July 9, 2007 - 2 - MW-2007-79 As can be seen, there have been various opportunities for the stakeholders to provide input into the development of the proposed sign by-law. Generally, the comments received were positive with respect to the proposed changes and the efforts to control the proliferation of signs within the City of Niagara Falls. Comments were received from the public and some of the BIA representatives as to the ability to remove signs that had been previously approved. It was indicated as per section 99 of the Municipal Act 2009, Advertising Devices, the new by-law will not apply to signs lawfully displayed on the day the new by-law comes into force. In order to satisfy the concerns raised by the Niagara Parks Commission with respect to signage near the park, sign applicants will now be required to obtain approval from other regulating authorities prior to the City issuing a sign permit. This provision will satisfy the Niagara Parks Act, section 22(1)(f), "the Commission, with the approval of the Lieutenant Governor and Council, may make regulations prohibiting or licensing, regulating and governing the erection, posting up or other display of notices, signs, sign boards and other advertising devices within the Parks or within 400 m's of any part thereof." The next area of major concern that was identified was the proposal to limit the portable signs to only new businesses fora 30-day period. As a result of discussions with a representative ofthe Portable Sign Industry a compromised position was reached wherein a portable sign would be allowed four times a year at 30 day intervals for each business located on a property. Finally, there were a number of minor wording changes and clarifications made to the proposed by-law. The following is a summary of the significant changes being made in the proposed sign by- law: Banners Banners are not currently covered in the existing sign by-law. It is proposed that there be two per pole with a maximum area of 2.5 m2 and a clearance of 2.5 m. Bench Signs Under the existing by-law they are restricted to private property and only allowed in commercial, tourist commercial and industrial zoned areas. It is proposed that be prohibited, as they do not improve the aesthetics of the streetscape. Existing bench signs will be grandfathered in. As well, there are few suitable locations for new bench signs. Canopy Signs Increasing clearance from sidewalk to bottom of the canopy from 2.45 m to 2.7 m, as it was identified that clearance height restrictions in the existing by-law may be too low. Readograph Sign Not covered in the existing by-law. The new by-law provides definition and regulations regarding this type of sign. Projected Images Not covered in the existing by-law. The new by-law provides definition and regulations regarding this type of .sign. July 9, 2007 - 3 - MW-2007-79 Billboards Existina Proposed Size Min. 21 m2 Min. 18 m2 Max. 70 mz Max. 70 m2 Location Restricted in residential Allowed in Major & Institutional zones Commercial/Industri al, Good General Agricultural & Rural Agricultural Not permitted within Central Business & Chippawa Districts Separation between Billboards None 300 m Distance from Residential, 62 m 90 m parks and historic sites An illumination and visual impact study will be required. The number of billboards will be capped by the official population divided by 625. Only 10 new billboards a year are allowed subject to the above cap. The official population is 82,124 thus allowing for 131 billboards. There are approximately 135 billboards in the City. Accordingly, as per the proposed by-law no additional billboards would be allowed without Council approval. Ground Signs New categories have been created for ground signs that include pylon signs, monument signs and general ground signs. Definitions for the sign types are found in the proposed by-law. New height limits have been established for the ground signs for the different types and the areas that they are located in. The maximum height for pylon signs has been increased form 7.62 m to 9.0 m and to be restricted in the Central Business District (CBD) (schedule A). Heights were increased because many ground signs were set too low, obstructing views of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Restriction to the CBD was in keeping with the Consultant's guiding principle that signage should be in keeping with the image of a district's streetscape. Maximum Area Ground Signs Proposed Proposed Lot Frontage Existino Chippawa(1) All Other 23 m or less 4.6 m2 4.6 m2 4.6 m2 23mto30m 7.0 m2 4.6mz 7.0 m2 30 m less than 46 m 9.3 mZ 4.6mz 9.3 m2 Over 46 m 4.6 m2 18.6 m2(2) (1) Pylon Signs Restricted (2) Pylon Signs 23.0 m2 July 9, 2007 - 4 - MW-2007-79 Wall Signs New categories have been created. This includes murals, awnings and logo signs. Under the existing by-law the maximum area for a wall sign is 25% of the building face to a maximum area of 14 m2. A larger sign, subject to Council approval, could be applied for if the wall has an area greater than 112 m2. It is proposed that the maximum area be 25% of the wall area with a maximum in the Chippawa District of 9.3 m2. An increase in wall sign area in Chippawa would be contrary to the historic, village nature of the area. An awning sign will have a maximum length of 10 m with a maximum of 25% for a sign. A logo sign is to have a maximum area of 10% of the wall area of the upper most storey. Roof Signs Under the existing by-law a roof sign had a maximum length of 30.5 m with a maximum height of 4.6 m for a maximum area of 139.4 mz. It is proposed that the maximum area be 20 m2. Roof signs will be restricted to the Clifton Hill District (schedule A). Roof sign usage should not be permitted in districts endeavouring to be more pedestrian-oriented ordistricts that have a quaint, residential or village character. In addition a visual impact and illumination study is required. The definition of a roof sing has been modified in that it has to be entirely or partly supported by the roof and not appear as a separate structure. Portable Signs Number Inflatable Time Limit Illumination On Vehicle or Trailer Existino 1 per business 14 days 3x/year Per business None Yes Proposed Separation Distance 1 per 15m frontage Not Allowed 30 days fourtimes a year per business No N/A Not allowed if parked or located so that the primary purpose is to display the sign None 15m Variances & Amendments Under the existing sign by-law, all variances and amendments were required to go to Council for approval. It is proposed under the new sign by-law that Council delegate the authority to grant minor variances to the Director of Planning & Development. Section 17.9 and 17.10 describe the tests that are to be used by the Director in determining whether a minor variance will be granted to the applicant. It should also be noted that as part of the variance process ali property owners within 60 meters of the subject sign will be notified of the proposed minor variance. In the event that a variance is not granted or where a proposed sign is not permitted by this by-law, the applicant will make an application for an amendment to the by-law which wil[ be considered by Council, as outlined in section 18 of the by-law. It should be noted that in this instance all property owners within 120 meters of the subject sign will be notified of the nrnnncart amanrlmant July 9, 2007 - 5 - MW-2007-79 Summary The by-law recommended to Council today is the end product of extensive research and public consultation. Staff submit that it represents a reasonable balancing of the competing interest and points of view that surround the regulation of signs that make use of the public realm within the particular culture and environment of the City of Niagara Falls. Recommended by: _ Ed Respectfully submitted: ~-. Executive Director of Community Services .~ ~ '~ Wald, Chief Ad istrative Officer V:12007000NCIL10707091MW-2007-79 -Sign By-law -Final Report.wpd Executive Summary The City of Niagara Falls vision to create a truly world-class tourist destination is amulti-layered challenge whereby all layers of the streetscape must work together to create a unique and lasting image. This report recognizes the importance of signage and its need to harmonize with the city landscape, be unique, beautiful and communicate information easily and effectively. The adoption of the Niagara Falls Tourist Area Development Strategy, June 1998 and the City of Niagara Falls streetscape Master Plan, October 2001 (refer to Appendix C) into the Official Ptan demonstrates the City's commitment to improving the state of its streetscapes. As part of the streetscape improvement task, the City has determined that the current sign bylaw may no longer respond appropriately to current issues. The City of Niagara Falls Council has initiated a review of its existing sign bylaw No. 6661, 1964. The purpose of the City of Niagara Falls sign bylaw review is to: ^ Evaluate the City's current sign bylaw in terms of effectiveness and appropriateness as it relates to the newly determined City Vision ^ To determine how types of signs in the City should be regulated in height, size, appearance and location ^ To develop a new sign bylaw that is consistent with the Official Plan and streetscape objectives ^ To develop a new sign bylaw that is enforceable ^ To develop a new sign bylaw that satisfies the stakeholders expectations The bylaw review presents an analysis of the current sign issues in the City of Niagara Falls and recommends a new approach for regulating signs in the City. A district specific bylaw is the essence of Il' this new approach. One comprehensive district specific bylaw is to replace the City's cun•ent, non-specific bylaw The districts that are to be specifically addressed in new sign bylaw are as follows: 1. Fallsview District 2. Clifton Hill Tourist District 3. Lundy's Lane and Whirlpool Tourist District 4. Chippawa Tourist District 5. River Road Tourist District 6. Commercial Districts Niagara Square Morrison Dorchester Stamford Central Business Districf Mount Carmel Centre Main and Ferry Victoria Avenue 7. Industrial Districts General Guiding Principles for the Bylaw Review Recommendations are as follows: ^ Recognize that signage is a part of the landscape and an amenity of the streetscape ^ Create a signage approach to help visitors feel the complete spirit of Niagara Falls and to 771 communicate an image appropriate for each of its unique Districts ^ Provide direction whereby all streetscape elements express the uniqueness of each District and at the same time harmonize with the existing atmosphere ^ Acknowledge that signage has the opportunity to convey the tourism theme and information as well as act as a means to stimulate exchanges, meetings and interactions on the street ^ Preserve views of the City and of the natural landscape ^ Establish visual priorities and appropriate rules of order to maintain the quality of the streetscape as the focus of visual attention. ~ ^ Define appropriate signage for the various districts with limitations to types and performance standards. ~ ^ Create a cohesive signage system that reinforces each district's own vitality and diversity, pulling together all the messages of the District into a cohesive story i ^ Provide, enliven and enhance streetscape quality, adding colour, continuity, animation and I warmth ^ Follow the principle of simplicity "Less -but good - is more" ~ ^ Demonstrate design excellence through the engagement of professional designers and engineers ~ in signage design. 1 ^ Commit to long term implementation plan and maintenance 1 ~ The bylaw recommendations cover a broad spectrum of general and specific amendments to the current bylaw regulations for signs. Some standards have been eliminated and others have been adjusted to -, r~ respond more appropriately and effectively to the streetscape objectives. The signage review makes specific recommendations to both existing sign types as well as the introduction of new sign initiatives for consideration and implementation into the new sign bylaw. Implementation is anticipated to be a long term objective which will need to be committed to and monitored. The review of the City of Niagara Falls bylaw has determined that a comprehensive district specific bylaw is required to solidify the City's commitment to improving the state of its signage and the streetscape in a holistic manner. This report concludes with a summary of the guiding principles and the bylaw recommendations. The new sign bylaw for the City of Niagara Falls is attached as Appendix A. July 9, 2007 i~.~r~~alls z~~:~~~ Councillor Carolynn loannoni and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: MW-2007- 83 Lead Water Service Investigation Status Report RECOMMENDATION: That this report be received for information. Background: nnw-2oo7-ss In April 2007, the Ontario Ministry of the Environment advised that some drinking water samples taken from consumer's taps in the City of London contained elevated levels of lead that exceeded the current standard. Lead is toxic, and poses a threat to pregnant women and young children. This prompted the Chief Drinking Water Inspector to issue orders to 36 municipalities to conduct precautionary testing in older homes on May 23, 2007. As a result of the testing the provincial government is proposing the following steps: New regulations for schools and day nurseries built before 1990 to implement flushing, testing and preventive action plans, MunicipaUProvincial public education campaigns, best management practices and on-bill financing to assist homeowners to replace lead services, More stringent regulatory requirements for community-wide lead testing, record retention/reporting, corrosion control measures and separate accounting of these costs. The City of Niagara Falls was not one of the 36 municipalities selected by the Ministry in their initial assessment however, in anticipation of the future regulation, we have voluntarily begun an inventory program and have conducted sampling at 20 homes to date. The results of our first round of samples show evidence that seven homes did exceed the test parameters for lead. The test results have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment (Chief Drinking 1Nater Inspector). Working Together to Serve Dur Community ~ Community Services Department July 9, 2007 - 2 - MW-2007-83 Samples were also taken from the City's distribution system to ensure that the elevated readings were not present in the City's water distribution system. All samples to date have confirmed that the water in the distribution systems is will under the established levels. Based on a review of our records and information obtained during our Water Meter Installation Program, the City may have up to 260 lead water services although some have recently been replaced. Our current practice is to replace any lead water service between the main and the property line as part of all Capital Works projects. At this time it is premature to propose any further plans for private service replacements but we will continue to work pro-actively with those homeowners who are willing to replace their lead services or would like to have samples taken at their residence. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer Attach: S:IREPORTS12007 ReportslMW-2007-83 -Lead Water Services.wpd Geoff Holman, Director of Municipal Works July 9, 2007 N~.ag~ra,Falls ~~~~~~ Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: R-2007-18 Highway 420 and Stanley Avenue Raised Highway Median Appearance Design Options RECOMMENDATION: R-2007-18 1) That the Committee provide direction on its preferred design option; 2) That the Ministry of Transportation be approached to provide. funding for the preferred design option; and failing Ministry support 3) That funding be considered in the City's 2008 Operating Budget. BACKGROUND: Council requested that Staff review the opportunities and associated costs to improve the appearance of the median at Highway 420 and Stanley Avenue. A lack of maintenance, which lead to overgrown grass and weeds, had been identified as a concern by Council and residents. The Ministry (MTO) had removed the plant materials from the median in response to the complaints regarding appearance, the difficulty of ongoing maintenance of the median, and MTO budget constraints. The Highway 420 median starts at Stanley Avenue continuing in a westerly direction and is a highly visual gateway corridor to the City of Niagara Falls. Presently, the median is a raised concrete wall with gravel. The overall length of the median is 900 linear metres or approximately 3000 feet. The width of the median is narrow at the start then widens to approximately 6 metres or 20 feet, and then narrows again. Photos of the median are attached. Communication with MTO representatives was initiated to discuss the appearance concerns and potential opportunities for improvement. Staff prepared two draft design options that provide potential enhancements to the median section which starts at Stanley Avenue and ends at the Drummond Road bridge overpass. The two design alternatives developed by PRC staff create an aesthetically attractive gateway corridor that is low maintenance (no need for irrigation and electrical services) and does not present a visual distraction for drivers. ;~ + Workiug Together to Serve Our Community ( Community Services Department Parks, Recreation & Culture a July 9, 2007 - 2 - R-2007-18 Design Option `A' -Preferred Solution (Refer to Drawing) Utilizing the improvements in artificial turf, Option `A' recommends that the raised gravel section of the median be covered with artificial turfwith a slight crown. Planting bed areas along the centre of the median would be cut out of the artificial turf for planting of low maintenance trees with a narrow upright growth habit, such as evergreen trees and Columnar Oak Trees. These planting areas can also include decorative large rock boulders, coloured stone bed cover, and low maintenance perennial plants. The artificial turf requires no watering, no cutting, and always looks green. Estimated Budget for Design Option ' A' - $ 280,000 Design Option ` B' -Moderate Solution (Refer to Drawing) Option 'B' recommends the installation of a coloured interlocking brick paver border, set on a cloth and gravel base. The colour and pattern of the interlocking pavers would be consistent with the stamped asphalt paving adjacent to the laneways along this corridor. Along the middle portions of the median, a pattem of design elements such as landscape rock boulders, ornamental perennial grasses, perennial plants, and evergreen trees set in a coloured stone planting bed would be installed. Estimated Budget for Design Option `B' - $ 190,000.00 Plant materials recommended in both design options would require minimal maintenance and have increased salt tolerance, which is critical. The annual maintenance costs would be additional and are not included in the design estimates. The 2007 operating or capital budgets do not include any allocations for this project. City staff is of the opinion that the Ministry is supportive of the beautification of the median. W hether or not, the Ministry will provide financial support, for the costs associated with the median redesign and ongoing annual maintenance, is yet to be determined. Recommended by: Denyse Approved by: `~ ~-c~.~ Ed Dujlovic, 1Exe~ittive DDiret;t - Respectfully submitted: ~.•~ ~[~/ °~" / ' J n MacDonald, Chief Admin Attachments jclaydon/das V:12007COUNCIL10707091R-2007- 18 -Highway 420 Enhancement.wpd Parks, Recreation & Culture s s of Community Services isti`ative Officer July 9, 2007 - 3 - R-2007-18 Highway 420 Median -Existing Photo Images VIEW LOOKING TOWARDS PORTAGE ROAD BRIDGE VIEW LOOKING TOWARDS STANLEY AVENUE The City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Resolution July 9, 2007 No. Moved by Councillor Seconded by Councillor WHEREAS all meetings of Council are to be open to the public; and WHEREAS the only time a meeting or part of a meeting maybe closed to the public if the subject matter falls under one of the exceptions under s. 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT on July 9"', 2007, Niagara Falls Council will go into a closed meeting to consider matters that fall under the subject matter of 239(2)(c) ofthe Municipal Act, 2001, a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land, and 239(2)(d), labour relations or employee negotiations. AND The Seal of the Corporation be hereto affixed. Carried Unanimously DEAN IORFIDA R. T. (TED) SALCI CITY CLERK MAYOR