2008/02/25 Fourth MEETING
Monday, February 25, 2008
6:00 p.m.
City Hall, Committee Room #2A & B
1 } Approval of the February 11, 2008 Community Services Minutes.
2) REPORTS: STAFF CONTACT:
a) TS-2008-07
Corwin Avenue
Traffic Operation Review Karl Dren
b) TS-2008-08
Garner Road between Mountain Road and
Warner Road -Speed Limit Review Karl Dren
c) TS-2008-16
Royal Manor Drive at Windsor Crescent
Intersection Control Review Karl Dren
3) NEW BUSINESS:
.,~4) ADJOURNMENT:
MINUTES OF COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING
MONDAY, February 11, 2008, CITY HALL, ROOM 2 AT 4:00 P.M.
PRESENT: Chair Councillor Carolynn loannoni Mayor Ted Salci, Councillors:
Jim Diodati, Victor Pietrangelo (4:40 p.m.}, Bart Maves, Wayne
Thomson, Janice Wing and Shirley Fisher
ABSENT: Councillor Vince Kerrio, John MacDonald, Denyse Morrissey, Lee
Smith
STAFF: Ed Dujlovic, Ken Burden, Ken Beaman, Alex Herlovitch, Dean lorfida,
Geoff Holman, Karl Dren, Todd Harrison, Serge Felicetti, Marianne
Tikky- Secretary
GUEST: Michael Patterson - 2066 Oakville Blvd., Oakville, ON, Don Jackson -
6770 Topaz Crescent, Hilary & John Ainslie - 6476 Huggins Street, Jo-
Ann McAlpine - 7029 Paisley Avenue, Gord West - 5764 Hanan
Avenue, Jim French - #7-6283 Cherrywood Road, Tom Richardson -
40 Queen Street, St. Catharines, Helen Antonio - 2819 Lalemant, John
Harkness - 3336 Baker Crescent, Naresh Verma -Knights Inn, 6276
Main Street, David Jovanovic - 6417 Main Street, Kathleen Powell -
Museum Manager -City of Niagara Falls.
PRESS: Corey Larocque, Niagara Falls Review, Rob Lapensee, Niagara This
Week
MINUTES
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Fisher and seconded by Councillor Wing,
that the January 28, 2008 minutes be approved as amended. F-2008-06, the motion
was amended as follows;
"That Councillor Bart Maves act on a voluntary basis as a liaison between staff and out
of town bus operators to promote transit services."
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2008/02/11
REPORTS
a) PD-2008-15
Appeal of Intention to Designate All Saints Anglican Church
5680 Robinson Street
• Archdeacon Michael Patterson the executive officer of the Diocese who is
speaking on behalf of the Bishop from the Anglican Church of Canada.
Mr. Patterson advised that All Saints Church has a long and historic
-2-
history in Niagara Falls. The Diocese is seeking exemption of designation
of the church pews so that the possibility of different kinds of ministries
may use the building. An anonymous group wishing to occupy the church
space wrote to the Diocese advising these types of buildings need
configurable spaces so that the same space may be used for education
on Saturdays and worship on Sundays. The letter further states, "that if
we are constrained by the pews in the main portion of the building space
we might not be able to utilize the space efficiently and effectively to
accomplish our goals and to grow the church." Mr. Patterson summarized
that if the diocese does not receive an exemption of the pew's designation
then the opportunity for new ministries will be lost and the church will
remain closed and become more of a museum.
• Councillor Wing requested that Mr. Patterson define the terms goals,
social justice ministry and relevant ministry in no uncertain terms. Mr.
Patterson advised that the terms mean working with people with mental
illness, working with street people and working with people living below
the poverty line. Though there is not an overabundance of mentally ill and
street people in the All Saints area, there is a considerable number of
people living below the poverty line.
• Councillor Wing does not see that this type of ministry fitting for the
historic Drummondville area which is a few blocks from the Fallsview
Tourist area and existing among stable residential neighbourhoods. As
the 90 member congregation meets bi-monthly and performs mission
work for the Anglican Church, Councillor Wing would like the parishioners
to be able to worship in their church once again.
• Mr. Richardson from Sullivan Mahoney Law Firm representing the
Anglican Church of Canada in this matter advised that the Diocese is in
agreement with staff's recommendations and find them a fair compromise.
The Diocese does not intend to the sell the building but have the building
used in a viable and socially responsible manner. The Diocese is
prepared to keep some of the pews off to the side in perpetuity but does
not feel that because the pews are original to the church that they warrant
historical designation. Should the pews be designated with the building,
then the reuse of this facility would be lost and the pews and interior of the
building would sit there unused and unfiling. Mr. Richardson echoed that
the use of the church rest with the Diocese.
• Mrs. Hilary Ainslie advised that though rumored this was the first time the
parishioners are hearing the future use of All Saints Church. Mrs. Ainslie
further noted that the configuration of All Saints is a very narrow nave and
not suitable for flexible seating.
• John(Jock) Ainslie advised that All Saints Church has an active 90
member congregation. The Bishop advised the congregation in April
2007 that he would like to see the congregation worship at All Saints once
again on a regular basis. The congregation has taken the closing of the
church as temporary and continues to meet bi-monthly for fellowship and
-3-
continues to perform community work. When the church was closed, All
Saints was the only Anglican Church in Niagara Falls that was increasing
in number over the past two years. Mr. Ainslie noted a petition regarding
the historical designation of the property received several thousand
signatures from the residents of Niagara Falls and advised that the pews
date back to 1857 and are original to the church.
' Mr. Patterson responded to Mr. Ainslie's remarks advising Committee that
All Saints church was no longer a viable church and the Diocese though
sympathetic to the parishioners has to make some tough choices. The
Diocese would like to see the church used for a worship centre and help
people in the community. It is the Diocese hope that a future use for the
church can be found that is responsive to the needs of the community.
• Councillor loannoni requested that Mr. Patterson clarify for Committee
and the parishioners what the outcome would be should the pews be
designated. Mr. Patterson advised that if the pews are not exempt from
the designation the church would not be reopen.
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Pietrangelo and seconded by
Councillor Diodati that the matter be deferred to allow the parishioners time to
meet with the new Bishop.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2008/02/11
b) MW-2008-09
Morrison Street -Victoria Avenue to Stanley Avenue
Detour Routing and Heavy Vehicle Restriction
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson and seconded by
Councillor Diodati;
1. That Morrison Street between Victoria Avenue and Stanley Avenue be the
designated detour route for the duration of the construction, and,
2. That the existing "Heavy Vehicle" restriction currently in place on Morrison
Street between Victoria Avenue and Stanley Avenue be eliminated during
the closure of Bridge Street.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2008/02/11
c) MW-2008-12
Ontario Municipal Infrastructure Investment
Initiative (MIII) Application for Funding
Resolution Drummond Road Reconstruction
Lundy's Lane to Murray Street
It was ORDERED on the motion of Mayor Salci and seconded by Councillor
Pietrangelo that the Drummond Road (Lundy's Lane-McLeod Road)
Reconstruction Project be submitted for funding under the Ontario Municipal
-4-
Infrastructure Investment Initiative (MIII) and that the related by-law on the
Council agenda be approved.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2008/02/11
d} TS-2008-06
Fallsview Tourist Area Traffic Count Comparison
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Wing and seconded by Councillor
Thomson that a meeting be held with stakeholders and that Council be advised
of the meeting date.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2008/02/11
e) MW-2008-14
Niagara Convention and Civic Centre
It was ORDERED on the motion of Mayor Salci and seconded by Councillor
Wing that;
1. The firm of MHPM Project Managers Inc. be awarded the Project
Management assignment for the construction of the Niagara Convention
and Civic Centre.
2. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary
agreement.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2008/02/11
3) NEW BUSINESS:
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson and seconded by Mayor Salci
that the previous Council's position on Region representation be brought back for
Council's consideration.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2008/02/11
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson and seconded by Mayor Salci
that;
1. Staff prepare a proposal outlining the strongest and best options, of
the vast possibilities for land on which to build a centralized police
headquarters in our City.
2. That staff investigate the possibility of private and City owned land
opportunities in order to strengthen the case for our City as the
best location for a centralized police service.
-5-
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2008/02/11
ADJOURNMENT
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Maves and seconded by Councillor
Pietrangelo that the regular meeting of the Community Services Committee be
adjourned at 6:05 p.m. and enter into an In-Camera Session.
Motion: Carried
February 25, 2008 TS-2008-07
•
Nla ara ails
cr~N~n,~
Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: TS-2008-07
Corwin Avenue
Traffic Operations Review
RECOMMENDATION:
That the following report be received for the information of Committee.
BACKGROUND:
Further to report MW-2007-95 (Corwin Avenue -Traffic Operations Review), City Council
directed staff to investigate the extent of cut-through traffic using the neighbourhood
streets. The request originated as a result of the opening of the Parts Source retail store
located on the southwest corner of Lundy's Lane and Corwin Avenue.
Two studies were carried out to assess traffic patterns in the area.
The objective of one study (Study 1) was to determine the number of motorists using the
local streets that do not have either an origin or destination in the study area. These
motorists are considered as "cut-through" traffic.
The second study (Study 2) examined the number of motorists entering the Part Source
Corwin Avenue access. These motorists are not considered as "cut-through" traffic. The
data provides information as to the direction Part Source patrons are coming from,
including through the neighbourhood.
Study 1:
The study was completed during the morning, midday, and afternoon peak periods which
normally carry the highest traffic volumes during the day. In the average hour, 44 vehicles
were recorded on Corwin Avenue between Lundy's Lane and Spence Street, of which six
(6}vehicles were determined to be strictly using the road to avoid the Dorchester Road and
Lundy's Lane intersection. These are considered to be "cut-through." The most prevalent
route for "cut-through" traffic was northbound on Dorchester Road turning right onto Barker
Community Services Department
~i~l. ~ Transportation Services
Working Together to Serve Our Community
` •.r G .n. . i • •1 • .
s ~ r
February 25, 2008 - 2 - TS-2008-07
Street or Spence Street and then proceeded north on Corwin Avenue. Then motorists
completed a right turn onto Lundy's Lane. This route is shown by the green line on the
attached study area drawing. An average of 2.5 motorists per hour completed this
movement.
Another route consisted of eastbound traffic on Lundy's Lane carrying out a right turn onto
Corwin Avenue, then proceeding south to either Spence Street or Barker Street, then
carrying out a left turn to continue south onto Dorchester Road. This is denoted by the
blue line on the drawing. It is presumed that these drivers exited one of the commercial
properties on Lundy's Lane between Dorchester Road and Corwin Avenue. Instead of
attempting a left turn onto Lundy's .Lane and then onto Dorchester Road, drivers
proceeded to turn right on Lundy's Lane followed by a second right turn onto Corwin
Avenue. An average of 1.5 motorists per hour completed this movement.
Various other "cut-through" patterns combined to accountforthe remaining two (2) vehicles
per hour average.
Study 2:
The second study determined the number of Parts Source patrons utilizing Corwin Avenue
via Barker Street and Spence Street. These motorists are not referred to as `cut-through'
as they have a destination in the study area. Over aneight-hour period, an average of nine
(9) vehicles per hour used the Corwin Avenue driveway to the Parts Source outlet. Two-
. thirds, six (6}vehicles per hour, of all customers using the Corwin Avenue driveway actually
came from or proceeded toward Lundy's Lane and did not filter through the
neighbourhood. An average of two (2) vehicles per hour were observed to arrive at or
leave the Part Source store using the Corwin Avenue access and further use either Barker
Street or Spence Street. It may be assumed that these motorists originated from, or
continued on to Dorchester Road. An average of one (1) vehicle per hour was noted to
continue in a southbound direction on Corwin Avenue presumably with their destination
within the neighbourhood.
Study Summary: I,
The data collected identifies that approximately six (6) vehicles per hour cut-through to
avoid the Dorchester Road and Lundy's Lane intersection. This volume cannot be
attributed to traffic generated by the Part Source store. Approximately three (3) vehicles
per hour arrive at or leave the Part Source store using the Corwin Avenue access and turn
to/from the south via Corwin Avenue. These vehicles are directly attributed to traffic
generated by the Part Source store.
General Information regarding Traffic Volumes:
Existing traffic volumes on Corwin Avenue abutting the residential zone has stayed fairly
consistent with the traffic volumes.
The 24-hour volumes recorded on Corwin Avenue were:
639 vehicles in 2005
635 vehicles in 2006
619 vehicles in 2007 (after the opening of the Parts Source)
with a peak hour volume of 76 vehicles
February 25, 2008 - 3 - TS-2008-07
Therefore, the perceived increase in traffic volume as a result of the new development on
Corwin Avenue has not been supported.
The 24-hour volume recorded on Spence Street was:
350 vehicles in 2007
with a peak hour volume of 30 vehicles
For comparison, traffic data was collected on Franklin Avenue between Lundy's Lane and
Ker Street in .2007. Franklin Avenue is the first road west of Drummond Road that leads
into this neighbourhood and is flanked by .commercial properties on both sides.
The 24-hour volumes recorded on Franklin Avenue were:
2,100 vehicles in 2007
with a peak hour volume of 240 vehicles
Similar traffic numbers were collected inmid-October. Franklin Avenue experiences more
than three times the amount of traffic than that of Corwin Avenue. Both roads are
residential collectors within the same neighbourhood that extends south from Lundy's
Lane.
Whenever a neighbourhood is designed in a grid pattern, some cut-through traffic maybe
expected. In this case the cut-through volumes on Corwin Avenue are not significant. A
typical residential road can accommodate 500-800 vehicles per hour and operate at an
acceptable level or service.
Traffic Speed:
Traffic calming has typically been installed in response to a speeding concern. Speed data
collected during the previous summer on Corwin Avenue identified operating speeds below 'I
the 50-km/h speed limit.
Future Improvements:
The approved Dorchester Road Environmental Assessment identifies an expansion of
Dorchester Road to five lanes north of Spence Street. The additional intersection capacity
will assist in improving the level of service at the intersection and reduce cut-through traffic.
In the meantime, Staff will request the Niagara Region to optimize the signal timings at
Lundy's Lane and Dorchester Road in an attempt to reduce northbound queues that may
be attributable to cut-throu h traffic.
g
In conclusion, a small number of vehicles cut-through using Corwin Avenue (six vehicles
on average per hour), but those cannot be attributed to the Part Source store. Patrons
arriving at the Part Source store generally arrive via Lundy's Lane. A small number (three
vehicles per hour) arrives/leaves via Corwin Avenue based on an 8-hour period. Given the
grid pattern of the subdivision, it is common to have some cut-through traffic.
The intersections within the neighbourhood are operating at acceptable levels of service,
and a collision problem has not been noted on any of the road sections or intersections
within the area. Therefore, based on the information, there is no evidence to indicate that
additional traffic control measures are warranted at this time, and therefore, no further
action required.
February 25, 2008 - 4 - TS-2008-07
Recommended b .g
Y
Karl Dren, Director of Transportation Services
.j
Approved by:
Ed Dujlovic, ec tive Director of Community Services
Respectfully submitted
"John MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer
John Grubich
S;IGeneral AdministrationlGA 1.01 Reports12008 Community Services102 Feb 251TS-2008-07 Corwin Avenue -Traffic Operations Review.wpd
l - - m` a S C. fi`b'
~ x
ft' k ti f F ~ A - O
4 Y ~ S q~* y. FEt ~Y e _ ~ "r
" ~ ~
M ~
# ~ f~LY~t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L
- , -~s L
" S X ~ ~ E, r~ Y 3 v '
~ t ~ jam, P~{ ~ i DL ~
}
J
_ V
~ ~y- ,~p
_ ~ ~
} r ~ - ~
~ ~
~ ~ i~
~k A.
a "'VF
~,y h _ ~ ~ ~
~ A' 'T ~ i ~ ~ ? ~ ~ t
~ y U
~ ~ P _ ~ ` ~ ~ v ~ i
, ~ a 1 a ~ ~
~ ~
t ~ ~
~ € ~s" zr
ti
~ .
,,.r,.x. s.
~z ~ ~~A
- .,~{~Yi1t~.i111 ABC Iif'
¦ ~ rx ~
~"~.~'rd' x ~ ; ~ - ` a ~ ma=t
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ r
ih~ s
' `
°.a ~ s S x ra ~ ~ ~
nr 1 xac~ Y: s, f, x" ~°:-a e2 ' ~ c .4 } 't
~ Y Y 6E'
~~ie
p
~
„ p
r
'`z 3; - ~i ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~8~.~s ~ 'fir $ x=s W
' PL ' ~ YW=~ ~L ~ ~ ~ rf ~i ! ~i 4~.- } ~ # ~~~f C ~'~k ~~v"Y.~.
~ ~ ~ , z ~
,
G >
~
+ jt'
` ~
~ j. ,B^•. ¢ ~~tax arv4a- R ~ ~ v'" x ~ { a ItYP Y~~ ~ +1}~{ ~ t
{ nt 5+
~ ~
~s ~4 ; ~ y ~
~ ~ ~
a
Q
N
q~ ~ ~ ~
e t
~ s~ i ~
>i~ ~7 i~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~~~`c~ 6~F k' jai ~~~s~~a"a~,`,'y/
~ ~
February 25, 2008 TS-2008-08
Nia ara ails
CANADA.
Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: TS-2008-08
Garner Road between Mountain Road and Warner Road
Speed Limit Review
RECOMMENDATION:
That the existing 80 km/h speed limit on Garner Road between Mountain Road and a point
350 metres south of Warner Road be reduced to 60 km/h.
BACKGROUND:
Staff has conducted a review of the existing speed limit on Garner Road between Mountain
Road and Warner Road. The concern stems from the difficulty motorists have exiting
driveways given the rolling terrain on Garner Road and the speed at which motorists are
travelling.
Garner Road is an arterial roadway, 7.5 metres in width with a gravel shoulder and ditch
on both sides. Garner Road has a speed limit of 80 km/h, with the exception of a section
between Warner Road and a point 350 metres to the south of Warner Road on which the
maximum legal speed. limit is 60 km/h. The roadway contains a "chip and tar" surface.
This section of Garner Road carries approximately 300 vehicles per day. This may be due
to the fact that Niagara-on-the-Lake bound motorists would most likely travel west on
Mountain Road to Taylor Road.
This section of Garner Road is relatively straight but contains two vertical curves. In the
northbound direction the elevation descends for approximately 100 metres, from a point
approximately 260 metres north of Mountain Road. Field investigations identify multiple
accesses to the predominantly agricultural properties abutting Garner Road. This area is
also flanked by thick foliage on either side. To forewarn motorists of possible conflicts with
homeowners exiting their property, "Hidden Driveway" warning signs are present in both
directions on this hill, advising motorists to proceed with caution. Another descent in
elevation begins at the existing railroad tracks located 100 metres south of Warner Road.
Warning signs are present to forewarn motorists of the sharp change in elevation
approaching the rail crossing, with 10 km/h advisory speed tabs posted suggesting the safe
crossing speed. A review of this incline has also taken place in the past, warranting the
Community Services Department
a L._.
~ ' Working Together to Serve Our Community Transportation Services
I ~ i
f ~ r
February 25, 2008 - 2 - TS-2008-08
60 km/h speed limit reduction as a safety concern was raised due to northbound vehicles
losing control. Light standards are present at irregular intervals to illuminate the road
surface.
A collision review has been conducted for the previous three-year period. The review
revealed that a collision problem does not exist, as no collisions .have been reported in the
study area.
A speed limit review was carried out to determine whether the current speed limit on the
study section of Garner Road, complements the roadway design. Factors used to
determine the appropriate speed limit includes .the roadway classification and design
speed, operating speed, road surface, roadway cross-sectional elements (shoulders,
sidewalks, etc.), surrounding land uses, roadway alignment, traffic volumes, collision
history, level of pedestrian activity, number of driveways and length of section under study.
The results reveal that the maximum speed limit on the roadway should be 60 km/h.
Based on the results obtained it is recommended that the existing speed limit of 80 km/h
on Garner Road between Mountain Road and a point 350 metres south of Warner Road,
be reduced to 60 km/h. This will match the 60 km/h zone at the northerly 350 metre
segment of Garner Road. The Niagara Regional Police will be advised of this change.
Recommended b ~ ~1
Y
Karl Dren, Dir ctor of Transportation Services
Approved by:
Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services
Respectfully submitted:
John Mac Wald, Chief Administrative Officer
B. Skiba
S:1General AdministrationlGA 1.01 Reports12008 Community Services\02 Feb 251TS-2008-08 Garner Road between Mountain Road and Warner Road- Speed Limit Review.wpd
-
O
y
~ - _
~ ~4 4
l ~
{
- ~i y
t yJ 1::~i
O O 'SFK ~ Inti9 ry
~~f
,.r. -
A
its
- - - h - -
~ e A6.g
r
~
I
V ~
hip FAA, n
- _ Y'.
i.
>i'.
~ ~ y.
a ~ ' ~ ,I~la~ _
~ - ~
_ + F
'N." ; i
1'i .
~ - _
i I,
i
t -'r
rf
~ j ~ 4 y xl
¦
-
~ -~zv
h'
R1 ~p ~
~ _ -
y
V~
~ Q -
o c„ ~ ~
~ ~
3 ~ ~ 1 ~ _
(D
y ~ ~ .Iw
r- ~
- ,
x.:34 ~ 't I ~{J ~i
ry. L ~ J~
~~I ~
~tt ~ 1 1 ~ Y~ ~ S~
~ F r s ' -
r~
M J
~r
(A,)
February 25, 2008 TS-2008-16
Nia ara all
g s
c~N~t~~
Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: TS-2008-16
Royal Manor Drive at_ Windsor Crescent (East Intersection)
Intersection Control Review
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That a stop sign be installed at the intersection of Royal Manor Drive at Windsor
Crescent (east intersection) facing northbound motorists.
2. That the Niagara Regional Police provide enforcement of the 50 km/h speed limit
on Royal Manor Drive, when resources permit.
3. That staff undertake follow-up speed studies in 6 months to determine the
effectiveness of Police enforcement.
BACKGROUND:
In reply to a request from a resident pertaining to the intersection of Royal Manor Drive and
Windsor Crescent (east intersection), Staff. has carried out a review to determine the
appropriate control at this intersection. In addition, concerns were expressed with the
speed of traffic on Royal Manor Drive, the need for signs to identify children playing and
the presence of school bus activity in the area.
Royal Manor Drive is a local residential roadway that extends between Dorchester Road
and Lundy's Lane. In the study area, Royal Manor Drive is approximately 7 metres in
width, consisting of a grass boulevard and a sidewalk on the south side only. Numerous
horizontal curves are present throughout the length of Royal Manor Drive. Light standards
are present on the south side providing illumination for motorists during nighttime
conditions. Heavy vehicles are prohibited on Royal Manor Drive. Windsor Crescent is a
.local roadway, 400 metres in length which intersects with Royal Manor Drive twice. The
roadway is approximately 7 metres in width. There are no sidewalks or curbs present on
either side of the roadway (a sidewalk for the west side of Windsor Crescent has been
budgeted for in the 2008 Municipal. Works Operating Budget). The study intersection is
uncontrolled.
Community Services Department
Transportation Services
~ Y Working Together to Serve Dur Community
February 25, 2008 TS-2008-16
-2-
Speed studies were conducted to determine the speed of motorists on Royal Manor Drive.
Manual speed studies reveal that on Royal Manor Drive between Windsor Crescent (east
intersection) and Dorchester Road the 85th percentile speed, the speed at which the
majority of motorists travel at or below was 55km/h during the off peak period and 60krri/h
during the pm peak period. Given the 50 km/h speed the Niagara Regional Police have
been requested •to provide enforcement.
A three-year collision review reveals that a collision problem does not exist at the study
intersection as no collisions were reported. On Royal Manor Drive between the eastern
and western junctions of Windsor Crescent, three collisions -were noted in the previous
three-year period. All collisions involved a single motor vehicle, two of which occurred
during adverse weather conditions and the other for undetermined reasons. Additionally,
one collision was reported on Royal Manor Drive between Windsor Crescent (east
intersection) and Dorchester Road, involving approaching vehicles also during adverse
weather conditions. It is the onus of the motorist to adjust their speed during inclement
road conditions.
Technical studies have been carried out at this intersection to determine whether a yield
or stop control is required. Study results indicate that a stop control is warranted at the
intersection. The visibility triangle requirement for an uncontrolled intersection is not met
thus warranting the stop control. This is common in developed residential areas with
buildings and fencing normally constructed within the visibility clear zone. This triangle is
intended to provide motorists with sufficient visibility to view approaching vehicles and
therefore be able to react appropriately. From the proposed stop location on Windsor
Crescent (east intersection}, a visibility study revealed that motorists are provided with the
minimum required visibility of 125 metres to the east and west when observing traffic at the
intersection.
Staff reviewed the warrants for "Children at Play" signs. These signs are placed in
advance of designated park locations where children may be encountered. As no parks
are present within the study area boundary, these signs are not warranted.
"School bus stop ahead" signs are considered in locations with limited sight distances.
Although Royal Manor Drive curves slightly at Windsor Crescent (east intersection), the
minimum stopping sight distance requirement is fulfilled throughout for motorists travelling
in both directions. School buses are equipped with flashing beacons and extendable stop
arms that are activated as occupants embark and alight the vehicle. Motorists are required
by law to stop for the school bus stop sign.
Based on the above information it is recommended that a stop sign be installed at the
intersection of Royal Manor Drive at Windsor Crescent (east .intersection) facing
northbound motorists.
February 25, 2008 TS-2008-16
-3-
Recommended by:
Karl Dren, Dire for of Transportation Serv-ices
Approved by:
Ed Dujlovic, Exec a Director of Community Services
Respectfully submitted:
~John MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer
Bart Skiba
S:1General AdministrationlGA 1.01 Reports12008 Community Services102 Feb 251TS-2008-16 Royal Manor Drive @ Windsor Crescent
- Intersection Control Review.wpd
o, F ~ s , s.
„
S
7
~ r~ ~
" 1.... ! c. 1o L
i ~
~ s
£ £ah ~ 3 ~ • ~
i~Y i `A ~
"K '
S
'£dS S~~ ,£~i.~~
~
s" ~ea:.T~ is ~g~~~'~s ~5 ~ , ~ Y
yl;.
~ .
~o
I
n ; ii
s
°as ~ O
y
J L
.1. 3
ti St ~ . L
L E
P Fy
a
. e.
~ lyq ~
~ ~ v~~~~~ ~ Sao
} }
~
~~'r
~
S y
„ •
O
1 £
~
~ ;
7~L .r~~ S .T n
E - 1~ j~L ~Y a ~ +q "~-.S
O
~ Y ~
A 3 V
~ ~h L
s~
~ ~
' L
%c EYL O
S~.i ~ ~
1 ~ ~•x ~ ~ O
~ n '('i: ~
~ ~ woxoa
w~' ~6
M ~ aS'~£
o '3 ~ '.y, 1
~
~ ' O
~ a °
~ ,<M
~
$4 3,
i
Fx. r.. II~ di; ~ ,1 ~ ~s
Z
x
E Y '~I~ i _
1 p,
3 ~t
0 0
L j o
~ " FS
~ a :fit ? < P
,
~ 7
. .
.
a ~u. ~ xwcacea. ,
n..H....w,:~
:'"~7!~"""" ~T~. ~...1E'..