2008/10/06 } 3~ '~55
~u~ ~i S~,°~~e' E
€ 3~Si"'~' F~S'~
':-uy,{~xz'?~ T #..u-ta
N r~.
~
~ C C C r"z, "~;?q~ ~ C C S~."5'~'i
V y f~n I~ ~i"j*~ V l9 c6 O 3
m 'i? rA
a ,l~f~~~ Q ~ ~ j ~ C C > k,~
'`~g'",~ H m ~o `m s ~ o 0 0 ~ ~ ~ o
s~'~'i"~ Z 2 2 2 ' Z 2 2 T ~ Q` ~i~.x8:?`:
~ ~ ~ ~ -o -o ~ Z'~i ~ p p ~ c - - ~ :
~ ~ ~ -o s
~ Q:~ LL F f-~ H W'-4 LL U' C7 W ~ Y Y W uy~Z ~
~~"f~~ LL ~ ~ ¢ LL
~'z;m' ~ ;aQ~ki ~ ~''-,~`..~i
x~LL7~:; t~ ~ LJJ~ m ~
~ W ° i m
F-~: ~ y E~
~'~Q~~ i`~'~ Q ~ ~'a~
r~3 m ~ E W N c 6~
~ LLI~ °tf '~~~r Z o ~ ~ ~2~~
~ a H N ~ N rsO~
~~I~~ O ~ ; W f0 ~ ~v ~tl~i ;
~ ~ ('J O ~'nOr~ W ~ ~ d m ~ N~.~`
n , a W
~a~~~ Z~ ~ V ~ G) o a7
e~~;`', O ~-:~"ti
? ~ ~ G1 ~ ~ ~tdJ~'
~"g~;~; LLI ~ ~ "Ns5 ~ v O ~ '~o
X'~~'U~ W~ ~~W~ Z ~ ~ ~ E ~
~ O C. w; ~
V'° W uj ~ E o 5.~.
t~ ,a ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 's~~~ 2 '~6 U U o ~ ~ ~ eQ:x
W.~, Z er ~ ~ ~ g U' ~ = o ~ 4 m ~ V~
~ ~ ~ ~Z~
~~U~ ~ ~ U E o ~~,f/~~~ W ~ i6 ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~
LLJ C _ ~ ~ ~s~t 2 0~ m ~ ~ ~ a
y O - ~a a Si~~~~ r o aLi ~ ~ m ~ o~
~ (n ~ V ~'"~j N ~ C d L ~ ' > C
~~aW~"~ = m -~60 ~ ~r~c V ~ ~ ~1D ~ m ~
r ~ ~ ~~Z~~i .°~o i~ m ~ U ~ a ~
N 'O a =`3'. U ~ -p
W V ~ ~ ~ s~ E ~ m .o a~ c ~ ~ ~'~~3 a~
~"H~ ii ¢ ~ fn H a in ~ 3 ° a~i o F ~ bl I- o
-o fA Z
~ ~a ~p LLJ LLJ s~~~ ~ -a :o ~o ~ a~ ~ ~ ° W W :;~.p~,~ o
~ c m Z ~ y ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ i;s~ ~ c
~ s' fA 'p ~ ~ y Z : V~ tn ,n m`o u61i m o` cp ~ ~ ~ m' ~ o~ y Z ''~~-i o
~~'~.a~ ~ rn~ ~ ~~z't~ O I- m~a~ o~~a~ mU M~ °~m c~d oo ~i a~
O ch V c~ o~ v m~ ~ ~ ~ o E~ o E~ o c w U o~ ~ o~ m~ o
`+v O O.C O T O ~
a'~ts.: Q O N L m N L rn p y p 0/ U p'~O ~ N N O ~.~4,~;. C
~f~..,,e~,``, d o ~ p ~ o ~a ~ d o> > > o> > >'o o c~ ~ ~ N o - O ~ ~ 4
"~'~~U;~3 W N ~ N C N C W ~ ~~c''~` W ~ N(0 > N(0 N~ (0 O ~ W?
O ~ ~ 7*r ; a ~ N fn O Sn Q N ~ O
~ ~iN ~i u~~ ZQ ¢ ~ ~~in ~~in ~m rtc~ ~a~ ~a zQ
~ ~ a`~i
~ ~ ,..a ~
~ax a- m .n ~ N M ~ N N ~ t~ ~ a~ o~ M<1'
~
October 6, 2008 F-200837
l~Tia~ara,Falls
c~naon
Councillor Victor Pietrangelo, Chair
and Members of the Corporate Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: F-2008-37
2007 Consolidated Financial Statements
RECOMMENDATION:
For the information of the Corporate Services Committee.
BACKGROUND:
Attached for your information is a copy of the audited 2007 Consolidated Financial
Statements for the Corporation of the City of Niagara Falis. The financial statements were
audited by the City's Auditor, Crawford, Smith and Swallow.
Upon approval of the report, the 2007 Consolidated Financial Statements will be posted
to the City's website.
` Recommended by:
Todd Harris n, Dire tor of Financial Seroices
Approved by: ! l( i~7~~
K. E. Burden, Executive Director of Corporate Services
Respectfully submitted: ~
John MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer
~
WoYki/2g Togetl2er to SePVe OI[P Col7lmuntty Corporate Services Department
Finance
, . s . . - - - _
, . . e. ~ ~
~ . . ; + 10` •0 1 • '1
r
~ ~ ~ . . . ~ s~. -a .
crawford
smlth
swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007
crawford
smlth
swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2007
Table of Contents
Page
Auditors' Report 1
Consolidated S[atement of Financial Position 2
Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 3
Consolidated StatemenC of Changes in Financial Position 4
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 5- 19
Consolidated Schedule of Operating Fund Activities 20
Consolidated Schedule of Capital Fund Activities 21
Consolidated Schedule of Reserves and Reserve Funds 22
Auditors' Report - Tiust Funds 23
Statement of Financial Position - Trust Funds 24
Statement of Financial Activities and Changes in
Fund Balances - Trust Funds 25
Notes to Financial Statements - Trust Funds 26
CrawlorQ Smith antl Swallaw crawford
G~atlerea Accounlanls LLP
4]41 Oueen Slree~ smith ~g~,
Niagara Falls, Onlario Q~'7~ T~T
Te ephane (905) 356-4200 1.7 VY U11OVV
Telecopler (905) 3563410
Ollices in:
Niagara Falls, Onlario
51. Calharines. Ontario
Potl Erie, ONario
Niagara-omlheiake, Onlario
Potl Colbome, Onlario
AUDITOR5' REPORT
To the Members of Council, Inhabitants and Ratepayers
of Corporation of the City of Niaga~a Falls, Ontario
We have audited the consolidated statement of financial position of Corporation of the City of
Niagara Falls, Ontario as at December 31, 2007 and the consolidated statements of financial
activities and changes in financial position for the year then ended. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the city's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform an auditto obtain reasonable assurance whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes exainining, on a test
basis, evidence supparting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of the ciry as at December 31, 2007 and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for the year then ended in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles.
- ~
,
Niagara Falls, Ontario
Apri125, 2008 CRAWFORD, 3MITH AND SWALLOW
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS LLP
LICENS~D PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
1
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
December 31, 2007
2007 2006
$
Financial Assets - note 9
Cash - note 3 49;4~1~•S;b34 ~ 25,360,282
Investments - note 4 23';313,569 22,662,306
Taxes receivable - note 5 15;599,45'4 13,569,650
Accounts receivable - notes 6 5;948,62a 4,037,707
User chargesreceivable 9-;241;005~ 11,508,320
Long-term receivables 495,04I 599,872
Note receivable - note 7 22';000;000, 22,000,000
3.
Long-tenn investment - note 7 44;223,209° , 41,532,805
Long-term investment - note 8 896,576=; _
171;133,112,~ 141,270,942
Contingent Liabilities - note 20
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 23,451;145~~ 28,400,010
Deferred revenue - obligatory reserve funds -
note 10 15~69.1,926~: 22,141,861
Deferred revenue 543,821' 305,743
Other cuirent liabilities 1;401 638~- ~ 1,793,490
Post-employment benefits - note ll 20;595 283 19,342,208
Net long-term liabilities - note 12 32;906,852;'.. 32,557,650
44,590 6,65 104,540,962
,
Net Fenancial Assets 76;542 447`= 36,729,980
Non Financial Assets
Inventories and prepaid expenses ,.752;L25; 893,395
- m .x,. .
Net Assets 77~294,572 37,623,375
; .
Municipal Position
Operating fund - note 13(a) 5;216;849~~ 5,142,120
Capital fund - note 13(b) 7~288,099. (8,140,548)
Reserves and reserve funds - note 13(c) 51;171,974~- 28,988,856
Niagara Falls Hydro Holding Corporation net
equiCy - note 13(d) ~66#2-23;209~ 63,532,805
Niagara Convention & Civic Centre Inc, net
equity - note 13(e) 896;576
130;796,707 89,523,233
Amounts to be recovered (53~502,135~) (51,899,858)
77`,294;572 37,623,375
See accompanying notes
2
crawfozt~ smith C~ swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES
for the year ended December 31, 2007
2007: 2006
~ ~ $
Revenues
Taxation - note 5 57;060,923 52,940,521
User fees and charges ~44;37&;605 43,671,562
Government of Canada grants 2,207 5,012
Province of Ontuio grants 2`6;751,018` S,ll9,199
Other municipal grants 15;591,445 60,524
Provincial Offences Act t2,49;500- 177,432
Interest and penalties 2;237,786, 2,269,631
InvestmenY income 3;284,045 3,110,948
Casino and gaming revenues 2;600 000` 2,600,000
Ontario Power GeneraYion Community
Impact Agreement 300,000
Niagaza Falls Hydro Holding Corporation
net income - note 7 2;690,404 1,698,363
Niagara Convention & Civic Centre Inc. net
income - note 8 ~ ~~~896,576
Contributions from Obligatory Reserve
Funds 1-1;553,825: 621,236
Proceeds on disposal of property 396,611` 5,795,083
Other 5;577,792; _ 3,949,170
173~~;27Q737~ 122,318,681
Expenditures
General government 14;226,221'• 16,762,056
Protecdon to persons and property 16;976;253. 16,782,953
Ttansportation sexvices 31;541,776;~~ 36,108,602
Environmental services 45~497;273'~ 45,678,082
Health services 1;959,417:< 1,888,336
Social and family services ;456,479' 398,853
Recreation and culCUra1 services 18;0'06,80I- 14,265,273
Planning and development 4;935,320s.. 4,057,328
133;599,540 135,941,483
Net Revenues (Expenditures) 39;671,197 (13,622,802)
Add: New debt issued or assumed 2;82Q000 21,922,000
Add: Post-employment benefits 1;253,075 1,523,830
I.ess: Debt principal repayments (2;470,798)_ (1,387,574)
Increase in amounts to be recovered 1;602,277 22,058,256
Change in Fund Balances 41;273,474~ ~ 89435,454
See accompanying notes
3
crawlortj srntth (.Z swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
for the year ended December 31, 2007
2007 2006
$
Operations
Netrevenues(expendituces) 39;671,197.., (13,622,802)
Sources (Uses) ~ ~
Change in iuvestments ,(651 263) - (6,ll 1,762)
Chuige in taxes receivable (2;029 804j_ (28,295)
Change in accounts receivable (1;910 917•)~ (1,083,261)
:
Change in user charges receivable 2;267,315 (2,557,993)
Change in long-term receivables 104 831- 42,804
Change in inventories and prepaid
expenses 141;270: (24,854)
Change in [emporary loans (14,479,304)
Change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities (4;948,865j 8,097,043
Change in deferred revenue - obligatory
reserve funds (6°,449,935) 3,766,975
Change in deferred revenue 238;078 (308,926)
Change in otber current liabilities (391 852)~ 384,444
Change in post-emplovment benefits 1`;253,075 1,523,830
(12;378 067)~.= (10,779,299)
Net income of Niagaca Falls Hydro Holding Corporation (2;690;404)` (1,698,363)
Net income of Niagara Convention & Civic Centre Ina (896,576)~.
Net increase (decrease) in cash from operations 23;706 150 (26,100,464)
Financing
I.ong-tei~n debt issued 2;820,000= 21,922,000
I,ong-term debt repaid (2;470;Z98)<_ (1,387,574)
~
Net increase in cash from financing 349,202' 2Q534,426
Increase (Decrease) in Cash Position 24;055,352~ (5,566,038)
Cash Position Beginning of Year .25;360;282:_ 30,926,320
Cash Position, End of Year 49,415,b34' 25,360,282
See accompanying notes
4
crawford smith C8Z swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
1. Significant Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements of the Corporation of the City of Niagara Palls,
Ontario (the "Municipality") are the representations of management prepared in accordance
with local government accounting standards established by the Public Sector Accounting
Board ("PSAB") of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants with Cbe excepdon of
providing budget figures (note 18).
(a) Basis of consolidation
(i) These consolidated financial statements reflect the assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenditures of t6e opeiating fund, capital fund, reserves and reserve funds and
include the activities of all committees of council and the following boards,
municipal enterprises and utilities which are under the control of council:
Library Board
Transit Operation - see note 21
Waterworks Operation
Chippawa Busiuess Improveinent Area
Clifton Hill Business Improvement Area
Downtown Board of Management
Fallsview Business Improvement Area
Lundy's Lane Business Improvement Are1
Main & Feiry Business Improvement Area
Victoria & Centre Business Improvement Area
Board of Museums
Niagara Falls Hydro Holding Corporation
Niagara Convention & Civic Centre Inc.
All inter-fund assets and liabilities and sources of financing and expenditures have
been eliminated with the exception of loans or advances between reserve funds
and any otYier fund of Che Municipality and the resul[ing interest income and
expenditures.
The Niagara F~lls Hydro Holding Corporation ('NFHHC") and Niagara
Convention & Civic Centre Ina ("NCCCI") is accounted for on a modified equiCy
basis, consistent with the accounting treatment for government business
enterprises. Under the modified equity basis, the business enterprise's accounting
principles are not adjusted Co conform with those of the Municipality, and inter-
organizational transactions and balances are not eliminated. The Municipality
recognizes its equity interest in the annual income or loss of NFHHC and NCCCI
in iCS "Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities" with a corresponding
increase or decrease in its investment asset account. Any dividends that the
Municipality may receive from NFHHC and NCCCI will be reflected as
reductions in the investment asset account.
5
crawlord smith C,8Z swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALL5, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
far the year ended Deceinber 31, 2007
1o Significant Accounting Policies - continued
(ii) Partial-consolidated entity
The following joint local board is proportionately consolidated. See note 17.
Niagara District Airport Commission
(iii) Accounting for Region and School Board transactions
The taxation, other revenues, expenditures, assets and liabilities with respect to the
operations of the school boards and the Region of Niagara are not reflected in Che
municipal fund balances of these consolidated financial statements.
(iv) Trust funds
Trust funds and their related operations administered by the Municipality are not
consolidated, but are reported separately on the "Trust Funds Statement of
Financial Position and Statement oP Pinancial Aclivities and Changes in Fund
Balances".
(b) Basis of accounting
(i) Revenues and expenditures are reported on the accrual basis of accounting.
(ii) The accrual basis of accounting recognizes revenues as they become available and
ineasurable; expenditures are recognized as they are incun'ed and measurable as a
result of receipt of goods or services and the creation of a legal obligation to pay.
(iii) Inventories
Inventories are valued at average cost.
(iv) Capital assets
CapiCal assets are recorded as an expenditure on the "Consolidated Statement of
Financial Activities" in the year of acquisition.
(v) Deferred revenue
Funds received for specific purposes are accounted for as deferred revenue unti]
the Municipality discharges the obligation whicb led to the receipt of the funds.
(vi) InvesCment income
Investment income earned on current sutplus funds, capital funds, reserves and
reserve funds (other than obligatary reserve funds) are recorded as revenue in the
period earned. Investment income earned on obligatory reserve funds are recorded
directly to each fund balance.
(vii) Amounts to be recovered
The balance referred to as "Amounts to be recoveced", includes balances for post-
employment benefits and net long-term liabilities.
6
crawford smith ~ swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
1. Significant Accounting Policies - continued
(viii) Use of estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with Canadian generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumpYions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of Che financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
2. Operations of School Boards and the Region of Niagara
Further to note 1(a)(iii), the taxation, other revenues, expenditures and overlevies of the
school boards and the Region of Niagara ue comprised of the following:
School Boaids Region
2007 2006 2007 2006
$ $ $ $
Taxation and user
charges 44;961?,961 42,902,693 65;658,539 57,129,910
Payments-in-lieu of ta~ces , 24~492:- = 3,289 7;A86,985= . 7,294,561
Amounts received or
receivable 44,9&6,453 42,905,982 73;145,524 64,424,471
Requisitions 44 986 453 42,905,982 73~;145~;524~. 64,424,471
Overlevies (Underlevies)
at the end of year
3. Cash
This xepresents cash and short term investments from both the operating fund and the reserve
funds (including those funds set aside in deferced revenue):
200$ 2006
$
Operating Fund 16;231,204 11,492,054
Reserve Funds 33;18~t,430, 13,868,228
49;415;634` 25,360,282
4. Investments
Total investments amounting to $ 23,313,569 22,662,306 - 2006) are recorded on the
"Consolidated Statement of Financial Position" at the lower of cost ar market. The mar~Cet
value as at December 31, 2007 is $ 23,313,569 22,662,306 - 2006).
7
crawforrl smith C,B~ swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
5. Tax Receivables and Revenues
Property tax billings are prepared by the Municipality based on an assessment roll prepared
by the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation ("MPAC"). The property tas receivables
and tax revenue of the Municipality are subject to measurement uncertainty as a significant
number of appeals submitted by ratepayers have yet to be heard. The Municipaliry has
established an allowance for doubtful accounts in the amount of $ 920,000 920,000 -
2006).
The Province of Ontario instituted a mandatory capping program through the provisions of
Bill 79, wbich limited assessment related increases to 10% in 1998, and an addidonal 5% in
each of 1999 and 2000. Multi-residential, commercial and industrial property owners
experiencing decreases were also capped at appropriate levels to fund the phasing-in of
increases. The Province has enacted Bill 140, which serves to extend the capping provisions
of Bill 79 indefinitely. The new legislation will limit assessment related increases in
property tax bills to 5%.
6. Interfund Receivables (Payables)
As a means of financing certain activities, funds are borrowed by the operating fund from
several reserve funds. Both financing and repayments are reflected as interfund transfers and
therefore ate eliminated from the "Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities".
Likewise interfund receivable and payable balances are not reflected on the "Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position". The interfund receivable and payable balance as at
December 31, 2007 was 1Q856,379) 2,494,793) - 2006).
7. Investment in Niagara Falls Hydro Holding Corporation
2007 2006
~
Statement of Financial Position
Current assets 35;051,247 34,585,384
Capital assets 62;250;095 6Q62Q017
Other assets ~66,3 517 1,466,256
Total Assets 97;964,859~~ 96,671,657
Current liabilities 21;855,320 22,680,692
Other liabili[ies 4;862,556 ~ 4,696,768
Note payable 22;000;000 22,000,000
Long-term debt 5~;023,774~ 5,761,392
Tota] Liabilities 53;741,650 55,138,852
Net Assets 44;223,209 41,532,805
8
crawford smith ~ swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
7. Investment in Niagara Falls Hydro Holding Corporation - continued
2007 2006
$ $
Statement of Financial Activities
Revenues 87;017;Z12~ 82,377,968
Operating expenses 84;327,308 80,679,605
Net Income 2,690,404 1,698,363
On January 1, 2008, Niagara Falls Hydro Inc. amalgamated with Peninsula West CJtilities
Limited to become Niagara Peninsula Energy Inc. Niagara Falls Hydro Holding Corporation
received 74.50% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the new Company.
8. Investment in Niagara Convention & Civic Centre Inc.
2007 2006
$ $
StaCement of Financial Position ~
Current assets 959;920!
Current liabilities 63,344;
Net Assets 896;576
2007 2006
$
Statement of Financial Activities
Revenues 1~,400,OOOr
Operating expenses 503 424?,.
,__.,r,_
NetIncome ~ 896,576~~
The Niagara Convention & Civic Centre Ina (the "Centre") was incorporated in January,
2006 under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The Centre is owned 100% by [he
Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Fallsview Business Improvement Area.
The Centre was organized to obtain financing for a convention and civic centre facility to be
owned by the CorporaCion of the City of Niagara Falls, Ontario. The Centre will operate the
facility on a non-profit basis with any poeential operating shoxtfalls or future capital
requirements covered by a$ 17,OOQ000 fund established primarily by the Corporation of the
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Fallsview Business ImprovemenC Area, as well as the
Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Viccoria/Centre Business Improvement
Area, the Niagara Parks Commission and the Niagara Falls Bridge Commission. To date,
the Centre has not earned significane operating revenues and is considered in the
development stage.
9
crawforrl smith C,~, swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
8. Investment in Niagara Convention & Civic Centre Inc. - conpnued
The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls, Ontazio Fallsview Business Improvement Area
is committed to funding the Centre $ 15,000,000, the Corporation of the Ciry of Niagara
Falls, Ontario Victoria/Centxe Business Improveinent Area is committed to Yunding the
Centre $1,500,000, the Niagara Parks Commission is commiCted to funding the Centre
$ 375,000 and the Niagara Falls Bridge Commission is committed to funding the Centre
$ 125,000. All amounts are payable over the next fifteen yeats.
The construction of the Centre is expected to cost approximately $ 84,600,000. This is to be
funded through gr~tnts to be received from various sources. $ 35,000,000 has been
committed by the Federal Government, of which NIL has Ueen received as at December 31,
2007. $ 35,000,000 has been committed by the Provincial of Ontario, of which $17,SOQ000
has been received by the Municipality as at December 31, 2007 and $14,600,000 has been
received by the Municipality from Fallsview Management Corporation as at December 31,
2007.
9. Credit Facilities
The Municipality has an authorized operating loan due on demand of $ 15,000,000 bearing
interesC at prime less 0.7% to assist with general operacing requirements and to finance
current expenditures. An authorized revolving term loan due on demand of $ 6,OOQ000
bearing interest at prime less 0.25% to assist in financing capital expenditures. An autborized
revolving term loan due on demand of $ 6,OOQ000 beazing interest at prime less 0.25% to
assist in financing the Cotnmunity Improvement Program. As at December 31, 2407, NIL
has been drawn upon foc all three credit facilities. All credit facilities are secured by a
pledge of tax revenues and a general security agreement.
10. Deferred Revenue - Obligatory Reserve Funds
The following balances ate reflected as defen-ed revenue - obligatory reseive funds as
provincial legislation restricts how these funds may be used and under certain circumstances
these funds may be refunded.
2007 2006
~ $
2% Parkland dedication 981,01~5~ ~ 782,7~t6
Public purpose ~~947,194 846,413
Federal gas tax rebate - transit 371,413 1,842,539
Provincial gas tax rebate - transit 1;436,879 785,769
Discounted development charges 3;081,606 2,436,488
Non-discounted development charges _8;873,818 15,447,906
15;691;926 22,141,861
10
crawtord smith swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
11. Post•Employment Benefits
2007' 2006
~ $
Post-employment benefits 12;940,034' 12,136,881
Accumulated sick leave 3;620 85,Q- 3,313,324
WSIB - Schedule II future liability 2;969;288= 2,866,754
Vacation pay 1;065,111:-- 1,025,249
20;595;283 ~ ' 19,342,208
Post-Employment BenefiYS and Accutnulated Sick Leave
The Municipality pays certain medical, dental and life insurance benefits on behalf of its
retired employees. The Municipality recognizes these post-retirement costs in the period in
which the employees rendeied the services.
As a xesult of actuazial valuations on post-employment benefits, it was deCermined that
actuarial losses of $ 1,951,492 existed. These amounts are being amortized over the
expected average remaining service lives of several employee groups. The unamortized
value is $ 1,32Q674. The actual obligation is $ 14,260,708.
Under the Municipality's sick leave benefit plan, unused sick leave can accumulate and
employees inay become entitled to a cash payment when they leave the Municipality's
employment.
As a result of actuu~ial valuations on the accumulated sick leave liability, it was determined
that actuarial losses of $ 169,797 existed. These amounts are being ainortized over the
expected average remaining service lives of several employee groups. The unamortized
value is $ 14Q242. The actual obligation is $ 3,761,092.
A reserve fund bas been established for the accumulated sick leave liability. The balance as
at December 31, 2007 is $ 1,073,533 1,033,828 - 2006).
The liabilities for post-employment benefits and accumulated sick leave as reflected in these
consolidated financial statements have been determined on an actuarial basis using a
discount rate of 5.25%.
Workplace Safety and Insurance Board - Schedule II Future Liability
The MunicipaliCy bas elected to be treated as a Schedule II employer and as such, is required
to remit payments to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board ("WSIB") to fund disability
payments. The liability as reflected in these consolidated financial statements has been
determined on an actuarial basis using a discount rate of 5.25%.
As a result of an actuarial valuation on the WSIB - Schedule II liability, it was determined
that an actuarial loss of $ 1,031,000 existed. This amount is being amortized over the
expected average remaining service lives of several employee groups. The unamortized
value is $ 200,955. The actual obligation is $ 3,170,243.
A reserve fund has been established for this liability. The balance as at December 31, 2007
is $ 636,039 1,203,950 - 2006).
The next valuation for all benefit groups is for the year ending December 31, 2008.
II
crawford smith C8Z swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
11. Post-Employment Bene~ts - continued
Vacation Pay
As at December 31, 2007, employees of the Municipaliry have accumulated vacation pay
credits in the amount of $ 1,065,111 1,025,249 - 2006). Any unused credits may be
carried forward to future years.
Pension Agreements
The Municipaliry makes contributions to the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement
System ("OMSRS"), which is a multi-employer plan, on behalf oP its staff. The plan is a
defined benefit plan which specifies the amount of the retirement benefit to be received by
Che employees based on the length of service and cates of pay.
The atnount contributed to OMERS for 2007 was $ 2,326,684 2,OSO,llS - 2006) for
current services.
12. Net Long-Term Liabilities
(a) The balance of net long-term liabilities reported on Che "Consolidated Statement of
Financia] Posi[ion" is made up as follows:
2007 ' 2006
$ $
Total long-term liabilities incurred by the ~
Municipality including those incurred ou behalf
of school boards, othex municipalities and
inunicipal enterprises and outstanding during the
year is 32,906,852;, 32,557,650
E
Net long-term liabilities, end of year 32,906;852 32,557,650
(b) Of the net ]ong-term liabilities repoi~ed in (a) of this note, $ 15,203,157 in principal
payments are payable from 2008 to 2012 and $ 17,703,695 from 2013 ro 2026.
(c) The long-tenn liabilities in (a) issued in the name of the municipality have received
approval of the Ontario Municipal Board for those approved on or before December 31,
1992. Those approved after January 1, 1993 have been approved by by-law. The annual
pxincipal and interest payments required to service these liabilities are within the annual
debt repayment limit prescribed by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
(d) Total chaiges for the year for net long-term liabilities which are reported on the
"Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities" are as follows:
2007 2006
$ $
Principal 2,470',798 1,387,574
Interest 1,679~,1 ~1~9 1,095,490
4;149;417 2,483,064
12
crawfom' smith C.d, swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
13. Municipal Fund Balances at the End of the Year
(a) Operating fund balance
2007 2006
$
For general reduction of taxaCion 531;127 748,081
For general reduction of user charges
respecting waterworks 838;910 838,330
For gener~l reduction of user
charges respecting sewers 2,197;892 2,176,770
For generaluse by Library Board 73;453 83,837
For general use by the Business Improvement
Areas I;329,643 1,111,542
For general use by the Board of Museums 122,283 85,404
For general use by Airport Commission 143;543 98,156
5216;849' S,1a2,120
2007 2006
$ $
(b) Capital fund balance
Acquisition of capital assets to be
recovered through taYation or user
charges (8;024,027): (6,474,308)
Acquisition of capital assets to be financed
from the proceeds of long-term liabilities (4',-132,585r) (4,020,018)
Acquisition of capital assets to be
recovered from [ransfers from reserves ~
and reserve funds (5;876,045). (18,429,166)
Acquisition of capital assets to be financed
from proceeds of disposition of property and
billings to third parties (5,886;40(1) (7,867,318)
Funds available for the acquisition of capital
assets 3'1;207;156._ 28,650,262
7;288,099 (8,140,548)
13
crawfom' smith n$ swallouT
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
13. Municipal Fund Balances at the End of the Year - continued
(c) Reserves and reserve fund balances
2007 2006
$
Reserves set aside by council far specific
purposes:
Special purposes 14,193;870 10,551,854
Working capital 265;000 265,000
Sewage capital 1,266,-763 821,763
WaCercapital 1;7§0;097~~ 1,165,097
Total Reserves l-;7;425;730 12,803,714
14
crawfortj smith C8Z swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
13. Municipal Fund Balances at the End of the Year - continued
(c) Reserves and reserve fund balances - continued
2007 2006
$ $
Reserve Funds set aside by council for specific
purposes:
Licence agreements - 40 years 46;888 48,701
Sick leave liabiliCy 1;073 53~3 1,033,828
Lundy's Lane Battlefield debt retirement 56,892 64,364
WS1B - Schedule II b36;039' 1,203,950
Fire station #5 debt retirement 62~352 100,217
Niagara Falls Hydro Holding Corporation
debenmre 82,649
Recreation trail development 53,594` 51,264
CapitaUOperadons b;44'7,4~19' 6,222,520
Tree planting - developers 16 730 15,703
Pazk development ll 8 025 118,620
Sewer and water impost 1;205;~164_- 1,161,884
Expansion and renewal ~~209;151~ 207,437
Drainage :580,286 556,546
Prepaid works projects conYributions 186,222' 179,394
Sidewalk construction 272,222 261,003
Future municipal works 749;258 722,318
Lotdiainage 150;619: 145,091
Library funds ,793,467~ 720,016
Sanitary ~ +359 630: 346,622
Sports fund 4 731~ 4,545
:
Projects - special needs children ~ 14;881~~ 14,307
Parking ~924 371': 892,659
Collins/Toby debt retirement 39;Oa5~ 43,364
Heritage Week Niagara 56;125'~ 53,953
Coat of Arm's 2;172 2,085
Lundy's Lane business improvement purposes 390;486 270,486
Board of Museum purposes 166;018 127,644
Niagara Tunnel Communiry Improvement 842>916 1,285,818
Ontario Power Generation Agreement ll3,4&9 208,574
Water pacrol boat 28,490 25,000
Branscombe Family Grant 3;390 14,580
Convention Centre 18;028,258
Fire department radios debenture ry.6A;38-1
Taral Reserve Funds 33;696;244 16,185,142
Total Reserves and Reseroe Funds 51;171,974 28,988,856
15
craw~ord smith C~CZ swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
13. Municipal Fund Balances at the End of the Year - continued
(d) Niagara Falls Hydro Holding Corporation net equity
2007 2006
$ " $
Niagara Palls Hydro Holding Corporation net equity 6G;223,209~. 63,532,805
(e) Niagara Convention and Civic Centre Inc.
2007 2006
$ . : $
Niagara Convention & Civic Centre Inc. net equity 896,5'76-
14. Trust Funds
Trust funds administered by the Municipality amounting to $ 2,719,569 2,587,775 - 2006)
have not been included in the "Consolidated Statement of Financial Position" nor have their
operauons been included in the "Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities".
15. Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Capital expenditures
The estimated future capital expenditures based on projects in progress at December 31,
2007 is approximately $ 74,999,000 16,173,000 - 2006) afrer deducting the expenclitures
incurred as at December 31, 2007. These projects will be financed by grants, subsidies and
long-term liabilities in fuCUre years.
International Railway Bridge
The Municipality, as a condition of the purchase of the CN/CP Railway Corridor, has the
responsibility for the costs of demolition of the International Railway Bridge by May 2012.
This condition is subject to being waived if tbe bridge is subsequently sold ro a third parry or
if demolition procedures have not commenced by CN/CP prior to May 2012. The
Municipality has set aside a reserve fund (Capital/Operations) amounC of $ 4,000,000
increasing each year by the amount of the Consumer Price Index for tbis purpose. In
addition, the Municipaliry is committed to reimburse CN/CP the lesser of the actual
maintenance costs incurred on the I~iternational Railway Bridge or $100,000 on an annual
basis unti] May 2012.
16
crawfort~ smith C8Z swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the yeaz ended December 31, 2007
16. FinancialInstruments
Credit Risk
The Municipality is esposed to credit risk on taxes receivable, user charges receivable,
accounts receivable and long-term receivables from its customers. Allowances are
maintained for the potential crediC losses. However, because of the large numbec of
customers, credit risk concentration is minimal.
Cash Flow Risk
The Municipality is exposed to the risk that the inlerest earned on its investments will
fluctuate due to changes in markeC interest rates. The Municipality manages its investments
based on its cash flow needs and with a view to opCimizing its interesC income.
Interest Rate Risk
The Municipality is exposed to the risk that the value of investments will fluctuate due to
changes in market inlerest rates. The Municipality manages its investments based on its cash
flow needs and with a view to optimizing its interest income.
The balances for certain temporary loans and long-term debt bear interest at fixed rates.
Consequently, the risk exposure associated with these balances is minimal.
Market Risk
Certain investments held by the Municipality are subject to the risk that the value will
fluctuate as a result of changes in market pcices, whether Chose ehanges are caused by factors
specific to the individual security, its issuer, or factors affecting all securities traded in the
market.
Fair Value
The fair value of the post-employment benefits, accumulated sick leave and WSIB -
Schedule II future liability were deterinined using actuarial valuations based on the
information presented in note ll to the financial statements.
L,ong-term debt is stated at face value. It is noc practicable within the constraints of
timeliness or cost to determine the fair value of this financial liability with sufficient
reliability.
The note receivable and long-term investmenC are stated at cost It is not practicable within
the constraints of timeliness or cost to determine the fair value of these financial asseCs with
sufficient reliabiliry.
Tbe fair values of the Municipality's other financial instiuments corresponds Yo tbeir carrying
values due to their short-term maturity.
17
crawfort~ smith C8~ swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CON50LIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
17. Contributions to Joint Board
Furthec to note 1(a)(ii) the following contributions were made by the Municipaliry to:
~ ':,2007 ' - ' 2006
K.~.:_...._:
~ ~ ~
Niagara District Airport Commission ~ A89;696;,, 87,679
The Municipality's share of the net assets of the Niagara District Airport Commission is
approximately 32%.
18. Budget Fi~ures
The approved operating budget for 2007 is reflected on the "Consolidated Schedule of
Operating Fund Activities". These numbers have not been audited but are presented for
information purposes only. The budgets established for capital funds, reserves and reserve
funds are on a project-oriented basis, the costs of which may be carried out over one or more
years. As such, they are not directly comparable with current year actual amounts and have
not been reflected on their respective schedules.
19. Classification of Expenditures by Object
The "Consolidated SkatemenC of Financial Activities" presents the expenditures by function;
the following classifies those same expenditures by object:
2007 2006
_ $
Salaries, wages and employee benefits 47;546 Db5` 44,884,185
Operating materials and supplies 18;975 799- 17,721,789
Contracted services 25;120 375 24,098,506
Rents and financial expenses 860 041 1,076,699
External transfers to others 4;254 741`. 3,364,353
,
Tangible capital assets 35;163 400;= 43,70Q461
~ -
Debt service _ 1;679,1'19 : . 1,095,490
Total expenditures by object 133;599,540 135,941,483
18
crawl~ord smith Cd~, swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
20. Contingent Liabilities
The Municipality has been named as one of several defevdants in a legal action seeking
$ 20,OOQ000 for loss or damage to property and lost revenue. The Municipality's maximum
insurance coverage per claim a[ the titne of the suit was $ IS,OOQ000. The Municipality is
also being sued for aggravated and punitive damages in the amount of $ 5,000,000. There is
no insurance coverage for punitive damages. The Municipality's legal counsel is unable to
assess the potential liability, if any, resulting from this action. Any settlement will he
reflected as a charge to operations in the year incurred.
The Municipality has been named as one of several defendavts in a legal action seeking
$ 21,200,000 for general and special damages. The Municipality's maximum insurance
coverage per claim at the time of the suit was $ 20,OOQOOQ The Municipality's legal
counsel is unable to assess the potential liability, if any, resulting from this action. Any
settlement will be reflected as a chaxge to operaCions in the year incurred.
No provision for possible loss has been inc]uded in these consolidated financial statements.
As at December 31, 2007, the Municipality has certain other legal claims outstanding. It is
management's assertion that adequate insurance coverages are in effect for the settlement of
these claims, if necessary.
21. Greater Niagara Transit Commission
Effective May 31, 2007, the Greater Niagara Transit Commission was dissolved. The
operations were then taken over by the Municipaliry.
22. Comparative Figures
Certain figures have been reclassified to conform wiCh the current year's presentation.
19
crawford smith CRZ swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF OPERATING FUND ACTIVITIES
for the year ended December 31, 2007
Budget 2007 2006
$ $
Revenues
TaxaUon - note 5 53,799,552 57;060,923_~= 52,940,521
User fees and charges 37,555,601 44,378;605~ ~ 43,671,562
Government of Canada grants 3,150 2 207 5,012
Province of Ontario grants 3,484,870 3,487;1,99,~ 3,206,551
Provincial Offences Act 151,130 249 500 - 177,432
Interest and penalties 2,235,000 2;237 786 2,269,631
Investment income 2,334,000 2,136 511~ 2,697,326
Casino and gaming revenues 2,600,000 2;600;000 2,600,000
Ontario Power Generation Communiry
Impact AgreemenC 30Q000
Proceeds on disposal of property 396;6ll ; 5,795,083
Other 3,799,547 'S~320,202~ 2,551,791
105,962,850 11Z;869 544~ . 116,214,909
Expenditures ~
General government 12,802,048 13';1~72,655 16,084,151
Protecdon to persons and property 14,456,217 16;218;506 15,114,230
Transportation services 20,631,530 22;970 233 ~ 18,658,318
Environmental services 26,287,695 25`470`551:~ 24,366,622
Health services 1,486,295 1;920,397 1,860,889
Social and family services 43Q848 456;479 398,853
Recreation and cultural services ]4,001,534 13;361;342~ I 1,739,598
~
Planning and development 4,876,653 : 4;865,977fi; 4,018,361
94,972,820 98;436140~ 92,241,022
Net Revenues 10,990,030 19;433 404L 23,973,887
Financing and Transfers
Debt principal repayments (2,470,810) (2~;470,798)~~ (1,387,574)
Post-employment benefits 1~;253,075~ 1,523,830
Transfers from (to) reservcs and reserve
funds 5,397,680 ~(3;778,837) (6,518,413)
Transfers to capital fund (13,916,900) (14;362,113) (17,367,870)
Net financing and transfeis (10,990,030) (19;358,675) (23,750,027)
Change in Operating Tund 74;729 223,860
Operating Tund, Beginning of Year 5,142,120 5';142;120 4,918,260
Operating Fund, End of Year 5,142,120 5,216;849 5,142,120
See accompanying notes
20
crawford smith C~, swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL FUND ACTIVITIES
for the year ended December 31, 2007
2007 2006
$
Revenues
Province of Ontario 23;263,819 1,912,648
Other niunicipal grants 15;591,445~ 60,524
Other 82;590.- 1,336,008
38;937,854 3,309,180
Expenditures
General government P;053,566. 677,905
Protection to persons and properry 757,747 1,668,723
Transportation services 8,571;543 17,450,284
Environmental services 20;026,722 21,311,460
Health services 39;020 27,447
Recreation and cultural services 4;645;459;= 2,525,675
Planning and development 69;343 . 38,967
35;163;400~ 43,700,461
Net (Revenues) Expenditures 3;774,454 (4Q391,281)
Financing and Transfers
L,ong-term debC issued 2;820;000 21,922,000
Transfeis from operadng fund 14;362,115 17,367,870
Transfers from (to) reserves and reserve
funds (5;527;922)„ 1,396,439
Net financing and transfers 11.,654 193 r 40,686,309
Change in Capital Fund 15;428 647: 295,028
Capital Fund, Beginning of Year (8;140;548)~, (8,~F35,57~
CaPital Fund, End of Year 4;288;099~~ (8,140,548)
See accompanying notes
21
crawforrl smith C~ swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF RESERVES AND RESERVE FUNDS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
2007 2006
$ $
Revenues
Contributions from Obligatoiy Reserve
Funds 11:;553,825 621,236
Investment income 1;147,534 . 413,622
Other 175;000~~ 61,371
r_ . _
1~2;876;359_ 1,096,229
Financing and Transfers
Transfers Prom (to) capital fund 5;527,922 (1,396,439)
Transfers from operating fund 3;7~78;837 6,S I8,413
Net financing and Cransfers 9,306,759 5,121,974
Change in Reserves and Reserve Fuuds 22;183,11_8 6,218,203
Reserves and Reserve Tunds, Beginning
of Year 28;988;856 22,770,653
Reserves and Reserve Funds, End of Year 51;171;974' 28,988,856
See accompanying notes
22
crawford smith C~C~, swallow
Grawlorq Smith antl Swallow crawfo/r~d~
Char~ered Acmun~an~s lLP
4)4t Queen Slreet Sr]'~1~ / J( ~
Niagara Falls, On~ario ii1 l<1 V`~
Te ephone ~905) 356-h200 swallow
Telecopier ~905) 3563410
Oltices in:
Niagara Falls. Onlario
SL Catharines, ONario
Fort Erie, Ontario
Niagara-on-tlre~Lake, On~ario
Port Colbome. Onlario
AUDITORS' REPORT - TRUST FUNDS
To the Members of Council, Inhabitants and Ratepayers
of Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
We have audited the statement of financial position of the trust funds of Coiporation of the City of
Niagara Falls, Ontario as at December 31, 2007 and the statement of financial activities and
changes in fund balances for the year then ended. These financial staCements are the responsibiliCy
of the city's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presenta[ion.
In our opinion, these financial stateinents present fairly, in all material respects, Che financial
position of the trusC funds of the city as at December 31, 2007 and Che continuiry of trust funds for
the year then ended in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.
- ~ ~~--r
,
Niagara Falls, Ontario
April 25, 2008 CRAWFORD, SMITH AND SWALLOW
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTSLLP
LICENSED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
23
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION - TRUST FUNDS
December 31, 2007
Ontario
Home Cemetery
Renewal Perpetual
Total Plan Care Other
$ $ $ $
Assets
Cash 410,659 16,566 284,786 109,307
Investments - note 2
Federal 373,093 373,093
Provincial 634,676 634,676
Corporate 1,218,590 1,217,389 1,201
2,226,359 2,225,158 1,201
GST receivable 97 97
Due from (to) operating fund 81,030 729 81,321 (1,020)
Loans receivable - note 3 1,424 1,424
82,551 2,153 81,418 (1,020)
2,719,569 18,719 2,591,362 109,488
Fund Balances 2,719,569 18,719 2,591,362 109,488
See accompanying notes
24
crawford smith ~ swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES AND CHANGES IN FUND
BALANCES - TRUST FUNDS
for the year ended December 31, 2007
Ontario
Home Cemetery
Renewal Perpetual
Total Plan Care Other
$ $ $ ~
Balance, Beginning of Year 2,587,775 24,436 2,468,097 95,242
Receipts
CampaignContributions 10,142 10,142
Cemetery lot receipts 126,979 126,979
Interest 104,794 1,518 98,381 4,895
Land sale deposits 17 500 17,500
259,415 1,518 225,360 32,537
Expenditures
Cemetery Care 102,643 102,095 548
Loan repayments to
Province of Ontario 7,235 7,235
Transfex to operating fund 17,743 17,743
127,621 7,235 102,095 18,291
Balance, End of Year 2,719,569 18,719 2,591,362 109,488
See accompanying notes
25
crawforrl smith C,B~ swallow
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - TRUST FUNDS
for the year ended Decembex 31, 2007
1. Basis of Accounting
Receipts and disbursements on the statement of continuity are reported on the cash basis of
accounting, with the exception of revenue derived from cemetery lot sales due to the
Ceinetery Perpetual Care Fund which has been accrued at year end.
2. Investments
Trust fund investments of $ 2,226,359 2,143,232 - 2006) are recorded on the "Statement
of Financial Position" at the lower of cost or markeL The market value as at December 31,
2007 is $ 2,234,611 2,177,114 - 2006).
3. Ontario Home Renewal Program
The Ontario Home Renewal Program was estab(ished by the Ontario Ministry of Housing in
1973 to provide grants for municipalities to make loans to assist owner occupants to repair,
rehabilitate and improve their homes to local property standards. Individual loans are
limited to $ 7,500 of which the maximum forgivable portion is $ 4,000.
On July 13, 1993, the OnCario Home Renewal Program was discontinued. The municipality
ceased issuing new loans as of this date and is required to remit the balance of the trust
account to the Ontario Ministry of Housing by March 1, 1994. Loan receivables collected in
each subsequent calendar year after 1993 must be remitted to the Province by March lst of
each year.
In the event of the sale or lease of the home or in the event of the homeowner ceasing to
occupy the home, the balances of the repayable loans and the unearned forgivable loan
immediately become due and payable by the homeowner.
4. FinancialInstruments
Interest Rate Risk
The City's trust funds are exposed to the risk that the value of investments will fluctuate due
to the changes in market interest rates. The City manages its tivst fund investments based on
its cash flow needs and with a view to optimizing its inCeresC income.
Market Risk
Certain investments within the Ciry's tmst funds are subject to the risk that the value will
fluctuate as a result of changes in market prices whether those changes are caused by factors
specific to the individual security or its issuer or factors affecting all securities traded in the
market.
26
crawforn' smith C~, swallow
October 6, 2008 F-200839
1~1ia~ara,Falls
c~Nau,,
Councillor Victor Pietrangelo, Chair
and Members of the Corporate Services Committee
City of Niagara Falis, Ontario
Members:
Re: F-2008-39
Investing in Ontario Act - Update
RECOMMENDATION:
Refer to 2009 Budget deliberations.
BACKGROUND:
The Province of Ontario announced on August 25, 2008 that the City of Niagara Falls
would receive $3,943,911 undera new funding program thatwas initiated bythe province
for local governments throughout Ontario. The Investing in Ontario Act which was
approved in May 2008, allows the province to distribute a portion of the unanticipated year
end surplus to municipalities. The funding will provide each local government with an
additional source of funding for capital infrastructure projects. These funds represent new
funding and were not considered in the City's 2008 budget. It should be noted that this
funding program is an annual determination by the province, dependent upon the
province's fiscal results.
Council requested that options for the use of these funds be established for its
consideration. Two options exist for the use of the funds. Firstly, the funds could be used
on an existing project that will use debentures as a funding source. Examples of projects
that could utilize such funds include the Bob Gale Complex, the Kalar Road expansion,
Bridge Street Sewer project. Alternatively, these funds could be used to fund new capital
projects.
Staff are currently preparing the 2009 General Purposes, Utility and Capital Budgets. It is
recommended that the Investing in Ontario Act funding be put into the City's Reserve
Funds until Council approves the use that will maximize benefit to ratepayers during the
2009 Budget process.
~
;
Working Together to Serve Our Conzmunity Corporate Services Department
Finance
.1~;::.~ _r~i,f, ,
. b. .f;u~.; : a ' . . _
- _
' ' ~;~10 '0 7~ 1 ~ ~1
' , ' . ~ "1~.'~
-2-
Recommended by: ~
Todd Harrison, rector Financial Services
Approved by: ~/~?a[~r~~CGt/
K. E. Burden, Executive Director of Corporate Services
Respectfully submitted: ~
J MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer
October 6, 2008 F-2008-41
.
1~1~a ara alls
~ c,~unun
Councillor Victor Pietrangelo, Chair
and Members of the Corporate Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: F-2008-41
Lundy's Lane Battlefield Legacy Project
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council approve the funding request for the engagement of architects, to develop a
set of tender ready construction drawings forthe Niagara Falls Board of Museums Lundy's
Lane Battlefield Legacy Project (the "project").
That the final approval ofthe project be deferred until the financial commitment of the other
stakeholders is finalized.
BACKGROUND:
Council received a letterfrom the City's Museum Board at its September22, 2008 meeting,
requesting funding assistance of up to $750,000. The requested funds are for the
tendering of construction drawings and specifications for the project. In order to meet the
hoped for, project completion date of 2012, the bicentennial of the War of 1812, it is
necessary to have the construction specs for fall of 2009 to allow construction to
commence in early 2010.
The project was included in the 2008 Capital Budget, where it was classified a Category
3 project. This type of project is one where Council has committed to the project in
principal but final approval has not been made. Under normal circumstances, this project
would be considered in the 2009 Capital Budget review but the project has been
accelerated for Council's consideration due to the construction targets outlined above.
~
Working Togetlaer to Serve Our Community corporate serv~ces oepanmem
,i i Finance
_ fs4;
A
. . ~ . , f'..,yq. . _
. . . ~O~I,j~' C~ 1 • •1 .
October 6, 2008 - 2- F-2008-41
The importance of this project has been highlighted to Council before (cf. CPS-2008-02,
Niagara Falls Board of Museum Legacy Project) and is the subject of another report on this
evening's agenda, related to the Building Canada Fund. As outlined previously, the
Lundy's Lane Museum is a City-owned building and is in desperate need of significant
repairs for its continued use. With each passing year, the condition of the building
deteriorates. The opportunity, to not only restore the existing building, as well as expand
the facility, is fast becoming an unavoidable action of City Council and the Board of
Museums to preserve this historic asset. In addition, timing the project to coincide with the
bicentennial of the War of 1812 shows a recognition of the importance of local history and
culture and an enhancing of our historical and tourist assets.
The required tender, for construction drawings and specifications, is an important initial
milestone toward completion of this project. At present, the museum does not have
resources adequate to fund this phase of the work; however, without drawings from a
qualified practitioner, it is unlikelythatthe projectwould attractfunding from the other levels
of government. Also, by Council agreeing to the request, it shows a continued commitment
by the municipality toward the project.
The City funding source was not identified at the time of the 2008 Budget for this future
project. Based on the current budget project sheets, the funds for the City's portion will
need to be financed from future years' capital allotment or future years' debentures. The
City can fund the initial drawings from its current cash position, with the understanding that
the complete funding of the project will need to be determined. It cannot be overstated,
that the approved funding arrangement from other stakeholders, is dependant upon
working specifications and, as a result, the City must move forward immediately to ensure
that both the project and the funding arrangements can be realized.
Recommended by: ~
Todd Har ison, Dir ctor of Financial Services
Approved by:
K. E. Burden, Executive Director of Corporate Seroices
Respectfully submitted:
John MacDonald hief Administrative Officer
~ "i~l .I~~ I ~ . ! + s~ll I~ ~ l ` " I II'.,
u, - -
lLundy's Lane ~attle~ield Le~a~y I~roject ~
n-i
a~
1'
1_I
~ ~l
1~_I
- Mayor Ted Salci and Mem6ers of Niagara Falls City Council
c/o City Hall `t=..
P O Box t023 `.i:t~
4310 Queen Street
Niagara 1~ ails, ON
L2E GXS
September 12, 2008,
Your «orship Mayor Salei and Members of Council,
As pxamised, the Soard of Museums would tike to take this opportunity to provide you with an
update of the progress made towards reaching our goal of providiug the City with a world class
heritage aud cultural facility and bring visibility to the Lundy's Lane Balllefreld National Hisioric
Site and our communiry's history in time to celebrate the War of 1812 Bicentennial.
Tlie Board of Museum's majar fundraising campaign continues aud ~uith City Council's
commitrnent of $Z miilion wa Siave been able to begin, in earnest, approaching major donors for
support. To date, we have raised close to 20% of our goal in pEedges and donations. We have
met with both our Provincial and Federal members ofparlisunent and their staff and hoth have
met our proposals with enthusiasm and have committed to assisting our efforts to secure funding.
Through the good graces of the Mayor and several members of Counci( this praject has been
presented to Deputy Premier and Minister of Energy a~id Infrastructure George Smithennan at
the Association of Canadian Nfunicipalities Conference held in August.
Tlie Business Plan for the Lundy's Lane Battlefieid Legacy Project, which is necessary in order
to ztgply to Federal and Provincial funding prograuis, is well on its way to being completed and is
expected to be ready by early October. Ivtuch oPttus has been done using funds that have been
set aside by the Board, donated or raised through government funding programs. We now find
that we must request funds &om Council in order to meet the deadIines set out in our Concept
Plan Review This includes tendering out the drawing-up of a comptete set of tender ready
consriuction drawings and specifcations. The cost of this portion, wluch will take
approximately 8-12 months, is roughly $750,000 and must be completed by the Pall of 2009 in
order to begin constcuction in early 2010 and to have the project completed in time for the
suuiiversary of the War of 1812 in June 2012.
Niagara Falls Bo~rd of Museums
5810 Ferry St., Niagara Falls, ON L2G 1S9 4 phone: 905-358-5082 O fax: 905-358-0920
~uww.niagarafaltsmuseum.ca
~~~I ~I~i . i i l'~. ; ~~i:l ~ i I~~ ~ 1~~, ~ i~ n
~,un~y's Lane ~att~e~edd Lega~y P~oject
W e are also aware of the recent Fedeval / Provinciai Building Canada Framework Agreement
providing infrastructure investment, through the Building Canada Eund, to communities within
17 ca#egories of infiastructure. The I.undy's Lane Sattlefield Legacy Project falls within 3 of
these fiu~ding priorities: Cuiture, Tourism and Capacity Building. 7'he Hoard of Museums
believes that the Legacy Project provides the Ciry of Niagara Falls with an exccllent opportunity
to put forward a project of National significance that builds the community's heritage tourism
capacity, increases community access and accessibility to Ciry-owned cultural facelities, and wii]
help our conununity express, preserve, develop and promote oiu culture and heritage within
Canada and Ontario.
With the above points in mind, the Board of Museums would like to respectfully request the
followin~:
1 That Ciry Council consider providing the Board of Museums with immediate funding
from tl~e $2 million committed in-principle to the project, in order for the Board to be
able to send out an RFP for the construction-ready drawiugs and a full set of
specifications and io be able to tender out this portion of our yroject. This is required so
that the project can stay on track and meet on-going timelines.
2, That Ciry Council consider appointing a City staff inember as a eoocdinatoc to oversee the
project, especially considering the Legacy Project will affect City buildings and
properties.
3 That Ciry Council consider endorsing the Lundy's Lane Battlefield Legacy Project as the
Ciry of Niagara Falls' submission to the Building Canada Fund for funding during its
initia] funding allocation expected in tate September 2008.
Thank you very much for your consideration and I am available to answer any questions or
concems Chat you may have telating to this request and look forward to hearing from you very
soon.
Sincerely,
/
~ Gord est
' Chai erson,
Ni ara Fall oard of Musewns
Niagara Fal[s Board of Museums
5810 Ferry St., Niagara Fatls, ON L2G IS9 ~ phone: 905-358•5082 b fa~c: 905•35&0920
vaww.niagatafallsmus eum.ca
MINUTES OF COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING
MONDAY, September 22, 2008, CITY HALL, ROOM 2 AT 5:00 P.M.
PRESENT: Chair Councillor Carolynn loannoni - Mayor Ted Salci, Councillors: Jim
Diodati, Vince Kerrio, Victor Pietrangelo, Bart Maves, Wayne Thomson,
Janice Wing and Shirley Fisher.
STAFF: John MacDonald, Ed Dujlovic, Ken Burden, Ken Beaman, Karl Dren,
Geoff Holman, Denyse Morrissey, Dean lortida, Alex Herlovitch, Serge
Felicetti, Trent Dark, Dale Morton, Tom Mussari, Marianne Tikky- Steno.
GUEST:
PRESS: Corey Larocque, Niagara Falls Review, Lori Sherman, Niagara This
Week
MINUTES
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Wing and seconded by Mayor Salci, that
the September 8, 2008 minutes be approved.
REPORTS
a) CAO-2008-04
Service Delivery Review - Water & Wastewater Services
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Diodati and seconded by Mayor
Salci that;
1. The recommended changes to the operation of the Water/Wastewater
section, as set out in this Service Delivery Report, be approved.
2. That staff be authorized to move forward with implementation.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council September 22, 2008.
b) MW-2008-57
City of Niagara Falls Rail Line Ad Hoc Committee
Terms of Reference
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson and seconded by
Councillor Wing that;
1. That the terms of reference be amended to allow up to 3 citizens; and
approved;and
-2-
2. That Mr. Red Iseppon be appointed as one of the citizen representatives;
and
3. That Councillor Thomson be appointed as the Council representative.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council September 22, 2008.
c) MW-2008-46
2008 Loose Leaf Collection
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson and seconded by
Councillor Wing;
1. That Council receive this report for information, and
2. That Council direct staff to investigate the delivery of this program.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council September 22, 2008.
d) MW-2008-53
Revisions to Contract 2008-205-08
2008 New Sidewalk Program
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson and seconded by
Councillor Kerrio;
1. That staff be directed to proceed with the proposed modifications as
stated in the report.
2. That the unit prices submitted by Sacco Construction Ltd. be accepted
and ratified at the Council meeting later this evening.
3. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary
agreement.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council September 22, 2008.
e) TS-2008-48
Feasability of Reopening Main Street
Environmental Assessment
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson and seconded by
Councillor Pietrangleo that this report be received for the information of
Committee and inclusion in the 2009 budget.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council September 22, 2008.
-3-
NEW BUSINESS
a) It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Kerrio and seconded by Councillor
Thomson that staff report back on possible priority projects for upcoming
Federal/ Provincial funding programs.
Motion: Carried
Conflict: Councillor Wing
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council September 22, 2008.
b) It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Thomson and seconded by
Council Pietrangelo that staff report on the replacement of trees in the Garner
subdivision.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council September 22, 2008.
ADJOURNMENT
It was ORDERED on the motion of Councillor Pietrangelo and seconded by Councillor
Diodati that the regular meeting of the Community Services Committee be adjourned at
6:23 p.m.
Motion: Carried
October 6, 2008 MW-2008-58
~Il~~~I~~~~~15
cnn ~~~e
Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair
and Members of the Community Servlces Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: MW-2008-58
Weightman Bridge Structural Rehabilitation
(Portage Road crossing Welland River) Status Report
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Council approve the proposed staging of construction on Weightman Bridge,
allowing it to stay open to two lanes of traffic and one sidewalk for pedestrians, for
reasons as outlined in this report.
2. That Council approve the postponement of construction of the proposed Bridge
Rehabilitation from 2009 to 2010.
3. That Council authorize the engagement of Rankin Construction Inc. to undertake
the proposed minor remedial repair works.
BACKGROUND:
Previous Reports
In September of 2007, Council approved the recommendations in Report MW-2007-96,
providing a status report, scope of work and schedule to proceed with proposed
Rehabilitation of the Weightman Bridge crossing of the Welland River in Chippawa. The
following main recommendations were included in the report:
• A Public Information Centre (PIC) be held to introduce the project to the
interested/affected public and stakeholders and to solicit Input on construction
staging alternatives.
• Construction of the proposed Bridge Rehabilitation works be delayed to 2009 to
allow completion of the Public Consultation and Class EA process. That Ellis
Engineering Inc., retained to undertake the detailed design of the Bridge
Rehabilitation works.
f
-
Community Services Department
N~~~t f,' ~-Y' ~ wOY]t[t1g TOgCI/tCY t0 .SCYVC ~LIY COriliitUKl~ Municipal Works
L> ` l`Y3 -
"_'N..<: .
~
<~3flOC~
-l~zaa- &~~0.n~b~~0
October 6, 2008 - 2- MW-2008-58
Public Information Centre (PICZ
The PIC for the project was held at the Chippawa Lions Club on August 19, 2008. An
afternoon and an evening session were held to answer questions and solicit feedback from
the public and stakeholders regarding construction staging alternatives. The PIC was held
concurrentlywith the mandated Pubic Meeting forthe Watermain Replacement/Relocation
investigation, as required by the Municipal Class EA process. Notice of the meeting was
extensively advertised in the local newspapers, including direct notification to impacted
agencies and local businesses. City staff and the Consultant were present to answer
questions. Information sheets and questionnaires were available for attendees to review
and fill out with their comments/feedback.
The sessions were well attended with 51 people signing the attendance sheets. Of the
forty-five comment sheets submitted to the City, the vast majority (44) indicated a
preference for the works to completed in two stages. This would keep the bridge open to
both vehicular and pedestrian traffic during construction but at a slightly higher cost and
for a more extended construction timeframe. The comments received cited impacts on:
emergency services, pedestrian traffic, transit services, tourist traffic, local business, and
the extensive detouring required as the main reasons against closing the bridge during
construction. Staff recommends that the construction proceed in two stages and the
consultant be directed to complete the detailed design, construction drawings and
specifications based on this implementation scheme.
2008 Inspection and Structural Assessment
In keeping with one of the key recommendations from Ellis Engineering's Inspection and
assessment report of July 12`h, 2007, a follow up Inspection and Assessment was
requested on July 2"d, 2008. An underside and topside inspection of Weightman's Bridge
was undertaken by Ellis Engineering Inc. on July 9`" and 22"d, respectively. A report with
their findings was issued on July 25th, (copy attached). In summary, the underside and
topside inspection reveal that the bridge is experiencing minor increases in deterioration
and noticeable leakage through the bridge deck.
The updated structural assessment of the bridge reveals that the previously identified
elevation drop in the cantilevered centre span section is due to rotation in the exterior
concrete girders on both sides. The centre span of the bridge is composed of a series of
these concrete girders, all tied together with steel tie rods. It was noted that the condition
of the tie rods cannot be inspected due to the ends being grouted. It was also noted that
the amount of elevation drop has not significantly changed from the 2007 inspection. The
consultant has indicated a concern regarding the rotation of the exterior girders as the
calculated centre of gravity for the girders (which includes the sidewalk, railing, and
hanging watermain) is outside ofthe steel supports. They are recommending that remedial
repairs, in the form of steel plates connecting the exterior girders to the adjacent girders,
be implemented as soon as possible to preserve the integrity of the exterior girders. The
report also concludes that the Bridge structure has sufficient capacityto permit delay ofthe
proposed Rehabilitation work to 2010, if necessary, provided that the recommended
remedial repair works are implemented.
The consultant has estimated that the repair work would cost approximately $20,000 and
could be completed in less than a week. They also recommend Rankin Construction as
having the necessary local expertiseto undertake the work. The submitted quotation (copy
October 6, 2008 - 3- MW-2008-58
attached) is for $18,443.00, plus GST. We would like to recommend that Rankin
Construction be directed to implement the proposed remedial repairs at their earliest
opportunity. The is due to the nature and urgency of the required work, the availability,
interest and expertise possessed by Rankin Construction to undertake the work, and the
fact that the quotation is less than the Engineer's estimated amount.
Proposed Work and Schedule
As part of the notification process to potential stakeholders for the PIC, consultation with
staff from the Regional Municipality of Niagara revealed the following information:
• The Region is in the process of undertaking the design of the structural
rehabilitation of Dean's Bridge (Regional Road 47 - Lyons Creek Road crossing
Lyons Creek) in Chippawa. The work involves the replacement of the bridge deck
and will be under construction for 3 or 4 months. The work is scheduled from
approximately April to July of 2009, and the road and bridge will be closed during
construction. The Region was also intending to use Weightman Bridge as part of
the proposed detour route during constructian.
• The Region also is in the process of undertaking the design of intersection
improvements at Stanley Avenue (Regional Road 102) and Lyons Creek Road
(Regional Road 47). The scope of work is still to be finalized, but will likely include
some re-alignment on Stanley Avenue leading into the intersection from the north.
The construction work will require approximately 3 months to construct and is
planned to commence following the completion of the Dean's Bridge Rehabilitation
project (August to October 2009).
The planned Regional projects will impact the current schedule of the Weightman Bridge
Rehabilitation project.
Since it is now recommended that Weightman Bridge be rehabilitated in two stages, this
will extend the time frame for construction to approximately 10 months (4+ months to
complete each stage, plus a three-week window between stages for the changeover of
utilities and traffic control devices/barricades). This time frame, would confine the
construction window to beginning in February and completion by the beginning to mid
November. Also since Weightman Bridge will be part of the proposed detour route during
the planned rehabilitation work on Dean's Bridge by the Region, it is recommended that
construction not be taking place concurrently on both bridges. Also, coordination of the
rehabilitation works on Weightman bridge could be further expedited if the proposed
watermain relocation works were already completed and operational. It is recommended
that the Structural Rehabilitation works for Weightman Bridge be postponed until 2010 for
construction. The updated Inspection and Structural Assessment of the Bridge also
supports this proposal.
CONCLUSIONS:
The proposed postponement in the construction schedule for the Bridge Rehabilitation to
2010 to permit the proposed watermain relocation work and other works planned by the
Region in Chippawa should not pose any increased concerns with regard to the structural
condition and capacityofthe existing bridge. This is provided thatthe recommended minor
remedial repairs are undertaken as soon as possible. The recommended contractor
(Rankin Construction) has indicated interest and availability to begin work on the project
October 6, 2008 - 4- MW-2008-58
shortly after authorization to proceed.
The quoted price for the work ($18,443.00 plus GST) would be paid from the Weightman
Bridge Structural Rehabilitation Budget (Account # 12-3-310048-030000), as it is part of
the recommended structural improvement works.
i
Recommended by:
Geoff olm , Director of Municipal Works
Approved by:
Ed ujlovic, Ex cutive Director of Community Services
~/C ~
Respectfully submitted:
J hn acDonald, Chief Administrat e Officer
K. Schachowskoj
S:\REPORTS12008 ReportslMW-2008-58 Weightman Bridge Structural Rehabilitation Status Report.wpd
E LLIS H~Itis Engineering Inc
~ Consulling lio~ineers
44 Port Master Urive
~ St. Cathannes, Ontario
Engineering Inc. c;,~,~e„
L2N 7A6
~ ~CeI: (9~5) y34-9049
Pex:(IDS)93d-442A
email: ellis(rc,'ellis.on.ca
July 25, 2008 ~
The CiCy of Niagxra Falls
Municipal Works Department
4310 Queen Street
Niagara f'alls, Ontario
L2E 6X5
Attention: Mr. Kent Schacliowskoj, P.Eng.
I'roject Manager, Municipal works
Reference: Weightmads Briclge-20U8Iospectiou and Structural Assessment
We aee pleased to submit our inspection report and StrucWral Assessment, as per your
email request dated July 2nd , 200$.
The underside inspection of the strtccture was completed on July 9, 2008 aaid the topside
~ inspection was completed on July 22, 20~8 by ELI,(S Engineering Ine. The structure was
found to be in a very similar condition to tha 2007 inspection evith minor inereases in
deterioration and noticeable leakage through the deck. At this time the struct~ire
assessment faimd that the siructure had sufficient capacity to delay cansTruction to 2010
if minor structural stability repairs, outlined in Che attached report and sketch, are
completed as soon as possible. We atso recommend patch repairing the asphalt over the
expansion joints.
'rhank you for giving us fhis opportunity in prc~viding our services, it is greatly
appreciated. Please do not hesitate to contaet myself or Duane VanGeest to confirm any
points.
Yours truly,
F,LLIS Engineeriog Inc.
~f~ r~
, ,
}3rian J.J. Ellis, P.Eng
President
Attachnrent: SK-1
.
ELLIS Engineering lnc. July 25, 2008
WEIGHTMAN'S BRIDGE
~ 2008 INSPECTION AND STRUCTURAL ASSESMENT
INTRODUCTION
An inspection and Purther analysis was completed on Weight~nan's t3ridge following a
request by the City of Aliagara Falls on July 2, 2(108.
Tha underside inspection of Weightmun's Bridge was compleYed on July 9, 2008 by
ELLIS Engineering (nc. with the assisYanee of Matt Ma°Keeman &om ASl - Marine
Serviees Group who provided a boat. A top side inspection of the sTrueture was
eompleted on July 22, 2008 by 6LLIS Gngineering lnc.
The structure was found to be in a very similar condiCion to the 2007 inspection with
minor increases in deYerioration and noticeable teakage through the dec;k. It was found
upan further structural review that the weight of the exCerior conorete girders fogether
rovith the concrcte sidewalk and watermuin has a cenhe of gravity that fies outside the
steelwork support. Wc, believe this eondition could possibly cause a failure of the
exterior girders if the transverse anchor rods, rying the precast conerete ~irders together,
fail. We could not inspect the anch4r rods as tliey are embedded in-the precasY eoncrete
girders.
At This time khe structure assessment found that the structure had sufficieat capacity to
delay construetion to 2010 if the minor structural stability r~;pairs outlined in the atWched
report are completed as soon as possible.
• lt was reported to F.;LLIS Engineering on July 3, 2U08 that a boater traveling under the
str•ucture had noted signifccanC detcrioration and rotution of the exterior concrete girders.
Fotlowing inspection it was fc~und the rotation of the exterior eoacreCe girders had noT
inereases since fhe last inspection on June 22, 2007. The exterior edge of Yhe sidewalk
elevation drops between 5mm - 35mm at the joinG between the steei girders and the
concrete girders. 'I'he exterior precasY girclers Mave rotated slightly, so th~t the external
side is lower than the interior sitie, due to the dead load of Ihe sidewalk and the
watermain. "I'he rotation nppears to have stabilized.
TOPSIDE 1NSPECTION
The topside of the structure is in a very simil;~r eonditio~ ta the inspection compleTed a
year ago. 7~he asphalt roadway is in poor condition with areas of severc transverse cand
longitudina( cracking and potholes, 'i'he espansion joints are generally in p~or condition.
`171e end seals have heen paved over but are still actively leaking as the patclies are
brenking up. The expansion joint seals at the centre span have also Pailed and the joinYs
are acCively leaking, There are areas of spalling anci cracking ulong boCh curbs.
Appraximate(y 10% of the steel railings are corroding and sections of the railings hava
Yailed ai various loc~tions. Several sections of the steel railing have separated at the
expansion joinTS over the centre span. The steel railing has been tempararily repaired at
~ the North West corner as the railin~ has rotaYed causing iC Co shear and t6e concrete end
post has been pulled out of the c~ncrete sidewalk.
Page 1 of 9
ELLIS Engineering Inc. July 25, 2008
~ A section of sidewalk xt the south west corner has cracked and broken away and the
~vingw~all has displaced vertically by ~pproximately ~}Omm. 'Che east side sidewalk is in
similar~condition to the wesC side sidewalk.
The concrete abutments are generally in good eondition. "I~he concrete wingwdlls are in
gaod condition. The concreCe sidewalks adjacent to fhe abutmenC under the bridge are
being undermined as the mass concrete protection is breakiog aparC and being
undermined, The concrete p[ers are in goad canditit~n.
We recommend patch repairing the asphalY over the expansion jaints.
UNDERSTDE 1NSYECI'ION
T'he under side of' the structure ~vas in a very si~nilar conditian to the inspection
eompleted a year ago. The structural steel girders are generally in good condition.
However, fhere are isolated areas of severe corrosion near the expansion joints. The steei
supparts for the precast girdars are in fair Co poor condition with severe corrosion
throughouk The concrete deek soffit above the steel girders is generally in fair to poar
condition with cracking, delaminations, I[ght to medium spalfs and evidence of leakage
throughaut. There are areas of vonorete spalling aEong the east edge of the bridge deck
and on Che soffit of the €~verhangs aC the east and west edge of the structure. The soffit of
the precast girders are in fair to poor condition witfi leakage between the jQinCs and with
~ medittm Yo severe delaminations and spa[(s at the ands, near the expansion joints and
between the exterior girders and the next ~irder in. The external girders have rotaYed so
that the axternal side of'the sidewalk is Smm to 35mm lower then the interior side, at the
joints.
lt appears Yhat the expansion and eontraetion of [he bridge deck structure is not behaving
the way it was desi~ned. "1'he expansion joints are shown at the ends of the precast
girders in the centre span and the bolted fixed joints are sho~vn atthe abutments on the
design drawings. '['he bottom flanges of the girders havc locally buckled slightly at the
south abutment as the structure expanded but Che stress was relieved as several o£ the
fixing bolts have sheared off.
'1'here was a slight increase in the nwnber of detaminations on the cancrete girders since
the last inspection. However, it appears that no delamSnations havc spalled off of the
conerete girders since the last inspecYion. It was also found that there was a minimat
increase in the amount of deterioration of the struetura( stael girders and stcel supports for
the concrete girders. There was an inerease in the amount of eftlorescence staining xnd
wet areas in the deck sotTit since the previous inspeetion.
We recommend structural sYabillCy repairs to the exterior concrete girder as out I~ned in
Che structural assessmenY.
i
Page 2 of 9
ELLIS Engineedng inc. July 25, ZOQ8
• STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT
An evaluation of the bearing support for the exterior conerete girders was completed and
it was found the centre of gravity of the exterior girder with its attached sidewalk and
watermain components is beyond the end af che steeJ support. The capacity of the
eorroded steel support for the concrete girdcrs was also investigated a~d there wns found
- Co be su~cient capacity allowing foe 50% seotion loss due to corrosion.
`Che Centre of gravity of the exterior girder with its attached componenCs tivas found to be
87mm beyond the end of the stee! suppart, see Pigure I a~d Fhotograph 8.
~ ~ Railing
300mm Dia. Watermain
Sidewalk Exterior Concrete Girder
Asphalt
1 Steel 'Tie Rod
o o---~---o-_ ---o----c~-_o--
• -
s~mn, ~
Steel Support
Centre of Steel Stittener
Graviry
Figure I: 6xterior Concrete Girder Existing Centre of Gravity
The original design shows that two P/a" post-tensioned steel tie rods connect the conerete
girders together, at third points which prevenf the exterior girders trom rotating off the
steel supporG. It was noted during Yhe inspection that the rotation of the esterior girders
was most evident at the ends of Che girders were there are no tie rods. We were unab(e to
inspecC the current condition of the steel Yie rods as they are in tubes tilled with grout and
the ends of the rods have been grouted over.
Due to the age of the structure and Chat amount of leakage through the precast concrate
girders, chlorides may have corroded the rods, reducing their capacity to support tha
exterior concrete girders. Therefore, we have recornmended a secondary means of
bracing to be insCalled to ensure the stability ofthe exterior girders.
•
Page 3 of 9
Et,LIS Engineering Inc. July 25, 2008
~ A stability analysis was completed of'the exterior girders using one line of wheel loads
applied on the sidcwalk adjacent to the railing. 7'he loading used is the CL-625-ONT
Cruck, from the Canadian Bridge Uesign Code, It was found that a resistance of
32.3kN/m was required at the joint between the interior and exterior ~irder to ensure that
the girder does nc~t rotate off the support
T'o prevent the rotation of the girder we recommend tying the top of the exterior and
interior girder togefher with steel ptates anchored ~cross the joint atthree IocaYions, each
side of~the bridge. Each plate shauld contain 8 anchors, epoxy grouted into the exis#ing
girders t25mm aIl as shown on the atfached sketch: Weightman's Sridge Navigable
Sp<tn, Esterior Girder SYabiGty Repair - SK-l.
An eval~~atian of the stcel support system for the conerete girders was also invesYigated.
Each interior conerete girder is supported by four and c~ne half steel stiffeners and the
extarior concrete girders are supporfed by three and one ha(f steel sCiffeners, see Fig~ue l.
The steel stiffencrs have a depth of 133mm and a web thickness of 19mm. 1'hey are
welded to the support stee) by full strength welds' meanir~ Yl~e support capaeity is based
an the shear capacity of the stiffener and not t6e wetds connecting the stiffener, Due to
Uie amount of corrosion fhe webs thiekness was taken as 9.Smm (half the original
thickness). "Che reduced shear capacity of the steel supports allowing for corrosion is
I95kN per steel stiffener. Tfie exterie~r girders loaded with a line of wheel loads residts in
a reaction of 465kN. The capacity of the cxterior support is 6$ZkN. The interior girders
t'ully loaded results in a reaction of 45 ( kN. "Che capucity of the interior support is 780k1~i.
• fherefore, theoreYically tha stiEteners and welds have sufficient capacity fo carry the
precast girders and live loads.
•
Page 4 of 9
ELL[S Engineering Ina July 25, 2008
•
~ . - ~
~
x,s~a
~ ~ ~ ~
k _
~ EF:
Photograph 1- Weightman's Bridge laokiog East
. '~~`~.i ~`~,~~~e~a-~' ~ ~ ~`at v~~a~^ 4 '°s
~~*~7 v'~~~'~ ~S'.,t ~.€`~i ~ t3~ .
~ c x s
~ .a.~~` a~" '~.a~°~s~ ~ a ~ .r'e:.^e-"~-'~' ~ ~*~rs.`
a~ s y.~r U.
° ' ~ ~ ~a~~„a''~ ~
~ ; - s~`~. q~ k~a~.~
~p x r~rc ~k ~ ~7
X t -Ar ~`~~3n` ~ ,4o- i * 7' ~{~.~t' y3 ~
~°'i xk*~,~'`' ~SS'Y}~ k'~_.+y ..z ~ ~~z- ~.'`Y ~ ~".;~~;~~3
ti s
S~+ te~.~ i ~.`~~~"~'i',,~2`^"`- ~ s~" -e~~'~eP, a- ~
d= v„ ~.33' 'x 3 ~ h~4 ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
Photograph 2- Roadway over Weightman's Bridge looking South
•
Yage 5 of 9
EL,LIS Sngineering tac. Juty 25, 2008
0
~~¢d;~,~~~;~{ ..~4 ~E~ao-F~ ~ag 5 g:R~`~~~ p'`~`_
a~µ',
y~~"B're Ae : t n} "ga~ S` ~ i 4
~ y ~ ~ u 6 p ~S`5Y ~
2 A+`~ 3^5 ~ q° `ons' i e ~
. $ ~'.~~p ° ~~a~ ,~k ~i .~,4' w Rrv~° > t ~av ~ . ~5,. .
t
~ a$',~ ~y ; j .a~ ?y ~ k ~A
~ 1+
~ 4 ~ -e p, Y:d.~i F y R f F3
di `S ~~r f¢ . "i AS ' Y 'i>'. y .
. . ' r . s e Y ' $-a~ -a~"
~ ~ r ~ + L' c 9 a ¢4~s'~'~ ~ " x~~ ~ , ~np y. ~
- ,j7.~~ ~ ta . gp, ' ~~5~..n4 d 3:
~ ~.^`~J ~B ~R a~x> '"8 ~t ~i ~s ~ ~5,4. o'4^:C+s+~~.
° d' Nu~ s 9 ~*s Ve.~x~ ~ ~
3~' ~ Y, ~ * ~f'~ *'4 a9 ~ { "4~ ~ .
-'~"',fao~, ,ym~ e 4' .~e a . .o,~#v°~,
~r~. e. .a~ 5 'y°~ a„ $ m+~z +n a
py nP g y& m. a ~
~~'k fu ~ .WV"z9, odcSP ~ p ~f i6~. ~
`~k. a~"'" ~>-n `S°4°.4~~}~'x~ ~+?S e~sp F~*~~ ~~~~"v?',` ~~L~"r~~°`
0'~5 ~ a s4'Sz~ ~t ; ~ ~+q* t'1g ~~4¢~~npa y,~ai,
ar ~ ~tx ~ ~4 „p°~~n g ~cyP~v~.": ^a ~ ~ ~ F U J"" , y,},'f
~j~.~'="`i ~ 4 "a~~Y.'~°~'.e~s ~ A,`H`~,.a~'~$ P
n.~"°~ - m r ~ ~ < r- a- `a e~~a3 ,~b ea ~
~ ~~t' @~"~YP ~yQ~~`, y ~ p~ ~k .t 'y~'§~~a a ~.1~~3 A „'~..,~,`."ig,
P~ ~~t~'i.~y ,w~+ ~~@ Y ~1t2`~ yew~ k
"-v~ ~ ~~Y~~ ~?~,d.~ ~,m~~Vy'g° '''$'!*r.~ 3°"' °~'.~y ~~?~j
£h1' ~ ,~x wd y 'S`~ ~ ^*~~,~,x 3~'R Pa~j..",~. y~~~
--N
= ~ . ~ ` ~ '~~a~a ~ - ~ o
a r~; g ~
~ ~e3~+'~4 4 ~$„ku~ `r
t@sc~ ~ Y~ t ~ ~'8~'#"'`M Y ~@w~§L :S
~r~'°pH'~,~*r~dT_ ~.~~pg m.P~ 9'.' „ ~t~~,& ga `~M<Y*,~ ~ ,
~ 9~
Yhotograph 3- Potholes at ihe expansion joiot between the steel and conerete gir~Eers.
~
~ . - , .
ti~.:° :s~
a ~
w +.ss~ ~'E~-'.~ . ° r d
' ~z.4~, ~ ~t" ` n~ ' v ° ~~„dia }y ~q .
~ ~ e~`,~ , . ~ . ' ~w
~'.r a . _
~ .
: ~ ~ ~
. . r ~.~F-, ~'-~o ~ ~ e .
q~
~5~p b~'~~_ 6 ~~'~~nVqt ~ ~ y,
Q ~1 e ~ "~P..~} . ~$r ~1 ia~
ro e ..:r q ° R
A9'pmm o.,.... m ~
i .+d ~ . ° ° ~ `n ~ ' ~7.
i . A dx ~A S a
~S'n~ `.ti.;~
. cn ~ ~~5~ . ~
I ; ~
i t~`` - :~'ti ~ w~ ,
e . ~ . r
~~~i~`h~.n~ ~a ~,~.C ~ S
~ ~
?~~m~y;,~"p .I ~ . . 9~ kr` ~~~ry~e' S 9 ~'~P~A ,
ng «/v ~ t~~ :kt._ e~ . ~ - `
a ~°~F ro ~~9 ~asc. ~ g`"~ ~ > " ~ ~s" ° .
a.~vu~,~~~~ . y~ -i¢~ . . ~a~<j"....
~.~~~°~`~s-~" ~I~q ~5~^4,'~ ~ `3~' a~,
^ ~~t~~,+ a~: 4 ~ • k `~t ~..f`~' w :
r n : yZ aeg~ ~
~`tRI '.+ae ~oy ~ ~
a~,
p J` S b ~ ~t~El `"s. ,@ ''~~'8W ~ ~rnµ.3A~~R"~l§ b a-.`s*
ae}~ .
t.. ~ ~ ~tie$ ~ib~ "~'x S' ^'1..~'8 "'T,~4 ° u ~ .~o"' S ~~.A~iy4d`.'+~' ",P'°
~ Photograph 4- Etevation change in the top oFthe East sidewalk at the joint between
the steel and concrete girders due ta the rntation of the exteriar concrete girder.
Page 6 of 4
ELi.IS Engineering inc. July 25, 2008
~
.
.
~ ~
L~
;i
~
y4~~r
_ a'~
r.y~m~
: '~'P>., . .v
p tu
u~g~ 1;
ce
'-y~;N,;.V"~y:
m"~.
i -
s
~
. . , Y ~ .
Photogruph 5-South Abutmen[ Iooking So~th East
•
i . F.
i § t ~
~
~'k ~S ~
y44
"4~
~
£ ~ i
~ ~h ~
~~e ,X `~Y~: .
~
~b"
1
~q ~
~~.~tbi~. m~x'.~.
~~ta+>
n .
'rY~~~,~cr _
:;pr;+35-~
e
'"s...
_ -
Phatograph 6- Spalling, delaminations and leakage on the deck soffit.
•
Page 7 of 9
ELLIS Engineering Inc. July 25, 2008
i
~ ~ ~r.
~ .
~ ~ ° ~ , ! ~
~ ~
~ ~
"l~t *L. 4 ~ Ii~Y~+~'"". S
~ ~ Y
ti,E ~ ,y ~:Y~ ~ JL ~ f 1~ R:ti%R.,.. .
~ HJ fi n•b"
~ '4.Yr ~ ~ R' . <
4 T+.' . _
. . . _e .
~ ~
~-~~Y ti~'e. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~a
. . . . . ~""~-a........,,._ .
4?Ra?
Phutograph 9- North centre span joint between the prestressed girders and steel
girders
t
• ~ ~
z-n ~5y 0. 3"".
Y ~T`y
ti
~ ~ ~"".Kr~~., _
U
A
~[i 7~r~.
v }'~y.
~
x~
'~.s"...i`
j: e:N~ [ m
s.,fPi
Ki rv
Photograph 8- Exterior Concrete girder and stee{ support.
•
Page 8 of 9
El,LtS Engineering Inc. July 25, 200$
~
~
~
~,ri
, :
,
Photograph Delamin~tions, spalling and Icakage on the eancrete girder at khe jaint
between the steel and concrete girders.
• , ~/~f
1q`~~~~ I~~~Pl~.. I '>'Q"t~~# y. ,
I NI (,~1" J ~<~~s~~~.d s
f
s w.3 ° g? '
~-a~ ~v5 •rs
j ~ ~ 4 ~ YT.~f ~m
~~^-s~n~ ~W i
' ~ fi ~~.,5,.~ ~,.`3
G a
gT ~i'. a 1 i S~ 1. 5" *.}y,.e~.
^.`.*R
- ~V ~ .>Y T~i ~ ~+'J' ~''ayp ~
'~y °y~ ~4~~
t
Sy . _
y v +`~sa~,. ~ :i
5 - ~s ,
~ a ~ 2'~F c
r
< ~J ~ ~ s r~ r~
f~
~
9~; ~..w,~'w E~~~'~~,~'+ CS¢ : j
y9~ i
{~~'^+#~4 rc'+ ~.<<
~j ~?:e `P~t~v`'-~`~~5 t
~~~~~~~;f
ut
~?~.u.}i=~
~,~e~A ~,k..
2
~ ¢
t'hotagrapfi (0 - Leakage behveen the coticrete girders t _
•
Page 9 of9
~i
<CY«
o z ZW~,
~~w~a ~"~~"r'
oo°~il~ ~~~s
in ==S?~ W Joo.
a - ~ -
m
~o ~ w~ ~°L Qc¢a~
w~ v g_ ~ tij
'C j 1- Y Q ~F1 Q~'
C~--__._ - ~ S O p?i O ~ Z W
. ~ . . ~n~~~r~ ~ Qw~
r~r-ir~: : ir'ii"-i 4l ~~~Qd N ~ Q~(.9
" I I I I I I I I I II I ~ J~X U) ~ Z
t II II f I II fl 1 ZUa~_ ~ _ ~t-
( t t i 1 t~ I 1 I i 7 I
i I( i f I I I i I I I ~ W ~ Z J ~ m W
I I I I I I~ I I I I I i C Q d CCUQ O~ R'
4 I I I ! I I~ I I I I I I ~ ~~-L~ T ~ y' t-U~ Z Z
~ I i i I I I I I I i i I ~ 2
i ii ii i i ii ii i U~3s~ Q~ _oi~ 4
i ii ii i i ii ~i i ~ U~~
i i ii ii i i ii ii i
~ i it ii i i ii it i a
i i ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ o w
i I I I I I I I I I I I I N W~ p
I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 ~ ~ W +
I I I I I I I I I I I i ~ h r
i ii ii i i ii ii i SZt ~w x,
i ii ii i i ii ii i ~3 W~
^i i ii ii i i ii ii r ~ c~7
i ii ii i i ii ii ~ °
I I ~ I I I I I I I I I a N Q(/j ~
I J`j ~ I t I I I` I I
" "i t_,. ~ i_ W ~ 1-.
~-1 I-~ f_ f'~ N N 'n I ~~Z o> w~
~ i ii ii i i ~i ii i ~ i ~ a o m o
i i I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ I _ U J
I I I I I I I I I I I ~ - --f- Q
i l I I I I I I I I I W ~ O w~ s z
~ ~ ii u i i ii ii i ~ ~ i ~ a a a~ w
~ ; ~ t ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ o~ x m
~ 1 I 1 1 I I i I I I I Z Q I ~ ~ U~ o U°
I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I
I I 17 I I II I QUj ~ I
L__ i I f 1 I I I I I F- ~ ~
1 ~ II II II 11 I ~ ~ W
~ II 11 71 II I~ ~
ii ii i i ii ti i crt- H~.
I 1 I I I I I I I I I J
U W P
~ ~ I I I I I I i I I i V p~ 1-Z~
I I I I 1 I I I l l I 0- Z ~ Y ~r,~
I I I 1 I I I 1 I 7 I ~ Q w ~ 4 W~~ W W
I i I I I I I I i I I U~
I I I I I I I 1 f 7 I ~''"L J L w ~
~ u u 5 ° ~ 1 ~ - -
r-~ r..~ ~_..i r--~ ~ Z Q. (J Ul
I I 1 I I I I I I I I I ~ W~
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I t I I I I I i I l
y I I I I I I I I I I I i
O I I I i I I I I I I f I
~ I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
i I I I I I I i I I I I
i I I 1 I I I 7 I I I I
I i I I I I I I I I I I
I 1I II I I 1I II I
I I I I I I I i I I I I
i t I I I I I I I I I I o
I 1 I I I I I I1 11 I ~I ~ ~ Q ~
~ 1 11 I7 I I II II I N ~
I I I I I I I II II I W y~ z yd ~ ~
7 ~ I I I I i I i I 1 1 I I g vi ? o~
Q i- ~ II II I I II il I O ma ir am ~
e~ S ~ Oo
I I I I I I 1 I i I I I v
~ ~
J I I I I I I I I I i I I , h~~ p~ oNNtt°N ° ~
~ ~ I- ~ I I I I I I i t I I I I q 4~ _ It..,. z ~ o
~~r t_~~~_~.: ~.r~-fr=~- pdX 8~C' 686868 8~' °w~ ~>~~~i°- zg °
. _
~ ~ ~ ~ I-- a u z c'ea ? a s " a U
d' ~ n .-oQ w~~~
_ _
_ ~ W X ~ Z Q F- ~~i Uan>~i,~_ ~mwCiaa"
4O J ~ Z~O:Q~~~1~-~~~-
~ ~I- ~ (~~J U)N a ~ a~_z mi Op 7~^~n.c~-p
i µ JQW ~ ~ ~W m QQ~~i"wzfi..
G ~ ~`L ~O ~ fJ EmV12 ~~~ZN
~=JF- pi~~ ~w c~n_, "'?~~unw~
i 7-V~i>4 ~Q s° ¢~os~-~mwoqi'n^
~Z4~LLyL C~ZO ~F ~yOO~~fKKZOO
ti0(W1'IWYv O~~ w3 OW(JQ¢~~O~OZm
~ '-t~o zx~oz¢oc~°'wg~
zpa...<3~~ V~O~£wa
a5cs.~ ~wo~~E~i~eza~~ia
~~o~zc~xo~a~oJ~-w
Z I-E'Q4~N !-V6~m
I _ N < ~ ~
?2/2 08) Kent Schachowsko' - Re: Weightman's Bridge 2008 Inspection and Structuralf ~Assessment Page 1
. From: Brian Ellis <ellis@ellis.on.ca>
To: Kent Schachowskoj <kschachowskoj@niagarafalis.ca>
Date: 7/2&/20~8 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: Weightman's 8ridge 2008 Inspection and Structurai Assessment
Attachments: Stability Work Cost Estimate.pdf
CC: Duane VanGeest <vangeest@eilis.on.ca>, Geoff Holman <gholma niagarafall...
Kent: It is difficult to accurately sstimate construction costs of
small repeirjabs such as this one. Anyhow, we have put an estimate
together (attached) and estimate that the City should carry an allowance
of $20,000 for the work. We estimate that the work should be complete
in no Ionger than 4 days. Rankin Construction would be our recommanded t
Contractor or any road Co~#ractor that would sub out the structural j
steelwork and installatio~ of the anchors.
1
Regards,
Brian ~
Kent Schachowskoj wrote: ~
> Brian & Duane,
>
> Thank you for the report and your quick response to our re uest for the work. I have reviewed it and I
am satisfied with the content. Photographs 8& 10 both illus'trate quite clearly the issue with the exterior
centre span concrete girders. Can you provide the City with an Estimated Cost to Construct the proposed
remedial repairs as is described in the report and approzimate construction timeframe. We would also
appreciate it if you can recommend some potential co ~ tractars w'rth capabi&ty to undertake the work.
>
~ > Thank you,
>
> Kent Schachowskoj, P. Eng.
> Projeci Manager, Municipal Works
> City of Niagara Falls
> Ph. 905-356-7521 Exk. 4336
> Fax 905-356-2354
> kschachowskoj@niagarafalls.ca
>
>
>
>
Duane VanGeest <vangee t@ellis.on.ca> 7/25/2008 1222 PM
> Kent,
>
> Please find attached We'r htman's Bridge 2008 lnspecfion and Sfructural
> Assessment as request d July 2, 2008. Please contact us if you have a~y
> questions or comment .
>
> Regards,
>
> Duane VanGeest
> ELLIS Engineeri Inc
> 905-934-9049 ~
>
• ~
>
~ ,,i
Job No. 357 28-Ju1-08
Weightman's Bridge Stability Repairs /
Construction Cosf Est[mate ~
Description Amount
1 Traffic Control (Flagging} $ 6,000.00
2 Asphalt Removal $ 2,p00.Q0
3 Grinding top of Girders $ 500-00
4 Steelwork Supply and Install $ 3,500.00
5 Drill and Epoxy Anchors $ 3~600.D0
6 ReinstateAsphalt $~1,500.00
Sub Total $17,T00.00
Contittgency~% $ 3,420.00
!
Total: $20,520.60
~
•
~
/ ~
/
~
!
/
•
~?2(2008) Kent Schachowskoj - We~Jfitman Bridge - temporary repairs
~ Page 1
~ From: Brian Ellis <ellis@ellis.on.ca>
To: Kent Schachowskoj <kschachowskoj@niagarafalls.ca>
Date: 9/19/2008 2:21 PM
Subject: Weightman Bridge - temporary repairs
Attachments: FW: Attached Image
CC: duane Vangeest <vangeesf@eilis.on.ca>, Roger Armstrong <rogera@rankincon...
Kent: We have received a quote from Rankin Construction (attached) for
the recommended stabilisation repair work to Weightman Bridge and
be[ieve their price to be reasonable. Roger Armstrong can order the
steelwork anytime, there is a two week lead time for the supply of
steelwork. Please !et Rankin Construction (Roger) know when you want to
proceed.
Regards,
Brian
•
~
~ 09l19/200& 12:29 IF~X stcath~rankinconstrnatian.ca ~ Roger Armstrong ~~O1~0o1
Rankln Construction Inc. ~
~ P.O. Box 1116
St Cathadne's, Ontario
L2R 7A3
TBIBpfiDne: (9Q5)68A-7711
Fax: (905)66A-2260
A'f7: Mr. Kent Schachowskoj, P. Eng.
The Ciryof Niagara Falis _ ~n'rE 19•Se •08__ _
4310 Queen Street
,..Engineer Ellis Engineerin9
_
iagara alis, Ontario oWNea _ City of Niagara Falls
Phone 905356-7521
Fax 905356-2354
doa: Wei~htman's Brid~e_- 2Q08 Exterior Concrete Girder Stabiliry Repair
~oC,arioN Niagare Falls, Omano -
- . _
e are pleased to subminhe following quotation !o carry oui vrork as described below: -
Please review the tollowing proposais
t Suppiy 8 Instafl (6) Steet Sheet as per Ellis Engineering DWG. SK•1 1 LS $18,443 $ 18,443
NOtBS:
1 Traffic conirol included
2 We will need one weeks notice before we start the work.
3 Will need 1 day (in shop)and t-2 days (in field) to complete the work.
4 Bonds and polWtion insurance not indutled if required
5 Price Valid 30 Days
• S Pst included
7 GST extra
Rankin Constr c.
~ j\ ~ ~ RogerArmsirong C.E.T. - Estimalor
w ^n p
errO ; LL~zO
_oE_---
Pa9~
~
October 6, 2008 MW-2008-59
~
I~TIl~~~m~~alls
C,aNA DA
Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: MW-2008-59
Weightman Bridge Watermain Relocation Project
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Council approve the implementation ofthe recommended preferred alternative
from the consultant (R.V. Anderson Associates Limited) investigation following the
Municipal Class EA process for the replacement/relocation of the existing
watermains on the Weightman Bridge.
2. That Council approve the proposed scheduling and phasing of the construction of
the recommended new watermain loop into Chippawa along Stanley Avenue and
Lyons Creek Road as outlined in this report.
BACKGROUND:
Previous Reaorts
In September of 2007, Council approved the recommendations in Report MW-2007-96,
providing a status report, scope of work and schedule to proceed with proposed
Rehabilitation of the Weightman Bridge crossing of the Welland River in Chippawa. One
of the recommendations included in the report was to undertake an investigation and
assessment of alternatives for the replacement and relocation of the existing watermain
crossings on the current bridge structure. Currently, two (2) - 300 mm (12-inch) diameter
watermains are located on the bridge, hanging underthe sidewalk (one on each side). The
scope of rehabilitation work and the location of the existing watermains necessitates that
they will need to be removed and replaced during the bridge construction. These
watermains will need to remain in service during construction as they are the only source
of potable water for the community of Chippawa on the south side of the Welland River.
Community Services Department
; Worki~:g Together to Serve Our Community i M~n~o~Pai works
;*$o ~ • ~ }
«3flOCo
-b~- ~~D~'sU~G~~m a
October 6, 2008 - 2- MW-2008-59
Municipal Class EA - Watermain Replacement/Relocation Investigation
In light of the above noted issues, staff has considered removing the existing watermains
off the bridge by boring new crossings under the Welland River. There are many
advantages to implementing this scheme, but most importantly this work could be done in
advance ofthe Bridge Rehabilitation providing more flexibility in the construction schedule,
as well as freeing up space on the replacement bridge deck. The comparative costs would
be similar because of the elimination of the need to provide temporary servicing during
construction of the new Bridge deck. Also, by relocating one or both of the watermain
crossings off the Bridge it creates additional security forthe supply source to the south side
of the Welland River. The location of the crossing was strategically investigated in an
attempt to improve the overall water distribution network operation, service delivery and
maintenance efficiency.
The planning process and investigation of alternatives for the relocation of the watermain
crossings off the bridge deck followed the Municipal Class EA process. The construction
of new watermains within an existing road allowance or utility corridor, including the use
of trenchless methods for water crossings, is considered a Schedule A+ project. If a new
watermain cannot be constructed entirely within an existing road allowance or utility
corridor the undertaking must follow the more stringent requirements of a Schedule B
project. Schedule A+ project are considered pre-approved and may proceed directly to
implementation (no mechanism for appeal to the Ministry of the Environment). However,
some form of Public Notification is required of the construction project is mandated. Any
stakeholder concerns would then be directed to Municipal Council for an appropriate
response.
R.V. Anderson Associates Limited were retained to undertake the Municipal Class EA
planning process for this project on behalf of the City. In consultation with City Staff, the
consultant derived seven alternatives for consideration and assessment to replace the
current bridge crossings. These ranged from bored Welland River crossings (numerous
locations) to the provision of a second feed into Chippawa along an alternate route, as well
as replacing the existing watermains on the replacement bridge deck. To properly assess
the feasibility of any bored river crossings, a Geotechnical consultant was retained to
undertake a borehole investigation at each potential crossing and confirm bedrock levels.
R.V. Anderson has completed their assessment of the pros and cons associated with each
of the alternatives, including the recommendation of a Preferred Alternative.
Public Information Centre (PIC~
The PIC for the project was held at the Chippawa Lions Club on August 19, 2008. An
afternoon and an evening session were held to answer questions and solicitfeedbackfrom
the public and stakeholders regarding the Watermain Replacement/Relocation
investigation and alternatives, as required by the Municipal Class EA process. The PIC
was held concurrently with the Pubic Meeting for the construction staging assessment for
the Weightman Bridge structural rehabilitation. Notice of the meeting was extensively
advertised in the local newspapers, including direct notification to impacted agencies and
local businesses. City staff and the Consultant were present to answer questions.
Information sheets and questionnaires were available for attendees to review and fill out
with their comments/feedback.
October 6, 2008 - 3- MW-2008-59
The sessions were well attended with 51 people signing the attendance sheets. Of the
fourteen comment sheets submitted to the City, the majority (10) indicated an agreement
with the Consultant recommended preferred alternative. The Consultant recommended
alternative is to replace one of the existing watermains back on the new Bridge deck and
to construct a new watermain feed into Chippawa via an alternate route. The new route
is illustrated on the attached map and consists of extending a 300 mm diameterwatermain
from the existing dead end at the south end of the Stanley Avenue bridge crossing of the
Welland River to Lyons Creek Road. The new main would then extend east along Lyons
Creek Road and connect to the existing water distribution system at Sodom Road and
Lyons Creek Road. The feasibility of any of the bored Welland River crossings was
diminished by the fact that the Geotechnical investigation confirmed they would all have
to be bored through bedrock, thus significantly increasing the cost and risk associated with
implementing these alternatives. There are numerous ancillary benefits achieved from an
operational and level of service standpoint with providing a second separate potable water
feed into Chippawa. Staff concurs with the Consultant and the majority of public opinion,
and therefore recommends thatthe preferred alternative be selected, and Staff be directed
to proceed with the detailed design, construction drawings and specifications based on this
implementation scheme.
Proposed Work and Schedule
As part of the notification process to potential stakeholders for the PIC, consultation with
staff from the Regional Municipality of Niagara revealed the following information:
• The Region has planned and is in the process of undertaking the design of the
structural rehabilitation of Dean's Bridge (Regional Road 47 - Lyons Creek Road
crossing Lyons Creek) in Chippawa. The work consists primarily of replacement of
the bridge deck and will be under construction for 3 or 4 months. The work is
scheduled from approximately April to July of 2009, and the road and bridge will be
closed during construction. The Region was also intending to use Weightman
Bridge as part of the proposed detour route during construction.
• The Region also has planned and is in the process of undertaking the design of
intersection improvements at Stanley Avenue (Regional Road 102) and Lyons
Creek Road (Regional Road 47). The scope of work is still to be finalized, but will
likely include some re-alignment on Stanley Avenue leading into the intersection
from the north. The construction work will require approximately 3 months to
construct and is planned to commence following the completion of the Dean's
Bridge Rehabilitation project (August to October 2009).
The planned Regional projects impact the schedules of both the Weightman Bridge
Rehabilitation project (see Report MW-2008-58) and the proposed Weightman Bridge
Watermain Relocation project. Due to the impacts of the planned Regional projects, it is
being recommended thatthe Weightman Bridge Rehabilitation work be postponed to 2010.
Coordination of the rehabilitation works on Weightman bridge could be further expedited
if the proposed watermain relocation works were already completed and operational, thus
negating the need to implement a temporary service across the bridge in order to maintain
two feeds at all times. The proposed new watermain along Stanley Avenue and Lyons
Creek Road would then need to be implemented in advance or following both Regional
projects in 2009. It is anticipated that the watermain construction work will require
approximately 4 months to complete. If either of the Regional projects were delayed in
implementation, it may cause difficulty in completing the watermain in time to be
October 6, 2008 - 4- MW-2008-59
operational beforethe planned February2010 startofthe Weightman Bridge Rehabilitation
project. It would therefore be prudent to complete the watermain in advance of the
planned start of the Regional projects. However, the potential realignment of Stanley
Avenue as part of the Regional intersection improvement project will cause property and
location issues for the new watermain. It is therefore recommended that the City request
the Region to include that Phase of the new watermain construction as part of the scope
of their Intersection improvement contract (as illustrated on the attached map).
The section of new watermain on Lyons Creek Road between Stanley Avenue and Sodom
Road is recommended to be surveyed and designed by In-house staff. This provides the
greatest likelihood to be able to complete the design, approvals, tendering and construction
in advance of the planned Regional activities in 2009.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The Capital Forecast contemplated and expenditure of $140,000.00 for engineering fees
in 2008 and $1,560,000.00 for construction in 2009. These estimates are consistent with
the consultanYs estimates. Further details on the project financing will be updated in the
2009 Capital Budget
Recommended by:
Geoff Hol an, Dir tor of Municipal Works
Approved by: ~ L
Ed Dujlovic, Ex cutive Director of Community Services
Respectfully submitted: ~
G,,,r John MacDon d, Chief Administrative Officer
K.Schachowskoj
S:\REPORTS120D8 Reports\MW-2008-59 Weightman Bridge Watermain Relocation Status Report.wpd
~ s , .h. •1~tk+~-'~ c.
.#+1 `S ~ , ~1~;~..r~
~~~L~r' •jS~:,~~~,s
` . x ~inrv~!r,n~r ~+i1.l~`~34'"~.e?..
' ~ 8' i~r,r a";R~~~ }"~'A:,..., ~y~n~~~ -
Y . ~ T 'i:.•~t ' H~,l, y 3~ 'M ati 1 ~ , ~I,+~ .
, ' i.i~^ ~ ~ ~ ,F
~ ~ ~.t' : : ~ l F, '"~C,' , r ~°'''-..`t y:~e ~~~1 4
t,~v ~ i ir~, i~, :y' ~ ; ~ ~ ,rR ht` `,F
; r ~ + n,~ f ~ . < £ * . , ~ .
t • t ~ ti' i i ~ 3
- l ~ , ~'yY "q?.
;~r ~;-p~, 1 ' ~ ~
I,•~ . ~ i:~ 3^ f , '-i
y~..: ,a . . . v
3 ,r~s~: ~ ~ s~ \ ~
~ 1 ryi~ak^+. : f~ Y ~1
1 FT. . j
~ '~S ~ . Y ~ ~ Iy~S`' - 1 i .
. . , ¢y ~k. A . . ~ i . . Y. /`'~=M~~ ~ ' t' y ~i { ~ ' `
~ , ' ~ J'^ ' a J. . 1 _ lier ,R ~ ' 'i_J _ ~.a . ~ ; ~
F
M ~1
ru ~ t~ ~F"?. t.. ~ hw t.
v!~ l s .:c~ , ~ ~ ~ M~~~ ` ! '
t + . 1~ ~l ~ r+ ~ ~ ~ ~ t. : ~ 6
~ ~ . . y~v'+ ~ 1 ' ~ ' py,~ 2 1t t
. ~a t ~ ••N -~S . ~.+ll'( ~ f ; t 1 j7
y ~1 ` , Y ~ M~ j
+ , ~ ;,y , A; - „ ` , V)
~ i
~ * :r ~ : ~ ; ' , }4 s ~ ~ ` OrtJ
i ~t ~
x : S,~a ~ I~ ~~*'~~~'c r~ i :wi 3 ~ ~ / ~
~'Y +5.,. " ~e~t r
~ "~4.~ ~ ` ~.fi.. . , . ~ ~ ' ~
~ r . ` : ~ ` . ~ ~w` r~ " D
. , . , '~.:FA~~ ? - . ' . C
• ~i~.R` 4 ~ ~ ~ , ~ 'r ' ie l.c ~
~ i ~s' t', ' i . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' a . i ~ ~
i . ,~'Y ~ • , : ~ ~ ° ~ +,j ' l ~
~ ~ t, ~ i~' . / . . t J ~ O
ic. . . ~ 1,. . S~ r .~C ' ~ Mr , r •
~ '~.1..1_ a `1 ~ ~~~~~~t+r 1 V r- ' ~
r# a. ' ' . " 1 ` • ~1 ~~~P~,~ ~ j . ~1 V Y ` 1
t~ ~ ~~O ~ ~ , f SI i J - n
' I M,.~~,.:~ ' ~k' r~ •~y~_~~., `i ~
~ T J ` ~5,:
tn , -..:a r..~ ~r~a ~~rwef ~ ~ ~ ~M ~ r ` ~ 1 .y '.1' _ ~
n"~, I t . ~ ~
'D ~ a:... r . _ i;it 1NQ ,y!' ~ ;t. ~y- t , Ql
~ ~ ~ , _ * . ~
I ~ 1:,.. ~ ~ ~ '1
~ y~ . - (D
3 ~ -r ~s~, ~ _ f . • i , ~ 3
~ ~~t ~ `
z < o ~ ? Q!
~ ~ ~ . 4 ' ~ '3r r' Y 7'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ `.~y ~ ~ ~ " 1't~t't ' ~ ~ f~ r`t . ~ f
3 d _ ` k :i~~ ~ . i~ o~~~ ~,y~` . ~ri ti~ O
~ ~ ~ ~ .i,'~. . \ ~
, p 1 ~ y',1} _..M' l•
~ ~ 7 ~ . " i ' , . i ~ ~ ^ ~ ' ~ , . \ 4 ~
O ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~Ly : ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~N.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ f' f ''~s~,J _:,~ir`~'k , `
~ ~y "~,~i " • + ~
'j' y~", x r ~ ;~r ~
~'~s ~r ~ ~i.
I lsf- .a ~ y ;n t. } ~~~S~' `
< , t ?
I ,i , R~ 4~ ~ ~ t•~7 , .
1 • It' ~ ~.,f,~,.'' ,~y'~3~ .5`~Q1~~s ~
; Y'., . n t ~ y ~ •
x ~ ~ e ~ ~
~ J s°,, ~s
~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ° r,, :
~ ~ . a'.
~ ~ ' ~,f, .~t.
~ w~ Ft~ ~~°t
~ ~t y~ y } ~ i~,~ ~ ~ ~ A
g ~ , t " i~~. T . . , ~
. ~r , ,,~..~s , ~ . -
c t~~ : ~«'~i; . " ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ 1~~ ~ ~~1'; ' w ~t . ~ ~~~i r~~•'t ~
~ ,•~F,r . .i>
October 6, 2008 MW-2008-61
~1Il~~~~~~alls
ctircnn,,
Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: MW-2008-61
Building Canada Fund
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City submit the Museum Legacy Project for the Building Canada Fund and that
the resolution appearing tonight be approved.
BACKGROUND:
On August 26, 2008, the Province of Ontario and Federal government announced the
Communities Component Agreement which is part of the Building Canada Fund.
Communities with population of less than one hundred thousand can look forward to $724
million, $362 million - Province and $362 million - Federal government, in funding through
to 2014. Ontario communities are to also to provide $362 million is matching funding which
will result in projects be funded one third by each level of government. The first intake
which closes November 21, 2008, will provide funding of $200 million in total one hundred
each from both the Federal and Provincial Governments.
Project-Based Program
The projects will be selected through a competitive application based process and will be
evaluated on the extent to which they meet Ontario's priorities of environmental
sustainability, better health, improved local and regional economic development and
competitiveness, and better quality of life objectives.
As part of the project justification and business case that applicants will submit with their
applications, applicants must describe how their proposed project meets or supports the
Provincial policy objectives and plans described as appropriate to the category. Applicants
are also encouraged to demonstrate, in their application, how project support their broader
asset management plans and policies.
Eliqible Projects
To be eligible for funding a rproject must;
;,,n Working Together to Serve Our Commu~:ity Community Services Department
Municipal Works
'Y,.~~_'j .
.
.,.,nr , . . , . . -
~~~~~~'+sD~~ '1
October 6, 2008 - 2- MW-2008-61
a) be submitted by an eligible applicant that demonstrates it will be able to operate and
maintain the resulting infrastructure over the long term;
b) fall within one of the applicable project categories, be consistent with the objectives
of the category, meet one or more of the project outcomes of the category and meet
the mandatory project criteria of the category;
c) be for the construction, renewal, expansion, upgrade or material enhancement of
infrastructure, excluding normal maintenance or operation;
d) be supported by a Project Justification and Business Case, as part of the
application, that is comprehensive, credible and feasible;
e) be completed no later than March 31, 2016;
f) be implemented in communities served by local governments with a population of
less than 100,000 people, as set out in the 5tatistics Canada 2006 Census; and
g) be duly authorized or endorsed by, as applicable;
i. In the case of municipal applicant, a resolution of its council; or
ii. In the case of a non-governmental, not-for-profit or private sector body
applicant, a resolution or endorsement of its board of directors and also by
a resolution of the municipal council where the infrastructure is proposed to
be located.
Municipal Council must pass and submit a resolution endorsing the project as its intake
one application. In the case of a non-governmental, not-for-profit or private sector body
applicant, a municipal council resolution from the municipality in which the project will be
located, indicating supportforthe project, is required. Forprojects where the applicant has
funding partners (direct municipal or public private) a copy of a resolution and/or
endorsement from each funding partner specifying the amount of its capital contribution
is required.
It should be noted there is no maximum value for a project that can be submitted.
Funding Categories
CORE NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM -The BCF Communities Componentwill promote
investments in Canada and Ontario's Core National Highway System to:
Support Canada and Ontario's trade and tourism flow, both inter-provincially and
internationally.
• Increase the efficiency and improve the safety and mobility of the transportation
system.
• Support new capacity, improved access to border crossings and multi-modal
facilities, and safety and rehabilitation Projects on highways that form part of the
Core National Highway System, including bridges.
October 6, 2008 - 3- MW-2008-61
SHORT-SEA SHIPPING - The BCF Communities Component will stimulate investments
that support short-sea shipping infrastructure to:
• Promote Canada and Ontario's competitiveness, trade and quality of life by helping
to optimize the use of all transportation modes, and by contributing to
the sustainability of the transportation system.
• Help reduce congestion on highways and at border crossings.
SHORTLINE RAILWAYS - The BCF Communities Component will encourage
investment in shortline railways to:
• Promote Canada and Ontario's competitiveness, trade and quality of life by helping
to optimize the use of all transportation modes, and by contributing to the
sustainability of the transportation system.
• Help reduce congestion on highways and at border crossings.
LOCAL AND REGIONAL AIRPORTS - The BCF Communities Component will
support investments in local and regional airports to:
• Promote Canada and Ontario's regional economic development.
• Improve the efficiency and accessibility of these facilities.
CONNECTIVITY AND BROADBAND - The BCF Communities Component funding
in this category will be directed towards Projects designed to:
• Improve the delivery of public services, such as government services, education and
health;
• Improve quality of life, social development, reduce travel requirements, and
increase the potential for innovation and economic development by connecting
Canadians -particularly in rural and remote communities.
TOURISM - The BCF Communities Component funding in this category will be
directed towards the construction or improvement of convention centres or exhibition
hall-type facilities that:
• Increase the number of visitors to the community, and the length and quality of stay
of those visitors;
• Promote Canada and Ontario as a leading destination for Canadian and
international visitors.
WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE - The BCF Communities Component will
encourage investments in wastewater infrastructure designed to:
• Reduce the negative impacts of municipal wastewater effluent or storm-water
effluent on human health and the environment;
• Improve the management of wastewater sludge; Improve the management and
October 6, 2D08 - 4- MW-2008-61
efficiency of municipal wastewater infrastructure or storm-water Infrastructure,
including improvements to the energy efficiency of the Infrastructure;
• Improve the quality of treated municipal wastewater effluent and storm-water
discharged into the environment.
PUBLIC TRANSIT - The BCF Communities Component will encourage investments in
public transit infrastructure:
• To support transit systems within cities, communities and urban regions to promote
mobility and improved travel times, and to reduce urban congestion;
• To construct, improve or restore public transit infrastructure that contributes to
economic, environmental and social sustainability in Canada and Ontario's
municipalities and communities.
• Large-scale transit infrastructure expansion Projects will be required to incorporate
Transportation Demand Management measures to help build ridership and improve
environmental outcomes.
GREEN ENERGY - The BCF Communities Component will stimulate investments in
sustainable energy infrastructure that contribute to:
• Increased availability and/or security of Canada and Ontario's clean energy supply;
• Increased availability of renewable energy;
• Improved air quality;
• Reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT - The BCF Communities Component will promote
investments in solid-waste processing infrastructure that can reduce the environmental
impacts of this waste.
DRINKING WATER - The BCF Communities Component promotes long-term funding for
water infrastructure Projects designed to:
• Improve the safety, management, reliability and efficiency of Canada and Ontario's
drinking water treatment and distribution systems;
• Increase the number of households with access to safe drinking water that meets
or exceeds the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality and Ontario's
drinking water quality requirements;
• Improve protection and management of drinking water sources;
• Improve conservation of water.
DISASTER MITIGATION - The BCF Communities Component investments will be directed
towards Projects that will reduce the vulnerability of a community or public infrastructure
to the negative impacts of extreme natural events, including adverse events related to
October 6, 2008 - 5- MW-2008-61
climate change.
BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT-The BCF Communities Component investments will
be directed towards Projects designed to contribute to:
• The removal or neutralization of the negative effects of brownfields on communities
and the environment by remediating and redeveloping these properties in a
sustainable manner;
• More intense land use within municipalities and communities.
LOCAL ROADS - The BCF Communities Component will support investments in local
roads to:
• Improve road safety, mobility and sustainability;
• Promote the rehabilitation of bridges, tunnels and other structures;
• Support economic and community development.
SPORT - The BCF Communities Component funding in this category will be directed
towards Projects designed to:
• Provide increased opportunities for sport activities that can improve the health of
Canadians and strengthen Canadian communities;
• Provide increased opportunities for the development of Canadian athletes and/or
the hosting of major amateur athletic events.
CULTURE - The BCF Communities Component funding in this category will be directed
towards projects that:
• Support arts and/or designated heritage facilities;
• Help communities express, preserve, develop and promote their culture and/or
heritage within Canada and Ontario.
COLLABORATIVE PROJECTS - The capacity building component will be based on the
principles outlined in Section 3.5.3 of the Framework Agreement and relate to the
achievement of at least one of the following strategic objectives:
• Promote the implementation of holistic approaches to public infrastructure planning
and management, and sustainable community planning principles;
• Encourage a culture of using integrated life cycle asset management as a
decision-making approach;
• Promote the integration of demand management in public infrastructure planning
and management;
• Encourage dissemination of Project results to other Local Governments; and
October 6, 2008 - 6- MW-2008-61
• Support collaborative feasibility studies for specific infrastructure Projects which at
the time of the study are not being actively considered for funding under the BCF
Communities Component and planning studies on public infrastructure Projects and
issues.
Proiects for Consideration
Upon review of the seventeen categories and the City's Five Year Capital Works Program
staff determined that the City had projects that fell within seven of the categories. The
seven categories are;
1. Tourism
2. Wastewater/Infrastructure
3. Public Transit
4. Drinking Water
5. Local Roads
6. Sport
7. Culture
Detailed criteria of the seven categories are attached forinformation.
The following projects were considered for each of the headings.
1. Tourism
The Museum Legacy Project meets some of the objectives for this catergory.
2. Wastewater- Infrastructure
The continuation of the City's sewer separation program which reduces the volume
of incidents of combined sewer overflows.
3. Public Transit
The Transit is currently undertaking a business plan for the City's transit system.
The plan would address a number of the project outcomes as listed in the criteria
for transit. The proposed plan has not been submitted to Council for consideration
at this time and such is premature for submission for intake number one.
4. Drinking Water
Ongoing replacement of City's watermains which increases the reliability of the
City's distribution system.
5. LocalRoads
Projects under consideration were;
• Rehabilitation of Weightman Bridge in Chippawa
• Grade Separation at Morrison Street which contributes to improved road and
pedestrian safety.
6. Sports
Consideration was given to the Bob Gale Complex however it should be noted that
all costs incurred priorto the announcement ofthe successful application would not
be eligible forfunding and the project does not meet some of the mandatory criteria.
October 6, 2008 - 7- MW-2008-61
7. CUItUre
The Museum Legacy Project meets the outcomes and criteria as set out.
After considering all the projects staff is of the opinion that the Museum Legacy Project
best meets the criteria as set out in order to be successful in obtaining funding from the
Building Canada Fund Communities Component for the City for the first intake.
Staff will continue to monitor this multi year program and will report back to Committee on
projects that should be submitted forfuture intakes.
Recommended by: ~
Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services
Respectfully submittedr~• ~ ~
C~ John MacDonald, hief Administrative Officer
S:IREPORTS12008 ReportslMW-2008-61 - 8uilding Canada Fund Communities Component.wpd
16. TOURISM INFRASTRUCTURE
Objective
To direct investments towards the constmcuon or improvement of convention centres or exhibition hall-
type facilities that:
• Increase tltie mmiber of visitors to the community, and the length and qualify oFstay of fl~ose visitors;
aud
• Promote Canada and Ontario as a leading destiuaCion for Canadian and international visifors.
Funding criteria will require that proponenCS of convenCion centre or exhiUition-hall type Projects
demonstrate that their projects wi]] have a significant economic and/or regional impact.
Sub-categories
• Convention centres.
• Exhibition hall-rype facilities.
Project Outcomes
• The project must have a significant economic and/or regional impact and lead to at least oue of Uie
following additional outcomes:
o increases the number of visitors and/or length of stay and/or quality of stay; and
o promotes Canada or the region as a leading destination for Canadian and in[emational tourists.
Mandatory Project Criteria
• The project l~as a significant economic and/or regiona] impact." (See below).
• The project increases the number of visitors to the coinmunify and/or tl~e length of stay and/or the
quality of stay.
• The project demonstrates that the community has the necessary infrastnicture to support the facility.
• The projeet will attract evenEs to the cegion.
Adtlitional Leveraging Criteria
• The project includes financial support or a resolution in support of the project from a loca]
govemrnenC council(s) in anoUier community.
• The project makes the community a new regional or national destination for this tourism sector.
• The project will eontnbute to U~e rehabilitation of a neighbourhood or community.
• The project is for a muld-use or multi-component facility.
• The project increases sustainable u~ban deve]opment and evcourages a more efficient urban form.
• Tl~e project minimizes the negative impacts on the environment by reducing ongoing energy
consumption and/or water consumption and/or waste compared to the existing infrastructure, oc by
encouraging recycling or by using recognized green materials in the eonstruction/restoiation or
improvement of the infrastructure.
ECF On-Iine Program Guide - Communities Component - 95
• The project is part of a broader tourism strategy or plan for the province/territory, region or
wmmunity.
* This is deFined as:
Significant economic impacL
• Having completed an economic impact study estimating the total economic effects of the projecf,
includivg the direct, indi~ect and induced impacts:
o direct impacts include the jobs and income generated by the project;
o indirect impacts include the production, employment and incoine chauges occurring in other
businesses/industries in the community that supply inputs to the project industry;
o induced impacts include the effects of spending by the l~ouseholds in the local economy as tl~e
result of dicect and indirect effects from Uie project.
Based on this, the proponent must estimate the multipliec effeet of tl~e project that is, how much
additional ecooomic activity will result from the project investment (induect and induced impacts), taking
into consideration displaeed impacts (e.g. shifting spending and einployment away from other ]ocal
activities). The project must demonstrate a significant economic retuin and positive cost-benefit.
OR
Signi&cantregionalimpact:
• Demonstrating that the project will benefit, and be used by, a significant number of people residing
outside of the communify where the pioject is located as a result of a documenfed user needs analysis
or market resea~ch.
• A financial contribuTion by the province demonstrating the pioject is of proviucia] significance.
Federal funding would not exceed the direct provincial contribution.
• If there is another facility within a reasonable geographic proximity fliat serves the same or similar
purpose, demonstration that the capacity of the existing facility is insufficient to service the needs of
the region.
96 - BCF On-2ine Program Guide - Communities Component
2. WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE
Objectives
To encourage investments in wastewater infrastructure designed to:
• Reduce the negative impacts of municipal wastewaCer effluent or storm-water effluent on human
health and the enviromnent;
• Improve the management of wastewater sludge;
• Improve the management and eFficiency of municipa] wastewater infrastmctuxe or storm-water
Infrashucture, ineluding improvements to the energy ePficiency of the Infrastnicture; and
• Improve the quality of treated municipal wastewatec effluent and storm-water discharged into the
environment.
Further, emphasis will be placed on Projects that result in wastewater treaCed to a higher standard, usually
a secondary level of treatment or better. In addition, Projects will 6ave to Ue supported by other measures
that reduce the amount of pollution going into wastewater streams and that improve the management of
wastewater infrastructure. Emphasis will also be placed on Projects involving cooperation among two or
more municipalities or commuuities in the management of their waCer and wastewater infrastructuxe.
Sub-categories
• Wastewater collection systems and/or wastewater treahnent facilities or systems (which may include
grey water reuse);
• Separation of combined sewers and/or combined sewer overflow control, including real-time contro]
and system optimization;
• Separate storm watec collection systems and/or storm water treatment facilities or systems;
• Wastewater sludge treatment and maoagement systems; and
• Aiea or regional wastewater treatment systems.
Project Outcomes
The project must achieve one or more of the following outcomes:
• A measurable and quantifiable reduction in volume and/or improvemeiit in Uie ]evel of treatment of
wastewaYer effluent;
• Inereased number of households, industries, commercial establishments; and ii~stitutions with
untreated wastewater connected to sanitary se~ver systems;
• Reduced volume and incidents of discharge of untreated wastewater effluent as a result of sanitary
sewer and combined sewer overflow events;
• Improved quality of stormwater effluevt;
• Implementa6on of full life-cycle cost accounting and full cost reeovery (where possible) for
wastewater infrastructure assets;
• Improvement to the reliability or performance of the wastewarer collection and/or treatment system;
and
• Improved wastewater sludge treatment and management.
64 - BCF On-line Program Guide - Communities Component
Mandatory Project Criteria
• Projects for tlie construction oPnew or matecial rehabilitation or expansion of existing municipal
wastewater treatment facilities must result in municipal wastewater effluent that meets applicable
provincial/federal regulations and licensing requirements.
• Projects for the consfruction of new, or material rehabilitafion or expansion of existing municipal
wastewater treatment facilities that include the use of chlorine disinfection processes, must also
incorporate chlorine removal processes.
• Projects far the construction of new or material rehabilitation or expansion of existing wastewater
sludge treatment and management facilities must meet app]icaUle provincial/federal regulations and
licensing requirements.
• For projects receiving federal funding of $1 Q000,000 or more, tlie proponent must have in place, or
commit to implementing witUin two years of project approval:
o an integrated watecshed management plan, 41~at includes, at minimum, flie following components
- Sewer Use Control Program, supported by appropriate compliance and enforcement po]icies,
including municipal sewer use by-laws, demand managemevt (including metering and pricing,
where appropriate), process optimization sfrategies, and energy management and
o full life-cycle cost accounting in respect of its wastewater infrastructure assets that takes into
account resources reqaired for ongoing operation, maintenance, upgrades and replacement.
• Municipality musC demonstrate how cost recovery will be pursued and how capital and operating and
mainCenance shortfalls, if any, will be addressed.
Additional Leveraging Criteria
• Projects for the construction of new or material rehabilitation or expansion of existing wastewater
keahnent faciliries result in wastewater effluent that meets standards equivalent to a secondary- or
tertiary-level treatment.
• Por projects receiving federal funding of less than $1QOOQOOQ municipality has implemented life-
cycle accounting.
• For projects receiving federal funding of less than $10,000,000, municipality has implemented full
cost recovery in respect of its municipal wastewater infrastructure asseCS fhat ensures suPficient
resouroes Por ongoing operation, maintenance, upgrades and replacement.
• Municipality has appropriate water demand management measares in place, whicl~ may include
education, opportunities for grey water systems, metering and full cost recovery.
BCF On-line Program Guide - Communities Component - 65
3. PUBLIC TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE
Objective
To encourage investmenis in public transit infrastructure:
• To support transit systetns within cities, communities and urban regions to promote mobility and
improved travel times, and to reduce urban congestion;
• To constrvct, improve or restore public transit infrastructure that contributes to economic,
environmental and social sustainability in Canada and Ontacids municipalities and communiries; aud
• Large-scale transit infrastructure expansion Projects will be required to incoiporate Transportatiov
Demand Management measures to help build ridership and itnprove environmental outcomes.
Furthermore, any public transit passenger infrastructure purchased with Fedexal or provincia] funding
must be accessible for persons with disabilities.
Sub-categories
• Transit infrastructure, including, but not limited to, rail and bus rapid transit systems, and related
facilities;
• Buses, rai] cars, ferries, para transit vehicles, and oHter rolling stock and associated infrasiructure, for
the expansion of services;
• G~een buses for expansion services and for replacemeut of existing capaciry, including altemative
fuel veliicles and diesel-electric hybrid buses;
• Intelligent T1'ansport Systems (ITS) including, but not 1'united to, fare collection, fleet management,
transit priority signalling, and real-time traveller infoanation systems aY stations and stops; and
• Related capital infrastructure including, but not limited to, transit queue-jump laties, reserved 6us
lanes, turning lanes or oYher related enhancemenfs in support of public transit, streetcar/holley
infrastructure, storage and maintenance facilities, security enhancements, and hansit passenger
terminals.
When undertaken as part of above subcategory improvements, active transportation infrastructure, such as
bicycle lanes that com~ect to transit facilities and bicycle storage and lockers at stations, is eligiUle.
Project Outcomes
The project must maximize outcomes in as many of the follo~ving areas as possible:
• Improved mobility and reduced eoogestion
• Improved access to transit
• Increased tcansit ridership
• Increased transit moda] share
• Improved tr'avel rimes
• Improved safery and security of passengers and othex eransportation users
• Improved operational efficiency
• Reduced emissions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases
66 - BCF On-line Program Guide - Communities Component
• Increased implementation of transit-oriented development
Mantlatory Project Criteria
• The project must demonstrate how it is consistent with an of5cial, integrated land-use and
transportation development plan or strategy.
• When security and emergency preparedness plans are in place that ha~~e been fimded through Transit-
Secure, operators must demonstrate that the project is consistent with these plans, and that future
related training public awueness aild incident reporting needs are taken into consideration.
• Any rolling stock or ferries fimded must be accessible for pecsons with disabilities.
Additional Leveraging Criteria
• Tl~e projects incorporates appropriate Transporlation Demand Management practices.
• Transit projects have been endorsed by regiona] coordination and planning bodies, where applicable.
• Tlte project includes an ITS componenY or system. ITS components and sys4ems must meet tlie
requiremeuts set out in the ITS fuinex.
• Wliere integated regional t~anspoRation and land-use plans do not exist, municipalities are
encoucaged to wozk collaboratively to develop such a plan.
ANNEX - Transportation Demand Management Measures
TranspoYtation Demand Management (TDM) measures wi11 be implemented as pm-t of trmisit
infrastructure projects to help build s~idership and irnprove e~xvironmental outcomes.
TDM projects should include at least one of the measures under a) and/or b) below:
a) Travel incentive and disincentive measures, including:
• serviees such as guaranteed ride home programs, and traveller information systems; or
• workplace or institution-based measures tl~at make transit more convenient; or
• road (e.g. turn cestrictions, bus queue jumping), parking, motor vehicle or txansit measures.
b) Education, promotion and outreacl~ measures, including:
• branding and positioning measures that shape socia] and individual perceptions of different travel
modes, and remove biases against more sustainaU]e choices; or
• information and education measures that enhance people's understanding of different travel choices,
and the positive or negative effects of their decisions; or
• targeted community-based social marketing measures Io help individuals or groups to fully
?nderstand their personal options and offer them incentives W travel more sustainably; or
• special events Chat raise awareness of travel options and encourage people to try tltem; ox
• recognition and rewards encourage continued TDM leadership and success by employers, institutions
and interest groups.
BCF On-line Program Guide - Communities Component - 67
ANNEX- Intelligent Transportation System
Mandatory requirements:
• Must be comptiant witli Uie ITS Architecture for Canada and the Border Inforrnation Flow
Architecture, or expand in new areas of national interest.
For projects consisting mainly of stand-alone ITS:
• In addition to the above, the following mandatory cequirements also apply:
• Must include an evaluation plan, setting out immediate, intermediate and long-term results, witli
method and timing of data collecfion and reporting.
• Must use Che ITS Evaluation BeneFit Framewark.
68 - BCF On-2ine Program Guide - Communities Component
1. WATER INFRASTRUCTURE
Objectives
To promote long-term funding for water infrastructure Projects designed to:
• Improve the safety, management, reliability and efficiency of Canada and Ontarids drinking water
treatment and distribution systems;
• Increase the number of households with access to safe drinking water that meets or exceeds the
Guidelines for Canadiau Drinkin~ Water Quality and Ontazio's drinking waTer quality requirements;
• Improve protection and management of drinking water sonrces; and
• Improve conservation of water.
Funding will focus on the protection of human health. In addiYion, Projects will have to be supported by
other measures that improve the management of sources of drinking water, reduce demand and improve
the management of drinking water infrastntcture. Emphasis will also be placed on projects involving
cooperation among two or more municipalities or communities in CUe management of their wafer and
wastewater infrastructure.
Sub-categories
• Drinking waYer treatment infrastructure, including area or regional tr'eatment systems;
• Drinking water distribution systems (may include meteiing as part of a larger Project).
Project Outcomes
The project must achieve oue or more of the following outcomes:
• Increased number of households provided with access to safe drinking water;
• Improved quality of drinking water;
• Increased number of households equipped with residential meYexing;
• Decreased daily per capita water use;
• Increased service reliabiliry of water t~eatment and distribution faci]iYies;
• Increased efficiency in the treatment plant operaYions and/or distribution system, as demonstrated by a
reduction in water leakage or loss, use of heatment chemicals, energy use and/or number of boil
water advisories; and
• Reduced impact on the enviraiment due to lowec volume of water extraction and watershed
mavagement.
Mandatory Project Criteria
• Where the project involves the new construction of or material rehabilitation of a drinking water
treatment plant, Yhe drinking water quality after completion of the pxoject must meet ox exceed
provincial standaxds.
• For projects where fhe federal contribution is $10,000,000 or more, the project applicant must have in
place, or commit to implementing within two years of project approval:
o full life-cycle cost accounting in respect of its water infrastr~cture assets; and
62 - BCF On-line Program Guide - Communities Component
o an integrated watershed management plan that includes, at minimum, the following components:
- a multi-barrier approach to safe drinking water including, where possible, source water
pintection;
- a demand management plan (including education, pricing and, as appropriate, metering);
- process optimization strategies, and energy management; and
- operator training/certification requirements that meet or exceed provincial standards.
• For non-commercial ventures, the proponent must indicate whether full cost pricing supported by
universal metering for water is in place, and if not, how cost recovery will be pursued and how capita]
and operating and maintenance shortfalls will be addressed.
• For commercial ventures, full cost pricing must be implemented, and if this is not possible, a
justificaCion for wl~y it is not possible and how cost-recovery will be pursued and how capital and
operating and maintenance shortfalls will be addressed.
Additional Leveraging Criteria
• For projecYS where the Federal contributiQn is less than $10,000,000.
o implements user fees or metering for residential or commercial projecfs; and
o Business plan includes aspects of demand management and water efficiency p~ograms that are
supported by public education, water metering and a sustainable approach to financing that
ensures ongoing operation, maintenance and upgrading.
• Proponent has in place or cominits to implementing full cost recovery.
BCF On-Iine Program Guide - Communities Component - 63
12. LOCALROADINFRASTRUCTURE
Objectives
To support investments in ]oca] roads:
• To improve road safety, moUility and sustainability;
• To promote the rehabilitation of bridges, funnels and otl~er sfructures;
• To support economic and community development.
Projects must be compatible with municipal Official Plans or other strategies fo promote the sustainable
development of the municipal area in which they take place.
Sub-categories
• Additional capacity and rehabilitation of roads within a municipal boundary, and liigh-occnpancy
and/or transit vehicle ]anes, grade separations, interchange structures, bridges, tunnels, intersections,
and roundabouts. Projects in aceas where Ontaiio acts as a local goveinment, or where there is a
governing entity that is established by Ontario are eligible;
• Infrastructure pursuant to compliance witl~ accessibility, such as wheel chair let down;
• IntelligentTransportarion Systems (ITS);
• Active transportation Projects, including sidewalks, bicycle lanes, pedestrian/ bike/ mulfi-use
patUways as a compone¢t of a larger Project; and
• Rehabilitation of bridges and major elevated or depressed structures (except those on fhe Core
National Highway System which are eligible fox rehabilit~afion under the National Highway System
category).
Project Outcomes
The project must achieve one ar more of the following outcomes:
• Improved transportation system efficiency, optimizi¢g the use of all modes, and decreasing the use o£
single-occupancy vehicles;
• Improved safety of the road network;
• Minimized environnlental impaets (e.g. emissions, land use);
• Improved access to one or all of tUe following:
o multi-modal transportation corridors and/or intermoda] facilities; and
o business and employment cenfres (including commercial, industrial, nafuxal resources and
tourism siEes).
• Support conununiCy deve]opment.
Mandatory Project Criteria
• The project must be compatible with official developmeut and hansportation plans or oflier strategies
to promote the sustainable development of the municipality in which they take place.
• Engineering standards must be recognized by the Transportation Association of Canada or approved,
equivalent provincial standards or municipal standards.
66 - BCF On-line Program Guide - Communities Component
• The project must demonshably contribute to improved road and pedestrian safety.
Additional Leveraging Criteria
• The rehabilitatiou of structures is given a priority.
• The pcoject minimizes greenhouse gas emissions and otl~ec environmental and land-use impacts.
e The project includes iunovation in transpoitation infrastructure solutions ttuough best pracfices and
new approaches and/or innovative technologies_
• The project includes an ITS component or system. IT5 components and systems must meet the
requirements set out in the ITS Annex.
• The project incoiporates appropriate Transportation Demand Matiagement (TDNn practices, as per
~ the attached TDM Annex.
ANNEX-Transportation Demand Management Measures
Transportation Demartd Ma~2age»ient (7DM) projects wiTl be implemenled as parf of new road capacity
projects in large urban centres to help maximize inveshnents in infrastructure, improve guality of life and
mnximize enviranmenta! outcomes.
TDM projects should include at ]east one of the measures under a) and/or b) below:
a) Travel incentive and disincentive measures, including:
• road or motor vehicle use pricing measures that increase or redistribute the costs of aatomobile or
commercial vehicle use such as parking fees, road tolls, mileage-based car registration fees, pay-as-
you-go insurance and other congestiou pricing initiatives; or
• worlcplace-based measures thaf make commuting less costly and stcessful, such as preferential caipool
parking flexible working hours or telework; or
• innovative travel services that add new choices to the menu of available travel options, such as car-
sharing clubs, station cars or vanpooling services; or
• infrastructure changes that improve trave] options, sucli as improving sidewalks and other pedestrian
linkages, creating on-road or off-road cycling routes, or reserving roadway lanes for use by carpools
in peak periods, or dedicated truck lanes.
b) Education, promotion and outreach meas~res, including:
• branding and positioning measures tl~at shape social and individual perceptions of different tra~~el
modes, aud remove biases against more sustainable choices; or
• information and education measuces tliat enhance people's understavding of differe¢t trave] cUoices,
and the positive or negative ePPects of their decisions; or
• targeted community-based social marketing measures to help individuals or groups to fully
understand their personal options and offer them incentives to trave] more sustainably; or
• special events that raise awareness of travel optious and encoarage people to try them; or
• recognition and rewards eneouxaging confinued TDM leadecship and suceess by employers,
institutions and interest groups.
BCF On-line Program Guide - Communities Component - 87
ANNEX- Intelligent Transportation Systems
Mandatory requirements
For projects with ITS components:
• Must be compliant with the ITS Architecture for Canada and the Border Information Plow
Arcliitecture, or expand in new areas of national interest.
For projects consistiug mainly of stand-alone ITS:
Li addition to the above, the following manda4ary requirements also apply:
• Must include an evaluatiou plan, setting out immediate, intermediate and long-Yerm results, with
method and riming of data collectiou and reporting.
• Must use the ITS Gvaluation Benefit Framework.
88 - BCF On-line Program Guide - Communities Component
10. SPORTINFRASTRUCTURE
Objectives
To achieve signiScant economic and/ar regional impacts Ilirougli the construction or material
rehabilitation of sport infrastructure° that results in at least one of ~lie following:
• Provides increased opportuniUes for sporf activities that can improve the healCh of Canadians avd
strengthen Canadian communities; and
• Provides inareased opportunifies for the development of Canadian athletes and/or the l~osting of major
amateur athletic events.
Sub-categories
• Sport infrastructure for cominunity public use (can include training facilities for high-performance
amateur athletes).
• Sport infrastructure in support of major amateur athletic events.
Project Outcomes
The project must have a significant economic and/or regional impact and lead to at least one of the
Following additional outcomes:
• A higher proportion of Canadians from all segments of society participating in sport activities;
• Supports tlie development of athletes; and
• Designed to attcact itosting opportunities foc regional, natimial or intematioval spoiting events.
Mandatory Project Criteria
• The proponent must demonstrate that the primary rationale for undertaking the project is to support
organized, competiYive, amateur athletic activities.
• The project must have a significant economic and/or regional impacf.* (See below.)
• Public access (community and amateur athletic use) to the proposed facility must be at least 60°/o oF
fhe normal operaEional time of the facility.
• The piaponent must also demonstrate that no more than 33% of the nommal operational tinie will be
used for physical recreationa] activities.
• The project must be multi-use and/or demonstrate a regional, national or international mandate (e.g.
national or regional training centre) designed to liost regional, national or inten~ational amateur
athleYic events.
Additional Leveraging Criteria
• The project includes financial support or a resolution in support of the project from a local
government council(s) in another commtmify.
• Tlte project increases public access to, and participation in, the facility and/or sports acCivities.
4 S ort infrastructure means or anized, com etitive amateur activities.
82 - BCF On-].ine Program Guide - Communities Component
• The project provides increased opportunities for the development of current Canadian athletes.
• The project increases sustainable urban development, encourages a more efficient urban form and is
serviced by public aansit.
• The project minimizes the negative impacfs on fhe environment by reducing ongoing energy
consumption andlor water consumption and/or waste compared to the existing infrastmcture, or by
encouraging recycling or by usiog ~ecognized green materials in the construction/restoration or
improvement of the infrastructure.
• The project inareases access/service availability to Aborigina] communities, or contributes to
neighbourhood/community revitalization.
• Pacility user fees are tailo~ed to accommodate Canadians of all income levels.
* This is defined as:
Significant economic impact:
• Having completed an economic impact smdy estimating the total economic effects of tl~e project,
including the direct, ivdirect and induced impacts:
o direct impacts include the jobs and income generated by [he project;
o indirect impacts include the production, employment and income changes occurring in otl~er
businesses/industries in the community that supply inputs to the project industry; and
o induced impacts include the eFfects of spending by the households in Uie local economy as the
result of direct and indirect effects from the project.
IIased on this, the proponent must estimate the multiplier effect of the pzoject; tliat is, how much
additional economic activity will result from the project investment (indirect and induced impacts), taking
into consideration displaced impacts (e.g. shifting spending and employment away from other ]ocal
activiries). The project would have to demonstrate a significant economic retum and positive cosf-benefit.
OR
Significant regional impact:
• Demonstration that the project will benefit, and be used by, a significant nuinber of people residing
outside of the commutiity where the project is located as a result of a documented user needs aualysis
or market cesearch.
• A finanaial contribution by the province demonstrating the project is of provincial significa~ce.
Federal funding would not exceed the direct provincial contribution.
• If there is another facility within a reasonable geographic proximity that serves the same oc similar
purpose, demonstration that tl~e capacity of the existing facility is insufficient to seivice the needs of
the region.
HCF On-Iine Program Guide - Communities Component - 83
9. CULTURE INFRASTRUCTURE
Objectives
To direct investments towards projects that
• Support arts ancUor designated heritage facilities;
• Help communities express, preserve, develop aud promote their culture and/or heritage within Canada
and Ontario.
Funding criteria will require proponents of culwral infrastrucCure Projects to demonstrate tliat theix
Project will have a significant economic and/or regional impact.
Sub-categories
• Museums2.
• The preservalion of designated heritage sites that are duly recognized by':
o UNESCO;
o Canadian government as per Uie national federal register of historic places; or
o Ontario or a Local Government.
• Provincial, and Local Government-owned libraries and archives.
• Facilities for the cxeation, produclion and/or presentation of the arts.
• Infrastructure in suppoR of the creation of a cultura] precinet within an ucban core.
Project Outcomes
The projecC must represent a demonstrable increase in tl~e numbex and/or quality of cultural opporhmities
Por Canadians and have a significant economic and/or regional impact, as well as at least one of the
following additional outcomes:
• Increases communiCy use of facilities or gives tl~e facilities a multipurpose dimension;
• Enhances ability of communities to express, preserve, develop and promote their cultural heiitage
within Canada; and
• Generates economies of scale, spinoff activities, and supports the larger economic priorities of the
community and of governments.
Mandatory Project Criteria
• The project has a significant economic and/or regional impact.* (See below.)
• The proponent must include a plan for inereased or expanded regioval outreach.
• The project must result in one or more of the following:
Z A museum is a non-proft making, permanent institution in ihe service of society and of its development, and open to the public,
which acquires, conserves, reseamhes, communicates and exhibits, for purposes of sWdy, education and enjoyment, artifacts
related to people and their environment.
3 Excludes private residences and religious sites.
BCF On-line Program Guide - Communities Component - 79
o increased seating or visitox capaciry;
o increased capacity to reach new audiences; and
o enhanced services in the piomotion of culture.
Additional Leveraging Criteria
• The project includes financial support or a resolution in support of the project from a local
government council(s) in anotliex eommunity.
• The project will increase access/service availability to Aboriginal communities.
• The project contributes to the revitalization of neighbourhoods or communities.
• The project enables the proponent to enhance and diversiCy its prograin services and offerings.
• The project provides increased capaeity to the facility through technological improvemenfs that allow
for the hosting of a greater number and/or more diverse types of performances; and/or gives tl~e
facilify a"rental capacity" in oxder to expand its activities.
• The project increases sustainable urban development and encourages a more efficient urban form.
• The project minimizes the negative impacts on the environment by reducing ongoing energy
consumption and/or water consumption and/or waste compared to the existing infrastrueture, or by
encouraging recycling or by using recognized green materials in the construction/restoration or
improvement of the infiastructure.
• The project contributes to long-term commm~ity building by promotiug partnerships with other
community organizations.
• The project improves/restores a public infrastmcture in a communiry where there will be a national
exhibition or a regional celebration such as the foundation of a ciCy.
• The project is a multi-use facility or has a multi-use componeut.
* This is defined as:
Significant economic impact:
• Having completed an economic impact study estimating the total ecouomic effects of the project,
including the direct, indirect and induced impacts:
o direct impacts include the jobs and income generated by the project;
o indirect impacts include the production, employment and income changes occurring in other
businesses/industiies in the community that supply inputs to the project industry; and
o induced impacts include the effects of spending by the households in tl~e loca] economy as the
result of d'uect and indirect effects from Ute project.
Based on this, the proponent must estimate the multiplier effect of the project that is, l~ow much
additional economic activity wil] resulY from the project investment (indirect and induced impacts), taking
into consideration displaced impacts (e.g. shifring spending and employmenC away from other local
activities). The project would have to demonstrate a significant economic ~etum and positive cost-benefit.
OR
Significant regional impact:
• Demonstrating tl~at the project will henefit, and be used by, a significant number of people residing
outside of flie community (if the community has a population of less Uian 100,000), or neighbourhood
(if the conununity is larger tl~an 100,000) where Yhe project is located as a result of a documented user
needs analysis or market research.
80 - BCF On-line Program Guide - Communities Component
• A financia] contribution by the province demonstrating the project is of provincial significance.
Federal funding would not exceed the direct provincia] contributiou.
• If theie is anofher faciliCy within a reasonable geographic proximity that serves the saine or similar
purpose, demonstcaCion that the capacity oPthe existing facility is insufficient to service the needs of
the region.
BCF On-line Program Guide - Communities Component - 81
r~~
The City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Resolution
No.
Moved by
Seconded by
WHEREAS on August 26, 2008, the Federal and Provincial goveinments announced Yhe
Communities Component Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "Program"), part of the Building
Canada Fund; and
WHEREAS $724 million has been committed to assist municipalities with apopulaYion of less than
100,000; and
WHEREAS Projects available for funding under the Program must respond to the broader federal
and provincial objectives of economic growth, cleaner envirorunent, and strong and prosperous
communities and fall into one of the seventeen (17) program categories; and
WHEREAS the Niagara Falls Board of Museums "Lundy's Lane Battlefield Legacy ProjecP'
(hereinafter referred to as the "Proj ecY") is a proj ect that will provide the mLmicipality with a world
class heritage and cultural facility, further develop the Lundy's Lane Battlefield National Historic
Site and celebrate Yhe War of 1812 Bicentennial; and
WHEREAS the Proj ect meets the Program criteria under Yhe categories ofCulture and Tourism; and
WHEREAS the Proj eet will increase community use, promote culture and heritage, increase visitors
and intemational tourists and contribute to Yhe rehabilitation of the Historic Drummondville
community; and
WFiEI2EAS Niagara Falls City Council has supported the ProjecY by identifying it in the 2008 -
2012 Capital Budget.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Niagara Falls City Council supports the Niagara Falls
Board of Museums "Lundy's Lane Battlefield Legacy ProjecP' as the project most worthy of
submission far the first intake of Yhe CommuniYies Component Agreement of the Building Canada
Fund.
AND The Seal of the Corporation be hereto af~xed.
DEAN IORF'IDA R. T. (TED) SALCI
CITY CLERK MAYOR
October 6, 2008 R-2008•31
~
Niagara~'alIs
cau,n,~
Cauncillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair
and Members of Gommunity 5ervices Committee
City of Niagara Falis, Ontario
Members:
Re: R-2008-31
Centennial Water Molecule Update
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That uncil approve that the Centennial Water Molecule be installed on an interim
basis at Niagara Falls Art Gallery located at 8058 Oakwood Drive.
2. That an ag ement with the Niagara Falls Art Gallery for the interim installation of
the Centennia ater Molecule be developed for Council approval.
Tha-F ~`~a-~' ~oolC in-~-o ~oss~bilcl-~ crF vv~c~~'in~ -1-4~z Cecn~vu~ic~~
BACKGROUND: ~olec~le buCk i=o •
On July 23, 2007, Council approved thatthe Centennial Water Molecule (photo attached)
located atthe Hi-Tech Material Handling Company site in Niagara-on-the-Lake be returned
to the City of Niagara Falls for installation on a permanent basis to coincide with the
opening of the new Bob Gale Complex (scheduled for May 2010).
In early Ju~e 2008, staff was made aware that owners of Hi-Tech Material Handling had
sold its building in Niagara-on-the-Lake. The owners of Hi-Tech Material Handling were
contacted so fhat arrangements could be made for the return of the public art to the City
of Niagara Falls. The owners agreed to store the Centennial Water Molecule until an
interim location was found.
At the July 21, 2008, meeting of Council, it was communicated that owners of Design
Electronics, located at 6913 Oakwood Drive were willing to offer their property for interim
display of the Centennial Water Molecule. 7his location is the former Hi-Tech Material
Handling building and had the former base on site from the years when the Centennial
Water Molecule was located there.
.
Co munitySFn ervicespepartment
^ ` i Parks, Recreation & CWture
Wor~ktrtg Together to Serve Our Comfnasity
~
,
,
~ ,
, -
, ;
~i~'~•'~ .
- . . ,
.
;.::,..=~.,z,e
October 6, 2008 - 2- R-2008-31
Interim Locations Review
A review of several possible interim sites was completed and included the Niagara Falis
Public Library Victoria Street location, the Fairview Cemetery, open land at Grand
Boulevard, Niagara Square, the square at City Hall, and the Niagara Falls Art Gallery.
The Arts & Culture Committee supports an interim location of the Niagara Falls Art Gallery.
The Niagara Falls Art Gallery was deemed through the location assessment completed by
staff to provide the best location and a very strategic fit (as public art at an art gallery) as
an interim location solution. The Niagara Falls Art Gallery is located at 8058 Oakwood
Drive. The gallery is both a public organization and a partner organization of the City. This
location has high visibility from the highway and can be enjoyed by patrons of the Art
Gallery.
The Niagara Falls Art Gallery Board of Directors passed a motion on September 11, 2008
(motion attached) to allow the Centennial Water Molecule to be installed on their property
on an interim basis, and that an agreement be put in place to address all issues associated
with this interim location. It is expected the Water Molecule would be installed at the
Niagara Falls Art Gallery in 2008.
Recommended by: / 5
Den e Morrissey, Direc or of Parks, Recreation & Culture
Approved by: ~
~ Ed ujlovic xecutive Director of Community Services
Respectfully submitted~ ~
~ John acDo Id, Chief Administrative Officer
Attachment
V:12008COUNCIL10810061R-200831 - Centennial Water Molecule Update.wpd
I
; ~ ~ ~
A 'l i' r
~ i A` ; S u:
~ r`+ ..f~ , ~Y. '..~J., A p~~~
I : Q I
. ~ . i R~ 'J, - 1° • " n.
. ~ . . . •
8058 Oakwood Drive - Niagara Falls, Ontario - Canada, L2E bS5
905-356-1514 www.niagarafallsartgallery,ca
i:
After discussion of the motion to accept the City of Niagara Falls' Proposal for the Centennial
Water Molecule to be displayed at the Niagara Falls Art Gallery, on motion duly made, seconded
and carried, the following resolution was passed.
RESOLVED THAT the Niagaza Falls Art Gallery display the City of Niagara Falls' Centennial
Water Molecule on an interim basis. The sculpture will be installed at the cost of the City along
with some suitable landscaping improvements to the site. The City will take full responsibility
for the insurance and liability while the scultpure is diplayed on Niagara Falls Art Gallery
property.
Date ZeY~~;
~
~ ti
Bazbara Buetter
Secretary, Board of Directors
. _
i '
. ~a ,A-,.a..,., ~ , ~ ~ ~
_ _ I
_ _
. _
.
4
a
, . _ . .
i / - r ~
. . -
. -
~ '~`'-'y
I •
~S r,-.
r' ~ .
~ 1
~
I
r ,
_ _ i~ ~i-, ;
~ ~ k f ~
r. , - ~ ~ ~
:f ~ ~
Y~. ; ,,~~tl~, ~ ~l~~~ ~~1~ 1~~1'
~~~yp'g' 1.. y'y~ I ` I 1 ` ~ /
^""`~f' v+ ~ 1'~- ~ a; ; ' , 11 ~ a
;.~1i;:s -m~'S ' is~_-.« ~ ~
~ ~ti.;+a' . . ~ ; 1 i ~ ~ { i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. .++~i- . ~ ''~s.,~~ ~ , ~ ~ t= - .
. . + ~ i , , l t ~ 1! ~sl
~ ~~*`~F"~ ,~~3ii,
' ~
I_ r ~t
~ i. ! s. z;l~ , i
-'f~p y f ,
1 ~
~ ,.n7.,~p9~ ~ ! ~ ~F'* ~ ~y d~ ~ i ( ~
~ ~ ~ a j~I ~M .~a. ~ ~r, p ~ ~ ~''.t
i > ' ' • ~s .~t e
~ f~, ~ , t yps~ ~ `f ~,1 ~ ?f i ~3'~. . ~t ~Ji~,~ y~
r ~ ~..e,. _ ' ~y'y ~i , ~ ~ t ~ r ia 9a~~
. . . - , . Y~ ..yJ'~':}i~+~.~
y y~ s ~ . . , ~ F i' .ti/~„~ ~ , n~ ~ ~i`~ . ~ . - ..afr . 'Y,
~n t'~„~ ~ Y ~ ~ f~
, ~:"1 ~ .Q _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-'-4~ ` ~ ~ ~~y+-J ~ ~
y • g~ { . -
t ~
r ~4 .~e~:. ~ ,
` . , . - ~ "
w~-~'"'- - . `,;c~'~:t; I
~ ~.v
4'~'• ~ '
~ ~ Sy I . . ,
` 1 ` ~
~ y~~ Y r'~M~?,~ F. iR,~~d!
M
Y.~ '4~'^ - , • i, . ~ " ~,~k~
~k ~S.,r' 7 ~ ~ _ t ~ ~ _ r~ . , , i'~
. ' -~It'vy .~W.: , -y,"~ . , ~...,'~lM~ . . .ll/. ~ JI-~.
October 6, 2008 TS-2008-05
/
Niagara~alls
~
Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: TS-2008-05
Portage Road between Church's Lane and Mountain Road
Traffic Calming Follow-Up Review
RECOMMENDATION:
That this report be received for the information of the Committee.
BACKGROUND:
Staff has conducted a follow-up review of Portage Road between Church's Lane and
Mountain Road to assess the effectiveness of the traffic calming measures implemented.
Portage Road is a collector roadway that extends in a north/south direction. The roadway
is 10 metres in width with sidewalks and boulevards on both sides. Portage Road is
residential in nature and consists of street lights located on the west side providing
illumination during night time periods. Portage Road is a through route within the study
area, with an all-way stop at Church's Lane.
The primary objective of the traffic calming project was to reduce the operating speed of
motorists from 63 km/h to the speed limit of 50 km/h. An Environmental Assessment was
carried out in 2005-2006 with the participation of local residents to formulate a preferred
plan to alleviate the speeding concern. The speed humps were constructed in autumn
2006 and the remaining devices were constructed in summer 2007.
The preferred traffic calming plan incorporates a combination of speed humps, curb
extensions and mountable centre median islands. The average distance between these
devices is approximately 115 metres (375 feet). Appropriate signs have been installed to
complement these devices. Sharp curve signs are present in advance of the horizontal
curve located near Mountaingate Drive.
Automated traffic recorders (A.T.R.) were installed to collect volume and speed information
for a week's duration in April of this year. Speed data was also manually collected using
a handheld radardevice. The speed data is summarized below and compared with studies
Community Services Department
Working Tagether to Serve Our Community TraosPortanor, seNices
i~~rrr~~71(~~~Q~~~~ o • ~
October 6, 2008 - 2- TS-2008-05
conducted in 2004 and 2007:
Table 1: O eratin S eed Summa
Mountain Road & Mountaingate Drive & Harvey Street &
Study Date Mountaingate Drive Theresa Street Church's Lane
A.T.R. Manual A.T.R. Manual A.T.R. Manual
}p.M S_ ~ ~ 6~.. 4 R`" ..x3 L'g Ii E.: x° ~.i
September 2004 63 km/h ~ N/A''~ ' ~N/A ~ N/A ° ~ N/Ar ' ~N/A ,;'3
p-~_ t , - , ~t u . ~a ~ ~ n
November 2007 / 54 km/h 57 km/h 55 km/h :~~`1N/A~
r~ 57 km/h "{¢~~NIA
January 2008 ` ~.';,i E ~c;.'-~~zJ i
~ _ 3,'m~
April 2008 54 km/h 55 km/h 53 km/h 52 km/h 54 km/h 53 km/h
A summary of the speed limit compliance is below:
Table 2: S eed Limit Com liance Summa
Mountain Road & Mountaingate Drive & Harvey Street &
Study Date Mountaingate Drive Theresa Street Church's Lane
ATR Manual ATR A.T.R. ATR Manual
Se tember 2004 40% ~N%A`~~ t ~~N/A~~'~ ~~NlA"~~~ ~ ~ ~ i~`'b~
P ~~~f?;.~..-r I'~~ ,.,.t_"`a1~r 3 z:;w~ k~' ¢N/,A~t~~ 9N/A 4~
;ti~ ~ _ ~~'S ~
November 2007 / January 86% 62% 72% ~6 NlA~ 58% ~ 3~N%Ar
~
2008 ; ~
Apfi12008 73% 64% 77% 75% 70% 70%
A summary of the technical results:
• The operating speed has been reduced by 8-10 km/h.
• Driver speed limit compliance has increased from 40% in the original 2004 studies,
to above 70% in the most recent studies.
• Portage Road carries approximately 2,400 vehicles daily. This is within 7% of the
pre-traffic calming volume.
• 45% of traffic within the traffic calmed area do not have either an origin or
destination in the subject area. The percentage of cut-through traffic has not
changed significantly.
• One collision has occurred on Portage Road since the traffic calming project has
been completed. Typically, a comparison of collision statistics examines a three-
year history before and three-year history after a change has been made. Thus, it
is premature to fully evaluate the effect the traffic calming plan has made to the
number and severity of motor vehicle collisions.
• As drivers are being accustomed to the devices, the speeds have decreased, based
on data collected in November 2007 / January 2008 and from April 2008.
The primary objective of the traffic calming project was to reduce the operating speed of
motorists from 63 km/h to around the speed limit. Based on the results obtained, the traffic
calming devices have been effective in reducing the speeds on Portage Road within the
October 6, 2008 - 3- TS-2008-05
study area. As a result, compliance to the 50 km/h speed limit has increased.
Recommended by: ~'~'C ~
Karl Dren, Direct r of Transportation Services
r
Approved by:
Ed Dujlovic, Execu ive Director of Community Services
Respectfully submitted:
J n MacDonald, Chief Administrat ve Officer
B. Skiba ~ ~ .
5'.1General AtlminisVationlGA 1.01 Reports~2008 Community Servicesi70 OcI6lT5-2008-05 Portage Roatl -TraRic Calming Reviewwptl
::a -~~r ~ P 5^°
! d:~~` isr ~J~.~ ~ ~ -.t.y ut~ ~ ~Y-~ hi,! L1
r~7 4I~t J• .~~.:3 s I ~
r4"°~ y ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ a t ilu~~ .~ii~ ~ ti~ }}}~f~f`~4 , ~ ,
l~' i i s`s- t ~ ~ ~ ~y
' ~ ~ . a~~ 1 ~ , w ~
, . y , a r ' .-.~-v ~ _ ' - ~°,b c,,~~/ ~ 's "S s'~' q~ ~ ~'FSi7.~'
v1~'k}~,~+~',~• ..cl f~~" T"- ~ 4i S l °Tf~~~ # it ~d~+ ~C"~W~ ~;u.,
a ,~r s.~.~ a~# 'a.` -rY s ~ ~F 1 ~ ~ I I !'1 j~ 4. l 1~ ~ .r F& ~
y~''' ~ a .L ow.+ ' . .
.-n i , ~ r~+? ' ~ f . ~ g~ ~,y_ . .
~ ~ , ~~t^7~ ~ ~ ~~1~ -1d: I; y ~~epe'~
~YWS~'s Y , ~Y~'~s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i~; ' 1,.:: -'r
a~ T ~ ~ ~ . f'J 7 tl x'6 _ •
' ~ 7 G-~~ ~
, s- . r ~,1~^ , ~...p` ~b, ~rq~ :,L
t; ~ ~ i3 ~ r ~ VA 1 f~,,{
1y..4 ~~~ry , ~2W -:c.i c+~'.' ' y~V• v w~ ~ t4 '~7 •
LtY ; 1r z . ~ w3~ aJ • ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ 1'^` - -
. w t rz f ~ !I ~ 'S ~ a.~-`''~t'~ c~' : x. ~ - ~
~ r Sr d"~"'r. sk ~ - ~ ty 'cf " I la~l~, S.,r~ R- ~ ~ t ~:~fl ~ ~
~'1~~ IQ;.f, n+ ~ , ~g; ,~~~~f~'l` 'g''~ i'7 :'"r`3•~~~~ ae~~4'~, . ~ .;y
C+a ! q i ,~t ~ -ri / 1 `'7 '
w.., ~ '~t- ~ I. ~ ....~r ~ A", ~
t y~ p o- ~ a ~ ~
, _,-1 ~1 ..«'~li` eSl~'ap~ ~ lPi ~~~i • (`L.f^4,' ~ ~ .~i j E>>q""
~ Y ~ ~ : • ~ ~~~-~1~-'P h~YY.' ..1 , ~S1 ~~e YF.~ i .;G~ 1
~ i Y y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j N \ k~~-(~"~j~ ,~p'~.i ~ ~ ~ , . ~
~ ~ t F - ,
~r . g~~:.. t i ' ~ k y ~'~el. r ' ~ ti u
~ ~ ~ '
ir: f ~.y ~ rErja r"[~'~^s gF:'~'{~+ +~i i ~~r~•
t p
C:~f ~s " Q }~Yr ~ ~.s kJ ~ r r.xi ~ ~ ~S ~ ft . ~
w }y~",r ys r ; , .,~k -s~~' . ~~4s~
~ _ ° , q~ 'r ~-r°~ , ~7 ~ ~ r~~ ~ ,
4 k~ .~..~s3 ti . ~ ~~,i~~ ¢~i'. - ~.F~ q'j~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~t~- yr.~
l~
^"ts • ' ~
~ - ~~C~~`'ct,.y ` ~ri~, ~ ,e~~--. * Js'!~ ,-yi ~
' E \ nn4`~r , j' ~ J`
~~y'a ~ ~~ly. . r ~si~j
ys ~Y
~0p '~~,•~:a.j~ ~ ~ x 1.~'I ~ ~ --e-~
iY ~_ri ~ ~.7tti ` L `t~.. Y 7~".,,~ u 1~~~~'+w'
~ ~ Y y ~ t
y ^ '~rr ~ ~..;J { .--w~' ~'~~~4~, 'E ! '~£rL~_~~ ~ °3~.;'+
~ w~,' r ~ ~,.~IA '?R'! ~ I.r' C ~ 'f`r ~ ~ +
4 ~ 1- t ~ I r~~ G
~ `'i I r.e J ~,.C, • ~ ~~RK.~F~ s J ~ ~
, Y 'y.
a~ ~~~V ~
t
~ p ~ ' r• ~ ~~~f?~ H~k ~ ,t1 * T,S, ~ ~ ` .l+~r~"' .
3 ~ ~ . d . . d F ~ ~ ~ ej-~" ~ ~s~ ~ . .
. t 1 r. "A r~,.d~ f4`- i:i U'~
X ~
~ ~ xFi } . ~ . ~ ~-ry~ +Y ~
} y.~y n.
r ' ~ ~ ~ ily~~g/ t ~ r ~d ~ Y'.t~~ ~ .1: ~ t ~ '
')'~.~SSro7~ ' ~ ~3~ ~~F ~a~ },.J "/`yp~~ t q Ll ~Y ~ ~ ~
' ~!'S ~d ~ `y •-~y-.~~~"~~ ,3y-~1~-'~~"~ a`, :~4
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~~t`~ f~` ~f~
~ ~ s~~J.~'~ ~ ~ x ~ -.L* ~.y `t~ [ ~ ~ .
L
.a 1-' S ~ ~
; ~ o ._.s~_ F . ~ ~
'i . p4 .,,i~ . • ?~i~~°~j ~ ~ 'R I~~ ~ •
"4w ,~+5 if • u ti ,y~~-Sr,~Ur~ .=fi~ ~G.~ ~ . ~L-r~j .c.~ 'i 4~r-,{ '
4R . ~ f i1~'L
c '~IL P t ~~j 1~.C} a ~r ~ I ~ Y~ ~ ~ s~~
"$C` r F.y.,~ ~ r i i~'c°,F R. ~y a~ . f ~ .
.9 r... • Fe'~` a.,, v-'~ iS ili C+.~r fly"'1 5°'Y! ~-s •
Ma. F e:. y S ~Yy~ aTg u • ~ i a ti~ ~
~ ~S t ~ r~~ Y~'. ( ~..°M c I r~, . . ~v' ~ ~g 1 T ~ ~ Y ~ •
r.'.^ r`~;' •~y r~i" ~ .f' 1 F^4, ~ I~~F4~,c~~ r~•~ . lG'
z t
~,~y.Y°¢~ 1 ~ p~ ~ . , r-~~` ~ '
z ~ ~ ~ ~ - 4 ~ F •
-s*~ ~tqc ~ ~ `.r~ ~ f ~ 'u ' i.-' ~ ~ ~ • v(~ . ` •
s ~ ~'M1i ~ ~ = • . ~ ' s {a . ~ ~ ~ ~ i • ~ I`.r~~ ~F ' ~3 . I
~ r ,~i.?t.?~,~'> ~ a, ,y ~ ~.1,.~( ~'"yx ' ~ •
~ ~ b ~x~ ~~N~~~-~' fs„1t. S T$i~~i~ ~ ^r"~ e.. ~ ~kF~ 1 ~ ' ' ~ ~ ,'f ~ ~
J "~~w .§A"~ ti- "i.. ~ } ~ - ~
u> ~ . rc i ~7'..~>~~ t-~ ~rs ~~~+rr sF ~~k~ 1 ~jt 1~ ~ ' 47i:a , '~`I# i't`-~ i
ys`'' ~ i q1I~~s i . r F c
~ .~3 a.~ ~L ~ ~ ~ ~~y~' ~~jdY}~~y~~ n'~ ~^s,`~ ~ ~ ~ _~V •
, a ~
r'~"'^~m- " f~5 js r'~s.~`'~~: 1. L- :~_n s'
.t ~ Kt C F'.~- ~"t~`:''~+~° ~ 'l e r'*~V~ ' -r c+ • ~
r.~,w. . d ~ ~ • ~ +i y . ~ ~"g alry ~ i? N _ ,
"a'A ~~w r~F` 1CQ a~R~ '7 J .i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~'n r ~ . t.-t~t'~w ..,~1~~ ~ + ~ ~ e~ " e) .
~S1 _ 1 y,~ ~ n.! ~v~ar~ . . ' .
f~
f" j.-,T., -+'1 r:.i~ . • .~y.r..... '
' ~~I , ~ ` d3r'r ~ ~'i
_ ~ ~~i. ` ~..~1s fi'~ `I.. .I' c ~~Pi
~ tr t ~'i.. 4. 6. S C-.~1i~„. , .n j ,t ~ i~ i
' ~i~ ~ 5. 4 ' ~ ~ ~~fz4~+.~~ ~
~,y~ ~ y. . , at+ x ~r i ~
~.~`4l~$~YC"~~.5 }a ~4 _ ~ ~LY `i~ S ~ ~ h ~ T ~•x
~ ,
~f,t~ ~ rt~-~ ~ Y : ` ~ , r _ . ,
1". 7. e ~.=-i" ~ ~ , ~ "F r~q'+~
,
5 i~ ~ 4
~ ~ - ~ ~ ~t'. ~ a ~~a-.sl
'E± ~:~dT .s
q,. a~~ Ta ~ 1 ~'P..a' 1
F - ;9
~ f~ ' ~ ~ ~
~ . ~.K ~]r~ ~ a ui r . ~ !I ~
1 ~ ~
~5+~ ~J {
l ~ -~,y7 ~i7't(x 'F1P i
J.t. `4~~i~ e . ~ 4' . ~t''`~.,~' °j?l ~a€~''a^E~ ~ ~ ~",l~
t„ ~ 74t151~i,'~7i" ~?'1~.:'~~V'1 ~ , n Y~~- ar•A <4. ~,~:C' 't+-./~-` r ~'S=s?1 f la`~-fi : b9
October 6, 2008 TS-2008-21
Niagara~alls
Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair ` ~ ~ ~ °
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: TS-2008-21
Woodbine Street - Traffic Calming Review
RECOMMENDATION:
That the following report be received for the information of the Committee.
BACKGROUND:
In 2005, a request was received that initiated a speed study investigation on Woodbine
Street. The results of the speed review indicated that the 85'h percentile speed along
Woodbine Street was 59km/h. An Environmental Assessment (EA) was subsequently
carried out, with the participation of local residents to develop a traffic calming plan for the
neighbourhood. Speed control devices were installed in 2006 and 2007 per the approved
recommendations of the EA.
Studies were conducted in August and October of 2007 in response to resident concerns,
shortly after the trafFic calming project was completed. However, these studies were
conducted before motorists had time to adjust to the newly implemented speed reduction
measures.
A follow up review was carried out in June 2008. The results of these studies take into
account the two new all-way stops that have been installed in December 2007 at the
intersection of Woodbine Street and Belfast Avenue and the intersection of Woodbine
Street and Baldwin Avenue.
85`h Percentile Speed
The results of the speed studies collected through the automated equipment are
summarized below by location. A breakdown of the average daily traffic and the g5`h
percentile speed (the speeds at which the majority of motorists travel at or below) is
provided.
~
I Community Services Department
Transportation Services
~rL•f:l~`,. ~'.1~"~Ti~~Q~~~u+'"-cr ~D~~ ~ ~ ~
:i#'
October6,2008 _2_ TS-2008-21
z. `F~ E~~f-`+~June~2005~~'~~>~`~t-~August2007~~ -`~.~~~~October2007~ ~'~F ~June200&~F''~-~~
'^~S~'~ ~rz 'i s~ . .w~, 5 _ . Ft'
b
~oseM
x ^s ~ v.u ~ n- r rt
f .~5~ `-s 9 h'~, k ~ s 3~'-t9:.~.~''*~S^,° ~zz^ y~ #~3~„ _ .F y d. i x ~ h ~ ~'~'ry y . " , .
,WOOdbmeStreet.'-`.~LBefore~Tr~cCalmmgi~{ Wdh~Trafficy~Calmmg~ W~thnTratficCalming"',~~FWith6Traffc'Calming4~ .
'~belween ~z ~ ~ dta 7.re ~3~ Fsua sd z.s ;sY'~' ~ z ~and(AII~Way Stops¢--2i
~ "',Daily~ 5~85"~~~I ~~Daily~ r~~~85~".~' ~~r`.~Da~ly~ ~,R?~85'" ~ ~~`iDa'ily~ P ~:~~85~~
f a~``"~`~'~ ~~VOlume ~ r percentile~ ~'~,,~V_olume~ Percenhiea I Valume ~~Peecen6le 1",Volume~ ~~Percent~le?1
~ . - ~3 ~ ~ s ~ e , Y.
Baldwin Avenue and 2389 53 km/h 2377 54 kmlh 2116 51 km/h
Lee Avenue ~
Baldwin Avenue and 2412 59 km/h 2058 50 kmlh 2012 50 km/h 1646 46 kmlh
Belfast Avenue
Wesl of - 1934 53 kmlh 1542 47 km/h
Belfast Avenue
West of - 1064 50 kmfh 1263 53 kmlh 1209 49 km/h
Paddock Trail Drive .
East of 1315 52 kmlh 1163 53 kmlh 1093 52 km/h
Kalar Road
Amongst the five locations where data was collected, the 85'h percentile speed has been
reduced significantly. Overall decreases of 7 to 13 km/h have been recorded. Additionally,
the traffic volumes on Woodbine Street have also been reduced, indicating that motorists
may be utilizing alternative routes to avoid using Woodbine Street.
To complement the data collected through the automated devices, speed data was also
acquired manually through a handheld device. A comparison of 2007 and 2008 results is
provided below:
xsA~e ~At'h~-a-.,z`tyzi ~r:'i~ l-EY t~v.J+.~ e _~zySjK.4S ~.Y+z^'6P' -b~'._. 2 ~ ~~yG
~F~~+~~~~.~ ~'f`•`v~~~~ ~~~MariualiSpeed(Results'+,yOctober2007„~z ~~-~.~~,i ~~'y,~~ a,'~
t%~~,f~ c-
~Woodbine~5tree~~~~~~~~~`~ i ~r'~`,~` ~ g`~'Number of ~ ~ ~°s+,-~^'~ ~ ~ ~ @'~ ~:1 Wn~ ~ Ti
between > s mi NumberAbove Highest Speed~' t^gLowest~Speed
~ ~ : {c-~ ~ ~ - ~ C85 Percenhle u~,Vehicles ~h < b ~ ~ ~ ~
c ~~`r fi~-~ ~ ^r 80(km/h ~ ~ .~Recorded~ jRecordedl~
~ l~ 4 k.`. ~..a:.es~~' ~5 ~ :
'3~ ' w C 40bserved~~ ~~.rr''S":~~ ,k 4. 1 ~ .x~ >~<a~`:,
Baldwin Avenue and Lee Avenue 52 km/h 209 - 4(1.9%) 62 kmfh 29 km/h
Baldwin Avenue and Belfast Avenue 51 kmlh 218 4(1.8%) 71 kmlh 29 kmlh
. East of Paddock Trail Drive 52 kmlh 200 - 4(2.0%) 68 kmlh 32 km/h ~
Paddock Trail Drive and Kalar Road 50 km/h 1 S6 2(1.1 62 kmlh 32 km/h
%..x se-.rr.~ d Trr d'k r%i c-~.s - r~ ~c r-.cz a. ~ ~ r ~a-1 - v r r ~ . Py
~ 5 sr q ~4t ~~r;~ry~ +Manual(Speed'Resutts ~June!2008 r . ~f,...~. . ` ~
~,-t-~,. ~i a L,
~ 1Wootlbine'Stree~t~"; ,~r ~`~~'~~a~d~SJNumbe~of a#~tak~" ~~~,,.v ~~~ti+- "`v -cY t;"
between r,s= ~;~r„ ~ ~ ag5"'IPerc~enhle Vehicles~ ~~Nu~mber(Above'~ C 'H~ghest~Speedrt ~t ~L'owest;Speed
~
s c°a ~ - ~ ' ~ ~ t~,~-' n{ 160 km/h $ 3 - Recorded F Recorded't4
i.r }i ~ti~:~i 1~~~ tr,,, a n ~~3'~bS@NCd~ l,~` 1..~' r ~ t ~ i
( . _ ~ ;...~4~~, n_. ~ r.-'^~tti es . a ~ ,2 -~..t~ e ...f.'~i_~ --:oz ~
Baldwin Avenue and Lee Avenue 47 kmlh 212 0(0%) 59 km/h 26 km/h
Baldwin Avenue and Belfast Avenue 46 kmlh 214 0(0%) 56 km/h 26 kmfh
East of Paddock Trail Drive 45 km/h 127 0(0%) 56 km/h 26 kmlh
Paddock Trail Drive and Kalar Road 47 km/h 200 0(0%) 59 km/h 29 km/h .
From these figures, it is evident that the traffic calming devices, in conjunction with the all-
way stop controls, have been successful in recJucing the overall speed profile on Woodbine
Street to a tolerable threshold. The all-way stop controls have contributed to a decrease
of 3- 7 km/h. The decreased distance between the physical devices and intersection
controls have prevented motorists from accelerating to speeds 10 km/h in excess of the
October 6, 2008 _3_ TS-2008-21
legal speed limit.
Stop Sign Compliance Study
Stop sign compliance studies were undertaken at each of the three all-way stop locations,
revealing the following results.
r~..`-u~. ~'7 ~ ,r ,n a~,6 - :~,,u.x i ~ -~v ~a~- .~'ti ^q~ ~.a kr 3~ »5~Y ~ -
'~'~~,~N" ~ t a'r-~- ~ e ~
~ ~ S sa~=.t~"~~- ~..~.+a-
~ r`~ rStop Sign Comphance~Results ~ as a-r3 x ..a
~~Woodbine Street~ ~ ~ ~ 'j~~ '~,~ix ' ~~--x~`~~" ~ ~ Total1Nymber ~ .
~ ~ ,~u "Did~NotrStop~`' s~~'?recticalty,, ~`~~Stspped~By '~2~Vol~untary Full j ~ ~ of Vehicles~
y,~ ~ ~ ~',~.~~'3r -c-e~~~,a 9 ~k-x ~"~t~ ~ ~~,~Stopped ~ ~~Traffic~ ~,~-~~S Stop~ ~
'}~``~Recoriled(j
_ _ ..a . <a s~ ~a.. r=~~ ~`..~a~d. '.__"rs.,a 'S~.Y.. ,a.3 _ R ~ ~e. ~ .7 ~ e.: ~ ~ : :
At Paddock Trail ~rive (2006) ~6% 67% 17% 10°/o NfA
At Paddock Trail Drive (2007) 21% 61% 10% 8% 372
At Patldock Trail Drive (2008) 28% 40% 15% 17 % 276
At 8aldwin Avenue (2008) 21% 48% 8% 23% 265 '
At Belfast Avenue (2008) 14% 49% 8% 29% . 250
The above data suggests that the rate of noncompliance has steadily increased at the
Woodbine Street and Paddock Trail Drive intersection. In all cases, more than half of all
motorists do not stop for the signs.
Based on the study results, vehicular speeds have been reduced on Woodbine Street
throughout its length following the installation of the existing traffic calming devices and the
all-way stop controls.. Compliance results obtained at these intersections are reflective of
results obtained at other all-way stop locations throughout the City. In general, respect for
the intersection control devices is diminishing. Additionally, the traffic volumes on
Woodbine Street have declined. Staff is currently investigating a concern from an adjacent
parallel street with respect to increased traffic volumes and speeding.
Recommended by: ~~cc~ ~
Karl Dren, Dire or of Transportation Services
Approved by: ~ `
Ed D~ i ecutive Director of Comm nity Services
Respectfully submitted:
Joh ona.ld, Chief Administrati e Officer
B. Skiba \
S:\General Administration\GA 1.01 Reporis\2008 Communiry Services~l0 Oct 61TS-2006-21 Woodbine Sireet - TraHic Cplming Review.wptl
r.
- . :~i i~': ~ w
~ rv 7- - X•£ ~k1 ~ _ ~y
, CZ F+j
~d ~ ~ ~ s- - I ~ , _ ~ ~ it
x ~ i - ~ O
- a
.C~Q . ~
2iQ 1(v21t )I~T~Urd _ ~ # ~ . ~F ~
_ _ _ _ _ _ r ~`e~. I ~~~~~l~':= ~ Z
~'ri~'~ i(b„>+~~t•Lar, Y - ~ -
r
9' . ~ ~ . . , f ~ ~ .f , ~ ~ :a. , .:e0-
~ ' E ' p k
C £ _ ~ ;~i:i ~ ~ ~ , Y
.fl ~ S L Q) ~ { .
c ~ ~ ~ ~ _
U ~ ' _ " '•a - ~ ~ , ~ s~i`; ~r
k ~ U~
.1J r _'-t ~
~ _ r.~ . , . ~ . >fi:.
i
i, r ~ ,s
~ ~ ` q~~ O ~a a +
: s~l. i ~ - ~ ,cn ~
, ~ a ~ ,t * i _ U ~ ~
~ ~ Y
~ ~ ,~i- . • ° ~ ~
~ ~`r~`! 9
(n ~ , ; ~ ' , ~ f . . . .s . 'y ~ s. ~_.i y~,
~ ~ ' ~t' ~ ~i _
~ ~a~: ~ ~ • r~. ~a=."=.:r.~ '
.-.-.~4' r'~~~ Y ~ . ' ~ o~.
~ ~ ~ ~ u '
~ - ~ ~c'~~>--
TY~~j ~ ~i: ' F ' ~ _
~ ~ . ~ . - 7 ' 3~~
~ r r ~
Q ;
~ ( i~ ` Y ~ ~ f r ~ ~v.3..--=.^-=~
~ , ~ ~
~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ [Z
<n f
~-~1 U v _ '8 -tnk
`T. ~C . . Q ~ .
o . s ~S; t.tl = i
F~ ,,1, I ~ '-M .
~ ~y ~~A~ ~ ~ .7 ~ '
. ~ :~r - ~ - . 3
~ ~ ~ " ~ ~
~ ,
~ " k ~r
R~ r i ,a~ ,~.-~'i' T~. ~
jl~i~-~+er~~ ~ C i ~
` :a ,
$ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~
i 0' 2~a. / s- Y.~i?_. ' i. C
~ ~ f , ' < l cn r } ~
~ 4
. t ~ •~y ~
~ =F ~ ~y~ ft
cn I ' , ~ ~ ~ ; ~ '~,~-~«'~~A ~ ,v`
~
t , r. . . ~ ~ . ^
~ \a~ ~ c € ; - _ ~ < U
r'TV 7a,m„"'~,; ' - s ~ . ~ ' C M'. f O ~
~ _ ~ ~i~1 _~,.y:~ ~ O ' ~ S ~ O . ~ ~ v
_ ~ i~`. ; .~,,'r , ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~
~
C ,,,,a ~y,~- ~ i U ~ _ a
u~ ~1z ~ r,s' ~
~ ~
_ ~ _~37fFI3A~! 15~~'1~~ ~ • ~ .
3A-,s mtw.~ . ~ ~ ~-'~~t, y.
,~14 -~"~i ~ ~`~`st ; u ~ , y
~ •
~ ~ i ~ , ' ' ! _ ~
~ ~ s t fi~• y ~
y
' ~ ~ ~ L
1 `n 7 ~ wy
' ~ `,~ep. ~ s' ~ ~ •V
. , ` % _
i
~ = .
_ . , - ~ s~e * ~ v ~ a! ~
.k'F~' - ~ 1?i/
{ , ~r ~
s~ ~ t - # ,;~I~ ~
~ ~ ~
_ ~ ~ - t ~ ~
~ ,t s ' r- . ~ i
~ ~ ~r_ ; ~
: ~ , ~ ~ • ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~8 F~y
~ ~ _ y~ ~ . s~ ~ ~ ~
2 ~ p~. ~ O a~~ t~ kir ~ a O
- P + . ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ _ s_, O ~
a ~
~ ~ . ~ . . ~ ' :
' ~1
~ ~ , - ~`7
~
y .L ,k . ~ .3 i ~ . ` . . _ .
, ~ s~i ~ ~ ~ - ! ~ ~
~ # ~ ~~F ~t ~ ~ MONT~E
MpNT(8)SE It0 MMNTROSE ~ M~M!MJSE RO ,~v
Y „ ~ ~
ASE R4 h 4 , ~ ~ . . - ~
Cf ~:S ~a~ ~,~k~~(
- , ~ ~ _ . ,
W a~i ~ ` VANDGATEQR
. ~ ~ ~ s r`~
Q LfE AYE lfE AYf LfE AV ~ ~ ~ ~1 # YIE1M AVE _~(t~F'
~ ~ $OUTN ~
~ N n
W
I
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ MR+cv~wc+a~s ~
ti ~ y~~
' ~ ' SALOWM AYf B~LCti'hM ~ p~+-
~ ~ " ~ ~ ~e
e ~
~ ~ N ~
. ~ ~
~ = S ~ ~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
• f . , ,~J w y_, %
. ` gEtFO,ST AVE BftiA51 MfE ~
N
F ~
4 N f1 ~ TItRA AVE
t ~`t . ~ ~ ~ ~ A°!
~ $ ~ ~ a} t 1
~ ~ ~
~ PA4~OC1( TAAII i1R 9a 3
w PAOOOCK T tMt DR ~ ~ t~' ~
~ ~
Q y
F , } a,
~ ~ ~NrJC!cYC~r ~ ~ ~
i '
~ a~~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ C
~ ~i ~ ~ ~n
~
y ,y ' ~ o ~ ~
FM,N'%ESG~A~ ' ~`dl ~ ~S ~ ~
4 , ` ~ a O ~
! ~ F , ~ lUN1RE£ DR ~
3 °
~ ~
~
' ~ e
n
~ f
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ; { ~ ~
~ ~ . ~
t
~ t~~~ , ~z~ ~ ~ o ~
< . fi ~ ~ , : . $ ~aU
' t ~ ~ «nU~rt Ro ~ ~ ~
~ ~ S - . , K1~.lI~R ~ ~ 4 ?Y
w
KpIp.RRO T~, ~i~~~ r vG
S 'f:.-d ~ ( - :'t r
~y~~~ ~j~ _ ~ ~ ~ y $ ' ; •y~I
, . . . L:.~_ } . ' ' ~ : : ~ ~
: . ..::,wY1E - ~ \ ; ~ . . ~ ~ . ;Y - ` ~ . , L
~ 'flctaber 6, 2008 CAO-20~8-OS
:g~K
~n
, Wp ~~/~r'/F
Councillor Carolynn loanonni, Chair
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: CAO-2008-05
People Mover Project Update
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City continue to dedicate the necessary resources to meet the June 30, 2009
Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund deadline for the People Mover Project.
BACKGROUND
City Council will recall that staff provided an update to Council on the Niagara Falls People
Mover Project on May 12, 2008. At that time, Council authorized staff to continue working
with the People Mover Project to investigate the feasibility of a phased approach to
providing the Request for Proposals 2(RFP2).
Following Council's approval, the consultant team developed five (5) alternative phase one
alignments, taking into consideration the original objectives ofthe Project. This information
has now been shared with various interested parties including the Stakeholders Liaison
Committee (SLC), Ontario Lottery & Gaming (OLG) and Falls Management Company
(FMC), the Federal Government and the three qualified bidders.
Stakeholders
The SLC consists of key members of the tourism business community along with
representation from the five (5) BIA groups, whose purpose is to represent the tourism
industry on this Project. The Project Consultant Team and staff metwith the SLC on June
17, 2008 to discuss the phased approach and possible phase one alignments. The Project
Consultant Team presented the five (5) possible alternatives and requested feedback.
Office of thc Administrator
October 6, 2008 - 2- CAO-2008-OS
A second meeting with the various interested stakeholders including representatives from
OLG and FMC was held on August 21, 2008.
Although various stakeholders have expressed disappointment that a fully looped system
would not be moving forward at this time, the prevailing opinion is the need to have a
system in place as soon as possible to deal with ongoing congestion and service issues.
The SLC is prepared to support a phased implementation approach.
The stakeholders responded to the consultants' presentations with a modification of the
consultanYs proposal, outlined in the attached letter from Harry Oakes. The suggested
alignment would operate within the existing road network with design enhancements to key
intersections to improve traffic movement. Although not a fully looped system within the
Park, it was emphasized that a phased system would only be effective if it also entered the
Park to drop tourists at Table Rock and possibly Maid of the Mist. The 20 private shuttles
that are now operating from the major hotels to the Table Rock location in the Niagara
Parks would be replaced in the proposal, eliminating congestion and duplication of service.
The system must also conveniently move tourists to all demand generators including the
Falls, as mentioned, the two casinos and other attractions. As a result of the above, the
goal would be to develop a full two-way loop running along Victoria Avenue, Clark Avenue,
Robinson Street and Fallsview Boulevard with connections for the Lundy's Lane shuttle
and to Table Rock. The former rail line right-of-way would not be required in this scenario,
however, the goal of congestion relief would still be achievable.
While the comments made in the attached letter did not receive unanimity, the majority of
the SLC was in support. Although to date the SLC has worked on a premise of a
consensus, with deadline pressures, there comes a pointwhere a majority opinion has to
rule the day.
As a result of the SLC feedback, the consulting team was directed to prepare a work plan
and budget to examine the feasibility of the suggested route. The work plan would have
to considerthe implications ofthe Environmental Assessment (EA), the RFP2 and ridership
projections. The Project consultants have completed the work plan and budget. They
have been submitted to OLG for review and approval on September 19, 2008. As of the
writing of this report, we have not received direction from the OLG to move forward.
OLG/FMC
Part of the successful bid for the permanent casino in Niagara Falls by FMC included a
commitment to provide a financial contribution of up to $15 million for the development of
a people mover system. $7.5 million of this commitment was utilized for the purchase of
the abandoned rail corridor. OLG/FMC have also continued to support the project and, to
date, have contributed approximately $2 million toward the Project, which includes the
Request for Quotation (RFQ), RFP1 process, the current RFP2 process, ridership and
revenue study, parking study, visitation study, as well as updates to those studies.
OLG/FMC is anxious to see the Project move forward to the construction stage and,
although they are disappointed that a fully-looped system will not go forward at this time,
they have expressed their support of a phased approach. However, they have also
requested that a target date be established for a contract to be awarded to a private sector
partner.
October 6, 2008 - 3- CAO-2008-05
Although the OLG has continued to be supportive of the project, with them "footing the bill",
even minor matters have required their sign off. Needless to say this has lead to a
protracted and cumbersome process. Although the municipality has no intention to
contribute to the "hard" infrastructure costs, with deadlines approaching, it would be
prudent for the Council to allocate $25,000 to the project at this time. These monies would
help expedite matters in the face of the looming deadline that is outlined later in the report.
Bidders
Council is aware the number of qualified bidders was narrowed down to three groups. The
Project Consultant Team has continued to update the three qualified bidders and has
provided opportunities for them to comment on the progress of the Project. On June 17,
2008, a meeting was held with the bidders to advise them of the decision to move forward
with a phased approach and to seek their feedback.
Although they were also disappointed that a fully looped system could not move forward
at this time, they reaffirmed their interest in the project.
Federal Government
The Federal Government has a significant role to play in the success of a People Mover
System. For a number of years, federal funding of up to $25 million has been held in
abeyance for this Project. Updates and discussions have been ongoing since the approval
of this funding and, on June 20, 2008, a letter was received from the Minister of
Transportation, Infrastructure and Communities, Lawrence Cannon, expressing the
Ministry's desire to have the project move forward to the construction phase. Specifically,
they indicated that they wanted the City to be in a position to sign a Contribution
Agreement by the end of June 2009. In order to do this, a private sector partner would
have to be chosen as a result of the RFP2 process being completed. In the absence of
a Contribution Agreement, the $25 million funding would no longer be available and the
Project will be considered withdrawn from consideration under the Canada Strategic
Infrastructure Fund (CSIF).
Further discussion with Minister Cannon's office has indicated that time lines could be re-
evaluated in the new year and based on progress, the June date may be extended. It is
also important for the City to reemphasize to the Federal Government that while
circumstances may have changed, the objectives as outlined in the original application,
have not changed - the People Mover is still a high priority for the City and tourism.
CONCLUSION
The People Mover Project is a complex initiative that has numerous technical, financial,
operational and governance issues to resolve. One of the most significant challenges is
the perceived need to gain a unanimous consensus from the tourism stakeholders.
The City's role has always been identified as that of facilitator. Our commitment to date
is in the provision of resources to manage and co-ordinate the Project through the
consulting team and clerical support.
October 6, 2008 - 4- CAO-2008-05
The People Mover Project is at a critical stage in its development. If the People Mover is
to become a reality the following issues must be resolved by June 2009:
• Council accept the wishes of the majority of the SLC regarding alignment;
• Complete a revised business plan in support of the Project;
• Undertake a technical assessment of the preferred alignment to assess the
engineering, transportation and traffic operations;
• Identifythe environmental approval process having regard for Provincial EA and
the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA) requirements;
• Negotiate new terms with the Federal Government regarding the $25 million
commitment;
• Complete the RFP2 process identifying the project implementation program;
• Select a private sector partner;
Respectfully submitted: ~
Joh acDonald, Chief Administrative Officer
.a- ~ .s.~ ~~s / ~y~ ~ ~ t
~ ~ ' 1
~ S~i~3 ` ~ ~ ~
."`~.~_._i `'p~.. ~ < <'~ft~r ~
~ ~ ~'t~t. i ~
~N'TIERTAIIVTVII~,N1' ~ ~~SOl~ ~~=~`rc~r~~:
Comlorl Inn ~ Qualilv Inn •~otilon Piz~.i • A~frey~'s • 7ini Houu~~t ~ 4l'endr~ "~~G~¢~~ T~~'~1 ~(1Fy ~
~Inlt'hecl • 1loaicland ~ Gi~a~ Canadi m 11id~ ~dc ~ DinnsaurP~rk ~ 6al,j+a~ GoG """'---a..~
Rnmoun ~ t;lnada'G~~~iding Compam~ • Spnr~s 7rne • Fudge h'a~mi~
Juty 30, 200£~
Mr. John MacDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
City of Niagara Fails
Box 1023
4310 ~ueen Stree±
Niagara Falls, On!ario L2E 2K9
R~: People Mover Project
Dear John,
As a follow up to the June 17, 2008 people mover project stakeholder's liaison
committee I have enclosed my comments relating to the projecYs future direction per
your request. In my opinion the people mover system has been studied enough over tf~E
past 30 years and if is time to proceed with an implementation plan.
The following summary is my attempt to outline a possible direction for the
stakeholder's to consider.
Peonle Mover Svstem
Design and implement a Theme Trolley style rubber tire system similar to the
Orlando I Rlde System on International Drive, which connects the area hotel's
with the Convention Center, Shopping areas and attractions such as SeaVJorlci
and Universal.
The sy~tem is in i±s 10'h year of operation and transports over 2,000,000 visitors
per year. We should study the operation and proceed towards a Niagara Falis
system.
- Gatlinburg also has a more recent installation to review.
Rubber'fire vs. Fixed Rail
A rubber tire system would maintain maxlmum flexibility with the ability to adjust
to operational issues, change alignment for seasonal concerns and new
development impact.
- Engine technology should be energy efficient and environmental friendly.
Fixed rail system would introduce a great deal of risk due to cost and potential
impact from construction. Lack of flexibility would further risk the system's lonyer
term operating success sho~dd a critical route design error occur.
I IOCO Limi~cA . d9(0 Qihun Hill • P0. [3o.e 60 •:A'ingv~ra Fa1Ls . Onttirio . Canads . L?[ G58
Tclephonc90i~ji ~-i91I . ~ra~utclifiunhilLmm . Faz, 9~i3ifi5,'i8
Route
- The system should operate within the existing road network with desiyn
enhancements to key intersections to improve traffic movement.
- Smart traffic light technology could provide advanced movement for systems
vehicles.
Strategic station locations should be developed to provide guest service and
market the system with maps, information and ticket kiosks.
- The goal should be to develop a full two-vvay loop with the rail corridor section re-
located to Vicforia Ave, Clark Ave, Robinson St. and Fallsview Bivd.
- Operational flexibility of the Rubber Tire system provides the abllity to operate
separate loops for the Lundy's Lane shuttfe and within the N+agara Parks.
- Traffic capacity within the existing road network is availab~e 99% of the time and
congestion occurs due to specific impacts such as fireworks for Canada Day,
(~ew Years Eve Concert and Rainbow Bridge back ups, Traffic management
could improve these few periods of congestion with an entrance/exit capacity
plan to help flow traffic.
Rait Corridor
- Use of the previous rail right of way appears to be a good opportunity however
on closer examination several issues arise.
~ Fallsview Casino creates a dead end and proposal's to connect via a pedestrian
link through the casino or proceeding aro~md the back of the building would have
limited success.
- The raii corridor merge at Victoria Ave and the Clifton Hill intersection create a
great logisticai design challenge.
- The system requires full exposure to the hotel facilities in the Fallsview and
Clifton Hill/Victoria Ave area's to succeed and should be located on the existing
road network.
- City of Niagara Falls could sell the rail corridor to the adjoining property o~vners
at full market value providing re-payment to City from original property p~uch~se
and stimulate new private sector development, which provide long term property
tax payments.
Business Ptan
Cify of Niagara Falls to facilitate process and provide operationai experience via
Niagara Transit.
- Private sector to provide financial support via long term ticket purchase
guarantee.
- Niagara Parks to consider option of full-integrated loop system or ta continue
operating independent parks loop.
- A full-integrated loop would provide the greatest service to Niagara Fafls visitors
and should benefit the Niagara Parks aYtraction attendance.
- System price should be affordable for visitors, such as $2/ride or ride all day `or
$5. With a realistlc capitai development cost and industry support the pricing
should be possible.
- Discontinue the current RFP process and attempt to enter the Federal
Government into a co-operative investment plan such as the success of the
convention centre group.
Conclusion
- Proceeding with an implementation plan process will force the stakeholders to
develop and identify real business issue's relating to the people mover systein.
- We need to start discussions of specifics; route, station locations, treffic
circulation, ticket sales, customer research and operating pians.
- The current process focus is based on an external operator's ability to turn a
profit operating a transportation system via control pf parking.
- Learn from examples in comparable markets to Niagara FaHs and from the
current network of shuttle bus operations in town, what does the guest want.
We need to focus on a realistic implementation plan to provide superior seniice
to our guests.
I wish to express my appreciation for the support the City continues to demonstrate r`or
the Tourism industry with efforts such as the peopfe mover system.
Yours Truly,
~
~ ~w
~ ~
Harry N. Oakes
President
_ ~ >y7,. 1 ~ ~ r >r,:c~ar:d»a:v.~w..a,_.,.
C~
~ y
/Y, t:
L/
C+~~~~~ J ?
~ - l ~ifa.l.'[J a .J1oYK` . ..JTIi" q~.r C^_ - r
. A~ L V, y~.~~ i . ~ ,s~o ~~wo ~~<s~ay ~e ~r. / , ~ ~ S
FOB RTS ST ~7l Of,~`~ i`- Y„ np° ~ i. t ~ J
2 a ~~~o °DC. : Y ~~i ~ ~ i~'~~t 3 ~
~ a:;~~lG14F~(5~''.'JI oo~~u'~Siiiic~.,~mc~ °arn~iuro n a c ~~T gc' s niNp ~ 1°<t+~ r' . S~ ,b
, ~ ; ca,x.af 3~~ri~~ ~3s~1 ~~b `c ~.~G~~.;~ ~''~~I-~~ ` ~ =
I ~
{ _ c -'CUFNL"83'r - Y., ~ ) 6 ~ `L ~ 4 9 yjk~g~. J
I y c .0 0~ O'~ + _ ~ 1; ~ S ~ ~ x ~'T 1 L~ i
I ,
i ` I , ~ ~ a~ ; a ~ g ~y ~ ~ , ~y . _
% ~ , ~ ~ (o~ ~S ~ ° ~ ;4'
I ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ o-~ ~ ~ t
' ~ .I~ , ~ ~P6 ~ 4~,y~.~'~ Yl'~°s '~i <f' ~S ~~\~rd 4' / i D . ;
- i ~ -~,ot° u '9~. ~ ~P ~~fi 7 i~ n n / 69~ ~.oiy o . ~i y ~:S
' . ' ~la'~~ 1 i~.~~ ~~4 'J'.~, ~ ? ~ v ~r~~+~cx' ~i ~
' ' ~ ~l~.r~ _ T~in~~,~ ' d' ~ ' . /~V„' I~ i ~~°f
r ~ ew ~ i ~ ~ . , > / ~'r~yi~~~ j~ ~
: 3 ~e`~ o ! i JG~ C^; %
i~~ ~ ~.{~L~ f~X~~lr~ i n' ~
~ ~J. ~ ~
~ ,l`f`7/~~z rt(;it ss` -
~ i ~ ~/e ~ ~ y //~~'"!G~ 7/,~~ / v , ~r~: ~
Q
l, y~
~ 'w)'~~. ~ ~y~J a 4` N~ ~
~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ i
1
- SP'il -~p . A~~ ~ p(l~ ~W \ FB' 4,~ ~ .
- r ` / ~ ~ . < CC ~ ~ . ~
t,~y
~
s i V ~ ~ /
ti
~FFI-h~{'V'7~ k Y Ja q ~ J ~ I' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~9~ ~ l ~1_
~i i 'S ~ , T~ ~i . i
~{7
~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ i o _ li V~ j ..5~ ~l~~t 5~1. '
~ ~a
f _ ~ ' cA' , p i , .
~ i_ ~ Q .n ~1~~~(~,J~X~ ~
~ ~ ~ ITN~~~`p1~1 t~ ~ .
~ .D a ~ ~ ~ ~fi{~iF~ ~ .
t~
> Y ~A~~J ~ p
I ~ r ~ / . hk+S~~ ~ ; ~ I ~
r - ~ ' ~
r ~ C.O ~ i ~.S ~~1~~i~{ L
1'~ ' 9 ~ e .~l~{ ~j ~y ii m
I ' - Q [')~t' j{y4' _
~ ~ T IC~^+,11~'(., .~if`: ~ . i
i`
~
~ I ~p~~ 2 ~i~, (.(l~ j, 'yt'~ ~i
~ . i> r %~'yI''~ ~t~z E o, ~ ~ ~ I ~
~ ! ya~ `t If" ~ ~ "d: ~
~ - IN.Yx ir ~ - ~
~ s_ ~ ~i~ 't } ~~S ri;;.l'f F
~ ~ ~.:~.qRrtY L~..~ ' }.+y~~ 1~~3tJ5~' ~ o _e _
.i ' _ z` ` y' / r`°rtt~~4~~~J~~~ L° u :
I ~ y I !/1 A`t~1 ~K.'4 .9~~~ = ~ ~ i i
~ ~ ~
_ ~ w ~ I ~ -
~
_ ~ > i~ ,
~ v ? ~ i.
~ - ~ U
r.~. ra~. ~ ~ : ~ , ~L,~ 'r(~ 5 - ~E
ii,E i+ ~ - !
- , -c-~ . , . F n'~ 7 a7 y~+,
< ~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ N4Tt~ t ~'i' .D ,u y `
-:t' • ~ Q 6'S~t', ~ ~ ~ . _
,i - I ~ C~ ~ ~ _
Y~~ ~ L l~`l\~ Z v 1• .
]~yy l `~1 f~
i r~\ ~ ~1 - I I~ Z ~ lu ~ ~l ~ ' .
~ w-TRI- I 1 ~U i- y~ f~S . I .
> ~ ~ 4 b ~ Y . il't : ; i, ~
= di~ ~ ~ I ~-'GU , t i~ , 4
~ : v~~y i I ,
~ ~Y. '~;li " > ~
~ ~ c a'v ~ I, ~ j2, , -L ~
~ 7
~J~.b~ i~~ ~ ~ ~ , ; ~ _2 0 o-
iti39ad ' ~ r ~ ' ~~i ~ ~ ~ a i 1, Q
~ - ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ . ~ ~ _
- I ~J~
o r -
{ ~ ~ . ~Y a ! I ~ S
~ .t ~ L ~ I ~ ~ ~-1-
r
f ~ ~ - v ' a~ G i I ~ .
__~II I ~ t } q ~ . I
\ ~p _ - \ M/:X2'`~l.l'y~~ ~r v~ ~~y ~~.i}S~~ ~
; \ ~
C'w~9A:6~S.~L3~i~`7r~~L~~`~•~ica~~:~'er/.«P'4c~t . .i - . _
B.-~..~__ _
~-(1 t~.Lv)' ~
~ w 3i~ ~ ~
i`~~ ~~#4 ~i.~'~ tFi} ~.s ~ Til ~5' ~ 1~ i~~i}
Y~~F i~ ~ Y~p~` ~",IY,: N V1 - . t1
, ~a}~~g'.~{ra~Y~~F~1~~~i'~g~ ~ R 'A' ~~q;`. _ = ~ o ~~q `a 4,~
. 3 ~~F 3 1 3~d' 1 iroY <Q ~ c W ~ ~ I~y ' .
S-~¢~; ~ ~b u~-•?~7 ~'S~~}j ~ .y r ~a.i •T ~ 'J ~ E~
~"`x t~ nFi ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ R ~ L^~ ~
~'a`+Y.~J ~'~~tk ~q.~c~...~,',~~;~+j~n~'cLi r H~ O~~, j'7„ ~ G., r' u ~f~~
' ~~l e .~~i~~Y ~,31' cy,~ ~ i, .O _ "'Q o~pm l'~'J ~ ~~p . .
a rk J ~S~f' d~ m e y f c' W{ z
~ = g, Li~~~J ~,f~~'~ , 7 s.i v~ o C J v-~ ~ t(E
I tiry S~ fi[.(( N Q G~'} [~g• i.. ~ CJ )~3
~ , i . -O 6 ~ ~ v. L ~yI {t.
r~ ? t . Q: rt . ~ 1 14 .
~ , ' ti ~ ~ E ~ ~x A - i ~i ,L k•e2~ ~i~ ~ j ? L w ~ ~ W ~q ~ ` ~ ~
~-i j 7 ,rfY ~l p8 j! N ~ W c.n
°C ' ~c3i # ,ql~ ~s- ~,r~ tfs o- a ~ ~ p~ C .y.:,
~ ~ d{ t`v'q.YSj A~~ ~ a ~~y~:y,,r~~., ~n ' p ~ ~ a k~r ~
t ~ ~x * h}~F ~ f i"'~-.(s
~~~t R~' ;~7 ~ ~ I . , a. > -C ° f7 ~ ~9,
17 ;4f~'g r , y y, ~ . f--
6u 1
~ ~s~'~,Id t~i''~~-'~. ~„~i ..S~SSl1 ~ a . ~ .'^-o a, .~n ~ ~ ;!~`~5°!
f t F.~~# p ~ti 1 ~ f 7` 3- F~ i:y ~ C~ °n ~ I. i
i 1 ..y`~ gf° ~~~~r~ ll Ci~ - ,r ~ ~ ~ c a~p ~ I . vC
s x °n{Y ~
rya{~, t .{~j~a~~~,~,~' \ Y'. ~>y.. ` N ~ ~ ~ r
k~~~~{~~~. . K ~ ~ - ~ N O ~ ~
h'~h ~,*tta~l?q~'"~ ~ =i 4- ,~Ax'y~e~~~~ ~ c~ ° ~ :k+~~ i
~ t~ ~zi.?~ j7~' .t j.+' .,~~'t3~k*v - .Y~ m ~ n) '•'S~~'
~ a>~Y ~ g~s < L~ ti` a~i ~p+T~~'~ N in ~ e' p.~~
' f .g~i ~ aF„ d ~ ~ ' ~~~+,f~~5 ~t ja;.' ~ ~
~k ; !L a -t ~ i~' ~ ~L,. "
° f _ '~y,T~&'~~''`~` ~`.7~i ~ ~ o ~ o r w- w a, i r ~ +
~ t~ e ~ 3i~~ ,xF~s."~ 5, "M Q~. ~~q ° a N o-~= 0~,4,
3 ~ _
-.'v~ , a.; ~i ~ i~`i ~ r t~~ t a.s r c' :r~ Y m ~ c' '
R: ~~~~~~~~'.z5~~y~~': E 5 O O rC -O C ys C Z
i' ~a+. ~i £"i'~~ f~1FT' t r.i~ N o~ C aJ ~ C' I ~
~ k' . F'' t ~ .a ~#k`.. 1 cr c ~ _ '
~ -c:. ~ r.: ~ ~ -i
~ ~r ° '~~~~.a~a ~~y~ t~ • a+ a~i E ° -r u~ k .
~"a~. ~~T "4KSF' ~ O•i O~° Aa Q r C> i J Y.~ i}'
~ ~R~ ~ ry ~ ~ N f ~ r v a5 7.'~ `z u ~ ~a ~ l~~~~
{
3~ ~,c ~ B` I~ C v' w a.- Qy C'~ a~ ~ 4..._
s [
3~ # tl d FhA`~"rt rsr's.~. ~ M~'. o~ Gl ~ o ai 'tr c' a4.. ~
~ 4 .1 ~ i t"~ " ,~~,f.~,,,v t "Y Kak ~ ~o °i i ~ a ~
S~ i 1 ~ p 5 : C O ~ N ~ -TJ ~i ~
~ Q ~ e * ~ ~ f= aa ~ Y o w n ft~
etc. ~ a"r7 ir~ 5~ C W s~ ~C c. Z {i~ .
* ~ t~i~ ~ V ~ ~ E ai ~ ~t.> -
iifi' ' ' ~ 1.~ 1 r : a+._ -o `c n ~ :
i 3 f ' ~ CG C'.~_., CY. Q; n
~ o-r'., ~ @ ~ ;t ~ v ~ ~v' . ~ a ~ q ~ ~ ~i ~3 ~ v^ ~ ° F d ~ . ;
' e f~ 11~. ~r~~
~ v ~i. 4 ~ ~ Cb pj ~ O ~ v ~ i
w ~'Oi9 'i.: ~ ~f ~ ~P~°'^~9 ~ a K . ~ . t O ~~n O ? p ~ ~ ` ~ k C ~ f~{
~ ~ F~, i ^ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a'~ ~1{ ~ ~
~ i r~~1 s~v,~. A~,..;~ a o.~ ° ..c. u. ~ el~t~.
h ~ f~u5 ~ ! , ~ t aKi ~c ^ c ` .r I ~ F t
' ~ CJi~~ , .N'Y` x . N > > C O i~ :a~ ei n ~ _ ~
OYf~ O O 1_ ~
~ ~ 1 : yp~Fj(
' Y 4~ ~ ~ ~ s .,.i0~ .F ~ 4s G ~ C 'N ~ c ^ pPY• ~
~ ~ 4 ~ .3~.~ ~ ~ c o a`~ a' .c O ~ ~ r. 'cli ~I ~`7~ I
~ ~a.} . a ay ~ ~ • a ° s. c~ ~ ~
~'.,'~lh ~ 73~h~ { . a 3 ~ ~ . ~.pq~~ ~
~ ~ . t~ is 1 a ~ r . ~ c c ~ ai ~ gp ~ ~
n F~,Aj~ts'~ r~+a . ~ o v_. ° on v~'t r. L~ ggT'yF:' j. i
a ~s,~ ,
~ r ~.A ? :i ~~l.~f {~II~iiG~
~
~
~
ARinister of 7ransport, ` ~ I~inisfre des l°ransports,
hlfrastructure and Gornmunities ~eR~x de Plnirastructure et des Caliecfivites
Ottawa,Canada h1A0N5
12 j
~EP 0 3 20Q8 ~
' RECEIVED o ~
His worship Ted Salci ~ S~p 1 0 2~08 - ~ r'-~~
Mayor ts~ l-- 7
P~'~~!J~'S flF~9t:;: i
City ofNiagara Falls t7FFiCE OF
City Hall THE ADARkP61S7RA70R g3 s~~fy
4310 Queen 5treet F_ ~ r ~1 ,
P.O. Bok 1023
Niagara Falls ON L2E 6X5
~ Dear Mayor:
Thank you for your letter of June 26, 2008, regarding the People Mover Project in
Niagara Falls.
I am pleased to be in a position to be able lo agree to your request that fhe Govermnent of
Cant~da maintain its commihnent to this project beyond the September 15`~ date
referenced in my letter of June 20, 2008. As such, by virtue of this letter, I am extending
the deadline on this project to June 30`~', 2009.
I trust that, given tliis fuither exte~ision, Iliat you would tl~en be in a position to sign a
l~inal contribution agreement on this important project under the Carzada Stralegic
Ir
fi~asu uctur-e Fund by that date, and I certainly wish you well in that endeavour.
Please accept my best wislies.
Youis truly,
: ~ ~
! ,.i~ L ~
~L~ ~~~t-F~ ~GU'.C,~~fi7./~
The Honourable Lawrence Cannon, P.C., M.P.
c.c.: The Honourable Rob Nieholson, M.P.
c: Patricia Decker
People Mover Project
For your files. kk
, ~3 v~
OJ-0386 (OGOb011 L 16 fz~@f~~~
r.J~
The City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Resolutaon
No.
Moved by
Seconded by
WHEREAS all meetings of Council are to be open to the public; and
WHEREAS the only time a meeting or part of a meeting may be closed to the public if the subject
matter falls under one of the exceptions under s. 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT on October 6, 2008 Niagara Falls Council will go into
a closed meeting to consider a matter that falls under the subject matter of 239(2)(fl of the
Municipal Act, 2001, to receive advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
AND The Seal of the Corporation be hereto aFfixed.
DEAN IORFIDA R. T. (TED) SALCI
CITY CLERK MAYOR