Loading...
2010/01/251) Approval of the December 14, 2009 Community Services Minutes. 2) REPORTS: FIRST MEETING Monday, January 25, 2010 4:00 p.m. City Hall, Committee Room #2A & B STAFF CONTACT: a) TS- 2010 -07 Tourist Area Parking Demand Study Karl Dren b) MW- 2010 -03 Mewburn Road Bridge (Mewburn Road - Concession 6 Road) Geoff Holman c) MW- 2010 -01 Tender #2009 - 179 -06 Downtown, Infrastructure Revitalization - Phase 1 Geoff Holman d) MW- 2010 -06 Sidewalk Winter Maintenance Service Requests and Policy Review Geoff Holman e) TS- 2010 -13 St. Clair Avenue Tourist Bus Loading Zone Karl Dren f) TS- 2010 -02 Park Street — Traffic Operations Review Karl Dren g) TS- 2010 -03 Forestview Boulevard and Kalar Road Traffic Operations Review Karl Dren h) TS- 2010 -04 Kalar Road — Parking & Bicycle Lane Review Karl Dren i) TS- 2010 -06 McLeod Road — Speed Limit Review Karl Dren j) TS- 2010 -08 Authority for the Temporary Installation of Regulatory Signs Karl Dren Community Services Committee - January 25, 2010 k) PRC- 2010 -01 Proposed 2010 Cemetery Fee Schedule Karl Dren 1) PD- 2010 -03 Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Application 5841 -5845 Ferry Street Hillside Holdings Inc. (Emidio Maroti and Peter Conte) Alex Herlovitch m) PD- 2010 -04 Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Application 5894 -5900 Main Street 1302771 Ontario Ltd. (Adam Newington) Alex Herlovitch n) PD- 2010 -05 Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Application 6036 Main Street 1254552 Ontario Inc. (Victor and Anthony Fraone) Alex Herlovitch o) PD- 2010 -06 Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Application 6022 - 6026 Main Street 1254225 Ontario Inc. (Victor and Anthony Fraone) Alex Herlovitch p) PD- 2010 -07 Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Applications 5769 Ferry Street 2211257 Ontario Inc. (Chris Rudan) Alex Herlovitch 3) NEW BUSINESS: 4) ADJOURNMENT: a) Resolution to go into Closed Meeting. ► ESSI + Seventeenth Meeting, Monday, December 14, 2009, Committee Room #2, 6:15 P.M. PRESENT: Councillor Carolynn loannoni , Chair; Mayor Ted Salci, Councillors Jim Diodati, Shirley Fisher, Vince Kerrio, Bart Mayes, Wayne Thomson, Janice Wing and Victor Pietrangelo. STAFF: MINUTES OF COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE Ken Todd, Ed Dujlovic, Ken Burden, Geoff Holman, Dean lorfida, Ken Beaman, Todd Harrison, Trent Dark, Serge Felicetti, Denyse Morrissey, Alex Herlovitch, Karl Dren, Lee Smith, Kathy Powell and Steno - Marianne Tikky. GUEST: Gary Beck, 483 Wing RCAFA, 9200 Sodom Road, Niagara Falls, Jim Doherty, 483 Wing RCAFA, 6039 St. Anthony Crescent, Niagara Falls. PRESS: Corey Larocque, Niagara Falls Review. 1 MINUTES: Niagara Its MOVED by Councillor Fisher and seconded by Councillor Kerrio the minutes of the November 30, 2009 meeting be adopted as recorded. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council December 14, 2009. 2. REPORTS: a) MW- 2009 -86 Niagara Falls Armoury MOVED by Mayor Salci and seconded Councillor Pietrangelo; 1. That the Niagara Falls History Museum (former Lundy's Lane Historical Museum) be permitted to operate temporarily from the Niagara Falls Armoury during the construction phase of the Museum expansion project from January 2010 to end of construction phase of the project.; and 2. That the City enter into a lease agreement with the Niagara Falls Military Museum. Motion: Carried Conflict: Councillor Wing Action: Recommendation submitted to Council December 14, 2009. MOVED by Councillor Fisher and seconded by Councillor Mayes; 1. That Council approve the revised Arena Payment and Cancellation Policy. 2. That the revised Arena Payment and Cancellation Policy be effective January 1, 2010. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council December 14, 2009. PRC- 2009 -35 Gale Centre Arena Construction Update MOVED Mayor Salci and seconded by Councillor Diodati that the Gale Centre arena construction update report be received for information purposes. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council December 14, 2009. d) BDD- 2009 -05 2010 Pan American Games -2- b) PRC- 2009 -36 Revised Arena Payment and Cancellation Policy MOVED by Councillor Thomson and seconded by Councillor Wing that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the 2015 Pan /Am Games Joinder Agreement. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council December 14, 2009. e) TS- 2009 -52 Vehicle Replacement, Niagara Chair -a -Van MOVED by Councillor Pietrangelo and seconded by Councillor Diodati; 1. That Council pre- approve the 2010 purchase of a Niagara Chair -A -Van vehicle with the lowest bidder Overland Custom Coach; and, 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to enter into an agreement to purchase. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council December 14, 2009. f) PD- 2009 -99 CB &FIG -2009 -013, CB&FIG-2009-014 and CB &FIG - 2009 -015 4532 -4534 Queen Street, 4544 Queen Street & 4536 Queen Street Applicant: Argiri Rigas MOVED by Councillor Thomson and seconded by Mayor Salci that the Council approve the three applications for Commercial Building and Facade Improvement Grants subject to considering the properties as different parcels and satisfying the Downtown CIP program requirements. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council December 14, 2009. g) PD -2009 -101 CB &FIG- 2009 -016, Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Grant Application Applicant: 1049474 Ontario Inc. (Anthony Kreze) 4529 -4531 Queen Street MOVED by Councillor Diodati and seconded by Councillor Pietrangelo; 1. That the Commercial Building and Facade Improvement Grant Application for 4529 -4531 Queen Street be approved subject to the owner satisfying the program requirements and, 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the grant agreement. Motion: Carried Action: Recommendation submitted to Council December 14, 2009. 4) ADJOURNMENT: -3- MOVED by Councillor Pietrangelo and seconded by Mayor Salci that Committee adjourn to at 6:28 p.m. and enter into an In- Camera Session. N agira,jl M C.h�SDA REPORT TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATIONS Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Transportation Services TS- 2010 -07 Tourist Area Parking Demand Study TS- 2010 -07 January 25, 2010 1) That the Tourist Area Parking Demand Study be adopted. 2) That staff proceed with the public process to amend the Zoning by -law to incorporate the new parking standards and recognize existing approvals (built and unbuilt) through site specific provisions. 3) That the Official Plan be amended to eliminate the submission of Parking Demand Studies to rationalize further reductions to parking requirements. 4) Parking Demand Studies continue to be accepted for land uses not surveyed. 5) Developers will continue to have the benefit of contributing toward cash -in -lieu for parking if unwilling or unable to provide the required parking, subject to the property being located within an approved cash -in -lieu area. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Parking Demand Study authorized by council was undertaken to assess actual parking needs in the tourist area and was commissioned in response to parking reduction requests for new applications. Thus, in lieu of developers having to provide site specific parking studies to justify a reduction, over 3000 field surveys were conducted to obtain the parking /travel modes of patrons visiting over 50 establishments. The surveys were carried out over 3 tourist peak seasons. The results of the study indicate that the parking requirements for the majority of land uses in the tourist area are over - represented in the current zoning by -law. Therefore, the majority of developments will benefit by applying the new rates. There is however one land use, hotels /motels, where the parking requirements may be somewhat higher. These rates, however are justified and validated through the surveys and represent the needs of our tourist community. To provide additional parking relief for hotels /motels a bus substitution has been introduced and is encouraged as a form of Transportation Demand Management. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) is a general term for various strategies that increase transportation system efficiency. It emphasizes the movement of people and goods, rather than passenger passenger cars and gives priority to more efficient modes (such as walking, cycling, public transit, ride sharing) particularly under congested conditions. Managing parking availability, both public and private is one method of � I4Y�:'� . k1a_n 'i Y h , £ 3 __ k . ,t °. l and Use; Category Proposed parking Ra te PFOpcsed Rats' Change Restaurants 1 space per 5 seats 1 space per 10 seats 4, Retail store 1 space per 25 m 1 space per 60 m Motel Hotel Motel 1 space per 1.3 rooms Hotel 1 space per 2.0 rooms 1 space per 10 seats 1 space per 5.5 m assembly 1 space per 25 m2 substitution currently not available Base Room Rates for Motel = T t 4, 4 New 1 space per 1.25 rooms Base Room Rates for Hotel 1 space per 1.25 rooms Ancillary Restaurant < 300 seats = no additional spaces > 300 seats = 1 space per 15 seats Ancillary Meetinq /Convention Room < 1400 m = no additional spaces 1 space per 66 m for 1400 m AncillaryRetail Area no additional spaces Bus Parking Space Substitution 1.0 bus parking space = 20 passenger cars parking spaces. Maximum substitution of 40 spaces. Museum 1 space per 50 m 1 space per 150 m 4, Tattoo parlor 1 space per 40 m - 1 space per 2 seats N/A Amusement game ** establishment 1 space per 5 person lawfully occupied 1 space per 75 m N/A Theatre /cinema 1 space per 5 seats 1 space per 10 seats ,I, January 25, 2010 -2- TS- 2010 -07 transitioning towards and encouraging alternate travel modes ie. transit, walking etc. Again, as previously stated, the results of the surveys indicate that the parking requirement in the tourist area is typically Tess than the current Zoning By -law requirements. This is primarily due to the concentration of establishments which in turn encourage drivers to park in one location and walk to various sites rather than driving to each site. Therefore statistically, each establishment is responsible for a portion of a parking space, rather than having to provide what would typically be one full parking space. This is the prime factor in justifying the lower parking requirement in the tourist area, and is reasonable given that the majority of establishments are not destinations in themselves. The recommended parking rates for the tourist core as defined by the attached study area drawing is summarized in the following table: N/A - Comparison not available due to unit type difference ** The Amusement game establishment category has been amended since the previous report to reflect a requirement of 1 parking space per 75 square metres from 30 square metres. BACKGROUND Further to report TS- 2009 -02 Tourist Area Parking Demand Study presented to Committee on April 20, 2009 a public meeting was subsequently held on June 17. Five members from the public, several staff members and a representative from the consulting firm Totten January 25, 2010 -3- TS- 2010 -07 Sims Hubicki attended the meeting to answer questions and address concerns. Following the public meeting, correspondence was received from the legal firm of Sullivan Mahoney suggesting revisions and additions to the recommended parking requirements for developments, in lieu of what was presented on April 20, 2009. The correspondence received consisted of eight (8) suggestions as noted in their attached letter. Upon reviewing the suggestions /comments staff have the following responses to the eight (8) comments: 1. The request to revise the definition of "Gross Leaseable Floor Area" may better be addressed through a Zoning Bylaw amendment which is in currently in draft form, as this definition would be applicable Citywide, and would not be specific to this study. 2. A rate for uses defined as an "amusement game establishment" was developed and calculated at 1 space per 75 square metres. Developers will still have the option of submitting Parking Demand Studies for uses classified as "amusement park" type activities. Given the multitude of potential variables in this category, it is virtually impossible to provide an overall parking rate for the category. Instead an analysis of each amusement ride /activity will need to be carried out with attention to ride /activity duration, capacity for a peak hour operation, and overall park area to assess circulation and the interactivity of the proposed rides /activities. 3. The resulting rate for the two restaurant classifications was: a. Fast food - restaurant offering only counter service: 1 parking space per 12.1 seats. b. Quality food - restaurant offering table service: 1 parking space per 7.8 seats The aggregate rate of both restaurant type classifications is 1 space per 10 seats. Adopting an aggregate rate rather than separating the rates results in a more liberal rate as the majority of restaurants in the area provide table service. Furthermore, separate rates would require developers to identify the restaurant classification type during the site plan and /or zoning application approval process, often which is not identified or known by the developer until later in the process. 4. Hotel developments that have previous site specific zoning approvals, but are currently unbuilt, can be addressed during the implementation stage where new parking standards are to be introduced. The approach which will be advanced to the public meeting stage is that any pre- existing site specific zoning will have a special provision which will include parking ratios for hotel rooms, meeting rooms and restaurants at the current 79 -200 rates. In the event the site specific zoning contained a special parking ratio or exempted certain uses from providing parking these will be brought forward. The revised standards will also be added a a special provision giving the developer the choice of using whatever standard is less at the time of building permit. January 25, 2010 -4- TS- 2010 -07 5. The 2 -bus parking space substitution in lieu of 20 parking spaces per bus, resulting in a maximum of 40 Tess parking spaces is included as a strategy to promote Travel Demand Management (TDM) and to encourage alternate modes of transportation. At this time, our surveys indicate that the majority of patrons do still arrive to hotels by passenger cars in the peak tourist season. Thus providing an arbitrarily higher or unlimited bus substitution rate not supported by studies, is n'ot considered prudent at this time, as there is insufficient evidence to support a modal shift towards even more bus travel during the peak season. Implementing an arbitrary number may result in a parking shortage at hotels during the peak season of July and August when the majority of passenger cars periods. Therefore, until there is a mode shift towards higher bus travel to hotels during the peak period, the 2 -bus parking space substitution is equitable. In the future, when and if a mode shift occurs and is justified through studies, the bus substitution rate could at that time be reconsidered. 6. Any property which has site specific zoning and which had been constructed (in whole or in part) can be recognized through site specific provisions including current parking requirements under 79 -200. The approach which will be advanced will be to include site specific provisions for parking rations at the current 79 -200 rates for all rooms, restaurant seating and meeting space at current ratios. This will ensure the operation remains a legal use and does not create a legal non - conforming situation. An application for building permit(s) to achieve full build -out of the site as permitted under zoning will be subject to the site specific zone provisions of the site. Any new rezoning application for expansion will be considered under the zoning provisions in place for the site at the time the application is submitted. 7 The collected data indicates that a 300 -seat restaurant within a hotel was the threshold which separated ancillary use eateries from a destination type restaurant. A destination restaurant is expected to attract hotel guests, walk -by traffic as well as a number of patrons from the community that choose to drive specifically to the restaurant. Thus, the parking rate of 1 space per 15 seats is applied to all seats in the restaurant given the anticipated patronage. Smaller eateries, with less than 300 seats are relieved from providing parking as their patronage is expected to primarily consist of hotel guests and walk -by traffic. A stand -alone restaurant rate is proposed as 1 parking space per 10 seats. Recognizing that a destination restaurant located within a hotel attracts patrons staying within the facility as well as outside patrons, the corresponding ratio is 1 parking space per 15 seats. Thus, larger restaurants within hotels still benefit by a reduction of an additional 50% in comparison to standalone restaurants. The same rationale was applied to conference facilities exceeding 1400 square metres in size. 8. Findings from our studies indicate that results tend to widely fluctuate when individual site specific parking studies are carried out. Fluctuations in study results occur due to a variety of reasons, such as study day, study month, weather conditions etc. The parking rates proposed in this report are weighted averages of several studies that were carried out at the same locations for various land uses and are thus considered to be more accurate than results from one study alone. Therefore, unless a specific land use has not been surveyed, there is no reason for January 25, 2010 -5- TS- 2010 -07 accepting site specific parking studies, as sufficient data is available. However, for land uses that have not been surveyed, developers will continue to have the option to submit Parking Demand Studies. A meeting was held with Ms. Gilberti, Planning and Transportation staff in January. Discussions revolved primarily around the implementation of the by -law and the impact to specific developments. Ms. Gilberti stressed that the following conditions were of significant importance. 1. Developments with existing approvals, that are not yet built should be able to use the parking standards in either 79 -200 or the new standards, whichever is less. 2. Until the new standards are formally adopted in the zoning by -law, developers will still have the opportunity to use the standards in 79 -200. 3. The new standards apply only to the expansion of a future development. 4. The 2 -bus parking space substitution in lieu of 40 passenger cars be in increased to 5 bus spaces for larger hotels based on a prorated system dependant on the number of hotel rooms. 5. Bus parking spaces may be accommodated in off -site lots. 6. The parking standard of 1 space per 15 seats for restaurants in hotels exceeding 300 seats, should apply only to the number of seats over 300, with the first 300 seats requiring no parking spaces. The response to Sullivan- Mahoney addresses several of the above issues. In general, staff is supportive of Ms. Gilberti's requests # 1 through #3. Staff is also supportive of #5 subject to the development having off -site parking tied through zoning to the hotel development. Staff is unable to support #4 and #6 at this time, given the results of the study. ANALYSIS /RATIONALE Developments in all land uses other than hotels /motels will unquestionably benefit by the new rates. This is reasonable given that these facilities are not "destinations" in themselves. Alternately, land uses that are more of a "destination" source tend to not benefit greatly ie. Hotels and motels (particularly those with limited ancillary uses) as the rate for rooms has increased from 1/2 parking space per room to .80 parking space per room. However, the room rate is offset by the elimination of a corresponding parking ratio for each ancillary use in hotels /motels ie. Retail, restaurants with 300 seats or less, breakfast areas etc. Also, to further reduce the parking requirement at hotels /motels, a substitution of 40 parking spaces is available if 2 bus parking spaces are provided. Although it is recognized that the majority of patrons still travel to hotels via passenger cars during the peak season, the substitution is a method of encouraging alternate modes of transportation by incorporating a Transportation Demand Management strategy. The following chart provides examples of various existing hotels, and the respective number of parking spaces currently required under by -law 79 -200. (Given the information January 25, 2010 -6- TS- 2010 -07 on the site plan used). Also, the number of parking spaces based on the new standards are provided, which also capture the 2 -bus substitution (subtracting 40 parking spaces), under the heading "with bus substitution ". These are examples only to show the difference in parking standards. There is no intention to request existing establishments that are built to comply with the new standards should they show an increase in parking requirements. However, if the existing property benefits from a lower rate, an opportunity to use the new standards will be available when adopted. Facility Cash -in -Lieu Overview By -law 79 -200 vs. New Standards Parking Requirement Examples Parking Requirements Parking Requirements Based on 79 -200 Based on New Standards Without Bus Substitution With Bus Substitution Difference Difference Imperial Hotel 110 114 +4 74 -36 Clarion Hotel 131 153 +22 113 -18 Sheraton Fallsview 380 312 -68 272 -108 Westin 328 414 +86 374 +46 Best Western 119 129 +10 88 -31 Doubletree 199 179 -20 139 -60 Days Inn 147 111 -36 71 -76 Embassy Suites (Phase 1) 337 420 +83 380 +43 Marriott & Ext. 296 349 +53 309 +13 Hilton(full buildout) 1053 815 -238 775 -278 Oakes Inn 164 192 +28 152 -12 HOCO Property 815 747 -68 707 -108 (Information based on plans, and actual numbers may vary given site plan amendments) There may be instances where developments are not able to physically accommodate the required parking, and /or would prefer to maximize the building footprint. In this case, the existing cash -in -lieu policy may be applied subject to certain conditions being fulfilled. The following is an overview of the policy. • This policy was developed in 1973, updated in 1991 and in 2002 • Was developed to encourage re- development and revitalization in established areas • there are 4 cash -in -lieu areas within the city • Tourist commercial core • Downtown central business district • Chippawa commercial area • Main /Ferry business area • Cash -in -lieu is not a right but the exception to the rule which may be granted when • hardship prevails • a change of use in an existing structure is proposed • a development is contributing to the revitalization of the area • for developments that will have a "minor impact" on the area Cash payments are 1 /2 the estimated cost of providing each required parking space. In 2001, an assessment of land values in the cash -in -lieu areas was undertaken with a January 25, 2010 resulting cost of $24,000 for a parking space within the tourist commercial area. Thus, subject to a property qualifying for cash -in -lieu, an applicant would have the option of contributing 1 /2 equating to $11,900 per space for parking relief. The payments may also be made in installments with a maximum of 5 annual equal payments. The cash -in -lieu funds deposited to the city are for use towards the construction of future parking lots. Many properties within the tourist area currently do not meet the parking standards of 79- 200 as they preexisted the by -law. These properties are credited the non- existent parking spaces which are termed "grandfathered ", and upon redevelopment these parking space credits are transferred to the new development. Also, there are a number of properties that are completely exempt from providing parking. Thus, the properties that fall into one of the above categories will always have a deficit in actual parking needs for their establishment. At this time, the combination of parking spaces available in municipal lots and on- street, private commercial parking lots and on private property adequately accommodates the parking needs during the peak tourist season. However, should private developments not provide adequate parking spaces for their needs, and /or private commercial parking lot operators redevelop their properties to a use other than for public parking, a parking shortfall may potentially result in the future. Thus, it is of significant importance to continue collecting cash -in -lieu payments from developers for the parking space shortage that they do not physically provide. Otherwise, the onus may then be on the City to construct additional parking facilities, financially burdening the taxpayers, as cash -in -lieu contributions have been waived. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Study Area drawing Correspondence from Sullivan Mahoney dated June 24, 2009 Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: /r“.4 -7- TS- 2010 -07 Karl Dren, Director of Transportation Services 4,ic Alex Herlovitch, Q!rector of Planning & Development )2-4--74/N-A Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services Ken Todd, Chief Administrative Officer � TS- 2010 -07 Tourist Area Parking Niagaraj3alls Demand Study Limits of Study Area NORTH January 20, 2009 via fax #905 - 357 -9293 City of Niagara Falls 4310 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023 Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5 Attention: Councillor Carolynn Ioannoni, Chair Members of the Community Services Committee Dear Ms. Ioannoni and Members of the Community Services Committee: Re: TS- 2010 -07 Tourist Area Parking Demand Study Please reply to the Niagara Falls Office As you may be aware, we represent a number of stakeholders who have a keen interest in the Tourist Area Parking Demand Study (the "Study ") which has been presented to you for adoption. Given that the undersigned will be on holidays from January 20, 2010 through to January 26, 2010, we are requesting that this matter be deferred so that we may have an opportunity to review the Study with our clients and make representations to the Committee. Although it is acknowledged that the Study's recommendations have been revised in a positive manner on a number of points, we have some ongoing concerns with the following recommendations: 1. That, irrespective of whether a hotel, for example, has five hundred (500) rooms or fifty (50) rooms, a maximum of two (2) bus parking space substitutions in lieu of twenty (20) parking spaces per bus is proposed; 2. That a parking standard of one (1) space per fifteen (15) seats per restaurant in hotels exceeding three hundred (300) seats will apply to all seats rather than only to the number of seats over three hundred (300); and 3. That parking demand studies will no longer be accepted for land uses such as restaurants, hotels, retail stores, museums, etc. notwithstanding the fact that a number of recent parking demand studies in the tourism area have been adopted by Council with substantially reduced parking requirements than that which is being proposed. Should this recommendation prevail, a stakeholder who has insufficient parking shall only have the option to pay cash in lieu rather than 40 Queen Street, P. O. Box 1360, St. Catharines, Ontario L2R 6Z2 Telephone: 905 -688 -6655, Facsimile: 905- 688 -5814 4781 Portage Road, Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 6B1 Telephone: 905- 357 -0500, Facsimile: 905- 357 -0501 waw.sullivan- mahoney.com V.F. Muratori, Q.C. J.M. Gottli S J. Premi L.KParsons P.B. Bedard Culliton C. D'Angelo CJ. Bittle T.A. Richardson J.R. Bush R. Vacca J.P. Maloney P.M. Sheehan P.A. Mahoney T. Wall S.E.Wells Of Counsel (Commercial Law): M.D. Kriluck W.B. McKaig B.A. Macdonald K.A. Book M.D. Atherton J. Dallal M.J. Bonomi B.J. Troup D.A. Goslin G.W. McCann M.F. Adams Yours very truly, SULLIVAN MAHONEY LLP Per: Rocco Vacca RV:jb c.c. Alex Herlovitch, Planning Department Dean Iorfida, City Clerk Marzenna Carrick, C.E.T. Manager of Traffic Operations Niagara 21' Group Inc. HOCO Limited Niagara Clifton Motor Limited Page 2 Thank you in advance for your consideration of our request. We remain hopeful that new parking ratios, which are long overdue, will be achieved through a process of communication, consultation and consensus with the stakeholders. January 20, 2009 via fax #905 - 357 -9293 City of Niagara Falls 4310 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023 Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5 E VAN MAH N EY,. LAWYERS Attention: Councillor Carolynn Ioannoni, Chair Members of the Community Services Committee Dear Ms. Ioannoni and Members of the Community Services Committee: Re: TS- 2010 -07 Tourist Area Parking Demand Study As you may be aware, we represent a number of stakeholders who have a keen interest in the Tourist Area Parking Demand Study (the "Study ") which has been presented to you for adoption. Given that the undersigned will be on holidays from January 20, 2010 through to January 26, 2010, we are requesting that this matter be deferred so that we may have an opportunity to review the Study with our clients and make representations to the Committee. Although it is acknowledged that the Study's recommendations have been revised in a positive manner on a number of points, we have some ongoing concerns with the following recommendations: 1. That, irrespective of whether a hotel, for example, has five hundred (500) rooms or fifty (50) rooms, a maximum of two (2) bus parking space substitutions in lieu of twenty (20) parking spaces per bus is proposed; 2. That a parking standard of one (1) space per fifteen (15) seats per restaurant in hotels exceeding three hundred (300) seats will apply to all seats rather than only to the number of seats over three hundred (300); and 3. That parking demand studies will no longer be accepted for land uses such as restaurants, hotels, retail stores, museums, etc. notwithstanding the fact that a number of recent parking demand studies in the tourism area have been adopted by Council with substantially reduced parking requirements than that which is being proposed. Should this recommendation prevail, a stakeholder who has insufficient parking shall only have the option to pay cash in lieu rather than V.F. Muratori, Q.C. J.M. Gottli S.J. Premi L.KParsons 40 Queen Street, P. O. Box 1360, St. Catharines, Ontario L2R 6Z2 Telephone: 905- 688 -6655, Facsimile: 905 - 688 -5814 4781 Portage Road, Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 6B1 Telephone: 905- 357 -0500, Facsimile: 905 -357 -0501 www.sullivan-mahoney.com P.B. Bedard R.B. Culliton C. D'Angelo C.J. Bittle T.A. Richardson J.R. Bush R. Vacca J.P. Maloney P.M. Sheehan P.A. Mahoney T. Wall S.E.Wells Of Counsel (Commercial Law): M.D. Kriluck W.B. McKaig B.A. Macdonald K.A. Book M.D. Atherton Please reply to the Niagara Falls Office J. Dailal M.J. Bonomi B.J. Troup D.A. Goslin G.W. McCann M.F. Adams Yours very truly, SULLIVAN MAHONEY LLP Per: Rocco Vacca RV:jb c.c. Alex Herlovitch, Planning Department Dean Iorfida, City Clerk Marzenna Carrick, C.E.T. Manager of Traffic Operations Niagara 21 Group Inc. HOCO Limited Niagara Clifton Motor Limited Page 2 Thank you in advance for your consideration of our request. We remain hopeful that new parking ratios, which are long overdue, will be achieved through a process of communication, consultation and consensus with the stakeholders. June 24, 2009 Dear Ms. Carrick and Mr. McGill: V.F. Muratori, Q.C. J.M. Gott li S.J. Premi N.L. Paduraru P.B. Bedard R.B. Culliton C. D'Angelo L.K.Parsons SULLIVAN MAHONEYLLP L_ AWYLRS Via Fax #905 -353 -0651 & Email: mcarrick(i)niaRarafalls.ca City of Niagara Falls 4310 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023 Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5 Attention: Marzenna Carrick, C.E.T. — Manager of Traffic Operations Via Fax #905- 682 -4495 & Email: john. mcjiilaaecom. com AECOM formerly (Totten Sims Hubicki Associates) 30 Hannover Drive St. Catharines, ON L2W ()Al Attention: John McGill, P. Eng., PTOE Re: Tourist Area Parking Demand Study Public Information Meeting — June 17, 2009 This letter is written further to our attendance at the Public Information Meeting on June 17, 2009 in respect to the Tourist Area Parking Demand Study (the "Parking Study "). As you are aware, we represent a number of affected stakeholders. Although our clients are generally in support of the recommendations contained in the Parking Study, we would like to take this opportunity to suggest some revisions or additions to the recommendations keeping in mind that Council has the jurisdiction to make certain policy decisions including the exemption of certain areas within the tourist area from the proposed parking rates and /or the exemption from parking for certain uses within the tourist area. Our clients will be considering their position in this matter once we receive your response to the issues outlined below. Our comments in respect to the Parking Study are as follows: 1. A number of the parking rates are based upon the area occupied by the use referred to as the "Gross Leaseable Floor Area ". Section 2.22 of Zoning By -law 79 -200 defines this term as generally being the aggregate of the horizontal areas of each floor in a building measured to and including the outside walls. We reiterate our comment from the Public Information Meeting that the definition of this term ought to be revised to exclude those areas which are not accessible by the public generally being the "back of house" including storage areas, office areas, employee break rooms and washrooms, etc. 40 Queen Street, P. O. Box 1360, St. Catharines, Ontario L2R 6Z2 Telephone: 905- 688 -6655, Facsimile: 905- 688 -5814 4781 Portage Road, Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 6B1 Telephone: 905- 357 -0500, Facsimile: 905- 357 -0501 www. sul l ivan- mahoney. com T.A. Richardson J.R. Bush R. Vacca C.J. Bittle P.M. Sheehan P.A. Mahoney T. Wall J.P. Maloney Of Counsel (Commercial Law): M.D. Kriluck W.B. McKaig B.A. Macdonald K.A. Book S.E.Wells Please Reply to Niagara Falls Office J. Dailal M.J. Bonomi B.J. Troup D.A. Goslin G.W. McCann M.F. Adams 2 2. Currently, there is no specific parking rate for uses such as "miniature golf courses" or indoor or outdoor "amusement rides ". As such, in these cases a Site Specific Parking Demand Study is required. This runs contrary to one of the stated purposes for the Parking Study which is to reduce the need for Site Specific Parking Demand Studies. Therefore, we are suggesting that parking rates be established for these uses and similar uses in consultation with the stakeholders before this matter proceeds to Council. 3. With respect to the proposed parking rates for restaurants, it is noted that no distinction is being made between fine dining restaurants and fast food restaurants. The results of the surveys summarized in the Parking Study illustrate that the parking needs for fine dining restaurants are substantially greater than fast food restaurants. It is further noted that a recent Site Specific Parking Demand Study completed by Delcan in respect to the former Pilgrim Inn site on Clifton Hill recommended a 50% reduction in the parking rate for fast food restaurants versus fine dining restaurants. Accordingly, we are requesting that you consider the same reduced parking rate for fast food restaurants. 4. It is noted that in the case of hotels with no ancillary services, parking rates will increase by 30 %. It is further noted by Mr. Herlovich that even those sites that have received Site Specific Zoning By -Law Approvals from Council but have yet to receive Site Plan Approval or have commenced construction, will be required to provide parking in accordance with the new parking rates. We are requesting that consideration be given to not applying the new parking rates to sites which have previously received Site Specific Zoning Approvals in the case where the new parking rates will result in an increase in parking requirements (ie. hotels with no ancillary services). We believe that there is justification for this position on the basis that said sites were previously approved by Council with parking demands and needs considered at that time. In our considered opinion, an increase of 30% in parking requirements for a site may result in a development not proceeding at all. 5. The Parking Study recommends a bus parking space substitution whereby one (1) bus parking space would be equal to twenty (20) vehicle parking spaces to a maximum substitution of forty (40) spaces (ie. two bus parking spaces). Although the inclusion of a substitution provision is a positive improvement, we have two points of concern. First, the bus parking space is not allowed to be offsite. As you are aware, a vast number of the high rise hotels in the City operate with offsite parking lots incorporated in its zoning and site plan approval. We see no reason why a bus parking space could not be located offsite given that the bus would drop off and pick- up guests at the entrance of the hotel in any event. Second, it is not equitable in our opinion to have a hotel with one hundred (100) rooms being treated the same way as hotel with five hundred (500) rooms in respect to the opportunity to substitute bus parking spaces for vehicle spaces. Accordingly, we are suggesting there be a maximum substitution of forty (40) spaces for a hotel with one hundred and forty (140) or less rooms and for every seventy (70) rooms thereafter a bus parking space substitution would be allowed with no maximum substitution. 6. Based on comments by Mr. Herlovich at the Public Information Meeting, it is our understanding that if the proposed new parking rates are approved by Council, the new parking rates will apply to any existing uses within the tourist area automatically without the need for any action to be taken by the owner. On the other hand, if the use has specific parking standards set out in its Site Specific Zoning By -law without any reference to By -law 79 -200, then the owner will need to bring an Application for Zoning By -law amendment or variance presumably to enjoy the new parking rates. Please confirm that this writer's understanding is correct on this issue. 7. With respect to the parking rates which would apply to restaurants in hotels and meeting rooms in hotels, it is understood that if the aggregate of restaurant seats is less than three hundred (300) 8. It is our understanding that the proposed recommendations include a proposed official plan amendment to prohibit any Site Specific Parking Demand Studies within the tourism area for the uses considered in the Parking Study. We have concerns with this recommendation. We believe the door should be left open to any proponent to pursue reductions in parking demand on a site specific basis. Although we agree that the proposed parking demand rates will result in fewer Site Specific Studies, a prohibition on this issue should not be put in place. For example, it is noted that the survey results for restaurant uses on Clifton Hill justify a range of parking demand rates from one (1) space per thirty (30) seats to one (1) space per ninety -five (95) seats. However, the parking demand rate being recommended is one (1) space per ten (10) seats. Based on these results, it would only exaggerate the resulting inequity to prohibit a property owner on Clifton Hill to pursue a Site Specific Traffic Demand Study in this case. We trust that there are a number of other similar cases within the tourist area. and the aggregate of meeting room area is less than 1400 square metres, then in each case, no parking would be required. However, if the opposite were true, then in each case the proposed parking rates would apply to all of the restaurant seats and all of the meeting room space. With respect to the issue of the restaurants, the rationale given was that any restaurant with more than three hundred (300) seats could be characterized as a destination type restaurant rather than an ancillary use within a hotel and therefore there is a parking need. Applying this rationale, we would suggest that the aggregate of the number of restaurant seats be of no relevance and that the proposed parking rates of one (1) per fifteen (15) seats would apply only to a restaurant within a hotel with greater than three hundred (300) seats. Also, clarification should be made to exempt from the parking rates any breakfast room or restaurant which is only open to guests of the hotel. For instance, many major hotel chains now offer a complimentary breakfast to its guests in a designated area which otherwise is not used as a restaurant and which is not open to the general public. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on behalf of our clients. We look forward to receiving your position on the matters noted above in due course. We remain confident that new parking ratios, which are long overdue, will be achieved through a process of communication, consultation and consensus with the stakeholders. Should you require any additional information or clarification on the above, please do not hesitate to contact this writer. Yours truly, SULLIVAN MAHONEY LLP Per: Rocco Vacca RV:jb c.c. Alex Herlovich, Planning Department Niagara 21 Group Inc. Hoco Limited Niagara Clifton Motor Unlimited 3 Niagara, a s, rx��irA REPORT TO: Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario SUBMITTED BY: Community Services Department EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MW- 2010 -03 January 25, 2010 SUBJECT: MW- 2010 -03 Mewburn Road Bridge (Mewburn Road - Concession 6 Road) Resolution from the Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake RECOMMENDATION That staff be directed to pursue funding assistance for the demolition and replacement of the Mewburn Road Bridge and further that By -Law No.2009 -172 be amended to restrict access to the structure by all users. In addition, staff be directed to install signage and barriers that will preclude any physical access to the structure and that notice of this decision be given to the property owners, CN Rail, Canadian Transportation Agency and the Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake. and that Mr. Iseppon's comments be referred to staff to investigate ownership & cost sharing for replacement of the rail bridge The Mewburn Road Bridge has been closed to vehicular traffic since last April pending the outcome of a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA). This process is nearing completion with the preferred alternative yet to be selected. In any case, the removal of the existing structure will be necessary as its condition is beyond repair. At its meeting on November 2, 2009, Council considered the recommendation set out in report TS- 2009 -44 and subsequently passed By -Law No. 2009 -172. At that time Council made a decision to allow access for pedestrian purposes only. The Public Works staff at the Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake has been actively engaged in the closure and the EA process given the structure's location on an important connector road between the two municipalities. City Council's decision was forwarded to the Town's Director of Public Works for information. At its meeting on December 14, 2009, the Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake Council passed a resolution offering their support for Federal or Provincial funding assistance and requested that the City reconsider its position with respect to the continued use of the bridge for non - vehicular traffic. Municipal Works staff continues to have concerns about the structural integrity of the bridge and the false impression that it may be safe to use despite the installation of warning signs advising pedestrians to use at their own risk. Staff also believes that a full closure of the structure raises the urgency of this matter and strengthens the City's position in its pursuit for funding from external sources. The EA is expected to be completed within the next 2 -3 months and, barring any Part it Order Requests, the preferred solution will be identified after the feedback from the public January 25, 2010 -2- MW- 2010 -03 and various agencies is considered. Given the preliminary assumption that the costs will range from $1 to $3 million it is not likely that the City will be in a position to afford this expenditure this year without a significant contribution from other external funding sources. BACKGROUND City Council adopted the recommendations set out in report MW- 2009 -42 on June 8, 2009 which provided for the temporary closure and investigation of solutions for the replacement of the Mewburn Road Bridge over the CN Railway. On August 31, 2009, City Council approved the initiation of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process and engagement of the consulting firm DelCan Corporation for this purpose (see report MW- 2009-59). On November 2, 2009, Council approved the recommendations in report TS- 2009-44 passing By -Law No. 2009 -172 being a by -law to temporarily remove the public right of passage over a highway. This by -law included provisions to "allow temporary passage of pedestrians and human powered vehicles." These resolutions were forwarded to the Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake as both municipalities have a vested interest in reestablishing the safe and functional use of this inter - municipal connector road. The Town Council, at its meeting of December 14, 2009 adopted the recommendations of its Public Works Advisory Committee requesting the City to reconsider its position regarding the continued use of the bridge for non - vehicular traffic. In addition, the Town offered its support to the City in any application for Federal or Provincial Funding for the replacement of the structure. A Public Information Centre was held on Thursday, January 14, 2010. The details of this session will be provided in a future report. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Upon completion of the EA process staff is recommending that the City make application for funding to the Gateways and Border Crossings Fund (GBCF) administered by Transport Canada. Under this program, the Federal Government will contribute up to 50% of the eligible costs of the project. The remaining share could be split in accordance with the cost apportionment formula specified in the Canada Transportation Act for grade separation projects (i.e., bridges). The application will be made immediately upon the completion of the EA. For budget purposes the following cost - sharing formula should be used; GBCF Funding (50%) $1,500,000 CN Rail Share (7.5 %) $ 225,000 City's Share (42.5 %) $1,275.000 Total Project Cost (est.) $3.0 million The City's portion of this project is not included in the five -year Capital Forecast and in order to accommodate this investment in the 2010 Budget it will be necessary to defer one or more tax - supported projects. A decision in this regard is premature until a more accurate cost estimate and the funding eligibility for this project have been confirmed. These preliminary figures are being provided for information only and subject to change. ' January 25, 2010 -3- MW- 2010 -03 COMMITMENT TO COUNCIL PRIORITIES The recommendation contained in this report is consistent with Council's priorities to identify and evaluate alternative sources of revenue and to establish infrastructure investment priorities. ATTACHMENTS 1. Report MW- 2009 -42 2. Report MW- 2009 -59 3. Report TS- 2009 -44 4. By -Law 2009 -172 5. Letter from the Town of NOTL, December 15, 2009. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Geoff Holman, Ed Dujlovi9, Executive Director of Corporate Services ector of Municipal Works Ken T dd, Chief Administrative Officer June 8, 2009 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND: Niag araFalls Re: MW- 2009 -42 Mewburn Road Bridge Over CN Railway Temporary Closure - Status Report Working Together to Serve Our Community MW- 2009 -42 The recommendation(s) contained in this report were adopted by City Council That this report be received for information and that staff be directed to meet with representatives from CN, the Region of Niagara and the Town of Niagara -on -the -Lake to address emergency response and road maintenance issues on an interim basis. On April 22, 2009, Municipal Works staff received a report from Ellis Engineering Ltd. recommending that "the City close the road immediately unless structural repairs are completed and it can be shown that the bridge can support the posted load limits. Once repaired we can then recommend Toad capacity evaluation (LCE) in order to determine a safe Toad carrying capacity. The structure should be scheduled for replacement with another bridge or level crossing NOW." The closure was implemented immediately and Council was advised of the temporary detour pending a full inspection by the structural engineers at CN. The Town of Niagara - on- the -Lake was notified so that arrangements for signs and emergency response to the immediate area could be coordinated. Staff has received notice that the Town's Public Works Advisory Committee passed a motion on May 11, 2009 requesting "the Region and the City of Niagara Falls and the Town staff meet with CN to discuss the closure of the Railroad Bridge on Concession 6 /Mewburn Road and to come back to Committee with scenarios to reopen." On May 21, 2009, CN completed a reassessment of the structure and advised our staff that the needed repairs are "too expensive and will not be completed." This means that any hope of reopening the roadway this year (even at a reduced load limit) is not likely. Community Services Department Municipal Works June 8, 2009 The single -lane structure needs to be reconstructed to meet the current Ontario Bridge Code. To complicate the matter further, the Region's Transportation Sustainability Review (see report MW- 2009 -30 attached) identified this section of Mewburn Road as being a candidate for transfer to the Region of Niagara due to its inter - municipal connector function. The cost of replacing the existing structure with a new bridge is approximately $2,000,000. Funding for an expenditure of this nature has not been included in the 5 -year Capital Forecast. The next step is to arrange a meeting with each of the stakeholders to coordinate a short term and long term operating plan to reopen the bridge. The full range of alternatives including the construction of a level crossing, will be examined. Given the importance of this road section, permanent closure is not considered to be a practical option. Staff will prepare a recommendation for Council's consideration once the discussions are completed later this Summer. Recommended by: • Approved by: Respectfully Submitted by: Attach: Geoff Holm.: n, Di ctor of Municipal Works Ed Dujlovic, E "- utive R'rector of Community Services - 2 - MW- 2009 -42 Ken Todd, Chief Administrative Officer S: \REPORTS \2009 \MW - 2009 -42 - Mewburn Road Birdge Over CN Railway Temporary Closure.wpd Office of the Town Clerk TELEPHONE 905- 468 -3266 FACSIMILE 905 -468 -2959 May 26, 2009 Canadian National Railway Company 4 Welding Way P.O. Box 1.000 Concord ON L4K 1B9 Yours truly, Holly Dowd Town Clerk Copy: Regional Clerk City of Niagara Falls V Town Public Works • The Town of iagara Attention: Mr. John MacTaggart, P.Eng. Engineering Services First Capital of Upper Canada - 1792 n=rhe -lake Dear Mr. MacTaggart: Re: Railway Bridge on Concession 6 Road /Mewburn Road, Niagara Falls Please be advised that the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake, at its regular meeting held on May 25, 2009, approved the following motion: that the Region, the City of Niagara Falls and Town staff meet with Canadian National Railway to discuss the closure of the railway bridge on Concession 6 Road /Mewburn Road and come back to Committee with scenarios to reopen. Please contact Mr. Ewald Kuczera, Director of Public Works at 905- 468 -3278 to schedule a meeting. 1593 FOUR MILE CREEK ROAD P.O. Box 100 VIRGIL, ONTARIO LOS ITO Niagara ails Mewburn Road Bridge Over CNR wasomin Subject Area — Municipal Boundary I.MO Other Municipalities Ortho Imagery ca. 2006 August 31, 2009 MW- 2009 -59 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: MW- 2009 -59 Mewburn Road Bridge - Temporary Closure Status Report and Next Steps RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND: Niagaraflalls CANADA Working Together to Serve Our Community The recommendation(s) contained in this report were adopted by City Council That the Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake, Region of Niagara and affected area residents be notified of the extension of the temporary closure of the Mewburn Road Bridge pending the completion of a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) of alternatives. That Delcan Corporation be engaged to complete the EA in accordance with their attached proposal dated July 3, 2009 at an upset limit of $60,000 (plus GST and contingencies.) The CN Rail Bridge on Mewburn Road has been closed on a temporary basis since late April of this year pending the completion of a detailed structural analysis and load capacity evaluation. Staff has met with representatives from CN, Region of Niagara and Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake to investigate the possibility of completing interim repairs to allow the overpass to be reopened with restricted load limits. CN has now confirmed that interim repairs would not be practical and deemed the structure to have reached the end of its service life. There is considerable interest from the public to reopen the structure as soon as possible and a need to coordinate proper signage, emergency and maintenance responses until such time as full access can be reinstated. The replacement of the existing structure requires the completion of a Schedule `B' Municipal Class EA which will examine the feasibility of all practical alternatives including a permanent closure, a level crossing and a new structure. Staff has requested a proposal from Delcan Corporation and has jointly developed a work plan to achieve this end. At its meeting on June 8, 2009, Council approved report MW- 2009 -42 which directs staff to meet with CN, the Region apq the Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake officials to address emergency response and lance issues on an interim basis. 4310 Queen Street, PO. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 www.nia arafalls.ca Community Services Department Municipal Works - - MW- 2009 -59 A meeting was held on June 16, 2009 resulting in a verbal commitment from CN to complete a detailed structural analysis to determine if it was feasible to repair the bridge. On August 5, 2009, staff received an email from Mr. John McTaggart (Sr. Engineering Services Officer) stating; "We have discussed the fate of this bridge with our Structural Department and the repairs required to put the bridge back to a temporary 6 tonne capacity are too high to consider as an option. While an exact estimate is unknown, the cost is likely well in excess of $500,000. The funds that the Railway had protected for this year would not be sufficient to reinstate traffic considering the advance state of deterioration of this structure. Since our funding would not provide any effective improvement to the bridge, we have re- assigned the funds to other areas. At this time, the Railway considers the bridge to have reached the end of its service life. 1 do not have the original date of construction for this bridge but do know that is was reconstructed under Board Order No 33714, dated June 1, 1923." Mewburn Road is an inter - municipal connecting link with the Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake which also provides access to the Pine Tree village Mobile Home Park and other agricultural and estate residential properties. Closing the roadway on a permanent basis will have significant social impacts. It would be prudent to commence the EA process immediately to expedite the implementation of a preferred alternative. The EA process is expected to take up to six months barring any complications. This project was not anticipated and therefore not included in the City's 2009 -2013 Capital Projects Budget. The completion of the EA is the first step in advancing a solution to this matter and funding from reserves will be necessary. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Since this project was not considered in the 2009 Capital Budget and given the urgent need to initiate the Mewbum Road Bridge EA, staff is recommending making changes to the 2009 Approved Capital Budget based on this new information. Specifically, this project should be added to the approved capital works projects. The required funding of $80,000 to perform the EA will utilize a portion of the Special Purpose reserve set aside for the Willodell Road Bridge Replacement. To facilitate this change a change in timing of the Willodell Road Bridge replacement will be required. Specifically, the engineering for the project will still proceed as scheduled however the actual construction phase of the project will need to be re- prioritized as part of the upcoming 2010 Capital Budget deliberations. The Willodell Road Bridge replacement project was included in the 2009 Capital Budget with $20,000 set aside for engineering in 2009 and $150,000 in costs planned for 2010 in the construction of a structure that would provide non - vehicular access only. The proposed action is consistent with the City Council's Strategic Priorities namely; • establish infrastructure investment priorities, and • develop and implement a comprehensive transportation plan. August 31, 2009 - 3 - MW- 2009 -59 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: • MW- 2009-42 • Proposal for Engineering Services - Declan Corporation (August 21, 2009) Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully Submitted by: Ed D jlovic, Executive Director of Community Services Ken Todd, Chief Administrative Officer S:1REPORTS120091MW- 2009 -59 - Mewbum Road Bridge Temporary Closure.wpd , Director of Municipal Works REPORT TO: Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario SUBMITTED BY: Transportation Services SUBJECT: TS- 2009 -44 Mewburn Road - Road Closure RECOMMENDATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND TS- 2009 -44 November 2, 2009 The reoamniendntion(s) contained in this report were amendedivco mittee and ratified by City Council That Council approves the by -law appearing on tonight's agenda to prohibit passage over the Mewburn Road rail bridge. With an amendment to allow temporary passage of pedestrians and human powered vehicles. A bylaw to authorize the closure of Mewburn Road at the rail bridge has been prepared. The bylaw will be in effect until bridge remediation is completed and traffic is again allowed to pass over the rail corridor. The detour signs will be removed and replaced with "No Exit" signs, and supplementary information signs identifying the closure at the bridge. At its meeting on June 8, 2009, City Council adopted the recommendations set in report MW- 2009 -42 regarding the temporary closure of the Mewburn Road Bridge over the CN Railway. On August 31, 2009, City Council approved the engagement of Delcan Corporation to complete the Environmental Assessment that would examine options for reopening the roadway. (See MW- 2009 -59) Recent discussion with Emergency Services and Operations staff has identified the need to make the road closure signage more visible and durable so that they will not be jeopardized during winter conditions. The issue of pedestrian activity has become a concern to staff given the uncertainty of the structural integrity of the bridge. This bridge is identified as part of the Bruce Trail and staff continue to have concerns about the use of the bridge by pedestrians and non - motorized vehicles. Since the bridge is owned by CN, staff requested their position regarding the use of this structure even by non - motorized vehicles and pedestrians to which staff received the following response. "We have discussed the matter of permitting pedestrian use only and are of the opinion that no traffic of any kind be permitted to use the bridge. It appears that any safety factors with the load capacity of the bridge no longer meet standards. We are not concerned at this time that the structure will collapse since it was handling heavy traffic a short time ago. We will continue to monitorthe bridge for signs of failure and movement." John MacTaggart, P.Eng., Senior Engineering Services Officer. November 2, 2009 -2- TS- 2009 -44 The Notice of Study Commencement for the Environmental Assessment has been advertised and the first Public Information Centre is scheduled for mid - November. ANALYSIS /RATIONALE It may be another two years before remedial action is completed which would allow traffic to traverse the rail corridor. Municipal works have identified a concern regarding the quality of snow plowing on Mewburn Road around the large road - closed sign. Furthermore, detour signing is normally not used for durations that extend beyond one year In the interim, Staff is suggesting that the street be signed with a "No Exit" sign supplemented with the star burst "New" sign on top. An information sign stating "Mewburn Road Closed at Bridge" will also be posted for driver information. Section 35 of the Municipal Act gives municipalities the authority to pass a bylaw to restrict the common right of passage over highways. The opposite end of the road segment, north of the rail bridge, is located within the Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake. Staff has updated town staff on the City's undertakings. As the bridge is entirely within Niagara Falls, town officials would only need to install similar signage at the ingress to the road segment. FINANCIAL/STAFFING/LEGAL IMPLICATIONS The installation of the signs is carried out by Transportation Services staff. The labour and material costs are accounted for in the Approved 2009 General Purposes Budget. Cost studies estimate that the cost to manufacture and install the signs is approximately $725. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 1. Study Area drawing. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: J. Grubich Karl Dren, Director of Transportation Services Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services Ken Todd, Chief Administrative Officer Location of Qverpass TS-2009-44 Mewburn Road Road Closure NORTH HCQ TO BCAI1 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By -law No. 2009 - 172 A by -law to temporarily restrict the public right of passage over a highway. WHEREAS Section 35 of the Municipal Act, provides, in part, that the Council of every municipality may pass by -laws to temporarily restrict the public right of passage over a highway; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls now deems it expedient to pass this by -law; THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The public right of passage over Mewburn Road, from 1.5 kilometres north of Mountain Road to 1.7 kilometres north of Mountain Road, is hereby temporarily restricted to passage on foot or by means of human powered vehicles. 2. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute all documents that may be required for the purpose of carrying out the intent of this by -law and the Clerk is hereby authorized to affix the corporate seal thereto and to deliver such documents. Passed this second day of November, 2009. First Reading: Second Reading: Third Reading: November 2, 2009. November 2, 2009. November 2, 2009. --1 DEAN IORFIpA CITY CLERK R.T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR Office of the Town Clerk TELEPHONE 905 - 468-3266 FACSIMILE 905.468 -2959 December 15, 2009 The City of Niagara Falls City Hall, PO Box 1023 4310 Queen Street Niagara Falls ON L2E 6X5 Attention: Dean lorfida, City Clerk Dear Mr. lorfida: The Town of agara- n - ar Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake Public Works Report PW -09 -067 Concession 6 Road — Mewburn Road Bridge Please be advised that the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Niagara-on-the- Lake, at its regular meeting held on December 14, 2009, approved the following recommendations contained in Public Works Report PW -09 -067: 1.1 That Public Works staff be instructed to install a sign on Concession 6 Road, south of Warner Road, for southbound traffic advising that the Mewburn Road Bridge is not safe for pedestrian or other non - vehicular traffic, and to place a notice in the local newspaper and on the Town's website warning residents of Niagara -on- the -Lake not to use the bridge; and, 1.2 That the Town Clerk prepare a letter to be sent to the City of Niagara Falls advising of the steps that the Town intends to take with respect to the bridge and asking them to reconsider their position with respect to the continued use of the bridge for non- vehicular traffic; and 1.3 That the letter from the Town Clerk include that the Council of the Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake supports the City of Niagara Falls in any application for Federal or Provincial funding assistance towards the replacement of the structure; and, 1.4 That the letter be copied to both the Canadian Transportation Agency and CN Rail for their information. A copy of Report PW -09 -067 is attached for your reference. First Capital of Upper Canada 1792 1593 FouR MILE CREEK ROAD P.O. Box 100 VIRGIL, ONTARIO LOS 1TO cc: Page 2 Concession 6 — Mewburn Road Bridge In view of the Town of Niagara -on- the - Lake's intent outlined in Report PW -09 -067, on behalf of Council, I respectfully request the City of Niagara Falls to reconsider its position regarding the continued use of the bridge for non - vehicular traffic. Furthermore, the Council of the Town of Niagara -on- the -Lake supports the City of N g r a } any application for Federal or Provincial funding assistance towards the s tructure. , yo 0 y, ul' favourable response. Holly Dowd, Town Clerk information please contact Ewald Kuczera, Director of Public G. Hare, Chair and CEO, Canadian Transportation Agency F. Binder, Regional Manager, CN Rail J. Mactaggart,Senior Engineering Services Officer, CN Rail G. Holman, Director of Municipal Works, City of Niagara Falls Hon. R. Nicholson MP Hon. J. Bradley, Minister of Transportation K. Craitor MPP M. Dilwaria, Delcan Corporation T. Senesi, Niagara Bruce Trail Club E. Kuczera, Director, Public Works, Town of Niagara -on -me -Lake Public Works Telephone (905) 468 -3278 Facsimile (905) 468 -1722 Report: PW -09 -067 Report To: Subject: Report : PW -09 -067 PW- 3 Committee Date: Due in Council: Public Works Advisory Committee Concession' 6 Road - Mewburn Road Bridge December 07, 2009 December 14, 2009 1. RECOMMENDATION It is respectfully recommended: 1.1 That Public Works staff be instructed to install a sign on Concession 6 Road, south of Warner Road, for southbound traffic advising that the Mewburn Road Bridge is not safe for pedestrian or other non- vehicular traffic, and to place a notice in the local newspaper and on the Town's website warning residents of Niagara -on- the -Lake not to use the bridge; 1.2 That the Town Clerk prepare a letter to be sent to the City of Niagara Falls advising of the steps that the Town intends to take with respect to the bridge and asking them to reconsider their position with respect to the continued use of the bridge for non - vehicular traffic; and 1.3 That the letter from the Town Clerk include that the Council of the Town of Niagara -on -the -Lake supports the City of Niagara Falls in any application for Federal or Provincial funding assistance towards the replacement of the structure. 1.4 That the letter be copied to both the Canadian Transport Agency and CN Rail for their information. 2. PURPOSE /PROPOSAL The purpose of this report is to obtain Council's authorization to notify res Niagara -on - the -Lake of an identified safety concern. idents of 3 Lorraine Strret P:0 Box 100 Virgil, Ontario LOS 1TO Page 1 3. BACKGROUND The City of Niagara Falls recently completed a study of all its bridges and determined that the bridge over the CN mainline, located on Mewburn Road, has significant deficiencies and is unsafe to cross. A more detailed condition survey of this specific structure was completed and a copy of which is appended to this report. Mewburn Road is the extension;, of Concession 6 Road into Niagara Falls. The structure is located 0.5 kilometres south of Warner Road. The only alternative route for traffic which is destined to or originating from the area bounded by the CN mainline, King's Highway 405 and the Queen Elizabeth Way, is via Concession 6 Road bridge over Hwy 405. This presents a concern for a number of servicing issues including emergency services. The Town's Public Works Advisory Committee passed a motion on May 11, 2009 to request that "the Region and the City of Niagara Falls and the Town staff meet with CN to discuss the closure of the Railroad Bridge on Concession 6 /Mewburn Road and to come back to Committee with scenarios to re- open." That meeting was held on May 25, 2009 and a follow -up memorandum was provided to Council (see attached June 22, 2009 memorandum). Since that meeting, the City of Niagara Falls has blocked vehicles from accessing the structure and commenced a Class Environmental Assessment Study for the Mewburn Road Bridge. The Notice of Study Commencement states: "Ultimately, the study will select the preferred alternative for the crossing which will provide safe, efficient and effective movement of vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle traffic, while remaining sensitive to the needs of adjacent land uses ". 4. DISCUSSION / ANALYSIS On October 27, 2009, the Town's Director of Public Works and Roads Supervisor attended a meeting with City staff to discuss the placement of road closure signs and alternative servicing arrangements for winter control. The City and Town Fire Chiefs had previously discussed fire response coverage for the Niagara falls properties located between the CN tracks and the Town boundary limits. Niagara Falls Community Services Committee held a meeting on November 2, 2009 at which time a report (TS- 2009 -44) from Transportation Services dealing with the subject bridge closure was discussed (see attached notice and report dated November 2, 2009). Subsequently, the City's Director of Municipal Works has advised that City Council approved the use of the Mewburn Road Bridge for pedestrian purposes only. Their staff have been instructed to install -a maze barrier at either end of the structure and to install signage that indicates "Road Temporarily Closed - Pedestrians Use At Own Report : PW-09-067 PW' -'4: Risk ". Although vehicles will not be able to negotiate the crossing, the concern lies with the fact that, despite the signs, residents of and visitors to Niagara-on-the-Lake may be falsely led to believe that the structure is safe to cross on foot not knowing the true condition of the structure. As a professional engineer, the writer has expressed his concern in an e-mail to the City's Director of Municipal Works. Furthermore, staff have contacted the Town's solicitor to obtain his legal opinion from a due diligence standpoint. After receiving the Solicitor's input, staff is seeking Council's authorization as follows: 1. Installation of a sign on Concession 6 Road south of Warner Road for southbound traffic advising that the bridge is not safe for pedestrian or other non- vehicular traffic; 2. Placement of a notice in the local newspaper warning residents' of Niagara -on- the -Lake not to use the bridge; and, 3. Correspondence to be sent to the City of Niagara Falls advising of the steps that the Town intends to take with respect to the bridge and asking them to reconsider their position with respect to the continued use of the bridge for non - vehicular traffic. 5. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The cost the sign and notice is estimated at $200.00 and $150.00, respectively. 6. COMMUNICATIONS The communications effort is described by this report. 7. CONCLUSION Mewburn Road Bridge, which has commonly been used by many of the local residents of Niagara -on - the -Lake and those living or working outside of the community to access parts of Niagara -on- the -Lake has been rendered unsafe for use. In addition to being an inconvenience, there is the real concern for the residents in the immediate area to be landlocked should there be a blockage on Concession 6 Road to the north of Warner Road. Replacement of the structure should proceed with haste. As such, the Town Council should support the City of Niagara Falls in its quest for financial assistance from the upper levels of government. At the same time, the Town has a duty to discourage pedestrians from using a structure which is at risk of failure as evidenced by the structural engineer's report. Report : PW -09 -067 PW -5 Page '3 Respectfully submitted, E.J. 'Ku P zera, Mme. P.Eng. Director of Public Works First Capital of Upper Canada - 1792 A`t HM NTS Memo. Conc. 6. Mewburn Railway Bridgezpdf PW =6 Don Smith CAO Report : PW -09 -067 Page 4 REPORT TO: Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario SUBMITTED BY: Community Services Department SUBJECT: MW- 2010 -01 Tender - Downtown Infrastructure Revitalization - Phase 1 Queen Street - Crysler Avenue to Erie Avenue St. Lawrence Avenue - Queen Street to Park Street St. Clair Avenue - Queen Street to Park Street Contract # 2009 - 179 -06 RECOMMENDATION MW- 2010 -01 January 25, 2010 1. The contract be awarded to the lowest bidder Peter's Excavating Inc. at the tendered price of $1,691,354.40. 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary contract documents. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The replacement of the existing aging sanitary sewers, watermains and storm sewers at key locations within the project area was previously identified as the important first phase of a larger program of Public Realm improvements for the Downtown Area. Tenders for this contract were opened on Tuesday, December 22, 2009 and the lowest bid of $ 1,691,354.40 received from Peter's Excavating Inc. is being recommended for acceptance. Council previously approved the recommendation to proceed with the Implementation of the phased program forthe proposed Downtown Infrastructure Revitalization. This project is to form part of the approved 2010 Capital Budget. BACKGROUND Niagara Falls City Council previously approved recommendations contained in Report MW- 2009-84 on November 30, 2009 directing staff to proceed with a phased implementation plan forthe Downtown (Queen Street) Infrastructure Revitalization Project. As is noted in that report, the first phase is the replacement of aging underground infrastructure in the project area. The existing sanitary sewer on Queen Street is in excess of 100 years old, and there are known issues with respect to its severely deteriorated condition. With the recent completion of the Trunk Storm sewer on Park Street, significant storm sewer drainage areas could be removed from the sanitary sewer system through the construction of new storm sewers on St. Lawrence Avenue and St. Clair Avenue from Queen Street to Park January 25, 2010 Street. The existing watermains on St. Lawrence, Crysler, St. Clair and Erie Avenues through the Downtown Area have all been rated as "very poor" and identified for replacement. With an extensive program of Streetscaping and Surface feature improvements planned for the public realm within the Downtown area for later in 2010, it is prudent and cost effective to address any lingering and serious underground infrastructure servicing issues in advance. The Tender Opening Committee, in the presence of the Manager of Clerk's Services, Mr. Bill Matson, opened tenders on at 1:30 p.m. Tuesday, December 22, 2009 for the above noted contract. Tender documents were picked up by nine (9) Contractors and five (5) bids were received. Listed below is a summary of the totalled tendered prices, excluding GST, received from the Contractors. The tenders were checked and the corrected bids are shown in bold and marked with an asterisk ( *). 1. Peter's Excavating 2. Provincial Construction 3. Alfidome Construction 4. Centennial Infrastructure (Niagara) 5. Alfred Beam Excavating Ltd. ANALYSIS /RATIONALE - MW- 2010 -01 Stevensville Niagara Falls FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Niagara Falls Niagara -on- the -Lake Fort Erie $ 1,691,354.40 $ 1,988,696.00 $ 1,988,696.21* $ 2,065,788.40 $ 2,065,793.40* $ 2,185,832.00 $ 2,895,509.50 $ 2,895,459.50* The lowest tender was received from Peter's Excavating Inc. in the amount of $1,691,354.40. This contractor has performed similar type projects for the City. We are of the opinion that this contractor is capable of successfully undertaking this project. Timing of tenders for construction, when the planned schedule permits, can play an important role in how competitive the market will be, based on prospective bidders work loads. The project is scheduled to be completed by April 30, 2010, subject to weather delaying restoration works. This work is to be included in the approved Municipal Works Capital Budget for 2010. In report MW- 2009 -84 the anticipated and cost and funding breakdown for Phase 1 were listed as follows: Federal - Provincial ISF Program Water Capital Reserve Sewer Capital Reserve Roads Capital Reserve Total Cost - Phase 1 $ 386,666 $ 367,500 $ 460,500 $ 33,334 $ 1,248,000 By accepting the lowest tender on this project it will be necessary to allocate an additional $443,355 to cover the cost of this project. The largest source of funds will be received from the Region for the CSO /MAP Funding program. January 25, 2010 Recent discussions with Regional Niagara staff confirm that the Thorold Stone Road Extension Phase 1 project will not be required in 2010 due to delays associated with the acquisition of the property for the roadway by the Region. As a result the funding for this project will not be necessary until 2011. The funding for the Thorold Stone Road Extension Phase 1 project was approved in the 2009 Capital Budget. As a result of the above mentioned delay, the funds previously earmarked for that project from the sewer budget can be re- allocated to this project. This is consistent with the increased scope of the project in regards to sewer separation The recommended funding breakdown is as follows: Federal - Provincial ISF Program (23 %) Region of Niagara CSO /MAP Funding (22 %) Water Capital Reserve (13 %) Sewer Capital Reserve (40 %) Roads Capital Reserve (2 %) Total Cost - Phase 1 CITY'S STRATEGIC COMMITMENT Implementation of this Capital Project meets the intent of Council's Strategic Priorities to establish infrastructure investment priorities, and to strengthen and promote economic development within the City. ATTACHMENT 1. Location Plan Recommended by: Approved by: Services Respectfully submitted: -3- MW- 2010 -01 Geoff Holman, Dir ctor of Municipal Works Ed Dujlovic, Exe utive Director of Community $ 386,666 $ 377,500 $ 217,613 $ 676,242 $ 33,334 $1,691,355 Ken Todd, Chief Administrative Officer K. Schachowskoj S: \REPORTS\2010 Reports \MW - 2010 -01 - Tender 2009 - 179 -06 Downtown Infrastructure Revitalization Phase 1.wpd REPORT TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION 1. It is recommended that Sidewalk Beat 6 be revised to include the short section of municipal sidewalk on McLeod Road between St. Michael's Secondary School entrance and St. Michael Avenue. 2. That staff investigates the implementation of a Citywide Sidewalk Maintenance By- Law for Council's consideration later this year. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Community Services Department MW- 2010 -06 Sidewalk Winter Maintenance Service Requests and Policy Review MW- 2010 -06 January 25, 2010 Municipal Works staff has received a number of phone calls from concerned citizens requesting staff to extend the sidewalk winter maintenance program to include more sections. The City currently has 6 sidewalk plow beats that target those sections meeting the following criteria; Heavily - traveled pedestrian routes along arterial streets including school and bus routes, In front of public buildings, including hospitals and churches, Business Areas School routes are plowed 12:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. - Monday through Friday. These sections are plowed and salted once an accumulation of 8cm of snow has fallen and continuously maintained until a bare condition is achieved. Current manpower and equipment resources only allow us to cover about 177 km of sidewalk which represents about one -third of the City's sidewalk assets. This program does not include any off road trails or pathways. Annual reviews of the program are conducted and any changes are reported to City Council for inclusion in the Operating Budget. While staff continues to look for efficiencies by optimizing route plans, it has been increasingly difficult to add any additional sidewalk sections without incurring additional delays in service delivery. Staff believes that we can accommodate one short addition to the sidewalk on McLeod Road near St. Michael's Secondary School without creating an impact on the existing response times and the 2010 Operating Budget. Moving forward and for the benefit of future budgets staff is also recommending that a full rationalization of this service is January 25, 2010 - MW-2010-06 necessary including options to implement a By -Law that requires individual property owners to assume responsibility for the clearing of adjacent sidewalks. This alternative, which is common in other Niagara municipalities, also has its challenges which need to be sorted out in advance of any new policy change affecting this service. Accordingly, staff will need time to engage the public and examine the effectiveness of the best management practices used in other jurisdictions. Service level changes and their corresponding budget impacts will not affect the 2010 Operating Budget. BACKGROUND The City's Winter Maintenance Policy was updated and approved by City Council at its meeting of December 10` 2007. Report MW- 2007 -134 included the following excerpts pertaining to the provision of sidewalk plowing services using City forces. The current minimum maintenance standard for road plowing is 8 cm or approximately 3 inches. Our past practice was to plow sidewalks once we start to receive snow accumulation. This has set a very high service practice and created an even higher public expectation. The City of Toronto had used the road policy as a guideline for sidewalk plowing. Due to projected budget shortfalls they have just increased their side walk plowing depth to 15 cm. Other municipalities have standards that range from plowing after 8 to 10 cm of accumulation, plowing only after the storm has finished, plowing sidewalks in a priority pattern or having By -Laws that require residents and businesses to shovel the walk in front of their property. The new standard proposed in this report is to commence sidewalk plowing after there is an accumulation of 8 cm. (Same as roadway standard) The City currently owns approximately 565 km of sidewalk which increases annually by approximately 5 km, due to the assumption of Plans of Subdivision and infilling of missing sidewalk sections. The current sidewalk program is designed (and budgeted) to maintain only 177 km (less than one third). Of the current 177 km that is maintained, there is a mix between main lines or class (2) & (3) and secondary or class (4) residential roads. Sidewalks in residential areas are cleaned to service walking routes for nearby schools. This program does not include trails. Staff has received complaints from parents who believe that school routes should be primary and that main line routes should be secondary. The public has difficulty understanding that the secondary routes that service these schools connect to main line routes. As well, the busy routes with higher traffic volumes and speeds, pose the greatest risk to children's safety. Staff has experimented with plow routes in an attempt to address these concerns. Currently all sidewalks that are being maintained are receiving the same level of service. This is to limit and mitigate liability exposure. The only exception to this is the mist area around the Falls. This area is subject to rapid icing conditions that may require a machine to be on regular patrol. One of the public complaints is that machines are going over sidewalks that appear bare. What the public does not understand is that once maintenance has begun we must continue until bare sidewalks are achieved. Sidewalks that have been plowed are subjected to a freeze /thaw cycle that will cause icing conditions. January 25, 2010 -3- MW- 2010 -06 To prevent pedestrians from slipping and falling these conditions must receive an application of salt over the entire length of the 177 -km route. There will be areas that are bare, and other areas will be icy. This will not be known until the operator is on the site. There are also times when staff will apply salt to address an approaching storm that may consist of sleet or freezing rain. The new Sidewalk Winter Maintenance Program is divided into six (6) routes. There are seven (7) Trackless machines to perform this work. During an operation six (6) machines are put out with one (1) machine being kept back as a spare. Sidewalk plowing and salting takes 8 to 10 hours per route for an average storm with straight blade plows. Plows will then be sent back out to try and remove all remaining traces of snow and ice by scraping and reapplying salt. When the snow fall is heavy or over a long period of time, the machines will need to change from the standard straight plow blade to a blower attachment to handle the larger volume. This attachment requires the operator to reduce the speed of the machine. It will then take an average of 20 hours to complete a route due to the reduction of speed. Back to back storms with heavy or wet snow may force sidewalks to be snow covered for a few days, before a full and thorough cleaning can be fully completed. Sidewalk Trackless machines are operated by two (2) full -time operators and four (4) seasonal operators spread over three (3) shifts covering the city 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The seasonal shift is from mid December until mid April. Additional operators from spare lists are brought in to support the standard compliment once additional machines are required or the normal operators have exhausted their hours of work. The recent changes to the hours of work legislation have impacted our ability to cover these same routes as in previous years. One issue created by sidewalk plowing is lawn damage. Residents feel quite strongly about this issue and staff receives numerous complaints from upset residents regarding damage to the lawns. There is no simple solution to this issue. The machine plow blades need to be wider than the machine wheel base or material would simply be pushed back onto the walk by the wheels once the plow blade has gone by. In most cases the grass adjacent to the walk is higher than the walk and the blade can peel it back. Grass is most susceptible to damage, in the first few snow falls and the last few snow falls. This is because there is no frost in the ground and the lawns are soft. Also until the routes have been plowed to the point that windrows have been created operators can miss the walk edge. Early snow falls can be heavy enough that the sidewalk disappears blending into the surroundings. It then comes down to the drivers memory and land marks to determine where the walk stops, starts or turns. Lawn repair from plow damage runs from early May until completed. The more areas that are plowed the more repair that will be required. This will be especially true if we were to increase our residential plowing by going into areas that are only plowed occasionally. These areas will not be familiar to operators and in all likelihood there would be a substantial increase in lawn damage. On November 17 2008, this policy was updated to reflect changes to the sidewalk routes. Report MW- 2008 -68 recommended the removal of 9 sections and added 4 new ones. ANALYSIS AND RATIONALE Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: o l a - It is difficult for staff to measure the overall effectiveness of this service based solely on public feedback because it is not provided to all residents. While this policy intends to serve the community's needs there is continual pressure from seniors, physically - challenged and recreation enthusiasts to improve and extend this service level. In 2009, the City spent close to $359,000 and just over $247,000 in 2008. The expenses are primarily manpower and equipment costs and are subject, of course, to weather conditions in the first 4 months and last 2 months in any budget year. Areas with sidewalk immediately adjacent to the curb pose additional challenges when trying to coordinate the removal of snow from the road. COMMITMENT TO COUNCIL PRIORITIES The recommendation contained in this report is consistent with Council's priority to continue to monitor and improve the efficiency of the Corporation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Plan of new sidewalk addition H n Geoff ol ,, rector of Municipal Works Ed Du'lovic, Executive irector of Corporate Services Ken odd, Chief Administrative Officer S:\REPORTS\2010 Reports \MW - 2010 -06 - Sidewalk Winter Maintenance 2010 Report.wpd S pH CRT r _KELSEY•CRES N FFORESTVIEW BCV ; 4STIAN • KUDLAC ====-,==:== 'f GLAVCIC_Ok' UPPER CANADA DR 1 \\ WESTPORTOR !!!At O ',p \� HEIKOOP CRS z z q IELD C ES N O ,MCGARFLY. m -03- 73: ; • 3' CRT' Niagara January, 2010 KpALr� �. -- CHORUGY - 0 . ID_ FONLEE 9 < z rm Nw�1 ' PAM F! I i iOp O VA(•- -E RIE. 10 COSTA�iL DR c nNt 2 � p wr�i Tri 1 MAgCZ5t3 ST �'DF DR !,m0 WOODBINE ST AINTREE OR; ° �VINDF Ira' ( - �l �v1 i� 60WAN; a1 p or", ti � M C RC �`O .. '- p T • P "0 - 010E DR_ '9S or C \R. a q.-- 4i�ONG q e t x w �9's ' g� mo c ' ;a z ( . ,`.. otLE $T m -( ORCHARD zAQVE.PKWY` �\ \. : WOODSVIEW CRES FO AVE s1 ' Qo 1,YNEy�ST 'HARVEST ORES ' S� II SPRING BLOSSOM pR LllNDY'S1ANE - CATALINA ST ` pR PIDEAU ST4 <n ALFRED TAD ST WESSYVOOD ST. - a - ` . a > \ ALEM S T I FIJ � DR �� gs.3NRNdjl�Oti 13 FAIRFIELD PL SIATGN CRT O -- r COVE RD ._-� RE y 9 \ MCLEOD RD INDUSTRIAL TT 1♦VANLESS GRE NDAL& i ST to' r i SIDEWALK ROUTES - BEAT 6 tO p 0 a - ST' f . � 41 •� SHELDON ST 3 `'4 CRES \ ° �WOOD • HOR yry44 t • -I, O m r > Q 0 1�RCY e a �CREB m;t�rZ Ci ST m %p t6LEN.QAT - „AA w ti ISCOSI N T S _ 'C p 0 0�c m C Re3 Qmi D: : 1 I � riA 0,,c�./. 4RES 1 '.t m _ — i CRE DIZ L � r - O i cCRRE_�; AMLE 2DE � ) ICI{ Q:�CHERDRRYHI L` ' �(O RT Aii u 1 �: n '' , f I ■ MORRISON ST min ------ . --- -- • UNA PARK CRT ETHE r y DEERkIEI:D CRES sGPVEND, °. BAME7 'bIE11Fi6RT ° _ G PETRULLO CRT A V ViAN � 'z x. ' ri tLi t4 ST �.;i10 '47 Rv) STD r A ' c #1 mm ADGER P CR ES r. K: \Standards \Maintenance Routes \Sidewalk Beats.map _ LAMARSFST BURDETTE DR i 7 9ROPP ST Sj - i - 9RACKEN }` A tiL ° m COACH DR t1E • 1 Q N ;Lao S }oKES 6 -rP d KEIFFER S3 O i - G 9 Auer S DAWS -QN ST„ �` pAA.- DC1 w O P_ O k. m c = \ _ DP • LEVUEST_� #410wESt i .- FREDERI^ ST O SOP C ff RCOOK eri_ 1`907, %GARDEN ST I O Z i !(�t ' m` LEEST NG ° Gill ST % rn m C O 03; r _ Z 5T GOODSIR DIVSSION,ST Z CEEMING'pS, m° 0 mm 6 Schools O i 12 W,LIAM ST` • ' O PEfINS1ST • 111 r ALTHEA St w ' CRES, { 2 \ • , CatT ST.4 CABOT ° STEVENS VALLEY Bt4K3NTE c �, jv10NTE PJl`i' • • PROSPECT M ' Z ml I D ? , MAETLAND ST _m UNDY'S LAANE', BUCHNER PI KER ST _ .. _BARKER -ST,_ - - -- MARANDAST - _CUL.P.ST - „_ .;=.;;;;;.;= TAYLOR ST - MONROE ST _ ASH ST HURRAY ST, - • M C MIL LAN D R - '5 �F 3. 'f CHESTNUT T y m �/IC5 �AT)>: _ CRES Z - DUNN ST m m LEAWOCR C i 'c : YL CRES C OD aim ! m RF *kARgARF�S 1 m:. D p �w,” m ATL S T: E ONNIE ST _R - to ¢ Z D CR ES. : �,r Q _ .. � - -. G CHU H ILL ST Z ._ . � , :> D < y m SKIIPJER ST r < i1 Winer ST i� / 1 Y;271:MPiry w - 0.1 v ARAD ST v Q'. C ENT E NNIAL STOONCtlRD ; P : _ - - - Cy 1 pS CRES D ¢E m m m C $T_ F • . a �- -- D 3 Lq 0 DOUGLAS ST m , • AWKINS ST - -. ifL r-...-k, r HAM<INS ST VIL ' MANN ST m MCLEOD RD - - IN AVE... C ; CRI,yF C COOPER RI$ 2' m W DR '9,q l , O � `\O, LPK � \ sr suNl D '11, . � � cRF `� r te�?? 6 & CRES b D • p p BAR 1 i `e in$f E soo- HERA?• 4 ; • A C ° 'RP w D;x r - •d TRILLIUM •GF A JILL bRm . , 'c > 3� 1 O 4 _ .. ?� - - .- _ VALIANT S - ` CHELSEA BRf�T(Lz A 'b Q '' SON ,,s‘. WILDROSE OR CRES) - RB A . m`" r.. '� 1 b 0 f R! M - to OLDFIELD RD • Proposed Additional Plow Route Sidewalk Plow Route Scale 1:NTS Niagara u ,s REPORT TO: Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario SUBMITTED BY: Transportation Services SUBJECT: TS- 2010 -13 St. Clair Avenue Bus Loading /Unloading Zone RECOMMENDATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND TS- 2010 -13 January 25, 2010 That the tour bus loading /unloading zone on the east side of St. Clair Avenue between Huron Street and Queen Street be reinstated to reflect 2 hour parking between 9am -5pm, Mon -Fri, with No re- parking within 5 hrs of initial parking. The removal the tour bus loading /unloading zone on St. Clair Avenue will be replaced with vehicle parking spaces for use by the public. In the spring of 2009 the downtown BIA requested that on- street loading /unloading be provided for tour buses, primarily in the vicinity of the Gypsy Theatre and The Buttery. Subsequently, staff met with downtown BIA representatives and agreed upon two side streets that could accommodate tour bus activity. As recommended in report TS- 2009 -26, a loading /unloading zone was established on the east side of St. Lawrence Avenue between Huron Street and Queen Street and on the east side of St. Clair Avenue between Huron Street and Queen Street. After unloading passengers buses would then proceed to the Niagara Falls Transit terminal to park or have services performed, and then proceed back to the loading area to pick up the passengers. The on- street designated areas were not intended for bus parking. Since the installation of the loading /unloading zones, several complaints have been received from the public, primarily requesting that the spaces on St. Clair Avenue be converted back to vehicle parking spaces. It was believed that the tour bus activity had not materialized, and thus the spaces may best service the immediate needs of patrons of nearby businesses. A meeting with the BIA indicated that they are supportive of removing the bus loading /unloading area on St. Clair Avenue between Huron Street and Queen Street and reinstating the vehicle parking spaces. January 25, 2010 TS- 2010 -13 - 2 - The BIA continues to actively market the downtown and anticipates that tour bus traffic will materialize in the future. At that time, at the request of the BIA, potential bus loading /unloading zones will again be reviewed. ANALYSIS /RATIONALE The recommendation supports the request of the downtown BIA, in addition to addressing the parking needs of nearby businesses. FINANCIAL /STAFFING /LEGAL IMPLICATIONS The replacement of the signs is to be carried out by Transportation Services staff. The labour costs are accounted for in the 2010 General Purposes Budget. Cost studies estimate that to remove and replace the signs is approximately $300.00. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Study Area drawing Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: M.Carrick fl Karl Dren, Dir ctor of Transportation Services Ed Dujlovic, xec utive Director of Community Services Ken Todd, Chief Administrative Officer S: \General Administration \GA 1.01 Reports\2010 Community Services\01 Jan 25 \TS- 2010 -13 St. Clair Avenue Bus Loading.wpd N 11 4 ST CLAIR AVE t i . 2 o 1 1 CRYSLER AVE 5T LAWRENCE AVE BUCKLEY AVE a -1 W ONTARIO AVE ST am CRYSLER AVE CATARACT AVE ' CATARACT AVE N 111 w ZIMMERMAN AVE ERIE AVE I 1 III MI ® 1 l if Il MI III ■ CRYSLER AVE Mil MI NM Mir r MO al i • 1 lei ZIMMERMAN AVE 1 ii ONTARIO AVE C✓ 7 ERIE AVE ERIE AVE ERIE AVE ERIE AVE 11 z z cu tit 1111111. ZIMMERMAN AVE ZIMMERMAN AVE ZIMMERMAN A a z R AVE b CRYSLER AVE 5T LAWRE AVE BUCKLEY AVE , 6. a 11 re f NEN _ O 8 ST LAWRENCE AVE BUCKLEY AVE 2 0 r O X ST CLAIR AVE r 1 1 1 ST LAWRENCE AVE 1 1 f-- BUCKLEY AVE z f H Og ONTARIO AVE ONTARIO AVE 11 ST CLAIR AVE CRYSLER AVE 0 O 2 E Q. EC o o • a' O 0 c m O C M o � • Lc) C N 73 co a o Q O �z /150' Niagara, g11s rn�.ign REPORT TO: Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario SUBMITTED BY: Transportation Services SUBJECT: TS- 2010 -02 Park Street Traffic Operations Review RECOMMENDATION That an all -way stop control is installed at the intersection of Park Street and Crysler Avenue, and that staff request the NRP speeding reports and investigate a possible second all -way stop along Park Street. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS /RATIONALE TS- 2010 -02 January 25, 2010 The warrants for an all -way stop at the intersection of Park Street and Crysler Avenue have been fulfilled. There is a sight line impediment which cannot be rectified at this time. A speeding problem was not identified on Park Street. The overwhelming majority of all vehicles travelling on Park Street between St. Clair Avenue and Crysler Avenue are passenger cars. At the September 28, 2009 Community Services Committee meeting, traffic concerns on Park Street were identified by a resident. The concerns stem from motorists and commercial bus operators speeding on Park Street near St. Clair Avenue, and the existing traffic control at the intersection of Park Street and Crysler Avenue. In response to these concerns, staff carried out radar speed studies on Park Street to determine the operating speed, and carried out an intersection control review at the intersection of Park Street and Crysler Avenue. Park Street is a two -lane minor collector roadway extending in an east/west direction from Victoria Avenue to River Road. In the study area the roadway is 10 metres in width and consists of a curb face concrete sidewalk on each side. Crysler Avenue is a local residential roadway extending in a north /south direction from Bridge Street to Jepson Street. In the study area the roadway is 8 metres in width and consists of a curb face concrete sidewalk on each side. At this time, the intersection of Park Street and Crysler Avenue is controlled by a stop sign facing northbound and southbound motorists on Crysler Avenue. The results obtained from radar studies on Park Street between Ontario Avenue and Crysler Avenue revealed an operating speed of approximately 55 km /h. Although it was January 25, 2010 - 2 - TS- 2010 -02 noted that some motorists are travelling in excess of the legal speed limit of 50 km /h, a speeding problem was not observed. A vehicle classification study on Park Street revealed that passenger cars comprise approximately 97% of all traffic, with trucks, buses and tractor trailers accounting for the remaining 3 %. A possible increase in commercial bus traffic on Park Street may be attributed to commercial bus operators driving to the Niagara Falls Transit parking lot. Signs are present near the established bus loading and unloading areas on St. Lawrence Avenue and St. Clair Avenue directing commercial bus operators to the Niagara Falls Transit parking lot via Park Street. The results obtained from intersection control review at the intersection of Park Street and Crysler Avenue reveal that all -way stop control is warranted. A technical assessment of this intersection identified that the available visibility for northbound motorists on Crysler Avenue stopped at Park Street is well below the minimum safety standard per the Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads. The building on the southwest corner of the intersection is situated abutting the property line and is within the driver line of sight. Drivers must partially encroach into the intersection to acquire an unobstructed view of oncoming eastbound traffic. To improve safety at this location by reducing the potential of angle collisions between northbound and eastbound motorists, an all -way stop control is recommended for installation. The proposed all -way stop control will necessitate all motorists travelling at this intersection to complete a full legal stop. Adequate visibility at this intersection can be obtained through a future sidewalk widening on the south side of Park Street or the removal of the building. FINANCIAL /STAFFING /LEGAL IMPLICATIONS The installation of the signs and the application of pavement markings is to be carried out by Transportation Services staff. The labour and material costs are accounted for in the 2010 General Purposes Budget. Cost studies estimate that the cost to manufacture and install the signs and apply the pavement markings is approximately $1200. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Study Area drawing. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Karl Dren, Director of Transportation Services Dujlovic, xecutive Director Dujl ector of Community Services 1 Ken Todd, Chief Administrative Officer Tim Burshtein S: \General Administration \GA 1.01 Reports\2010 Community Services \01 Jan 25 \TS- 2010 -02 Park Street - Traffic Operations Review.wpd a ° z Niagara, ?a1 s REPORT TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Transportation Services TS- 2010 -03 Forestview Boulevard and Kalar Road Traffic Operations Review TS- 2010 -03 January 25, 2010 That an all -way stop control is installed at the intersection of Forestview Boulevard and Parkside Road. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The technical warrants for an all -way stop control at the intersection of Forestview Boulevard at Parkside Road have been fulfilled. The Principal of Forestview Public School identified concerns with respect to drivers travelling at excessive speeds on Forestview Boulevard and Kalar Road, increased vehicular and pedestrian traffic on Forestview Boulevard resulting from subdivision expansion, and motorist and pedestrian behaviour at the intersections of Forestview Boulevard at Kalar Road as well as Forestview Boulevard at Parkside Road. Forestview Boulevard is a collector roadway that is approximately 10.5 metres in width. The road cross - section consists of a curb and gutter on both sides, with a grass boulevard and concrete sidewalk on the north side only. A sidewalk will be constructed on the south side of Forestview Boulevard following the completion of a townhouse complex. Stopping restrictions are present on both sides of Forestview Boulevard adjacent to the school property to prohibit motorists from stopping their vehicle in this area and impeding through traffic. Kalar Road is a City arterial roadway. South of Forestview Boulevard, the recently reconstructed road consists of two through lanes in each direction, a left turns lane for northbound traffic, with each side containing a bike lane, curb and gutter, grass boulevard and sidewalk. The intersection of Kalar Road and Forestview Boulevard is signalized. Two (2) school crossing guards supervise persons crossing the north leg of the intersection. Forestview Public School is located on the north side of Forestview Boulevard. The school has an on -site school bus loading zone, kiss and ride program, and 100 parking spaces. The parking supply is double the City's Zoning Bylaw requirement. January 25, 2010 2 TS- 2010 -03 ANALYSIS /RATIONALE A traffic recorder was installed for the duration of one week on Forestview Boulevard in the vicinity of Forestview Public School to record traffic volume and speed data. Traffic volume results indicate average daily volumes of approximately 2,300 vehicles on Forestview Boulevard between Kalar Road and Parkside Road. These volumes are typical of a collector roadway. Speed studies identify that the operating speed on Forestview Boulevard is 51 km /h in the morning and 52 km /h in the afternoon. Given the 50 km /h speed limit, a speeding problem was not identified. On Kalar Road, north of Forestview Boulevard, the operating speed is 57 km /h in both the morning and afternoon. South of Forestview Boulevard, the operating speed is 56 km /h in the morning is 56 km /h and 60 km /h in the afternoon. Additional speed limit signing has recently been installed on Kalar Road between Lundy's Lane and McLeod Road to advise drivers of the legal speed limit. Staff carried out observations in the study area. The majority of students walking to school originated from the east side of Kalar Road. Motorists were observed yielding the right -of- way to the school crossing guard when they are lawfully carrying out their duties. Due to the large parking facility on the school property, drivers are able to find on -site parking and did not have to stop on the road to discharge or pick up passengers. Very few children were observed walking from the west. This may be due to the fact that the subdivision is not fully developed. A majority of drivers were observed not completing a full legal stop at the intersection of Forestview Boulevard at Parkside Road. The low compliance rate warrants police enforcement. Staff has requested the Niagara Regional Police to carry out stop sign compliance. Four collisions have occurred at the intersection of Forestview Boulevard and Kalar Road in the previous three years. However, three of the four collisions occurred before the traffic signals were operational. Staff carried out a review of the Forestview Boulevard and Parkside Road intersection to determine whether the technical criterion for an all -way stop control is met. The intersection carries approximately 150 vehicles per hour during the busiest hours of the day. The traffic volume split is nearly equal between the two roads, which is typical at intersections of two collector roads. No collision has been reported at this intersection in the previous three years, nor is there a sight line problem. However, the traffic volume and volume split ratio at the intersection has met the minimum criteria needed to satisfy the City's Residential All -Way Stop Warrants. Staff is recommending that an all -way stop control be installed at the intersection of Forestview Boulevard at Parkside Road. FINANCIAL /STAFFING /LEGAL IMPLICATIONS The installation of the signs and the application of pavement markings is to be carried out by Transportation Services staff. The labour and material costs are accounted for in the 2010 General Purposes Budget. Cost studies estimate that the cost to manufacture and install the signs and apply the pavement markings is approximately $1200. January 25, 2010 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Study Area drawing. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Bart Skiba 3 Karl Dren, Director of Transportation Services Ken Todd, Chief Administrative Officer TS- 2010 -03 Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services •� eu as ▪ II o a) m as ce L O co • 0 NY N L - E- I— l < 1— ;rr, 4: 1 •,• Niagara„lalls REPORT TO: Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario SUBMITTED BY: Transportation Services SUBJECT: TS- 2010 -04 Kalar Road Parking & Bicycle Lane Review RECOMMENDATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS /RATIONALE TS- 2010 -04 January 25, 2010 That the "no parking anytime" restriction on the west side of Kalar Road between McGarry Drive and McLeod Road be maintained. Exclusive bike lanes are in effect at all times and are designated through a municipal bylaw. For parking to be allowed on Kalar Road with a dedicated bicycling facility, even if it is only during the winter months, both uses would have to be independent of each other. This could only be accomplished if the road width was widened to accommodate the additional width for a parking lane, or converting one of the through lanes into a parking lane and a bike lane. Widening the road would require property acquisition and further reduce the driveway space available at each residential unit. Eliminating a through lane is not feasible as the technical analysis compiled for the Kalar Road Environmental Assessment identified the need for two lanes in each direction to meet projected traffic volumes. Cycling is a form of active transportation promoted in large and mid -sized jurisdiction. In the Niagara Falls Transportation Master Plan, Kalar Road is designated as a commuter bike route intended to provide an important link between future cycling facilities on Lundys Lane and McLeod Road which in turn form a portion of the overall cycling network within the city. Following the adoption of TS- 2009 -42 in October 2009 (report attached) City Council requested Staff to review the feasibility of allowing on- street parking during the winter months abutting the residential dwellings on the west side of Kalar Road between McLeod Road and Loretto /Kate S. Durdan school in addition to a review of the bike lane configuration on St. Paul Street in St. Catharines to determine whether that configuration could be incorporated on Kalar Road. The Ontario Traffic Manual identifies that designated bicycle lanes which are signed with reserved bicycle lane signs "must be used to designate on -road lanes reserved exclusively January 25, 2010 for bicycles with no time -of -day conditions." There is no time and /or date restriction applied "because bicycle lanes typically have narrow lane widths" which are insufficient for use by other travel modes. Therefore, a designated bike lane is not able to be in effect during only the summer months. Therefore, alternate configurations to accommodate both parking and a bike lane were considered. Unlike St. Paul Street, Kalar Road is ..- a major collector road consisting of two lanes in each direction with a 1.5 metre curbside bicycle lane on y each side of the road. As well, cyclists are afforded their own lane that vehicle traffic is not allowed to use. If drivers were allowed to park on Kalar Road in the winter, their vehicle would occupy the entire bicycle lane and a portion of the adjacent vehicular traffic lane. Although, there are a reduced number of cyclists in the winter, the regulations dictate that a cycling lane that is by -lawed is reserved -2- TS- 2010 -04 St. Paul Street Configuration St. Paul Street in St. Catharines is a primary collector route located in a built up urban Central Business District. It is a two -lane, two -way road consisting of one lane in each direction with an operating speed below 50km /h. Cyclists use the same lane as vehicle traffic; there is no reserved facility exclusively for bike use. However, the lane is slightly wider (.25 -.5m) than a typical lane. A "Share the Road" warning sign alerts motorists to the presence of bicyclists and encourages cooperative behaviour. To further advise drivers that cyclists are also entitled to use the road, pavement markings with the bicycle symbol and arrows are painted within the right half of the traffic lane. This type of "Share the Road " scenario is primarily used in downtown /business areas where there is a limited road right of way (road space) On- street parking is accommodated in a parking bay, similar to the indented parking bays that exist on both sides of Queen Street in downtown Niagara Falls. Motorists are able to park their vehicle without conflicting with the adjacent traffic lane. St. Catharines City officials adopted this approach given that an exclusive 1.5 metre wide bike lane could not physically be accommodated within the existing pavement width. This is an alternative method of advising motorists of cyclists sharing the road. The signs are only advisory and not regulatory, thus not requiring a by -law. January 25, 2010 -3- TS- 2010 -04 exclusively for bicycles with no time -of -day conditions. Dedicated bike lanes are preferred on high volume roads to ensure sufficient lateral clearance and maximize safety. For a "share the road" lane to be incorporated on Kalar Road as is on St. Paul Street, the dedicated bike lane would be removed and replaced with a parking lane. As a parking lane is typically 2.5m., the parking lane would encroach into the through lane, thus eliminating one through lane on Kalar Road. The elimination of this lane would cause undue traffic delays on Kalar Road, as the additional through lane is required to adequately service the traffic volumes. This area of Kalar Road experiences higher traffic volumes due to the joint school, city park and proximity to McLeod Road. Staff is of the strong opinion that the St. Paul Avenue configuration is not a suitable alternative for Kalar Road, due to: • traffic volumes on Kalar Road that necessitate two full through lanes in each direction as per the Environmental Assessment report vehicle operating speeds on Kalar Road that necessitate additional clearance between motorists and cyclists Preferred Parking Lane and Bike Lane Configuration To fulfill geometric standards to accommodate an independent parking lane and a dedicated bike lane the pavement width would need to be widened an additional 2.5m. This in turn would result in further reduced front yard and driveway space for local homeowners and would require property acquisition. Although, this alternative would meet the needs of both cyclists and homeowners, it is not considered feasible due to the financial and residential property impacts. The following comments were received from the Trails and Bike Committee regarding the bike lane on Kalar Road. "Our committee would like the continued support of Council to not allow on- street parking in the bike lane zone on Kalar Rd. south, west side, no matter what season it is. On- street parking, over a bike lane should never be encouraged, even in the winter months. And note to, that on- street parking can disrupt traffic, not just cyclists. Photo of vehicle parked and partially obstructing through lane forcing motorist to pass Kalar Rd area is an expanding and high residential area which encompasses (4) schools, Niagara Falls Girls Soccer Club, Niagara Square Mall, McBain Community Centre and the coming Boys & Girls Club that are all within a 1.5 km radius of this bike lane. This area, with planned expansion on McLeod and Kalar north (beyond Rideau) is slated to become a model commute route. We all must encourage active transportation (year round) for our citizens health and providing bike lanes only adds to the safety of cyclists and motorists who are forced to share the road. Kalar Rd is already designated a major bike route for cyclists in the network of Regional Niagara, a better route to the busier Montrose Rd, Kalar provides access to an alternate route of Thorold Stone or Lundy's Lane for cyclists to cross the QEW. We disagree with comments from residents that they "never see bicycles on Kalar Rd." and find that a false statement. Another comment received was that WE are taking parking spots away from them, to that I'd, personally like to comment that in fact, THEY are taking January 25, 2010 -4- TS- 2010 -04 a bike lane away from US. As an important side note, after the recent approved extension of this lane portion, the Trails & Bikeway Committee, with the support of Regional Health Niagara has actively began to spearhead a rolling /walking school bus program in this area, full and safe access to bike lanes is a key component." CITY'S STRATEGIC COMMITMENT Dedicated on -road bicycle facilities build upon City Council's vision for a comprehensive transportation plan that promotes active transportation and provides for alternate modes of travel. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Study Area drawing Recommended by: Recommended by: Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Karl Dren, Director of Transportation Services t.w ll„J.Ir� Alex Herlovitch, Director of Planning and Development 1744,e Denys Morrissey, Director of/Parks, Recreation & Culture Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services Ken Todd, Chief Administrative Officer J. Grubich S: \General Administration \GA 1.01 Reports\2010 Community Services \01 Jan 25 \TS- 2010 -04 Kalar Road - Parking & Bicycle Lane Review.wpd TS- 2010 -04 Kalar Road N'iagcirafalh Parking & Bicycle Lane Review Existing "No Parking" zone Existing "No Standing" zone Existing "No Stopping" zone I Existing Bicycle lane NOTE: Existing parking control shown for the west side of Kalar Road only. agaraF0 1 t 4 St t [i A REPORT TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND ANALYSIS /RATIONALE Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Transportation Services TS- 2010 -06 McLeod Road Speed Limit Review TS- 2010 -06 January 25, 2010 That the speed limit on McLeod Road between Parkside Road and Garner Road is reduced to 50 km /h. A reduction to the speed limit from 60km /h to 50km /h is warranted for the section of McLeod Road between Parkside Road west to Garner Road, as this area within the urban boundary has been experiencing rapid development. The reduced speed limit will be effective adjacent St. Michael secondary school, a group institution building located east of Garner Road and the proposed Boys and Girls Club. Staff has been requested to review the speed limit and signing on McLeod Road west of Kalar Road and on Kalar Road north of McLeod Road. McLeod Road has a 60 km /h speed limit between Thorold Townline Road and Parkside Road. East of Parkside Road, the speed limit is 50 km /h. Previously the area west of Kalar Road was rural in nature with few access points and buildings. St. Michael school previously located on Valleyway relocated to McLeod Road in 2003 -2004. The residential area initially commenced expanding west of Kalar Road in late 1990's, and currently extends to Garner Road. The area still under development results in increased traffic volumes on both McLeod Road and on Kalar Road. Most recently Kalar Road was widened to a 4 -lane cross - section with traffic signals being installed at the intersection of McLeod Road and Kalar Road. McLeod Road at Kalar Road was also reconstructed to full buildout design with the intention to widen McLeod Road east of Kalar Road to a 4 -lane cross - section. Given the urbanization, traffic volumes, land uses and access points, studies indicate that a 50km /h speed limit is justified for this section of McLeod Road. Kalar Road between McLeod Road and Lundy's Lane is currently 50 km /h, and there is no justification to warrant a lower speed limit. Given the continued development in the area and that a school and community building January 25, 2010 -2- TS- 2010 -06 is located within the study area, a 50 km /h zone is more appropriate for McLeod Road east of Garner Road. West of Garner Road, which is currently controlled by an all -way stop, the speed limit will remain at 60 km /h. An investigation of the speed limit signing on Kalar Road identified that some signs were missing during our observations, and have been since installed. In the absence of speed limit signing, the default speed limit within the City is 50 km /h and this applies to both urban and rural streets. Signs are installed at major entry ways into the City indicating "50 km /h Unless Signed Otherwise" and advertisements were published in the local newspapers in November to remind residents of the default speed limit within the municipal boundary. FINANCIAL /STAFFING /LEGAL IMPLICATIONS The relocation of the signs is to be carried out by Transportation Services staff. The labour costs are accounted for in the 2010 General Purposes Budget. Cost studies estimate that the cost to relocate the signs is approximately $240. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Study Area drawing Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: J. Grubich Karl Dren, Director of Transportation Services Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services Ken Todd, Chief Administrative Officer E 0 0 EJ - N N O co 0. (O L U) -c E� EYE `JO O O in -0 co w O 175 0 -17) 'X ® WLL.W iag Iraj a .h5 co�a�:� REPORT TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION That by -law 89 -2000 (A by -law regulating parking and traffic on City roads) appearing on tonight's agenda be approved. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The amendment of by -law 89 -2000 will authorize the Director of Transportation to install regulatory signs on city roads on a temporary basis. BACKGROUND To expeditiously address the safety of the public on a temporary basis the Director of Transportation Services may be required to authorize the immediate installation of regulatory signs ie. stop sign, yield sign. Typically, an amendment to by -law 89- 2000(A by- law regulating parking and traffic on City roads) is required prior to the installation and enforcement of these signs. However, on the rare occasion, it may be necessary to install these signs on a temporary basis and prior to by -law amendment approval. Section No. 205.02.14 of the Traffic and Parking by -law 89 -2000 currently authorizes the Director to erect parking prohibition signs as follows: "Where the Director of Transportation Services is of the opinion that, for some temporary period, the safety of the public, the proper movement of traffic, or the proper and safe performance of some vital function of the City requires the prohibition of limited parking." Therefore, Staff is recommending that this same authority be extended to include all regulatory signs. ANALYSIS /RATIONALE Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Transportation Services TS- 2010 -08 Authority for the Temporary Installation of Regulatory Signs TS- 2010 -08 January 25, 2010 Under certain circumstances, it may be necessary to erect signs on a temporary basis to ensure the safety of the public, the proper movement of traffic, or the proper and safe performance of some vital function of the City. This situation has recently occurred at the intersection of Queen Street and Erie Avenue where an all -way stop control was deemed necessary to be installed on a temporary basis until the removal of the hoarding protecting the former Rosbergs building. The hoarding restricts visibility at the intersection, primarily January 25, 2010 2 TS- 2010 -08 viewing westbound vehicles. FINANCIAL /STAFFING /LEGAL IMPLICATIONS The Financial impact will be the actual cost to erect the necessary signs. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Karl Dren, Director of Transportation Services Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services Ken Todd, Chief Administrative Officer Niagararalls January 25, 2010 CA \'1DA REPORT TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Parks, Recreation & Culture PRC- 2010 -01 Proposed 2010 Cemetery Fee Schedule PRC- 2010 -01 RECOMMENDATION 1. That the 2010 Cemetery Fees be approved effective March 1, 2010. 2. That the 2010 Cemetery Fee Schedule be forwarded to the Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations, Cemeteries Branch, for review and approval. 3. That staffs continue to review revenue opportunities and operating efficiencies of cemetery services in 2010; and that staff report back to Council on options and potential directions to further reduce the annual operating subsidy. The costs to operate the cemeteries are heavily subsidized by the tax payer annually. A proposed increase of 10% on all fees is recommended to offset the operating budget deficit. The estimated 2010 subsidy, as included in the draft General Purposes Budget is approximately $977,000. The major source of revenue for the municipal cemeteries is derived from the sale of graves and interments, and the annual interest from the `care and maintenance fund'. The City cemeteries include Fairview (77 acres), Lundy's Lane(16 acres), Stamford Presbyterian (2 acres), Drummond Hill (4 acres) and Stamford Green Columbaria, in addition to sixteen semi - active and abandoned cemeteries (2.65 acres collectively). Overall, the annual cost to operate the cemeteries are heavily subsidized by the tax payer. On December 8, 2009 a meeting was held with a number of Niagara Falls funeral directors to outline and discuss the 2010 financial challenges of cemetery services. In particular the declining revenues achieved each year from the 'care and maintenance fund' due to the significant drop in interest rates, and the impact this has had on annual cemetery revenues was discussed. The recommended 2010 fee schedule includes an approximate increase of 10% on all Lot Sales, Opening and Closings and Surcharges. The proposed fee schedule is estimated, based on approximately 315 burials per year and 270 lot sales per year, to generate an increase in revenue of approximately $54,000 which is currently not included in the 2010 General Purposes Budget. Additionally, staff has also identified approximately $48,000 in additional reductions to the draft 2010 operating budget. January 25, 2010 - 2 - PRC- 2010 -01 Applying both the estimated increased revenue and the reduction in expenses would adjust the estimated draft operating cemetery services budget to $875,000 (from $977,000). Included in the fee schedule is the elimination of the complimentary tent service for each full burial. Consistent with most cemeteries, there would be a fee of $200 for a tent to be provided as part of the burial service. Staff will also be completing a 2010 comparison with other municipal cemeteries including approximately twelve (12) municipal cemeteries within the Niagara Region and a number of municipal cemeteries outside the region including Oakville, Owen Sound and Chatham Kent. FINANCIAL/STAFFING /LEGAL IMPLICATIONS The costs to operate the cemeteries are heavily subsidized by the tax payer annually. A proposed increase of 10% on all fees is estimated to provide additional revenues of about $54,000 and are recommended to offset the operating budget deficit. CITY'S STRATEGIC COMMITMENT One of the seven (7) strategic priorities, identified in 2007 by Council, was to `identify and evaluate alternative sources of revenue'. Given the fiscal challenges faced in 2010 and what is anticipated in future years, a review of potential new revenue sources for Cemetery services was initiated in conjunction with the 2009 Budget. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Appendix A - 2010 Proposed Cemetery Fee Schedule Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: CR/das 2i' ' Den s 1' Mit e Morrissey, Dir tor of Parks, Recreation & Culture Ed Dujlovic, xecutive Director, Community Services Ken 1%/1/4 1 \ )( Todd, Chief Administrative Officer RESIDENT - INTERMENT RIGHTS (Lot Sales) CEMETERY FEE 3ARE & MTNCE TRUST FEE TOTAL FEE 5% GST TOTAL CHARGE Adult Single Lot $642.00 $428.00 $1,070.00 $53.50 $1,123.50 Preferred Adult Single Lot $702.00 $468.00 $1,170.00 $58.50 $1,228.50 Adult Two Lot Plot $1,284.00 $856.00 $2,140.00 $107.00 $2,247.00 Preferred Adult Double Lot $1,404.00 $936.00 $2,340.00 $117.00 $2,457.00 Adult Three Lot Plot $1,926.00 $1,284.00 $3,210.00 $160.50 $3,370.50 Adult Six Lot Plot $3,852.00 $2,568.00 $6,420.00 $321.00 $6,741.00 Child /Infant Single Lot (Fairview) $180.00 $120.00 $300.00 $15.00 $315.00 Stillborn Single Lot ( Lundy's Lane) $138.00 $92.00 $230.00 $11.50 $241.50 Cremation Plot (Four Lots) $324.00 $216.00 $540.00 $27.00 $567.00 Preferred Cremain Plot $384.00 $256.00 $640.00 $32.00 $672.00 RESIDENT - INTERMENT SERVICES (Burial Fees) CEMETERY FEE PROVINCIAL FEE TOTAL FEE 5% GST TOTAL CHARGE Adult Casket Burial (TENT IS EXTRA FEE) $920.00 $10.00 $930.00 $46.50 $976.50 Child Casket Burial (TENT IS EXTRA FEE) $380.00 $10.00 $390.00 $19.50 $409.50 Infant/Stillborn Casket Burial (TENT IS EXTRA FEE) $240.00 $10.00 $250.00 $12.50 $262.50 Cremains Urn Burial (TENT IS EXTRA FEE) $275.00 $275.00 $13.75 $288.75 Cremains Scatter Burial (Fairview) $135.00 $135.00 $6.75 $141.75 Cremains Urn Burial - Double (Admin. Fee) $50.00 $50.00 $2.50 $52.50 Interment Cancellation - Casket $300.00 $300.00 $15.00 $315.00 Interment Cancellation - Urn $125.00 $125.00 $6.25 $131.25 One Time Care & Mtnce Fee ** Per Lot (grave) $100.00 $5.00 $105.00 NON - RESIDENT - INTERMENT RIGHTS (Lot Sales) CEMETERY FEE BARE & MTNCE TRUST FEE TOTAL FEE 5 %GST TOTAL CHARGE Adult Single Lot $963.00 $642.00 $1,605.00 $80.25 $1,685.25 Adult Two Lot Plot $1,926.00 $1,284.00 $3,210.00 $160.50 $3,370.50 Adult Three Lot Plot $2,889.00 $1,926.00 $4,815.00 $240.75 $5,055.75 Adult Six Lot Plot $5,778.00 $3,852.00 $9,630.00 $481.50 $10,111.50 Child /Infant Single Lot (Fairview) $270.00 $180.00 $450.00 $22.50 $472.50 Stillborn Single Lot (Lundy's Lane) $207.00 $138.00 $345.00 $17.25 $362.25 Cremation Plot (Four Lots) $486.00 $324.00 $810.00 $40.25 $850.50 NON - RESIDENT - INTERMENT SERVICES (Burial Fees) CEMETERY FEE PROVINCIAL FEE TOTAL FEE 5% GST TOTAL CHARGE Adult Casket Burial (TENT IS EXTRA FEE) $1,385.00 $10.00 $1,395.00 $69.75 $1,464.75 Child Casket Burial (TENT IS EXTRA FEE) $575.00 $10.00 $585.00 $29.25 $614.25 Infant/Stillborn Casket Burial (TENT IS EXTRA FEE) $365.00 $10.00 $375.00 $18.75 $393.75 Cremains Urn Burial $415.00 $415.00 $20.75 $435.75 Cremains Scatter Burial (Fairview) $202.00 $202.00 $10.10 $212.10 Cremains Urn Burial - Double (Admin. Fee) $50.00 $50.00 $2.50 $52.50 Interment Cancellation - Casket $450.00 $450.00 $22.50 $472.50 Interment Cancellation - Urn $187.00 $187.00 $9.35 $196.35 PLEASE NOTE: 1) All Committal Service scheduling is at the approval of the Cemetery's Section based on location, weather, staff availability & the number of services requested t 2) Monday to Friday Interment Services (except on statutory or City Holidays) may be scheduled between 10:00 a.m. & 3:15 p.m. only. 3) Saturday Services may be scheduled between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. only 4) Sunday & Statutory Holiday Interment Services may be scheduled between 11:00 a.m. & 2:00 p.m. 5) A "Scheduled" Funeral Late Arrival & other interment surcharges will apply as indicated in the Cemetry Fee Schedule - "Interment Surcharges ". 6) Funeral late arrivals (arriving after the scheduled time) will be subject to an additional "Funeral Crew Standby" fee. 7) Funeral Directors are responsible for advising families, in advance, of potential funeral late charges & applicable surcharges. " One Time Care & Maintenance Fee is charged for an interment (Full Body or Cremation) that takes place in a lot (grave) that was purchased prior to 1955. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURE CEMETERIES FEE SCHEDULE Effective March 1, 2010 APPENDIX A ADMINISTRATION SERVICES CEMETERY FEE 5% GST TOTAL CHARGE Interment Rights Transfer $50.00 $2.50 $52.50 Interment Rights Exchange $50.00 $2.50 $52.50 Interment Rights Replacement/Duplicate $25.00 $1.25 $26.25 Double Cremain Interment/Companion Urn $50.00 $2.50 $52.50 Cemetery Records Search (charge per hour) 25.00 /hr. $1.25 $26.25 MEMORIAL PROGRAM Memorial Tree $300.00 $15.00 $315.00 Memorial Bench with 3" x 6" plate installed on back of bench $1,250.00 $62.50 $1,312.50 Memorial Bench with bronze plaque (8" x 10 ") & stand $1,600.00 $80.00 $1,680.00 Memorial Marker - Maple Grove Memory Lane (includes inscription) $350.00 $17.50 $367.50 INTERMENT SURCHARGES Weekday Funeral Late Arrival Scheduled After 3:15p.m. $100.00 $5.00 $105.00 Funeral Crew Standby - Weekdays - Funeral procession arrives after scheduled time 30.00 / 1/4 hr. $1.50 $31.50 Saturday Casket Burial - Arrival Before 2:00 p.m. $370.00 $18.50 $388.50 Sunday & Holiday Casket Burial - Arrival Before 2:00 p.m. $525.00 $26.25 $551.25 Saturday Cremains Burial - Arrival Before 2:00 p.m. $190.00 $9.50 $199.50 Saturday Scatterin Burial - Arrival Before 2:00 p.m. $90.00 $4.50 $94.50 Sunday /Holiday Cremains Burial - Arrival Before 2:00 p.m. $280.00 $14.00 $294.00 Funeral Crew Standby - Sat., Sun. & Holidays - Funeral procession arrives after scheduled 40.00 / 1/4 hr. $2.00 $42.00 TENT RENTAL (Adult/Child /Stillborn /Cremains Burials) $200.00 $10.00 $210.00 Less Than 8 Working Hours Casket Burial Order $175.00 $8.75 $183.75 Less Than 8 Working Hours Cremains Burial Order $90.00 $4.50 $94.50 Lower & Seal Concrete Vault/Liner Lid $40.00 $2.00 $42.00 Lower Concrete Vault/Liner Box $70.00 $3.50 $73.50 FOUNDATION /MARKER INSTALLATION SERVICES CEM. FEE 5% GST TOTAL CHARGE Concrete Foundation Per Cublic Foot - Supply & Install $19.00 $0.95 $19.95 Foundation Installation (Minimum Charge) $223.00 $11.15 $234.15 Pre -Pour Foundation (Section Q & P Double Plots) $310.27 $15.51 $325.78 Foundation Removal $150.00 $7.50 $157.50 Veteran Upright Marker Setting $80.00 $4.00 $84.00 Small Flat Marker Setting Under 172 Square Inches $50.00 $2.50 $52.50 Large Flat Marker Setting Over 172 Square Inches $80.00 $4.00 $84.00 Corner Markers Setting (Per Set of 4) $45.00 $2.25 $47.25 MARKER CARE & MAINTENANCE FEE CARE & MTNCE 5% GST TOTAL Flat Marker Over 172 Square Inches $50.00 $2.50 $52.50 Upright Marker Including Base Up To 4 Feet High /Long $100.00 $5.00 $105.00 Upright Marker Including Base Over 4 Feet High /Long $200.00 $10.00 $210.00 DIS- INTERMENT SERVICES CEM. FEE 5% GST TOTAL Adult/Child Dis- interment Only * $900.00 $45.00 $945.00 Adult/Child Dis- interment & Re- interment $1,630.00 $81.50 $1,711.50 Infant/Stillborn Dis- interment Only * $300.00 $15.00 $315.00 Infant/Stillborn Dis- interment & Re- interment $500.00 $25.00 $525.00 Cremains Dis- interment Only * $150.00 $7.50 $157.50 Cremains Dis- interment & Re- interment $350.00 $17.50 $367.50 * Remains are removed from Municipal Cemetery PLEASE NOTE: 1) Dis - interments will take place on a day and at a time determined by the Manager of Cemeteries or designate. 2) Dis- interments may be scheduled from May 1st to November 1st only 3) Dis- interments not in a vault will be contracted out & will be the responsibility of the Funeral Director 4) The Funeral Director is responsible for the scheduling & all related costs of: - casket/urn /vault removal - vault/urn unsealing & resealing - Niagara Regional Health Unit CEMETERY FEE SCHEDULE OPENING & CLOSING CEMETERY FEE BARE & MTNCE TRUST FEE TOTAL FEE 5% GST TOTAL CHARGE RESIDENT - NICHE LEVEL A & G $200.00 $10.00 $210.00 Single Niche $375.00 $100.00 $475.00 $23.75 $498.75 Double Niche $760.00 $190.00 $950.00 $47.50 $997.50 *administration fee for the 2nd inurnment if taking place the same time as the first and in the same Niche RESIDENT - NICHE LEVEL B - F Single Niche $480.00 $120.00 $600.00 $30.00 $630.00 Double Niche $880.00 $220.00 $1,100.00 $55.00 $1,155.00 NON - RESIDENT - NICHE LEVEL A & G Single Niche $560.00 $150.00 $710.00 $35.50 $745.50 Double Niche $1,140.00 $285.00 $1,425.00 $71.25 $1,496.25 NON - RESIDENT - NICHE LEVEL B - F Single Niche $720.00 $180.00 $900.00 $45.00 $945.00 Double Niche $1,320.00 $330.00 $1,650.00 $82.50 $1,732.50 COLUMBARIA PRODUCTS CEMETERY FEE GST PST TOTAL GLASS - Single Niche $35.00 $1.75 $2.80 $39.55 GLASS - Double Niche $60.00 $3.00 $4.80 $67.80 BRONZE - Single Niche $440.00 $22.00 $35.20 $497.20 BRONZE - Double Niche $560.00 $28.00 $44.80 $632.80 OPENING & CLOSING CEMETERY FEE 5% GST TOTAL CHARGE RESIDENT - Single Inurnment $200.00 $10.00 $210.00 NON RESIDENT - Single Inurnment $300.00 $15.00 $315.00 Double Cremain Inurnment* $50.00 $2.50 $52.50 *administration fee for the 2nd inurnment if taking place the same time as the first and in the same Niche COLUMBARIA FEES Effective March 1, 2010 STAMFORD GREEN HERITAGE COLUMBARIUM NICHE & PRODUCT SALES STAMFORD GREEN COLUMBARIA OPENING & CLOSING RESIDENT CEMETERY FEE 3ARE & MTNCE TRUST FEE TOTAL FEE 5% GST TOTAL CHARGE Double Niche - A & F $600.00 $150.00 $750.00 $37.50 $787.50 Double Niche - B & E $680.00 $170.00 $850.00 $42.50 $892.50 Double Niche - C & D $760.00 $190.00 $950.00 $47.50 $997.50 *administration fee for the 2nd inurnment if taking place the same time as the first and in the same Niche NON - RESIDENT Double Niche - A & F $900.00 $225.00 $1,125.00 $56.25 $1,181.25 Double Niche - B & E $1,020.00 $255.00 $1,275.00 $63.75 $1,338.75 Double Niche - C & D $1,140.00 $285.00 $1,425.00 $71.25 $1,496.25 COLUMBARIUM PRODUCT - Trillium Court CEMETERY FEE 5% GST 8% PST TOTAL Bronze Wreath - includes inscription & installation $550.00 $27.50 $44.00 $621.50 RESIDENT CEMETERY FEE BARE & MTNCE TRUST FEE TOTAL FEE 5% GST TOTAL CHARGE Double Niche - A & F $800.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 $50.00 $1,050.00 Double Niche - B & E $880.00 $220.00 $1,100.00 $55.00 $1,155.00 Double Niche - C & D $1,000.00 $250.00 $1,250.00 $62.50 $1,312.00 *administration fee for the 2nd inurnment if taking place the same time as the first and in the same Niche NON - RESIDENT Double Niche - A & F $1,200.00 $300.00 $1,500.00 $75.00 $1,575.00 Double Niche - B & E $1,320.00 $330.00 $1,650.00 $82.50 $1,732.50 Double Niche - C & D $1,500.00 $375.00 $1,875.00 $93.75 $1,968.75 COLUMBARIUM PRODUCT - Trillium Court CEMETERY FEE 5% GST 8% PST TOTAL Bronze Wreath - includes inscription & installation $550.00 $27.50 $44.00 $621.50 OPENING & CLOSING CEMETERY FEE 5% GST TOTAL CHARGE RESIDENT - Single Inurnment $200.00 $10.00 $210.00 NON RESIDENT - Single Inurnment $300.00 $15.00 $315.00 Double Cremain Inurnment* $50.00 $2.50 $52.50 *administration fee for the 2nd inurnment if taking place the same time as the first and in the same Niche MAPLE GROVE - TRILLIUM COURT NICHE & PRODUCT SALES MAPLE GROVE - PRIMROSE & PERRIWINKLE LANES NICHE & PRODUCT SALES FAIRVIEW - MAPLE GROVE OPENING & CLOSING PD- 2010 -03 NiagaraFalls January 25, 2010 CANADA REPORT TO: Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario SUBMITTED BY: Planning and Development SUBJECT: PD- 2010 -03 Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Application CB &FIG - 2009 -006, 5841 -5845 Ferry Street Hillside Holdings Inc. (Emidio Maroti and Peter Conte) RECOMMENDATION 1. That Committee support the approval of the Commercial Building and Facade Improvement Grant for 5841 -5845 Ferry Street subject to the owners satisfying all the program requirements including all necessary City permits and entering into an agreement with the City. 2. That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the grant agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The application can be supported because: • the items to be improved are eligible under the Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Grant program; the funding will help restore a two storey building that has deteriorated over the past few years; and sufficient funds are available in the CIP reserve account. BACKGROUND The City has received an application for a commercial building and facade improvement grant for 5841 -5845 Ferry Street within the Historic Drummondville CIP area. The property contains a large two storey vacant building which has been used in the past as a furniture store and offices. The proposed improvements under the building component include a new roof and replacement of three roof top HVAC units. The cost estimate for these improvements is $61,735. The work described in the improvements are eligible items and the applicant will be entitled to receive a maximum grant of $10,000. The applicants wish to improve the facade of the building and will be making application for a facade improvement grant in the near future. January 25, 2010 - 2 - PD- 2010 -03 As part of the grant application, the applicant will be required to enter into an agreement with the City. The agreement details the responsibilities of the applicant in order to receive the grant. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The funding for the grant application will come from existing reserves for incentives. The program requires all work to be completed within one year of Council's approval. CITY'S STRATEGIC COMMITMENT The approval of this application will comply with the City's strategic commitment in implementing the financial incentive programs within the Historic Drummondville CIP and will assist in the revitalization of the Main and Ferry area. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ► Appendix 1 - Location map of the subject property. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: u.„JAA-co Alex Herlovitch, Director of Planning & Development Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director, Community Services v I Ken Todd, Chief Administrative Officer B.Bolibruck Attach. S: \PDR\2010 \PD- 2010 -03, CB &FIG - 2009 -006 5841 -5845 Ferry Street Maroti &Conte.wpd January 25, 2010 5841 -5845 Ferry Street Subf ect - 3 - APPENDIX 1 PD- 2010 -03 Location Map OW NM illiis — MWM pal illIM NOM i ya .....r■ r?m ■+11111111 rr 11011.4 11111191 II I1 ittt- ;. to , m1 ■ a January 2010 • • • Niagara,Falls January 25, 2010 CANADA REPORT TO: Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario SUBMITTED BY: Planning & Development SUBJECT: PD- 2010 -04 Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Application CB &FIG - 2009 -007, 5894 -5900 Main Street 1302771 Ontario Ltd. (Adam Newington) Agent: Chuck Vanoverbeke RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND PD- 2010 -04 1. That the Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Grant Application for 5894- 5900 Main Street be approved subject to the owner satisfying all the program requirements including the requirements of City permits and entering into an agreement with the City. 2. That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to sign and execute the grant agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The application can be supported because: the items of improvement are eligible under the Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Grant program; sufficient funds are available in the CIP reserve account; and the work will improve the appearance of the building and have a positive impact on the revitalization of Historic Drummondville CIP area. The City has received an application for a facade improvement grant for 5894 -5900 Main Street. There are two stores on the main floor that are currently vacant. The second floor contains apartment units. The extent of improvements to the facade include structural changes to the top of the outside wall, a new stucco surface on the second floor, stone cladding on the first floor of the facade and new signage. The colours of the facade are to satisfy the heritage colours as referenced in the City's draft Urban Design Guidelines (June 2007). The total cost of the improvements is estimated to be $27,900. The owner would be eligible for the maximum facade grant of $10,000. January 25, 2010 - 2 - PD- 2010 -04 ANALYSIS The proposed work complies with the eligibility items contained in the Commercial Building and Facade Improvement Program for the Historic Drummondville CIP. The detailed finishing of the facade will satisfy the objective of creating a more historical appearance of the building. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The funding for this grant will come from existing reserves for incentives. The program requires all work be completed within one year of Council's approval. CITY'S STRATEGIC COMMITMENT The approval of the grant application will comply with the City's strategic commitment by implementing the financial incentive programs of the Historic Drummondville CIP and encourage the continued improvement of facades in the area. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ► Appendix 1 - Location map of the subject property. ► Appendix 2 - Illustrates the proposed facade by the owner. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: AG414,1„ Alex Herlovitch, 1' ector of Planning & Development Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director, Community Services Ke Todd, Chief Administrative Officer B.Bolibruck Attach. S: \PDR\2010 \PD- 2010 -04, CB &FIG - 2009 -007, 5894 -5900 Main Street Newington.wpd January 25, 2010 5894-5900 Main Street Subject Land - 3 - APPENDIX 1 PD-2010-04 Location Map 1 , f , 1111= 111 Mils nos mum 4 1. Mai ,, S.NR9I ;s lj NVIUII IOW 1.01181 :4S1114 AV& EVAIII 1:6 1 11 1111 wi r I rn ii 111 11.11011 ir . I ii.tvkia 11 imilivavew 1 1 raiz 1111161 of a January 2010 January 25, 2010 - 4 - APPENDIX 2 PD-2010-04 • • • Niagara,Falls January 25, 2010 CANADA REPORT TO: Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario SUBMITTED BY: Planning & Development SUBJECT: PD- 2010 -05 Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Application CB &FIG - 2009 -008, 6036 Main Street 1254225 Ontario Inc. (Victor and Anthony Fraone) RECOMMENDATION 1. That Committee support the approval of the Commercial Building Improvement Grant for 6036 Main Street subject to the owners satisfying all the program requirements including all necessary City permits and entering into an agreement with the City. 2. That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the grant agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The application can be supported because: the items of improvement are eligible under the Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Grant program; sufficient funds are available in the CIP reserve account; and the funding will help improve the appearance of the building and have a positive impact on the Historic Drummondville CIP area. BACKGROUND PD- 2010 -05 The City has received an application for a commercial building and facade improvement grant for 6036 Main Street within the Historic Drummondville CIP area. The property contains a narrow 2 storey building which is vacant on the main floor and contains apartments on the second floor. The main floor had been occupied by a design and print shop. The proposed facade improvements include a new awning and repointing of the front brick. The cost estimate for the facade improvements is $3,950. The building component of improvements include new plumbing at a cost estimate of $3,644. The total cost of improvements is $7,594 and the owners would be eligible for a grant of 50% or $3,797. As part of the grant application, the applicant will be required to enter into an agreement with the City. The agreement details the responsibilities of the applicant in order to receive the grant. January 25, 2010 - 2 - PD- 2010 -05 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The funding for these grant applications will come from existing reserves for incentives. The application requires all work to be completed within one year of Council's approval. CITY'S STRATEGIC COMMITMENT The approval of this application will comply with the City's strategic commitment in implementing the financial incentive programs within the Historic Drummondville CIP and will assist in the revitalization of the Main and Ferry area. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ► Appendix 1 - Location map of the subject property. ► Appendix 2 - Illustrates the proposed awning for the building. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: kolua4 B.Bolibruck Attach. S: \PDR\2010 \PD- 2010 -05, CB &FIG - 2009 -008, 6036 Main St. Fraone.wpd Alex Herlovitch, Director of Planning & Development Ed Dujlovic, xecutive Director, Community Services Ken odd, Chief Administrative Officer January 25, 2010 6036 Main Street Sub Lcald - 3 - APPENDIX 1 PD-2010-05 Location Map _ jIllIIU%IIll 1 uit 11 vemiilinI0 Elk00117" Fast 41'44 lir !MIK. 1111111111 11111\greilir of Niagara *r U f"*1 1/Cir 4 ' 111.=•-i;i:;111A ittio 111111in IN OE 1 n1 ot 11 11u - rs 1 tri January 2010 January 25, 2010 - 4 - APPENDIX 2 PD- 2010 -05 Niagara,Falls January 25, 2010 CANADA REPORT TO: Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario SUBMITTED BY: Planning & Development SUBJECT: PD- 2010 -06 Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Application CB &FIG- 2009 -009, 6022 -6026 Main Street 1254225 Ontario Inc. (Victor and Anthony Fraone) RECOMMENDATION 1. That Committee only support the approval of the Commercial Building Improvement Grant for 6022 -6026 Main Street if the owners remove the existing billboards from the roof of the property and satisfy all other program requirements. 2. If the billboards are removed from the top of the roof and other requirements are satisfied, that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the grant agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The application cannot be supported as submitted because there are two billboards that exist on the top of the building. The funding program for Historic Drummondville does not support the approval of grants for buildings containing billboards. The applicant is aware of this program requirement but has requested that the application still proceed before the Committee for consideration. BACKGROUND PD- 2010 -06 The City has received an application for a commercial building and facade improvement grant for 6022 -6026 Main Street within the Historic Drummondville CIP area. The property contains a large 2 storey building. The main floor of the northerly section is vacant while the southerly section is used as the Hair Gallery. The second floor contains apartments. The proposed improvement under the facade program includes the erection of a new awning. The improvement under the commercial building program is for a new heating system for the hair salon. The cost estimate for the awning and heating system is $13,900. If the owners were to be eligible for a grant, they would receive 50% or $6,950. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Funding for these grants would come from existing reserves for incentives. The program requires all work to be completed within one year of Council's approval. January 25, 2010 - 2 - PD- 2010 -06 CITY'S STRATEGIC COMMITMENT The approval of this application does not comply with the financial incentive programs of the Historic Drummondville CIP as there are two billboards in the building. The Historic Drummondville CIP excludes properties containing billboards from being eligible for improvement grants. The BIA feels that billboard advertising is not conducive to creating a rejuvenated commercial area and they should be encouraged to be removed. The grant can only be considered for approval provided the billboard signs are removed. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ► Appendix 1 - Location map of the subject property. ► Appendix 2 - Photo of property illustrating existing billboards. • Appendix 3 - Illustrates the proposed awning for the Hair Gallery. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Alex Herlovitch, Director of Planning & Development Ed Dujlovic, xecutive Director, Community Services Ken odd, Chief Administrative Officer B.Bolibruck Attach. S: \PDR\2010\PD- 2010 -06, CB &FIG - 2009 -009, 6026 Main St.Fraone Hair Gallery.wpd January 25, 2010 6022-6026 Main Street Subiect Land - 3 - APPENDIX 1 PD-2010-06 Location Map IIM 11111111Vizi 11111irCzy MP Pi January 2010 January 25, 2010 - 4 - APPENDIX 2 PD- 2010 -06 January 25, 2010 - 5 - APPENDIX 3 PD- 2010 -06 • • • Niagara,Falls January 25, 2010 REPORT TO: Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair and Members of the Community Services Committee City of Niagara Falls, Ontario SUBMITTED BY: Planning & Development SUBJECT: PD- 2010 -07 Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Application CB &FIG - 2009 -010, 5769 Ferry Street 2211257 Ontario Inc. (Chris Rudan) Agent: Emilio Raimondo RECOMMENDATION 1. That Committee support the approval of the Commercial Building Improvement Grant for 5769 Ferry Street subject to the owner satisfying all the program requirements including all necessary City permits and entering into an agreement with the City. 2. That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the grant agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The application can be supported because: the items of improvement are eligible under the Commercial Building & Facade Improvement Grant program; sufficient funds are available in the CIP reserve account; and the work will improve the appearance of the vacant building and have a positive impact on the Historic Drummondville CIP area. BACKGROUND PD- 2010 -07 The City has received an application for a commercial building and facade improvement grant for 5679 Ferry Street within the Historic Drummondville CIP area. The property contains a large single storey building that had been previously used as the Concord Club (Adult Entertainment Parlour). It is the intention of the owner to renovate and improve the building for use as a bar and restaurant. The proposed facade improvements include applying new stucco finish with decorative cornice and other trim and molding. A new front window is being added with new canopy, lighting and signage. The cost estimate for the facade improvements is $39,900. The building component of the improvements includes a new flat roof which is estimated to cost of $55,000. The total cost of the improvements is $94,900 The improvements to the facade and roof are eligible items and the applicant will be entitled to a maximum grant of January 25, 2010 - 2 - PD- 2010 -07 $20,000. As part of the grant application, the applicant will be required to enter into an agreement with the City. The agreement details the responsibilities of the applicant in order to receive the grant. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The funding for these grant applications will come from existing reserves for incentives. The application requires all work to be completed within one year of Council's approval. CITY'S STRATEGIC COMMITMENT The approval of this application will comply with the City's strategic commitment in implementing the financial incentive programs within the Historic Drummondville CIP and will assist in the revitalization of the Main and Ferry area. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ► Appendix 1 - Location map of the subject property. ► Appendix 2 - Illustrates the proposed facade of the building. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Alex Herlovitch,,Director of Planning & Development B.Bolibruck Attach. S: \PDR\2010\PD- 2010 -07, CB &FIG - 2009 -010 5769 Ferry Street Chris Rudan.wpd Ed Dujlovi , Executive Director, Community Services Ke Todd, Chief Administrative Officer January 25, 2010 5769 Ferry Street i --., - : • aw , AS.. Me 4 16 1 1 ii ,ital M4 ow Pm EININ 1IXONS Mal GrA a ' -' ' Atry: 1 , . ''''' P 1' 9 ri - ::* ipmi~ owq+ wpm *sb.-1 -;="4 `: 1.1 i 1 • ,, MN . Mira room tom - , , , 4, 1.11191th.,,,TKOCialg' alowx:iftmeo .4t.- ,, ' =Wills= .1 -..,-.. s immi 74 &1/41' WM tanotil4.,,, warm Alm Hoc: 4 0 .11 mouPPGA ,',I ore! al - PAM ancosOn. : ." , 7 , -,4, ,, , Mil a -- Nos mai ?lir saw Asia , .Ar. am ritimimev NW wilessirm M oo f Poi W ' ami ' „,,... H, MP. Wig 'WM MK Ville fienr &POMP .44.,.. ,- .A . 1.1, 1:1 %., ;. I- MINN 1111111 i II all n10 higilli WM POW 111111111 OM iFiag laareg WO/ , Ai ZA . -.- WISMEll 1 t ,;, i C. , 1: 1._1, :,1 A WS mak A 6Clial III . ."tAWF., 19111111 woo mem, maw 4. - II: r.:: u',..:t.,1 1 ;• iitti:i.U;4-1.1110 um tow atftle 00110"1" Zirilie!I 7 Pi ! i tti." 1 1 vil limiliii iiiii iiiiiiiiiiiisac LIJ 04, -.11 lin l' • _.-s--;- 0„, ‘rit, di 1110101 r 1111111N 0 : 111111- Vtliikl Subject - 3 - APPENDIX 1 Location Map January 2010 PD-2010-07 January 25, 2010 - 4 - APPENDIX 2 PD- 2010 -07 CITYOi• CANADA NIAGARA FAILS_ The City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Resolution No. Moved by Seconded by WHEREAS all meetings of Council are to be open to the public; and WHEREAS the only time a meeting or part of a meeting may be closed to the public if the subject matter falls under one of the exceptions under s. 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act "); and WHEREAS s. 239(7) of the Act mandates that the municipality or local board or a committee of either of them shall record without note or comment all resolutions, decisions, and other proceedings at a meeting of the body whether it is closed to the public or not; and WHEREAS s. 239(8) of the Act requires that the record required by subsection 239(7) shall be made by the Clerk of the Corporation in the case of a meeting of council; and WHEREAS on January 25, 2010, Niagara Falls City Council will be holding a Closed Meeting as permitted under s. 239(2)(c)of the Act, pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land and s. 239(2)(d)pertaining to labour relations. WHEREAS due to the nature of the discussion in the Closed Meeting related to labour relations, it is not appropriate for City staff to be in attendance, save the Chief Administrative Officer and the Director of Human Resources ( "HR "); and WHEREAS s. 228(4) permits the Clerk the discretionary authority to delegate in writing to any person, other than a member of council, any of the clerks powers and duties under the Act. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT on January 25, 2010, Niagara Falls Council will go into a closed meeting to consider a matters that fall under the subject matter of s. 239(2)(c), a proposed acquisition of land and s. 239(2)(d), labour relations or employee negotiations; and FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED THAT on January 25, 2010 the Clerk, Dean Iorfida, delegates his authority to the Director of HR, Trent Dark for the items related to labour relations or employee negotiations; and FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Director of HR will record without note or comment all recommendations to Council emanating from the Closed Meeting; and FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Clerk will resume his duties upon conclusion of the Closed Meeting agenda. AND The Seal of the Corporation be hereto affixed. DEAN IORFIDA R. T. (TED) SALCI CITY CLERK MAYOR