2002/04/15PLANNING/COUNCIL
MEETING
Monday, April 15, 2002
Order of Business
and Agenda Package
PLANNING MEETING
~2002.
PRAYER: Alderman Selina Volpatti
DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
Disclosures of pecuniary interest and a brief explanation thereof will be made for the
current Council Meeting at this time.
DEPUTATIONS
Niagara Health Coalition
Ms. Kim Stasiak, RN, Emergency Nurses Association of Ontario wishes to
address Council on the development of the Niagara Health Coalition and request that
Council proclaim May 15, 2002 as National Public Medicare Day.
PLANNING MATTERS
ITEM NO. 09 Public Meeting
Zoning By-law Amendment Application
AM-08/2002, 6257 Dunn Street
Applicant: Michal Lukac
Agent: G. Steenburg
Proposed Bed & Breakfast AccommOdation
Background Material:
Recommendation Report: PD-2002-32
- AND -
Correspondence from Regional Niagara, Planning
And Development Department
-2-
ITEM NO. 10
Public Meeting
Zoning By-law Amendment Application
AM-06/2002, 4448 Ellis Street
Applicant: Frank Spadafora
Agent: Chris Cristelli
Proposed Bed & Breakfast Accommodation
Background Material:
Recommendation Report: PD-2002-38
- AND -
Correspondence from Nina Perfetto
ITEM NO. 11
Public Meeting
Zoning By-law Amendment Application
AM-07/2002, 4741 Zimmerman Avenue
Applicant: Tony & Anna D'Amicco
Proposed Bed & Breakfast Accommodation
Background Material:
Recommendation Report: PD-2002-35
- AND -
Correspondence from Deborah Kehoe
Correspondence from David Tetrault
Correspondence from Regional Niagara, Planning
And Development Department
Correspondence from Ana Kolesar & Svetozar Malesev
Correspondence from Joanne Fonzi
MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING MATTERS
Chief Administrative Officer
PD-2002-39, Requests for Extension to Draft
Plan Approval; Williams Subdivision; 26T-93011
(Revised) Williams Subdivision Plan 2, 26T-
94001; Owner: River Realty Development (1976)
Inc.
Chief Administrative Officer
-3-
PD-2002-37, Extension of a Temporary, Use By-
law; AM-09/2002, 6361 Fallsview Boulevard and
the SW Corner of Stanley Avenue and Murray
Street; Applicant: 876891 Ontario Limited;
Agent: John Broderick
Proposed Off-site Parking for the Hilton Hotel
Chief Administrative Officer
Chief Administrative Officer
- AND -
Correspondence from Regional Niagara, Planning
and Development Department.
PD-2002-40, Application for Site Plan Approval;
SPC-06/2002; Niagara 21st Group Inc. Marriott
Courtyard; 5950 Victoria Avenue.
PD-2002-36, Falls Avenue Master Plan.
- AND -
Correspondence from Toshi Takishita
REGULAR COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF MINUTES: Regular COuncil Minutes of April 8, 2002.
MAYOR'S REPORTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, REMARK,~
COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMENTS OF THE CITY CLERK
Royal Canadian Naval Association - Re: Proclamation- requesting that Council
proclaim April 29th - May 3~d, 2002 as Battle of the Atlantic Week and further that
authorization be given to conduct a short Flag Raising ceremony on April 29th, 2002
in front of City Hall at 9:15 a.m.
RECOMMENDATION: That the request be approved.
Canadian Mental Health Association - Re: Proclamation - requesting that Council
proclaim the week of May 6th to May 12th, 2002 as Mental Health Week in the City
of Niagara Falls.
RECOMMENDATION: That the request be approved.
-4-
Bob Rodger, 127 Westwood Crescent, Welland, Ontario - Re: Golf fees at par
with the U.S. - expressing concerns regarding the high rate of $130.00 Canadian for
golf fees being charged and requesting Council support to have the Niagara Parks
Commission consider accepting the golf fees at par with the American counterparts.
RECOMMENDATION:That the matter be referred to the Niagara Parks Commission.
Additional Items for Council Consideration:
The City Clerk will advise of any further items for Council consideration.
COMMUNITY SERVICES MATTERS
Chief Administrative Officer
Chief Administrative Officer
Chief Administrative Officer
Chief Administrative Officer
Chief Administrative Officer
Chairperson, Arts & Culture
Commission
7. Chief Administrative Officer
CORPORATE SERVICES MATTERS
REPORTS
MW-2002-08. Policy and Procedures for Road
Occupancy Permits.
MW-2002-41, Beaverdams Road at Rysdale
Street/Magnolia Drive School Crossing Guard
Review.
MW-2002-42, Kister Road at Progress Street,
Intersection Control Review.
MW-2002-46, Rodent Control.
MW-2002-47, CN/CP Railway Corridor Land
Purchase.
R-2002-15, Singing of the National Anthem
- AND -
Correspondence from the City Clerk.
R-2002-18, Parks and Field Use 2002 Schedule.
1. Chief Administrative Officer F-2002~24, Municipal Accounts.
-5-
Chief Administrative Officer
F-2002-25, ExtensionAgreement, Montrose Road
ES Greenworld Enterprises Roll #2725 130 004
19258.
RATIFICATION OF COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE ACTIONS
The City Clerk will advise of any additional by-laws or amendments to the by-
laws listed for Council consideration.
BY-LAWS
2002-063
To amend By-law No. 79-200, as amended. (Re: AM-08/2002, 6237
Dunn Street)
2002-064
To prohibit the obstructing, encumbering or fouling of highways and to
regulate the crossing of curbings, sidewalks, boulevards and parkland.
2002-065
For prohibiting or regulating the injuring of highways or bridges and for
closing temporarily any highway or portion of a highway under the
jurisdiction of the City of Niagara Falls for any period during the
construction, repair or improvement of such highway.
2002-066
To amend By-law No. 79-200, as amended. (Re: AM-09/2002, 6361
Buchanan Avenue, part of Stanley St.)
2002-067
To authorize monies for General Purposes (April 15, 2002)
2002-068
To adopt, ratify and confirm the actions of City Council at its meeting
held on April 15, 2002.
NEW BUSINESS
Ontario Health Coalition
Municipal Council Resolution
WHEREAS: Niagara Falls residents and Canadians alike pride ourselves on the fact that Canada
has provided universal, publicly accessible health care to its citizens for over 30 years,
WHEREAS: The principles of the Canada Health Act are the basis upon which our public health
system was formed and have provided public access to life saving and life enhancing care for
over a generation~
WHEREAS: Canadians are challenged as we have never been before to protect, restore and
upgrade where necessary our public Medicare system.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That Niagara Falls City Council supports Canada's public
health care system and the principles of the Canada Health Act.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That Niagara Falls City Council calls upon the Rornanow
Commission, and federal and provincial governments to ensure that the principles of the Canada
Health Act are maintained, and the public health care system is publicly delivered and upgraded
where necessary, and that adequate public funding be provided to do so,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That Niagara Falls City Council hereby proclaims May 15,
2002, National Public Medicare Day,
The City of
Niagara Falls'
Canada
Corporate Services Department
Planning & Development
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-mail: planning@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Doug Darbyson
Director
PD-2002-32
April l5,2002
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thomson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re:
PD-2002-32, Zoning By-law Amendment Application
AM-08/2002, 6257 Dunn Street
Applicant: Michal Lukac
Agent: G. Steenburg
Proposed Bed & Breakfast Accommodation
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council approve the Zoning By-law amendment application to permit the
existing dwelling at 6257 Dunn Street to be used as a tourist home (bed & breakfast) containing not
more than four (4) rooms for tourists.
THE PROPOSAL:
Michal Lukac has requested an amendment to the Zoning By-law to permit the existing dwelling at
6257 Dunn Street (see Schedule 1) to be used as a tourist home (bed & breakfast) containing four
(4) rooms for tourists. Schedule 2 illustrates the details of the site. Site specific zoning provisions
are requested to be added to the Residential Apartment 5B Density (R5B) zoning of the property to
permit the proposal.
CIRCULATION COMMENTS:
Information regarding the application was circulated to City departments, government agencies and
the public for comment. The following is a summary of the comments that have been received to
date.
Building & By-law Services
All required
obtained prior
construction.
building permits are to be
to the commencement of
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Clerk's Finance · Human Resources · Information Systems , Legal Planning & Development
April 15, 2002 - 2 - PD-2002-32
The Ontario Building Code classifies any
sleeping accommodation for the travelling
public as a hotel. The designer shall review
the B & B from this respect.
Municipal Works
A 3.05 metre (10 feet) road widening shall be
dedicated to the City.
· Parks, Recreation & Culture
No objection.
PLANNING REVIEW:
The following is a summary of staff' s assessment of the application:
1. The proposal complies with the intent and purpose of the Official Plan.
The subject land is designated Residential in the Official Plan. Lands under this designation
are intended to be developed for housing. B & B's are ancillary which are permitted under
the Residential designation where they are compatible with the neighbourhood. The
establishment of such facilities is to be carefully regulated as to their location, size and traffic
generation to minimize potential disturbances to adjacent properties and to protect the
character and identity of the overall neighbourhood.
The existing dwelling is not proposed to be enlarged to accommodate the proposed use. Any
internal alterations will have to confom~ with the Ontario Building Code. As such, the
residential character of the property will be maintained. The size and configuration of the
lot (as shown on figure 2) are such that there is sufficient space to accommodate the
additional required parking beside the existing garage. The majority of the rear yard will be
maintained as amenity space. Traffic generated by the B & B will be similar to a small
apartment conversion which is permitted under the current zoning. Any increase in traffic
to the site should not be noticeable because the property is located on Dunn Street which
functions as an arterial road.
2. The requested amendment is appropriate for the site.
The property is zoned R5B. The R5B zoning permits the development of a three-storey
apartment building. The applicant has requested that site specific provisions be added to the
R5B zoning to permit a four-room B & B. The amendment is appropriate as the R5B zoning
will be maintained, which is the zoning of the lands to the north and west. Maintaining the
R5B zoning will encourage the redevelopment of this property and the adjacent lands in the
future should apartments become desirable and economical.
CONCLUSION:
The requested amendment can be supported for the following reasons:
· The proposal is within the intent and purpose of the Official Plan respecting B & B's.
April 15, 2002 - 3 - PD-2002-32
· The residential character of the property will be maintained.
· There is sufficient lot area for parking and amenity space.
The request to site specifically add a tourist home, with not more than four units, as a
permitted use under the current R5B, is appropriate.
Planner 2
Respectfully submitted:
John MacDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended by:
Doug Darbyson
Director of Planning & Development
Approved by:
Tony Ravenda
Executive Director of Corporate Services
JB:am
Attach.
FILE: S 5PDR~2002~PD2002~32.wpd
SCHEDULE 1
LOCATION MAP
Subject Land
Dixon St.
Dunn St.
Amending Zoning By-law No. 79-200
6257 Dunn Street
Applicant: Michal Lukac
AM-08/2002
I:NTS
SCHEI~ _.LE 2
Date:
To:
Re:
April 3, 2002
Doug Oarbyson
Director of Planning and Development
City of Niagara Falls
REGIONAl. MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
REGION.Al, AND PROVINCIAL REVIEW
COMMENTS
~,. Planning
Zoning By-law Amendment Application
Michel Lukac
6257 Dunn Strcct
City File No.: AM-0812002
Proposal.-
To permit an existing dwelling to be used as a tourist home containing 4
rooms for tourists
REGIONAL REVIEW
Regional Policy Plan: Urban Area
Regional Public Works: Not Applicable
Regional Public Health: Not Applicable
AdQitional Comments:
PROVINCIAL REVIEW I
Based on available infon-,-,atlon, this proposal affectsJdoee not appear to affe=t the Interests of the
following Provincial Ministries:
Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs
Ministry of Citizenship, Culture & Recreation
Ministry of Environment
Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing
Ministry of Natural Resources
Additional Comments:
INTERESTs INTERESTS
· ~'FECTED NOTAFFECTED
RECOMMENDATIONS
~ Based on our review, Regional Planning Staff have no objection to the approval of this application.
[] The following are additional comments or conditions of approval:
Peter Coles/mo, Planner
Development Implementation Services
Copy to:
P/ease send net/ce of Cot, lncil'~ decl=lon.
3550 Schmon Parkway P.O. Box 1042 -- Thorold Ont. L2V 4T7 -- Phone (9051
The City of
Niagara Falls
Canada
Corporate Services Department
Planning & Development
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-maih planning@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Doug Darbyson
Director
PD-2002-38
April 15, 2002
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thomson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re.'
PD-2002-38, Zoning By-law Amendment Application
AM-06/2002, 4448 Ellis Street
Applicant: Frank Spadafora
Agent: Chris Cristelli
Proposed Bed & Breakfast Accommodation
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council approve the Zoning By-law amendment application to permit the
existing dwelling at 4448 Ellis Street to be used as a tourist home (bed and breakfast
accommodation) containing not more than two rooms for tourists.
PROPOSAL:
Frank Spadafora has requested an amendment to the Zoning By-law to permit the existing dwelling
at 4448 Ellis Street (see Schedule 1) to be used as a tourist home (bed & breakfast) containing two
rooms for tourists. Schedule 2 illustrates the details of the site. Site specific zoning provisions are
requested to be added to the Residential Single and Two Family (R2) zoning of the land to permit
the proposal.
CIRCULATION COMMENTS:
Information regarding the application was circulated to City departments, government agencies and
the public for comment. The following is a summary of the comments that have been received to
date.
· Municipal Works
No objections.
· Fire
Any issues can be dealt with through
the building or change of use permit.
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Clerk's . Finance · Human Resources Information Systems · Legal Planning & Development
Apfil15,2002 -2- PD-2002-38
· Parks, Recreation & Culture
No objections.
· Regional Planning and Development
No objections.
PLANNING REVIEW:
The following is a summary of staffs assessment of the application:
1. The proposal complies with the intent and purpose of the Official Plan.
The subject land is designated Residential in the Official Plan. Lands under this designation
are intended to be primarily used for dwelling units. However, a number of ancillary uses
are permitted under the Residential designation, including bed & breakfast accommodations.
Bed and breakfast accommodations are permitted within owner-occupied homes provided
they are considered to be compatible with the residential neighbourhood. Establishment of
these facilities is to be regulated as to their location, size and traffic generation to minimize
potential disturbances to adjacent properties and to protect the character and identity of the
overall neighbourhood.
The proposed bed & breakfast is to be located within the existing two-storey dwelling. No
significant alterations have been indicated. The parking is to be located in the rear of the
property to maintain the residential appearance from the street. A wooden fence is proposed
around the parking lot and along the west property line in the rear yard. This fence, along
with an existing garage on the property to the east, would mitigate impacts on the abutting
residences.
A bed & breakfast with two rooms would generate minimal traffic and would not have an
unacceptable impact on the residential neighbourhood. The proposed bed & breakfast is
located close to River Road and would have convenient vehicular access to tourist areas.
2. The requested amendment is appropriate for the site.
The property is zoned R2. The applicant has requested site specific provisions be added to
the R2 zoning to permit a two-room bed & breakfast. No changes are proposed to the
development standards and setbacks. Such a site specific zoning is appropriate for this
proposal since the R2 zoning will ensure the site is maintained in a manner that is appropriate
with the surrounding neighbourhood. The amending by-law will add a tourist home as a
permitted use and will restrict the tourist home to two rooms within the existing dwelling.
CONCLUSION:
The requested amendment can be supported for the following reasons:
The proposal is within the intent and purpose of the Official Plan respecting bed &
breakfasts.
· The residential character of the property will be maintained.
April 15, 2002 - 3 - PD-2002-38
· There is sufficient lot area for parking and amenity space.
The request to site specifically add a tourist home, with not more than two units, as a
permitted use under the R2 zoning, is appropriate.
Prepared by:
Planner 2
Respectfully submitted:
.~ John MacDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended by:
Doug Darbyson
Director of Planning & Development
Approved by:
Tony Ravenda
Executive Director of Corporate Services
AB:gd
Attach.
FILE: S 5PDR~2002WD2002-38.wpd
SCHEDULE 1
LOCATION MAP
Subject Land
Morrison Street
Ellis Street
Simcoe Street
Amending Zoning By-law No. 79-200
4448 Ellis Street
Applicant: Frank Spadafora
AM-06/2002
I:NTS
Maeoh 2(;02
A
SCHEDUI~E 2
Corporate Services Department
Planning & Development
The City of ~l~ll~ 4310 Queen Street
llk P,O. Box 1023
Niagara
Falls
Niagara Falls, ON L2E6X5
web site:
www,city.niagarafalls.on.ca
~ I-- Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-maih planning@city.niagarafalls,on.ca
April 15i 2002
Doug Darbyson
Director
PD-2002-35
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thomson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re:
PD-2002-35, Zoning By-law Amendment Application
AM-07/2002, 4741 Zimmerman Avenue
Applicant: Tony & Anna D'Amlco
Proposed Bed & Breakfast Accommodation
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that:
1) Council approve the Zoning By-law amendment application to permit the single detached
dwelling, currently under construction at 4741 Zimmerman Avenue, to be used as a tourist home
(bed & breakfast accommodation) containing not more than four rooms four tourists; and
the amending by-law include site specific provisions regulating the extent of parking in the front
THE PROPOSAL:
Tony and Anna D'Amico have requested an amendment to !the Zoning By-law to permit the single
detached dwelling at 4741 Zimmemian Avenue (see Schedule i1), which is currently under construction,
to be used as a tourist home (B & B) containing four rooms for !ourists. Schedule 2 illustrates the details
of the site. The property is zoned Deferred Commercial (DC). !The applicants have requested to change
the zoning to Residential Single and Two Family (R2-2) zone, which permits a tourist home with not
more than four rooms, and to permit vehicles to be parked in ithe front yard.
CIRCULATION COMMENTS:
,g 2)
Information regarding the application was circulated to City departments, government agencies and the
public for comment. The following is a summary of the comments that have been received to date.
Building & By-law ServiceS
Building permitsl have been issued for the construction of
a single detached dwelling. Further building permits will
be required for the B & B use.
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Clerk's Finance · Human Resources · Information Systems Legal Planning & Developmenl
April 15, 2002
Municipal Works
Parks, Recreation & Culture
- 2 - PD-2002-35
The Ontario Building Code classifies any sleeping
accommodation for the travelling public as a hotel. The
designer shall review the B & B from this aspect.
No objection.
No objection.
PLANNING REVIEW:
1. The proposal is within the intent and purpose of the Official Plan.
The subject land is designated Residential in the Official Plan. Lands under this designation are
intended to be developed for housing. However, a number of ancillary uses may be developed
under the Residential designation, without amendment to the Plan, which include bed &
breakfast accommodations (B & B's). B & B's may locate in areas where they are compatible
with the neighbourhood. The establishment of such facilities is to be carefully regulated as to
their location, size and traffic generation to minimize potential disturbances to adjacent
properties and to protect the character and identity of the overall neighbourhood. The Official
Plan's tourism policies for the River Road District further reinforce the maintenance of the area's
residential character and do not permit commercial uses within the district.
The house is currently under construction. Building peimits have been issued for a single
detached dwelling only. The size and configuration of the lot are such that the development
could have been designed in a variety of ways. However, as shown on Schedule 2, the B & B
was initially to be built with the intention of providing parking within the front yard. Parking
within the front yard, to the extent shown on Schedule 2, is not in character with the
neighbourhood. The intent of the Plan's policy is to ensure that B & B's retain their residential
identity and not appear to be a commercial enterprise. Discussions with the applicant have
resulted in a revised plan that is mutually acceptable to staff and the applicant. There are five
parking spaces required to be provided for the development: four for the B & B, one for the
house. Two spaces are to be provided in front of the garage. The two remaining spaces can be
accommodated within the front yard, provided that they are set back from the front property line
at least 20 feet, which is the required setback for a dwelling under the R2 zoning. This will only
cover about 45% of the front yard. In this way, the required front yard can be landscaped
appropriately to provide screening and a street presence. The revised plan is illustrated as
Schedule 3.
2. The request for the R2-2 zoning is appropriate for the proposed B & B.
The property is zoned DC. The applicant has requested that the property be rezoned to R2-2.
The R2-2 zoning affects the lands south of Morfison Street to Hiram Street and east of the former
CP Rail line. This zoning permits a four room B & B. Two other properties nearby have also
been recently rezoned in the same manner.
In order to regulate the extent of parking in the front yard, it is recommended that site specific
provisions, including a front yard setback and coverage, be included in the amending by-law.
April 15, 2002 - 3 - PD-2002-35
CONCLUSION:
The requested amendment to permit a four-room B & B can only be supported, in part, for the following
reasons:
The proposed B & B, as illustrated on Schedule 3, is within the intent and purpose of the Official
Plan.
The parking of two vehicles within the front yard should not detract from the residential
character of the area.
the extent of parking in the front yard.
The R2-2 zoning is appropriate for the proposal, together with site specific regulations to control
Planner 2
Respectfully submitted:
John MacDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended by:
Do~n --
Director of Planning & Development
Approved by:
Executive Director of Corporate Services
JB:gd
Attach.
FILE: S :h°DRX2002~PD2002-35 .wpd
SCHEDULE 1
LOCATION MAP
Subject Land
.Queen Street
/// / HuronStreet
Morrison Street
Amending Zoning By-law No. 79-200
4741 Zimmerman Avenue
Applicant: Tony & Anna D'Amico
AM-07/2002
I:NTS
i ~isting Tree . }* ~ 51 Sod i
~. ~ .......................... ~ ~////~~///////////~
~ ~ ........... BenotesProper~Line PROPOSED SITE PLAN
FOR 4741 ZIMMERMAN AVE.
Existing Chain Link Fence
SITE SUMMARY
Description Proposed Percentage
Site Area szz.s8 sm (8750 SF)
Building Area 20~.85 sm (2268 St:')
Building Coverage z5.8%
Landscaping Area 352.42sm (3792 SF) 43.3%
Building Height 9.~sm (3o'-6")
Parking Requirements 4
z4'
I
N
Morrlson St.
Proposed
~ Site
~ Huron St.
/Z/ Queen St.
SCHEDULE2
N
Exl~ng Chain Unk Fence
Extstl.g Tr~n
Ii ........... .....,ro~,,~U.o PROPOSED SITE PLAN
· ~ FOR 4741. ZIMM£RMAN A1/[.
]: i~ Scate: !/8" = 1'-0'
SITE SUMMARY
Description Proposed Percenta§e
Site Area 82;.88 ~ (87~0 s~
Building Area 209.85 m (2258 SF)
Building Coverage 25.8~
La ndscaping Area ~s2.42,,, ~792 sr') 43.3%
Building Height 9.ism (~0'.6")
Parking Requirements ~
March 26, 2002
Mr. Doug Darbyson
Director of Planning and Development
City Hall
4310 Queen St.
Niagara Falls, Ontario
L2E 6X5
City File AM-07/2002
Dear Mr. Darbyson;
I am miring to you to express my concern regarding the amendment request for 4741 Zimmerman
Ave. The fact that they are applying for a tourist home designation is not a problem, it would
actually be good for our section of Zimmerman. My concern is with the plan itseff and the fact
that front yard parking will be allowed. Friends of mine who own B&B's in the area were
info,ned that they could under no circumstances have front yard parking and had to do some
renovations to one of their properties in order to comply with the zoning. Also, the B&B on the
other side of my property which has the same size lot was able to accommodate parking at the rear
of the building for the same amount of cars.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
Deborah Kehoe
4755 Zimmerman Ave.
(905) 356-4072
PL NNtN
APR
RECEIVED
APR 0 2 2002
PLANNING
!, OEVELOPUENT
Planning ]
Doug Darbyson
Director of Planing & Development
This is in response to the Zoning By Law Amendment Application for
4741 Zimmerman Ave, City file: AM-07/2002.
I have no objection for the zoning change ~o a Bed&Breakfast.
I do object to parking for 4 cars in the front of the property.
I own Bampfioldhall B&B at 4761 Zimmerman Ave, two doors away
to the south.
Our lot sizes are the same. When I applied for the zoning change last year
I was told that my parking should be located m the rear of the house as to
not affect the look of the street.
I have the same configuration in the back yard, a two- cars garage and 4
parking spaces, which gives me room to park 6 cars.
Likewise I was surprised that parking in the front of the house would be
considered especially for a new construction.
One could understand flit was an existing parking area or there were no
other options.
David Tetrault
4761 Zimmerman Ave
(905) 353 - 8522
RECEIVED
APR 0 4 2002
I; NNtN
t,)EVELO
U~/UJ/UZ
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
The Regional Munieipalit7 of Niagara
3550 $chmon Parkway, P.O, Box 1042
Thomld, Ontario L2V 4T7 :~c~nned
Telephone: (905) 984-3630 ]~0~ rv'd~
Fax: (905) 641-5208
E-mail: plan@regional.niagara.on.ca
April 3, 2002
D. 10.M. 11.23
Mr. Doug Darbyson, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning and Development
City of Niagara Falls
4310 Queen Street
Niagare Falls, ON L2E 6X5
Dear Mr, Darbyson:
RE:
Zoning By-law Amendment Application
To Permit Tourist Home and Front Yard Parking
4741 Zimmerman Avenue
City of Niagara Falls
Your File: AM-0712002 ,,
This application proposes to amend the local zoning by-law from "Deferred Commercial
(DC)" to "Residential Single and Two Family (R2-2)" to allow a dwelling, that is under
construction, to be used as a tourist home with parking permitted in the front yard.
The property is within the Urban Area Boundamj for the City of Niagara Falls in
accordance with the Regional Policy Plan. There is no objection to the proposed use
from a general Regional or Provincial policy planning perspective. However, the City
should consider prohibiting or limiting front yard parking in order to maximize the
amount landscaped space. This will maintain the character of the surrounding
residential neighbourhood and secure a higher level of compatibility. These
considerations are also important to reflect Smart Growth principles that encourege
mixed uses within an attractive urban environment.
Please send notice of City Coun¢il°s decision on this application.
Youre truly,
Director of Planning Services
MSWORD~PC\N Fzbla~4741Zimmennan.doc
RECEIVED
APR 0 4 2002
~ i~EVE~
Untitled
April,9/2002
To:
Director of Planning and Development, City Hall
Re:Aha Kolesar&Svetozar Malesev
4248 Huron str.
Niagaea Falls
L2E,2G7
We are submitting comments on Zoning-By-Law Amedment Application City F
lie:AM-07/2002.
The garage which will be to build on land known as 4741 Zimmerman Avenue will
block sunlight from our wery essential
area,living and diningroom.As inteligent andenvironmental conscious man MR. D"A
mico has planed and build
his house in such a way that the all windows (including basement windows)newer
will be blocked with any
objeckt. He and his guest will enjoy in full sunlight and beautifull wiew. Off co
urse he has a right as human bein for
light and wiew,
But we also have right. We,as well as our future guests in 'SIMONIDA' B&B will
have no wiew or what is the most important
sunlight at all.
Future garage will blocks our 4 windows on main floor and probablly will blocks
3 windows on 1st floor where there are
guest bedroom and private bathroom.
To build his house Mr. D,Amico has allredy rose level of his property by 1 foot
.Our house will now feel as if it is
in the hole and we are wery concerned about possibility coming water in our bas
ement.
According to Schedule 2 there is not enough parking space for 4 guest cars.The
requirment by Law for the propel~
parking space is 36 ft x 43 ft.,but in this property parking lot will be 36 x 34
1ft.
It is very nice if people from Planing Department are flexible and like to do
favour to their client. Whit out that acting we
can not build our future together. But this flexibility and kindness they did n
ot show in our case.
When we ask to rezon oure house,refer:City file:AM17/2001,we asked for our gue
st parking will be on the end of our beckyard.
As very aesthetics and artistick orientetid people we did not wont to have gue
stpa.rl~ing close to our garden and
Page 1
pLI NNtNG A .PR t5 7.i31]'
RECEIVED
APE 1 0 2002
PLANNING
& DEVF.10PUENT
Untitled
deck. But we did not have choice. Person from your Departament did not have sense
for our aesthetics feeling.
Parking has to be besides siting area on our deck.
Now we will be surrounded with Mr.D Amicos garage on east- south side and with
our guest parking on
sout-west side.
With all our respectk to the employes from the Planning&Development Departament
we like to ask them
.."Do you act with double standard?"
sar
Thank you
Ana&Svet°zar M~e~K~°~_~r~
Page 2
U~/IU/UZ
FAX TRANSMISSION
To: Doug Darbyson
From: Joanne Fonzi
op, GE 'T
RE: City File: AM-07/2002
Date: April 10, 2002
Mr. Darbyson,
Please accept the following letter of support from the Niagara Falls Bed &
Breakfast Association regarding the re-zoning application for 4741 Zimmerman
Avenue.
I just returned from a business trip, therefore I apologize for this letter being late.
If there is a problem with not being able to accept this correspondence for the
Monday, April 15, 2002 Council Meeting, please notify me right away at (905)
354-8686.
Your cooperation is sincerely appreciated.
Thank you,
Joanne Fonzi
.,.. (~ APR I 5 ZOOZ
PLANNING MEE ~IN :~,.,_...~ ............ ~
RECEIVED
APR 1 0 2002
?LANNING
, ~VELOPMENT
Niagara Falls Bed & Breakfast ASsociation
5359 River Road
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 3G9
April 9, 2002
Mr. Doug Darbyson
Director of Planning & Development
City of Niagara Falls
4310 Queen Street
Niagara Falls, ON
L2E 6X5
RE: City File: AM-0712002
Dear Mr. Darbyson:
The Niagara Falls Bed & Breakfast Association, the official association
representing 15 licensed bed & breakfast in the Niagara area, is pleased to
submit this letter of support to City Council regarding the re-zoning application for
the proposed new Villa Gardenia Bed & Breakfast located at 4741 Zimmerman
Avenue.
This newly proposed bed & breakfast, currently under construction, is a welcome
addition to our association and the Niagara Falls bed & breakfast indust~. The
obvious dollar investment put towards this project will only help revitalize the
current area.
Furthermore, easy accessible Parking is a very important service to offer bed &
breakfast clients, therefore, we have no objection to the submitted plan, which
provides front yard parking.
Attached please find a Niagara Falls Bed & Breakfast Association membership
list, we trust this letter clearly expresses our full support of this re-zoning
application.
Sincerely,
On behalf of
Niagara Falls Bed & Breakfast Association
.'
PLANNING MEETIN~
MEMBER OF THE BED & BREAKFAST ASSOCIATION
Ms, Sue Ong - Ace of Hearts Bed & Breakfast
Ms, Sue Weston - Angel's Hideaway Bed & Breakfast
Ms, Andrea Armstrong - Andrea's Bed & Breakfast
Ms, Heather Matte - Bedham Hall Bed & Breakfast
Mr. & Mrs. Don Lambertson - Bed of Roses Bed & Breakfast
Ms. Luciana Siciliano - Butterfly Manor
Ms, Mary Cable - Cairngorm Bed & Breakfast
Ms. Karen Canali - Chestnut Inn Bed & Breakfast
Mr, & Mrs. Keith McGough - Danner House Bed & Breakfast
Ms, Joanne Fonzi - Eastwood Lodge
Ms. Sue Weston - Gretna Green Bed & Breakfast
Ms. Mary O'Shea - Sherma Bed & Breakfast
Mr, & Mrs. George Rowe - Stamford Village Bed & Breakfast
Mr. & Mrs. Tom Jackson ~ Strathaird Inn Bed & Breakfast
Ms. Mary Kok - Trillium Bed & Breakfast
The City of
Niagara Falls
Canada
Corporate Services Department
Planning & Development
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-maih planning@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Apfil15,2002
Doug Darbyson
Director
PD-2002-39
His Worship Mayor W. Thomson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re:
PD-2002-39, Requests for Extension to Draft Plan Approval
Williams Subdivision, 26T-93011 (Revised)
Williams Subdivision Plan 2, 26T-94001
Owner: River Realty Development (1976) Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council support a one-year extension to draft plan approval for the Williams
Subdivision and Williams Subdivision Plan 2, conditional on the applicant maintaining the
appropriate subdivision signs on the properties for public information purposes.
BACKGROUND:
Conditions of the original draft plan approval for these subdivisions indicate that final approval must
be obtained within two years or the draft approval will lapse. Before the initial approval period
passes, an extension to draft plan approval may be granted provided that a written request is received
from the applicant which sets out the reasons for the delay and the steps being taken to resolve the
required conditions of approval.
In order to ensure that draft plans are not automatically extended without consideration being given
to current Council policy, planning principles and contemporaryrequirements, requests for extensions
of draft plan approval must satisfy certain criteria and review guidelines. As part of the conditions
associated with the delegation of subdivision approval authority, the concurrence of the Region is
required before an extension can be granted.
PLANNING REVIEW:
In a letter dated March 13, 2002, the developer submitted a request for an extension to draft approval
of the Williams Subdivision and Williams Subdivision Plan 2 (see attached letter and location map).
Original draft approval for the Plans was received from the Region on May 5, 1994 and June 16,
1994, respectively. Several extensions have previously been granted.
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Clerk's · Finance Human Resources · Information Systems · Legal Planning & Development
Apfil15,2002 -2- PD-2002-39
The subdivisions conform to the City's Official Plan and are zoned appropriately. The Williams Plan
consists of 53 single-detached lots and the Williams Plan 2 contains 39 single-detached lots. There
are no additional expenditures required on the part of the municipality for external or internal
servicing or oversizing. The Region has no objection to the extension of draft approval for a one-year
period. The developer has indicated that negotiations are underway with the City regarding additional
parkland in the area. Their intention is to proceed with one of the subdivisions following these
discussions.
The final registration of these subdivision plans, as well as others in the City, may potentially be
delayed due to servicing requirements. Niagara Falls and the Ministry of Environment (MOE) have
a development strategy in place that permits development to proceed City-wide on the basis that the
City's annual sewer program results in a net decrease in sewage flows. The City's sewer separation
program has been suspended which affects this City/MOE development strategy. Therefore, all
developments must be reviewed individually to determine their impact on localized sewage overflows
or basement flooding.
CONCLUSION:
Based on this review, a further one-year extension to draft plan approval can be supported for both
plans (Williams Subdivision until May 5, 2003 and Williams Subdivision Plan 2 until June 16, 2003),
conditional on the subdivision signs being maintained for public information purposes.
Prepared by:
Richard Wilson
Planner 2
Respectfully submitted:
John MacDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended by:
Doug Darbyson
Director of Planning & Development
Approved by:
Tony Ravenda
Executive Director of Corporate Services
RW:tc
Attach.
FILE: S 2PDR~2002~PD2002-39.wpd
6746 MORRISON STREET, NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO L2E 6V2
P.O. BOX 576
TELEPHONE (905) 354-3853
FAX (905) 354-1816
March 13, 2002
HAND DELIVERED
Mr. Doug Darbyson
Director of Planning & Development
City of Niagara Falls
4310 Queen Street, Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON
L2E 6X5
Dear Mr. Darbyson:
RE: EXPIRY OF DRAFT APPROVALS
WILLIAMS SUBDIVISION (26T-93011 AND 94001)~ CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS
The above-mentioned Draft Plan Approvals are due to expire as follows:
26T-93011 - Williams Subdivision - Expires May 5, 2002
26T-94001 - Williams Subdivision Plan 2 - Expires June 16, 2002
We have been working and negotiating with the City Parks and Recreation Department regarding
additional parklands for the addition to the arena. These negotiations are not yet resolved. We hope to
proceed with one of the phases of the above development once these negotiations are complete.
Therefore, we ask that the approvals be extended for a further One (1) year period. By copy of this letter
we are requesting the support of the Regional Municipality of Niagara.
Enclosed is our cheque in the amount of $1,000.00 for processing fees.
Yours truly,
RIVER REALTY DEVELOPMENT (1976) INC.
Per: -~ ~
S.A. Branscombe, B.Sc.,
President.
SAB:dm
Encl.
RECEIVED
MAR I 4 2002
PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT
Mr. David Farley - The Regional Municipality of Niagara (Enclosed is our cheque for
$700.00 for your processing fees.)
Draft Plan of Subdivision
Williams Subdivision
26T-93011 (Revised)
Williams Subdivision 2
26T-94001
LOCATION MAP
Williams Subdivision
Williams Subdivision 2
1: NTS
S:~ffodivis~4~uM"willi~m~Dphn'aPr April 2002
The City of
Niagara Fails
Canada
Corporate Services Department
Planning & Development
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-maih planning@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Doug Darbyson
Director
PD-2002-37
April 15, 2002
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thomson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re:
PD-2002-37, Extension of a Temporary Use By-law
AM-09/2002, 6361 Fallsview Boulevard and
the SW Corner of Stanley Avenue and Murray Street
Applicant: 876891 Ontario Limited
Agent: John Broderick
Proposed Off-site Parking for the Hilton Hotel
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council approve a one-year extension to the temporary use by-law permitting
the land on the southwest comer of Stanley Avenue and Murray Street to be used for off-site parking
for the Hilton Hotel, conditional on the outstanding matters listed in this report being satisfied/
BACKGROUND: 7-~' HR r7'~'£.
876891 Ontario Limited has requested an extension of the temporary use by-law that permits the land
on the southwest comer of Stanley Avenue and Murray Street (see Schedule 1) to be used for off-site
parking for the Hilton Hotel. Refer to Schedule 2 for details.
Two years ago, Council approved two temporary use by-laws to pemfit off-site parking for the Hilton
Hotel: the by-law that is the subject of this application and a second affecting land on the west side
of Allendale Avenue. The subject by-law was approved for a two-year time frame and expires April
17, 2002.
At the time of the initial application, the off-site parking was being proposed temporarily on leased
lands from Hydro One until such time that the applicant was in a financial position to build the six-
storey parking structure. Council's approval o fthe temporary use by-laws was based on that premise:
that the off-site parking is only an interim solution until the parking structure is built on-site.
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Clerk's Finance Human Resources Information Systems Legal Planning & Development
April 15, 2002 - 2 - PD-2002-37
The approval of the temporary use by-laws was conditional upon the applicant satisfying conditions
affecting both the hotel and off-site parking lands. As detailed below, these conditions remain
outstanding.
1. Landscaping of the on-site parking area
On the hotel lands, parking is accommodated behind Denny's Restaurant extending out to
Stanley Avenue. As noted in report PD-2000-44:
"Currently, temporary parking, recently constructed behind the existing
Denny's on the hotel lands, does not comply with the tourism policies.
The parking lot extends to the property line and beyond into the Murray
Street road allowance with no landscape screen. The applicant has,
however, agreed to improve upon this situation by providing landscape
details, which will increase the screening, to the satisfaction of the
Director of Parks, Recreation & Culture, within 90 days of this approval.
It is recommended that this be included as a condition of the site plan
agreement."
To date, the applicant has yet to comply with this condition. Moreover, the parking layout
on the hotel lands does not conform to the minimum dimensions for parking spaces as stated
in the Zoning By-law.
2. Accommodation of storm drainage
As noted above, the off-site parking for the Hilton involved two properties. The lot on the
west side of Allendale Avenue is in an area currently serviced by a combined sanitary and
storm sewer. Although the parking lot has a gravel surface currently, the long-term solution
is to pave the lot and construct a proper storm drainage system. As noted in report PD-2000-
44:
"Should the parking lots exist beyond five years, it is recommended that
the parking lot be paved and a proper storm drainage system be
constructed if municipal stonii sewers are available. Sufficient security
should also be deposited by the applicant to guarantee these works."
To date, the applicant has yet to deposit sufficient securities in order to guarantee these
works.
3. On-street bus "lay-by" area
As part of the site plan for the hotel lands, the applicant proposed a temporary bus "lay-by"
area within the Fallsview Boulevard right-of-way. This was only an interim measure as the
development plans of the "Denny's lands" did accommodate bus loading areas on-site.
Moreover, the proposed reconstruction of Fallsview Boulevard will require the entire right-
of-way for the road expansion. Such a scenario was noted in report PD-2000-44:
Apfil15,2002 -3- PD-2002-37
"With respect to the hotel lands, the applicant proposes to construct a bus
"lay-by" area within the Buchanan road allowance that involves indenting
the curb in toward the hotel that will provide for a stopping area for two
buses. Given that Buchanan may indeed be widened to five lanes in this
area, the stopping area is only temporary as the entire right-of-way along
the west side of Buchanan will be required for the road expansion.
Because of this, the applicant will have to demonstrate that this stopping
area can be accommodated on the site."
The site plan illustrates that buses can indeed be accommodated on-site. However, the
applicant has refused to sign the site plan agreement and is objecting to the Environmental
Assessment (EA) for the road reconstruction over this issue.
4. Sanitary sewer extension along Murray Street
The applicant is required to construct a sanitary sewer extension along Murray Street in order
to redirect flows into the Murray Street system or to deposit sufficient securities in order to
guarantee the work. As noted in report PD-2000-44:
"Street sanitary system or to submit a security deposit to guarantee these
works. As these works have not been done, and are still necessary, it is
recommended that the applicant deposit this security with Municipal
Works within 30 days of this approval."
To date, the applicant has yet to satisfy this requirement.
5. Security deposits
As noted in report PD-2000-44:
"In order to guarantee the works noted (above), it is recommended that
the applicant post sufficient securities in the form of Letters of Credit
within 30 days of this approval. These Letters of Credit will be held until
satisfactory completion of each and certification by the appropriate design
professional."
Approximately $150,000 in Letters of Credit are outstanding.
6. Site plan agreement
To date, the site plan agreement, which contains clauses regarding the above matters, has not
been signed by the applicant.
7. Building permits
Occupancy has been granted under a Conditional Permit Agreement only. Full building
permits cannot be issued until a building code issue regarding foam core moulding has been
resolved and the site plan agreement registered on title.
April 15, 2002 - 4 - PD-2002-37
CONCLUSION:
As noted above, the applicant has failed to sign the site plan agreement and satisfy the conditions
of the previous approval. The applicant, through its agent, has requested a one-year extension to the
temporary use by-law. The applicant has also stated that it will shortly be initiating pre-consultation
with staff regarding further redevelopment of the hotel lands. Hopefully, Council's approval of a
one-year extension will enable staff to resolve the outstanding matters noted in this report.
Accordingly, staff are recommending approval of the one-year extension conditional on the
following being satisfied within the one-year time frame:
1. Signature and registration of the site plan agreement.
2. Deposition of all securities required of the applicant.
3. Satisfaction of all building permit issues.
Planner 2
Respectfully submitted:
- John MacDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended by:
Doug Darbyson
Director of Planning & Development
Approved by:
Tony Ravenda
Executive Director of Corporate Services
JB:gd
Attach.
FILE: S:~PDR~002~PD2002-37.~d
SCHEDULE 1
LOCATION MAP
Subject Property
Amending Zoning By-law 79-200
1. 6361 Fallsview Avenue
2. Offsite Parking Lot
Applicant: 876891 Ontario Limited
AM-09/2002
1 :NTS
R F...CB~ F-D
MURRAY
RANG~ 1~
HILTON
NIAGARA
THE I~ff~UE GROU~
Date:
To:
Re:
April 4, 2002
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
REGIONAL AND PROVINCIAL REVIEW
COMMENTS
Doug Darbyson
Director of Planning & Development
City of Niagara Falls
Zoning By-law Amendment Application
876891 Ontario Ltd.
Southwest Corner of Stanley Avenue and Murray Street
City File: AM-0912002
Proposal: To approve a further temporary use by-law to allow off-site parking
associated with the Hilton Hotel for an additional one year period
REGIONAL REVIEW
Regional Policy Plan: Urban Area
Regional Public Works: Refer to Public Works Comments
Regional Public Health: Not Applicable
Additional Comments:
PROVINCIAL REVIEW
Based on available information, this proposal affects/does not appear to affect the interests of the
following Provincial Ministries:
Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs
Ministry of Citizenship, Culture & Recreation
Ministry of Environment
Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing
Ministry of Natural Resoumes
INTERESTS INTERESTS
AFFECTED NOT AFFECTED
Additional Comments:
RECOMMENDATIONS
[]Based on our review, Regional Planning Staff have no objection to the approval of this application.
[~The following are additional comments or conditions of approval:
The City should be satisfied that there is a reasonable commitment by the hotel to eventually provide
on-site parking or a suitable alternative to meet long term parking needs.
Peter Colosimo, Planner
Development Implementation Services
Copy to:
W. Stevens, Regional Public Works
Please send notice of Council's decision.
RECEIVED
APR 0 9 2002
PLANNING
&'~NT
3550 Schmon Parkway P.O. Box 1042 - Thorold Ont. L2V 4T7 - Phone (905) 984-3630 FAX (905) 641-5208
The City of
Niagara Falls
Canada
Corporate Services Department
Planning & Development
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-mail: planning@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Doug Darbyson
Director
PD-2002-40
April 15, 2002
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thomson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re:
PD-2002-40, Application for Site Plan Approval
SPC-06/2002, Niagara 21't Group Inc.
Marriott Courtyard, 5950 Victoria Avenue
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that:
1)
Council receive the staff report and approve the site plan amendment for a restaurant
expansion on the Marriott Courtyard property '
...... :- ' *'--:-'- ----~: --:::::-':'-'-L7 =:v:-'.7 ::-= .- ..... rr ...... .,
2)
Council direct staff to initiate a Functional Design and Feasibility Study to establish design
criteria for the Grand Boulevard and the vehicular and pedestrian linkages thereto.
BACKGROUND:
This report outlines issues regarding a site plan amendment application for a restaurant expansion
at the Marriott Courtyard, 5950 Victoria Avenue (see location on Schedule 1), and seeks direction
on the further processing of this application. This report is also seeking direction on initiating a
Functional Design Study for the Grand Boulevard.
The Official Plan designates a Grand Boulevard that is intended to extend south from Victoria
Avenue along the recently purchased railroad right-of-way. The Official Plan states that "the
Grand Boulevard concept, as set out in Sections 4.1.13 through 4.1.17 of this Plan, shall be created.
Council shall ensure that public improvements and new developments along this new public street
are consistent with the Design Criteria for the new Grand Boulevard." The referenced policies are
attached for Council's information.
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Clerk's · Finance · Human Resources Information Systems · Legal Planning & Development
April 15, 2002 - 2 - PD-2002-40
When the original Marriott Courtyard hotel was approved in 1999, provision was made to
accommodate a future extension of Ferry Street through to the new Grand Boulevard in accordance
with the Official Plan policies. Schedule 2 illustrates the schematic alignment.
On March 25, 2002, the owners, Niagara 21st Group Inc., submitted a site plan amendment
application for a 220 sq. metre expansion to the existing restaurant on the first floor of the hotel
(see Schedule 2). The expansion of this restaurant would encroach onto the proposed alignment
of the Ferry Street extension. The impact of the proposed expansion on the future of the Ferry
Street extension is unclear.
Although site plan approval has been delegated to the Director of Planning & Development, this
matter has been brought to Council for consideration and direction as future development on this
property may compromise the above noted Official Plan policy.
Discussion:
As can be seen in Schedules 2 and 3, the schematic alignment of the Ferry Street extension would
mn'directly through the restaurant expansion. Although there is room left over in the parking lot,
the room to properly engineer an extension of Ferry Street is reduced. Therefore, it might become
difficult to achieve an important component of the Grand Boulevard if future expansions are
approved. It should be noted that, other than this concern, the proposed Site Plan complies with
the Zoning By-law, there are no other Planning concerns, and the proposed expansion and adjacent
parking lot is located on privately owned lands. It should be noted that the Planning Act would
not permit the acquisition of an entire street free of charge through Site Plan Control.
As a way to satisfy itself that future development would not jeopardize the provision of a link
through this property, it is recommended that Council obtain a letter of intent or undertaking from
the property owner that future development will not be undertaken until the Functional Design and
Feasibility Study is completed and approved by Council.
To fulfill the above noted Official Plan policies, it is also recommended that a Functional Design
and Feasibility Study be initiated for the Grand Boulevard Scheme. This study should provide
design criteria for the Grand Boulevard and public vehicular pedestrian access points. This study
should also help guide future development on private property that abuts the Grand Boulevard and
its linkages. Such a study would be necessary for the review of future development applications
to ensure that approval of these applications does not further compromise Official Plan policies
regarding the Grand Boulevard.
CONCLUSION:
l)
To ensure future development on this site does not further compromise a link to the Grand
Boulevard, it is recommended that a Functional Design and Feasibility Studybe completed
prior to consideration of future proposals to the north and east of the existing hotel.
April 15, 2002 - 3 - PD-2002-40
2)
Council is also requested to provide direction to initiate the Functional Design and
Feasibility Study that will provide design criteria for the Grand Boulevard and serve as a
guideline for future development along this corridor.
Prepared y:
Andrew Bryce
Planner 2
Respectfully submitted:
John MacDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended by:
Doug Darbygon
Director of Planning & Development
,~[///10roved by:
Tony Ravenda
Executive Director of Corporate Services
AB:tc
Attach.
FILE: S 5PDRX2002~PD2002 -40.wpd
2-16
4.1.8
The escarpment separating the City and Queen 'Victoria Park shall be
protected as a significant environmental feature. Development or
redevelopment plans shall not take place within the escarpment area.
Pedestrian connections through the escarpment and new developments at
its top shall maintain and protect this natural and physical quality.
AN INTEGRATED PEOPLE MOVER SYSTEM
4.1.9
The elimination of the railway line, which currently traverses the Central
District, is a critical component of this Plan. The railway lands shall be
acquired for public transportation purposes in order to improve visitor
circulation throughout the core area.
4.1.10
The rail corridor together with Niagara Parks Commission lands shall
provide for the alignment of the high tech visitor transportation service
linking principle attractions and parking facilities in a looped system.
Satellite Tourist Districts shall be connected to the People Mover system
through the extension of transit services.
4.1.11
The People Mover shall be fully integrated with the Tourist Area. Stations
will be designed to be directly accessible to the street level to service the
surrounding area and maximize interaction with adjacent developments.
4.1.12 The People Mover shall:
4.1.13
a) be flexible as to the precise alignment in order to facilitate integration
with adjacent developments;
b) be elevated through the built-up area to avoid traffic conflicts at street
level;
c) contain strategically planned stops;
d) be environmentally sensitive in design; and
e) enhance public and private development.
Grand Boulevard is a concept aimed at improving linkages between Tourist
Districts, creating street frontages for large development sites and
eliminating barriers which restrict the movement and circulation of visitors.
With the elimination of the CP rail line as a major impediment to
development, the rail corridor can be utilized to expand the existing street
pattern to better service the tourist area and its growth potential.
4.1.14
The Grand Boulevard is also a concept aimed at the creation of a new
publicly-owned transportation corridor targeted at improving the movement
and experience of the visiting tourist. It will provide for the extension of
Victoria Avenue southerly to Robinson Street and then to Bucha nan thereby
2-17
4.1.15
~ 4.1.16
4.1.17
connecting the existing activity node at Clifton Hill to the new activity node
in Fallsview. Similar opportunities exist to improve the Portage Road link
between Marineland and the Rapidsview amphitheater and the Fallsview
subdistrict. The extension of Ferry Street through to the new Grand
Boulevard will also serve to create a stronger link with the Lundy's Lane
District.
The new Grand Boulevard shall provide for a comfortable and animated
public street featuring wide sidewalks and a variety of activities and
amenities for pedestrians. It shall contain the People Mover where the
Grand Boulevard follows the railway right-of-way.
Detailed engineering and design studies for the Grand Boulevard follows
the railway right-of-way.
a)
determine the alignment and right-of-way along the full length of the
new boulevard required to accommodate pedestrians, bicycles, a
People Mover System and automobile traffic;
b)
identify detailed streetsca pe improvements such as road and sidewalk
widths, sidewalk paving, street lighting, the location and type of street
trees, street furniture details, the treatment of public utilities in street
allowance and signage.
Implementation of the Grand Boulevard concept will be considered as part
of future undertakings including a Master Transportation Plan update and
a Streetscape Master Plan.
THE NEW CASINO DEVELOPMENT
4.1.18
4.1.19
4.1.2O
The new casino complex on the Murray Hill site shall be consistent with the
policies of this Plan and shall make a positive contribution to the public
realm of the Niagara Falls Tourist Commercial Area.
The area around the new casino development shall become the second
activity node in the Tourist Area, with the first activity node located at
Clifton Hill and the existing casino. Council shall ensure that both activity
nodes remain important tourist destinations, each containing a wide range
of commercial uses.
Other components of the new casino initiative include an expansion of
Marineland and the establishment of an amphitheatre at Rapidsview. This
will result in a third activity node being created. Improved linkages
between these nodes will be required to ensure that economic spin-offs
accrue to the surrounding properties.
Figure 2
2-29
Additional Entry Corrido~
from MarineJand Parkwa~ ,,
Street System
LEGEND
Entry Corridor
Grand Boulevard
Falls Access
Retail Street
SCHEDULE 1
Subject Land
Location Map
5950 Victoria Avenue
Niagara 21 st Group Inc.
SPC-06/2002
1 :NTS
S:~SiI~t~n~SPCFil ~'x200'ZSPC'06kl%tie~.aPr April 2002
SCHEDULE 2
SCHEDULE 3
The City of
Niagara Falls
Canada
Corporate Services Department
Planning & Development
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-mail: planning@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Doug Darbyson
Director
PD-2002-36
April 15, 2002
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thomson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: PD-2002-36, Falls Avenue Master Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that:
1) Council support the conceptual Falls Avenue Master Plan;
2)
staffcontinue to work with Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc. to satisfy concerns respecting the
proposed sidewalk works, signage (on public and private lands) and traffic safety issues;
3)
4)
the applicant provide all required information regarding any encroachments into the Falls
Avenue and Clifton Hill rights-o f-way and sign all required agreements prior to construction;
the Clifton Hill BIA be consulted with and its comments obtained4p~or"~o [~e~r
commencement of construction; and
5)
approval be obtained from the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) and the Niagara Parks
Commission (NPC) for the aspects of the proposed works under these agencies'jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND:
In February of this year, Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc. (CNHI) presented concept drawings of its
proposal to upgrade the streetscaping and pedestrian-level building fi-ontages along Falls Avenue and
Clifton Hill. Referred to as the Falls Avenue Master Plan, the proposal entails:
installation of decorative banding and elements within the existing sidewalks;
construction of a water feature and enhanced landscaping in front of Planet Hollywood;
erection of a rock climbing wall in front of Planet Hollywood;
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Clerk's · Finance · Human Resources Information Systems , Legal Planning & Development
April 15, 2002 - 2 - PD-2002-36
erection of decorative streetlights and traffic signal structures;
erection of oversized signage panels on the rear facade and building frontages of the
Sheraton-on-the-Falls and on the north facade of the parking structure;
the installation of a new crosswalk on Clifton Hill; and
use of 2% parkland dedication monies to finance the work.
ISSUES AFFECTING THE FALLS AVENUE MASTER PLAN:
Staffhas had several pre-consultation meetings and discussions with CNHI. Staffis supportive of
CNHI's plans but noted several concerns with the proposed work.
1. Streetscape Master Plan
Over the past two years, the MBTW Group and staffhave been working toward the completion
of the Streetscape Master Plan. The Streetscape Master Plan outlines the concepts and details
involved in upgrading the streets within the tourist area. Streetscaping is required to be
provided by developers in exchange for increases in building height, as stated in the Official
Plan.
The Falls Avenue Master Plan conceptually outlines CNHI's proposal to streetscape Falls
Avenue and part of Clifton Hill. The plans do not include elements of greening or traditional
landscaping. The Streetscape Master Plan states that although it will be difficult to green the
Clifton district in the traditional sense, through tree planting, the pedestrian environment
should be enhanced by the use of planters, hanging baskets and "hard" urban design elements
such as public art, interpretive elements and paving patterns. These should be all designed
around a music theme or telling the stories of the various daredevils who performed on,
arotmd, or in, the Falls. The Falls Avenue Master Plan does include decorative paving; the
other elements of the Streetscape Master Plan should be investigated further and the plans
revised accordingly.
2. Roberts Street
The reconstruction of Roberts Street into a parkway setting is the most significant greenspace
development in the City. At completion, the visitor travelling east will be greeted with a well
treed and landscaped parkway. This same sense of greenery should accompany the visitor
through to Queen Victoria Park.
If implemented completely, in its present fo, m, the Falls Avenue Master Plan will result in the
west side of Falls Avenue being somewhat at odds with the parkway setting of the Roberts
Street development. As noted above, the Master Plan includes no plantings, street trees or
public art that would tend to soften the hard urban form that now exists along the west side of
Falls Avenue. Inclusion of the elements recommended by the Streetscape Master Plan would
assist in blending in Falls Avenue with the Roberts Street initiative serving as a new gateway.
The Falls Avenue Plan should be revisited by the consultants to review and revise the
document in light of the plans for Robert Street, together with the Streetscape Master Plan.
April t5, 2002 - 3 - PD-2002-36
3. Sidewalk Paving
The proposal involves the installation of decorative bands and elements within the existing
sidewalk. Construction drawings of the sidewalks affected are required that illustrate the type
and location of the banding, dimension of the sidewalk and the installation details. Staff has
requesied these details but they have yet to be submitted. Moreover, Municipal Works staff
is concerned with the use of pavers that are not specified in the Streetscape Master Plan. As
these pavers do not adhere to the Streetscape Master Plan's standards, it may not be possible
to stock, repair or replace them.
4. Water Feature in front of Planet Hollywood
An extensive water feature is planned in front of Planet Hollywood. The proposal is to extend
the landscaping to the travelled portion of Falls Avenue, eliminating the municipal sidewalk.
This would result in the sidewalk and plaza area in front of Planet Hollywood being used as
the municipal sidewalk. Municipal Works, in the attached memorandum, state that the existing
municipal sidewalk should remain as it will maintain motorists' sightlines when travelling
southbound and will afford the opportunity for pedestrians to by-pass Planet Hollywood should
the need arise. The water feature will also require MTO approval.
5. Erection of a Rock Climbing Wall
CNHI proposes a rock climbing attraction adjacent to Planet Hollywood. In discussions with
CNHI, it is apparent that the rock wall is 40 feet high. The zoning affecting the land upon
which the rock wall is to be placed limits the height of structures to 35 feet. CNHI has agreed
to reduce the height of the structure to 35 feet.
6. Erection of New Streetlights, Traffic Signals and Signage Pylons
An integral part of the Master Plan is the erection of new streetlights, traffic signals and
signage pylons. Together with decorative sidewalks, these elements provide significant
aesthetic improvement to a streetscape. In general, the concepts are reasonable and staff are
supportive of the intent. However, as noted in the attached memoranda, several concerns have
to be addressed:
Deletion of the "Falls Avenue" sign on traffic signal poles.
Proposed traffic poles do not conform with Provincial standards.
Regional Niagara approval is required for any alterations to traffic signal poles.
Wind load analysis on traffic signal poles and light standards for structural integrity.
Adherence to Streetscape Master Plan standards.
The need for more light standards due to lower illumination levels of those proposed;
conflicts with other overhead structures is to be avoided.
7. Signs
Probably the element which will have the most significant impact will be the signage panels
that are to be erected on the Sheraton-on-the-Falls building and the parking structure. Sign
permits are required for all signs proposed. A number of the signage panels are in excess of
the Sign By-law regulations. Council will have to grant the appropriate variances subsequent
to the review being conducted by Building and By-law Services.
April 15, 2002 - 4 - PD-2002-36
It should be noted that some of the signage panels encroach into the Falls Avenue and Clifton
Hill fight-of-way. Survey plans are required to detemfine the location and extent of the
encroachments. Also, CNHI will have to enter into encroachment agreements with the City
in order to permit their placement.
Staff has also yet to determine if the "Falls Avenue, the Centre of it All" sign that is placed on
light standards, traffic signals and throughout Falls Avenue is a third-party sign. If so, the Sign
By-law prohibits private signs on public lands and would not be permitted.
The NPC, in the attached memorandum, states that certain electronic signs are not permitted
by the NPC and require its approval.
8. Crosswalks
A crosswalk is proposed to cross Clifton Hill between the west exit/entrance to Queen Victoria
Park and the Rainforest Cafe. Parking and Traffic Services does not support the crosswalk.
Visibility and sightlines of the eastbound drivers are the major concern and that there is a
crosswalk (at the intersection of Falls Avenue and Clifton Hill) in close proximity. Details are
included in the attached memorandum.
9. 2% Parkland Dedication
CNHI has requested that the installation of the streetscaping be credited toward their payments
for 2% parkland dedication for the conference centre and Planet Hollywood. Section 42 of the
Planning Act permits municipalities to collect monies in lieu of parkland dedication or to
require dedication of land. The Act is very specific as to how monies collected are to be used:
Special account- s. 42(15)
All money received by the municipality under subsections (6) and (14) and all
money received on the sale of land under subsection (5), less any amount spent
by the municipality out of its general funds in respect of the land, shall be paid
into a special account and spent only for the acquisition of land to be used for
park or other public recreational purposes, including the erection or repair of
buildings and the acquisition of machinery for park or other public recreational
purposes. 1994, c. 23, s. 25, part;
The work proposed constitutes streetscaping of a public road allowance. As a road
allowance is not a park or lands meant for public recreational purposes, any monies expended
by the proponent to implement the Master Plan works cannot be credited toward 2%
parkland dedication.
REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS:
The streetscape works conceptually outlined in the Falls Avenue Master Plan are a major
undertaking. As is clearly seen from the above discussion, the issues concerning the project are
significant and substantive. While being supportive of CNHI's efforts, staff needs to address long-
range safety, maintenance, budgetary and liability aspects. Staff has not been afforded sufficient
opportunity to properly review the project and, as such, questions and concerns are still unanswered
and require further information for CNHI.
April 15, 2002
CONCLUSION:
- 5 - PD-2002-36
The Falls Avenue Master Plan is an ambitious proposal to upgrade the Falls Avenue and
Clifton Hill streetscapes. It 'is laudable that CNHI should propose such works. Once the
comments and concerns noted above have been satisfied, the comments from the Clifton Hill
BIA obtained, and appropriate approvals obtained from the MTO and NPC, staff should be
in a position to advise Council in greater detail.
Respectfully submitted:
John MacDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
Recommended by:
Doug DarlSyson
Director of Planning & Development
Approved by:
Tony Ravenda
Executive Director of Corporate Services
JB:tc
Attach.
S:~DR~2002~PD2002-36.wpd
The Niagara Parks Commission
P.0. Box 150, Niagara Fails. Ontario. Canada 1.2E 6T2
Brian E. Merrett
John A,M. Kemahan
Ontario g~erel Man,Oar
Mr. Doug Darbyson, Director of Planning
City Hall
4310 Queen Street
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
Dear Sir:
E-Mail: npinfo~niagaraparks.com
Web Site: http;//www, niagarapad~s.ce~n
Telephone 905/356-2241 Fax 905/354-6041
Engineering Fax: 9Q51356-7262
E.Mail: npceng@niagaraparks.com
April 11,2002
Planning
Scanned
RE: FALLS AVENUE MASTER PLAN
Niagara Parks Commission (NPC) Planning spoke today with a representative of Canadian Niagara
Hotels (CNH) regarding our April 8~h letter to the City of Niagara Falls and the Falls Avenue Master Plan.
Many of the items brought forward, in our previous letter have been dealt with and we now submit the
following.
Scrolling signs, tri vision signs, LED screens and third party signs are not permitted under the NPC
sign policy and therefore require Commission approval.
CNH and the NPC are to meet and discuss wording on signs adjacent Niagara
Parks properties prior to installation.
Canadian Niagara Hotels and The Niagara Parks Commission will continue to cooperate with respect to
this Falls Avenue Master Plan.
Yours truly,
David Gillis
Manager Planning and Properties
CC:
Regional Public Works
Ministry of Transportation
City of Niagara Falls - Engineering
R'EC /ED
APR 1 2 2002
Corporate Services Department
Planning & Development
Inter-Departmental Memorandum
The City of ~1~,~
.iogoro Foils
I -
To: Alex Hertovitch April 8, 2002
Deputy Director of Planning & Development
From:
Subject:
William Clark
Senior Zoning Administrator
Extension 4233
Falls Avenue Streetscape Plan
Zoning Comments
Upon review of the documents I wish to provide my preliminary comments. Please note points 1
and 2 may not reflect zoning by-law issues.
Status and need to have license agreements completed between the Canadian Niagara Hotels
and the City regarding possible building encroachments onto Falls Avenue by the Sheraton
Foxhead Hotel.
Additional agreements and/or approvals may be required with regard to proposed signage
and other proposed structures that may encroach onto Municipal/MTO property; that would
also include the existing fountain by Clifton Hill.
"Proposed Rock Climb Attraction':. The height of the proposed structure is 40 feet whereas
the by-law permits structures to have building heights of not greater than 35 feet. The
location of the structure falls within the jurisdiction of By-law 5335,1955. Please note that
lands noted as Block 25, also owned by the applicant, are zoned Tourist Commercial in
accordance to By-law 79-200 which permits building heights of 40 feet. The issue of height
could be elevated if properly re-located onto that parcel. Further discussions may be
warranted.
WC:gd
c. R. Kallio
In addition, the location of this structure with respect to the limits of the property owned solely by
the applicants has not been clearly identified. There would be concern if any part of said structures
or other elements which may encumber other lands, ie. Municipal, MTO, etc. Clarifications are
required.
S:\TOURISMXStscapMPXFallsAveMP\WC Zoning Comments.wpd
Wor[~ino T00et~er to Serve Our C0mm~,it~
Community Services Department
Parks, Recreation & Culture
Inter-Departmental Memorandum
To: Doug Darbyson, April 8th, 2602
Director of Planning and Development
From:
Adele Ken,
Director of Parks, Recreation & Culture
Extension 4507
Subject: Falls Avenue Masterplan - Proposal by Canadian Niagara Hotels (CNH)
In response to Alex Herlovich's memo dated April 3~, we have the following comments:
Overall Comments - The animation and graphic design within this proposal is very attractive and inviting
for the tourist industry in this area and CHN should be congratulated for taking such a dynamic approach
to their properties. However, the City is working hard at creating an integrated streetscape program for
each tourist di~Uiet having the various BIA's input. Each developer / landowner within the Clifton Hill
Tourist District must work at blending their property streetseaping into the City's Streetscape Masterplan' s
theme and landscape to achieve a harmonious final product.
Celebration Place (Clifton Hill & Falls Avenue) - The CI-IN's proposal must be modified at this comer
to tie in with the Clifton Hill Tourist Diutdct theme of'music'. Music elements should include paving
patterns, banners, interpretive panels and columns that tell the story of music as part of our culture.
Street Trees - Street Trees are to be located along Falls Avenue where ever possible. The typical tree
guards, concrete tree caps and precast planters for trees as specified in the Streetscape Masterplan are to
be incorporated into this design. Where trees cannot be accommodated the typical precast concrete planter
with tuteur should be used.
Streetscape Elements - Other streetscape elements such as the banner pole, garbage receptacles, benches,
bicycle rocks, and typical bollards should be incorporated into this design along Falls Avenue.
Signage - Way finding signage, bus stop, no stopping, no parking signs should be designed and become
part of the Sign Projects report to be incorporated into the streetscape.
Lighting - More details are required on the proposed light standard.
Site Plan - The revised landscape amenities for Planet Hollywood Restaurant will have to go through the
Site Plan process for approvals.
We would appreciate you inviting Jamie Douglas, our City Landscape Architect to all future meetings pertaining
to streetscape development to ensure it is consistent with our new Streetscape Masterplan do~ih--~t.
Should you have any questions with regard to the above, please call m.m~catqour4:onvenien~ce]
Thank you. / . /~(
JD t Adele Ken
Copy: Bob Bolibmck, Manager of Community Development and Landscape Design
Jamie Douglas, City Landscape Architect
From: Bob Judge
To: Alex Herlovitch
Date: 4/5/02 11:02AM
Subject: Falls Ave. "Streetscape"
Alex;
Some information from our point of view that you may need for Council Mtg.;
1 ) The properties involved are at their maximum allowable signage at the present;
2) Total Proposed signage is an additional 61 signs - 38 of which are shown on either City or Parks
Commission Property (possibly more);
3) It appears that some of the projecting signs may be over City property ( possible encroachment
agreement);
4) There may be a conflict at the traffic signal ( check with Traffic Division);
5) Wall signs proposed exceed the maximum square footage allowed ( 150 sq. ft. max'm );
6) Wall signs and projecting signs will require a structural engineer design;
I may not have pointed out all of the requirements due to time restraints, but basically Sign Permits are
necessary. However before they can be issued Council approval for all signs is required along with more
specific details of the individual signs are needed,( also some other approvals Niagara Parks Comm.,
MTO, etc.).
Bob
CC: Mel Brown
Community Services Department
Municipal Works
Inter-Departmental Memorandum
To: John Barnsley April 10, 2002
Planner 2
lhe City of ~1~
From:
Marzenna Carrick, C.E.T.
Manager of Traffic Operations
Extension 5204
Subject:
Falls Avenue - Streetscape Master Plan Submission
by Canadian Niagara Hotels
This memo is prepared in response to the following documents:
· Falls Avenue Master Plan (April 2002) prepared by Forrec Ltd. on behalf of Canadian
Niagara Hotels (CNH)
· Falls Avenue Streetscape Sign Projects prepared by Signage Systems on behalf of CNH
· Falls Avenue Master Plan (Streetscaping) Commentary on Transportation Operations and
Safety Aspects of the Plan prepared by Synectics on behalf of CHN
In summary, I have the following comments to offer related to traffic issues:
· The proposed crosswalk on Clifton Hill 50m west of Falls Avenue is not supported
· During our meeting with Mr. M. DiCienzo, on March 21, it was agreed that the 8'6" x 2'
"Falls Avenue" sign would not be installed at locations with traffic signal poles. Instead, the
oval pylon sign (as on the street light standards) was deemed to be sufficient. The revised
drawings do not reflect this modification.
· Again, during our meeting of March 21, I understood that the existing traffic signal poles
would be maintained and retrofitted with top mounted brackets to support the oval "Falls
Avenue" pylon signs and retrofitted with a skirt at the base. The revised drawings identify the
replacement of all traffic signal poles, and the proposed poles do not conform to OPSD
standards.
It is presumed that a substantial costs will occur if the poles are replaced, as the anchor bolt
patterns vary and theretbre, it is highly likely that not only the poles will need replacement,
but also underground work carded out. Prior to agreeing to a specific pole type, it is
suggested that the Region of Niagara be requested to comment, as they carry out installations
and maintenance for city traffic signals.
The Region of Niagara is in the process of standardizing a decorative style traffic signal pole
that would be used throughout the Region. The advantage of a standardized traffic signal
pole is that the poles will be readily available should they need to be replaced following a
traffic accident. By installing unique poles on Falls Avenue different than from the rest of
the city
· the possibility of not having a replacement in due time is of concern
· the additional cost of manufacturing a unique pole when replacement is required will
more than likely be borne by the city
It is suggested that specific traffic signal poles, unique to Falls Avenue not be used; instead a
decorative style pole as proposed by the Region be used when available. The cost for
replacing all traffic signal hardware needs to be addressed.
· Wind load analysis of the pylon signs on the traffic signal poles and light standards is
required to ensure structural integrity.
Page -2-
· Due to the conceptual nature of the document, the available line of sight for motorists is not
able to be determined to identify whether any of the proposed signs will obstruct traffic signal
indications, overhead guide signing or regulatory side mounted sign installations. Synectics,
commented on this issue and also identified that additional informati6n is required.
· All signs proposed on Falls Avenue north of the USA bridge require MTO approval. The
drawings identify that an 8'6" x 2' Falls Avenue pylon sign is proposed within this area on
Falls Avenue, adjacent the Planet Hollywood property and across the road. It appears that
these signs will overhang Falls Avenue, however, due to the conceptual nature of the
drawings, this cannot be confirmed.
· The underground wiring for the light standards on Falls Avenue adjacent the Planet
Hollywood property may not be easily accessible when the area is developed with the rock
garden and waterfall. The design should ensure that clear and unobstructed access to all
electrical plants is available. Hydro review and approval is suggested to ensure that electrical
standards are maintained with respect to the proposed location of the light standards and the
proposed waterfall feature.
· The development of the waterfall, rock climb, rock garden, shrubbery etc. adjacent Planet
Hollywood property is subject to approval of the MTO. as it is understood that at least a
portion of the property is leased from the MTO.
Furthermore, I have addressed the specific items as per the document submitted by Synectics and
have the following comments to offer:
Item 1 - page 3-5 (Proposed patterned crossing on Clifton Hill...)
The patterned crossing proposed by CNH is located 50m to the east of the Falls Avenue ~
Clifton Hill signalized intersection. As per the streetscape plan submitted, the crossing is to be
identified by interlocking brick embedded between the asphalt surface on Clifton Hill and will
extend across 4 lanes of traffic; 1 westbound through lane, 1 westbound left turn lane, and 2
eastbound through lanes.
Of concern is the stopping sight distance available for eastbound motorists when viewing
pedestrians at the crossing, which is on a curve to the right and an 8% downgrade. Stopping
sight distance is the length of the road visible to the driver. Synectics report states that
"Eastbound drivers are afforded a relatively unobstructed view of the proposed crossing
location". The available stopping sight distance at the proposed crossing, based on the findings
in the Synectics report, is 67m. This sight distance is 7m above the minimum sight distance for
50kn~, however, the when the grade of Clifton Hill is incorporated into the calculation, the
minimum required sight distance increases to 75m, which is below the available distance. In
addition, the "gradient provides the approaching driver with a higher height-of-eye than would
otherwise exist". This higher line of sight may preclude motorists from adequately viewing
children in the crossing, particularly when initially stepping offthe sidewalk. It was further
noted that the light standards and the garbage containers attached to the light standards somewhat
obstruct eastbound motorists view of pedestrians on the sidewalk that may be waiting to cross
Clifton Hill at this location.
Studies carried out by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration,
conclude that "traffic and roadway factors found to be related to a greater frequency of pedestrian
crashes included higher pedestrian volumes, higher traffic ADT, and a greater number of lanes".
The report submitted by Synectics, as quoted by Zegeer (Zeeger, 1999) found no measurable
Page -3-
difference in safety performance between marked and unmarked crossing of two-lane roads, and
of multi-lane roadways with an Average Annual Daily Traffic of less than 10,000 vehicles/day.
The report continues to state that the calculated traffic based on factoring the peak hour volume
is 6750 and 9440 vehicles/day. In 2001, as part of the cities Traffic Count Program, a 24 hour
traffic volume study was completed on Clifton Hill. The summer average daily traffic volume
obtained on Clifton Hill was 18,881 vehicles in a 24 hour period. This volume is substantially
higher than what was identified by Synectics and is substantially above the 10,000 vehicle
threshold. In fact, due to the high traffic volume on Clifton Hill, the existing three unmarked
crossings should be reevaluated.
Pedestrian generators are located along the entire extent of Clifton Hill ie. popular fast food
establishments, a variety of souvenier shops, arcade/entertainment complexes etc. Furthermore,
on the south side of Clifton Hill, the redevelopment of the Oakes property will introduce
additional major pedestrian generators. Should crossings be provided at locations where
pedestrian crossings occur or may potentially occur, Clifton Hill would be inundated with
crosswalk markings. Synectics identifies that the proposed location of the crossing is logical as it
connects two substantial pedestrian generators, however, there were no pedestrian counts or
observations that confirmed the number of crossings.
Therefore, in view of the above, staff is not supportive of the placement of an additional
unmarked crossing on Clifton Hill.
Item 2 -page 5 (Sidewalk surface treatment...)
Maintenance/replacement of the decorative treatment and the stocking of spare material needs to
be addressed. Information regarding this concern may be forthcoming from engineering staff.
Item 3 - page 5 (Pedestrian storage and visibility...)
Further details as to the dimensions of the structure on the northwest quadrant are required.
Synectics report states that "pedestrian storage and visibility concerns have been taken into
consideration since the initial concepts were developed", however, there are no details ie.
dimensions provided. Visually, the structure appears to reduce the sidewalk width considerably
and thus may obstruct the direct passage for pedestrians crossing Falls Avenue and Clifton Hill.
Item 4 -page 6 (Traffic and pedestrian signal display...)
Staff concurs with the statement in the report that "it is not possible to determine, with precision,
the relative position of the various visual elements within the northwest quadrant of the
intersection, based on initial conceptual drawings." Further review of the visibility of the signs is
required.
Item 5 - page 6 (Wayfinding signs...)
Staff concurs that the standardized roadway signing ie. street name signs with 20cm letter heights
should be retained on the primary mast arms at signalized locations. Installation of larger street
signs at signalized intersection is the practice within Niagara Falls, and is being adopted by the
Region of Niagara. This practice provides consistency throughout the city.
Page -4-
Item 6 - page 7 (Roadway Illumination...)
Staff concurs with the comments as additional detail is required to determine whether the
proposal provides sufficient lighting for pedestrians and motorists. Additibnal comments
regarding illumination may be forthcoming from engineering staff. The proposal identifies a total
of 27 light standards; 10 with illuminated top headers; 17 without top headers (as a light standard
only). There is no information on the drawing as to which ones are placed where.
Item 7 -page 7 (Banners on luminaire...)
Staff concurs with the comments, however, wind load studies will be necessary to ensure the
integrity of the structure as the sign is 3' high by 4'8" wide.
Item 8 -page 7 (Light trespass...)
Staff concurs with the comments as additional detail is required analyze.
Item 9 -page 7 (Right-in, right-out..)
The crosswalk across the access to the CNH parking garage located on Falls Avenue between
Planet Hollywood and the hotel is proposed to be skewed to the northwest directing pedestrians
to a passageway through the Planet Hollywood property. Based on the drawings provided, there
is insufficient infmmation as to the visibility available for southbound motorists viewing
pedestrians crossing when entering the garage. The conceptual drawing depicts rock structures
and plantings that may affect visibility. MTO comments should also be solicited as the garage
entrance is off Ministry jurisdiction right-of-way.
Iteml 0 - page 8 (Realignment of curb face sidewalk..)
The removal of the existing sidewalk from Bender Street will force pedestrians to proceed
through the Planet Hollywood property. Sidewalks placed farther from the traveled lanes are
preferred, as indicated in the Synectics report, however, providing access through private
property is not typical. Further comments from engineering staffmay be forthcoming regarding
this matter.
Iteml I - page 8 (Installation of signing pylons)
Further to the comments submitted by Synectics, the following need to be addressed.
Item 12 -page 8 (Replacement of existing traffic signaL..)
Although the design of a traffic signal pole is provided in the document, there is no information
as to whether the poles meet Ontario Provincial Standard Specifications. Replacement of the
existing poles will more than likely require a complete rebuild aboveground. Maintenance issues
regarding the stocking of non typical poles in case of accidents needs to be addressed.
Item 13-page 9 (Rock pooL..)
The property that the rock pool is proposed to be constructed on are lands belonging to the
Ministry of Transportation. It is imperative that all documents are submitted to the Ministry for
Page -5-
their review and comment. Applications and approvals for all signs, construction etc. must be
made to the Ministry.
The rock pool will consist of low pressure water jets. As the jets will be 6perating year round,
additional information pertaining to how the mist will be confined is required.
The aforementioned issues require further information and clarification prior to staff being able
to support the document.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
c. Geoff Holman
S:\TRAFFIC\Siteplan Comments~2002\Falls Ave str¢¢tscape CNH 5.wpd
Community Services Department
Municipal Works
Inter-Departmental Memorandum
To: John Bamsley
Planner 2
From:
Subject:
Date: April 11,2002
Geoff Holman, C.E.T.
Manager of Development
Ext. 4219
Falls Avenue Streetscaping Project
Technical Review
Our File: G-190-21
the CiW of
Niclgoro Foils
Municipal Works staff have completed a technical review of the proposed streetscaping on Falls
Avenue and have the following comments for your consideration.
1. Boulevard Feature - Falls Avenue ~ Bender Street (Planet Hollywood)
The sketches show an attractive water feature constructed adjacent to the curb at
this comer and it appears that the existing 1.5 m curb-face sidewalk will be
removed. While we agree with the Synectics report that pedestrians are safer
when further away from travel lanes, we are concerned that pedestrians not
wanting to use the Planet Hollywood courtyard for whatever reason, (congestion,
closure), may have to use the roadway to bypass this area. Staff have concerns
about sight lines, particularly southbound movements from Bender Street onto
Falls Avenue, and the retention of the curb-face sidewalk will, at least, ensure
that the water feature is set back sufficiently to allow motorists to view the
pedestrian activity around the comer, and give pedestrians an opportunity to view
the water feature from the street side.
2. Streetscape Materials
While there is no technical argument to be made regarding the suitability of the
proposed paving stones, streetlight poles and street furniture, our staff do want
to point out that by allowing the use of materials that do not match those
specified in the Streetscape Master Plan, it may not be possible to stock, repair
and replace these materials with exact replacements if they are damaged or
removed. Adherence to the adopted standards will ensure that the theme and
aesthetics intended by the streetscaping effort will be maintained over time.
Wor~iu~ To~et~er to Seroe Our Comm~nit~ ]
Roadway Illumination
The use of lower level, decorative streetlighting will, by necessity, result in the
need for more light posts in order to meet minimum illumination requirements.
The additional light
poles must be located in the boulevard area which is already below standard
width. The
streetlighting should be designed such that there are no conflicts with the
overhanging canopy, especially in the south end. It is assumed that no lighting
changes are proposed on the east side of Falls Avenue.
Process
Municipal Works staff are supportive of the concept but have not had sufficient
time to analyse the impacts that this development and the associated public realm
features will have on motorists and pedestrians as they relate to pubic safety. We
also recognize that we shouldn't stifle innovation and the creation of
opportunities initiated by development.
Accordingly, it would be appropriate to approve the concept of the proposed
streetscaping with the condition that only upon completion of the necessary
review and approval of the detailed drawings to the satisfaction of the Director
of Municipal Works, should authorization to commence construction be
permitted.
GH:Ib
Manager of Development
S:\I General Files/G-190-21 Streetscape Mzster Plan\Technical Review Apr 02wpd
Corporate Services Department
Planning & Development
Inter-Departmental Memorandum
1'he Cily of
Niagara Fails ll~J
To:
Doug Darbyson
Director of Planning & Development
February 14, 2002
From:
Alex Herlovitch
Deputy Director of Planning & Development
Ext. 4231
Subject: Attributes of CNH Falls Master Plan
I see many positive features to the Falls Avenue Master Plan. The approach by Canadian Niagara
Hotels (CNH) to address all of its street frontage through a master plan is a good approach.
The plan calls for the embellishment of sidewalk details through the addition of brick bands, granite
paving bars and "starburst" treatments in key locations. The use of starburst decoration for emphasis
and to create focal point areas is a good idea and should be strategically placed. The scheme to enrich
the west side of Falls Avenue (and a portion of Clifton Hill) may give the appearance of reduced
standards throughout the rest of the district and lose the continuity intended.
The opportunity exists to include the east side of Falls Avenue to address more than just the comer
of Oakes Garden Theatre. Opening the comer of Oakes Garden Theatre to the Clifton Hill/Falls
Avenue intersection can easily tie into the "Music Place" theme of the Streetscape Masterplan. The
possibility exists to create a music motif within the gateway to this underutilized entertainment
venue. Such a concept should be discussed with the NPC and incorporated into the illustrations on
page 9 of the Falls Avenue Master Plan. This theme should also be extended to the other quadrants
of the intersection.
A mid-block crosswalk is proposed across Falls Avenue from the Sheraton-by-the-Falls conference
concourse to the Oakes Garden Theatre. It appears that a new entrance to Oakes Garden is proposed
at this point and discussions should be initiated with NPC to explore the possibility of implementing
this concept. Certainly a safe and clearly defined crosswalk is needed on Falls Avenue. The full
potential of this crossing should be developed further with regard to foot and vehicular movements.
Embellishment of the entertainment potential in from of Planet Hollywood reinforces the sub-
district's role of providing enjoyable tourist experiences. The obvious intent is to build on the sense
of adventure already provided. The idea of building on daredevil activities extends the theme
proposed for Clifton Hill in the Streetscape Master Plan. The possibility also exists to provide for
acts of heroics associated with the dramatic rescues conducted in the River and gorge. This may help
create a balanced view of thrill and risk.
The proposal to strengthen the access to and from Queen Victoria Park through the pedestrian
entrance (slightly to the east of the Mowat Gate) should be considered in greater detail. The proposal
for a rock "canopy" on the sidewalk to decorate the pedestrian entrance from Queen Victoria Park
Wor~ Tooe~er to Serve Our Communit$
-2-
needs more discussion. Similarly, a pedestrian crosswalk from this entrance to the Rain Forest Caf6
plaza area needs to be examined more closely. An unregulated pedestrian crossing already exists
approximately 15 metres (50 feet) further uphill.
The Falls Avenue Master Plan promotes the use of signage to enliven the street. The use of signs
has both merit as well as drawbacks. Signage used to direct and welcome the visitor is beneficial.
However, the number of pylon signs (in front of casino, entrance to Duty Free, Planet Hollywood
and Custom's service entrance) which overhang the street and encroach on public realm is a concern
unless there is a specific purpose. The video sign on the Sheraton Hotel just above the traffic signals
should be examined relative to safety issues. The fashion sign panels fastened to the metal grid on
the Sheraton Hotel should be reviewed relative to the overall image intended by the Streetscape
Master Plan. In this regard, John Barnsley's memo provides additional insight. It is obvious the sign
industry is changing and the municipality must reassess its position in order to keep pace.
While Canadian Niagara Hotels has specifically addressed its properties and potential, the Falls
Master Plan document presents a springboard for discussion for the balance of the street and its
integration within the tourist district. The Plan provides a visionary view of what can happen to
reinforce the vibrant festive atmosphere associated with the Clifton Hill Tourist Subdistrict. It is
possible this document could be refined to provide the overall guidance intended.
AH:tc
S :\TOURIS M\Stscap MPkFallsAveMPkAHcomments.mem.wpd
Corporate Services Department
Planning & Development
Inter-Departmental Memorandum
To: D. Darbyson February 1, 2002
Director of Planning & Development
From:
J. Bamsley
Planner 2
Ext. 4247
Subject: Falls Avenue Master Plan
As requested, I have reviewed the Falls Avenue Master Plan prepared by Forrec Ltd., for Canadian
Niagara Hotels Inc., against the Streetscape Master Plan.
Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc., should be applauded for the efforts to enliven Falls Avenue and the
lower end of Clifton Hill. In general the concepts are good; the "portal" at Casino Niagara,
accentuation of two of the comers at Falls Avenue and Clifton Hill, the additional landscaping at
Planet Hollywood and the paving details will all assist in the much-needed upgrading of the street.
That being said, there are some concerns I do have with the plan and also its conformity with the
Streetscape Master Plan. Generally, the plan seems to rely on signage for animation of the street.
There are large, multi-storey signage panels on the rear of the Sheraton (at Clifton Hill), on the
Sheraton at the comer of Falls Avenue and Clifton Hill and the north elevation of the Brock. A
significant amount of signage is also located along the second (and possibly third) floor(s) of the
Sheraton along the Falls and Clifton frontages. These appear to be third-party signage and video
display type signs.
The Streetscape Master Plan states that, although it will be difficult to green the Clifton district in
the traditional sense through tree planting, the pedestrian environment should be enhanced by the
use of planters, hanging baskets, and "hard" urban design elements such public art, interpretative
elements and paving patterns. These should all be designed around the theme of music or telling the
storey of the various daredevils who performed on, around or in the Falls.
The reliance on signage for enhancement does not provide for a pedestrian realm as envisaged by
the Streetscape Master Plan. Signage should be reduced, with the elements noted above included
and designed around the themes. Bollards should be included along the street frontages for
pedestrian safety due to the curbface sidewalk.
The Streetscape Master Plan proposes a celebration place (Music Place) at Clifton Hill and Falls
Avenue. While the Falls Avenue Plan proposes enhancement and improvement of north comers,
there appears to be no theme to the design, let alone that proposed by the Streetscape Master Plan.
While there is no portal to mark the entry to Clifton Hill on Falls Avenue, the one proposed at the
entrance to the parking structure is a good idea. The portal should, however, be devoid of signage
and be strong, vertical architectural elements.
W0r~n0 Tol~et~er to Serve Oar Comm~mit~
2
Some detailed comments:
· Sidewalk cafes are proposed in front of the Brock. Is there room?
· What is the "big rock" in front of Planet Hollywood?
· The Falls Avenue sign appears to be too big and obtrusive. It should be smaller in keeping
with the entry gate design (which is a nice detail).
· The benches and trash receptacles should be in keeping with those in the Streetscape Plan.
JB:arn
S:\TOURiSM~StscapMP~FallsAveMP~,DarbysonFallsAveM P.wpd
[ TOSHI TAKI[SHITA (MR.) DUV~ct Dial: (416) 369-4347 E-mail: ttakishita~tlpanners.ea File No.: 2000046 BY FAX ]
ONLY
April 11, 2002
Ms. Susan Scerbo
Secretary-Treasurer
Niagara Falls Committee of Adjustments
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 5X5
Dear Ms. Scerbo:
Re: Council Meeting of April 15, 2002 at 6:00 p.m.
As you are aware, we are the solicitors for Beefeater (Niagara) Limited and C.I. Burland
Properties Limited, being the owners of the land adjacent to the lands owned by the Canadian
Niagara Hotels Inc.
On April 11, 2002, we were advised by Mr. John Bamsley of the City of Niagara Falls that the
Falls Avenue Master Plan (the "Master Plan") will be considered by City Council on Monday,
April 15, 2002 at 6:00 p.m., at a meeting to be held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, City
Hall, 4310 Queen Street in Niagara Falls. We confimt that our client has been provided with a
copy of the Streetscape Plans proposed by Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc (the "Streetscape
Plans").
Please be advised that we will be attending this meeting with our client to make submissions
regarding the Master Plan and the Streetseape Plans. Accordingly, we ask that you or your staff
kindly provide our office with a meeting agenda and any information relevant to the proposed
Streetseape Plans but not yet provided to our client, if any, prior to April 15, 2002.
Please contact me at (416) 369-4347 if you would like to discuss this matter further.
Yours very truly,
TREMAYNE-LLOYD PARTNERS
Toshi Takishita
c. Doug Darbyson, Director, Development and Planning Department
c. Charlie Burland
HlP~. FRLL$ CLEEKI '0~ 04C~
Royal Canadian Naval Association
N. iagar Region.
/
April 4, 2002
City Hall
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 6X5
ATTENTION: Mr. Dean Iorfida
City Clerk
Dear Sir:
Re: PROCLAMATION
It is respectfully requested that the Niagara Falls City Council
inclusive, as "Battle of the Atlantic Week," during which time the
could be flown at Niagara Falls City Hall. This request is also bein
City Councils.
We would appreciate also, being given authorization to conduct
Monday, April 29th, in front of City Hall at 9:15am. Similar servic~
Catharines and.(pm at Welland City Hall.
t.
ILC.N.A., Niagara Region, would like to take this opportunity t(
aforementioned to City Council on our behalf, and we trust we ma~
convenience.
Should you rgquire additional information, please contact our ~
(905) 353-1626.
Yours truly,
ROYAL CANADIAN NAVAL ASSOCIATION
NIAGARA REGION
Christine Draper, S~7~'
Cc: J.V. Blackburn, President
Lee Cook, Master-At-Arms
oclaim April 29n - May 3rd, 2002
'aditional Navy Flag, the White Ensign,
made of St. Catharines and Welland
short Flag Raising ceremony on
; are scheduled for 1 lam in St.
thank you for presenting the
look forward to a reply at your earliest
aster-at-Arms, Lee Cook at:
CANADIAN MENTAL SULERKS L~.02Li:~
,EALT. ASSOC Sr '
L'ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE
POUR LA SANTI5 MENTALE
February 21, 2002
Mr. Dean Iorfida
City Clerk
City of Niagara Falls
4310 Queen Street
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
Dear Mr. Iorfida:
Since 1952, Mental Health Week in Canada has traditior
week of May. The official date for this week is Monday
The Canadian Mental Health Association, Niagara Brant
opportunity to ask you to officially declare Mental Healt
Falls.
We have enclosed a suggested wording for a declaration
convenience. Please feel free to alter the wording or to i
words. We would also like to have an official flag raisir
11:00AM with the Mayor as part of the declaration. A tn
Board Member will be in attendance.
As you know, the purpose of Mental Health Week is to ~
necessity for emotional well-being and to alert them to tl
health in our community. We would appreciate your hel
officially declaring Mental Health Week in the City ofl~
Yours truly,
John Kelly
President, Board of Directors
PLAN
JK:dd
cc. Karen Robson, Mental Health Resource Centre ~
\\SERVER\SYS\User\ALL\Word Documents\Administration\AGENCY\Iv
Week Letter(NF).doc
15 Wellington Street, St. Catharines, Onta
A Member of Fort Erie Satellite Office: 230 Bertie Street, Fort E~
the United Way Mental Health Resource Centre: 5841 Ferry Street, Niag;
Charitable Registration No. 13053 295,~
Niagara Branch
Administration Office
FO. Box 1251
Fonthill, ON LOS 1E0
Tel: 905-641-5222
Fax: 905-892-1993
emaik cmhaniag @ iaw.on.ca
lly been held during the first
May 6 to Sunday May 12, 2002.
.h would like to take this
Week in the City of Niagara
This is merely for your
5sue the declaration in your own
g on Monday May 6, 2002 at
ember of our staff as well as a
emind our fellow citizens of the
te issues surrounding mental
p in supporting our efforts by
iagara Falls.
lING MEETING
afl
ental Health Week~2002WIental Health
io L2R 5P7
e, Ontario L2A 1Z2
tra Falls, Ontario L2G 1S9
RR0001
Ministry ol Health
and Long Term Care
The Mayor and City Councillors,
In approximately one month, the
Will
course, iue -ege.u be ope
south of Niagara Falls.
This course will be a tribute to th~
Commission. They are Lo ue comi
ingenuity and fore-sigh in bringin
Falls area. In conjunction with tht
Complex, this will encourage out-
United States to visit our country
and play a round or two.
As a golfer, I too would like to
upon inquiry i found the rate of
$85.00 U.S. to be rather experts
with other first class course in th~
privately owned and operated, bt
rather high. ! think that the rate
should be at par with the U.S. go
ity of Niagara Falls
magnificent golf
ning in Chippawa, just
., Niagara Parks
nended for their
g this attraction to the
; Cas,.i,n_o Niagara
neignDours from the
and hopefully stay
,y The Legend, but
130.00 Cdn. Or
/e. This rate is in line
!.a~ea that are
IL mufti puummc course
For Ontario golfers
Ifer.
We, who are on a fixed income c,
~rom ute weak Canadianuu.ar.~-"-- ~
the past 15 or 20 years need the! qenerosity, of the
mur~icipalities and'government tb-be able to pursue
recreational endeavours, i
)uld surely use a break
~e, who have retired in
our
The purpose of this letter is to sc
have ~'- -
L[]U cornrnissior~ accept our
American counterpart.
Thank you for your consideration
Bob Rodger,
127 Westwood Cr.,
WELLAND, Ont.
L3C 4R2
licit your support to
fees at par with our
PLANNING NEETING~APR 1 5 Z~ i O[-RGE Or, THE MR~IOR
The City of
Niagara Falls
Canada
Community Services Department
Municipal Works
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city,niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-mail: darrells@city, niagarafalls.on.ca
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thompson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Fails, Ontario
Members:
Re-'
MW-2002-08
Policy and Procedures for Road Oc
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City of Niagara Fails adopt the P(
Occupancy Permits and pass the associated Access By-law a
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of the Road Occupancy Policy is to regulate cot
works to be undertaken on City property, and to restore the
completion of work.
At present, the Municipai Consent Policy deals with Utiliti¢
municipai road ailowance, however, there is no policy which
such, depending on the contractor, the road cut may not be re
this occurs it becomes a long term maintenance cost, it genez
and it reduces the effective life of the road.
The objective of the Road Occupancy Policy is to ensure tha'
construction is achieved on restoration of road cuts. A consi
ensure that all projects are processed and undertaken in a sin
acceptable restoration.
PROCESSING
The application for a road Occupancy Permit will be process
Municipal Works. It is the intention of staff to process the a[
depending on the number of applications received. The foll~
permit process:
Municipal Works
Working Together to Serve Our
· Fire Services Parks, Recreation
Ed Dujlovic, P. Eng.
Director
MW-2002-08
tpril 15, 2002
:upancy Permits
,licy and Procedures for Road
id Obstruction By-law.
tractors who apply to.the City for
te to acceptable City standards upon
and their contractors with'm the
deals with private contractors. As
instated to City Standards. When
ates numerous resident complaints
a uniform and acceptable quality of
~tent and equitable system can
.ilar manner, yielding similar and
:d by the Engineering Section of
plications within five working days
~ing is a brief summary of the
'ommunity
Culture · Business Development
2002-04-15 2 MW2002-08
Application forms will be available at the Service Centre, Building Counter and
Engineering Counter. This ensures that the public and private contractors will be able to
complete the application form in association with any other application for permits, ie
building permits.
The completed forms are forwarded to the Manager of Construction for processing. The
Manager of Construction will coordinate the processing of the forms with the Parking and
Traffic Section, the Building Section and Parks and Recreation as required. The required
security deposit is calculated.
Once the permit is issued, the private contractor has two weeks to commence the work.
Unless an extension is requested and approved, if the work has not commenced within
two weeks, the permit is null and void.
The contractor is responsible for contacting the City when the works commence. The
Manager of Construction will arrange for inspection. If the contractor does not contact the
City upon commencement, the Manager of Construction may cash the security deposit or
extend the maintenance period to ensure that the road cut is properly restored.
Upon completion of the work, the contractor notifies the City by returning the permit and
requesting a final inspection.
Any deficiencies must be repaired by the contractor. If the contractor refuses to repair
deficiencies, than the security deposit is cashed and the work is done by the City.
Once the maintenance period is complete, the security deposit (less any portion used for
repairs) is returned.
Council's concurrence with the recommendation made would be appreciated.
PreP/are~d~y:
Manager of Engineering Services
f/,x3tfully Submitted by:
John MacDonald,
Chief Administrative Officer
Recommen/~ted by:
Ed Dujlovic, P. Eng.,
Director of Municipal Works
S:~PORTS~2002 Reports~vP~V-2002-08 Road Occupeney wpd
The Corporation of the City )f Niagara Falls
Policy and Procedures
Reviewing and Authori~
Road Occupancy Permi
April, 2002
~r
ng
Table of Contents
Page
1.0
2.0
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction .................................................... -2-
ROAD OCCUPANCY PROCESS AND PROCEDURES
3.0
2.1 Application ..................................................... -2-
2.2 Processing ..................................................... -2-
2.3 Commencement of Work .......................................... -3-
2.4 City Inspections ................................................. -3-
2.5 Restoration ..................................................... -3-
2.6 Completion of Works ............................................. -3-
~FEES
3.1 Fees .......................................................... -4-
APPENDICES
A
B
C
D
Road Occupancy Permit
Permit Conditions
(Reverse of Road Occupancy Permit)
Access By-law
Obstruction By-law
-2- January 21,2001
Policy and Procedures for
Road Occupancy Permits
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
The purpose of the Road Occupancy Policy is to regulate contt
to be undertaken on City property, and to restore the sit~
completion of work.
The objective of the Road Occupancy Policy is to reduce rom
term performance of road cut repairs. The City of Niagara F~
drainage, maintenance, and traffic serviceability of City str
policy & procedure to ensure that a uniform and acceptable
restoration of road cuts. A consistent and equitable system cm
and undertaken in a similar manner, yielding similar and acc
2.0 ROAD OCCUPANCY PROCESS AND PROCEE
The procedures for road occupancy permits outlined below
application, authorization and review of works undertaken
2.1 Application
The applicant is required to fill out the road occupancy p
Occupancy Permit) providing details of location, purpose of'
cuts. For access across City right-of-way, the applicant is to p:
as well as proposed access across parklands and encroachmen
application, along with sufficient Public Liability Insurance, i
of the Municipal Works Department at least two working day
or in the case cfa complete road closure, five working days. ~I
the application, must submit a deposit for works to be carrie,
required is outlined in Schedule "A" of Access By-law No.
In addition to the road occupancy permit, the applicant mt
building permit, sewer permit, parking meter permit and/o~
approval by the City, utility companies or other government
out. In addition, the contractor must prepare and submit a tr
Ministry of Transportation Guidelines. A copy of this plan n
2.2 Processing
The permit shall be processed by the Engineering Section o
other sections and departments as required. The road occup~
specified in the Access By-law * * -*** and/or Obstruction By-
as specified on the face of the permit or in writing by the
designate.
The permit holder is responsible for contacting all utility corn
actors who apply to the City for works
to acceptable City standards upon
I maintenance costs by means of long
lls is the authority responsible for the
:ets, according it has developed this
luality of construction is achieved on
t ensure that all projects are processed
~ptable restoration.
ill ensure a consistent approach to the
~ a City right-of-way.
:rmit form (refer to Figure 1: Road
~ork and dimensions of cut for utility
'ovide details of work to be performed
Is on sidewalks and/or roadways. The
to be forwarded to the Permits Clerk
prior to the commencement of work,
he applicant, at the time of submitting
out. The amount of deposit and fee
~t obtain and submit, if applicable, a
any other pemfit that would require
agencies prior to works being carded
fffic control plan in accordance with
rust be kept on site at all times.
f Municipal Works, with input from
ncy permit is subject to all conditions
law **-*** and any special provisions
Director of Municipal Works or his
~anies listed on the reverse side of the
Policy and Procedures for
Road Occupancy Permits
-3- January 21, 2001
road occupancy permit at least 48 hours prior to commencing works. The permit holder is also
responsible for contacting emergency services, Niagara Transit and the City's Traffic and Parking
Services Section if temporary road closure is required.
2.3 Commencement of Work
If work has not commenced within two (2) weeks of the issuance of the permit, the permit will be
considered null and void and the applicant will have to re-apply for a new permit.
2.4 City Inspections
The Engineering Section shall perfoim inspections during the period work is in progress by the
contractor. Field notes from the inspection are recorded, noting the date of the inspection and
general observations. Any deviations from the requirements of the permit are subject to immediate
stoppage of work, until the requirements have been met. A copy of the permit must be available on
the work site at all times. Failure of the contractor to produce an approved permit at the time of
inspection may result in termination of all works.
2.5 Restoration
The permit holder is required to restore the site (road, shoulder, curbs, sidewalks, boulevards,
parkland, etc.) to specifications supplied by the City's Municipal Works Department. The applicant
is required to complete restoration, in accordance with the time limits described on the permit, upon
substantial completion of the project.
If the permit holder is unable to complete the work by the completion date indicated on the permit,
the permit holder must apply to the Director of Municipal Works or his designate for an extension
at least two (2) working days prior to the completion date.
Refer to Figure 2 for restoration specifications for roads, sidewalks, trenches, boulevards, curbs, trees
and grass.
2.6 Completion of Works
Upon completion of all works, the permit holder must return the permit to the Municipal Works
Department after completing the bottom section of the permit. Staff conducts a final inspection to
ensure compliance of restoration works according to City specifications.
If the work is not completed to the satisfaction of the City, the contractor will be contacted to carry
out remedial repairs or the City may carry out remedial work at the applicant's expense.
Reimbursement of works carried out by the City will be obtained from the deposit or through other
means (certified cheque, municipal taxes, court action if necessary) should the amount of the deposit
be less than the cost of the works performed. Similarly, any other works carried out by the City
relative to the contractor's construction either before, during and after construction works will be
subject to reimbursement. These include, but are not limited to the removal of parking meters,
installation of construction signing and temporary removal or relocation of signs.
Policy and Procedures for
Road Occupancy Permits
All restoration work completed under the permit shall be gu~
workmanship) for a twelve (12) month period after the date
the amount of five percent (5%) of the value of the work con
until the expiration of the guarantee period. All deficiem
expiration of the guarantee period will be rectified to the
Municipal Works. Furthermore, the contractor's guarantee st
the guarantee period.
The City will retain the remaining deposit until the end of the
cut works. Similarly, final acceptance for sod will be a mink
trees/shrubs, the final acceptance will be a minimum of one'
3.0 FEES & DEPOSITS
See Schedule "A" of Access By-Law **-*** for fee stmctu
January 21, 2001
xanteed (against faulty materials and
[completion. A security reduction in
tpleted shall be held back by the City
ies in the work arising prior to the
rdtten satisfaction of the Director of
.all extend for works occurring within
twelve (12) month guarantee for road
lum of 30 days after installation. For
ear after planting.
Appendix 'A'
Road Occupancy Permit
CibJ of Niagara Falls
Municipal Works Department
4310 Queen Street
Niagara Falls ON L2E 6X5
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
APPLICANT
Company Name:
Mailing Address:
Owner's Name:
Office Telephone No.: (
Fax Number: ( )
WORK AND LOCATION
Purpose of Work:
Location(s):
Anticipated Start Date:
Anticipated Completion Date:
Anticipated Working Hours:
Road Closure. Required: [] Yes
Date/Times for Road Closure:
Application - Road Occupancy Permit
Con1
) Cellular TelE
DETAILS
Road Surfa(
& Access Permit
Permit No.:
act Person:
~hone No.:
[] No
DIAGRAM OF THE WORK AREA
(;omments/DescriDtion: __
[] Road Cut [] Access
e type:
Estimated Size of Cut
Length Width Depth Area
;ulvert: IDia= [ ---[
L~L- ..................... ~
Road:
Curb:
Sidewalk:
Boulevard:
Other:
Det ,ur Plan must
mpany permit
~ the undersigned h~'e read and understood the Infarrnaflon provided ond og~e 1o oblde by o
Applicant's
Signature:
North
conditions listed on the reverse side of this perrnlt, All in
Date:
Upon completion of permanent restoration, this section is to compl
of Niagara Falls Municipal Works Department at the address indic;
Dates of restoration: Start:
Name of App cant:
~ted and this permit returned to the City
ited above.
Finish:
Signature:
Appendix 'B'
Permit Conditions
(Reverse of Road Occupancy Permit)
CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS
MUNICIPAL WORKS DEPARTMENT
This application must be delivered to the City of Niagara Falls Municipal Wor}
commencing work and five working days prior to a complete road closure.
I. ROAD OCCUPANCY OR ROAD CUT INFORMATION
The permit holder agrees to indemnify and save harmless The Corpo~
claims and/or actions that may arise from the issuance of this permit,
within the limits of the road allowances will be guaranteed for a peri,
final restoration.
b. The permit holder agrees to notify the following at least 48 hours pri
s Department two working days prior to
ation of the City of Niagara Falls from all
and further agrees that all required works
~d of 12 months, from the date of completion of
to commencing works:
City of Niagara Falls - Municipal Works ....................... 356-7521
Region of Niagara - Water, Sanitary and Traffic Cables ............. 685-1571
Niagara Falls Hydro .......................................... 356-2681
Ontario Hydro ................................... , .......... 357-0322
Traffic Control Cables - M.T.O .......................... (416) 643-1232
Enbridge Consumers Gas .................................... 641-4841
Bell Canada .................................... , .......... 310-2355
Cogeco TV ..................................... , .......... 374-5571
Canadian Niagara Power Co. Ltd ............................... 871-0330
AND FOR ROAD CLOSURES
Niagara Regionai Police ..................................... 688-4111
Niagara Transit .......................................... 356-1179
Ambulance Services ........................................ 358-0171
City of Niagara Falls - Traffic and Parking Services ............... 356-7521
Niagara Falls Fire Department ................................. 356-1321
Niagara Parks Police ........................................ 356-1338
The permit holder agrees, to accept and indemnify The Corporation
temporary and permanent repairs to the approval cut, including any
to ensure a safe condition and any subsequent maintenance work re;
The permit holder agrees, unless otherwise specified on the face of'
material thoroughly compacted in 12" (300mm) layers to roadways,
Mix to roadways immediately on completing backfilling operations,
conditions.
NOTE: I.
Contractor must also perform final paving using a mit
placed and compacted in 2 layers to 100% S.P.D. (St~
of road cuts to be milled down minimum 1" (25mm)
2. Contractors must reinstate sidewalks, curb and/or gw
with current City standards and specifications. Positi
The permit holder shall supply, erect and maintain all barricades, si
control devices, detour signing and other safety warning devices in
Roadway Work Operations - Field Edition and the Manual of Unif~
work.
The permit holder shall maintain access to all public and private pn
on the face of this permit.
The roadway is to be opened for two-way traffic after construction
A copy of this permit must be available on the job site at all times,
This road occupancy permit is issued pursuant to the latest Access
of the City of Niagara Falls for all costs included in making
md all periodic site inspections by the permit holder, required
fired during the 12 month warranty period.
tis permit, to backfill, the authorized cut with Granular 'A'
driveways, shoulders and sidewalks, plus 2" (50mm) of Cold
remainder of right of way and/or easement to existing
imum of 2" (50mm) HL8HS and 1" (25mm) HL3HS Asphalt,
ndard Proctor Density), or to existing depth of asphalt. Edges
nd 12" (300mm) back from edges.
er, exposed concrete roads and other surfaces in accordance
re drainage shall be maintained during the course of operations.
;ns, signals, flag men, delineation hazard markers, traffic
accordance with the Ministry of Transportation Manual for
rm Traffic Control Devices of Ontario for the duration of the
~erties for the duration of the work, unless otherwise specified
)uts.
luring actual construction or reinstatement.
3y-law No. ?%?? and Obstruction By-law No.??-??.
j. The requirements of the road occupancy permit pertaining to any aspect of this permit shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of
Municipal Works or his designate, otherwise the job site will be closed until those requirements have been met.
k. Any alterations to this permit must be authorized by the Director of Municipal Works or his designate prior to such changes taking
place.
1. The return of this permit to the City of Niagara Falls Municipal Works Department is notification of completion of work and
restoration of site.
2. ACCESS ACROSS CITY PROPERTY INFORMATION
Upon authorization it is agreed that:
a. Access only be made at the point(s) indicated on this permit.
Parkland must not be crossed when wet, or if precipitation has occurred in previous 24 hours.
The applicant will indemnify and save harmless the City from all liabilities, damages, costs, claims, suits or actions arising out of
any breach or non-performance of any covenant herein contained on the part of the permit holder, and any damage to the property
howsoever occasioned by the use and occupation of the property by the permit holder or any person or persons including death,
resulting at any time therefrom, occurring on or about the property or any part thereof or resulting from the use of the property
during the term of the permit for any purpose whatever.
d. Any such damage occurring during the time of the permit, shall be reported to the Municipal Works Department forthwith.
e. Permits are valid for the location, date and time specified only, and may not be changed or altered unless approval is obtained fi.om
the Municipal Works Department.
f. The Municipal Works Department reserves the right to cancel permits wherever and whenever it is deemed necessary.
g. This permit is valid only al[er pre-construction inspection has been made.
h. Restoration of the site shall be completed within ten (10) days of the substantial completion of the project.
i. Refund of security deposit by the City will be within thirty (30) days of the final acceptance of the whole restoration, or expiration
of the warranty period, whichever occurs last.
j. F'inal acceptance for sod shall be a minimum of thirty (30) days after installation.
k. Final acceptance of trees and shrubs will be a minimum of I year from the date of successful planting and replanting.
1. The City reserves the right to require the permit holder to provide proof of insurance coverage to the form and Satisfaction of the
City.
Appendix '(
Access By-law By-l:
BY-LAW
Number
To prohibit the obstructing,
encumbering or fouling of highways
and to regulate the crossing of
curbings, sidewalks, boulevards and
parkland
WHEREAS pursuant to subsection 314 (1) of the Municipal Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.M.45, as
amended, a municipal council may pass by-laws for prohibiting or regulating the obstructing,
encumbering, injuring or fouling of highways or bridges;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls ENACTS as
follows:
DEFINITIONS
1. In this by-law:
(a) "construction" means anything done in the erection, installation, extension or material
alteration, demolition or repair of a building'or structure and the associated works, and
includes the installation of building units fabricated or moved from elsewhere and the
installation of swimming pools;
(b) "City" means The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls;
(c) "iDirector" means the Director of Municipal Works for The Corporation of the City of
Niagara Falls, or a person designated by him;
(d) "highway" has the same meaning as in the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.H.4, as
amended;
(e) "parkland" is as defined in By-law 71-57, as amended; and
(f) "person" includes a corporation and its successors and assigns and any reference to the
masculine gender in this by-law shall also be deemed to include the feminine.
OBSTRUCTION OF HIGHWAYS, DITCHES AND CULVERTS
(1) No person shall obstruct or foul any highway or bridge under the jurisdiction of the City
by any means whatsoever.
o
-2-
(2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), the
or bridge includes:
(a) the building or maintaining of a fence on a hit
(b) the depositing of snow or ice on a highway; aa
(c) the depositing of large refuse containers or bu
No person shall obstruct a ditch or culvert which is upon
No person shall throw, place, deposit or permit to be bio'
occupied by him, hand-bills, garbage, rubbish, the carca~,
or waste material or material dropped from a newspaper,
Any person employing or using tracks, graders or loader
excavations for construction purposes, or in conveying e
such excavations or from any other place along the publi
operation involving the passage of such vehicles to and
construction purposes or otherwise, shall at once remov,
or from any public place where the same may be deposit
material that may fall from the wheels of or from such tr
employ and keep employed a sufficient number of swee
may be necessary to keep all such pavements and sidew
from earth, rubbish or other material.
The Director may give to any such person noted in secti{
removal from such pavements and sidewalks of such em
four (4) hours of receipt of the notice, and notifying suct
with the said notice, the City will perform the work at hi
In the event that such person does not comply with the d
may perform the work, or cause it to be done, and the cc
such person by court action, or the same may be recover
CROSSING OF CURBINGS, SIDEWALKS, BO1
(1) Every person owning land abutting a highway on wi
construction which necessitates the crossing of curb!
boulevards shall submit to the Director an applicatic
accompanied by a deposit, as determined by City Cc
metre of the lot on which the construction takes plac
sidewalk or boulevard.
(2) Where access to the land where construction is to
parkland, the owner of the land shall submit to the 12
provided by the Director accompanied by a deposit
>bstmction or fouling of a highway
away;
rd/or
lk containers on a highways.
a City highway.
~m or escape from premises
s of any animal, or any other refuse
on any highway in the City.
; or other vehicles in making
nth, rubbish or other material from
: highways of the City, or in any
rom any site, whether for
from the pavements and sidewalks,
~d, all earth, rubbish or other
acks, graders or loaders, and shall
ers or workers or use such means as
lks in a clean condition and free
~n 5 a notice in writing requiring the
th, rubbish or other material within
t person that in default of compliance
s expense.
irection in the said notice, the City
st thereof may be recovered from
.~d in like manner as municipal taxes.
7LEVARDS & PARKLAND
ich land he intends to carry out
ngs, sidewalks, grass or paved
n in a form provided by the Director
uncil from time to time, per linear
where the lot abuts such curbing,
~- place is available only by crossing
,irector an application in a form
~s determined by City Council from
-3-
(3)
time to time.
An application required by subsections (1) or (2) shall be accompanied by a non-
refundable administration fee as determined by City Council from time to time.
(1) 'Upon receipt of an application under subsection 8(2), the Director shall determine the
location where the parkland crossing shall be permitted.
(2) No person shall drive construction vehicles or equipment anywhere except as designated
by the Director.
10. (1)
The owner of the land where construction is to take place shall repair any damage to
curbings, sidewalks, boulevards or parkland occasioned by a crossing to which
subsections 8(1) or (2) applies.
(2)
(3)
In the event that the said owner does not complete the repairs required by subsection (1),
the City may complete the repairs and retain from the deposit required by subsections 8(1)
and (2) an amount equal to the cost of the repairs.
The owner or the occupier of lands upon which construction is taking place as set out in
subsections 8(1) and (2) shall take all necessary steps to prevent building materials, waste
or soil from being spilled or tracked onto the highway by vehicles or equipment going to
or coming from the lands during the course of the said construction and the owner or
occupier of the said lands shall reimburse the City for any costs incurred by the City in
removing such building materials, waste, soil or other material.
(4)
(5)
The City may recover its costs incurred pursuant to subsection (3) from the deposit
required under subsections 8(1) and (2).
Where the costs incurred by the City under subsections (2) and (3) exceed the amount of
money deposited under subsection 8(1) and (2), the excess cost thereof may be recovered
from such person by court action, or the same may be recovered in like manner as
municipal taxes.
.RETURN OF DEPOSIT MONEY
11. (1) When construction has been completed and the City has not incurred and will not be
incurring any costs under subsections 10(2) and (3), the City shall, upon application by
the person having paid the deposit required by subsections 8(1) and (2), refund the
deposit to that person.
(2) Where the costs incurred or to be incurred by the City under subsections 10(2) and (3) are
less than the amount of the deposit required by subsections 8(1) and (2), the City shall,
upon application by the person having paid the deposit, refund the difference to that
person.
(3) Where any money paid under subsections 8(1) and (2) remains unclaimed for a period of
-4-
six (6) years, the provisions of paragraph 2(b) of sect
1990, c.M.45, as amended, shall apply.
12. Any person who contravenes the provisions of the by-la~
conviction is liable to a penalty not to exceed Five Thom
13. By-law 77-272 and By-law 6317 are hereby repealed.
14. This By-1aw shall come into force and take effect on the
Passed this day of 2002.
DEAN IOFRIDA, CITY CLERK
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Third Reading:
WA YN J
on 314 of the Municipal Act, R.S.O.
r is guilty of an offence, and upon
and Dollars ($5,000.00).
day upon which it is finally passed.
THOMSON, MAYOR
SCHEDULE "A"
Access By-Law
Road Occupancy Permits
Fees
Administration Fee
$50.00
Crossing of Curbings, Sidewalks, Boulevards
$25.00/linear metre
Parkland Crossings
0) $2.50 for each square metre of turf area to be crossed;
(iii) $25.00 for each square metre of asphalt park walkway to be crossed;
(iii) $220.00 where the crossing necessitates the removal of part of any fence;
(iv) $120.00 where a curb has to be crossed;
(iv) $140.00 where a sidewalk has to be crossed; and
(vi) where the crossing may disturb trees or shrubs, an amount to be determined by the
Director which represents the replacement cost of any tree or shrub which might
be damaged.
Deposits for Right of Way Works
(i) $100.00 for each square metre of road to be excavated;
(iii) $65.00 for each liner metre of concrete curb and/or gutter to be excavated;
(iv) $50.00 for each square metre of concrete sidewalk to be excavated;
(v) $40.00 for each square metre of asphalt sidewalk to be excavated;
(vi) $10.00 for each square metre of grass, gravel or asphalt boulevard to be excavated;
and
(vii) $10.00 for each square metre of land to be excavated between the sidewalk and the
property line, or the land between the edge of roadway and the edge of cut furthest
from the roadway if a sidewalk does not exist.
Appendix 'D'
Obstruction By-law By-law **-**
BY- LAW
Number
A by-law for prohibiting or regulating the
injuring of highways or bridges and for
closing temporarily any highway or portion
of a highway under the jurisdiction of the
City of Niagara Falls for any period during
the construction, repair or improvement of
such highway.
WHEREAS pursuant to subsection 314(1) of the Municipal Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.M.45, as
amended, a municipal council may pass by-laws for prohibiting or regulating the obstructing,
encumbering, injuring or fouling of highways or bridges;
AND WHEREAS pursuant to paragraph 43 of section 208 of the Municipal Act, R.S.O. 1990,
c.M.45, as amended, a municipal council may pass by-laws for closing temporarily any highway or
portion of a highway under the jurisdiction of the municipality for any period during the
construction, repairing or improvement of any such highway or portion thereof, or of any works
under, over, along, across or upon such highway or portion thereof;
AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls deems it expedient
to authorize the Director of Municipal Works to temporarily close any highway under thej urisdiction
of the City of Niagara Falls for the purposes as authorized by this section;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls ENACTS as
follows:
1. In this by-law,
(a), "City" means The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls;
(b) "Director" means the Director of Municipal Works for the City of Niagara Falls, or a person
designated by him;
(c) "entrance culvert" means an arched drain or conduit for the passage of water constructed on
City land under a driveway or other access point to private lands;
(d) "highway" has the same meaning as in the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.H.4, as
amended;
(e) "permit holder" means any person to whom a permit has been issued under this by-law;
(f) "person" includes a corporation and its successors and assigns and any reference to the
masculine gender in this by-law shall also be deemed to include the feminine; and
(g) "working day" means any Monday to Friday inclusive which is not a statutory holiday
between 08:30 and 16:30 hours:
-2-
2. (1) No person shall commence construction or repair of:
(a) an entrance culvert, or
(b) any work over, on, under or adjacent to any C
the temporary closing, obstruction or encumb~
unless and until a permit has been obtained for such t
barricades and other safety measures have been proviz
traffic routes have been established in accordance wilt
law.
(2)
All applications for a permit required under subsec
provided by the Director and shall be accompanied by ~
be required by the Director, including payments and fe
time to time.
(3) An application required under subsections (1) and
refundable administration fee as determined by Ci
administration fee shall not be required for Public U~
(4)
If the work to be undertaken necessitates a temporary
permit shall take such steps as are reasonable and nec
persons who will be affected by the temporary closu
(1) (a)
If the work to be undertaken does not necessi
application to the Director for a permit require~
two (2) working days before the date of comu
(b)
If the work to be undertaken necessitates a teml
to the Director for a permit required under S¢
working days before the date of commencem~
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1), if
immediately for public health, safety or welfare reas(
permit required under Section 2 shall be made witk
working day after the date of commencement of the~
4. When a permit has been issued, the permit holder shall,.
(a) maintain a reasonable safe alternate route for vehicu]
(b) provide and maintain reasonable local access routes
whose access will be affected by the proposed works
(c) supply, erect and maintain at his own expense all baa
and other safety warning devices as may be required 1
and pedestrian traffic; and
.ty highway which is likely to require
:ring of part or all of such highway,
,urpose from the Director, until signs,
[ed, and, if necessary, until alternative
. the provisions of Section 4 of this by-
[ion (1) shall be made on the forms
~uch other supportive materials as may
~s as determined by City Council from
(2) shall be accompanied by a non-
~ Council from time to time. The
ilities.
highway closure, the applicant for the
essary to advise and accommodate all
:e of the highway.
rate a temporary highway closure, an
under Section 2 shall be made at least
mcement of the work.
)rary highway closure, an application
ction 2 shall be made at least five (5)
~nt of the work.
Ihe work to be undertaken is required
ns an application to the Director for a
in the first four (4) hours of the first
york.
luring the course of the work,
ar and pedestrian traffic;
for all property owners or occupants
'icades, signs, covers, lights, flagmen
~y the Director to protect the vehicular
-3-
(d) provide and maintain pedestrian traffic routes which are separated from vehicular traffic and
the project site in a manner satisfactory to the Director.
Where a permit holder fails to comply with any of the provisions of Section 4, the Director may
perform the works necessary to effect compliance with the Section, and all costs and expenses
incurred thereby shall be borne by the permit holder.
If the works to be undertaken cannot be completed by the expiry date set out in the permit, the
permit holder shall make an application to the Director for an extension of time and the
application shall be made at least two (2) working days prior to the expiry date set out in the
permit.
7. (1) No pemfit holder shall remove, relocate, conceal from view or interfere with any traffic signs
in the course of carrying out the work.
(2)
If a pemfit holder requires traffic signs to be temporarily removed or relocated he shall
request the Director to carry out such removal and all costs thereby incurred shall be borne
by the permit holder.
(3)
Ifa project requires that parking control devices be temporarily removed, the permit holder
shall reimburse the City for revenue lost during the period the parking control devices are out
of service, based on the current rate charged, plus applicable taxes, per day, per parking
control device. The permit holder shall request the Director to carry out such remoVal, and
all costs thereby incurred shall be borne by the permit holder.
8. All work to be undertaken under a permit issued under this by-law shall be carried out in a
manner which is satisfactory to the Director.
9. (1)
When a hazardous condition arises during the course of the work undertaken by a permit
holder, the permit holder shall immediately notify the Director and any affected utility
company of the condition.
(2)
When a hazardous condition arises during the course of the work undertaken by the permit
holder, the Director may order the road closed, the work halted or other appropriate remedial
action to be taken. Where such action is taken by the Director no person shall perform any
further work without the authorization of the Director.
10. The permit holder shall notify the Director immediately when the work undertaken has been
completed.
11. (1) Upon completion of the work the permit holder shall restore the highway affected by the
work to the condition satisfactory to the Director and shall guarantee the workmanship on
all the restoration work within the limits of the road allowance for a period of eighteen (18)
months from the date of completion of the work.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1), the restoration of the highway may be
carried out by the City and the permit holder shall reimburse the City for the costs of the
-4-
restoration.
(3) The City may recover its costs incurred pursuant to sul
under subsection 2(2).
(4)
In the event that the permit holder does not complete
or does not complete the repairs required by subsecti,
Director, the City may complete the repairs and
subsection 2(2) an amount equal to the cost of the re
(5)
Where the costs incurred by the City under subsecl
money deposited under subsection 2(2), the excess co:
person by court action, or the same may be recovered
(6) The permit holder shall accept a maintenance holdba,
of the value of the work completed until the expiratk
12. The pemfit holder shall be responsible for all damage
damages arise out of the work undertaken by the permit ]
13. The permit holder shall provide Public Liability Insuran4
to the City, and such insurance shall name the City as co
14. Work performed by the City under this by-law shall not r,
servants or workers from any responsibility or any liabilit
work under the pemfit.
15. Every person who uses a highway or portion of a highway
this by-law does so at his own risk and the municipality i
by reason of the person using the highway or portion the
16. The permit holder shall produce an approved permit if re
any other person who is authorized to enforce this by-la~
~section (2) from the deposit required
~te repairs required by subsection (1)
in (1) in a manner satisfactory to the
etain from the deposit required by
irs.
n (3) and (4) exceed the amount of
~t thereof may be recovered from such
in like manner as municipal taxes.
:k in the amount often percent (10%)
.n of the warranty period.
~ to all existing services when such
tolder.
',e in an amount and form satisfactory
.insured.
:lieve the permit holder, or his agents,
arising out of the performance of the
which has been closed to traffic under
~ not liable for any damages sustained
reof so closed to traffic.
quested to do so by the Director or by
v during the course of the work.
17. The Director shall have the authority to order the stopp~ ge of any work over, on or under any
highway where an approved permit has not been issued qr where the conditions of an approved
permit, or provisions of this by-law, have not been complied with, and to revoke an approved
permit if the permit holder does not meet the requirements of the permit or of this by-law.
/
18. (1) Every person who contravenes any provision of this l~y-law is guilty of an offence and upon
conviction is liable to a fine of not more than Five Tlmusand Dollars ($5,000.00) exclusive
of costs. /
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 1, a person who without lawful authority uses
a highway or portion thereof closed to traffic and pr4 ~tected pursuant to this by-law, and/or
who removes or defaces any barricade, device, detour sign or notice placed thereon under this
by-law, is guilty of an offence and is liable to a p, malty of not more than Fifty Dollars
($50.00) plus costs and is also liable to the City for ar damage or injury occasioned by such
-5-
wrongful use, removal or defacement.
19. This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the day upon which it is finally passed.
Passed this day of 2002.
DEAN IOFRIDA, CITY CLERK
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Third Reading:
WA YNE THOMSON, MA YOR
The City of
Niagara Falls
Canada
Community Services Department
Municipal Works
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-mail: munwks@city.niagarafalls.on.
April 15
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thompson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
MW-2002-41
Beaverdams Road at Rysdah
School Crossing Guard Revi,
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that:
the assistance of a school crossing guard be
Beaverdams Road and Rysdale Street/Magn
the existing "Turn" sign facing westbound r
of Rysdale Street/Magnolia Drive be relocal
intersection and replaced with a "Sharp Cur
this intersection be reviewed once again for
crossing guard upon a full buildup of the O~
sidewalks are constructed on Rysdale Street
side of Beaverdams Road.
BACKGROUND:
Staff has carried out followup studies of the school crossing
Beaverdams Road and Rysdale Street/Magnolia Drive. A sc
this intersection in January 2002 prior to the completion oft{
assignment of the school crossing guard at this intersection,
installation.
Beaverdams Road is an arterial roadway that extends wester
limit of Niagara Falls. Beaverdams Road, in the study area i
narrow gravel shoulder and grass ditch on both sides. A con
entire north side of Beaverdams Road between Lundy's Lan{
Working Together to Serve Our Cc
Municipal Works · Fire Services · Parks, Recreation & Culture · BusinE
Ed Dujlovic, P. Eng.
Director
MW-2002-06
File G- 180-41
:a
2002
Street/Magnolia Drive
:W
removed from the intersection of
alia Drive;
aotorists on Beaverdams Road east
ed to the west side of the
?e" warning sign; and
the possible placement of a school
chard Grove Subdivision and when
Magnolia Drive and on the south
,uard operation at the intersection of
ool crossing guard was assigned to
~.chnical studies. In addition to the
all way stop was approved for
y from Lundy's Lane to the western
6.8 metres in width consisting of a
:rete sidewalk is present along the
and Kalar Road. Magnolia Drive
mmunity
ss Development · Building & By-Law
April 15, 2002 -2- MW-2002-4 !
extends southerly one block from Beaverdams Road to Spring Blossom Drive.
Rysdale Street extends three blocks from Beaverdams Road to Montrose Road. Currently, there
are no sidewalks on either Rysdale Street or Magnolia Drive.
The study area is primarily residential in nature. The study intersection is in a cross
configuration, consisting of north/south and east/west approaches. Aside from this location,
school crossing guards are present at Beaverdams Road and Cardinal Newman Way, and at the
Intersection Pedestrian Signal located at Montrose Road and Rysdale Street.
Studies and observations were recently carried out at the intersection of Beaverdams Road and
Rysdale Street/Magnolia Drive to determine if the assistance of a school crossing guard is
required. The warrants used to determine whether a crossing guard is warranted include the
number of children crossing the roadway, traffic volumes, visibility and collision history. A
school crossing guard assists children across the roadway during the morning, noon and
afternoon sessions for children attending Cardinal Newman School and Greendale Public School.
The designated school crosswalk is located on the east leg of the intersection.
Studies that were carried out indicate that very few children are utilizing this crossing. Over a
one week period, no children were observed crossing Beaverdams Road during the moming or
the lunch period. In the afternoon, two children and four children were observed crossing
Beaverdams Road on two separate days within the same week. The school crossing guard
studies indicate that there are acceptable gaps in each time period for children to safely cross
Beaverdams Road. Furthermore, with the recent installation of the all-way stop at the
intersection, safety for pedestrians has increased by requiring motorists to stop prior to
proceeding and thus allowing pedestrians to cross with the assistance of the stop signs.
A recent collision review indicates that there have been no reported collisions at the intersection
of Beaverdams Road and Rysdale Street/Magnolia Drive in the previous three years. Visibility at
the intersection is adequate for pedestrians and motorists.
Based on the results of the studies and observations, staff is recommending that the assistance of
the school crossing guard be removed from the intersection of Beaverdams Road and Rysdale
Street/Magnolia Drive. It is also recommended that this intersection be reviewed upon a full
buildup of the Orchard Grove Subdivision to determine whether a guard is warranted at that time.
Sidewalks are scheduled to be constructed in conjunction with development construction on the
east side of Magnolia Drive from Spring Blossom Drive to Beaverdams Road. A sidewalk on the
north side of Rysdale Street between Montrose Road and Beaverdams Road is included in the
2002 budget. A sidewalk on the south side of Beaverdams Road from Cardinal Newman Way to
Rysdale Street/Magnolia Drive, will be evaluated in the Beaverdams Road Environmental
Assessment. The sidewalk on Magnolia Drive is anticipated to be constructed by the developer
within a 2-year period.
April 15, 2002 -3-
The Committee's concurrence with the recommendations ou'
appreciated.
Prepared by:
Karl Dren, C.E.T.
Manager of Traffic & Parking Services
Respect
John M~
ChiefA
Approved by:
Ed Dujlovic, P. Eng.
Director of Municipal Works
J. Crcubioh
S :\TRAFFICh~.EPORTSX2002\2002 CouncilLMW-2002-4 l.wpd
MW-2002-41
lined in this report would be
itlly Submitted by:
tcDonald
Jministrative Officer
STUDY
ST.
~ LUND~S LN.
CAT.~LINA ST.
NORTH
NOT TO SCALE
Wes~
The Cltyof
Nl~g~m F,,~,,
Cannd~
LEGEND:
Stop Sign
O All-Way Stop
! {
VYield Sign
[~ Traftic Signal
MUNICIPAl, WORKS
TRA2'FIC & PARKING SERVICES
Beaverdams Road ~ Rysdale Street / Magnolia Drive
School Crossing Guard Review
April 16, 2002
Tim Burshtein
The City of
Niagara FallsI
Canada
Community Services Department
Municipal Works
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-mail: munwks@city.niagarafalls.on.
April 15
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thompson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members: RE:
MW-2002-42
Kister Road at Progress Stre
Intersection Control Review
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the existing yield signs located at the
Progress Street for northbound and southbound traffic be re
BACKGROUND:
The intersection of Kister Road and Progress Street located
large number of heavy vehicles. It is a four way intersection
signs. The existing yield signs for northbound and southbou
allocate the right of way for vehicles approaching the interse
that the existing yield signs be replaced with stop signs.
The Committee's concurrence with the recommendation out
appreciated.
Karl Dren, C.E.T.
Manager of Traffic & Parking Services
Approved b/~:
Ed Dujlovic, P. Eng.
Director of Municipal Works
S:\TRAFF IC~iI.EPO RT S~2002~2002 CouncilhMW-200242 wpd
Tim Burshtein
Respecl
John M
Chief3
Working Together to Serve Our Co
Municipal Works · Fire Services · Parks, Recreation & Culture · Busim
Ed Dujlovic, P. Eng.
Director
MW-200242
File G- 180-08
2002
intersection of Kister Road and
laced with stop signs.
a the Falls Industrial Park carries a
that is presently controlled by yield
ad traffic do not appropriately
',tion. Therefore, it is recommended
ined in this report would be
fully Submitted by:
:Donald
[ministrative Officer
munity
Development · Building & By-Law
MCCLF~ ST,
to bc
Yield Si .~n. s
PROGRBSS ST.
STUDY
INTERSECTION
CHIPPAWA PKWY.
DON MURffi ST,
NORTH
l~C~of
MUNICIPAl, WORKS
TRAFFIC & PARKING SERVICES
Kister Road / Progress Street
Intersection Control Review
April 16, 2002
Tim Burshtein
The City of
Niagara Falls
Canada
Community Services Department
Municipal Works
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-mail: munwks@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
A
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thomson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: MW-2002-46
Rodent Control
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council support the elimination of the skunk and ground~
to private residential property owners and on civic property.
and that
The existing Rodent Control Policy Section 319.2 be revised
BACKGROUND:
Staff recently suspended the City's skunk control program in'~
the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR). Presently the City pr
program on private residential and civic properties. Upon the h
control contractor traps the skunk or groundhog and release~,
boundaries in rural areas. In 2001 the City trapped 349 skunk,,
Recent changes to the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act(FC)
practise. The Ontario Regulation 665/98 states in section 133. (
kill wildlife under clause 3i (1)(b) of the Act shall, not later tht
the wildlife as soon as possible into the area in close proximit.
directed by the Ministry; Staff have contacted the MNR for a in'
proximity and has been advised that the animal must be rele
To continue this trapping program under this requirement
animals will more than likely find their way back to the origin
option once an animal is trapped would be to have the animal h
have an animal euthanased would be $160 to $200 per animal. '
cost to capture the animal which averages $100.00 per skunk. I
skunk and groundhog programs. If we continue to run this progt
cost an estimated $105,000 to operate this year. This increase
Operating Budget.
Working Together to Serve Our
Municipal Works Fire So.ices Parks, Recreation g Culture
Ed Dujlovic, P. Eng.
Director
MW-2002-46
~ril 15, 2002
og control program presently offered
:cordingly.
ht of recent information provided by
vides a skunk and groundhog control
omeowner's request the City's rodent
the animal outside the City's urban
and 5 groundhog.
.) prohibit our current trap and release
9 A person who captures but does not
!n 24 hours after capture, (a) release
~ to the capture site unless otherwise
erpretation of their definition of close
~ed within 1 km of capture point.
ould seem ineffective. The trapped
al den within several days. Our only
~manelykilled. The estimated cost to
['his cost would be over and above the
ast year the City spent $ 35,000 on the
am under the new MNR criteria it will
cost is not included in the 2002 City
Business Development
Building & By-Laws
MW-2002-46 - 2 -
April 15, 2002
Staff has contacted several local Municipalities and has found that none of the Cities contacted
provide a skunk and groundhog program.
Should Council support the elimination of the skunk control program the homeowner would have to
deal with the nuisance animal on their own. There are several web sites and publications available to
the public that deal with how to eliminate nuisance animals. Staff can provide this information to
residents upon request. Also, several local contractors in the Niagara Region can deal with nuisance
animals should the homeowner wish to have the animal removed at their cost.
Council's favourable consideration with the above recommendation would be appreciated.
P~epared by:
Manager of Building Services
Recommended by:
Ed Dujlovic, P. Eng.
Director of Mtmicipal Works
Respectfully submitted by:
-~(-- John MacDonald
Chief Administrative Officer
/SC
The City of
Niagara Falls
Canada
Community Services Department
Municipal Works
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2354
April 15
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thompson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re-'
RECOMMENDATION:
MW-2002-47
CN/CP Railway Corridor
It is recommended that the City exclude from the railway col
agreement, the lands that have been identified as contaminat
BACKGROUND:
As Council is aware during the due diligence period for t
determined that a part of the width of the railway lands in th~'
a result of activities undertaken by Cytec. Accordingly, the £
of closing of this land, however, the City did have the option
City carrying out further investigations.
Staff has determined that the cost that would be incurre¢
investigations and potential clean up activities would be gre
in questions, hence, staff is recommending that the City does
that CP Rail be advised accordingly.
Committee's concurrence with the above recommendation
Ed Dujlovic, P.Eng.
Director of Municipal Works
Respec
'~ John 5
Chief,~
Municipal Works
Working Together to Serve Our
· Fire Services · Parks, Recreation & Culture
Ed Dujlovic, P. Eng.
Director
MW-200t..47
2002
ad Purchase
ridor purchase, as provided for in the
:d within the north end of the line.
~te railway corridor purchase, it was
north end had been contaminated as
ity did not take possession at the time
of retaining ownership subject to the
to carry out further environmental
ater than the actual value of the lands
not retain ownership of the parcel and
rould be appreciated.
:fully Submitted by:
acDonald
~dministrative Officer
Business Development . Building and By-Laws
The City of
Niagara Fails
Canada
Community Services Department
Parks, Recreation & Culture
7565 Lundy's Lane
Niagara Falls, ON L2H 1G9
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-7404
E-mail: akon@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
April 15
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thomson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: R-2002-15 - Singing
AK/das
Attach.
RECOMMENDATION:
For the information and direction of Council.
BACKGROUND:
At their February 28, 2002 meeting, the Arts and Culture Co~
To have someone sing or play 'O Canada' at one Cig
month, on a trial basis for a two-month period at a tir
suitable for the agenda.
With Council's approval, the Members of the Commission
musician present to lead Council in the singing of our Nati,
Council meeting. The rationale for their recommendation is t
some of our local talented singers and musicians.
Respect
Karen )
Arts &
&\Council\Council 2002~R-2002-15 - Singing of thc National Anthemwpd
Municipal Works
Working Together to Serve Our 4
Fire Services · Parks, Recreation
Adele Kon
Director
R-2002-15
2002
f the National Anthem
missiOn passed the following motion:
Council meeting per
~e Council deems most
will arrange to have a vocalist or a
)nal Anthem prior to the start of the
) provide an opportunity to showcase
~alu, Chairperson -~/ ' -- '
;ulture Commission
'ommunity
Culture · Business Development
Niagara Falls JJj
Corporate Services Department
Clerk's Division
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www,city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-9083
E-mail: diorfida@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Februm
Mrs. Karen Akalu, Chair
Arts & Culture Commission
c/o 4756 St. Lawrence Avenue
Niagara Falls ON L2E 3X9
Dear Karen:
Sorry I did not get back to you sooner.
I brought up your request tbr the performing of the National.
Staff at City Hall. It was thought that having artists in wee
consuming.
Nonetheless, it was suggested that perhaps on special occasi
would be nice. We could have someone come in at the Cc
publicize Canada Day or if the Arts & Culture Commission w
· we could have one of the performers sing at Council to hel
Give me a call and we can look at a couple of appropriate
Sincer~
Dean
City CI
c. Adele Ken, Director of Parks, Recreation & Culture
Working Together to Serve Our,
Clerk's · Finance · Human Resources Information Systems
Dean Iorfida
City Clerk
21,2002
nthem at Council meetings to Senior
dy might be a bit disruptive and time
)ns the singing of the national anthem
uncil meeting prior to July Ist to help
as sponsoring an event or activity, then
plug the occasion.
tes.
¸y,
~rfida
erk
Legal . Planning & Development
The City of
Niagara Falls~
Canada
Community Services Department
Parks, Recreation & Culture
7565 Lundy's Lane
Niagara Falls, ON L2H 1G9
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-7404
E-mail: akon@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
April 15
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thomson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: R-2002-18 - Parks an,
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Schedules for Special Events and Regular Use o1
Grounds, be approved by City Council.
BACKGROUND:
In accordance with City Policy, applications were requested by
use of Municipal Athletic Fields, to make application, in wril
On Tuesday, April 9th, 2002, all interested organizations ant
meeting to review the proposed schedules. As a result of thi:
a general agreement was reached regarding the schedules.
Permits for the use of the Parks, Athletic Fields and School
2OO2
Adele Ken
Director
R-2002-18
Field Use 2002 Schedule
'Parks, Athletic Fields, and School
all persons or organizations requiring
ing, to Parks, Recreation & Culture.
individuals were invited to attend a
meeting and subsequent discussion,
;rounds will be issued.
A e K~on~~Recommended by:
~ ~ohn MacDonald
Director of Parks, Recreation & Culture -- (~hief Administrative Officer
/
S:\Council\Counci12002\R-2002-18 - Parks and Field Use 2002 Schedule.wpd ~
',espectfully Submitted:
Municipal Works
Working Together to Serve Our ¢Ommunity
Fire Services Parks, Recreation : Culture . Business Development
The City of
Niagara Falls
Canada
Corporate Services Department
Finance Division
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2016
E-mail: kburden@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
April 15,
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thomson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: F-2002-24 - Municipal Ac
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the municipal accounts totallin
April 15, 2002.
BACKGROUND:
The accounts have been reviewed by the Director of Finance
is listed on tonight's. Council agenda.
Recommended by:
K.E. Burden
Director of Finance
Respect
John M',
Chief A
Approved by:
T. Ravenda
Executive Director of Corporate Services
KEB :j d
Working Together to Serve Our ~
Clerk's Finance · Human Resoumes-- Information System
F-2002-24
Kenneth E. Burden
Director of Finance
2002
counts
$4,120,271.69 for the period ending
and the by-law authorizing payment
'ully submitted:
tcDonald
:lministrative Officer
7ommunity · Legal
Planning & Development
Niogoro Foils
Cclnod~,~.~l~
Corporate Services Department
Finance Division
4310 Queen Street
PO Box 1023
Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-2016
E-maih kburden~city.niagarafalls.on.ca
His Worship Mayor Wayne Thomson
and Members of the Municipal Council
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members: Re: F-2002-25 - Extension Agreeme]
Greenworld Enterprises Roll #
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council approve the extension agreement for Mont~
Maraschiello, President of Greenworld Enterprises.
BACKGROUND:
Section 8-(1) of the Municipal Tax Sales Act provides that"a:
the registration of the tax arrears certificate and before the ex1
in subsection 9 (1), may authorize an extension agreement wi~
period of time in which the cancellation price is to be paid ."
On April 23rd, 2001, the property located at Montrose Road, o
registered due to tax arrears. The present tax arrears balance
Mr. Jim Marachiello, President of Greenworld Enterprises
extension agreement to G-reenwofld Enterprises based on the
1) Commencing May 16th, 2002, Pre-Authorized Pay
2) The ratepayer agrees to pay all taxes as they beton
3) On or before April 15~, 2004, a payment for the
Staff supports the request of Mr. Maraschiello and, should ti
extension agreement will follow for Council's endorsement.
Working Together to Serve Our ¢
Clerk's · Finance · Human Resources · Information System.
F-2002-25
Ken Burden
Director
Iri115,2002
:-Montrose Road ES
;725 130 004 19258
)se Road as proposed by Mr. Jim
nunicipality, by a by-law passed after
~iry of the one-year period mentioned
h the owner of the land extending the
arned by Greenwodd Enterprises was
is $13,666.54.
is requesting that the City grant an
following repayment proposal:
nent Plan of $800.00 per month.
~e due during the agreement.
dance of the cancellation price.
Committee concur, a By-law for this
Legal
Planning & Development
Apfil15,2002 -2- F-2002-25
Prepared by:
L. Antonio
Coordinator of Tax
Utilities, and Other Receivables
Approved by:
T. Ravenda
Executive Director of Corporate Services
Recommended by:
K.E. Burden
Director of Finance
Respectfully submitted:
-(~ Jo~ MacDonald
Chief Administrative Officer