2003/03/311)
FIFTH MEETING
Monday, March 31, 2003
From 4:00 p.m. to 5:45 p.m.
City Hall, Committee Room #2A & B
Approval of the 2003 3 17 Community Services Committee Minutes.
2) REPORTS
a) MW-2003-66 -
Main Street Environmental Assessment
STAFF CONTACT
Ed Dujlovic
b) MW-2003-67 - Casino Road EA - Update
Ed Dujlovic
c) R-2003 - 18 -
d) R-2003-20 -
e) R-2003-17 -
Development Options of Phase 2 of
Millennium Trail - NOTICES SENT OUT
TO BEGIN AT 5:00 p.m.
Chippawa Lions Park Swimming Pool
Proposal Selection
Niagara Youth Network Arena Waiver Request
Adele Kon
Adele Kon
Adele Kon
BBS-2003-04 - Tender for Demolition of Unsafe Building at
4052 Portage Road
Ed Dujlovic
g) MW-2003-68 -
Huron Street, west of Ontario Avenue,
Chicane Operational Review
Ed Dujlovic
3) NEW BUSINESS
4) ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING,
Monday, March 17, 2003, City Hall, Room 2 at 4:00 p.m.
PRESENT:
Chairman Alderman Victor Pietrangelo, Mayor Wayne Thomson,
Alderman Paisley Janvary-Pool, Alderman Shirley Fisher, Alderman
Janice Wing, Alderman Judy Orr, Alderman Norm Puttick, Alderman
Wayne Campbell, Alderman Kim Craitor, Alderman Carolynn Ioannoni,
Alderman Ken Feren, Alderman Art Federow.
STAFF:
John MacDonald, Colin Ruddell, Dean Iorfida, Ken Burden, Ray Kailio,
Darrell Smith, Karl Dren, Ed Dujlovic, Sue Forcier, Adele Kon.
ABSENT:
Alderman Selina Volpatti
PRESS:
Corey Larocque, Niagara Falls Review
GUESTS:
Nick Paiombo - Delcan
Italia Gilberti - Broderick & Partners
Mr. DiCosimo - Hilton Hotel, Mr. Menechella - Niagara 21st Group,
Mr. Yerich Jr - Skylon, David Maddocks - FMC, Mr. Kerrio - NHH,
Mr. Jovanovic - Lincoln Motor Inn
MINUTES
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN FISHER and seconded by Alderman Craitor that the
minutes of the February 17, 2003 meeting be approved.
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
2) REPORTS
a) MW-2003-55 - Update on Casino Roads Environmental Assessment
After a brief presentation by Mr. Nick Palombo of Delcan, Members of Council questioned the
various options and the effects they would have on the surrounding area. Italia Gilberti on behalf
on the stakeholders stated that the BIA would like to have one additional meeting before this
report is sent out with preferred Option ld since the BIA would prefer Option lb. Alderman
Ioannoni requested that Council be notified of the above meeting.
2
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN CRAITOR, seconded by Alderman Ioannoni that
Committee authorizes staff to prepare the Environmental Study Report and meet with area
stakeholders.
Motion:
Conflict:
Action:
Carried
Alderman Orr ~ Employed by Casino
Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
b) MW-2003-45 - Review of Parking Meter Fines
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN CRAITOR, seconded by Alderman Fisher that the set f'me
of $15.00, be reduced to $10.00, for the Downtown BIA and the Main Street BIA areas only.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
c) 1VUvV-2003-32 - Huron Street, west of Ontario Avenue Chicane
Skateboarding Concerns
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN FEREN, seconded by Mayor Thomson that the report be
deferred for more information.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
d) MVv'-2003-51 - Union Marsh Drain Petition
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN FISHER, seconded by Alderman Feren that the attached
petition for the improvement of the Union Marsh Drain be accepted by Committee in order to
proceed with the improvements.
Motion: Carried
Conflict: Alderman Federow
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
e)
MW-2003-39 - CN Railway Upgrade Kalar Road - (Lundy's Lane to Beaverdams
Road Modifications to Design and Cost Estimate)
IT WAS MOVED BY MAYOR THOMSON, seconded by Alderman Feren that the City of
Niagara Falls request CN Rail and the Minister of Transport to modify the agreement for the cost
sharing and future maintenance of the gate and Warning Control System on Kalar Road.
3
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
f) MW-2003-54 - Site Alteration Permit Policies and Procedures
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN FEREN, seconded by Alderman Fisher that staff be
directed to prepare a by-law for Council's consideration to regulate the placing or dumping of
fill, removal of topsoil or alternation to the grade of the land.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
g) MW-2003-56 - NW Quadrant Servicing Study EA
IT WAS MOVED BY MAYOR THOMSON, seconded by Alderman Feren that The City of
Niagara Falls support the f'mdings and the preferred alternative described in the Northwest
Quadrant Servicing Study - Environmental Assessment and further that staff be authorized to
meet with the benefiting landowners to discuss cost sharing alternatives.
Motion:
Action:
CanSed
Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
h)
MW-2003-57 - Mid-Peninsula Transportation Corridor EA
Terms of Reference - Study Update
IT WAS MOVED BY MAYOR THOMSON, seconded by Alderman Feren that The City of
Niagara Falls support the continued efforts of the Ministry of Transportation to finalize the Mid-
Peninsula Transportation Corridor Environmental Assessment - Terms of Reference.
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
MW-2003-58 - Development Agreement for the Beautification of Former Railway
Lands - Victoria Avenue (east side) to Clifton Hill - HOCO
Streetscape Proposal
IT WAS MOVED BY ALDERMAN FISHER, seconded by Mayor Thomson that the City
approve the proposed landscaping plan and sidewalk construction and further that staff be
directed to prepare a Development Agreement.
Motion:
Action:
4
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
J)
MW-2003-59 - Development Agreement Oakwood Drive Extension Lundy's
Regency Arms Corporation
IT WAS MOVED BY MAYOR THOMSON, seconded by Alderman Craitor that staffbe
authorized to prepare a Development Agreement with Lundy's Regency Arms Corporation
regarding the extension of Oakwood Drive.
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
k) R-2003-01 -
Landscape Development of the Kalar Road Community SPOrts Park
- Phase 2 "Home for Girls Soccer" - TR 18-2002
IT WAS MOVED BY MAYOR THOMSON, seconded by Alderman Feren that the City enterS
into a contract agreement with Stevensville Lawn Service Inc. for the tendered works.
Motion:
Action:
Carried
Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
1) R-2003-15 - Don Johnson Park - Washroom Facilities
IT WAS MOVED BY MAYOR THOMSON, seconded by Alderman Feren that washroom
facilities at Don Johnson Park be installed at the City's expense.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council 2003-03-17
3) NEW BUSINESS
Alderman Fisher requested that staff carry out an investigation of The Little Mississippi Drain
and bring a report back to Council.
ADJOURNMENT
MEETING WAS ADJOURNED at $:36 p.m.
The City of
~~CanadaNiagara Falls
Community Services Department
Municipal Works
4310 Queen Street
P,O. Box 1023
Niagara Fails, ON L2E 6X5
web site: www. city.niagarafalls.on,ca
Tel.:
Fax:
E-mail:
(905) 356-7521
(905) 356-2354
darrells@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
MW-2003-66
Ed Dujlovic
Director
March 31, 2003
Alderman Victor Pietrangelo, Chairperson
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: MW-2003-66 - Main Street Closure Environmental Assessment
RECOMMENDATION:
That Committee authorizes staff to prepare and file the Environmental Study Report with Option 6
as the preferred alternative.
BACKGROUND:
On February 17, 2003, Staff brought forward a report requesting permission to take Option 6 to a
Public Meeting. On March 6, 2003 the Public Information Center was held at Our Lady of Peace
Parish Hall. The following is a summary of the comments received.
Approximately 65 people attended the meeting. Representatives from Totten Sims Hubicki
Associates (TSH) were on hand to respond to questions and concerns. Darrell Smith from the City
of Niagara Falls was unable to attend due to illness.
The following members of the project team were in attendance:
TSH
Garry Pappin, Project Manager
Tim Stuart, Project Co-ordinator
In addition, Alderman Kim Craitor also attended the PIC.
NOTIFICATION
A notice of the Public Information Center was published in the Niagara Falls Review prior to the
PIC on March 6, 2003. Notices were sent by mail to anyone who had provided written comments
over the course of the study. Notices were also hand-delivered to properties along the Study Area
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Municipal Works · Fire Services · Parks, Recreation & Culture · Business Development · Building & By-Law Services
h4arch 31, 2003 -2- MW-2003-66
section of Main Street the week of February 24, 2003.
Upon arrival, people were asked to sign the meeting register. Approximately 65 people signed
in.
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS
A total of 27 questionnaires were submitted as of March 26, 2003. The following is a summary
of the comments received.
Question #1
I am:
7 respondents are Residents in the study area.
7 respondents are Residents outside the study area.
12 respondents are Business Owners within the study area.
3 respondents are Business Owners outside the study area.
0 respondents are elected representatives.
1 respondent is a member of a concemed agency.
1 respondent replied Other: Main/Ferry BIA.
1 respondent replied Other: Neighboring facility
Question #2
I have reviewed the information provided at this Public Information Center and have the
following comments:
11 Respondents are satisfied with the preferred solution as presented.
16 Respondents are not satisfied with the preferred solution as presented.
0 Respondents checked "I have No Opinion"
The following is a summary of comments provided by residents who were satisfied with the
preferred solution as presented:
The traffic movements of Altemative 6 seem very complex but are probably the best
solution possible in light of all the objectives to be achieve and difficulties to be resolved;
Project Team did well to come up with this plan to please all parties. It will mn smoothly
and safely for all;
Appreciation for the consideration that has been given to the west leg of Murray Street;
Suggestions for an overpass with pedestrian walkways, something signature/significant
for the area;
Historical importance of Portage Road as some consider, the most important road in
Canada. Please remember to install historical plaques when finished;
Bicycle traffic should be considered prior to approval of the project;
A mechanism should be in place to stop a future closure of Main Street as originally
proposed;
March 31, ~003 -3- MW-2003-66
Concerns over parking within hydro corridor;
Concerns with the emergency access area. It should be moved to the west side of Level
Avenue. Allow the use of Allendale to Dixon Street, Dixon Street to Level Avenue and
Level Avenue to Dunn Street; and
The preferred alternative is the best one yet. It is too bad you cannot access Main Street
directly from Oakes Drive.
The following is a summary of comments provided when the respondents were asked to indicate
why they were not satisfied with the preferred solution:
Alternative 6 will be bad for buses on Main Street. Alternative 1 is preferred;
Alternative 1 better for businesses on Main Street;
Prefer Alternative 1 or 2. It is best to have Main Street access. A stop sign or traffic
lights should be provided at Main Street for traffic to flow through easier;
Preference to Alternative 5A;
Many small businesses on Main Street would probably not survive having Main Street
with little or no access;
Main Street should be available for full north-south travel. Alternative 6 cuts off
nothbound traffic onto Main Street and through Main/Ferry Business Area;
Dixon Street should be closed at Level Avenue to prevent traffic going down Dixon
Street to Dnunmond Road. Alternative 6 will harm new parking lot. Marineland Parkway
and Portage Road should be used to access casino for trucks, buses and cars as entrance
and exit;
Left mm up Dixon Street closes Main Street from Fallsview Boulevard and limits
movements from business parking lots;
Alternative 6 limits movement onto Main Street from the south. It limits access into the
Casino from Dixon Street;
Left turn movements from Stanley Avenue onto Main Street should not be prevented;
Murray Street should not be closed west of Allendale;
Dixon Street should not be closed west of Allendale;
Dixon Street should be designed to connect to Cleveland Avenue;
A "fast" route to/from Chippawa for emergency vehicles should be provided. Tourists
travelling from Chippawa will not visit the businesses on Main Street due to the barrier
blocking access;
Preferred alternative prohibits traffic from entering into Main Street from Stanley
Avenue. Only the fight hand turn off Stanley Avenue is permitted. This will restrict the
flow of traffic into our business;
A turning signal should be used similar to that of the Hwy 420;
Staggered/stages traffic lights will help alleviate the anticipated congestion in the area.
Traffic coming from Chippawa/McLeod Road travelling along Stanley Avenue to center
of city will become disoriented when reaching this new intersection;
Preferred alternative limits traffic flow past comer of Main Street and Murray Street; and
The preferred alternative inhibits traffic flow to our business and therefore should not be
selected. There should be no restriction to traffic at Main/Stanley intersection. It will
effectively deter all Casino-bound business from travelling through our area and
March 31, 2003 -4- MW-~003-66
negatively affect Main Street businesses.
The following is a summary of additional comments made regarding the project:
Use Murray Street to Fallsview Boulevard to get into the front entrance of the casino.
Close Allendale at Main Street. Bring Allendale over to Stanley Avenue;
Alternative 1 accounts for the flow traffic from both sides;
Opportunity for small business to survive in better conditions and is good for everyone,
including the Casino;
Severe financial consequences will occur from closing left down Dixon Street from Main
Street for businesses;
This study is being rushed to meet the completion date of the Casino. If the alternatives
were used over the last ten years, a feasible and correct alternative would have been
chosen;
Since start of Casino construction there has been an increase in traffic on Dixon Street;
and
Dixon Street must be kept open in both directions for traffic flow ease, business growth
and expansion.
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Most of the comments received have been submitted previously for other alternatives. All of the
comments and concerns were reviewed and the consultant tried to balance the needs of all the
affected parties, while meeting the objective of making this intersection safe.
It is the opinion of staff and the consultant, that Option 6 is the best compromise solution. It
meets thc safety criteria while maintaining as many of the traffic movements as possible.
MOVING FORWARD
Based on the comments, it is apparent that we have received more support of this option than any
of the others. However, many of the major stakeholders in the area are still opposed to Option 6.
The Fallsview BIA stated preference is Option 4 with modifications, however they will accept
Option 6 if certain concessions are made in the Casino Roads EA (guarantee of no more than
four lanes on Fallsview Boulevard, bus parking on the road, close Main Street from Stanley
Avenue to Murray Street and convey the property to the adjacent landowners).
Therefore, Staff is of the opinion that we should proceed with filing Option 6 for the following
reasons:
1. Through the process there were 10 (ten) options examined at the first PIC, 5 (five)
options at the second PIC and 2 (two) subsequent options that have been reviewed and
brought forward to the public. In addition there have been several modifications of
options examined. Through this whole process, it is evident that there is no option
that will satisfy all stakeholders; in fact, there is no option that will satisfy the
March 31, ~003 -5- MW-2003~66
majority of the stakeholders.
Knowing that there is no way to satisfy the majority of the stakeholders, staff has the
opinion that we should proceed forward with the option that will satisfy the intent of the
Environmental Assessment Process, which is Option 6. It is both technically and
procedurally sound and scored higher than any other option.
3. Continuing to defer to try to find a different alternative will be a futile exercise that will
only serve to delay the process. There is no magic solution to be found.
The stakeholders have an avenue of appeal open to them through the Ministry of
Environment. If the MOE is of the opinion that the stakeholders have not received a
fair hearing of their concerns, the MOEwill order the City to reopen the EA or
enter into a higher level process.
Time is critical. The City has entered into a legal agreement with Ontario Gaming and
Lottery Corporation requiring the City to complete the specified infrastructure
improvements prior to the opening of the new casino. The casino is scheduled to open in
April 2004. If everything goes perfectly, the work requires three months for detailed
design and a minimum of seven calendar months (thirteen months of working days) to
complete the work. If we do not meet these deadlines there may be consequences.
There has been some discussion lately about linking the Environmental Assessment for
Main Street and the Environmental Assessment for the Casino roads reconstruction.
Under the EA process, the City cannot promise certain outcomes in one EA to receive
concessions in another EA. This is not permitted under the Environmental Assessment
Act which governs the EA process.
Committee's concurrence with the recommendation would be appreciated.
Darrell Smith,-P?Eng.
Manager of Engineering Services
Respectfully submitted:
EffI)uj-lov~c, P.Eng.
Director of Municipal Works
Commun}ty ~erv~ce~ Depll'tmen~
~ F';h, ,~f ,/~&- Munleliml WoHm
~ ~'"~ "' I1~, 4310 Oueen S~eet
Niogara Folls]J~,d~' P.O. Box 1023
Cartocia ~' Niagara Falls. ON L:?.E 6X5
Tel.: (905) 356-752~
Fax: (905) 356-2354
E-mail: darrells~city, nlagarafalls,on,cn
Ed Dujlovlc
Direclor
March 31, 2003
Alderman Victor Pielrangelo, Chairperson
and Members of the Comm~mity Services Committeo
City of Nialyu-n Falls, Ontsrio
Members:
Re: MW-2003-67 - Casino Roads Environmental Assessment
RECOMMENDATION:
That thisrepogberec~iveda~df~ecl, and that staff meet with the stakeholders.
BACKGROUND:
On March 24, 2003, Staffmet with members of the Fallsvicw BIA to discuss the mad widenings
within the tourist core area. Twenly -six people attended including six Aldermen. The following is
a surmnary of the issues raised.
r...vi w B0alev%d
More emphasis should be put on thc pedestrian realm, with fewer lanes of ~ratTlc
Allow for bus bays for private buses on thc municipal mad allowance
Eliminate the pedestrian rea/m on the west side to make room for the bus bays.
Reduce the lanes and allow the traffic to back up
Construct an overhead walkway
Eliminate thc lights at thc casino main m~m~
Must have four lanes plus turning lanes where required, fit pedestrian realm into what is left
of the road allowance
Mu~ have signals at mnin erl~'allCe m the casino
Must have turning lanes at main Mun~y S~'eet, casino main entrance and Dixon Street
Pedestrian realm is adequate with 4 lane plus turning lane configuration
Roadways must be kept clear of stopped vehicles and buses
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Municipal Works · Fire $ewices · Parks, Reo~a#on & Culture · Business Development · Building & By-Law $ervfcea
March 3~1, 2003 -~- MW-~003-67
Murray Street
Eliminate the sidewalk on the south side of the street
Make the sidewalk as wide as possible on the north side of the street
Balance the sidewalks and pedestrian realm on both sides of the street
Provide for an at grade pedestrian crossing at the easterly limit of the City right of way
Make sidewalks as big as possible.
As Committee can see from the list of the issues raised there are opposing views and interests in how
the roads will be constructed. I must emphasize that staff did not hear any new suggestions or
comments at the meeting. These issues were brought forward previously and Staff believe that the
consultants plan is a good compromise solution. It provides the maximum pedestrian realm while
still meeting the absolute minimum traffic requirements by providing turning lanes only where they
are absolutely necessary. With respect to bus bays on the roadway, both Staff and the consultant
agree that it cannot be accommodated without sacrificing the pedestrian realm and the traffic
operations. Therefore, in our opinion, in this case, it is an inappropriate use of the public right of
way.
Staff will be bringing a report in the near future with recommendations.
Committee's concurrence with the recommendation would be appreciated.
Prepar/e~ by:
Darrell Smith, P.Eng.
Manager of Engineering Services
Respectfully submitted:
j~o~ MacD~onal~~
Chief Administrative Officer
Director of Municipal Works
Community Services Depar~tent
Th .... .~A , Parks, Recreation & Culture
e (.~IIY at' ~r~. 4310 Queen Street
Nlogara FOIIs~,~_ P.O. Box 1023
Canada ~~ Niagara Fails, ON L2E 6X5
~~ web site: www. city. niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel.: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-7404
E-mail: akon~city.niagarafalls, on.ca
R-2003-18
Adele Kon
Director
Alderman Victor Pictran~elo, Chairperson
and Members of Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re:
March 31, 2003
R-2003-18 Development Options for
Phase 2 of the Millennium Trail
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council support the Trails & Bikeway Committee's recommendation that t.he development of
Phase 2 of the Millennium Trail occur on the ea~ side of the Niagara Power Canal south of McLeod
Road.
BACKGROUND:
The Trails & Bikeway Committee presented Report R-2002-53 to the Community Services
Committee on October 7, 2002. This report, of which a copy is attached as Appendix 1, authorized
the Trails & Bikeway Committee to host a public meeting with those residents living along Ronnie
and Redhaven Crescents that back onto the Niagara Power Canal property. The Public Meeting was
held on November 14, 2002 and the purpose of the meeting was to obtain comments from the
residents on the possibility of the Wail being developed on the east side of the Power Canal.
Consideration for relocating the trail stemmed largely from addRional research carried out and the
high cost of constructing a pedestrian bridge. It has also been determined that Ontario Power who
own the land, will allow the proposed trail to be constructed closer to the actual Power Canal and
along the existing maintenance road.
The Public Meeting was attended by 14 of the 37 property owners (38%). One additional letter and
two phone calls were received from owners who wer~ unable to attend the Public Meeting. The
letter and one phone call were from residents opposed to the trail on the east side of the Power Canal,
while one phone call was from a resident not opposed to the trail on the east side. The consensus
Working Together to Serve Our Cornmunlty
Municipal Works · Fire Services · Parks, Recreation & Gu/turn * Business Development * Building & By-Law Services
March 31, 2003 - 2 - R-2003-18
of the residents who attended the Public Meeting was that they were not opposed to the development
of Phase 2 of the Millennium Trail but, they would like the trail on the opposite or west side of the
Power Canal. One resident expressed that she had no objection with the trail on the east side of the
Power Canal. A summary of the comments made at the Public Meeting and responses prepared for
the Trails & Bikeway Committee are attached as Appendix 2. A followup letter was sent to the
residents on February 7, 2003 and a copy of this letter is attached as Appendix 3.
In regards to the cost of the pedestrian bridge, there have been two preliminary estimates received
from construction company's who have built pedestrian bridges in the Niagara Region. These
estimates indicate an estimated cost of between $170,000 and $200,000.
At the March 6, 2003, meeting of the Trails & Bikeway Committee there was considerable
discussion regarding the two development options for Phase 2 of the Millennium Trail. The
Committee supported the trail on the east side of the Power Canal because of the high cost of the
pedestrian bridge, the safer location and easier access of the trail to the neighbouring community and
the fact that the trail would implement the plan contained in the Trails & Bikeway Master Plan. The
Committee noted that with the success seen of other recreational trails in the City and nearby
municipalities, and the significant health and social benefits that are derived from recreational trails,
it was hoped that Council would support the placement of Phase 2 of the Millennium Trail on the
east side of the Niagara Power Canal. Based upon the above, the Trails & Bikeway Committee
approved the following motion:
That the Trails & Bikeway recommend to City Council that Phase 2 of the Millennium Trail be
developed on the east side of the Niagara Power Canal due to the cost savings of not having to
build a pedestrian bridge, increases in overall safety, improved accessibility to the community and
the trail on the east side of the Niagara Power Canal conforms with the Plan contained in the
Trails & Bikeway Master Plan.
In conclusion, it is the hope of the Committee that Council will support the motion of the Trails and
Bikeway Committee and that Phase 2 of the Millennium Trail will proceed in 2004 as a Centennial
Project of the City.
Respectfully submitted:
Clyde Carruthers, Chair
Trails & Bikeway Committee
BB/das
Attachments
S:\Council\Counci12003~R-2003-18 Development Options for Phase 2 of the Millennium Trail.wpd
Community Services Department
PaSs, Recreation & Culture
Of----~J~. 7565 Lundy's Lane
The
CIIy
'~"~ Niagara FallslJ~l~ .iagara Fails, ON L2H 1G9
· web site: vnvw.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
~ I- Tel: (905)356-7,521
Fax: (905) 356-7404
E-mail: akon{~city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Appendix 1
R-2002-53
Adele Kon
Director
Alderman Victor Pietrangelo, Chairperson
and Members of Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
October 7, 2002
Members:
Re: R-2002-53
Phase 2 - Millennium Trail
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Trails & Bikeway Committee host a public meeting with thc residents of Rcdhaven and
Ronnie Crescents whose property backs onto thc Power Canal.
BACKGROUND:
Phase I of the Millennium Trail has been a great success. Thc City has received numerous positive
comments on the wail and interest from people wanting to know when Phase 2, south of McLeod
Road will be constructed. Efforts are continuing by the City's Trails & Bikeway Committee to raise
funds for Phase 2.
At the time that Council originally dealt with the Millennium Trail, a decision was made to develop
the trail on the west side of the Power Canal. This decision was made because 7 of the 44
homeowners on Redhaven & Ronnie Crescents objected to the trail behind their home. However,
at the time that this decision was made, the financial implleafions were not available. By developing
on the western side of the Power Canal, a bridge costing $300,000 will have to be constructed in
order to cross the Power Canal and link up with Dorchester Road. From Dorchester Road, the trail
will proceed along the Chippawa Parkway and eventually link up with the Niagara Parks
Commission Trail.
It is estimated that Phase 2 of the Millennium Trail from McLeod Road to Dorchester Road (near
the former CYRO building) will cost approximately $300,000. Therefore, the cost of Phase 2 of the
trail including the pedestrian bridge will double to about $600,000. Attached to this report are plans
outlining the two development options and a photo showing the proximity of the existing
maintenance road from the residential properties.
There are a couple of matters worth noting regarding the possible placement of the trail on thc east
side of the Power Canal. Firstly, the Ontario Power Generation Company has no objection, in
principle, to the recreational Ixail being placed on the maintenance road immediately adjacent to the
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Municipal Works Fire Services Parks, Recreation & Culture Business Development
October 7, 2002 - 2 - R-2002-53
Power Canal. This would provide about a 60-foot separation distance from the rear lots of homes
along Ronnie and Redhaven Crescents to the txail. During the original planning a few years ago, it
was proposed that the trail be located between the residential lots and the existing maintenance road.
Secondly, the City has not experienced the problems in Phase 1 of the Millennium Trail that some
people had feared would occur such as, increased garbage, loitering or vandalism.
The Trails & Bikeway Committee is supportive of the continuation of the Millennium Trail. The
decision as to whether or not the trail will be located along the east or west side of the Power Canal
south of MeLend Road will have a significant financial impact on the frail. Therefore, the Trails &
Bikeway Committee is recommending that this issue be further discussed and that a meeting be held
with the homeowners who back onto the trail south of MeLeod Road. A follow-up report will be
prepared for Counoil on the outcome of the meeting.
Respectfully Submitted:
Vince Catone, Chair,
Trails & Bikeway Committee
AK/BB/das
Attachments
S:~Couneif~_~ounci12002LR-2002-$3 - Phase 2 Millennium Trail.wlxt
PHASE 1 (COMPLETE)
I~ILLENI~UM TRAJL
PHASE 2'
MILLENNIUM .ECREAI~ONAL TRAIL (PHASE 2)--'
OPTION ' A' ( TRAIL WEST SIDE)
PHASE '1 (COMPI~ETE)"
I,W~LENNKn~ TRAIL
MCLEOO l;
PHASE2'
City of ~m ~:al;s '
MtLLENNIUM RECREATIONAL TRAIL (pHASE 2i
OPTION 'B' (SHARED T~IC, USE )
Appendix 2
Trails & Bikeway
Public Meeting - November 14, 2002
7:00 p.m.
Phase 2 Millennium Trail
Summary of Public Comments and Responses on the proposed relocation of Phase 2 of the
Millennium Trial from the west side to the east side of the Niagara Power Canal south of
McLeod Road.
Increase in garbage - garbage is a concern that can be addressed through maintenance.
The experience in Phase One is that there is very little problem with litter and garbage.
Privacy affected -people will be using the trail but there would be a sizeable buffer (40-
60feet)from the rear residential property line. There will be an opportunity to implement
enhanced landscaping.
Wildlife lost - wildlife will adapt. It has been found that the families of wild turkeys are
not effected in Phase 1 of the Trail.
Reconstructed Bridge? Military to build. Ask Ministry of Transportation - the cost
of bridges have been explored with Stonebridge in Port Colborne. They are part of Hard
Rock Paving Company who constructed Phase 1 of the Trail .Stonebridge constructed
two bridges in Port Colborne and those bridges are comparable to what is required in
Phase 2 and the cost of each bridge was approximately $300,000. This company has a
couple of trusses from old bridges and the City was exploring the use of the trusses for
the Phase 2pedestrian bridge. After inspecting the site, Stonebridge has advised that the
trusses would not be appropriate for length of bridge required.
Use old railroad bridge?- upon rechecking the status of the railway bridge to the south,
it was learned that the railway is still active and services the Industrial Park to the
southeast.
Cost of proposed bridge too high? Get additional quotes - the City will obtain a
couple more quotes for pedestrian bridges.
Keep trail on west side which is more inviting - the west side is very scenic but there is
the question of the cost of the bridge to link with the trail to the east side along Chippawa
Parkway.
Option B travels along part of McLeod Road. (very busy) -there would be a short
section (about 1 O0 yards) where people will have to travel along the south side of
McLeod Road (either along the road or sidewalk) to reach the start of Phase 2 of the
Millennium Trail.
-2-
Trail is okay behind house - one resident expressed no concerns with the trail
relocation.
Parking inadequate now for Phase 1- a small parking lot was part of the design. It is
hoped that eventually people will be able to be linked with a network of trails throughout
the City.
Use pipe across canal for support of bridge - the storm waterpipe would not support a
bridge.
Option B better for thieves to see in back yards - this presumes there will be thieves.
Research indicates that in areas where there are people using trails there is actually less
vandalism.
Phase I has no homes along side - there are industrial operators along Phase 1 and they
have not experienced problems with increased vandalism. There is Oakwood Lodge
across from Oakwood Drive and they utilize the trail on a regular basis. A residential
development is being proposed to the north and they wish to have access to the trail as
part of their development proposal.
Has been vandalism in Phase I - there have been no reports to the City of vandalism in
Phase i.
Possibly less vandalism because of more exposure - research indicates this to be true.
Possible construction may cause loss of trees - there would be no loss of trees.
Landscaping in the area will be enhanced
Phase III & IV turned down why do Phase II - people will be directed to on road bike
routes connecting them to the northerly portion of the proposed Millennium Trail.
Awkward entrance would make people backing onto trail hard to get too -people
that back onto the trail could obtain gate permit to access the trail. The gate would be
required to be built to the City's standard
Resale price of homes will be lower - our research indicates that trails actually
enhance property values.
Bought house because of hydro land behind - there will be a change with the
introduction trail on the east side.
-3-
Early walkers would disturb homeowners - some walkers will use the trail early in the
morning but they would not likely generate much if any noise.
West side more parking opportunity - there are no intentions of constructing any
parking lot in Phase 2 of the trail.
How would hydro use area for maintenance - Hydro would seldom use the area where
the trail will be although they could travel on the trail similar to what City crews do in
Phase 1 when they inspect the trail and pick up garbage. Hydro will travel along the west
side for their inspections. The City would have a recreational license agreement with
Hydro and be responsible for all the maintenance on the east side between the current
property fence and the new security fence.
Service Road may possibly move further east closer to homes - if Hydro travels along
the east side of the canal, they will travel along [he trail.
More commercially inviting on west side of the canal - with the new McDonald's
Restaurant there will likely be trail users visiting the restaurant.
City might add shrubs on east side for a buffer - staff is prepared to recommend
enhanced landscaping along the trail. Some trees currently exist and some properties
have vegetative screening.
Businesses could contribute financially to the trail - the Trails & Bikeway Committee
will approach new businesses in the area to sponsor the trail.
Shrubs could take time to grow - attempts will be made to purchase sizeable scrubs.
Increase in vandalism - there is no assurance that vandalism will increase as a result of
the trail. Research has indicated that introduction of trails actually deters vandalism in
areas because people are present.
Walked the trail on west side and it is more attractive - the trail would be more scenic
on the west side of the power canal.
Need more quotes on pedestrian bridges $300,000 seems too much - staffwill
investigate additional price quotes for a pedestrian bridge.
Why, when trail proposed on west side was cost of $300,000 for bridge not known?
- staff were hopeful that a long single span bridge would suffice to cross the power canal
and cost approximately $80,000 - $100,000. The bridge contractor has informed us of the
need for abutments on either side of the canal. The bridge would be in 3 sections.
-4-
Why does trail have to keep going over bridge if on west side? - it is desired for the
trail to be linked and provide access to other areas. It is not desirable for the trail to end
without a connection.
How much Government Grant available? (Lotteries?) - there are no government
grants currently available for recreational trails. The City did take advantage of funding
under the Federal Millennium Partnership Program for Phase lof the Millennium Trail.
There was mention of Trillium Funding at the Public Meeting. Municipal Governments
are not eligible for Trillium funding. There is Superbuild Funding but the City has chosen
and received approval for funding for the Community Centre as their Superbuild
Project.
Government funding tough to get - not specific information yet - the City is not aware
of any government funding available.
Hold fundraising events? (For bridge cost) - fi~ndraising efforts are ongoing for the
Phase 2 of the trail which currently includes the pedestrian bridge.
Use Chippawa Creek Road as trail - Chippawa Parkway will be used to link trail users
to Chippawa. It wouM be desirable to some day place a separate off road trail along the
Welland River, similar to the Niagara River Trail.
Council moved Phase 2 to west side due to complaints - City Council approved Phase
2 on the west side of the trail. Since the cost ofapedestrian bridge is approximately
$300,000 the Trails and Bikeway Committee has asked Council to allow them to host a
public meeting to reintroduce the trail to the east side. This public meeting has provided
the input necessary for the Trails & Bikeway Committee to report back to Council for a
decision.
Gazebo-Necessary? Cost? - the gazebo was constructed largely with material that was
donated The gazebo provides an excellent location for hosting events and providing
shelter from the elements.
Phase 2 is 1.2 km long - the length of Phase 2 will be less than Phase 1 and connect to
Chippawa Parkway.
S:\Trails & Bikeway~Iillennium Trails~Nov. 14 comments and responses.wpd
BB:
Niagara Falls JJ~J.
Community Services Department
Parks, Recreation & Culture
7565 Lundy's Lane
Niagara Fails, ON L2H 1G9
web site: www.city.niagarafalls,on.ca
Tel.:
Fax:
E-mail:
(905) 356-7521
(905) 356-7404
bbolibru@city, niagarafalls.on.ca
Appendix 3
Adele Kon
Director
February 7, 2003
FIELD(Name)
FIELD(Street Address)
FIELD(City and Province)
FIELD(Postal Code)
DearFIELD(Dear )
Re:
Response to Residents on the November 14, 2002
Public Meeting on Phase 2 of the Millennium Trail
The City's Trails & Bikeway Committee thanks those residents who attended the Public Meeting on
November 14th at the Niagara Fails Memorial Arena to discuss concerns regarding a possible
relocation of Phase 2 oftbe Millennium Trail from the west side of the Power Canal to the east side.
The suggestion for changing the location of the trail is due to the possible high cost ora pedestrian
bridge which would be necessary to link trail users from one side to the other.
The Committee has reviewed the comments made at the meeting by the residents of the Ronnie and
Redhaven area. It was agreed at the meeting that the Committee would summarize the comments and
send them out to the residents. The Committee would like to ask that you review these comments
and provide the Committee with any further conunents prior to reporting the results to City Council.
All residents will be notified of the date and time at which Council will deal with the matter.
Proposed Relocation of the Trail Location From the West Side of the Power Canal to the East
Side:
A few years ago the Millennium Trail south of McLeod Road was proposed to travel along the east
side of the Power Canal. However, City Council supported a relocation of the trail to the west side
with the intention of building a pedestrian bridge across the Power Canal in the future. The City has
proceeded and developed Phase 1 of the Millennium Trail north of McLeod Road.
It was originally estimated that a pedestrian bridge would cost approximately $100,000.00. This was
based upon an understanding that a local construction company had trusses available from a previous
bridge construction project. Following a more detailed site inspection and length of the span, the
construction company advised that the old bridge trusses could not be used and the cost of the
pedestrian bridge would be substantially greater. It was based on this information that the Committee
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Municipal Works · Fire Services · Parks, Recreation & Culture · Business Development · Building & By-Law Services
DATE
requested permission to host a public meeting with the residents with the intent of revisiting the
recreation trail on the east side of the power canal to save on the cost of a pedestrian bridge.
At the public meeting there were comments made that there were other options available regarding
the pedestrian bridge such as using an old abandoned bridge that may be available or using the
existing railway crossing bridge to the south from Montrose Road. Careful review of any proposed
pedestrian bridge is necessary as they are required to meet specific safety regulations and standards.
In this case, there is a need for the bridge to be a minimum of 8 feet wide to allow maintenance
vehicles and equipment to cross. There are also safety features required leading up to and on the
bridge itselfi The option of using the railway bridge to the south is not available as it is still an active
rail line.
Since the meeting was held with the residents, site information has been received from Niagara
Power Generation (formerly Ontario Hydro) and provided to other bridge construction companies
for cost estimates. We have received one cost estimate of $140,000.00 for the bridge, its installation
and engineering drawings. There would be additional costs for concrete piers and footings. A
preliminary estimate of total costs may be approximately $170,000.00. Another company has
suggested a budgeted estimate of $200,000.00. Based upon this information, the option of
continuing the Millennium Trail on the west side of the Power Canal may be considered more
palatable.
Negative Trail Impacts:
There were a number of residents who were concerned that the trail on the east side of the Power
Canal would increase the level of noise and amount of garbage, effect privacy, lower property value
and destroy wildlife habitat. Our research indicates that in areas where recreational trails are
introduced near residential areas, the concerns over potential negative impacts such as those
mentioned above, do not materialize. Some examples of local trails that have been successfully
introduced in residential areas include the Friendship Trail in Fort Erie, and the Niagara Parks
Recreation Trail in the south end of Niagara Falls. In the situation being proposed along the power
canal, there is a sizeable buffer of approximately 40-60 feet between the rear of the residential lots
and the proposed trail. There is also an oppommity to provide enhanced landscaping in this area.
A number of people expressed fears that there would be an increase in vandalism. One person stated
at the public meeting that there has been vandalism along Phase 1 of the Millennium Trail. The
Parks, Recreation & Culture Office has not received any calls from any of the existing businesses
along Oakwood Drive stating that they have experienced an increase in vandalism as a result of the
Millennium Trail.
More Scenic Trail on the West Side of Power Canal:
There were comments that the trail is more attractive and scenic on the west side of the Power Canal.
In addition, this route provides a better connection with Phase 1 and opportunity for parking at the
newer commercial plaza to the west along Oakwood Drive. These points are positive features if the
trail was to be developed on the west side of the Power Canal.
DATE
Conclusion:
Based upon the majority of comments received from the residents of the Ronnie and Redhaven area
at the Public Meeting there is no opposition to the development of Phase 2 of the Millennium Trail
provided it is located on the west side of the Power Canal. There was one resident in attendance who
lives along the Power Canal and she was supportive of the trail on the east side of the canal. It is the
intent of the Trails & Bikeway Committee to report back to City Council with the results of the
Public Meeting and all residents owning land backing along the Power Canal will be advised of
when the upcoming meeting will be held. The Committee also intends to report back to Council with
the estimated cost figures for a pedestrian bridge.
Should anyone have any comments regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact the Parks,
Recreation & Culture office.
Yours truly,
Clyde Carruthers, Member of the
Trails & Bikeway Committee
BB:pb
S:\Trails & Bikeway~LettersX2002~vlerge response to R & R residents.rrm
Community Services Department
The Cjh/of Parks, Recreation & Culture
" ~'il', 4310 Queen Street
Niogoro Foils ~ ~1~,~ P.O. Box 1023
Col3odo ~~ Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
~ml~ web site: www. city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel.: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-7404
E-mail: akon@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
R-2003-20
Adele Ken
Director
March 31, 2003
Alderman Victor Piet~angelo, Chairperson
and Members of Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: R-2003-20 -Chippawa Lions Park Swimming Pool Proposal Selection
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that a contract be awarded to Kan-Du Pools & Spas Limited for the supply and
installation of an outdoor concrete swimming pool including decking and fencing at Chippawa
Lion's Park, for a total cost of $127,043.68 including taxes.
BACKGROUND:
Parks, Recreation & Culture staff invited qualified pool contractors to submit proposals to construct
a 25 foot by 50 foot outdoor concrete pool at Chippawa Lion's Park including a concrete deck and
a 6 foot high galvanized chain link perimeter fence.
Four (4) bid proposals were received by the Clerk's Office for this project. The Proposal Opening
Committee, in the presence of the Manager of Supply & Services, opened the proposals on Tuesday,
March 11, 2003 with the following results:
1. Bonavista Pools Markham, ON $113,900.00
2. Kan-Du Pools & Spas Limited Niagara Falls, ON $127,043.68
3. Acapulco Aquatic Specialists Kitchener, ON $130,700.00
4. Touchstone Site Contractors St. Catharines, ON $141,871.00
(Prices include all taxes)
The Chippawa Outdoor Pool Technical Committee reviewed the proposals in detail and
recommended that Kan-Du Pools & Spas Limited be awarded the contract based on specific criteria.
Kan-Du Pools included higher quality mechanical equipment, thicker concrete in the pool structure,
Working Together to Serve Our CommuniO~
Municipal Works · Fire Services · Parks, Recreation & Culture · Business Development · Building & By-Law Services
March 31, 2003 -2 - R-2003-20
and has been involved in the repair and maintenance operation of City pools for many years.
Furthermore, Kan-Du Pools & Spas can meet the completion deadline of June 20, 2003. (Bonavista
Pools has given us a completion date of mid July.) A clause will be included in the contract for
liquidated damages to reflect the difference in the contract price between the low bidder and the second
low bidder, Kan-Du Pools & Spas Limited. A financial penalty will be applied for each day that the
contract goes beyond the agreed upon completion date.
The Swimming Pool Building Contract was sent out under a separate tender and a report will be
presented to City Council for approval in April. The pool building contract stipulated a completion
deadline o£ June 20, 2003 to coincide with the completion of the pool and decking construction.
FINANCING:
Funding for the Chippawa Lions Swimming Pool project was approved by City Council through the
2003 Capital Construction Budget deliberations.
The Committee's concurrence with the recommendations in this report would be appreciated.
Director of Parks, Recreation & Culture
Respectfully submitted:
Chief Administrative Officer
JD/das
&\Council\Council 2003~R-2003-20 - Chippawa Lions Swimming Pool.wpd
Community Services Dep~¢..ent
Th ~" of .,~& . Plrlm, Recreation & Culture
e ~111/ i~r~m., 4310 Queen Street
Niagoro Fcllls ~1~,' P.O. Box 1023
Conodo .~' Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
~~r~l webs~: www.city.niagarafalis, on.ca
TeL: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 356-7404
E-mail: akon~c~ty, niagarafalls.on.ca
R-2003-17
Adele Kon
Director
March 31, 2003
Ald~,-aian Victor Pietrengelo, Chairperson
alld Members of Community Services Committee
· City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: R-2003-17 - Niagara Youth Network Arena Waiver Request
RECOMMENDATION:
That the request for waiver of the arena rental be ~. Approved.
BACKGROUND:
At thc Monday, March 3, 2003 Council meeting, a letter recpaesting thc waiver of the arena rental
fcc was referred to staff. As the attached letter indicates, thc Niagara Youth Network (NYN) is
planning to host.a concert and their intent is to donate any surplus from the event to the Ray
Andcrson fund.
On a number of occasions in thc past, Council has waived thc arena rental fee. Howcv~, in all cams
all incremental charges still applied.
Staff is recommending that thc rental fee not be waived. However, Council may wish to consider
three (3) options:
1. .Waiving thc antirc rantal fee.
2. Charging the rental fee to thc or?ni:,ation and donating the rgntal fee directly to the Ray
Anderson Fund, thereby OlYminin~ credit for thc donation.
3. Maintaining the current fcc schedule policy.
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Municipal Works · Fire Sen, ices · Pad<s, Reeaestton & Culture · Business Development · Building & By-Law 3ewices
2003 - 2 - R-2003-17
would both ab~de by the City's current fee schedule. Should Council wish to select
as part of the approval process, the group should be required to submit a report on
,rk luding a financial statement.
~,,, , ~l'fqa. ks Recreation & Culture
;spect~/~bmitted:
~ !~ h ,'ii 2903kR-2003-17 NYN Arena Waivcr.wpd
iagara
Youth
et vork
· Redeemer Bible
Church
· Glenga~e Alliance
Church
· St. Andrew's
United Church
· f4ountain Park
Church
· Grace Gospel
Church
· Ughthouse
Church
· Your church???
March 5,2003
To the Members of the City of Niagara Falls City Council:
For the past two years, a number of the youth ministries here in
Niagara Falls, have been worldng together to reach out to the youth
of our city, as the Niagara Youth Network. It has been an amazing
experience over the last few years, which has challenged us to take
it to the next level.
On the week of May 8-9, 2003, Michael Skupin, a contestant on the
reality TV show "Survivor Australia", will be touring all five of the
Niagara Falls high schools as a motivational speaker. Our goal is to
end the tour with a city-wide concert called T/~l'~$~t?, featuring
Superchic[k], at the Niagara Falls Memorial Arena.
We are anticipating over 2,000 people to be in attendance for this
concert, some already inquiring from as far as Haliburton, Ontario.
With word spreading across Ontario and Western New York about
this opportunity, the city of Niagara Falls will be host to many
outside visitors for this event.
I have included a copy of our budget for this event, including the
estimated costs of using the Niagara Falls Memorial Arena for the
concert. While we anticipate a large crowd, our goal is to avoid any
shortfall a~er the event. We would like to request a consideration
for some of the fees to be waived for the use of the arena, in order to
avoid any such shortfall. If there is a surplus from this event, we
will be making a donation to the Ray Anderson fund in support of
the family.
We would love to make city hall a part of Michael's visit, and are
looking forward to hearing how we can partner with you in this
event.
Thank-you for your time and considemfion~
I remain,
Network Co-ordinator
Youth Pastor - Redeemer Bible Church
905-356-6888
Illa~ara T'euth Iletwerk · NYil
Area I Description
Artists
Estimated Cost
Superchic[k]
Michael Skupin
One Rich Fool
$4,000.00 U.S.
$1,700.00 U.S.
$500.00 CDN
Hotel
Food
PromotiOn
Superchic[k] I $400.00
Michael Skupin I $300.00
Artist J $400.00
Volunteers $150.00
Posters I $700.00
Tickets $300.00
Design $200.00
Media $1000.00
Ticket Sales
Canadian
Amedcan
Venue
Arena
no expense
$125.00 U.S.
Insurance
$6,000.00
$1,000.00
Security
I Po/ice I $200.00
Administrative
Production
TOTAL
I Supplies I $150.00
Audio/Visual
$10,400.00
$31,000.00
8
Community Services Department
T- Ai- f ~ Building & By-Law Services
ne (,.: ~/O II~, 4310 Queen Street
Niagara Falls yj~,~' p O Box 1023
Canada .~~ Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5
~T~ web site: www.city.niagarafalis.on.ca
Tel.: (905) 356-7521
Fax: (905) 374-7500
E-mail: melb@city.niagarafalls.on.ca
BBS-2003-04
Mel Brown
Director
March 31, 2003
Alderman Victor Pietrangelo; Chair
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re:
BBS-2003-04, Tender for Demolition of
Unsafe Building at 4052 Portage Road
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Director of Building and By-law Services be authorized to call for tenders for the
demolition of the unsafe building at 4052 Portage Road.
BACKGROUND:
The building at the above location is an old existing commercial building, last used as a veterinary
office, which has been unoccupied and derelict for several years. It is in a considerable state of decay
due to age, lack of maintenance and upkeep, intrusion, frequent vandalism and a recent fire. It is a
significant eyesore and a continuing fire hazard and has had to be boarded up on many occasions by
City forces to prevent access to the interior.
On December 23, 2002, an Unsafe Building Order, under the Building Code Act, was issued to the
owner, requiring demolition or evaluation by an engineer and repair. This Order was not complied
with and accordingly an Order Prohibiting Occupancy was issued on February 5, 2003. Both of these
Orders were sent by registered mail and posted on the property. Both Orders are now final and
binding as neither has been appealed. The owner has made no attempt to comply or take any other
remedial action, to date.
The Building Code Act authorizes a Chief Building Official to undertake the demolition or repair,
ora building at the owner's expense where an Unsafe Building Order, which is final and binding,
has not been complied with. In default of payment, the cost of the demolition may be added to the
taxes of the property. The owner has been advised accordingly.
Working Together to Serve Our Community
Municipal Works · Fire Services · Parks, Recreation & Culture · Business Development · Building & By-Law Services
March 31, 2003 ~2- BBS-2003-04
Prepared by:
Respectfully submitted:
Mel Brown
Director of Building & By-Law Services
~mDi°n~sa}dat iv e Officer
Encl.
March 31,2003 -3- BS-2003-04
March 31, 2003 -4- BS-2003-04
March 31,2003
-5-
BS-2003-04
The City of
Niagara Falls ll~,~l
Canada~=~~'-
Community S~rvlc~ Depa~tmnt
Muni~ll~l WoHm
4310 Queen Street
P.O. Box 1023
Niagara FelI~, ON L2E 6X5
web lite: w~w~.city.niagarafalls.on.ca
Tel,:
Fax:.
E-mall:
(9O5) ~56-7521
adujlovl~:lty, niagarafall$.on.ca
Ed DuJlovlc
Director
Maxc~ 31, 2003
Ald~,,,,an Victor Piemmiclo, Chairperson
~ M~mb~ of the Cm-m,mity Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontsrio
Members:
1~: MW-2003~8
Huron Slreet, we~ o! O~tario Avenue
Cbfcane [mprm, emeats
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended thst this report be received for the information of lhe Commu/li~y Set'"vice~
Commi~t/~,, AND THAT PLANTERS BE INSTALLED.
BACKGROUND:
This report is further to ~ MW-2003-32 regarding the operational x~vlew of the chicane on
Huron Street, west of Ontario Avenue. The committee, at their me~ng March 17, 2003,
The consffucfion of the Acres
property required thc pr,~manmt
closure of Huron Street betwem
Ontmio Avenue and Erie Avmue.
Prior to the developmeat of the
provided a lane for each p~,~issible
movemmt at the intersection of
Ontario Av~aue, a:
· left turn lane
· through lane
· right tamlane
Facing east ~m Huron Slzeet towazd Ontario Avmme
~orking Togab#r to Ser~ O~r Community
March 3t, 2003 - 2 - MW-2003-68
Upon the construction of the property, The Downtown Parking Strategy identified the need to
designate two eastbound lanes at this intersection, rather than the existing three lanes. Thus, a
lane for the eastbound left turn and a lane for the right turn movement was required. Designated
traffic lanes onto private property are typically not allocated fi.om the public road network,
except at signalized intersections where the driveway approach is part of the signal system.
Therefore, the Acres driveway would be accessed from the eastbound right turn lane which lines
up with the private driveway.
Prior to delineating the three lanes into two lanes, motorists at times carded out dual left tums
onto Ontario Avenue, and dual right tums onto Ontario Avenue. Because, there is only one lane
in either direction, two lanes of vehicles were merging into one lane within the intersection.
Geometric design requires that two lanes are available on the far side of the intersection with
dual taming lanes.
Prior to the installation of the chicane, the following concerns were expressed by road
users/citizens:
lack of direction at the intersection indicating from which lane turning movements are to be
carded out from
· motorists turning in the same direction side by side into one lane
near misses at the intersection
motorists not able to see, or choose to disregard pavement marking arrows on Huron Street
· motorists turning in the wrong direction onto Huron Street
Although there are no reportable collisions on file prior to the installation of the chicane, staff
does recall instances where road users have called in to report collisions that are of the
unreportable type (non-injury, below the $1000.00). Since the installation of the chicane there
have been no complaints other than the skateboarding type.
Initially, hatched pavement markings were applied along the leflmost traffic lane on Huron
Street. The pavement markings were replaced with a physical chicane in 2001 as motorists
continued to carry out dual left tums. During the winter season, with the accumulation of snow
on the road, and due to the fading of the pavement markings, the markings were not adequately
delineating the permissible movements and were not visible at all times. As a result a physical
device "chicane" was installed, which also aided in decreasing the exposure of pedestrian
crossing Huron Street, with vehicles as the crossing width is reduced.
Staff's report to the Community Services Committee on March 17, 2003 identified the need for a
physical impediment to discourage activities such as skateboarding on the chicane. Enforcement
of this type of activity is typically carded out through the Niagara Regional Police Force, and the
Niagara Regional Police have been requested to carry out enforcement when necessary. A park
designed for skateboard use typically resolves this situation and the problem may rectify itself
upon the construction of the proposed skate park at the Community Centre.
March 31, 2003 - 3 - MW-2003-68
The purpose of the ch/cane is to provide proper delineation for allowable traffic movements at
the intersection. The use of the chicane for skateboarding, may be eliminated by implementing
various alternatives:
install planters
· remove the interlocking brick and replace with ornamental grass
· install decorative railings/posts
It is recommended that a device be installed to physically deter skateboarding activities and that
the chicane is not removed as its placement is necessary to delineate traffic lanes. Decorative
planters are preferable as they are the most cost effective alternative. Furthermore, the planters
will be aesthetically pleasing and may be relocated to an alternate location in the future.
The Committee's concurrence with the recommendation outlined in this report would be
appreciated.
Prepared by:
Karl Dran
Manager of Traffic & Parking Services
/xResp. ectfully Submitted by:
]John MacDonald
~' Chief Administrative Officer
Director of Municipal Works
J. G-mbich
S:\TRAFFIC~_EPORTS~2003~2003 Community Sen, icesWlW-2003-68.wpd
File: G-180-01
_/BRIDGE ST.
..~ ~---~ ~ - ~ ~
I ,?'. "~ /
ON ~'f ~ }{UP. ON
. ,--- ~.~ ,~ ,/
J - - -- ~
I I ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ II [/
~ . ~ A~ LEGES:
~ON ST, ~
~C & P~G
H~on S~ west of ~o Av~ue
~fional Renew
NORT~
N~ m ~,.~ ~h 31, 2003 Joh~ ~bich