The URL can be used to link to this page

2007/09/10COUNCIL MEETING Monday, September 10, 2007 Order of Business and Agenda Package The City of Niagara Falls Canada Alzheimer Society Niagara Falls Ministerial Fellowship Regional Councillor COUNCIL MEETING September 10, 2007 PRAYER: Councillor Pietrangelo ADOPTION OF MINUTES: Council Minutes of August 13, 2007 DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST Disclosures of pecuniary interest and a brief explanation thereof will be made for the current Council Meeting at this time. DEPUTATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS Teena Kindt, Director of Development, Alzheimer Society, will be speaking re: National Coffee Break Day, September 20, 2007, the annual Alzheimer Society fundraiser. Rev. Martin Goode will be speaking re: the Niagara Falls Ministerial Fellowship "Our Turn to Regenerate the Heart of Our City" and requesting a proclamation for the week of September 23 to 30 as "a week of prayer for the City of Niagara Falls Regional Councillor Norm Puttick would like to address Council on governance and NEDCORP. -2 PLANNING MATTERS PUBLIC MEETINGS Public Meeting AM- 07/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 6306 to 6378 Pinestone Road and 6339 to 6367 Pinestone Road Applicant: Walker Community Development Corporation Proposed On- Street Townhouse Dwellings Background Material: Recommendation Report: PD- 2007 -75 -and- Correspondence from Niagara Region Planning Development Correspondence from John Grant Correspondence from Nida Burciul Petition signed from 26 area residents Public Meeting AM- 23/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 6505 Fallsview Boulevard Applicant: 210000422 Ontario Limited Agent: Italia Gilberti, Broderick and Partners Proposed 30- storey, 383 Room Hotel Background Material: Recommendation Report: PD- 2007 -74 -and Correspondence from Niagara Region Planning Development Correspondence from Niagara Parks Commission Public Meeting AM- 21/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 5950 Victoria Avenue and 5956 Clark Avenue Applicant: Niagara 21s Group Inc. Background Material: Recommendation Report: PD- 2007 -73 and Correspondence from Niagara Region Planning Development Public Meeting AM- 24/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 5741 McGrail Avenue Applicant: Joe Lyons Agent: Brian Sinclair Recognition of the Existing Building as an Apartment Hotel (Hostel) Background Material: Recommendation Report: PD- 2007 -70 -and Correspondence from Niagara Region Planning Development Public Meeting AM- 22/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 5997 Drummond Road Applicant: Robert Oliver Agent: Chris Cristelli Recognition of an Existing Triplex Background Material: Recommendation Report: PD- 2007 -67 and Correspondence from Niagara Region Planning Development Public Meeting AM- 20/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 5532 Drummond Road Applicant: Beverly Miller Proposed Day Nursery Background Material: Recommendation Report: PD- 2007 -72 -and- 4 Background Material: Recommendation Report: PD- 2007 -71 -and Correspondence from Niagara Region Planning Development Public Meeting AM- 18/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 6565 and 6585 Lundy's Lane Applicant: Real Capital Partners Agent: Zelinka Priamo Limited Proposed Retail Store Correspondence from Niagara Region Public Works Department Correspondence from Niagara Region Planning Development Correspondence from Roberta Scott and Christine James MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING MATTERS 1. Chief Administrative Officer PD- 2007 -77 A- 29/2007, Minor Variance Application, 6870, 6888 6892 Drummond Road Applicants: Sam Navarroli Enzio Navarroli, Agent: Rick Brady, Urban Environmental Management, Proposal: 5- Storey, 95 Unit Apartment Building MAYOR'S REPORTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS 5 COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMENTS OF THE CITY CLERK 1. Boost: Child Abuse Prevention and Intervention requesting that October be proclaimed as Child Abuse Neglect Prevention Month. RECOMMENDATION: For the approval of Council. 2. Brian Jones requesting that the municipality participate in National Flag Day on February 15` RECOMMENDATION: For the consideration of Council. 3. Ontario 9 -1 -1 Advisory Board requesting financial assistance of $100 and related resolution. RECOMMENDATION: For the approval of Council. 4. Niagara Ice Dogs requesting the City to purchase a Municipal Advertising Package for $4,000 for the upcoming hockey season. RECOMMENDATION: For the consideration of Council. 5. City Clerk memorandum indicating the need to fill the vacancy on the Committee of Adjustment. RECOMMENDATION: For the consideration of Council. Niagara Region Planning Public Works Committee information on the support of the City of Niagara Falls' application for $10,000 through the Smarter Niagara Incentives Program for the City's Brownfield C.I.P. RECOMMENDATION: For the information of Council. 7 Maple Lodge Kennels complaint against enforcement action. RECOMMENDATION: For the information of Council. Additional Items for Council Consideration: The City Clerk will advise of any further items for Council consideration. 6 REPORTS RATIFICATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE ACTIONS (Councillor loannoni, Chair) RATIFICATION OF "IN CAMERA" ACTIONS CONSENT AGENDA THE CONSENT AGENDA IS A SET OF REPORTS THAT COULD BE APPROVED IN ONE MOTION OF COUNCIL. THE APPROVAL ENDORSES ALL OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN EACH OF THE REPORTS WITHIN THE SET. THE SINGLE MOTION WILL SAVE TIME. PRIOR TO THE MOTION BEING TAKEN, A COUNCILLOR MAY REQUEST THAT ONE OR MORE OF THE REPORTS BE MOVED OUT OF THE CONSENT AGENDA TO BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. F- 2007 -31 Major Receivables Quarterly Report F- 2007 -32 Municipal Accounts FS- 2007 -03 RRVP Niagara Square, Riocan Property Services, Booking and Licence Agreement, Fundraiser for Cancer "Headshave for Charlie" FS- 2007 -04 Bill 221, Presumptive Legislation for Fire Fighter Illness L- 2007 -34 Release of Site Plan Agreement, Racey Avenue, Lots 28 44 and Block 100, Plan 59M -316, File No. 2007 -209 MW- 2007 -93 City Transportation Model Development MW- 2007 -104 Warren Creek Watershed Municipal Class EA Detailed Engineering Design PD- 2007 -66 Summary of Financial Incentive Applications under the City's Community Improvement Plans and Proposed Amendment to the Downtown CIP PD- 2007 -68 Application for a Commercial Building and Facade Improvement Grant within the Historic Drummondville CIP 6032 Main Street PD- 2007 -69 Application fora Peer Robinson Residential Rehabilitation Grant within the Historic Drummondville CIP 5808 Peer Street 7 PD- 2007 -76 PLC 04/2007, Request for Removal of Part Lot Control Lot 45, Registered Plan 59M -338 (Garner Estates Phase 5), 6928/6938 Courtney Crescent, Owner: 1692747 Ontario Inc. (Brenda Glassman) R- 2007 -22 A.G. Bridge Park Site for Proposed Boys Girls Club R- 2007 -23 Contract for the Supply Installation of a New Splash Pad Play Area at the MacBain Community Centre Park DRAINAGE MATTERS 1. Chief Administrative Officer MW-2007-97 Union Marsh Municipal Drain Final Engineer's Report BY -LAWS UNDER THE DRAINAGE ACT 2007 -174 A by -law to provide for a drainage works in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara BY -LAWS The City Clerk will advise of any additional by -laws or amendments to the by -laws listed for Council consideration. 2007 -175 A by -law to establish part of Lot 20 Niagara Falls as a public highway, to be known as and to form part of Byng Avenue 2007 -176 A by -law to establish Part Township Lot 148 Stamford as a public highway, to be known as and to form part of Graham Street 2007 -177 A by -law to amend By -law No. 2006 -224, being a by -law to consolidate fees and charges for various services, licences and publications for the City of Niagra Falls in compliance with the Municipal Act 2001 2007 -178 A by -law to establish part of Block A Plan 54 Stamford as a public highway, to be known as and to form part of Dorchester Road 2007 -179 A by -law to amend By -law No. 2002 -081, being a by -law to appoint City employees, agents and third parties for the enforcement of provincial or municipal by -laws 2007 -180 8 A by -law to authorize the execution of an Agreement with Niagara Waste Systems Limited and The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls respecting the compensation payable by Niagara Waste Systems Limited to the City for hosting the South Landfill 2007 -181 A by -law to designate Lot 45, Registered Plan 59M -338, not be subject to part lot control 2007 -182 A by -law to authorize the execution of an Agreement of Purchase and Sale with Badger Farms Limited respecting the purchase of lands being Part 1 on Reference Plan 59R- 13486; in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara 2007 -183 A by -law to authorize the execution of an Agreement of Purchase and Sale with Liliana Propocio respecting the purchase of lands being Part 2 on Reference Plan 59R- 13486; in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara 2007 -184 A by -law to authorize the payment of $24,319,473.44 for General Purposes 2007 -185 A by -law to adopt, ratify and confirm the actions of City Council at its meeting held on the 10 day of September, 2007 NEW BUSINESS (7/11/2007) Anna Morocco 2007 Alzheimer Coffee Break Deputation Page 1 From: "Gina DeIle Rose" gdellerose @alzheimerniagara.ca> To: <diorfida @niagarafalls.ca> Date: 7/11/2007 3:39 PM Subject: 2007 Alzheimer Coffee Break Deputation Good Afternoon, As per our recent phone conversation, I would like to request a deputation time slot for Monday September 10th. Teena Kindt, Director of Development, will be presenting on the 12th Annual Alzheimer Coffee Break. She will be doing a power point presentation if you could please send any information that you require for the deputation as well. Thank you very much. Gina DeIle Rose Special Events Coordinator Alzheimer Society of Niagara Region 403 Ontario Street, Unit 1. St.Catharines, Ontario. L2N 1L5 Ph: 905.687.6856 ext. #556 Fax: 905.687.9952 Or Register Online Now!! www.alzheimerniagara.ca http /www.alzheimerniagara.ca http /www.alzheimerniagara.ca NFMF: Like minded pastors and congregations bringing a unified message of salvation in Jesus Christ to the city of Niagara Falls, Core Leadership Team: Rev. John Fraser Rev. Martin Goode (chair) Rev. Dale Hebert Rev, Herm Piett Rev. Mark Soppltt Rev. Kees Tengnagel Information: c/o 5855 Valley Way Niagara Falls, ON L2E 1X9 905-354-2811 Finances: c/o 7840 Donlee Drive Niagara Falls, ON L2H 2N5 905 354 -1113 liagara s lmmi in its ter iiaal �e o�� l ii "ONE LORD, ONE FAITH,..ONE GOD AND FATHER OF ALL" EPH.4 5 -6 August 1, 2007 Mayor Salci and Members of City Council City Hall 4310 Queens Street Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 6X5 Dear Mayor Salci and Members of City Council: Re. Proclamation of OurTurn 2007 It is our privilege once again this year as a Ministerial Fellowship to organize a week of prayer for our city. Last year our Mayor and Council affirmed the Ministerial in coordinating this effort. Our Turn was organized so that all Christian churches and people of our city could pray for various sectors of our city, and humbly seek God's help. This year our theme in prayer is "Our Turn to Regenerate the Heart of Our City." It is the NFMF's desire to see people seek the Lord in concert for His favour and blessing on our City. With increasing social and moral issues affecting our families, schools, leaders and organizations, we need God's wisdom, intervention and protection more than ever before.... all things for which He invites us to pray. We are again requesting that a proclamation be issued and that you consider declaring the week of Sept. 23 30th a week of prayer for the city of Niagara Falls and that it would be part of the agenda at the Sept. 10th City Council meeting. We also thank you, our members of City Council, for continuing to allow the NFMF the privilege of using the Council Chambers at City Hall for times of prayer like these. We look forward to this opportunity for all of us in the city to seek God's help and favour on our families and life in this city. It's "our turn!" Dean Iorfida Re: Update From: "Norm Puttick Cogeco" <nputtick @cogeco.net> To: "Dean Iorfida" <diorfida @niagarafalls.ca> Date: 9/3/2007 2:55 PM Subject: Re: Update Page 1 of 1 Yes: I thought I mentioned the 10th. Subjects {briefly} NEDC and Governance. This is timed for after my 6th Sept Regional Council. Thanks Norm {confirm} Original Message From: Dean lorfida To: Norm Cogeco Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 2:26 PM Subject: Update Hi Norm: A few weeks back we talked and you indicated that you might want to address Council in September. Can you provide me an update. Thanks Dean Dean Iorfida, City Clerk Niagara Falls 905 -356 -7521, Ext. 4271 905- 356 -9083 (Fax) file: /C: \Documents and Settings \di202\Local Settings\ Temp \XPgrpwise \46DC205FDomain... 9/4/2007 September 10, 2007 PD- 2007 -75 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: PD- 2007 -75 AM- 07/2007, Revised Zoning By -law Amendment Application 6306 to 6378 Pinestone Road and 6339 to 6367 Pinestone Road Applicant: Walker Community Development Corporation Proposed On- Street Townhouse Dwellings RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the revised Zoning By -law amendment application to permit the construction of 19 on- street townhouse dwelling units instead of 12 single detached dwellings, subject to the standards outlined in this report including reduced maximum building heights of 7.0 metres (22.9 feet) and 9 metres (30.0 feet) for specific blocks. BACKGROUND: Niag araJ CANADA Walker Community Development Corporation has requested an amendment to Zoning By- law No. 79 -200 for 12 lots totalling 1 hectare (2.6 acres) known as 6306 to 6378 Pinestone Road and 6339 to 6367 Pinestone Road as shown on Schedule 1. The lands are currently vacant and zoned for single detached dwellings. The applicant is proposing to construct 19 on- street townhouse dwellings on these lands instead of 12 single detached dwellings as shown on Schedule 2. The subject lands are currently zoned Residential Single Family 1A Density 427 (R1A- 427) in part and Residential Single Family 1E Density 429 (R1 E -429) in part. The applicant is requesting the lands be rezoned to a similar site specific Residential Mixed 430 (R3 -430) zone that applies to the adjacent lands. The current requirement of a rear yard setback of 10 metres (32.8 feet) is proposed to be maintained for the lands nearest the lots fronting onto January Drive known as 6306 to 6378 Pinestone Road. In addition, the applicant has revised the application to limit the height of the townhouses proposed on lands known as 6306 to 6378 Pinestone Road to 10 metres (32.8 feet) in response to concerns about views. Queen Street, P.O Box 1023, Niagara falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Planning Development September 10, 2007 -2- PD- 2007 -75 Council considered this application on June 11, 2007 and deferred it due to the following concerns perceived by the public: the panoramic views of properties to the south would be blocked by the townhouses; the embankment on the site, abutting properties to the south, may be eroded; there is insufficient parking for dwellings in the neighbourhood and the addition of these units may exacerbate the situation; snow removal has been an ongoing concern in the area and may worsen if the new units will have their snow plowed onto Pinestone Road; and maintenance of the rear yards of internal townhouse units has been a concern as there are no easements to accommodate access. Planning Analysis This report addresses the 5 above noted concerns raised by the residents. Attached for background as Appendices 1 and 2 are the previous staff report (PD- 2007 -32) in support of the application, and the Council minutes on this matter. Staff also note the proposal complies with the Provincial Policy Statement and Provincial Growth Plan, which promote the intensification of residentially designated areas provided new development is compatible with surrounding land uses. The concerns are addressed as follows: 1. Impacts on Panoramic Views Residents immediately to the south of the proposed townhouses voiced concerns that their panoramic view of Lake Ontario and the countryside would be affected contrary to the Official Plan. One resident produced photos illustrating how their view may be impacted. In response to these concerns, the applicant has reduced the height of the 2- storey units on the two blocks immediately behind the two concerned residents, from 10 metres (32.8 feet) to 8.6 metres (28 feet). In addition, the applicant has noted that units 9 through 15 refer to (Schedule 1) will be bungalows (single storey dwellings) with heights of 6.5 metres (21 feet). As illustrated on Schedules 3 and 4, the top of the dwellings will be below the top of bank that defines the rear yards of the neighbouring properties. These plans confirm that panoramic views will be maintained. To ensure the dwellings are constructed as currently proposed and views are not impacted, it is recommended that all the proposed townhouses be restricted in height to 9.0 metres (30 feet) and 7.0 metres (22.9 feet), respectively, to reflect the maximum proposed height. September 10, 2007 -3- PD- 2007 -75 2. Slope Stabilization /Erosion A substantial slope up to the neighbouring properties in Caliguiro Estates exists to the rear of proposed townhouses on the south side of Pinestone Road. One of the neighbours is concerned that construction on the site may erode this slope, affecting her property. Development of these units will be subject to a development agreement. This agreement will secure a grading plan that will ensure this slope is properly stabilized to avoid erosion. 3. Parking Issues Several residents are concerned that there is not sufficient parking for the existing dwelling units. Many of these units were developed with two car garages accessed by rear laneways, with no private driveways. Overnight parking on the streets is not available for guests of residents. The residents were under the impression that visitor parking would be developed along Stone Gate, off of St. Paul Avenue. These concerns are not directly related to the proposed townhouses. While one space per dwelling unit is required for the proposed townhouse units, each dwelling unit is proposed to be built with a double car garage and double driveway which should be sufficient to serve the needs of their occupants. The amending by -law will address the proposed parking arrangement. The off street parking for existing townhouses (generally 2 per unit) meets minimum by -law standards. Surveys conducted during the day indicated minimal off -site parking demand. The issue appears to be with the occasional parking demands of visitors. Residents can obtain a on- street parking permit, renewable every year. In addition, traffic services provide some leniency in overnight parking enforcement on a single night basis if contacted in advance. Area residents believed that visitor parking for the townhouses was proposed to be provided on either side of Stone Gate, off of St. Paul Avenue. Early conceptual plans identified this area (since developed for townhouses) as parking associated with possible mixed use residential commercial developments along St. Paul Avenue. These parking areas were never intended to provide visitor parking for the rest of the development. Off street parking areas typically are not provided for on- street townhouse dwellings, or single detached dwellings. 4. Snow Clearance Residents are concerned that snow clearance in the winter reduces the maneuvering width of streets and snow clearance for the new units may exacerbate the situation. This matter involves the existing dwellings, in particular the townhouse dwellings accessed by rear laneways. The proposed townhouses will have landscaped front yards adjacent to driveways that will provide on -site areas for snow storage. A.Bryce:cb September 10, 2007 -4- PD- 2007 -75 Municipal Works staff reviewed the concerns raised and note that with occasional heavy snowfalls, plowing the rear laneways can be an additional challenge due to their limited amount of boulevard for snow storage. In these cases, the laneway is ploughed, then snow blowers and trucks are brought in to remove the remaining snow. 5. Maintenance Easements It is true that owners of existing on- street townhouse dwellings have no legal access to their rear yards from public streets without crossing their neighbour's property. If legal access is desired it would have to be obtained by means of a maintenance easement. Without these easements, access would need to be provided through arrangements between neighbours. Council has previously dealt with this same concern by inserting a warning clause, in the conditions of draft approval for this subdivision, noting that there is no legal access to the rear yards of internal townhouse units. If the concerned residents wish to secure access to their rear yards they will have to obtain an easement overtheir neighbours property through the consent process. The City has already granted one consent for such purpose in this neighbourhood. Further consideration to providing maintenance easements for the proposed townhouses should be given when the lands are subdivided for purposes of sale. CONCLUSION: 1. The proposed Zoning By -law amendment is in compliance with the Official Plan. Reducing the height of the proposed townhouses to 9 metres (30 feet) will lessen any impacts on the panoramic views of the residences to the south. The proposed townhouses will not impact on neighbourhood snow clearance and on- street parking. 2. Requests for maintenance easements for existing on- street townhouses in the neighbourhood will have to be dealt with on a site by site basis through consent applications. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: 16 (46 IsitA- oug Darbyson, Di ector of Planning Development Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services l es-t. John MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer S: \PDR\2007 \PD- 2007 -75, AM -07 -2007, 6306 to 6378 Pinestone Road and 6339 to 6367 Pinestone Road, Proposed On Street Townhouse Dwellings.wpd Subject Land SCHEDULE 1 LOCATION MAP Amending Zoning By -law No. 79 -200 Location: 6306 Through to 6378 Pinestone Road 6339 Through to 6367 Pinestone Road Applicant: Walker Community Development Corporation STONE GATE PINESTONE RD 1:NTS AM- 07/2007 k: \GIS_Requests\ 2007\Schedules \ZoningAM\AM- 07\mapping.map April 2007 Block 41 Legend 17 Lot #'s 10 Proposed Unit #'s Existing Lot Line Proposed Lot Line PropoeedRet.Wall The Neighbourhoods of t. David's Proposed Chan e s to Lots 12- wti Brett J ack 0n w.4 C Carle 1 250 (Metric) A 25; 2007 ww 1 0f1 1 A Block 44 16 Block 45 Block 49 RECEIVED pmzsnm {OEVELOPUE T THE NEIGHBOURHOODS OF ST. DAVID'S UNITS 5 -8. (AUGUST 16, 2007) SCALE 1:200 200.00 195.00 Jovanovic Top of Slope THE NEIGHBOURHOODS OF ST. DAVID'S UNITS 9 -11 (AUGUST 16, 2007) SCALE 1:200 June 11, 2007 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Niajarapaijs ANA DA Working Together to Serve Our Community Appendix 1 (THIS MATTER DEFERRED BY COUNCIL Re: PD- 2007 -32 AM- 07/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 6306 to 6378 Pinestone Road and 6339 to 6367 Pinestone Road Applicant: Walker Community Development Corporation Proposed On- Street Townhouse Dwellings RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the Zoning By -law amendment application to permit the construction of 19 on- street townhouse dwelling units instead of 12 single detached dwellings. BACKGROUND: Walker Community Development Corporation has requested an amendment to Zoning By- law No. 79 -200 for 12 lots totalling 1 hectare (2.6 acres) in area (known as 6306 to 6378 Pinestone Road and 6339 to 6367 Pinestone Road), as shown on Schedule 1. The lands are currently vacant and zoned for single detached dwellings. The applicant is proposing to construct 19 on- street townhouse dwellings on these lands instead of 12 single detached dwellings as shown on Schedule 2. The subject lands are currently zoned Residential Single Family 1A Density 427 (R1A- 427) in part and Residential Single Family 1E Density 429 (R 1 E -429) in part. The applicant is requesting the lands be rezoned to the same site specific Residential Mixed 430 (R3 -430) zone that applies to the adjacent lands. The current requirement of a rear yard setback of 10 metres (32.8 feet) is proposed to be maintained for the lands known as 6306 to 6378 Pinestone Road. Surrounding Land Uses Lands to the north and east have been developed for on- street townhouse dwellin s. Single detached dwellings are l,9,cated to the west and south of the subject lands. g 4310 Queen Street, P.O. Sox 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905- 356 -7521 www.nia arafalls.ca ommunity Services Department Planning Development June 11, 2007 -2- PD- 2007 -32 Circulation Comments Regional Municipality of Niagara The proposed on- street townhouses will make more efficient use of these lands and improve the housing mix in the neighbourhood as promoted by Provincial policies and the Regional Policy Plan. Regional Planning staff has no concerns with this application from a Provincial or Regional planning perspective. Municipal Works A development agreement will be required, prior to construction, to secure the additional required service connections as well as the preparation of a comprehensive grade control plan and payment of applicable fees. The increase in traffic from the additional units will be marginal. There are no traffic concerns. Legal Services Building Services The lands are subject to subdivision agreement and restrictive covenants which secure the noise control and drainage works along the ON railway. All required building permits are to be obtained prior to commencement of construction, Parks, Recreation and Culture Landscaping and street tree planting to be reviewed in further detail as part of the development agreement. Fire Services No objections. Through the building permit process, the provision of adequate fire access and water supply will need to be demonstrated. Planning Analysis 1. The proposal complies with the Official Plan. The land is designated Residential in the Official Plan and falls under Special Policy Area #6. A range of compatible housing types, including on- street townhouses, up to an overall gross density of 22 units per hectare (9 units per acre), is permitted. A gradation of building heights and densities away from existing residences to the June 11, 2007 -3- PD- 2007.32 south is to be provided to protect the panoramic views of Lake Ontario and the surrounding countryside protected. The proposal meets the intent of the Official Plan as follows: The overall density limits of the Walker Community will be adhered to. A proposed apartment dwelling block within the Community was developed as townhouses at a lower density than what was originally intended, allowing for intensification of development elsewhere in the Community. A transition of densities will be provided to single detached dwellings to the south, as the proposed townhouses on the south side of Pinestone Road will have large rear yard setbacks. As these existing single detached dwellings are located up on a significant slope above the proposed townhouses, the existing panoramic views will be protected and the height of the townhouses will not impact on these single detached dwellings. The development is compatible with the surrounding Walker Community development. The majority of the land has been developed for similar on- street townhouse dwellings. The proposed lots have larger frontages and lot sizes than a typical on- street townhouse dwelling, assisting in keeping these lots compatible with adjacent single detached dwellings. The townhouses will diversity the housing mix in the general area meeting the intent of the Official Plan to provide a range of housing types for residents. 2. The requested amendment is appropriate. The R3 -430 zone applies to the existing townhouse developments to the northwest and northeast of the property. This zone contains elements of "neo- traditional" planning, bringing the townhouse dwellings close to street frontages to help create the atmosphere of more traditional urban neighborhoods. Reflecting the larger single detached dwellings in this area, this zone also establishes a larger minimum floor area (90 square metres or 969 square feet per dwelling unit) than what is contained in the standard R3 zone. As the R3 -430 zone applies to the other existing on- street townhouse dwellings in this area, it is appropriate to extend this zone onto the subject lands. The applicant has requested the current rear yard building setback of 10 metres (32.8 feet) that applies to the lots on the south side of Pinestone Road (6306 to 6378 Pinestone Road) be maintained for the proposed townhouses. As discussed above, this setback helps to provide a transition between the townhouses and the large single detached dwellings in the Calaguiro subdivision. June 11, 2007 -4- PD- 2007 -32 CONCLUSION: The requested Zoning By-law amendment to permit the subject lands to be developed for on- street townhouse dwelling units can be supported for the following reasons: It conforms to the residential policies of the Official Plan that apply to the area. The townhouses will be compatible with the surrounding Neighbourhoods of St. David's development. Substantial setbacks will be provided from the larger single detached dwellings to the south. The dwellings will provide additional housing choices for residents wishing to live in this area. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: A. Brycelc b S:1PDR\20071PD- 2007.32, AM- 07.2007, Proposed On Street Townhouse Dwellings.wpd Doug Darbyson, Director of Planning Development Ed Du' vic, Executi 'rector of Community Services Joh acDonald, Chief Ad nistrative Officer Subject Land rA SCHEDULE 1 LOCATION MAP Location: 6306 Through to 6378 Pinestone Road 6339 Through to 6367 Pinestone Road Applicant: Walker Community Development Corporation k:1CIS R 12007\ Schcdulea \ZoningAM\AM•071mappinl& map di ■erni, AINE STONE re RYp 1111111 j T, Amending Zoning By -law No. 79 -200 STONE GATE 1:NTS AM- 0712007 April 20007 SCHEDULE 2 PD- 2007 -32- Chief Administrative Officer Zoning By -law Amendme Appendix 2 6306 to 6378 Pinestone Road and 6339 to 6397 Pinestone Road; Applicant: Walker Community Development Corporation; Proposed On- Street Townhouse Dwellings Proposed Application Applicant is proposing to build 19 on street townhouse dwellings on 1 ha (2.6 ac) of land. Subject lands are zoned Residential Single family. A multiple family residential zone is proposed. Planning Analysis Official Plan Designated Residential The proposed development conforms with the OP as follows: Development conforms with overall density provisions for Neighbourhoods of St. David's community. Existing panoramic views enjoyed by homes to the south of the proposed townhouses will not be impacted. The townhouses are compatible with the surrounding mix of housing. Zoning Zoned Residential Single Family Proposed zoning is the same as the other townhouse zoning in the neighbourhood. Zoning Features: Permits neo traditional townhouse designs with reduced front yard setbacks. Large floor areas reflecting the larger single detached dwellings in the area. Larger frontages, lot size and rear yards than typical on street townhouse dwellings. Conclusion The application can be supported for the following reasons: The proposed change of land use conforms to the residential policies of the Official Plan that apply to the area. The townhouses will be compatible with the surrounding Neighbourhoods of St. David's development. Substantial setbacks will be provided from the larger single detached dwellings to the south. The dwellings will provide additional housing choices for residents wishing to live in this area. Recommendation That Council approve the Zoning Bylaw amendment application to permit the construction of 19 on street townhouse dwelling units instead of 12 single detached dwellings. Ceri Hugill of 6304 Stonefield Road was present in opposition to the application. Mr. Hugill was of the opinion that there was no compelling reason to change the original zoning approval, other than the developer wants it. The proposed development will change the mix of housing in the subdivision. Presently there are many concerns of parking for the present townhouses and this development will further add to the parking issues. Mr. Hugill believed there was provision for two visitor parking lots. He suggested that Council defer the zoning amendment until the parking concerns are resolved and further suggests creating an area for visitor parking. The Director of Planning Development clarified that the original proposal was to have a commercial component and that parking was in relation to the commercial amenities and not visitor parking. John Grant of 6289 Pinestone Road presented Council with a petition circulated by the community opposed to the application. Mr. Grant expressed that the current site plan is approved for single family homes and there is no reason to change the existing plan except for the developer's best interest. Snow removal has been an ongoing concern and the new 9 landlock units will push snow directly onto Pinestone Road. Andrea Jovanovic of 6447 January Drive on behalf of her family, felt that the developer should provide accurate sight line elevations. Her family was concerned that their panoramic view would be impeded, especially if the height is 13 metres for the units. Kit Thomson of 6425 January Drive also had concerns regarding the elevation and sightlines. She also questioned the possibility of erosion to the embankment. Kerry Clark, for Walker Community Development, was present at the meeting. Mr. Clark advised Council that they were working with staff to resolve the elevation issues and have provided a profile plan. All the units derived from the block 49 to the southeast have the roof design lowered and the sightlines were kept in mind. Other units have height under 10 metres. Lots 12 to 15 have ground elevation closer to Caliguiro Estates. The provision of parking for the new units, include 2 cars in a garage and up to four cars in a driveway, therefore, there should be no impact on existing parking. He remarked that only one resident had ever expressed concerns regarding lack of access to backyards. Mr. Clark indicated that he did not have the authority to commit to the provision a visitor parking lot The public meeting was closed. ORDERED on the motion of Councillor loannoni, seconded by Councillor Wing that the report be deferred. Carried Unanimously with Councillors Thomson and Mayes declaring conflicts. Niagara Region PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT March 29, 2007 Andrew Bryce Planner 2 City of Niagara Falls 4310 Queen St., 2 Floor Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5 Dear Mr. Bryce: Re: Zoning By -law Amendment Application- 6306 6378 Pinestone Road and 6339 -6367 PinestorufRoad Walker Community Development Corporation City of Niagara Falls This application proposes to amend the City's Zoning By -law to permit street townhouses. The following Provincial and Regional planning comments are provided for your consideration. The site is located in the Region's Urban Area Boundary for Niagara Falls according to the Regional Policy Plan. A wide range of land uses and residential densities are permitted in Urban Areas. The proposed street townhouse development will make more efficient use of these lands and improve the housing mix in the neighbourhood as promoted in the Provincial Policy Statement, Provincial Growth Plan and Regional Policy Plan. Regional Planning staff has no concerns with this application from a Provincial or Regional planning perspective. Please send notice of City Council's decision on this application when available. Yours truly, Peter Colosimo, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner c: D. Darbyson, City of Niagara Falls C. Clark, Walker Community Development Corp., P.O. Box 100, Thorold, ON L2V ZY RECEIVED Councillor W. Smeaton M:\MSWORD\PC \Niagara FallsINFzbla\PinestoneRd Walkers.doc Building Community. Building Lives. Planning The Regional Municipality of pie• r 2201 St. David's Road, P.O. =ox Thorold, Ontario L2V 4T7 a Telephone: 905 -984 -3630 Fax: 905 -641 -5208 E -mail: plan @regional.niagara.on. c10C File: D.10.M.11.23 APR 9 2 2007 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT To: The Mayor, Councillors, Director, and the Planning and Development Department From: John Grant 6289 Pinestone Rd. Niagara Falls, Ontario (905) 357 -1846 Dated: Monday, June 11th, 2007 Our main concern... Re: Speaking both personally and on behalf of the petitioners in The Neighbourhoods of St. Davids, including the following issues and objections regarding the Application to amend Zoning By -Law #79 -200 which will increase the new homes by 7 and add 9 landlocked units... 1. The current site plan is for approved single family homes. These following issues were also raised... Changes to the Walker development are not new. Earlier site plans amended over time allowed 4 and 5 plex units to be added to sub- sequent site development replacing 3 plexes originally scheduled. We all bought here in good faith based on the site plan presented to us at the time of purchase. The overriding concern of the petitioners is there's simply no reason to change the existing plan for other than what appears to be only in the developer's best interest. 2. Snow removal has been a serious issue and a present concern to the ;0 ti2017::..h367: t homeowners on Pinestone Road, Stonefield Park, and some of Stone- haven Ave. All of our garages back onto Greystone Mews. It becomes increasingly difficult to negotiate cars in the mews once snow accumlation begins. The City does respond to phone calls to clear the snow but it takes a few days to get the burden of larger accumulations taken care of once middle units have to shovel snow into the street or wherever to access their garages. We can't park overnight on Pinestone Road. Has the Planning Department considered the challenge of snow removal on Pinestone Road especially from the 9 new landlocked units owners who will push snow directly onto Pinestone Road? 3. Parking is currently an issue for overnight guests on Pinestone Rd, and Stonefield Park. We cannot park on on the street and we have no driveways to speak of. And, what happened to the two parking lots proposed in the site plan from the late 90's to accomodate additional and overnight parking? 4. The 8 single family homes on Sandhill Drive and 2 sold lots will be orphaned. A concern expressed is what will happen to their value if four 4 plex and a 3 plex unit will replace the currently approved 12 single family homes. Many residents as well include their home as a large part of their per- sonal assets and worry about (the likelihood of reduced) home values. We all bought our homes having looked at the site plans at hand at the time of purchase and knowing what to expect in future development. 5. Has the Planning Department carefully considered the impact of the 9 landocked units? Once the end units have fenced which seems to the trend and precedent, how can construction, maintenance, fire, or ambulance services enter the back yards other than in the front and out through the back door? Drainage could also be a factor with the high elevation, runoff, and groundwater with the landlocked units. Has this been addressed by the Planning Department and City Engineers? Across the street PinestonelStonefield have had to address drainage issues after buying. In conclusion We strongly feel that there's no reason to amend the current By -Law #79 -200 to allow for 1 three plex and four 4 plex homes to be built. Nida Burciul From: "Nida Burciul" <n.burciut @sympatico.ca> To: <n.burciul @sympatico.ca> Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 10:31 AM Subject: by -law Doug Darbyson Director of Planning Development 2308 Stonehaven Ave. Niagara Falls,ON L2J 4K1 Re: File AM- 07/2007 6306 to 6378 Pinestone Rd 6339 to 6367 Pinestone Rd Dear sir, As homeowners in the subdivision 'The Neighbourhoods of St. Davids we are writing to express our endorsement of the proposed townhouses in the above mentioned location. Siprely Pet.pr Burciu Nida Burciul RECEIVED AUG 2 8 2007 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT rage i or 1 8/26/2007 To: The City of Niagara Falls Community Services Department Planning and Development Re: Zoning By -Law Amendment Application City File: AM -07/2007 The residents of the subdivision known as "The Neighbourhood of St. Davids" whose names, addresses and signatures appear on the attached documents wish to make the City of Niagara Falls know that they oppose the rezoning application designed to change the current Zoning By -law No. 79 -200 from 12 single detached dwellings to accommodate the development of 19 on -street townhouses on Pinestone Road in the City of Niagara Falls. This opposition is made in order that the City of Niagara Falls consider the following critical criteria in examining the application: 1. The current residential development was zoned for and is presently comprised of a desirable mix of townhouse units and single family homes. At the time of sale of the existing units, and as displayed on the layout of the district provided to the present purchasers, this was always the indication of the future residential mix of this development. The current zoning of the subject lands further supports this concept. The current residents whose signatures appear on that attached documents wish to have this dwelling density and layout honoured by both the City and the Developer. 2. The proposed design of the units for this portion of the development if the application for rezoning is approved would appear to constitute a real and considerable risk of personal safety to the occupants of the 9 dwellings that would be referred to as "inside" units. In the event that the owners of the two dwellings on the respective ends of the multi dwelling units elected to fence their properties to the proposed rear property lines, the rear portion of the property of the two "inside" units would be inaccessible to both Emergency personnel and the residents. This opportunity for this unsafe and inconvenient situation to present itself is made even more apparent by the extreme hillside that will form the rear yards of most of these dwellings. 3. The current Development has a major snow removal issue each winter. The proposed change from single family dwellings to townhouses will add to this concern. Without the side yards of the single units, there is a severely reduced opportunity for the snow on these driveways to be placed anywhere but on the roadway. This recurrent and significant and unsafe driving problem within the existing development will only be made worse by adding to the problem by approving this zoning change. There is a further safety consideration with additional snow on the roadway as there is no sidewalk provided in the Development, forcing residents to walk on the road. cocci vj/rZ' /07 Respectfully submitted to City Council at a Public Meeting on June 11, 2007 I, the undersigned, as a resident of the Neighbourhood of St. Davids, support the opposition to the amendment of Zoning Bylaw No. 70-200 Name: Address: Phone: (905) S Signature: klh6S \(eN 1, the undersigned, as a resident of the Neighbourhood of St. Davids, support the opposition to the amendment of Zoning Bylaw No. 70-200 Name: jtivP( (7 1- N( /(L- Address: 6 3OY S7v/U PAC Phone: (905) 6 B ?yy Signature: I, the undersigned, as a resident of the Neighbourhood of St. Davids, support the opposition to the amendment of Zoning Bylaw No. 70-200 Name: Address: Phone: (905) 3 Signature: �6�1 1 '"U,1 C /g" -e& Septeng4L10, 2007 PD- 2007 -74 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Niag araJ CANADA Re: PD- 2007 -74 AM- 23/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 6505 Fallsview Boulevard Applicant: 21000422 Ontario Limited Agent: Italia Gilberti, Broderick and Partners Proposed 30- Storey, 383 Room Hotel RECOMMENDATION: That Councils approve the Zoning By -law Amendment application to permit a 30- storey hotel proposal Architectural f ccr Review Repo,1 died L,► biyrrificanl riricroeliniate Impacts on private prepertics and the public rcalm. BACKGROUND: Victor and Carmen Menechella (21000422 Ontario Limited) have requested an amendment to Zoning By -law No. 79 -200 for a 0.17 hectare (0.4 acre) property known as 6505 Fallsview Boulevard, as shown on Schedule 1. The applicants are proposing to construct a 30- storey, 383 room hotel (without meeting rooms) with most of the required parking off site on the existing parking lot at 5896 -6046 Dunn Street. Schedules 1 and 2 show details of the proposed hotel. The lands are zoned Tourist Commercial with site specific zoning provisions (TC -616 and TC -635) which currently restrict the development to 4 storeys. The applicant is requesting a new site specific zone to allow a 30- storey hotel and to allow the majority of the hotel's parking to be provided off -site. Surrounding Land Uses The property is surrounded by tourist commercial uses. A restaurant abuts the site to the northwest, while a commercial parking lot abuts the site to the south. The Fallsview Casino complex and two high -rise hotels lie to the east and north, while a smaller hotel and a restaurant exist to the west. 4310 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905- 356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Working b' tJ' Planning Development September 10, 2007 -2- PD- 2007 -74 Circulation Comments Regional Municipality of Niagara Municipal Works The proposed development conforms to the Regional Policy Plan, Provincial Policy Statement and Provincial Growth Plan from a general land use perspective. It may not be the most desirable approach to facilitate parking by providing it at the off -site parking lot on Dunn Street, but it is noted approvals have been given by the City for this parking lot. Further comments on the applicant's traffic study will be provided at the site plan stage. Staff are opposed to allowing required parking for the site to be located on the Dunn Street/Ailanthus Avenue parking lot due to adverse traffic conditions that have already transpired with valet services accessing this parking facility. Services are adequate for the development. A 7 metre by 7 metre (23 foot by 23 foot) daylight triangle is required at the corner of Fallsview Boulevard and Dixon Street which will be secured at the time of site plan approval. An encroachment agreement will be necessary to allow a portion of the proposed hotel to cantilever over the daylight triangle. Further comments on site access and circulation will be provided at the site plan approval stage. Building By -law Services All required building permits to be obtained prior to construction. Planning Analysis Due to the significant departure of this project from Council's approved Design Guidelines and the adverse pedestrian level wind conditions which will be created, the project is not in conformity with the Official Plan and cannot be recommended. The proposal significantly exceeds the density of other developments in the tourist area and represents an overdevelopment of the site. Staff is also concerned about the amount of off -site parking this project relies on, and the additional traffic congestion it will cause. The following is a summary of Planning Staff's analysis of the application: 1. The proposal is within an area designated for high -rise buildings. Schedule 4 of the Tourist Commercial policies identifies those areas where high -rise development may occur. The property is within an area where Council may consider proposals for hotels up to 30 storeys in height subject to good planning and conditional on Section 37 Agreements. The costs for streetscape improvements along the street frontages is calculated as $86,000 approximately. September 10, 2007 -3- PD- 2007 -74 2. The proposal does not meet the Sky View Principle contained in the urban design objectives. The Official Plan requires that the building mass for high -rise hotels be reduced above the podium level and that separation distances be used between buildings to avoid a wall of buildings, allow light penetration and gaps between buildings and possible views for second and third tier developments. While the proposed building satisfies the built form for maximum floor plate area; maximum width to length ratio and percentage of building to lot frontage, it does not satisfy any of the provisions for separation of towers. This submission proposes zero metres on the interior lot line and provides only 6.0 metres (19.6 feet) on the south side whereas 12.5 metres (41.0 feet) is required. This could set a undesirable precedent for the future development and, in general, does not protect the skyview for other properties. 3. The proposal is not recommended by the Architectural Peer Review Panel. The Official Plan requires high -rise buildings over 10 storeys to complete an Architectural Peer Review (APR) (attached as Appendix 1 2). The applicant attended approximately 6 pre consultation meetings with the Panel. The Panel had significant concerns about the massing and location of the building. The applicant prepared a further design which is the subject of this application. In its final report the APR panel found that the applicant had made some changes and responded with an improved surface treatment and roof design, but no change was made to the general massing of the tower and did not address the principle concern about lack of sufficient setbacks. This is a notable failing of this project. 4. The proposal does not satisfy the Public Realm at Grade Principle. A podium is an essential part of creating human scale at the street level. This is achieved by setting the tower back 3 metres (10 feet) above the podium along the street frontages. The lack of a podium also appears to exacerbate microclimate impacts at the street level because of sheer wall effects. 5. The development will create a severe impact on pedestrians and conflicts with the Positive Microclimate Principle. The pedestrian realm, as well as adjacent properties and Queen Victoria Park are to be protected, from wind and other microclimate impacts. The applicant's consultant, RWDI Associates, provided a pedestrian wind study for the project. Their study identifies significant potential problems and suggests possible mitigation: Due to wind conditions which will be created by this building there will be safety failure at the corner of Dixon Street/Fallsview Boulevard and along Fallsview Boulevard immediately south of the proposed hotel. Wind gusts of over 88 km per hour (or 55 miles per hour) are forecasted meaning these locations may be hazardous for pedestrian use. Wind conditions along Fallsview Avenue and the Dixon Street sidewalks, adjacent to the proposed hotel, will be uncomfortable after the hotel is constructed. September 10, 2007 -4- PD- 2007 -74 The consultant suggested mitigation measures such as the placement of wind screens and columnar oak trees within the City sidewalk, as well as screens along the building facade. These extraneous measures only become necessary because the building does not provide the preferred podium and building setbacks intended to address sheer wall wind effects. Concerns about these adverse conditions should not be dismissed as the City strives to become a year round destination, more tourists will be utilizing sidewalks during the winter months. 6. The principle concerning parking and circulation is being compromised. This principle provides that, as a general rule, parking for new developments should be provided on -site. The APR panel raises concern about the development's reliance on off -site parking and the distance between the hotel and the off -site parking lot. Staff notes that zoning currently allows required parking for this site to be located off -site. However, this provision was granted when the site was proposed for a restaurant/entertainment use within a four storey building. Staff remains opposed to locating the majority of required parking for this site on the Dunn Street parking lot due to the impacts on surrounding streets and on residential area surrounding the parking lot. 7 The requested Zoning By -law amendment is not appropriate. The proposed zoning amendment would increase the permitted height of a building on this property from 15 metres (50 feet) to 109 metres (358 feet). Due to the lack of compliance with the built form guidelines and the adverse street level wind impacts, this request is not appropriate. The proposal is considered an overdevelopment of the site. The proposed hotel would be among the tallest, most dense developments in the City. The proposed hotel would have a density of 2,250 rooms per hectare (910 rooms per acre) as compared to 726 rooms per hectare (294 rooms per acre) for the Marriott Fallsview (another hotel that provides nearly all its required parking off site) and 975 rooms per hectare (395 rooms per acre) for the Embassy Suites Hotel. The proposed amendment also appears to increase the dependancy of this site on off -site parking. The current zoning is intended to permit a restaurant or attraction. The proposed hotel would require over 200 required parking spaces to locate in the off -site parking lot. This could increase the traffic problems already occurring on Dunn Street (congestion and speeding). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the proposed Zoning By -law amendment cannot be supported for the following reasons: 'September 10, 2007 -5- PD- 2007 -74 it does not comply with the Official Plan with respect to the built form regulations; it does not represent good planning as it is an overdevelopment of the site; the Architectural Peer Review panel does not support the development due to lack of conformity with the built form guidelines; there will be adverse wind conditions created at the street level as result of this hotel; and A.Bryce:gd Attach. the reliance on off -site parking to meet the parking requirements for an intensified development is not supported by staff. Should Council wish to support a 30- storey hotel on this block it should be on the basis of land assembly and compliance with the City's built form guidelines for high -rise hotels. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted; Doug Darbyson, Director f Planning Development irec Ed Dujlovic, Executive for of Community Services John MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer S: \PDR\2007 \PD- 2007 -74, AM -23 -2007, 6505 Fallsview Boulevard, Proposed 30 storey, 383 Room Hotel.wpd a) U DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY SITE AREA 1,485.5 sm BUILDING AREA COVERAGE 1,214 sm, 81.710 LANDSCAPED AREA 149.5 sm PARKING AREA 122 sm PARKING PROVIDED 172 OFF SITE, 20 ON SITE PARKING REQUIRED 192 GROSS FLOOR AREA 24,631,5 stun NUMBER OF GUEST UNITS 383 BUILDING HEIGHT 108.275 m Cceden Cele Connet 1.,:ottree ■:0 Vottte Co-tcretc Sicetwo, r cJ DIXON STREET 2:STOREY .RODIOM/ROOF GARDEN Concrete Sidewaik Ih1firr JT WA 1. 1L.111_1 135.60 (41.33 r) N 56 11 E Cut, 93.151 (26.41 4 1416 72 Asonelt 64.28 (19.59 m) 4 95' 11' E I I :1111111 1 11■■1 :111 1111111 I1 IDL91ldVIDYL1GV0 1.•1.1, 11URRR 1 PLAZA '11111 11 U cc 11■ I !!!1n11111111111 11..11■■■■ ■■■■■a■■ ■■1 11..11■■■■■■ ■��1 inicumnfisilmlimmiti 111161_ �111t11 11■ ■11■■ ■■■■rand! iiai: ■■.---r1 11■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■ ®lUI ■1 111111_ ®11111 11111 J 11111111111 111 11111 111111111111MIMMINI1111111 1111: -r1 .Gi: r■r ----■i iii ■1 11■ ■11 ■■■■■■■will 11■■1I■■■■■■■■■■■■al■■■ili '8111111111111111IIIM iWI 111111111111111111/Pli iYti 111111 ■illililellilI 11 fl 111A 1 II 11∎1.:!: c11 U 11 111111 :1111 41111 '1 1 1 11 111111 1--- 1■ ■■■■1 -■■■■1 I.1 alit! I ttalll■11'41 ®lfii re II111A.116tlI1.1G1 1 r 1111111 IdI11!Ill4 AID 1 I a 21 11'1111111111 AILLSVIEW I III I ,I 11 61 111 „11 11 II. 1 PLAZA EAST ELEVATION SCALE: .1:250 HOTS Schedule 3 4 1•111w-r1 ■111111■ ■1 a I 111 ■1 I II 111 111. 11 7.4 i 1'1 1 u 111 FALLSVIEW Ell PLAZA II .1111 big 111 -1 NORTH ELEVATION 00010: 1:350 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS Architectural Peer Review Comments HAMPTON INN PROPOSAL March 9, 2007 Appendix 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 1 2 PRINCIPLES: POSITIVE BASE BUILDING 3 3. SKY VIEW PRINCIPLE 3 4. SKYLINE HEIGHT PRINCIPLE 5 5. VIEWS AND VISTAS PRINCIPLE 5 6. POSITIVE MICROCLIMATE PRINCIPLE 5 7. PARKING AND CIRCULATION 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROPOSED HAMPTON INN NIAGARA FALLS, ON ARCHITECTURAL PEER REVIEW At the request of the proponent, the Architectural Review Panel (ARP) members met to review the development proposals on four occasions over the course of the summer and fall of 2006. All meetings took place at Niagara Falls City Hall. The ARP holds the view, which has been expressed to the proponent from the initial review, that the site is too small to support the scale of development being proposed. Setbacks and Separations of towers, as required in the Implementation Guidelines, are not possible to achieve with the scale of the proposed project and the dimensional limitations of the site. The Panel was open to some relaxation of the guideline principle if design excellence and innovation so warranted. To date, in the opinion of the ARP, the proposed design has not demonstrated a level of innovation and design excellence commensurate with the stated expectations of the Official Plan and Implementation Guidelines. Although some progress has been made towards resolution of other shortfalls in achieving the letter of the guidelines, as delineated following, until the tower setback and "Sky View Principle" are satisfactorily resolved. The ARP cannot support the application as currently shown. March 9, 2007 Page 2 of 5 1 2 PRINCIPLES: Positive Base Building Positive Public Realm at Grade The proponent tabled an example of a project that illustrated a lively and animated base /sidewalk condition that articulates the base from the body of the building, scale approximate to the pedestrian realm, elements that could contribute to pedestrian comfort and generally shows a rich pedestrian /building interface. The current design, while still very conceptual, could, in the opinion of the Panel, be developed into a similar richness through development of animated retail edges, sidewalk cafes, hotel access points, high quality landscape and signage. The Panel encouraged the designers to pursue the design possibilities embodied in Example A above. In conjunction with the comments above, the street edge and sidewalk width, combined with principle building setback at grade, appears to be dimensionally adequate to support street/building amenities such as cafes, etc. The streetscape components at the base of the building need stronger design elements to attract pedestrians to the main entrance and to the outdoor amenity areas. Higher quality wind screens and planting elements would also assist with creating a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street frontages. The possible protection from negative wind down drafts may be ameliorated through a combination of setback and canopy although a more robust and permanent canopy would be necessary rather than that shown in the renderings. The hard and soft landscaping and plantings will need to be of the highest quality for the Fallsview and Dixon streetscapes to succeed. This high quality must be maintained at all aspects of building /public interface. Care needs to be taken in the scale and proportion of the base design. The renderings appear to distort the relative scale of pedestrians and building elements. 3. SKY VIEW PRINCIPLE The Sky View Principle consists of three basic elements: 1. Tower separation of 25 metres between towers, or 12.5 metres each side of a property line. The design concept does not provide the required setback from the property line to the south. Provision of the required setback would severely limit the development potential of the site and indeed may render the development unfeasible. The proponent must resolve the shortfall in tower separation (25 metres) consisting of 12.5 metres on each side of the southerly property line. If a reduction of the separation is to be considered by the ARP, a convincing physical scenario needs to demonstrate the effect of such a reduction as well as illustrating the mitigating design measures which will reduce the negative impact of building separations less than prescribed by the guidelines. March 9, 2007 Page 3 of 5 The applicant should illustrate the following: Effect on subject property of providing 12,5 metre setback from south property. If setback reduced on subject property, but 25 m separation to be achieved, illustrate effect on property to the south to provide setback, and provide proof of acceptance by landowner to south, and provide proof of a binding agreement with the landlord to the south that they accept any impact on development of their property as a result. Illustrate design measures which would mitigate any setback reduction. The proponent has offered instead a 6 metre setback of the tower on the North side of the south property line (this is Tess than half the prescribed setback) and advised the ARP that the adjacent landowner to the south is willing to set back any future development a reciprocal 6 metres on the southerly site. While the ARP is willing to entertain some relaxation of the guidelines, providing less than half of the prescribed separation is not acceptable. If the full separation is to be achieved, then an imposed setback of 19 metres would be required on any development on the property to the south and mutually agreed to by the adjacent landowners. Such an agreement between the two landowners would have to be secured through legal means and be registered on title to be considered by the ARP. As currently shown, the design does not show effective design measures to mitigate for the reduction of tower separation. Such design measures need to be convincingly illustrated through accurate diagrams showing: Separation of buildings in elevation and 3 -D Model (multiple angles) Views to features, i.e. Falls, and vistas to surrounding environment. Views from neighbourhood, to prove that the proposed development and proposed setbacks will not create a "wall." Acceptance by the southerly neighbour of increased setback in their future development registered on title. 2. Base Building at street level which transitions from base to tower by employing 3 metre Stepback at approximately 15 metre above grade. As discussed previously, although the Stepback is not literally provided for in the design concept, a setback of the principle building face at grade, which forms a colonnade combined with a reciprocal setback of the third level, provides an alternative articulation of the base principle which shows promise. 3. Floor Plate Dimension The proponent should illustrate their response to the floor plate dimensional ratio of 1:1.5 length to width. March 9, 2007 Page 4 of 5 4. SKYLINE HEIGHT PRINCIPLE The Panel noted that the shaft and top of the hotel tower are poorly resolved architecturally and require considerably more design effort to distinguish base, middle, and top in a tripartite elevation. The tower should be depicted elevationally in the context of the Niagara Falls Skyline with views from the USA side, Victoria Park and from the residential area to the west. These views will assist the designer preparing a building design which contributes architecturally (not with signage) to the quality of the City skyline. 5. VIEWS AND VISTAS PRINCIPLE Illustrate the views and vistas discussed in the response report prepared by Chapman Murray. Verbal explanation is inadequate. 6. POSITIVE MICROCLIMATE PRINCIPLE The proposed design appears to have potential to create a positive microclimate in proximity to the building, although some elements such as the canopies will likely have to be more robust than the awnings shown. A pedestrian level wind study will be required and it is recommended that this be conducted during the design stage to enable design changes in response. These may be building and /or landscape plantings. 7. PARKING AND CIRCULATION It is acknowledged that car parking will be off -site via valet parking, in accordance with current zoning approvals. All vehicular movements for buses, cars, delivery and garbage removal are proposed to occur within the site boundaries. Careful scheduling and monitoring will be required to avoid conflicts and ensure safe and effective pedestrian and vehicular movements. J:111947 \10.0 Reports \UTRhamptoninn (5)2007- 03- 08.doc \BH March 9, 2007 Page 5 of 5 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS Architectural Peer Review Comments HAMPTON INN PROPOSAL August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 Appendix 2 Proposed Hotel at Fallsview Boulevard Dixon Niagara Falls, Canada Subsequent to the current report prepared by the Architectural Review Panel (ARP) dated March 9, 2007. the Panel members have been issued new and revised materials as follows. 1. PREPARED BY CHAPMAN MURRAY ARCHITECTS Architectural Drawings SP1, S1, Al -All, inclusive, July 9, 2007 Perspective Renderings, April 1, 2007 Shadow Impact Programs, June 22, 2007 Review of Urban Design Principles, June 22, 2007 2. PREPARED BY RWDI Pedestrian Wind Study, May 16, 2007 3. PREPARED BY DELCAN Traffic Impact Study, April 2007 In reviewing the materials submitted, the ARP notes that no change has been made to the general massing of the proposed project to effectively mitigate the shortcoming of the recommended setback on the south side of 12.5 m each side of the property line, resulting in a 25.0 m separation between towers. The "Sky View Principle" being separation of towers to prevent a "wall" effect, has not been addressed satisfactorily in the current configuration. Therefore ARP position is unchanged in that the ARP cannot support the application as currently shown. The applicant acknowledges this shortcoming in the design report (p4) that the recommended setback cannot be achieved, substantiating, in our opinion, that the project is too large for the site. The applicant goes on (p4) to suggest that acquisition of the adjacent site to the northwest would enable the filling in of the "L" currently shown. The plans submitted do not indicate how this infill would be accomplished. Such an infill, while perhaps accomplishing some operational objectives, does not contribute to the deficiency noted in the separation of towers. However, should the adjacent site become available and indeed part of the development property, it would appear to offer significant scope to redesign the project and enable the proponent to more closely meet the intent and letter of the guidelines. We would recommend that the candidate explore the opportunities utilizing the adjacent site with a new design. In the opinion of the ARP, there have been improvements in the architectural design to articulate the base, middle, top concept (tripartite elevation), the vitality at street level, landscape and street activity potential and generally better legibility and proportion of the building design. August 23, 2007 Page 2 of 3 Addendum 1 The Pedestrian Wind Study recommends that further design collaboration between the architects and RWDI would help mitigate noted unpleasant conditions found through wind tunnel testing. The ARP concurs with this recommendation. Now that we have had a chance to study the "Traffic Impact Study" prepared by Delcan it should be noted that the "off site" parking is a considerable distance from the proposed hotel, resulting in fairly long delays in retrieving vehicles by valet especially during rush hour. See Figure 1.1 "Proposed Site Location. CONCLUSION The ARP cannot support the application as currently shown. It appears that through acquisition of the adjacent site to the north, rationalization and improved building design and compliance with the guidelines could be achieved and we recommend that avenue be explored with a new comprehensive design rather than infill of the "L" which does not address the critical shortcoming of building separation. August 23, 2007 Page 3 of 3 Addendum 1 Niagara ,f Region PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT August 13, 2007 Andrew Bryce Planner 2 City of Niagara Falls 4310 Queen St., 2 Floor Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5 Dear Mr. Bryce: Re: Zoning By -law Amendment Application 6505 Fallsview Boulevard AM- 23/2007 City of Niagara Falls This application proposes to amend the City's Zoning By -law to permit a 30 storey, 383 unit hotel. The following Provincial and Regional planning comments are provided for your consideration. The site is located in the Region's Urban Area Boundary for Niagara Falls according to the Regional Policy Plan. The proposed development conforms to the Provincial Policy Statement, Provincial Growth Plan and Regional Policy Plan from a general and use perspective. Regional Public Works Department has received the Traffic Report prepared by Delcan and has advised that there are no objections to the proposed development since the site fronts on a local road and will be connected directly to local sewer and water services. Contrary to the Traffic Report, the only Regional road in the immediate area is Stanley Avenue (Regional Road 102). Regional Public Works staff will complete a review of the Traffic Report and provide any comments when a site plan is processed for the development. A majority of the parking for this development will be provided in an off -site parking lot on Dunn Street. Although this may not be the most desirable approach to facilitate parking in the tourist district, the City approved this private parking lot several years ago for a number of tourist commercial businesses operated by the Niagara 21 Group. The City should be satisfied that adequate space is available to accommodate the proposed development and that valet services can be safely provided. Please send notice of City Council's decision on this application when available. Yours truly, Peter Colosimo, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner C: D. Darbyson, City of Niagara Falls B. Stevens, Regional Public Works Councillor W. Smeaton M:WISWORD\PC \Niagara Falls\NFzbla\6505 FallsviewBoulevard.doc Building Community. Building Lives. ji Planning The Regional Municipality of Nia.ara 2201 St. David's Road, P.O. Bo' p *p. Thorold, Ontario L2V 417 AM Telephone: 905 -984 -3630 Fax: 905 641 -5208 E mail: plan @regional.niagara.on.ca File: D.10.M.11.23 v RECEIVED AUG 15 2007 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT Ilu( LI% LV V Ain Williams Chairman Niagara Parks 14.1 An apenoy Of the Opvev of Oatsalo ctnne 1885 J•JVI Ili it 111,1111 \II IlllrIrV a.11,nalr L. LIra lvH Andrew Bryce Planner 2 Planning and Development City of Niagara Falls 4310 Queen Street Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 6X5 Dear Sir: THE NIAGARA PARKS COMMISSION' P.O. Box 150, Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada 1,2E 6T2 Web Site: www.niagaranarks.00m Engineering Dave Gillis Phone: 905/356 -2241, eXt. 260 Fax: 906/356 -7262 E Mail: npceng@niagaraparks.com August 27, 2007 RE: AM-23/2007 ZONING BY LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION PROPOSED 30 STOREY HOTEL DEVELOPMENT 6605 FALLS BOULEVARD, NIAGARA FALLS The Niagara Parks Commission has no objection to this development proposal provided it is subject to the same architectural peer review that the other hotel developments in the area were required to adhere to such as wind, shadow and mist studies, design and building mass qualities etc. Yours truly, Dave Gillis, MCIP, RPP /cr Manager Planning Properties RECEIVED AUG 2 8 2007 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT John Xenia/tan General Manager September 10, 2007 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: PD- 2007 -73 AM- 21/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 5950 Victoria Avenue and 5956 Clark Avenue Applicant: Cosmo Menechella (Niagara 21S Group Inc.) RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Council approve the Zoning By -law amendment application to incorporate lands known as 5956 Clark Avenue under the same site specific zoning that applies to 5950 Victoria Avenue and include recent variances granted to adjust the design of the hotel. 2. That staff meet with the developer regarding the outstanding issues of 2 landsca•e o fer v s. a decorative fence, appropriate security for is b -law occur after the execution of determination agreement to secure future str future Grand Boulevard streetscaping and Section 37 Public Benefits. BACKGROUND: of calculations for NiagaraJalls an Working Together to Serve Our Community the PD- 2007 -73 Cosmo Menechella (Niagara 21' Group Inc.) has requested an amendment to the Zoning By -law for the land known as 5950 Victoria Avenue and 5956 Clark Avenue, as shown on Schedule 1. In 2005, Council approved zoning (TC -478) which permits the development of a 30- storey hotel in addition to the existing 10- storey hotel on 5950 Victoria Avenue. In March 2007, the applicant was granted variances to allow adjustments to the massing and roof feature of the 30- storey hotel. The applicant has acquired 5956 Clark Avenue and is now requesting the TC -478 zoning be extended over it. The Clark Avenue property is currently zoned Tourist Commercial (TC). Surrounding Land Uses Surrounding land uses are primarily tourist commercial and comprised of hotels, restaurants, attractions and souvenir stores. The10- storey Marriott Courtyard Hotel exists on the north part of the site. A parking lot currently leased to the Ontario Gaming Corporation lies to the south and the former CP Rail corridor lies to the east. ommunity Services Department Planning Development September 10, 2007 2 PD- 2007 -73 Circulation Comments Regional Municipality of Niagara Municipal Works Regional Planning has no concerns with this application from a Provincial or Regional planning perspective as the proposed land use conforms to the Provincial Policy Statement, Provincial Growth Plan and Regional Policy Plan. A 3.05 metre widening along the Clark Avenue frontage is required. A Traffic Impact Study was submitted as part of the zoning application for the 30- storey hotel in 2004. However, there are some outstanding issues regarding the traffic generated by the site and its impact on the municipal roads, which need to be addressed and therefore the applicant is requested to provide a revised Traffic Impact Study. Building By- Laws Services No objection to the proposed zoning. Fire Services No objection to the proposed zoning. Parks, Recreation Culture Payment of the 2% cash -in -lieu of parkland dedication will be required at the Building Permit stage. It is recommended that consideration be given to future pedestrian linkages to the Grand Boulevard as well as improving landscaping treatment. Planning Review 1. The proposed amendment complies with the Official Plan. The lands are designated Tourist Commercial under the Official Plan and are part of the Fallsview Subdistrict. The Fallsview Subdistrict is the primary location for large scale accommodations, entertainment, retail and cultural attractions. The Official Plan design guidelines encourage hotels to provide adequate on -site parking which is screened by landscaping. The Official Plan also emphasizes that future developments should enhance the attractiveness of the tourism environment and promote pedestrian friendly streetscapes. Prior to acquiring 5956 Clark Avenue, development was focused internally with no street presence. The acquisition of additional frontage land has provided the opportunity to provide additional street presence to the project along Clark Avenue. However, a proper buffer is required between the parking area and the sidewalk to soften the impact of the asphalt parking area and increase aesthetics. To accomplish this the parking spaces should be pushed back approximately 3 metres after the required road widening. The recommended landscaping strip will greatly assist in improving the pedestrian realm along Clark Avenue. September 10, 2007 3 PD- 2007 -73 2. The proposed Zoning By -law amendment is appropriate. The majority of the subject lands are zoned Tourist Commercial with site specific provisions (TC -478) permitting a 10 and 30- storey hotel. The newly acquired land at 5956 Clark Avenue is currently zoned TC. The amendment will result in the TC -478 zone being extended over 5956 Clark Avenue. The requested zoning amendment is a housekeeping matter which would place the properties under one by -law for development purposes. The amending by-law would include minor variances recently granted with regard to the location of the 30- storey hotel previously approved and should include a provision to require the recommended landscape strip between the parking lot and the street line (Clark Avenue). The landscape design along Clark Avenue and along Grand Boulevard will be addressed through site plan control. 3. Section 37 Public Benefits All projects between 4 and 30 storeys are required to contribute to streetscape improvements on abutting streets. The City has already obtained securities for streetscape improvement along the future Grand Boulevard from other developers. The streetscaping cost for the three affected street frontages along Clark Avenue, Victoria Avenue and the future Grand Boulevard are estimated to be $66,312, $55,945 and $165,937, respectively, totaling $288,000. A letter of credit to secure this work will be required at the Building Permit stage and addressed in the Section 37 agreement. The agreement will have to be entered prior to the passing of the by- law. CONCLUSION: The Zoning By -law amendment application can be supported for the following reasons: 1. The Official Plan encourages hotels to provide a greater portion of the required parking on -site. The additional land will benefit the hotel by enabling additional parking to be provided on -site. A. Dilwaria /K.Mech:gd Attach. The additional land will provide an opportunity for additional landscaping on -site which will improve the aesthetics of the site and give the hotel a greater street presence. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Doug Darbyson, Director of Planning Development Ed Dujlovic, Execu S: \PDR\2007 \PD- 2007 -73, AM -21 -2007, 5950 Victoria 5956 Clark, Niagara 21st Group.wpd e 'rector of Community Services John MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer Schedule 1 (8/31/2007) Andrew Bryce ZBLA Victoria Ave Clark Ave From: To: Date: Subject: Andrew "Colosimo, Peter" peter. colosimo @regional.niagara.on.ca> "Andrew Bryce" <abryce @city.niagarafalls.on.ca> 8/13/2007 1:04 PM ZBLA Victoria Ave Clark Ave Re: Zoning By -law Amendment Application To Include Additional Lands for Hotel Development 5950 Victoria Avenue and 5956 Clark Avenue Niagara 21st Group City of Niagara Falls Regional Planning has no concerns with the above referenced application from a Provincial or Regional planning perspective as the proposed land use conforms to the Provincial Policy Statement, Provincial Growth Plan and Regional Policy Plan. Peter Colosimo, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Regional Niagara Planning Development Department 2201 St David's Road, P.O. Box 1042 Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Phone: 905 984 3630, ext. 3382 Fax: 905 641 5208 E -Mail: peter. colosimo @regional.niagara.on.ca <mailto: peter. colosimo @regional.niagara.on.ca> IVEZEIVEY AUG 3 1 2007 PLANNING I DEVELOPMENT The Regional Municipality of Niagara Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have Page 1 (8/31/20Q7) Andrew ryce ZBLA Victoria Ave Clark Ave received this communication in error, please re -send this communication to the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of it from your computer system. Thank you. Page 2 September 10, 2007 PD- 2007 -70 NiagaraFalls CANADA His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: PD- 2007 -70 AM- 24/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 5741 McGrail Avenue Applicant: Joe Lyons Agent: Brian Sinclair Recognition of the Existing Building as an Apartment Hotel (Hostel) RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND: That Council approve the Zoning By -law amendment application to recognize the existing building as a hostel. Joe Lyons has requested an amendment to Zoning By -law No. 79 -200 for a 845 square metre (9,093 square foot) property known as 5741 McGrail Avenue, as shown on Schedule 1. An apartment building used as the Lyon's House Hostel exists on the property. The applicant is requesting the use of the building to be recognized in the Zoning By -law. Refer to Schedule 2 for details of the property. The land is currently zoned Tourist Commercial (TC). The applicant is requesting site specific zoning provisions to be added to the TC zoning of the property to recognize the use of the existing building as an apartment hotel (hostel) and to establish a site specific parking requirement for the use. Although the building was originally constructed as an apartment dwelling, it is being used as a hostel, with bedrooms or entire dwelling units being rented to individual travellers or groups of travellers. The property is proposed to be sold and the owner wishes to legalize the use prior to the sale. There are no known complaints against the property or the use. Surrounding Land Uses The land is surrounded by a mix of uses. A variety of tourist commercial uses and parking areas lie to the south and southwest of the property. Residential uses lie to the west and north -east of the property, while a mix of uses, including an industrial use, lies to the north. 0 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada 1.2E 6X5 905-356-7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Planning Development September 10, 2007 2 PD- 2007 -70 Circulation Comments Regional Municipality of Niagara Municipal Works Fire Services Planning Analysis No objections. The land use conforms with the Regional Policy Plan, Provincial Policy Statement and the Provincial Growth Plan. No concerns. The provision of five parking spaces is adequate for the use. Building and By -law Services A Change in Use Building Permit to reflect the change in use from an apartment building to a hostel is required. Any applicable development charges are to be paid at the building permit stage. No objections, any fire safety concerns can be addressed through the normal building permit process. 1. The proposal complies with the Official Plan. The property is designated Tourist Commercial by the Official Plan and is within the Clifton Hill Subdistrict. Lands in this Subdistrict are intended to be used for a variety of tourist uses including accommodations; the development of such uses to the west of Victoria Avenue is to provide an appropriate transition to the adjacent residential and institutional uses. The requested amendment complies with the Official Plan as follows: The use of the former apartment building as a hostel provides an alternative form of tourist accommodation. This small -scale use does not appear to have negative impacts on the surrounding road network or servicing infrastructure. This small -scale use provides an appropriate transition from the larger scale, more intensive tourist commercial uses located toward the centre of the Subdistrict to the nearby low density residential and institutional uses west, north and northeast of the site. The low -rise building fits into the scale of the adjacent single detached and multiple dwellings and the use (providing short or longer term accommodations to guests) in the form of apartment units is compatible with dwellings. As the use has similarity to multiple residential uses and the property has historically been used as an apartment dwelling, no land use impacts on adjacent dwellings are expected by the continuation of this use. September 10, 2007 3 PD- 2007 -70 2. The requested zoning is appropriate. The applicant is requesting a hostel to be site specifically added as a permitted use on the property to reflect the existing use. As a hostel is not defined in Zoning By- law No. 79 -200, the following definition is proposed to be used in the amending by- law to describe the use. Approved by: A.Bryce /bs "Hostel" means a building in which rooms intended for the sole purposes of sleeping accommodation only are offered for a fee, and which contains common washrooms and kitchens, and which may contain accessory rooms for recreational or other similar purposes, and may include one (1) accessory dwelling unit for the owner or operator thereof. Traffic Services is satisfied with the provision of 5 parking spaces (1 plus 0.23 per bedroom). As many guests of the hostel either walk to the site or use public transit, the use does not have a high demand on parking. CONCLUSION: Recognition of the use of the property as a hostel is appropriate as it complies with the Official Plan with respect to the location of tourist facilities and it is compatible with surrounding properties. Recommended by: Respectfully submitted,,. John MacDonal Doug Darbyson, Director of Planning Development Ed Dujl voc, Exe u lye Director of Community Services Chie Administrative Officer S: \PDR\20071PD- 2007 -70, Application 5741 McGrail Avenue, Recognize Existing Apartment Hotel.wpd Schedule 1 41L.0,ts1 x741 fevrptz.v4r A<2t t2;t3_o,o9" ct ,e L D L SC-ti ED U L� (8/31/2007) Andrew Bryce ZBLA 5741 McGrail Ave From: To: Date: Subject: Andrew "Colosimo, Peter" peter. colosimo @regional.niagara.on.ca> "Andrew Bryce" <abryce @city.niagarafalls.on.ca> 8/2/2007 10:03 AM ZBLA 5741 McGrail Ave Re: Zoning By -law Amendment Application 5741 McGrail Avenue Permit Existing Hostel as an Apartment Hotel City File: AM- 24/2007 Regional Planning has no concerns with the above referenced application from a Provincial or Regional planning perspective as the proposed land use conforms to the Provincial Policy Statement, Provincial Growth Plan and Regional Policy Plan. Peter Colosimo, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Regional Niagara Planning Development Department 2201 St David's Road, P.O. Box 1042 Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Phone: 905 984 3630, ext. 3382 Fax: 905 641 5208 E -Mail: peter. colosimo @regional.niagara.on.ca mailto: peter. colosimo @regional.niagara.on.ca> RECEIVED AUG 3 12007 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT The Regional Municipality of Niagara Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re -send this communication to the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of it from your computer system. Thank you. September 10, 2007 PD- 2007 -67 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: RECOMMENDATION: Niag araa11s CANADA Re: PD- 2007 -67 AM- 22/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 5997 Drummond Road Applicant: Robert Oliver Agent: Chris Cristelli Recognition of an Existing Triplex That Council approve the Zoning By -law amendment application to recognize the existing triplex on the property known as 5997 Drummond Road. BACKGROUND: Robert Oliver has requested an amendment to Zoning By -law No. 79 -200 for a 723 square metre (7,700 square foot) property known as 5997 Drummond Road, as shown on Schedule 1. The applicant is requesting the existing triplex on the property to be recognized in the Zoning By -law. Refer to Schedule 2 for details of the property. The land is zoned Transition Residential Multiple (TRM). The applicant is requesting the zoning of the property to be changed to a site specific Residential. Mixed (R3) zone to recognize the existing dwelling as a triplex. Surrounding Land Uses The land is surrounded mainly by single detached and duplex dwellings. The lands to the south were approved in principle for cottage rental dwellings in detached and duplex dwellings. Lands further to the north, fronting onto Lundy's Lane, are used for commercial purposes. reet, P.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON Canada 'L2E 6X5 905- 356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Planning Development September 10, 2007 2 PD- 2007 -67 Circulation Comments Regional Municipality of Niagara Fire Services Building By -law Services Municipal Works No concerns. The land use conforms to the Regional Policy Plan, Provincial Policy Statement and the Provincial Growth Plan. Approval of the application is to be conditional on the owner providing a report from a qualified person verifying that the building meets the requirements of the Fire Code or arranging an inspection by Fire Services Staff, and applying for any necessary building permits. A Change of Use Building Permit will be necessary to recognize its conversion from its original single detached dwelling use to a triplex dwelling use. No objections. Parks, Recreation and Culture No objections. Planning Analysis 1. The proposal complies with the Official Plan. The property is designated Residential by the Official Plan. Compatible multiple dwelling unit developments, up to a density of 75 units per hectare (30 units per acre) are permitted within this designation where they have convenient access to the arterial road system and are generally in close proximity to schools, parks and neighbourhood commercial areas. The requested amendment complies with the Official Plan as follows: The density of the development is 41 units per hectare (17 units per acre), well within the density contemplated for such developments. The site has ready access to an arterial road (Drummond Road) and is located close to commercial facilities on Lundy's Lane, as well as to schools and parks. The dwelling is a former single detached dwelling that is compatible, in terms of massing and setbacks, with the surrounding single detached and duplex dwellings. No expansions are proposed. September 10, 2007 3 PD- 2007 -67 2. The requested zoning is appropriate. The applicant has requested a zoning change from TRM to a site specific R3 zone to permit the existing triplex. The TRM zone is essentially a hold zone that permits legal, existing development until such time as a proposal for a higher density development in conformity with the Official Plan is proposed. Typically these proposals involve the assembly of land for a multiple unit dwelling, however, the conversion of dwellings that are complementary to surrounding dwellings (similar to the existing request) can also be considered. Minor site specific adjustments to the lot area, lot frontage, front yard depth and rear yard depth standards of the R3 zone are requested to recognize the existing lot conditions. In addition, the applicant is requesting that the existing basement apartment unit be recognized. Historically, basement apartments have been prohibited by the Zoning By -law due to building and fire code safety concerns. Recent changes to the Ontario Building Code (OBC) and Fire Code now address basement apartments. To ensure safety, these regulations require basement apartments to be built to a specific standard which can be secured through the necessary Change of Use Building Permit. As these apartments are now addressed by the OBC staff have no concerns with this request. CONCLUSION: The existing triplex complies with the Official Plan with respect to the location of multiple dwellings and is compatible with surrounding dwellings, therefore, the Zoning By -law amendment application to recognize this use can be supported. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: A. Bryce:cb Attach. Doug Darbyson, Director of Planning Development Ed Dujlovic, Executive irec or of Community Services John MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer S: \PDR\2007 \PD- 2007 -67 5997 Drummond Road, Recognition of an Existing Triplex.wpd I NM Subject 111111111111 EMU Land IIIIIllhIIIIIIP mummin 111111indal miewitip LUNDY'S LANE 3 O z 1.1.1- 71 AM- 22/2007 NMI -max. PAWA.LA 14/-1 Loft -1 I 2oNeD t >`18)( ao .x, ptZkve..vJAy geun L,or 1.4o, 70 V T�y D or PAt t NC-t cA S \Z ■'7 S eA CE S 4- P iz 1 T h.� �c� I\ .i o z n CD CD (8/31/2007) Andrew Bryce ZBLA 5997 Drummond Road From: To: Date: Subject: Andrew "Colosimo, Peter" peter. colosimo @regional.niagara.on.ca> "Andrew Bryce" <abryce @city. niagarafalls.on.ca> 8/2/2007 9:48 AM ZBLA 5997 Drummond Road Re: Zoning By -law Amendment Application 5997 Drummond Road Recognize Existing Triplex Dwelling City File: AM- 22/2007 Regional Planning has no concerns with the above referenced application from a Provincial or Regional planning perspective as the proposed land use conforms to the Provincial Policy Statement, Provincial Growth Plan and Regional Policy Plan. Peter Colosimo, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Regional Niagara Planning Development Department 2201 St David's Road, P.O. Box 1042 Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Phone: 905 984 3630, ext. 3382 Fax: 905 641 5208 E -Mail: peter. colosimo @regional.niagara.on.ca <mailto: peter. colosimo @regional. n iagara. on. ca> RECEIVED AUG 3 12007 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT The Regional Municipality of Niagara Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re -send this communication to the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of it from your computer system. Thank you. September 10, 2007 PD- 2007 -71 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: PD- 2007 -71 AM- 20/2007, Zoning By -law Amendment Application 5532 Drummond Road Applicant: Beverly Miller Proposed Day Nursery RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the Zoning By -law amendment application to add a day nursery to the list of uses on the property known as 5532 Drummond Road and to recognize the setbacks of the existing building. BACKGROUND: Beverly Miller has requested an amendment to Zoning By -law No. 79 -200 for a 712 square metre (7,664 square foot) property known as 5532 Drummond Road, as shown on Schedule 1. The applicant is running a private home daycare on the site, and is permitted under the zoning by -law and Regional license to care for up to 5 children. The applicant is requesting to convert this day care to a day nursery, accommodating up to 19 children. Schedule 2 shows details of the development. The land is zoned Neighbourhood Commercial (NC). The applicant is requesting site specific zoning provisions to add a day nursery to the list of uses permitted on the property and to recognize the setbacks of the existing building. Surrounding Land Uses Niag arajalls CANADA The land is surrounded mainly by single detached dwellifigs to the east and south, while lands to the west of the property are used for apartment buildings. A coffee shop lies to the north of the subject land. 4310 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Planning Development September 10, 2007 2 PD- 2007 -71 Circulation Comments Regional Municipality of Niagara No concerns. The proposed development conforms with the Regional Policy Plan, Provincial Policy Statement and Provincial Growth Plan. Municipal Works A 3.05 metre (10 foot) wide road widening along the length of the property frontage will be required if the property is subject to site plan control in the future. Building Services A Change in Use Building Permit is required to reflect the change to a day nursery. Fire Services City Clerk Fire Services has no record of a current fire safety inspection for the above noted property. A fire safety inspection would be required in order to determine its current fire safety status. The day nursery will require a license from Niagara. Planning Analysis 1. The proposal complies with the Official Plan. the Regional Municipality of The property is designated Residential in the Official Plan. Although lands under this designation are primarily intended for dwellings, neighbourhood commercial facilities may also be permitted. Such facilities are to be conveniently and appropriately located to serve area residents, with significant traffic generators directed to sites that have access onto arterial or collector roads. The property has been zoned Neighbourhood Commercial and used for commercial properties since 1979. The use of this property has achieved a degree of comparability with surrounding properties. A range of small scale commercial uses, intended to serve the surrounding community, are already permitted on the property. The site fronts onto an arterial road (Drummond Road). September 10, 2007 3 PD- 2007 -71 A.Bryce /cb The proposed day nursery is a small scale use that is consistent and compatible with other uses permitted in the NC zone and will provide another service to the surrounding neighbourhood. As the building is not being expanded and the site has direct access to Drummond Road, no additional impacts are expected on the surrounding neighbourhood. In response to interest to have day nurseries located near the communities they serve, Council approved a previous request to add the same use to another NC zoned property. Staff intend to present Council with an amendment in the near future to add day nurseries to the list of uses permitted in all Neighbourhood Commercial zones. 2. The requested zoning is appropriate. The applicant has requested a day nursery to be site specifically added to the list of use permitted by NC zone. The proposed day nursery is a small scale use that serves a segment of the surrounding community and is compatible with other uses in an NC zone and therefore is appropriate for the NC zone that applies to the property. Minor adjustments to the front, rear and side yard standards of the NC zone are required to recognize the siting of the existing building. A sufficient number of parking spaces (4 required) exist to serve the use. An additional tandem parking space is available on the north side of the building. CONCLUSION: The proposed day nursery complies with the Official Plan with respect to locating ancillary uses in the Residential designation and is an appropriate use for an NC zone, and therefore can be supported. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: 4. Doug Darbyson, Director of Planning Development S: \PDR\2007 \PD- 2007 -71, Application 5532 Drummond Road Proposed Day Nursery.wpd d Dujlovic, Executive Director of Co munity Services h trati e MacDonald, Chief Adminis Officer 420 H1NY Schedule 1 ce x O a PROSPECT ST Subject Land NORTH ST 1 :NTS AM- 20/2007 IT E. 0.0 7' 2 O O c0 0. 0 0 0 z t): m W 0 LI- PI z W lJ W t0 O O O M z 18 W' M M W O CO M I fo cc to tO C V/ ✓1 C N n ci e U w wood planter and metal PLAN plastic sign 0 S'LY LIMIT OF' PLAN 42 N89'06'E edge of o asphalt concrete walk 46.75' halt N89'06 wire fe edge 0 48.55' NORTH ST. P. L N. 64319- 0149(LT) asphc TOWN .HIP 0 3 le) d 13&+— (4•n±) in N 2 t wide Hedge rn iq C P.L 64319- 0184(LT) INST. NO. BB25982 (1965) 7(A DISTR. DISTR. SN 44513 S DESCRIBED IN INSTR 681487) (RBE SET) ood fenc ospholt LOT 82 N89•06'E (PLAN do MEAS.) 111.04' edge of asphalt 1- STOREY BRICK AND STONE DWELLING, #5532). P.LN 64319- 0150(LT) .INSTR SN 140603 (AS DESCRIBED IN INSTR. 653837) CQ wire fence )t (RBE MEAS.) LOT u fence corner 0.4' N., 0.4' E.---\ 110.25' end of wood fence /0.35 S., 0.25' E. z 29.6' 29.85' 'Cy/re fence)126.58' 127.33' (01) 03 0 ai 42 (RBE SET) N88'59'E 17.50' comer on line, 0.35' h tT (01Sfence flj, rood Jenaq 0.13' M, 0.20' E a F::<,,,.. M e nd of wood 0.15' I fiend of wire 03 fence 0.3' E. 03 o� W 4 10 N z ence comer on line, 0.05' W. O z Zif PAO{unly SP?.e_sS Accep I E, a9 (07 ThT4 A1cE. 1C.4. SvL.aln.iC� 4.REd z ?.ct g 5@• '(Z336srdn►�, jOQ% Ju 1, ',V. 4VV1 ILA VVI III RLVlvllnl 1 Ln11f1111V Niagara IVO Region PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT July 18, 2007 File: D.10.M.11.23 Andrew Bryce Planner 2 City of Niagara Falls 4310 Queen St., 2" Floor Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5 Dear Mr. Bryce: Re: Zoning By-law Am ndment Application 5332 Drummond Road Beverly Miller City of Niaoara Falls This application proposes tcp amend the City's Zoning By-law to permit a day nursery within an existing building on a property currently zoned Neighbourhood Commercial. The following Provincial and Regional planning comments are provided for your consideration. The site is located in the Region's Urban Area Boundary for Niagara Falls according to the Regional Policy Plan. A wide range of land uses is permitted in Urban Areas. The proposed development conforms with the Provincial Policy Statement, Provincial Growth Plan and Regional Policy Plan. Regional Planning staff has no concerns with this zoning by-law amendment application from a Provincial or Regional planning perspective. Please send notice of City Council's decision on this application when available. Yours truly, 0 n C11 9. Peter Colosi C1P RPP Senior Planner a D. Darbyson, City of Niagara Fads M:UASWORDIPCWiagara FadsWFzbla15332 DrummondRd MNlar.doo Building Community. Building Lives. IIV. V f 7V The Regional Municipality of Niagara 2201 St. David's Road, P.O. Box Thorold, Ontario L2V 417 P tonning Telephone: 906. 984 3630 z Sciuured Fax 905-641-5208 E-mail: planeregional.niagara.on.ca /IIr 0 20 /0 7 00 RECEIVED JUL 18 2007 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT September 10, 2007 PD- 2007 -72 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Niag araf C A N A D A Re: PD- 2007 -72 AM- 18/2007,6565 and 6585 Lundy's Lane Applicant: Real Capital Partners Agent: Zelinka Priamo Limited Proposed Retail Store RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Council approve the Zoning By -law amendment application to rezone a portion of the land known as 6565 Lundy's Lane from Residential to Commercial and to apply site specific zoning provisions to both 6565 and 6585 Lundy's Lane to guide the development of a retail store. 2. That the applicant complete a traffic calming study for Byng Avenue as part of the application for site plan approval, and that required works be secured from the applicant through a development agreement. BACKGROUND: Real Capital Partners has requested an amendment to Zoning By -law No. 79 -200 for land holdings totaling 0.67 hectares (1.67 acres) known as 6565 and 6585 Lundy's Lane, as shown on Schedule 1. The applicant is requesting a portion of the land known as 6585 Lundy's Lane to be rezoned from a residential to a commercial category and site specific zoning provisions be applied to both 6565 and 6585 Lundy's Lane to guide the development of a 1,583 square metre (17,030 square foot) retail store, as shown on Schedule 2. The majority of both properties are already zoned General Commercial (GC) permitting retail stores. A small portion of the land known as 6585 Lundy's Lane is currently zoned Residential Single Family and Two Family (R2) and is requested to be changed to GC. In addition, site specific zoning provisions are proposed to be applied to the whole of the land to ensure the provision of the proposed landscaping, as shown on Schedule 1. 4310 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada 'L2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Planning Development September 10, 2007 2 PD- 2007 -72 Surrounding Land Uses Lands on either side of the subject lands fronting onto Lundy's Lane are used for a variety of commercial uses. Lands to the north of the subject lands are primarily single detached residential dwellings. Circulation Comments 1. Regional Municipality of Niagara No objections. The land use conforms with the Regional Policy Plan, Provincial Policy Statement and the Provincial Growth Plan. A 3.05 metre (10 foot) wide road widening along the length of the Lundy Lane frontage of the property, and a 4.5 metre by 4.5 metre (15 foot by 15 foot) daylight triangle at the corner of Lundy's Lane and Byng Avenue, will be required to be dedicated. Municipal Works Adequate services exist to serve the development. A 2.44 meter (8 foot) wide road widening is required along the length of the Byng Avenue frontage of the property. To mitigate any traffic impacts on the residential neighborhood as a result of the access onto Byng Avenue, the applicant is to develop and implement a traffic calming plan for Byng Avenue to the City's satisfaction. Fire Services No objections. Adequate fire access and fire protection will be required to be demonstrated at the site plan stage. Parks, Recreation and Culture A landscape plan, detailing landscape development and tree preservation measures for any trees to be preserved, will be required at the site plan stage. Building Services All required building permits to be obtained prior to commencement of construction. September 10, 2007 3 PD- 2007 -72 Planning Analysis 1. The proposal complies with the Official Plan. The property is designated Tourist Commercial by the Official Plan and is within the Lundy's Lane Tourist District. The district is a multi functional commercial area catering to residents and tourists. New development is to contribute to an attractive streetscape including uniformly bringing buildings up closer to the street line, introducing a consistent landscaped setback and minimizing the number of access driveways. Additionally, the Official Plan stipulates that impacts on residential areas adjacent to tourist areas, such as traffic spilling out onto local streets, are to be minimized. The proposed development complies with the Official Plan as follows: The scale of the proposed retail store is consistent with other similar uses in the District. The proposal consolidates two existing accesses onto Lundy's Lane into one that is properly designed. Although the design of the site, with the building pushed back and a large parking area along Lundy's Lane, is not in strict conformity with the design policies for Lundy's Lane, it minimizes traffic impacts on residences on Byng Avenue by placing the access onto Byng Avenue opposite existing commercial uses and as close to Lundy's Lane as possible. The proposed development is consistent with front yard setbacks of other similar scale retail developments. The proposal provides extensive landscaping along Lundy's Lane to compensate for the large parking area abutting this street. This landscaped area contributes to an improved street scape along Lundy's Lane and will provide a benchmark for the redevelopment of adjacent sites. 2. The requested zoning is appropriate. A site specific GC zone is proposed to be applied to both properties. Only a small portion of 6585 Lundy's Lane, occupied by a dwelling fronting onto Byng Avenue and accessory to the main motel use, requires a zone change from a residential to commercial category. A retail store of a similar size could be developed on the balance of the property, with an entrance off of Byng Avenue, without needing a Zoning By -law amendment. Placing the whole of both properties under a site specific GC zone is good planning for the following reasons: It enables provisions to be included in the amending by -law to control the number and the location of access points onto Byng Avenue and thereby ensure impacts on residences are minimized. September 10, 2007 3. Site plan control is applicable. CONCLUSION: The Zoning By -law amendment to permit a retail store on the subject properties can be supported for the following reasons: Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Abryce:cb Attach. 4 PD- 2007 -72 The proposed landscaping along Lundy's Lane and Byng Avenue, as well as along adjacent residential properties, can be secured. This landscaping will buffer the parking lot from adjacent properties and streets and will contribute to a pleasing pedestrian environment. To further reduce the impacts on adjacent Byng Avenue residents, it is recommended the parking stall closest to Byng Avenue in front of the proposed building be eliminated and replaced with landscaping. Sufficient parking will remain to service the store. Through site plan control, a substantial landscaped screen along Byng Avenue will be sought to buffer the adjacent residents. Through the site plan approval process, the locations of driveways, landscaping and buffering, lighting and loading and waste disposal areas will be determined and secured. The provision of traffic calming measures along Byng Avenue will need to be secured through a development agreement, as well as with the collection of a letter of credit to ensure the works are completed. It is recommended that this development agreement be executed along with the execution of a site plan agreement for the subject site. It complies with the Official Plan with respect to the provision and design of retail store developments along Lundy's Lane. Placing the whole site under one site specific GC zone will secure the landscaped areas as shown on Schedule 2 and will give more control over the location of the access onto Byng Avenue. 1' rbyson, Direct of Dou .AP a u' jlovic, Executive Directo ommunity Services 0; ohn MacDonald, Chief Admi istrative Officer S: \PDR\20071PD- 2007 -72, Application 6565 and 6585 Lundy's Lane, Proposed Retail Store.wpd r of Planning Development Schedule 1 w z i Schedule 2 L U N D Y' S LANE Niagara/1i Region August 29, 2007 Mr. Andrew Bryce Planner II Planning and Development City of Niagara Falls Dear Mr. Bryce: Zoning By -law Amendment Application Transportation Impact Study (TIS) Proposal: Pharmacy Retail Store (Shoppers Drug Mart) Owner: Real Capital Partners Location: Regional Road 20 (6565 and 6585 Lundy's Lane) Byng Avenue In the City of Niagara Falls City File: AM- 18/2007 Our File: D.18.04.643130206 (ID #6084) Regional Niagara Public Works Department has reviewed the T1S prepared by LEA Consulting Ltd. for the above referenced application and would advise that we are in agreement with the 'conclusions'. We would also note that the site plan included in this report satisfactorily indicates our road widening requirements and the planned access(es) to Lundy's Lane (and Byng Avenue) are appropriately located. We trust this response is sufficient for your purposes. Yours truly, Doug Cherringto C.E.T. Manager, Engineering Planning Development t 16 Planning 7Scannad PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR Aar t z 7 Transportation Services Division 2201 St. David's Road, P.O. Box 1042 Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Tel: 905 685 -1571 Tol I- free:1- 800 263 -7215 Fax: 905 687 -8056 www, regional niagara.on.ca DC/cm L: \ENGINEERING PLANNING DEVELOPMENIIVetrone- Carmen \Niagara Falls \CORRESPONDENCE 2007 \14087.Andrew Bryce.City of Niagara Falls.doc c: Eric Flora, C.E.T., P. Eng., Associate Director, Transportation Systems Brian Hughes, P. Eng., Associate Director Transportation Engineering losimo, MCIP, RPP, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Department RECEINib AUG 3 1 2007 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT Building Community. Building Lives. v 1, LVV I L. I V 1 111 1ll_M 1,1.111- I 1-111.11 w Fax Transmittal To: Niagara Region PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 2201 St. David's Road, P.O. Box 1042, Thorold ON L2V 4T7 Tel: 906- 984-3030 Fax: 905441 P FEx: From. h p4i Dat: ol �a Re: Cc)il D lll �r5 �/1 l Including cover page CC: 4 L 5 L,si 4_ Ji4A,Le_z? /a7 I urgent For Review 0 Please Commit Please Reply Please Recycle 4 4 rem -J arm Uk L-) b,1 C.. wd5 re,./Ye 4 Pcfr t RECEIVED JUL 2 7 2007 PLANNING p O, EVE OpMI =NT CONFIDENTIAL The information contained in this %C OM* message Is legally privileged and confidential and is tended only for the use of the individual or entity named below. My other use, dissemination, distribution, &closure or copy of this facsimile is strictly prohibited. If you have received this faasimlle in error, please Immediately notify us by telephone so that we may arrange the return of the original transmission. Thank you, )UL L( L DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: L. I VI II RECEI JUL 27 20x7 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT n Luivirni. i Lnirirtiru Niagara Niagarailriff Region July 26, 2007 Peter Colosimo, MCJP, RPP Senior Planner Planning and Development Department William J. Stevens, C.E.T. Development Approvals Manager Zoning By-law Amendment Application Applicant/Owner: Real Capital Partners Proposal: Retail development (Shoppers Drug Mart) Location: Regional Road 20 (6585 6565 Lundy's Lane) In the City of Niagara Falls City File•. AM- 1812007 Our File: D.18.04.643130206 (JD#6084) IU v7LI 1 L Regional Niagara Public Works Department has reviewed the above referenced application and provide the following comments: 1) Regional Road Allowance Widening Request The subject property has frontage along Regional Road 20 (Lundy's Lane)). The Region's road allowance policy identifies an ultimate right-of- -way width of 26.2 metres for this section of Lundy's Lane. Therefore, in accordance with the approved Regional Road Allowance Policy (Amendment 2-2005 to the Offidal Plan for the Niagara Planning Area), we would request the applicant dedicate the following road widening gratuitously to the Region: 3.05 metre road allowance widening across the frontage of the subject property, in order to achieve 13.1 metres from the centreline for this road section. 4.5 metre x 4.5 metre daylighting triangle (as measured from the widened road allowance) at the Regional Road 20 (Lundy's Lane) and Byng Avenue intersection. The widening is intended to provide the necessary road allowance needed for future pavement expansion and boulevard area for an alternative alignment for sidewalks, utility placement, snow storage, and tree plantings. The requested widening is to be conveyed free and dear of any mortgages, liens or other encumbrances. As the widening process can take an average of 8- weeks, the applicant is encouraged to contact Randy Clegg, Coordinator Properties of our Public Works Department at (905) 685 -4225, extension 3326, at the earliest opportunity to discuss this matter. 2) Access to Regional Road 20 (Lundy's Lane) dicated that a Traffic impact Study is being be undertaken in order to provide tion data and other potential travel needs for this area. The developer will need v RECE►� /E-� du 2 7 2007 Relfo+�� $3aY PLANiriNG to enter into an agreement with the Region for any required works, which would be carried out at the developer's expense. 3) Regional Permit Requirements Prior to any construction taking place within a Regional road allowance, Regional Construction Encroachment and Entrance Permits must be obtained. Applications must be made through the Transportation Division's Permits Section of the Public Works Department 4) Sanitary Sewer A sanitary sewer connection may be available from the local 229 mm 0 sewer located in Byng Avenue. As this is a local jurisdictional issue, the developer should contact City of Niagara Falls staff. Commercial development may require a sewer sampling manhole. 5) Watermaln A watermaln connection may be available from the local 150 mm 0 watermain located in Byng Avenue, As this is a local jurisdictional issue, the developer should contact City of Niagara Falls staff. 6) Storm Water Run-off Post development storm flows must not exceed pre development flows in the direction of Regional Road 20 (Lundy's Lane). 7) Protection of Survey Evidence Survey Evidence adjacent to all road allowances are not to be damaged or removed during the development of the property. We would request that any agreements entered into for this development include a clause that requires the owner to obtain a certificate from an Ontario Land Surveyor, stating that all existing and new evidence is In place at the completion of said development. Ham J. ,C. Development Approvals Manager Public Works Department Transportation Services Division 1,1.,1 IL I 4.111111i ION V/LI J Peter Colosimo, MCI RPP Senior Planner Planning and Development Department July 26, 2007 Page 2 of 2 IM/crn L•1ENGINEERING PLANNING DEVELOPMENTWetror GnnenWIgara FaIIs1,CORRESPONDENCF 2007U4005.P.Colosimo.doc c: Randy Clegg, SR/WA, Coordinator Properties Mike Purcer, C.E.T., Design Technologist, Transportation Engineering Phil Bergen, Transportation Planning Technologist Petar Vujic, Supervisor Traffic Studies, Transportation Systems Jim Zeoli, Permits, Municipal Law Enforcement Officer Normans V. Taurins, B.Sc., O.L.S., O.L.I.P. Legal Surveys Manager (8/31/2007) Andrew Bryce ZBLA 6565 6585 Lundy's Lane From: To: Date: Subject: CC: Andrew: "Colosimo, Peter" peter. colosimo @regional.niagara.on.ca> "Andrew Bryce" <abryce @city. niagarafalls.on.ca> 7/25/2007 11:53 AM ZBLA 6565 6585 Lundy's Lane "Stevens, Bill" <bill.stevens @regional. niagara.on.ca "MacPherson, lain... Re: Zoning By -law Amendment Application 6565 and 6585 Lundy's lane Proposed Shoppers Drug Mart City File: AM- 18/2007 Regional Planning has no concerns with the above referenced application from a Provincial or Regional planning perspective as the proposed development conforms to Provincial and Regional plans and policies. The road widening and daylighting triangle at the corner of Byng Avenue should not be referred to as "easements" as these lands will be required to be dedicated to the Region. The dimensions will be confirmed through comments from the Regional Public Works Department. These are being finalized and will be forwarded when available. Peter Colosimo, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Regional Niagara Planning Development Department 2201 St David's Road, P.O. Box 1042 Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Phone: 905 984 3630, ext. 3382 Fax: 905 641 5208 E -Mail: peter. colosimo @regional.niagara.on.ca <mailto: peter. colosimo @regional. niagara. on.ca> RECEIVED AUG 3 12007 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT The Regional Municipality of Niagara Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re -send this communication to the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of it from your computer system. Thank you. Page 1 August 24, 2007 Director of Planning and Development City Hall 4310 Queen Street Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5 Dear Sir: We would like to submit our input regarding the proposed development of a retail store at the corner of Byng Avenue and Lundy's Lane before attending the public meeting being held on September 10, 2007. We feel that our residential homes at 5815 and 5823 Byng Avenue are directly impacted by the proposed changes and we would like to list our concerns with the hope that they will be addressed at the aforementioned meeting. Our concerns are: what the retail store will be and the hours of operation the necessity of the proposed driveway into the parking lot from Byng Avenue and the subsequent increased traffic on our residential street the landscaping plans for the side of the building that will face Byng Avenue we would like to see the city tree stay which would be approximately at the NW corner of the building on Byng Avenue the brightness of the parking lot lighting when construction will begin and our it will affect our properties that are directly across the road We look forward to discussing these concerns at the Public Meeting. Sincerely, Roberta Scott and Christine James Concerned Neighbours of Byng Avenue RECEIVED AUG 2 8 2007 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT September 10, 2007 PD- 2007 -77 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: PD- 2007 -77 A- 29/2007, Minor Variance Application 6870, 6888 6892 Drummond Road Applicants: Sam Navarroli Enzio Navarroli Agent: Rick Brady, Urban Environmental Management Proposal: 5- Storey, 95 Unit Apartment Building RECOMMENDATION: Niag araJ That Council determine whether it wishes to continue with the appeals to the Committee of Adjustment's decision to grant variances that would permit the development of a 5- storey, 95 unit apartment building. BACKGROUND: On August 14, 2007, the Committee of Adjustment approved an application for three variances to site specific By -law No. 2003 -156. The variances would facilitate the development of a 5- storey, 95 unit apartment building on the lands known municipally as 6870, 6888 and 6892 Drummond Road, which are located between Churchill Street and Collins Drive. The variances would allow the following: 1) the construction of one, 5- storey building with a flat roof rather than two, 2 -3 storey buildings with pitched roofs; 2) a maximum building height of 14.33 m (47.0 ft.) rather than 11.5 m (37.73 ft.); and 3) a maximum of 95 dwelling units rather than 70. Staff is of the opinion these variances are significant and should have been dealt with by Council especially given the rezoning application was quite controversial at the time and involved a number of meetings with the public. Staff find the increase in height represents a significant increase in massing which is not in keeping with the intent of the Zoning By- law. Further, the proposal for a flat roof instead of a pitched roof will be out of character 0 Queen Street, P.C. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 wwwniagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Planning Development September 10, 2007 with the area. The increase of 25 units represents a 35% increase over Council's approval which is not in keeping with the Official Plan. Staff were unable to support the requested variances because they were of the opinion the relief being requested failed the four tests of a minor variance, namely: did not maintain the general intent and purpose of the City's Official Plan; did not maintain the general intent and purpose of Zoning By -law No. 79 -200, as amended site specifically by By -law No. 2003 -156; is not desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land; and is not minor in nature. Staff filed an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) with the Secretary- Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment because the last day of appeal was September 4, 2007. CONCLUSION: Staff requests that Council determine whether to continue with the appeal of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment. If not staff should be directed to withdraw the appeal. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: K.Mech:gd S: \PDR\2007 \PD- 2007 -77, A -29 -2007, Navarroli, 6870, 6888 6892 Drummond Rd.wpd 2 PD- 2007 -77 Doug Darbyson, Director of Planning Development Ed Dujlovic, Execu Director of Community Services ohn MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer July 27, 2007 Mayor Ted Salci Council City of Niagara Falls 4310 Queen Street, P.O. 1023 Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 6X5 Dear Mayor Ted Salci Council, BOOST Child Abuse Prevention Intervention (formerly known as Toronto Child Abuse Centre) is planning the 3 annual Go Purple for Prevention! Campaign. The purpose of the campaign is to raise awareness and provide education for the general public in our efforts to eliminate abuse and violence in the lives of children and youth.. The Go Purple for Prevention! campaign is an important opportunity for all Ontario citizens to participate and support the need for child abuse awareness and prevention. Every year, thousands of children and youth are affected by violence and abuse. We believe that through education and prevention we can make a difference. We are seeking your support to proclaim October as Child Abuse Neglect Prevention Month and October 1 2007 as Go Purple for Prevention Day in your community. We are also hosting a Go Purple breakfast on October 1, 2007 from 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. to kick -off the campaign and would be honoured if you could attend. The breakfast will be held at: Plans for this year's campaign include: breakfast event for more than 150 guests to launch the campaign; button distribution at Toronto Maple Leaf Hockey game on Friday, September 28 at the ACC; button distribution at Toronto Argo's game on October 12 to raise awareness; an arts and music festival to showcase the artistic expression of children and youth from all across Ontario; and Go Purple days for businesses, schools, community agencies and the general public. Your support is critical to the success of the campaign and our efforts to encourage the entire community to participate. Please feel free to contact us with any questions. Please see attached sample copy of Proclamation and information brochure with registration form. Please do not hesitate to contact Siew Lee Brett at 416 -515 -1100 ext. 224 to discuss an event in your community. We look forward to our continued partnership with you and the City of Niagara Falls to end violence and abuse in the lives of children and youth. Thank you. Yours truly, Karyn Kennedy, Executive Director Encls: CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION INTERVENTION Air Canada Centre 40 Bay Street, Toronto, ON M5J -2N8 Keynote Speaker Ms. Teresa Kruze b.4-QQ Siew Lee Brett Coordinator of Fundraising Special Events Boost: Child Abuse Prevention and Intervention Formerly Toronto Child Abuse Centre 890 Yonge Street, 11 Floor Toronto, ON M4W 3P4 Telephone: (416) 515 -1100 Fax: (416) 515 -1227 www. boostforkids.orq Proclamation Child Abuse Prevention Month October 2007 WHEREAS: children are our most precious asset and it is our responsibility to ensure they have a safe, nurturing environment in which to grow to their full potential, free from violence, abuse and neglect; and WHEREAS: child abuse and neglect are tragedies inflicted on innocent children, an ever increasing problem in today's society that crosses all socio- economic boundaries; and WHEREAS: with increased public awareness, education and support programs, together with community involvement, we can help to ease the pain and suffering and stop the abuse of our children; and WHEREAS: during Child Abuse Prevention Month, groups and organizations within our community will be holding a variety of events and activities, and will offer information on the vitally important child abuse support and prevention programs that are available in our (insert township, city). NOW THEREFORE: I, Mayor on behalf of (name of township /city) Council and the (insert population number) people of our great (insert township /city), do hereby proclaim October 2007 as "Child Abuse Prevention Month" to recognize the ongoing commitment of individuals and organizations in our community whose tireless efforts help prevent child abuse. (insert name of Mayor) Mayor CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION INTERVENTION Go Purple! For Prevention Campaign Upcoming Events Calendar September 28 Toronto Maple Leaf Hockey Air Canada Centre October Go Purple! For Prevention Campaign October 1 Go Purple! Fundraiser Breakfast Air Canada Centre Speaker: Teresa Kruze 7 :30 amto9 :00am Tickets: $50 October 12 The Argos Support BOOST! Argos vs Montreal Allouettes At 7 :30 p.m. $5 from each ticket sold will go to BOOST!!! Call Liz Palermo (Argos) at (416)341 -2742 to order. November 17 BOOSTfest a festival of arts music. A showcase of the artistic expression of children and youth from all over Ontario. For more information or to register your participation, call: Siew Lee Brett, BOOST (416) 515 -1100 ext. 224 E -mail: brett@boostforkids.ora November 19 World's Child Abuse. Prevention Day. n Purple -frr r$u Mee ',valid Dean Iorfida National Flag Day From: "Linda Brian Jones" <brian.jones6 @sympatico.ca> To: <tsalci @niagarafalls.ca> Date: 8/19/2007 6:57 PM Subject: National Flag Day Brian Jones lo McConnell Lane Newmarket, On L3Y 7M1 Brianjones6@sympatico.ca Attn: Mayor and Council Members. Yours Sincerely, Brian Jones No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.484 Virus Database: 269.12.0/961 Release Date: 8/19/2007 7:27 AM Page 1of1 My name is Brian Jones and I reside in the town of Newmarket, On. I have had the pleasure of living in various places in our country and along time ago decided that I would share my enthusiasm for the love of my country. This enthusiasm has not been dampened by the knowledge that we as Canadians at times do not show that spirit more times than maybe we should. Yes we have Canada Day but how many average citizens are aware that February 15 was decreed in 1996 by Jean Chretien's government as National Flag Day. I personally would like to take the time and energy to ask your city, town and regional governments to plan for your community with the co operation of the provincial and federal representatives a day that appropriately falls on, so that the majority of our citizens can participate in a celebration of this day. Also, can the 3 levels of government co ordinate the accessibility for our people who have decided to fly our flag proudly to receive or to replace flags that I see to many times ripped yet still sadly at the top of poles. Especially now with our soldiers defending and dying for that symbol we should look so proudly upon. Can municipalities sell or make available in any way our Maple Leaf so we can keep the collective spirit of the love of our nation. It would be great in future to celebrate our National Flag Day and 1 feel as an average patriotic citizen to speak to you respectfully. Let's do it! file: /C:\Documents and Settings \di202\Local Settings\ Temp\XPgrpwise \46C96044Domai... 8/20/2007 Corporate Services Department Clerk's Division Inter Department Memorandum NiagaraFalls CANADA TO: Mayor Ted Salci DATE: September 10, 2007 Members of Council FROM: Dean Iorfida City Clerk Ext. 4271 RE: National Flag Day Attached is some background on National Flag Day. Although proclaimed at a Federal level, as the attached article from the CBC indicates to be considered a statutory holiday (i.e., a holiday where members of the public have a day off), the Province would have to designate it through labour standards legislation. As you may be aware, the Provincial Liberals have proposed a statutory holiday for February, possibly called Family Day, on what is known as Heritage Day in other jurisdictions. An article on the economic ramifications of a holiday is also included for your information. Finally, with regard to the provision of flags, the M.P.'s office does receive an allotment of flags every year (about 75). They give these flags out to such public entities as Legions, Nursing Homes etc. Obviously, it would be cost prohibitive to make flags free for residents. Of course, flags are available for purchase at many commercial outlets. RECOMMENDATION: For the consideration of Council. Aikc Working Together to Serve Our Community Clerks Finance Human Resources Information Systems Legal Planning Development National Flag of Canada Day February 15 Home Home The Canadian Flag Defining Moments in Canadian History Did You Know...? Flag Do's and Don'ts Challenge Yourself! Participate! Teachers' Comer Canadian Heritage Home Page Canadian Petrlmalne Heritage canadien Ca as National Flag of Canada Day February 15 is National Flag of Canada Day. It marks the day in 1965 when our red and white maple leaf flag was first raised over Parliament Hill in Ottawa, and indeed, hundreds of communities across Canada. This is a perfect opportunity to celebrate our flag and what it stands for a country and a citizenship that are the envy of the world. In our often understated ways, be it instructing students in a school classroom, taking time to listen to the stories of veterans, or volunteering at the local community centre, Canadians share their pride in our flag and in their common values. In its striking simplicity, the National Flag of Canada speaks to the exciting challenges and opportunities of our future. At the same time, it speaks to all that we have accomplished together as a people and to those moments that have served to define us. The creation of our flag in 1965 was such a moment. While very much focussed on our flag, the National Flag of Canada Day Web pages provide interesting information on five key moments that have made us who we are as a country and a people: Confederation (1867) The Battle of Vimy Ridge (1917) The Statute of Westminster (1931) The National Flag of Canada (1965) The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) The past, present and future can all be found in the folds of the National Flag of Canada. While we are still a relatively young country, our rich and fascinating history is only equalled by our incredible spirit and vitality that will define our future. February 15 National Flag of Canada Day is the perfect opportunity to share our pride in Canada and being Canadian. Download printable versions of the poster and brochure of the National Flag of Canada Day and order Page 1 of 2 http: /www.pch.gc.ca/special/flag- drapeau /indexe.cfm 9/4/2007 Toronto MP calls for national paid holiday in February Page 1 Toronto MP calls for national paid holiday in February Last Updated: Thursday, February 15, 2007 1 7:49 PM ET CBC News National Flag Day should be a statutory holiday for Canadians across the country, says a Toronto NDP MP. Peggy Nash, MP for Parkdale -High Park, was expected to table on Thursday a private member's bill that asks the federal government to make Flag Day, Feb. 15, a legal federal holiday. There are no national statutory holidays in February, and Flag Day would serve as a good break for Canadians between New Year's Day and Easter, she said at a news conference in Ottawa. 'Flag Day is a great day to have that break, especially in the middle of winter.' —MP Peggy Nash "Flag Day is a great day to have that break, especially in the middle of winter," Nash said. "It's a good way to get over the February blahs." Ron Mayer, an Ottawa -based author who has lobbied for Flag Day to be a national holiday for years, said the day could become a special time for Canadians to reflect on their values and to think about their country. Mayer spoke alongside Nash. "I think this bill is going to be a great success. I can't see anyone not supporting it. We need something to perk us up," he said. Holidays vary across country Each jurisdiction in Canada provides for statutory holidays through labour standards legislation. Public holidays are considered days of special significance established by governments to mark certain events. Employees who qualify are entitled to a paid holiday, or, if required to work, to wages paid at a premium rate. The number of statutory holidays enjoyed by workers, however, varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Some provinces have created their own special paid holidays that they celebrate. Alberta and Saskatchewan, for example, enjoy Family Day on the third Monday in February. This is the first year that Saskatchewan will mark the day. Quebec has long celebrated St- Jean Baptiste Day, or Fete nationale, on June 24. The Northwest Territories was the first jurisdiction to make National Aboriginal Day on June 21 a statutory holiday. Under the Flag Day bill, Nash said, the statutory holiday would fall on Feb. 15, the actual date that marks the first time the Maple Leaf was raised on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. TheStar.com Ontario Liberals promise February long weekend he sec A first big step for Toronto Director Rkhie Mehit at The Toronto International film Festival. :-)starocom Liberals promise February long weekend September 03, 2007 RICHARD BRENNAN OTTAWA BUREAU The provincial Liberals are promising to give Ontarians a long weekend in February if they are re- elected. "In our party's platform, which will presented in a few days, we will include a provision to create a new statutory holiday in the month of February," campaign chair Greg Sorbara announced today. The holiday would fall on the third Monday in February, which is already known as Heritage day in most of Canada. So far the Liberals are calling their proposed day off "family day." "Ontario winters are very, very long and Ontarians deserve a statutory holiday in February," Sorbara told reporters at Queen's Park. The vote getting pledge is reminiscent of the 1985 Liberal promise to put beer and wine in the corner store, which the David Peterson government reneged on when it got into power. Sorbara, who is the provincial finance minister, said Ontario governments have been talking about having a long weekend during the long winter months for years, joining other provinces such as Alberta, B.C. and Saskatchewan. "It's probably something that should have been done some time ago," he said. While even Progressive Conservative Leader John Tory wouldn't disagree with the fact Ontarians could really use a break in February, he suggested the timing of the announcement is just a tad opportunist. Page 1 of 2 http /www.thestar.com/printArticle /252698 9/4/2007 TheStar.com Ontario Liberals promise February long weekend Page 2 of 2 "The gap between New Year's Day and Easter is a long gap and I'm all for family having a day to be together," Tory said just before boarding his campaign bus. I just have to ask why, at the very, very end of a four -year term, 38 days before an election, did he suddenly have this brain wave Given the loss of some 175,000 manufacturing and resource sector jobs across the province, New Democrat Peter Kormos suggested a more appropriate Labour Day announcement might have been to offer workers some kind of assurance that the government is working to preserve good jobs in Ontario. Noting the Liberals already killed a private members bill that would have established another stat holiday, Kormos said this announcement could end up being nothing more than another broken promise. "There have been private members bills before that the Liberals supported, but the McGuinty government declined to put it into effect," he said. "We couldn't believe his promises four years ago. We have no more reason to believe his promises today." But Sorbara dismissed the criticism, suggesting the Ontario economy is only now strong enough to bear an extra stat holiday. Ontario is no longer struggling to deal with the economic deficit left by the previous Conservative government and the last three -day holiday of the summer just seemed like a good time to announce it, he said. While Sorbara admits corporate Canada is likely to scoff at the idea, he maintains the province can more than handle it economically. "We know that initially there will be some impact on productivity. That's always the case with a holiday," he said. "But our own analysis suggests we'll make that up and more because a workforce that gets time off is a workforce that works even harder when they're on the job." Adding a Family Day to the calendar would give Ontario workers a total of nine long weekends per year, putting the province on par with Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia and the Territories. with files from Canadian Press http /www.thestar.com/printArticle /252698 9/4/2007 TheStar.com Ontario Holiday economics: Boost or burden? Page 1 of 2 tarocom Holiday economics: Boost or burden? Many businesses benefit but others hit with wage and overtime payouts September 04, 2007 IAIN MARLOW STAFF REPORTER Measuring the economic impact of a statutory holiday is complex but at least partially explained by two women wandering through the financial district yesterday. Mary Lapointe is of the opinion that, "Of course," she "definitely spends more money" on holidays and long weekends. But Donna Scardochio disagrees. "No," she yells, when asked whether she injects money into the economy on her time off from work. "There's nothing open." Lapointe, though, carries evidence to the contrary: two department store bags filled with toys. "You're out and about, so it's natural," she said. "We went shopping at the Eaton Centre. And there we spent." Yesterday, Finance Minister Greg Sorbara announced that if re- elected, the Liberals would place a statutory holiday in the middle of bleak February. Employees should rejoice, but the impact of another holiday on business is another matter. "You add up all the wages for all of those workers that are lost on that day, the extra overtime pay for that day. We think of it as $1.5 billion to $3 billion" across all sectors of the Canadian economy, says Marvin Ryder, a business strategy professor at McMaster University. http /www.thestar.com/printArticle /252848 9/4/2007 TheStar.com Ontario Holiday economics: Boost or burden? Page 2 of 2 Some companies with large unions might be able to offset the costs of paying hundreds or thousands of unions mandatory overtime pay by counting the holiday as one of the employee's "floater days," Ryder said. Small businesses that don't have to stay open can just close down and give their few employees the day off. A new holiday might even benefit business by raising morale among employees, Ryder said, especially in those winter months when there are "more incidents of illness on Mondays and Fridays." Weather seems intrinsically linked to statutory holidays a time when shops shutter and people flee the stale office air for local tourist destinations. Gilbert Vesleno, who works at a ticket booth on Queens Quay for lake tours, agrees: "Weather is a factor," he said. "I remember Labour Day last year it was cloudy and rainy," Vesleno said. "It was really slow for us." Some foreign tourists "don't even know it's a holiday," Vesleno added. Elsewhere in the world, though, the conspicuous consumption of an enforced holiday seems a tad more deliberate. "In China," Ryder said, "they used to just have May Day. And they turned it into May week. They did that because the Chinese are notorious savers and the government gave them a week to force people out to spend money." http /www.thestar.com /printArticle /252848 9/4/2007 TheStar.com Ontario Election 'Family Day' flaw: 'Flag Day' less syrupy A first big step for Toronto Director Richie Me' at The Toronto International Film Festival. z7:'..starocom 'Family Day' flaw: 'Flag Day' less syrupy September 05, 2007 DAVID OLIVE COLUMNIST Lord knows we could use a new statutory holiday in February, as the Ontario Liberals proposed Monday. The idea has been floating around Queen's Park for years. If implemented, it would give us nine long weekends, as many as British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and the three territories. But is the insipid "Family Day" tentatively proposed by the Grits the best we can manage? Do we really want another treacly appellation that plays to the greeting -card industry, which we already can thank for Mother's Day, Father's Day and Valentine's Day? Family Day, already celebrated on the third Monday in February in Alberta and Saskatchewan, and taking effect in Manitoba next year, has an inauspicious beginning. It was the brainwave of Don Getty, one of Alberta's least able premiers. (He presided over scandals and bequeathed a stratospheric deficit to successor, Ralph Klein.) Getty proclaimed Canada's inaugural Family Day, first celebrated in 1990, shortly after his son was revealed to have a cocaine addiction. Getty publicly confessed to neglecting his family. He then imposed on the province a holiday theme that served his own purposes of expiating the guilt he felt. Flag Day would be a far better choice. It's a longstanding contender, owing largely to the date of the existing non statutory Flag Day, Feb. 15, which marks the Maple Leaf's official proclamation in 1965. One nation, Israel, has a statutory Family Day. Twenty -eight nations have Page 1 of 2 http /www.thestar.com/printArticle /253278 9/5/2007 TheStar.com Ontario Election 'Family Day' flaw: 'Flag Day' less syrupy Page 2 of 2 Flag Days, some statutory and others informal. They include the United States, Australia, Russia, Brazil, Greece and Denmark. Germany has 11 flag days, including one commemorating Claus von Stauffenberg's failed attempt to assassinate Adolf Hitler (July 20). Next to the Mounties, the Maple Leaf is Canada's most internationally recognized symbol. Its one failing is that maple trees are scarce west of Manitoba. It otherwise captures as no other symbol does even Parliament the virtues of civility, modernity, boldness and respect for nature that we strive for. The Great Flag Debate of 1964 was a crucial rite of passage in relinquishing our colonial past and embracing a future bereft of ethnic heraldry and other potentially alienating markers. And it was a triumph for national unity. When its designer, Dr. George F.G. Stanley of the Royal Military College in Kingston, was conferred with an honorary doctorate at Universite Laval, the students interrupted his citation with rousing applause at the mention of his role in creating a new flag that bore no trace of colonial fealty. For many of us, and not just flag collectors such as the author, every day is Flag Day. The Maple Leaf is a constant reminder of the struggle of forebears who carved from an unforgiving wilderness a nation with the world's seventh highest standard of living, who welcomed successive waves of newcomers, and who fought both to vanquish tyranny and keep warring parties from tearing each other apart, yet who have a reputation as a serene people in a tranquil land. Tom Wolfe, one of Canada's keenest outside observers, put it best in an interview 20 years ago. "Canada is one of the few countries that does not have some rapacious animal as its national animal," he said. "Practically every other national flag has its origins in battle, while the Canadian flag is the maple leaf. It almost symbolizes a pastoral idyll." That's worth celebrating on the third Monday in February, and every day. http /www.thestar.com/printArticle /253278 9/5/2007 Corporate Services Department Clerk's Division Inter Department Memorandum Niagara�alls 1 N A D A TO: Mayor Ted Salci DATE: September 10, 2007 Members of Council FROM: Dean Iorfida City Clerk Ext. 4271 RE: Ontario 9 -1 -1 Advisory Board Attached is a correspondence from the Ontario 9 -1 -1 Advisory Board. The Board acts as an advocate for the 9 -1 -1 system in Ontario. It serves as an authoritative source of information and expertise to the Province and its Municipalities as it relates to the implementation and operation of 9 -1 -1 Emergency Number systems and serves in an advocacy role with other organizations, governments and their agencies, to represent the interests of Ontario The Board is requesting $100 from all Ontario municipalities to "create the funds for the Board to continue its work and represent the interests of municipal governments and their citizens." The amount requested is nominal and is supported by the Fire Chief. RECOMMENDATION: For the approval of Council. „5,flA Working Together to Serve Our Community Clerks Finance Human Resources Information Systems Legal Planning Development HIM FALLS CLERKS YO? 0816 09:4 APCO Canada Association of Municipalities of Ontario City of Toronto NENA Ontario Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police Ontario Association of Fire Chiefs Ontario Ministry of Health and Long -Term Care Ontario 9 -1 -1 Advisory Board c/o Peel Regional Police Telecommunications 7750 Hurontario Street Brampton, ON L6V 3W6 Tel: 905 453 -2121 Ext. 4680 Fax: 905 456 -6140 Email: tvoisey @peelpoliceion.ca On is 9 -1- 'Advis0 Board August 1, 2007 Dean Iorfida City Clerk City of Niagara Falls Box 1023, 4310 Queen St. Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5 To all Members of Council Subject: Ontario 9 -1 -1 Advisory Board Ladies and Gentlemen, Thank you in advance for your consideration of the attached matter. Sincerely, Dan Van Londersele Chair August 12007 TO: FROM: ISSUE: Ontario -1-- Ad uisO ALL MUNICIPAL COUNCILS 9-1-1 ONTARIO ADVISORY BOARD 9-1-1 ADVISORY BOARD SEEKS YOUR ASSISTANCE a) What is Needed and Why: The 9 -1 -1 Ontario Advisory Board (OAB) is seeking financial assistance from each municipal government in order to continue as the technical and information authority respecting the implementation and operation of 9 -1 -1 Emergency Number systems in Ontario. In August 2006, an appeal for financial assistance was made to Ontario municipalities resulting in receipts of eleven thousand dollars and we are very greatful for that support. Several municipalities suggested that the request should be made earlier in the year in order to receive consideration during the annual budget process, therefore this appeal is being sent at this time for the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years. We need operational support and therefore this request for assistance in the form of a small donation from each municipality. If each of Ontario's 445 municipalities provided $100, this would create the funds for the Board to continue its work and represent the interests of municipal governments and their citizens on 9 -1 -1 issues. Technology advancements and the expansion of the telecommunications market have increased the work of the 9 -1 -1 Advisory Board. We make submissions to hearings of the Canadian Radio Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) and provide input on implementation issues related to wireless 9 -1 -1 service and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 9 -1 -1 service. The costs to attend these cross Canada meetings alone are significant. We also maintain the OAB 9 -1 -1 website, http: /oab911.ca, develop public awareness, liaise with all levels of government (municipal, provincial and federal) and with the Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association, assessing impacts of new technology (VoIP) as it relates to the provision of 9 -1 -1 service. Much work remains to be done and we require funds to support these activities. b) More about the 9-1-1 Ontario Advisory Board and its Activities: Mission of OAB 9 -1 -1: Be a source of technological expertise regarding implementation and operation of 9 -1 -1 services Advocate to represent Ontario ratepayers at CRTC hearings and provide public education Act as authoritative source of information and expertise regarding 911 systems Accomplishments of the OAB 9 -1 -1: Enhanced Wireless 9- 1- 1Trial tested technology to trace cellular 9 -1 -1 calls On -going working relationship with the Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association Page 1 of 3 d) How is 9-1-1 operated? Other provinces operate 9 -1 -1 systems themselves. In Ontario, local municipal authorities operate the 9 -1 -1 systems. 9 -1 -1 systems are provided only within municipalities electing to provide the service (now greater than 95 with subscriber billing for network services and maintenance. The cost associated with staffing and equipment is provided by municipalities. 9 -1 -1 systems are designed around a central answering point (Primary Public Safety Answering Point (PPSAPs) which have dedicated lines. Incoming calls for 9 -1 -1 are conferenced with the associated police, fire and ambulance dispatch center for a given municipality. Networks are designed, installed and maintained by Bell Canada. e) A Sample Resolution: Whereas The Ontario 9 -1 -1 Advisory Board was formed at the request of Ontario Municipalities; and Whereas it is now in great need of financial assistance in order to continue to represent our ratepayers in the face of ever increasing technological advancement; and Whereas technological advancement and deregulation of the local telephone market makes it necessary to represent municipalities and ratepayers at the Canadian Radio Telecommunication Commission (CRTC) and the CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee (CISC) on a regular basis; Therefore be it resolved that the municipality of contributes to the Ontario 9 -1 -1 Advisory Board in order to allow it to continue to advance a safe delivery of 9 -1 -1 system for police, fire and ambulance emergency services in our municipalities and throughout the Province. f) Thank you: Thank you for your consideration of this issue and for more information please visit our website at http: /oab911.ca www.crtc.gc.ca/ archive /ENG/Decisions /1997/DT97 -8.HTM local exchange carriers www.crtc.gc.ca/ archive /ENG /Orders /2000 /02000- 500.htm centrex resellers www.crtc.gc.ca/ENG /public /2000 /8180 /Crtc /cptspob.htm competitive payphone providers www.crtc.gc.ca /archive /eng/Orders /1999/099- 1155.htm alternate operator services www.crtc.gc.ca/ archive /ENG /Decisions /2001/DT2001- 299.htm foreign exchange service www.crtc.gc.ca/ archive /ENG /Decisions /2003/dt2003- 53 -1.htm wireless services www.crtc.gc.ca/ archive /ENG /Decisions /2005 /dt2005- 21.htm VO1P Page 3 of 3 (9/4/2007) Dean lorfida Re: Fwd: 9 -1 -1 Resolution Etc. From: Lee Smith To: Dean Iorfida Date: 8/31/2007 3 :39 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: 9 -1 -1 Resolution Etc. Dean, we should support the $100 suggestion. Lee Dean Iorfida 8/30/2007 1:49 PM Lee: As discussed yesterday... Drop me a quick note on whether we should support or not. Thanks Dean Dean Iorfida 8/17/2007 4:08 PM Lee: I received this correspondence which I intend to bring forward to a future Council meeting. Any comments i.e. should Council support this etc. Thanks Dean Page 1 Office of the Mayor Inter Department Memorandum TO: Dean Iorfida DATE: August 14, 2007 FROM: Kristine Speck Ext. 4205 RE: Council Information Hello Dean: Would you please have the attached letter from Niagara Ice Dogs regarding a proposal distributed to council. Thanks, Kristine HMG, FALLS CLERKS 081 4. 459 905 687 DOG1 (3641) info @niagaraicedogs.net Prepared for: City of Niagara Falls Niagara Ice Dogs 2007 Confidentiality caution the pages comprising this document contain confidential information. This information is proprietary and is intended solely for use by the individual entity authorized by the Niagara IceDogs. Be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this document without authorization is strictly prohibited. I am truly honoured and delighted to be associated with both the Canadian Hockey League (CHL), the greatest amateur hockey league in the world, and the Ontario Hockey League (OHL), the jewel in the CHL's crown. Since graduating from Ridley College years ago, I have developed a deep attachment to the Niagara region. So I am very excited about bringing Major Junior A hockey back to an area rich in OHL history. IceDogs hockey will be passionate, determined, tough and skillful. I ask that you support your athletes, and your team. In return, I promise you a long -term commitment to area communities, and to winning. Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome your Niagara IceDogs. Go Dogs Go! Bill Burke Governor and CEO INTRODUCTION 2006-07 SEASON HIGHLIGHTS ti TEAM HIGHLIGHTS IceDogs broke several team records including most wins in a season (43), most points in a season (90), and most goals scored during a season (326). Michael Swift breaks the single season point record with 93 points in one season passing current NHL player Patrick O'Sullivan. Chris Lawrence breaks the single season goal record with 47 goals passing former IceDog Patrick O'Sullivan. 16- year -old standout rookie Alex Pietrangelo is named Captain of Team Ontario and guides the team to a gold medal at 2007 Canada Winter Games in Whitehorse. IceDogs sniper Stefan Legein represents the team at the OHL All -Star game and the CHL Top Prospects Game. IceDogs Stefan Legein, Luca Caputi and Drew Schiestel emerge as NHL draft picks in the 2007 NHL Entry Draft. PARTNERS IP PROPOSAL (Municipal Package) Proposal During the 2007 -08 season, as part of a partnership agreement between the Niagara IceDogs and the City of Niagara Falls, the City of Niagara Falls as a partner would receive: 1 Website Exposure With direct link to the City of Niagara Falls website. Value $750 2. Game Day Magazine Half Page Ad for Mayor's Message or to introduce your community events. Value $900 3. Game Day Promotion Table Access to a Game Day Promotion Table in the Arena Lobby for one game. Value $500 4. Bowl Banner High traffic Banner which hangs above the standing room crowd. Value $2500 5. Mayor dropping the puck on the City of Niagara Falls Game Day Priceless During the 2007 -08 season, as part of a partnership agreement between the Niagara IceDogs and the City of Niagara Falls, the IceDogs would receive: The IceDogs would receive $4000 (plus GST) for a Municipal Package that has a value of $4650. For more inforrnation please feel free to contact me. Bryan Elliott Corporate Sales Niagara IceDogs Hockey Club 905 687 -3641 ext. 224 b.eIIiottniagaraicedogs.net Niagara IceDogs 2007 -08 Regular Season Home Schedule GAME DATE OPPONENT TIME 1 Friday, September 21 Mississauga 7:30pm 2 Sunday, September 23 Brampton 2:OOpm 3 Sunday, September 30 Sudbury 2:OOpm 4 Thursday, October 4 Mississauga 7:30pm 5 Sunday, October 7 Saginaw 2:OOpm 6 Thursday, October 11 Brampton 7:30pm 7 Sunday, October 14 Guelph 2:OOpm 8 Thursday, October 18 London 7:30pm 9 Sunday, October 21 Barrie 2:OOpm 10 Thursday, November 1 Plymouth 7:30pm 11 Sunday, November 4 Peterborough 2:OOpm 12 Sunday, November 11 Windsor 2:OOpm 13 Sunday, November 25 Owen Sound 2:OOpm 14 Thursday, November 29 Erie 7:30pm 15 Sunday, December 2 Ottawa 2:OOpm 16 Sunday, December 9 Mississauga 2:OOpm 17 Thursday, December 13 Belleville 7:30pm 18 Friday, December 14 Barrie 7:30pm 19 Sunday, December 30 Sudbury 2:OOpm 20 Thursday, January 3 Kitchener 7:30pm 21 Sunday, January 6 Kingston 2:OOpm 22 Thursday, January 17 Sault Ste. Marie 7:30pm 23 Sunday, January 20 Ottawa 2:OOpm 24 Thursday, January 24 Erie 7:30pm 25 Sunday, January 27 Sarnia 2:OOpm 26 Thursday, February 7 Kingston 7:30pm 27 Sunday, February 10 Mississauga 2:OOpm 28 Sunday, February 17 Barrie 2:OOpm 29 Sunday, February 24 Sudbury 2:OOpm 30 Thursday, February 28 Brampton 7:30pm 31 Sunday, March 2 Erie 2:OOpm 32 Sunday, March 9 Oshawa 2:OOpm 33 Thursday, March 13 Belleville 7:30pm 34 Sunday, March 16 Peterborough 2:OOpm Corporate Services Department Clerk's Division Inter Department Memorandum FROM: Dean Iorfida City Clerk Ext. 4271 NiagaraFalls N 1 D A TO: Mayor Ted Salci DATE: September 10, 2007 Members of Council RE: Committee of Adjustment As Council is probably aware, a vacancy now exists on the Committee of Adjustment. Based on the balloting from early in the year, the candidate with the next most votes is Lou Stranges. Mr. Stranges has indicated that he is still interested in sitting on the Committee. Also, the Committee of Adjustment has indicated that they would like the vacancy filled. RECOMMENDATION: That Council consider appointing Lou Stranges to the Committee of Adjustment. Working Together to Serve Our Community Clerks Finance Human Resources Information Systems Legal Planning Development (8/30/2007) Dean lorfida Fwd: FW: Distribution of DPD 86 -2007 From To: Date: Subject: Attachments: Dean Doug has asked that the Regional Report be included in the next Council package for their information. Thanks Bob Doug Darbyson 8/13/2007 4:13 PM "Ungaro, Judy" judy. ungaropregional.niagara.on.ca> 7/31/2007 3:52 PM Please see the attached. Judith Ungaro Planning Development Department Regional Municipality of Niagara 2201 St. David's Road, PO Box 1042 Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Phone: 905 984 -3630 or 1-800-263-7215 Fax: 905- 641 -5208 Email: iudy.ungaro@ regional.niagara.on.ca P Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail Original Message From: Ungaro, Judy Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 3:51 PM To: 'clarmour(oelham.ca'; 'Cheryl Miclette' Subject: FW: Distribution of DPD 86 -2007 Please see attached. Judith Ungaro Planning Development Department Regional Municipality of Niagara 2201 St. David's Road, PO Box 1042 Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Bob Bolibruck Dean Iorfida 8/13/2007 4:44 PM Fwd: FW: Distribution of DPD 86 -2007 text.rtf; Dist Letter.doc; dpd 86- 2007.pdf Page 1 (8/30/2007) Dean lorfida dpd 86- 2007.pdf Page 1 REPORT TO: Co- Chairs and Members of the Planning and Public Works Committee SUBJECT: Smarter Niagara Incentives Program Local and Regional Partnerships City of Niagara Falls Pilot Project Area RECOMMENDATION That this Committee recommend to Regional Council: 1,. That the request from the City of Niagara Falls for funding support in the amount of $10,000 from the Smarter Niagara Incentives Program to complete planning work in the Pilot Project Area of the Brownfield Community Improvement Plan be approved. 2 That a copy of this report be sent to all the local municipalities with an invitation to partner with the Region in the implementation of the Smarter Niagara Incentives Program EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Niagara Region DPD 86 —2007 July 18, 2007 File: D16,URre The purpose of this report is to recommend approval of a request from the City of Niagara Falls for funding support in the amount of $10,000 from the Smarter Niagara Incentives Program to complete planning work in the Pilot Project Area of the City's Brownfield Community Improvement Plan. This report recommends support for a request from the City of Niagara Falls for funding in the amount of $10,000 to complete planning work in the City's Pilot Project Area lying generally east of Stanley Avenue and north of Bridge Street, Planning for the redevelopment of brownfield lands within the Area will provide opportunities to respond to the Economic Gateway Zone concept of the Province's Places to Grow Plan, and contribute to the Region's Growth Management Strategy through the provision of additional serviced and within the existing urban area of Niagara Falls.. (8/30/2007) Dean lorfida dpd 86- 2007.pdf FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS DPD 86 -2007 July 18, 2007 Page 2 Approval of this report will involve commitment of $10,000 from the Smarter Niagara Incentives Program.. Background REPORT The City has adopted a Brownfield Community Improvement Plan which includes planning for a Pilot Project Area lying generally east of Stanley Avenue and north of Bridge Street.. A map showing the location of the Area is included in Appendix A. This Area is identified in the CIP as the highest priority for remediation and redevelopment in the City. The Region supported the preparation of the CIP with a $25,000 funding allocation approved in 2004. Planning Staff served on the Steering Committee for the project.. Preliminary development concepts were prepared for the Pilot Project Area, and presented at a public meeting in February, 2007. It has been determined that additional planning work is needed to address the recognition of existing industries in the Area. Analysis The Smarter Niagara Incentives Program includes a component which allows the Region to partner with the Area Municipalities in planning studies including Community Improvement Plans which support the Region's Smart Growth objectives. These objectives include the remediation and redevelopment of Brownfield properties. Completion of a Community Improvement Plan is a prerequisite for participation by the Area Municipalities in Incentives Programs which are intended to encourage private initiatives including Brownfield redevelopment projects. The City of Niagara Falls has completed an ambitious Brownfield Community Improvement Plan which includes planning for a Pilot Project Area in the City This Pilot Project Area has been identified as the highest priority area for brownfield redevelopment in the City Redevelopment of lands within the Pilot Project Area will support the Region's interest in Brownfield redevelopment generally and enable the City to meet its commitments under Provincial policy for infill and intensification within its Urban Area Boundaries, Availability of the Area for new development will also provide new opportunities for the City to respond to the Economic Gateway Zone proposed for Niagara in the Province's Places to Grow Plan. Availability of these lands for redevelopment will also contribute to the Region's Growth Management Strategy by providing additional serviced land within the existing urban area of Niagara Falls. Page 2 (8/30/2007) Dean lorfida dpd 86- 2007.pdf Page 3 CONCLUSION This is an important partnership opportunity for the City and the Region.. Support for the City's request for funding is warranted.. Regional Staff will be available to provide input into the plan as requested by the City.. Submitted by: Director of Planning Se s This report was prepared by Alan Comprehensive Community Planning, in Smart Growth and Partnerships, NEDC.. APPENDIX Approved by: Dave Farley Mike Trojan Chief Administra o, MCIP, RPP, Associate Director, nsultation with Mark Brickell, Vice President of Appendix 1 Correspondence from the City of Niagara Falls Page 4 DPD 86 -2007 July 18, 2007 Page 3 r (8/30/2007) Dean lorfida dpd 86- 2007.pdf Mr Alan Gunimo Senior Policy Coordinator Planner Regional Municipality of Niagara 2201 St. David's Road Thorold, Ontario L2V 4T7 Dear Alan: Niagar aJalls May 16, 2007 Working Together to Serve Our Community DPD 86 -2007 Appendix 1 July 18, 2007 Page 11 1 RECEIVED MAY 2 2 2007 !legions! Municipality of Niagara PL.ANNNG Re: Additional Planning Study Work within Pilot Project Area As you are aware, the City of Niagara Falls hired RCI Consulting to carry out additional planning work within the Pilot Project Area as identified in the Brownfield Community Improvement Plan.. The intention of this work was to prepare detailed land use concepts for the Cytec lands and the Silvertown area showing short and long term road pattern, proposed land uses, lotting pattern and recreational trails.. The additional work included thepreparation of'official plan policies and a zoning by -law amendment.. A plan showing the subject area is attached. The budget for this work was $22,570. A public meeting was held on February 12, 2007 to present the draft land use concepts and obtain public feedback. This meeting was attended by more than 100 people. The City received submissions from almost 20 individuals and businesses.. An area of concern involves the Silvertown area where there is an older established residential community and a number of abandoned and two active industrial operations.. It has become apparent that the Silvertown area now warrants further detailed work which will include the following: 1. Carry out a parcel by parcel review of the area.. 2.. Meeting with the two major existing industrial businesses.. 3.. Investigate the Ministry of Environment separation guidelines as they relate to the industrial businesses. 4. Prepare a non residential land use concept that will recognize the industrial businesses.. 5. Prepare a brief of issues related to the non residential land use concept, including potential truck traffic and land use compatibility.. 6.. Present the non- residential land use concept at a public meeting, 7.. Receive Council's direction on proceeding with a recommended land use scenario before preparing the official plan andszaning amendments.. Community Services Departs. Planning Development Ext 4230 Fax 005- 356.2354 ddarbyson gniagarafalIs.ca Page 4 (8/30/2007) Dean lorfida dpd 86- 2007.pdf Page 5 The cost for this additional planning work is $10,000 and we would like to engage the consultant to carry out this work in the near future., The purpose of this letter to you is to request the Region's consideration of'a contribution towards the completion of this important work. The over all detailed planning review will cost $22,570 (original) $10,000 $32,570. We would like to request the Region's contribution of $10,000 for the additional planning work necessary to address the recognition of the existing industries in the area. We would also appreciate the Regional Planning's input in providing comments on the conceptual land use plans when they axe prepared.. Your consideration of the City's request is appreciated and should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact myself or Bob Bolibruck of ow office.• Attachment cc. Serge Felicetti DPD 86 2007 Appendix 1 July 18, 2007 Page 5 2 Yours truly, Doug Darbyson Director of Planning and Development S: \COMMUMi 711MPR0VEMENIPLANS \CityWide- Brownfields\Planning Work within Pilot Project Area\Funding Request to Region wpd August 27, 2007 Mayor Ted Salci and Niagara Falls City Council Members City Hall 4300 Queen Street Niagara Falls, ON Re: Maple Lodge Kennels This is a complaint against our local SPCA and in particular, Mr. Don Horvath. Last August, 2006, Mr. Horvath laid six charges against Maple Lodge Kennels at 6129 Drummond Road, Niagara Falls, Ontario. In September, 2006 we attended at Niagara Falls Court for the hearing and at that time, Mr. Horvath and Valerie escorted us to a room and emphatically stated to us, "If you do not plead guilty to these charges, we will make sure you never have a licensed kennel again We had never been to court in the past and knowing that we were not guilty of his charges, we refused to plead guilty. Five of the six charges were dismissed and it was evident that he was very annoyed with us after the proceedings. When Mr. Horvath attended at our kennels on August 15, 2007 to license us, he stated everything was in order at that time, but that he was unable to license us because City Hall was changing the bylaw. We feel Mr. Horvath is prejudiced towards us as he licensed another local kennel on St. Clair Avenue that same week, but refused to license us. The SPCA has licensed our kennel for the last 12 years and we do not understand why our kennel is being refused licensing this year. Respectfully submitted, Julie Hodgins Maple Lodge Kennels Shelley Hodgin Maple Lodge Kennels /j g September 4 2007 Mayor Ted Salci 4310 Queen Street Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 6X5 Dear Mayor Salci: On behalf of the Royal Canadian Legion Branches No. 51, 396 and 479, we request that the week of September 16 to 22n be proclaimed "LEGION WEEK This week will be observed through Canada and many Branches will have activities to make the public aware of Branch and Community projects. Branch 51 will be responsible for the payment of publication of the Proclamation in the Niagara Falls Review. Thank you for your attention to this very impprtatit event. For any further information, please contact Helen Keating at 354- 8331, regarding Legion Week. Yours truly, Stuart Craig Pres. Br.51 cc: Br.479 396 124 The Royal Canadian Legion NIAGARA FALLS (ONT. NO. 51 BRANCH) 5743 Valley Way, Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 1X7 Tel: 905- 354 -8331 LOGO CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS PROCLAMATION NIAGARA FALLS ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION WEEK WHEREAS, The Ontario Command of the Royal Canadian Legion has set aside the 16 to the 22n day in September as Legion Week in Ontario and WHEREAS, The Royal Canadian Legion is represented in the City of Niagara Falls by Niagara Falls Branch 51, Chippawa Branch 396, A.C. McCallum Branch 479. WHEREAS, The contributions of the Royal Canadian Legion Branches to the Community, in youth programs, senior programs, as well as their work in caring for veterans and their families and their active remembrance of civic recognition. THEREFORE, I Mayor Ted Salci, hereby proclaim the week of September 16 to 22n 2007 as "NIAGARA FALLS ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION WEEK" in the City of Niagara Falls. TED SALCI MAYOR September 4 2007 Mayor Ted Salci 4310 Queen Street Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 6X5 Dear Mayor Salci Yours truly, —h Stuart Craig Pres. Br.51 The Royal Canadian Legion NIAGARA FALLS (ONT. NO. 51 BRANCH) On behalf of the Royal Canadian Legion Branches 51, 396, and 479, we request that permission be granted for a Legion Flag Raising Ceremony to be held on Monday, September 17th, 2007, at 10:00a.m. in honour of Legion week. This week will be observed throughout Canada and it would be greatly appreciated if permission could be received to fly the Canada Remembers flag at City Hall. We also request your presence and members of City Council at this event. We appreciate your attention to this matter. 5743 Valley Way, Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 1X7 Tel: 905- 354 -8331 September 10, 2007 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: F- 2007 -31 Major Receivables Quarterly Report Tax Arrears Total Unpaid Taxes Niagaraaalls C A N A D A RECOMMENDATION: For the information of Council. BACKGROUND: The following is the quarterly report of Tax and Sundry Receivables to June 30th, 2007. 1. Tax Receivables Current Taxes 2007 2006 Percentage Collected 73% 74% Levy to Date 109,229,952 105,400,195 Penalties Charged 432,249 405,632 Collections 80,010,265 77,818,781 Balance 29,651,936 27,987,046 2007 2006 Percentage Collected 34% 35% Opening Balance 14,489,650 14,461,355 Penalties Charged 952,721 936,005 Collection 5,183,633 5,407,623 Balance 10,258,738 9,989,717 39,910,674 37,976,764 0 Queen Stree RO. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905- 356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community F- 2007 -31 Corporate Services Department Finance September 10, 2007 2. Other Receivables Sundry Receivables Accounts Receivables Finance staff has increased the focus on tax collections and follows a collection procedure to ensure that all accounts are collected in a timely manner. All overdue accounts are charged penalty /interest of 1-1/4% per month. Recommended by: Approved by: A. Felicetti Respectfully submitted: 2 F- 2007 -31 2007 2006 834,348 839,256 Todd Harrison, Acting Dir ctor of Financial Services K »Burden, Acting Executive Director of Corporate Services acDonald, Chief Administrative Officer September 10, 2007 F- 2007 -32 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: F- 2007 -32 Municipal Accounts RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the municipal accounts totaling $24,319,473.44 for the period August 1, 2007 to August 28, 2007. BACKGROUND: Niag araa11s C A N A D A The accounts have been reviewed by the Acting Director of Financial Services and the by -law authorizing payment is listed on tonight's Council agenda. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Tod rden, Acting Executive Director of Corporate Services 6,4 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca rector of Financial Services Joh MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer Working Together to Serve Our Community Corporate Services Department Finance September 10, 2007 FS- 2007 -03 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: FS- 2007 -03 RRVP Niagara Square, Riocan Property Services Booking and Licence Agreement Fundraiser for Cancer "Headshave for Charlie" RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the City enter into an agreement with RRVP Niagara Square, Riocan Property Services, for the "Headshave for Charlie a fundraiser for Cancer at Niagara Square on Saturday, September 15, 2007. 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: A fundraiser "Headshave for Charlie" is being organized by the Niagara Falls Professional Fire Fighters Association at Niagara Square on Saturday, September 15, 2007 in the Centre Court. Niagara Falls Firefighters will collect pledges to have their heads shaved at the event, with all proceeds being donated to the Terry Fox at Work Day, Great Canadian Headshave in Charlie Stroud's name. It is recommended that the City enter into this agreement and support the Firefighters in this worthy cause. ue reet, F.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Recommended by: Respectfully submitted: :TChambers John Niagarajlalls Lee Smi Fire Chief cDonald, Chief Administrative Officer Working Together to Serve Our Community Fire Services September 10, 2007 FS- 2007 -04 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: FS- 2007 -04 Presumptive Legislation for Firefighter Illness RECOMMENDATION: That Council requests the Province of Ontario to include part -time and volunteer fire fighters in the definition of "firefighters" in Bill 221, Workplace Safety and Insurance Act (Presumptions for Firefighters, 2007). BACKGROUND: The risks inherent to the firefighting occupation have been exemplified too many times over the years. Communities provide as much protection for their firefighters as possible to protect them from occupational illnesses and injuries related to their jobs. Training requirements have also increased significantly in attempts to reduce these illnesses and injuries. The proclamation of presumptive legislation for firefighters was a significant step to ensure those stricken with certain cancers during the course of their duty are properly cared for. Although the intention was admirable in Bill 221, an amendment is required in order to cover all firefighters who may be similarly affected while serving their communities. The attached resolution has been reflected by many communities in Ontario and our volunteer firefighters in Niagara Falls sh• Id hav he sane assurances for themselves and their families. Recommended by: Respectfully submitted: L.Smith:tc Niagaraj7alls Lee Smith, Fire Chief MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer P.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Fire Services (8/27/2007) Dean lorfida Resolution_ Kingsville_ 2007JuI10 _BILL221_WorkplaceSafety.doc Page 1 RE: Corporation of the Town of Kingsville 2021 Division Road North Kingsville, Ontario N9Y 2Y9 Phone: (519) 733 -2305 FAX: (519) 733 -8108 July 10, 2007 TO: All Municipalities in the Province of Ontario FROM: Linda Burling, Clerk of The Corporation of the Town of Kingsville (lburling @kingsville.ca) Bill 221, Workplace Safety and Insurance Amendment Act (Presumptions for Firefighters), 2007 At the Civic Administration Committee meeting of The Corporation of the Town of Kingsville held on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 Fire Chief Robert B. Kissner Jr. presented a report which outlined his concerns with respect to the definition of "firefighter" in terms of the above recently adopted legislation in that the provincial government may choose not to treat the volunteer and part time sectors the same as their full time counterparts. The following Resolutions were passed: "C56 -2007 Moved by K. Gunning, seconded by G. Queen Council to request that the Province of Ontario ensure that volunteer and part time firefighters are defined as "firefighters" and treated equitably with their full time counterparts in accordance with the regulations detailed in Bill 221 —An Act to amend the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997 with respect to firefighters and certain related occupations, and further that this resolution be circulated to the other municipalities in Essex County for their support. C57 -2007 Moved by B. Peterson, seconded by G. Queen to amend motion to state that all municipalities in the Province be notified for their support. A copy of Chief Kissner's report FD07 -05 is available for review upon request. CARRIED CARRIED" r �A OFFICE OF THE: MAYOR CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER CLERK DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SERVICES DIRECTOR OF BUILDING ENFORCEMENT SERVICES August 15, 2007 MS. LINDA BURLING, CLERK TOWN OF KINGSVILLE 2021 DIVISION ROAD NORTH KINGSVILLE ON N9Y 2Y9 Dear Ms. Burling: This is to advise that Council of the Town of Pelham, at its last regular meeting held on Monday, August 13, 2007, resolved to enact the following resolution: "THAT Council of the Town of Pelham endorse and support the resolution enacted by the Town of Kingsville whereby they request the Province of Ontario to ensure that volunteer and part time firefighters are defined as "firefighters" and treated equitably with their full time counterparts in accordance with the regulations detailed in Bill 221; AND THAT a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the local MPP's and area municipalities." Yours very truly, Cheryl Miclette, AMCT Town Clerk Cc: Local MPP's Area Municipalities THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF PELHAM POST OFFICE BOX 400 PELHAM MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 20 PELHAM TOWN SQUARE FONTHILL, ONTARIO LOS 1E0 TEL. (905) 892.2607 FAX (905) 892.5055 September 10, 2007 L- 2007 -34 Members: RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND: Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: K. Beaman /L. Banks Niag ara CANADA His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Re: L- 2007 -34 Release of Site Plan Agreement Racey Avenue Lots 28 -44 and Block 100, Plan 59M -316 Our File No.: 2007 -209 That the release of a Site Plan Agreement dated October 21, 1988 and registered on title to Lots 28 to 44 inclusive and Block 100, Plan 59M -316, is hereby approved and authorized. On October, 26, 1988 The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls "the City entered into a Site Plan Agreement with Peter Aiello for the purpose of erecting a commercial building. The property, as shown hatched on Attachment "1", was severed from the orginal parcel of land in 2003 and merged with the Orchard Grove West Subdivision. The City has received a request to remove the said Site Plan Agreement from title for Lot 43 on Plan 59M -316 as it is no longer applicable against the property. Upon circulation of the above request to various City departments, Municipal Works recommends that the said Site Plan Agreement be removed from title to all of the affected properties. Ke Beaman, City Solicit 4 1 E. Burden, Acting Director of Corporate Services 0 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905- 356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca 97- vz- ohn MacDonald, Chief Administra Working Together to Serve Our Community icer Corporate Services Department Legal Services Roads Road Names /IDs Addresses (I Property Outline Niagara Falls SCALE 1 3,092 200 0 200 400 600 FEET N http:/ /nfweb.city.niagarafalls.on.ca: 8081 /gis /mwf/!nternal /int_gen2l.mwf Monday, July 23, 2007 10:19 AM RECOMMENDATIONS: 2) That the Mayor and the Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary agreements. BACKGROUND: Transportation Services strategic priority is to ensure a sustainable transportation system in Niagara Falls. One objective is to reduce existing traffic congestion on major arteries and to predict where future infrastructure improvements will be needed to assist in the planning process. The tool that may best address these issues on a larger scale is through the development of a transportation model. The key benefits that a transportation model will provide include: September 10, 2007 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Niag araJ C A N A D A Re: MW -2007- 93 City Transportation Model Development Working Together to Serve Our Community MW-2007-93 1) That Delcan Incorporated be retained to complete the Citywide Paramics transportation model, and further a platform to evaluate future transportation needs identifying where to focus EA's to maximize the greatest benefit on the road network and allocate funding to priority areas a tool to generate alternative solutions to problems estimating how road closures and other construction projects will divert traffic, and prepare for it by altering signal timings and planning reasonable detour routes identifying how the traffic impacts of larger developments including subdivisions will have on the road network and outside the immediate development area an excellent visualization tool to showcase alternatives to Council and the public. Staff accepted proposals from two (2) firms that have performed similar modeling exercises. The cos s for= developing the base model (developed to retlect existing conditions) is as 4310 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Community Services Department Transportation Services September 10, 2007 Consultant Cost excluding GST Delcan 89,775.00 Totten Sims Hubicki 89,900.00 2 MW- 2007 -93 Both consulting firms have demonstrated through their submissions that they are capable of satisfactorily completing the project in reasonable time frames given their experience using the Paramics modeling suite. Both consultants have also included, as options to model, the tourist area to also include weekend peak conditions. Delcan has provided an optional task of modeling the City to forecast 2011 traffic conditions, TSH has provided an option to model a hypothetical scenario i.e., Road closure. Consultant Options excluding GST Delcan 44,600.00 (Tourist Area Model) 33,550.00 (2011 Citywide Model) Totten Sims Hubicki 28,000.00 (Tourist Area Model) 6,400.00 (Scenerio Model) Staff recommends that Delcan be hired to provide the consulting services for this project. Key advantages that Delcan offers to this project include: Their project team leader is involved in peer reviewing the Region of Niagara's TransCAD model. This is a strategic travel demand planning model that has been developed with the primary purpose of testing long -term strategic networks, alternative land use plans and supporting transportation policies. Much of the information the City's transportation model will build upon the Region's planning model. Regional staff indicated that they are very satisfied with the team leader's knowledge, insight and direction in the development of the planning model. Their proposal provides for the development of a model concentrated within the urban boundary. Additional time has been allocated in the calibration /validation portion of the project which is considered a key component in model development. Has allocated more than three times the resources in reviewing and updating the model infrastructure coding. Set aside more project meetings with Staff. an option to forecast the pm peak hour for the 2011 horizon year, considered to be an asset in establishing the development charges by -law. Delcan has been and is currently involved in several projects within the City of Niagara Falls. They have a broad knowledge of overlapping issues within the municipality that is considered to be valuable as they have completed projects within the City, Region and neighbouring jurisdictions. Taking into account the aforementioned factors, it is Staffs opinion that Delcan is fully capable of undertaking this project. The base model is expected to be completed within one year after project commencement. Following the completion of the base model, staff is suggesting to expand the model to forecast 2011 traffic conditions. This information may be used to identify short to medium range infrastructure improvements, and for the development charges by -law. September 10, 2007 Consideration will then be given to forecast the tourist area for the weekend peak period. Financing: The estimated amount for the project was The actual project cost is 5 contingency Funding: Capital Account 50% Development Charges 50% Therefore, Staff is recommending that Delcan be retained, as their proposal provides not only a comprehensive approach to developing the base model but also an innovative option to include traffic forecasting for the year 2011. The project is not to exceed $129,491.25 excluding GST. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: J. Grubich /M.Carrick Base model 2011 model Total Project Cost Karl Dren, Directo cf Transportation Services w' tive erector of Community Services Ed Dujlovic, E 3 n 200,000.00 89,775.00 33,550.00 6,166.25 129,491.25 hn MacDonald, hief Administrative Officer S: \TPS \TPS 1.00 Administration \TPS 1.06 Reports\2007 Council \09 Sept 10 \MW- 2007 -93 Transportation Model 2.wpd MW- 2007 -93 September 10, 2007 MW- 2007 -104 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND: Niag araa11s CANADA Re: MW- 2007 -104 Warren Creek Watershed Municipal Class EA Detailed Engineering Design That the City contract the services of Upper Canada Consultants to complete the detailed design and tendering process for the reconstruction of the Warren Creek between McLeod Road and Kalar Road for an upset limit of $32,049.00 Council previously approved report MW- 2005 -116 authorizing City staff to engage the services of Upper Canada Consultants to proceed through the Environment Assessment process with this project. Phases I though IV will be completed this month which will require the City to file a notice of completion to the review agencies and the public. To date, two Public Information Centers have been scheduled with valuable public input being incorporated into the Environmental Study Report. It is anticipated that the design and tendering process will be completed by the end of this year with construction commencing in early 2008. The funding for this project is included in the 2007 Capital Works Budget as follows: Capital Holding Account 30% Development Charges Reserve 70% This project was identified in the 2004 Development Charges Background Study (Project DC- NT -ST3) as being funded from the Development Charges Reserve Fund. Attached for your information is a copy of the design and tender proposal from the project team including the work plan, staffing commitment and fee schedule. A typical Consultant Services Agreement governing the completion of this work will be prepared upon confirmation of engagement. 4310 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Municipal Works September 10, 2007 Recommended by: Approved by: -2- Hol an D' Geoff ctor of Municipal Works Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services Respectfully submitted: /1 7_, John MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer R. Volpini S: \REPORTS \2007 Reports \MW 2007 -104 Warren Creek.wpd Working Together to Serve Our Community MW- 2007 -104 I. CV. LVVI 0;`tIlMIVI t O UPPER CANADA CONSULTANTS ENGINEERS /PLANNERS July 19, 2007 File 0594 City of Niagara Falls 4310 Queen Street P.O. Box 1023 Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5 Attention: Mr. Rick Volpini, C.E.T., Project Manager Re: Warren Creek Watershed Final Engineering Design We are pleased to provide you with a price to complete the detailed engineering design drawings for the reconstruction of the Warren Creek between McLeod Road and Kalar Road. The proposed engineering services to be provided and the associated fees are as follows: A. Detailed Engineering Design B. Tendering Prepare tender quantities and construction cost estimate. Prepare tender documents and tender proposed works. iuo. 17y0 r I Upper Canada Planning Engineering Ltd. 261 Martindale Road Unit #1 St. Catharines, ON L2W 1A1 Phone 905 -688 -9400 Fax 905 688 -5274 Prepare detailed HEC -RAS Modelling of the final creek cross section and the anticipated future flows within the watercourse with respect to the back water effects resulting from the 3 culvert crossings. Prepare detailed plan and profile drawings of the channel. Prepare culvert design details. Implement naturalized landscape design details. Facilitate permits and approvals. C. Naturalize Channel Design/Landscape Plan Prepare detailed landscape plan of proposed channel (Donald Martin). Prepare naturalization design details and facilitate DFO, MNR and NP CA permits (Lisa Campbell) Burlington St. Catharines JU I LU LUUI 0:411HIYI UPPER CANADA CONSULTANTS ENGINEERS /PLANNERS D. Project Team and Fees The project team shall be managed through Upper Canada Consultants by Martin Heikoop, C.E.T. with design being prepared by Jason Schooley, P.Eng. and Adam Keane, E.I.T. Subconsultants are L. Campbell Associates, and Donald Martin Landscape Architect. The project fees and expenses are per the attached Fee Schedule. We thank you for providing the opportunity to prepare the above works. Should you have any questions with respect to the proposal, please contact the undersigned. Yours very truly, Martin Her oop, C.E.T. MH /jb Pc-DO Sa,,,,t 2 l�ca� P <P90 Sib I Ocf C.01 .0-44/\,---> Apr NO I DYti r' L Ju I. LU, LUUI U:4UHIVI tO UPPER CANADA CONSULTANTS ENGINEERS /PLANNERS UPPER CANADA CONSULTANTS 2007 BILLING RATES Senior Engineer /Project Manager 120.00 Senior Designer/Project Manager 120.00 Planner 75.00 Senior Project Manager 90.00 Intermediate Engineer 80.00 Junior Engineer 70.00 Field Supervisor 75.00 Office Administration 55.00 Autocad Drailsman 65.00 Inspector 65.00 Field Crew 100.00 EXPENSE RATES Travel 0.42/km Photocopies 0.25 each Whiteprints 2.00 each Mylars $10.00 each Fax 1.00 page Phone Cost Courier Cost IVO, 1 r. j c 0 ti a Upper Canada Consultants 261 Martindale Road, Unit#1 APPENDIX A FEES SCHEDULE St. Catharines, ON L2W 1A1 905- 688 -9400 Revised July 2007 Project: Warren Creek Watershed Capital Works (Kalar Road to Garner Estates Ex. SWM Facilities, City of Niagara Falls Estimated Hours Estimated Dollars Project Mgr /MH Sr.Eng /JS Int.Eng /AK Survey CAD Clerical FEES ESTIMATED TOTAL $120 $110 $80 $90 $65 $45 EXPENSES' Task Description 4.0 Detailed Design 4.1 Prepare Plan and Profiles 10 30 120 $11,300 4.2 Culvert Design 5 10 5 $1,675 4.2 Model Culvert Backwater Effects 3 15 $1,530 4.3 Naturalized Landscape Design 2 5 10 $1,270 4.5 Finalize Drawings 5 5 20 40 $5,3501 4.6 Landscape Plans (D. Martin) $3,184 Subtotals 5 25 80 0 175 0 24,309 0 0 5.0 Facilitate Permits and Approvals 4 10 10 5 5 $2,930 Subtotals 4 10 10 0 5 5 2,930 0 0 6.0 Tender Documents 6.1 Tender Quantities and Cost Estimate 5 2 6 5 $1,525 6.2 Tender Documents and Proposed Work 5 4 4 10 $1,810 Subtotals 10 6 10 0 0 15 3,335 0 0 7.0 L Campbell Associates $1,475 Subtotals 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,475 0 0 TOTALS 19 41 100 0 180 20 32,049 0 0 PERCENTAGE BREAKDOWN 5.28% 11.39% 27.78% 0.00% 50.00% 5.56% Total Hours' 360 c 0 ti a JUI. LV. LOH tl;41HIV1 IVO. 1 0 r. Martin Heikoop Upper Canada Consultants 261 Martindale Road, Unit #1 St. Catharines, ON L2W 1A1 June 30, 2007 Dear Mr. Heikoop, Re: Detailed Channel Design Phase Warren Creek Realignment, City of Niagara Falls We are pleased to provide you with a quote and scope to complete the tasks associated with the detailed channel design for the Warren Creek realignment in Niagara Falls. The tasks associated with the detailed design phase include: 1) Consultation with the Landscape Architect and review of landscaping plans 2) Consultation with the Project Engineers regarding fisheries habitat requirements within the channel 3) Preparation of the DFO Authorization and consultation with DFO staff 4) Preparation of the NPCA permit application and consultation with NPCA staff 5) Completion of all required of forms and documents associated with the channel realignment 6) Fisheries Assessment Addendum report (if required) The Detail Design Phase EA tasks will cost $1475.00 for professional services and associated expenses, plus GST. Please return a signed copy of this letter to confirm that the tasks and associated fees have been accepted. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, Lisa Campbell, M.Sc., C.C.E.P. L Campbell Associates Martin Heikoop 104 -155 Main Street East, Suite 234, Grinsby, Ontario, Canada L3M 1P2 Tel 905 -687 -4400, camphelt- associates@sympatico.ca DUI L V LVV I 0 :9 DONALD MARTIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 4655 Fifth Avenue Niagara Falls Ontario L2E 4R7 Phone Fax 905.357.1947 e-mail donmartin ©cogeco.ca Tuesday, July 03, 2007 Attention: Mr. Martin Heikoop Upper Canada Consultants St. Catharines. On Igo 170 r, o Re: PROPOSAL Landscape Architectural Services for 'Warren Creek' Relocation Landscape planting plan at Kalar Mcleod Rds., Niagara Falls, Ontario Mr. Heikoop, Thank you for considering my services in the development of a landscape plan for the for 'Warren Creek' Relocation Landscape planting plan at Kalar Mcleod Rds., Niagara Falls, Ontario site. After our brief conversation, I am prepared to submit the following proposal for your consideration. The Proposal is organized as follows; 1. Scope of Work: 2. Fees: 3. Expenditures: 4. Method of Payment: 5. Terms: 6. Proposed Schedule: Sincerely, Donald Martin Jul, 2U. 2UU/ tl:41HIVl Proposal For the Park and Storm Water Management Pond Plantings `Michael Estates', Welland, Ontario 1 Scope of Work: My services will include the following; 1 Develop a 'Concept Landscape Plan', as per your direction, which will show; .1 The position, size and type, of plant material proposed, along with a plant schedule for the 2.38 kms of proposed waterway. 2 Prepare a 'Finished Landscape Site Plan' which meets with your approval. This Plan may be used to submit to City of Niagara Falls for Site Plan approval, 3 Prepare a `Cost Estimate' of the Landscape elements. 2 Fees: 1'Concept Landscape Plan' 2 Finished Landscape Site Plan' 4 'Cost Estimate' Sub -Total (a) Fees .3 Expenditures: .1 Auto .2 Administration Sub -Total (b) Expenditures 1 547.00 1047,00 500.00 3 094.00 10,00 80,00 90.00 No. M O r. TOTAL FEES EXPENDITURES 3184.00 .4 Method of Payment: .1 On acceptance of Proposal 600.00 2 On completion of 'Concept Landscape Site Plan' 1700.00 3 On completion of 'Finished Landscape Site Plan' &`Cost Estimate' 884.00 5. Terms Should you accept this proposal, the retainer fee of 600.00, in conjunction with this proposal, will constitute a contract between you and me. I will begin work on this project when the retainer fee has been paid. Payment is due within 30 days of completion of each phase, as per the 'Method of Payment'. Interest will be charged at 1.5% per month on overdue balances owing. This Proposal' is valid for 90 days. You will note that there has been no CST has been added. I am unregistered at the moment. Should additional work beyond what is described above, be required, fees will be charged at 90,00 /hour, and invoiced monthly Invoices will be issued to you; Upper Canada Consultants or as you wish, 6. Proposed Schedule: As required Sincerely, Donald Martin September 10, 2007 PD- 2007 -66 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: RECOMMENDATION: Niag araj C A N A D A Re: PD- 2007 -66 Summary of Financial Incentive Applications under the City's Community Improvement Plans and Proposed Amendment to the Downtown CIP That Council receive the summary of financial incentive applications under the City's CIP's and support the processing of an amendment to the Downtown CIP to change the financial incentive program for commercial buildings and facade improvements. BACKGROUND: The City of Niagara Falls has three Community Improvement Plans and they are for the Downtown area, Historic Drummondville area and Brownfields. The purpose of this report is to apprise Council of the number of financial incentive applications that have been processed and approved, and to propose an amendment to the Downtown CIP. The number of financial incentive applications received has been relatively low. However, it is expected that the number of applications will increase as we see positive results from approved applications and as the marketing programs are expanded and promoted. A brief summary of proposals is highlighted as follows and a Summary Chart is attached as Appendix 1: 1. Downtown CIP The City has received dozens of inquiries regarding the financial incentive programs for the Downtown CIP and staff has met with more than twenty property owners to discuss various potential development proposals involving applications for funding assistance. Only one application has been received to date by a property owner along Bridge Street. The Urban Design Guidelines for Downtown are now complete and applications for facade improvements are being encouraged. Marketing brochures for the Downtown incentive programs are now available. 2. Historic Drummondville CIP The Historic Drummondville CIP was approved this past spring and there has been 0 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada 1.2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Planning Development September 10, 2007 2 PD- 2007 -66 considerable activity and interest in the financial incentive programs for this area. City staff has received more than twenty development inquiries within the CIP area and a total of six applications have been received since May 2007. Most of the applications have been for commercial building and facade improvement grants. Marketing brochures for the Historic Drummondville incentive programs are available. 3. City Wide Brownfields CIP The City has received two Environmental Study Grant Applications. A total of $22,500 has been paid out for the studies. Since approval of the Brownfield CIP, there have been five inquiries involving the remediation of brownfield sites. Proposed Amendment to the Downtown CIP RCI was the lead consultant in preparing the City's three Community Improvement Plans. When the Historic Drummondville CIP was being prepared, and the incentive programs developed, there was discussion on how the Downtown programs were working. It was found that there was little interest in the commercial building loan. It was based upon the above, that the consultant's proposed a matching commercial building grant of $10,000 rather than a matching $15,000 loan for the Historic Drummondville CIP. The facade grant for the Historic Drummondville CIP also allows for an additional $5,000 grant for properties adjacent to the Sylvia Place Market, those located in highly visible areas along major streets and properties designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. The maximum grant under this program is $25,000. Staff has seen first hand the success of the program and recommends a change to mirror the program for Downtown. The proposed increase in facade grant for the Downtown would apply to larger more prominent buildings, as well as, for properties designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. The change to the incentive program will create more interest for Downtown property owners, and if Council supports this change, staff will prepare the necessary amendment to the CIP which will include providing public notice and a mandatory public meeting. CONCLUSION: The implementation of the financial incentive programs for the City's Community Improvement Plans is still in its infancy. As the City experiences successful results of the financial incentive programs, and the programs are promoted, the City will see an increase in the number of applications received. Staff will continue to monitor the number of applications and keep Council informed on a regular basis. Council's support to amend the commercial building and facade improvement program for Downtown is also appreciated. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Doug Darbyson, Dir tor of Planning Development Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services John MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer B. Bolibruck:tc Attachments S: \PDR\2007 \PD- 2007 -66, Summary of CIP Incentives and Proposed Amendment for Downtown CIP.wpd 2. Historic Drummondville CIP of Applications of Applications Approved Value of Grants/Loans Approved Commercial Building Facade Improvement Grant 4 (1 appl. is in process) 3 $58,886.50 Revitalization Grant 1 1 $104,743.80 (estimated) Residential Loan 0 0 0 Peer Robinson Residential Rehabilitation Grant 1 (1 appl. is in process) 0 0 1. Downtown CIP of Applications of Applications Approved Value of Grants/Loans Approved Commercial Building Facade Improvement Grant 0 0 0 Commercial Building Improvement Loan 0 0 0 Revitalization Grant 1 1 $11,521.87 (estimated) Residential Loan 0 0 0 3. City Wide Brownfields CIP of Applications of Applications Approved Value of Grants Approved Environmental Study Grant 2 2 $22,500 Brownfield Tax Assistance Grant 0 0 0 Brownfield Rehabilitation Grant 0 0 0 SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL INCENTIVE APPLICATIONS WITHIN CITY COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLANS Appendix 1 Development Charges Exemption Program all applications approved within the CIP areas will be eligible for 75% 100% exemption of Development Charges September 10, 2007 PD- 2007 -68 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Niagara falls Re: PD- 2007 -68 Application for a Commercial Building Facade Improvement Grant within the Historic Drummondville CIP 6032 Main Street RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Council approve the application for a Commercial Building Facade Improvement Grant in the amount of $20,000 subject to meeting the program requirements including the entering into an agreement with the City. 2. That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the grant agreement as attached to this report as Appendices II. BACKGROUND: The City has received a Commercial Building Facade Improvement Grant Application for 6032 Main Street. The main floor of the building is currently vacant, but had been occupied for a short time by a computer exchange outlet, and previously for several years, as Davey Automotive. The upper level contains an apartment. The owners wish to carry out a number of improvements to both the exterior and interior of the building. The extent of exterior work that is eligible under the City's facade grant program includes a new awning and signage, replacement of windows and doors, and repairing the exterior brick. These improvements will be in excess of $20,000. As for structural items that comply with the commercial building grant program, the owners plan to repair the foundation wall and carry out interior plumbing and electrical improvements. This work is also in excess of $20,000. Based upon the work proposed and the estimate provided to staff, the applicants will be eligible for a grant of $20,000. A plan showing the location of the property is highlighted in Appendix I. As part of the grant approval process, the applicants will be required to enter into an agreement with the City. The agreement specifies the details for the grant which will be provided following the work being completed and inspected by City staff. The agreement is attached as Appendix II to this report. neon Street, P0. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905 356 -7521 wwwniagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Planning Development September 10, 2007 2 PD- 2007 -68 CONCLUSION: The improvements proposed by the applicants will greatly improve the appearance and structure of the building. The proposed work will also have a positive impact on the revitalization efforts along Main Street. Based upon the above, staff recommends approval of the grant application. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Bob Bolibruck:tc Attachments Doug Darbyson, Director of Planning Development Ed Dujlovic, Exe tfiv for of Community Services hn MacDonald, Chief Adm istrative Officer S: \PDR\2007 \PD- 2007 -68, Application for Commercial Building Facade Grant.wpd Location Map 6034 Main Street LUNDY'S LANE m 111111.11.1 111111 al 1 v aN woomminr l="1111..1 MUM OW 00111111111 am n 010- MM. :4111111111•11 MUM I" Z Meal.laWl iIII NM= IMMINO 11111111 MilM morn 1101 WO 0= I WM M MUM MOM MUS MOMS IMMO MUMS MIME opium L r udimm. I A 5111111111111 tina was, wok tap Mitin °la wows LarliNsMIS ''''1111111111 .101110 amorisagla MIN r m Hum= u iii1=21 mg.= a i MINNS MINI 6034 Main Street Historic Drummondville Community Improvement Project Area 11. i:nrrs August 2007 1111111 mum M§&%/11 11. IMMIll 111=11111•1•1•1•11* kV KAGIS_RequestA2006 \Custom \InternalPlannIng \CITAHistoric_DnImmondvilleanap THIS HISTORIC DRUMMONDVILLE COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND IMPROVEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT made this 10 day of September, 2007. BETWEEN: THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS (hereinafter referred to as the "City and 1254225 ONTARIO INC. (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant APPENDIX II FACADE WHEREAS the Applicant is the registered Owner of, or operates a business on, lands described in Schedule "A" attached to this Agreement "the subject lands which are situated within the Historic Drummondville Community Improvement Project Area, and the Applicant has applied to the City for a Commercial Building and Facade Improvement Grant "Grant under the City's Commercial Building and Facade Improvement Grant Program "Program and the City has agreed to make such a Grant pursuant to Section 28 of the Planning Act and under By -Law No. 2006 -227; AND WHEREAS as a condition of approval of such a Grant, the Applicant is required by the City to enter into this Agreement; NOW THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION of the City making this Grant in the maximum amount of $20,000.00 to the Applicant, the Applicant and the City hereby agree: 1. INFORMATION ON SUBJECT LANDS 1.1 The Grant shall apply to the subject lands as set out in Schedule A attached. 1.2 The subject lands are /are not designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. 2. GRANT ELIGIBILITY 2.1 To be eligible for the Grant, the works on the subject land shall conform to and fulfill: a) the objectives and Program requirements of the Commercial Building and Facade Improvement Grant Program and the Historic Drummondville Community Improvement Plan "CIP b) City policies and procedures for the Identification Remediation of Potentially Contaminated Sites under the Planning Act Application Review Process; and, c) any other requirements as specified by the City. 2.2 The Applicant acknowledges that it has received and read a copy of the City's Commercial Building and Facade Improvement Grant Program Guide (the "Guide and 1 the City's Historic Drummondville CIP, and the Applicant covenants with the City that the subject lands shall be restored /improved and the Grant provided for in this Agreement shall be applied in accordance with the City's objectives, policies and program requirements set out in the Guide and the City's Historic Drummondville CIP. 2.3 The City shall review all cost estimates submitted in support of the Application in evaluating the estimated rehabilitation costs eligible for the Grant, which costs, when designated by the City shall constitute the maximum amount of the total grant to be paid. In the event the City is not satisfied with said cost estimates, the City may substitute their opinion of such amounts for purposes of calculating the eligible rehabilitation costs for the Grant. If the City is not in receipt of sufficient information satisfactory to the City to determine rehabilitation costs and the amount of the Grant, the application will not be processed and the application file will be closed. The decision of the City regarding the total amount of rehabilitation costs, the calculation of the total estimated maximum Grant and the calculation of the actual Grant payments is final, absolute and within the City's sole discretion. 2.4 The City agrees to provide a Grant to the Applicant estimated as of the date of this agreement in the amount of $20,000.00. 2.5 The Grant will not be advanced by the City until: a) a Grant agreement has been signed and executed; b) the Applicant provides proof that the building maintenance and facade improvement works are complete, including a final colour photograph(s) of the property and building clearly showing the completed works; and, c) the building facade and /or building improvements have been inspected by municipal staff. 3. CORPORATE STATUS 3.1 The Applicant represents to the City that: a) the Applicant has been duly incorporated as a corporation and is in good standing under the Business Corporations Act and is in compliance with all laws that may affect it and will remain so throughout the term of this Agreement; b) the Applicant has the corporate capacity to enter into this Agreement and to perform and meet any and all duties, liabilities and obligations as may be required of it under this Agreement; c) to the best of their knowledge, there are no actions, suits or proceedings pending or threatened against or adversely affecting the Applicant in any court or before or by any federal, provincial, municipal or other governmental department, commission, board, bureau or agency, Canadian or foreign, which might materially affect the financial condition of the Applicant or title to their property or assets; d) the Applicant shall notify the City immediately of any material change in the conditions set out in paragraphs (a) -(c) above. 2 4. PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE APPLICANT 4.1 At the time of application for the Program, the Applicant shall have submitted to the City for its review and acceptance a colour photograph of the existing facade, architectural drawing /design plans for the facade restoration/improvement and any other supporting documentation required by the City. 4.2 The Applicant will complete all eligible works as specified in the approved Grant application, and in documentation submitted in support of the Grant application, including but not limited to the architectural /design drawings, specifications, contracts, and cost estimates. As the City is relying upon this information, if the information in this Agreement, the associated application, and /or any supporting documentation submitted to the City is, in the opinion of the City, incomplete, false, inaccurate or misleading, the Grant may be reduced and /or delayed, and /or cancelled, and where part or all of the Grant has already been paid by the City, such payments shall be repaid by the Applicant as required by the City. 4.3 The Applicant shall not commence any works that are the subject of a Grant Application prior to receiving approval of the Grant Application, and approval and execution of this Agreement. 4.4 The Applicant agrees that the rehabilitation works made to buildings shall be made in compliance with all required Building Permits, and constructed in accordance with the Ontario Building Code and all applicable zoning by -aw requirements, municipal requirements and other approvals required at law. 4.5 The Applicant shall complete construction of all improvements within one (1) year of Grant approval, failing which, unless extended by the City, this Grant approval shall be at an end, there shall be no Grant, and this Agreement shall be terminated. The deadline imposed by this paragraph shall not include delays that are outside the control of the Applicant. 4.6 Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall provide the City with documentation satisfactory to the City as to the amount of the actual costs of restoration/improvement incurred by the Applicant. 4.7 The Applicant shall ensure there are no liens or other claims outstanding in respect of the subject lands, and that all accounts for work and materials which could give rise to any claim for a construction lien against the subject lands have been paid. 4.8 The Applicant shall ensure that the Applicant is in compliance with the Construction Lien Act, including its holdback provisions and is not aware of any potential or unresolved Lien claim in respect of the redevelopment. 4.9 The Applicant agrees to comply with all outstanding work orders and /or orders or requests to comply from any and all City departments prior to or as a condition of Grant approval. 3 4.10 If the Applicant is the Owner, the Applicant covenants to the City that where the subject lands for any reason cease to be in the Applicant's name by sale, assignment or otherwise, prior to the advance of part or all of the Grant, the Applicant will notify the City in writing of said pending ownership change at least 30 days prior to the ownership change taking place. 4.11 The Applicant acknowledges that without limiting the generality of the other provisions of this Agreement: a) the onus and responsibility is upon the Applicant at all times to assume all costs of facade restoration and improvement and building maintenance and improvement and to apply for and obtain, at the Applicant's expense, all approvals required from the City and all other agencies for said works, including but not limited to all Official Plan Amendments, rezoning bylaws, minor variances, and site plan approval; b) nothing in this Agreement limits or fetters the City in exercising its statutory jurisdiction under the Planning Act or under any other legislative authority or by -law and that in the event the City decides to deny or oppose or appeal any such decision, that such action by the City is not in any manner limited by reason of the City entering into this Agreement; c) the Applicant releases the City from any liability in respect of the City's reviews, decisions, inspections or absence of inspections regarding the facade restoration/improvement works and the Applicant agrees that it is its responsibility at all times to prepare and implement its works; d) nothing in this Agreement is intended to impose or shall impose upon the City any duty or obligation to inspect or examine the land for compliance or non compliance or to provide an opinion or view respecting any condition of development; and, e) nothing in this Agreement is intended to be or shall be construed to be a representation by the City regarding compliance of the land with: (1) applicable environmental laws, regulations, policies, standards, permits or approvals, or, (2) other by -laws and policies of the City. 4.12 If the City determines in its sole discretion that any of the conditions of this Agreement are not fulfilled, the City may at its sole discretion cease or delay payment of the Grant, and the Applicant agrees that notwithstanding any costs or expenses incurred by the Applicant, the Applicant shall not have any claim for compensation or reimbursement of these costs and expenses against the City, and that the City is not liable to the Applicant for losses, damages, interest, or claims which the Applicant may bear as a result of the lapse of time (if any) where the City is exercising its rights herein to either delay a Grant payment pending compliance with this Agreement, or to terminate this Agreement. 4.13 The Applicant shall indemnify and save harmless from time to time and at all times, the City and its officers, employees, councillors, and agents from and against all claims, actions, causes of action, interest, demands, costs, charges, damages, expenses and loss made by any person arising directly or indirectly from: 4 (a) the City entering into this Agreement; and (b) any failure by the Applicant to fulfil its obligations under this Agreement. This indemnification shall, in respect of any matter arising prior to the termination of this Agreement, remain in force following termination or expiry of this Agreement. 5. PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE CITY 5.1 The City agrees to provide a Grant to the Applicant estimated as of the date of this agreement in the amount of $20,000.00, subject to and in accordance with the terms and provisions set out in this Agreement. 5.2 The City reserves the right to require a third party review or independent audit, at the Applicant's expense, of all documentation submitted in support of the Application or during the administration of the Grant. 5.3 The City, its employees and agents are entitled to inspect the subject lands and all fixtures and improvements upon the subject lands at any time during usual business hours for the purpose of ascertaining their condition or state of repair or for the purpose of verifying compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. 5.4 The City retains the right at all times not to make any or all of Grant payments or to delay payment where the City deems that there is non compliance by the Applicant with this Agreement. 5.5 Except where expressly stated in this Agreement, all conditions in this Agreement are for the benefit of the City and may only be waived by the City. No waiver is effective unless in writing. 6. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES 6.1 The Applicant agrees to maintain in good repair the improvements for which the Grant is provided. In the event that the Applicant does not maintain in good repair said improvements, the City may: a) serve on the Applicant a written Notice to Repair detailing the particulars of the failure to maintain and the particulars of needed repairs; and, b) provide the Applicant with at least 30 days to make such repairs. 6.2 On the occurrence of Default under this Agreement, the City shall be entitled to its remedies to enforce this Agreement, including, but not limited to: a) delaying or ceasing the release of the Grant; b) requiring repayment of the Grant; and /or c) terminating this Agreement. 5 6.3 Default shall be deemed to occur upon any default of the Applicant in complying with the terms set out in this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the following: a) the as constructed works do not comply with the description of the works as provided in the Application Form and Required Documents; b) the works are not undertaken in conformity with the Ontario Building Code and all applicable zoning requirements and planning approvals; c) the building is damaged by fire or otherwise, and repair or reconstruction is not commenced with 90 days; d) the Applicant is in property tax arrears with respect to the property for more than 90 days; e) any representation or warranty made by the Applicant is incorrect in any material respect; f) failure to perform or comply with any of the obligations contained in this Agreement or contained in any other Agreement entered into between the Applicant and the City; g) the Applicant makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or assigns in bankruptcy or takes the advantage in respect of their own affairs of any statute for relief in bankruptcy, moratorium, settlement with creditors, or similar relief of bankrupt or insolvent debtors, or if a receiving order is made against the Applicant, or if the Applicant is adjudged bankrupt or insolvent, or if a liquidator or receiver is appointed by reason of any actual or alleged insolvency, or any default of the Applicant under any mortgage or other obligation, or if the subject lands or interest of the Applicant in the subject lands becomes liable to be taken or sold by any creditors or under any writ of execution or other like process; h) construction ceases for a period of 60 days due to the Applicant's default (strikes and Acts of God excepted) and /or the Applicant abandons the property or project; I) if this Agreement is forfeited or is terminated by any other provision contained in it. 6.4 The City may at its sole discretion, provide the Owner with an opportunity to remedy any default. 7. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 7.1 The approved architectural /design drawings referred to may be amended by the Applicant and the City from time to time, as they may agree. 7.2 Time shall be of the essence with respect to all covenants, Agreements and matters contained in this Agreement. 7.3 Schedule "A" attached to this Agreement forms part of this Agreement. 8. NOTICES 8.1 Where this Agreement requires notice to be delivered by one party to the other, such notice shall be in writing and delivered either personally, by e -mail, by fax or by prepaid 6 registered first class post, by party wishing to give such notice, to the other party at the address noted below: Such notice shall be deemed to have been given: a) in the case of personal delivery, on the date of delivery; b) in the case of e -mail or fax, on the date of transmission provided it is received before 4:30 p.m. on a day that is not a holiday, as defined in the Interpretation Act, failing which it shall be deemed to have been received the next day, provided the next day is not a holiday; and, c) in the case of registered post, on the third day, which is not a holiday, following posting. Notice shall be given: To the Applicant at: 6034 Main Street Niagara Falls, ON L2G 5Z9 905- 357 -4966 To the City at: City of Niagara Falls City Hall Planning Development 4310 Queen Street P.O. Box 1023 Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5 Attention: Community Improvement Program Coordinator Telephone No: 905- 356 -7521, ext. 4298 Fax No: 905- 356 -2354 E -mail: bbolibruck @niagarafalls.ca 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed his hand and corporate seal duly witnessed and attested by the hands of the proper signing officers in that behalf and the said signing officers certify that they have authority to bind their corporation. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED In the presence of THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS R.T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK 1254225 ONTARIO INC. Name: Title: Name: Title: 8 SCHEDULE "A" of a Grant Agreement between the City and the Applicant named in this Agreement. Legal Description of land PT LT 14 E/S Portage Road; S of Peer PL 653 ABSTRACTED AS BLK VILLAGE OF NIAGARA FALLS AS IN NF 28682, S/T NF 28682; NIAGARA FALLS 9 September 10, 2007 PD- 2007 -69 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Niag araJ C A N A D A Re: PD- 2007 -69 Application for a Peer Robinson Residential Rehabilitation Grant within the Historic Drummondville CIP 5808 Peer Street RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Council approve the application for a Residential Rehabilitation Grant in the amount of $7,215.00 subject to meeting the program requirements including entering into an agreement with the City. 2. That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the grant agreement which is attached to this report as Appendix II. BACKGROUND: An application has been received for a Residential Rehabilitation Grant for 5808 Peer Street. This property is located within the Historic Drummondville CIP. The residential building has been used for a duplex for a number of years and complies with the current zoning. The owner wishes to carry out a number of exterior improvements which will improve the appearance of the home. The improvements include the replacement of exterior doors and windows, new shingles for the roof, shutters and landscaping. The improvements comply with the intent of the residential rehabilitation grant program which encourages the improved appearance of homes in the area. The proposed improvements for the residence will be $14,430.00 and the applicant is eligible for 50% or $7,215.00. A plan showing the location of the property is highlighted in Appendix I. As part of the grant approval process, the applicant will be required to enter into an agreement with the City. The agreement specifies the details for the grant which will be provided to the applicant following the completion of the work and inspection by City staff. The agreement is attached as Appendix II to this report. 4310 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Planning Development September 10, 2007 2 CONCLUSION: The proposed improvements for the residential home at 5808 Peer Street comply with the residential rehabilitation program of the CIP and will significantly improve the appearance of the existing dwelling. Therefore, the grant application can be supported. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Bob Bolibruck:tc Attachments Doug Darbyson, rector of Planning Development Ed Dujlovic, S: \PDR\2007 \PD- 2007 -69, Application for Residential Rehabilitation Grant, Patterson.wpd tive Director of Community Services acDonald, Chief Administ -tive Officer PD-2007-69 Location Map 5808 Peer Street IlL111111111111111111: 11111111111111.11111 WWI soilimilli ....r 0111111 11011110 111•1111•1 111•111.1. MUM Mom s !lir! �L NM= aimaiii Mow iii r a A I ll= LUNDY'S LANE amat 4 16 Y u :IN. 11 01110 NMI now maw num lea Hill s IIIU 11 lalla NMI s gyre num SP :SW t tit i in t i t i tr X1 6111011116.. IIIIII SION ter':: m im ■1 Inallm un ro oIIII �l'�= ■.tt1111 mill x Ittt11111tt►tli�1 II ll tl t 5808 Peer Street Hi storic Drummondville Community Imp rovement Project Area ��1 urarirr -t 1:NTS ��tttt■- �,l�f� August 2007 _...r te �itt�t a l..�if KAGIS Requests\2 006\ Custom\I ntemal\ PWnning \CIP \HistoHLD /ummaMVille.map THIS HISTORIC DRUMMONDVILLE PEER ROBINSON RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION GRANT AGREEMENT made this 10` day of September, 2007. BETWEEN: THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS (hereinafter referred to as the "City and FRANCIS AND PATRICIA PATTERSON (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant APPENDIX II WHEREAS the Applicant is the registered Owner of, lands described in Schedule "A" attached to this Agreement "the subject lands which are situated within the Historic Drummondville Community Improvement Project Area, and more specifically the area bound by Main Street, Peer Street, Allendale Ave. and Robinson Street, and the Applicant has applied to the City for a Peer- Robinson Residential Rehabilitation Grant "Grant under the City's Peer Robinson Residential Rehabilitation Grant Program "Program and the City has agreed to make such a Grant pursuant to Section 28 of the Planning Act and under By -Law No. 2006 -227; AND WHEREAS as a condition of approval of such a Grant, the Applicant is required by the City to enter into this Agreement; NOW THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION of the City making this Grant in the maximum amount of $7,215.00 to the Applicant, the Applicant and the City hereby agree: 1. INFORMATION ON SUBJECT LANDS 1.1 The Grant shall apply to the subject lands as set out in Schedule A attached. 1.2 The subject lands are /are not designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. 2. GRANT ELIGIBILITY 2.1 To be eligible for the Grant, the works on the subject land shall conform to and fulfill: a) the objectives and Program requirements of the Peer Robinson Residential Rehabilitation Grant Program and the Historic Drummondville Community Improvement Plan "CIP b) City policies and procedures for the Identification Remediation of Potentially Contaminated Sites under the Planning Act Application Review Process; and, c) any other requirements as specified by the City. 1 2.2 The Applicant acknowledges that it has received and read a copy of the City's Peer Robinson Residential Rehabilitation Grant Program Guide (the "Guide and the City's Historic Drummondville CIP, and the Applicant covenants with the City that the subject lands shall be restored /improved and the Grant provided for in this Agreement shall be applied in accordance with the City's objectives, policies and program requirements set out in the Guide and the City's Historic Drummondville CIP. 2.3 The City shall review all cost estimates submitted in support of the Application in evaluating the estimated rehabilitation costs eligible for the Grant, which costs, when designated by the City shall constitute the maximum amount of the total grant to be paid. In the event the City is not satisfied with said cost estimates, the City may substitute their opinion of such amounts for purposes of calculating the eligible rehabilitation costs for the Grant. If the City is not in receipt of sufficient information satisfactory to the City to determine rehabilitation costs and the amount of the Grant, the application will not be processed and the application file will be closed. The decision of the City regarding the total amount of rehabilitation costs, the calculation of the total estimated maximum Grant and the calculation of the actual Grant payments is final, absolute and within the City's sole discretion. 2.4 The City agrees to provide a Grant to the Applicant estimated as of the date of this agreement in the amount of $7,215.00. 2.5 The Grant will not be advanced by the City until: a) a Grant agreement has been signed and executed; b) the Applicant provides proof that the building and property improvement works are complete, including a final colour photograph(s) of the property and building clearly showing the completed works; and, c) the property and building has been inspected by municipal staff. 3. PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE APPLICANT 3.1 At the time of application for the Program, the Applicant shall have submitted to the City for its review and acceptance a colour photograph of the existing residential dwelling, architectural drawing /design plans showing the proposed improvement works and any other supporting documentation required by the City. 3.2 The Applicant will complete all eligible works as specified in the approved Grant application, and in documentation submitted in support of the Grant application, including but not limited to the architectural /design drawings, specifications, contracts, and cost estimates. As the City is relying upon this information, if the information in this Agreement, the associated application, and /or any supporting documentation submitted to the City is, in the opinion of the City, incomplete, false, inaccurate or misleading, the Grant may be reduced and /or delayed, and /or cancelled, and where part or all of the Grant has already been paid by the City, such payments shall be repaid by the Applicant as required by the City. 2 3.3 The Applicant shall not commence any works that are the subject of a Grant Application prior to receiving approval of the Grant Application, and approval and execution of this Agreement. 3.4 The Applicant agrees that the rehabilitation works made to buildings shall be made in compliance with all required Building Permits, and constructed in accordance with the Ontario Building Code and all applicable zoning by -aw requirements, municipal requirements and other approvals required at law. 3.5 The Applicant shall complete construction of all improvements within one (1) year of Grant approval, failing which, unless extended by the City, this Grant approval shall be at an end, there shall be no Grant, and this Agreement shall be terminated. The deadline imposed by this paragraph shall not include delays that are outside the control of the Applicant. 3.6 Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall provide the City with documentation satisfactory to the City as to the amount of the actual costs of the improvement works incurred by the Applicant. 3.7 The Applicant shall ensure there are no liens or other claims outstanding in respect of the subject lands, and that all accounts for work and materials which could give rise to any claim for a construction lien against the subject lands have been paid. 3.8 The Applicant shall ensure that the Applicant is in compliance with the Construction Lien Act, including its holdback provisions and is not aware of any potential or unresolved Lien claim in respect of the redevelopment. 3.9 The Applicant agrees to comply with all outstanding work orders and /or orders or requests to comply from any and all City departments prior to or as a condition of Grant approval. 3.10 The Applicant covenants to the City that where the subject lands for any reason cease to be in the Applicant's name by sale, assignment or otherwise, prior to the advance of part or all of the Grant, the Applicant will notify the City in writing of said pending ownership change at least 30 days prior to the ownership change taking place. 3.11 The Applicant acknowledges that without limiting the generality of the other provisions of this Agreement: a) the onus and responsibility is upon the Applicant at all times to assume all costs of restoration and improvement and to apply for and obtain, at the Applicant's expense, all approvals required from the City and all other agencies for said works, including but not limited to all Official Plan Amendments, rezoning bylaws, minor variances, and site plan approval; b) nothing in this Agreement limits or fetters the City in exercising its statutory jurisdiction under the Planning Act or under any other legislative authority or 3 by -law and that in the event the City decides to deny or oppose or appeal any such decision, that such action by the City is not in any manner limited by reason of the City entering into this Agreement; c) the Applicant releases the City from any liability in respect of the City's reviews, decisions, inspections or absence of inspections regarding the facade restoration/improvement works and the Applicant agrees that it is its responsibility at all times to prepare and implement its works; d) nothing in this Agreement is intended to impose or shall impose upon the City any duty or obligation to inspect or examine the land for compliance or non compliance or to provide an opinion or view respecting any condition of development; and, e) nothing in this Agreement is intended to be or shall be construed to be a representation by the City regarding compliance of the land with: (1) applicable environmental laws, regulations, policies, standards, permits or approvals, or, (2) other by -laws and policies of the City. 3.12 If the City determines in its sole discretion that any of the conditions of this Agreement are not fulfilled, the City may at its sole discretion cease or delay payment of the Grant, and the Applicant agrees that notwithstanding any costs or expenses incurred by the Applicant, the Applicant shall not have any claim for compensation or reimbursement of these costs and expenses against the City, and that the City is not liable to the Applicant for losses, damages, interest, or claims which the Applicant may bear as a result of the lapse of time (if any) where the City is exercising its rights herein to either delay a Grant payment pending compliance with this Agreement, or to terminate this Agreement. 3.13 The Applicant shall indemnify and save harmless from time to time and at all times, the City and its officers, employees, councillors, and agents from and against all claims, actions, causes of action, interest, demands, costs, charges, damages, expenses and loss made by any person arising directly or indirectly from: a) the City entering into this Agreement; and b) any failure by the Applicant to fulfil its obligations under this Agreement. This indemnification shall, in respect of any matter arising prior to the termination of this Agreement, remain in force following termination or expiry of this Agreement. 4. PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE CITY 4.1 The City agrees to provide a Grant to the Applicant estimated as of the date of this agreement in the amount of $7,215.00, subject to and in accordance with the terms and provisions set out in this Agreement. 4.2 The City reserves the right to require a third party review or independent audit, at the Applicant's expense, of all documentation submitted in support of the Application or during the administration of the Grant. 4 4.3 The City, its employees and agents are entitled to inspect the subject lands and all fixtures and improvements upon the subject lands at any time during usual business hours for the purpose of ascertaining their condition or state of repair or for the purpose of verifying compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. 4.4 The City retains the right at all times not to make any or all of Grant payments or to delay payment where the City deems that there is non compliance by the Applicant with this Agreement. 4.5 Except where expressly stated in this Agreement, all conditions in this Agreement are for the benefit of the City and may only be waived by the City. No waiver is effective unless in writing. 5. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES 5.1 The Applicant agrees to maintain in good repair the improvements for which the Grant is provided. In the event that the Applicant does not maintain in good repair said improvements, the City may: a) serve on the Applicant a written Notice to Repair detailing the particulars of the failure to maintain and the particulars of needed repairs; and, b) provide the Applicant with at least 30 days to make such repairs. 5.2 On the occurrence of Default under this Agreement, the City shall be entitled to its remedies to enforce this Agreement, including, but not limited to: a) delaying or ceasing the release of the Grant; b) requiring repayment of the Grant; and /or c) terminating this Agreement. 5.3 Default shall be deemed to occur upon any default of the Applicant in complying with the terms set out in this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the following: a) the as constructed works do not comply with the description of the works as provided in the Application Form and Required Documents; b) the works are not undertaken in conformity with the Ontario Building Code and all applicable zoning requirements and planning approvals; c) the building is damaged by fire or otherwise, and repair or reconstruction is not commenced with 90 days; d) the Applicant is in property tax arrears with respect to the property for more than 90 days; e) any representation or warranty made by the Applicant is incorrect in any material respect; f) failure to perform or comply with any of the obligations contained in this Agreement or contained in any other Agreement entered into between the Applicant and the City; 5 g) the Applicant makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or assigns in bankruptcy or takes the advantage in respect of their own affairs of any statute for relief in bankruptcy, moratorium, settlement with creditors, or similar relief of bankrupt or insolvent debtors, or if a receiving order is made against the Applicant, or if the Applicant is adjudged bankrupt or insolvent, or if a liquidator or receiver is appointed by reason of any actual or alleged insolvency, or any default of the Applicant under any mortgage or other obligation, or if the subject lands or interest of the Applicant in the subject lands becomes liable to be taken or sold by any creditors or under any writ of execution or other like process; h) construction ceases for a period of 60 days due to the Applicant's default (strikes and Acts of God excepted) and /or the Applicant abandons the property or project; I) if this Agreement is forfeited or is terminated by any other provision contained in it. 5.4 The City may at its sole discretion, provide the Owner with an opportunity to remedy any default. 6. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 6.1 The approved architectural /design drawings referred to may be amended by the Applicant and the City from time to time, as they may agree. 6.2 Time shall be of the essence with respect to all covenants, Agreements and matters contained in this Agreement. 6.3 Schedule "A" attached to this Agreement forms part of this Agreement. 7. NOTICES 7.1 Where this Agreement requires notice to be delivered by one party to the other, such notice shall be in writing and delivered either personally, by e -mail, by fax or by prepaid registered first class post, by party wishing to give such notice, to the other party at the address noted below: Such notice shall be deemed to have been given: a) in the case of personal delivery, on the date of delivery; b) in the case of e -mail or fax, on the date of transmission provided it is received before 4:30 p.m. on a day that is not a holiday, as defined in the Interpretation Act, failing which it shall be deemed to have been received the next day, provided the next day is not a holiday; and, c) in the case of registered post, on the third day, which is not a holiday, following posting. 6 Notice shall be given: To the Applicant at: 6870 Imperial Court Niagara Falls, ON L2G 7W9 905- 357 -4385 To the City at: City of Niagara Falls City Hall Planning Development 4310 Queen Street P.O. Box 1023 Niagara Falls, ON L2E 6X5 Attention: Community Improvement Program Coordinator Telephone No: 905-356-7521, ext. 4298 Fax No: 905- 356 -2354 E -mail: bbolibruck @niagarafalls.ca 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed his hand and corporate seal duly witnessed and attested by the hands of the proper signing officers in that behalf and the said signing officers certify that they have authority to bind their corporation. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED In the presence of THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS R.T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK FRANCIS PATTERSON PATRICIA PATTERSON 8 SCHEDULE "A" of a Grant Agreement between the City and the Applicant named in this Agreement. Legal Description of Land PT LT F PL267 Village of Niagara Falls; PT LT 14 E/S Portage Road, S of Peer PL 653 ABSTRACTED AS BLK 14 Village of Niagara Falls As In R0613614; Niagara Falls 9 September 10, 2007 PD- 2007 -76 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Niag araj CANADA Re: PD- 2007 -76 PLC 04/2007, Request for Removal of Part Lot Control Lot 45, Registered Plan 59M -338 (Garner Estates Phase 5) 6928/6938 Courtney Crescent Owner: 1692747 Ontario Inc. (Brenda Glassman) RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Council approve the request and pass the by -law included in tonight's agenda to designate Lot 45, Registered Plan 59M -338, as exempt from Part Lot Control. 2. That the applicant be given one year to create the individual parcels and notify the City when the separate deeds have been registered. BACKGROUND: The Owner has submitted a request to remove a property on Courtney Crescent from Part Lot Control (see attached letter and Schedule 1). This process enables the division of lots or blocks within a registered plan of subdivision. The general intent of removing Part Lot Control is for the minor redesign of subdivision lots or the separation of semi detached or on- street townhouse units. The subject land is within the Garner Estates Phase 5 plan of subdivision (59M -338) that was registered in November 2005. This subdivision was approved with 101 single detached lots and one lot for a semi detached dwelling (Lot 45 the subject land). The applicant proposes to divide this property into 2 Tots for the future construction of single detached dwellings. The attached draft Reference Plan (Schedule 2) indicates the proposed configuration of the separate lots. The land is currently zoned Residential Single Family and Two Family (R2) through Zoning By -law No. 79 -200. This zoning category permits both single- detached and semi detached dwellings. Lot 45 was originally established as an oversized semi detached lot to allow accessible dwelling designs for persons with disabilities. The minimum R2 zone standards for single- detached lots are 12 metres (39.4 feet) for lot frontage and 370 square metres 4310 Queen Street, PO. Box 1023, Niagara falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905- 356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Planning Development September 10, 2007 2 PD- 2007 -76 (3982.7 square feet) for lot area. The proposed lots (Parts 1 and 2 on Schedule 2) would exceed the zoning requirements for single- detached dwellings. There are planned single detached dwellings in the neighbourhood and the subject land abuts City property to be developed for an active park to the south and a stormwater management area /trail system to the east. The proposed new lots will be compatible with the area. Approval of a Part Lot Control by -law is required so that a new property line can be created to separate the lots and allow their sale. A time period of one year is recommended to permit the transfer of the parcels. Service laterals were previously installed for Lot 45 on the basis of a semi detached dwelling on the land. The two municipal water lines to the property boundary were located close to the centre point of the overall lot. Staff has advised the current owner, and future purchasers should be aware, that these water laterals may need to be relocated through the building permit/construction process in order to be positioned within the street frontage of each proposed lot. CONCLUSION: The removal of Part Lot Control will permit the division of the subject land to create two lots that comply with zoning provisions for single- detached dwellings. The use of this Planning Act mechanism is appropriate. The applicant should advise the City when the land transactions described in this report have been completed. The by -law to designate the land as exempt from Part Lot Control is included in tonight's Council agenda. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: R.Wilson:gd Attach. John MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer S: \PDR\2007 \PD- 2007 -76, PLC -04 -2007, 1692747 Ontario Inc., Garner Estates Phase 5.wpd 1 >oug Darbyson Director of Planning Development Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services July 5, 2007 The City of Niagara Falls Planning and Development 4310 Queen Street P.O. Box 1023 Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 6X5 Attention: Richard Wilson MCIP, RPP Re: Dear Mr. Wilson: 6928 Courtney Crescent, Niagara Falls, Ontario Lot 45 Plan 59M338 Registered Owner: 1692747 Ontario Inc. I am the sole officer, director and shareholder of 1692747 Ontario Inc., the registered owner of the above property. There are no mortgages, liens, encumbrances etc. registered against the said property. When the original plan was about to be registered by the developer River Realty Development (1976) Inc., I attended at the Planning Department in order to have 2 lots joined as one for the purpose of erecting 2 semi detached buildings. This was done. I am a paraplegic and consequently it was my intention to erect 2 semi- detached buildings suitable for persons with disabilities. Unfortunately, I have been unable to obtain the necessary government funding and consequently I must abandon my original intention. I would now like to restore Lot 45 to its original designation, which was 2 single lots. I met with you recently and you indicated that this required removal of part lot control, and a sketch for review /preliminary reference plan. I am pleased to enclose herewith this documentation. I would be obliged if you would call me to advise what further requirements exist including the payment of any fees. Your very truly rrenda Glassman 8267 Mount Olive Crescent Niagara Falls, Ontario L2H 2Y9 905- 357 -3544 Planning Scanned File' 5(4)64 VIS'd n RECEIVED JUL 0 6 2007 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT Removal of Part Lot Control Lot 45, Registered Plan 59M -338 6928/6938 Courtney Crescent Subject Land K: \GIS_Requests \2007 \Schedules \PLC\6928 6938_Courtney.map SCHEDULE 1 Location Map r- m NM ft w p C RES Parkland W DR 11111 Kate S. Durdan/ Loretto Elementary School N Scale 1:NTS August 2007 N88'42'30 "E feel .620 C. 1.620 N40 22'45'W 62 LOT 46 P.556 64284 1185(57) (PLAM 8 MEAS.) PART 2 44.896 N86.22'10"W (REFERENCE BEARING) SCHEDULE LOT 45 PLAN 59M -338 Z .a c r- 0 y 0 2 Ay 689 46. 9813'42 r ti 0 a ✓y r0 J PART 2 s i,,� �-6, o 2? BLOCK 770 REGISTERED PLAN 59M -324 P•LN. 64284- 1063(LT) 53.200 (PLAN 0 MEAS.) P.I.N. AREA ALL OF 64264- 1164(LT) 679.2 sq.m 795.0 sq.m 1 REQUIRE THIS PLAN TO BE DEPOSITED UNDER THE LAND TITLES ACT JULY 4. 2007 DATE ANDREW CAMERON Ontario Land Surveyor PLAN 59R— RECEIVED AND DEPOSITED DATE ASS'T DEPUTY LAND REGISTRAR FOR THE LAND TITLES DIVISION OF NIAGARA SOUTH (59) NOTES ALL FOUND MONUMENTATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WAS PLANTED BY Matthews, Cameron, Heywood Kerry T. Howe SURVEYING LTD. OR A PREDECESSOR FIRM UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. METRIC NOTE DISTANCES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE IN METRES AND CAN BE CONVERTED TO FEET BY DIVIDING BY 0.3048 BEARING NOTE BEARINGS ARE ASTRONOMIC AND ARE REFERRED TO THE SOUTHERLY LIMIT OF LOT 45 AS SHOWN ON REGISTERED PLAN 59M -338, HAVING A BEARING OF N86'22'70 "W. LEGEND -it DENOTES SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT SET IT IRON TUBE CC CUT CROSS IIB II IRON BAR STANDARD IRON BAR SSIB SHORT STANDARD IRON BAR 180 ROUND IRON BAR CM CONCRETE MONUMENT CP CONCRETE PIN Sr WASHER (wit) DENOTES WITNESS (OH) ONTARIO HYDRO PLAN PLAN 59M -338 MT0 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION OF ONTARIO N2,0 or 71.4 Mother', Cameron. Heywood Kerry T. Howe SURVEYING LTD. N Mo. S South E East W e Wet moos meow o prop proportion PLAN OF SURVEY OF LOT 45, REGISTERED PLAN 59M -338 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA MATTHEWS, CAMERON, HEYWOOD KERRY T. HOWE SURVEYING UMITED 5 0 5 19 15 20 METRES 1 300 2007 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I CERTIFY THAT 1, THIS SURVEY AND PLAN ARE CORRE T AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SURVEYS ACT, THE SURVEYO S ACT AND THE LAND TITLES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS MA E UNDER THEM 2. THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON JULY 4, 2007 DATE ANDREW CAMERON Ontario Land Surveyor MATTHEWS, CAMERON, HEYWOODeKERRY HOWESURVEYIN6 LTD, 5213 Slade? Mese Unll +l, Wagers 648, Wade L2E 762 Phone(9O5)358 -3693 Fox(905)358 -6124 98 Church Sheet, 9. Calhwines, OnlerIs L23 358 Phone(905)687 -3500 31ow0 A.T. (Checked 4.c. IL.L.N. 38140 (File 2007 -159 G:: lob ,98000.38246333140Wwg138140.dwg RPLAN 9E14817 Jul 04, 200710:54nma08eesen September 10, 2007 R- 2007 -22 NiagaraFalls CANADA His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: R- 2007 -22 A.G. Bridge Park Site for Proposed Boys Girls Club RECOMMENDATION: That a community information meeting regarding the use of A.G. Bridge Park for the proposed new Boys Girls Club facility be coordinated by staff and be held in October 2007. BACKGROUND: On May 28, 2007, the recommendations were outlined in Report 2007 -15 based on the Feasibility Study: Proposed New Boys Girls Club and approved by Council. The site analysis outlined that the site at McLeod Road not be supported. Further review was identified as needed to determine which of the three City parks sites (Ker, Palmer and A.G. Bridge) evaluated would be selected as the location for the new facility. The Boys Girls Club of Niagara provided confirmation in their July 11, 2007 that the organization supports A.G. Bridge Park as the park site for the new facility. A summary of the discussion from the October 2007 community information meeting will be outlined in the next update report to Council on the project, expected in November 2007. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: r) 0 1 l 1A OA Denye Morrissey, Dir ctor of Parks, Recreation Culture r Ed Dujlovic, Eecutive Director of Community Services Montrose Road, Unit Niagara Falls ON,Canada L2H 3N3 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca John MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Parks, Recreation Culture September 10, 2007 R- 2007 -23 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: RECOMMENDATION: Niag araa11s CANAD Re: R- 2007 -23 Contract for the Supply Installation of a New Splash Pad Play Area at The Park at the MacBain Community Centre. That the proposal from ABC Recreation Ltd., for the supply and installation of a complete and operational splash pad play area at The Park at the MacBain Community Center in the amount of $179,793.05 excluding GST, be approved. BACKGROUND: A Request for Proposal was issued through the Supply Services Section to invite companies to submit designs for a specified budget cost for a new Splash Pad Area at the MacBain Community Centre Park. Three (3) companies submitted proposals to the City. Staff completed a thorough review of each proposal and preferred the ABC Recreation design submission. The decision for the successful splash pad proposal was not based solely on the price, since the $190,000 budget available was specified in the Request for Proposal. Factors such as number of splash play elements, play value, accessibility, design appearance and maintenance were considered in the decision making process. This project, with a budget of $190,000 was approved in the 2007 Capital Budget for the MacBain Community Centre Park Development as part of the Phase 2 Park Amenities. ontrose Road, Unit 1, Niagara Fails ON, Canada L2H 3N3 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department Parks, Recreation Culture September 10, 2007 Splash Pad Area Costs (excluding GST): Splash Pad Play Area (with rubberized play surface) Concrete Walkway Apron for Splash Pad Funding: Funding for this work is available in the following accounts: Park Development Charges PRC Capital Construction Program PRC Reserve Funds Public Purpose Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Total: 179,793.05 Total: 2 R- 2007 -23 169,793.05 10,000.00 63,000.00 61,793.05 55,000.00 179,793.05 ptiLi Deny Ed Dujlovic, J. Claydon S: \Council \Council 2007 \R 2007 -23 MacBain Community Centre Park Development Splash Pad.wpd 'rector of Parks, Recreation Culture xecutive Director of Community Services MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer September 10, 2007 MW- 2007 -97 His Worship Mayor Ted Salci, and Members of the Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Members: Re: MW- 2007 -97 Union Marsh Municipal Drain Final Engineer's Report Consideration Meeting Reconvened RECOMMENDATION: Niag araJ CANADA 1. That the City adopts the Final Engineer's Report on the Union Marsh Municipal Drain prepared under the authority of Section 78 of the Drainage Act, R.S.O., 1989 being the initial report dated January 30, 2006 and the amending report dated August 23, 2007. 2. That the City gives two readings to the by -law (provisional) which will initiate the appeal process. BACKGROUND: This is a reconvening of the last Report Consideration Meeting on July 9, 2007 which resulted in a Council resolution directing the consultant, KSmart Associates to amend the report to reflect the landowners petition. This petition requested that the west branch works for the QEW upstream be eliminated from the proposed construction. The petition also requested that the City of Niagara Falls landowners assessment be paid from the general levy. Therefore, the attached amended report prepared by KSmart Associates reflects Council's resolution on assessment payment and reducing the scope of works in this project. Pursuant to the Drainage Act, the passing of the provisional by -law (two readings) which have been included in this evening's agenda, will initiate the appeal process with the mandated scheduling of the Court of Revision. Once all appeals are settled, a third reading of the by -law will be necessary prior to initiating the tender and construction phase of this project. 4310 Queen Street, P.O.' Box 1023, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada L2E 6X5 905 -356 -7521 www.niagarafalls.ca Working Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department September 10, 2007 2 MW- 2007 -97 The details and design parameters are described in the attached Engineer's Report which has been provided to all assessed landowners. Additional funding for this project will be pending 2008 Budget approval. Council's concurrence with the above recommendations would be appreciated. Recommended by: Approved by: Respectfully submitted: Attach: R.Volpini S: \REPORTS \2007 Reports \MW 2007 -97 Union Marsh.wpd Geoff Holm n, dir- tor of Municipal Works Ed Dujlovic, Ex'utive Director of Community Services John MacDonald, Chief Administrative Officer Dear Friend: Re: Union Marsh Municipal Drain Niagara,Falls CANADA .+ate Municipal Works Scanned File' ca 1 Please find enclosed changes to the Final Engineer's Report on the Union Marsh Municipal Drain as prepared by the City's consultants KSmart Associates. The enclosed changes are reflective of City Council resolutions from July 9, 2007, namely: that the west branch works for the QEW upstream be eliminated from the proposed construction, as per the residents' petition; and that the City of Niagara Falls landowners assessment be paid from the general levy. The report reflects Council's resolutions on assessment payment and reducing the scope of works in this project and amends the Engineer's report of January 30, 2006. As per Section 78 of the Drainage Act, City Council will consider the adoption of the Engineer's Final Report at their September 10, 2007 City Council Meeting. Also, the Council will consider the provisional by -law which will initiate the appeal process with the mandated scheduling of the Court of Revision. You will be notified in the near future of the scheduling of the Court of Revision. Copies of the Council report and provisional by -law will be available through the City's website by September 6, 2007. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Mr. Rick Volpini, Project Manager, 905- 356 -7521, Ext. 4221. K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS KITCHENER SUDBURY CHATHAM ENGLEHART RAINY RIVER 85 McIntyre Drive Kitchener, ON N2R 11-18 August 23, 2007 ADDENDUM NO. 1 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls Tel: 519-748-1199 Fax: 519- 748.6100 File No. 03 -039 BACKGROUND The objective of this Addendum is to amend the original Union Marsh Drain 2006 report dated January 30, 2006 to address issues that arose during consideration of the report before City Council on July 9, 2007. At the meeting on July 9, 2007 Council passed the following resolution: "that a grant be provided for residents of Niagara Falls for works associated with the Union Marsh Drain and that works associated with the West Branch of the drain be eliminated" This Addendum addresses primarily the second part of the above resolution with respect to modifying the recommended work on the West Branch of the Union Marsh Drain. The items that are addressed by this Addendum are summarized as follows: West Branch Maintenance work to be undertaken under this report on the West Branch is modified to only include work on the branch from the Main Drain upstream to the north side of the QEW. No maintenance work will be undertaken upstream or south of the QEW on the West Branch. The West Branch upstream of the QEW remains part of the Union Marsh Drain as defined in the original report. Thiel property Marshall Road The allowances and assessments to this property, which is located on and along the west side of the West Branch on the south side of Marshall Road, have been adjusted to recognize a severance on this property that had been missed in the original report. Schedule of Assessments Schedule A has been modified to recognize no maintenance work on the West Branch upstream (south) of the QEW and the severance on the Thiel property as noted above. Schedule B remains unchanged except for the severance on the Thiel property. Schedule C has been modified to reflect the changes made in Schedule A and to illustrate the grant being considered by the City of Niagara Falls. West Branch The original request for maintenance work on the Union Marsh Drain came from the Director of Public Works for the City of Niagara Falls to ensure proper drainage for all City Roads within the watershed. Initial comment was that maintenance work should be considered on the West Branch upstream to Bossert Road which is the most upstream traveled road that crosses the West Branch. Several owners had suggested that maintenance be considered upstream (south) from Bossert Road to the centre of the E'/2 Lot 7, Concession 5 (south limits of the Brouillette property Roll No 004 080 -00). e Consulting Engineers of Ontario Email: info @ksniart.on.ca www.ksmart.on.ca Addendum No. 1 Union Marsh Drain 2006 2 August 23, 2007 The original report therefore recommended maintenance work on the West Branch from the Main Drain outlet upstream to the south limits of the Brouillette property. At public meetings held during the preparation of the report and at the two meetings to consider the report before Council a number of owners on the West Branch upstream of the QEW objected to having maintenance work completed on the West Branch. Between the two meetings to consider the report before Council the City received a petition requesting abandonment of the West Branch upstream of the QEW. This petition was determined to not meet the requirements of Section 84 of the Drainage Act and therefore was not acted on. However, at the fmal meeting to consider the report on July 9, 2007 City Council requested that work be eliminated on the West Branch as noted in the resolution quoted above. Following the July 9 meeting the Director of Public Works indicated that maintenance work was not required to continue to Bossert Road on the West Branch under this report. However, it was determined that the maintenance work recommended on the West Branch from the Main Drain outlet to the north side of the QEW is required to provide adequate drainage outlet for the QEW and City roads, therefore not all maintenance work on the West Branch should be eliminated. The West Branch upstream of the QEW remains as part of the Union Marsh Drain and any upstream owner can provide a written request to the City for future maintenance work on the West Branch upstream of the QEW. The following sections of the original report are amended as outlined below to reflect the reduced extent of maintenance work to be undertaken on the West Branch of the Union Marsh Drain. SUMMARY West Branch Drain cleanout is recommended on the West Branch from the outlet into the Main Drain upstream to the north limits of the QEW in the northeast part of Lot 10, Concession 5. Depth of cleanout will average 250mm. In some locations no bottom excavation will be required. In many locations it will be necessary to clear the channel cross section of all brush and fallen trees. A 10m wide path will be cleared along one bank to permit the work. Minor cleanout may be required through the road culverts on the West Branch. No cleanout is required on the QEW culvert and no maintenance work is to be completed upstream (south) of the QEW. Total length of drain to be cleaned out: 11,037m Main Drain 3,250m; East Branch 3,838m; Trendle Branch 580m; West Branch 3,369m The estimated cost of the project is $239,900. RECOMMENDED WORK West Branch The West Branch is to be cleaned out from the Main Drain outlet upstream to the north limits of the QEW in the northeast part of Lot 10, Concession 5. The cleanout depth will vary from 200min to 500mm The cleanout will not be continuous as in many locations the existing channel bottom is at or below the proposed grade. The estimated cost for a new crossing for Jeffery Susin (west part of the north part Lot 14, Concession 3 Roll 003 145 -01) was presented to Mr. Susin prior to completing this report. Mr. Susin elected not to have a culvert installed under this report. If a culvert is installed on this property it should be a 1400mm diameter pipe or any other type of crossing that will have an end area equal to that for a 1400mm diameter pipe (1.5 square metres or 16 square feet). Con Lot Roll No. Owner Main Dr West Br East Br Trendle Br Total 111 7,8 114100 1683163 Ontario Inc. 2,200 2,200 I 18 209400 Niagara Parks Commission 600 600 18 209500 City of Niagara Falls 50 50 I 18 209600 Niagara Parks Commission 800 800 I 18 209700 Barry Heather Trendle 50 50 1 18 212200 Milena Jovicic 100 100 II 17,18 215101 1662718 Ontario Inc. 700 700 II 17 215600 Gary Landry 300 300 II 15 &16 215900 Rosina Costa 700 700 II 16 216300 1662718 Ontario Inc. 600 600 11 15 216400 1662718 Ontario Inc. 700 700 II 14 216600 Wilfred Maria Weber 300 200 500 1,000 II 13 216900 Rosanne Arthur Federow 200 200 II 13 216902 L. Knofe H. -J. Herrman 400 400 II 12 217100 J. Maslek M. Manojlovich 300 300 II 12 217700 Ralph Biamonte 300 300 II 12 217703 Richard Donna Chamberlain 200 200 II 11 217800 Steven Heather Barnett 400 400 II 11 217900 708020 Ontario Inc. 300 300 II 10 218200 Natale Lana Giampa 200 200 II 9 218500 Olga Norman Watson 100 100 II 9 218503 Bertram Susan Watson 100 100 II 9 218600 TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. 400 400 II 10 219000 Catharine Lapenna 200 200 II 10 219100 Frank Lapenna 200 200 III 15 314300 1664531 Ontario Inc. 400 400 III 14 314501 Jeffery Susin 1,300 1,300 111 9 317600 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 500 500 IV 13 319300 Gertrude Locher 900 900 IV 12 319500 Roberta Thiel 400 400 IV 12 319505 David Catherine Thiel 300 300 IV 11 319600 1664531 Ontario Inc. 900 900 V 11 322400 Ryszard Alice Rydygier 100 100 IV 8 402000 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 200 200 V 10 404900 Ryszard Alice Rydygier 300 300 4,900 4,800 6,700 16,400 Addendum No. 1 Union Marsh Drain 2006 3 COST ESTIMATE Allowances The table in the ori einal report is modified as outlined below: August 23, 2007 Table of allowances was also adjusted for the severance which had been missed on Roll No 003 195 -00. Addendum No. 1 Union Marsh Drain 2006 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 4 August 23, 2007 West Branch Main Drain junction to Ort Road 000 to 1 +150 Clear 10m wide path. Remove debris from channel. 14,700 Minor cleaning through two road culverts 600 1 +150 to 1 +392 Minor cleanout working within the channel 1,200 1 +392 to 1 +411 Minor cleaning through concrete road culvert 300 Ort Road to QEW 1 +411 to 3 +507 Clear 10m wide path, remove debris from channel, bottom cleanout Revised Subtotal West Branch Revised Subtotal Construction Contingencies Lump sum allowance for miscellaneous work including sediment and erosion control as required during construction ASSESSMENTS Total estimated cost in the original report $264,400 Revised total estimated cost $239,900 Decreased cost 24,500 15,800 32,600 140,100 13,300 Revised TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE: 153,400 ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE Construction Administration Supervision Assist with tender documents and tender call, review tenders, attend pre construction meeting, periodic construction inspection, payments, fmal inspection, post construction follow -up, review grant application Revised Total Construction Administration Supervision 15,500 Revised TOTAL ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE 65,000 Revised TOTAL ADMINISTRATION COST ESTIMATE 5,100 Revised ESTIMATED COST SUMMARY Allowances 16,400 Construction Cost 153,400 Engineering Cost 65,000 Administration 5,100 Revised TOTAL ESTIMATED COST 239,900 As indicated in the original report the assessment calculations were completed on drain intervals. In this calculation process the West Branch upstream of the QEW was an interval. The estimated cost of this interval was reduced by $24,500 as noted above. In this interval there remained a cost of $5,900 which is the Engineering cost for report preparation. In this interval all benefit assessments were deleted and the remaining total was assessed as outlet liability to the upstream watershed. A revised Schedule A and Schedule C are included with this addendum. All property ownership was updated based on current City assessment roll records. Schedule A was also revised for the severance which had been missed on Roll No 003 195 -00. Schedule C has been revised to illustrate the application of the grant being considered by the City of Niagara Falls to all privately owned parcels of land within the Union Marsh Drain watershed. Addendum No. 1 Union Marsh Drain 2006 ORIGINAL REPORT The above sections amend the original Union Marsh Drain 2006 report dated January 30, 2006. Revised Schedules A to C are included with the addendum. Only change to Schedule B was for the Thiel severance. All other sections of the report and the standard specifications in the original Union Marsh Drain 2006 report remain unchanged. The drawings for the Union Marsh Drain 2006 were revised as required to: delete reference to work upstream of the QEW on the West Branch show the severance on the Thiel property (Roll No 003 195 -00) update the ownership A complete set of revised drawings is included with the Addendum. The cost of preparing this Addendum will be included in the final cost for the Union Marsh Drain 2006 and will thus be assessed prorata with the total assessments in the revised Schedule C. All of which is respectfully submitted. K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED John Kuntze, P. Eng. 5 August 23, 2007 /Qa /o aes r o e4 W 9 J. W. KUNTZE m J b January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 F: K Smart file \union Marsh Dr* In \ReportNddendum \03- 039Schedules revised addendumxls SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls File No. 03-039 PAGE Al MAIN DRAIN WEST BRANCH EAST BRANCH TRENDLE BRANCH on Lot Roll No. (272513000 Owner Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total Approx ha Affected Beneft Outlet Total GRAND TOTAL II 7 111500 Estate of Frank Critelli Mark Ramella 3.1 54 54 0.0 3.1 122 122 0 0 0 176 II 7 111600 Mary Godak Louann Singleton 1.0 26 26 0.0 1.0 58 58 0 0 0 84 7 114100 1683163 Ontario Inc. 70.4 2.086 2,086 0.0 70,4 3,80 5,462 9,262 8.5 1,20 211 1,411 12,759 I 1 7 114200 Arthur Marlyn Kostuk 3.2 82 82 0.0 3.2 216 216 3.2 79 79 377 I I 6 114300 Hans Helga Zapp 8.6 221 221 0.0 10.5 581 581 10.5 260 260 1,062 I I 6 114400 Barbara Elson Richard Swot 2.0 51 51 0.0 2.0 135 135 2.0 50 50 236 18 209400 Niagara Parks Commission 2,50 0 2,500 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 2,500 17,18 209500 City of Niagara Falls 3,9 1,00 32 1,03 0.0 0.0 1,032 17,18 209600 Niagara Parks Commission 2,50 0 2,500 0.0 0.0 2,500 18 209700 Barry Heather Trendle 0.5 60 8 608 0.0 0.0 I 608 18 209800 Jack Kathy Quiquero 0.2 30 3 303 0.0 0.0 303 18 210000 Richard Brian Mann 0.4 7 7 0.0 0.0 7 18 210100 7 0,1 2 2 0.0 0.0 2 18 210200 Timothy McMillan 0,1 2 2 0.0 0.0 2 18 210300 Gerald &Deborah Migneault 0.1 2 2 0.0 0.0 2 17 211600 Michele Stranges 0,4 7 7 0.0 0.0 7 17 211700 Irene Coules 0,4 7 7 0.0 0.0 7 17 211800 Michelle Domenic Stranges 1.0 8 8 0.0 0.0 8 17 211900 Philip Jennifer Priddle 0.4 7 7 0.0 0.0 7 17 212000 David Nisbett 0.6 10 10 0.0 0.0 10 17 212100 Mark Elizabeth Caddis 0.6 10 10 0.0 0.0 10 17 212200 Milena Jovicic 4.0 30 33 333 0.0 0.0 333 16 212300 Robert Zupan Barbara Schoonings 1.6 33 33 0.0 0.0 33 16 212500 Benson Ida Brooks 0,2 10 10 0.0 0.0 10 16 212600 Albert Beryl Vout 0.1 6 6 0.0 "0.0 6 16 212601 Robert Janice Watson 2.3 31 31 0.0 0.0 31 16 212700 Eric Ellen Francis 0.1 3 3 0.0 0.0 3 16 212800 Audrey Willick 0.1 6 6 0.0 0.0 6 16 212900 Audrey Wllick Ellen Francis 0.1 1 1 0.0 0.0 18 212901 Robert Darla Watson 0.5 8 0.0 0.0 8 16 213300 Kevin Shirley Hotta 1.7 29 2 0.0 0.0 29 16 213301 James Francesca Zoretich 1.8 29 2 0.0 0.0 29 15 213302 Dorothy Gordon MacDonald 1.7 29 2• 0.0 0.0 29 15 213303 Carole Parker 1.7 29 2 0.0 0.0 29 15 213304 Teesdale Carol Colledge 1.5 25 2 0.0 0.0 25 18 215100 Joseph Joseph L. Ferro 0.2 3 0.0 0.0 3 17,18 215101 1662718 Ontario Inc. 36.2 4,60 269 4,86 0.0 0.0 4,869 156 18 215200 Nell Weaver 19.1 156 15 0.0 .0.0 18 215500 Gary Margaret Misner 0.9 15 1 0.0 0.0 i5 17 215600 Gary Landry 8.9 2,30 63 2,36 0.0 0.0 2,363 17 215700 Heinz Voss Estate of Karl Voss 8.9 67 6 0.0 0.0 67 17 215800 Nell Weaver 6,9 56 56 0.0 0.0 58 17 215804 Shirley Brookson 0.6 10 10 0.0 0.0 10 18 215805 Barbara David Maiden 0.6 10 10 0.0 0.0 10 15,16 215900 Rosina Costa 23.1 4,40 358 4,758 0.0 0.0 4,758 21 15 216000 Christopher Lynn Graham 0.4 21 21 0.0 0.0 15 216100 Gary Catherine Jamieson 6.4 157 157 0.0 0.0 157 16 216300 1662718 Ontario Inc. 23.1 3,80 561 4,361 0.0 0.0 4,361 15 216400 1662718 Ontario Inc. 28.1 4,40 565 4,965 0.0 0.0 4,965 14 216401 Antonio Pasqualina Fazio 2.1 28 28 0.0 0.0 28 14 216500 Antonio Angela Biancaniello 2.3 31 31 0.0 0.0 31 14 216501 Harry Ortnrd Bauer 1.2 47 47 0,0 0.0 47 14 216502 Mario Maria Criveller 1.2 47 47 0.0 0.0 47 14 216503 Giovanni Maria Stir•e 1.2 47 47 0.0 0.0 47 •ismm®" i 6 13 216600 216900 Donald Judith Cockburn ElerVIIIEECIINEEDMIEMIEEM Rosanne Arthur Federow ®IIIMINIZEM:li 4,5 105 105 r MEI 0.0 1' 900 IMM3 ••r MIME= 4.5 m' 1,100 New MilfiE 1,140 =IC 0 0 0 MEEN 1,245 13 216902 Liselotte Knofe H.J. Herrman 28.1 688. 688 0.0 28.1 2,800 260 3,060 0 0 0 3,748 12 217100 Jovo Maslek M. Manojlovich 9.9 255 255 0.0 9.9 1,300 168 1,468 0 0 0 1,723 12 217200 City of Niagara Falls 1.4 36 36 0.0 1.4 500 24 524 0 0 0 560 12 217400 Brian Cassidy Patricia Trendle 0.4 10 10 0.0 0.4 100 7 107 0 0 0 117 12 217500 Martin Somerville 0.4 21 21 0.0 0.4 100 14 114 0 0 0 136 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 F: K Smart file \union Marsh Dr* In \ReportNddendum \03- 039Schedules revised addendumxls SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls File No. 03-039 PAGE Al January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niepara Falls File No. 03-039 F \K Smart file \Union Marsh Draln \Repar8Addendum103- 039Schedules revised addendumsls PAGE A2 MAIN DRAIN WEST BRANCH EAST BRANCH TRENDLE BRANCH I Con Lot Roil No. (272513000-) Owner Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total GRAND TOTAL II 12 217600 Benjamin Trendle 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 100 14 114 0 0 0 0 135 II 12 217700 Ralph Biamonte 5.6 0 144 144 0.0 0 0 0 5.6 1,200 95 1,295 0 0 0 0 1,439 II 12 217701 Mara Kosanovich 8.3 0 214 214 0.0 0 0 0 8.3 0 142 142 0 0 0 0 356 II 12 217703 Richard Donna Chamberlain 1.4 0 36 36 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 900 24 924 0 0 0 0 960 II 11 217800 Steven Heather Barnett 14.2 0 366 366 0.0 0 0 0 14.2 2,500 428 2,928 0 0 0 0 3,294 II 11 217815 Anne Stevens 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 0 24 24 0 0 0 0 45 II 11 217900 708020 Ontario Inc. 9.6 0 247 247 0.0 0 0 0 9.6 6,450 289 6,739 0 0 0 0 6,986 II 10 218200 Natale Lana Giampa 8.5 0 180 180 0.0 0 0 0 8.5 2,100 407 2,507 0 0 0 0 2,687 II 10 218201 Max Kehl Rhonda Kavanaugh-Kehl 0.6 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0 0.6 0 71 71 0 0 0 0 102 II 10 218210 Frank Catherine Lapenna 1.0 0 49 49 0.0 0 0 0 1.0 0 110 110 0 0 0 0 159 II 10 218214 Harold Teresa Nelson 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 0 46 46 0 0 0 0 67 II 10 218216 Catherine Steven Pilon 0.4 0 10 10 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 22 11 9 218500 Olga Norman Watson 2.3 0 49 49 0.0 0 0 0 2.3 1,000 110 1,110 0 0 0 0 1,159 11 9 218501 Patricia Joseph Mills 0.4 0 13 13 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 500 30 530 0 0 0 0 543 11 9 218503 Bertram Susan Watson 0.9 0 36 36 0.0 0 0 0 0.9 1,000 81 1,081 0 0 0 0 1,117 II 9 218600 TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. 48.6 0 1,157 1,157 0.0 0 0 0 48.6 3,000 2,610 5,610 0 0 0 0 6,767 II 10 218800 Sherry Allen 0.8 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.8 0 24 24 0 0 0 0 45 II 10 218900 Johnny Jocelyn Lapenna 1.4 0 34 34 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 0 39 39 0 0 0 0 73 II 10 219000 Catharine Lapenna 1.4 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 1,500 37 1,537 0 0 0 0 1,568 II 10 219100 Frank Lapenna 1.4 0 34 34 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 1,500 39 1,539 0 0 0 0 1,573 II 10 219200 Felix Kathleen Lostracco 1.4 0 36 36 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 0 42 42 0 0 0 0 78 II 10 219300 Miroslaw Joanna Wityk 1.4 0 36 36 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 0 42 42 0 0 0 0 78 II 10 219401 Michael Thewliss Tracey Doolan 1.4 0 36 36 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 0 42 42 0 0 0 0 78 II 10 219501 Gary Sharon Hail 1.4 0 36 36 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 0 42 42 0 0 0 0 78 II 10 219601 Jeffrey Rosanne Somerville 1.4 0 36 36 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 0 42 42 0 0 0 0 78 II 10 219700 Anthony Bartkowiak Carol Blcugh 1.1 0 28 28 0.0 0 0 0 1.1 0 33 33 0 0 0 0 61 III 17 313700 Nadia Kosta 1.8 0 15 15 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 III 17 313800 Rudolph Brigitte Stegmann 3.8 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 III 17 313801 John Weaver 1.0 0 8 8 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 III 16 314000 Costa Family Holdings Inc. 5.9 0 152 152 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 III 16 314100 Ciro Angela Costa 7,8 0 201 201 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 III 15 314300 1664531 Ontario Inc. 39.8 0 946 946 39.8 2,700 570 3,270 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,216 III 14 314500 Mark Marcinkowski Lisa Travers 0.8 0 41 41 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 III 14 314501 Jeffery Susin 19.0 0 464 464 19.0 4,800 280 5,080 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5544 III 14 314600 Paul Linda Weaver 0.5 0 26 26 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 III 14 314601 Gary Linda Barkwill 0.5 0 26 26 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 III 14 314700 Orest Mary Szymanski 17.6 0 227 227 17.0 0 132 132 0.6 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 362 III 14 314800 Christine Tothpal 0.6 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0 0,6 500 12 512 0 0 0 0 543 III 14 314801 John Audstey 0.5 0 26 26 0.0 0 0 0 0.5 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 36 III 13 314900 Martin Ursula Bienzeisler 0.3 0 16 16 0,0 0 0 0 0.3 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 22 III 13 315000 Wayne Edna Sloggett 0.6 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0 0.6 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 43 III 13 315100 David Jessica Fowler 0.6 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0 0.6 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 43 III 13 315200 William Catherine Adams 1.7 0 44 44 0.0 0 0 0 1.7 0 17 17 0 0 0 0 61 III 13 315201 Keith Sandra Waller 17.7 0 415 415 11.8 0 159 159 5.9 0 57 57 0 0 0 0 631 III 13 315300 Adonis Dianne Somerville 0.2 0 10 10 0.0 0 0 0 0.2 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 14 III 13 315400 John Susan Pendergast 1.4 0 36 36 0.0 0 0 0 1.4 0 14 14 0 0 0 0 50 III 13 315402 Natale Rocco Brigante 1.5 0 38 38 0.0 0 0 0 1.5 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 53 III 13 315500 Dennis Lee Sargeson 0.3 0 16 16 0.0 0 0 0 0.3 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 22 III 13 315600 Vijay Kapur Alam Mahboob 16.6 0 296 296 6.3 0 50 50 10.3 0 75 75 0 0 0 0 421 III 12 315700 Bruce Nichols Rhonda McInnis Nichols 0.6 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0.6 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 32 III 11 315800 Thomas Leala Smith 38.6 0 978 978 0.0 0 0 0 38.6 0 703 703 0 0 0 0 1 681 III 12 315810 Thomas Valerie Smith 0.3 0 16 16 0.0 0 0 0 0.3 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 22 III 12 315900 John Jennifer Logan 0.1 0 6 6 0,0 0 0 0 0.1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 8 III 12 316000 Todd Canham Stephanie Harrison 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 29 HI 12 316100 Henry Linda Brideau 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 29 III 12 316200 Dominic Aiello Nicole Cesciano 9.1 0 23.4 234 0.0 0 0 0 9.1 0 167 167 0 0 0 0 401 III 12 316300 Adam Carol Hemming 0.8 0 41 41 0.0 0 0 0 0.8 0 16 16 0 0 0 0 57 III 12 316400 Joanne Kenneth Olsen 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 29 III 12 316500 Kevin Tracey Cooper 4.3 0 105 105 0.0 0 0 0 4.3 0 40 40 0 0 0 0 145 III 12 316600 John Debra Bimie 4.8 0 123 123 0.0 0 0 0 4.8 0 67 67 0 0 0 0 190 111 12 316700 City of Niagara Falls 0.6 0 31 31 0.0 0 0 0 0.6 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 43 III 11 316800 Richard Thresa Winger 0.2 0 10 10 0.0 0 0 0 0.2 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 14 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niepara Falls File No. 03-039 F \K Smart file \Union Marsh Draln \Repar8Addendum103- 039Schedules revised addendumsls PAGE A2 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 F \K Smart file \Union M rsh Drain \ReporOAddendum \03 039 Schedules revised addendumxis SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagera Falls File No. 03-039 PAGE A3 MAIN DRAIN WEST BRANCH EAST BRANCH TRENDLE BRANCH_ Con Lot Roll No. (272513000-) Owner Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total GRANO TOTAL III 11 316900 Thomas Susan McCabe 3.1 0 79 79 0.0 0 0 0 3.1 0 81 81 0 0 0 0 160 III 11 316901 Hans Hella Reinert 16.0 0 413 413 0.0 0 0 0 16.0 0 483 483 0 0 0 0 896 III 11 317000 Lewis Nancy Wllick 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 0 24 24 0 0 0 0 45 III 11 317100 Ronald June Wllick 0.2 0 10 10 0.0 0 0 0 0.2 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 22 III 10 317300 Donald Loretta Allen 9.3 0 227 227 0.0 0 0 0 9.3 0 265 265 0 0 0 0 492 III 10 317400 Edward Alicia Krawczyk 0.8 0 41 41 0.0 0 0 0 0.8 0 49 49 0 0 0 0 90 III 10 317500 John Gabor 19.9 0 442 442 0.0 0 0 0 19.9 0 827 827 0 0 0 0 1,269 III 9 317600 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 19.9 0 513 513 0.0 0 0 0 19.9 1,600 1,256 2,856 0 0 0 0 3,369 III 9 317700 Anthony Mary Cuviello 0.3 0 16 16 0.0 0 0 0 0.3 0 35 35 0 0 0 0 51 Ill 9 317800 Brad Laura Crichton 9.9 0 247 247 0.0 0 0 0 9.9 0 514 514 0 0 0 0 761 III 10 317801 1664531 Ontario Inc. 9.9 0 221 221 0.0 0 0 0 9.9 0 456 456 0 0 0 0 677 III 9 317802 Marlene Wllick Wendy Schaeffer 9.5 0 229 229 0.0 0 0 0 9.5 0 471 471 0 0 0 0 700 IV 14 319201 Diane Filer 2.0 0 26 26 2.0 0 16 16 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 IV 13 319300 Gertrude Locher 24.3 0 469 469 24.3 2,800 481 3,281 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,750 IV 13 319400 Good Gain Ltd. 7.0 0 180 180 7.0 0 207 207 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 387 IV 13 319401 Robert Mewhinney 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319420 Sandra Ventresca 3.7 0 95 95 3.7 0 110 110 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 205 IV 12 319430 Anna Di Cienzo 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319433 Anthony Di Cienzo 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319436 Angie Shavalier 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319439 Michael Di Cenzio 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319442 Emmy Baxter 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319446 Anna Manza 3.8 0 98 98 3.6 0 112 112 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 IV 12 319500 Roberta Thiel 6.2 0 154 154 6.2 700 177 877 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,031 IV 12 319501 Michael& Joan Stoll 19.1 0 388 388 19.1 1,200 347 1,547 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,935 IV 12 319503 Anna Manza 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319505 David Catherine Thiel 1.0 0 26 26 1.0 500 30 530 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 556 IV 12 319506 Dino Di Cienzo 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319509 Anthony Di Cienzo 0.4 0 21 21 0,4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319512 Emmy Baxter 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319515 Anna Di Cienzo 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319520 Alma Rees 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 12 319523 Dino Di Cienzo 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 .0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 11 319600 1664531 Ontario Inc. 60.4 0 1,253 1,253 37.7 2,700 827 3,527 22.7 0 273 273 0 0 0 0 5,053 IV 11 319700 Catharine Miller Jacqueline Boutin- Miller 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 11 319705 Brian Beth Smith 3.6 0 92 92 3.6 0 106 106 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 IV 12 319800 Earl Catherine Devoe 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 23 23 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 IV 10 319900 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 44.0 0 569 569 25.9 0 384 384 18.1 0 274 274 0 0 0 0 1 227 IV 9 320000 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 9.2 0 188 188 2.3 0 32 32 6.9 0 186 186 0 0 0 0 406 IV 9 320100 Old W lloughby Realty Ltd. 9.1 0 218 218 0.0 0 0 0 9.1 0 256 256 0 0 0 0 474 IV 9 320200 Catherine Venzon Wiliam Reich 9.1 0 160 160 4.8 0 86 86 4.3 0 99 99 0 0 0 0 345 IV 9 320300 Brock University Foundation 11.8 0 247 247 11.8 0 283 283 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 530 V 13 321900 Bauer's Poultry Inc, 1.5 0 38 38 1.5 0 44 44 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 V 12 322100 John Marshall 0.9 0 13 13 0.9 0 15 15 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 V 11 322105 Stephen Harris 2.6 0 34 34 2.6 0 38 38 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 V 12 322201 Bauer's Poultry Inc. 12.0 0 309 309 12.0 0 355 355 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 664 V 11 322400 Ryszerd Alice Rydygier 20.6 0 384 384 20.6 800 440 1,240 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 624 IV 8 402000 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 7.5 0 193 193 0.0 0 0 0 7.5 200 506 706 0 0 0 0 899 IV 7 402100 Estate of Elizabeth Boller 4.6 n 119 119 0.0 n 0 0 4.6 311 0 0 0 0 430 IV 7 402300 Thomas Patricia Simpson 2.0 51 51 0.0 0 0 0 2.0 135 135 0 0 0 0 186 IV 7 402400 Kelly Rees 0.4 0 21 21 0.0 0 0 0 0.4 0 53 53 0 0 0 0 74 IV 7 402500 Angelo Rizzo 16.9 435 435 1.6 0 0 0 15.3 1,139 -i, ion 0 0 0 0 1,574 IV 7 402700 Michael Charlotte Kerrio 28.9 0 618 618 28.9 0 1,182 1,182 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1,800 433 IV 8 402800 Paul Margaret Brunning 12.2 0 185 185 12.2 0 248 248 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IV 8 402900 Ronald Deborah Sebastian 4.8 0 123 123 0.0 0 0 0 4.8 0 324 324 0 0 0 0 447 >I> 8 403000 Maple Road Ltd. 39.8 0 0 772 772 22.7 000 645 645 17.1 0 0 0 1,152 1,152 0 000 0 0 0 L 0 0 2,569 6 403100 Joyce William Rudd 1.2 21.31 47 47 0.0 0 0 1.2 122 122 0 169 10 404701 Hans Zapp 275 275 21.3 315 315 0.0 0 0 0 590 V 10 404800 Transportation Ministry 1.1 0 16 16 1.1 0 17 17 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 V 10 404900 Ryszerd &Alice Rydygier 5.4 0 69 69 5.4 1,100 80 1,180 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,249 V 9 405000 John Walter 2.2 0 47 47 2.2 0 90 90 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 V 9 405100 Douglas Watchorn Dorothy Butler 0.5 0 18 18 0.5 0 35 35 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 F \K Smart file \Union M rsh Drain \ReporOAddendum \03 039 Schedules revised addendumxis SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagera Falls File No. 03-039 PAGE A3 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 F \K Smart ale 1 Unlon Marsh Drain\ReporilAddendum \03- 039 Schedules revised addendummis SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls File No. 03-039 PAGE A4 MAIN DRAIN WEST BRANCH EAST BRANCH TRENDLE BRANCH Con Lot Roll No. (272513000 Owner Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total Approx ha Affected Benefit Outlet Total Approx he Affected Benefit Outlet Total Approx he Affected Benefit Outlet Total GRAND TOTAL V 9 405300 Robert Barry Ewa Tiboldy 0.4 0 10 10 0.4 0 20 20 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 V 9 405400 Michael Margaret Pretty 0.5 0 18 18 0.5 0 35 35 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 V 9 405500 Michael Brian Krutasky 0.5 0 26 26 0.5 0 50 50 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 V 9 405600 Michael Christina Fazekas 0.5 0 26 26 0.5 0 50 50 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 V 9 405700 Leonard Wllems 0.1 0 6 6 0.1 0 10 10 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 V 9 405801 Gregory Pamela MacDonald 5.5 0 47 47 5.5 0 90 90 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 V 9 405803 Margaret Kenny 13.2 0 221 221 13.2 0 430 430 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 651 V 9 405815 Steven Apostolos 14.3 0 229 229 14.3 0 444 444 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 673 V 9 405900 Paul Rhonda Coleman 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 39 39 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 V 9 406000 Diane Deborah Masonovich 0.2 0 10 10 0.2 0 20 20 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 V 9 406100 Robert Mildred Maiott 0.3 0 16 16 0.3 0 29 29 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 V 9 406300 William Loma Watchom 0.3 0 16 16 0.2 0 29 29 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 V 9 406400 Jack Deborah Rush 0.2 0 10 10 0,2 0 20 20 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 V 9 406500 Kathleen Watchom 0.6 0 23 23 0.6 0 45 45 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 V 9 406600 William Betts 1.1 0 28 28 1.1 0 55 55 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 V 9 406700 Lucien Rose Rondeau 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 39 39 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 V 9 407300 Bill Pota Apostolos 0.8 0 21 21 0.8 0 39 39 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 V 8 407700 Ronald Margaret Ballinger 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 39 39 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 V 8 407800 Vera Bowman 39.8 0 921 921 39.8 0 1,790 1,790 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,711 V 8 407801 Clifford Brenda Ballinger 0.8 0 41 41 0.8 0 80 80 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 V 8 407901 Richard Laurel Waidick 2.8 0 72 72 2.8 0 140 140 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 212 V 7 408000 Rose Levesque John Brouillette 12.0 0 268 268 12.0 0 520 520 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 788 V 7 408100 Donald Holly Watchom 0.4 0 21 21 0.4 0 39 39 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 V 7 408200 Victor Sidin 4.1 0 105 105 4.1 0 205 205 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 310 V 7 408300 John North Samantha Gendron 7.6 0 147 147 7.6 0 286 286 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 433 V 7 408400 Adrian Rosa Formisano 15.7 0 375 375 15.7 0 729 729 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,104 V 7 408500 Ann Pellitieri 5.2 0 133 133 5.2 0 261 261 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 394 V 7 408502 Tracey Van Wylick 0.5 0 26 26 0.5 0 50 50 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 V 7 408504 Donald Patricia Krawec 3.3 0 85 85 3.3 0 165 165 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 V 8 408506 Tanya Mod 3.8 0 98 98 3.8 0 190 190 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 288 V 6 408600 Gordon Melissa MacLeod 45.0 0 1,073 1,073 45.0 0 2,085 2,085 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 158 V 6 408700 Robert Nancy Collucci 4.0 0 103 103 4.0 0 200 200 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 303 V 5 408800 Vincent Brenda Barry 4.8 0 100 100 4.8 0 195 195 0.0 295 V 5 408900 Donald Debra Devlin 9,9 0 255 255 9.9 0 495 495 0.0 750 V 5 409000 Amy Brunning Michael Lynch 4.9 0 126 126 4.9 0 244 244 0.0 370 V 5 409100 Peter Wilson 4.9 0 126 126 4.9 0 244 244 0.0 370 V 5 409200 Bruce Gail Jacobs 5.0 0 129 129 5.0 0 250 250 0.0 379 VI 4 416800 Everted Sharon Friskie 3.2 0 82 82 3.2 0 161 161 0.0 243 V,VI 5,6 416700 Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority 44.6 0 574 574 44.6 0 1,115 1,115 0.0 1,689 1 17 18 494000 Canadian Niagara Power Company 0.0 400 0 400 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 400 Total Assessments on Lands: 1439.2 29,400 31,136 60,536 648.5 18,200 19,165 37,365 549.3 35,45 22,55 58,00 24. 1,20 60 1,80 157,709 DEW MTO 37.2 0 3,828 3,828 22.2 6,000 2,623 8,623 15.0 6,00 4,054 10,05 5. 5,00 53 5,53 28,041 Willoughby Drive City of Niagara Falls 3.6 3,000 167 3,167 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,167 13 196 Sodom Road(Region Rd 116) Region of Niagara 9.0 0 700 700 1.1 2,000 51 2,051 5.8 9,80 645 10,44 Ort Road City of Niagara Falls 7.8 0 396 396 2.4 3,000 112 3,112 5.4 2,00 40 2,40 0.7 5 5 5,969 Stanley Avenue City of Niagara Falls 2.8 0 133 133 2.8 2,000 154 2,154 0.0 0 2 _klib,(ino Road City of Niagara Falls 4.0 0 309 309 4.0 0 573 573 0 0 882 Beck Road City of Niagara Falls 1.8 0 78 78 1.8 0 150 150 0 0 228 Sauer Road City of Niagara Falls 1.6 0 123 123 1.6 0 240 240 0 0 363 Shark Road City of Niagara Falls 4.8 0 123 123 3.3 0 165 165 1.5 10 10 0.5 1 1 402 Bossert Road City of Niagara Falls 6.0 0 299 299 •2.8 0 392 392 3.2 3,00 20 3,20 0 3 897 Detenbeck Road City of Niagara Falls 6.6 0 237 237 2.4 1,000 129 1,129 4.2 4,00 14 4,14 0 5 511 Marshall Road City of Niagara Fails 5.2 0 463 463 2.7 3,000 189 3,189 3.3 3,000 131 3,131 0 0 0 0 6,783 Miller Road City of Niagara Falls 3.6 4,000 154 4,154 2.0 3,000 31 3,031 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7185 Weaver Road City of Niagara Fails 2.9 4,000 208 4,208 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 208 Mick Road City of Niagara Fails 1.5 0 33 33 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Lemon Road City of Niagara Falls 0.5 0 13 13 0.5 0 26 26 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 Total Assessments on Roads 98.9 11,000 7,264 18,264 49.6 20,000 4,835 24,835 38.4 27,800 5,692 33,492 6.6 5,000 600 5,600 82,191 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS ON THE UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 1538.1 40,400 38,400 78,800 698.1 38,200 24,000 62,200 587.7 63,250 28,250 91,500 30.8 6,200 1,200 7,400 239,900 Notes: 1. All of the abase lands are classified as non- egdcuhrrel, except those as noted Pith an asterisk )which are rated egrlcultrel. Refer !so to page 12In report 2. section 21 a1 the Drainage Act, RSO 1990 requires that assessments beah wn opposite each parcel of land and road effected. The *fleeted parcels of land have bee Identead using the roll number from the last revised aneaement roll for the City. For convenience only, the owners names es shown by the last revised assessment roll. has also been Included. 1 1 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 F \K Smart ale 1 Unlon Marsh Drain\ReporilAddendum \03- 039 Schedules revised addendummis SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls File No. 03-039 PAGE A4 Roll No. Con Lot (272513000.) Owner MAIN DRAIN WEST BRANCH EAST BRANCH TRENDLE BRANCH (000 t0580) 000 50 1.074 (MCCredia 50 Willoughby) 000 to 2 +176 (WIlowhby to Br Junction) TOTAL -000 to 1+411 (Outlet to On Rd) 1 +411 to 3 +507 (Onto 0614) 3+507 to 5 +550 (OEW to McLeod) TOTAL 000 to 540 54010 1 +259 1 +259 to 1 +698 1 +698 to 2 +510 2 +510 to 3 +838 TOTAL II 111500 Estate of Frank Critelli Mark Remake 17 37 54 20 15 28 59 122 II 111600 Mary 00dak 8 Louann Singleton 6 18 26 10 7 13 28 58 III 114100 1883163 Ontario Inc. 662 1,424 2,086 788 591 1,062 2,268 4,553 9,262 1,411 III 114200 Arthur a Marllyn Kostok 26 56 82 31 23 42 90 30 216 79 III 114300 Hans &Helga Zapp 70 151 221 84 63 113 241 80 581 260 III 114400 Barbara Elsona Richard Swol 16 35 51 19 15 26 56 19 135 50 18 209400 Niagara Parksc 2,500 17,18 209500 CA) of Niagara Fells 1,032 1,032 17,18 209600 Niagara Parks Commission 2,500 2,500 18 209700 Berry Heather Trendle 608 608 18 209800 Jack 6 Kathy O, 303 18 210000 Richard 6 Brian Mann 7 7 18 18 210100 210200 7 Timothy McMillan 18. 210300 Gerald &Deborah Migneault 17 211600 Michelle Stranges n 17 211700 Irene Coules 17 211800 Michelle Dom 17 211900 Phibp&Jennife 7 17 212000 Do'd Malmo 10 10 17 212100 Mark B Elizabeth 10 17 212200 Wane Jowcic 333 333 16 212300 Robert Zupan& Beepers Schoonings 16 17 16 212500 Benson 8 M Brooks 3 7 10 16 212600 Albert &Beryl Vout 16 212601 Robert &Janice Watson 16 212700 Eric 8 Ellen Francis 16 212800 Audrey Mick N co 16 212900 Audrey Wllick Ellen Francis 16 212901 Robert Darla Watson I 16 213300 Kevin Shblay Hotta 14 29 I 16 213301 James 6 Francesca Znretich 14 29 I 15 213302 Dorothy 8 Gordon MacDonald 14 29 I 15 213303 carne Parker 14 29 I 15 213304 Teesdale& Carol 0,11.0ge 12 25 18 215100 Joseph Joseph L. Ferro 3 3 17,18 215101 1662718 Ontario Inc. 769 3,600 4,369 18 215200 Net Weever 156 156 18 215500 Gary Margaret Misner 15 15 17 215600 Gary Landry 63 2,300 2,363 17 215700 Helm Voss& Estate of Kart Voss 67 67 17 215800 Nell Weever 56 56 17 215804 Shirley Brooksan 10 10 18 215805 Barbara 8 David Maiden 10 10 15,16 15 215900 216000 Roslna Costa Christopher B Lynn Graham 127 7 4,631 14 4,758 21 15 216100 Gary &Cetherine Jemies0n 50 107 157 16 216300 1662718 Ontario leo. 189 4,172 4,361 15 216400 1662718 Ontario Inc. 204 4,761 4,965 14 216401 Antonio 6Pesguallna Fazio 9 19 28 14 216500 Antonio& Angela Blancenielio 10 21 31 14 216501 Harry Orttmd Bauer 15 32 47 14 218502 Marl, 6 Marla Criveller 15 32 47 11 14 216503 Giovanni Marie Stirpe 15 32 47 II 14 216504 Donald&Judim 15 32 47 II 14 216600 Wltred B Maria Weber 175 2,677 2,852 900 900 1,700 1,700 II 13 216900 Rosanne& Arthur Federow 33 72 105 40 1,100 1,140 II 13 216902 LHelatte Knee 6 H..1. Herrman 218 470 688 3,060 3 060 12 217100 Moo Maslek 6 M. Manopovich 81 174 255 Nr 'Tr CO CO vt OI N 1,372 1,468 12 217200 city ofNlagera Fags 11 25 36 510 I 524 12 217400 Brian Caasldy 6 Patricia Trendle 3 7 10 103 107 12 217500 Martin Somerville 7 14 21 106 114 12 217600 80,50,lo Trendle 7 14 21 106 114 12 217700 0001.0,014 46 98 144 1,241 1,295 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 SCHEDULE B Schedule of Assessment for Future Maintenance UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006, City of Niagara Fells File No. 03 -039 F'.W ame,elrl,WNan Merrl, nninretoM.ea.ra orooga95cneabe mvnee•afar*marp PAGE 81 Roll No. Con Lot (272513000 DWnef MAIN DRAIN WEST BRANCH EAST BRANCH TRENDLE BRANCH 000 580) 000501+074 (MoCredle 50 W111oughby) 000 to 2 +176 (434110ughby to Brjunetion) TOTAL 000551 +411 (Outlet to OM1 Rd) 1 +411 to 3 +507 (0,5t0 0E104 3 +507 to 5 +550 (OEW to Mcleod) TOTAL 000 le 540 540 to 1 +259 1 +259 to 1 +698 1 +698 t0 2 +510 2 +510 to 3 +838 TOTAL II 12 217701 Mara Kosanovich 68 146 214 81 61 142 II 12 217703 Richard 6 Donna Chamberlain 11 25 36 14 910 924 11 11 217800 Steven a Heather Bemett 116 250 366 138 104 2,686 2,928 il 11 217815 Anne Stevens 7 14 21 8 8 10 24 II 11 217900 7080200ntetlo inc. 78 169 247 93 70 2,226 2,389 218200 Netale 6 Lana Glampa 57 123 180 68 92 2,296 2,507 218201 Mao Kehl 6 Rhonda Kavanaugh -Kehl 10 21 31 12 16 34 71 0 218210 Frank Catherine Leponne 16 33 49 18 e 25 53 110 218214 Harold 6 Teresa Nelson 7 14 21 8 10 22 46 218216 Catherine a Steven Pion 3 7 10 4 5 12 218500 Olga a Norman Watson 18 33 49 18 14 25 1,053 1,110 218501 Patricia 3 Joseph Mins 4 9 13 5 4 7 514 530 0 218503 Bertram 6 Susan Watson 11 25 36 14 10 18 1,039 1,081 218600 TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. 367 790 1,157 437 327 589 4,257 5,810 218800 Sherry Allen 7 14 21 8 6 10 24 218900 Johnny 3 Jecalyne Lapenna 11 23 34 13 9 17 39 10 219000 Catharine Lapenna 10 21 31 12 18 1,500 1,537 10 219100 Frank Lnpenna 11 23 34 13 17 1,500 1,539 10 219200 Felix Kathleenl 11 25 36 14 0 18 42 10 219300 Mlmslaw Joanna Woyk 11 25 36 14 18 42 10 219401 Michael Thewliss 5 Tracey Dcolan 11 25 36 14 18 42 10 219501 Gary 6 Sharon Hall 11 25 36 14 18 42 219601 Jeffrey 6 Rosanne somerv5l, 25 36 14 10 18 42 t 0n 219700 313700 Anthony Bartkowlak 6 Carol Slough Nadia Nast* 0 N 19 28 15 11 8 14 33 313800 Rudolph Brigitte stegmann 31 313801 John Weaver 8 16 314000 Costa Famiy Holdings 48 104 152 16 314100 Ciro&Angela Costa 64 137 201 15 314300 1694531 050b0 Inc. 300 646 946 3,270 3,270 I 14 I 14 314500 314501 Man Meminkam Jeffery susln 13 147 28 317 41 464 5,080 5,080 14 314600 Paul 6 Linda Weaver 8 18 14 314601 Gary 6 Linda Refining 18 1 14 314700 Ores/ 6 Mary Szymanski 155 227 132 132 3 3 1 14 314800 Christine Tothpal O 21 512 512 14 314801 John Audsley 18 10 10 I 13 314900 Martin Ursula Bienneislar 11 16 6 8 13 315000 Wayne Edna sl 21 31 12 12 1 315100 David &Jessica Fowler 10 21 31 12 12 315200 mama Catherine 14 30 44 17 17 315201 Keith 8 Sandra Waller 131 284 415 159 159 57 57 315300 Adonis 6 Dianne Somerville 3 7 10 4 4 I 315400 John Susan Pendergast 11 25 36 14 14 315402 Nalale a Rocco 6rigante 12 26 38 15 15 13 315500 Dennis 6 Lee sergeson 11 16 6 6 13 315600 Vijay Kapur 3 Atam Menh000 202 296 50 50 75 I 75 12 315700 Bruce Nichols a Rhonda McInnis Nichols 16 23 11 315800 Thomas Leata Smith O 668 978 370 119 214 703 12 315810 'DOOMS Valerie Smith 11 16 6 6 12 315900 John &Jennifer Logan 4 8 2 2 I 12' 316000 Todd Canhem a Stephanie Harrison 7 14 21 10 CO n 0 0 0 m 1 a 12 316100 Henry 3 Linda Brideau 7 14 21 12 316200 Dominic Aiello 6 Nicole Casciano 74 160 234 0 0 28 50 I 12 316300 Adam& Carat Hamming 13 28 41 12 316400 Joanne Kenneth Olsen 7 14 21 12 316500 Kevin& Tracey Cooper 33 72 105 I 12 316600 John P. Debra Sirnie 39 84 123 47 7 13 67 I 12 316700 Ctty of Niagara Fans 10 21 31 12 12 11 316800 Richard 6Threw Winger 3 7 10 4 4 11 316900 Thomas& Susan McCabe 25 54 79 30 18 33 81• 11 316901 Hans 6Hella Reinert 131 282 413 156 117 210 483 11 317000 Lewis Nancy MINN 7 14 21 8 6 10 24 11 317100 Ronald JUne Vdllick 3 7 10 4 3 5 12 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007- Addendum i SCHEDULE B Schedule of Assessment for Future Maintenance UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006, City of Niagara Falls File No. 03-039 F?M an.m. nion 0.00, 000W ,por +YMMUnW>0rO4,neouhe,e..M ea]ntlumvh PAGE B2 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 SCHEDULE B Schedule of Assessment for future Maintenance UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006, City of Niagara Falls File No. 03-039 Fu amen ni•sumua ue,x d,.m a. ponumv .aMnxaaeam.m,w „..a.oae.wm.,s PAGE B3 MAIN DRAIN WEST BRANCH EAST BRANCH TRENDLE 000 to 1 +074 000 (0 2 +176 TOTAL 000 to 1+411 1 +411 to 3 +507 3 +507 to 5+550 TOTAL 000 to 540 540 to 1 +259 1 +259 to 1 +998 1 +598 to 2 +510 2 +510 to 3 +838 TOTAL BRANCH Roll No (MCCredle to (Willoughby to (Outlet to (Ort 50 DEW) (OEWto (000 to 580) Con Lot (272513000 Owner Wg0ughby) Br junction) Or( Rd) McLeod) I I I I I I I 10 10 317300 317400 Donald& Loretta Allen Edward Alicia KrawdZyk 72 13 155 28 227 41 86 16 64 12 115 21 265 49 III 10 317500 John Gabor 140 302 442 167 126 226 308 827 III 317600 Old Wlloughby Realty Ltd. 163 350 513 194 144 261 493 1,764 2858 91 317700 Anthony Mary Ou +<Ilo 5 11 16 6 4 8 17 35 III 0 317800 Brad Laura Crichton 78 169 247 93 70 126 225 I 514 III 317801 1864531 Ontario Inc. 70 151 221 84 63 113 198 458 III 317802 Marlene Mick 8 Wendy Schaeffer 73 156 229 87 65 117 202 471 14 319201 Nene Filer 8 18 26 16 16 13 319300 Gertrude Locher 149 320 469 282 2,999 3,281 13 319400 Good Gain Lw, 57 123 180 109 98 207 13 319401 Robert MeWninney 7 14 21 12 11 23 12 319420 Sandra Ventresca 30 65 95 58 52 110 12 319430 Anne DI Cienzo 7 14 21 12 11 23 12 319433 Anthony Dl Cleft] 14 21 12 11 23 12 319438 Angle shoveller 14 21 12 11 23 12 319439 Michael Di Canals 14 21 12 11 23 12 319442 Emmy eater r 14 21 12 11 23 12 319446 Anne Monza 67 98 59 53 112 12 319500 Roberta Thiel 105 154 93 784 877 12 319501 Michael &Joan t._.. 265 388 234 1,313 1,547 12 319503 Anna Monza 14 21 12 11 23 12 319505 David& Catherine Thiel 18 28 18 514 530 12 319508 Dino Di Cienzo V 14 21 12 (1 23 12 319509 Anthony Dl Cienzo 14 21 12 11 23 12 319512 Emmy Baxter 14 21 12 11 23 12 319515 Anne Dl Cienzo 14 21 12 11 23 12 319520 Alma Rees 7 14 21 12 11 23 12 319523 Dino DI Cienzo 7 14 21 12 11 23 11 319600 1694531 Ontario trio. 398 855 1,253 435 3,092 3,527 201 26 48 273 11 319700 Catharine miller Jacqueline Boutin 7 14 21 12 11 23 11 319705 Brian &Beth Small 29 63 92 58 50 106 12 319800 Earl &Cathenne Devoe 7 14 21 12 11 23 319900 Old WUloughby Realty Ltd. 181 388 569 202 182 384 89 66 119 274 320000 Old Willoughby Realty ltd. 60 128 188 17 15 32 80 45 81 I 186 0 320100 014Winoughby Realty Ltd. 69 149 218 83 62 111 258 320200 Catharine Venz0n&William Reich 51 109 160 45 41 86 32 24 43 99 320300 Brock Univers+y Foundation 78 169 247 149 134 283 13 321900 Bauer's Poultry Inc. 12 26 38 23 21 44 12 322100 John Marshall 4 9 13 8 7 15 11 322105 Stephen Hams 11 23 34 20 18 38 12 322201 Bavers Poultry Inc. 98 211 309 187 168 355 11 322400 Ryszard& Alice Rydygler 122 262 384 232 1,006 1,240 402000 Old Wllooghby Realty ltd. 61 132 193 73 55 98 210 270 708 402100 Estate of Elizabeth Bollen 38 81 119 45 34 60 129 43 311 r 402300 Thomas Patricia Simpson 16 35 51 19 15 26 58 19 135 402400 Kelly Rees 7 14 21 8 6 10 22 7 53 402500 Angelo Rizzo 138 297 435 164 123 222 473 157 1,139 1 402700 Mlchos!& Charlotte Kardo 196 422 618 372 335 765 1,472 402800 Paul& Margaret BrunnI•- 59 126 185 112 101 56 269 402900 Ronald Deborah 39 84 123 47 35 63 134 45 324 403000 Maple Road Ltd, 245 527 772 201 180 426 807 166 125 224 478 159 1,152 CO 403100 Joyce William Rudd 15 32 47 18 13 24 50 17 122 404701 Hans Zapp 87 188 275 166 149 1,900 2,215 404800 Transportation n 5 11 16 9 8 900 917 404900 Ryazerd Agee RydYgier 22 47 69 42 1,138 1,180 405000 John Wafter 32 47 28 '00 0 0 f' N N N 59 112 405100 Dosses Watcher,,_ Butler 12 11 23 44 405300 Robert Berry a Ewa "Moldy 7 10 6 13 25 405400 Mianae10 Margaret Pretty 12 18 11 23 44 0 405500 Michael Brian Krotaoky 0 18 26 16 33 63 405600 Michael Christine Fazekes 18 28 18 33 63 405700 Ladnerd Wdems 4 8 3 7 13 405801 Gregory Pamela MacDonald 32 47 28 1,859 1,912 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 SCHEDULE B Schedule of Assessment for future Maintenance UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006, City of Niagara Falls File No. 03-039 Fu amen ni•sumua ue,x d,.m a. ponumv .aMnxaaeam.m,w „..a.oae.wm.,s PAGE B3 Roll No. Con Lot (272513080 Owner MAIN DRAIN WEST BRANCH EAST BRANCH TRENDLE BRANCH (000 to 580) 000 to 1 +074 (M00005le to Wllaupn5y) 000 to 2+176 p TOTAL 00o to 1+411 (Outlet to d) 1+411 to 3 +507 (Oct to OEW) 3.507 to 5 +550 PEW to McLeod) TOTAL 000 to 540 540 to 1 +259 1 +259 to 1 +698 1 +698 to 2 +510 2 +510 to 3 +838 TOTAL V 9 405803 Margaret Kenny 70 151 221 134 120 784 1,038 a V 9 405815 Steven Apostalos 73 156 229 138 124 294 556 V 9 405900 Paul Rhonda Coleman 7 14 21 12 11 26 49 V 9 406000 Olen. Deborah Stlasonovich 3 7 10 6 6 13 25 406100 Robert Mildred Melon 11 16 20 37 406300 Wiliam Loma Watchom 11 16 20 37 406400 Jock Deborah Rush 7 10 13 25 m 406500 Kathleen Wareham 16 23 nr 30 57 406600 Moroeehs 19 28 36 68 406700 L0Nen Si Rose Rondea0 14 21 26 49 407300 Bill a Pots Apostolos 14 21 26 49 407700 Ronald Margaret Ballinger 7 14 21 12 11 26 49 407800 Vara Bowman 292 629 921 558 500 3,881 4,937 407801 Gafford& Brenda Balan(er 13 28 41 25 22 553 600 m 407901 Rmhard Laurel walalek 23 49 72 44 39 1,792 1,875 408000 Rose Levesque a John Bmuillette 85 183 268 162 145 3,243 3,550 408100 Donald Holy Welchorn 7 14 21 12 11 26 49 408200 Victor9ldin 33 72 105 64 57 635 756 408300 John Hotta& Samanthacenamn 47 100 147 89 80 1,188 1,357 408400 Aamn Rasa FormNano 119 256 375 228 204 482 912 1- 408500 Ann Pellaied 42 91 133 81 73 172 326 408502 Tracey Vanwylick 8 18 28 18 14 33 63 408504 Donald Patricia Krawec 27 58 85 51 46 109 206 0,10 (0 N N 10 N 1n 408506 Tanya Moo 31 87 98 59 53 125 237 408600 Gordon& Melissa MacLeod 341 732 1,073 648 583 3,876 5,107 408700 Rabart &Nancy C011ucdi 33 70 103 62 56 132 250 408800 Vincent& Brenda Barry 32 68 100 61 54 629 744 408900 Donald Debra Datum 81 174 255 154 138 327 619 409000 Amyerunntng Mi'chael Lynch 40 66 126 76 68 162 306 409100 Peterwdson 40 88 126 78 68 162 306 409200 Bruce &Oeil Jacobs 41 88 129 78 70 165 313 VI 4 416800 Everett Sharon Friskie 26 56 82 50 45 106 201 V,VI 5,6 416700 Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority 182 392 574 346 312 735 1,393 I 17 18 494000 Canadian Niagara Power Company 400 400 Total Assessments on Lands: 18,647 41,389 60,036 16,350 15,714 25,944 58,008 10,279 8,407 9,806 18,003 7,183 53,858 1,800 QEW MTO 1,215 2,613 3,828 1,381 7,242 8,623 583 444 789 1,681 8,557 10,054 5,538. Willoughby Drive City of Niagara Falls 3,085 79 3,167 Sodom Road(Region Rd 116) Region of Niagara 221 479 700 2,051 2,051 3969 94 138 6,244 10,445 Ort Road City of Niagara Falls 126 270 396 3,112 3,112 80 51 92 140 2,046 2,409 52 Stanley Avenue City of Niagara Falls 42 91 133 81 2,073 2,154 King Road City of Niagara Fails 98 211 309 187 168 346 701 Beck Road City of Niagara Falls 25 53 78 47 42 99 188 1 Sauer Road City of Niagara Falls 39 84 123 75 67 158 300 Shark Road City of Niagara Falls 39 84 123 51 46 2,609 2,706 15 11 20 42 14 102 12 Bossert Road City of Niagara Falls 95 204 299 131 117 5,228 5,478 31 23 42 90 3,020 3,206 Detenbeck Road City of Niagara Falls 75 162 237 68 1,061 1,129 47 35 4,063 4 145 Marshall Road City of Niagara Falls 147 316 463 126 3,063 3,189 96 3,035 3,131 Miller Road City of Niagara Fails 49 4,105 4,154 3,031 3,031 Weaver Road City of Niagara Falls 71 4,137 4,208 Wlllick Road City of Niagara Falls 19 14 33 Lemon Road City of Niagara Falls 4 9 13 9 7 16 32 Total Assessments on 80a50' 5,353 12,911 18,264 10,350 13,886 8,456 32,692 4921 3,693 5,144 8,197 11,637 33,492 5,600 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS ON THE UNION MARSH DRAIN 24,000 54,300 78,300 26,700 29,600 34,400 90,700 15,100 12,100 14,950 26,200 18,800 87,150 7,400 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 FAN amen 0.+Urle11 MeruOnlO opertuemnan000 10ne&b nnns. .Marwnas SCHEDULE 8 Schedule of Assessment for Future Maintenance UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006, City of Niagara Fells File No. 03-039 Notes 1. A110100 above lands are obasified as non- agricultural, exeept Mese as noted with an asmrhk(•(which are rated agncuIWnl Refer a so to page 12 In rep 5. 2, Section 21 elate Drainage Ad, RSO 1990 requires that aaaesaments be shown opposite each parcel al and and road affected. The affected parcels of len have been ldentillaa using the rot number from the last revised assessment roll for Ma City. For convenience only, the owners names as shown by the lest revised assessment roll, has also been Included. PAGE B4 Con Lot Roll No. (272513000 Owner Estimated Assessment minus 1/3 Grant minus Allowances Sub total minus City Grant NET 11 7 111500 Estate of Frank Critelli Mark Ramella 176 176 176 11 7 111600 Mary Godak Louann Singleton 84 84 84 III 7 114100 1683163 Ontario Inc. 12,759 2,200 10,559 10,559 III 7 114200 Arthur Marilyn Kostuk 377 377 377 III 6 114300 Hans Helga Zapp 1,062 1,062 1,062 111 6 114400 Barbara Elson Richard Swol 236 236 236 1 18 209400 Niagara Parks Commission 2,500 600 1,900 1,900 I 17,18 209500 City of Niagara Falls 1,032 50 982 982 1 17,18 209600 Niagara Parks Commission 2,500 800 1,700 1,700 I 18 209700 Barry Heather Trendle 608 50 558 558 I 18 209800 Jack Kathy Quiquero 303 303 303 I 18 210000 Richard Brian Mann 7 7 7 1 18 210100 2 2 2 I 18 210200 Timothy McMillan 2 2 2 1 18 210300 Gerald &Deborah Migneault 2 2 2 I 17 211600 Michelle Stranges 7 7 7 I 17 211700 Irene Coutes 7 7 7 1 17 211800 Michelle Domenic Stranges 8 8 8 1 17 211900 Philip Jennifer Priddle 7 7 7 1 17 212000 David Nisbett 10 10 10 1 17 212100 Mark Elizabeth Caddis 10 10 10 I 17 212200 Milena Jovicic 333 100 233 233 1 16 212300 Robert Zupan Barbara Schoonings 33 33 33 1 16 212500 Benson Ida Brooks 10 10 10 1 16 212600 Albert Beryl Vout 6 6 6 1 16 212601 Robert Janice Watson 31 31 31 1 16 212700 Eric Ellen Francis 3 3 3 1 16 212800 Audrey Willick 6 6 6 1 16 212900 Audrey Willick Ellen Francis 1 1 1 I 16 212901 Robert Dorla Watson 8 8 8 1 16 213300 Kevin Shirley Hotte 29 29 29 1 16 213301 James Francesca Zoretich 29 29 29 I 15 213302 Dorothy Gordon MacDonald 29 29 29 1 15 213303 Carole Parker 29 29 29 1 15 213304 Teasdale Carol Colledge 25 25 25 II 18 215100 Joseph Joseph L. Ferro 3 3 3 II 17,18 215101 1662718 Ontario Inc. 4,869 700 4,169 4,169 II 18 215200 Nell Weaver 156 156 156 II 18 215500 Gary Margaret Misner 15 15 15 II 17 215600 Gary Landry 2,363 300 2,063 2,063 II 17 215700 Heinz Voss Estate of Karl Voss 67 67 67 11 17 215800 Nell Weaver 56 56 56 II 17 215804 Shirley Brookson 10 10 10 11 18 215805 Barbara David Maiden 10 10 10 II 15,16 215900 Rosina Costa 4,758 1,586 700 2,472 2,472 11 15 216000 Christopher Lynn Graham 21 21 21 11 15 216100 Gary Catherine Jamieson 157 157 157 II 16 216300 1662718 Ontario Inc. 4,361 1,454 600 2,307 2,307 II 15 216400 1662718 Ontario Inc. 4,965 700 4,265 4,265 II 14 216401 Antonio Pasqualina Fazio 28 28 28 11 14 216500 Antonio Angela Biancaniello 31 31 31 11 14 216501 Harry Ortrud Bauer 47 47 47 11 14 216502 Mario Maria Criveller 47 47 47 11 14 216503 Giovanni Maria Stirpe 47 47 47 11 14 216504 Donald Judith Cockbum 47 47 47 11 14 216600 Wilfred Maria Weber 5,452 1,000 4,452 4,452 11 13 216900 Rosanne Arthur Federow 1,245 200 1,045 1,045 11 13 216902 Liselotte Knofe H.-J. Herrman 3,748 400 3,348 3,348 II 12 217100 Jovo Maslek M. Manojlovich 1,723 574 300 849 849 11 12 217200 City of Niagara Falls 560 560 560 II 12 217400 Brian Cassidy Patricia Trendle 117 117 117 II 12 217500 Martin Somerville 135 135 135 II 12 217600 Benjamin Trendle 135 135 135 II 12 217700 Ralph Biamonte 1,439 300 1,139 1,139 11 12 217701 Mara Kosanovich 356 119 237 237 II 12 217703 Richard Donna Chamberlain 960 200 760 760 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 SCHEDULE C Schedule for Actual Cost Bylaw UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls File No. 03-039 PAGE C1 F:\K Smart files \Union Marsh Drain Report \Addendum \03- 039 Schedules revised addendum.xls Con Lot Roll No. (272513000 Owner Estimated Assessment minus 1/3 Grant minus Allowances Sub total minus City Grant NET 11 11 217800 Steven Heather 8amett 3,294 400 2,894 2,894 II 11 217815 Anne Stevens 45 45 45 II 11 217900 708020 Ontario Inc. 6,986 300 6,686 6,686 II 10 218200 Natale Lana Giampa 2,687 200 2,487 2,487 II 10 218201 Max Kehl Rhonda Kavanaugh -Kehl 102 102 102 II 10 218210 Frank Catherine Lapenna 159 159 159 II 10 218214 Harold Teresa Nelson 67 67 67 II 10 218216 Catherine Steven Pilon 22 22 22 II 9 218500 Olga Norman Watson 1,159 100 1,059 1,059 II 9 218501 Patricia Joseph Mills 543 543 543 II 9 218503 Bertram Susan Watson 1,117 100 1,017 1,017 II 9 218600 TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. 6,767 400 6,367 6,367 II 10 218800 Sherry Allen 45 45 45 II 10 218900 Johnny Jocelyne Lapenna 73 73 73 II 10 219000 Catharine Lapenna 1,568 200 1,368 1,368 II 10 219100 Frank Lapenna 1,573 200 1,373 1,373 II 10 219200 Felix Kathleen Lostracco 78 78 78 II 10 219300 Miroslaw Joanna Wityk 78 78 78 II 10 219401 Michael Thewliss Tracey Doolan 78 78 78 11 10 219501 Gary Sharon Hall 78 78 78 II 10 219601 Jeffrey Rosanne Somerville 78 78 78 II 10 219700 Anthony Bartkowiak Carol Slough 61 61 61 111 17 313700 Nadia Kosta 15 5 10 10 III 17 313800 Rudolph Brigitte Stegmann 31 31 31 III 17 313801 John Weaver s 8 8 8 III 16 314000 Costa Family Holdings Inc. 152 152 152 III 16 314100 Ciro Angela Costa 201 201 201 III 15 314300 1664531 Ontario Inc. 4,216 1,405 400 2,411 2,411 III 14 314500 Mark Marcinkowski Lisa Travers 41 41 41 III 14 314501 Jeffery Susin 5,544 1,848 1,300 2,396 2,396 III 14 314600 Paul Linda Weaver 26 26 26 III 14 314601 Gary Linda Barkwill 26 26 26 III 14 314700 Orest Mary Szymanski 362 362 362 III 14 314800 Christine Tothpal 543 543 543 III 14 314801 John Audsley 36 36 36 III 13 314900 Martin Ursula Bienzeisler 22 22 22 III 13 315000 Wayne Edna Sloggett 43 43 43 III 13 315100 David Jessica Fowler 43 43 43 III 13 315200 William Catherine Adams 61 61 61 III 13 315201 Keith Sandra Waller 631 631 631 III 13 315300 Adonis Dianne Somerville 14 14 14 III 13 315400 John Susan Pendergast 50 50 50 III 13 315402 Natale Rocco Brigante 53 53 53 III 13 315500 Dennis Lee Sargeson 22 22 22 III 13 315600 Vijay Kapur Alam Mahboob 421 421 421 III 12 315700 Bruce Nichols Rhonda McInnis Nichols 32 32 32 III 11 315800 Thomas Leala Smith 1,681 1,681 1,681 II I 12 315810 Thomas Valerie Smith 22 22 22 III 12 315900 John Jennifer Logan 8 8 8 III 12 316000 Todd Canham Stephanie Harrison 29 29 29 III 12 316100 Henry Linda Brideau 29 29 29 111 12 316200 Dominic Aiello Nicole Casciano 401 401 401 III 12 316300 Adam Carol Hemming 57 57 57 III 12 316400 Joanne Kenneth Olsen 29 29 29 III 12 316500 Kevin &Tracey Cooper 145 145 145 111 12 316600 John Debra Birnie 190 190 190 III 12 316700 City of Niagara Falls 43 43 43 III 11 316800 Richard Thresa Winger 14 14 14 111 11 316900 Thomas Susan McCabe 160 160 160 III 11 316901 Hans Hella Reinert 896 896 896 III 11 317000 Lewis Nancy Willick 45 45 45 III 11 317100 Ronald June Willick 22 22 22 III 10 317300 Donald Loretta Allen 492 492 492 III 10 317400 Edward Alicia Krawczyk 90 90 90 III 10 317500 John Gabor 1,269 1,269 1,269 III 9 317600 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 3,369 500 2,869 2,869 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 SCHEDULE C Schedule for Actual Cost Bylaw UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls File No. 03-039 PAGE C2 F \K Smart files \Union Marsh Drain \ReporMddendum \03 -039 Schedules revised addendumxls Con Lot Roll No. (272513000 Owner Estimated Assessment minus 1/3 Grant minus Allowances Sub total minus City Grant NET III 9 317700 Anthony Mary Cuviello 51 51 51 III 9 317800 Brad Laura Crichton 761 254 507 507 III 10 317801 1664531 Ontario Inc. 677 677 677 III 9 317802 Marlene Willick Wendy Schaeffer 700 700 700 IV 14 319201 Diane Filer 42 42 42 IV 13 319300 Gertrude Locher 3,750 1,250 900 1,600 1,600 IV 13 319400 Good Gain Ltd. 387 387 387 IV 13 319401 Robert Mewhinney 44 44 44 IV 12 319420 Sandra Ventresca 205 205 205 IV 12 319430 Anna Di Cienzo 44 44 44 IV 12 319433 Anthony Di Cienzo 44 44 44 IV 12 319436 Angie Shavalier 44 44 44 IV 12 319439 Michael Di Cenzio 44 44 44 (V 12 319442 Emmy Baxter 44 44 44 IV 12 319446 Anna Manza 210 210 210 IV 12 319500 Roberta Thiel 1,031 400 631 631 IV 12 319501 Michael Joan Stoll 1,935 645 1,290 1,290 IV 12 319503 Anna Manza 44 44 44 IV 12 319505 David Catherine Thiel 556 300 256 256 IV 12 319506 Dino Di Cienzo 44 44 44 IV 12 319509 Anthony Di Cienzo 44 44 44 IV 12 319512 Emmy Baxter 44 44 44 IV 12 319515 Anna Di Cienzo 44 44. 44 IV 12 319520 Alma Rees 44 44 44 IV 12 319523 Dino Di Cienzo 44 44 44 IV 11 319600 1664531 Ontario Inc. 5,053 900 4,153 4,153 IV 11 319700 Catharine Miller Jacqueline Boutin Miller 44 44 44 IV 11 319705 Brian Beth Smith 198 198 198 IV 12 319800 Earl Catherine Devoe 44 44 44 IV 10 319900 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 1,227 1,227 1,227 IV 9 320000 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd- 406 406 406 IV 9 320100 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 474 474 474 IV 9 320200 Catharine Venzon William Reich 345 345 345 IV 9 320300 Brock University Foundation 530 530 530 V 13 321900 Bauer's Poultry Inc. 82 27 55 55 V 12 322100 John Marshall 28 9 19 19 V 11 322105 Stephen Harris 72 72 72 V 12 322201 Bauers Poultry Inc. 664 221 443 443 V 11 322400 Ryszard Alice Rydygier 1,624 541 100 983 983 IV 8 402000 Old Willoughby Realty Ltd. 899 200 699 699 IV 7 402100 Estate of Elizabeth Bolien 430 430 430 IV 7 402300 Thomas Patricia Simpson 186 186 186 IV 7 402400 Kelly Rees 74 74 74 IV 7 402500 Angelo Rizzo 1,574 1,574 1,574 IV 7 402700 Michael Charlotte Kerrio 1,800 1,800 1,800 IV 8 402800 Paul Margaret Brunning 433 144 289 289 IV 8 402900 Ronald Deborah Sebastian 447 447 447 IV 8 403000 Maple Road Ltd. 2,569 856 1,713 1,713 IV 6 403100 Joyce William Rudd 169 169 169 V 10 404701 Hans Zapp 590 590 590 V 10 404800 Transportation Ministry 33 33 33 V 10 404900 Ryszard Alice Rydygier 1,249 300 949 949 V 9 405000 John Walter 137 137 137 V 9 405100 Douglas Watchom &Dorothy Butler 53 53 53 V 9 405300 Robert Barry Ewa Tiboldy 30 30 30 V 9 405400 Michael Margaret Pretty 53 53 53 V 9 405500 Michael Brian Krutasky 76 76 76 V 9 405600 Michael Christina Fazekas 76 76 76 V 9 405700 Leonard Willems 16 16 16 V 9 405801 Gregory Pamela MacDonald 137 137 137 V 9 405803 Margaret Kenny 651 651 651 V 9 405815 Steven Apostolos 673 224 449 449 V 9 405900 Paul Rhonda Coleman 60 60 60 V 9 406000 Diane Deborah Masonovich 30 30 30 V 9 406100 Robert Mildred Malott 45 45 45 V 9 406300 William Lorna Watchom 45 45 45 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 SCHEDULE C Schedule for Actual Cost Bylaw UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls File No. 03 -039 PAGE C3 F: \K Smart files \Union Marsh Drain \ReporMddendum \03 039 Schedules revised addendumxls Ron No. Con Lot (272513000 Owner Estimated Assessment minus 1/3 Grant minus Allowances Sub total minus City Grant NET V 9 406400 Jack Deborah Rush V 9 406500 Kathleen Watchom V 9 406600 William Betts V 9 406700 Lucien Rose Rondeau V 9 407300 Bill Pota Apostolos V 8 407700 Ronald Margaret Ballinger V 8 407800 Vera Bowman V 8 407801 Clifford Brenda Ballinger V 8 407901 Richard Laurel Waldick V 7 408000 Rose Levesque John Brouillette V 7 408100 Donald Holly Watchom V 7 408200 Victor Sidin V 7 408300 John Horth Samantha Gendron V 7 408400 Adrian Rosa Formisano V 7 408500 Ann Pellitieri V 7 408502 Tracey Van Wylick V 7 408504 Donald Patricia Krawec V 8 408506 Tanya Mod V 6 408600 Gordon Melissa MacLeod V 6 408700 Robert Nancy Collucci V 5 408800 Vincent Brenda Barry V 5 408900 Donald Debra Devlin V 5 409000 Amy Brunning Michael Lynch V 5 409100 Peter Wilson V 5 409200 Bruce Gail Jacobs VI 4 416800 Everrett Sharon Friskie V,VI 5,6 416700 Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority I 17 18 494000 Canadian Niagara Power Company 30 68 83 60 60 60 2,711 121 212 788 60 310 433 1,104 394 76 250 288 3,158 303 295 750 370 370 379 243 1,689 400 20 1,053 123 30 68 83 60 40 60 2,711 121 212 788 60 310 433 1,104 394 76 250 288 2,105 303 295 750 247 370 379 243 1,689 400 30 68 83 60 40 60 2,711 121 212 788 60 310 433 1,104 394 76 250 288 2,105 303 295 750 247 370 379 243 1,689 400 Total Assessments on Lands 157,709 12,358 16,400 128,951 115,277 13,674 QEW MTO Willoughby Drive City of Niagara Falls Sodom Road(Region Rd 116) Region of Niagara Ort Road City of Niagara Falls Stanley Avenue City of Niagara Falls King Road City of Niagara Falls Beck Road City of Niagara Falls Sauer Road City of Niagara Falls Sherk Road City of Niagara Falls Bossert Road City of Niagara Falls Detenbeck Road City of Niagara Falls Marshall Road City of Niagara Falls Miller Road City of Niagara Falls Weaver Road City of Niagara Falls Willick Road City of Niagara Falls Lemon Road City of Niagara Falls 28,041 3,167 13,196 5,969 2,287 882 228 363 402 3,897 5,511 6,783 7,185 4,208 33 39 28,041 3,167 13,196 5,969 2,287 882 228 363 402 3,897 5,511 6,783 7,185 4,208 33 39 28,041 3,167 13,196 5,969 2,287 882 228 363 402 3,897 5,511 6,783 7,185 4,208 33 39 Total Assessments on Roads: 82,191 82,191 82,191 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS ON THE UNION MARSH DRAIN 239,900 12,358 16,400 211,142 115,277 95,865 January 30, 2006 August 23, 2007 Addendum 1 SCHEDULE C Schedule for Actual Cost Bylaw UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 City of Niagara Falls File No. 03 -039 PAGE C4 Notes: 1. All of the above lands are classified as non agricultural, except those as noted with an asterisk which are rated agricultural. Refer also to page 12 in report. 2. Section 21 of the Drainage Act. RSO 1990 requires that assessments be shown opposite each parcel of land and road affected. The affected parcels of land have been identified using the roll number from the last revised assessment roll for the City. For convenience only, the owner's names as shown by the last revised assessment roll, has also been included. F: \K Smart files\Union Marsh Drain\Repod Addendum \03 039 Schedules revised addendum.xls 003_124 -00 5 0000 GAIN LTD. 19.7 ha. F. amiamm s od s STOLL O 19.1 0-0. 003-140 -00 COSTA FAMILY 20.3 he. 003 -141 -00 C. It A. COSTA 20.2 ha. 002 160-00 003 143-00 1664531 ONTARIO INC. 39.8 110. _14401 J. SUSIN 19.0 h.. 0. at M. SZYMANSKI 17.6 h0. 003 1.6 003 140 003 -145-0 003 -145- 003 -002 -m 0G3- 120. .K. L s. iatlflK -o• 00]- 152 17.7 he 17.7 he 003 -151 -00 003 -156 -00 V. KAPUR k A. *990000 .15.6 ho. 003-155 -10 003 159-00 003 180 -00 1 003 -135-01 00 -153_ 003-154 003-1e5- 0w-u4- 003 -i6 -00 CO 001_147 -00 NILIJCK ROAD 003-164 -00 2- 155-0° 002- 152-05 N. WEAVER 19.1 ha. 002 158-05 02- 105 -04 002 -153-00 N. WEAVER 6.9 ha 00x- 164-00 662718 0N1AR10 INC 29.4 0-0 1 1111\ir 1111/7 007 00 002 002 002 -090 -00 002 007 -00 02 -00 101 00 00-00 002 151 -01 1662718 ONTARIO ING 36.2 ha. 002 -1b -W C. LANDRY 6.9 ha 002 163 WEAVER ROAD 00. 057 -00 16027 00 116-00 ONTARIO ING i�� 23.1 50 00 3 i 0 10056 002.4 002 159-00 R. COSTA 23.1 110. «9r MILLER ROAD CD Oo2- 109 -02 17 L Ka OFE N. -J. 60RRM 36.0 ha O MARSHALL ROAD 96 S ON 1 002- 003-00 002 -124 -00 (LOWER) 002 005 -00 NIAGARA PARKSI N S COMMISIO 23 COMMISSION 040 60. 002 122 -00 1111111 N. COSTA 11■ N. COSTA k r121 11111•11•011 gar -16 rreTf" �S.S1SR�:711� 4 mar mom V: 002 171 -00 Lli 3-I a17t 11111 1 /11111111 001-1 0 0] 06000 81:.30x I� CHECKED 91: 1W K. LOGAN 13 03-194]• 00] -1942] °0] -19 m]- 104-]9 Ji oo3 194-.1 005 198 i� 22-63 003-10e-00 I 1664531 ONTARIO INC. IMI cdle .nl. s 3111 618 w I OS 1 111 CON 3 h_ s •9 MCCREDIL' ROAD (CLOSED) 002 -001-00 NIAGARA PARKS COMMISSION 145.6 h0. PLAN LEGEND -NAAR WA7EASHEO INTERMEDIATE WATERSHED NEW OR RECO4STMICIED 0*1902T LOCATION PREP95E0 9014 �00 OTHER DRAINS OR 861060CVRSES -E- 013101ES PROPERTY 014013241111 ON 00114 00E5 OF LOT UNE 0 APPROXIMATE HECTARES IN WATERSHED 5.2 ha HECTARES OWNED 002- 160-00 ASSESSMENT ROLL NUMBER \I SCALE 0 091ONAL m 06630 KAN 1215.000 WAIL LOT LEGEND ROLL NO. NAME AREA AFFECTED O,1 On 1 002-005.00 L r .c. 110016 00] 00 7-00 Y K Pu 170100.0 002 0'50 1w1.W G0 100 -0 R.YLYW. m F. L 5 086 0 613 20 -1 1 O ro n STUM 23-00 4. Ne0[R m] -110-60 Y C MOM m] -12] -m K CAaC 0 02. 126 -0 0. 4. 8011 mi °6_01 Y Y 1 7706 D -60 C Y C AYYC m] -1L -1300 `A 11V 4925 6,11I 0 M]- Oli-pl 11. ARP, -111 -m S Y L 0000 y-01 13 5-! ,1 T. IA0KPAmMMa 00-320 2- 01 T. Y e CW6K 05 4 Y 1 rcv6o 1-03 n5-.. u91R 002 -1 3 24 0. 0 0 1% 1 002 6..01 A Y I. 1AM 5- 165.00 SOUIO ]L0 001 165 -01 K Y n BAU@ 000] 0. Y. 51006 m] -155 -m n Y w. Mgr 017 0 004 r.1ls L C.EOV Y 1. 1Rp5E 0. mw 1 m -0 4-00 00] -m -02 1 6 6 ge 1.7 11 4.8 0 F•" RaRR4N1°"v[$°. n m.WRl WS_1.e_ a: 1 10 e 3. 003 -t.e_m n tenPN1 L 'ae 883'3 _8; 0! 6. 0 0 I 83 000- 10hI00 A 23 6.32036 16.5 m 1 4 0. 0 0 0 O. 2 01 0 0 0 3 100__�2 g 0 IL 0800 9103 0. Man160 -30006 0. 233,1 A 1' b 0 08000 N 00 6 -00 0. NOt° N. 04284MO IA 1 t. 77 001-6 4 a6 a151 ipp 1 Erg g 0. 01 GIE000 O.i m4- 940 -00 0µN004 MMMA YORA 500700? 06 0.a of 04 QS S:e ti 3e ai REVISED FOR ADDENDUM 1 AUGUST 23, 2007 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 CRY OF MAGMA FALLS (WILLOUGHBY 101221014IP) RECAONAL MVNICIPAUTY OF NIACM NORTH PART OF WATERSHED Is 20. SMART AgBOCIA179 Taxa ED COMLM1TN4 'P.O.W. AV0 MaamnI 60CWNER 11404O1Aii 5000087 RAM Rh4R 003500-039431210941 W 5 F W 103 JAN. 30, 2008 0020.010 -022 2 OF 17 03420072446:26 003 -iu -01 BAUER'S POULTRY INC. O 16.2 he. -J 004086 -16 S. APOSTOLOS 14.3 ha, 004-046-00 i 00 3 104 oo \OY190_00 003 234-00 R. k A. 04040 ER 21.7 0a. ROSSRRT RO4 0,. 016 -o+ 0 0 0775 1- 00 C. B. 3 BALLINGER 9.8 ha. 0.6 ha. C04-079 -01 006 -Oe R. L. 600 WALDICK 2.8 ha. 004 080-00 R, LEVESQUE h J. 8ULLETTE µ0 72.0 R0I h0. 004 -06 -00 J. NORTH k q S. 00609011 Y. 7.6 ha. C 004 087 -00 COLLUCCI 4,0 h0 y 004000 -00 In V. B. BARRY 4.8 ha r- 004 -10) -00 NPCA 232.1 ha. x466 003- 106 -a0 1654531 ONTARIO INC. 60.4 ha. F O T-TP o0i- 199 -0O 0L0 'MLLOUGHBY 1 REALTY LTD. 44.0 ha, C VENZON 0L0 NILLDUGH9Y W. REICH REALTY LTD. 9,1 ha. 9.2 ha. 1- i 4651 4, i ESTATE U OF A H00L \EO 1. CRI A R A c Cc MA MELLA k oy 801 ..1115 00 A q \Gy 001 -141 -00 1663163 ONTARIO INC, 95.9 ho. ,2 h, 004 013-00 1 A. RIZ20 0040x3 -00 16.9 ha. T. P. SIMPSON W 003-148- 14) -00 0 O. k M. SZYMANS10 Go> -a -0 17.6 h0. 003- 146 003 150 -00 V. KAPUR A. 6448008 1 0, 16.6.110.® 003 171-02 003 -1)7 -M 003 -170 -00 001 106-03 003 -n6 -e0 OLD WILLOUGHBY FA5( REALTY LTD, 0 6. 6 19.9 ha.1 ..1 :9L4'6 !fli fi�� n I]6 Oo1 -162 -I I�I'J�I�I�] COi- 161 1 )A ha. 162 RR' ROAD 1 00 90 1 O.4 M1 004 030-00 004 -031 -00 MAPLE ROAD LTD. J. k W. 39.8 ha, 9800 1.2 h0. 206 002- 179 rg a a 708020 ON LTD. 1406 17,4 ho. 003 -+Ye -90 8, kH. I• BARNET. 22.8 ha. 702- 108 -00 ANSCANAOA PI NES LTD. 1 81, ha. 8.6 072 -+64000 0. N. WATSON 2.3 ho. UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 CTY OF NIAGARA FALLS (111LLOUGHOT T REGIONAL YUNICIPAUTT Of NIAGARA X. 9114075 ASS006ATk:s ISMITZO 9 60ryL11NO 00018866 MD PI INM99 0 0GNFN64 ENGLWl41 SUDBURY MW1 AMER 9 OCI7 /1001 OSi TOP OF BRIDGE (GOLF COURSE) TOP PAR F NIAGARA BRIDGE—\ I 176 174 BERM TO BE 4STRUCTED BY OTHERS TOP ELEVATION: 171.40 lac 2 171.40 Aug. 26/04 ASSUMED DITCH BOTTOM KNOT SURVEYED) 171.40 Aug. 26/04 R 8 N m o m 166 O CO USSHERS CREEK TO NIAGARA PARKWAY BRIDGE OF NIAGARA MARSH DRAIN 2006 MR1 FALLS MOONED 0 1N.N. NW" II*, SCALE REGIONAL NUNIl1YAUlY OF NIAGARA PROFILE USSHER'S CREEK JAN. 30, 2006 MEMO IFfs OCR 4'. .flo a Se 100m DRAWN m. (.1 CREC% m M 41. 910.""' 1QfS t 9L 0 In) EC. SMART 0890500228 Ian= S0NSULTI0 FNDINEERS WO 4 IN® NSA DNDfl SucNENEA SUDBURY RODS mOLL'WAS SNOB RY R 11N101 4 OF 17 t ffi. 9 OCI7 /1001 OSi BM 02 178 CUTS 0R10CE AT STA NE CORNER OF CONC. SPAN E. 510E OF WILLOIIGHBY. 80. 000 MAIN DRAIN 000V. 175.217 T 0] BM 25 j K 0 c,,,.. SPAN N1D� TEM 4 :M 2 T9M 1 BM 27 AIL IN SE ROOT 200mmm D NAIL IN E 5100 OF 1118 WEST 00 STA. FENCE POST 925 0.EV. 172.740 NAIL IN W ROOT 60041914 OAK TREE tam SE OF STA. 425 ELEV. 172254 d 66 2 MULTI -TRUNK TREE ON SOUTH BANK AT STA. 025 ELEV. 172.273 NAIL IN N. SIDE 000, MUL TRON 547 71]91 TO ST m NE CORNER OF CONC. BRIDGE o 000A0 (MAC 61 01E) AT EUEV. 173.303 6 K NAIL IN SE ROOT 1.541• MULTI -TRUNK MAPLE ON EAST BANK AT STA. 205 ELEV. 172.502 :RIDGE OPENING) THEE RRM 0 7 tOm SOUTH OF STA. ELEV. n S 5 i N c i E II N AIL IN S, 90E 700m DECI000 TREE &n NORTH OF STA. 545 ELVA 5 172.226 m g LL 9 Y E E H 11111111111111111/11111.•11L W L. yyE 1 61 -44111k .��_4611 EE o a I�andIll m h_�► /l Q 3 3 0 n t w 174 E g qk S g M 11 R' F LL: a V Fj fi M f�� t �'TS'�1�{u 1 9 JO ICI ILL I 0.03 R F HE 0. 2% O 0 2: rlgLSV 111 5!' s 111;11111110111111111 ,11 1111111. 1 1R 1111 6 MRS:•m II.lip Ro 1• rI c0 !iHu1 Iliol ouIIiiiihI LO: '11111 "N T N Y OR.. II1 2:1 Ca S OP ill II Mill IIIIImUIUIIIIMImIIMII=IIIIIIIIIIIII.■.M.MIIIIIIUEMIIIIIIIIIUMIIIIm 'I'II 11410„s II 1111 .:1 ms., O` I nIl11.I■ MNIIIIIIIII■ M.IIIIIIIIIIIII.M■ �'r r0 Y m [V e N MAIN DRAIN d °t a s o m 8 S $P m $8 E u v USSHERS R N CREEK I UPPER) k g a s MAIN DRAIN REVISED FOR ADDENDUM 1 AUGUST 23, 2007 (LOWER) UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 air DF NIAGARA FALLS (valsu0601 REGIONAL MUNICIPNITY OF NIAGARA STATIONS MARKED 'X' SEE CROSS- SECTION ON owcs. 13-15 SAL PROFILE MAIN DRAIN 30, 2006 6, iMx D0.WN M.a. S'F'‘ A.. C.3 gun, K 81462 ABB°C(ASSS LIAfISLD CONSVLTHO CNF W [RS µ0 1 •y,OaP C: 7”. p m 0 In nnx• 5 OF 17 0MFGKI5 181 GJA RrtGM SR SNCI➢l4R SYONRT RN RAM C:\01- 01 P PROFILE I.4 01/202001 12.55,4065 0 Q CO CO w 00H H 5 P. CN W TCf w ort H V H.P. CN W iCE ES3M 1/118 eY /3z 10 P010 N 178 CUTS ON NW CORNER CONCRETE CULVERT AT STA 1 +939 U ELEV. 1]4.031 2 cc BM 4 31 W K S 61 O0100000 IN DITCH (TREES AIM MANN NAIL IN S SIDE OF 2007K60 ELM TRES 10m N OF STA. 1+000 ELEV. 172.761 Ye cl T.B.Y. NA! IN 5 ROOT OF 0003/01 TW TRUNK TREE ON SAKI AT STA. 1 +620 V.V. 172.605 NA! !A IN S S10E OF 400mm■ 'LE TREE AT STA. 1+823 ELEV. 171371 STA 250 0 300 tn aYoa 000103d0 MNl HOLL]NLLSBO 02i 031001d0110 001 1 IO51MC1IDN IN DITCH ("FREES A STA. 1 +150 OBSIRUCTON IN 01 STA- 1 +105 SMALL TREE 000101.1011110 010C11 Mtl3H 009 Y1S 004.+1 V1S 1,6 50000 R0A0. SN. 6 30010 a OAK CNEES ALONG W /B' STA. 2 6 PONDEO 0 l0 24120 AREA p GRASS AND DRONING IN O6tLI r fE CE At °J 1 if j LaI III Q B i R. 1 30,4 w99 "0) 171 E ri FAL 1007L 1 F. IA AA A 111 LS'0 H, +2ro sae nenn n I fl�J IC PA IT lG W. a) R. ��1 1 62?: ON1T. INS C! O' F 111111111111111_ DAININIIII III II I it4YLL�„il� Ifjl 1 1 I "1„' 2: E BS NI meno mil III ""IIIIH„! SID pPEI )III IHhi1bi 1G i 0 o n Y n o o r 8 m 8 t 6 x o a o o N10 N r n a u CO CE` w+ i 0 160 REVISED FOR ADDENDUM 1 AUGUST 23. 2007 q MAIN DRAIN UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 EAST BRANCH II OTT OF NIAGARA FALLS (UPPER) REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA (F1R101IC1(8Y 30NNSMPj DEA5NE0 6+ ARK. I" SLUE mon o C PROFILE MAIN DRAIN JAN. 30, 2006 STAl10N5 MARKED SEE CROSS SECTION ON OWGS. 13 -15 CN f]5tm m iWK. DRAWN R/ 1.mA i I1w. pM1II L '1/4...7:,.....' A s I J l �m K. sw-nr AASOCUrc9 trump OJNMTW DIMNESS ANO PIMm[R4 cam CNECKW H: CIA m-oa I KRCNENER EN6LLNART SoGIWAT PNM' AM 6 OF 17 C:\01- 01 P PROFILE I.4 01/202001 12.55,4065 -o nos -oov va rwE.en ovxeJZOm ra NAIL IN /SIDE 514 ELEV. 175429 m BM /19 17 OF 400mme TREE ELEV. 175.443 d21 NAIL IN W/ROOT OF 300mm DECIDUOUS TREE ELEV. 175.007 NAIL IN S/SIOE OF WHITE FENCE Pc ELEV. 174133 ST IN E/SIDE OF M.P. W OF STA. 420 ELEV. 174.841 Low BONS (FROM BOIN 51DES1 KILN (W) BN1001 (2 x EAU NATURAL CAS MARKERS al PLPEIWE STAKE OIL PIPELINE STAKE O0S1800 ON IN 01TCA DITCH (W) 91, I +392 181011 IN, l n) I +365 IAETALS (BUBOISHI ON 1+355 SEWAGE (000044 I3om 0 1+200 SCRATCH DITCH (W) (STA. 1 +264) STA. 1 +172 51B (W B/L) STA 1 +126 SIB (W BA) LARGE CONC. BLOCKO (W B/K) 7 I STA. 930 MOOD FOOTBRIDGE STA_ 098 01TCN (N) STA. 808 5CRA104 DITCH (W) STA. BM P0NOE0 BM }15 AND or TRIBUTARY O ('A6 9 T I NOY11 STJ IN HI WIN Ks f` 1.1.1110 NI 5501 N211 00110 NI 1101131181560 (A) 1-0110 11-0110 00140 NI X31111590 SE CORNER CONC CULV, 35m± W OF STA 540 aEV. 174555 I O R R11 CGF z TOP OF OUTLET �te� hav 2221. 1TE A LE LEVEL IN POND rd W 1 -n� ID az a6 L, Sr. I 3. I� r l�� om WAX lz. r 4 1 e'j 5 EN; II1flh D Iry PAG R' M. M A PEi I y 1 27 TREN 76 D 1 TR 4NSCA o A 'IP LID ES 215 �E. �"�„I�31:[1C1�!!I 1/ 11111511111111111111 4,4 Ah6E C. LA ��I�' iGl I A OU UPlII!IIIlfl!! 1- 0. 01 U O 0 O Q J 00 z ow �qq Yry a I HiP AIN C. EA�, mail E.1111111= 0• 10 U- 0 4 sn �n ��:�SO OPE�-111 1 1 1. a 51 r M ES"1�� 00 Irril MEI E O {S7�JC4 O d p i o O d n O y X< i 6 n m S O ry C4 n N O m m m t n M, 4:11.. n n n$ n 9 'O 0. n S 6 x n b 'i cd Y N Y N t i T. 7 7- W REVISED FOR ADDENDUM 1 AUGUST 23, 2007 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 MY 0 NIAGARA FJ11S (WILLOW:41W TOWNSS4P) REC OALMUNI wACARA AST BRANCH CONTD. CESFNEp BY. J.W 3'!JE PROFILE -EAST BRANCH E-E JAN. 30, zoos OIEIXLO !1: 1M.K ow.wx w: 00. STATIONS MARKED 'X' SEE CROSS— SEC110N ON DWGS. 13 -15 a \k.......„...),.3 E D tm I x. swam Ass o00.001 mor=n Nxalnxo ENGINEERS A.VG PLANNERS ezw rte ,yp °u 7 OF 17 x C mam m: caw 1 E, ,m f`(1 Ima[nw omLomm avowal' awn MU -o nos -oov va rwE.en ovxeJZOm ra B4 1D 80 NAIL 15 E/R001 OF 200mm 0 MULT -TRUNK TREE 75m* 5 OF STA. 3 +838 EBEV. 177.123 0' -1 16'31:3 MIME H.P. LOCATED 26m O 2 505 176.045 N T AT 0P STA. S/W 2 ORN05 846 OF GONG CULV. ELEV. 178. NAIL IN E /SIDE OF ON W/S1DE OF 50 CULVERT AT ST 78 176 174 172 170 m m n p10 TOP OF 3' REBAR ON W/BK AT STA. 34580 re ELEV. 178.860 0 3 174 5 30 0 n TOP OF S REBAR ON S/90E OF B05 ERT ROAD 15m N OF STA. 3 +440 ELEV. 177.044 S °o p N A C -4 EAST BRANCH CONT'D. STATIONS MARKED SEE CROSS SECTION ON DWGS. 13 -15 0150Nm 1111 N TB M A F'AEC J Fi' �II I'� nnn ��nlin��. nn FAL SR 0 1 I III uIuII nliiiIiII!1 II !I ■uiiuIiI iirmi�IIUIIHHhIaIINl !Ii �l�U■n•IRII UIlIl�I�I■IIn■■IIIlIIIIII■iIui a o s a ?d S R ti., m ry R b N 'j NN o p n N SALE O w ^em I KRAC 1 i. .m. REVISED FOR ADDENDUM 1 AUGUST 23, 2007 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 O1Y OF NIAGARA FALLS (WLEW0IBY TCNNSMP) REGIONAL NUNIOPAUTY OF NIAGARA PROFILE- EAST BRANCH Is 9. SMART ASSOCIATES SZSOTTD CONSULS,. 0!01x0415 ARO KITCHENER ENGLE... SUDD REV JON. 30, 2008 Fro a w. 03-030 8 OF 17 0,03- 0390 -019 PROIR(Af 0/14/101 I155■t AM CDT 182 17 U a fi 180 178 176 17 u 8 A N TRENDLE BRANCH 182 180 178 176 174 (MGM 1Y. 1010. PIEIX0 15 113.6. DIUNN 11< A5A CHECKED SW. 5.lA REVISED FOR ADDENDUM 1 AUGUST 23, 2007 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 017 OF NIAGARA FALLS (WILL000IDV TOVNStP) REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA PROFILE TRENDLE BRANCH JAN. 30, 2006 IL SMART AEEGCLATES LW 11130 covsuln10 'yawn /+IO MANNERS YIIGIFNFE EN8ENST ANWRY RAM R5101 ACISIW www OF CUM 35\03 <39 PROF6EJr9 45 /14/3 41 17:50L1 NILD3 'nYl, '0800 *30 911/22 NAIL IN W/R00T 500/ WEE 19m EAST OF STA. 585 ELF/. 177.259 5TA- 3 +665 STA 245 DITCH (s) FOOM STA 355 LOW RUH (4) STA 384 10W R1111 (4) 208 801 Obi 105 EAST IN *NCII Pi B6o ''l 190'9L1 (C01 16331.3 141- ONT. 0) INC. 14'9L E •[V BOIT IDE 5 PCS BC1TIIM ANDU 182 17 U a fi 180 178 176 17 u 8 A N TRENDLE BRANCH 182 180 178 176 174 (MGM 1Y. 1010. PIEIX0 15 113.6. DIUNN 11< A5A CHECKED SW. 5.lA REVISED FOR ADDENDUM 1 AUGUST 23, 2007 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 017 OF NIAGARA FALLS (WILL000IDV TOVNStP) REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA PROFILE TRENDLE BRANCH JAN. 30, 2006 IL SMART AEEGCLATES LW 11130 covsuln10 'yawn /+IO MANNERS YIIGIFNFE EN8ENST ANWRY RAM R5101 ACISIW www OF CUM 35\03 <39 PROF6EJr9 45 /14/3 41 17:50L1 NILD3 .urlaYln rROflu.g me.nam U*L 176 70 2_,u 8 Bye NAIL MARV` AT STA NN (J BIA 11 CUTS ON SE CORNER OF LONG CULV. E /907 OF ORT RD AT STA 1+390 ELEV. 174.861 INN ROOT Of BOOmmO TREE ON 8/138 1+036 ELEV. 173.621 BM 5 NAIL IN W ROOT OF DECIDUOUS TREE ON 50mmr V/BK NAIL IN POPLA 1n 0 NW ROOT OF MULM TRUNK TREE OF 5TA 013 ELEV 173.0.35 NAIL IN NE DECIDUOUS AT STA 68 001 OF •/Ommr 'EE ON N/OK ELEV. 173.762 AT STA 350 U ElEV, 171513 NAIL IN S ROOT OF 300/nrn■ TREE lorr. N OF STA 1+575 ELEV. 173.5187 NAIL IN N ROOT OF 60Orprner— TREE ON N/BK AT STA 1+176 ELEV. 171.1011 DECIDUOUS TREE ON S/B1( AT STA 556 EIZV. 173.56 TOP SE CORNER E/SIDE OF SOO OF CONC. CULV. 1 RO AT STA 077 ELEV. 174.127 1 1 176 Oal 01"000 (5) 319055 Ma 3001001001 691+ 15 00NN 115 SYALE (5) :OAD ED) 5■ 70 490 ACROSS 01TCH (a3 OVD: ma moms STA. 1 +500 TO 1+725 SWAMP AREA .93 1+21! I -r� O dIA'•A CIY AL' 1 l td c+ 1 0) I I a o `i a I V. I Y 174 c 172 rr• US N at ��M��MM�— M�_�M� �E MM�1/��MM� B TT o m M CL AN•UT C OLT 1111 21 °IDESOP0 IH! iII II nn�nnn�n IHhI 170 e, m oo .14, w R o t x i i W0 x 8 n o 3 r m m �n N :p n 4 '..i° n RENSED FOR 166 o W 3 m F 8 n n 8- ot ADDENDUM 1 AUGUST 23, 2007 WEST BRANCH UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS (WILLOUGHBY TOWNSHIP) REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA STATIONS MARKED 'X' SEE CROSS SECTION ON DWG'S. 13 -15 0509+0 m 716x. r w C 7 N% A..emB c sG3 SO I �1 PROFILE WEST BRANCH JAN. 30, 2006 amxm an ♦wx Mum •n D.9 T 1""` °'1 0 1 M. BNART ASSOCIATES' 1.13 CPMMTUO VI0i.2CRS PO PLANNERS "p 0}939 4,,,..._...),,K p. r NI 10 0F 17 CNECNm BA 0.14 `m. 11 NIRNµq C ILMM SUBWAY NNW AMR .urlaYln rROflu.g me.nam U*L 13 f 15 TOP SE CORNER OF CONC MWY CULV. AT STA 3 +411.5 EZV. 175.885 17B EN 15 6 B 1 11 IN E ROOT OF aOOmm• TREE W OF STA 2 +238 ELEV. 174.252 L) 17 10 5 ON NE CORNER OF CONO CULV. A 1+11 OF MARSHALL RO AT STA 1+99] ELEV. 1]5208 701.1 NAIL IN 73/12007 OF 400m m0 SLANTED TREE lOr OF 3 +301 i El£V. 1. 0 NAIL SUN 15m 3 N /EIDE OF 300mm0 0 TREE OF STA 3+050 ELEV. 175.484 NAIL DE CD 11n VI OF 1F 1.53330 STA 3+878 ELEV. 174.480 SR 13 12 8M NA 10 NAIL IN W ROOT OF TREE ON EAK AT =TA ELEV SOOmmO 2 +746 1]5082 38 00 LET 48529 'AVTO O W w 0� 2 5 ov a NAIL MAP 1Om N E ROOT OF 1.5m• TREE OF STA 2+445 ELEV. 174.571 T AT STA CORNER OF CULV. UNDER OEw 460 3 ELEV. 175.920 n t 32 Bm 85 d 2i e n 17' STA. 1+725 TO 1+975: SWAMPY W /0NRIDOR F N 2Nitnd0 M ..fC Alr0 '0003 O 1 STA. 1+819 TO 14830 r, S F POND AREA rl r Id 41 11 11 I -A I Rt J r 0)� II 17-4 T iiiatsg Arq 1 �I 58 0 ST'• P•RT A 0� T7 TJ, iI FL1!ii I A z F'LL' C. ••3 •03 10) R. 1n) JP LL •1- oJ 00 on L L 1 1111111111 21 1■ ■f1i ■x■ ■p 111 ■21117 ■■■■N■■1E1�7 ■IM "OI MMOI 8 I -,";1. 112 111 10 0-K nil RECU ��n IInI uu n d a 0 0 a i i 0 w 1 00 c m m nQ N i n O a 8 03 M ry S n .T- O N n X nM M n n n n M O M O a N ry ry o p d r O On y ry 4- N N.. O m 01 P RE07SED FOR ADDENDUM 1 AUGUST 23. 2007 WEST BRANCH CONT D UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 R00 OF NUCIRA FALLS (MU.OUON9y TOWNSHIP) REGIONAL MUNICIPAUTy OF NIAGARA 55 WI 0 1•NIA A.) 1m Q n' PROFILE -WEST BRANCH JAN. 3a zoos STATIONS MARKED 'X' aim= m ,o.0 °may SEE CROSS- SECTION ON DWGS. 13 -15 9FAM130 0.0. S c 9. exwxr *SS000ASB xiO474G 9 ANS NNEp NG 5040 w x"010 4 Oa w FP IUR5140 40 MRi 5 0 0 MENER RU 39091311t PAW RNER a"�• 11 OF 17 3\533 493- 3900•Illnq\03 -039 PAWIL Capp 81/]410019 8111 031 Y Y w i 170.151\ v i ce' 3.0n, PROPO DITCH 1� Om 1I Om_ I SEO DITCH DITCH 51 SS Y Y co 3 s 1 c` T 1 17215 OSE6] N 3.0n, PROPO DITCH 1� Om w 3 M h itimn 173.53 2.00 PROPO DITCH Y Y m N Z 173.53 2.00 PROPOSED 1� Om PROPC DITCH 1.5:1 SS DITCH Y Y m N Z 175.2- Y PROPOSED 1� Om DITCH 1.5:1 SS 174 172 PRE Drt1 172 75 6 2 FAST BRANCH. (STA. 175) 174 175 173 172 174 8 45 15 FAST BRANCH (STA. 550) LQ w Co 3 2.50 5.3 3 3 1 3 FAST RRANCH (STA. 1 +200) 55 4 15 EAST.BRANCH (STA. 1 +650) 173 PROPOSED DITCH 172 0 Y 175 0 0 0 174 SED 0 470 174 0 178 176 178 176 01 t-,)a.R I N 175.75T tf v Sm 55 4 15 EAST BRANCH (STA. 2 +100) 2 4 FAST BRANCH (STA. 2 +950) 178 176 PROP SED DITCH 1.5:1 15 0 1 5 3.5 5 FAST BRANCI{ (STA. 3 +500) 0 2 35 5 FAST BRANCH (STA. 3 +800) 0 178 176 Y PROPOSED DITCH 176 174 6 0005(9 005 JAM CQ050 9Y; 105X. OPJ.M■ n: 0.0. 0NFCNE9 B0 GJA 178 176 2.5 4 5 TRENDI F BRANCH (STA. 200) 70 178 176 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS (WAI.WGHSY TONNSNN) REGIONAL 00NICIPAIITY OF MAGMA SECTIONS EAST BRANCH Is K. SMART ASSOCIATES ISY[R9 100E1ry9N0 00 :00SSS `0 MA55FA5 NR M CNENEN 010M 1i 001X1' AWl ANq JAN. 30. 2006 00 wA 01.039 14 OF 17 L sol. (11 1 EXim, 11/14/114/ WWI 0/1[05 0 N 52 0 172.10 i Y T1 7291 3.500 100110SED DITCH 2:1 2:t ss 72.38 2.500 PROPOSED 000 I 2. WIDTH EXCAVATION) (NO E% S EO 3 0J w O Y 172.10 i Y 3 T1 7291 3.500 DITCH 2T SS 100110SED DITCH 2:1 2:t ss I 2.500 PROPOSED DITCH 21 SS 3 0J w O 172.10 i Y 3 2 2. {rI�I 2500 100110SED DITCH 2:1 2:t ss 2.500 1-.. 2 i 07310 1 3 2 2. m PROPOSED DITCH 2.500 1-.. 2 i �Y 3 U1n40 N._ 1 2.500 PROPOSED DITCH 21 SS 25* PROPOSED DITCH 2:1 S5 I I N 2 i �Y T02.A0 N._ 1 2.500 PROPOSED DITCH 21 SS 174 172 174 172 174 172 Y 33 73 WEST BRANCH (STA. 375) 23 48 y/FST BRANCH (STA. 800) 0 2 8 5.5 WEST BRANCH. (sTA. 1 +150) 50 74 172 8 98 10 174 172 12 174 174 72 172 174 3 172 5 174 061EM0 T: 1M0. cN¢xw An ANAL DRAWN M 0.0. 0X001001 R: G2 0 0 WEST BRANCH. (STA. 2 +200) 2.3 5 7 WEST BRANCI (STA. 1 +625) 7.3 5 172 9 2.5 0 WEST BRANCH (STA. 2 +950) 174 172 174 10 174 172 REVISED FOR ADDENDUM 1 AUGUST 23. 2007 UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006 DTT OF NIAGARA FALLS (100.1.5110181 70WNSVP) REGIONAL MVNIOPAUITT Of NIAGARA sce" 7_______,., SECTIONS WEST BRANCH JAN. 30. 20115 (fca 501 9+00 K. 9G(AAT w990GGT89 LIMITED wa O}NO en 0 0ONMRNO ENPRE{R! ARO PLANNEM MRCX(HUI .514.5X0.1 WORM 15 OF 17 A0 .004/3.030 SEE ASAR. AO1 /0000 0■ID :10mm GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. Working Area- General Condition E.37 Wotidtsg area shall be as outlined In General Condition E.37 and as further modified in the specific corvwetion notes below. 2. Access General Condition E35 Each owner with to ditch on their property may be required to provide an access mute for the contractor to access the working area along the ditch. The Contractor shall confirm with the owner the use of an access route before using the access route. The following property owners are directly affected by the work proposed.. Where possible telephone numbers for contact are shown (Area Code 905); Roll No (haler Phone Number Lower Mein Drain 002. 094, -096 Niagara Parks Commission 004 -094 Hydro One Networks Inc. 002 -095 City of Niagara Falls 002 -097 Barry Heather Trmdle 002 -122 Milene Jovicic Uaoe Main Drain 002 -151 -01 1662718 Ontario Inc. 002 -156 Gary Landry 002 -163 1662718 Ontario Inc. 002.159 Rosins Costa 002 -I64 1662718 Ontario Inc. 002 -166 Wilfred Maria Weber Ease Brandt 002 -169 -02 002-169 002.171 002.177 002 -177 -03 002 -179 002 -178 002- 190, -191 002.182 002.186 002 -185 -01 002. 185 -03 002 -185 003 -176 004 -141 )Vast Branch 003 -145 -01 Jeffery Sarin 003 -143 1662718 Ontario Inc. 003 -193 Gertrude Locher 003-195 Roberta Thiel 003. 195 -05 David Catherine Thiel 003 -196 1664531 Ontario Inc. 003 -224, 004 -049 Rysrard Alice Rydygier Liselotte Knob H.-J, Herrman Rosanne Arthur Federow Jovo Maslek Mile Menojlovich Ralph Biamonte Richard Donna Chamberlain 708020 Ontario Inc. Stovers Heather Barnett Frank Lapeona Neale Lana Gimps TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. Norman Joanne Watson Bertram Susan Watson Olga &Norman Watson Old Willoughby Realty Ltd, 1683163 Ontario Inc. City of Niagara Falls, Rick Volpini Drainage Superintendent 356 -7521 ant 4221 Project Engineera, John Kuntze, P.Eng. and Chris Alter, P.Eng. ice 519. 748.1199 3. Pre and Port Construction Meetings The Contractor may be required to attend pre -and post construction site meetings with the Engineer and landowners before carting and after finishing the work if requssed by the Engineer or Drainage Superintendent Ce11 519- 635.5997 4. Open Drain Construction Refer to F. 1 Standard Specifications for Open Drains F.1 In eases of conflict between varying specifications and/or the drawings, the following order of precedence shall apply. 1. Specific Construction Notes 2. Contract Drawings 3. General Construction Notes 4. Standard Specifications for Open Drains F.1 5. Standard Drawing Details 6. Part /3 General Conditions If the contractor is an11 in doubt as to proper interpretation, please contact the Project Engineer for clarification. 5. Corrugated Steel Pipe Materials Corrugated Steel Pipe (CSP) shall be fabricated from steel coils with ahot- dipped aluminum cootlng- A(ytuinired Steel Tyne 2 finish. The pipe shall be helically corrugated, fabricated with a lock -seam and shell be supplied with re-rolled annular ends. Aluminized CSP is available form: Armtec Guelph, Ontario 1- 800 265 -9391 Other approved equals will also be considered by the Engineer. Approval must be obtained prior to construction. 6. Access Culverts Refer to the drain Profiles and the specific constucdon notes for location of new access culverts to be installed Est Branch -1 +259 to 1 +271 Twin (2) 1400= diameter (2= wall 125x25= corrugation) x 12m CSP Refer to Standard Specification F.1.3 (g), Detail Drawing NE -7A (See Drawing 13) and Specific Construction Notes for complete details. Contract only provides for new laueway over Culvert to match existing channel width. Constructing new laneway up to culvert is landowner's responsibility. 7. Threshing and Tree Removal In many locations it will be necessary to clear a 10m wide path along the bank ofthe channel to permit excavation. All cleared material is to be cut flush with existing ground, no motor stump removal required. Use ofa brush cutter or a grapple on an excavator is suggested for brush and small trees. Large trees that need to be removed are to be cut flush with ground either by chain saw or tree shear. Stump removal not required Large tram (300 =diameter or greater) that will not interfere with the channel cleanaut or leveling of the excavated material can remain. The Contractor shall endeavour to maintain at least one manure tree every 20 to 25 metres near the top of bank Trimming of the lower branches of a remaining tree to facilitate access to the drain is permitted. All small branches and limbs are to be removed from felled trees and piled so that this material CaO be chipped using a portable chipper or a brash eater on an excavator. All chipped material can be spread on the 10m cleared path. All nee trunks and limbs 200= diameter or greater are to be cut into 2 to 3m lengths and piled along the edge of the cleared path or within any remaining wooded area beyond the ]Om wide path Prior m commencing any clearing work, confirm the side of the drain on which the worldng corridor is located by referring to the Specific Construction Notes. For reaches along the drain where the working side has not been determined, the Contractor shall contact the affected landowner to determine the side for completing excavation and/or clearing work. Available contest Information is noted to the left. The channel cross section shall also be cleared of all brush, trees, deadfall and other debris which shall be disposed as described above for limbs and branches. Grubbing of stumps may be required within the channel cross-section topennit excavation. Stamps removed shall be piled along the edge of the cleared path. Dead, damaged or partially fallen trees on the apposite bank shall also be removed and disposed of as described above. 8. Seeding of Ditch Bank Slopea and Leveled Spoil For seeding use mechanical (cyclone) spreader and the following shall apply. Seed mixture applied at 60kf/ba: 35% Creeping Red Fescue 25 %BirdsfootTrefoil 25% Kentucky Bluegrass 10% Cover Crop (Oats, Rye, Braley, Wheat) 5% White Clover Fertilizer to be 500:20 or 10:10:10 applied at300 kg/ha Seed and fertilizer to be applied as soon as possible after excavation (the end of the day). To provide temporary cover for lam fall planting add an additional 10 kg/ba of rye or winter wheat Contractor responsible for additional seeding as required during the 1 year contract warranry period. 9. Silt Fence Silt fence shall be in accordance with Ontario Provincial Standard Drawing (OPSD) 219.190 1996) except that nstsinsom height above ditch bottom shall be 500mm. Materials shall be in accordance with Ontario Provincial Standard Specification (OPSS) 577.05.02.02 (1996) for peak-Mile and OPSS 577.05.03 (1996) for stakes (1.5m length minimum). The silt fence shall remain in place until the project Is completed and the Contractor is directed to remove the silt fence by the Project Engineer or the City Drainage Superstmdent. The Contractor shall maintain the silt fence until it is removed Prim to removal of the silt fence, silt accumulation upstream of the fence shall be removed and leveled on adjacent lands as per ditch cleanom leveling. The cast of the supply, installation, maintenance, removal and disposal of the silt fence and silt remove/ and leveling shall be paid as an extra UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006, City of Niagara Falls File No. 03 -039 Drawing 16 of 17 CONSTRUCTION NOTES January 30, 2006 Revised for Addendum 1 August 23 2007 SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION NOTES MAIN DRAIN MoCredle Road to Willouahbv Drive 000 to 100 No work. (Do not clear trees for access corridor) 100 to 427 Minor bottom cleanout required, remove debris from channel. Some clearing required Side for work will vary to minimise impact an golf course north side aswmed. Access to be confirmed In consultation with golf course manager. 427 to 1 +074 New low Dow ebannel to be created (4m bottom width. 3:1 bank slope) by working from one beak Level and seed excavated material. Minor clearing required 427 to 900. Side for work to be determined, possibly north bank 900 to 1 +074 Work on =oats and east bank Wiilouvhbv Drive to Weaver Road 010 to 668 Clear a IOm wide path 00 one bank (side to be determined at time of construction) Remove all debris from the channel 200 to 400 Bottom cleanout required, minimum 410 bottom width 668 to 677 Minor cleaning through 6.1m wide concrete culvert to grade on profile Weaver Road to Miller Road 677 to 1+000 Clearing required is minor and will depend on side for work Remove all debris from the channel. Bottom cleanout required. 1+000 to 1+959 Clear a 10m wide path on ono bank (side to be determined at time of construction) Remove ell debris from the channel. Minor bottom cleanout required, may am be continuous 1 +959 to 1+964 Clean through single all only of twin 3.65m wide opening concrete culvert to grade on profile Miller Rood to Brach funcfion 1 +964 to 2 +176 Minor clearing as required will depend on side for work. Bottom cleanoot required EAST BRANCH Main Dmin junction to Marshall Road 000 to 100 Clew a 10m wide path on east bank Bottom cleanout. 100 to 565 Scattered clearing is required on east bank including trees in bottom of channel and on east bank. Most trees on west bank an remain. Remove ell debris from channel prior to cleanout. 565 to 713 Minor clearing may be required to permit work on east bank, most large trees can remain. 100 to 713 Work on east bmk. Drain cleanout 71310 729 Minor cleaning through 2.45m wide concrete culvert to grade on profile Marshall 9.00410 Detenbeck Roed 729 to 850 Dram cleanout Work on west bank. 850 to 975 Work on south bank Drain deanout 975 to 1 +259. Work on east bank Clearing is required on east bank Including trees in bottom of channel and on east bank Most trees on west bank an remain. Remove all debris from channel prior to drain cleanout 1 +259 to 1 +271 Remove exlsolng 950x1500mm arch culvert, dispose of broken concrete/debris and salvage/reuse any existing lane surface material. Suppty and 'install twin (2) 1400mm diameter CSP by 1205 long. Culverts to have a minimum 700mm separation. Laneway surface Is to be built up to elevation 174.65m to provide minimum 300mm cover for new pipes. Channel excavation to provide for a b0n0m width transition over IOm both upstream and downstream of the culverts. 1 +271 to 1+435 Work on east bank Drain cleanout 1 +433 to 1+688 Work on east bank Clearing is required on east bank including trees in bottom of channel and on east bank Most trees m west bank can remain. Remove ail debris from channel prior to drain cleeaout 1+688 to 1+693 Clean through 3m wide concrete culvert to grade on profile. Level material removed along ditch hank, upstream and dowestrvm of road. DetenbeckRoad to Sodom Roed 1 +693 to 2 +342 Clears 10m wide path on out bank (side to be determined at time of construction) including trees in bottom of channel. Remove all debris from channel prior to clamant 1+698to 1+918 Location of drain to be confirmed with owner at time ofcomtrumion as ditch is to be parallel to lot line for a distance upstream from the road. 1+693 to 2+000 Bottom cleanout 2+000 to 2 +200 Drain cleanout 2+030 to 2+074 CAUTION Ditch mosses right of way with three buried pipettes 2+055, 2 +105 Clanout out below small wooden footbridge 2 +200 to 2+488 Bottom eleanom or spot cleanout 2 +342 to 2+480 Clara 10m wide path on east and south bank Sodom Road to Hossert Reed 2 +506 to 2 +837 Drain cleanout Side for work to be determined at time of construction. 2 +837 to 2 +846 Clean through 2.3m wide concrete culvert to grade on profile. Level material removed along ditch bank upstream and downstream dived. Bossert Road to On Road 2 +846 to 2 +950 Drain dem0ut Side for work to be determined at time of construction. 2 +915 Remove casting 300mm culvert in drain and leave on bank for owners salvage (abandon Ianeway crossing). 2 +950 to 3 +709 Bottom cleanout Side for work to be determined at time of construction. 3 +709 to 3 +718 Clem through north culvert only of twin 9000510 dia. canon-cc culverts to grade on profile Ott Road to OEW .3 +718 to 3 +838 Bottom cleanout Side for work to be determined el time of construction. TRENDLE BRANCH 000 to 580 Bottom cleanout Side for work to be detsmtined at time of construction. WEST BRANCH Mein Drain loorOon t0 Sodom Road 000 to 173 Clew 10m wide path on one bank (side to be determined at time of construction) Remove all debris from channel. No bottom cxcavation required. 173 to 192 Minor cleaning through 4.85m wide concrete culvert to grade on profile. Sodom Road to Ort Road 192 to 565 Clear 10m wide path on one bank (side to be determined at time of construction) Remove all debris floor channel. Bottom cleanout 565 to 571 Clean through 1 of 2 pipes only (twin 1500mm dies culverts) to grade on profile. 571 to 1 +050 Bottom cleanout Side for work to be determined at time of construction. Clearing will be minor depending on side for work. 1 +050 to 1 +150 Clear a 10m wide path on north bank Bottom Memout 1 +150 to 1 +398 1 +398 to 1+405 No work required, except to remove debris from thermal by hand or using small equipment working within the channel. No Mating on either bank Minor Meaning through 3.65m wide concrete culvert to grade on profile Ort Road to Marshall Rood 1+405 to 1 +500 Minor bottom clemout, remove debris from channel and limited clearing immediately west of Ort Road Work from south beak- 1+500 to 1 +800 Bottom cleanout, work on southeast bank Access woftlng corridor from Ort Road only 1 +800 to 1 +995 No work required Marshall Road to OEW 2+016 to 2 +350 Bottom elan0ut work an west bank. 2 +350 to 2+450 Clear 1010 wide path on west bank, level old spoil bank Bottom cleanout 2+450 to 3+040 Bottom cleanout Side for work to be determined et time of construction. Clearing will be minor depending on side for work. 2 +895, 2 +899 CAUTION Ditch crosses two buried pipelines 3+040 to 3+060 Excavate channel across unopened Stanlry Road road allowance. May be necessary to remove exiting culvert. 3+060 to 3 +325 Clewing required to re- establish 10m wide path on wear bank. May be necessary to level old spoil. Bottom cleanout 3 +325 to 3+411 No work 3+411 to 3 +460 No work required across traveled portion of QEW. UNION MARSH DRAIN 2006, City of Niagara Falls File No. 03-039 Drawing 17 of 17 CONSTRUCTION NOTES Ianuary 30, 2006 Revised for Addendum 1 August 23 2007 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By -Law No. 2007 A by -law to provide for a drainage works in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara. WHEREAS the Director of Public Works has petitioned the Council of the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara in accordance with the provisions of the Drainage Act requesting that the Union Marsh Drain be improved to ensure proper drainage for all roads with the watershed. AND WHEREAS the Council of the City ofNiagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality ofNiagara, has procured a Report made by K. Smart Associates Limited dated January 30, 2006 and as amended August 23, 2007 the report is attached hereto and forms part of this By -law; AND WHEREAS the estimated total cost of constructing the drainage works is $239,900.00 AND WHEREAS $156,231.00 is the amount to be contributed by the municipality for construction of the drainage works both within the City's road allowances and on private property for those landowners within the municipality. AND WHEREAS $13,196.00 is being assessed in the City of Niagara Falls to the Regional Municipality of Niagara. AND WHEREAS $28,074.00 is being assessed in the City of Niagara Falls to the Ministry of Transportation. AND WHEREAS Council is of the opinion that the drainage of the area is desirable THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS UNDER THE DRAINAGE ACT ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The initial report dated January 30, 2006 and the amending report date of August 23, 2007 and attached hereto is hereby adopted and the drainage works as therein indicated and set forth is hereby authorized and shall be completed in accordance therewith; 2. (1) The Corporation of the city of Niagara Falls may borrow on the credit of the Corporation, the amount of $239,900.00 being the amount necessary for construction of the drainage works. (2) The Corporation may arrange for the issue of debentures on its behalf for the amount borrowed less the total amount of, (a) grants received under section 85 of the Act; (b) commuted payments made in respect of lands and roads assessed within the municipality; (c) money paid under subsection 61(3) of the Act, and (d) money assessed in and payable by another municipality, and such debentures shall be made payable within ten (10) years from the date of the debenture and shall bear interest at a rate not higher than the rate charged by The Ontario Municipal Improvement Corporation on the date of sale of such debentures. 3. A special equal annual rate sufficient to redeem the principal and interest on the debentures shall be levied upon the lands and roads as set forth in Schedule `A' attached to the aforesaid Report, to be collected the same manner and at the same time as other taxes are collected in each year for ten (10) years after the passing of this by -law. 4. For paying the amount of $239,900.00 being the amount assessed upon the lands and roads belonging to or controlled the municipality and private lands within the municipality, a special rate sufficient to pay the amount assessed, plus interest thereon shall be levied upon the whole rateable property in the City of Niagara Falls in each year for ten (10) years after the passing of this by -law to be collected in the same manner and at the same time as other taxes are collected. 5. All assessments of $50.00 or less are payable in the first year in which the assessment is imposed. 6. This by -law comes into force on the passing thereof and may be cited as the "Union Mash Municipal Drain By -law First Reading: September 10, 2007 Second Reading: September 10, 2007 Provisionally adopted this 10 day of September 2007. Dean Iorfida, CITY CLERK R.T. Salci, MAYOR Third Reading: Enacted this day of 2007 Dean Iorfida, CITY CLERK R.T. Salci, MAYOR CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By -law No. 2007 A by -law to establish part of Lot 20 Niagara Falls as a public highway, to be known as and to form part of Byng Avenue. WHEREAS Section 31 of the Municipal Act, 2001 provides, in part, that a municipality may pass a by -law to establish a highway; THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. That part of Lot 20 designated as Part 3 on Reference Plan 59R -13443 in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara, be established for public highway purposes. 2. That said part of Lot 20 designated as Part 3 on Reference Plan 59R -13443 that is hereby established as a public highway, be known as and form part of Byng Avenue. Passed this tenth day of September, 2007. DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK R.T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR First Reading: Second Reading: Third Reading: September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By -law No. 2007 A by -law to establish Part Township Lot 148 Stamford as a public highway, to be known as and to form part of Graham Street. WHEREAS Section 31 of the Municipal Act, 2001 provides, in part, that a municipality may pass a by -law to establish a highway; THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. That Part Township Lot 148 Stamford being Part 7 on Reference Plan 59R -13143 in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara, be established for public highway purposes. 2. That said Part Township Lot 148 Stamford being Part 7 on Reference Plan 59R -13143 that is hereby established as a public highway, be known as and form part of Graham Street. Passed this tenth day of September, 2007. DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK R.T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR First Reading: Second Reading: Third Reading: September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. A by -law to amend By -law No. 2006 -224, being a by -law to consolidate fees and charges for various services, licences and publications for the City of Niagara Falls in compliance with the Municipal Act 2001. THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Schedule "A Page 6, Legal, of By -law No. 2006 -224 is amended by deleting the description and corresponding fee regarding "Preparation of Discharge of Property Standards Order 2. Schedule "A Page 15, Building By -law, of By -law No. 2006 -224 is amended by changing the description and corresponding fee regarding "Preparation of Discharge of Property Standards Order Administration Fee plus Legal Disbursements" to the description "Preparation of Discharge of Property Standards Order" and corresponding fee of "$200.00 Passed this tenth day of September, 2007. DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK R. T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR First Reading: Second Reading: Third Reading: September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By -law No. 2007 A by -law to establish part of Block A Plan 54 Stamford as a public highway, to be known as and to form part of Dorchester Road. WHEREAS Section 31 of the Municipal Act, 2001 provides, in part, that a municipality may pass a by -law to establish a highway; THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. That part of Block A Plan 54 Stamford designated as Part 1 on Reference Plan 59R -13326 in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara, be established for public highway purposes. 2. That said part of Block A Plan 54 Stamford designated as Part 1 on Reference Plan 59R- 13326 that is hereby established as a public highway, be known as and form part of Dorchester Road. Passed this tenth day of September, 2007. DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK R.T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR First Reading: Second Reading: Third Reading: September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By -law No. 2007 A by -law to amend By -law No. 2002 -081, being a by -law to appoint City employees, agents and third parties for the enforcement of provincial or municipal by -laws. THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. By -law No. 2002 -081 is amended by deleting Schedule "C" and Schedule "C" attached hereto shall be inserted in lieu thereof. 2. By -law No. 2002 -081 is amended by deleting Schedule "D2" and Schedule "D2" attached hereto shall be inserted in lieu thereof. Passed this tenth day of September, 2007. DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK R. T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR First Reading: Second Reading: Third Reading: September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By -law No. 2007 1. Parking By -law Enforcement Officers: Sam Arnold Charles Arsenault James Edward Bird Gordon Boardman Gabe Bogucki Robert Bunn Bob Bunston Bill Crowder Alex DeGaust Raymond Devitt Larry Downing John Formica Hanya Goforth William Graham Brian Green Steve Hamilton Kevin Howe Les Jarvis Norm Leonard David Lewis Jason MacLean Rob McDonald Edward Allan McDonnell John McLeod John McPherson Shawna McSporran Kerri Michaud Al Poisson Jim Reggler Stewart Rodgers David Smith Gary Statchura Jana Vermeulen Sue Wheeler Brenda Wylie SCHEDULE "C" SCHEDULE "D2" CANADIAN NIAGARA HOTELS INC. 1. Parking By -law Enforcement Officers on private property: Chris Ennest Matt Campbell Bill Gemmell Don Houser Brad Kennedy Brad Ker Maurizio Lamattina Krystle Reece Passed this tenth day of September, 2007. First Reading: Second Reading: Third Reading: September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By-law No. 2007 A by -law to authorize the execution of an Agreement with Niagara Waste Systems Limited and The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls respecting the compensation payable by Niagara Waste Systems Limited to the City for hosting the South Landfill. THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. An Agreement made between The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls as City and Niagara Waste Systems Limited as NWSL, respecting the compensation payable by Niagara Waste Systems Limited to the City for hosting the South Landfill, subject to the terms and conditions as set out in the Agreement attached hereto, is hereby approved and authorized. 2. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the said Agreement. 3. The Clerk is hereby authorized to affix the corporate seal thereto and to deliver the said Agreement. DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK R. T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR THIS AGREEMENT dated the 10 day of September, 2007 BETWEEN: NIAGARA WASTE SYSTEMS LIMITED (Hereinafter "NWSL -AND THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS (Hereinafter the "City WHEREAS NWSL is the owner of lands on which it is seeking to operate a new landfill (the "South Landfill which portion of land is located north of Thorold Stone Road, west of Taylor Road, south of former Mountain Road and east of Thorold Townline Road; AND WHEREAS NWSL carried out an environmental assessment of the proposed South Landfill (the "EA AND WHEREAS the EA did not identify any negative impact beyond 500 metres from the South Landfill and did not contain any conditions requiring a host community agreement; AND WHEREAS notwithstanding that the EA did not require a host community agreement, NWSL has decided to enter into this host community agreement with the City; NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows: 1. The purpose of this agreement (the "Agreement is to set out the principles governing compensation payable by NWSL to the City for hosting the South Landfill notwithstanding that NWSL believes and the EA has shown that there will not be any significant non mitigatable off -site 2 effects from the operations of the South Landfill. 2. (a) This Agreement is conditional upon the following being obtained by NWSL, its successors and/or assignees for the construction and operation of the South Landfill: (i) approval in accordance with the Environmental Assessment Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.18, as amended; (ii) approval in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. E.19, as amended; (iii) all zoning by -law and Official Plan Amendments from the City; (iv) an amendment from The Regional Municipality of Niagara (the "Region to its Regional Policy Plan; and (v) all other necessary approvals, all of the above hereinafter referred to as the "Approvals (b) This Agreement shall become effective on the day (the "Effective Date that all of the following shall have occurred: (i) all of the Approvals have been obtained; (ii) all appeal periods in regard to the Approvals have expired and all conditions in regard to obtaining the Approvals have been satisfied; (iii) the South Landfill has commenced operation and is receiving waste. This Agreement shall continue until such time as the South Landfill ceases to operate (the "Termination Date 3. After the Effective Date and up to the Termination Date NWSL shall pay to the City $0.75 per tonne for the number of tonnes of solid, non hazardous waste (the "Waste received at the 3 South Landfill up to a maximum of 750,000 tonnes of Waste in each calendar year (the "Maximum Tonnage The City acknowledges that the Region may at some point after the Effective Date bring municipal waste "Municipal Waste to the South Landfill over and above the Maximum Tonnage. The City acknowledges that it shall not be entitled to receive any compensation pursuant to this Agreement for the Municipal Waste brought to the South Landfill by the Region in each calendar year up to a maximum amount of 100,000 tonnes. 4. In each year of this Agreement after the Effective Date NWSL shall provide the City with an affidavit (in the form attached hereto as Schedule "A as to the number of applicable tonnes of Waste it receives at the South Landfill in each calendar year plus a cheque for payment of the total amount of compensation owed to the City pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Agreement. The statement and the cheque shall be provided to the City no later than March 31 of each year in regard to the previous calendar year end. 5. The City acknowledges that it is the wish of NWSL that the compensation paid by NWSL to the City be used for projects in the City of Niagara Falls that are consistent with the types of proj ects that NWSL and its affiliates have a history of supporting. While not committing to same, the City will endeavour to spend the compensation on such projects and will, if possible, establish a process whereby NWSL, or its affiliates, will have some input in the spending of the aforesaid compensation on those projects. 6. Any notice or other writing required or permitted to be given under this agreement or for the purposes hereof (referred to in this paragraph as a "notice to any party shall be sufficiently given if delivered personally, or if sent by prepaid registered mail or if transmitted by fax or other form of recorded communication tested prior to transmission to such party: (a) in the case of a notice to NWSL at: P. O. Box 100 Thorold, Ontario L2V 3Y8. Attention: Mike Watt Fax: (905) 680 -1916 (b) in the case of a notice to the City at: 4310 Queen Street P. O. Box 1023 Niagara Falls, Ontario L2E 6X5 4 Attention: Dean Iorfida, City Clerk Fax: (905) 356 -9083 or at such other address as the party to whom such writing is to be given shall have last notified the party giving the same in the manner provided in this paragraph. Any notice delivered to the party to whom it is addressed as provided in this paragraph shall be deemed to have been given and received 011 the day it is so delivered at such address, provided that if such day is not a business day then the notice shall be deemed to have been given and received on the business day next following such day. Any notice mailed as aforesaid shall be deemed to have been given and received on the fifth business day next following the date of its mailing. Any notice transmitted by fax or other form of recorded communication shall be deemed given and received on the first business day after its transmission. For the purpose of this agreement "business day" shall mean a day other than Saturday or Sunday on which the commercial banks located at Niagara Falls, Ontario are open for business during normal banking hours. 7. No waiver by either party shall be effective unless in writing, and a waiver shall affect 5 only the matter, and the occurrence of it, specifically identified in the writing and granting the waiver shall not extend to any other matter or occurrence. 8. This agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario. 9. This agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed and delivered this agreement as of the date first written above. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED NIAGARA WASTE SYSTEMS LIMITED PER: Q John Fishe President THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS PER: R.T. (Ted) Salci, Mayor Dean Iorfida, City Clerk I, DO SOLEMNLY DECLARE THAT: 6 SCHEDULE "A" AFFIDAVIT of the 1. I am the of Niagara Waste Systems Limited. 2. For the calendar year Niagara Waste Systems Limited received at its South Landfill tonnes of Waste "South Landfill" and "Waste" as defined in the agreement between Niagara Waste Systems Limited and The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls, dated DECLARED before me at the City of in the Regional Municipality of this day of 2007.) A COMMISSIONER, ETC. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By -law No. 2007 A by -law to designate Lot 45, Registered Plan 59M -338, not be subject to part-lot control. WHEREAS subsection 50(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, provides, in part, that the council of a local municipality may by by -law designate lands that would otherwise be subject to part-lot control, not be subject to such part-lot control; AND WHEREAS such by -laws are required under subsection 50(7.1) of the Planning Act to be approved by the appropriate approval authority, that being The Regional Municipality of Niagara as per subsection 51(5) of the Planning Act, subsequently delegated to the City of Niagara Falls by Regional Municipality of Niagara By -law No. 8819 -97; AND WHEREAS the said land is zoned by By -law No. 79 -200 to permit the erection of single detached dwellings and semi detached dwellings thereon; AND WHEREAS the said land was intended for a semi detached dwelling through the original subdivision approval; AND WHEREAS the owner proposes the division of the said land to create two lots that comply with the zoning by -law provisions for single- detached dwellings; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls deems it expedient to designate that the said land not be subject to part-lot control. THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. That subsection 50(5) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, not apply to Lot 45, Registered Plan 59M -338, in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara. 2. This by -law shall remain in full force and effect for one year from the date of passage of this by -law, after which time this by -law shall expire and be deemed to be repealed and of no effect. Passed this tenth day of September, 2007. DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK R. T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR First Reading: Second Reading: Third Reading: September 10, 2007 September 10, 2007 September 10, 2007 A by -law to authorize the execution of an Agreement of Purchase and Sale with Badger Farms Limited respecting the purchase of lands being Part 1 on Reference Plan 59R- 13486; in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara. THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. An Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated July 28, 2007 and made between Badger Farms Limited and The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls for the property described as Part of Lot 180, Township of Stamford, designated as Part 1 on Reference Plan 59R- 13486; in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara, subject to such terms and conditions as set out in the Agreement of Purchase and Sale attached hereto, is hereby approved and authorized. 2. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Agreement of Purchase and Sale and all other documents that maybe required for the purpose of carrying out the intent of this by -law. 3. The Clerk is hereby authorized to affix the corporate seal thereto and to deliver such documents. Passed this tenth day of September, 2007. DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK R.T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR First Reading: Second Reading: Third Reading: September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By -law No. 2007 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE PURCHASER, The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls agrees to purchase from VENDOR, Badger Farms Limited the following REAL PROPERTY: Address southerly side of McLeod Road between Kalar Road and Parkside Road, and legally described as Part of Lot 180, in the Geographic Township of Stamford, in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara on Schedule "B" attached (the "property PURCHASE PRICE: Dollars(CDN$� DEPOSIT: Purchaser submits_ Dollars (CDN8 (Herewith /Upon acceptance) cash or negotiable cheque payable to The Vendor to be held in trust pending completion or other termination of this Agreement and to be credited toward the Purchase Price on completion. Purchaser agrees to pay the balance as follows: The balance of the purchase price by bank draft or certified cheque to the Vendor on closing, subject to the usual adjustments. SCHEDULE(S) "A" and "B" attached hereto forms(s) part of this Agreement. 1. CHATTELS INCLUDED: N/A 2. FIXTURES EXCLUDED: N/A 3. RENTAL ITEMS: The following equipment is rented and not included in the Purchase Price. C.C.Tr, is not ..ubjcct t C:C.T. N/A 4. IRREVOCABILITY: This Offer shall be irrevocable by Purchaser until 4:30 p.m. on the 20" day of August 2007 after which time, if not accepted, this Offer shall be null and void and the deposit shall be returned to the Purchaser in full without interest. 5. COMPLETION DATE: This Agreement shall be completed by no later than 5:00 p.m. on or before the 15" day of September 2007. Upon completion, vacant possession of the property shall be given to the Purchaser unless otherwise provided for in this Agreement. 6. NOTICES: Any notice relating hereto or provided for herein shall be in writing. This offer, any counter offer, notice of acceptance thereof, or any notice shall be deemed given and received, when hand delivered to the address for service provided herein or, where a facsimile number is provided herein, when transmitted electronically to that facsimile number. FAX NO. (For delivery of notices to vendor)FAX NO. (905) 371-2892 (For deliver y of no tices to Purchaser) 7. GST: If this transaction is subject to Goods and Services Tax (G.S.T.), then such tax shall be in addition to the Purchase Price. If i1.1., Lrunoa tion io not oubj.oct to (included in /in addition to) V� 8. TITLE SEARCH Purchaser shall .e allowed until 6:00 p.m. on or before the 31" day of August ,2007 (Requisition Date) to examine the title to the property at his own expense and until the earlier of: (I) thirty days from the later of the Requisition Date or the date on which the conditions in this Agreement are fulfilled or otherwise waived or; (ii) five days prior to completion, to satisfy himself that there are no outstanding work orders or deficiency notices affecting the property, that its present use agriculture may be lawfully continued and that the principal building may be insured against risk of fire. Vendor hereby consents'to the municipality or other governmental agencies releasing to Purchaser details of all outstanding work orders affecting the property, and Vendor agrees to execute and deliver such further authorizations in this regard as Purchaser may reasonably require. 9. FUTURE USE: Vendor and Purchaser agree that there is no representation or warranty of any kind that the future intended use of the property by Purchaser is or will be lawful except as may be specifically provided for in this Agreement. 10. TITLE: Provided that the title to the property is good and free from all registered restrictions, charges, liens, and encumbrances except as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement and save and except for (a) any registered restrictions or covenants that run with the land providing that such are complied with; (b) any registered municipal agreements and registered agreements with publicly regulated utilities providing such have been complied with, or security has been posted to ensure compliance and completion, as evidenced by a letter from the relevant municipality or regulated utility; (c) any minor easements for the supply of domestic utility or telephone services to the property or adjacent properties; and (d) any easements for drainage, storm or sanitary sewers, public utility lines, telephone lines, cable television lines or other services which do not materially affect the present use of the property. If within the specified times referred to in paragraph 8 any valid objection to title or to any outstanding work order or deficiency notice, or to the fact the said present use may not lawfully be continued, or that the principal building may not be insured against risk of fire is made in writing to Vendor and which Vendor is unable or unwilling to remove, remedy or satisfy and which Purchaser will not waive, this Agreement notwithstanding any intermediate acts or negotiations in respect of such objections, shall be at an end all monies paid shall be returned without interest or deduction and the Vendor shall not be liable for any costs or damages. Save as to any valid objection so made by such day and except for any objection going to the root of the title, Purchaser shall be conclusively deemed to have accepted Vendor's title to the property. 11. DOCUMENTS AND DISCHARGE: Purchaser shall not call for the production of any title deed, abstract, survey or other evidence of title to the property except such as are in the possession or control of Vendor. If requested by Purchaser, Vendor will deliver any sketch or survey of the property within Vendor's control to Purchaser as soon as possible and prior to the Requisition Date. If a discharge of any Charge /Mortgage held by a corporation incorporated pursuant to the Loan Companies Act (Canada), Chartered Bank, Trust Company, Credit Union, Caisse Populaire or Insurance Company and which is not to be assumed by Purchaser on completion, is not available in registerable form on completion, Purchaser agrees to accept Vendor's lawyer's personal undertaking to obtain, out of the closing funds, a discharge in registerable format to register same on title within a reasonable period of time after completion, provided that on or before completion Vendor shall provide to Purchaser a mortgage statement prepared by the mortgagee setting out the balance required to obtain the discharge, together with a direction executed by Vendor directing payment to the mortgagee of the amount required to obtain the discharge out of the balance due on completion. 12. INSPECTION: Purchaser acknowledges having had the opportunity to inspect the property prior to submitting this Offer and understands that upon acceptance of this Offer there shall be a binding agreement of purchase and sale between the Purchaser and Vendor. 13. INSURANCE: All buildings on the property and all other things being purchased shall be and remain until completion at the risk of Vendor. Pending completion Vendor shall hold all insurance policies, if any, and the proceeds thereof in trust for the parties as their interest may appear and in the event of substantial damage, Purchaser may either terminate this Agreement and have all monies paid returned without interest or deduction or else take the proceeds of any insurance and complete the purchase. No insurance shall be transferred on completion. If Vendor is taking back a Charge /Mortgage, or Purchaser is assuming a Charge /Mortgage, Purchaser shall supply Vendor with reasonable evidence of adequate insurance to protect Vendor's or other mortgagee's interest on completion. 14. PLANNING ACT: This Agreement shall be effective to create an interest in the property only if Vendor complies with the subdivision control provisions of the Planning Act by completion and Vendor covenants to proceed diligently at his expense to obtain any necessary consent by completion. 15. DOCUMENT PREPARATION: The Transfer /Deed shall, save for the Land Transfer Tax Affidavit, be prepared in registerable form at the expense of Vendor, and any Charge /Mortgage to be given back by the Purchaser to Vendor at the expense of the Purchaser. If requested by Purchaser, Vendor covenants that the Transfer /Deed to be delivered on completion shall contain the statements contemplated by Section 50(22) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990. 16. RESIDENCY: Purchaser shall be credited towards the Purchase Price with the amount, if any, necessary for Purchaser to pay to the Minister of National Revenue to satisfy Purchaser's liability in respect of tax payable by Vendor under the non residency provisions of the Income Tax Act by reason of this sale. Purchaser shall not claim such credit if Vendor delivers on completion the prescribed certificate or a statutory declaration that Vendor is not then a non resident of Canada. 17. ADJUSTMENTS: Any rents, mortgage interest, realty taxes including local improvement rates and unmetered public or private utility charges and unmetered cost of fuel, as applicable, shall be apportioned and allowed to the day of completion, the day of completion itself to apportioned to Purchaser. 18. TIME LIMITS: Time shall in all respects be of the essence hereof provided that the time for doing or completing of any matter provided for herein may be extended or abridged by an agreement in writing signed by Vendor and Purchaser or by their respective lawyers who may be specifically authorized in that regard. 19. TENDER: Any tender of documents or money hereunder may be made upon Vendor or Purchaser or their respective lawyers on the day set for completion. Money may be tendered by bank draft or cheque certified by a Chartered Bank, Trust Company, Province of Ontario Savings Office, Credit Union or Caisse Populaire. 20. FAMILY LAW ACT: Vendor warrants that spousal consent is not necessary to this transaction under the provisions of the Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990 unless Vendor's spouse has executed the consent hereinafter provided. 21. UFFI: Vendor represents and warrants to Purchaser that during the time Vendor has owned the property, Vendor has not caused any building on the property to be insulated with insulation containing ureaformaldehyde, and that to the best of Vendor's knowledge no building on the property contains or has ever contained insulation that contains ureaformaldehyde. This warranty shall survive and not merge on the completion of this transaction, and if the building is part of a multiple unit building, this warranty shall only apply to that part of the building which is the subject of this transaction. 22. CONSUMER REPORTS: The Purchaser is hereby notified that a consumer report containing credit and /or personal information may be referred to in connection with this transaction. 23. AGREEMENT IN WRITING: If there is conflict between any provision written or typed in this Agreement (including any Schedule attached hereto) and any provision in the printed portion hereof, the written or typed provision shall supersede the printed provision to the extent of such conflict. This Agreement including any Schedule attached hereto, shall constitute the entire Agreement between Purchaser and Vendor. There is no representation, warranty, collateral agreement or condition, which affects this Agreement other than as expressed herein. This Agreement shall be read with all changes of gender or number required by the context. 24. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the undersigned are bound by the terms herein. DATED AT Niagara Falls this day of 2007 SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED in the presence of: IN WITNESS whereof I have hereunto set my hand and seal: THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS (witness) (Witness( I, the Undersigned Vendor, agree to the above Offer. DATE SI 1 �e (Witness, a.m. /p.m. this Niagara Falls SEALED AND DELIVER and seal: (Purchaser( Dean Iorfida, City Clerk isean day of 20 {Purchaser) R.T. (Ted) Salci, Mayor (seal) this Z1; day of BADGER FARMS LIMITED wamm0 Per: (Vendor( (Seal) (Seal( DATE DATE in the presence of: IN WITNESS whereof I have hereunto set DAT DATE (Signature) 2007 CONFIRMATION OF EXECUTION: Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, I confirm this Agreement with all changes both typed and written was finally executed by all parties at ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I acknowledge receipt of my signed copy of this accepted Agreement of Purchase and sale and direct that a copy be forwarded to my lawyer. BADGER FARMS LIMITED THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS DATE DATE rve�dori Per: rr„rrn,�en R.T. (Ted) Salci, Mayor (Vendor, DATE L No. (c7 7 /7 Vendor's Lawyer 1)4_ N(( f• Address t f 3 Q S f 1�1 vt( a. (--(k b q65, 3 G (9 4(foy3575686 Tel.No. FAX No. DATE (arng Dean Iorfida, Clerk Address for Service: v Address for Service: The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls, 4310 Queen St., P.O. Box 1023 Niagara Falls, Ontario, L2E 6X5 Tel. No. (905) 356 -7521 Purchaser's Lawyer Kenneth L. Beaman Address 1310 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023 Niagara Falls, Ontario, L2E 6X5 (905) 356 -7521 Tel. No. (905) 371 -2892 FAX No. VENDOR: Badger Farms Limited SCHEDULE "A" AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE PURCHASER: The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls 1. It is understood and agreed that the land to be conveyed herein is subject to a Survey to be prepared at the expense of the Purchaser (the City). In the event that the Survey reveals the land area to be conveyed is more or less than 0.185 acres, the Purchase Price will be adjusted at a rate of $120,000.00 per acre. 2. It is understood and agreed that the Purchaser will pay the Vendor's reasonable legal fees required to complete this transaction. 3. It is understood and agreed that the Purchaser (the City) will reconstruct the Vendor's existing agricultural entranc6on McLeod Road in its present location in accordance with City standards during the reconstruction and widening of McLeod Road. It is further understood and agreed that this condition does not merge on closing. 4. It is understood and agreed that this Agreement of Purchase and Sale is subject to the approval of Niagara Falls City Council. SCh'EDUGE A4Z,9 BPD, E9rEyG1G✓7i:of 6'4o6 2T'— OC./r✓�".° ,6i906e4 7.W/11S i°O,ez 4o7A5O Ter.//c2 CITY or //�G42e? QLCS .4,9A✓D 7v BE /2o.,70 Datv9✓�� A by -law to authorize the execution of an Agreement of Purchase and Sale with Liliana Propocio respecting the purchase of lands being Part 2 on Reference Plan 59R- 13486; in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara. THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. An Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated August 9, 2007, and made between Liliana Propocio and The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls for the property described as Part of Lot 180, Township of Stamford, designated as Part 2 on Reference Plan 59R- 13486; in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara, subject to such terms and conditions as set out in the Agreement of Purchase and Sale attached hereto, is hereby approved and authorized. 2. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Agreement of Purchase and Sale and all other documents that may be required for the purpose of carrying out the intent of this by -law. 3. The Clerk is hereby authorized to affix the corporate seal thereto and to deliver such documents. Passed this tenth day of September, 2007. DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK R.T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR First Reading: Second Reading: Third Reading: September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By -law No. 2007 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE PURCHASER, The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls agrees to purchase from VENDOR, Liliana Propocio the following REAL PROPERTY: Located at the southwesterly corner of McLeod Road and Kalar Road, and legally described as Part of Lot 180, in the Geographic Township of Stamford, in the City of Niagara Falls, in the Regional Municipality of Niagara on Schedule "A" attached (the "property PURCHASE PRICE:_ Dollars(CDN$ DEPOSIT: Purchaser submits Dollars (CDN$ (Herewith /Upon acceptance) cash or negotiable cheque payable to The Vendor to be held in trust pending completion or other termination of this Agreement and to be credited toward the Purchase Price on completion. Purchaser agrees to pay the balance as follows: The balance of the purchase price by bank draft or certified cheque to the Vendor on closing, subject to the usual adjustments. SCHEDULES) "A" and "B" attached hereto forms(s) part of this Agreement. 1. CHATTELS INCLUDED: N/A 2. FIXTURES EXCLUDED: N/A 3. RENTAL ITEMS: The following equipment is rented and not included in the Purchase Price. N/A 4. IRREVOCABILITY: This Offer shall be irrevocable by Purchaser until 4:30 p.m. on the 30" day of September 2007 after which time, if not accepted, this Offer shall be null and void and the deposit shall be returned to the Purchaser in full without interest. 5. COMPLETION DATE: This Agreement shall be completed by no later than 5:00 p.m. on or before the 31°b day of October 2007. Upon completion, vacant possession of the property shall be given to the Purchaser unless otherwise provided for in this Agreement. 6. NOTICES: Any notice relating hereto or provided for herein shall be in writing. This offer, any counter offer, notice of acceptance thereof, or any notice shall be deemed given and received, when hand delivered to the address for servide provided herein or, where a facsimile number is provided herein, when transmitted electronically to that facsimile number. FAX N0. (For delivery or notices to vendor) FAX N0. (905) 371 -2892 (For delivery of notices to Purchaser) 7. GST: If this transaction is subject to Goods and Services Tax (G.S.T.), then such tax shall be in addition to the Purchase Price. If this transaction is not subject to (included In /in addition to) G.S.T., Vendor agrees to provide on or before closing, a certificate that the transaction is not subject to G.S.T. 8. TITLE SEARCH Purchaser shall be allowed until 6:00 p.m. on or before the 30" day of September ,2007 (Requisition Date) to examine the title to the property at his own expense and until the earlier of: (I) thirty days from the later of the Requisition Date or the date on which the conditions in this Agreement are fulfilled or otherwise waived or; (ii) five days prior to completion, to satisfy himself that there are no outstanding work orders or deficiency notices affecting the property, that its present use(vacant) may be lawfully continued and that the principal building may be insured against risk of fire. Vendor hereby consents to the municipality or other governmental agencies releasing to Purchaser details of all outstanding work orders affecting the property, and Vendor agrees to execute and deliver such further authorizations in this regard as Purchaser may reasonably require. 9. FUTURE USE: Vendor and Purchaser agree that there is no representation or warranty of any kind that the future intended use of the property by Purchaser is or will be lawful except as may be specifically provided for in this Agreement. 10. TITLE: Provided that the title to the property is good and free from all registered restrictions, charges, liens, and encumbrances except as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement and save and except for (a) any registered restrictions or covenants that run with the land providing that such are complied with; (b) any registered municipal agreements and registered agreements with publicly regulated utilities providing such have been complied with, or security has been posted to ensure compliance and completion, as evidenced by a letter from the relevant municipality or regulated utility; (c) any minor easements for the supply of domestic utility or telephone services to the property or adjacent properties; and (d) any easements for drainage, storm or sanitary sewers, public utility lines, telephone lines, cable television lines or other services which do not materially affect the present use of the property. If within the specified times referred to in paragraph 8 any valid objection to title or to any outstanding work order or deficiency notice, or to the fact the said present use may not lawfully be continued, or that the principal building may not be insured against risk of fire is made in writing to Vendor and which Vendor is unable or unwilling to remove, remedy or satisfy and which Purchaser will not waive, this Agreement notwithstanding any intermediate acts or negotiations in respect of such objections, shall be at an end all monies paid shall be returned without interest or deduction and the Vendor shall not be liable for any costs or damages. Save as to any valid objection so made by such day and except for any objection going to the root of the title, Purchaser shall be conclusively deemed to have accepted Vendor's title to the property. 11. DOCUMENTS AND DISCHARGE: Purchaser shall not call for the production of any title deed, abstract, survey or other evidence of title to the property except such as are in the possession or control of Vendor. If requested by Purchaser, Vendor will deliver any sketch or survey of the property within Vendor's control to Purchaser as soon as possible and prior to the Requisition Date. If a discharge of any Charge /Mortgage held by a corporation incorporated pursuant to the Loan Companies Act (Canada), Chartered Bank, Trust Company, Credit Union, Caisse Populaire or Insurance Company and which is not to be assumed by Purchaser on completion, is not available in registerable form on completion, Purchaser agrees to accept Vendor's lawyer's personal undertaking to obtain, out of the closing funds, a discharge in registerable format to register same on title within a reasonable period of time after completion, provided that on or before completion Vendor shall provide to Purchaser a mortgage statement prepared by the mortgagee setting out the balance required to obtain the discharge, together with a direction executed by Vendor directing payment to the mortgagee of the amount required to obtain the discharge out of the balance due on completion. 12. INSPECTION: Purchaser acknowledges having had the opportunity to inspect the property prior to submitting this Offer and understands that upon acceptance of this Offer there shall be a binding agreement of purchase and sale between the Purchaser and Vendor. 13. INSURANCE: All buildings on the property and all other things being purchased shall be and remain until completion at the risk of Vendor. Pending completion Vendor shall hold all insurance policies, if any, and the proceeds thereof in trust for the parties as their interest may appear and in the event of substantial damage, Purchaser may either terminate this Agreement and have all monies paid returned without interest or deduction or else take the proceeds of any insurance and complete the purchase. No insurance shall be transferred on completion. If Vendor is taking back a Charge /Mortgage, or Purchaser is assuming a Charge /Mortgage, Purchaser shall supply Vendor with reasonable evidence of adequate insurance to protect Vendor's or other mortgagee's interest on completion. 14. PLANNING ACT: This Agreement shall be effective to create an interest in the property only if Vendor complies with the subdivision control provisions of the Planning Act by completion and Vendor covenants to proceed diligently at his expense to obtain any necessary consent by completion. 15. DOCUMENT PREPARATION: The Transfer /Deed shall, save for the Land Transfer Tax Affidavit, be prepared in registerable form at the expense of Purchaser, and any Charge /Mortgage to be given back by the Purchaser to Vendor at the expense of the Purchaser. If requested by Purchaser, Vendor covenants that the Transfer /Deed to be delivered on completion shall contain the statements contemplated by Section 50(22) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990. 16. RESIDENCY: Purchaser shall be credited towards the Purchase Price with the amount, if any, necessary for Purchaser to pay to the Minister of National Revenue to satisfy Purchaser's liability in respect of tax payable by Vendor under the non residency provisions of the Income Tax Act by reason of this sale. Purchaser shall not claim such credit if Vendor delivers on completion the prescribed certificate or a statutory declaration that Vendor is not then a non resident of Canada. 17. ADJUSTMENTS: Any rents, mortgage interest, realty taxes including local improvement rates and unmetered public or private utility charges and unmetered cost of fuel, as applicable, shall be apportioned and allowed to the day of completion, the day of completion itself to apportioned to Purchaser. 18. TIME LIMITS: Time shall in all respects be of the essence hereof provided that the time for doing or completing of any matter provided for herein may be extended or abridged by an agreement in writing signed by Vendor and Purchaser or by their respective lawyers who may be specifically authorized in that regard. 19. TENDER: Any tender of documents or money hereunder may be made upon Vendor or Purchaser or their respective lawyers on the day set for completion. Money may be tendered by bank draft or cheque certified by a Chartered Bank, Trust Company, Province of Ontario Savings Office, Credit Union or Caisse Populaire. 20. FAMILY LAW ACT: Vendor warrants that spousal consent is not necessary to this transaction under the provisions of the Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990 unless Vendor's spouse has executed the consent hereinafter provided. 21. UFFI: Vendor represents and warrants to Purchaser that during the time Vendor has owned the property, Vendor has not caused any building on the property to be insulated with insulation containing ureaformaldehyde, and that to the best of Vendor's knowledge no building on the property contains or has ever contained insulation that contains ureaformaldehyde. This warranty shall survive and not merge on the completion of this transaction, and if the building is part of a multiple unit building, this warranty shall only apply to that part of the building which is the subject of this transaction. 22. CONSUMER REPORTS: The Purchaser is hereby notified that a consumer report containing credit and /or personal information may be referred to in connection with this transaction. 23. AGREEMENT IN WRITING: If there is conflict between any provision written or typed in this Agreement (including any Schedule attached hereto) and any provision in the printed portion hereof, the written or typed provision shall supersede the printed provision to the extent of such conflict. This Agreement including any Schedule attached hereto, shall constitute the entire Agreement between Purchaser and Vendor. There is no representation, warranty, collateral agreement or condition, which affects this Agreement other than as expressed herein. This Agreement shall be read with all changes of gender or number required by the context. 24. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the undersigned are bound by the terms herein. DATED AT Niagara Falls this day of SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED in the presence of: IN WITNESS whereof I have hereunto set my hand and seal: THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS (witness] (witness) I, the Undersigned Vendor, agree to the above Offer. (witness) a.m. /p.m. this day of 20 ,Purchased R.T. (Ted) Salci, Mayor (seam (eerenas«i Dean Iorfida, City Clerk �s<aii DATED AT Niagara Falls this day of 2007 SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED in the presence of: IN WITNESS whereof I have hereunto set my hand and seal: Liliana Propicio rv<naon Per: (Seal) DATE DATE DATE (51g11a tune, 2007 DATE Au 9 /(V 7 (Seal) CONFIRMATION OF EXECUTION: Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, I confirm this Agreement with all changes both typed and written was finally executed by all parties at ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I acknowledge receipt of my signed copy of this accepted Agreement of Purchase and sale and direct that a copy be forwarded to my lawyer. Liliana Propicio THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS rve�ao :i Per: 1(4) 357 3'730 Tel DATE DATE )O$) 3 St OILS FAX No. (905) 356 -7521 Tel. No. DATE rrme,, R.T. (Ted) Salci, Mayor DATE Dean Iorfida, Clerk Address for Service: Address for Service: The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls, 4310 Queen St., P.O. Box 1023 Niagara Falls, Ontario, L2E 6X5 Tel. No. Tel. No, (905) 356 -7521 Vendor's Lawyer Sa/nn E$ 1 c c: -a. Purchaser's Lawyer Kenneth L. Beaman Address 4 1-8 5 4, 0e t" C'QS a' eY 12-of Address 4310 Queen Street, P.O. Box 1023 N 6 (3 G�1 T O /'1 Niagara Falls Ontario, L2E 6X5 (905) 371 -2892 FAX No. OPsO r.;O I 4. GRNYET. GRAVEL 5: 5. 3; 0 ASPHALT RRORQSEO CONC +"CUR 00:31M/14 S GRAVEL Li nF;(501 23OT S OlffiGE 50 PAFW.LtL 54 3.00 01700 Fd. ATOP GM. .PO 4Q 0..2o/�Q cRAVE<. SfiOVLGER PROPERTY REQUIRED 4 e' Gi�1 /7' of �i2acL�iq '-4 Z T7 11.40 VENDOR: Liliana Propocio SCHEDULE "B" AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE PURCHASER: The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls 1. It is understood and agreed that the purchase price of $30,000.00 includes compensation for loss of land and any and all claims for injurious affection pursuant to the Expropriations Act R.S.O. 1990, as amended. 2. It is understood and agreed that the Purchaser will pay the Vendor reasonable legal fees required to complete the transaction. 3. It is understood and agreed that this Agreement of Purchase and Sale is subject to the approval of Niagara Falls City Council. 4. It is understood and agreed that the land to be purchased as described herein is subject to a survey to be prepared at the expense of the Purchaser. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By -law No. 2007 A by -law to authorize the payment of $24,319,473.44 for General Purposes. THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: That the City Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to pay the attached list of disbursements for the period beginning August 1, 2007 to August 28, 2007. Passed this tenth day of September 2007. DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK R. T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR First Reading: Second Reading: Third Reading: September 10, 2007 September 10, 2007 September 10, 2007 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTS Vendor Name 1184521 ONTARIO LTD 1456531 ONTARIO LTD 1492246 ONTARIO LTD 1609711 ONTARIO INC 2010159 ONTARIO LIMITED 4 OFFICE AUTOMATION LTD 407 ETR EXPRESS TOLL ROUTE 942352 ONTARIO LIMITED 0/A BRISK ALL GLASS SAFETY SUPP 984265 ONTARIO LTD aka CIRCLE P PAVING ABSOLUTE COMMUNICATIONS DESIGN ABSOLUTE COMMUNICATIONS DESIGN ACAPULCO ACOC MARKETING LTD ADVANCE TOWING AFFILIATED CUSTOMS BROKERS LTD AIR CARE SERVICES AIR CARE SERVICES AIR CARE SERVICES AIR CARE SERVICES AIR LIQUIDE CANADA INC ALBANESE,LORI ALFIDOME CONSTRUCTION ALFIDOME CONSTRUCTION ALFIDOME CONSTRUCTION ALFRED BEAM EXCAVATION LTD ALL GREEN IRRIGATION ALLEN TREE SERVICE ALLIED MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS ALTUS CLAYTON AMADIO AUTOMOTIVE CENTRE INC AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION #1582 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION #1582 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION #1582 AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION #1582 ANTHONY'S EXCAVATING AND ELCHO FARMS INC ANTONIO,CHUCK ANTONIO,CHUCK ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES ARMTEC LIMITED ARMTEC LIMITED ARNOTT,D ASHLAND CANADA CORP ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS OF ONT BAIOCCO CONST CORP BAIOCCO CONST CORP BAKER TRANSIT PARTS INC BAKER TRANSIT PARTS INC BAKER TRANSIT PARTS INC BANK OF MONTREAL BARRY BRYAN ASSOCIATES (1991) LTD BARRY J. LEGG BEATTIES BASICS BEATTIES BASICS BECKINGHAM,PAUL BEHRING,ALEX BEL VOLT SALES LTD BEL VOLT SALES LTD BELL CANADA BELL CANADA BELL CANADA BELL CANADA BELL CANADA BELL CANADA BELL CANADA BELL CANADA BELL MOBILITY BEN BERG FARM INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT LTD BEST WESTERN CAIRN CROFT HOTEL BETTER SHADE BOB ROBINSON SON CONSTRUCTION BOB ROBINSON SON CONSTRUCTION BOB ROBINSON SON CONSTRUCTION Cheque No. Cheque Date Purpose 313029 14- Aug -2007 REFUND -TAX 313030 14- Aug -2007 REFUND SERVICE DEPOSIT 313031 14- Aug -2007 REFUND -TAX 313032 14- Aug -2007 REFUND -TAX 313371 28- Aug -2007 REFUND 313033 14- Aug -2007 LEASES AND RENTS 313372 28- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 313213 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312930 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313035 14- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 313374 28- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 313214 21- Aug -2007 POOL SUPPLIES 313215 21- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 313375 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313036 14 -Aug -2007 SERVICES 312905 07- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313037 14- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313216 21- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313376 28- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313217 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313218 21- Aug -2007 TRAVEL/MILEAGE 313038 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313039 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313377 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313219 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 312906 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313220 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 312907 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312908 07- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 313040 14- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 312909 07- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313041 14- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313221 21- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313378 28- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313042 14- Aug -2007 EQUIPMENT 313043 14- Aug -2007 TRAVEL/MILEAGE 313379 28- Aug -2007 TRAVEL/MILEAGE 312910 07- Aug -2007 SUPPLIES 313044 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313222 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312911 07- Aug -2007 REGISTRATION FEE 313223 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312912 07- Aug -2007 MEMBERSHIP 312913 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 312914 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 312915 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313045 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313224 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312916 07- Aug -2007 REFUND -TAX 313046 14- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 313381 28- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 312917 07- Aug -2007 OFFICE SUPPLIES 313382 28- Aug -2007 OFFICE SUPPLIES 312904 03- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313225 21- Aug -2007 REFUND SERVICE DEPOSIT 312919 07- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313050 14- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 312918 07- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313048 14- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313049 14- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313226 21- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313227 21- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313228 21- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313229 21- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313383 28- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313230 21- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313384 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312920 07- Aug -2007 MEETING EXPENSE 313051 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312999 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313334 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313477 28- Aug -2007 LEASES AND RENTS Page 1 of 8 Amount 21,069.98 750.00 85,959.96 7,689.26 11,192.72 642.33 179.78 249.66 266,988.92 742.00 1,966.50 2,177.40 6,254.00 371.00 169.71 2,143.34 3,118.44 5,056.06 1,501.46 10.60 23.00 62,508.73 28,990.10 6,988.35 20,465.75 1,000.38 16,536.00 351.38 836.58 94.62 684.48 684.48 695.52 662.40 445.20 24.00 37.50 71.71 1,100.87 399.77 45.00 255.20 349.80 225,155.75 4,977.21 119.70 1,090.27 536.40 154.59 114,595.60 7,679.97 466.26 17.44 85.00 750.00 74.67 437.88 8,529.84 57.00 180.90 662.41 57.00 17.01 2,389.00 7,195.90 463.92 179.12 121.32 1,100.00 530.00 636.00 1,510.50 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTS Vendor Name BOBB BARRATT PHOTOGRAPHER BOOTH,JOANNE BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS BOUW,JOHN BOUW,JOHN BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF NIAGARA BRENNAN,JIM BRINKS CANADA LTD BRINKS CANADA LTD BRITISH AUTO SUPPLY BRITISH AUTO SUPPLY BRITISH AUTO SUPPLY BROCK AUTOMOTIVE BROCK AUTOMOTIVE BROCK AUTOMOTIVE BRODERICK PARTNERS BRODERICK PARTNERS BRODERICK PARTNERS IN TRUST BUNTIN REID BUNTIN REID BUNTIN REID BURSHTEIN,TIM BUSH,STEVE BUSINESS EDUCATION COUNCIL OF NIAGARA BUSY BEE CONVENIENCE C R L CAMPBELL CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE LTD C R L CAMPBELL CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE LTD CALE SYSTEMS INC CANADIAN BEARINGS LTD CANADIAN DOOR DOCTOR CANADIAN LINEN AND UNIFORM SERVICE CANADIAN MAINTENANCE SERVICES CANADIAN NATIONAL CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO CANADIAN TIRE COMMERCIAL MASTERCARD CANAL,DANIEL CANNON HYGIENE CANADA LTD CANTEC SECURITY SERVICES CANTEC SECURITY SERVICES CARDINAL COURIERS LTD CARLETON UNIFORMS INC CARR,KEVIN CARRICK,MARZENNA CARSWELL CARTER CAR TRUCK RENTALS CENTRE FOR ADVANCED VISUALIZATION CERIDIAN CANADA LTD CH2M HILL CANADA LTD CHARLES JONES INDUSTRIAL LTD CHARLES JONES INDUSTRIAL LTD CHARLES JONES INDUSTRIAL LTD CHECKERBOARD CONSULTANTS CHOWN CAIRNS IN TRUST CHRIS TURNER ASSOCIATES INC CIMCO REFRIGERATION CIT FINANCIAL LTD CITICORP VENDOR FINANCE LTD CITY OF BRAMPTON CITY OF ST CATHARINES CLAYDON,JEFF COGECO CABLE CANADA INC COGECO CABLE CANADA INC COGECO CABLE CANADA INC COGECO CABLE CANADA INC COMMERCIAL SOLUTIONS INC COMMISSIONAIRES COMMISSIONAIRES COMMISSIONAIRES COMMUNITIES IN BLOOM COTTON INC COTTON INC COTTON INC Cheque No. Cheque Date Purpose 313231 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312921 07- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313385 28- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 312922 07- Aug -2007 LIVESTOCK FEE 313052 14- Aug -2007 LIVESTOCK CLAIM 313053 14- Aug -2007 GRANT 313054 14- Aug -2007 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 312923 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313233 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313055 14- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313234 21- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313386 28- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 312924 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313056 14- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313235 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313058 14- Aug -2007 LEGAL FEES 313387 28- Aug -2007 LEGAL FEES 313210 17- Aug -2007 DEPOSIT 313059 14- Aug -2007 OFFICE SUPPLIES 313237 21- Aug -2007 OFFICE SUPPLIES 313388 28- Aug -2007 OFFICE SUPPLIES 313389 28- Aug -2007 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 313390 28- Aug -2007 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 313391 28- Aug -2007 COMPUTER 313238 21- Aug -2007 MONTHLY PASS REV 313083 14- Aug -2007 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 313257 21- Aug -2007 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 313060 14- Aug -2007 GPRS SERVICE 313392 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313062 14- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313064 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313239 21- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 313240 21- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313242 21- Aug -2007 REFUND -TAX 313065 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313067 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312925 07- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 313241 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313066 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313243 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313068 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312926 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312927 07- Aug -2007 SAFETY SHOES 313069 14- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 312928 07- Aug -2007 BOOKS 313070 14- Aug -2007 LEASES AND RENTS 313071 14- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 313394 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313072 14- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 313073 14- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313245 21- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313395 28- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313074 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313246 21- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 313352 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313247 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313248 21- Aug -2007 LEASES AND RENTS 313075 14- Aug -2007 LEASES AND RENTS 313370 21- Aug -2007 REGISTRATION FEE 313249 21- Aug -2007 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AD 313077 14- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 312932 07- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313078 14- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313250 21- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313396 28- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 312933 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312934 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313079 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313397 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313251 21- Aug -2007 REGISTRATION FEE 312936 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313081 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313082 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS Page 2 of 8 Amount 3,271.80 443.46 221.16 60.00 350.00 17,500.00 229.20 178.70 45.32 547.20 283.86 383.52 81.70 1,446.82 342.00 2,020.63 3,663.89 2,500.00 1,375.78 674.79 236.21 214.36 79.00 175.00 225.40 6,937.70 8,589.18 923.40 246.73 253.08 2,143.68 2,937.81 4,632.84 48,589.08 975.48 458.09 573.00 267.12 3,884.52 13,235.16 108.98 95.76 150.00 141.50 109.71 739.86 79,500.00 2,281.50 21,370.12 1,383.71 251.10 41.61 804.50 15,000.00 530.00 2,267.71 107.64 2,016.09 300.00 573.75 112.50 101.66 409.96 50.83 199.13 194.92 1,863.90 2,316.56 35,525.57 742.00 2,556.25 264,876.10 2,265.23 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTS Vendor Name COTTON INC CRAMARO TARPAULIN SYSTEMS CRAWFORD ADJUSTERS CANADA INCORP CRAWFORD ADJUSTERS CANADA INCORP CUPE LOCAL 133 CUPE LOCAL 133 CUPE LOCAL 133 CUPE LOCAL 133 CUPE LOCAL 133 CYGNAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP T46181 DAIMLER CHRYSLER COMM BUSES NORTH AMERICA DAIMLER CHRYSLER COMM BUSES NORTH AMERICA DAMATO,JOHN DATA FIX DEBENEDETTI,NICK DEEP STEAM DELDUCA,DAVE DELL CANADA INC DENCO ENGINEERING LTD DEROSE BROS GENERAL CONTRACTING LIMITED DESIGN ELECTRONICS DIFILLIPPO,TONY DIRECT IT CORP DIRECTOR OF FAMILY SUPPORT DOBBIES FLORIST LTD DRAFTCON CALAMAR CORP DYNAMIC ONLINE MARKETING CORP E3 LABORATORIES E3 LABORATORIES EARTHDANCE LANDSCAPING INC EARTHDANCE LANDSCAPING INC ELLIS ENGINEERING INC EMERALD EMERALD EMERALD ENBRIDGE ENBRIDGE ENBRIDGE ENBRIDGE ENGINEERING CONCEPTS NIAGARA ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR CANADA LTD ESTATE OF,PATRICK SHAUGHNESSY EVERLASTING IMPRESSIONS EVERLASTING IMPRESSIONS EVERLASTING IMPRESSIONS FALLS AUTO BODY INC FALLS ELECTRIC INC FALLS ELECTRIC INC FALLSVIEW BIA FEDERAL EXPRESS CANADA LTD FIRESERVICE MANAGEMENT LTD FIRST NIAGARA INSURANCE FLEXO PRODUCTS LTD FLEXO PRODUCTS LTD FLEXO PRODUCTS LTD FLUELLON,FRANK D FOGLER RUBINOFF LLP (IN TRUST) FRANK COWAN COMPANY LIMITED FRED CRAIG FRED CRAIG G K SERVICES CANADA INC GALT MACHINE KNIFE SAW GATTO,LORENZO GB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NIAGARA LTD GIBBS FAMILY TRUST GIURA BROTHERS GLADDING SALES AGENCY LTD GLADDING SALES AGENCY LTD GLADDING SALES AGENCY LTD GLADDING SALES AGENCY LTD GOLIA COLOR CENTRE GOODLIFE FITNESS CLUBS GRAYBAR ELECTRIC LTD Page 3 of 8 Cheque No. Cheque Date Purpose Amount 313252 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 1,011.63 312937 07- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 75.86 313255 21- Aug -2007 INSURANCE CLAIMS 5,819.60 313256 21- Aug -2007 TRUST ACCT REPLENISHMENT 13,377.69 312903 01- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 4,022.54 312939 07- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 4,249.91 313084 14- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 4,234.86 313258 21- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 4,198.23 313398 28- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 4,137.75 313259 21- Aug -2007 COMPUTER 2,970.00 313085 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 660.51 313260 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 261.98 313086 14- Aug -2007 REFUND PARKING 24.37 313087 14- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 2,226.00 313088 14- Aug -2007 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 477.00 313089 14- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 83.74 313400 28- Aug -2007 REFUND SERVICE DEPOSIT 750.00 313401 28- Aug -2007 COMPUTER 33,101.04 313261 21- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 1,071.16 313090 14- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 1,060.00 312940 07- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 1,944.91 313091 14- Aug -2007 REFUND SERVICE DEPOSIT 750.00 313402 28- Aug -2007 COMPUTER 1,391.25 313403 28- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 325.00 313092 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 77.12 312941 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 41,127.96 313093 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 342.00 313094 14- Aug -2007 WATER TESTING 143.10 313405 28- Aug -2007 WATER TESTING 3,931.58 313095 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 7,981.80 313262 21- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 530.00 313263 21- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 5,990.40 312942 07- Aug -2007 METER INSTALLATION 439.90 313096 14- Aug -2007 METER INSTALLATION 439.90 313406 28- Aug -2007 METER INSTALLATION 994.28 312943 07- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 50.41 313097 14- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 4,007.84 313264 21- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 1,162.90 313407 28- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 87.16 313408 28- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 795.00 313409 28- Aug -2007 REFUND PARKING 15.00 313183 14- Aug -2007 REFUND 199.86 312945 07- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 1,160.17 313098 14- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 424.00 313410 28- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 1,999.16 313411 28- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 1,873.96 312946 07- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 315.88 313412 28- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 528.43 313022 08- Aug -2007 CONVENTION CENTRE 500,000.00 313265 21- Aug -2007 SERVICES 36.90 312947 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 336.93 313099 14- Aug -2007 INSURANCE PREMIUMS 144,331.92 313100 14- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 663.65 313266 21- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 2,089.97 313413 28- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 176.27 313101 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 35.00 313211 17- Aug -2007 DEPOSIT 5,000.00 313102 14- Aug -2007 INSURANCE CLAIMS 77,922.86 313103 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 226.58 313267 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 170.60 313104 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 109.00 313268 21- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 69.54 312948 07 Aug 2007 LIVESTOCK CLAIM 99.00 313269 21- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 742.00 312949 07- Aug -2007 REFUND SERVICE DEPOSIT 750.00 313270 21- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 408.10 312950 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 1,780.65 313105 14- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 117.54 313271 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 2,031.63 313414 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 2,391.44 313415 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 3,142.66 312951 07- Aug -2007 MEMBERSHIPS 12,402.00 312952 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 123.54 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTS Vendor Name GRAYBAR ELECTRIC LTD GRAYBAR ELECTRIC LTD GRAYBAR ELECTRIC LTD GREATER NIAGARA GENERAL HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND GREENLAWN GREY ISLAND SYSTEMS INC GROSZ,STEVE GROUND AERIAL MAINTENANCE LTD GROUND AERIAL MAINTENANCE LTD GROUND AERIAL MAINTENANCE LTD GRUBICH,JOHN GT FRENCH PAPER LIMITED GUILLEVIN INTERNATIONAL INC GUILLEVIN INTERNATIONAL INC GUILLEVIN INTERNATIONAL INC GYM CON LTD HAINE,LESLIE HALCO MOBILE MFG SALES SERVICE INC HALCO MOBILE MFG SALES SERVICE INC HALCO MOBILE MFG SALES SERVICE INC HALF WAY SAND PIT LIMITED HALF WAY SAND PIT LIMITED HALLIDAY,DR FIONA HAMDANI DRYCLEANERS LTD HAMILTON,STEPHEN HANKS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE HAPPENINGS PARTY RENTALS HARD ROCK CONST INC HARD ROCK CONST INC HARPER POWER PRODUCTS INC HARPER POWER PRODUCTS INC HARPER POWER PRODUCTS INC HECO HECO HECO HERTZ CANADA LTD HICKS MORLEY HAMILTON STEWART STORIE LLP HORTON AUTOMATICS OF CANADA ICI CANADA INC ICI CANADA INC ICI CANADA INC INDEPENDENT SUPPLY CO LTD IOANNONI,CARMINE IOANNONI,CAROLYNN IPSOS REID ISECO INDUSTRIAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO LTD J. DAVID POUNDER LIMITED JACK DOW AUTO SUPPLIES LIMITED JACKSON,CHRISTINE JAX COMMERCIAL FITNESS EQUIPMENT REPAIR KAN DU POOLS LTD KCM CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE KCM CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE KELLY DIGS LANDSCAPING KELLY DIGS LANDSCAPING KENWORTH TORONTO LTD KENWORTH TORONTO LTD KERRY T HOWE ENGINEERING LTD KERRY T HOWE ENGINEERING LTD KNOWLTON PASS ELECTRONICS INC KRAWCZYK CONST MAINTENANCE KUCHYT,TOM LAERDAL MEDICAL CANADA LTD LAFARGE CANADA INC LAKES MAINTENANCE LAMMERT,MICHAEL LATOPLAST LTD LATOPLAST LTD LATOPLAST LTD LAWSON PRODUCTS INC LAWSON PRODUCTS INC LAWSON PRODUCTS INC LEEDS TRANSIT Cheque No. Cheque Date Purpose 313106 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313272 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313416 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313417 28- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313418 28- Aug -2007 LAWN SERVICE 313273 21- Aug -2007 MONTHLY SERVICES 312953 07- Aug -2007 REFUND SERVICE DEPOSIT 312954 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313274 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313362 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313419 28- Aug -2007 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 313275 21- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313109 14- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313276 21- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313420 28- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313277 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313421 28- Aug -2007 REFUND SERVICE DEPOSIT 313110 14- Aug -2007 LEASES AND RENTS 313278 21- Aug -2007 LEASES AND RENTS 313422 28- Aug -2007 LEASES AND RENTS 313111 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313279 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313423 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312955 07- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313112 14- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 313113 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313424 28- Aug -2007 REFUND 313114 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313280 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312956 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313115 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313281 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313116 14- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313282 21- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313425 28- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313426 28- Aug -2007 REFUND PARKING 313427 28- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 313283 21- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313117 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313284 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313428 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313285 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313429 28- Aug -2007 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 313027 13- Aug -2007 ADMINISTRATIVE 313430 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 312957 07- Aug -2007 SAFETY SHOES 313327 21- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 312958 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313286 21- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 313287 21- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313432 28- Aug -2007 REFUND 312959 07- Aug -2007 LEASES AND RENTS 313288 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313119 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313289 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313120 14- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES 313433 28- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES 313121 14- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 313290 21- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 312960 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313122 14- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313024 09- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 312962 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312963 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313291 21- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 312964 07- Aug -2007 REFUND 312965 07- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313123 14- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313292 21- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 313124 14- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES 313293 21- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES 313434 28- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES 313294 21- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS Page 4 of 8 Amount 24.67 70.71 132.24 70.50 678.43 2,309.60 750.00 22,205.14 1,511.80 24,555.32 217.01 4,684.60 1,437.70 2,948.16 712.50 3,593.85 750.00 1,410.75 1,633.05 3,343.05 838.75 1,257.74 9,325.24 21.39 112.00 855.00 60.00 13,006.57 7,447.32 2,715.46 291.66 680.38 2,016.36 117.66 9,849.41 15.00 1,366.19 3,402.60 288.96 50.31 104.30 1,630.40 219.50 717.36 5,300.00 136.79 2,377.56 127.34 46.00 74.20 9,413.50 842.70 2,183.60 4,922.64 11,065.95 137.76 905.04 9,795.67 8,818.18 5,597.40 4,028.00 387.24 2,581.09 513.00 360.40 344.50 239.40 199.47 513.12 1,159.99 2,718.71 1,182.24 223.28 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTS Vendor Name LEXISNEXIS CANADA INC LEXISNEXIS CANADA INC LEXISNEXIS CANADA INC LOUISA DAVIE ARBITRATIONS LOURAS,GEORGE MALIBU POOLS MALIBU POOLS MALIBU POOLS MANCHESTER SUPPLY MAR -CO CLAY PRODUCTS INC MARINE CLEAN LTD MARINE CLEAN LTD MARR SWEEPER SERVICE MARTIN,ROBERT MATTHEWS CAMERON HEYWOOD KERRY T HOWE SURVEYING MCCLURG,ROBERT MCCORDICK GLOVE SAFETY INC MCLEOD,CRAIG MCLEOD SAVOIE AUTO AND TRUCK SERVICE LTD MCMASTER MEDICAL ORIENTATION MCQUILLAN,KEVIN MCRAE,LEN MEDCON MECHANICAL LTD MELLEN DISTRIBUTING 1137637 ONTARIO INC MERIDIAN PLANNING CONSULTANTS INC METRO PLUMBING HEATING METRO PLUMBING HEATING MINERVINI,DOMENIC MINISTER OF FINANCE MINISTER OF FINANCE MINISTER OF FINANCE MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL MIRABELLI,SAM MODERN LANDFILL INC MODERN LANDFILL INC MODERN LANDFILL INC MOHAWK MFG SUPPLY CO MOHAWK MFG SUPPLY CO MONTCAP FINANCIAL CORPORATION MONTGOMERY,MOE& MONTGOMERY, MIKE MONTGOMERY,MOE& MONTGOMERY, MIKE MOROCCO,JOHN MORRISSEY,DENYSE MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES LIMITED MOTTOLA,MIKE MR KLEEN ALL MUSSARI,TOM N TEC GREENHOUSES NATALE,BOB& MCAULEY, VIRGINIA NIACON LTD CONST CO NIAGARA BATTERY AND TIRE NIAGARA BLOCK INC NIAGARA CHAIR A VAN NIAGARA DOOR HARDWARE 1434220 ONTARIO LIMITED NIAGARA DOOR HARDWARE 1434220 ONTARIO LIMITED NIAGARA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION NIAGARA FALLS PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC NIAGARA FALLS PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC NIAGARA FALLS PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC NIAGARA FALLS PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC NIAGARA FALLS HUMANE SOCIETY NIAGARA FALLS HUMANE SOCIETY NIAGARA FALLS HYDRO NIAGARA FALLS HYDRO NIAGARA FALLS HYDRO NIAGARA FALLS HYDRO NIAGARA FALLS HYDRO Cheque No. Cheque Date Purpose 312966 07- Aug -2007 PUBLICATIONS 313126 14- Aug -2007 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 313435 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313438 28- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 313296 21- Aug -2007 REFUND 312968 07- Aug -2007 POOL SUPPLIES 313297 21- Aug -2007 POOL SUPPLIES 313439 28- Aug -2007 POOL SUPPLIES 313298 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313299 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 312969 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313300 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313440 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313301 21- Aug -2007 REFUND 313302 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313128 14- Aug -2007 SAFETY SHOES 313303 21- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 312970 07- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 313441 28- Aug -2007 REFUND 313442 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313305 21- Aug -2007 REFUND 313129 14- Aug -2007 REFUND 313443 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 312971 07- Aug -2007 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 313306 21- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 313130 14- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313444 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 312972 07- Aug -2007 MILEAGE 313308 21- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 313309 21- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 313310 21- Aug -2007 ADMINISTRATIVE 312973 07- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313132 14- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313307 21- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313445 28- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313133 14- Aug -2007 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 312974 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313311 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313446 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313134 14- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 313447 28- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 313135 14- Aug -2007 COLD PATCH 312975 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 313312 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 312976 07- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 313136 14- Aug -2007 TRAVEL /MILEAGE 312977 07- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 313137 14- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 313313 21- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 313448 28- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 313138 14- Aug -2007 REFUND 313139 14- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313140 14- Aug -2007 PETTY CASH 313321 21- Aug -2007 REFUND 313141 14- Aug -2007 REFUND SERVICE DEPOSIT 313143 14- Aug -2007 REFUND SERVICE DEPOSIT 313449 28- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 313314 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313363 21- Aug -2007 GRANT 313144 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313315 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 313145 14- Aug -2007 ADMINISTRATIVE 312980 07- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313149 14- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313319 21- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313453 28- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 313146 14- Aug -2007 DOG TAG REMITTANCE 313364 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 312978 07- Aug -2007 WATER ARREARS 312979 07- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313147 14- Aug -2007 WATER ARREARS 313148 14- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 313317 21- Aug -2007 WATER ARREARS Page 5 of 8 Amount 243.80 188.15 248.03 1,715.61 750.00 612.87 2,412.67 450.06 1,386.24 212,03 20,824.18 5,160.73 755.00 750.00 530.00 150.00 721.48 713.00 149.04 500.00 293.16 180.00 332.41 134.32 13,724.91 22,323.85 13,087.47 307.50 564.17 11,225.41 19,200.00 1,613.46 1,613.46 1,517.92 1,517.92 132.44 3,603.45 664.25 2,750.06 696.81 88.55 2,854.55 530.00 330.37 329.50 36.00 2,252.36 382.01 371.86 1,205.89 750.00 636.00 196.24 390.00 750.00 750.00 5,304.66 109.32 74,078.75 323.76 1,045.95 3,158.72 2,629.76 2,629.76 2,629.76 2,629.76 75.00 38,843.19 4,882.87 2,641.87 5,745.73 2,717.85 4,923.76 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTS Vendor Name NIAGARA FALLS HYDRO NIAGARA FALLS HYDRO NIAGARA FALLS HYDRO NIAGARA FALLS TOURISM NIAGARA FALLS TOURISM NIAGARA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES NIAGARA ON THE LAKE HYDRO INC NIAGARA PLUMBING SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED NIAGARA REGIONAL POLICE SERVICE NIAGARA RESORTS INC. NIAGARA SHEET METAL NIAGARA SHEET METAL NIAGARA TRANSIT NIAGARA WATER CONDITIONING LTD NIAGARA.COM NORJOHN LTD NORJOHN LTD OCE- CANADA INC OKIMI'S ATWORK OFFICE FURNITURE ONEIDA CANADA LIMITED ONTARIO POWER GENERATION INC ONTARIO REALTY CORPORATION ONTARIO WATER PRODUCTS INC ONTARIO WATER PRODUCTS INC OPTIMIST CLUB ORNAMENTAL CONCRETE IND. LTD ORNAMENTAL CONCRETE IND. LTD PALMER,WENDALL PANTUSA,BRIAN PARRENT,SHAUN PART SOURCE PART SOURCE PART SOURCE PATRICK,GREG PEARSON BUS SALES LTD PENINSULA ABSTRACT INC PENINSULA CONSTRUCTION INC PENINSULA CONSTRUCTION INC PENINSULA PRESS LIMITED PENINSULA PURE WATER PENINSULA PURE WATER PERFORMANCE CHRYSLER PERFORMANCE POWDER COATING FASTENERS LTD PIGEON,ROGER PINERIDGE TREE SERVICE LTD PIPEFLO CONTRACTING CORPORATION PITNEY BOWES POTTHAST,FRED PRATA,GUY PRATA,GUY PRAXAIR PREVOST COACH TRANSIT PREVOST COACH TRANSIT PREVOST COACH TRANSIT PROFESSIONAL'S CHOICE FLOORING PROJECT SHARE PROSECUTORS' ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO PROVINCIAL CONSTRUCTION (NIAGARA FALLS) LTD PROVINCIAL CONSTRUCTION (NIAGARA FALLS) LTD PROVINCIAL CONTRACTORS INC PURDY,ROGER& PURDY, CATHERINE PUROLATOR COURIER PUROLATOR COURIER PUROLATOR COURIER R J SMITH EQUIPMENT INC R J SMITH EQUIPMENT INC R J SMITH EQUIPMENT INC RAIMONDO ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS INC RAINBOW GREENHOUSES LTD RANKIN CONSTRUCTION INC RANKIN CONSTRUCTION INC RBC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY RCI CONSULTING Page 6 of 8 Cheque No. Cheque Date Purpose Amount 313318 21- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 207.50 313450 28- Aug -2007 WATER ARREARS 3,450.73 313451 28- Aug -2007 UTILITIES 124,563.47 313365 21- Aug -2007 GRANT 23,333.33 313454 28- Aug -2007 REIMBURSE FROM OPG FUNDING 977.65 313455 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 5,651.10 312981 07- Aug -2007 ADMINISTRATIVE 41.64 313150 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 16.10 313456 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 35.00 313151 14- Aug -2007 REFUND -TAX 109,420.07 312982 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 114.00 313320 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 114.00 313152 14- Aug -2007 PETTY CASH 765.53 312983 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 182.40 313142 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 152.06 312984 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 89,944.44 313153 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 658,388.77 313154 14- Aug -2007 COURIER 4,032.31 313457 28- Aug -2007 EQUIPMENT 347.69 313209 15- Aug -2007 REFUND -TAX 3,067.09 313155 14- Aug -2007 LEASES AND RENTS 975.20 313212 17- Aug -2007 DEPOSIT 2,100.00 312986 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 1,938.00 313458 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 131.10 313156 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 601.92 313157 14- Aug -2007 SEWER REBATE 540.34 313459 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 228.00 313158 14- Aug -2007 LIVESTOCK CLAIM 400.00 313322 21- Aug -2007 REFUND 300.00 313460 28- Aug -2007 REFUND 750.00 313159 14- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES 770.69 313323 21- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES 23.29 313461 28- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES 346.25 312987 07- Aug -2007 REFUND 148.01 313160 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 308.45 313463 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 137.53 313324 21- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 318.00 313462 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 7,436.51 313325 21- Aug -2007 ADVERTISING 6,636.18 312988 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 395.00 313161 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 100.00 313162 14- Aug -2007 VEHICLE 56,282.94 313464 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 57.00 313465 28- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 45.00 313326 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 7,568.40 312989 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 7,950.00 313163 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 184.51 313466 28- Aug -2007 SAFETY SHOES 150.00 313164 14- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 47.50 313467 28- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 35.00 313468 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 1,088.36 313165 14- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 45.55 313328 21- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 30.72 313469 28- Aug -2007 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 18.38 313470 28- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 707.52 313366 21- Aug -2007 GRANT 25,412.67 313166 14- Aug -2007 TRAINING 1,054.70 313167 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 98,349.18 313168 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 170,194.32 313169 14- Aug -2007 REFUND SERVICE DEPOSIT 750.00 313329 21- Aug -2007 REFUND 310.70 312990 07- Aug -2007 COURIER 105.04 313170 14- Aug -2007 COURIER 20.65 313471 28- Aug -2007 COURIER 200.20 312998 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 1,687.20 313333 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 2,102.39 313475 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 2,114.70 312991 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 1,662.03 313171 14- Aug -2007 PLANT MATERIALS 275.56 312992 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 5,300.00 313172 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 111,921.88 313330 21- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 1,226.31 313173 14- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 4,242.76 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTS Vendor Name REALTAX INC RECEIVER GENERAL RECEIVER GENERAL RECEIVER GENERAL RECEIVER GENERAL REMPEL,LAUREN ROBERT BRAKEL ASSOCIATES LTD ROCHESTER MIDLAND LIMITED RODMAN,HEATHER RONA ONTARIO INC RONA ONTARIO INC RUDACHUK,PHILIP SACCO CONSTRUCTION SAFETY TODAY SALCI,TED SALCI,TED SALCI,TED SALIT STEEL SCARINGI,VITO SCOTIABANK SCOTIABANK SCOTT PETRIE BRANDER WALTERS WRIGHT LLP SEALER WORKS SETON SETON SHAHEEN PEAKER LTD SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHRED IT KITCHENER SIMPLEX GRINNELL SIMPLEX GRINNELL SIMPLISTIC LINES INC SKOWRONEK,PETER SMITH,LEE SNAP ON TOOLS ST CATHARINES BUSINESS MACHINES STELFAB NIAGARA LTD STEVENSVILLE LAWN SERVICE INC STRATEGY CORP STREAMLINE STRIPES AND SIGNS SULLIVAN MAHONEY SULLIVAN MAHONEY SUN LIFE OF CANADA SUN LIFE OF CANADA SUN LIFE OF CANADA SUN LIFE OF CANADA SUN LIFE OF CANADA SUNCOR ENERGY PRODUCTS INC SUNCOR ENERGY PRODUCTS INC SUNCOR ENERGY PRODUCTS INC SUNCOR ENERGY PRODUCTS INC SUPERIOR BLEND COFFEE LTD SUPERIOR BLEND COFFEE LTD SUPREMEX INC SUPREMEX INC TALK WIRELESS INC TAMM COMMUNICATIONS INC TANFARA,BRENDA TD CANADA TRUST PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT TD CANADA TRUST PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT TELUS MOBILITY TELUS MOBILITY THE CAMERA PLACE FOTO SOURCE THE CITY OF ST ALBERT THE COUNTRY BASKET THE DRAFTING CLINIC CANADA LTD THE EQUIPMENT SPECIALIST INC THE JACKET CELLAR THE ONTARIO HISTORICAL SOCIETY THE PRINTING HOUSE LTD THE PRINTING HOUSE LTD THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA Page 7 of 8 Cheque No. Cheque Date Purpose Amount 313472 28- Aug -2007 FEES 4,266.50 312993 07- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 269,917.66 313174 14- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 177,730.76 313331 21- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 213,925.81 313473 28- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 189,659.92 312997 07- Aug -2007 TRAVEL /MILEAGE 23.50 313476 28- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 31,688.57 313478 28- Aug -2007 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 429.24 313178 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 300.00 313335 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 31.83 313479 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 48.15 313179 14- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 366.50 313180 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 104,964.29 313480 28- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 983.25 313028 13- Aug -2007 ADMINISTRATIVE 903.00 313336 21- Aug -2007 TSF TO ELECTION ACCOUNT 3,152.28 313337 21- Aug -2007 ADMINISTRATIVE 1,155.00 313338 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 238.09 313481 28- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 132.00 313483 28- Aug -2007 US DRAFT 420.56 313484 28- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 99,195.74 313485 28- Aug -2007 ADMINISTRATIVE 161,262.53 313486 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 159.00 313339 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 373.60 313487 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 534.14 313488 28- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 1,782.92 313340 21- Aug -2007 PAINTS 1,393.85 313489 28- Aug -2007 PAINTS 300.91 313490 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 68.90 313001 07- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 214.32 313184 14- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 1,845.66 313185 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 3,596.68 313186 14- Aug -2007 FIRE COLLEGE COURSE 45.00 313002 07- Aug -2007 PETTY CASH 132.76 313341 21- Aug -2007 MECHANICS TOOLS 231.77 313492 28- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 134.24 313368 21- Aug -2007 REFUND 500.00 313003 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 36,259.63 313342 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 15,900.00 313493 28- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 558.60 313188 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 684.00 313189 14- Aug -2007 LEGAL SERVICES 2,797.87 313494 28- Aug -2007 LEGAL SERVICES 3,712.47 313021 08- Aug -2007 PAID UP LIFE INSURANCE 1,712.16 313025 13- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 573.59 313026 13- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 282.66 313344 21- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 266,701.08 313345 21- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 953.37 313004 07- Aug -2007 FUEL 59,034.03 313190 14- Aug -2007 FUEL 54,491.94 313343 21- Aug -2007 FUEL 23,036.95 313495 28- Aug -2007 FUEL 85,156.22 313005 07- Aug -2007 COFFEE SUPPLIES 799.57 313496 28- Aug -2007 COFFEE SUPPLIES 787.36 313006 07- Aug -2007 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,561.68 313497 28- Aug -2007 OFFICE SUPPLIES 951.90 313498 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 21.38 313499 28- Aug -2007 ADVERTISING 2,659.41 313191 14- Aug -2007 REFUND SERVICE DEPOSIT 500.00 313007 07- Aug -2007 REFUND 1,443.38 313192 14- Aug -2007 REFUND 1,009.20 313008 07- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 1,251.01 313193 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 537.89 313061 14- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 328.32 313076 14- Aug -2007 REGISTRATION FEE 1,409.40 313253 21- Aug -2007 REFUND -WATER STANDPIPE 300.00 313404 28- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 200.66 312944 07- Aug -2007 MAINTENANCE /REPAIRS 1,177.00 313502 28- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 279.30 313346 21- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 30.00 313009 07- Aug -2007 BUSINESS CARDS 55.86 313503 28- Aug -2007 BUSINESS CARDS 111.72 312994 07- Aug -2007 3 RD TAX LEVY 15,181,765.00 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTS Vendor Name THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF NIAGARA THE REVIEW THOMSON,WAYNE TORONTO POLICE SERVICE TOUCHSTONE SITE CONTRACTORS TOWN OF CALEDON TRAVELPIC NIAGARA FALLS TROY SPRINKLER LIMITED TURNBELL,JULIE TWARDAWSKY,NICK UAP INC #963 UAP INC #963 UAP INC #963 UAP INC #963 UNITED RENTALS UNITED WAY UPPER CANADA CONSULTANTS UPS CANADA URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INC URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INC URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INC URBAN METRICS INC V GIBBONS CONTRACTING LTD V GIBBONS CONTRACTING LTD VAN HOUTE COFFEE SERVICES INC CO 38 VICTORIA CENTRE BIA WAHEED,ABDUL WALDROFF,PAUL WALK ON DUST CONTROL WALK ON DUST CONTROL WALK ON DUST CONTROL WALKER AGGREGATES INC WALKER AGGREGATES INC WALKER AGGREGATES INC WARDON HOMES LIMITED WASTE MANAGEMENT WASTE MANAGEMENT WEBBTRONICS WELDARE METAL WORKS LTD WESCO DISTRIBUTION CANADA INC WESCO DISTRIBUTION CANADA INC WESCO DISTRIBUTION CANADA INC WINGER,TERRI WINTER FESTIVAL OF LIGHTS WOMEN'S PLACE OF SOUTH NIAGARA INC WRIGHT FUELS INC WRIGHT FUELS INC WSIB WSIB WYLIE,BRENDA YELLOW PAGES GROUP YMCA YMCA YMCA YWCA ST CATHARINES Page 8 of 8 Cheque No. Cheque Date Purpose Amount 312995 07- Aug -2007 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES 221,458.54 312996 07- Aug -2007 SIGNS/WASTE COLLECTIONS 10,949.85 313175 14- Aug -2007 MOE APPLICATION FEE 1,200.00 313176 14- Aug -2007 OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW 1,800.00 313177 14- Aug -2007 DEBENTURES /SERVICES 437,493.04 313367 21- Aug -2007 WATER FLOWS 1,734,882.79 313474 28- Aug -2007 SIGNS 1,490.28 313504 28- Aug -2007 ADVERTISING 8,160.47 313347 21- Aug -2007 TSF TO ELECTION ACCOUNT 5,410.56 313010 07- Aug -2007 ADMINISTRATIVE 49.82 313348 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 4,080.99 313349 21- Aug -2007 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 450.00 313350 21- Aug -2007 SOUVENIR BOOK 267.12 313351 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 379.48 313506 28- Aug -2007 REFUND 5.00 313507 28- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 83.00 313011 07- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 29.96 313195 14- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 44.28 313353 21- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 18.18 313508 28- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 328.13 313012 07- Aug -2007 LEASES AND RENTS 214.30 313509 28- Aug -2007 PAYROLL REMITTANCE 1,458.50 313196 14- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 17,574.86 313197 14- Aug -2007 COURIER 62.81 313013 07- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 10,806.70 313354 21- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 11,382.91 313510 28- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 6,004.07 313355 21- Aug -2007 CONSULTING SERVICES 5,670.45 313199 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 6,582.60 313200 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 1,593.74 313198 14- Aug -2007 SUPPLIES 175.55 313023 08- Aug -2007 GRANT 50,000.00 313201 14- Aug -2007 TRAVEUMILEAGE 106.60 313356 21- Aug -2007 REFUND 166.68 313015 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 316.35 313203 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 46.64 313511 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 203.00 313014 07- Aug -2007 ASPHALT 1,627.85 313202 14- Aug -2007 SHEET TOP ASPHALT 1,046.17 313357 21- Aug -2007 MATERIALS 3,043.10 313204 14- Aug -2007 REFUND SERVICE DEPOSIT 750.00 313016 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 50.18 313512 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 50.73 313017 07- Aug -2007 EQUIPMENT 1,937.09 313513 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 125.40 313018 07- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 78.84 313205 14- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 1,681.58 313514 28- Aug -2007 STORES /INVENTORY 84.48 313515 28- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 65.00 313369 21- Aug -2007 GRANT 31,666.67 313358 21- Aug -2007 GRANT 2,083.33 313019 07- Aug -2007 FUEL 35,850.09 313516 28- Aug -2007 FUEL 21,470.96 313206 14- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 150,448.19 313359 21- Aug -2007 REMITTANCE 1,585.75 313207 14- Aug -2007 PETTY CASH 372.66 313517 28- Aug -2007 ADVERTISING 15.53 313020 07- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 5,358.23 313208 14- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 2,838.36 313360 21- Aug -2007 CONTRACT SERVICES 4,197.00 313361 21- Aug -2007 GRANT 5,181.83 Total 24,319,473.44 Passed this tenth day of September, 2007. First Reading: Second Reading: Third Reading: September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. September 10, 2007. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS By -law No. 2007 A by -law to adopt, ratify and confirm the actions of City Council at its meeting held on the 10 day of September, 2007. WHEREAS it is deemed desirable and expedient that the actions and proceedings of Council as herein set forth be adopted, ratified and confirmed by by -law. NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The actions of the Council at its meeting held on the 10 day of September, 2007 including all motions, resolutions and other actions taken by the Council at its said meeting, are hereby adopted, ratified and confirmed as if they were expressly embodied in this by -law, except where the prior approval of the Ontario Municipal Board or other authority is by law required or any action required by law to be taken by resolution. 2. Where no individual by -law has been or is passed with respect to the taking of any action authorized in or with respect to the exercise of any powers by the Council, then this by -law shall be deemed for all purposes to be the by -law required for approving, authorizing and taking of any action authorized therein or thereby, or required for the exercise of any powers thereon by the Council. 3. The Mayor and the proper officers of the Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls are hereby authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to the said actions of the Council or to obtain approvals where required, and, except where otherwise provided, the Mayor and the Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute all documents arising therefrom and necessary on behalf of the Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls and to affix thereto the corporate seal of the Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls. DEAN IORFIDA, CITY CLERK R. T. (TED) SALCI, MAYOR