2009/04/06 # ~ st ~ ~ ~r x
~ ~ ~.,4 ~ : ~ ~ .~3, ~ ~~y ' ~ t 3 ~ r i ~
~~~~s~ ;COMMUNIT~Y SERVICES:~COMMITTEE AGENDA ~
~
x..s-~ ~ c s . t" . w ss ~,a,:. r , ~.;.kc z,z's ;s.. ~ ~
FOURTH MEETING
Monday, April 6, 2009
4:00 p.m.
City Hall, Committee Room #2A & B
1) Approval of the March 23, 2009 Community Services Minutes.
2) REPORTS: STAFF CONTACT:
a) MW-2009-21
DWQMS Operational Plan with Presentation Geoff Holman
b) BS-2009-01 John Castrilli
House moving concept in partnership with Niagara Regional
Housing, Niagara Region, Niagara Catholic District School Board,
Ed and Ruth Ann Nieuwesteeg and the City of Niagara Falls
c) R-2009-14
Recreation Property and Building End Use Update Denyse Morrissey
d) MW-2009-18
Front Street Flooding Remedial Works Geoff Holman
3) NEW BUSINESS:
4) ADJOURNMENT:
F ~ ~ ~ , ~
t+~, e . x ,r~., ~ .>a s ~ ..m o g ~ _ ~ ,3' : ~t ~
~ ~ , ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IN CAMERA SESSION~`~ _ Y ~
„n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
>,`~e~s.~..3.,''L2~S.M x~ . Ha .,a...,-a ~:...r-..sw~.i, ,~'~..o3~s5..2 .x,ti,..~w s~' ~-s .3 , ~'w ~ .°'+Y ~ --'-F'3..:.
a) Resolution to go into Closed Meeting.
Niagar~~'c~lls
MINUTES OF COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE
Third Meeting
Monday, March 23, 2009, Committee Room 2, 5:00 P.M.
PRESENT: Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair; MayorTed Salci, Councillors: Jim
Diodati, Shirley Fisher, Vince Kerrio, Bart Maves, Wayne Thomson
Janice Wing and Victor Pietrangelo.
STAFF: Ed Dujlovic, Todd Harrison, Geoff Holman, Dean lorfida, Ken Beaman,
Lee Smith, Denyse Morrissey, Dave Stuart, Alex Herlovitch, Trent Dark,
Karl Dren, Steve Norris, James Sticca and Marianne Tikky - Steno.
GUEST: Geoffrey Chapman - Main Street
PRESS: Corey Larocque, Niagara Falls Review, Paul Forsyth, Niagara This
Week
1. MINUTES
MOVED on the motion of Councillor Maves, seconded by Councillor Fisher that the
minutes of the March 9, 2009 meeting be adopted as amended. TS-2009-01 - Oxford
Street Parking Review, MOVED by Councillor Thomson and seconded by Councillor
Pietrangelo.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council March 23, 2009.
2. REPORTS
a) TS-2009-11
Transit Strategic Business Plan and Ridership Growth Strategy
Phase 4- Long Term Strategic Plan and Phase 5-
Short Term Business Plan Final Report
Presentafron by: Chris Prentice, IB! Group Consulfants
MOVED on the motion of Mayor Salci and seconded by Councillor Wing that;
1) That Phase 4- Long Term Strategic Plan and Phase 5- Short Term Business
Plan of the final report for the Transit Strategic Business Plan and Ridership
Growth Strategy be adopted by Council.
2) That the financial recommendations of the Phase 5- Short Term Business Plan
be forwarded for consideration as part of the 2009-2013 Capital Budget
deliberations.
-z-
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council March 23, 2009.
b) TS-2009-20
St. Michael Avenue at Brittany Court
St. Michael Avenue at McGarry Drive
Intersection Control Review
MOVED on the motion of CouncillorThomson and seconded by Councillor Fisherthat
an all-way stop control be installed at the intersection of St. Michael Avenue and
McGarry Drive.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council March 23, 2009.
c) TS-2009-18
Main Street Parking Review
MOVED on the motion Councillor Thomson and seconded by Councillor Wing that;
1) That the "No Parking, except by Permit on Sunday's between 9:00 a.m. to ~:00
p.m." restriction located on the south side of Main Street between Robinson
Street and a point 145 metres west of Allendale Avenue be removed to allow
unrestricted free parking; and,
2) That the "No Parking, except on Sunday's between 9:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m."
restriction located on the north side of Main Street between Robinson Street and
a point 155 metres west of AIlendale Avenue be removed to allow unrestricted
free parking; and,
3) The paid parking on Main Street adjacent the hydro corridor revert back to
unrestricted free parking.
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council March 23, 2009.
d) MW-2009-15
Basement Flooding
MOVED on the motion of Mayor Salci and seconded by Councillor Fisher that;
the report be receive and filed.
Motion: Carried
Conflict: Councillor Maves
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council March 23, 2009.
MOVED on the motion of Councillor Pietrangelo and seconded by Councillor Fisher
that staff prepare a report on a policy making payment to property owners that have
experienced basement flooding.
-3-
Motion: Carried
Action: Recommendation submitted to Council March 23, 2009.
4) ADJOURNMENT:
MOVED by Councillor Pietrangelo seconded by Councillor Maves that the
Committee adjourn to an In-Camera session at 5:57 p.m.
Motion: Carried
April 6, 2009 MW-2009-27
j~
l~lia~ara~aIls
Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: MW-2009-21
Drinking Water Quality Management System (DWQMS)
Operational Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
1) That City Council endorse the Drinking Water Quality Management System
Operational Plan, and
2) That staff be authorized to make the appropriate application to the Ministry of the
Environment priorto May 1, 2009.
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting held on September 24, 2007, City Council received an information report
(MW-2007-111) regarding the requirements of the Safe Drinking WaterAct, 2002, and the
steps the municipality must take in order to achieve compliance.
On October 29, 2007, Council authorized the engagement of the consulting firm, Urban &
Environmental Management Inc., to assist in the preparation and implementation of the
required Operational Plan (MW-2007-124).
On June 23, 2008, City Council approved the hiring of a DWQMS Coordinator to
implement the Operational Plan and perform related administrative duties (MW-2008-38).
At that meeting, Council received a presentation and due diligence training regarding the
roles and responsibilities, as owners of the City's water distribution system.
Le~slative Overview
As mentioned in the previous reports, the new legislation was fueled largely by an E. Coli
(bacteria) contamination incident in May 2000 in which agricultural turnoff entered a
municipal well in the community of Walkerton. The event resulted in seven deaths and
more than 2,500 reported illnesses (representing more than 40% of the community's
population).
Worki~ig Together to Serve Our Community Community Services Department
Municipai Works
,
ti~ ~ _ . .
y 'S
' . f,i'~t,''t.
.3- _ _ 1.0 '9'i~~ 1 0 '1
.'.g. . "t, a ' . . ~ _ } ...fii t .
April 6, 2009 - 2- MW-2009-21
Key components of the system failure were identified as:
- Improper operating practices
- Falsified records, and
- Lack of awareness by Senior Management
Justice O'Connor concluded 121 recommendations which focus on making owners and
operators better informed, better trained, and more accountable. Municipalities are
required to obtain accreditation of its personnel and file and Operational Plan by May 1,
2009 that sets out the description, procedures, staff/owner responsibilities and an
assessment of possible risks.
Methodoloqy of QMS Development
The Drinking Water Quality Management System standard has 21 elements which will
become the guidelines underwhich we operate. It has been developed in consultation with
staff and tested against other best management practices within the industry. The
Operational Plan includes policies, structures and lines of communication to ensure the
Council is informed and problems identified for prompt correction.
Next Steps
The endorsement of the DWQMS Operational Plan will allow the City to apply for its
operating licence. Some additional training will be necessary for both staff and Council.
An internal audit and verification audit will be completed later in the year to ensure
compliance. A Financial Plan that supports the activities of the Operational Plan must be
completed and endorsed by Council by July 1, 2010.
This DWQMS Operations Plan is a comprehensive document that includes extensive
research, best practices and accurate documentation of how the City will operate its water
distribution system. The goals of providing a reliable and dependable drinking water
system delivering safe, potable water, are supported by the policies and procedures set
out in this manual.
The real and perceived importance of making the City's water distribution system one of
its most valuable assets is obvious and endorsement of the Operational Plan solidifies
Council's commitment to its residents and many visitors that rely on this system.
Recommended by: '
Geoff Holman, Dir tor of Municipal Works
Respectfully submitted: ~
Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services
B. Darrall
S:IREPORTS12009\MW-2009-21 - DWQMS Opera[ional Plan.wpd
City of Niagara Falls DWQMS Operational Plan
Meeting: Community Services Committee April 6, 2009
. .
.
s
•
~
uep~~_ - .
,a,~'~~,„, • . .
~ -
.
• . -
. • .
. •
. . ~
r, uq~'`
. ~ . ~ .
1
City of Niagara Falls DWQMS Operational Plan
Meeting: Community Services Committee April 6, 2009
m •
~
~
~~j
Es-z~'7 ~ - _
~
~
UE~*
~
~wY.~in ~ • ~ . ~
• • • - • - •
• • • •
~
~
u~f
i Y ~
t
•
-0dnking,..
wate~
~ Works ~
Permit %
=Flnancial-~
=MUnitlpal Plan
~ DrlnNinq ~
Water
u~.~u
f"'~ • •
AcneAlted OperatlonafJ
'OPeraHn9: Pla~n g .
AutlioHtY /
~.r
~i
2
City of Niagara Falls DWQMS Operational Plan
Meeting: Community Services Committee April 6, 2009
.
~
~ e . .
. .
- - . .
• - - -
.
- .
. . - . • - . • . . -
. .
iuep,
~ ~ . ~ . ~
~
~i. aw.rw•+a.~i*us~+»m
' I: aunrwmo.~.~asr.umati
.f Camev~a+aEmw+rnw+ ~
1 OwYy LLany~rwu Sv~Pepawu~w~
5 ~m~u+NR~tw6CUqd ~
e. owMwawM ~
i. Rs~%waumr '
~B. ALLAtvw~n0.1MM
~c aaw,m~.isora.aa«.
w.ounmawsw.w~w. ~
~+o w~wuMw
'~i~.r«w..ice...+~. i
~c wm..~m~. i
u E.wea5ur4w~max.us
It~. Rrwatl Rv.elam>4trMVSne
15NM1mucbeWi4n>mw.Iblwt~lY ( 91wrrW~Wn~
artlF~wl A Ywiwr~m
IE bfrrNry.l~tutyar9Mmamp ~L Nr.w~
~i.YwwMr+NaMNKYWLWp~~N _
(114Y~'/~YtlMaNxulea I21.GMIVY i
~B.En~p~cyYanye~wv I~~pan~na
. VE~'.'~,~
3
City of Niagara Falls DWQMS Operational Plan
Meeting: Community Services Committee April 6, 2009
~M a e • ~
- ~ .
. . - - .
.
.
• . .
• - .
.
. . . . .
. . .
u~i,"
~ • • • ~
11:
. • ' ~1'
i • • • •
-r 11 ~ -
~ -
•
~ • ~
• - ~
" _ '
p ' " Op•
. . . . . .
~~E
~ • ~ ! • ~ • . ~ .
• • - - ~ ~ ~
• . •
~ " '
~ ~1 • -
• • •
~
~
~
~
4
City of Niagara Falls DWQMS Operational Plan
Meeting: Community Services Committee April 6, 2009
~ ~ ~
. ~~~.~~~~~,~,~~.:~,r:,~;;.~„a~:,
Mi;;sic+n .~t:itenient
• w.. ti
~ M1~
~
~
• •
• . w.~
.
~~i.
• ~ . •
- -
owner
I h~ou~nu.-- OperatingAUl~wlry
1 T~I*romwnw~m=xl
~w~ ti~noa.wn?i~wm ~
Rn p e
- . . . . . ,..U~~I
! ~
16 w ' ~
• ~ ~
~ •
~ • •
•
. • ¦ ~
• ~ '
~ • ' ~
. ~ • •
-
~ ~ ~
. . . . . . . . ~U~~..-,.
5
City of Niagara Falls DWQMS Operational Plan
Meeting: Community Services Committee April 6, 2009
.
~ti
.
. . . .
r- - . - .
• . .
. - ~ • .
• . . .
. . . .
- . . ~ ~
• . .
Y
h ~ ~ ~
1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ e -
~ • -
• .
.
.
. . - .
6
City of Niagara Falls DWQMS Operational Plan
Meeting: Community Services Committee April 6, 2009
'~L~~ • ~ . . . .
DevolapDWaMS ~
Submit0 rallonalPlan:Ma 1.3~09
SYStamAUEitIC0.9B) ~
ImplemeniDW~MS ~ ~
_ ~ComyleteUWOM5lnternalAUtlit J
. - . _ . . _
SubmitOpemllonalPlun:MayL]O10 ~
VetlllcatbnAUtlit ~
.~CG58~-Year1
SystemsAUtlit~CGSB~-~ , SyatamsAUtlIt~CO58)-
Vear3 Year3 ~
%
IF ~ ~
• ~ . • .
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ' •
~ • I
• ~ ~ S
? ~ ' ~ Q~ • ~ I
' ~ 1 •
u~'f,
• ~ •
m
• • • ~
~ : ~
~ ~
• . ~ ~
~
• ~ • ' ~ ~
1 1
~ • ~ • , ~p°tt
• •
LEm
7
City of Niagara Falls DWQMS Operational Plan
Meeting: Community Services Committee April 6, 2009
. . .
-
.
. . .
. -
. ~ ~ . . . . .
~ - .
.
.
.
e .
i
8
April 6, 2009 BS~2009•01
Niagara~alls
Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair
and Members of the Community 5ervices Committee
City of Niagara Falls; Ontario
Members:
Re: BS-2009•01
House moving concept in partnership with Niagara Regional Housing,
Niagara Region, Niagara Catholic District School Board,
Ed and Ruth Ann Nieuwesteeg and the City of Niagara Falls
RECOMMENDATION:
For the consideration of the Committee. That the City provide grants equal toi.larid costs,
various permit costs and to assist in dealing with
BACKGROUND: Hydro and the Niagara Regional Police.
On Monday, December 9, 2008, representatives from Niagara Regional Housing, Niagara
Region, Niagara Catholic District School Board along with Ed and Ruth Ann Nieuwesteeg,
the Mayor and Chief Building Official met to discuss the concept of moving a single family
dwelling from 5818 Peer Street to a surplus City owned piece of land, known as the
Glenholme Avenue road allowance, located on the north side of Bellevue Street. Mr. and
Mrs. fVieuwesteeg are prepared to donate the Peer Street properfy to Niagara Regional
Housing conditional on not being responsible for the costs of moving the dwelling two (2)
kilometers. If approved, the home would be placed on a newfoundation and duplexed to
provide affordable housing. The municipally-owned property is surplus to the City's needs.
On January 30, 2009, the Niagara Regional Housing Board of Director approved the plan
in conceptonly. Further approval ofthe Niagara Regional Housing Board would be subject
to costing out the project, including ongoing operational costs, and the approvals of the
other various Councils and Baards that are involved.
City's In~olvement
The City has been asked to consider grants equal to land costs, various permit costs and
to assist in dealing with Hydro and the Niagara Regional Police. Nydro lines may need to
be moved when transporting the building and a Police escort is mandatory.
Planning Comments:
The Bellevue Street I jis'86 ft. X 125 ft. not serviced , zoned R2 which permits-a-duplex
on an interior lot and'would meet the criteria for set backs, lot frontage and coverage.
Working Together to Serve Our Conunuraiiy Community Services Department
Bullding Services
. . ~
. . . D 1 . ~ '1
. ~ . . ' . . . . . . . i wk
~t~" .
April 6, 2009 - 2- BS-2009-01
Financial Implication to the City
a) Cost of lot $ 60,000.00 to $ 65,000.00
b) Cost to service lot, water and sanitary sewer -$10,000.00 to $14,000.00
c) Cost of Phase 1 Environmental Assessment 2,000.00
d) Building permit fee for foundation - Bellevue Street -$150.00
e) Demolition permit fee for foundation - Peer Street -$150.00
f) Permit fee to install services -$225.00
g) Permit fee to convert Single Family Dwelling to Duplex Dwelling 1,000.00
h) Development Charges - exempt.
It is important to note that the Region(Niagara Housing) typically pays all permit fees when
undertaking a project within the City; therefore, Council could consider only providing a
grant equal to the cost of the lot. It is doubtful that the project would proceed if Council
was only to provide relief on the permits only and not the cost of the lot.
In terms of revenue to the City, Niagara Regional Housing properties are subject to the full
tax rate, so, in essence, the municipality would gain one housing unit in taxation.
CONCLUSION:
The provision of affordable housing in our community is always to be encouraged. The
concept, proposed by the various agencies and parties, is unique. Nonetheless, it is an
example of the lower-tier municipality being asked to provide relief in the social services
area, traditionally the responsibility of the upper-tier municipality. The Committee will have
to weigh the community benefits of the pr ' c ersus the costs to the tax base.
Recommended by: "
Joh i, re tor of Building Services
Approved by:
Ed Dujolvic, Executive Director of Community Services
attach.
IC 09-74-3.1.
~ January 30, 20D9
N~ Page 1 of 3 ;
,
Niagara Regional Nousing
i
REPORT TO: Board of Directors of Niagara Regional Housing ;
SUBJECT: 5818 Peer Street, Niagara Falls
i
F>~';~
O(Z9-n~ ;
;
RECOMMENDATION i
That the Niagara Regional Housing Board of Directors provides approval of the concept i
outlined in this report subject to clarification of the outstanding issues.
BACKGROUND i
~
Ed and Ruth-Ann Nieuwesteeg of Niag~ira Falls ere prepared to donate a house that
they own at 5818 Peer Street to Niagara Regional Housing/Niagara Region for use as
an affordable dwelling. This offer is made on the condition that NRH agree to be
responsible for the cost of moving the house 2 km from its current location to a vacant
Iot on Betlevue St owned by the City of Niagara Falls (See Appendix A for pictures). In
exchange, the owners would like to receive a charitable receipt for the value of the '
house.
REPORT
Mr.. and Mrs. Nieuwesteeg own a funeral home which has its entrance from Main Street.
The funeral home lo# extends behind the house on Peer St creating potential for an "L"-
shaped lot that would allow for entrance from Peer St to the funeral home. When the
Nieuwesteegs bought the house four years ago, they did so with the intent to sever the
back half, to gain additional parking for the funeral home, leaving the house intaci for
rentalpurposes.
Although they were successful in gaining approval for the severance, ihey have since
decided that fhey would prefer to remove the house and gain access to Peer St, from
the funeral home parking lot. Each year, the city of Niagara Falls holds a Festival which
requires street closures. Main Street cannot be considered at this point for the Festival,
as it would require closing fhe funeral home for the day Having the side entrance
would avoid this issue.
i
,
~ j
IC 09-74-3.1.
January 30, 2009
Page 2 of 3
Multiple Partners
The Niagara Catholic Scfiool Board, through qualified teachers, offers courses to the ~
students in electrical, construction and general repairs. This house would offer the ~
students in the Construction as well as the liorticulture & Landscaping Specialist Nigh
Skilis Major Programs practical hands-on experience under the guidance of their
teachers. Students wou~d prepare the house for the move by removing the front and
back porches and the brickwork. Once the house is relocated, the students would
assist in any electrical, construction renovations, plaster repairs as well as landscaping
gardens and lawns.. ,
The school board has also been successful in retaining donated services from an ;
architect, who has provided drawings of the existing house, and a contractor who is
prepared to build the foundation on the vacant lot. Through a quote process, the board
has found a contractor who is prepared to move the house and gain the necessary
permits, for a fee to be paid by the NRH.
The City of Niagara Falls has aiso indicated an interest in this proposal and is prepared
to donate the land and facilitate the approval process for permits pending the approval
of City Council. The City also offered to speak to the Niagara Regional Police and
Hydro to see if they would be prepared to donate their services as part of the !
community partnerships to relocate this house.
Description of the House ~
The house is a 2'/2 storey single family home built in the1920s.. The lower half of the !
house is brick construction with aluminum siding on the upper half.. A site visit was
completed in January with the owners, city and school board representatives. The ;
house appears to be solidly constructed with a central staircase, iwo bedrooms and a
bathroom on the upper 8oor and living room, kitchen and bathroom on the main level.
This house would lend itself quite well to a duplex option which would allow for one
bedraom apartments on each level. The main floor apartment could easily be ramped
and made wheel chair accessible.. The current zoning on the site allows for a duplex.
Creating 2 one bedroom units is consistent with the need identified by the waiting list
which currently has 797 applicants waiting for 1 bedroom accommodation in Niagara ~
Falls..
Amenities
The proposed lot is located on Believue Street which runs parallel to highway 420 in
Niagara Falls. The street currently has single family homes as well as duplex units.
The Hospital, as welf as six schools, are located nearby.. Although the street is not
directly on fhe bus route, it is a short walk to the nearest route. The nearest ptaza which
has a Zellers, Wal-Mart, Zehrs and other major retailers is a five minute drive.
B5 ~ 2aoq ~ o t
I
i
IC 09-74-3.1.
January 30, 2609 '
Page 3 of 3 i
Outstanding Issues
1. Clarity on Responsibilities
Further work is required to clarify who is responsibie for what A draft project plan
has been developed and is continually being mod~ed as issues are identified and
resolved. Niagara Region's legal division will draft the appropriate agreements as
clarity is gained. ;
i
2. Construction Cost Analysis
Once it is determined who is responsibl~ for what, a full cost analysis will be
undertaken. Current estimates for NRH costs are approximately $100,000 -
$15~,660. Funding for this initiative will be from Federa(/Provincial funds provided ~
through the Delivering Opportunities forOntarib Renfe~s (DOOf2) program.
3. Rents
It is hoped that the rents from the two units will cover the carrying casts of the taxes,
maintenance and utilities and that ongoing subsidy will not be required.
4. Communications Plan
With a project of this scope a full communications plan will need to be developed.
i
Submitted by: Approved by:
~
~ ?
, ,
; ; ,
~La~a ~~eckwith Karen M~irr ~
Gene~al Manager Chair
g5-2v~a-o~
~
1
i
Appendix A ;
09-74-3.1. ;
January 30, 2009
CONFIDENTIAL Paae 1 of 1 ~
Please Note:
This is a tairly recent initiative and work is stiil underway to determine feasibility. A
full report will be tabled at the Board meeting on January 30, 2008 for discussion.
Proposal
I
Mr. and Mrs Nieuwesteeg of Niagara ~alls are prepared ta donate a house that they ;
own at 5818 PeEr Street Niagara Fails to Niagara Regional Housing for use as an
affordable dweiling_ This offer is made on the condition that NRH is respoosible for
the cost of moving the house from its current location to a vacant lot owned by the
Ciry of Niagara Falls on Bellevue Street, a distance o# 2 km away. In exchange, the ~
owners would like to have a charitabte receipt for the cost of the house. ~
i
Existing House 5818 Peer Street Niagara Falls
Owned by Ed and Ruth-Ann Nieuwesteeg
Built 1996
2%2 storey single famify home :
~
~ ~ '
5 s, I
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ `
" u~
~ s ~ 'i
u; : i ? i
i~
i ~
y •S
- #,'t ~s
. ~a uw~~i3 `~x" ~~i~~
vb ~i~x:_. 3`AS{• ~'4~r•..au.~ a
Proposed Site Vacant Lot owned by the City of Niagara Fails ~
4~~ y r ro z. ~ ~
a
? 3~
?.kmz i s K Y
~ s~
~2~~,G'3i ~ - : ~ %J
z .=T~' c . °`fl
§ ~ ~
. I
~ a-10
- T~a y
-L 1°~. i f R iv3
4
. A"+~_
i` ,s,-x~. 1..~>.: -
~~•~bdG~U?
~ ~ _ . . . . . ,
~ ~'~cx~i ~D l
. ~
~
\
\ -r~
~
~
„
r
•r
a.~:t.i~3:~i1lf-!y`.~:.
r...~f.. •
~:'~~~a
/ ~~~f(!~ ~
~_rr i F.N«•
~ - e
~
' ' . . _ _ . . .
'`y _ - r -
"fl=i
~ * r ~
r
~ , '
` S
. . ~ _ V
~ 'y! :
~ , ~ _ . . . _ . _ . . - - - . _ ~
~ _
,
~ ~
, , , I I '~I I
- ~ , ~
t _ ~ - _ .
~ ` - ~ • ~ ~
~yr,
T~ . '
`
_ ~ ~ ~
~ I
'i
. 11"",~~ i~~ ~+i
,
.
. .)i'~!:~' . a,
. . . . . "..x;
F~
y
- ~ . . : .c.=z ~ . - , . __e+^~;,,~- - .-r~+s~.'..,~t t . ' . • . . ` ._~1. r .
~t . - . . _ ' ~ r * ti T-a~~
~ ' ~ t>~ . - _ . : . -•.a' ~a• - - . ~ .I
P~. _ ~ - r. ~ .4.. ~.~h`
~ ~c
I
~ ` ~ ~y~'~~1'.+~`~
e' ~ ~ ~ ` ' ~ .
~ ~ ~ I P ~ ~ . ' ~ ~ ~'1' .
~ , 1. ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ i ~ I
~ ~~j I ' • ~ - i
1' ' ° ; ~
r ' ~
3 ~ 1~ ~ .
r
~
~
~ ~
~
.~r
r,. ~ ~ z a.' ~
1i~' ` ~ :x~ ..y .
t ~ . .
f,'~ d
~ i; _ ~ ~ ~
~ , ~ , ~ ` . . _ , _ ; ~1 ~~~f
, , z
,
! , ~
~r ~ ,,l~
~,:~,f \
b;~ `f; `
.1 ~ \
~
~ : ; ~ ~
' 'jt ~.~.~r ;;i r~Q~
, ~ ~
~
t , ,
p:;
;
~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~ ~
a , f ~
: j•, ~ ~ + d ,
3 ' `:t ~
~ . . i
, ~ ~AI~I~AE' ~
:F i I.
~,t j ~
,ii
~~''f? .bl• . .
y . .
i. '~~ws
~i ' . ~
{
+ ,
: - ^ l
_ :yYC~ ~ \ 1
~;k~.. .
~
~ ~ ~ S
~x,. . ~ ' ,
¢
, ~
~ ~ 0\
~r,
~
.
i I ~______.J ~ L.-.-J' ~
1
1
i , 2.~~
~ , 2.50D
~ 12.500 12.500
~ ~ 12500 a
15.959 ~ 3•~ ~ „ ~ ~
~ ~
ROp 1
ROP lS 4 150~ C DR18 CL 50
M 4 SJW P P 65.3m SIW 0.
76 - 250i1 SAN 0. X ~
o,
2 P P 1.3m - 37 5T1A O
P 76. - ~ O ~ T~ PROP
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ _ = y
12.500 12.500 12500 12.500 12..000
12.500 12•~ 4 ~
+ I ~
~
~
1
~
DR! E
t ~ t
~ ~
t t
~ ~
~ w ~
VI ~ ~ N ~ A ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~
`j ~
~ ~
\
~ 2..500 .5.8~'4 6.g88 ~ 2.:~00 ~ 2..50~ lOP ~ 2.5U0 ~ 2.00~
1 Q.695 1.8U2
R1~C8 pROp 1NtiDE ALE SOm O 1.5% ~
, SW ~ t~~ INV. 190.6
INY. MN tEd97
~pp ~ ~ 12m O .8x ~
I i ~
1 ~ ~
~ ' ~
_ _ _ s, _ - - - . ~ . ~ _
~
; -
~
i
~
' ~ _ -
~~~~.~VU~ ~
s. ~
- ~~o ~1 ~ ~ ~ .
April 6, 2009 ~ R-2009-14
Niagara~a~ls
Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: R-2009-14
Recreation Property & Building End Use
RECaMMENDATION:
That Council choose their preference of the three options proposed for the former
Recreation building located at 7565 Lundy's Lane.
That the former Recreation Buildi~g be appraised, put on the open market [aith
BACKGR~UND: a reserved bid, with notice of the future
_ intent to designate.
Past Reports/Decisions
In May 2005, staff first prepared a recommendation report on the end use of the former
Recreation building located at 7565 Lundy' Lane. To accommodate expansion to the
Lundy's Lane cemetery, the report recommended demolition of the building. Council
deferred a decision after interest in the building was expressed by Niagara Falls Tourism.
In June 2006, staff returned with a recommendation report. After consultation with the
Lundy's Lane BIA, staff continued to recommend the expansion of the Lundy's Lane
Cemetery, however, with the accommodation of a pedestrian gateway which would
enhance beautification. The reportwas deferred after a request bythe Municipal Heritage
Committee to investigate the "adaptive re-use of the building".
In June 2007, staff's recommendations remained the same as the reportthe previous year.
In consultation with the Municipal Heritage Committee, it was assured that brick and stone
work from the building would be incorporated into the design and landscape features of the
gateway.
Council approved the recommendations contained in the June 2007 report. However, prior
to the scheduled demolition of the building, a local businessman, Mr. Felix Pingue, made
a plea to save the building. The matterwas referred to staff and Council passed a motion
to not demolish the building in the interim.
Wo~~king Togetker to Serve Our Community Community Servicos Department
,
x"~ ~ ~ Parks, Recreation 8 Culture ~
`::4 -:nYt' ~ .
i, ,.r
1 • '1
~A
e
I ~
April 6, 2009 - 2- R-2009-14
In June 2008, an update report was provided that recommended that the building not be
demolished, that an offer be sought from Mr. Felix Pingue to refurbish the building, at no
cost to the City, and that a detailed building end use plan, outlining specific space
utilization, be provided.
In light of budget deliberations, it is prudent to seek some final resolution to the long-
standing issue of end use of the former Recreation building.
Overview of Pingue Proposal
• the building would have some commercial business space for uses such as an
insurance business or law firm. Pingue Construction would maintain an office for
their administrative functions. Community meeting spaces would be available on
the lowerfloor (basement) and include a new "cultural room". Heritage space would
accommodate public and private art or museum-like collections.
• nine parking spots would be provided.
• A new driveway entrance from Lundy's Lane is proposed.
• two ground signs and rent from potential tenants would provide revenue for the
operation.
• despite potential sign and rent revenue, the building would be operated on a"break
even basis" with any revenue going into a reserve fund to support potential building-
related costs in future years.
• the City would support the annual building operating costs associated with taxation
and building/property insurance.
• the City would maintain ownership of the building with a long-term lease (50 years)
entered into with Mr. Pingue or a related company.
Overview of Cemetery Proposal
• the removal of the existing building allows for the expansion of the cemetery
adjacent Lundy's Lane cemetery, which could provide between 257 to 305
additional graves.
• a pedestrian gateway feature and enhanced corner landscape would be developed
in conjunction with the Lundy's Lane BIA. The BIA would financially contribute to
the project costs.
Open Market Proposal
• Senior staff also discussed the possibility of declaring the property surplus which
was an option for property end use in 2003-study by BMA It would only be sold
with the provision of a minimum reserved bid equal to the net revenue estimated
under the Cemetery proposal.
April 6, 2009 - 3- R-2009-14
Pros & Cons of the Three Proposals
PINGUE PROPOSAL
PROS CONS
• A building that has had historical uses is • The property zoned Open Space, which
maintained. limits the use of the building to cemetery,
• The building remains for community use. hospital, recreational uses, religious
• The proponent has stated his intent to institution and school.
invest $200,000 into the building. • A zoning by-law amendment for the intended
• The Official Plan identifies the area as uses would be required
General Commercial (GC), in keeping • The proposed driveway access from Lundy's
with the proposal. Lane is unlikely to be supported by the
• Parking appears sufficient for intended Region, the road authority.
use. • Any taxes realized by the new uses is to be
absorbed by the municipality.
• No revenue for the City, as envisioned in the
other two options.
• The property would remain on the City's list
of properties it maintains, but from which the
City does not realize revenue.
• The refurbishment of the building for
continued use and re occupancy will require a
management plan to detail how any
hazardous materials will be managed or
abated, including asbestos, lead, and mold.
• The proposal may be viewed as "bonusing"
under the Municipal Act, as a private
individual will derive a benefit from the
proposal.
April 6, 2009 - 4- R-2009-14
CEMETERY PROPOSAL
PROS CONS
• Expanding the cemetery would meet the • The former Recreation buiiding will be
current Open Space zoning. demolished.
~ An environmental assessment paid for • In light of the fiscal chailenges being faced in
by the City has been completed 2009, the gateway feature may be too
specifically to the demolition of the expensive and no longer a priority project.
building.
• The gateway proposal and enhanced
landscaping provide beautification and
green space in this tourist corridor.
• Partial funding would be provided by the
Lundy's Lane BIA.
• There is a demand for more cemetery
plots at Lundy's Lane cemetery.
• 305 graves would represent new
maximum net revenues of approximately
$195,000 to cemetery services.
• Local funeral homes are in favour of the
initiative.
OPEN MARKET PROPOSAL
PROS CONS
• The Official Plan identifies the area • The former Recreation building could be
as General Commercial (GC), which demolished depending on the future use.
may entice interest in the property. • The property is zoned Open Space and
• The property is located in a busy would require a zoning by-law
commercial area. amendment for commercial uses.
• An environmental assessment paid • The property may need to be "up zoned'
for by the City has been completed by the City to be truly marketable.
specifically to the demolition of the • Putting the property on the market would
building. prevent cemetery expansion or
• Sale of the property would provide beautification efforts.
one-time revenue for the • Access issues may preclude certain
municipality. development. '
• Putting the property on the open • No appraisal has been done to date.
market would alleviate any concerns
of "bonusing".
• The property would be removed from
the City's inventory of buildings
requiring maintenance and upkeep.
• The building could, conceivably, be
maintained in its current form if a
buyer is so inclined.
• Mr. Pingue could still bid on the
property.
April 6, 2009 - 5- R-2009-14
CONCLUSION:
The matter of the end use of the City-owned building at 7565 Lundy's Lane has long been
studied, discussed and debated. Staff has outlined what we view as the three available
options for the property. Obviously, all of the options offer pros and cons and it will be for
Council to weigh the merits and provide direction to staff on how they wish to proceed.
Recommended by: ,r~r~ ~~,c ti~1r,~~
Deny e Morr sse irecto of Parks, Recreation & Culture
Approved by: ~
Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services
duam
V:12D09COUNCIL12009 04 O6VR-2009-14 - Recreation Property & Building End Use Update.wpd
April 6, 2009 MW-2009-18
l~Tiagara~alls
c,su~un
Councillor Carolynn loannoni, Chair
and Members of the Community Services Committee
City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Members:
Re: MW-2009-18
Front Street Flooding Remedial Works
RECOMMENDATION:
That City Council authorizes staff to proceed with the installation of sewage ejector pumps
and new sewer laterals at the five-unit townhouse development on Front Street.
BACKGROUND:
The five-unit townhouse development on Front Street at Norton Street has experienced
chronic basement flooding during heavy rainfall events and snow melt conditions. City
forces have done emergency pumping, however; flooding has continued to occur during
heavy rainfall events.
The flooding occurs when the sanitary sewer system surcharges and backs up throughout
the system to the lowest relief point (i.e., basements).
Several alternative solutions have been investigated by staff. While most of the solutions
require a long implementation period and will only marginally improve the risk of further
basement flooding. Installation of sewage ejector pumps to separately service the
basement level will increase the level of protection from sewer surcharging in the sewer
main.
Municipal Works staff has met with the five property owners and they are in agreementwith
the installation of the ejector pumps.
The recommended solution includes the installation of the ejector pumps, modifying the
existing internal plumbing, replacing the backwatervalves, installing a new sanitary sewer
lateral from the Front Street sewer to the foundation wall and grouting the existing sewer
lateral.
Working Together to Serve Our Commu~:ity I Community Services Department
,
- ' MunicipalWorks
v
e . ' . _ .
+ , ,
~ • • . ~ , Y!N'/~~!"^^^YY.~_~. i ~ ~ ~ ~ . 0 • ~ • ~ ~ • ~ ~
~(I~,.
' . c . . x. t ii "Y3.:#.4ihfY.dlr
April 6, 2009 - 2- MW-2009-18
The remedial repairs are being recommended as a goodwill gesture and should not be
regarded as an admission of any negligence or wrongdoing on behalf of the City.
The project costs are estimated to be $47,200 which can be funded from the Contracted
Services account (16-3-413000-040000) in the draft 2009 Utility Budget. Staff has
coordinated the scope of the work with Metro Plumbing who has detailed knowledge of this
matter.
The installation of the ejector pumps is expected to commence the week of April 27, 2009.
A report on the long term solutions to the Chippawa flooding will be presented at a future
date for Council's consideration.
~ ~
Recommended by:
Geoff Holman, irect r of Municipal Works
Respectfully submitted:
Ed Dujlovic, Executive Director of Community Services
B. Darrall
V:\2009COUNCIL\2009 04 061MW-2009-18 - Front Street Flooding Remedial Works .wpd
„
The City of Niagara Falls, Ontario
Resolartion
No.
Moved by
Seconded by
WHEREAS all meetings of Council are to be open to the public; and
WHEREAS the only time a meeting or part of a meeting may be closed to the public if the subject
matter falls under one of the exceptions under s. 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT on Apri16, 2009, Niagara Falls Council will go into
a closed meeting to consider matters that fall under the subject matter of 239(2)(c) of the Municipal
Acl, 2001, a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality.
AND The Seal of the Corporation be hereto affixed.
DEAN IORFIDA R. T. (TED) SALCI
CITY CLERK MAYOR