Loading...
11/22/2016 (3) I it CITY OF! CANADA NIACAARAFA _--_ The City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Resolution November 22, 2016 No. 34 Moved by: Councillor Pietrangelo Seconded by: Councillor Thomson WHEREAS sections 239(2), (3), and (3.1) of the Municipal Act outline the permissive and mandatory grounds for a municipal council to close a meeting to the public; and WHEREAS the Ombudsman's office report to Niagara Falls City Council, dated November 3, 2016 indicates that closing a meeting to the public regarding acquisition or disposition of City lands should only be done with a view to protecting the city's bargaining position in property negotiations; and WHEREAS the exceptions to the open meeting provisions do not currently allow a municipality to proceed In Camera for the purpose of protecting its competitive interest or sensitive business information; and WHEREAS many municipalities enter into public/private partnerships with third parties, who regularly protect sensitive commercial and business information that may hinder their competitive position if broadcast to the general public; and WHEREAS the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act is a piece of legislation within the municipal realm that protects the disclosure of commercial and financial information supplied in confidence would significantly prejudice an organization's competitive position; and WHEREAS municipalities should have some mechanism to protect their competitive position, not just in relation to land acquisition or disposition. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT in light of the on-going review of the Municipal Act, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs be petitioned to allow one of the permissive grounds, for the closed meeting exceptions, to be the protection of the municipality's competitive interest or sensitive business information. Carried Unanimously AND The Seal of the Corporation be hereto affixed. —7. 2EAUI1VN IOR I JAMES M. DIODATI CITY CLE K MAYOR